HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-06-11; City Council; Resolution 2024-121RESOLUTION NO. 2024-121
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE
POTABLE WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATES
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary, desirable and in the public
interest to award a professional services agreement for engineering services for the Potable Water and
Sewer Master Plan Updates; and
WHEREAS, on March 1, 2024, staff published a request for proposals for engineering services
for the Potable Water and Sewer Master Plan Updates in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code, or
CMC, Sections 3.28.050 and 3.28.060; and
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2024, staff received two proposals in response to the advertisement;
and
WHEREAS, after a review of the proposals based on best-value criteria consistent with CMC
Sections 3.28.050 and 3.28.060, staff selected Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc., or KJ, as the most
qualified firm for the project; and
WHEREAS, staff and KJ negotiated the scope of work and associated fee in an amount not to
exceed $791,638; and
WHEREAS, the portion attributable to the wastewater operating fund is $424,245; and
WHEREAS, sufficient funding is available to complete the professional services for the project;
and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has determined that pursuant to Public Resources Code Section
21065, the action to award a professional services agreement for planning, engineering, or
environmental services does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the California
Environmental Quality Act in that it has no potential to cause either a direct physical change in the
environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and therefore
does not require environmental review at this time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute a professional services
agreement with KJ in an amount not to exceed $791,638 for engineering services for the
Potable Water and Sewer Master Plan Updates, of which $424,245 is attributable to the
wastewater operating fund, which is attached hereto as Attachment A.
3. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to amend the Agreement to extend the term
for one (1) additional one (1) year period or parts thereof. If the City Manager extends
the term of the Agreement, the amount shall not exceed $100,000 per Agreement year.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Joint Special Meeting of the City Council and the
Carlsbad Municipal Water District Board of Directors of the City of Carlsbad on the 11th day of June,
2024, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
BLACKBURN, BHAT-PATEL, ACOSTA, BURKHOLDER.
NONE .
NONE.
LUNA.
KEITH BLACKBURN, President
(1~t:m~
~HERRY FREISINGER, Secretary
/7 (SEAL)
OocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-4987-811 E-503184A51 BC3 Attachment A
PSA24-3436UTIL
AGREEMENT FOR SEWER AND POTABLE WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATES SERVICES
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS, INC .
.Il$i AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the / / ffi day of�..l LL(\-€ ,,,.... , 2024, by and between the City of Carlsbad, California, a municipal
corporation ("City") and Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor").
RECITALS
A.City requires the professional services of a consultant that is experienced in sewer master
planning and, on behalf of the Carlsbad Municial Water District ("CMWD"), requires the professional
services of a "design professional" (as that t�rm is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), for sewer and
water master planning.
B.Contractor has the necessary experience in providing professional services and advice
related to sewer and water master planning.
C.Contractor has submitted a proposal to City under Request for Proposals No. RFP24-
2405UTIL and has affirmed its willingness and ability to perform such work.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein,
City and Contractor agree as follows:
1.SCOPE OF WORK
City retains Contractor to perform, and Contractor agrees to render, those services (the "Services") that
are defined in attached Exhibit "A", which is incorporated by this reference in accordance with this
Agreement's terms and conditions.
2.STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE
While performing the Services, Contractor will exercise the reasonable professional care and skill
customarily exercised by reputable members of Contractor's profession practicing in the Metropolitan
Southern California area and will use reasonable diligence and best judgment while exercising its
professional skill and expertise.
3.TERM
The term of this Agreement will be effective for a period of two (2) years from the date first above written.
The City Manager may amend the Agreement to extend it for one (1) additional one (1) year period or
parts thereof. Extensions will be based upon a satisfactory review of Contractor's performance, City or
CMWD's needs, and appropriation of funds by the City Council and/or Board of the CMWD. The parties
will prepare a written amendment indicating the effective date and length of the extended Agreement.
4.TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.
5.COMPENSATION
The total amount payable for the Services to be performed during the initial Agreement term shall not
exceed seven hundred ninety-one thousand six hundred thirty-eight dollars ($791,638). No other
compensation for the Services will be allowed except for items covered by subsequent amendments to
this Agreement. If the City elects to extend the Agreement, the amount shall not exceed the total amount
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 1
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 2
of the original Agreement. The City reserves the right to withhold a ten percent (10%) retention until City
or CMWD has accepted the work and/or Services specified in Exhibit "A".
Incremental payments, if applicable, should be made as outlined in attached Exhibit "A".
6.CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Procore Project Management and Collaboration System. This project may utilize the Owner’s Procore
(www.procore.com) online project management and document control platform. The intent of utilizing
Procore is to reduce cost and schedule risk, improve quality and safety, and maintain a healthy team
dynamic by improving information flow, reducing non-productive activities, reducing rework and
decreasing turnaround times. The Contractor is required to create a free web-based Procore user
account(s) and utilize web-based training / tutorials (as needed) to become familiar with the system.
Unless the Engineer approves otherwise, the Contractor shall process all project documents through
Procore because this platform will be used to submit, track, distribute and collaborate on project. If
unfamiliar or not otherwise trained with Procore, Contractor and applicable team members shall
complete a free training certification course located at http://learn.procore.com/procore-certification-
subcontractor. The Contractor is responsible for attaining their own Procore support, as needed, either
through the online training or reaching out to the Procore support team. It will be the responsibility of the
Contractor to regularly check Procore and review updated documents as they are added. There will be no
cost to the Contractor for use of Procore.
It is recommended that the Contractor provide mobile access for Windows, iOS located at
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/procore-construction-management/id374930542 or Android devices
located at https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.procore.activities with the Procore App
installed to at least one on-site individual to provide real-time access to current posted drawings,
specifications, RFIs, submittals, schedules, change orders, project documents, as well as any deficient
observations or punch list items. Providing mobile access will improve communication, efficiency, and
productivity for all parties. The use of Procore for project management does not relieve the contractor of
any other requirements as may be specified in the contract documents.
7.STATUS OF CONTRACTOR
Contractor will perform the Services in Contractor's own way as an independent contractor and in pursuit
of Contractor's independent calling, and not as an employee of City. Contractor will be under control of
City only as to the result to be accomplished but will consult with City as necessary. The persons used by
Contractor to provide services under this Agreement will not be considered employees of City for any
purposes.
The payment made to Contractor pursuant to the Agreement will be the full and complete compensation
to which Contractor is entitled. City will not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of
Contractor or its agents, employees or subcontractors. City will not be required to pay any workers'
compensation insurance or unemployment contributions on behalf of Contractor or its employees or
subcontractors. Contractor agrees to indemnify City and CMWD within thirty (30) days for any tax,
retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, unemployment payment or workers’
compensation payment which City may be required to make on behalf of Contractor or any agent,
employee, or subcontractor of Contractor for work done under this Agreement. At the City’s election, City
may deduct the indemnification amount from any balance owing to Contractor.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 3
8.SUBCONTRACTING
Contractor will not subcontract any portion of the Services without prior written approval of City. If
Contractor subcontracts any of the Services, Contractor will be fully responsible to City for the acts and
omissions of Contractor’s subcontractor and of the persons either directly or indirectly employed by the
subcontractor, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by Contractor.
Nothing contained in this Agreement will create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor
of Contractor and City. Contractor will be responsible for payment of subcontractors. Contractor will bind
every subcontractor and every subcontractor of a subcontractor by the terms of this Agreement
applicable to Contractor’s work unless specifically noted to the contrary in the subcontract and approved
in writing by City.
9.OTHER CONTRACTORS
The City reserves the right to employ other Contractors in connection with the Services.
10.INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor agrees to defend (with counsel approved by the City), indemnify and hold harmless the City of
Carlsbad, the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, and each of their officers, officials, employees and
volunteers from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorney’s fees arising out
of the performance of the work described herein caused by any negligence, recklessness, or willful
misconduct of the Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them
or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable.
If Contractor’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s
performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then,
and only to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein,
Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to
the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor, and, upon Contractor obtaining a
final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction. Contractor’s liability for such claim, including the
cost to defend, shall not exceed the Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault.
The parties expressly agree that any payment, attorney’s fee, cost or expense City incurs or makes to or
on behalf of an injured employee under the City’s self-administered workers’ compensation is included as
a loss, expense or cost for the purposes of this section, and that this section will survive the expiration or
early termination of this Agreement.
11.INSURANCE
Contractor will obtain and maintain for the duration of the Agreement and any and all amendments,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise out of or in
connection with performance of the services by Contractor or Contractor’s agents, representatives,
employees or subcontractors. The insurance will be obtained from an insurance carrier admitted and
authorized to do business in the State of California. The insurance carrier is required to have a current
Best's Key Rating of not less than "A-:VII"; OR with a surplus line insurer on the State of California’s List of
Approved Surplus Line Insurers (LASLI) with a rating in the latest Best’s Key Rating Guide of at least “A:X”;
OR an alien non-admitted insurer listed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
latest quarterly listings report.
11.1 Coverages and Limits. Contractor will maintain the types of coverages and minimum limits
indicated below, unless Risk Manager or City Manager approves a lower amount. These minimum
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 4
amounts of coverage will not constitute any limitations or cap on Contractor's indemnification obligations
under this Agreement. City, its officers, agents and employees make no representation that the limits of
the insurance specified to be carried by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement are adequate to protect
Contractor. If Contractor believes that any required insurance coverage is inadequate, Contractor will
obtain such additional insurance coverage, as Contractor deems adequate, at Contractor's sole expense.
The full limits available to the named insured shall also be available and applicable to the City as an
additional insured.
11.1.1 Commercial General Liability (CGL) Insurance. Insurance written on an “occurrence” basis,
including personal & advertising injury, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general
aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location
or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
11.1.2 Automobile Liability. (if the use of an automobile is involved for Contractor's work for
City). $2,000,000 combined single-limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
11.1.3 Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability. Workers' Compensation limits as
required by the California Labor Code. Workers' Compensation will not be required if Contractor has no
employees and provides, to City's satisfaction, a declaration stating this.
11.1.4 Professional Liability. Errors and omissions liability appropriate to Contractor’s profession
with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim. Coverage must be maintained for a period of five years
following the date of completion of the work.
11.2 Additional Provisions. Contractor will ensure that the policies of insurance required under this
Agreement contain, or are endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
11.2.1 The City and Carlsbad Municipal Water District will be named as an additional insured on
Commercial General Liability which shall provide primary coverage to the City.
11.2.2 Contractor will obtain occurrence coverage, excluding Professional Liability, which will be
written as claims-made coverage.
11.2.3 This insurance will be in force during the life of the Agreement and any extensions of it
and will not be canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice to City sent by certified mail pursuant
to the Notice provisions of this Agreement.
11.3 Providing Certificates of Insurance and Endorsements. Prior to City's execution of this Agreement,
Contractor will furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements to City.
11.4 Failure to Maintain Coverage. If Contractor fails to maintain any of these insurance coverages,
then City will have the option to declare Contractor in breach or may purchase replacement insurance or
pay the premiums that are due on existing policies in order to maintain the required coverages. Contractor
is responsible for any payments made by City to obtain or maintain insurance and City may collect these
payments from Contractor or deduct the amount paid from any sums due Contractor under this
Agreement.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 5
11.5 Submission of Insurance Policies. City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete and
certified copies of any or all required insurance policies and endorsements.
12.BUSINESS LICENSE
Contractor will obtain and maintain a City of Carlsbad Business License for the term of the Agreement, as
may be amended from time-to-time.
13.ACCOUNTING RECORDS
Contractor will maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred under this
Agreement. All records will be clearly identifiable and distinguish between costs incurred by the City and
costs incurred by CMWD. Contractor will allow a representative of City during normal business hours to
examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of records and any other documents created pursuant to
this Agreement. Contractor will allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities
related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this
Agreement.
14.OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
All work product produced by Contractor or its agents, employees, and subcontractors pursuant to this
Agreement is the property of City. In the event this Agreement is terminated, all work product produced
by Contractor or its agents, employees and subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement will be delivered
at once to City. Contractor will have the right to make one (1) copy of the work product for Contractor’s
records.
15.COPYRIGHTS
Contractor agrees that all copyrights that arise from the services will be vested in City and Contractor
relinquishes all claims to the copyrights in favor of City.
16.NOTICES
The name of the persons who are authorized to give written notice or to receive written notice on behalf
of City and on behalf of Contractor under this Agreement are:
For City For Contractor
Name Sean Diaz Name Paul Chau
Title Senior Engineer Title Project Manager
Department Public Works Address 35 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 550
City of Carlsbad Pasadena, CA 91101
Address 5950 El Camino Real Phone No. 626-568-4311
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Email PaulChau@kennedyjenks.com
Phone No. 442-200-7222
Each party will notify the other immediately of any changes of address that would require any notice or
delivery to be directed to another address.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 6
17.CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Contractor shall file a Conflict of Interest Statement with the City Clerk in accordance with the
requirements of the City of Carlsbad Conflict of Interest Code. The Contractor shall report investments or
interests as required in the City of Carlsbad Conflict of Interest Code.
Yes ☐ No ☒
18.GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
Contractor will keep fully informed of federal, state and local laws and ordinances and regulations which
in any manner affect those employed by Contractor, or in any way affect the performance of the Services
by Contractor. Contractor will at all times observe and comply with these laws, ordinances, and
regulations and will be responsible for the compliance of Contractor's services with all applicable laws,
ordinances and regulations.
Contractor will be aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and will
comply with those requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of
all agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants whose services are required by this Agreement.
19.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD (CARB) ADVANCED CLEAN FLEETS REGULATIONS
Contractor’s vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 8,500 lbs. and light-duty package
delivery vehicles operated in California may be subject to the California Air Resources Board (CARB)
Advanced Clean Fleets regulations. Such vehicles may therefore be subject to requirements to reduce
emissions of air pollutants. For more information, please visit the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage
at https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/advanced-clean-fleets.
20.DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT PROHIBITED
Contractor will comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations prohibiting
discrimination and harassment.
21.DISPUTE RESOLUTION
If a dispute should arise regarding the performance of the Services the following procedure will be used
to resolve any questions of fact or interpretation not otherwise settled by agreement between the parties.
Representatives of Contractor or City will reduce such questions, and their respective views, to writing. A
copy of such documented dispute will be forwarded to both parties involved along with recommended
methods of resolution, which would be of benefit to both parties. The representative receiving the letter
will reply to the letter along with a recommended method of resolution within ten (10) business days. If
the resolution thus obtained is unsatisfactory to the aggrieved party, a letter outlining the disputes will
be forwarded to the City Manager. The City Manager will consider the facts and solutions recommended
by each party and may then opt to direct a solution to the problem. In such cases, the action of the City
Manager will be binding upon the parties involved, although nothing in this procedure will prohibit the
parties from seeking remedies available to them at law.
22.TERMINATION
In the event of the Contractor's failure to prosecute, deliver, or perform the Services, City may terminate
this Agreement for nonperformance by notifying Contractor by certified mail of the termination. If City
decides to abandon or indefinitely postpone the work or services contemplated by this Agreement, City
may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Contractor. Upon notification of termination,
Contractor has five (5) business days to deliver any documents owned by City and all work in progress to
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 7
City address contained in this Agreement. City will make a determination of fact based upon the work
product delivered to City and of the percentage of work that Contractor has performed which is usable
and of worth to City in having the Agreement completed. Based upon that finding City will determine the
final payment of the Agreement.
City may terminate this Agreement by tendering thirty (30) days written notice to Contractor. Contractor
may terminate this Agreement by tendering sixty (60) days written notice to City. In the event of
termination of this Agreement by either party and upon request of City, Contractor will assemble the work
product and put it in order for proper filing and closing and deliver it to City. Contractor will be paid for
work performed to the termination date; however, the total will not exceed the lump sum fee payable
under this Agreement. City will make the final determination as to the portions of tasks completed and
the compensation to be made.
23.COVENANTS AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
Contractor warrants that Contractor has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a
bona fide employee working for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that Contractor has
not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission,
percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon, or resulting from, the award
or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City will have the right to annul this
Agreement without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or
otherwise recover, the full amount of the fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fees, gift, or contingent
fee.
24.CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS
By signing this Agreement, Contractor agrees that any Agreement claim submitted to City must be
asserted as part of the Agreement process as set forth in this Agreement and not in anticipation of
litigation or in conjunction with litigation. Contractor acknowledges that if a false claim is submitted to
City, it may be considered fraud and Contractor may be subject to criminal prosecution. Contractor
acknowledges that California Government Code sections 12650 et seq., the False Claims Act applies to this
Agreement and, provides for civil penalties where a person knowingly submits a false claim to a public
entity. These provisions include false claims made with deliberate ignorance of the false information or in
reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of information. If City seeks to recover penalties pursuant to the
False Claims Act, it is entitled to recover its litigation costs, including attorney's fees. Contractor
acknowledges that the filing of a false claim may subject Contractor to an administrative debarment
proceeding as the result of which Contractor may be prevented to act as a Contractor on any public work
or improvement for a period of up to five (5) years. Contractor acknowledges debarment by another
jurisdiction is grounds for City to terminate this Agreement.
25.THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.
The parties acknowledge and agree that the Carlsbad Municipal Water District is an intended third-party
beneficiary of the Agreement and may enforce the terms of the Agreement as if the Carlsbad Municipal
Water District was a named party to the Agreement.
26.JURISDICTION AND VENUE
Any action at law or in equity brought by either of the parties for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights
provided for by this Agreement will be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of San
Diego, State of California, and the parties waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in
these proceedings to any other county.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 8
27.SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
It is mutually understood and agreed that this Agreement will be binding upon City and Contractor and
their respective successors. Neither this Agreement nor any part of it nor any monies due or to become
due under it may be assigned by Contractor without the prior consent of City, which shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
28.ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated by it, along with
the purchase order for this Agreement and its provisions, embody the entire Agreement and
understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter of it. In case of conflict, the terms of the
Agreement supersede the purchase order. Neither this Agreement nor any of its provisions may be
amended, modified, waived or discharged except in a writing signed by both parties. This Agreement may
be executed in counterparts.
29.AUTHORITY
The individuals executing this Agreement and the instruments referenced in it on behalf of Contractor
each represent and warrant that they have the legal power, right and actual authority to bind Contractor
to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
[signatures on following page]
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11 E-503184A51 BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
Executed by Contractor this __ 4_t_h __ day of _____ Ju_n_e ___ � 2024.
CONTRACTOR
KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS, INC., a
California corporation
By:
{sign here)
Paul Chau, Vice President
(print name/title)
By:
(sign here)
Gerald P. Cavaluzzi, Vice President & Secretary
(print name/title)
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of
the State of California
By:
�Mayor
ATTEST:
SHERRY FREISINGER, City Clerk
Bu� f!-17L�
Deputy City Clerk
If required by City, proper notarial acknowledgment of execution by contractor must be attached. �
corporation. Agreement must be signed by one corporate officer from each of the following two groups.
Group A
Chairman,
President, or
Vice-President
Group B
Secretary,
Assistant Secretary,
CFO or Assistant Treasurer
Otherwise, the corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under
corporate seal empowering the officer(s) signing to bind the corporation.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CINDIE K. McMAHON, City Attorney
BY: btlAA. fu,myA, ------------Assistant City Attorney
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 9
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 10
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND FEE
Consultant to update the 2019 Sewer Master Plan (SMP) and the 2019 Potable Water Master Plan (WMP)
for a fee not-to-exceed $791,638.
All data collected or deliverables prepared by the Consultant will be provided to the City/CMWD in
electronic format compatible with the Microsoft platform (Excel spreadsheets, Word files, etc.), Adobe
PDF, Potable Water and Sewer Hydraulic Modeling files, and AutoCAD (.dwg) files as applicable. GIS data
files shall be in ArcGIS Pro format. All documents and data produced for this project shall be considered
property of the City/CMWD.
As part of the Master Plan Updates, the following City and CMWD hydraulic models shall be updated and
converted to the most current version of the selected modeling software, as determined in the evaluation
and selection of hydraulic modeling software task:
•InfoSWMM® Sewer Model
•InfoWater® Potable Water Model
The following table provides a summary of the tasks and deliverables included in the scope of services:
Task Deliverables
Task 1 – Project Management •Meeting Agendas and Minutes; Project Management Plan; Monthly
Project Status Reports and Invoices
Task 2 – Data Collection,
Research, and Review
•Data Request Tracking Log and updates; Basis of Planning
Meeting Agenda/ Minutes; TM No. 1 Basis of Planning; Sewer
flow monitoring report
Task 3 – Existing Facilities •Existing facilities database spreadsheets
Task 4 – Potable Water
Demand Analysis
•Excel-based demand forecast tool; Potable water demand forecast
evaluations and graphics (incorporate in TM No. 2 in Task 6)
Task 5 – Potable Water
Supply Analysis
•Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations in TM No. 2 in
Task 6.
Task 6 – Regulatory Analysis •TM No. 2, Potable Water Supply, Demands and Regulatory Analysis
Task 7 – Hydraulic Models •7A: Draft and final calibration plan; TM No. 4 Potable Water
Hydraulic Model Calibration
•7B: TM No. 5 Sewer Model System Calibration
•7C: TM No. 3 Evaluation and Recommendation for Hydraulic Modeling
Software
Task 8 – Existing System
Analysis
•8A: Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations for the
Existing Water System Analysis in TM No. 6, Task 9.
•8B: Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations for the
Existing Sewer System Analysis in TM No. 6, Task 9.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 11
Task 9 – Future System
Analysis
9A: TM No. 6, Existing and Future Potable Water Analysis; Updated
Potable Water Model (System Model Maps, All Run Scenario
Reports, All Source Files)
9B: TM No. 5 Existing and Future Sewer System Analysis; Updated
Sewer Model (System Model Maps, All Run Scenario Reports, All
Source Files)
Task 10 – Capital
Improvement Programs
10A: TM No. 7, Potable Water CIP and unit costs for facility
construction.
10B: TM No. 7, Sewer CIP and unit costs for facility construction.
Task 11 – Prepare Draft
and Final Reports
For each of the two reports:
• Prepare an outline of the proposed report organization.
• Prepare Draft Reports.
• Prepare Final Reports.
Consultant’s services shall include the following tasks and activities for each individual Master Plan
Update, as applicable:
Task 1 – Project Management
The Consultant shall provide one Project Manager for each master plan who shall serve as the primary
point of contact. The Consultant will provide project coordination and communication, invoicing, schedule
and budget tracking.
At a minimum, the Consultant’s Project Director, Project Manager and key support staff shall attend each
meeting. The Consultant shall prepare and submit meeting minutes to the City/CMWD within three (3)
business days for review and concurrence.
1.1 Kick-Off Meeting – The Consultant shall attend an in-person kick-off meeting with City/CMWD
staff. Prepare and submit meeting agenda and meeting minutes. Up to 3 KJ staff will attend in
person.
1.2 Coordination Meetings – The Consultant shall conduct up to six meetings with other City
departments (e.g., IT, Community Development - Planning, and Fire). The Consultant shall attend
one meeting each with partner agency stakeholders: Encina Wastewater Authority (EWA), the
City of Vista/Buena Sanitation District, the City of Oceanside, the City of Encinitas, Leucadia
Wastewater District, Olivenhain Water District, Vista Irrigation District, and Vallecitos Water
District. Prepare and submit meeting agendas and meeting notes. All meetings with partner
agencies shall be coordinated through the CMWD/City Project Manager. It is assumed that all 6
meetings will be virtual. Up to 2 KJ staff will attend each meeting.
1.3 Progress Meetings – The Consultant shall attend up to 12 progress review meetings to discuss
project status, request or present information, and gain concurrence on key project issues. Six of
the meetings shall be attended in-person. The Consultant shall participate in monthly
teleconference calls or Microsoft Teams meetings to keep the City/CMWD Project Manager
apprised of project status. Prepare and submit meeting agendas and meeting notes. 1 KJ staff will
attend each in-person meeting.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 12
1.4 Project Management Plan – Prepare a PMP at the onset of the project to include an Executive
Summary, Project Scope and Deliverables, Project Schedule (Gantt chart), Project Team and
Responsibilities, Risk and Issue Management Plan, Communication Management Plan, and Cost
and Quality Management Plan. Throughout the project, provide general project management
functions, prepare and maintain the PMP and monitor progress and budget. Provide a summary
of work performed with each invoice. Submit monthly project schedule updates with each status
meeting.
1.5 QA/QC – Project deliverables will undergo quality reviews prior to submittal to the City in
accordance with KJ’s Quality Control Program. An internal team project initiation review meeting
and Concept & Criteria Review meeting will be conducted to review project approach and
methodology early in the process. As the project is executed, other QC reviews are performed at
appropriate milestones, which are generally associated with submittals to CMWD; internal QC
review will occur prior to submission of a submittal.
Task 1 Deliverables:
• Meeting Agendas and Minutes
• Project Management Plan
• Monthly Project Status Reports and Invoices
Task 2 – Data Collection, Research and Review
City/CMWD will provide the consultant with the latest GIS data files, existing hydraulic models, as-built
drawings and records of CMWD water and City wastewater facilities. GIS shape files, geodatabases,
engineering standards and specifications will be made available at this time. The Consultant shall review
these records and gather additional information to support the planning and engineering evaluations.
2.1 Data Collection and Review. Prepare and maintain a data request tracking log and provide
common access among all team members via Microsoft Teams or other City/CMWD approved
data management platform. Obtain and review all available and pertinent information, reports,
data, and mapping relevant to the Master Plan Updates including, but not limited to the following:
• The 2012 and 2019 Water Master Plans.
• The 2012 and 2019 Sewer Master Plans.
• The 2019 Asset Management Master Plan.
• The 2015 and 2020 Urban Water Management Plans.
• Existing hydraulic models with current GIS and SCADA data.
• Water and sewer monthly billing records, 2017 through 2024.
• Hourly water meter AMI data for the past 2 years.
• General Plan zoning and land use data including the Housing Element (2021-2029), Final EIR
and Supplemental EIR for the 2024 Housing Element Update, and the Village & Barrio Master
Plan.
• Relevant planning reports including building permits issued, development monitoring reports,
and pending planning applications for proposed developments, years 2017 through 2024.
• Interagency agreements and Memorandum of Understanding with Buena Sanitation District,
City of Vista, Vallecitos Water District, Leucadia Wastewater District and Encina Wastewater
Authority.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 13
• Uniform Contract with the SDCWA for purchase of desalinated water.
• Engineering reports, documents, engineering standards, regulatory standards and policies.
• Operational data including Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) settings and
controls, pipe condition assessment reports, corrosion reports.
• The City of Carlsbad’s Asset Register data. The Asset Register includes the asset conditions
and remaining useful life of existing assets to be considered in the preparation of each Master
Plan Update and developing priorities for proposed CIP Projects.
• Sewer flow data from Encina Wastewater Authority meters and lift station operational data
for evaluation of Carlsbad’s flow contribution to interceptor sewers.
2.2 Sewer flow monitoring.
• The Consultant shall meet with Engineering, Operations and Asset Management staff to
develop a list of areas of concern in the existing sewer system in addition to the available
condition assessment data.
• Review flow monitoring data and rehabilitation plans prepared for the inflow and infiltration
(I&I) program since the 2019 SMP Update. Review the main source location of I/I found in the
flow monitoring studies, review plans and recommend a remediation plan based on those
results, as applicable.
• Wet weather flow monitoring: Prepare and implement a flow monitoring plan and submit the
plan to the City for review before incorporating the results in the SMP Update. The plan shall
be prepared after the Consultant has reviewed the existing data and met with Utilities
Department staff to prioritize the placement of the flow meters. The flow monitoring data
shall be reviewed and used in conjunction with lift station flow data or manhole remote
monitoring data to backcheck the calibration of the sewer hydraulic model in identified areas.
Pending the results and agreed upon discussions with city staff, data can be used to assist
with recalibration of the sewer hydraulic model as required. The Consultant shall include the
following items in this subtask:
o Twelve flow meters will be installed and will remain in place for a period of eight weeks.
o Traffic control permit and traffic control operations for flow meter installation and
removal.
o The Consultant shall implement the flow monitoring plan during the 2024-2025 wet
weather season.
2.3 Basis of Planning Workshop. Conduct a 4-hour workshop with City staff to present key issues and
prioritize goals for the Master Plan Updates. In addition to the 4-hour Basis of Planning Workshop,
KJ proposes holding 2 additional 4-hour workshops, one with the water operations/engineering
staff and the second with sewer operations/engineering staff. The purpose of these additional
utility-focused workshops is to interview the City’s most experienced O&M staff and engineers to
understand existing operational issues, potential system vulnerabilities, opportunities for system
improvements, and ongoing performance-based asset management strategies. For both water
and sewer utilities, topics may include:
• Discuss any operational/performance issues for most critical water/sewer infrastructure with
O&M staff
• Identify any need for additional field data collection to understand asset condition
• Potential system improvements/CIP projects not identified in previous CIPs or through the
Asset Management Plan (AMP).
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 14
• Review of Business Risk Exposure (BRE) calculation methods/procedures
At the conclusion of the workshop, prepare a Basis of Planning Technical Memorandum to summarize the
following topics:
• Project Goals and Objectives
• Demand Forecasting Tools and Approach
• Water Supply Parameters and Level of Service Goals
• Identification of Known System Deficiencies
• Design and Planning Criteria
• Hydraulic Modeling Approach
• Regulatory Issues of Concern
• Interagency Coordination Opportunities and Constraints
• Asset Management data integration into the WMP and SMP Updates
• Summary of utility-focused workshops and operations input
Key Assumptions / Quality Control:
The GIS database is up to date when it is delivered to KJ as part of Task 2. It is assumed the current GIS
database will be used to update the hydraulic model. In the process of its data review, the Consultant
shall examine the water and sewer utility systems and the database of attributes and the CMWD/City
atlas, as-built plans, record drawings, and GIS database information. The Consultant shall develop and
submit a list of discrepancies discovered during the review to the City for verification. City staff will make
the necessary changes to correct the existing GIS databases within an agreed upon timeframe. The
consultant shall incorporate any updates to the GIS database into the final model.
Task 2 Deliverables:
• Data Request Tracking Log and updates
• Basis of Planning Meeting Agenda/Minutes
• TM No. 1 Basis of Planning
• Sewer flow monitoring report
Task 3 – Existing Facilities
Provide a listing of existing water and sewer facilities and capacities and summarize system characteristics
and system operations. The operational set points for pressure reducing stations and pump stations will
be documented.
Task 3A – Existing Potable Water Facilities
• Reservoirs
• Distribution and transmission pipelines
• Water pump stations
• Pressure Reducing Stations
• Agency Interconnections
The study effort shall evaluate areas of operational concern in the water distribution system to identify
potential improvements for the CIP. The following elements shall be inventoried and studied and
recommendations for system improvements provided:
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 15
• Water storage capacity.
• Pressure zone redundancy.
• Redundancy and reliability of critical pipelines and isolation valves, including those in limited access
areas such as highway crossings, railroad crossings, environmentally sensitive areas, topographically
constrained areas, easements on private properties, and high-pressure pipelines.
• Identification of facilities critical for fire flow capacity such as distribution pipelines 6” and smaller and
pressure reducing stations.
• Abandonment of pressurized, but inactive, potable water services.
• Steel, ductile iron, and asbestos cement pipe transmission and distribution pipelines.
• Single-check backflow prevention devices.
• Maerkle Dam outlet valve.
Task 3B – Existing Sewer Facilities
• Lift stations and force mains
• Diversion structures
• Collector and trunk sewers
• Sewer interceptor systems
• Interagency agreements
• Wastewater treatment and disposal
The study effort shall evaluate areas of operational concern in the sewer collection system to identify
potential improvements for the CIP. The following elements shall be inventoried and studied and
recommendations for system improvements provided:
• Wet well and emergency storage
• Redundant force mains and sewer pumps
Task 3 Deliverables:
• Existing facilities database spreadsheets
Task 4 – Potable Water Demand Analysis
CMWD maintains a billing database of its metered water demands. The water meters are read on a
monthly cycle. This data will be used as the basis for existing system demand analysis, via development
of an excel-based water demand forecast tool. In addition, CMWD records daily water purchases and that
data can be used for additional analysis of the past two years. It is understood that the CMWD has AMI
data for metered water demands, which will be utilized to evaluate monthly, daily, and hourly demands.
Prior to using the AMI data, KJ will thoroughly review the data for anomalies and coordinate with the
CMWD to make adjustments to the AMI data, as needed.
The City’s land use data shall be used for future demand evaluation in conjunction with the demand
forecast tool. As part of the demand analysis, the Consultant shall perform these minimum tasks:
4.1 Highest Consumption. Identify the top 40 critical system users for further location identification
by CMWD staff. The purpose of this review is to consider how the consumption patterns of these
large users may change over time.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 16
4.2 Demand Variability. Evaluate annual, seasonal, and diurnal variability in demand. Review and
update design criteria from the 2019 Water Master Plan, including maximum day and peaking
factors, to be used for hydraulic modeling and future planning.
4.3 Geographic Distribution & Demand. Evaluate the geographic distribution of demand for each
pressure zone, based on assignment of water meters to nodes in the hydraulic model.
4.4 Statistical Demand. Summarize statistical demand information such as minimum day, maximum
day, unaccounted for water and total annual demand for historical water uses, using the excel
based demand forecast tool or as otherwise approved by CMWD.
4.5 Unit Demands. Review and confirm that unit demands listed in the District’s standards for
development are appropriate, and adjust, if needed, based on the demand analysis. KJ will
calculate existing unit demands (gpm/acre) for land use categories based on the City’s existing
demands and the Carlsbad General Plan.
4.6 Buildout Demands. Develop an approach for buildout demand determination. At least two
different methods of demand estimation should be considered for demands estimation
comparisons. Provide a brief technical memorandum (TM) for CMWD consideration. Estimate
buildout demands for the planning horizon in consideration of consumption, water use efficiency
and population trends. Buildout demands will be estimated based on undeveloped parcels in the
City’s service area and unit demands calculated under Task 4.5. It is anticipated that variations in
the unit demands will be utilized to develop a buildout demand envelope for the City’s
consideration. Adjustments may be made to account for water conservation and potential future
changes in land use. The analysis will be coordinated with the City’s General Plan and Planning
Department to ensure consistency in planning principles for demand projections.
Task 4 Deliverables
• Excel-based demand forecast tool
• Potable water demand forecast evaluations and graphics (incorporate in TM No. 2 in Task 6)
Task 5 – Potable Water Supply Analysis
5.1 Existing Water Supply Sources. Evaluate and summarize existing water supply sources, capacities,
and potential issues that could affect water delivery to the District.
5.2 Future Supply Sources. Review and identify future supply sources needed to meet demands
developed in Task 4. Seawater desalination should be given special consideration, based on the
terms of new Water Purchase Agreement for direct supply, as well as recycled water. Water
supplies shall be provided for 2020, 30 years in 5-year increments, and buildout.
5.3 Supply Reliability. Discuss supply reliability and opportunities to improve potable supply
reliability and redundancy. Develop and evaluate potential failure scenarios with input from
CMWD staff.
Task 5 Deliverables
• Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations in TM No. 2 in Task 6.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 17
Task 6 – Regulatory Analysis
Task 6A – Regulatory Analysis (Potable Water)
6A.1 Review Standards, Ordinances, and Regulations as pertain to potable water. Review the District’s
design standards, water quality management practices, and federal and state regulations and
summarize findings. Review the findings of the District’s Lead and Copper Rule Revision inventory
and assessment.
6A.2 Summarize State and Federal existing water quality standards. Identify current and future potable
water system monitoring and reporting requirements. Prepare a table listing monitoring type,
frequency, reporting agency, test methodology, and the potential implications on operations or
the need for system improvements.
6A.3 Provide a summary of upcoming regulatory issues that could impact potable water distribution,
such as water conservation.
6A.4 Review CMWD planning criteria and design standards and provide recommendations for revisions
for CMWD review. Key criteria include unit demands, pressure and flow requirements, storage,
fire flow, and facility redundancy.
6A.5 Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations in TM No. 2.
6A.6 Prepare a TM No. 2 summarizing the findings of Tasks 4, 5 and 6.
Task 6A Deliverables
• TM No. 2, Potable Water Supply, Demands and Regulatory Analysis
Task 6B – Regulatory Analysis (Sewer)
6B.1 Review and summarize existing and pending sanitary sewer regulations and ordinances including
the latest State of California Waste Discharge Requirements and describe any potential impacts
on the City’s management and operation of its sewer collection system.
6B.2 The Consultant shall review the City’s Operation and Maintenance Program including the Sewer
System Management Plan (SSMP), condition assessment reports and rehabilitation and
replacement plans. In addition, the Consultant shall address the requirements of the SSMP, titled
System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan.
6B.3 Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations in TM No. 2.
Task 6B Deliverables
• TM No. 2, Regulatory Analysis for Sewer System
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 18
Task 7 – Hydraulic Models
Task 7A – Potable Water Hydraulic Model
CMWD currently uses the potable water model in InfoWater. An alternative water modeling software
shall be evaluated in Task 7C. If an alternative software is selected by CMWD for use on this project, the
Consultant shall convert and calibrate the model to the selected water modeling software.
The Consultant shall thoroughly review the water GIS data and complete and calibrate the water model
to fully represent the existing potable water distribution system. A static and extended period calibration
will be performed based on the established baseline demand. Once the existing model has been updated,
it shall be used to analyze the existing and 2050 buildout scenarios and to develop a Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP).
7A.1 Use the data collected in Tasks 1 and 2 to complete or update the facilities of the existing potable
model. The model shall include necessary potable water infrastructure in the District’s water
system. Provide large plots of the model shapefiles with pressure zones, reservoir tanks, pressure
reducing stations, interties, and pipe diameter labels for CMWD review. Identify areas for
discussion and updates to incorporate into the model, highlighting areas for CMWD review.
Incorporate CMWD comments into model. KJ will provide an ArcGIS Online database of the model
elements that the City can access online and review.
7A.2 Based on the characteristics of the existing model, develop calibration procedures for Extended
Period Simulations (EPS). CMWD will collect and furnish data to include SDCWA supply data and
SCADA or manually recorded data on tank levels, operating pressures at pressure reducing
stations or key nodes, and pump operations. KJ will provide a draft calibration plan for the City’s
review that will encompass both static and EPS calibration procedures. A final calibration plan will
be provided based on the City’s comments.
7A.3 Review and update hydraulic friction factors to be used for the model. The friction factors will be
updated based on the static calibration results developed under Task 7A.4.
7A.4 Review and calibrate the existing model, establishing a baseline demand, for hydraulic conditions
under static and EPS based on the data collected in the Potable Water Demand Analysis Task and
in Task 7A.2. The existing model has been calibrated based on consumption data from 2017
through 2019, and partial-year data collected in 2022.
The static calibration will be conducted based on fire flow data and system pressure data provided
by the City. The EPS calibration will be conducted based on SCADA data and demand data
provided by the City. It is assumed that the EPS calibration will be conducted over a 2-day period.
The calibration level of accuracy will be developed in accordance with the general guidelines
provided by AWWA Manual M32, Section 4.1.4.2. Predicted HGLs will be within 5-10 ft of the
field-recorded values, and water level fluctuations predicted by the model will be within 3-6 ft of
the field-recorded values.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 19
Task 7A Deliverables
• Draft and Final Calibration Plan
• TM No. 4 Potable Water Hydraulic Model Calibration
Task 7B – Sewer Hydraulic Model
The City currently uses the InfoSWMM Sewer Model, based on system data as of 2016. An alternative
sewer modeling software shall be evaluated in Task 7C. If an alternative software is selected for use on
this project, the Consultant shall convert and calibrate the model to the selected water modeling
software.
The Consultant shall thoroughly review the sewer GIS data and complete and calibrate the sewer model
to fully represent the City’s existing sewer system. Lift station flow data and force main conveyance
systems shall be reviewed and included in the model update. The model shall be used to analyze the
existing system demands and capacities and future demands and the required system improvements.
7B.1 Use the data collected in Tasks 1 and 2 to complete or update the facilities of the existing sewer
model. Provide large plots of the model shapefiles for all sewer facilities (gravity and force main
pipes, diameter and materials, lift stations) for city review. Identify areas needing clarification or
additional data to incorporate into the model, highlighting areas for City review. Incorporate City
comments into the model. KJ will provide an ArcGIS Online database of the model elements that
the City can access online and review.
7B.2 Review and update hydraulic friction factors and manning’s coefficients to be used for the model.
The friction factors will be updated based on the static calibration results developed under Task
7B.3.
7B.3 Calibrate the existing model for hydraulic conditions based on Task 7B.1 and 7B.2, in conjunction
with the Existing Sewer System Analysis Task. For the model calibration, the following steps will
be taken:
1. Import Flow Monitoring and Rainfall Data. Import flow monitoring data for each monitored
location. Import weighted rainfall data for the collection system service area.
2. GWI and BWF Extraction. Use software to separate dry weather flow meter data into
groundwater infiltration (GWI) and base wastewater flow (BWF). BWF represents the sewer
loadings from upstream customers.
3. Define BWF Pattern and Adjust Sewershed Loads. Use the isolated BWF to develop a demand
pattern that can be applied to upstream customers. Adjust the magnitude of the sewer loads
to match the monitored flows during dry weather flow conditions (less the GWI).
4. Create RDII/Wet Weather Time Series. The rainfall derived inflow and infiltration (RDII)
during a wet weather event is defined as the total observed flow minus the BWF and GWI.
This helps identify what portion of wet weather flow is due to I&I.
5. Calibrate RTK Hydrograph Parameters. The RTK parameters are used to measure the short-
term, medium-term, and long-term sewer flow responses to a wet weather event. The
modeling software is used to calibrate the RTK parameters for each sewershed (area
upstream of the flow monitoring station). A genetic algorithm is used to iterate the RTK
parameters until the predicted RDII matches the observed RDII. The more significant wet
weather events that are captured during the flow monitoring period, the more accurate the
RDII calibration is.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 20
6. Finally, the calibrated flow can be compared to the observed flow at each flow monitoring
location to examine how well the model performs.
7B.4 Evaluate current sewer flow monitoring data versus data used in the 2019 sewer model to
determine the existing peak dry weather and peak wet weather flow factors. Identify areas that
have undergone sewer replacement and incorporate inflow and infiltration (I&I) analysis from
recent flow reports into the model. Review and update design criteria from the 2019 Water
Master Plan to be used for sewer hydraulic modeling and planning.
7B.5 Use the calibrated model to analyze the capacity of the existing system in its current condition
and with future system buildout conditions under both peak dry weather and peak wet weather
flows.
7B.6 Complete model data input/output, provide results, and provide maps of each of the model runs
in the report. Provide deliverables of all model data in digital file format and in accordance with
existing system and future system tasks.
7B.7 An optional task is provided to address unanticipated out-of-scope items related to updating and
calibrating the sewer hydraulic model. The budget is equal to 10% of the budget for Subtasks 7B.1
through 7B.6.
Task 7B Deliverables
• TM No. 5 Sewer Model System Calibration
Task 7C – Evaluation and Selection of Hydraulic Modeling Software
The Consultant shall conduct an evaluation of the existing hydraulic modeling software and an alternative
hydraulic modeling software(s) such as AquaTwin Sewer and AquaTwin Water by Aquanuity. The
evaluation shall thoroughly compare both software packages for use in the WMP and SMP Updates and
for future hydraulic analyses. GIS data and ArcGIS Pro platform compatibility must be considered. The
Consultant shall list advantages and disadvantages for each software and develop an evaluation matrix
with weighted categories for City/CMWD selection of the hydraulic modeling software.
7C.1 Evaluate and recommend a water hydraulic modeling software. The evaluation shall include the
use of CMWD’s potable water model in InfoWater and compare it with another software, such as
AquaTwin Water. The Consultant shall prepare a TM to summarize the evaluation and provide a
basis for the recommended hydraulic modeling software for this project.
7C.2 Evaluate and recommend a sewer hydraulic modeling software. The evaluation shall include the
use of City’s sewer model in InfoSWMM and compare it with another software, such as AquaTwin
Sewer. The Consultant shall prepare a TM to summarize the evaluation and provide a basis for
the recommended hydraulic modeling software for this project.
Task 7C Deliverables
• TM No. 3 Evaluation and Recommendation for Hydraulic Modeling Software
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 21
Task 8 – Existing System Analysis
Task 8A – Existing System Analysis (Potable Water)
8A.1 Evaluate the design criteria based on a review of the data collected in prior tasks, previous studies,
and criteria typically used in the industry. Prepare draft design criteria to be discussed with CMWD
staff and finalized prior to the system evaluations.
8A.2 Use the calibrated model to analyze the existing potable water system with the established
baseline demands under the following demand conditions:
• Minimum Day Demands
• Average Day Demands
• Maximum Day Demand
• Peak Hour Demands
• Fire flow – assume one max fire demand scenario for each of the 17 major pressure zones
8A.3 Use the hydraulic model to analyze system capacity and for the recommended sizing of the
required infrastructure to improve the existing system for hydraulic performance and reliability.
The improvements shall consider pipelines, pressure reducing stations, storage facilities and
operational improvements such as off-peak pumping and SCADA improvements to reduce
operational costs.
8A.4 Perform an operational review of the water system and identify possible operational or facility
improvements for winter and summer seasons. Provide recommendations to achieve optimum
distribution system operation.
8A.5 Review the existing pressure zone boundaries and any changes since the 2019 Water Master Plan
Update. Provide recommendations to improve service.
8A.6 Utilize the model to conduct up to four outage scenarios to assist with supply reliability
evaluations in Potable Water Supply Analysis Task.
8A.7 Verify that the distribution system can meet minimum pressure requirements in accordance with
California regulations and the established design criteria.
8A.8 Update the fire flow analyses conducted in the 2012/2019 WMP and prepare a map of facilities
summarizing the fire flow analysis using the calibrated model.
Task 8A Deliverables
• Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations for the Existing Water System Analysis
in TM No. 6, Task 9.
Task 8B – Existing System Analysis (Sewer)
8B.1 Review historical and projected sanitary sewer per capita and sanitary sewer factors for the
various land use categories in the General Plan. Evaluate design criteria for the sewer collection
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 22
system using previous studies and typical industry criteria. Prepare draft design criteria for review
with Carlsbad staff and finalize prior to system evaluations.
8B.2 Review the residential, industrial, and commercial flows and estimate flows based on the Carlsbad
Engineering Standards and the Carlsbad Municipal Code for Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs). KJ
will use the water demand analysis developed under Task 4 to develop sewer return flow ratios
that will be used for existing sewage flow calculations. Sewer return ratios will be established for
residential, industrial, and commercial flows; and will be calibrated based on available sewage
flow data provided by the City.
8B.3 Investigate high sewer generation rates from commercial or industrial operations which may
contribute to significantly greater flows such as car wash, laundry or manufacturing facilities,
based on a review of water demand data or sewer flow monitoring reports. Provide
recommendations for sewer flow monitoring where additional data is warranted. Evaluate major
discharges from commercial or industrial point sources using available plans of the existing
establishments, industrial and institutional zoning plans, and projections of past records of water
or wastewater flow rates.
8B.4 Obtain, evaluate and summarize current flow and estimated flow projections from neighboring
sewer agencies that contribute flow to the sewer interceptor system and compare those flows
with City and EWA flow records. Evaluate interceptor capacity based on flow data from
neighboring agencies.
8B.5 Summarize the I&I based on prior analyses, characterize the main source location of I&I found in
the flow monitoring studies.
8B.6 Use the calibrated model to represent the following scenarios for the existing system and identify
deficiencies. Lift stations with dual force mains and flow diversion structures shall include a
separate model run for each condition. At a minimum, model conditions shall be run which
represent the following scenarios:
• Existing system with peak dry weather flow (PDWF)
• Existing system with peak wet weather flow (PWWF)
• Existing system with capital improvements constructed and with PWWF
8B.7 An optional task is provided to address unanticipated out-of-scope items related to the sewer
hydraulic model analysis. The budget is equal to 10% of the budget for Subtasks 8B.1 through
8B.6.
Task 8B Deliverables
• Summarize deficiencies and provide recommendations for the Existing Sewer System Analysis
in TM No. 6, Task 9.
Task 9 – Future System Analysis
For the Future System Analysis, three potable water demand/sewer flow scenarios will be evaluated:
2030, 2035, and 2050. Future potable water demand projections will be based on coordination with the
City’s Planning Department.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 23
Task 9A– Future System Analysis (Potable Water)
9A.1 Analyze the future system supply. Prepare updated storage and demand tables under the buildout
scenario for the water system.
9A.2 Develop demands in cooperation with CMWD staff. Identify general system deficiencies resulting
from potential zoning, land use or development density changes in the General Plan, the Housing
Element Update and the Village and Barrio Master Plan.
9A.3 Use the calibrated model to analyze the future potable water system with the established baseline
demands under the following demand conditions:
• Minimum Day Demands
• Average Day Demands
• Maximum Day Demand
• Peak Hour Demands
• Fire flow – assume one maximum day plus fire demand scenario for each of the 17 major
pressure zones
9A.4 Develop modeling scenarios and a CIP phasing plan for facility improvements or extensions to
meet projected buildout demands including the General Plan and Housing Element Update and
the Village and Barrio Master Plan, evaluating the system impacts at up to 16 rezone sites. One
scenario shall evaluate the impact of the California Density Bonus Law with an assumed 50%
density bonus above the local limit.
9A.5 Prepare TM No. 6 summarizing potable water existing and future system analysis.
Task 9A Deliverables
• TM No. 6, Existing and Future Potable Water Analysis
• Updated Potable Water Model
o System Model Maps – showing pipe, node, and all model feature identification numbers.
Produce maps at a scale that provide legibility of all facility data.
o All Run Scenario Reports – results corresponding to System Model Maps (excel and pdf
format)
o All Source Files – used for the model data in electronic file format for download and
external flash drive.
Task 9B – Future System Analysis (Sewer)
9B.1 Develop sewer generation flow rates in cooperation with City staff. Identify general system
deficiencies resulting from potential zoning and land use changes in the General Plan, Housing
Element Update, and the Village and Barrio Master Plan.
KJ will utilize sewer return flow ratios developed under Task 8B and the water demand projections
developed under Task 9A to calculate future sewer flow projections. The City’s projected per
capita water demand, based on coordination with the City’s Planning Department, will be utilized
to incorporate future additional water conservation to the sewer flow projection analysis.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 24
9B.2 Use the calibrated model to represent the following scenarios for the future sewer system and
identify deficiencies. Lift stations with dual force mains and flow diversion structures shall include
a separate model run for each condition. At a minimum, model conditions shall be run which
represent the following scenarios:
• Future system with peak dry weather flow (PDWF)
• Future system with peak wet weather flow (PWWF)
9B.3 Develop modeling scenarios and a CIP phasing plan for facility improvements or extensions to
meet projected buildout demands including the General Plan and Housing Element Update and
the Village and Barrio Master Plan, evaluating the system impacts at up to 16 rezone sites. One
scenario shall evaluate the impact of the California Density Bonus Law with an assumed 50%
density bonus above the local limit.
9B.4 Update and incorporate Sewer Benefit Area maps for the City’s 25 growth management zones
(GMZs) in hard copy, color-coded CIP and sanitary sewer maps (including sewer basin boundaries).
Improvements that are necessitated by future development projects or by increases in
development density shall be identified separately in the CIP phasing plan.
9B.5 Prepare TM No. 6 summarizing existing and future sewer system analysis.
Task 9B Deliverables:
• TM No. 6 Existing and Future Sewer System Analysis
• Updated Sewer Model
o System Model Maps – showing pipe, manhole, and all model feature identification
numbers.
o All Run Scenario Reports – results corresponding to System Model Maps (excel and pdf
format).
o All Source Files – used for the model data in electronic file format for download and
external flash drive.
Task 10 – Capital Improvement Programs
Task 10A – Capital Improvement Program (Potable Water)
10A.1 Develop a comprehensive 25-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) based on the
recommended hydraulic design criteria, forecasted development densities and associated
demands, and the hydraulic modeling results. The CIP shall outline the project needs, budgets,
and priorities for 5-year, 10-year and 25-year periods.
10A.2 The CIP shall identify specific projects to meet the required levels of service and factors of safety.
Where deficiencies exist, the Consultant shall provide recommendations on alternatives, where
feasible. Existing undersized facilities shall be prioritized for improvement and clearly identified
on a color exhibit (minimum 48-inch-wide scroll plot). Projects shall be identified with the
recommended improvement details (pipe size, length, etc.) and estimated costs.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 25
Each CIP project will be summarized in a one-page project sheet that includes a description, map
or figure, cost estimate, and implementation schedule. It is assumed that up to 30 projects will be
developed.
10A.3 Improvements that are necessitated by future development projects or an increase in
development density shall be identified separately in the CIP phasing plan.
10A.4 Conduct a CIP Workshop to review recommended projects with Engineering and Operations staff
to discuss validation with field observations, potential for grouping multiple projects and
prioritization of projects. Review the Asset Management Master Plan and the replacement and
rehabilitation program to evaluate potential phasing or bundling of CIP projects. Special attention
should be given to water mains between/adjacent to buildings, limited access locations, and
critical facilities.
10A.5 Develop unit costs for the various facilities to be implemented. Provide a TM to the District for
review of the unit costs to be used for CIP development. Provide budgetary level cost estimates
for the CIP.
10A.6 Prepare TM No. 7, summarizing potable water projects for Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Task 10A Deliverables:
• TM No. 7, Potable Water CIP and unit costs for facility construction.
Task 10B – Capital Improvement Program (Sewer)
10B.1 Develop a comprehensive 25-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) based on the
recommended hydraulic design criteria, forecasted development densities and associated
demands, and the hydraulic modeling results. The CIP shall outline the project needs, budgets,
and priorities for 5-year, 10-year and 25-year periods.
10B.2 The CIP shall identify specific projects to meet the required levels of service and factors of safety.
Where deficiencies exist, the Consultant shall provide recommendations on alternatives, where
feasible. Existing undersized facilities shall be prioritized for improvement and clearly identified
on a color exhibit (minimum 48-inch-wide scroll plot). Projects shall be identified with the
recommended improvement details (pipe size, length, etc.) and estimated costs.
Each CIP project will be summarized in a one-page project sheet that includes a description, map
or figure, cost estimate, and implementation schedule. It is assumed that up to 30 projects will be
developed.
10B.3 Improvements that are necessitated by future development projects or an increase in
development density shall be identified separately in the CIP phasing plan.
10B.4 Conduct a CIP Workshop to review recommended projects with Engineering and Operations staff
to discuss validation with field observations, potential for grouping multiple projects and
prioritization of projects. Review the Asset Management Master Plan and the replacement and
rehabilitation program to evaluate potential phasing or bundling of CIP projects. Special attention
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 26
should be given to facilities constrained by limited access or posing other risks to sewer collection
system operations.
10B.5 Develop unit costs for the various facilities to be implemented. Provide a TM for review of the
unit costs to be used for CIP development. Provide budgetary level cost estimates for the CIP.
10B.6 Upon completion of CIP development, the Consultant shall prepare an update of the City’s sewer
connection fees. Sewer connection fees are used to generate revenue to construct sewer
infrastructure needed to support new development. The fees pay for the planning, design and
construction of capacity improvements and/or new facilities required for the conveyance and
treatment of sewage.
10B.7 Prepare TM No. 7, summarizing the Sewer CIP program and updated sewer connection fees.
Task 10B Deliverables:
•TM No. 7, Sewer CIP and unit costs for facility construction.
Task 11 – Prepare Draft and Final Reports
The results of the analyses, findings, and recommendations shall be summarized into clear and well-
documented reports (one for the Potable Water Master Plan Update, and one for the Sewer Master Plan
Update). Hard copy reports shall be bound in three-ring binders and include appropriate supporting
documentation. Electronic files shall be compiled with bookmarks indexed to the table of contents. The
reports should generally provide the minimum content as provided in the current Master Plans, which are
located on the City’s website, and additional information contained in the contract Scope of Services.
Task 11 Deliverables:
For each of the two reports:
11.1 Prepare an outline of the proposed report organization. The outline should at minimum
include the items listed in the 2019 Water Master Plan Update and 2019 Sewer Master
Plan Update. This draft report outline will be discussed at the kick-off meeting and finalized
early in the project to establish the requirements for the final deliverables.
11.2 Prepare Draft Reports. Incorporate City/CWMD comments on Technical Memoranda that
are submitted during the study effort. Submit five (5) copies of the bound draft reports for
review, which shall include all figures, tables, system maps, computer analyses, cost
estimating, and recommendations for prioritization and implementation in color-coded
maps and table format. It is assumed that Carlsbad will provide comments on the Draft
Reports within 15 works days.
11.3 Prepare Final Reports. Incorporate City/CWMD comments on the Draft Report. Upon
incorporation of comments, submit ten (10) paper copies and an electronic copy of the
final report on an external hard drive in PDF format. Additionally, all electronic files
(spreadsheets, reports, TMs, figures, maps, hydraulic model files, and CAD drawings) shall
be delivered on an external hard drive in the native file format.
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
June 11, 2024 Item #10 Page 31 of 40
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 27
Carlsbad Master Plan Fee Summary
Continues next page
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 28
Carlsbad Master Plan Fee Summary
TASK DESCRIPTION Total Budget Potable
Water Master
Plan (CMWD)
Sewer
Master Plan
(City)
Task 1 – Project Management
General Project Management & Administration
1.1 Kickoff Meeting $6,675 $3,338 $3,338
1.2 Coordination Meetings (6 virtual) $9,420 $4,710 $4,710
1.3 Progress Meetings (6 virtual, 6 in-person) $22,770 $11,385 $11,385
1.4 Project Management Plan $29,050 $14,525 $14,525
1.5 QA/QC $9,770 $4,885 $4,885
Task 2 – Data Collection, Research and Review
2.1 Data Collection and Review $5,090 $2,545 $2,545
2.2 Sewer Flow Monitoring $74,910 $74,910
2.3 Basis of Planning Workshop $14,325 $7,163 $7,163
TM No. 1 - Basis of Planning + Utility Focused Workshop Results $5,850 $2,925 $2,925
Task 3 – Existing Facilities
3A Existing Potable Water Facilities $4,480 $4,480
3B Existing Sewer Facilities $4,560 $4,560
Task 4 – Potable Water Demand Analysis.
4.1 Highest Consumption $2,285 $2,285
4.2 Demand Variability $2,285 $2,285
4.3 Geographic Distribution & Demand $4,570 $4,570
4.4 Statistical Demand $2,285 $2,285
4.5 Unit Demands $4,570 $4,570
4.6 Buildout Demands $8,090 $8,090
TM No.2 - Task 4 $4,250 $4,250
Task 5 – Potable Water Supply Analysis
5.1 Existing Water Supply Sources $2,685 $2,685
5.2 Future Supply Sources $4,650 $4,650
5.3 Supply Reliability $4,650 $4,650
TM No. 2 - Task 5 $4,250 $4,250
Task 6 – Regulatory Analysis
6A1-4 Regulatory Analysis (Potable Water) $5,440 $5,440
6A5-6 TM No. 2 (Potable Water) $6,920 $6,920
6B1-2 Regulatory Analysis (Sewer) $5,600 $5,600
6B3 TM No. 2 (Sewer) $7,860 $7,860
Task 7 – Hydraulic Models
7A Potable Water Hydraulic Model
7A1 Model Update $8,250 $8,250
7A2 Calibration Plan $4,410 $4,410
7A3 Friction Factors Update $3,130 $3,130
7A4 Model Calibration $19,770 $19,770
7A5 TM No 4 $11,450 $11,450
7B Sewer Hydraulic Model
7B1 Model Update $11,370 $11,370
7B2 Friction Factors Update $2,960 $2,960
7B3 Model Calibration $20,170 $20,170
7B4 Peaking Factors $2,960 $2,960
7B5 Existing Model Analysis $3,530 $3,530 7B6 TM No.5 $11,650 $11,650
7B7 Contingency $5,264 $5,264
7C – Evaluation and Selection of Hydraulic Modeling Software
7C1 Potable Water Evaluation $2,490 $2,490
7C2 Sewer Evaluation $2,490 $2,490
TM 3 - Hydraulic Software Selection $2,490 $1,245 $1,245
Task 8 – Existing System Analysis
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PSA24-3436UTIL
City Attorney Approved Version 12/22/2023
Page 29
8A Existing System Analysis (Potable Water)
8A1 Design Criteria $3,130 $3,130
8A2 System Analysis $18,410 $18,410
8A3 Infrastructure Requirements $8,970 $8,970
8A4 Operational Analysis $11,370 $11,370
8A5 Pressure Zone Boundaries $6,970 $6,970
8A6 Outage Analysis $8,250 $8,250
8A7 Minimum Pressure Analysis $2,560 $2,560
8A8 Fire Flow Analysis $13,370 $13,370
TASK DESCRIPTION Total Budget Potable
Water Master
Plan (CMWD)
Sewer Master
Plan (City)
8B Existing System Analysis (Sewer)
8B1 Historical Sewer Factors & Design Criteria $6,930 $6,930
8B2 Sewer Unit Flows $9,450 $9,450
8B3 Commercial & Industrial Sewer Flows $6,490 $6,490
8B4 Neighbor Flows $9,450 $9,450
8B5 I&I Analysis $8,880 $8,880
8B6 Hydraulic Analysis $25,690 $25,690
8B7 Contingency $6,689 $6,689
Task 9 – Future System Analysis
9A Future System Analysis (Potable Water)
9A1 Future Supplies $5,085 $5,085
9A2 Demand Analysis $7,965 $7,965
9A3 Hydraulic Analysis $21,885 $21,885
9A4 Buildout Analysis $11,085 $11,085
9A5 TM No. 6 $9,965 $9,965
9B Future System Analysis (Sewer)
9B1 Sewer Flows $7,725 $7,725
9B2 Hydraulic Analysis $25,085 $25,085
9B3 Buildout Analysis $12,685 $12,685
9B4 Sewer Benefit Areas $5,245 $5,245
9B5 TM No. 6 $11,605 $11,605
Task 10 – Capital Improvement Programs
10A Capital Improvement Program (Potable Water)
10A1 25-Year CIP $3,645 $3,645
10A2 Project Summary Sheets (30) $29,940 $29,940
10A3 Projects for Developments $3,885 $3,885
10A4 CIP Workshop $2,765 $2,765
10A5 Unit Costs $2,640 $2,640
10A6 TM No. 7 $10,840 $10,840
10B Capital Improvement Program (Sewer)
10B1 25-Year CIP $3,805 $3,805
10B2 Project Summary Sheets (30) $30,540 $30,540
10B3 Projects for Developments $4,005 $4,005
10B4 CIP Workshop $2,765 $2,765
10B5 Unit Costs $4,845 $4,845
10B6 Sewer Connection Fees $5,245 $5,245
10B7 TM No. 7 $10,040 $10,040
Task 11 – Prepare Draft and Final Reports
11.1 Report Outline $1,925 $963 $963
11.2 Draft Report $29,090 $14,545 $14,545
11.3 Final Report $11,050 $5,525 $5,525
Tasks 1 to 11 TOTAL $791,638 $367,393 $424,245
DocuSign Envelope ID: DDBDE501-4343-49B7-B11E-503184A51BC3
PS
A
2
4
-34
3
6
U
T
I
L
Cit
y
A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
V
e
r
s
i
o
n
12/22/2
0
2
3
Pa
g
e
30
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
1
,
2
0
2
3
R
a
t
e
s
Eng-Sci-9 Ferguson,
Fejarang
Eng-Sci-8
Taffler
Eng-Sci-7 Chau
Eng-Sci-6 Perez
Eng-Sci-5
Rutten, Taha
Eng-Sci-4
Eng-Sci-3 Desai
Eng-Sci-2 Lithgow,
Kalafatic
Admin. Assist.
To
t
a
l
KJ
Su
b
KJ
KJ
KJ
Total
Labor
Total
Subs
Total
Expenses
Total Labor +
Subs +
Expenses
Cla
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
Labor
ADS
Sub-Markup
ODCs
ODCs
Markup
Ho
u
r
l
y
Ra
t
e
:
$3
2
0
$3
0
5
$2
8
5
$2
6
0
$2
4
0
$2
2
0
$2
0
0
$1
8
0
$1
2
0
Ho
u
r
s
Fe
e
s
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
Ta
s
k
1
– Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
1.1
K
i
c
k
o
f
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
2
6
4
8
6
26
$6
,
3
6
0
$0
$3
0
0
$1
5
$6
,
3
6
0
$0
$3
1
5
$6
,
6
7
5
1.2
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
(
6
v
i
r
t
u
a
l
)
12
12
12
36
$9
,
4
2
0
$0
$0
$9
,
4
2
0
$0
$0
$9
,
4
2
0
1.3
P
r
o
g
r
e
s
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
(
6
v
i
r
t
u
a
l
,
6
i
n
-pe
r
s
o
n
)
28
24
33
85
$2
2
,
1
4
0
$0
$6
0
0
$3
0
$2
2
,
1
4
0
$0
$6
3
0
$2
2
,
7
7
0
1.4
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
50
26
26
15
11
7
$2
9
,
0
5
0
$0
$0
$2
9
,
0
5
0
$0
$0
$2
9
,
0
5
0
1.5
QA
/
Q
C
12
6
4
4
8
34
$9
,
7
7
0
$0
$0
$9
,
7
7
0
$0
$0
$9
,
7
7
0
Ta
s
k
1
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
12
8
10
0
70
87
0
0
6
15
29
8
$7
6
,
7
4
0
$0
$0
$9
0
0
$4
5
$7
6
,
7
4
0
$0
$9
4
5
$7
7
,
6
8
5
Ta
s
k
2
– Da
t
a
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
R
e
v
i
e
w
2.1
Da
t
a
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
6
6
4
4
22
$5
,
0
9
0
$0
$0
$5
,
0
9
0
$0
$0
$5
,
0
9
0
2.2
S
e
w
e
r
F
l
o
w
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
12
6
18
$4
,
5
6
0
$6
7
,
0
0
0
$3
,
3
5
0
$0
$4
,
5
6
0
$7
0
,
3
5
0
$0
$7
4
,
9
1
0
2.3
B
a
s
i
s
o
f
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
6
24
20
50
$1
2
,
7
5
0
$0
$1
,
5
0
0
$7
5
$1
2
,
7
5
0
$0
$1
,
5
7
5
$1
4
,
3
2
5
TM
N
o
.
1
- Ba
s
i
s
o
f
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
+
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
o
c
u
s
e
d
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
4
2
8
8
22
$5
,
8
5
0
$0
$0
$5
,
8
5
0
$0
$0
$5
,
8
5
0
Ta
s
k
2
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
4
0
10
50
40
0
4
4
0
11
2
$2
8
,
2
5
0
$6
7
,
0
0
0
$3
,
3
5
0
$1
,
5
0
0
$7
5
$2
8
,
2
5
0
$7
0
,
3
5
0
$1
,
5
7
5
$1
0
0
,
1
7
5
Ta
s
k
3
– Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
3A
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
4
16
22
$4
,
4
8
0
$0
$0
$4
,
4
8
0
$0
$0
$4
,
4
8
0
3B
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
e
w
e
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
4
16
22
$4
,
5
6
0
$0
$0
$4
,
5
6
0
$0
$0
$4
,
5
6
0
Ta
s
k
3
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
4
0
0
4
4
0
0
32
0
44
$9
,
0
4
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9
,
0
4
0
$0
$0
$9
,
0
4
0
Ta
s
k
4
– Po
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
D
e
m
a
n
d
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
4.1
H
i
g
h
e
s
t
C
o
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
1
2
4
4
11
$2
,
2
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
2
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
2
8
5
4.2
D
e
m
a
n
d
V
a
r
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
1
2
4
4
11
$2
,
2
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
2
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
2
8
5
4.3
G
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
&
D
e
m
a
n
d
2
4
8
8
22
$4
,
5
7
0
$0
$0
$4
,
5
7
0
$0
$0
$4
,
5
7
0
4.4
S
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
D
e
m
a
n
d
1
2
4
4
11
$2
,
2
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
2
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
2
8
5
4.5
U
n
i
t
D
e
m
a
n
d
s
2
4
8
8
22
$4
,
5
7
0
$0
$0
$4
,
5
7
0
$0
$0
$4
,
5
7
0
4.6
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
D
e
m
a
n
d
s
2
6
16
16
40
$8
,
0
9
0
$0
$0
$8
,
0
9
0
$0
$0
$8
,
0
9
0
TM
N
o
.
2
- Ta
s
k
4
4
2
4
8
18
$4
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
2
5
0
Ta
s
k
4
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
4
0
11
0
24
0
44
52
0
13
5
$2
8
,
3
3
5
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2
8
,
3
3
5
$0
$0
$2
8
,
3
3
5
Ta
s
k
5
– Po
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
S
u
p
p
l
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
5.1
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
W
a
t
e
r
S
u
p
p
l
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
1
4
8
13
$2
,
6
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
6
8
5
$0
$0
$2
,
6
8
5
5.2
F
u
t
u
r
e
S
u
p
p
l
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
2
8
12
22
$4
,
6
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
6
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
6
5
0
5.3
S
u
p
p
l
y
R
e
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
2
8
12
22
$4
,
6
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
6
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
6
5
0
TM
N
o
.
2
- Ta
s
k
5
4
2
4
8
18
$4
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$4
,
2
5
0
Ta
s
k
5
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
4
0
7
0
24
0
0
40
0
75
$1
6
,
2
3
5
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
6
,
2
3
5
$0
$0
$1
6
,
2
3
5
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n
E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
I
D
:
D
D
B
D
E
5
0
1
-
4
3
4
3
-
4
9
B
7
-
B
1
1
E
-
5
0
3
1
8
4
A
5
1
B
C
3
PS
A
2
4
-34
3
6
U
T
I
L
Cit
y
A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
V
e
r
s
i
o
n
12/22/2
0
2
3
Pa
g
e
31
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
1
,
2
0
2
3
R
a
t
e
s
Eng-Sci-9 Ferguson,
Fejarang
Eng-Sci-8
Taffler
Eng-Sci-7 Chau
Eng-Sci-6 Perez
Eng-Sci-5
Rutten, Taha
Eng-Sci-4
Eng-Sci-3 Desai
Eng-Sci-2 Lithgow,
Kalafatic
Admin. Assist.
To
t
a
l
KJ
Su
b
KJ
KJ
KJ
Total
Labor
Total
Subs
Total
Expenses
Total Labor +
Subs +
Expenses
Cla
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
Labor
ADS
Sub-Markup
ODCs
ODCs
Markup
Ho
u
r
l
y
Ra
t
e
:
$3
2
0
$3
0
5
$2
8
5
$2
6
0
$2
4
0
$2
2
0
$2
0
0
$1
8
0
$1
2
0
Ho
u
r
s
Fe
e
s
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
Ta
s
k
6
– Re
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
6A
1
-4
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
)
2
8
16
26
$5
,
4
4
0
$0
$0
$5
,
4
4
0
$0
$0
$5
,
4
4
0
6A
5
-6
T
M
N
o
.
2
(
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
)
4
8
8
8
28
$6
,
9
2
0
$0
$0
$6
,
9
2
0
$0
$0
$6
,
9
2
0
6B
1
-2
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
S
e
w
e
r
)
2
8
16
26
$5
,
6
0
0
$0
$0
$5
,
6
0
0
$0
$0
$5
,
6
0
0
6B
3
T
M
N
o
.
2
(
S
e
w
e
r
)
4
4
8
8
8
32
$7
,
8
6
0
$0
$0
$7
,
8
6
0
$0
$0
$7
,
8
6
0
Ta
s
k
6
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
12
0
12
16
24
0
0
48
0
11
2
$2
5
,
8
2
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2
5
,
8
2
0
$0
$0
$2
5
,
8
2
0
Ta
s
k
7
– Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
M
o
d
e
l
s
7A
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
M
o
d
e
l
7A
1
M
o
d
e
l
U
p
d
a
t
e
2
12
24
38
$8
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$8
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$8
,
2
5
0
7A
2
C
a
l
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
2
6
12
20
$4
,
4
1
0
$0
$0
$4
,
4
1
0
$0
$0
$4
,
4
1
0
7A
3
F
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
2
4
8
14
$3
,
1
3
0
$0
$0
$3
,
1
3
0
$0
$0
$3
,
1
3
0
7A
4
M
o
d
e
l
C
a
l
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
2
30
60
92
$1
9
,
7
7
0
$0
$0
$1
9
,
7
7
0
$0
$0
$1
9
,
7
7
0
7A
5
T
M
N
o
4
4
2
15
30
51
$1
1
,
4
5
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
4
5
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
4
5
0
7B
S
e
w
e
r
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
M
o
d
e
l
7B
1
M
o
d
e
l
U
p
d
a
t
e
2
12
32
46
$1
1
,
3
7
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
3
7
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
3
7
0
7B
2
F
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
4
8
12
$2
,
9
6
0
$0
$0
$2
,
9
6
0
$0
$0
$2
,
9
6
0
7B
3
M
o
d
e
l
C
a
l
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
2
20
60
82
$2
0
,
1
7
0
$0
$0
$2
0
,
1
7
0
$0
$0
$2
0
,
1
7
0
7B
4
P
e
a
k
i
n
g
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
4
8
12
$2
,
9
6
0
$0
$0
$2
,
9
6
0
$0
$0
$2
,
9
6
0
7B
5
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
M
o
d
e
l
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
2
4
8
14
$3
,
5
3
0
$0
$0
$3
,
5
3
0
$0
$0
$3
,
5
3
0
7B
6
T
M
N
o
.
5
4
2
10
30
46
$1
1
,
6
5
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
6
5
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
6
5
0
7B
7
Co
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
0
0
1
5
15
0
0
0
0
21
$5
,
2
6
4
$0
$0
$5
,
2
6
4
$0
$0
$5
,
2
6
4
7C
– Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
M
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
7C
1
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
2
8
10
$2
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$2
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$2
,
4
9
0
7C
2
S
e
w
e
r
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
2
8
10
$2
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$2
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$2
,
4
9
0
TM
3
- Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
8
10
$2
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$2
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$2
,
4
9
0
Ta
s
k
7
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
8
0
25
59
25
2
0
13
4
0
0
47
8
$1
1
2
,
3
8
4
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
1
2
,
3
8
4
$0
$0
$1
1
2
,
3
8
4
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n
E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
I
D
:
D
D
B
D
E
5
0
1
-
4
3
4
3
-
4
9
B
7
-
B
1
1
E
-
5
0
3
1
8
4
A
5
1
B
C
3
PS
A
2
4
-34
3
6
U
T
I
L
Cit
y
A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
V
e
r
s
i
o
n
12/22/2
0
2
3
Pa
g
e
32
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
1
,
2
0
2
3
R
a
t
e
s
Eng-Sci-9 Ferguson,
Fejarang
Eng-Sci-8
Taffler
Eng-Sci-7 Chau
Eng-Sci-6 Perez
Eng-Sci-5
Rutten, Taha
Eng-Sci-4
Eng-Sci-3 Desai
Eng-Sci-2 Lithgow,
Kalafatic
Admin. Assist.
To
t
a
l
KJ
Su
b
KJ
KJ
KJ
Total
Labor
Total
Subs
Total
Expenses
Total Labor +
Subs +
Expenses
Cla
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
Labor
ADS
Sub-Markup
ODCs
ODCs
Markup
Ho
u
r
l
y
Ra
t
e
:
$3
2
0
$3
0
5
$2
8
5
$2
6
0
$2
4
0
$2
2
0
$2
0
0
$1
8
0
$1
2
0
Ho
u
r
s
Fe
e
s
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
Ta
s
k
8
– Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
8A
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
)
8A
1
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
2
4
8
14
$3
,
1
3
0
$0
$0
$3
,
1
3
0
$0
$0
$3
,
1
3
0
8A
2
S
y
s
t
e
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
2
16
70
88
$1
8
,
4
1
0
$0
$0
$1
8
,
4
1
0
$0
$0
$1
8
,
4
1
0
8A
3
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
10
30
42
$8
,
9
7
0
$0
$0
$8
,
9
7
0
$0
$0
$8
,
9
7
0
8A
4
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
2
20
30
52
$1
1
,
3
7
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
3
7
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
3
7
0
8A
5
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
Z
o
n
e
B
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
2
10
20
32
$6
,
9
7
0
$0
$0
$6
,
9
7
0
$0
$0
$6
,
9
7
0
8A
6
O
u
t
a
g
e
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
2
12
24
38
$8
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$8
,
2
5
0
$0
$0
$8
,
2
5
0
8A
7
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
4
8
12
$2
,
5
6
0
$0
$0
$2
,
5
6
0
$0
$0
$2
,
5
6
0
8A
8
F
i
r
e
F
l
o
w
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
2
20
40
62
$1
3
,
3
7
0
$0
$0
$1
3
,
3
7
0
$0
$0
$1
3
,
3
7
0
8B
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
S
e
w
e
r
)
8B
1
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
S
e
w
e
r
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
&
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
2
6
20
28
$6
,
9
3
0
$0
$0
$6
,
9
3
0
$0
$0
$6
,
9
3
0
8B
2
S
e
w
e
r
U
n
i
t
F
l
o
w
s
2
12
24
38
$9
,
4
5
0
$0
$0
$9
,
4
5
0
$0
$0
$9
,
4
5
0
8B
3
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
&
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
S
e
w
e
r
F
l
o
w
s
2
8
16
26
$6
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$6
,
4
9
0
$0
$0
$6
,
4
9
0
8B
4
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
F
l
o
w
s
2
12
24
38
$9
,
4
5
0
$0
$0
$9
,
4
5
0
$0
$0
$9
,
4
5
0
8B
5
I
&
I
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
12
24
36
$8
,
8
8
0
$0
$0
$8
,
8
8
0
$0
$0
$8
,
8
8
0
8B
6
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
2
32
70
10
4
$2
5
,
6
9
0
$0
$0
$2
5
,
6
9
0
$0
$0
$2
5
,
6
9
0
8B
7
Co
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
1
8
18
27
$6
,
6
8
9
$0
$0
$6
,
6
8
9
$0
$0
$6
,
6
8
9
Ta
s
k
8
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
0
0
25
90
29
2
0
23
0
0
0
63
7
$1
4
6
,
6
0
9
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
4
6
,
6
0
9
$0
$0
$1
4
6
,
6
0
9
Ta
s
k
9
– Fu
t
u
r
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
9A
F
u
t
u
r
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
)
9A
1
F
u
t
u
r
e
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
1
8
16
25
$5
,
0
8
5
$0
$0
$5
,
0
8
5
$0
$0
$5
,
0
8
5
9A
2
D
e
m
a
n
d
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
1
12
24
37
$7
,
9
6
5
$0
$0
$7
,
9
6
5
$0
$0
$7
,
9
6
5
9A
3
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
1
40
60
10
1
$2
1
,
8
8
5
$0
$0
$2
1
,
8
8
5
$0
$0
$2
1
,
8
8
5
9A
4
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
1
20
30
51
$1
1
,
0
8
5
$0
$0
$1
1
,
0
8
5
$0
$0
$1
1
,
0
8
5
9A
5
T
M
N
o
.
6
4
1
10
30
45
$9
,
9
6
5
$0
$0
$9
,
9
6
5
$0
$0
$9
,
9
6
5
9B
F
u
t
u
r
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
S
e
w
e
r
)
9B
1
S
e
w
e
r
F
l
o
w
s
1
12
24
37
$7
,
7
2
5
$0
$0
$7
,
7
2
5
$0
$0
$7
,
7
2
5
9B
2
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
1
40
60
10
1
$2
5
,
0
8
5
$0
$0
$2
5
,
0
8
5
$0
$0
$2
5
,
0
8
5
9B
3
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
1
20
30
51
$1
2
,
6
8
5
$0
$0
$1
2
,
6
8
5
$0
$0
$1
2
,
6
8
5
9B
4
S
e
w
e
r
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
A
r
e
a
s
1
8
16
25
$5
,
2
4
5
$0
$0
$5
,
2
4
5
$0
$0
$5
,
2
4
5
9B
5
T
M
N
o
.
6
4
1
10
25
8
48
$1
1
,
6
0
5
$0
$0
$1
1
,
6
0
5
$0
$0
$1
1
,
6
0
5
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n
E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
I
D
:
D
D
B
D
E
5
0
1
-
4
3
4
3
-
4
9
B
7
-
B
1
1
E
-
5
0
3
1
8
4
A
5
1
B
C
3
PS
A
2
4
-34
3
6
U
T
I
L
Cit
y
A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
V
e
r
s
i
o
n
12/22/2
0
2
3
Pa
g
e
33
Ta
s
k
9
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
8
0
10
90
20
5
0
14
4
64
0
52
1
$1
1
8
,
3
3
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
1
8
,
3
3
0
$0
$0
$1
1
8
,
3
3
0
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
1
,
2
0
2
3
R
a
t
e
s
Eng-Sci-9 Ferguson,
Fejarang
Eng-Sci-8
Taffler
Eng-Sci-7 Chau
Eng-Sci-6 Perez
Eng-Sci-5
Rutten, Taha
Eng-Sci-4
Eng-Sci-3 Desai
Eng-Sci-2 Lithgow,
Kalafatic
Admin. Assist.
To
t
a
l
KJ
Su
b
KJ
KJ
KJ
Total
Labor
Total
Subs
Total
Expenses
Total Labor +
Subs +
Expenses
Cla
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
Labor
ADS
Sub-Markup
ODCs
ODCs
Markup
Ho
u
r
l
y
Ra
t
e
:
$3
2
0
$3
0
5
$2
8
5
$2
6
0
$2
4
0
$2
2
0
$2
0
0
$1
8
0
$1
2
0
Ho
u
r
s
Fe
e
s
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
5%
Fe
e
s
Ta
s
k
1
0
– Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
10
A
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
P
o
t
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
)
10
A
1
2
5
-Ye
a
r
C
I
P
1
8
8
17
$3
,
6
4
5
$0
$0
$3
,
6
4
5
$0
$0
$3
,
6
4
5
10
A
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
S
h
e
e
t
s
(
3
0
)
4
30
12
0
15
4
$2
9
,
9
4
0
$0
$0
$2
9
,
9
4
0
$0
$0
$2
9
,
9
4
0
10
A
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
1
6
12
19
$3
,
8
8
5
$0
$0
$3
,
8
8
5
$0
$0
$3
,
8
8
5
10
A
4
C
I
P
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
1
4
4
4
13
$2
,
7
6
5
$0
$0
$2
,
7
6
5
$0
$0
$2
,
7
6
5
10
A
5
U
n
i
t
C
o
s
t
s
8
4
12
$2
,
6
4
0
$0
$0
$2
,
6
4
0
$0
$0
$2
,
6
4
0
10
A
6
T
M
N
o
.
7
4
4
4
12
24
48
$1
0
,
8
4
0
$0
$0
$1
0
,
8
4
0
$0
$0
$1
0
,
8
4
0
10
B
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
S
e
w
e
r
)
10
B
1
2
5
-Ye
a
r
C
I
P
1
8
8
17
$3
,
8
0
5
$0
$0
$3
,
8
0
5
$0
$0
$3
,
8
0
5
10
B
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
S
h
e
e
t
s
(
3
0
)
4
30
12
0
15
4
$3
0
,
5
4
0
$0
$0
$3
0
,
5
4
0
$0
$0
$3
0
,
5
4
0
10
B
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
1
6
12
19
$4
,
0
0
5
$0
$0
$4
,
0
0
5
$0
$0
$4
,
0
0
5
10
B
4
C
I
P
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
1
4
8
13
$2
,
7
6
5
$0
$0
$2
,
7
6
5
$0
$0
$2
,
7
6
5
10
B
5
U
n
i
t
C
o
s
t
s
1
16
4
21
$4
,
8
4
5
$0
$0
$4
,
8
4
5
$0
$0
$4
,
8
4
5
10
B
6
S
e
w
e
r
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
e
e
s
1
8
16
25
$5
,
2
4
5
$0
$0
$5
,
2
4
5
$0
$0
$5
,
2
4
5
10
B
7
T
M
N
o
.
7
4
4
4
8
24
44
$1
0
,
0
4
0
$0
$0
$1
0
,
0
4
0
$0
$0
$1
0
,
0
4
0
Ta
s
k
1
0
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
8
8
24
64
84
0
4
36
4
0
55
6
$1
1
4
,
9
6
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
1
4
,
9
6
0
$0
$0
$1
1
4
,
9
6
0
Ta
s
k
1
1
– Pr
e
p
a
r
e
D
r
a
f
t
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
11
.
1
R
e
p
o
r
t
O
u
t
l
i
n
e
2
1
2
2
7
$1
,
9
2
5
$0
$0
$1
,
9
2
5
$0
$0
$1
,
9
2
5
11
.
2
D
r
a
f
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
16
8
2
24
40
40
13
0
$2
9
,
0
9
0
$0
$0
$2
9
,
0
9
0
$0
$0
$2
9
,
0
9
0
11
.
3
F
i
n
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
2
12
20
20
54
$1
1
,
0
5
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
0
5
0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
0
5
0
Ta
s
k
1
1
- Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
18
8
5
2
38
0
60
60
0
19
1
$4
2
,
0
6
5
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4
2
,
0
6
5
$0
$0
$4
2
,
0
6
5
Ta
s
k
s
1
t
o
1
1
T
O
T
A
L
82
24
22
9
44
6
10
7
3
0
62
0
67
0
15
31
5
9
$7
1
8
,
7
6
8
$6
7
,
0
0
0
$3
,
3
5
0
$2
,
4
0
0
$1
2
0
$7
1
8
,
7
6
8
$7
0
,
3
5
0
$2
,
5
2
0
$7
9
1
,
6
3
8
Do
c
u
S
i
g
n
E
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
I
D
:
D
D
B
D
E
5
0
1
-
4
3
4
3
-
4
9
B
7
-
B
1
1
E
-
5
0
3
1
8
4
A
5
1
B
C
3