HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-05-01; Planning Commission; ; Normandy Beach Home (Lot 38) Item No. 1
Meeting Date: May 1, 2024
To: Planning Commission
Staff Contact: Kyle Van Leeuwen, Associate Planner, 442-339-2611,
kyle.vanleeuwen@carlsbadca.gov
Subject: Normandy Beach Home (Lot 38)
Location: 260 Normandy Lane/APN: 203-023-15-06 /District 1
Case Numbers: CDP 2023-0052 / V 2023-0009 (DEV2023-0135)
Applicant/Representative: Kirk Moeller, 760-814-8128, kirk@kmarchitectsinc.com
CEQA Determination: ☐Not a Project ☒ Exempt ☐ IS/ND or IS/MND ☐ EIR
☐Other:
Permit Type(s): ☐SDP ☐ CUP ☒ CDP ☐ TM/TPM ☐ GPA ☐ REZ ☐ LCPA
☒Other: Minor Variance
CEQA Status: ☐The environmental assessment IS on the Agenda for discussion.
☒A CEQA determination was already issued. That decision is final and
IS NOT on the Agenda
Commission Action: ☒Decision ☐ Recommendation to City Council ☐ Informational (No Action)
Recommended Actions
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution (Exhibit 1), APPROVING Coastal
Development Permit CDP 2023-0052 and Minor Variance V 2023-0009 based upon the findings and subject to
the conditions contained therein.
Existing Conditions & Project Description
Existing Setting
The 0.058-acre (2,511 square feet) project site is located
at 260 Normandy Lane on the north side of the street
between Garfield Street and Mountain View Drive as
shown on the attached location map (see Exhibit 2). The
lot is generally flat and is presently developed with a
portion of a one-story single-family home built in 1951.
The surrounding neighborhood is developed with a
mixture of older one- and two-story single-family and
multi-family residences and newer two- and three-story
single-family residences. No public beach access or
coastal resources are identified onsite, and no
improvements exist along the subject property’s frontage
with Normandy Lane.
Site Map
May 1, 2024 Item #1 1 of 44
0
Table “A” below includes the General Plan designations, zoning and current land uses of the subject site and
surrounding properties. Also refer to Exhibits 2 for a larger site map.
TABLE A – SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USE
Location General Plan Designation Zoning Designation Current Land Use
Site Residential, 8-15 dwelling
units per acre (R-15)
Multiple-Family Residential (R-3)
w/ Beach Area Overlay (BAO)
Single-family residence
(portion)
North Residential, 8-15 dwelling
units per acre (R-15)
Multiple-Family Residential (R-3)
w/ Beach Area Overlay (BAO)
Multi-family residences
South Residential, 8-15 dwelling
units per acre (R-15)
Multiple-Family Residential (R-3)
w/ Beach Area Overlay (BAO)
Single-family residences
East Residential, 8-15 dwelling
units per acre (R-15)
Multiple-Family Residential (R-3)
w/ Beach Area Overlay (BAO)
Single-family residences
West Residential, 8-15 dwelling
units per acre (R-15)
Multiple-Family Residential (R-3)
w/ Beach Area Overlay (BAO)
Single-family residences
General Plan Designation Zoning Designation
Proposed Project
Proposed Residential Construction: The project consists of demolishing an existing 1,384 square foot one-story
single-family residence, which occupies the subject lot and the adjacent lot to the east, and constructing a new
2,968-square-foot three-story single-family residence with an approximately 480 square foot attached two-car
garage.
The new single-family residence is oriented towards Normandy Lane and will include four bedrooms and four
and one-half bathrooms. The habitable living space of the primary residence includes 611 square feet within the
ground floor first story, 1,199 square feet within the second story, and 1,158 square feet within the third story
for a total of 2,968 square feet. The height of the residence is just under 30 feet (29 feet, 11.5 inches). The
project also includes a Minor Variance (V 2023-0009) requesting a front yard setback reduction of 10 feet (50%
reduction), from a required 20 feet to 10 feet, as well as a rear yard setback reduction of five feet (50%
reduction), from a required 10 feet to five feet. Architecturally, the new residence reflects a coastal
contemporary architectural style with extensive pitched-roof articulated elements covered by a dark gray
composition shingle roof material. Primary building materials consist of colored stucco, board and batten siding,
lap siding, stacked stone accents, and decorative wood columns. Decks are enclosed by decorative guard rails.
May 1, 2024 Item #1 2 of 44
Proposed Grading: The amount of soil the project is moving does not exceed 200 cubic yards – 25 cy of cut; 50 cy
of fill, of which 25 cy will be imported; and 45 cy of remedial grading. No fill material is being placed on an
existing slope steeper than five units horizontal to one vertical – the site is virtually flat. No cut or fill material
exceeds four feet in vertical depth at its deepest point, measured from the existing ground surface – maximum
cut height is 1.0 ft and maximum fill height is 2.0 ft.
Public Outreach & Comment
Public notice of the proposed Project was mailed on April 19, 2023, to property owners within 600 feet of the
subject property and all residents within 100 feet. A Notice of Determination of Exemption was posted on the
city’s website and an email was distributed to interested individuals on February 20, 2024, no comments were
received. The project is also subject to City Council Policy No. 84 (Development Project Public Involvement
Policy). As such, a notice of application was sent, by the applicant, to surrounding property owners and a notice
placed on the site informing neighbors of their application. These early notices were carried out in November of
2023. Additionally, while the Project is not subject to the enhanced stakeholder outreach in City Council Policy
No. 84 (Development Project Public Involvement Policy), on Jan. 13, 2024, the applicant did hold a community
outreach meeting with surrounding neighbors within a 600-foot radius of the project site.
No emails were received by staff with comments or concerns about the project. Some phone calls were received
by staff from those who were noticed, but only general project questions, such as proposed height and setback
and timing of the project were raised. The applicant reported similar questions being raised at their additional
outreach meeting, which had approximately 12 people in attendance.
Response to Public Comment & Project Issues
No comments of concern were received on the proposed project.
Project Analysis
General Plan Consistency
The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of R-15 Residential which allows for the
development of single-family residences at a density of 8-15 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The City of
Carlsbad General Plan includes several goals and policies that guide development and land use within the
city. A discussion of how the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan policies is summarized in
Exhibit 3.
Municipal Code Consistency
The City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, most notably Tile 21 Zoning Code, includes requirements and provisions
that guide development and land use within the city, consistent with the General Plan. The project is required to
comply with all applicable regulations and development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC)
including the Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) zone (CMC Chapter 21.16) and the Beach Area Overlay (BAO)
zone (CMC Chapter 21.82). Specific compliance with these relevant requirements is described in Exhibit 3.
Local Coastal Program Consistency
The project site is in the Coastal Zone and requires a Coastal Development Permit. The project complies with the
Local Coastal Program (Mello II Segment), including all goals and policies of the General Plan and all zoning code
standards, as referenced above. Additional information on the Coastal Development Permit and Local Coastal
Program findings is included in Exhibit 3.
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
For any residential development of less than seven (7) units, the inclusionary housing requirements may be
satisfied through the payment of an inclusionary housing in-lieu fee or inclusionary housing impact fee. The
proposal to construct a new single-family residential dwelling unit has been conditioned to pay the applicable
inclusionary housing fee prior to the issuance of a building permit.
May 1, 2024 Item #1 3 of 44
Discretionary Actions & Findings
In addition to the Coastal Development Permit required for development of a new single-family home within the
Coastal Zone, the following discretionary action is requested. Additional information on the Coastal Development
Permit and Local Coastal Program findings is included in Exhibit 3.
Minor Variance
Pursuant to CMC Chapter 21.50, a setback reduction that does not exceed 75 percent requires a minor variance.
Typically, minor variances are decided by the City Planner pursuant to CMC Section 21.50.040.A.1.a. However,
because this project also requires a Coastal Development Permit, the Planning Commission has the authority to
approve, conditionally approve or deny all concurrently processed development permits subject to CMC Section
21.54.040.C.2.
The applicant has requested a minor variance for a reduction of the front yard setback by 10 feet. The required
front yard setback in the R-3 zone is 20 feet per CMC Section 21.16.040. With the proposed minor variance, the
resulting front yard setback would be 10 feet, a 50% reduction. The applicant is also requesting a reduction of
five feet in the rear yard setback, a 50% reduction. The required rear yard setback in the R-3 zone is twice the
length of the required side yard setback (five feet) per CMC Section 21.16.060.A.1.b, or 10 feet in this case. With
the proposed minor variance, the resulting rear yard setback would be five feet. Additional information and
findings related to this are included in Exhibit 3.
Environmental Review
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines, the City Planner has
determined that the project qualified for an exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15303(a) – New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. A notice of intended decision regarding the environmental
determination was advertised on February 20, 2024, and posted on the city’s website. No comment letters or
appeal was received and consistent with Chapter 21.54 (Procedures, Hearings, Notices, and Fees) of the Zoning
Ordinance the City Planner’s written decision is final. Refer to Exhibit 3 for additional support and justification.
Conclusion
Considering the information above and in the referenced Exhibits, staff has found that the proposed Project is
consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan and Local Coastal Program, provisions of the Municipal
Code and Local Facility Management Zone. The Project will be required to comply with all applicable California
Building Standards Codes and engineering standards through the standard building permit and civil
improvement plan checking process. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the resolution
recommending approval of the proposed Project described in this staff report.
Exhibits
1.Planning Commission Resolution
2.Location Map
3.Project Analysis
4.Disclosure Form
5.Notice of CEQA Determination
6.List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
7.Reduced Exhibits
8.Exhibits “A” – “J” dated May 1, 2024
May 1, 2024 Item #1 4 of 44
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7510
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
AND MINOR VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR THE DEMOLITION OF A PORTION
OF AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A
NEW 2,968-SQUARE-FOOT, THREE-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
WITH AN ATTACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE AND A FRONT YARD SETBACK
REDUCTION OF TEN FEET AND A REAR YARD SETBACK REDUCTION OF
FIVE FEET, WITHIN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE CITY'S LOCAL
COASTAL PROGRAM LOCATED AT 260 NORMANDY LANE WITHIN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: NORMANDY BEACH HOME (LOT 38)
CASE NO: CDP 2023-0052/V 2023-0009 (DEV2023-0135)
WHEREAS, Rincon Homes, "Developer," has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property owned by 260 Normandy LLC, "Owner," described as
LOT 38 IN GRANVILLE PARK, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF N0.1782,
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO
COUNTY, FE. 21, 1924.
("the Property''); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal Development Permit as
shown on Exhibit(s) "A" -"J" dated May 1, 2024, attached hereto and on file in the Carlsbad Planning
Division, "COP 2023-0052/V 2023-0009 (DEV2023-0135) -NORMANDY BEACH HOME (LOT 38)" as
provided in Chapter 21.201.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Division studied the Coastal Development Permit and Minor Variance
application and performed the necessary investigations to determine if the project qualified for an
exemption from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, {CEQA,
Public Resources Code section 21000 et. seq.), and its implementing regulations (the State CEQA
Guidelines), Article 14 of the California Code of Regulations section 15000 et. seq. After consideration of
all evidence presented, and studies and investigations made by the city planner and on its behalf, the city
planner determined that the project was exempt from further environmental review pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines sections 15303(a) -New Construction or Conversion of Small, This exception is for the
construction of a single-family residence with an attached two-car garage. The project will not have a
significant effect on the environment and all of the requirements of CEQA have been met; and
WHEREAS, on Feb. 20, 2024, the city distributed a notice of intended decision to adopt the "New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures" exemption. The notice was circulated for a 10-day period,
which began on Feb. 20, 2024, and ended on March 1, 2024. The city did not receive any comment letters
on the CEQA findings and determination. The effective date and order of the city planner CEQA
determination was March 1, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on May 1, 2024, hold a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if
any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Coastal
Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad,
as follows:
A)
B)
Findings:
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission
APPROVES "CDP 2023-0052/V 2023-0009 (DEV2023-0135)-NORMANDY BEACH HOME
(LOT 38),'' based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Coastal Development Permit
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program and
all applicable policies in that the site is designated for residential development, and the project
proposes the demolition of an existing one-story single-family residence to construct a new
three-story single-family residence w ith an attached garage. The development is consistent
with the LCP Mello II R-15 land use designation. No agricultural activities, sensitive resources,
geological instability, flood hazard or coastal access opportunities exist onsite. Given that the
project site is located in a residential neighborhood where the majority of dwellings are a
mixture of older one-and two-story single-family and multi-family residences and newer two-
and three-story single-family residences, the construction of a new three-story single-family
residence will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-
way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the Coastal Zone.
2. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the
Coastal Act in that the property is not located adjacent to the coastal shore; therefore, it will
not interfere with the public's right to physical access or water-oriented recreational activities.
3. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone
(Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the city's Master
Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and
Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program (JRMP) to avoid increased urban runoff, pollutants,
and soil erosion. No steep slopes or native vegetation are located on the subject property and
the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion,
floods, or liquefaction.
M inor Variance
4. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such
property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning
classification in that the subject lot is considered substandard at 2,511 square feet, which is 67
percent smaller than the 7,500-square-foot minimum lot size for the R-3 zone. The lot was
legally created approximately 100 years ago (Feb. 21, 1924) and is one of t he smallest residential
lots within the subdivision and surrounding area. The strict application of the zoning ordinance
requiring residential buildings to be 20 feet from the front and 10 feet from the rear property
lines physically constrains or constricts development onsite from satisfying current
development standards. Additionally, the configuration of the legal, substandard lot is
considered shallow (50 feet) when a typical lot in the R-3 zone is approximately 125 feet in
depth, furthering the deprivation of future development. Furthermore, without approval of the
minor variance, the applicant could not achieve a similar building footprint and square footage
enjoyed by other properties located within the subdivision and surrounding neighborhood.
5. That the minor variance shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located
and is subject to any conditions necessary to assure compliance with this finding fh that the
surrounding neighborhood consists of substandard lot sizes and developed properties that
generally do not meet the current R-3 development standards. Most of the surrounding lots
have been developed in a way that does not meet at least one of the current required
development standards of t he R-3 zone. Deviations on other lots include front yard, rear yard,
and side yard setback reductions and reduced off-street covered parking requirements. Many
other properties in the neighborhood were originally built with reduced front, side, and rear
yard setbacks. Minor variances for setback reductions have been granted to other properties in
the same zone and vicinity. Therefore, the minor variance is not considered a grant of special
privilege. Overall, the proposed front yard setback reduction to 10 feet and rear yard setback
reduction to five feet is similar to other nearby properties within the neighborhood.
6. That the minor variance does not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly
authorized by the zone regulation governing the subject property in that the granting of a minor
variance to reduce the required front yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet and the rear yard
setback from 10 feet to five feet does not authorize a use which is not otherwise expressly
permitted by the zoning regulations. A one-family dwelling is allowed by right within the
Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) zone. Therefore, a deviation from the setback standards does
not authorize a use or activity which is not authorized by the zone.
7. That the minor variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the general plan and
any applicable specific or master plans in that the project consists of a new single-family home
with an attached two-car garage. The proposed use is expressly authorized by the Zoning
Ordinance and General Piao regulations governing the subject property. The granting of a minor
variance for front yard and rear yard setbacks to allow for the construction of a new home is
consistent with the general purpose and intent of the General Plan for the R-15 Residential Land
Use designation.
8. The minor variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the certified local coastal
program and does not reduce or in any manner adversely affect the requirements for protection
of coastal resources in that the project consists of the construction of a new 2,968-square-foot
single-family residence with an attached two-car car garage in an area designated for residential
development. The proposed three-story, single-family residence is compatible with the
surrounding development of a mixture of older one-and two-story single-family and multi-
family residences and newer two-and three-story single-family residences. The three-story
residence will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-
of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. No agricultural uses or
sensitive resources currently exist on this previously graded and developed site. The proposed
single-family residence is not located in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazard.
Given that the site does not have frontage along the coastline, no public opportunities for
coastal shoreline access or water-oriented recreational activities are available from the subject
site. Furthermore, the subject property is a previously developed parcel that does not include
steep slopes (equal to or greater than 25% gradient), native vegetation, nor is it located in an
area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction.
Therefore, the granting of such minor variance to construct a single-family residence will not
adversely affect the Local Coastal Program.
General
9. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with the
Elements of the city's General Plan, in that the General Plan Land Use designation for the
property is R-15 Residential, and uhder Land Use Element Policy 2-P.7, one single-family
dwelling is permitted to be constructed on a legal lot that existed as of October 28, 2004. The
subject lot was legally created on Feb. 21, 1924. Therefore, the existing single-family residence
is consistent with the Elements of the city's General Plan.
10. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 1 and all city public policies and ordinances. The project includes
elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all facilities and
improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire;
schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and
open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or
concurrent with need, Specifically,
a. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School District
that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities.
b. The Public Facility Fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected
prior to the issuance of building permit.
11. That the project is consistent with the city's Landscape Manual and Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 18.50).
12. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it would not have approved this Coastal
Development Permit and Minor Variance application to use the Property for completing and
implementing the project, except upon and subject to each and all of the conditions hereinafter
set, each and all of which shall run with the land and be binding upon the Developer and all
persons who use the Property for the use permitted hereby. For the purposes of the conditions,
the term "Developer" shall also include the project proponent, owner, permittee, applicant, and
any successor thereof in interest, as may be applicable. If the Developer fails to file a timely and
valid appeal of this Coastal Development Permit and Minor Variance within the applicable appeal
period, such inaction by the Developer shall be deemed to constitute all of the following on behalf
of the Developer:
a. Acceptance of the Coastal Development Permit and Minor Variance by the Developer; and
b. Agreement by the Developer to be bound by, to comply with, and to do all things required of
or by the Developer pursuant to all of the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Coastal
Development Permit and Minor Variance or other approval and the provisions of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code applicable to such permit.
13. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to
mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree
of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
General
NOTE: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of a building
permit.
1. Approval is granted for CDP 2023-0052/V 2023-0009 -NORMANDY BEACH HOME (LOT 38) as
shown on Exhibits "A" -"J", dated May 1, 2024, on file in the Planning Division and incorporated
herein by reference. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in
these conditions.
2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
according to their terms, the city shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further
condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted;
record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained
by Developer or a successor in interest by the city's approval of this Coastal Development Permit
and Minor Variance.
3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and
modifications to the Coastal Development Permit and Minor Variance documents, as necessary
to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed
development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
4. Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
5. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any
fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged,
this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such
condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council
determines that the project without the condition complies with all rectuirements of law.
6. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and
costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the city arising, directly or indirectly,
from (a) city's approval and issuance of this Coastal Development Permit and Minor Variance,
(b) city's approval or issL1ance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or nondiscretionary,
in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and
operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities
arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or
emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues
even if the city's approval is not validated.
7. Prior to submittal of the building plans, developer shall submit to the City Planner, a 24" x 36"
copy of the Site Plan, conceptual grading plan, and preliminary utility plan reflecting the
conditions approved by the final decision-making body. The copy shall be submitted to the City
Planner, reviewed and, if found acceptable, signed by the city's project planner and project
engineer. If no changes were required, the approved exhibits shall fulfill this condition.
8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Building
Division from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to
provide school facilities.
9. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part
of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to
the issuance of building permits.
10. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within
24 months from the date of project approval.
11. Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, Developer shall submit to the city a Notice of
Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed
in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all
interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a(n) Coastal
Development Permit and Minor Variance by the subject Resolution on the property. Said Notice
of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project
details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for
inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute and record an
amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause
by the Developer or successor in interest.
12. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and
sewer services to the project provides written certification to the city that adequate water service
and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the
building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until
the time of occupancy.
13. At issuance of building permit , the Developer shall pay to the city an inclusionary housing impact
fee in the amount in effect at the time, as established by City Council Resolution from time to
time.
14. Consistent with requirements of CMC 21.44.060, Table E, paving in the front yard shall not
exceed 30% of the front yard area, or 24 feet in width, whichever is greater. The remaining area
shall be landscaped.
Engineering Conditions
NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of
this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a building permit.
General
15. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within
this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer for the proposed
haul route.
16. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for
the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that
adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit issuance and will continue
to be available until time of occupancy.
17. Developer shall include rain gutters on the building plans subject to the city engineer's review and
approval. Developer shall install rain gutters in accordance with said plans.
Fees/ Agreements
18. Developer shall cause property owner to enter into a Neighborhood Improvement Agreement
with the city on a city standard form for the future public improvement of Normandy Lane along
the property frontage for a half street width of ten feet. Public improvement s shall include but
are not limited to paving, base, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, grading, clearing and grubbing,
undergrounding or relocation of utilities, sewer, water, fire hydrants, streetlights, pedestrian
ramps.
Storm Water Quality
19. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practfces include but are
not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during
construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices,
maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the
discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the
maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above
requirements.
20. Developer shall complete and submit to the city engineer a Determination of Project's SWPPP
Tier Level and Construction Threat Level Form pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Developer
shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and appropriate Tier
level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee
schedule.
21. Developer shall complete the City of Carlsbad Standard Stormwater Requirement Checklist Form.
Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans, grading plans, and building plans
incorporate applicable best management practices (BMPs). These BMPs include site design,
source control and Low Impact Design (LID) measures ihcluding, but not limited to, minimizing
the use of impervious area (paving), routing run-off from impervious area to pervious/landscape
areas, preventing illicit discharges into the storm drain and adding storm drain stenciling or
signage all to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
Dedications/Improvements
22. Prior to any work in city right-of-way or public easements, Developer shall apply for and obtain a
right-of-way permit to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
23. Developer shall prepare and process public improvement plans and, prior to city engineer
approval of said plans, shall execute a city standard Development Improvement Agreement to
install and shall post security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 18.40.040 for public
improvements shown on the site plan. Said improvements shall be installed to city standards to
the satisfaction of the city engineer. These improvements include, but are not limited to:
A. Install potable water service and meter in Normandy Lane.
B. Install sewer lateral in Normandy Lane.
C. AC paving.
D. Trench resurfacing.
E. Grind and overlay.
Additional public improvements required in other conditions of this resolution are hereby
included in the above list by reference. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check
and inspection fees in accordance with the fee schedule. Improvements listed above shall be
constructed within 36 months of approval of the subdivision or development improvement
agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
24. Developer is responsible to ensure utility transformers or raised water backflow preventers that
serve this development are located outside the right-of-way as shown on the site plan and to the
satisfaction of the city engineer. These facilities shall be constructed within the property.
Utilities
25. Developer shall install potable water and/or recycled water services and meters at locations
approved by the district engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public
improvement plans.
26. The developer shall agree to install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the city
engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans.
Code Reminders
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the
following:
27. Developer shall pay planned local area drainage fees in accordance with Section 15.08.020 of the
City of Carlsbad Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
28. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section
13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor
area contained in the staff report and shown on the site plan are for planning purposes only.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
An appeal of this decision to the City Council must be flied with the City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village
Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Planning Commission's
decision. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.54, section 21.54.150, the appeal must be in
writing and state the reason(s) for the appeal. The City Council must make a determination on t he appeal
prior to any judicial review.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
The project site is within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. This Coastal
Development Permit (CDP) shall not become effective until ten (10) working days have elapsed, without
a valid appeal being filed with the Coastal Commission, following the Coastal Commission's receipt of the
city's notice of the CDP issuance ("Notice of Final Action"). The filing of a valid appeal with the Coastal
Commission within such time limit shall stay the effective date of this CDP until such time as a final decision
on the appeal is reached by the Coastal Commission.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest
them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the
protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent
legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT
APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other
similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute
of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad,
California, held on May 1, 2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Kamenjarin, Hubinger, Meenes, Merz, Sabellico.
NAYES: Lafferty.
ABSENT: Stine.
ABSTAIN: None.
i.JiLLIAM K~MENJARIN, Chair
CARLSBAD PLAN~ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
ERIC LARDY
City Planner
O C E A N S T
NORM
A
N
D
Y
L
N
PACIF
I
C
A
V
M
O
U
N
TAI
N
VIEW
DR
GARFIELDST
P R I V ATEDY
G
A
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
T
E
L
C
AMINO
R
E
A
L
LA COSTA AV
A L G A R D
C
A
R
L
S
B
A
D
B
L
CDP 2023-0052/V 2023-0009
NORMANDY BEACH HOME (LOT 38)
SITE MAP
J
SITE
Map generated on: 2/20/2024
Exhibit 2
May 1, 2024 Item #1 15 of 44
PROJECT ANALYSIS Exhibit 3
(GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, AND OTHER REGULATIONS)
NORMANDY BEACH HOME (LOT 38)
PROJECT ANALYSIS
The project is subject to the following regulations:
A.General Plan (Residential 15) Land Use Designation
B.Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.16) & Beach Area Overlay (BAO) Zone (CMC
Chapter 21.82)
C.Coastal Development Procedures for the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (CMC
Chapter 21.201) and Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC Chapter 21.203)
D.Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85)
E.Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90)
F.Variance (CMC Chapter 21.50)
G.California Environmental Quality Act Exemption (Environmental Statement)
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project’s consistency
with the applicable regulations and policies. The project’s compliance with each of the above regulations
is discussed in detail within the sections below.
A.General Plan R-15 Residential Land Use Designation
The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of R-15 Residential which allows for the
development of single-family residences at a density of 8-15 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The project
proposes the demolition of an existing 1,384 square foot single-family residence, which occupies the
subject lot and the adjacent lot to the east, and the construction of one single-family residence. Per
Land Use Element Policy 2-P.7, one single-family dwelling is permitted to be constructed on a legal lot
that existed as of October 28, 2004. The subject lot was legally created on February 21, 1924. Therefore,
the existing single-family residence is consistent with the Elements of the city’s General Plan.
This housing development implements the general plan that as a whole enables the city to achieve its
goal of contributing housing with diversity of types, prices, tenures, densities, and locations, and in
sufficient quantity to meet the demand of anticipated city and regional growth and to meet or exceed
the city’s established Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The project site is not identified in the
city’s General Plan Housing Element Residential Sites Inventory for the 6th RHNA Planning Cycle.
B.Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.16) & Beach Area Overlay (BAO) Zone (CMC
Chapter 21.82)
The project is required to comply with all applicable regulations and development standards of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) including the Multiple-Family Residential (R-3) zone (CMC Chapter 21.16)
and the Beach Area Overlay (BAO) zone (CMC Chapter 21.82). Table “A” below shows how the project
complies with the applicable requirements of the R-3 zone.
May 1, 2024 Item #1 16 of 44
TABLE A – R-3 ZONE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANDARD REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED
Front Yard Setback 20 feet minimum 10 feet*
Side Yard Setback 5 feet minimum 5 feet
Rear Yard Setback 10 feet minimum 5 feet*
Building Height 35 feet maximum 30 feet
Lot Coverage 60 percent 59.9 percent
Parking Two-car garage Two-car garage
*Subject to approval of Minor Variance V 2023-0009
The project is required to comply with the development standards of the Beach Area Overlay (BAO) zone.
The proposed project meets all applicable requirements of the BAO zone as demonstrated in Table B
below. CMC Section 21.82.040 requires that a site development plan be approved in order for any building
permits or other entitlements to be issued for any use in the BAO zone. However, a site development plan
is not required for the construction, reconstruction, alteration, or enlargement of a single-family
residential dwelling on a residentially zoned lot.
TABLE B – BAO ZONE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
STANDARD REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED
Building Height 30 feet for roof pitch ≥3:12 or
24 feet for roof pitch <3:12
30 feet (w/ ≥3:12 pitched roof)
Visitor Parking 0.30 space per unit (1 space rounded up) 1 visitor parking space (two
uncovered parking spaces are
provided)
May 1, 2024 Item #1 17 of 44
C.Conformance with the Coastal Development Regulations for the Mello II Segment of the Local
Coastal Program (CMC Chapter 21.201) and the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC
Chapter 21.203)
The project site is located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and is not in the appeal
jurisdiction. The site is also located within and subject to the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone.
The project’s compliance with each of these programs and ordinances is discussed below:
1.Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies.
The project is located in the Mello II Local Coastal Program Segment.
The subject site has an LCP Land Use Plan designation of R-15 Residential, which allows for a density of 8
to 15 du/acre and 11 du/acre at the Growth Management Control Point (GMCP). The project density of
17.34 du/ac is consistent with the R-15 General Plan Land Use designation as discussed in Section A above
(one single-family dwelling is permitted to be constructed on a legal lot that existed as of October 28,
2004). Therefore, the project is consistent with the Mello II Segment of the LCP. The size of the 0.058-acre
(2,511 square feet) site allows for one dwelling unit.
The project consists of the construction of a new 2,968-square-foot single-family residence with an
attached two-car car garage in an area designated for residential development. The proposed three-story,
single-family residence is compatible with the surrounding development of older one- and two-story
single-family and multi-family residences and newer two- and three- story single-family residences. The
three-story residence will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or the public right-
of-way, nor otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. No agricultural uses or sensitive
resources currently exist on this previously graded and fully developed site. The proposed single-family
residence is not located in an area of known geologic instability or flood hazard. Given that the site does
not have frontage along the coastline, no public opportunities for coastal shoreline access or water-
oriented recreational activities are available from the subject site.
2.Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone
The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (CMC
Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the city’s Master Drainage Plan,
Grading Ordinance, Storm Water Ordinance, BMP Design Manual and Jurisdictional Runoff Management
Program (JRMP) to avoid increased urban run-off, pollutants and soil erosion. The subject property does
not include steep slopes (equal to or greater than 25% gradient) nor native vegetation. In addition, the
site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or
liquefaction.
D.Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.85)
Pursuant to CMC Chapter 21.85, Section 21.85.180, and Community Development Department
Administrative Policies, the Inclusionary Housing Requirement may be met by the payment of an
Inclusionary Housing Impact Fee for single-family residential projects of any size, for which all
discretionary approvals, except Site Development Plans, were granted on or before the date of the original
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (May 1993). A Site Development Plan or Coastal Development Permit or
similar permit may be processed after the effective date of the original Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
(May 1993) in order to allow the actual construction of a single-family home without triggering additional
inclusionary requirements other than payment of the Housing Impact Fee as long as the original
May 1, 2024 Item #1 18 of 44
subdivision or creation of the lot was approved prior to May 1993. The subject lot was legally created on
February 21, 1924, over 69 years prior to the date of the original Inclusionary Housing Ordinance in May
1993. The Inclusionary Housing Requirement for the project will be met by the payment of the
Inclusionary Housing Impact Fee prior to issuance of a building permit.
E.Growth Management (CMC Chapter 21.90)
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest quadrant of
the city. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted
performance standards, are summarized in Table “C” below.
TABLE C – GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE
City Administration 3.54 sq. ft. Yes
Library 1.89 sq. ft. Yes
Wastewater Treatment 1 EDU Yes
Parks .007 acre Yes
Drainage N/A (Developed Site) N/A
Circulation 10 ADT Yes
Fire Fire Station No. 1 Yes
Open Space N/A N/A
Schools Carlsbad (E = 0.01844 / M = 0.1056 / HS = 0.1441) Yes
Sewer Collection System 1 EDU Yes
Water 250 GPU Yes
F.Minor Variance (CMC Chapter 21.50)
Pursuant to CMC Chapter 21.50, a setback reduction that does not exceed 75 percent requires a minor
variance. Typically, minor variances are decided by the City Planner pursuant to CMC Section
21.50.040.A.1.a. However, because this project also requires a Coastal Development Permit, the Planning
Commission has the authority to approve, conditionally approve or deny all concurrently processed
development permits subject to CMC Section 21.54.040.C.2.
The applicant has requested a minor variance for a reduction of the front yard setback by 10 feet. The
required front yard setback in the R-3 zone is 20 feet per CMC Section 21.16.040. With the proposed minor
variance, the resulting front yard setback would be 10 feet, a 50% reduction. The applicant is also
requesting a reduction of five feet in the rear yard setback, a 50% reduction. The required rear yard
setback in the R-3 zone is twice the length of the required side yard setback (five feet) per CMC Section
21.16.060.A.1.b, or 10 feet in this case. With the proposed minor variance, the resulting rear yard setback
would be five feet. Pursuant to CMC 21.50.050 minor variances may only be granted if five findings can
be made. Each of the findings and the supporting analysis is described below.
1.That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such
property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning
classification.
Given the size (2,511 square feet or .058 acres) and the shape (roughly 50 feet wide by 50 feet deep)
of the project site, approval of a Minor Variance is warranted for relief from the strict application of
May 1, 2024 Item #1 19 of 44
the zoning ordinance provisions for required front yard and required rear yard setbacks. The
location of the project lot and the character of surrounding developed properties in the vicinity are
also unique and warrant support for the requested Minor Variance.
Size: The site is 2,511 square feet in size, or .058 acres, and was created as a legal lot nearly 100
years ago (Map No. 1782, filed February 21, 1924). There are no smaller lots among the 12 lots that
have frontage on Normandy Lane and is one of the smallest residential lots in all of Carlsbad.
The required minimum lot area in the R-3 Zone is 7,500 square feet (CMC 21.16.070). The required
minimum lot width in the R-3 Zone is 60 feet (CMC 21.16.080), which would lead to a 125-foot lot
depth in order to achieve the 7,500 square foot minimum lot area. The 20-foot front yard and 10-
foot rear yard setback standards are based on the premise of a minimum 7,500 square foot lot, with
a minimum 60-foot lot width.
At 2,511 square feet, the project lot is substantially smaller than the minimum required 7,500
square foot lot size (67% smaller). Applying the standard required front yard and rear yard setback
standards to this lot would be quite onerous. The proposed building square footage, at 2,968
square feet is below the maximum lot coverage allowed in the R-3 Zone (60% is allowed (CMC
21.16.080); project lot coverage is 59.9%) and meets all other required R-3 development standards,
including providing for a two-car garage meeting the minimum interior garage dimension standards
of 20 feet by 20 feet clear (CMC 21.44.020.A. – Table A)
Shape: In addition to being small in overall square footage, the project lot is relatively square –
roughly 50 feet wide by 50 feet deep. At 50 feet wide, it falls 10 feet short of the required R-3
minimum 60-foot lot width. At 50 feet deep, it is impossible to meet the required minimum interior
dimension standards for a two-car garage without relief from either the front or rear yard setback
standards – 20’ by 20’ interior, with a 20’ front yard setback and a 10’ rear yard setback leaves no
room for garage wall framing.
Location and Surrounding Properties: The project lot (Lot 38) is located at 260 Normandy Lane on
the north side of the road. It is located in a neighborhood consisting entirely of substandard lot
sizes and developed properties that generally do not meet the current R-3 development standards.
The project lot was created as a legal lot nearly 100 years ago (Map No. 1782, filed February 21,
1924). There are no smaller lots among the 12 substandard sized lots that have frontage on
Normandy Lane and is one of the smallest residential lots in all of Carlsbad.
The site is currently developed with a portion of a 1,384 square foot single story, single-family home
(built in 1951) and a detached habitable accessory structure (formerly a one-car garage – converted
in 1980 and included in the 1,384 square feet). The existing home has a substandard front yard
setback of significantly less than 20 feet and the detached habitable accessory structure has a
substandard rear yard and side yard setback.
All of the other 11 substandard sized properties that have frontage on Normandy Lane have been
previously developed and were built such that they do not meet at least one of the current required
development standards of the R-3 Zone – either through the approval of a variance or are
considered legal non-conforming properties. Past deviations include front yard, rear yard, and side
yard setback reductions and lack of a required two-car garage. 10 of the 11 other properties with
May 1, 2024 Item #1 20 of 44
frontage on Normandy Lane are set back from Normandy Lane less than 20 feet – with a minimum
setback of 5.9 feet.
The last two homes to be developed on Normandy Lane, 221/223 Normandy Lane (Schiff Residence,
AV 2017-0001, completed in 2020) and 250/252 Normandy Lane (Rancho Paradiso, AV 16-03,
completed in 2019) were granted approval of a Minor Variance for reduced front yard (to 10 foot
minimum) and rear yard (to 5 foot minimum) setbacks.
Conclusion: Strict application of the R-3 Zone development standards to the project site would
deprive the project site of development privileges enjoyed by all other property in the vicinity and
under the identical R-3 zoning classification.
2. That the minor variance shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located
and is subject to any conditions necessary to assure compliance with this finding.
The project site (Lot 38) is located in a neighborhood consisting entirely of substandard lot sizes and
developed properties that generally do not meet the current R-3 development standards. The
project lot was created as a legal lot nearly 100 years ago (Map No. 1782, filed February 21, 1924).
There are no smaller lots among the 12 substandard sized lots that have frontage on Normandy
Lane and is one of the smallest residential lots in all of Carlsbad. The requested approval of a Minor
Variance for relief from the strict application of the zoning ordinance provisions for required front
yard and required rear yard setbacks is consistent with the development footprint realized by
surrounding properties in the vicinity and in the same R-3 Zone.
All of the other 11 substandard sized properties that have frontage on Normandy Lane have been
previously developed and were built such that they do not meet at least one of the current required
development standards of the R-3 Zone – either through the approval of a variance or are
considered legal non-conforming properties. Past deviations include front yard, rear yard, and side
yard setback reductions and lack of a required two-car garage. 10 of the 11 other properties with
frontage on Normandy Lane are set back from Normandy Lane less than 20 feet – with a minimum
setback of 5.9 feet.
The last two homes to be developed on Normandy Lane, 221/223 Normandy Lane (Schiff Residence,
AV 2017-0001, completed in 2020) and 250/252 Normandy Lane (Rancho Paradiso, AV 16-03,
completed in 2019) were granted approval of a Minor Variance for reduced front yard (to 10 foot
minimum) and rear yard (to 5 foot minimum) setbacks.
Conclusion: The granting of a Minor Variance does not constitute a grant of special privileges
inconsistent with the limitations upon other surrounding properties in the vicinity and in the same
R-3 Zone in which the subject property is located.
3. That the minor variance does not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly
authorized by the zone regulation governing the subject property.
The project consists of a new 2,968 square foot single family home, with a two-car garage. The
proposed use is expressly authorized by the Carlsbad Zoning regulations governing the subject
May 1, 2024 Item #1 21 of 44
property. The granting of a Minor Variance for front yard and rear yard setbacks does not allow for
or authorize a use not otherwise expressly permitted.
Conclusion: The granting of the Minor Variance does not authorize any use or activity not otherwise
expressly authorized by the Carlsbad Zoning regulations governing the subject property.
4. That the minor variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the General Plan and
any applicable specific or master plans.
The project consists of a new 2,968 square foot single family home, with a two-car garage. The
General Plan land use designation for the project site is R-15, the project lot was created as a legal
lot nearly 100 years ago (Map No. 1782, filed February 21, 1924), and the development of a new
single-family home on a legal lot residentially designated is consistent with the General Plan (one
single-family dwelling is permitted to be constructed on a legal lot that existed as of October 28,
2004). There are no Specific or Master Plans that apply to the project site.
Conclusion: The granting of a Minor Variance is entirely consistent with the general purpose and
intent of the General Plan.
5. The minor variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the certified local coastal
program and does not reduce or in any manner adversely affect the requirements for protection of
coastal resources.
The project site is located within the coastal zone and the Mello II Segment of the certified Local
Coastal Program. The project site is completely devoid of coastal resources. It is completely
developed, relatively flat, contains no habitat, is not designated for or has never been used for
agriculture, no public access exists across the property, and no public views exist or are impacted by
the proposed project. The proposed project meets all parking, height, and lot coverage
requirements. The proposed project, including the Minor Variance request, poses no conflict with
any Mello II LCP LUP policy.
Conclusion: The granting of a Minor Variance is consistent with and implements the Mello II
Segment LCP LUP requirements and does not in any manner adversely affect the protection of any
coastal resources. The granting of a minor variance is consistent with and implements the
requirements of the Local Coastal Program. The minor variance will not have an adverse effect on
coastal resources as discussed above in Section “C” and will have no impacts on sensitive
environmental resources. Therefore, the granting of such minor variance is consistent with the Local
Coastal Program.
G. Environmental Statement (California Environmental Quality Act)
The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), and its implementing regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”)
adopted by the Secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency, list classes of projects that have
been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and as a result are exempt from
further environmental review under CEQA. City staff completed a review of the project and potential
environmental impacts associated with the project pursuant to CEQA and concluded that the project
qualified for an exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15303(a) – New Construction or
Conversion of Small Structures. CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 is a Class 3 exemption for new
construction or conversion of small structures. Exempted is the construction of one-single residence in a
May 1, 2024 Item #1 22 of 44
residential zone, including accessory (appurtenant) structures such as garages, carports, patios, swimming
pools and fences. The proposed project and site meet the criteria of the Section 15303 Class 3 New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures exemption.
Because a portion of a structure that is associated with the development request is more than 45 years
old and proposed for demolition, the City Planner requested additional information and research to
determine whether the property qualifies as a “historical resource” for the purposes of CEQA and/or to
aid in the evaluation of the effects a proposed project may have on a historical resource. Specifically, a
Cultural Resources Report was prepared by a qualified professional to determine if the property meets
the terms and definitions applied to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5. The property does not meet the
criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources; therefore, the property cannot be
deemed significant pursuant to the criteria in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.
A notice of intended decision regarding the environmental determination was advertised on February 20,
2024 and posted on the city’s website. The notice included a general description of the project, the
proposed environmental findings, and a general explanation of the matter to be considered. The findings
and determination contained in that notice was declared as final on the date of the noticed decision,
unless appealed as provided by the procedures commencing in Chapter 21.54 (Procedures, Hearings,
Notices, and Fees) of the Zoning Ordinance.
During the 10-day public review period, the city received no comment letters from the public regarding
the prospective environmental determination. Since no appeal was filed and no substantial evidence was
submitted that would support a finding that the exemption requirements would not be satisfied, the
project was determined by the city planner to not have a significant effect on the environment. The CEQA
Determination letter is attached to this staff report as Attachment 4 and demonstrates that the project is
categorically exempt from further environmental review. The city planner’s written decision is final and
the CEQA determination is not within the Planning Commission’s purview. With the appropriate
environmental clearances in place, all the city’s procedural requirements and relevant aspects of CEQA
have been satisfied. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed in
Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 19.04 of the Municipal Code do not apply to
this project, including “historical resources.”
May 1, 2024 Item #1 23 of 44
Exhibit 4
May 1, 2024 Item #1 24 of 44
DocuSign Envelope ID: 38050F39-BECB-49D9-A38A-A713F5B554AE
{_ City of
Carlsbad
AUTHORIATION, CONSENT, AND
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
P-1(A)
Development Services
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
442-339-2600
www.carlsbadca.gov
[Ifil APPLICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT INFORMATION
This submittal form (Part A through Part F) must be completed as part of your application with the City
of Carlsbad. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed.
PART A. Owner Authorization and Consent
NOTE: This Consent and Disclosure Form must list the name of the principal owners {10% or greater) and
attach a copy of the current corporate articles, partnership agreement, or trust document, as applicable.
Provide name(s) of the person(s) authorized to sign on behalf of the organization. (A separate page may
be attached if necessary.) IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE
NOT-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW.
This is to certify under penalty of perjury that the undersigned is/are the record owner(s) of the
property known as:
Assessor's Map Book, Page and Parcel (APN/APNs): _2_0_3-_0_2_3_-0_6_-_0_0 _________ _
_______________________________ ; and
Street Address (if applicable): 260 Normandy Lane -Lot 38
that I/we (full legal name of all record owners) consent to the filing of the Land Use Review Application
on our property for processing by the City of Carlsbad Planning Division. I/We declare under penalty of
perjury t hat I/we have reviewed this Affidavit and the information is true and correct.
Name· Glenn D. Jackson, Trustee of the Jackson Family Trust, Dated October 22, 2011
Slgnat~re: [~I~~, Th<fu-
Name: _________________________ _
Signature: ________________________ _
Name: --------------------------
Signature: ________________________ _
(For additional names, please use a separate sheet of paper)
nr.1 • o '! r Page 1 of6
P-1(A) Form Rev 6/2023
May 1, 2024 Item #1 25 of 44
DocuS!gn Envelope ID: 38050F39-BECB-49D9-A38A•A713F5B554AE
IMPORTANT: A Grant Deed is required if the ownership does not match city records. Ownership on the
deed must correspond exactly with the ownership listed. If the owner noted on the Grant Deed does not
match the person signing as Property Owner, provide paperwork documenting the person signing is
authorized to sign as a Property Owner.
Whenever any excavation, fill, or other project-related improvement requires entry onto adjacent
property for any reason, the Land Use Review Application shalt include the written consent or legal
easements or other property rights of the adjacent property owner or their authorized representative,
and shall include such consent with the application package. The application will not be deemed
complete unless and until all necessary consent documents are so filed. The consent shall be in a form
acceptable to the City Planner. If the proposed improvements on the adjacent property change the
nature of the property's development rights (or implied bundle of rights), the city might require
recordation of a Covenant and Agreement for Offslte Improvements and Release of Liability as a
condition of project approval.
Does the project's limits of disturbance encroach on property not owned by the Property Owner?
□ Yes llil No If yes, attach adjacent owner authorization.
PARTS. Owner Declarations (to be signed by Property Owner)
I/We hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I have read the information below and that:
1. I/We understand that it is the responsibility of the Applicant to substantiate the request through
the requirements of the application.
2. I/We understand that If there is a zoning violation on the property, application review may be
delayed. Any unpermitted structures or uses must either be removed or legalized at part of this
application.
3. I/We understand that if this application is approved, I/we may be required to record a covenant
with the County Recorder's Office, the form and content that is satisfactory to the City and its
City Attorney, to notify future owners of the project approval and restrictions.
4. If this Land Use Review Application is approved or conditionally approved, I/we hereby certify
that I/we wlll comply with all conditions attached to the approval action. I/We understand that
the failure to comply with any conditions shall constitute grounds for the revocation or
modification of the approval, permit, or other authorizations provided.
5. Prior to any use of the project site pursuant to the permit issued, all conditions of approval (if
any) will be completed or~e ~Nf!V~lfnanner as stated or required.
. btUAJA, V, Jt,.&~.SDIA,1 Th.A.sfu.
Property Owner S1gnature(s): Eftl,li'e:-:-, ... -----------------
Gl enn D. Jackson, Trustee 10/11/2023 Name(s): ____________________ Date:
Page 2 of 6
P-1(A) Form Rev 6/2023
May 1, 2024 Item #1 26 of 44
OocuSlg11 Envelope ID: 38050F39-BECB-49D9-A38A-A713F5B554AE
I
PART C. Project Team Information (complete all applicable fields)
Applicant: □ Same as Owner Ix! Different from Owner
Name {if different from Owner): _K_i_rk_M"""o"""e_ll..;_e_r _________________ _
Company or Firm: Kirk Moeller Architects Inc.
Contact Address: 2888 Loker Aven ue East, Suite 220
City: Carlsbad State: _C_A _________ Zip Code: 92010
Agent or Representative: IXl Same as Applicant □ Different from Applicant ON/A
Name {if different from Applicant}: ______________________ _
Company or Firm: ___________________________ _
Contact Address: ____________________________ _
City: ___________ State: ___________ Zip Code: ____ _
Other (specify Architect, Engineer, CEQA Consultant, etc.): ______________ _
Name:--------------------------------
Company or Firm: ____________________________ _
Contact Address: ____________________________ _
City: ___________ State: ___________ Zip Code: ____ _
NOTE: A Letter of Authorization (LOA) from the Property Owner empowering a person or persons to act
on the behalf of the Property, is required if anyone other than the Property Owner signs the Land Use
Review Application as the Applicant or Agent. The authorized person (Applicant or Agent) on the LOA
must correspond with the name and signature, above.
PART D. Single "Point of Contact" Designation
A single "point of contact" is an individual that handles all communications with the city and its review
team for the purposes of sending and receiving application materials, information, reports, etc. The
point of contact is to be the single individual elected on the Land Use Review Application form for all
communications and to remain as the primary contact for all status updates relating to the Land Use
Review Application.
Single Point of Contact: IE Applicant □ Property Owner □ Agent □ Other _______ _
Page 3 of 6
P-1(A) Form Rev 6/2023
May 1, 2024 Item #1 27 of 44
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3805OF39-8ECB-49D9-A38A-A 713F5B554AE )
PART E. Contribution Disclosure
Has the Property Owner, Applicant, or Agent had more than $900 worth of business transacted with any
member of city staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past 12 months?
D Yes lil No If yes, indicate person(s): __________________ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
PART F. Applicant Declarations (to be signed by Applicant)
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I have read the information below and that:
1. I have carefully reviewed and prepared the application and plans in accordance with the
instructions.
2. I understand that the specific information needed to initiate planning case processing
corresponds to those items listed in the application form's "Minimum Submittal Intake
Requirements Checklist." I also understand that even if the application is duly filed and
accepted for intake processing, each application submitted to the Planning Division is
required to have specified information included in the application packet before it is
determined to be complete. The specific information to determine completeness is in
"Completeness Determination Requirements Checklist."
3, The Planning Division has developed policies to help ensure that discretionary permit
applications are timely processed. The Permit Streamlining Act shot clock starts on the intake
date the Planning staff accepts a duly filed application.
4. I understand that once an application Is determined to be complete, project or design changes
that will increase the number of units, add uses t hat were not previously listed, substantially
change the site plan, or other changes that trigger the need for additional discretionary
approvals will require a new application, or the filing of other application permit types, which
would restart the review "clock" and extend processing timelines.
5. I understand that upon city review, addit ional information, documents, reports, entitlements
and fees might be required, including any referral fees. I understand that all fees and deposits
submitted with this application will be refunded only as provided for by the ordinances,
regulations, or policies in effect at the time of the application submittal.
6. I understand that it is my responsibility to ensure that statements are true, that discrepancies do
not exist between the project's description on the application, the architectural plans and t he
structural plans. If discrepancies exist between the architectural plans and the structural plans,
the architectural plans shall take precedence. Ultimately, the scope of work, as described on the
permit that authorizes construction, takes precedence over the plans. If there is a discrepancy
between the plans and the description on the permit, the permit governs.
Page 4of6
P-1(A) Form Rev 6/2023
May 1, 2024 Item #1 28 of 44
DocuSign Envelope ID: 38050F39-BECB-49D9·A38A-A713F5B554AE
7. I understand that all materials submitted in connection with this application might become
public record subject to inspection and copying by the public. I acknowledge and understand
that the public might inspect and copy these materials and that some or all of the materials
might be posted on the city website or elsewhere online, outside of the city's control.
8. I understand there are no assurances at any time, implicitly or otherwise, whether provided to
me in writing or by oral communications regarding final staff recommendations to the decision-
making body about this application or the determination of any decision-making body.
9. If the project is approved or conditionally approved, the approved plan set of project drawings,
civil plans/grading, sections, site plans, floor plans, architectural elevations, and landscape plans
shall not be altered without express authorization by the City Planner. Once a permit has been
issued, the Applicant may request permit modifications. "Minor" modifications might be granted
if found by the City Planner to be in substantial conformity with the approved plan set, including
all exhibits and permit conditions. Modifications beyond the scope described in the approved
plan set might require submittal of an amendment to the permit and approval by the authorized
review body.
10. Should any proponent of the project fail to file a timely and valid appeal of the permit within the
applicable appeal period, such inaction shall be deemed to constitute acceptance of the permit
by the Applicant; and agreement by the Applicant to be bouhd by, to comply with, and to do all
things required of or by the Applicant pursuant to all of the terms, provisions, and conditions of
the issued permit or other approval.
11. As part of this application, the Applicant hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
the City of Carlsbad, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, volunteers, and
agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Carlsbad, its Council, boards and
commissions, officers, employees, volunteers and agents, to attack, set aside, void or annul an
approval of the application or related decision, including environmental documents, or to
challenge a denial of the application or related decisions. This indemnification shall include, but
not be limited to, damages awarded against the city, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and
other expenses Incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or
proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, city, and/or the parties Initiating or bringing such
proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the city for all of the city's costs, attorneys' fees, and
damages that the city incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth herein. The
Applicant shall pay to the city upon demand any amount owed to the city pursuant to the
indemnification requirements prescribed.
Page 5 of 6
P•1 (A) Form Rev 6/2023
May 1, 2024 Item #1 29 of 44
By signing below, I hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the city and I certify that the
application I am submitting, including all additional required information, is complete and accurate to
the best of my knowledge. I understand that any misstatement or omission of the requested
information or of any information subsequently requested might be grounds for rejecting the
application, deeming the application incomplete, denying the appllcatlon, suspending or revoking a
permit issued on the basis of these or subsequent representations, or for the seeking of such other and
further relief as deemed by the City of ~;bad,
..___ ~~
Applicant Signature: :-,.,,:j[" ~ ""--=--.:::=.=.:._-:_-------------
Name: Kirk Moeller Date: 10-03-23
This form must be stapled/attached to the application and shall be effective until replaced or
revoked in writing.
Page 6 of 6
P-1 (A) Form Rev 6/2023
May 1, 2024 Item #1 30 of 44
DocuSlgn Envelope ID: 38050F39-BECB-49D9-A38A•A713F5B554AE ,
Letter of Authorization
Lot 38 -260 Normandy Lane
APN: 203·023-06
I, Glenn D. Jackson, Trustee of the Jackson Family Trust, dated October 22, 2011, as the owner
of Lot 38 -260 Normandy Lane, APN 203-023-06 (Property), do hereby empower Kirk Moeller
Architects Inc. to act on behalf of the Property.
Glenn 0. Jackson, Trustee of the Jackson
Family Trust, dated October 22, 2011
10/11/2023
Date
Exhibit 5
May 1, 2024 Item #1 31 of 44
8
CEQA DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION
Subject: This California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Determination of Exemption is in compliance
with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 19.04.060. An appeal to this determination must be filed
in writing with the required fee within ten (10) calendar days of the City Planner's decision
consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.140.
City Planner Decision Date:""'"F"""e""'"b"'"'ru'""a"""ry---=-20""',--=2"""0=2""'"4 ___________________ _
Project Number and Title: CDP 2023-0052/V 2023-0009 (DEV2023-0135) -NORMANDY BEACH HOME (LOT38)
Project Location -Specific: ""2=60"'-'-'N=o-'-'rm-=-=-an=d=y._L=a=n=e ___________________ _
Project Location -City: _C_ar_ls_b_ad _____ _ Project Location -County: ~Sa=n~D~ie~g~o ____ _
Description of Project: Demolish an existing single-family residence and accessory structure and construct
a 2,939-square-foot, three-story, four-bedroom, single-family home with an attached two-car garage.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Carlsbad -~~-~----------------
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS INC
Name of Applicant: KIRK MOELLER, KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS INC
Applicant's Address: 2888 LOKER AVE EAST, SUITE 220, CARLSBAD, CA, 92010
Applicant's Telephone Number: (760) 814-8128 ~~-----------------------
Name of Applicant/Identity of person undertaking the project (if different from the applicant above):
Exempt Status: (Check One)
D Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268);
D Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
D Emerger.icy Project (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c));
[8J Categorical Exemption -State type and section number: New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures -Section 15303
D Statutory Exemptions -State code number:. ___________________ _
D Common Sense Exemption (Section 15061(b)(3))
Reasons why project is exempt: Construction of one single-family residence.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Kyle Van Leeuwen Telephone: 442-339-2611
ERIC LARDY, City Planner Date
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS EXHIBIT 6
This is a list of acronyms and abbreviations (in alphabetical order) that are commonly used in staff
reports.
Acronym Description Acronym Description
APA American Planning Association LCPA Local Coastal Program Amendment
APN Assessor Parcel Number LOS Level of Service
AQMD Air Quality Management District MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
BMP Best Management Practice NCTD North County Transit District
CALTRANS California Department of Transportation ND Negative Declaration
CC City Council PC Planning Commission
CCR Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions PDP Planned Development Permit
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act PEIR Program Environmental Impact Report
CFD Community Facilities District PUD Planned Unit Development
CIP Capital Improvement Program ROW Right of Way
COA Conditions of Approval RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
CofO Certificate of Occupancy SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments
CT Tentative Parcel Map SDP Site Development Permit
CUP Conditional Use Permit SP Specific Plan
DIF Development Impact Fee SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program
DISTRICT City Council Member District Number TM Tentative Map
EIR Environmental Impact Report ZC Zone Change
EIS Environmental Impact Statement (federal)
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
GP General Plan
GPA General Plan Amendment
GIS Geographic Information Systems
HCA Housing Crisis Act 2019
IS Initial Study
May 1, 2024 Item #1 32 of 44
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
A0.1
TITLESHEET
A0.1
CONSTRUCTION OF A THREE-STORY, 30 -FOOT-TALL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT. SITE
IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY WITH ADEQUATE ON-SITE PARKING DEDICATED TORESIDENCE. ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE DEMOLISHED INCLUDING A PORTION OF THE
EXISTING DWELLING UNIT. POOL DEMOLITION IS ALREADY APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.
260 NORMANDY LANE
203-023-06-00
CONDITIONED AREA:
LOT AREA:
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOT:2,511 S.F. / .05 AC
RESIDENTIAL UNITS:
TOTAL FLOOR AREA (CONDITIONED):2,972 S.F.
GARAGE:529 S.F.
611 S.F.
R-15GENERAL PLAN:
R-3, BEACH AREA OVERLAY (BAOZ)ZONING:
MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM (LCP)
PROPOSED WATER USAGE
RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING):0 GPD
RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING):0 ADT
PARKING REQUIRED
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MULTIPLE/(1) 2-CAR GARAGE PLUS VISITOR AT 0.3 SP. PER UNIT.
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED:
PARKING PROVIDED
PROPOSED SEWER USAGE
RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING):0 GAL/DAY
EXISTING (TO BE REMOVED):1 UNIT
OVERHANGING ELEMENTS:
DWELLING UNIT DENSITY:
ALLOWABLE DENSITY:
BUILDING AREAS:
BUILDING A (UNIT 1):
NOTE: THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DOES NOT CONTAINACCESSIBLE UNITS.
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
PROPOSED DENSITY:
NORMANDY BEACH HOME
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
260 NORMANDY LANE LOT 38
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
SHEET INDEXPROJECT DIRECTORYPROJECT INFORMATIONCODESVICINITY MAP
SCOPE OF WORK/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION
UTILITY/ SERVICE PROVIDERS
260 NORMANDY, LLCTRUSTEE OF
CONTACT: KEVIN DUNN
5315 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE 200CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
T: 949-637-3254kdunn@rincongrp.com
PLUMBING CALCULATIONS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER:
ADDRESS:
STORIES:HEIGHT (MAXIMUM):30-0"
DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
SITE
PASCO LARET SUITER &
ASSOCIATES (PLSA)CONTACT: TYLER LAWSON535 N HIGHWAY 101 STE A
SOLANA BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92075T: 858-259-8212tlawson@pslaengineering.com
CIVIL:
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.CONTACT: KIRK MOELLER2888 LOKER AVENUE EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92010T: 760-814-8128kirk@kmarchitectsinc.com
ARCHITECT:
PARKING ANALYSIS
N
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
SEWER DISTRICT:CARLSBAD WASTEWATER DIVISION
WATER DISTRICT:CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ELECTRIC:SDGEGAS:SDGE
SCHOOL DISTRICT:CARLSBAD UNIFIEDFIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT:CARLSBAD FIRE
TELCO:AT&T
BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:V-B
OCCUPANCY:R-3/ U (PRIVATE GARAGES)OCCUPANT LOAD:15DESCRIPTION OF USE:RESIDENTIAL
EXISTING USE:VACANTFULLY SPRINKLERED:NFPA 13D YESFIRE ALARM:NO
STORIES:3HEIGHT:30'-0" MAX.
ARCHITECTURAL
A0.1 COVER SHEETA1.1 SITE PLAN
STANDPIPES:NO
OWNER:
A2.1 1ST FLOOR PLANA2.2 2ND FLOOR PLAN
A2.4 ROOF PLANA3.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3.2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
PRIVATE GARAGE:
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 4 SPACES
2 CAR GARAGE = 2 SP.
2 SP.DRIVEWAY SPACES:
1 DWELLING UNIT
1 DWELLING UNIT
1ST FLOOR:
CONDITIONED AREA:1,199 S.F.
2ND FLOOR:
LOT COVERAGE:
LOT 38:1,505 S.F. / 2,511 S.F. = 59.9%
ALLOWABLE FLOOR:UNLIMITED
RINCON HOMES
CONTACT: KEVIN DUNN5315 AVENIDA ENCINAS, SUITE 200
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008T: 949-637-3254kdunn@rincongrp.com
DEVELOPER/
CONTRACTOR:
CIVIL
C1.0 DRAINAGE AND GRADES PLAN
A2.3 3RD FLOOR PLAN
3
YESCOASTAL ZONE:
347 S.F.
CONDITIONED AREA:1,162 S.F.3RD FLOOR:
PRIVATE GARAGE:
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 3 SPACES
2 CAR GARAGE = 2 SP.
(0.3 X 1 RESIDENCES) 1 SP.VISITOR
LOTS 38 IN GRANVILLE PARK, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1782, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 21, 1924.
PROPOSED RESIDENCE:1 UNIT
RESIDENTIAL (PROPOSED):10 TRIPS PER D.U. X 1 UNITS = 10 ADT
NET INCREASE:10 TRIPS
RESIDENTIAL (PROPOSED):250 GPD X 1 UNITS = 250 GPD
NET INCREASE:250 GPD
RESIDENTIAL (PROPOSED):(EDU) = 220 GAL/DAY X 1 DU X (1 EDU PER/DU) = 220 GAL/DAY
NET INCREASE:220 GAL/DAY
TOTAL BUILDING AREA (INCLUDING GARAGE):3,497 S.F.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE:
2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
A1.2 EXISTING SITE PLAN
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
1A. CONSISTENT WITH GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AND ZONING YES
2A. PHOTOVOLTAIC REQUIREMENT YES
2. RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION
CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA (CFA) METHOD)2.83 KWDC
3A. WATER HEATING YES
HEAT PUMP WATER HEATING YES
4B. ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING YES
READY:1
Exhibit 7
May 1, 2024 Item #1 33 of 44
C)
\ \
•
--
.
9
-· s,,...'-"'-•bl>--....,,.~ 9
' 9 A
' j .....
.. -
• ~h•"'""""
a~v"'-g:'1--------------------------------------------1 •
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT .
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOE OEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOE
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
NORMANDY LANE
20.6'
FF 45.00
PAD 44.33
(44.10)FG
43.19 FG
44.5 HP 43.77
FS
43.29 FG
43.25 FS43.64 FS43.95
FG
44.33 FS 44.33 FS
44.25 FS 43.52 FS
44.5 FS
3.
5
%
1.
5
%
1.9%
(1.9%)
44.98 FS
44.86 FS
44.12 FS
43.84 FS
2 RISERS
44.7 FS
44.7 FS 44.7 FS
44.33 FS
W S
4.
9
%
DS
DS
DS
DSDS
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
2,939 S.F.
10
'
-
0
"
F.
Y
.
S
.
B
.
20
'
-
0
"
F.
Y
.
S
.
B
.
G
A
R
A
G
E
/
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
5'-0"
S.Y.S.B.
5'-
0
"
R.
Y
.
S
.
B
.
7'-
0
"
5'-0"
S.Y.S.B.
23
'
-
1
0
"
20'-0"
PAVER DRIVEWAY
ENTRY
PAVERS
PAVERS
T R GHW
NORMANDY LANE
EXISTING 6'DECORATIVEMASONRY BLOCKWALL TO REMAIN
EXISTING 6'DECORATIVEMASONRY BLOCKWALL TO REMAIN
NEWDECORATIVE6' WOODFENCE
EXISTINGRESIDENTIAL
EXISTINGRESIDENTIAL
EXISTINGRESIDENTIAL
LINE OF DECKABOVE
LINE OF DECKABOVE
TRANS.
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
5' 10'0 20'CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
A1.1
SITEPLAN
A1.1N
May 1, 2024 Item #1 34 of 44
1111
I i cOKN(F(
4)4) \✓1' r,:CROSS
Ii O. UNE L'
Ii 1il
Ii 11
I I /1
371
4)3)
50,2 '
I ,'i·
HA
---r----1...,.
I re"'"' A-, I ,-A-, I
i I \ I I I I \
I I I \ I I I I \ I I
I I I \ I I I I \ I I
I I I \ I I I I \ I I
I I I \ l(Oli 3f!ll \ I I f'/'c
I ii \I I ii \I I
L _ _j I ;_ __ _j I
-1--
!NORMANDY LANE
- - --i,-- - -,°'" EDGE OF PAV.
----- --
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOE
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GW
NORMANDY LANE
FF 45.00
PAD 44.33
(44.10)
FG
43.19 FG
44.5 HP 43.77
FS
43.29 FG
43.25 FS43.64 FS43.95FG
44.33 FS 44.33 FS
44.25 FS 43.52 FS
44.5 FS
3.
5
%
1.
5
%
1.9%
(1.9%)
44.98 FS
44.86 FS
44.12 FS
43.84 FS
2 RISERS
44.7 FS
44.7 FS 44.7 FS
44.33 FS
W S
4.
9
%
DS
DS
DS
DSDS
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
5' 10'0 20'EXISTING SITE PLAN
A1.1
EXISTINGSITEPLAN
A1.2N
May 1, 2024 Item #1 35 of 44
''
[L(O)l ~7/
N54"15'57"E
t
50.25'
• --t .---t;...i?--
w I ..
-~HA~RDSCAPE I
•2.;, t
N54"15'57"E
/
6' HIGH BLOCK \VALL
HARDS CAPE
4?,.\ t-----------'-,t--------------~
u
15 u
w
I --+---___ J ~
Ln
I -~.______ m
I -------,,, ,,-71 -m
~-=;'-' HIGH BLO K -"'----i,~;'T-::o-"'--------.;,M,;.J-__ J 43~
I • \VALL / 43.1 / / CONC
438
>
!
NORMANDY LANE
- - --'.I,-- - -
,°,'? EDGE Or PAV
3 0.00
.~~
50.25'
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
11I \ 1 r---APPROX l'
• 6" CONC. ...... -----, I PARALLEL
I I
\
g;
~
I
554·39• 33"\v 26.94'
Sile BE/
~ 41
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
20
'
-
0
"
13'-2"
13
'
-
0
"
9'-7"
20'-3"24
'
-
1
"
6'-1"
7'-3"
3'-8"
GARAGEBEDROOM 1
CLOSET
BATHROOM 1
HW T R G
CLOSET
FOYER
LINE OF FLOOR ABOVEE.E.
LINE OF DECK ABOVE
UP
14'-1"5'-4 1/2"20'-8 1/2"
40'-2"
33
'
-
0
"
2'-
0
"
19'-0"21'-2"
10
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
FIRST FLOOR = 611 SF
TOTAL UNIT = 2,968 SF
ELEV.
LI
N
E
O
F
D
E
C
K
A
B
O
V
E
LI
N
E
O
F
F
P
A
B
V
.
PL
PL
PL
PL
2'-0"
2'-
0
"
DECORATIVE NON -STRUCTURAL ENTRY
COLUMNS
1'
-
0
"
LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
N
A2.1
LOT 38FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
A2.1
May 1, 2024 Item #1 36 of 44
,-T ------------------------
1
□
Q Q
L_
■
ODD □
,----------,----------7
' -T -, r------,
I I \ I I I \ I
I I \ I I I \ I
I I \ I I I \ I
I I I I \ I
I I \ I I I
I \ I I I \ I
I \ I \
I I I I /□\ I
I I I I I
I I I I I \ I
I I I I \ I
I I \ I I I
I 1 \ I I I \ I
I 1 I I I \ I
I I I I
I I \ I I I
I \ I I I \ I
I I \ I I I L_ __ _ _ _j /_': _______ :'_] -1.
'-./11 /'\ I ----------~----------~
-----7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I •
-,
I
I
I
I
_ _J
L ____________________ ~
I
I
I
I ___ _,,
I
I
L _____ ----------------------------------~---~
L■
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
18'-10"
5'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
14'-3"
HVAC
7'
-
0
"
16
'
-
1
"
17
'
-
2
"
7'
-
1
1
"
4'
-
0
"
4'-2"10'-0"
5'-5"4'-0"19'-2"
15'-1"
PANTRY
10'-6"
9'
-
8
"
LINE OF GARAGE BELOW
WINE
19'-5 1/2"7'-6 1/2"13'-2"
40'-2"
35
'
-
0
"
40'-2"
35
'
-
0
"
BEDROOM 2
BATH 2
KITCHEN
DINING
LIVING
CLOSET
DECK
160 S.F.
SECOND FLOOR = 1,199 SF
UP
DN
POWDER
FP
ELEV.
1'
-
0
"
2'-0"
2'-
0
"
LINE OF ARCH.FEATURE ABV.ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE ABV.
LINE OF ARCH. FEATURE ABV.
LI
N
E
O
F
D
E
C
K
A
B
O
V
E
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
N
A2.2
LOT 38SECONDFLOOR PLAN
A2.2
May 1, 2024 Item #1 37 of 44
,---------,
' -
□---------
□ D
D
L_
______ _J
--- -__ _J __ _,.
L __ _ ____ _J
.G :G
1--------
-------
oo
0
- ----=----=----=-00
I
I
I
I
I
,----_J
L■
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
12'-0"
21
'
-
8
"
15
'
-
3
"
16'-4"12'-8"
5'
-
8
"
HVAC
5'-2"
12
'
-
8
"
12'-3"
4'-2"
7'
-
8
"
5'
-
6
"
4'-2"
8'-10"
5'
-
8
"
7'-4"
19'-7"7'-5"13'-2"
40'-2"
22
'
-
0
"
30'-2"
35
'
-
0
"
12'-0"
13
'
-
0
"
PRIMARY
BATHROOM
PRIMARY
BEDROOMDECK
284 S.F.
BATH 3
LIN
LAUNDRY
BEDROOM 3
CLOSET 1
THIRD FLOOR = 1,162 SF
ELEV.
1'
-
0
"
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURE LINE OF DECK BELOW
1'
-
0
"
LINE OF FIREPLACE BELOW
LI
N
E
O
F
F
L
O
O
R
B
E
L
O
W
CLOSET 2
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 THIRD FLOOR PLAN
N
A2.3
LOT 38THIRDFLOOR PLAN
A2.3
May 1, 2024 Item #1 38 of 44
l
-,---
□
•••
-8--7
I
I
I ------i-
i
I
I □
L ____________ _
L_ ---------8
L■
l
-7
I
I
I
I
_ _J
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
1'-
6
"
DECK BELOW
LINE OF BUILDING BELOW
RIDGE
3:
1
2
3:
1
2
3:123:123:123:12
1'-6"
1'-6"
3:123:12 3:123:12
RI
D
G
E
RI
D
G
E
RI
D
G
E
RI
D
G
E
DECK
BELOW
6"
3:
1
2
3:
1
2
F.P. BELOW
NOTE: PROVIDE
PV SOLAR ZONE ASREQUIRED
DECORATIVE
ASPHALT SHINGLEROOF TYPICAL
NOTE: PROVIDE
DECORATIVE RAINGUTTERS ASREQUIRED
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
A2.4
LOT 38ROOF PLAN
A2.4
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 ROOF PLAN
N
May 1, 2024 Item #1 39 of 44
□ I
I
I
I
I
,------------J
: 1
I
I
----,
,------_J
____ _J
L _____ _
L
-----------7
7
L ___ _
L■
I
I
I
I
I
I
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
A3.1-2
COLOR &MATERIALPALETTE
A3.0NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
CARLSBAD, CA
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF KIRKMOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY ANDSHALL NOT OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OFKIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC. THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS ORACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT.
COLOR AND MATERIAL PALETTE- LOT 38
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM760-814-8128
A
ELDORADO STACKED STONE: KORYAK RIDGE,COLOR: DAYBREAK
JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILL LAP
SIDING, COLOR: SLATE STEPS
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSITE BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING, COLOR: ARCTIC WHITE
D
C LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 -
COLOR TO MATCH JAMES HARDIE SLATE
STEPS SIDING COLOR
B
E DARK PAINT (FASCIA/ TRIM) - SW 7069 IRON
ORE
F LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - COLOR MATCHTO JAMES HARDIE ARCTIC WHITE
DECORATIVE DECK GUARDRAIL - PAINTED
WHITE WITH SW IRON ORE SPINDELS AND TOPCAP
G
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORSH
J CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH COLORED
ALUMINUM BLACK TRIM
DECORATIVE NATURAL WOOD TONE GARAGE
DOORK
L DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOF
May 1, 2024 Item #1 40 of 44
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
CARLSBAD, CA
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
CARLSBAD, CA
CONCEPTUAL SOUTH ELEVATION -LOT 38
ALL l)EA8, DE$JClNS Af{D DJRECTli:tl NllCATEDYIJTlllN THEl;E IJRAWIMl:S,!\RE T1:E Pl~OPERJ:'(OF Kl~
t/OELLER ~TECTB .. JNC.ANDARI; INTENDB) to. BE>$,QCl"1"ED WITl:l:n'IS SJ'E£FI_C PRO.{CT ONLYNO SHALL NOl OlliEI-IWISE BE USEll FU-lNIY PUAAOSEWHAlSOEVEN 'NllliOIJT H-E "MIDTEN CbNSE'IT OF
KlRl(:IIIClfUEIUJlCHITl:C""$: fN_c·nHESH,lll BE r,/0 CH_IINtlESOR OEVII\TION5 FRalT-iesE ffiAVIJNGS0-
AroOtif¥.NVINGSFEClPJCAl10NS\'imruTllE WRITTErJ".CQ!iS;NT OF THC ARCHITECT.
CONCEPTUAL EAST ELEVATION -LOT38 12-11-23
All ll~ OESIGNS A.NDllJRECTIQN tllll)\TEOYIJTlllN ~ffiAWl~:GS!\RE T1:E ~T(OF Kl~
tJOELLER AAC11TEc,r:s.)NC.ANCIAAE ltJT~DE[1 to.'BE.AS$(JCIATED ~_TrlS ~PECl=I_CPROE'f _OM,Y·i\l,[,
$HA!L NiJl07liEl™$EBE U$E□ FCRN!YPIJro'OSEWHATS0EVERWllliOIJT THEVl'RITIEN C"i'.JNS!:'11' OF
IIJRlo:·MOELLERI\RCHITl:C""$;_fN,C•ni.ERESHIILL BE·r,/OC1:Wf3ESW.DclA/\TIOIIJS FRalT -iE.SI; CW,Vll~G,Sas
AroOld'ANYING.'SF.EClFICAllONS\','/M'.llltniE WRITTErtoomr OF THC-ARCHITECT.
Klfi:KM□tU.tR.Afi.~ T(b'fS, INb,
KIID{@;KMARCl'IITEIIT"El°INC.l::Ot.l
76D·li14-ll.1 ~B
Kl!?l(r,IJ:j~u.cR:ARCJJ.1 rt:ct.;, INCl. KIRK°jKMARSHITl!CT"!!!·INC.Ja□N
76D·li14-81~8
"' .
-.;~ -..i,-'t,;·-t -i '
0
0
0
0
0
0
]ill]
--
--
~ -~---
------:,------
-- ---------.
--~----
+' •
• \f-1 . ,;;-.....
;\' . -.,,
"'-, :-
0
0
0
0
0
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
29
'
-
7
3
/
1
6
"
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
F
7'
-
6
"
8'-
9
1
/
4
"
7'-
1
1
1
/
4
"
F.F.E.
F.F.E.
6"
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
F.F.E.
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
TOP PLATE
WHITE TRIM
WHITE WINDOW TRIM
STUCCO COLOR TO MATCH JAMES
HARDIE SLATE STEPS SIDING COLOR
DARK GRAY SHINGLE ROOF
PAINTED FASCIA - SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW7069 IRON ORE
JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILLLAP SIDING - SLATE STEPS COLOR
BLACK WINDOW FRAMES TYP.
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSIT BOARDAND BATTEN SIDING - ARCTIC
WHITE COLOR TYP.
A
E
L
J
F
C
F
B
2'-0"
29
'
-
7
3
/
1
6
"
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
F
7'-
6
"
8'-
9
1
/
4
"
7'
-
1
1
1
/
4
"
F.F.E.
F.F.E.
6"
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
F.F.E.
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
TOP PLATE
WHITE TRIM
WHITE WINDOW TRIM
STUCCO COLOR TO MATCH JAMES
HARDIE SLATE STEPS SIDING COLOR
DARK GRAY SHINGLE ROOF
PAINTED FASCIA - SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW7069 IRON ORE
JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILLLAP SIDING - SLATE STEPS COLOR
BLACK WINDOW FRAMES TYP.
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSIT BOARD
AND BATTEN SIDING - ARCTICWHITE COLOR TYP.
A
E
L
J
F
C
B
B
FIREPLACE VENT LOCATION
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
A3.1-2
LOT 38BUILDINGELEVATIONS
A3.1
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 NORTH ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1. BUILDING HEIGHT IS MEASURED FROM NEWLY CREATED PAD.
2. F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3. ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4. ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5. ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6. ALL WINDOWS ADJACENT TO STUCCO OR SIDING PROVIDES 4" WIDE AND 2" DEEP WINDOW TRIM OFTHE SAME MATERIAL (STUCCO OR FIBER/CEMENT BOARD). AT LEAST 66% OF WINDOWS/ DOORSSHALL HAVE TRIM THAT PROJECTS A MINIMUM OF 2".
7. SLIDING WINDOW AND DOORS FRAMES TO BE VINYL.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DECK GUARDRAIL - PAINTED WHITE WITH SW IRON ORE SPINDELS AND TOP CAP
JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILL LAP SIDING, COLOR: SLATE STEPS
DARK PAINT (FASCIA/ TRIM) - SW 7069 IRON ORE
D
E
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSITE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING, COLOR: ARCTIC WHITE
F LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - COLOR MATCH TO JAMES HARDIE ARCTIC WHITE
KEYNOTES
1
PAINT HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS.
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
G
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH COLORED ALUMINUM BLACK TRIM
H
COMPOSITE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
DECORATIVE NATURAL WOOD TONE GARAGE DOOR
J
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOF
K
L
ELDORADO STACKED STONE: KORYAK RIDGE, COLOR: DAYBREAK
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - COLOR TO MATCH JAMES HARDIE SLATE STEPS SIDING
COLOR
C
3 4" WIDE DECORATIVE STUCCO OR SIDING WINDOW TRIM. PROJECTS 2" MINIMUM FROM WINDOW.
4 WOOD COLUMNS
COMPOSITE HORIZONTAL SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
STONE PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE D
May 1, 2024 Item #1 41 of 44
I
I
I
I
I
--------------------~-
--------------------------------------------
[j]
. . ·:, . ·-• . .. . . . • • . •
••.. • ...... ·• ·; .. ' .. ··.--•. ,_. .-... ·:· ,·:___.·,·· .. ' • .• •. _-'--------,,---------,
-"-'--------',-'-----'~-~----0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
~
D
. [J
■
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
29
'
-
1
1
1
/
2
"
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
F
7'
-
6
"
8'-
9
1
/
4
"
7'-
1
1
1
/
4
"
F.F.E.
F.F.E.
6"
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
F.F.E.
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
TOP PLATE
DARK GRAY SHINGLE ROOF
PAINTED FASCIA - SHERWINWILLIAMS SW7069 IRON ORE
JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILL
LAP SIDING - SLATE STEPS COLOR
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSIT BOARD
AND BATTEN SIDING - ARCTIC
WHITE COLOR TYP.
DECORATIVE WOOD TONE FINISHGARAGE DOOR
DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE
DECORATIVE WOOD COLUMN WHITE
WHITE TRIM
WHITE WINDOW TRIM
DECORATIVE DECK GUARDRAIL -PAINTED WHITE WITH SW IRON ORE
SPINDELS AND TOP CAP
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSIT TRIM
BOARD - ARCTIC WHITE COLOR TYP.
DECORATIVE EL DORADO STONE FINISH
STACKED STONE - KORYAK RIDGEDAYBREAK COLOR
DECORATIVE NATURAL WOOD TONE
FRONT ENTRY DOOR
BLACK WINDOW FRAMES TYP.
A
B
E
L
J
F
B
F
1
K
F
D
H
G
2'-0"
29
'
-
1
1
1
/
2
"
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
F
7'-
6
"
8'-
9
1
/
4
"
7'
-
1
1
1
/
4
"
F.F.E.
F.F.E.
6"
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
F.F.E.
TOP PLATE
1'-
0
3
/
4
"
TOP PLATE
WHITE TRIM
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSIT BOARD
AND BATTEN SIDING - ARCTICWHITE COLOR TYP.
WHITE WINDOW TRIM
STUCCO COLOR TO MATCH JAMESHARDIE SLATE STEPS SIDING COLOR
DARK GRAY SHINGLE ROOF
PAINTED FASCIA - SHERWIN
WILLIAMS SW7069 IRON ORE
JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILLLAP SIDING - SLATE STEPS COLOR
BLACK WINDOW FRAMES TYP.
A
E
L
J
F
C
B
B
Date:10-04-23
Sheet Title:
Sheet Number:
Project:
File:
Revisions:
1
NORMANDY BEACH HOMES
26
0
N
O
R
M
A
N
D
Y
L
A
N
E
-
L
O
T
3
8
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
,
C
A
9
2
0
0
8
NO
R
M
A
N
D
Y
B
E
A
C
H
H
O
M
E
12-14-23
CDP 2023-0052V 2023-0009
KIRK MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
2888 LOKER AVE. EAST, STE 220
CARLSBAD, CA 92010
KIRK@KMARCHITECTSINC.COM
760-814-8128
PLANNING #1
2 2-05-24PLANNING #2
3 3-28-24PLANNING COMMISSION
A3.1-2
LOT 38BUILDINGELEVATIONS
A3.2
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
2' 4'0 8'LOT 38 SOUTH ELEVATION
COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
GENERAL NOTES
1. BUILDING HEIGHT IS MEASURED FROM NEWLY CREATED PAD.
2. F.F.E. = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION.
3. ALL NOTES ARE TYPICAL.
4. ALL PAINT COLOR CHANGES TO OCCUR AT INSIDE CORNERS U.N.O.
5. ALL PAINT FINISHES ARE TO BE FLAT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
6. ALL WINDOWS ADJACENT TO STUCCO OR SIDING PROVIDES 4" WIDE AND 2" DEEP WINDOW TRIM OFTHE SAME MATERIAL (STUCCO OR FIBER/CEMENT BOARD). AT LEAST 66% OF WINDOWS/ DOORSSHALL HAVE TRIM THAT PROJECTS A MINIMUM OF 2".
7. SLIDING WINDOW AND DOORS FRAMES TO BE VINYL.
B
A
C
DECORATIVE DECK GUARDRAIL - PAINTED WHITE WITH SW IRON ORE SPINDELS AND TOP CAP
JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILL LAP SIDING, COLOR: SLATE STEPS
DARK PAINT (FASCIA/ TRIM) - SW 7069 IRON ORE
D
E
JAMES HARDIE COMPOSITE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING, COLOR: ARCTIC WHITE
F LIGHT PAINT (ACCENT/ TRIM) - COLOR MATCH TO JAMES HARDIE ARCTIC WHITE
KEYNOTES
1
PAINT HATCH LEGEND
2 BUILDING ADDRESS LOCATION PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS.
DECORATIVE BLACK EXTERIOR WALL SCONCE LOCATION.
NATURAL WOOD TONE FRONT DOORS
G
CLEAR RESIDENTIAL GLAZING WITH COLORED ALUMINUM BLACK TRIM
H
COMPOSITE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A
B
STUCCO PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
DECORATIVE NATURAL WOOD TONE GARAGE DOOR
J
DARK GRAY COMPOSITE SHINGLE ROOF
K
L
ELDORADO STACKED STONE: KORYAK RIDGE, COLOR: DAYBREAK
LIGHT COLOR SAND FINISH STUCCO 20/30 - COLOR TO MATCH JAMES HARDIE SLATE STEPS SIDING
COLOR
C
3 4" WIDE DECORATIVE STUCCO OR SIDING WINDOW TRIM. PROJECTS 2" MINIMUM FROM WINDOW.
4 WOOD COLUMNS
COMPOSITE HORIZONTAL SIDING PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE
STONE PER COLOR/ MATERIAL SCHEDULE D
May 1, 2024 Item #1 42 of 44
-1-1- -1-1-
-------
------1,,-------------.................................................................... ---------...1------~----~------.......J------
. . ·. . . ' . . ' -,.
.__::.,...:...... _-_, _ _:__.____,,-___:__.<~-'---'----'-,_ .. _·. . • .. -· . ·' .... ,_ . • _··. '. •• ,· .. ::,--~•-:: .:..:.c_ _·-_.' ·--~ .•.. -.. '
- - - - - -..,...,......,',-n-,,--,r--;;--~~~~-,,--,r--;;-,+----• _· • • • • • • ._ --+~------~'--_J_-- -
.,. . ·,: : • . ;~ ·. ·•· ... :
.. · ... -·:~•. ' . ·-..... -.-. ..... •,
... ·;:·: . . ' '
·:.:: : ..... _: • : ' ,; ;, ,. l::':==================='==='"==='::::':L~-------------------------------------------'--'-t'=============l
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
~
D
. [J
■
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS AND
DIRECTION INDICATED WITHIN
THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE
PROPERTY OF KIRK MOELLER
ARCHITECTS, INC. AND ARE
INTENDED TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT
ONLY AND SHALL NOT
OTHERWISE BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT
THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF KIRK
MOELLER ARCHITECTS, INC.
THERE SHALL BE NO CHANGES
OR DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
DRAWINGS OR ACCOMPANYING
SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT THE
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE
ARCHITECT.
OE
O
E
OE
OE
O
E
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOE OEOEOEOE
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S
S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGW
S
W
W
W
X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NORMANDY LANE 12
.
6
'
20
.
0
'
FF 45.00
PAD 44.33
(44.10)FG
43.27 FG
44.5 HP 43.77FS
43.29 FG
43.37 FS43.64 FS43.95
FG
44.33 FS 44.33 FS
44.25 FS 43.52 FS
44.4 FS
3.
5
%
4.
9
%
1.
5
%
1.9%
(1.9%)
44.98 FS
44.86 FS
44.12 FS
43.84 FS
2 RISERS
44.7 FS
44.7 FS 44.7 FS
44.33 FS
20
.
0
'
W
W S
5.0'
5.
0
'
5.0'
4.
6
'
NOT A PART
1
3
2
4
5
6
6
7
8
9
10
APN 203-023-04-00
APN 203-023-05-00 APN 203-023-07-00
APN 203-023-06-00 APN 203-023-06-00
APN 203-023-09-00
APN 203-023-08-00APN 203-023-07-00
A-A A-A
B-B
B-B
3.0'
3.0'
5.0'
7.
9
'
EX 6" AC WATER
EX 8" PVC SWR (DWG 462-4)
DS
DS
DS
DS
DSDS
20.7'
3.
0
'
±
12N3
5
°
4
7
'
4
9
"
W
50
.
0
0
'
N54°15'57"E 50.25'N54°15'57"E 50.25'
S3
5
°
4
4
'
0
3
"
E
50
.
0
0
'
N54°15'57"E 50.22'
S3
5
°
4
5
'
5
6
"
E
50
.
0
0
'
N54°15'57"E 50.22'
EX ABANDONED 8" VCP SWR
0 10 20 30
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE & GRADES PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 10'
THE IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING WORK TO BE DONE ACCORDING TO THESE PLANSAND THE LATEST EDITIONS OF:
WORK TO BE DONE
(1) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING THE REGIONALSUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENTS.(2) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROLS FORCONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE WORK ZONES"
(3) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
(1) SAN DIEGO REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWINGS**(2) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLANS**(3) CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING STANDARDS, VOLUME 1, 2, & 3.** AS MODIFIED BY CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
STANDARD DRAWINGS
NOTE: UTILITIES ARE KNOWN TO EXIST IN THE AREA. THECONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARYMEASURES TO PROTECT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES ORSTRUCTURES LOCATED AT THE WORK SITE.
EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN PER AVAILABLE RECORDINFORMATION. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, DEPTH,
LOCATION, AND MATERIAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
SITE NOTES
1. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON PER BEST AVAILABLE RECORD INFORMATION.EXACT HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES UNKNOWN.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF WORK OF ANYDISCREPANCIES BETWEEN ACTUAL LOCATION AND PLAN LOCATION OF UTILITIES UPONDISCOVERY OF DISCREPANCY.
2. ALL STREET SIGNS, LIGHTS, LAMPS, UTILITIES, ETC. LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE PROTECTED IN-PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION OR REPLACED TO
THE SATISFACTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SITE ADDRESS
TOPOGRAPHY
BENCHMARK
ZONING INFORMATION
EARTHWORK / PROJECT GRADING
ACCESS
ENGINEER OF WORK
260 NORMANDY LANECARLSBAD CA 92008
TOPOGRAPHY OBTAINED BY FIELD SURVEYPREPARED BY: BAKER LAND SURVEYSCARLSBAD, CA
TYLER LAWSON, PE #80356 DATE
LOT 38 OF GRANVILLE PARK, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF NO. 1782, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,FEBRUYARY 21, 1927
APN 203-023-06-00
EXISTING PARCELS:1 PARCELS EXISTING USE: RESIDENTIALPROPOSED PARCELS:1 PARCELS PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: R-15VILLAGE AND BARIO PLAN DISTRICT: N/APRESENT ZONING REQUIREMENTS: R-3 OVERLAY ZONE: COASTAL, BEACH
CUT: 25 CY MAX CUT HEIGHT: 1.0 FTFILL: 50 CY MAX FILL HEIGHT: 2.0 FTIMPORT: 25 CY
REMEDIAL: 45 CY
ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE STRIPPINGS OR UTILITY TRENCH VOLUMES, IF REQUIRED BY SITE CONDITIONS.CONTRACTOR SHALL SATISFY SELF THAT ESTIMATES ARE CORRECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE ESTIMATED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. (CALCULATED ON A THEORETICALBASIS. ACTUAL QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TO SHRINKAGE OR SWELL FACTORS).DEPTH & QUANTITY OF REMEDIAL GRADING IS SUBJECT TO FIELD VERIFICATION BY PROJECT SOILS ENGINEERIN FIELD DURING EXCAVATION.
NORMANDY LANE, A PUBLIC ROAD
ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON CITY OF CARLSBAD BENCH MARK 129, STATION NAME
BM-OC 155. NGVD 29 ELEVATION = 20.04. SEE SITE BENCH MARK.
SHEET INDEX
SHEET 1 - DRAINAGE & GRADES PLAN
SCOPE OF WORK/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE PROJECT INCLUDES THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SITE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSEDRESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE & ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS. CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTWILL INCLUDE SITE GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS.
UTILITIES
WATER CWMDFIRECARLSBAD FIRESEWERCBDSCHOOL DISTRICT CA
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1 EXISTING BUILDING & APPURTENANCES TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING HARDSCAPE TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING POOL TO BE REMOVED & FILLED IN PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY GRADING (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)
EXISTING WALL (OFF-SITE) TO REMAIN
EXISTING WALL (ON-SITE) TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING WALL (ON-SITE) TO BE REMOVED
PROPOSED POROUS PAVERS PER DETAIL THIS SHEET
PROPOSED 4" SEWER LATERAL @ 2% MIN PER CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD DETAIL S-7
PROPOSED 1" METER W/ FIRE SERVICE PER CMWD STD W-5.
PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET.
NOT USED
PROPOSED CONDUIT & TRANSFORMER PER SEPARATE SDGE WORK ORDER.
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
C1.0
DRAINAGE AND GRADES PLAN
SITE
S
T
A
T
E
S
T
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: NTS
N
R
O
O
S
E
V
E
L
T
S
T
C
A
R
L
S
B
A
D
B
L
V
D
PACIF
I
C
A
V
6
SCALE: 1" = 10'
O
C
E
A
N
S
T
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
O
C
E
A
N
LAGUNA DR
ABBREVIATIONS
BC= BOTTOM OF CURBBS= BOTTOM OF STAIRBW= BOTTOM OF WALLFS = FINISHED SURFACEFG = FINISHED GRADE
FF = FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION PER ARCHITECT
FL = FLOWLINEFS = FINISHED SURFACE
GF = FACE OF GARAGE ELEVATIONIE = INVERT ELEVATIONTC = TOP OF CURBTG = TOP OF GRATETW = TOP OF WALL
TS= TOP OF STAIR
T.CAP. = TRASH CAPTURE
LOT 38
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND GRADES PLAN
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY/ PLRIGHT-OF-WAYCENTERLINE OF ROAD
EXISTING SEWER MAIN
EXISITNG WATER MAIN
PROPOSED FLOWLINEPROPOSED FLUSH CURBPROPOSED 6" (MIN) TYPE G CURBPROPOSED WATER SERVICE
PROPOSED POROUS PAVERS
PROPOSED PCC
PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT
PROPOSED TRENCH & AC RESTORATION
S SWW
W W
P/L P/L
FF 45.00PAD 44.33
PROP. BLDG
EX. GRADE
5' 5'
P/L R/W
FF 45.00PAD 44.33
PROP. BLDG
EX. GRADE PROP. PAVERDRIVEWAY SEEDETAIL THIS SHEET
5' 20'
REMOVE EX WALL(6-FT MAX REVEAL)
SECTION A-A
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION B-B
NOT TO SCALE
PROP. PAVER SWALE SEEDETAIL THIS SHEET
EX. CMUPRIVACY WALLTO REMAIN
5% MAX
5'
8'
CDP 2023-0052/V 2023-0009 (DEV2023-0135)
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA:2512 SF
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA:2750 SF
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:1432 SFPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: (TOTAL) 1700 SFNEW:725 SFREPLACED: 975 SF
APN 203-023-04-00
APN 203-023-06-00 APN 203-023-06-00
APN 203-023-07-00
NORMANDY LANEAPN 203-023-06-00
LANDSCAPE NOTE:SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPING (SITE DESIGNBMP SD-K) TO BE IMPLEMENTED TO MAXIMUMEXTENT FEASIBLE, PER FACT SHEET BL-4,CITY OF CARLSBAD BMP DESIGN MANUAL.
5
12
11
PROP. PAVER SWALE SEE
DETAIL THIS SHEET
PROP. PAVER SWALE SEEDETAIL THIS SHEET
GEOTECHNICAL NOTE:
PROVIDE IMPERMEABLE LINER A MIN. OF 24"FROM OUTSIDE OF ENTIRE BUILDINGPERIMETER FOUNDATION PER SOILSENGINEER RECOMMENDATIONS.
NOTES:
-ALL AGGREGATE MUST BE CLEAN/WASHED AND FREE OF FINES (SAND, SILT, ETC.)
-THE PAVERS SHALL NOT BE SEALED ONCE THE VOID FILLER HAS BEEN ADDED-EACH COURSE SHALL BE VIBRATORY COMPACTED BEFORE PLACEMENT OF NEXT COURSE-SPECIAL APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR USE IN HIGHLY EXPANSIVE SOIL - SUBDRAIN MAY BE REQUIRED
6"x16" FLUSH CURB
520-C-2500 PCC
INSTALL DECORATIVE
PERVIOUS PAVERS 2" BEDDING PERMANUFACTURE'S SPECS
4" - NO. 57 STONE OPENGRADED BASE
6" MIN. THICK - NO. 2STONE SUBBASE
SOIL SUBGRADE
POROUS PAVER DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
POROUS PAVER SWALE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
5% MAX 5% MAX
FLOWLINEPER PLAN0.5% MIN 0.5% MIN
PA
V
E
M
E
N
T
E
D
G
E
SA
W
C
U
T
L
I
N
E
PER PLAN
STRUCTURAL PAVEMENT
( 4" AC OVER 6" CLASS II AB OVER NATIVE
SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 95% REL. COMP.)OR PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
COLD PLANE AND OVERLAY
(2" MIN. DEPTH) TO PROVIDESMOOTH TRANSITION
EXISTING AC
PAVEMENT
6"
A
B
(T
Y
P
)
DETAIL: AC PAVEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
12" MIN
IMPERMEABLE LINER
(EXTEND 24-INCHES MIN. FROM EDGE OF
PAVERS WHEN ADJACENT TO BUILDING);
SEE GEOTECH. NOTE
BLDG
BLDG
IMPERMEABLE LINER
(EXTEND 24-INCHES MIN. FROM EDGE OF PAVERS
WHEN ADJACENT TO BUILDING); SEE GEOTECH. NOTE
C/L R/WR/W
EX. 6" AC WATERTO REMAIN
EX. 8" PVC SEWERPER DWG 462-4
TO REMAIN
NORMANDY LANE TYPICAL SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
EX. BRICK TO BE REMOVEDAND REPLACED WITH AC PAVEMENT
PROJECTSITE
EX. AC PAVEMENT TO REMAIN
EX. PCC WALKTO REMAIN
EX. 1-1/4" GAS TO REMAIN
7.5'
10.0'
3.5'
5.5'
EX. ABANDONED 8" VCPSEWER
2.5'
PROP. FENCE
X
PROP. ACPAVEMENTAND BASE
~ 3'
May 1, 2024 Item #1 43 of 44
VZZZZZ I
\\ \ \
t-----T-\-c:,,------i-1 -
f--------------11
l(O)l '37/
I
~ I I ~-----.--, I oRN£R I I \NP.LI, icRoss
\ I / i!--'c6~ uN£ 41Sl : 4141
l
\
i
I
I 11 I k ~~I------•&~-----,· ~gq;-~ I Jiiiiii;I:~ -~ :. ... . --~. t----.'I,'/, / ... l.9 -J!e::'""'I"-'~'""
II R ·: 1','1 • : I ___ l L I -_h_ - --., 5' HIGH BLOCK WALL
I, I a• I --" _L ~• Z ,lg+--+ --n , 11/).
I
I
I
I
r--------------1:_--------------~
l(O)l SlfBl
-r --r--------------------------t
I
I
I
I
------
I
I
I
I
\I
HAt><I 1:,
..
ol u 6 u
l(O)l SlfBl
3)[0)
•-t F~
, l' . H;,c
o::::i
gc
r
~
~
~I ".;, ·>s-
HARD SCAPE
.ii'~
I
I
I
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,h
LJ
-<1.
I
~
'<:-"
r::,'<
:\
I
r-----
.:, v "
r-----
• " r-----~,,, Q) ,,, . ..
r--r-----
I! 8
G'1-0
I .'I,;
42.3 • I
I
"~0.1 -
/
"~es
-S54 ·39' 33"W
.~<fo
~(8)
I
I \NP.LL coRNC~, UN(
I / CL(P-R Of
l(O)l 411l
I
I
- ----
'APPROX 1' HIGH
5" CONC. WALL
PARALLEL W/LOT LINE
I
~ Til 41[0) -
I I I I
\
WESTERLY EDGE
-OF FENCE IS ON
1 ~ THE LOT LINE
I
I
PLSAENGINEERING.COM
Exhibit 8
Exhibits “A” – “J” dated May 1, 2024 (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
May 1, 2024 Item #1 44 of 44