Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 2019-0008; STATE STREET COMMONS; TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS; 2020-01-17'\ I URBAN SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. Pt.ANNING & TRAFFIC EHGINEERJNO, MARKETING & PROJECT SUPPOlfT CONSULTANTS TO INoVSTRY ANO GOVERNIIENT MEMO JAN 2" ZG2J ATTN: Sc7'::;as -?2.tudio _ ~; E-Mail: ~ scoll@fieldxn11dio.com 6 + FROM: ~.isa~OE TOTAL PAGES (Including Co..,J: attachments DATE: January 17, 2020 TIME: 11:58:JBAM JOB NUMBER: 002319 SUBJECT: State Street Commons Transportation Impact Analysis . Confidential Communications This transmittal is intended for the recipient nnmed 11bove. nless otherwise c.xprcssly indicated, this entire communication is confidenti11l nnd privileged information. lf:,ou ore not the intended recipient, do not disclose. copy, distribute or use this information. If you rccched this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. nt our expense nnd destroy the information. Thank you for the opportunity to conduct a transportation impact analysis for the State Street Commons project. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate multi-modal conditions for the one (I) street segment adjacent to 2742-2752 State Street. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Requirements: The April 2018 City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines explains that the City requires the travel modes of pedestrians, bicycles, and transit are to receive a qualitative evaluation and a letter grade, ranging from A to F. This grade is to be considered that mode of travels level of service (LOS). Please see the table below for the MM LOS level of service thresholds. MMLOS Level of Service Thresholds ·,.· .-· • -· •• t Hr1-. ...... •u1~ ·.1 • ·'<>,-·,i _." ~ 90-100 A 80-89 B 70-79 C S0-69 D 50-59 E 0-49 f soura: City of CDrfsbad, MMLOS Worbhfft The City of Carlsbad's Mobility Element identifies MMLOS standards for each designated roadway typology. MMLOS standards can be found in Table 3-1 of the City of Carlsbad's Mobility Element, or as shown in Attachment A. Designated roadway typologies can be found in Figure 3-1 of the Mobility Element, or as shown on Attachment B. The City of Carlsbad's Mobility Element also establishes that each mode of travel for which the MMLOS standard is applicable is to maintain LOS D or better after applying the City of Carlsbad's MMLOS methodology. 1 . 0023 /9 _Of I 72020_TIA_B.docx 8./5 I Miralani Drive, Suite .-1 • San Diego, CA 91116 • (858) 560-./9 /I Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 The City of Carlsbad developed an MMLOS Tool which applies specific methodology through a user-friendly platform that evaluates pedestrian, bicycle, and transit levels of service. Multi-Modal Level of Service {MMLOS) Analysis: The State Street Commons project is located on the east side of State Street between Christiansen Way and Beech Avenue. Project access will be included via a project driveway along State Street. Please refer to Attachment C for a project site plan. As shown in the fi gure below, Figure 3-1 of the City of Carlsbad 's Mobility Element identifies the street · segment adjacent to project access as "Local/Neighborhood Streets." Figure 3-1: Street System ·.4 --Freeway -Arurb.l Sueets -ldffltityScreft.S --VIiiage StrHU --A"erlal CoMKtor StrNU -Nef&hborhood Connector s~ -Coast:al Screeu School Streeu --Employment!Transit Connector StrHU --Indus-trial 5uftu -Local/Nef&hborhood Str'Ht ..... Planned Art~CJ.I Streets r ---Planned Arterial Connector StrNtS .. •• • Planned Local/NeJahbo<hood Streeu --Hl&hway,, ~ ~lullrnad 0 I ~ • TransttCenten -( t::)HaN Mile R.adius LJCityUmiu * Project l.oc.ltion t..J 2 002319 OJ 172020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Su ite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 As shown in the table below, Table 3-1 of the City of Carlsbad's Mobility Element states that "Local/Neighborhood Streets" are subject to a MMLOS analysis for pedestrians and bicycles. TABLE 3-1: CARLSBAD LIVABLE STREETS GUIDE STREET TYPOLOGY ANO ACCOMMODATED MODES ACCOMMODATED SUBJECT STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION ANO PREH RED ATTRIBUTES toDES TOMMlOS STANDARD (Y/ ) local/Neighborhood Street --N • Primary purpose Is to conn~ people to and through res1dent1al neighborhoods and local areas of the ctty. • Designed to safely move all modes of travel whlle cmhanc1ng mobllfty for pedestrians and bicyclists. t~ y • Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement • Pedestrians should be .Kcommodated on a sidewalk or soft surface trail (such as de- composed granite) unless those fadlttles are Inconsistent w ith the existing desirable ~ y neighborhood character • Bicycles can be accommodated wlth a bicycle lane or route If vehlcle volumes and/or speeds necessttate; otherwise bicycles can share the street • Bicycle boulevards can be considered "-"' N • Traffic calming measures should be considered when supported by the neighborhood or when warranted for safety reasons • On-street parking should be considered Figure 1 below shows the project's study area map. 3 002319 011 72020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio SOUTH OCEANSIDE Lecend -stu.dyAlea • Pro1ttt Location --C,. Transit Locat.lon Figure 1: State Street Commons Study Area Map JIL,LSBAO ~T ILLAGE ~ Carlsbad © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January I 7th, 2020 Carlsbad Htgh S In order to approximate the existing average daily traffic volume along the study street segment of State Street between Christiansen Way and Beech Avenue, the SANDAG Traffic Forecast Information Center (TFIC) Traffic Series 13 Year 2020 online model has been referenced. The SANDAG TFIC Series 13 Year 2020 capture can be found in Attachment D. As an observation of the existing conditions of the study area, and for the Pedestrian MMLOS evaluation from which the accessibility and functionality of the east sidewalk along State Street (between Christiansen Way to Beech Avenue) is included, the evaluation criteria assigns points based on the width of the sidewalk. The sidewalk under evaluation has a width that is observed to vary throughout the study area extents from approximately 6 feet to 12 feet. As shown in the table below, results show that the street segment required to be studied operates at an acceptable LOS Dor better in the Existing condition after being applied to the City of Carlsbad's MMLOS methodology. 4 002319 01172020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Existing NB SB Score LOS Score LOS State Street (Christiansen Way-Beech Avenue} 70 C N/A N/A 80 B 80 B N/A N/A 100 A l)All "Essential Feature" criteria wa s not met 2) The SB direction has not been studied as the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines require to only conduct the pedestrian analysis for the side of the street where the project is located unless the project is located on both sides of the street. The project is located east of State Street. The spreadsheet interface requires a speed limit input under the Pedestrian MMLOS table entries for the Bike MMLOS evaluation. Consequently, since a Bike MM LOS evaluation for both directions of travel of the study area has been conducted, a speed limit input was necessary under the Pedestrian MM LOS sprea dsheet interface for the SB directions. Therefore, the detail worksheets show points assigned for the Pede strian MM LOS results for the SB direction of travel, whilst this direction has not been analyzed as described above. Therefore, the table entries for the Pedestrian MM LOS for the SB direction of travel are shown as N/A (not applicable). Results of the Existing MMLOS Analysis can be found in Attachment E. January I 7th, 2020 Legend □ Pedestrian □ Bicycle □ Transit The table below shows the trip generation for the State Street Commons project. As shown in the table, the project is anticipated to generate less than 500 net average daily trips (ADT) or 50 peak hour trips in either direction of travel. 5 002319 OJ 172020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio Project Trip Generation Table AM land Use Intensity Rate• ADT In •;. I Out¾ Peak0/o* Vol. Existing Land Uses Snecialtv Retail/Strip Commercial 14.833 /KSF 40 /KSF 593 3% 18 60% : 40°/4 Proposed Land Uses Qualitv Restaurant 5.370 /KSF 100 /KSF 537 1% 5 60% : 40% Delicatessen (7am-4nm\ 0.859 /KSF 150 /KSF 129 9% 12 60°/o : 40°/o Standard Commercial Office 12.815 /KSF 20 /KSF 256 14% 36 90% : 10°/4 Sub-Total for Pronosed land Uses 922 53 Total 329 35 Source: © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17'h, 2020 PM In Out Peak 0/4* Vol. In •;.lout% In Out 11 7 9% 53 so01o . so•;. 27 27 3 2 8% 43 70% : 30°/4 30 13 7 5 3% 4 JO¾ : 70% I 3 32 4 13% 33 20°/4 : so•/4 7 27 42 10 80 38 42 32 3 27 11 16 *Rates are used taken from SANDAG "(Not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region", April 2002. Note: ADT= Average Daily Trips KSF = 1,000 Square Feet Overall, based on this MMLOS evaluation, we find that for both pedestrians and bicycles, acceptable levels of service are provided. This conclusion is valid for the existing condition. Please let us know if you have any questions or you need any other information. This evaluation should be submitted to the City of Carlsbad staff for their review and concurrence. 6 002319 01172020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January I 7th, 2020 Attachment A Table 3-1 of the City of Carlsbad's Mobility Element TABLE 3-1: CARLSBAD LIVABLE STREETS GUIDE STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMOOATEO MOOE5 ACCOMMODATED SUBJECT I STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION Atm PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES MODES TO ,1LOS STANDARD (YIN) I freeways -y • High-speed facilities designed to ac:commodat@ vehicles and buses moving through lhe city and region !iiiiiiiiiiiiii y • 8icydes and pedestrians are prohibited I Arterial Streets -'( 1 • Th"s,, ,., th" primary vehicle routes through the city for both 1ocal and regional v"hkle I. tri~. Designed to safely mo11e all modes of travel while efficiently moving vehicles and buses I lluoughout the city. '----~ • Traffi<: signals ,hall be <:o0rdinated to optimize vehicle movement. . Bicycle lanes shall be provided and can be further enhanced or complemented by other facilities or off-street pathways . Pedestrian facilities to be provided consistent with ADA requirements --·-·-· l • Mid-block crossings should not be provided . On-stteet parking should be prohibjted along thes,, corridor• . Vertical traffic calming techniques ~uch as speed tables. humps. etc.) should not be considered ......a '( . Special considerations can be considered on arterials within proximity to schools to enhance Safe Routes to S<hools for pedestrians and blcycllsts. Identity Streets -' . These streets provide the primary ac:cl!Ss to and from the he rt of the city • the Village I· Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists . Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote sale pedestrian and bicycle movement . No pedestrian shall cross more than five vehlcular travel and/or turn lanes . In addition to ADA compliant ram~ and sidewalks, sidewalks should support the adja- .... cent land uses as follows: ~ y -Adjacent to retail uses, modified/new sidewalks should generally be a minimum of 10 feet (12 feet p1eferred) in width where feasible and taking into consldcuation the traffic volurnes of the adjacent roadway, and allow for the land use to utll1ze the sldew.-.lk with outdoor seating and other activities -Adjacent to residential uses. modified/new sidewalks should be a minimum of slx feet In width Elsewhere. modified/new sidewalks should be a minimum of eight feet in width ~ y . Where feasible. bicycle lanes should be provided . Vehicle speeds should complement the .ldjacent land uses . Bicycle parkjng should be provided in retail areas . Bike radu should be readily provided within the public right•of~wav and encouraged on prlvate property . Traffk calming devices. such as curb extensions (bulbouts) or enhanced pedestrian cross-ings should be considered and evalua1:1>d for implementation !iiiiiiiiiiiiii . Street furniture shall be otiented toward the businesses . Mid-block pedestrian crossings could be provided at appropriate locations (e.g. where sight distance is adequat;, and speeds are appropriate) . On-street vehicle parking should be provided. In areas with high parking demand. In- novativ@ parking management techniques should be implemented/ considered . Pedestrians should typically be "buffered" from vehlde traffic using landscaping or I parked vehicles 7 002319_01172020_TIA_B.docx 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-491 I Scott Maas Fieldxstudio I I I <Q Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January I 7th, 2020 TABLE 3-1: CARLSBAD LIVABLE STREETS GUIDE STREET TYPOLOGY ANO ACCOMMODATED MODES ACCOMMODATED SUBJECT STREETTYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION ANO PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES MODES TO MMLOS STANDARD (Y,'N) Village Streets ----~ . Primary purpose is to move people throughout the Village; providing access to busi- I nesses, residences. transit and recreation within the Village area. . Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing moblllty for pedestrians nd bicydists. ~ y • Vehlde speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement . Promote pedestrian and bicycle connectivity through short block lengths . Bicycle lanes should be provided A I y . Bicycle boulevards can be considered . Pedestrians should be accommodated on sidewalks adjacent to the travel way (mini- mum s· wide sidewalk} ~ N . Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be considered, but only at locatlom with high pedestrian activity leVl!'ls or major desllnatlons/attractlons . On-street parking may be provided Arterial Connector Streets .. y . Primary purpose Is to coMect people to different areas and land uses of the city by con- ne<ting to/from arterial streets . Designed to safely move all modes of travel while ecnhandng mobility for· pedestrians ~ y and bicyclists and efficiently moving vehlcl@s b@twHn arterial streets. . Bicycle I nes should be provided -~ y . Pedestrians should be accommodated on sidew.11lks adjacent to the travel way (mini- mum s· wldec sidewalk) . Mid,block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be considered, but __. N only at locations with high ped@strian activity l@vels or major d!!stlnatlons/attractions • On-street parking may b@ proviclt?d ------Neighborhood Connector Street -N . Primary purpose is to connect peopl@ to ditfer@nt n@ighborhoods and land usecs of th@ city . Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility f.or p@desttians ~ y and bicyclists_ . Vehicl@ sp@eds should be managed to promote safe pedest,lan and bicycle movement . Bicycle lanes should bee prosided A y . Bicycle boulevards can be considered . Pedestrians should be accommodat@d on sidewalks adjacent to th@ travel way (mini- mum s· wlde sidewalk) oiiiiiiiiiiiil N . Mid-block pedutrlan crossings and traffic calming devicesshould be consider@d, but only at locations with high pedestrian actlvity levels or major destinations/attractions . On-street parking may be provided 8 002319 OJ 172020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio I © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January I 7'h, 2020 TABLE 3--'1: CARLSBAD LIVABLE STREETS GUIDE STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATf_D MODES ACCOMMODATED I SUBJECT STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES MODES TO MMLOS STANDARD (YIN) Employment/Transit Connector Streets -N • Pr1mary purpose is to connttt people to nd from the employm nt areas of the city, as well as important destination and major transit facilities. . . Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians ~ I y and blcydists and efficlently moving buses to employment transit stat.ions and major ' destinations. -~ • Vehide speeds should be managed to promote safe pedesttian and bicyde movement ~ y • Direct connections to bus stops should be provided . E.nhan<ed bus stops should be considered that lndud!! shelters. benches. and lighting I . Bicycle lanes and sldewalks should be providl!d r.iiiiiiiiil y . Pedestrian c,osslng distances should be minimized . On-street parking may be provided Coastal Streets -N . Primary purpose is to move people along the city's ocean waterfront and connect people to the beach, recreation, businesses and residences in close prol<Jmity to the waterfront. The sttei!t U!NH as a destination for people who seelc to drive. wallc and bicycle along the ocean waterfront. . Designed to safely move all modes of tra•el while enhancing mobility for pedesttians and blcydists. * y . Vehide speeds shall be m naged to support uses along the coast . E.nhan<ed bicycli! and p@destrlan aossings should be provided. Including: -High visibility crosswalks -Enhanced pedestrian notifications (e.g. responsive push-button devices) A y -Enhanced bicycle detection -Bicyc.le lanes shall be provided andca.n be further enhanced or complemented by other facilities (such as bicycle lane buffers or off-Sltei!t pathways) . Pedestrian fadlitles should be a minimum of f,ve feet and shall strive for Sil( to eig.hl fi!et in width nd sh II conform to ADA requirements . Pedestrian mming distances should be minimized ---r1 • Trail facilities should be encouraged . Opportunities for mid-block pedestrian crossings should be Investigated . On-street parking should b@ pr011id@d . _!ransit facllily and operation improvements should be enwurag d 9 002319 011 72020 TIA B.docx 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-491 I Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 TABLE 3-1: CARLSBAD LIVABLE STREETS GUIDE STREET TYPOLOGY Am ACCOM fOOATED MODES ACCOMMODATED MODES SUBJECT STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTIOtl AND PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES TO MMtOS STANDARD (YIN) School Streets y Industrial Streets -y ij N A II ~ y Local/Neighborhood Street r, ij y y • Primary purpose is to connect people to schools from nearby residential neighbor• hoods_ • Designed to safety move all modes of travel with an emphasis on proYiding safe pedes- ttlan and bicycle access for stodents ttaveling to and from nea,by s.c.hools. • Vehicle speeds shall be managed to support school uses (typically 25 MPH) • Enhanc~ bicycle and pedestrian crossings should be provided, lnduding: -High visibility crosswalks -Enhanced pedestrian notifications (e_g_ responsive push-button devices) -Enhanced bicycle detection -Bicycle lanes shall be provided and can be further enhanced or complemented by other facilities or off-street pathw ys • Pedestrian facilities should be a minimum of si>t feet and shall strive for eight feet in width and shall conform to ADA requirements • Pedestrian crossing distances should be minimized • Opportunities for mid-block pedestrian crossings should be investigated • Traffic calming devices that improve service levels and safety for p destrians and bicy- clists should be considered • Primary purpose is to connect people to businesses within the city's industrial pa.rks .. • Designed to safely movl! all modes of tra.vel while etridently ,mo,:ing vehicles and buses from arterial streets and employment/transit connector streets to businesses. • Traffic calming devices are generally discouraged given the propensity tor larger trucks and heavy vehicles ln this area • On-street parking may be provided as long as it does not interfere wlth the turning radii of heavy vehicles. • Primary purpose is to connect people to and through residential neighborhoods and local areas of the ci ty. • Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhandng mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists. • Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicyde movement • Pedestrians should be accommodated on a sidewalk or soft surface trail (such as de- composed granite) unleu those facilities are inconsistent with the existing desirable neighbothood tharacter • Bicytles can be accommodated with a bicyde lane or route if vehlde volumes and/or speeds necessitate; otherwise bicyde.s can share the street 1-------~------~ • Bicycle boulevards can be considered • Traffic calming measures should be considered when supported by the neighborhood or when warranted for safety reasons • On-street polrklng should be consider~ IO 002319 01172020 TIA B.docx 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-49/ 1 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 TABLE 3-1: CARLSBAD LIVABLE STREETS GUIDE STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES I ACCOMMODATED SUBJECT I STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION A D PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES MODES TOMMLOS STM OARD (YIN) I Bicyde/Pedestrian Pathway ~ y I . Primary purpose is to provld safe bicycle and pedestrian .KCMs throughout the com- munity by connectlng people to residences. businesses and reaeatlon uses. . for bicycles and p d strians only -no 11ehicular a«ess is petmitt d A y Set11es comtnute,s and recreational users . Streets within Yi Mile of a Transit Center -N I . Primary pur·pose is to connect people to/from the city·'s transit centers. I • Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians -------and bicyclists and efficiently mo11lng vehicles and buses to/from transit centers. I ij y . Vehiclesp,e,eds should be m.tnaged to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement ! • PYo.-ides acceu to the Breeze/COASTER system via enhanced bicycle/pedestrian oonnec- A ti11ity or via shuttle service from the stations to the ultimate destination y Could include enhanced transit systems. such as signal priority for transit. dedicated . ROW for transit, or queue bypass lanes. ~ y . Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be con~ldered in these areas . Patking $hould be provided and managed using innovative parldng techniques ]/ 002319 0l/72020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-491 I Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 Attachment B Figure 3-1 of the City of Carlsbad's Mobility Element This page is left intentionally blank. The attachment is provided on the fo llowing page. 12 002319 011 72020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Figure 3•1: Street System --Fmw,y -Arterial Strttts --ldendcy Sueeu --Vit~e Sueeu --Arterial Connector Streets --Neighborhood Connector Streets --Coastal Streets Sc.hoolSueeu --Employment/Transit Connector Streets --Industrial Streets --loa.lJNeighbomood Sueet ••••• Planned Arterial Strtta • ••• • Planned Arterial Connector Streets • •• • • • • • Planned Loca.1/Ne!ghborhood Streets --Highways ~~ Rallroa.d * TransitCenters CJ Half Mile Radius CJCityUmits Sou!u:Oq,oJCartlbad,lOll:SANOAG,1013:Fehr&~lOll; Oy.n& Bhatla,2013. Scott Maas Fieldxstudio Attachment C Proposed Site Plan © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 This page is left intentionally blank. The attachment is provided on the fo llowing page. 13 002319 OJ 172020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-491 I I (P) ~ UNOCR DRAIN j (P)l8°WAU. I ,. """'-' CRN> i---_ OYER1AY AT M,i: \ TRCNCHN::LOCAOONS; "' "1 PROPOSfD TR[[, TYP.; REF. ""'5CAP£ (P)J.2'..,WOUNTED ~ ,t SCRWI WAU. (P)~UN[ODRAIN i (E)wAkS[RV(;(T08C I =rm (E) PRIVAT[ UTlJTY EHCRCl,l,CHMENTSTOIIE ~ .. W<Mll.T'tP. u!J LU et:: ., '1 LY ., <( t-- Cf) (P) sioAUC UNOCR DRAIN i """"'1Ylt£Tl) S!R<IT""""""' --_i_ __ \...jLOJLNCTOBE I'°"""' SUITE 8 i I i i i i ! SITE PLAN LEGEND: =·A•~--=-~ c::::::::::J C-J.l'.Cl:J,IClllll Ei:5:511,N•••-IIU'.l.-co,( c:::J u.f'. COICJlt"I( •Tt-.,,_ ll§,B10IIU•TtM,1, STATE STREET COMMONS -~~ --~\l l,111-.C,I .... ~---.. -5.IIIIU,ICIO\l-CUDIM ... M4"-t,& _, -----M--... .. IJQln.,,.,t,&_ -,....:oUMlUUI-IU .... -y .. -IVOt.l:lall ---mll()K\l!M-,Qlltlt .. ,,.,c.,.-, 'G -, COLEMAN ,,, ARCHITECT ,iliri@!!lQQ .... ~ --0, ___ "..._ •J.11'1!! -111 --mo1. OIJ.t•[.lt ~ ~ff'!, 11/1!{11 SITE PLAN A2.00 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 Attachment D SANDAG TFIC Series 13 Year 2020 This page is left intentionally blank. The attachm ent is provided on the fo llowing page. 14 0023 19 01172020 TIA B.docx --- 8451 Miralani Drive, Su ite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 Forecaot Vsa, 2020 (Soenalio 10 710\ Enter e Sing~ M0RA number between 1· 23.002 Scott Maas Fieldxstudio Attachment E Existing MMLOS Results © Urban Systems Associates, Inc. January 17th, 2020 This page is left intentionally blank. The attachment is provided on the following page. 15 002319_01 /72020_TIA_B.docx 8451 Miralani Drive, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92126 • (858) 560-4911 May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'): * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)? * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements? Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count) Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way: Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way? Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings? Are there any permanent speed control devices installed? Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)? iii ? Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings? Is thee e la ale Ii i ? Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line? Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions? Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length? State Street Christiansen a Beech ven e Villa e 1,100 NB SCORE I LOS 70 IC NB 0 6' No No Yes 25 mph or I wer 1 No O' to 2' Yes Yes No No 0 No No No Yes Yes No 0 SB SCORE I LOS o I - SB 25 mph or lo er * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)? * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines? Is on-street parking provided? Speed limit (miles per hour -mph): Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan? Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections? Any bicycle racks are provided along segment? NFO State Street Christiansen Way Beech Avenue Village 1,100 NB SCORE I LOS 80 I B Yes Yes Yes Parallel parking 25 mph or lower Study Segment Only No No ore not required f e based on street TRANSIT May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! * Transit stop amenities available: Do the sidewalks or path to the transit stop appear to be ADA compliant? Do multiple transit routes stop on the study segment? Do any of the routes provide a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility hub? Do any of the routes provide a single transfer to reach a COASTER station or mobility hub? Closest distance to existing transit stop: What type of transit priority is present? Headways between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays: Is there commute shuttle service provided during the morning and afternoon commute periods? On weekends, are the headways no more than 1 hour headways between 9 am-5 pm? Is there bike parking available at the bus stop? Is the bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop? Is area governed by an adopted TDM ordinance that will promote ridesharing and/or the use of non-auto modes? Are On Demand rideshare services available? YINFO State Street Christiansen Way NB SCORE I LOS o I - D Bench □Trash cans NB D Covered Bus Stop 0 Well-lit Stops Roadway D Stop located within a block of commercial users Project: State Street Commons Segment: State Street From Christiansen Way To Beech Avenue Scenario: _E_x_is_ti_n.:.g ___________________________________________ _ By: Urban Systems Associates, Inc. meets ADA unobstructed width requirements • Essential Features (Criteria must be met}: Sidewalk width meets minimum width for typology according to the Mobility 10 10 0 Element (or 5' if unspecified) Sidewalk width exceeds minimum width for typology 5 0 0 Accessibility and according to the Mobility Element (or 6' if unspecified) functionality • Essential Features (Criteria must be met}: Ramps and 10 0 0 landings within segment meet ADA requirements segments meet ADA requirements (cross-slope and trip 10 0 0 Sidewalk width meets recommended width for typology 10 10 0 according to the Mobility Element (or 8' if unspecified) 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge 10 0 0 On-street parking or bike lane provides 6' or more buffer 5 5 0 between pedestrians and vehicle travel way Landscaping 2' to 5' wide provides 'buffer' between 5 0 0 pedestrians and vehicle travel way Landscaping greater than 5' wide provides 'buffer' between 10 0 0 Street characteristics pedestrians and vehicle travel way Less than 3,000 vehicles per lane per day 5 5 0 Speed limit 30 mph or less 5 5 5 No apparent sight distance issues at intersections and 5 0 0 pedestrian crossings Permanent speed control devices installed on segments 5 0 0 posted as approved by the City Traffic Engineer • Essential Features {Criteria must be met}: Crosswalks are 10 0 0 marked according to CA MUTCD guidelines Crosswalk is high visibility (i.e., continental markings per the 5 0 0 CA MUTCD) Traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width Crossing characteristics (pedestrian refuge, bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median 10 0 0 island) Presence of intersection enhancements for pedestrians (pedestrian-friendly signal phasing, pedestrian countdown 10 0 0 heads, signage, etc.) RRFBs at uncontrolled crossings if warranted 5 0 0 • Essential Features (Criteria must be met): Street light 10 locations appear adequate 10 0 Active building frontages on 80% of street curbline (pedestrian attracting frontages such as active storefronts and recreationa 5 5 0 Other Elements spaces) Street trees provide shade over more than 50% of sidewalk 5 0 0 length Street furniture oriented toward businesses or attractions 5 5 0 0 0 s F No Project: State Street Commons Segment: State Street From Christiansen Way To Beech Avenue Scenario: _E_x_is_ti_n"'g ___________________________________________ _ By: Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Speed limit is s 25 mph 25 25 25 Speed limit is 30 mph 15 0 0 Street Characteristics Speed limit is 3S mph 10 0 0 Residential street with ADT < 3,000 15 0 0 Street with ADT between 3,000 and 6,000 10 0 0 Class I facility (off-street path), Class IV (cycle track), or 25 0 0 multiuse path Class II facility that meets minimum width of 5' (on-street 15 0 0 bicycle lanes) Facility Bike lane buffer (2' min) is provided 5 0 0 Class Ill facility (bike route designated by signage or paint only) 5 5 5 Additional traffic calming/speed management features have 10 0 0 been applied to Class Ill facility (i.e. a bike boulevard) Bikeway meets or exceeds the Bicycle Master Plan 25 25 25 Bike lane (including buffer) is at least 8' wide from face of curb 10 0 0 Bicycle facilities with signing and striping meet design 10 10 10 Bikeway Design guidelines D Good pavement condition for bikeway (no visible potholes) 10 10 10 Free of infrastructure that obstructs bike facility (e.g. grates) 5 5 5 Bikeways on side streets are consistent with Bicycle Master 5 0 0 Connectivity/ Plan along segment Contiguity Bike lanes are striped continuously on all approaches to and departures from intersections, without dropping at turn lanes 5 0 0 or driveways Adjacent Vehicle No on-street parking and speed limit is 25 or 30 mph 5 0 0 Parking Back-in angled parking 5 0 0 Parallel parking with door-side buffered bike lane 5 0 0 Enhanced bicycle detection or video detection is provided at 5 0 0 Other Elements 0 0 80 80 B B Project: State Street Commons Segment: State Street From Christiansen Way To Beech Avenue Scenario: _E_x_is_ti_n,,_g __________________________________________ _ By: Urban Systems Associates, Inc. Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment 50 (rail/bus)· 0 so No greater than 1/4 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 30 (bus) 30 (rail/bus) 0 0 Access No greater than 1/2 mile walk to the nearest transit stop 20 bus No greater than 1 mile bicycle ride to the nearest transit stop s 0 0 ADA compliant sidewalk or path to transit stops in both 15 directions 0 0 Multiple transit routes stop on segment 10 0 10 Route provides a direct link to a COASTER station or mobility 15 0 15 Connectivity hub Route provides for a single transfer to reach a COASTER station or mobility hub s 0 5 Transit priority Dedicated right of way 5 0 5 Transit priority during peak hours 5 0 0 Headways of-15 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays 15 0 0 Headways of 30 minutes between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays 5 0 0 Service Headways of 1 hour between 6:30-8:30 am and 4-6 pm on weekdays 2 0 2 Commute shuttle service provided during the morning and afternoon commute periods 10 0 0 No more than 1 hour headways between 9 am and 5 pm on 5 weekends 0 0 Covered bus stops 5 0 s Bench 10 0 10 Amenities Well-lit stop that provides a sense of security 5 0 5 Trash cans 2 0 2 Bus stop located within a block of commercial services 5 0 5 Bicycle Bike parking available at the bus stop 5 0 5 Accommodations Bus stop within 1/4 mile of a bike repair shop 5 0 s No Transit Stop Located Within 1/2 Mile Walk from Subject Site or Roadway Segment Area governed by an adopted TOM ordinance that will 60 0 0 Available Mobility promote ridesharing and/or the use of non-auto modes Services On demand rideshare services available 60 0 0 Segment within FLEX service area 60 0 0 Total Score: 0 100 Transit LOS: A