Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2512 TAMARACK AVE; CS; CBC2022-0308; Permit
Building Permit Finaled (city of Carlsbad Commercial Permit Print Date: 11/28/2023 Job Address: 2512 TAMARACK AVE, # CS, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Permit Type: Parcel#: Valuation: Occupancy Group: #of Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Bathrooms: Occupant Load: BLDG-Commercial 1671013500 $0.00 Code Edition: 2019 Sprinkled: Project Title: Description: ATT: CELL SITE MODIFICATION Work Class: Track#: Lot#: Project#: Plan#: Construction Type: Orig. Plan Check#: Plan Check#: Applicant: Property Owner: CORE ONE CONSULTING US LTD BRETT COFFELT 4515 S MCCLINTOCK DR, # 217 TEMPE, AZ 85282-7376 FEE BUILDING PLAN CHECK CITY OF CARLSBAD CURTIS JACKSON 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 (760) 434-2836 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW -MINOR PROJECTS (LDE) BUILDING PLAN REVIEW -MINOR PROJECTS (PLN) CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ELEC: OTHER COMPLEX ELECTRICAL FIRE Special Equipment (Ovens, Dust, Battery) SB1473-GREEN BUILDING STATE STANDARDS FEE STRONG MOTION -COMMERCIAL (SMIP) Tenant Improvement Permit No: Status: Applied: Issued: CBC2022-0308 Closed -Finaled Finaled Close Out: 08/19/2022 11/28/2022 11/28/2023 Final Inspection: 11/02/2023 INSPECTOR: Kersch, Tim Contractor: BECHTEL INFRASTRUCTURE AND POWER CORPORATION 12245 KIRKHAM RD, # STE 100 POWAY, CA 92064-6162 (949) 372-4503 AMOUNT $267.80 $194.00 $98.00 $16.00 $412.00 $493.00 $2.00 $14.00 Total Fees: $1,496.80 Total Payments To Date: $1,496.80 Balance Due: $0.00 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 11fees/exaction." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitation has previously otherwise expired. Building Division Page 1 of 1 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 I 442-339-2719 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov .... (city of Carlsbad COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION B-2 Plan Check C6'vx0a:i)-030R Est. Value PC Deposit Date ? • l 9 • J. 3 Job Address2512 Tamarack Ave Carlsbad, CA 92010 Tenant Name#: City of Carlsbad/Curtis M Jackson Suite: _____ APN:167-101-35-00 Lot #:. ____ Year Built: _________ _ Year Built:. __ _ Occupancy:_U __ _ Construction Type:comalt Fire sprinklersQ'ESQNO A/C:QYESQNo BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK:AT&T Mobility proposes to modify an existing wireless Cell facility by installing 2 antennas per sector stacked, remove and replace {3)DC6 with DC9 surge protectors, replace perforated shroud be replaced with FRP perforated shroud. please See proect description on T-1 page of drawings. D Addition/New:. ____________ New SF and Use, __________ New SF and Use ______ SF Deck, _______ SF Patio Cover, SF Other (Specify) ___ _ [Z]Tenant Improvement: _2_00 ____ SF, Existing Use: _2_0_0 ______ Proposed Use: _2_0_0 _____ _ _____ SF, Existing Use: Proposed Use: ------- D Pool/Spa: _____ SF Additional Gas or Electrical Features? ____________ _ D Solar:. ___ KW,. ___ Modules, Mounted: 0Roof 0Ground D Reroof: ____________________________________ _ D Plumbing/Mechanical/Electrical 00ther: _____________________________________ _ APPLICANT (PRIMARY CONTACT) Name: Brett Coffelt Address· 1126 w 12th ave City·escondido State:ca Zip: 92025 Phone· 760-975-7679 Email·brett.coffelt@coreoneconsultants.com DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PROPERTY OWNER Name: City of Carlsbad/Curtis M Jackson Address: 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr City: Carlsbad State:_C_a_,..Zip: 92008 Phone: 760-434-2836 Email: ___________________ _ CONTRACTOR OF RECORD Name: Michael Shewbridge Business Name: Bechtel Infrastructure and Power//TBD Address: 11908 Hamden pl Address:_5_32_3_N_9_9_th_A_v_e ____________ _ City:Santa Fe Springs State:Ca Zip:90670 City:_G_le_n_d_a_le ____ .State:_Az __ ,Zip:85305 Phone: 949-251-1177 Phone: 6023687884 --------------------Em a ii: r aka po no@ be ch t e I.com Email:_ra_k_o_.p_o_n_o@=-b_e_c_ht_e_l._co_m ___________ _ Architect State License: C-19797 CSLB License #:913045 Class:B,C10,A ·-------- Carlsbad Business License# (Required):913045 BL()S/JOrd!JS·1f:r APPLICANT CERTIFICATION: I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the 'llJ t'J information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with a(( City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. NAME (PRINT):_B_re_tt_c_o_ff_el_t -----DATE: 08/17/2022 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad,CA 92008 SIGN: ff-uit:~..Jf44: Ph: 442-339-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Email: Building@carlsbadca.gov REV. 07/21 THIS PAGE REQUIRED AT PERMIT ISSUANCE PLAN CHECK NUMBER: ______ _ A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED TO EITHER A STATE LICENSED CONTRACTOR OR A PROPERTY OWNER. IF THE PERSON SIGNING THIS FORM IS AN AGENT FOR EITHER ENTITY AN AUTHORIZATION FORM OR LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. (OPTION A): LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION: lherebyaffirmunderpenaltyofperjurythatlamlicensedunderprovisionsofChapter9(commencingwithSection7000JofDivision3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. I also affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations (CHOOSE ONE}: D1 have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work which this permit is issued. PolicyNo. _____________________________________ _ -OR- D1 have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, f the pe ormanc~ of the wo~r which this permi My workers' o p ns tio i suran e, ~illier and policy number are: Insurance Company Name: Policy No. -"'-"-"""'-'LlaLI-1.%1.>:H'C!...!T'--_________________ Expiration Date: -OR- Ocertificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers compensation coverage Is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and clvll fines up to $100,000.00, In addition the to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest and attorney's fees. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY, IF ANY: I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued {Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). Lender's Name:. ____________________ Lender'sAddress: ___________________ _ CONTRACTOR CERT/FICA TION: lcertifythat I have read the application and state that the above infarmatian is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. /agree to comply with all Cityardinances and State laws relating to building construction. - NAME (PRINT):J0r.d-~ ~uk SIGNATUR : Note: If the person signing above Is 7authorizec:igent for the contractor provide a I ATE: lf/£/ijt/12 tractor letterhead. (OPTION B): OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: n I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. ~, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold wfthin one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). -OR- D1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). -OR-□1 am exempt under Business and Professions Code Division 3, Chapter 9, Article 3 for this reason: AND, □FORM B-61 "Owner Builder Acknowledgement and Verification Form" is required for any permit issued to a property owner. By my signature below I acknowledge that, except for my personal residence in which I must have resided for at least one year prior to completion of the improvements covered by this permit, I cannot legally sell a structure that I have built as an owner-builder if it has not been constructed in its entirety by licensed contractors. I understand that a copy of the applicable law, Section 7044 of the Business and Professions Code, is available upon request when this application is submitted orat the following Web site: http://www.leginfo.ca.govlcalaw.html. OWNER CERTIFICATION: I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the infarmationon theplansisaccurate. /agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating ta building construction. NAME (PRINT): Brett Coffelt SIGN: 8-u.tt-~~ DATE: 08/17/2022 Note: If the person signing above Is an authorized agent for the property owner Include fonn B-62 ~roperty owner. 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 442-339-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Email: Building@carlsbadca.gov 2 REV. 07/21 Building Permit Inspection History Finaled {'city of Carlsbad PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBC2022-0308) Permit Type: BLDG-Commercial Application Date: 08/19/2022 Owner: CITY OF CARLSBAD Work Class: Tenant Improvement Issue Date: 11/28/2022 Subdivision: RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA POR OF Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 03/26/2024 Address: 2512 TAMARACK AVE, #CS IVR Number: 42786 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date Status 09/19/2023 09/19/2023 BLDG-11 224280-2023 Passed Tim Kersch Complete Foundation/Ftg!Plers (Robar) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 09/28/2023 09/28/2023 BLDG-11 225411-2023 Passed Tim Kersch Complete F ou ndation/Ftg/P ie rs (Robar) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLOG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-34 Rough 225413-2023 Passed Tim Kersch Complete Electrical Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes 11/02/2023 11102/2023 BLDG-Final Inspection 229236-2023 Passed Tim Kersch Complete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-Plumbing Final Yes BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes BLDG-Structural Final Yes BLDG~Electrical Final Yes Tuesday, November 28, 2023 Page 1 of 1 May 4, 2022 Attn: Curtis Jackson -sent via email (curtis.jackson@car1sbadca.gov) RE: AT&T Cell Site Modification -Letter of Authorization Site Number: NS0039 (CAL01039) I Calavera Hills Community Park I FA: 10090935 Site Address: 2512 Tamarak Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92010 Dear Landlord, I am writing to you on behalf of AT&T Mobility Corporation. Currently, AT&T leases space from you at the above- mentioned address for the operation of a wireless telecommunication facility. Our office has been asked to work with AT&T Mobility landlords to ensure seamless communication. As part of this process, we are sending you notification and request for consent for the pending modification and to submit relevant jurisdiction approvals. As a result of changes and improvements made in its technology, AT&T Mobility will be upgrading its communication equipment to ensure the successful, secure, and ongoing operation of its communication facilities. Scope of Work: TOWER WORK: • INSTALL (2) ANTD~NA PER SECTOR (STAO<ED). TOTAi. or (6) • REMOVE ANO ~ (3) OC6 SURGE PROT£CTORS W/ (3) NEW DC-9 SURGE PROTECTORS. • (E) PERFORATED SHROUD TO BE REPI.ACED WllH PERFORATED FRP SHROUD EQ\N'NENJ ARf.A WORK • INSTAl.L (5) REClYlERS IN (E) WAUHJP CABINCT • INSTALL ( 12) SATIERY IIOOULCS • INSTALL (3) f6AWG DC POWER CA&.[ TRUNKS • INSTALL (1) 66<18 881..1 IN (E) WAU<-UP CABINET •NO AC POW£R WORK IS REOUlRCO ON THIS PROJECT Authorization Required: Pursuant to the Agreement your Authorization is required to complete this work. Therefore, please indicate your consent by dating and signing below and returning this letter within 15 days from receipt. Please return this completed form to me by email or US Mail. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Core One Consulting 4515 S McClintock Dr, Ste 220 Tempe, AZ 85282 Jamo.Stephenson@coreoneconsultants.com '1 Landlord Consent Provided By: /) J_·. ~>t,, Name:_~-----t--7'1-------- www coreoneconsulting com Sincerely, Jamo Stephenson Core One Consulting, on behalf of AT&T Phone: (619) 798 6759 11', • 55 Title: ___________ _ Signature: __________ _ Date: ___________ _ www.coreoneconsulting.com November 3, 2022 City of Carlsbad Community Development Department -Building Division 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review: TI AT&T Mobility Address: 2512 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad, CA Applicant Name: Brett Coffelt Applicant Email: brett.coffelt@coreoneconsultants.com OCCUPANCY AND BUILDING SUMMARY: Occupancy Groups: S2 Occupant Load: NIA Type of Construction: VB Sprinklers: NI A Stories: NI A Area of Work (sq. ft.): NIA sq. ft. The plans have been reviewed for coordination with the permit application. Valuation: See Notes Below Scope of Work: Confirmed Floor Area: Confirmed Notes: Valuation is not specified on application Attn: Building & Safety Department, COMPLIANCE SERVICES City of Carlsbad -FINAL REVIEW City Pennit No: CBC2022-0308 True North No.: 22-018-202 True North Compliance Services, Inc. has completed the fulfil review of the following documents for the project referenced above on behalf of the City of Carlsbad: 1. 2. Drawings: One (1) copy dated July 27, 2022, by Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corporation. Structural Calculations: One (I) copy dated July 25, 2022, by Telecom Management Group. The 2019 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Codes (i.e., 2018 !BC, UMC, UPC, and 2017 NEC, as amended by the State of California), 2019 California Green Building Standards Code, 2019 California Existing Building Code, and 2019 California Energy Code, as applicable, were used as the basis of our review. Please note that our review has been completed and we have no further comments, We have enclosed the above noted documents bearing our review stamps for your use. Please call if you have any questions or if we can be offurther assistance. Sincerely, True North Compliance Services Review By: Amer Atassi-Plan Review Engineer True North Compliance Services, Inc. 3939 Atlantic Avenue Suite 116, Lang Beach, CA 90807 TI 562. 733.8030 • Transmittal Letter September 1, 2022 City of Carlsbad Community Development Department -Building Division 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review: TI AT&T Mobility Address: 2512 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad CA --~':) Trt1e North /' COMPLIANCE SERVICES FIRST REVIEW City Pennit No: CBC2022--0308 True North No.: 22-018-202 Applicant Name: Brett Coffelt Applicant Email: brett.coffelt@coreoneconsultants.com True North Compliance Services, Inc. has completed the first review of the following documents for the project referenced above on behalf of the City of Carlsbad: I. Drawings: Electronic copy dated July 22, 2022, by Telecom management group. 2. Structural Calculations: Electronic copy dated August 25, 2022, by Telecom management group. Attn: Permit Technician, the plans have been reviewed for coordination with the permit application. See below for additional information: Valuation: Scope of Work: Floor Area: See Notes Below Confirmed Confirmed Notes: Valuation is not specified on application Our comments follow on the attached list. Please call if you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, True North Compliance Services Review By: Amer Atassi -Plan Review Engineer True North Compliance Services, Inc. 3939 Atlantic Avenue Suite 116, Long Beach, CA 90807 T I 562. 733.8030 • TI AT&T Mobility 2512 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad CA September 1, 2022 RESUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS: Plan Review Comments City of Carlsbad-FIRST REVIEW City Pennit No.: CBC2022-0308 True North No.: 22-018-202 Page2 Deliver THREE corrected sets of plans and TWO corrected calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Division, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (442) 339-2719. The City will route the plans to True North, Planning and Land Development Engineering Departments (if applicable) for continued review. Note: If this project requires FIRE PREVENTION review, ensure that you follow their specific instructions for resubmittal review. The City will not route plans back to Dennis Grubb & Associates for continued Fire Prevention review. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. The following comments are referred to the 2019 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, California Green Building Standards Code, and Energy Code (i.e., 2018 IBC, UMC, UPC, and 2017 NEC, as amended by the State of California). B. There may be other comments generated by the Building Division and/or other City departments that will also require your attention and response. This attached list of comments, then, is only a portion of the plan review. Contact the City for other items. C. Respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a response letter. Indicate which details, specification, or calculation shows the required infonnation. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check. D. Please be sure to include the architect and engineer's stamp and signature on all sheets of the drawings and on the coversheets of specifications and calculations per CBPC 5536.1 and CBPC 6735. This item will be verified prior to plan approval. OCCUPANCY & BUILDING SUMMARY: Occupancy Groups: S2 Occupant Load: NIA Type of Construction: VB Sprinklers: N/ A Stories: NIA Area of Wolk (sq. ft.): NIA ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: No comments. ELECTRICAL COMMENTS: No comments. • TI AT&T Mobility 2512 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad CA Septem her 1, 2022 STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: City of Carlsbad-FIRST REVIEW City Pennit No.: CBC2022-0308 True North No.: 22-018-202 Page 3 S 1. The engineer of record that stamped the structural calculations shall stamp and sign sheet A6. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact Amer Atassi via email amera@tncservices.com or telephone (562) 733-8030. [END] Section 6409(a) Modification Worksheet For Wireless Base Stations Purpose: This worksheet serves to assist the City of Carlsbad to determine whether a proposed collocation or modification to an existing base station qualifies as an eligible facilities request and/or would cause a substantial change as defined by the FCC. Instructions: Applicants must complete this worksheet and submit it with an application for a Section 6409(a) modification to collocate or modify transmission equipment on an existing base station submitted for approval pursuant to Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)). Any proposed modification submitted for approval pursuant to Section 6409(a) must answer two general questions: (1) is the proposed modification an eligible facilities request and if so, (2) will it cause a substantial change? Section 1 addresses the eligible facilities request question and Sections 2 through 7 address the substantial change questions. In general. any "NO" answer in Section 11 or any "YES" answer in Sections 2 through 7 will disqualify the proposed modification from Section 6409(al. The City may deem any application without a completed worksheet incomplete. If a response to any question requires additional space, applicants may attach additional pages to this worksheet so long as the responses are clearly labeled with the number that corresponds with the question. Questions about this worksheet should be submitted to the Planning Division at planning@carlsbadca.gov. Applicant Name: -'B"'rcse"'tt....,C,.,o"'ff,..e..,lt~------------------------- Phone: 760-975-7679 Email: brett.coffelt@coreoneconsultants.com Project Address: 2512 Tamarak Aye Carlsbad Ca 92010 Applicant's Site ID: CAL01039/ NS0039 ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST Section 1. EXISTING FACILITY 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. Does the non-tower structure currently support wireless transmission equipment? Has all the transmission equipment been deployed in accordance with the applicable siting and zoning regulations in effect when the deployment occurred? Does the application include a copy of the most recent permit or regulatory approval issued in connection with this site? lllYES ONO Ill YES D NO lllYES ONO If the answer in Line 1.3 is "NO" explain why the relevant permits and/or regulatory approvals are not attached: 6049(a) Modification Worksheet For Base Stations page1l5 03118 • 1.4. Will the proposed modification maintain (and NOT replace) the existing Ill YES O NO non-tower support structure? SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE FACTORS Section 2. HEIGHT INCREASES Rule: A modification substantially changes a base station if it increases the height of the original support structure by more than 10% or 1 0 feet (whichever is greater). 4 7 C. F. R. § 1.40001 (b)(7)(i). 2.1. Provide the following measurements: 2.1.1. overall height after the proposed modification: 2.1.2. support structure height when originally constructed: 2.1.3. subtract Line 2.1.1 by Line 2.1.2 2.1.4. multiply Line 2.1.2 by 0.1: 2.2. Is the measurement in Line 2.1.3 greater than 10 feet AND greater than the measurement in Line 2.1.4? Section 3. WIDTH INCREASES 79' feet 79' feet 0 feet 8619" feet DYES llll NO Rule: A modification substantially changes a base station if it adds an appurtenance that protrudes from the support structure by more than six (6) feet. 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001(b)(7)(ii). 3.1. 3.2. Provide the furthest distance that any proposed appurtenance would protrude from the support structure: Is the measurement in Line 3.1 greater than six (6) feet? Section 4. EQUIPMENT CABINETS --=2c,'6c..." __ feet D YES Ill NO Rule: A modification substantially changes a base station if it involves (i) more than four (4) new equipment cabinets; (ii) installation of any new ground-mounted equipment cabinets if none currently exist; or (iii) installation of any ground-mounted equipment cabinets that are more than 10% taller or voluminous than any existing ground-mounted cabinets associated with the base station. 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001(b)(7)(iii). 4. 1. Provide the following quantities: 4.1.1. total proposed new equipment cabinets: 4.1.2. existing ground-mounted equipment cabinets: 4.1.3. proposed new ground-mounted equipment cabinets: 6049(a) Modification Worksheet For Base Stations page2/5 03118 ' ' [CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE] 4.2. Provide the following measurements (unit of measure required): 4.2.1. height of the tallest proposed ground-mounted equipment cabinet: 4.2.2. height of the tallest existing ground-mounted equipment cabinet: 4.2.3. multiply Line 4.2.2 by 1. 1: 12'6" 4.2.4. volume of the most voluminous proposed ground-mounted equipment cabinet: 96 fl' 4.2.5. volume of the most voluminous existing ground-mounted equipment cabinet: 96ft' 4.2.6. multiply Line 4.2.5 by 1.1: jQ5 63 4.6. Is the quantity in Line 4.1.1 greater than four (4)? DYES Ill NO 4.7. Is the quantity in Line 4.1.2 zero (0) AND the quantity in Line 4.1.3 greater than zero (O)? DYES Ill NO 4.8. Is the measurement in Line 4.2.2 greater than the measurement in Line 4.2.3? □ YES Ill NO 4.9. Is the measurement in Line 4.2.5 greater than the measurement in Line 4.2.6? DYES Iii NO Section 5. NEW EXCAVATION OR DEPLOYMENT AT GROUND LEVEL Rule: A modification substantially changes a base station if it entails any excavation or deployment outside the current boundaries of the leased or owned property and any access or utility easements related to the site, and further restricted to the area in proximity to the support structure and to other transmission equipment already deployed on the ground. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.40001 (b)(6), 1.40001 (7)(iv). 5.1. Mark the appropriate box(es) if the project plans contain the following items. Mark any box "N/A" if the item is not part of the scope of work for the proposed modification: □ Current boundaries of the area that the carrier/infrastructure provider leases or owns, including access and utility easements □ All proposed equipment deployed on the ground □ All proposed ground disturbance (excavation, trenching, boring, digging, etc.) 5.2. Describe all proposed ground disturbance and proposed equipment deployed on the ground: NONE just changing equipment no vis11al change 6049(a) Modification Worksheet For Base Stations page315 03118 ' . 5.3. [CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE] Will any new ground disturbance or equipment deployed on the ground be outside the leased or owned areas, including any associated easements for access or utilities, OR outside the proximity of the support structure or existing ground-mounted transmission equipment? Section 6. CONCEALMENT ELEMENTS D YES ll! NO Rule: A modification substantially changes a base station if it would defeat the concealment elements of the base station. 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b)(7)(v). 6.1. Mark the appropriate box(es) if the application contains the following items: 'it Full-color photo simulations that depict how the site appears now and how it will appear after the proposed project 'it Project plans that depict and call out all existing and proposed concealment elements (painting, stealth techniques, camouflaging, integration, etc.) 6.2. Describe the existing concealment elements and/or techniques: Ibis is a existing ERP Baydom 6.3. Describe the proposed concealment elements and/or techniques and how, if at all, the proposed modification would alter the existing concealment elements: 6.4. No visual change will be the existing raydom Will the proposed modification defeat the existing concealment elements of the base station? Section 7. COMPLIANCE WITH PRIOR PERMIT CONDITIONS DYES Ill NO Rule: A modification substantially changes a base station if it does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval for the original construction or subsequent modification(s) of the base station. Noncompliance with prior permit conditions related to height, width, equipment cabinets and excavation would not cause a substantial change to the extent the condition is more restrictive than the applicable FCC thresholds (described in Sections 2 through 5 of this worksheet). 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 (b)(7)(vi). 7.1. Mark the appropriate box(es) if the application contains all the following items: I1f' Copies of all prior permits and other regulatory approvals issued in connection with this site c," All conditions of approval applicable the corresponding prior permits and other regualtory approvals 6049(a) Modification Worksheet For Base Stations page415 03118 • .. 7.2. 7.3. 7.4. Identify the condition(s) corresponding to a prior permit or regulatory approval that the proposed modification would violate: None Identify the condition(s) corresponding to a prior permit or regulatory approval that the proposed modification would violate, but such condition(s) would be preempted by a "NO" answer in Line 2.2, 3.2, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 or 5.3 of this worksheet: Are there any conditions identified in Line 7 .2 that do not appear in Line 7.3? D YES Ill NO PREPARER'S CERTIFICATION I have read and I understand this worksheet and all its instructions. All my responses on this worksheet are true, accurate and based on my personal knowledge about the proposed project to which this worksheet corresponds. I understand that the City of Carlsbad will rely on my responses to evaluate whether to process this application in accordance with the FCC's regulations under 47 C.F.R. § 1.40001 et seq., and I acknowledge that any inaccuracies may result in the application being deemed incomplete or the request for approval pursuant to Section 6409(a) being denied. Applicant Name: ....cB,:ire,uUi.:CLA.J.affw"'"'"L------------ Applicant Signature: /311,tt:CJ:ifilc 6049(a) Modification Worksheet For Base Stations page 5/5 Date: 08/17/2022 03/18 --. .. -=. MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• ,._,_ Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report Predictive (RFSSRP) Jurisdictional Report Report Writer: Vishesh Kumar Site Name: FA# USID: Site ID: Address: County: Latitude: Longitude: Structure Type: Property Owner: Pace Job: RFDS Technology: Report Information CALAVERA HILLS COMMUNITY PARK 10090935 143903 CAL01039 2997 GLASGOW DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 SAN DIEGO 33.1666110 -117.2998890 LIGHT POLE CITY OF CARLSBAD MRSDL040329 5G NR 1 SR CBAND Report Generated Date: 07-30-2022 Compliance Statement AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 2.0 or appropriate remediation determined by AT&T is implemented ~ ~ AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Page 1 of 12 Except under written agreement. © 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved~,,il~ _. 6 3o8 ' Ill .. ~. MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• ,.,,_ Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 Compliance Measures ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.0 Site Scale Map ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 5.0 FCC Rules and Regulations and Guidelines from OET 65 .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 6.0 Safety Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 7.0 FCC Limits ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 8.0 Certification .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except underwritten agreement.© 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page 2 of 12 .... MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• ~ Your ISO 9001·2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner 1.0 Introduction MobileComm Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by AT&T Mobility LLC to produce a theoretical assessment of the potential radio frequency emissions at the proposed AT&T "LIGHT POLE" site. FCC OET Bulletin 65-Edition 97-01 recommends that theoretical calculations should be done to yield a worst-case scenario. This theoretical analysis will provide a worst-case assessment of potential emissions and will assume all transmitters are operating at highest capacity and power. This will provide AT&T with a guideline of how to proceed with mitigating the site to ensure the site will be compliant with FCC regulations at any instance. For this MPE theoretical analysis, MobileComm considered the accessible areas of site to determine approximate field strength levels and to identify any areas with higher levels exceeding FCC MPE limits and then determined spatially averaged field levels in areas with highest fields. . MobileComm has utilized computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report. The modeling software that MobileComm used to create this report is IXUS. General Model Assumptions In this Site Compliance Report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. MobileComm has further assumed a 100% duty cycle for UMTS & 75% duty cycle for L TE/5G carriers. Obstructions (trees, buildings etc.) that would normally attenuate the signal are not taken into account. MobileComm obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from AT&T (or approved vendors) which is considered reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Due to the complexity of some wireless sites, MobileComm performed this analysis and created this report utilizing best industry practices and due diligence. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement.© 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reseived. Page 3 of 12 •&• MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• ~ Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner 2.0 Compliance Measures The compliance determination is based on theoretical modeling, RF signage placement recommendations and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. At the time of our analysis, AT&T will be compliant with the FCC rules and regulations, as described in OET Bulletin 65 upon implementation of below remediation(s). AT&T Alpha Sector: • No action required. AT&T Beta Sector: No action required. AT&T Gamma Sector: • No action required. Light Pole: • Two Caution Signs with dimensions 7" x 7" (Ordering part number for this sign is "R801 RPE") to be posted 10 feet beneath the antenna opposite to each other or, in the event of an obstruction or other impediment to such placement, within 1 foot above or below that location. The Caution signs must specify that a distance of 96 feet must be kept from the antenna. (2 Total Signs) It is recommended to have periodic inspections of the components that are involved in radiation of RF energy. Periodic Electromagnetic Emission (EME) measurement should be conducted to reevaluate the RF radiation level at this site. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement.© 2022 AT&T Intellectual properly. All rights Reserved. Page 4 of 12 3.0 Site Scale Map AT&T Antenna Proposed 0 Panel Barrier --- 0 OMNI Posts C 19:e MobileComm Professionals, Inc. • ~ Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner Safety Instructions ...:.il.1f:i. I ---I t=;;~j I \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Fence I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ground=O' I I Sloped Area AT&T Light Pole=79' ------ I I I I \ I I Light=79' I \ I \ \, AT&T Sector A 35•,------- 1 I 6 """°'• t AT&T I ~-==: I ~ :::.:..--·--· / \ :~~~: 100,' Sector C 210° \ I / \ AT&T \ Sector B Shroud \ 125° I I I I I I I \ Sloped Area \ I \ I \Fence I \ I \ I I \ \ I \ I \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ I 100' Ground=O' Proposed Signage Q -100· Notice 2 Caution 2 Caution 2B Caution 2C Caution 7"x7" Warning 1B r'~ ..... f..r-j ~~ r;-e,;...-;, ~ :~.:=:; '.., I I /; I I ,._ I ' ' ' I I I F -1 l~-II I ' !._ __ _! I I !_ __ J !; __ ~ ~--..! L-:,-___ 1 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement. © 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. RF Exposure Map Lock Map Scale= 10ft . I): " ~,,,,-,7 ~ I •' .... Page 5 of 12 M&e MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• """"'1!' Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner 4.0 Summary All calculations performed for this analysis yielded results that were within the allowable limits for exposure to RF Emissions. Based on theoretical modeling, and upon implementation of recommendations in Section 2, there will be no modeled exposures on any accessible walking/working surface related to AT& T's equipment in the area that exceed the FCC's Occupational or General Population exposure limits at this site. The anticipated maximum theoretical RF-EME at Ground level will be 18.48% of the FCC's General Population. This was determined through calculations along a radial from each sector taking full power values into account as well as actual vertical plane antenna gain values per the manufacturer-supplied specifications for gain. Based on worst-case theoretical modeling, there are no areas at ground level related to the proposed antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or General Population exposure limits at this site. A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these RF hazards. Modeling indicates that there will be no accessible areas on the walking/working surfaces in front of the AT&T antennas that may exceed the FCC standards for general population and/or occupational exposure after implementation of mitigation measures. To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury, MobileComm recommends that access to the areas associated with the active antenna installation or mitigation measures to be restricted and secured wherever possible. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement. © 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page 6 of 12 M&e MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• .,,.,_ Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner s.o FCC Rules and Regulations and Guidelines from OET 65 When considering the contributions to field strength or power density from other RF sources, care should be taken to ensure that such variables as reflection and re-radiation are considered. In cases involving very complex sites predictions of RF fields may not be possible, and a measurement survey may be necessary. The process for determining compliance for other situations can be similarly accomplished using the techniques described in this section and in Supplement A to this bulletin that deals with radio and television broadcast operations. However, as mentioned above, at very complex sites measurements may be necessary. In the simple example shown in the below diagram, it is desired to determine the power density at a given location X meters from the base of a tower on which are mounted two antennas. One antenna is a CMRS antenna with several channels, and the other is an FM broadcast antenna. The system parameters that must be known are the total ERP for each antenna and the operating frequencies (to determine which MPE limits apply). The heights above ground level for each antenna, H1 and H2, must be known in order to calculate the distances, R1and R2, from the antennas to the point of interest. I J i '' • I~ \• --' r • I I ' ' -l • I'-_. ◄ • • 'i':.:' /.i : ,\ i N_~ \ I>, ~-► l Iii ( i .i ~: • • AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement. © 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page 7 of 12 M&e MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• -· Your ISO 9001•2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner This summarizes the policies, guidelines and requirements that were adopted by the FCC on August 1, 1996, amending Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and further amended by action of the Commission on August 25, 1997 (see 47 CFR Sections 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091 and 2.1093, as amended from FCC "OET Bulletin 65"). Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities, require the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA), as described in 47 CFR Section 1.1311, if the particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields in excess of these limits. For exact language, see the relevant FCC rule sections. The FCC-adopted limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) are generally based on recommended exposure guidelines published by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) in "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," NCRP Report No. 86, Sections 17.4.1, 17.4.1.1, 17.4.2 and 17.4.3. Copyright NCRP, 1986, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. In the frequency range from 100 MHz to 1500 MHz, exposure limits for field strength and power density are also generally based on the MPE limits found in Section 4.1 of, "IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, Copyright 1992 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, New York 10017, and approved for use as an American National Standard by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The exposure guidelines are based on thresholds for known adverse effects and they incorporate a significant margin of safety. The federal health and safety agencies such as: the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), the National Institute on Occupational Safety and Health ("NIOSH") and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") have also been actively involved in monitoring and investigating issues related to RF exposure. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or "Controlled environment" and General Population or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Population limits are generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply to accessible areas where workers or the General Population may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Population limits. The formulas used in IXUS for calculating Power density is based on FCC "OET Bulletin 65", Section 2: PREDICTION METHODS, August 1997, Edition 97-01. Power density is converted to Maximum Permissible Exposure Limits (MPE Limits) based on Limits of General population/Uncontrolled Exposure and Limits of Occupational/Controlled Exposure presented in the following table generated from Appendix A of "OET Bulletin 65". AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except underwritten agreement.© 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page B of 12 Mt\e MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• "-"""' Your ISO 9001•2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure ___________ ,, ________ ----------------------··-··-·--- Frequenc Power Density Averaging -y Time (S) - Range (mW/cm2) IEl2, IHl2, ors (MHz) (minutes) - 300-1500 f/300 6 1500-5 6 : ' 100,000 ' ' ' Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure ' . C:-p .. ,Si' , • 1,-~ Frequency Power Density Averaging Range Time (MHz) (S) (mW/cm2) IEl2, IHI', ors (minutes) 300-1500 f/1500 30 1500-1 30 100,000 AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement. © 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page 9 of 12 i&e MobileComm Professionals, Inc. ~ Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner 6.0 Safety Recommendations Occupational Safety and Health Administration {OSHA) Requirements OSHA requires that those in the Occupational classification must complete training in RF Safety, RF Awareness, and Utilization of Personal Protective Equipment. OSHA also provides options for Hazard Prevention and Control: Hazard Prevention Control • Utilization of good equipment • Employ Lockout/Tag out • Enact control of hazard areas • Utilize personal alarms & protective clothing • Limit exposures • Prevent access to hazardous locations • Employ medical surveillance and accident • Develop or operate an administrative control response program RF Signage and Barriers All RF signs should be obeyed by at all times. Post the appropriate NOTICE, CAUTION & WARNING sign at the main site access point(s) and other locations as required. The signs below are examples of signs meeting FCC guidelines NOTICE {(~)) •·u..,. ......... .. ,.,.._._,.,.,,, ... ,.....,,._ ......... , .. ,,, ....... ..., .. ., .... ,,...-"' ... ,,., ....... .... ~:.-t-.. ,.,-,,l., .... . .... ~ ,...~ .. w .. •-~•"4: ''"''"' ...... ,. . ..,.,,.,., .. ,..... .... ........ ,. ... 1..,,~•--·•,tt .A CAUTION. A. CAUTION 1 .A CAUTION. ·• CAUTION. M ~!M ~ .., ,,sa, ""ulfft..,..., .or.Ju••.-.n ,,un """-cw ............... ,, ... .,,,..,"" ... ,.--~ .. -·---............... -... ,... .. ,.111 .. ""' ...... .......,.,..,.,,...~#t-, ......... """ .... "' ,,,,,.,.-.:, ........ -.td!'lfC~•Jflltli:.., .... N ,,..__.,.,,"-.Clc;tldn_,.,,u1. .. .. ~~\ft;i--...,, .... n, ..--r..,...,[....,., .... "«•••••u-~w ~n. Kl ... .allUMl:eei•L• f"'•J'll",--.a.ICl-.•o••c 1 .. t ,...,~,...ti.twllllft.lin"• 1-1.-......,, .... M \• ... .,•t-·••lf " ..... dMINJ•,...,.#lf: ....... , .. ..,M'l!'\.,_.f\ .. .....-..1""} •f•#u.nt ~ ... -,Wfn.,, ·-·--"""'·IH"'' -"-~-••MaJJ..-;pil 1n:411n·,,,._...,.,u,..,.,, .... ,.,,..tf:lllrtJtlft~~lktUltltUtl c-,.,,-ya1,1W-iM--a..t•,...•-, ....... --.;~ .............. ; .. ,nttuNlll~~•rt""IJ'llfll 'K•Y'I.N )\f ... UNt....,_, ..... -, ............... " ..... "'"•prb-t~tt -------'"'f•t; .. ,.. .. .._. , ... ,.., ~--" .... 1• ........ '"''' ................ ~ ~-"°"" ..... ffllf'l<lp•ttl •'•--.... --•• --· .. ..--·---·--·-. ·-----·-- :1,.,...,..._,_.......,to ... ..-. ............... ,.,.,,, .. .,.., ..... ~"-.......... ,,.,,. . .....__.,., t-l,_ .. .,.~..,,_t ... ...,_._,un-•-.•-.. .. ~-.,-,,,,,.. ...... "" f!Ct~•·•f ..... ~ ~,.'-"•"'•lltf .. r "'-"'°" ,. ........... ._.., ........ ~ ,, • .,,...,..,,.,.n1u,.1 ,..,,.,,u• u. w"-•"'"..tl ... , ..,11tt.., ....... (J'OjQ•~D4,.! .. a:J, ... ,, ... t r.tQO"ll#-~B.Jtff44Jffl Nl•wt1•b•l·Y•--•«1 Ql'Jb,--....~-~ ... w-110111~0 nihn11111' ... ,. .............. If there are workers in an area with a sign that they do not understand, they can call the NOC Number at 800-638-2822 for guidance. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement. © 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page 10 of 12 Mice MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• ,,,.,_ Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner 7 .O FCC Limits Occupational limits Apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for occupational/controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where occupational/controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the potential for exposure. General population limits Apply in situations in which the General Population may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Controlled Environment Applies to environments that are restricted or "controlled" in order to prevent access from members of the General Population classification. Uncontrolled Environment Applies to environments that are unrestricted or "uncontrolled" that allow access from members of the General Population classification. Contribution to Co-Located areas Any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Generic Values The use of "Unknown" for an operator means the information with regard to the carrier, their FCC license and/ or antenna information was not available. Generic values are used as estimation for Effective Radiated Power (ERP) and antenna characteristics for unknown antennas. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except under written agreement. © 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page 11 of 12 M40 MobileComm Professionals, Inc .• - Your ISO 9001-2000 Certified, Quality Centric RF Safety Services Partner 8.0 Certification This report has been prepared by or under the direction of the following Registered Professional Engineer: I, Timothy Leonakis P.E. CA, P. Eng., on 07-30-2022 hereby certify that: I am registered as a Professional Engineer with License number E 13436 and that I am thoroughly familiar with the Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), both in general and specifically as they apply to FCC guidelines for human exposure to Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation and that EME theoretical analysis for site identified as 10090935 located at 2997 GLASGOW DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92008, has been performed on 07-30-2022 in order to determine where there might be electromagnetic energy that is in excess of both the Controlled Environment and Uncontrolled Environment levels; and that I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. ;::~ 'I L ( 0. ¥.,.;.,-,_ !? ( .::'· 0-rr,< 1.2. ,.i 134 ; . .£--;z_q'~ u'~~ 1F CAL If Timothy Leonakis P .E. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use Only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T Companies, Except underwritten agreement.© 2022 AT&T Intellectual property. All rights Reserved. Page 12 of 12 • July 25, 2022 T.J. Burmesch, P.E. Lead Market Engineer Bechtel Infrastructure and Power Corp. 4030 E. Quenton Drive, Ste. 101-E Mesa, AZ. 85215 TELECOM MANAGEMENT GROUP 5'<,W.:o.w-V.,,w, R...,kt Subject: Structural Analysis for AT&T's New Cabinet Installation Inside Proposed Equipment Enclosure Site Name: Calavera Hills Community Park Site Number: CAL01039 FA Number: 10090935 Site Address: 2512 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92010 Dear Mr. Burmesch: Telecom Management Group (TMG) has completed a structural analysis of the above referenced site to determine its adequacy for the installation of AT&T's new equipment as shown in the following page. This analysis assumes that the existing structures, structure modifications and associated components have been properly constructed per original design and have been well maintained. The loads considered in this analysis were determined in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code, 2019 Edition, and the ANSlfTIA-222-H (Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas) for an ultimate 3-second gust wind speed of 96 mph for San Diego County, California. Ss=0.983g, S1=0.36g, Site Class D, Risk Category II. Our findings show that the proposed anchor system will be adequate to support AT& T's new equipment. The new equipment will be installed on the concrete pad inside new CMU enclosure. The analysis is based solely on information available to us as listed on the following page. This report is considered void if any of the listed information is incorrect. We trust that this report is satisfactory. If you have any questions regarding the analysis, please contact our office. Yours very truly, Telecom Management Group David Tan, P.E. (CA License C 58359) TELECOM MANAGEMENT GROUP· 302 W Washington St. #150-6850, San Diego, CA 92103 • Tel (858) 248-7678 AT&T Analysis Report Page 2 Site No: CAL01039, Calavera Hills Community Park Design Criteria & Information Wind 96 mph ultimate wind speed. Seismic Ss=0.983g, S1=0.36g, Site Class D, Risk Category II. Documents Construction Drawing by Telecom Management Group, dated 5/2/2022. Site Photos. New Equipment Loading Ant. Tip Carrier New Description Dimensions Weight Elev. /Existing (in) (lbs) -AT&T N (1) NetXtend Flex 72x36x37 4200 (max.) Battery Enclosure Notes: 1. Any discrepancies in loading from this listing should be brought to TMG's attention. Results of this evaluation cannot be used if the loading is different. AT&T Analysis Report Page 3 Site No: CAL01039, Ca\avera Hills Community Park Conclusion The proposed anchoring system has adequate capacity to support AT& T's equipment installation. The anchoring system will be stressed to 30% as a maximum of its structural capacity. The proposed CMU enclosure and concrete foundation also have adequate capacity to support AT& T's equipment installation. Assumptions and Limitations 1. This report is based solely on the information supplied to us as listed above, and the results, in turn, are only as accurate as data extracted from this information. This report is considered void if any of the listed information or assumptions state herein is inaccurate. 2. The antenna mounts, including any existing modifications to them, have been installed in accordance with original design drawings and are in satisfactory condition to carry their full design capacity. 3. Any existing modifications not listed in this report have not been considered in the analysis. 4. Antennas and equipment are as given in the table above. Assumptions made with regards to antenna and mount sizes, and their projected areas, are based on our best interpretation of the provided information and our best knowledge of industry practice. 5. Contractor shall inspect the condition of all mount members and connections prior to installation of proposed equipment; if there are any deficiencies or discrepancies, Contractor shall notify Engineer of Record. AT&T Analysis Report Page4 Site No: CAL01039, Calavera Hills Community Park APPENDIX ·CALCULATIONS Analysis Subject Mathcad Page Number Drawing Sheet Reference 1. Design Load 1 . 2. Cabinet Overturning Check 2 Detail 3/A6 3. CMU Enclosure Check 3 Detail 5/A6 NS0039 7/24/2022 1. Design Load: Wind Loads -Other Structures: ASCE 7-16 Ultimate Wind Pressures Wind Factor~ Gust Effect Factor (G) =' Kzt,;, 1.00 0.85 Ukimate\.lindSpeed= 1.00 Exposure = 96 mph C The proposed cabinets are installed on the conaete pad inside the proposed Endosure and ,,.;II be shielded from IMnd. Seismic Loads: IBC 2018 Strength Level Forces Risk Category II Importance Factor (le) 1 00 Site Class O -code del Clan D • code default Ss (02 sec)= S1 (1.0 sec)= Fa= 1 ?i~(; Fv= 19--IC 98 30 ~-Og~ 36 00 %? Sms= Sm1= 1 180 0 698 A s:to:: specific ground rrwtwn Jndl\'SI!::, is reou1recJ for se1s.rn1canv Site specific ground motion analysis performed· No Scs = 0. 786 Design Category = Sc·= 0466 Design Category= 0 MECH AND ELEC COMPONENTS SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS Seismic Desi<;;-n Care,;;c-r; G & tpec; I} therefore seP. ASC£7 Sectii:tn 13 1 4 for exc:eptmns Mech or Electrical Component Generators, battenes, inverters, motors, transformet5, and other elt>rtricat rnmponents ,... Importance Factor (Ip) Ip "' 1 .o all other components Component Amphfication Factor (ap) = Comp Response Modification Factor (R,) = Over-Strength Factor (Qo) = Fp = 0.4a0SdslpWp(1+2z/h)/Rp = not greater than Fp = 1 GSds/pWp = but not less than Fp = 0 3SdslpWp = Seismic load Govems. 1 25 2 0 377 Wp 1258 Wp 0 236 Wp h::!I 6 0 feet z=' 6 0 feet zlh = 1 00 use Fp = 0 377 Wp 1 of 4 NS0039 7/24/2022 2. Cabinet Overturning Check: NetXtend Flex Battery Enclosure THE NETXTEN□-FLEX SERIES -48VOC/+24VDC 8A1TERY ENCLOSURE TECH>,,jlCAL SPECIFlCATIONS (NE0.'5918 / F2012495, NEQ.159Hl / F2012496 BATTERY: 180 Ah GNB BATTERIES, MODEL M12V180FT (12.5"Hx4.9'\l,'x22"Q) !JIMENSIONS. HxWxD· 1829.6x914.9x9J4.5mrT' (72 OJ"x36.02"x36.79") FOOTPRINT 1829x762x762rnm {72"x3(}°x30") ENCLOSURE 1829x762x960mm (72"x30"x37.8") WEIGHT 980 LB (445 KG) wrrHOUT BATIERIES 4200 LB (1905 KG) W1TH FULL COMPLEMENT OF GNB OR SAFl BA1TERIESIJOIJNTING: PAO OR PlAT!="ORM l'.TS . .SIJN ~-~m-H iBEHU,:: ::>A\Eli lhTTE",v :·\El\t-.E-, _t,,·:,-£V ,:l' 1 < (,iEHNI' ..:.i..t,El'. .:.LA~bl :1,.:;,l, :)iEHJh; •'t..\El) ---t----41 :ATTEfN '-,HELF 'ff/ KETAI\£'< ;:i) ·l>\TI["\IE'-i .cm T~.;y;, Wcabinet := 4200lbf Fp:= 0.377-Wcabinet= l.583x 103 lbf H := 6ft H My:= Fp·-= 4. 75-kip• ft 2 3 Vx := Fp = 1. 583 x 10 lbf n := 2. o :,r;,1 '•{('.TEC1E\'I ~:1,ll.£T'.: £N·•I'< •\I ftENTAL • f,T'."iL liMl ([,::L;• Maximum Cabinet Weight Seismic Force Moment Reaction Shear Reaction Overstrength Factor See attached Hlltt Report for Anchor Check, the proposed (4) 5/8" Hiltf KB-122 bolts with 4" embedment are adequate for proposed cabinet overturning. 2 of4 •=iiSif i Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.79 Specifier's comments: 1 Input data Anchor type and diameter; Item number: Effective embedment depth: Material: Evaluation Service Report: Issued J Valid: Proof: Stand-off installation: Kwik Bolt TZ2 -55 304 518 (4) hnom3 2210279 KB-TZ2 5/8x6 SS304 hef,act = 4.000 in., hnom = 4.500 in. AISI 304 ESR-4266 12/17/2021 I 12/1/2023 Design Method ACI 318-14 / Mech eb = 0.000 in. (no stand-off); t = 0.500 in. II • •F~ lll Anchor plateR : Ix x fy x t = 32.400 in. x 25.470 in. x 0.500 in.; (Recommended plate thickness: not calculated) Profile: Base material: Installation: no profile cracked concrete, 2500, r = 2,500 psi; h = 8.000 in. hammer drilled hole, Installation condition: Dry Reinforcement: tension: condition 8, shear: condition B; no supplemental splitting reinforcement present edge reinforcement: none or < No. 4 bar Seismic loads (cat. C, D, E, or F) Tension load: yes (17.2.3.4.3 (d)) Shear load: yes (17.2.3.5.3 (c)) R -The anchor calculation is based on a rigid anchor plate assumption. Geometry [in.] & Loading [lb, In.lb] z ij Input data and results must be checked for COnfOllTlily with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROFIS Engineering ( c) 2003-2022 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Sc:haan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilli AG, Schaen 'C.7.992 i : I I S • • ----------------------Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.79 1.1 Design results Case Description Forces [lb] / Moments [in.lb) Seismic Max. Util. Anchor[%] --------------,--,-c-~-c--,----~~~-------------cc----~ Load case: Design loads N = -3, 780; Vx = O; Vy = -3, 166; yes 30 Mx = 37,992; My= O; Mz = O; Input data and results must be checked for confom,ity with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROFIS Engineering ( c) 2003-2022 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaen Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaen 2 i=iiSi.i Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.79 2 Proof I Utilization (Governing Cases) Loading Proof Concrete Breakout Failure Tension Shear Concrete edge failure in direction y- Loading Combined tension and shear loads 0.013 3 Warnings Please consider all details and hints/warnings given in the detailed report! Design values [lb] Load Capacity 84 6,630 3,166 10,844 Pv t 0.292 5/3 Fastening meets the design criteria! Input data and results must be checked for conformity With the existing conditions ard for plausibil'1ty! PROFIS Engineering ( c) 2003-2022 Hilli AG, Fl-9494 Schaen Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Sctlaan Utilization P.1 Pvr!.J Status 21-OK -/ 30 OK Utilization PN,V _r/,] Status 13 OK 3 ,:11s., ----------------------------H ii ti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.79 4 Remarks; Your Cooperation Duties Any and all infonnation and data contained in the Software concern solely the use of Hilti products and are based on the principles, formulas and security regulations in accordance with Hilti's technical directions and operating, mounting and assembly instructions, etc., that must be strictly complied with by the user. All figures contained therein are average figures, and therefore use-specific tests are to be conducted prior to using the relevant Hilti product. The results of the calculations carried out by means of the Software are based essentially on the data you put in. Therefore, you bear the sole responsibility for the absence of errors, the completeness and the relevance of the data to be put in by you. Moreover, you bear sole responsibility for having the results of the calculation checked and cleared by an expert, particularly with regard to compliance with applicable norms and permits, prior to using them for your specific facility. The Software serves only as an aid to interpret norms and permits without any guarantee as to the absence of errors, the correctness and the relevance of the results or suitability for a specific application. You must take all necessary and reasonable steps to prevent or limit damage caused by the Software. In particular, you must arrange for the regular backup of programs and data and, if applicable, carry out the updates of the Software offered by Hilti on a regular basis. If you do not use the AutoUpdate function of the Software, you must ensure that you are using the current and thus up-to-date version of the Software in each case by carrying out manual updates via the Hilti Website. Hilti will not be liable for consequences, such as the recovery of lost or damaged data or programs, arising from a culpable breach of duty by you. Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility! PROF IS Engineering ( c) 2003-2022 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hi\~ is e registered Trademanc: of Hilti AG, Schaen 4 NS0039 7/24/2022 3. CMU Enclosure Check: Wind Loads: • Ultimate Wind Speed • Nominal Wind Speed Risk Category Exposure Category , ASCE 7-16 96 mph 74.4 mph D C Ewposure C ... Enclosure Clas.sit. Enclosed Bu1k:ling ~ ~nolosed __ Building ____ .., .,_W.,.i"'n:.:d,..L::;O::;8::;d::;S:,_•.:.:MW="-F.:.R,aS.._,h"'9==-0" (Low-rise Buildings) exceyt for open buildings Kz = Kh (case 1) = 0.85 Edge Strip (a)= Base pressure (qh) = 17.0 psf End Zone (2a) = GCpi = +/-0 18 Zone 2 length = Horizontal MWFRS Simple Diaphragm PrHSUl'ltS (psfl • Transveru direction (normal to L) ' Interior Zone Wall 117 psf Roof -5.4 psf •• End Zone· Wall 17 7 psi Roof -9.2 psf •• Longitudinal direction (parallel to L) Interior Zone: Wall 11. 7 psf End Zone. Wall 17 7 psf "'UOTE Total hor1z force shall not be les.;s than that deterrrnned hcmu := 6ft Fwind := 17. 7psf Maximum CMU Height Maximum Wind Pressure 3.0ft 6.0ft 5 Oft Seismic Design Category =-" 0 Redundancy Coefficient p =" 1 30 I O Check to ~ SOC Oas • minimum Number of Stories 1 Structure Type All otht'r budding systt>ms Honzontal Struct Irregularities No plan lncgu\arrty Vertical Structural Irregularities. No vertical tiregult111ty Flexihle Diaphragms·"' No Rigid ..:.I .::J 3 Bwlding System Dual Systems w/ intermediate Moment Frame, Capable of Resisting >• 25% of Seismic Forces Seismic resisting system 3. Ordinary_ reinforced masonry shnr wans ~ 3ystem Structural Height Limit. System not permitted fo, this seismic design category Actual Structural Height (hn) = 6 0 ft Ser:> ASCE:7 Section 12? 6 for l'.:XCl."pt1ons Jnd ,JHJN :,ystern lnrntat1ons 3 of 4 NS0039 7/24/2022 PERMITTED ANAL YllCAL PROCEDURES Simplified Analysis • Use Equivalent Lateral Force Analysis Equivalent late«-111-force AnaJy1 -Permitted Building period coe! (C,) = 0 020 Approx fundamental period (Ta)= Crh/ = User calculated fundamental period= Long Period Transition Period (ll.} = .I\SCE7 map= Seismic response coef. (Cs}= Sdsl!R = but not less than Cs::: 0.044Sdsl::: USE Cs= 0 077 sec x= 0 75 ' 8 sec 0 262 0.035 0.262 Equivalent Lateral.force Analysis .!J Cu= 1.40 Tmax =: CuTa = 0 107 sec T = 0 077 sec Design Base Shear V • 0.262W Wcmu := 66psf CMUweight Pseismic := 0. 262Wcmu • hcmu = 103. 7 52 • plf Wind I.Dad Gove ms! See at1ached EnerCalc report for CMU wall endosure and foL11dation check. 4 of 4 I ----- 1 Masonry Slender Wall IlC# :·Kw:oso1'fi ff,Bu'OCE20.i.2~'r 14 DESCRIPTION: CMU Wall Enclosure Code References --------- Calculations per TMS 402-16, !BC 2016, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 load Combinations Used: ASCE 7-16 General Information Construction Type : Grouted Hollow Concrete Masonry F'm 1.50 ksi Norn. Wall Thickness Fy -Yield Fr-Rupture Em= fm * = 60.0 ksi Actual Thickness Max% of p bal. Grout Density Block Weigh! Wall Weigh! 61.0 psi 900.0 = 0.007135 = 140 pct Normal Weight = 63.0 psf Wall is grouted at rebar cells only One-S!ory WaUt>imension!I A Clear Height 6 ft B Parapet heigh! ft Wall Support ConditionTop Free, Bottom Fix Lateral Loads Wind Loads: Rebar "d" distance Lower Level Rebar . Bar Size Bar Spacing 8 ! A Seismic Loads : I L # Project File: emu enclosure.ec6 1 (Cj "ENtRCALC-iNC-1983-2022 Calculations per TMS 402-16, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 a in 7.625 in 3.750 in 5 16 in Temp Oiff across thickness Min Allow Out-of-plane Defl Ra= Minimum Vertical Steel % ROOf Attachment Floor Attaehment I .--_,_, ______ J deg F 0.0 0.0020 f'7 I I I Full area WINO load 17.7 psf Wall Weight Seismic Load Input Method : Factor applied to wall weight entered Seismic factor to be applied to wall weight 0.262 Fp = Wall I/Vt.. " 0.2620 16.506 psf j Masonry Slender Wall 1 I1ar:·KW-0001111t. -euHd:20.·22:1 _14· DESCRIPTION: CMU Wall Enclosure DESIGN SUMMARY Governing Load Combination . PASS Moment Capacity Check +0.90D+W PASS Service Deflection Check WOnly PASS Axial Load Check +1.20D+W Reinforcing Limit Check Design_Maximum Combinations -Moments Axial Load Load Combination Pu 0.2*fm*b*t k k 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 +1.20D+0.50W at 0.00 to 0.20 0.454 18.612 +1.20D-0.50W at 0.00 to 0.20 0.454 18.612 +1.20D+W at 0.00 to 0.20 0.454 18.612 +1.20D-W at 0.00 to 0.20 0.454 18.612 +0.90D+W at 0.00 to 0.20 0.340 18.612 +0.90D-W al 0.00 to 0.20 0.340 18.612 +1.286D+E at 0.00 to 0.20 0.486 18.612 +1.286D-E at 0.00 to 0.20 0.486 18.612 +0.8144D+E at 0.00 to 0.20 0.308 18.612 +0.8144D-E at 0.00 to 0.20 0.308 18.612 _De_~_~g~ __ !'ftaxim!J_m _C~m-~~na~~o~~ -Deflectior::1s Mer k-ft 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Project File: emu enclosure.ec6 1 --. .,. __ . ------------------------I {c) ENERCALC INC 1883,.2022 Results reported for "Strip Width" of 12.0 in Actual Values . Allowable Values . Maximum Bending Stress Rato:0954& Max Mu -0.3187 k-ft Phi• Mn 3.339 k-ft Actual Defl. Ratio U 15090 Allowable Defl. Ratio 150.0 Max. Deflection 0.009543 in /2 for Cantilever Max Pu/ Ag 7.311 psi Max. Allow. Deft. 0.960 in Location 0.1 oft 0.2 • rm 300.0 psi Actual As/bd 0.0050 Max Allow As/bd Maximum Reactions for Load Combination .. Top Horizontal Base Horizontal W Only Vertical Reaction D Only 0.007135 0.0 k 0.1062 k 0.3780 k Results reported for "Strip Width"= 12 in. Moment Values 0.6 * Mu Phi Phi Mn As As Ratio rho bal Bar'd' k-ft k-ft in"2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.16 0.90 3.36 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.16 0.90 3.36 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.32 0.90 3.36 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.32 0.90 3.36 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.32 0.90 3.34 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.32 0.90 3.34 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.30 0.90 3.37 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.30 0.90 3.37 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.30 0.90 3.33 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 0.30 0.90 3.33 0.233 0.0050 0.0070 0.00 Resutts reported for "Strip Width"= 12 in. Axial Load Moment Values Stiffness Deflections Load Combination Pu Mer Mactual I gross I cracked I effective Deflection Defl. Ratio k k-ft k-ft in114 in114 in114 ;n 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.0 +D+0.60W at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.006 25,138.5 +D-0.60W at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.006 25,138.5 +D+0.450W at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.004 33,518.0 +D-0.450W at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.004 33,518.0 +0.60D+0.60W at 5.80 to 6.00 0.008 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.57 376.000 0.006 25,143.2 +0.60D-0.60W at 5.80 to 6.00 0.008 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.57 376.000 0.006 25,143.2 +D+0.70E at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.006 23,106.0 +D-0.70E at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.006 23,106.0 +D+0.5250E at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.005 30,807.9 +D-0.5250E at 5.80 to 6.00 0.013 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.58 376.000 0.005 30,807.9 +0.60D+0.70E at 5.80 to 6.00 0.008 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.57 376.000 0.006 23,110.2 +0.60D-0.70E at 5.80 to 6.00 0.008 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.57 376.000 0.006 23,110.2 W Only at 5.80 to 6.00 0.000 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.55 376.000 0.010 15,090.1 -W at 5.80 to 6.00 0.000 0.50 0.00 376.00 41.55 376.000 0.010 15,090.1 ' , Masonry Slender Wall I-------------------------UC#: KW-06017177, Build:20.22.7.14 DESCRIPTION: CMU Wall Enclosure E Only at 5.80 to 6.00 E Only• -1.0 at 5.80 to 6.00 Reactions -Vertical & Horizontal Load Combination DOnly +D+0.60W +D-0.60W +D+0.450W +D-0.450W +0.60D+0.60W +0.60D-0.60W +D+0.70E +D-0.70E +D+0.5250E Reactions -Vertical & Horizontal Load Combination +D-0.5250E +0.60D+0.70E +0.60D-0.70E WOnly -W EOnly EOnly"-1.0 0.000 0.50 0.000 0.50 Base Horizontal 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Base Horizontal 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 ENGQUEST INC. 0.00 0.00 376.00 376.00 Project File: emu enclosure.ec6 (C) ENERCA[C INC 198:J:2022 41.55 41.55 376.000 376.000 Top Horizontal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Top Horizontal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.009 0.009 16,181.7 16,181.7 Vertical @ Wall Base 0.378 0.378, 0.378. 0.378 0.378 0.227. 0.227 - 0.378 0.378 0.378 Vertical @ Wall Base 0.378 0.227 0.227 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -, i WallFooting Project File: emu enclosure.ec6 ,1 1__ LfC#: KW.-060:11117;-Build:_20 •. 22°.7. f4-ENGdUESTTNC-. --"<C) E"NERCALC "fi~rc 1{}(1:j.:2022 DESCRIPTION: CMU Wall Enclosure Foundation Code References ------- Calculations per ACI 318-14, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combinations Used : ASCE 7-16 General Information Material Properties fc : Concrete 28 day strength fy : Rebar Yield Ee ; Concrete Elastic Modulus Concrete Density q, Values Flexure Shear Analysis Settings Min Steel % Bending Reinf. Min Allow % Temp Reinf. Min. Overturning Safety Factor Min. Sliding Safety Factor AutoCalc Footing Weight as DL Dimensions Fooling Width Wall Thickness Wall center offset from center of footing Applied Loads P : Column Load OB : OVerburden V-x M-zz Vx applied = = = = = = = = = = = 3.0ft 8.0in 14in D 2.50 ksi 60.0 ksi 3,122.0ksi 145.0pcf 0.90 0.750 0.00090 1.0: 1 1.0: 1 Yes Soil Design Values Allowable Soil Bearing Increase Bearing By Footing Weight Soil Passive Resistance (for Sliding) Soil/Concrete Friction Coeff. Increases based on footing Depth Reference Depth below Surface Allow. Pressure Increase per foot of depth when base footing is below Increases based on footing Width Allow. Pressure Increase per foot of width when footing is wider than Adjusted Allowable Bearing Pressure Reinforcing Footing Thickness 18.0in Bars along X-X Axis = = = = Rebar Centerline to Edge of Concrete .. Bar spacing = at Bottom of footing = 4.0in Reinforcing Bar Size •. Lr L s w E 0.3960 0.1060 0.1030 0.3180 0.3090 in above top of footing 2.0ksf No 200.0 pcf 0.30 2.0ft ks! ft ks! ft 2.0 ks! H k 18.00 # 5 ks! k k-ft ' ; _wa!I Footing LIC#: KW-06017177, Build:20.22.7.14 -ENGOtJE-ST INC. DESCRIPTION: CMU Wall Enclosure Foundation DESIGN SUMMARY Factor of Safety Item PASS PASS PASS 2.054 7.819 n/a Overturning -Z-Z Sliding -X-X Uplift Utilization Ratio Item PASS PASS 0.4658 0.0 PASS 0.06654 PASS n/a PASS 0.04427 Detailed Results Soil Bearing Rotation Axis & Load Combination ... , DOnly , +D+0.60W , +D-0.60W , +D+0.450W , +D-0.450W , +0.60D+0.60W , +0.60D-0.60W , +D+0.70E , +D-0.70E , +D+0.5250E , +D-0.5250E , +0.60D+0.70E , +0.60D-0.70E Overt.urning Stability Rotation Axis & Load Combination .. , DOniy , +D+0.60W , +D+0.450W , +0.60D+0.60W , +D+0.70E , +D+0.5250E , +0.60D+0.70E Sliding Stability Force Application Axis Load Combination ... ,DOnly , +0+0.60W , +D+0.450W , +0.60D+0.60W , +D+0.70E , +D+0.5250E , +0.60D+0.70E Footing Flexure Soil Bearing Z Flexure (+X) Z Flexure (-X) 1-way Shear (+X) 1-way Shear (-X) Applied 0.3245 k-ft 0.07210 k 0.0 k Applied 0.9317 ksf 0.0 k-ft 0.8513 k-ft a.a psi 3.320 psi Gross Allowable 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf 2.0 ksf Overturning Moment NOrie 0.2862 k-ft 0.2147 k-ft 0.2862 k-ft 0.3245 k-ft 0.2433 k-ft 0.3245 k-ft Sliding Force 0.0 k 0.06360 k 0.04770 k 0.06360 k 0.07210 k 0.05408 k 0.07210 k Xecc 5.288 in 8.563 in 2.012 in 7.744 in 2.831 in 10.747 in -0.1717 in 9.001 in 1.574 in 8.073 in 2.503 in 11.476in -0.9013 in Flexure Axis & Load Combination Mu --Which TensfOri·@-Bot. • As Req'd ,+1.40D ,+1.40D ,+1.20D , +1.20D , +1.20D+0.50W , +1.20D+0.50W , +1.20D-0.50W k-ft Side ? or Top ? 0.7668 0 0.6573 0 0.4516 0 0.8657 -X +X -X +X -X +X -X Bottom Bottom Bottom Bottom Bottom Bottom Bottom in112 0.1944 0.1944 0.1944 0.1944 0.1944 0.1944 0.1944 Capacity 0.6665 k-ft 0.5637 k 0.0 k Capacity 2.0 ksf 0.0 k-ft 12.794 k-ft 75.0 psi 75.0 psi Project File: emu enclosure.ec6 -! (CfE°NEFfCALCTNC 1983-2022' Design OK Governing Load Combination +0.60D+0.70E +0.60D+0.70E No Uplift Governing Load Combination +D+0.70E No Moment +0.8148D-E nla +1.40D AC:tuaT-~foif Beaririij ··stresS Actucil I Afiowable -X +X Ratio 0.04171 ksf 0.6573 ksf 0329 0.0 ksf 0.8885 ksf 0 444 0.2324 ksf 0.4666 ksf 0.233 0.0 ksf 0.8176 ksf 0.409 0.1847 ksf 0.5143 ksf 0 257 0.0 ksf 0.6935 ksf 0.347 0.2157 ksf 0.2037 ksf 0.108 0.0 ksf 0.9317 ksf 0466 0.2579 ksf 0.4411 ksf 0.221 0.0 ksf 0.8446 ksf 0422 0.2038 ksf 0.4952 ksf 0.248 0.0 ksf 0.7710 ksf 0.386 0.2412 ksf 0.1782 ksf 0.121 Units: k-ft Resisting Moment Stability Ratio Status 1:111 k:ft Infinity OK 1.111 k-ft 3.881 OK 1.111 k-ft 5.175 OK 0.6665 k-ft 2.329 OK 1.111 k-ft 3.423 OK 1.111 k-ft 4.565 OK 0.6665 k-ft 2.054 OK Resisting Force Sliding SafetyRatio Status 0.6896k No··slidlng OK 0.6896 k 10.842 OK 0.6896 k 14.456 OK 0.5637 k 8.864 OK 0.6896 k 9.564 OK 0.6896 k 12.752 OK 0.5637 k 7.819 OK --Gvrn. As Actual As Phi*Mn in112 in11.2 k-ft Status Min Temp% 0.2067 12.794 OK Min Temp% 0.2067 12.794 OK Min Temp% 0.2067 12.794 OK Min Temp% 0.2067 12.794 OK Min Temp% 0.2067 12.794 OK Min Temp% 0.2067 12.794 OK Min Temp% 0.2067 12.794 OK ! Wall Footing UC#: KW-060171n, Build:20.22.7.14 ---"ENGQUESTINc'. DESCRIPTION: CMU Wall Enclosure Foundation Footing Flexure Mu -WhlCh --Tension-@Bot. -As Re-q'd Flexure Axis & Load Combination k-ft Side? or Top? in"2 , +1.20D-0.50W 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.20D+W 0.2613 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.20D+W 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.20D-W 1.074 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.20D-W 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.90D+W 0.1122 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.90D+W 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.90D-W 0.9098 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.90D-W 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.285D+E 0.3158 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.285O+E 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.285D-E 1.109 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +1.285D-E 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.8148D+E 0.08178 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.8148D+E 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.8148D-E 0.8513 -X Bottom 0.1944 , +0.8148D-E 0 +X Bottom 0.1944 One Way Shear Load Combination ... Vu@-X Vu@+X Vu:Max +1400 :f.32psi -0 pST-332i,si +1.20D 2.846 psi Opsi 2.846 psi +1.20D+0.50W 2.846psi Opsi 2.846 psi +1.20D-0.50W 2.846 psi Opsi 2.846 psi +1.20D+W 2.846psi Opsi 2.846 psi +1.20D-W 2.846 psi Opsi 2.846 psi +0.90D+W 2.134psi Opsi 2.134 psi +0.90D-W 2.134psi Opsi 2.134 psi +1.285D+E 3.048 psi Opsi 3.048 psi +1.285D-E 3.048 psi Opsi 3.048 psi +0.8148D+E 1.932 psi Opsi 1.932 psi +0.8148D-E 1.932 psi Opsi 1.932 psi Gvrn. As in"2 Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Min Temp% Phi Vn 75 p-sr 75 psi 75psi 75 psi 75 psi 75 psi 75 psi 75 psi 75 psi 75 psi 75 psi 75 psi Project File: emu enclosure.ec6 _j (c) Ef.JERCALC INC 198S.:-2022 Actl.13I As -Phi*Mri in.11.2 k-ft Status 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK 0.2067 12.794 OK Units: k Vu/ Phi*Vn Status 0.04427 o-K 0.03795 OK 0.03795 OK 0.03795 OK 0.03795 OK 0.03795 OK 0.02846 OK 0.02846 OK 0.04064 OK 0.04064 OK 0.02577 OK 0.02577 OK I ------------- : General Footing , __ UC#: KW--66017177, Build'.20.22.7.14 DESCRIPTION: Slab Check Code References Calculations per ACI 316-14, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combinations Used: IBC 2015 General Information Material Properties fc : Concrete 28 day strength fy : Rebar Yield Ee : Concrete Elastic Modulus = Concrete Density q> Values Flexure Shear Analysis Settings Min Steel % Bending Reinf. Min Allow% Temp Reinf. Min. Overturning Safety Factor Min. Sliding Safety Factor Add Ftg VVI for Soil Pressure Use ftg wt for stability, moments & shears Add Pedestal \/v't for Soil Pressure Use Pedestal wt for stability, mom & shear Dimensions Width parallel to X-X Axis Length parallel to Z-Z Axis Footing Thickness Pedestal dimensions ... px : parallel to X-X Axis pz : parallel to Z-Z Axis Height = = Rebar Centerline to Edge of Concrete .. at Bottom of footing = Reinforcing Bars parallel toX-X Axis Number of Bars Reinforcing Bar Size Bars parallel to 2-Z Axis Number of Bars = Reinforcing Bar Size = Bandwidth Distribution Check (ACI 15.4.4.2) Direction Requiring Closer Separation 2.50 ksi 60.0 ksi 3,122.0 ksi 145.0 pct 0.90 0.750 = 0.00090 = 7.666 ft 8.083 ft 18.0 'tn in in in 4.0 in 6.0 1.0 1.0 Yes Yes No No # 5 # 6.0 5 Bars along X-X Axis # Bars required within zone # Bars required on each side of zone Applied Loads P : Column Load OB : Overburden = M-xx = M-u V-x V-z D 97.4% 2.6% 4.20 Lr : 1 : 1 Proj~~!i~: ~~u e~~~sure.ec6 j (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2022 Soil Design Values Allowable Soil Bearing = Soil Density Increase Bearing By Footing Weight Soil Passive Resistance (for Sliding) Soil/Concrete Friction Coeff. Increases based on footing Depth Footing base depth below soil surface Allow press. increase per foot of depth = when footing base is below Increases based on footing plan dimension Allowable pressure increase per foot of depth when max. length or width is greater than X L 5 z 7'tl" w -! ·'·-···---1 ~·· -·' ,_,.1_. = X E 4.80 1.60 2.0 ksf 100.0 pct No 200.0 pct 0.30 1.50 ft H ksf ft ksf ft k ksf k-ft k-ft k k ' I General Footing uaf: KW-06017177, Build:20.22.7.14 DESCRIPTION: Slab Check ENGQll~ST INC. P~j~ci-~~le:_~~ -~-~cl~:~re:~~----j (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2022 DESIGN SUMMARY Min. Ratio PASS 0.1726 PASS 8.505 PASS n/a PASS n/a PASS 4.381 PASS nla PASS 0.04903 PASS 0.04903 PASS 0.08143 PASS 0.05176 PASS 0.02021 PASS 0.02021 PASS 0.03395 PASS 0.02192 PASS 0.04888 Detailed Results Soil Bearing Rotation Axis & Load Combination ... X-X, D Only X-X, +D+0.70E X-X, +D+0.5250E X-X, +0.60D X-X, +0.60D+O. 70E Z-Z, DOnly Z-Z, +D+0.70E Z-Z, +D+0.5250E Z-Z, +0.60D Z-Z, +0.60D+0.70E Overturning Stability Rotation Axis & Load Combination ... )(:.x, D Onfi- X-X, +D+0.70E X-X, +D+0.5250E X-X, +0.60D X-X, +0.60D+0.70E Z-Z, D Only Z-Z, +D+0.70E Z-Z, +D+0.5250E Z-Z, +0.60D Z-Z, +0.60D+0.70E Sliding Stability Force Application Axis Load Combination ... X-l(b Only X-X, +D+0.70E X-X, +D+0.5250E X-X, +0.60D X-X, +0.60D+0.70E Z-Z. D Only Z-Z, +D+0.70E Z-Z, +D+0.5250E Z-Z, +0.60D Z-Z, +0.60D+0.70E Item Applied Soil Bearing 0.3451 ksf Overturning -X-X 5.040 k-ft Overturning -Z-Z 0.0 k-ft Sliding -X-X 0.0 k Sliding -Z-Z 1.120 k Uplift 0.0 k Z Flexure (+X) 0.6971 k-ft/ft Z Flexure (-X) 0.6971 k-ft/ft X Flexure (+Z) 1.219 k-ft/ft X Flexure (-Z) 0.7750 k-ft/ft 1-way Shear (+X) 1.516 psi 1-way Shear (-X) 1.516 psi 1-way Shear (+Z) 2.546 psi 1-way Shear (-Z) 1.644 psi 2-way Punching 7.332 psi .. Xecc Zecc Gross Allowable (in) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 nla 0.0 n/a 3.421 n/a 2.566 n/a 0.0 nla 5.702 0.0 n/a 0.0 n/a 0.0 n/a 0.0 n/a 0.0 n/a Overturning Moment Ncine 5.040 k-ft 3.780 k-ft None 5.040 k-ft None None None None None Sliding Force Cl.Ok 0.0 k 0.0 k 0.0 k 0.0 k 0.0k 1.120k 0.840 k 0.0 k 1.120 k Design OK Capacity Governing Load Combination 2.0 ks! +D+0.70E about X-X axis 42.866 k-ft +0.60D+0.70E 0.0 k-ft No Overturning 0.0 k No Sliding 4.907 k +0.60D+0.70E 0.0 k No Uplift 14.217 k-ft/ft +1.40D 14.217 k-ft/ft +1.40D 14.974 k-ft/ft +1.354D+E 14.974 k-ft/ft +1.400 75.0 psi +1.40D 75.0 psi +1.40D 75.0 psi +1.354D+E 75.0 psi +1.40D 150.0 psi +1.40D -Actual SOU e&aiil'IQ Stress-@'Location Actual/ Allow Bottom, -Z Top,+Z Left, -X Right, +X Ratio ---- 0.2853 0.2853 n/a nla 0 143 0.2255 0.3451 n/a n/a 0 173 0.2405 0.3301 n/a n/a 0 165 0.1712 0.1712 n/a n/a 0 086 0.1114 0.2309 n/a n/a 0 116 n/a n/a 0.2853 0.2853 0 143 nla n/a 0.2853 0.2853 0 143 n/a n/a 0.2853 0.2853 0.143 n/a n/a 0.1712 0.1712 0.086 n/a n/a 0.1712 0.1712 0 086 Resisting Moment Stability Ratio Status 0.01<-ft Tllfinity OK 71.443 k-ft 14.175 OK 71.443 k-ft 18.90 OK 0.0 k-ft Infinity OK 42.866 k-ft 8.505 OK 0.0 k-ft Infinity OK 0.0 k-ft Infinity OK 0.0 k-ft Infinity OK 0.0 k-ft Infinity OK 0.0 k-ft Infinity OK All units k Resisting Force Stability Ratio Status 7.122 k· NO-SlldiTlQ OK 7.122 k No Sliding OK 7.122 k No Sliding OK 5.001 k No Sliding OK 5.001 k No Sliding OK 7.028 k No Sliding OK 7.028 k 6.275 OK 7.028 k 8.367 OK 4.907 k No Sliding OK 4.907 k 4.381 OK 1 1 Gene_l'al Footing LIC#: kW-06017177,Build:20 . .22.7."14 DESCRIPTION: Slab Check Footing Flexure Flexure Axis & Load Combination X-X, +1.40D X-X, +1.40D X-X, +1.20D X-X, +1.20D X-X, +1.354D+E X-X, +1.354D+E X-X, +0.90D X-X, +0.90D X-X, +0.7456D+E X-X, +0.7456D+E Z-Z, +1.40D Z-Z, +1.40D Z-Z, +1.20D Z-Z, +1.20D Z-Z, +1.354D+E Z-Z, +1.354D+E Z-2, +0.90D Z-2, +0.90D Z-Z, +0.7456D+E Z-2, +0.7456D+E One Way Shear Mu Side k-ft 0.7750 +Z 0.7750 -Z 0.6643 +Z 0.6643 -Z 1.219 +Z 0.2802 .:z. 0.4982 +Z 0.4982 -Z 0.8823 +Z 0.05683 -Z 0.6971 -X 0.6971 +X 0.5975 -X 0.5975 +X 0.6744 -X 0.6744 +X 0.4481 -X 0.4481 +X 0.3712 -X 0.3712 +X ENGQL.iESt INC. Tension As Req'd Gvrn. As Surface in"2 jnA2 Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Top 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Bottom 0.1944 AsMin Project File: emu encJosure.ec6 I ----• -(<:) ENf:RCALC INC-198:'i=2022 • Actual As Phi•Mn Status in"2 k-ft 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 14.974 OK 0.2426 16.066 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK 0.2301 14.217 OK Load Combination ... +1.40D Vu@-X Vu@+X Vu@ ..Z Vu@+Z Vu:Max PhiVn Vu/ Phi.-Yn Status +1.20D +1.354D+E +0.90D +0.7456D+E Two-Way "Punching" Shear Load Combination ... +1.40D +1.20D +1.354O+E +0.90D +0.7456D+E 1.52 psi 1.Jopsi 1.47 psi 0.97pSi 0.81 psi 1.52 psi 1.64 psi 1.30psi 1.41 psi 1.47 psi 0.63 psi 0.97psi 1.06 psi 0.81 psi 0.08 psi Vu Phi*Vn 7.33 psi 150.00psi 6.29 psi 150.00psi 7.09 ps·1 150.00psi 4.71 psi 150.00psi 3.91 psi 150.00psi 1.64 psi 1.64 psi 75.00psi 0.02 OK 1.41 psi 1.41psi 75.00 psi 0.02 OK 2.55 psi 2.55 psi 75.00 psi 0.03 OK 1.06 psi 1.06 psi 75.00 psi O.o1 OK 1.83 psi 1.83 psi 75.00 psi 0.02 OK All units k Vu/ Phi*Vn Status 0.04888 OK 0.0419 OK 0.04729 OK 0.03142 OK 0.02603 OK 7119/22, 5:32 PM ATC Hazards by Location l\TC Hazards by Location Search Information ........ '-('- Addl9SS: 2512 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92010, USA ~ne~if~fnd Temecula 0 135 ft Borreg, Spr,i,ng: Coordinates: Elevation: Tlmestamp: Hazard Type: ASCE 7-16 MRI 10-Year MRI 25-Year MRI 50-Year MRI 100-Year Risk Category I Risk Category II Risk Category Ill Risk Category IV 33.157417, -117.3068899 135 fl 2022-07-19T21 :31 :30.2222 Wind 67 mph 72 mph 77 mph 82 mph 89 mph 96 mph 102 mph 107 mph ASCE 7-10 MRI 10-Year MRI 25-Year MRI 50-Year MRI 100-Year Risk Category I Risk Category 11 Risk Category 111-IV Habitat.. Carll 0 Cleveland Anza B National Forest Des State Go gle ~~n ni1>nn • Map data @2022 Google, INEGI Report a map error ASCE7-05 72 mph ASCE 7-05 Wind Speed 85 mph 79 mph 85 mph 91 mph 100 mph 110 mph 115 mph The results indicated here DO NOT reflect any state or local amendments to the values or any delineation Jines made during the building code adoption process. Users should confirm any output obtained from this tool with the local Authority Having Jurisdiction before proceeding with design. Disclaimer Hazard loads are interpolated from data provided in ASCE 7 and rounded up to the nearest whole integer. Per ASCE 7, islands and coastal araas outside the last contour should use the last wind speed contour of the coastal area -in some cases, this website will extrapolate past the last wind speed contour and therefore, provide a wind speed that is slightly higher. NOTE: For queries near wind-borne debris region boundaries, the resulting determination is sensitive to rounding which may affect whether or not it is considered to be within a wind-borne debris region. Mountainous terrain, gorges, ocean promontories, and special wind regions shall be examined for unusual wind conditions. While the information presented on this website is believed to be correct, ATC and its sponsors and contributors assume no responsibility or liability for its accuracy. The material presented in the report should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by engineers or other licensed professionals. ATC does not intend that the use of this information replace the sound judgment of such competent professionals, having experience and knowledge in the field of practice, nor to substitute for the standard of care required of such professionals in interpreting and applying the results of the report provided by this website. Users of the information from this website assume all liability arising from such use. Use of the output of this WAhsite does not imnlv AnnrnvAI hv thA novArninn huilrlinn mdA borliA!=!. rAsnnnsihle for hui\rlino mdR AnomvAI Rnd intAmmt::1tion for thA https://hazards.atcouncll.orgl#/wind?lat=33.157 417&Ing=-117 .3068899&address=2512 Tamarack Ave%2C CaMsbad%2C CA 92010%2C USA 112 7/19/22, 5:33 PM ATC Hazards by Location L\TC Hazards by Location Search Information Address: Coordinates: Elevation: Tlmastamp: Hazard Type: Reference Document: Risk Category: Site Class: 2512 Tamarack Ave Carlsbad CA 92010 USA ina Island ' ' ' sent1al 33.157417, -117.3068899 135 fl 2022-07-19T21 :33:15.5142 Seismic ASCE7-16 II D-default Habitat. Go gle Basic Parameters Name Value Ss 0.983 s, 0.36 SMs 1.18 SM1 * null Sos 0.787 So1 * null • See Section 11 .4.8 Description MCER ground motion (period=0.2s) MCER ground motion (period=1.0s) Site-modified spectral acceleration value Site-modified spectral acceleration value Numeric seismic design value at 0.2s SA Numeric seismic design value at 1.0s SA •Additional Information Name Value Description soc * null Seismic design category Fa 1.2 Site amplification factor at 0.2s Fv • null Site amplification factor at 1.0s CRs 0.9 Coefficient of risk (0.2s) CR1 0.911 Coefficient of risk (1.0s) PGA 0.429 MCEG peak ground acceleration FPGA 1.2 Site amplification factor at PGA PG~ 0.515 Site modified peak ground acceleration Temecula 0 Borreg1 Spri_ng, 135 ft Carll 0 Cleveland Anza-B National Forest Des State S::m niPnn Map data ©2022 Google, !NEG! Report a map error https://hazards.atcouncil.org/#lseismic?lat=33.157417&Ing=-1 t 7.3068899&address=2512 Tamarack Ave%2C Carlsbad%2C CA 92010%2C USA 1/2 7/19/22, 5:33 PM TL 8 SsRT 0.983 SsUH 1.093 SsD 1.5 S1RT 0.36 S1UH 0.395 S1D 0.6 PGAd 0.5 * See Section 11.4.8 ATC Hazards by Location Long-period transition period (s) Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion (0.2s) Factored uniform-hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) Factored deterministic acceleration value (0.2s) Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion (1.0s) Factored uniform-hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) Factored deterministic acceleration value (1.0s) Factored deterministic acceleration value (PGA) The results indicated here DO NOT reflect any state or local amendments to the values or any delineation lines made during the building code adoption process. Users should confirm any output obtained from this tool with the local Authority Having Jurisdiction before proceeding with design. Disclaimer Hazard loads are provided by the U.S. Geological Survey Seismic Design Web Services. While the information presented on this website is believed to be correct, ATC and its sponsors and contributors assume no responsibility or liability for its accuracy. The material presented in the report should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by engineers or other licensed professionals. ATC does not intend that the use of this information replace the sound judgment of such competent professionals, having experience and knowledge in the field of practice, nor to substitute for the standard of care required of such professionals in interpreting and applying the results of the report provided by this website. Users of the information from this website assume all liability arising from such use. Use of the output of this website does not imply approval by the governing building code bodies responsible for building code approval and interpretation for the building site described by latitude/longitude location in the report. https:llhazards.atcouncil.org/#lseismic?lat=33.157417 &lng=-117.3068899&address=2512 Tamarack Ave%2C Carlsbad%2C CA 92010%2C USA 212 Hazardous Materials Questionnaire County of San Diego, Department of Environmental Health and Quality PO Box 129261, San Diego, CA 92112-9261 Record ID #: Not In System Plan Check#: DEH2022-HHMBP-012182 Balance Due: $87.00 (858) 505-6700 (800) 253-9933 www.sdcdehq.org Business Name AT&T Mobility Business Contact Sylvia Tello Telephone# Plan File# (858) 886-3122 Project Address 2512 Tamarack AVE City Carlsbad State CA Zip Code 92010 APN# 167-101-35-00 Applicant Brett Coffelt Applicant E-Mail Applicant Telephone# brett.coffe1t@coreoneconsultants.com (760) 886-3122 The following questions represent the faclllty's actlv es, NOT the specific project ascription. PART I' FIRE DEPARTMENT-HAZAl~.DOUS METERIALS PMSION· OCCUPANCV CLASSIFICATION: (Not required for projects within the City of San Diego.) Indicate by selecting the Item, whether your business will use, process, or store any of the following hazardous materlals. If any of the Items are selected, Applicant must contact the Fire Protection Agency with jurisdiction prior to plan submittal. Occupancy Rating: U Faclllty's Square Footage (including proposed project): 200 □ Explosive or Blasting Agents □ Organic Peroxides □ Water Reactlves liil Corrosives □ □ Compressed Gases Flammable/Combustible Liquids □ □ Oxidizers Pyrophorics □ Cryogenics D other Health Hazards □ Highly Toxic or Toxic Materials □ None of These □ Flammable Solids □ Unstable Reactlves □ Radioactlves PART H· SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH • HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PMSION (HMP)· If the answer to any of the questions ls yes, applicant must contact the County of San Diego Hazardous Materials Division, in person at 5500 Overland Ave., Suite 110, San Diego, CA 92123, or by phone at (858) 505-6700 prior to issuance of a building permit. FEES ARE REQUIRED. Project Completion Date: 8/31/2022 YES 1. .. 2. □ 3. □ 4. □ 5. □ 6. □ 7. □ 8. □ NO □ .. .. □ .. .. .. .. Is your business listed on the reverse side of this form? (check all that apply). WIii your business dispose of Hazardous Substances or Medical Waste in any amount? WIii your business store or handle Hazardous Substances In quantities equal to or greater than 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet? WIii your business handle carcinogens or reproductive toxins in any quantity? Will your business use an existing, or install an underground storage tank? Will your business store or handle Regulated Substances (CalARP)? Will your business use or install a Hazardous Waste Tank System (Title 22, Article 10)? WIii your business store petroleum In tanks or containers at your facility with a total storage capacity equal to or greater than 1,320 gallons? (California's Aboveground Petroleum Storage Act). □ □ □ CalARP Exempt CalARP Required CalARP Complete Review Data: PART m· SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT (APCD)· If the answer to Question #1 is 'Yes' and the answer to Question #2 is 'No', the applicant must contact the APCD prior to the Issuance of a building or demolition permit. If any answer to Questions #3, #4, or#5 is 'Yes', the applicant must contact the APCD prior to the issuance of a building ordemolitlon permit. If the answer to Question #3 or #4 is 'Yes', the applicant may need to submit an asbestos notification form to the APCD at least 10 working days prior to commencing demolition or renovation (some residential projects may be exempt from the notification requirements). Contact the APCD at 10124 Old Grove Road, San Diego, CA 92131 or telephone (858) 586-2600 for more information. 1. 2. 3. 4. YES NO □ .. □ □ □ □ □ .. Will any existing building materials be disturbed as part of this project? (If the answer is 'Yes', an asbestos survey may be required.) Has a survey been performed to determine the presence of asbestos containing materials? Will the project involve handling or disturbance of any asbestos containing materials? 5. □ liil Will the project Involve the removal of any load supporting structural member? WIii the subject facility or construction activities Include operations or equipment that emit or are capable of emitting an air contaminant? (See the APCD factsheet at http://www. sdapcd.orglinfolfacts/permits.pdf (ANSWER ONLY IF QUESTION 5 IS 'YES') Will the subject facility be located within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school (K through 12)? Search the Califomla School Directory at http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/sd/ for public and private schools or contact the appropriate school disbict. 6. □ □ Briefly describe business activities: Briefly describe proposed project: Existing wlreless cell faclllty existing wlraless cell facility adding new antennas, replacing the dc6 to DC9 surge protectors and adding batteries (Total Gallon Electrolytes On Site 29.8 I declare under penalty of perjury that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the responses made herein are true and correct. Iii; Fees Acknowledged: Im Brett Coffelt 8/17/2022 Name of Owner or Authorized Agent Date FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FIRE DEPARTMENT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: BY: DATE: _________ _ EXEMPT OR NO FURTHER INFORMATION RELEASED FOR BUILDING PERMIT BUT NOT FOR RELEASED FOR OCCUPANCY REQUIRED OCCUPANCY COUNTY-HMD* APCD COUNTY-HMO APCD COUNTY-HMO APCD o,.:, qfVIEWEt'i M. Martinez SIONATUttf 9/8/2022 CATI! ... ~ *A stamp m this box only exempts businesses from completing or updating a Hazardous Materials Business Plan. Other permitting requirements may still apply. OEHQ_HMD_HMBP _Questionnaire v 2.0 (8/2021) Printed on: 91812022@ 11:02 AM