Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1170 TAMARACK AVE; ; CBR2023-4303; Permit
Building Permit Finaled Residential Permit Print Date: 09/10/2024 Job Address : 1170 TAMARACK AVE, CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3417 Permit No: Status: (city of Carlsbad CBR2023-4303 Closed -Finaled Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit Parcel #: 2054302000 Track #: Valuation: $104,384.91 Lot#: Occupancy Group: Project#: #of Dwelling Units: 1 Plan#: Bedrooms: Construction Type: Bathrooms: Orig. Plan Check #: Occupant Load: Plan Check #: Code Edition: Sprinkled: Project Title: MACLEOD ADU Description: MACLEOD; ADDITION OF DETACHED 497 SQ FT ADU Applicant: SNAPADU WH ITNEY HILL PO BOX 2685 CARLSBAD, CA 92018-2685 (760) 259-2476 FEE BUILDING PLAN CHECK BUILDING PLAN REVIEW -MINOR PROJECTS (LDE) BUILDING PLAN REVIEW -MINOR PROJECTS (PLN) CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SB1473 -GREEN BUILDING STATE STANDARDS FEE SFD & DUPLEXES STRONG MOTION -RESIDENTIAL (SMIP) SWPPP INSPECTION TIER 1 -Medium BLDG SWPPP PLAN REVIEW TIER 1 -Medium DEV2023-0132 Total Fees: $2,908.07 Total Payments To Date: $2,888.07 Applied: 09/15/2023 Issued: 03/08/2024 Finaled Close Out: 08/28/2024 Final Inspection: 08/09/2024 INSPECTOR: Renfro, Chris Alvarado, Tony CoApplicant: SNAPADU LUIS CALDERON PO BOX 2685 CARLSBAD, CA 92018-2685 (760) 259-2476 Balance Due: AMOUNT $864.50 $197.00 $104.00 $20.00 $5.00 $1,330.00 $13.57 $292.00 $82.00 $20.00 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exaction." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any su bsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitation has previously otherwise expired . ... Building Div:,!on Page 1 of 1 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 I 442-339-2719 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov ( Cifyof Carlsbad RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 8-1 Plan Check Est. Value PC Deposit Date Cf)P-2023-Lt~D3 #lDLf , 3 ~4 .q I Cf/ 15/23 r J Job Address 1170 TAMARACK AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Unit: NA APN: 205-430-20-00 -----· CT/Pro1·ect #: Lot#: Year Built: 1961 ·-----------------· ------------- Fire Sprinklers:OE~(!)m Air Conditioning:(!)YES QNO Electrical Panel UpgradeQYES0No BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK:AOOITION OF A NEW DETACHED 497 SF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT E) New SF :497 Living SF, 1,566 Deck SF, 0 Patio SF, 0 Garage SF _0 __ Is this to create an Accessory Dwelling Unit? {!)vQN New Fireplace? Qv{!)N , if yes how many? __ _ □Remodel: SF of affected area -----Is the area a conversion or change of use? Ov QN Additional Gas or Electrical Features? □ Pool/Spa: ____ SF ------------ O solar: ___ KW, ___ Modules, MountedOoofO;round, Tilt:O vO N, RMA:QvQN, Battery: Q( 0 , Panel Upgrade: 0 ~ D Re roof: __________________________________ _ D Plumbing/Mechanical/Electrical 0 Only: Other: PRIMARY APPLICANT Name: SnapADU Address: PO Box 2685 PROPERTY OWNER Name: MICAHN MACLEOD Address: 1170 Tamarack Avenue City: Carlsbad State:_C_A __ .Zip: 92018 City: Carlsbad State: CA Zip:_9_20_0_8 __ _ Phone: 760-259-2476 Phone: 760-612-5067 Email: permits@snapadu.com Ema ii: micahnmacleod@gmail.com DESIGN PROFESSIONAL CONTRACTOR OF RECORD Name: NA Business Name: SnapADU ---------------------------------Address: Address: PO Box 2685 ----------------City:. _______ .St ate:. ___ .Zip: ____ City: Carlsbad State: CA Zip:_9_20_1_8 ___ _ Phone: Phone: 760-259-2476 -----------------Em a 11: Email: permits@snapadu.com Architect State License: CSLB License#: 1075582 Class: B ------------------- Carlsbad Business License# (Required):. _______ _ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION: I certify that I have read the application and state that the above Information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. ./}'f.JJ ,l. /!} NAME (PRINT): Whitney Hill SIGN: ~ttfvi~ {,f1A,f' DATE:_9_11_1_12_3 __ _ 163S Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 760-602-2719 FaK: 760-602-8558 Email: Bullding@carlsbadca.gov REV. 07121 .., • THIS PAGE REQUIRED AT PERMIT ISSUANCE PLAN CHECK NUMBER: ______ _ A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED TO EITHER A STATE LICENSED CONTRACTOR OR A PROPERTY OWNER. IF THE PERSON SIGNING THIS FORM IS AN AGENT FOR EITHER ENTITY AN AUTHORIZATION FORM OR LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. (OPTION A): LICENSED CONTRACTOR DECLARATION: I herebyaffirm under penal tyof per jury that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 ( commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. I also affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations (CHOOSE ONE): QI have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the ork which this permit is issued. Policy No. ______________________________________ _ -OR- t.')1 have and will maintain worker's compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. ~y workers' compensation Insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Name: Ohio Security Insurance Company Policy No. XWS62859313 Expiration Date: _3_15_/2_4 _____________ _ -OR-O Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit Is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to $100,000.00, in addition the to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest and attorney's fees. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY, IF ANY: I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). Lender's Name: ____________________ lender's Address: ____________________ _ CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION: I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. NAME (PRINT): _w_h_it_ne_y_H_i_11 ____ SIGNATURE:..,/'--'-'---~__,,_-WJ ___ DATE: 9111123 Note: If the person signing above is an authorized agent for the contractor provide a letter of authoriz on on contractor letterhead. -OR - (OPTION B): OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). -OR-O I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). -OR-O I am exempt under Business and Professions Code Division 3, Chapter 9, Article 3 for this reason: AND, D FORM B-61 "Owner Builder Acknowledgement and Verification Form" 1s required for any permit issued to a property owner. By my signature below I acknowledge that, except for my personal residence in which I must have resided for at least one year prior to completion of the improvements covered by this permit, I cannot legally sell a structure that I have buift as an owner-builder if it has not been constructed m ,ts entirety by licensed contractors./ understand that a copy of the applicable law, Section 7044 of the Business and Professions Code, is available upon request when this application Is submitted or at the following Web site: http:/ lwww.leginfo.ca.gov/calow.html. OWNER CERT/FICA TION: I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. NAME-fPR4N:t:'~t Whitney Hill -s Note: If the person signing above is an authorized agent for the property owner in 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Email: Bullding@carlsbadca.gov 2 REV. 07/21 ( City of Carlsbad OWNERS AUTHORIZED AGENT FORM B-62 Development Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT FORM Only a property owner, contractor or their authorized agent may submit plans and applications for building permits. To authorize a third-party agent to sign for a building permit, the owner's third party agent must bring this signed form, which identifies the agent and the owner who s/he is representing, and for what jobs s/he may obtain permits. The form must be completed in its entirety to be accepted by the City for each separate permit application. Note: The following Owner's Authorized Agent form is required to be completed by the property owner only when designating an agent to apply for a construction permit on his/her behalf. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT TO ACT ON PROPERTY OWNER'S BEHALF Excluding the Property Owner Acknowledgement, the execution of which I understand is my personal responsibility, I hereby authorize the following person(s) to act as my agent(s) to apply for, sign, and file the documents necessary to obtain an Owner-Builder Permit for my project. . . . . Addition of 497 SF ADU Scope of Construction ProJect (or Description of Work): __________________ _ 1170 Tamarack Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Location or Address: ___________________________ _ Name of Authorized Agent: Whitney Hi 11 760-259-24 76 Tel No. ________ _ Address of Authorized Agent: p Q B Q X 2 6 8 5 Carlsbad, CA 92018 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the property owner for the address listed above and I personally filled out the above information and certify its accuracy. Property Owner's Signature: _____ rv1_i_~ ___ fvl_o.cA... __ o-u1v ________ Date: 9 / 11 /2 3 Building Permit Inspection History Finaled {city of Carlsbad PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBR2023-4303) Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 09/15/2023 Owner: MICAHN MACLEOD Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit Issue Date: 03/08/2024 Subdivision: WOODLAND HEIGHTS Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 11/19/2024 Address: 1172 TAMARACK AVE IVR Number: 52012 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-341 7 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date Status 03/27/2024 03/27/2024 BLDG-21 243403-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Underground/Underflo or Plumbing Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-SW-Pre-Con 243527-2024 Partial Pass Tony Alvarado Re inspection Incomplete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency SWPPPS and all BMP's for soil and debris, Yes erosion and sediment control -OK. 03/28/2024 03/28/2024 BLDG-11 243536-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Foundation/Ftg/Plers (Rebar) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-31 243706-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Underground/Conduit - Wiring Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Underground electrical conduit for Yes grounding UFER ground wire -OK. BLDG-SW-Inspection 243705-2024 Partial Pass Tony Alvarado Reinspection Incomplete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed Are erosion control BMPs Yes functioning properly? Are perimeter control BMPs Yes maintained? Is the entrance stabilized to Yes prevent tracking? Have sediments been tracked Yes on to the street? Has trash/debris accumulated Yes throughout the site? Are portable restrooms Yes properly positioned? Do portable restrooms have Yes secondary containment? 04/11/2024 04/11/2024 BLDG-15 Roof/ReRoof 244858-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete (Patio) Wednesday,August 28, 2024 Page 1 of 5 PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBR2023-4303) Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 09/15/2023 Owner: MICAHN MACLEOD Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit Issue Date: 03/08/2024 Subdivision: WOODLAND HEIGHTS Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 11/19/2024 Address: 1172 TAMARACK AVE IVR Number: 52012 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3417 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date Status Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-SW-Inspection 244979-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed Are erosion control BMPs Yes functioning properly? Are perimeter control BMPs Yes maintained? Is the entrance stabilized to Yes prevent tracking? Have sediments been tracked Yes on to the street? Has trash/debris accumulated Yes throughout the site? Are portable restrooms Yes properly positioned? Do portable restrooms have Yes secondary containment? 04/23/2024 04/23/2024 BLDG-22 Sewer/Water 246277-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Service Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-81 Underground 246035-2024 Partial Pass Tony Alvarado Reinspection Incomplete Combo(11, 12,21,31) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-21 Yes Underground-Underfloor Plumbing BLDG-31 Yes Underground-Conduit Wiring BLDG-SW-Inspection 246278-2024 Partial Pass Tony Alvarado Reinspection Incomplete Wednesday, August 28, 2024 Page 2 of 5 PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBR2023-4303) Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 09/15/2023 Owner: MICAHN MACLEOD Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit Issue Date: 03/08/2024 Subdivision: WOODLAND HEIGHTS Status: Closed -Finaled Expiration Date: 11/19/2024 Address: 1172 TAMARACK AVE IVR Number: 52012 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3417 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection Date Start Date Status Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed Are erosion control BMPs Yes functioning properly? Are perimeter control BMPs Yes maintained? Is the entrance stabilized to Yes prevent tracking? Have sediments been tracked Yes on to the street? Has trash/debris accumulated Yes throughout the site? Are portable restrooms Yes property positioned? Do portable restrooms have Yes secondary containment? 05/03/2024 05/03/2024 BLDG-13 Shear 24 7231 -2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Panels/HD (ok to wrap) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-14 247232-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Frame/Steel/Bolting/We ldlng (Decks) Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-SW-Inspection 247405-2024 Partial Pass Tony Alvarado Re inspection Incomplete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed Are erosion control BMPs Yes functioning properly? Are perimeter control BMPs Yes maintained? Is the entrance stabilized to Yes prevent tracking? Have sediments been tracked Yes on to the street? Has trash/debris accumulated Yes throughout the site? Are portable restrooms Yes properly positioned? Do portable restrooms have Yes secondary containment? 05/13/2024 05/13/2024 BLDG-27 Shower 248274-2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Pan/Tubs Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes Wednesday, August 28, 2024 Page 3 of 5 PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBR2023-4303) Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit Status: Closed -Finaled Application Date: 09/15/2023 Owner: MICAHN MACLEOD Issue Date: 03/08/2024 Subdivision: WOODLAND HEIGHTS Expiration Date: 11/19/2024 Address: 1172 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3417 IVR Number: 52012 Scheduled Date Actual Inspection Type Start Date Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection 05/16/2024 BLDG-84 Rough Combo(14,24,34,44) 248137-2024 Checklist Item BLDG-14 Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding (Decks) BLDG-24 Rough-Topout BLDG-34 Rough Electrical BLDG-44 Rough-Ducts-Dampers COMMENTS BLDG-SW-Inspection Checklist Item 248275-2024 COMMENTS Are erosion control BMPs functioning properly? Are perimeter control BMPs maintained? Is the entrance stabilized to prevent tracking? Have sediments been tracked on to the street? Has trash/debris accumulated throughout the site? Are portable restrooms properly positioned? Do portable restrooms have secondary containment? 05/16/2024 BLDG-16 Insulation Checklist Item 248825-2024 COMMENTS BLDG-Building Deficiency BLDG-SW-Inspection Checklist Item 248826-2024 COMMENTS Are erosion control BMPs functioning properly? Are perimeter control BMPs maintained? Is the entrance stabilized to prevent tracking? Have sediments been tracked on to the street? Has trash/debris accumulated throughout the site? Are portable restrooms properly positioned? Do portable restrooms have secondary containment? Wednesday, August 28, 2024 Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Passed Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial Pass Tony Alvarado Reinspection Incomplete Passed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Passed Yes Partial Pass Tony Alvarado Reinspection Incomplete Passed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Page 4 of 5 PERMIT INSPECTION HISTORY for (CBR2023-4303) Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit Status: Closed -Finaled Application Date: 09/15/2023 Owner: MICAHN MACLEOD Issue Date: 03/08/2024 Subdivision: WOODLAND HEIGHTS Expiration Date: 11/19/2024 IVR Number: 52012 Address: 1172 TAMARACK AVE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3417 Scheduled Date Actual Inspection Type Start Date Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Inspection 05/23/2024 08/09/2024 08/12/2024 05/23/2024 BLDG-18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 249451-2024 Checklist Item COMMENTS BLDG-Building Deficiency Drywall only BLDG-Electric Meter Release 249450-2024 Checklist Item COMMENTS BLDG-Building Deficiency 08/09/2024 BLDG-Final Inspection Checklist Item 257390-2024 COMMENTS BLDG-Plumbing Final BLDG-Mechanical Final BLDG-Structural Final BLDG-Electrical Final 08/12/2024 BLDG-SW-Inspection Checklist Item 257617-2024 COMMENTS Are erosion control BMPs functioning properly? Are perimeter control BMPs maintained? Is the entrance stabilized to prevent tracking? Have sediments been tracked on to the street? Has trash/debris accumulated throughout the site? Are portable restrooms properly positioned? Do portable restrooms have secondary containment? Wednesday, August 28, 2024 Partial Pass Chris Renfro Re inspection Incomplete Passed Yes Passed Chris Renfro Complete Passed Yes Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Passed Yes Yes Yes Yes Passed Tony Alvarado Complete Passed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Page 5 of 5 ,, @kwa Kearins Wheat & Associates, Inc. 7040 Avenida Encinas, Suite 104-130 Carlsbad, CA 92011 March 28, 2024 RE: 1170 Tamarack Ave, Unit B Carlsbad, CA 92008 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to certify that March 28, 2024 I determined that the foundation form boards for the structure referenced are placed in accordance with the plans prepared by SNAP ADU with a revision date of 12/04/2023, release #C and approval day of March 8, 2024. Sincerely, KWA, Inc. www.kwasurvey.com Z:\2023\2335-Tamarack Avenue-Mcleod\Office\2335 Form Cert.docx \ \ t S61'21'10"W n .19' / / / l t / --/ / / / ,,1'.;~& (t-~vv 1~~ / / 5ENCHMAR"- .JWA CONlRQ. POINT 111()11 EJ.£\/AllON,,120.~ EJ.£\/AllONS SH0'MI ~ WERE l)[,-im Ull.JZING 1HE CALEllNA REAL TIIE -(Cll'TN) NAwae OEDI012B. 5ASl6 OF 5EARING5 1HE BASS Of 11EAA1NGS Fa! 1115 SUR\£Y IS N0RTli 91'21'10" EAST, IENO 1HE SCltJlll EASml.. Y UNE Of LDT 20 Of W00lll.NI) tEGH'IS, IN THE CITY Of CARI.SIIAD, C0UNlY Of SAN DIEGO, STAlE Of CAI.E0INA, ~ 10 MAP 1HEIIE1lf NO. 44311. FUD IN lllE 0Ff1CE Of 1HE C0UNlY R£C0RllER Of SAN DIEllO, JANUARY I!, 11180. OElERWE) BY FOUND IKHJMEJl1S AND SHO'#I HEREON. SURVEYOR•s STATEMENT lHIS MAP REPRElEITS A F1ElJ) sur.£Y MADE BY ME OR UNDEll MY ~ONAS~3,'2024 IH)_ R£?11ESEH!S 1HE "1SUAI. SURFACE Joi,-1170 TAMARACK AVE. CARLSBAD, CA 92008 )! ~I / ..... «, IJOB llWll: 2335 ISCALE:1"-20' 1~, ot 1 !~ I !DRA• ff.PIii( IQ£QCED B'r..llW I • d • ---= I , __ •a. / / ,[k\YAYJ@ SURVEYING AND MAPPING 1-...-.-AS-STAKED EXHIBIT ~ , GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMJM'AL I MATERIALS G ■OT ■K FIELD TESTING REPORT PROJECT NO.: 3758.037-S0 DATE: 3-25-24 NAME: EAM HOURS~ REG. OT CLIENT ______ PROJECT S ]CJ'4A N\ ~ Pf¥_,\L tV;t LOCATION f}.'fJ ~ J Q. SUPT. CONTRACTOR _~=·'::.il~c-==.1)~1_..,---'~:=..1:t>::!...-:~------------- EQUIPMENT: -----------------,,,,-------------------- SUBJECT /TESTING OF: GY)<'.";(~~,rf ~ 1£" . .,--:rn -. ½l\<Y<))\ Test Elev. o,u-l11eW Dry Mu: %Jlelatfve Location Deptll Mabare% Moldare Daatky SoHType Demlty C.,1dlH No. C..r.t% p.e.l. TEST TYPE: Nudear Guage Test (unless otherwise noted in tile Comments Sectioa) COMMENTS: ________ ' ~\1~_2> .e ~"1'1,.p-: -"Jo ~-S"' w 1~~ 1t--('1?,-Fv\J )JO/\ 11. .-·_,.j l ,,.. '11-tii-~\L--~-13_..b J \/\5 $~,<...., !; r-.J u yv y, .e: t-LJ ( ...vi; ec,-.,]~A:::'\"C r-w A rvt 5 v !J 0~<-K.. lA)e>.J) ~ DAl +a ~""7 wl -11--t~ /.JG. -n..(i=;-(;;"vvv~"'--N Gvfu SUPEIUNTEDENT: GeoTelt, IDC. By: % ... lllnd ~ COMPANY: Page of __ Revised 0S-01-2019 Pa,or , .. A GEOTECHNJCAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I MA1EIUALS PROJECTN0.:31Si I O"J1,. DATE: 7 r,, t,IV,)(<..:a..\ GEOTEk FIELD TESTING REPORT NAME: u::-r, > HOURS~REG.•''/ OT CLIENT ~M ~~ PROJEC1\\1J;~ X: ~}t: Avr.-£- SUPT. LOCATION ~LSM D (A CONTRACTOR 7 EQUIPMENT: e..-~"2 ..\ ~c--e.. SUBJECT/ TESTING OF: ~.:;:~ 7 ;_; e ~ E,s:!!1111-1'~ c ~~rJ lq -~ ~~o~-J Test FJn,. fldll Dry N6. Locadea 0,.... Mu %11datm " ....... ....... Dtptla .......... " Mallelln DeMlrJ W'l'ype Dtmhy o ...... 0••• Ill• Fd Ceatat% pd I 'A>F-Y.. C'2--~~ Sc.. c;,7 9,){ I i '){l 0 ~ ln.7 'fl. 9n '"P 2 /~<,'\ h. •l I I i c., I (b7 "1 7 I ? I \\~l,, ,.._ I TEST TYPE: Nuclear Guse Test (unless otherwise noted la tbe Ctmmeats Sedion) COMMENTS: ~ \2·'<2. ,~u @, 51,E 1/J -n /f; v~ e.,Y ..l..-..A-n=-~~\\)-.J~ R.; ,y ~1.,--'l'J V A ,-1 r-_,,'-J cf ~tu Abu ------.C..r1.'~· ClL ~ 1 7 )'V Lj e,,=:-pte&J E-c.-,-. -ClC'v-J/-n--t~ f~Bfa 51-rc. ._,e 6 7b 13£; F,~ -t C-017 y.j f, f,o ,\., V v-J YI t.f L 6 I l'--1 c~~ c-:i l ,..:/'-' 5 ;-(,.,-1,v /G /'1-N~-r -re-'~ ,.-:--- l U.5 t!~ ,1-1 «;" /v, G, JO ~h tp./~ b t:: { I G. ,.I..) c::-<--t!.v <-41"' ~ 1 ✓ r.,v t::.'3,.:... .e '(.1>;: -fHE. r'" (7,,;·J -//-f'r?, ( S: £_ ~ ---------------------------- GeoTek, Inc. SUPEJUNTEDENT: By: Page: of --COMPANY: Jlc:vised 0S-01-2019 Transmittal Letter November 27, 2023 City of Carlsbad Community Development Department -Building Division 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review: Detached ADU Address: 1170 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad CA Applicant Name: SnapADU Applicant Email: permits@snapadu.com OCCUPANCY & BUILDING SUMMARY: Occupancy Groups: Type of Construction: Sprinklers: Stories: Area of Work (sq. ft.): R-3 V-B No One 497 sq. ft. The plans have been reviewed for coordination with the permit application. Valuation: Scope of Work: Floor Area: Confirmed Confirmed Confirmed True North COMPLIANCE SERVICES FINAL REVIEW City Permit No: CBR2023-4303 True North No.: 23-018-912 True North Compliance Services, Inc. has completed the review of the following documents for the project referenced above on behalf of the City of Carlsbad. Our comments can be found on the attached list. 1. Drawings: Electronic copy dated October 26, 2023, by SNAP ADU Design Build. 2. Structural Calculations: Electronic copy dated August 13, 2023, by Martin Structural Consulting. 3. Geotechnical Report: Electronic copy dated August 29, 2023, by GeoTek, Inc. The 2022 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Codes (i.e., 2021 IBC, UMC, UPC, and 2020 NEC, as amended by the State of California), 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 California Existing Building Code, and 2022 California Energy Code, as applicable, were used as the basis of our review. Please note that our review has been completed and we have no further comments, however, we bring the following to your attention: We have enclosed the above noted documents bearing our review stamps for your use. Please call if you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, True North Compliance Services, Inc. 3939 Atlantic Avenue Suite 224, Long Beach, CA 90807 T / 562. 733.8030 Detached ADU 1170 Tamarack Ave September 21, 2023 True North Compliance Services Review By: Richard Moreno -Plans Examiner City of Carlsbad-FINAL REVIEW City Permit No.: CBR2023-4303 True North No.: 23-018-912 Page2 October 26, 2023 City of Carlsbad SNAPA DU D E S I G N / B -U I L D Community Development Department -Building Division 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 City Permit No: CBR2023-4303 True North No.: 23-018-912 Architectural Comments: Al. a) PV system not required per PC exception 2: no PC required when minimum PC size (section 150.l(c)14) < 1.8 kwdc (0 kw). b) HERS features added to proposed site plan A0ll A2. a) No gas appliances proposed for this project b) Drainage is shown on sheet Cl00 c) Title 24 calcs updated to reflect SO-gallon water heater A3. a) Aging-in-Place notes added to sheet GlOl. See Floor Plan note #5. b) This window is not required to be tempered as the sill is more than 60" above the finish floor. See window schedule on sheet Al00. c) Door landing has been previously noted as such by code notes R315 and R316 on sheet G200. Code tag added to floor plan legend on sheet AlO0. d) This has been previously noted as such by code note R308 on sheet G200 e) Dimensions added as requested on sheet AlO0. f) Notes added to sheet Gl0l (Floor Plan Notes #6, 7, and 8) and controls shown on sheet Al00 (See keynote 15410.A3). A4. Building address note provided on sheet A200. See General Note #2. AS. Smoke and Carbon monoxide alarm note provided on sheet ElO0. See note # 4 of the Smoke & Monoxide Carbon Notes section. Mechanical Comments: Ml. Mini-split system previously shown on sheet All0 (See keynote 15800.Al). M2. Exhaust duct termination note provided on sheet GlOl (See Plumbing & Mechanical Note #10). M3. Electric appliances note provided on sheet El00 (See Power Note #17). M4. Exhaust duct termination notes provided on sheet Gl0l (See Plumbing & Mechanical Notes #11, 12, and 13). Electrical Comments: El. Dimming controls provided as noted (see the revised Electrical Floor Plan on sheet El00); Outdoor lighting note has been revised as noted (see Lighting Note #8); Outdoor electrical outlet provided at the rear side of ADU (see the revised Electrical Floor Plan on sheet El00); Wiring note provided on sheet El00 (See Power Note#l8}. E2. New Dual Meter location provided on sheet A0ll (See Keynote 02500.C12}; Revised Electric Riser Diagram provided on sheet ElO0. SnapADU I PO Box 2685 Carlsbad CA 92018 I info@snapadu.com I 760-259-2476 I CSLB License #1075582 f SNAPA DU D E S I G N / B -U I L D Plumbing Comments: Pl. Sewer lateral size provided on sheets A0l0 and A0ll (see keynote 02500.A6). Sewer main line note provided on sheet A0ll (See General Note #18). P2. Overflow roof drains are not proposed. P3. Recycled irrigation water note provided on sheet A0ll (See General Note #19). P4. Water-conserving requirement notes previously provided on sheet G200. Missing Code tags added on sheet Al00 (see code tags P401 and P403). Not for construction note removed from sheet Pl00. PS. Water heater strapping note provided on sheet Gl0l (See Plumbing & Mechanical Note #14). Green Building Comments: Gl. CalGreen checklists have been properly filled out. See sheets G300 and G301. G2. The design team acknowledges this comment and has made a note of it. Form 8-50 has been provided. Energy Compliance Comments: Tl. Wall and ceiling insulation per T24 previously provided on each building section. See keynotes 07210.A12 and 07210.AB on sheet A300. T2. U-factor and SHGC values per T24 calcs have been provided on sheet AlO0. See the revised Door and Window schedules. T3. Kitchen exhaust fan CFM has been provided on sheets All0 and ElOO. See keynote 15732.A4. T4. Electric panel array previously provided per ESS requirements on sheet El00. See ESS notes added on sheet El00. TS. Gas appliances will not be installed on the proposed ADU. 240V electrical outlet already provided. See Electrical Floor Plan on sheet ElO0. T6. Gas appliances will not be installed on the proposed ADU. 240V electrical outlet already provided. See Electrical Floor Plan on sheet ElOO. T7. Gas appliances will not be installed on the proposed ADU. 240V electrical outlet already provided. See Electrical Floor Plan on sheet ElO0. Structural Comments: Sl. Letter from Geotechnical engineer has been provided. S2a. No Special Inspection required. The 4500 psi for concrete was a typo. It is changed to 2500. Only type shear walls on this building. S2b. Using type D is conservative. S2c. Reference updated on sheet Sl. S2d. Per structural engineer there is no structural observation or special inspection required for this residential project. S3a. Vapor barrier and optional bar callouts have been revised on structural detail 1/S2. S3b. Structural detail 3/S2 has been revised as noted. S3c. Structural detail 4/S2 has been revised to show LTP4 @48". S4a. Per plan thickness of roof ply and gypsum is 1/2". Loads are Ok. S4b. 2022 CBC and 2021 IBC are the same when it comes to beam calcs. SnapADU I PO Box 2685 Carlsbad CA 92018 I info@snapadu.com I 760-259-2476 I CSLB License #1075582 .. SNAPADU D E S I G N / B -U I L D S4c. H/L of 8/3.5= 2.3 which reduces capacity of by 4% which is OK for a demand of only 100 plf. Sincerely, Luis Calderon Head of Design 760.259.2476 ext s I Lujs@SnapADU.com SnapADU I ADU Oesign+Build Services in Greater San Diego CA License #1075582 www.SnapADU.com Follow us on: Instagram ~ Y2lw!.b!:: ~ SNAPA DU D E S I G N / B -U I L D SnapADU I PO Box 2685 Carlsbad CA 92018 I info@snapadu.com I 760-259-2476 I CSLB License #1075582 MARTIN STRUCTURAL CONSUL TING, INC. I STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Tamarack Ave ADU 11 70 Tamarack Ave, Unit B Carl sbad, CA August I CBR2023-4303 1170TAMARACKAVE MACLEOD: ADDITION OF DETACHED 497 SQ FT ADU 2244 Faraday Ave #202 Carlsbad, CA tod@martinstructuralconsulting.com -htt 2054302000 9/15/2023 CBR2023-4303 CALCULATIONS fll::=C MARTIN PROJECT: STRUCTURAL CONSUL TING, INC. 1--~.=..:..~---£a::!:!.~~~~~~~~.J _______ _J ... 22« FARADAY AVf.. #202 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PROJ. NO.: -z._ Jv I DATE: /'/I] I 2. Qoad Loads:. Extel'.iorwill - stucco 2x6 Stud&-@ 16" o.c. Top ~ind Sill Plate 112" Gypsum !;loard Insulation/Misc. Total Interior wan (2) 1/2" Gypsum Board 2x4@ 16" f:>.C. Top and SiH plates M1S"C. • ••• -· Total live Loads: . Roof -20 psf_ 8.0 psf 1.5 0.5 2.2 1.8 • 14.0 psf 4.4 psf 1 .. 0. 0.5 • 11 . . BY: " SHEET: Roof ----__ .,. -t~ '3qofin.9 Ply Joists Gypsum Misc Total Lateral Load$: See calculations for d&tennll)atlon of loaids Vs= .091W Ho~zor,tal wind pressure = 16 psf at wall, 8 psf at roof '·t 2.0 psf 1.5 I 2.0 2.2 4 .. 3 12.0 psf CALCULATIONS m==C MARTIN STRUCTURAL CONSULTING, INC. PROJECT: .,,nl..A'U'-,,.,_,E ,'NJ.I PROJ . NO.: '?.)ivJ DATE: / ? Ii.. 2244 FARADAY AVE. #202 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 BY: , ~ SHEET: :t--,---...:.L···~~~;, ·: -~':1A--'.I ,,-·c..,ttE . ~ftY1-ca E,;.c..).·: __ . ·_fZ d t,'_ '. : . \ : r • i. ,. v,/ 1 J.,-1 Project Title: Tamarack Ave ADU Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: 23101 J ,Wood Beam t. nc, ·-"i<w-06019270, Bulld.20.23.07 20 • -• ----MARTIN STRUCTlJIW."CC)NSOL TING, IN't . --• •• Project file: cak:s.d 7ci ENERCALC TNC1&ib-2b23 DESCRIPTION: B1 CODE REFERENCES Calculations per NOS 2018, IBC 2021, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set : IBC 2021 Ma~erial Pro~!lfes Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Load Combination IBC 2021 Fb + Fb • 900psi 900psi E : Modulus of Elasticity Ebend-xx 1600ksl Fe -Prll Fe -Perp Fv 1350 psi 625psi 180 psi 575 ps1 Eminbend -xx 580ksi Wood Species Wood Grade Douglas Fir-Larch No.2 Ft Density 31 .21 pct Beam Bracing Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling .----D 0.096 Lr(0.16) 1 5.50X 3.50 1 Span =60 fl Applled_l;:oads__ _ __ Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. -. Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Uniform Load : D = 0.0120, Lr= 0.020 ksf, Tributary Width= 8.0 ft DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = 0.995 1 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = Section used for this span 5.50 X 3.50 Section used for this span lb: Actual = 1,231 .08psi fv: Actual = F'b = 1,237.SOpsi F'v = Load Combination +D+Lr Load Combination Location of maximum on span = 3.000ft Location of maximum on span = Span # where maximum occurs = Span# 1 Span # where maximum occurs = Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.149 in Ratio= 482>=360 Span: 1 : Lr Only Max Upward Transient Deflection O in Ratio= 0<360 n/a Max Downward Total Deflection 0.239 In Ratio = 301 >=180 Span: 1 : +D+Lr Max Upward Total Deflection O in Ratio= 0<180 n/a Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Load Combination Max Stress Ratios Moment Values Se~~ent Length Span# M V CD CM C1_Clx Cfu M lb F'b DOnly Length = 6. 0 ft +D+Lr Length = 6.0 ft +D+0.750Lr Length = 6. 0 ft +0.600 Length = 6.0 ft 1 0.518 0.125 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.995 0.241 1.25 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.839 0.203 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.175 0.042 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.43 461.7 891.0 0.0 1.15 1,231.1 1,237.5 0.0 0.97 1,038.7 1,237.5 0.0 0.26 277.0 1,584.0 Design OK 0.241 : 1 5.50 X 3.50 54.17 psi 225.00 psi +O+Lr 0.000ft Span# 1 "Snear Values V fv F'v 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.26 20.3 162.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.70 54.2 225.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.59 45.7 225.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.16 12.2 288.0 1WoodBeam ·' i.1Ci: KW'":°00019270, Build 20.23.07 20·· DESCRIPTION: B1 Overall Maximum Deflections Load Combination +D+Lr Vertical Reactions Load Combination Span ·1- Max Upwartffrorri all Load Conditions- Max Upward from Load Combinations Max Upward from Load Cases DOnly +D+Lr +D+0.750Lr +0.60D Lr Only Project Title: Tamarack Ave ADU Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: 23101 P(Ojed File: calcs.ec6 .; -· -·--·Cc) ENE~i.C iNc· 1·993.2023 Max ... _ .. Defl Location in Span Load Combination Max. "+" Defl Location in Span 0.2388 3.022 0.0000 0.000 Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Support 1-Support 2--- 0.768 O .'768 0.768 0.768 0.480 0.480 0.288 0.288 0.768 0.768 0.648 0.648 0.173 0.173 0.480 0.480 8/13/23, 11 :22 AM U.S. Seismic Design Maps USGS w,b serv,rAtS we,·,: down for some penod of lime and as a result lh1s tool wasn't op«ali003I, resuttang 1n tuneouf erro, USGS web sel'VlCes are now operatJonal so this tool shoukl work as ex.peded. 1170 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA Latitude, Longitude: 33.1538452, -117.3332991 Dote Dfflan Cod• Refe,enc• Ooournen1 Rl•k category Sil• Clou Type v ..... s~ 1.055 s, 0.362 s,..s 1.266 s,.., null -See S&Cllon 11.4.8 Sos 0.844 So, no~ -See Sect on 11 .4.8 Type V■luo soc null -See Section 11 A.8 Fa 1.2 F, null -See SeCIJon 11.4.8 PGA 0.464 FPGA 1.2 ~ 0.557 TL 8 SsRT 1.055 SsUH 1.179 SsO 1.5 S1RT 0.382 S1UH 0.422 S10 0.6 PGAd 0.543 PGAu., 0.464 C,.s 0.895 CR1 0.906 ~ 1.311 https:/lwww.se1smicmeps.org ' StP!k Catholic Church Vonsq DHcripClon 8/13/2023. 11 :22:45 AM ASCE7,16 II 0 -091nuR (See Sect,on 11.4.31 ~1CEi, ground motion. (fo< 0.2 secood period) 0Hct1p11on MCER ground motion. (fo, UJ,o period) Srt..-nodiflod spectral acceleration value Sit..-nodillod -Cltal accelera11on value Numeric •elsmic design VAIUft at 0.2 IOCOnd SA Numeric .eiom,c de&ign value at 1.0 aocond SA Setamic design ca1ogo,y Sfte ampllllcaoon f1c,o, II 0.2 second Sllo ampliftcaoon !actor at 1.0 second MCE0 pee~ ground ecceloratioo Stto amptficabon r~ at PGA Srte modified peak ground acceloratJon Long-penod trill1,sltlo,, period m seconds Probabilistic nsk-t.orgeled ground motion. (0.2 second) Factored un lom>-hlzard (2'1. probabKlly ol oxceedanco In 50 yeara I speciral aocelorabon Factored de1e<mlnlstlc acce1era11on value. (0.2 second) Probablllsbc risk-targeted ground motJon. (1.0 aocood) F.etortd ""lorrTMlazard (2'll. p,obebi!ly ol exceedance ,n 50 )'H ll) specinll acceleration. Factored determ,mst~acceleradon value. (i.o second) Factor■d deterministic accalorftfioo •aloe. (Peak Ground Acceie<Bhon) Un,ro-azam (2'1'. probaMly of e•coedanca ,n SO yoin) Peak Cround Accelerabon Mapped value ol 1ho nSk coefficient at short penocls Mac,ped value ol lho nsk coefficient ot a penod er 1 a Vertical coell'lcient OSHPD Map data ©2023 Google 1/2 CALCULATIONS 2244 FARADAY Al/f.. #202 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 BY: -::. ., SHEET: t, LA,£ '~"'°'-' A-r!~,_,., S: IS ~ d:-1 -=. s a._.; ) p_,_1 -= , '1 -I~ I <,J-1' • • /11 Q ~.,, .-;, .... -~JJ · ... ..,../• .. v.,i ~ ; ~ .-= n ... 1-,, o ""' "L l_ ~~ F . v>rt-~ t . o ./Lt. r . : ....I , ,-, D> j'> JtA.${ ~fl-4 e _ I/--l'J F t : ...:., _h.l,.<.-J Y (>J. F ~ ~ F{. I'll~-"\_ 7, / ..rJ 1 a . Jc.7·r, .. 1v..c j, I~ ~f A~,~ A : V.s = r-Y t7 '.' i . 11 : (? • ..., 1 l '!rt. , V-' 7 (c,..;,1t,) :::,q ."l)C . . F1; C/.. 7 ~ ~ AJ ✓ ... ~ . .V • ,-p;-.. r ~-· = , .. (/ ) u] .. , .. . . . . . . . -- ~ .. J.' f ? ,1 tr • ~ .. . . . . < ~ ~ -., ; . ' ~ ~," f ~ ll f 0 . ' "" ... . . "'"" · C'. ~ 0 '" _,.. _ .. . . " .. . . . no\ / 03 H ~ \ I .L 3 0 M3 N g; < -t- -- - - __ . _ . :1 (/ ) , .. . . I '" , 4 ... . .., .. . , "' ' ' t .. .,. ,. na v 03 H :: l \1 1 3 0 M3 N C z w " ~ z ~ .. . " z § ~ ,, I ' ' u j .. . w "' « [' z .. D. " z 2 0 ~ ~ ;:; _ w "' "' ' ' .,, . .., ~ ► ., ;!, ,, (/ ) i. ~ ; ~ f ~ : ~ .J ~ z ~. , (/ ) ;t .; , I! ' 0 z ~ .w , ll' f .. f • ., .. Vf l r f . 1 Pf f l I f. ' ... ... . . . •fl na v 03 H O \ f . l 3 0 M3 N . , .. . 0 z "' " ~ z t 8 "' I I I ... . . .. . wJ ] 0 I;;, ; N • .. . . <( I ; ' ., 6 z 8 I 10 "' ~ I • i H :5 ' j t a ; f ~ .. • I u . . ; ... I z :i ~ 8 "' . ' ► .. . '" • I (/ ) ' , ., ' , ., :I ,_ 'l . 1 • } . - Ill ' • ., ] .. . .., .. . l4 l . . ffo , ,' ° ' ¥ 1 f f l " . f o I Wf' I I 'IO T .. W" t ' l i f ' J na v 03 H : : > vl3 a M3 N z i= •t > ~ ~ "' ~ .. .. . -, - • ,I ,._ , ' ' 1- : . .. .. . , .. .. ✓ 1 z i= •( > ~ r ~ "' "' I!! i .J ff i ~ ~ I; ; :,, 0 .. . 0 ll : N " < ~ i l ' ,, ., ' , ., • =. \ 1 I • ' h j 11 I, '3 - , l .. .. ... . , . .: -~ ,, ... . , -' ~; 0 .. 0 m ·. , M < , . • <., .. . 3 "' ,. .. . . . KEYNOTES ELECTRICAL NOTES ....... 1, ELECTRICAL FLOOR PLAN LEGEND -- MECtiANICAl. NOTES ... ,, -·~ -..... ----•-Q,,O'.W:•, ..... __ ... --..... •-·• .. ,_,,.._ __ ,.,,., . .,..,,.,._••"• ...,u•••• --... ··----·--····-..................... ,.._ ... , •-• ,(.-., .. ~1t• .. -·•--~ _. •• ,,. .. _,_.,..._,..,._,_ •••I-, .... ♦-•-..... • ,r,.. ... ,..1_,_, .•. ,. ....... . ............. -·-"'--•·" ...... ,, ... ~.-.. ---= ... .,..,_,.,,_ .......... -__ , .. , ,.. SMOKE & CARBON MONOXIOE NOTES .......... .-..,,.,.~ INDOOR AIR QUALITY NOTES n~c,T Fl(X)q ft fC'TRf£AJ P"-AN ~4 ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM INDOOR AJR QUALITY NOTES ... _, .. ~ ••:.-.:.:::":!:.:::..~-t-•-,.~••"'-.... -•-•1 s SNAP .... OCfAA...1011 :.-1,,.,. .... ~.-, .. .......... ""°" ..... ,ww,,i.....,•~ - :, Cl <( Cl •1 LU •, :z: u <( ., f-~ LU • Cl •, ;! LU z r:=7 ~ ii •! ' .. 1 11"1rt(•~A f HW"' "' E100 "· •;;: ;J found in ARTICLE 220.10 of the Nat/o;~; Ei;~trl~-C~d~_,_· ~-;y be used 1. GENERAL LIGH~NG LOADS Dwelling 3:: 4 sq. ft. x 3 VA= 220-3(a) 2, 2-'1 l-( VA Small appliance loads -220-16(a) 1500 VA x ;).... circuits= !#'$0 VA Laundry load -220-16(b) 1500 VA x _ _._ ___ circuits= / VA ½ 44 General Lighting Total , :f:: VA 2. COOKING EQUIPMENT LOADS -Nameplate Value Range J-.JO >t VA= g,\pOQ VA Cooktop ______ VA= Oven(s) ______ VA= I VA ____ VA Cooking Equipment Total 9,loQO , VA 3. ELECTRIC DRYER 220.54 (Nameplate, 5000 VA minimum) Dryer 30 A. VA= Dryer Total 1J ZC>C> VA 4. FIXED APPLIANCE LOADS 230.30(b)(3) Dishwasher = Disposal = Compactor = Water Heater = Hydromassage Bathtub = Microwave Oven = Built-In Vacuum = = i(l-00 VA ([LOO VA VA ---:-;,200 VA -=-.,,....,..-_VA !5'!'0 VA •~ VA VA ----Fixed Appliance Total SUBTOTAL (Add all of the above totals) FACTORS 220.82(b) ~r 10,000VAx 100% = .,;.r,,,.,,.'.l, ~ . , •) { Remaining Z':t, WL/ v Ax 40%= I 'ABLE 220.82(c) = totals from llnes 6 and 7) = 10,000 VA &)1 ~58: VA 1,200 VA i1068 VA I I, I oo I VA ·3Y,lJtLf VA • i I 3 Ampere 1~t of card under Computed Load) Address: Owner: Contractor: PANEL: LOCATION CKT 31 33 35 37 39 ~ . .,. , .... ,~~ Permit Number: Phone: PDS. Phone: Area In Sq. Ft. A.LC. VOLTS -0 ____ WIRE MISC I L TG I REC I REC I L TG I MISC , SIZE I TYPE WLRE LOCATION BKR I CKT SIZE I) Type:□ cu DAL •> Conduit Size: -td: CEC 250---- 1_,..t.w,e Wn: 0 CU O AL ,., 2 4 6 -8 10 12 -14 -16 -18 20 -22 24 26 28 30 32 34 -36 38 40 -42 AFCI Protected Circ. 210.12 ~Bed, Family, Dining, Living, Halls, and Similar Rooms. Branch circuits required: A) Lighting Circuits 220.12 220.140) B) Two Small Appliance Circuits 210.11 (c)(1) C) Laundry Circuit 220.11(c)(2) D) Central Heating Equipment 422.12 E) Bathroom 210.52(d) Remarks: _________________ _ I certify that all term/nations have been torqued In accordance with manufacturer's instructions and that the worl< shown on this circuit card i resents the full extent oft worl< performed under this permit. Owner __ -.-i1-r-+------------- Contractor -"---'r-"lr------------- S i g n e d __________ Date ____ _ ,, CA 92123 • (858) 565-5920 • (888) 336-7S53 I Wrnee, ctno anc:L nDn GeoTek, Inc. 1384 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A Vista, CA 92081-8505 (760) 599-0509 (760) 599-0593 www.geotekusa.com SnapADU Yucca Road Oceanside, CA 92054 Attention: Subject: Mr. Luis Calderon Geotechnical Review of Foundation Plans Detached Auxiliary Dwelling Unit 1170 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr. Calderon: October 26, 2023 Project No. 3758.037-SD As requested, GeoTek, Inc. (GeoTek) has completed a geotechnical review of the referenced structural plans, specifically the foundation plan, structural notes, and structural details. Based on this review, it is GeoTek's opinion that the provided and reviewed plans have been prepared utilizing the soil engineering design parameters and recommendations provided in the referenced report. These plans are considered to be geotechnically suitable. Geo T ek makes no representation as to the accuracy of dimensions, calculations, or structural design provided on the referenced plan. Should you have any questions after reviewing this addendum, please feel free to contact our office at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, GeoTek, Inc. ~ D. Livesey CEG, 2733 Exp. 05/31 /25 Vice President ~~ n . Edwin R. Cunningham RCE 81687, Exp. 03/31 /24 Project Engineer GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRONMENTAL I MATERIAL SNAPADU Geotechnical Review of Foundation Plans 1170 Tamarack Ave, Carlsbad, California 92008 REFERENCES October 26, 2023 Project No. 3758.037-SD Page 2 GeoTek, Inc., 2022, "Limited Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Auxiliary Dwelling Unit, 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008," dated August 29, 2023. Martin Structural Consulting, Inc., 2023, Foundation Plan, Structural Notes, and Structural Details for "New Detached ADU, 1170 Tamarack Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008", Job No. 2310 I, Sheet SI and S2, dated October 16, 2023. GEOTEK GEOTEK LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PROPOSED Auxiliary Dwelling Unit {ADU) I 170 TAMARACK AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PROJECT No. 3758.037-SD PREPARED FOR SNAPADU YUCCA ROAD OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 PREPARED BY GEOTEK, INC. 1384 POINSETTIA AVENUE VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92081 CBR2023-4303 1170 TAMARACK AVE MACLEOD; ADDITION OF DETACHED 497 SQ FT ADU GEOTECHNICAL I ENVIRON!' 2054302000 9/15/2023 CBR2023-4303 GeoTek, Inc. 138'4 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A Vista, CA 92081-850S (760) S99-0509 (760) 599-0593 www.geotekusa.com SnapADU Yucca Road Oceanside, California 92054 Attention: Subject: Mr. Mike Moore Limited Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Auxiliary Dwelling Unit (ADU) 1170 Tamarack Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr. Moore, August 29, 2023 Project No. 3758.037-SD GeoTek, Inc. (GeoTek) is pleased to provide results of this Limited Geotechnical Evaluation for the subject improvements. Based upon review, site construction appears feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint, provided that the recommendations included herein are incorporated into the design and construction phases of site improvements. The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Geo T ek. Respectfully submitted, GeoTek, Inc. Christopher D. Livesey CEG 2733, Exp. 05/31/2025 Vice President tf.L i?_ c ~ ,,7 c_,· Edwin R. Cunningham RCE 81687, Exp. 03/3 I /2024 Project Engineer SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page i l. PURPOSE AN D SCOPE OF SERVI CES .................................................................................................... 1 2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 1 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................ I 3. FIELD STUDY AND LABORATORY TESTINC ...................................................................................... 2 3. I FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................................................ 2 3.2 L ABORATORY T ESTING ............................................................................................................................ 2 4. GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 2 4.1 EARTH MATERIALS ............................................................................................................................ 2 4.1. 1 Artificial Fill (Map Symbol Aj) ...................................................................................................... 2 ./.1.2 Very Old Paralic Deposits (Map Symbol Qvop) ............................................................................ 3 4.2 SURFACE AND GROUND WATER ................................................................................................................ 3 4.2. 1 Surface Water ................................................................................................................................. 3 ./.2.2 Groundwater .................................................................................................................................. 3 4.3 EARTHQUAKE AND SEISMIC HAZARDS ..................................................................................................... 3 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 3 5.1 GENERAL. ................................................................................................................................................. 3 5.1. 1 Site Clearing and Building Pad Preparation ................................................................................. 4 5.2 D ESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................... 4 5.2. I Foundations ................................................................................................................................... 4 5.2.2 Seismic Design Parameters ............................................................................................................ 7 5.2.3 Soil Sulfate Content ........................................................................................................................ 7 5.3 CONSTRUCTION O BSERVATIONS ............................................................................................................... 7 6. INTENT ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 7. LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 8 8. SELECTED REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 10 ENCLOSURES Figure I -Site Location Map Figure 2 -Geotechnical Map Appendix A -Logs of Exploration Appendix B -Results of Laboratory Testing GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad. CA 92008 Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page I I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this study was to assess the site geotechnical conditions with regards to the proposed improvements. Services provided for this study included the following: ► Research and review of readily available geologic data and general information pertinent to the site. ► Excavation of one manual auger boring and one test pit, and collection of loose bulk samples for subsequent laboratory testing. ► Laboratory testing of soil samples collected during field exploration. ► Review and analysis of geologic and geotechnical engineering data. ► Compilation of this geotechnical report which presents GeoTek's findings of pertinent site geotechnical conditions and geotechnical recommendations for site development. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed improvement is located within the property at 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 (See Figure I). The property is currently improved with a single-story residence (primary dwelling}, concrete driveway, backyard, concrete masonry unit retaining wall, and various landscaping improvements. Property is bounded to the north, east, and west by residential property and to the southeast by Tamarack Avenue. This report is limited to the area of proposed improvements as discussed herein and located within the boundaries presented on the Geotechnical Map, Figure 2. The area of planned improvements (referred to herein as the "site") is located northwest of the existing primary residence in the northwest portion of the property. 2.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed site improvements consist of a detached approximately 748 square-foot single- story accessory dwelling unit (ADU). A topographic site plan provided to Geo T ek in July 2023, was used as the basis for the approximate location of the exploratory boring and test pit as shown GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 2 on Figure 2 (geotechnical map). The ADU is anticipated to be constructed with additional utility improvements. No additional site grading (cuts or fills to change grades) is proposed at this time. 3. FIELD STUDY AND LABORATORYTESTING 3.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for this study was conducted on August I'\ 2023, and consisted of a site reconnaissance, excavation of one manual auger boring and one test pit, and collection of loose bulk soil samples for subsequent laboratory testing. A soil probe was applied at discrete depths to qualitatively evaluate the underlying soil properties. A representative from Geo Tek visually logged the excavations as depicted on the Logs of Exploration, presented in Appendix A The approximate location of the boring and test pit is presented on the Geotechnical Map, Figure 2. 3.2 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on the soil sample collected during the field exploration. The purpose of the laboratory testing was to evaluate their physical and chemical soil properties for use in engineering design and analysis. Results of the laboratory testing program, along with a brief description and relevant information regarding testing procedures, are included in Appendix B. 4. GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS 4.1 EARTH MA TE RIALS A brief description of the earth materials encountered during the subsurface exploration is presented in the following sections. Based on review of published geologic maps and the site- specific evaluation, the subject site is locally underlain by artificial fill over very old paralic deposits. 4.1.1 Artificial Fill (Map Symbol Af) Artificial fill was encountered to the full depths ( one foot) of the subsurface exploration. Artificial fill consisted of silty fine to medium sand, orange brown in color, dry, and very dense with roots and organics in the upper inch. The fill was probed qualitatively and found to be firm and unyielding. Boring and test pit excavations reached practical refusal at a depth of one foot. GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 4.1.2 Very Old Paralic Deposits (Map Symbol Qvop) Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 3 Although not encountered during the subsurface exploration, but inferred at a depth of one foot due to refusal of explorations, Very Old Paralic deposits are anticipated to underly the artificial fill. Old Paralic deposits are typically silty sands, red orange in color, and med ium to very dense with depth. 4.2 SURFACE AND GROUND WATER 4.2.1 Surface Water Surface water was not observed during the site visit and exploration. If encountered during earthwork construction, surface water on this site will likely be the result of precipitation or possibly some minor surface r unoff. Standing water or ponding of water was not observed. 4.2.2 Groundwater Groundwater or localized perched water was not encountered in the exploration and is not anticipated to be a factor in the proposed construction. 4.3 EARTHQUAKE AND SEISMIC HAZARDS No active or potentially active fault is known to exist at this site nor is the site situated within an "Alquist-Priolo" Earthquake Fault Zone or a Special Studies Zone (Bryant and Hart, 2007). No faults are identified on the geologic maps reviewed for the immediate proximity of the study area. The liquefaction potential and seismic settlement potential on this site are considered negligible due to the apparent density of the Very Old Paralic deposits at a depth of one foot and absence of a shallow groundwater table. Evidence of ancient landslides or gross slope instabilities at this site was not observed during this study or indicated on regional geologic maps. Thus, the potential for landslides is considered negligible. S. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 GENERAL The proposed improvements appear feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint provided that the project design and construction comply with ordinances of the 2022 California Building Code (CBC), City of Carlsbad guidelines and recommendations contained in this report. GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 5.1.1 Site Clearing and Building Pad Preparation Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 4 Prior to building construction, the site should be cleared of vegetation which should be properly disposed of off-site. The building pad should be reprocessed within the upper 12 inches of ground surface after clearing of surface vegetation. Reprocessing should consist of ripping/scarification to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioning to near optimum moisture content and compacting to a minimum 90% of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. The recommended removals and recompaction should extend to at least 2 feet outside the proposed improvements, where possible. If soils are needed to raise pad grades after stripping of unsuitable materials, acceptable engineered fill materials should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, moisture conditioned to at or slightly above the optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90% of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. In addition, after excavation of the building footings and before concrete forms and reinforcement bar has been placed, the footing bottom should be moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum 90% of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. 5.2 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 5.2.1 Foundations If reprocessing of the building pad is not prepared as recommended under section 5.1.1, the structural engineer should design an appropriate slab based on the understanding that subgrade that typically supports a slab spanning the length between footings may not perform as well as a building slab supported on fill compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90% of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. The structural engineer should also design the slab and beam reinforcement based on actual loading conditions. As verified by laboratory testing, the near surface subgrade soils are considered to have a "very low" (Ef <20) expansion index based upon ASTM D4829 test procedures. The following criteria is for the design of the project's building foundation system. GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad. CA 92008 Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 5 MINIMUM DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONALLY REINFORCED FOUNDATIONS DESIGN PARAMETER "Very Low" Expansion Index (20$El$S0) Perimeter Foundation Embedment Depth 18 inches (inches below lowest adjacent finished grade) Minimum Perimeter Foundation Width 15 inches Minimum Isolated Square Foundation Width 24 inches Minimum Isolated Square Foundation Depth 18 inches (inches below lowest adjacent finished grade) Minimum Slab Thickness 4 inches 6"x6"-W2.9/W2.9 welded wire fabric Minimum Slab Reinforcement placed in middle of slab or No. 3 bars at 18 inch centers. Minimum Footing Reinforcement Four No. 4 Reinforcing Bars, two top and two bottom Pre-Saturation of Subgrade Soil (percent of Minimum I 00% to a depth of 12 optimum moisture content) inches It should be noted that the above recommendations are based on soil support characteristics only. The structural engineer should design the slab and beam reinforcement based on actual loading conditions. • For footings supported within suitable bearing materials, as observed and documented by a GeoTek representative, these footings may be dimensioned based on an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. The allowable soil bearing pressure may be increased by one-third for short term wind and/or seismic loads. • The passive earth pressure for footings within the engineered fill may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 150 psf per foot of depth, to a maximum earth pressure of 2,500 psf. A coefficient of friction between soil and concrete of 0.25 may be used with dead load forces. When combining passive and frictional resistance, the passive pressure component should be reduced by one-third. A moisture and vapor retarding system should be placed below slabs-on-grade where moisture migration through the slab is undesirable. Guidelines for these are provided in the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) Section 4.505.2, the 2022 CBC Section 1907.1 and ACI 360R-10. The vapor retarder design and construction should also meet the requirements GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Pr oject No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 6 of ASTM E 1643. A portion of the vapor retarder design should be the implementation of a moisture vapor retardant membrane. It should be realized that the effectiveness of the vapor retarding membrane can be adversely impacted as a result of construction related punctures (e.g. stake penetrations, tears, punctures from walking on the vapor retarder placed atop the underlying aggregate layer, etc.). These occurrences should be limited as much as possible during construction. Thicker membranes are generally more resistant to accidental puncture than thinner ones. Products specifically designed for use as moisture/vapor retarders may also be more puncture resistant. Although the CBC specifies a 6 mil vapor retarder membrane, it is Geo T ek's opinion that a minimum IO mil thick membrane with joints properly overlapped and sealed should be considered, unless otherwise specified by the slab design professional. Moisture and vapor retarding systems are intended to provide a certain level of resistance to vapor and moisture transmission through the concrete, but do not eliminate it. The acceptable level of moisture transmission through the slab is to a considerable extent based on the type of flooring used and environmental conditions. Ultimately, the vapor retarding system should be comprised of suitable elements to limited migration of water and reduce transmission of water vapor through the slab to acceptable levels. The selected elements should have suitable properties (i.e., thickness, composition, strength, and permeability) to achieve the desired performance level. Moisture retarders can reduce, but not eliminate, moisture vapor rise from the underlying soils up through the slab. Moisture retarder systems should be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable American Concrete Institute, Portland Cement Association, Post- Tensioning Concrete Institute, ASTM and California Building Code requirements and guidelines. Geo Tek recommends that a qualified person, such as the flooring contractor, structural engineer, architect, and/or other experts specializing in moisture control within the building be consulted to evaluate the general and specific moisture and vapor transmission paths and associated potential impact on the proposed construction. That person (or persons) should provide recommendations relative to the slab moisture and vapor retarder systems and for migration of potential adverse impact of moisture vapor transmission on various components of the structures, as deemed appropriate. In addition, the recommendations in this report and GeoTek's services in general are not intended to address mold prevention; since Geo T ek, along with geotechnical consultants in general, do not practice in the area of mold prevention. If specific recommendations addressing potential mold issues are desired, then a professional mold prevention consultant should be contacted. GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad. CA 92008 5.2.2 Seismic Design Parameters Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 7 The site is located at approximately 33.153852 Latitude and -117.333292 Longitude. Site spectral accelerations (Ss and SI), for 0.2 and 1.0 second periods for a risk targeted two (2) percent probability of exceedance in SO years (MCER) were determined using the web interface provided by ASCE 7 Hazard Tool (https://asce7hazardtool.online/) to access the USGS Seismic Design Parameters. A Site Class "C" is deemed appropriate for this site based on the apparent density of the fill underlying the project site. SITE SEISMIC PARAMETERS Mapped 0.2 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, S, 1.055g Mapped 1.0 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, S1 0.382g Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral 1.266g Response Acceleration for 0.2 Second, SMs Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral 0.573g Response Acceleration for 1.0 Second, SM1 5% Damped Design Spectral Response 0.844g Acceleration Parameter at 0.2 Second, Sos 5% Damped Design Spectral Response 0.382g Acceleration Parameter at I second, S 0 1 Seismic Design Category D 5.2.3 Soil Sulfate Content The soil soluble sulfate content was determined in the laboratory for an on-site soil sample. The results indicate that the water-soluble sulfate result is 0.0034 percent by weight, which is considered "negligible" per Table 4.2.1 of ACI 318. Based on the test results and Table 4.3.1 of ACI 318, no special recommendations for concrete are required for this project due to soil sulfate exposure. S.3 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS GeoTek representatives should be present during site grading and foundation construction to check for proper implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. These representatives should perform at least the following duties: • Observe site clearing and grubbing operations for proper removal of unsuitable materials. • Observe and test bottom of removals prior to fill placement/subgrade recompaction GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 8 • Evaluate the suitability of onsite and import materials for fill placement, if needed, and collect soil samples for laboratory testing where necessary. • Observe the fill for uniformity during placement. • Perform field density testing of the fill and backfill materials. • Observe and probe foundation and slab subgrade excavations to confirm suitability of bearing materials. This observation should be performed prior to placement of reinforcement. 6. INTENT It is the intent of this report to aid in the design and construction of the proposed development. Implementation of the advice presented in this report is intended to reduce risk associated with construction projects. The professional opinions and geotechnical advice contained in this report are not intended to imply total performance of the project or guarantee that unusual or variable conditions will not be discovered during or after construction. The scope of this evaluation is limited to the area explored that is shown on Figure 2. This evaluation does not and should in no way be construed to encompass any areas beyond the specific area of the proposed construction as indicated to us by the client. Further, no evaluation of any existing site improvements is included. The scope is based on Geo T ek's understanding of the project and the client's needs, and geotechnical engineering standards normally used on similar projects in this region. 7. LIMITATIONS GeoTek's findings are based on site conditions observed and the stated sources. Thus, GeoTek's comments are professional opinions that are limited to the extent of the available data. GeoTek has prepared this report in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the engineering and science professions currently practicing under similar conditions in the jurisdiction in which the services are provided, subject to the time limits and physical constraints applicable to this report. Since GeoTek's recommendations are based on the site conditions observed and encountered and laboratory testing, the conclusions and recommendations provided in this report are GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad. CA 92008 Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 9 professional opinions that are limited to the extent of the available data. Observations during construction are important to allow for any change in recommendations found to be warranted. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty of any kind is expressed or implied. Standards of care/practice are subject to change with time. GEOTEK SnapADU Limited Geotechnical Evaluation 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 8. SELECTED REFERENCES Project No. 3758.037-SD August 29, 2023 Page 10 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2022, "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures," ASCE/SEI 7-22. ___ , ASCE Tsunami Hazard Tool, 2022, ASCE Tsunami Design Geodatabase Version 2022- 1.0, accessed March 30, 2023, at https://asce7tsunami.online. __ , ASCE 7 Hazard Tool, 2021, ASCE/SEI 7-22 Hazard Tool, accessed August I, 2023, at https://asce7hazardtool.online. ASTM International (ASTM), "ASTM Volumes 4.08 and 4.09 Soil and Rock." Bryant, W .A., and Hart E.W., 2007, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zone Maps, California Geological Survey: Special Publication 42. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, 2022 "California Building Code," 2 volumes. California Geological Survey (CGS, formerly referred to as the California Division of Mines and Geology), 1977, "Geologic Map of California." __ , 1998, "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada," International Conference of Building Officials. GeoTek, Inc., In-house proprietary information. Kennedy, M.P., and Tan, S.S., 2005, "Geologic Map of the Oceanside 30x60-minute Quadrangle, California," California Geological Survey, Regional Geologic Map No. 2, map scale I : 100,000. SnapADU, 2023, "Site Layout-Proposed Addition of ADU, 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, San Diego, CA USA 92008," info@SnapADU.com, dated July 11, 2023. Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B., I 967, "Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Second Edition. GEOTEK ] L II l~b .. 1d C'tt 3,11.-ill SnapADU 1170 Tarmrack Ave Carlsbad, California PN: 3057.037-SD DATE: August 2023 ~ Approximate Site Location VI )> '2 0 -""" G"\ 0 ,, Figure I Site Location Map - tJ'\ C. Agua 1-/ediondo GEOTEK 1384 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A Vista, California 92081 'S SED ADDITION OF ADU ~.,. \ HA-I :17, ,J.. \ -z 0., ~~:,,.,\ 61, "t-~ 'o--~~ ~ 1fu-~--y <9 ~ ,,., / ~ ~f?\ t1 ~ / .,,,,~--?. "1--,, / .,,,.-· 1, ·,,1.. \ ,/ / .,,,,-::>. \ \ ,. / -/ / _.,,,, \ ,. / / \ <' _ .,,,,,,,-~ (E)PERGOLA -\~ \\· --(1 • ~ \.-· ,. \ \ ,,., ,/,,/' ,, ':-,.0~ \ :i ¼' s c,'f.. -..::'• 1,6 ' • ~ ~~ -~-.;~_ ~1 $~-<... \ <:,\0~ .... "l, ·~ ~o ' S)u c,'f.. \ f~~ ~· f>-'v ~~~ , ,, ' • X <:-:,<t, ~ ' \ :, ',b; S) \ '< \'~,~~ \ \\ ',,> '\" \ ~--.. ,, ~ \ ~__; \ \ \ \ ., •~ \ ' ·a t~-'\\ '· V \:\ \ \ ? \ :\\~~ \ \ [,> \ \ \ \ (E) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNIT \ \\ ,, "~-\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ APN: 2054302000 DWELLING AREA: 1,566 SF LOT: 8,990.53 SF ~ \\ \ . '(-> (E)~ S~E~ _;. ,,> \ > ':''?, '> \ .. / -;ft \ c: •' ,l • \ . ct,' ~ 0" <' _, 1' ~~:>~~ • c..1(:. <\ ~ 0--;.,,' s\v -l i-~ \ 9\1 ci-.-, cf~~~}. .,,,, ~--~----"' -v:·"" /.,. .,,,,-✓ . /. t,; • <:,1(:. \ .I-\ ~--/ \ \~,\ \ \ \ \/~~ \ f:'\ \ \ \~.~ \ \ I'\\ \ .,>_ '\ ,· ,/ )\· / \, ) ""'· .,,,,-\ Q ...-::· ~'o., ' \\ -~r .,-~ ~ }!._ \~ .,,,,-~ % ,~) _.,,,,-\ -y...>, -:;..\ ~ ., ., ~.,. .,. / .,. .,. / -•f>-~ \ ~ o., " \ o. ~ t'.l..0 , -z ~/ / \)~ '1~~ LEGEND -~ ~o / ., .,. . ,. / '< '::>. -;,z, \ ~ ::>. \ q:_ ,, ~ "~\\-~ \.-·11 • 't--~ C, ¥ ~\ ~\ (Y_ ~\~ ~\ 'o., ~-~ t . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ♦ Approximate Location of Hand Auger Boring TP-1 iill Approximate Location and Orientation of Test Pit N Af Artifical Fill Scale: I"= 10' 0 S 10 Approximate Limits of Study, this report ---20 Plan adapted from "Site Plan" by SnapADU SnapADU I 170 Tamarack Ave Carlsbad, California Figure 2 Geotechnical Map A GEOTEK PN: 3057.037-SD I DATE: Au~ust 2023 1384 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A Vista, California 9208 I APPENDIX A LOGS OF EXPLORATION GEOTEK CLIENT: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: LOCATION· SAMPLES §. <I> 0 - - - -- -- 5- --- -- ---- 10---- --- --- 15- ----- ---- 20 - - ---- ---- 25- -. -. -. - -- 30-- Q z w CJ w ...I .£ <D l a, 50/0 -!~ E E .. ::, (/J z BB-1 Sample type: Lab testing: ~ [ (/J (/J (.} (/J ::, SM GeoTek, Inc. LOG OF EXP LORA TORY BORING .SnapADU DRILLER: DRILL METHOD: ---Ha_n_d-Au_g_e,--- LOGGED BY: ____ ....:c....:H ___ _ OPERATOR: 1170 Tamarack Ave 3758.037-SD HAMMER: RIG TYPE:--------- Carlsbad CA ELEVATION·-------DATE· c <I> c o-<: l. BORING NO.: HA-1 1-------=-===.,...,..-=-=-=-====.,....,-=-c====,-,-----------1 ~ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS ~ Artifical Fill !Afl Fine to medium silty SAND, orange brown, dry, very dense, probes firm and unyielding. auger hits refusal at 4 inches, ring sample 50+ blows with no recoverv. shovel used to retrieve bulk baa HOLE TERMINATED AT 1 FOOT No recovery at 4 inches Shovel refusal and scraping at 1 foot No groundwater encountered Backfilled with soil cuttings 8/1/2023 Laboratorv Testing El, SR, MD, OS ■ -Ring I SPT 0 SmallBulk ~ LargeBulk □ No Recovery ~ Water Table AL• Atlerberg Limits SR• Sulfate/Resisitivity Test El • Expansion Index SH • Shear Test SA= Sieve Analysis RV= R-Value Test CO • Consolidation test MO = Maximum Density GeoTek, Inc. LOG OF EXP LORA TORY TRENCH CLIENT: SnapADU DRILLER: LOGGED BY: CH ----------PROJECT NAME: 1170 Tamarack Ave DRILL METHOD: OPERATOR: PROJECT NO.: 3758.037-5D HAMMER: RIG TYPE: LOCATION: Carlsbad CA ELEVATION· DATE· 8/1/2023 SAMPLES :s Laborato,v Testina g 8. c ,!:; [ TRENCH NO.: TP-1 ;1l ~ 5 ~ "' ~ .8 (/) ~ C. ., 1 (/) o-!1 ., ., a. E E u U'#-,5 0 .. :, i-E 0 (/) z (/) i!-0 .. iii :, MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS 0 (/) Attempted second test pit for more sample material -Artifical Fill [Afl -Fine to medium silty SAND, orange brown, dry, very dense, refusal at 1 foot --HOLE TERMINATED AT 1 FOOT --- No groundwater encountered Backfilled with soil cuttings - 5---------- 10 ---------- 15 ---------- 20 ---------- 25 ---------- 30 • Q Sam11le nrne: ■ -Ring 1-SPT IZJ-small Bulk ~-Large Bulk g -Water Table z LI.I CJ AL = Atterberg Limits El = Expansion Index SA = Sieve Analys RV= R-Value Test LI.I Lab testing: ..I SR= Sulfate/Reslsitivity Test SH = Shear Test CO= Consolidatic MO = Maximum Density APPENDIX B RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING GEOTEK SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING Identification and Classification Soils were identified visually in general accordance with the procedures of the Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (ASTM D2488). The soil identifications and classifications are shown on the exploration logs in Appendix A Expansion Index Expansion Index testing was performed on a representative site soil sample obtained from the subsurface exploration. Testing was performed in general accordance with ASTM D 4829 test procedures. The results of the testing are presented in Appendix B. Sulfate and Chloride Content The soluble sulfate and chloride content of a representative site soil sample was determined by GeoTek's subconsultant, Project X, in general accordance with ASTM D 4327 test procedures. The results of the testing are provided in Appendix B. GEOTEK A B C D E F G H I J K GEOTEK EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) Project Name: 1170 Tamarack Project Number: 3758.037-SD Project Location: Carlsbad, CA Ring ld:_1_2_Ring Dia." ·_4_'_' _Ring 1_1'_' Loading weight: 5516. grams DENSITY DETERMINATION Weight of compacted sample & ring Weight of ring Net weight of sample Wet Density, lb/ ft3 (C*0.3016) Dry Density, lb/ ft3 (D/1 .F) SATURATION DETERMINATION Wet Weight of sample & tare Dry Weight of sample & tare Tare Initial Moisture Content, % (E*F) (E/167 .232) (1.-H) (62.4*1) (G/J)= L % Saturation 774.2 369.6 404.6 122.0 111.3 138.7 126.9 4.8 9.7 1075.4 0.67 0.33 20.9 51.5 !EXPANSION INDEX = Tested/ Checked By: Date Tested: Sample Source: Sample Description: DATE 8/29/2023 8/29/2023 8/30/2023 ERC Lab No 8/29/2023 HA-1 @ 0-1' Brown Silty Sand READINGS TIME 8:30 8:40 8:41 8:46 3:30 7:00 READING 28 27 26 26 27 28 Initial 10 min/Dry 1 min/Wet 5 min/Wet Random Final FINAL MOISTURE sample & tare sample & tare Tare Moisture 443.9 378.4 4.8 17.5% 0 Project X Corrosion Engineering Corrosion Control -Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab REPORT S230810C Page I Results Only Soil Testing for 1170 Tamarack August 14, 2023 Prepared for: Lesley White GeoTek, Inc. 1384 Poinsettia Ave, Suite A Vista, CA, 92081 lwhite@geotekusa.com Project X Job#: S230810C Client Job or PO#: 3758.037-SD ~s:grn:•~ Eduardo Hernandez, M.Sc., P.E. Sr. Corrosion Consultant NACE Corrosion Technologist #16592 Professional Engineer California No. M37 I 02 ehemandcz@projectxcorrosion.com 29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com ►:◄ Project X Corrosion Engineering Corrosion Control -Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab Bore#/ Description HA-1 Soil Analysis Lab Results Client: GeoTek, Inc. Job Name: 11 70 Tamarack Client Job Number: 3758.037-SD Project X Job Number: S2308 1 0C August 14, 2023 Method ASTM D4327 Depth Sulfates so/ (ft) (m2/k!!) (wt%) 0-1 33.6 0.0034 Cations and Anions, except Sulfide and Bicarbonate. tested with Ion Chromatography mg/kg = millig.rams per kilogram (pans per million) of dry soil weight ND = 0 = Not Detected I NT = Not Tested I Unk = UnknO\,n Chemical Analysis pcrfonned on I :3 Soil-To-Water extract PPM = mg/kg (soil)= mg/L (Liquid) ASTM 04327 Chlorides er (m2/k!!) (wt%) 39.2 0.0039 REPORT S230810C Page 2 Note: Sometimes a bad sulfate hit is a contaminated spot Typical lenilizer,, are Potassium chloride, ammonium sulfate or ammonium sulfate nitrate (ASN). So this is another reason why testing full corrosion series is good because we then have the data to see if those other ingredients arc pres1.,11 meaning the soil sample is just fertilizcr..:ontaminated soil. This can happen ot1en "i1en the soil samples collected are simply surface scoops which is ,'11y it's best to dig in a foot. throw away the top and test the deeper stuff. Dairy fam1s are also notorious for these items. 29990 Technology Dr .. Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 2 13-928-72 13 Fax: 951-226-1 720 www.projectxcorrosion.com ,~ ►:◄ Project X Corrosion l·ngmccring Lob Request Sheet Chain of C u~tod) Phone: C2 I') 9U-72 I J Fn, (95 1) 226-1720 www.11ro1ccl'IC0rros10n.com Ship Samples To: 29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13, Munieta, CA 92~63 rr'OJect X Job Numbt'r ~2~0 a,oc. Ga.o-/-'2: ~ J ::J s-g -S.v l=/0 ~~r~ct_ I ~O<-, IM l'ORTANT: Please rnmplctc Projcrf and Sample Identification Data as vou would likl' ii to appear in rc110rt & include this form with samples. Compauyl'fam,:IGeoTek, Inc. l"onlO<I N•mr:I Lesley White Phour l\n: 1760-599-0509 ~tollln~.\dclrns:I1 384 Poisettia Ave, Suite A, Vista, CA 92081 Coma<! Emoil:llwhite@geotekusa.com Arcounlin~Conl»rl:ISuzen Clark lnvoirt •:m•il:I a p@geoteku sa. com Clit'nl Projt'ct No: .1>7.~1J-SD Pr.ojttl Name:! L70. TAM.AR~ClL Av~ r .o.#: V.51-=, J-5 Oa) s,~ndard 3 Day Gmannttt ~m:trk-un 24 Hour RUSH I 1oo,i-, m:irlr.-un METHOD ANALYSIS REQUESTED (Please circle) (Business Days) Turn Arnund Time:! X For Corrosion Control Recommcndalions (350g soil sample): NEEU (I) Groundwater depth and[ -- (2) Soil Sample Loci11ions Map _ _ __ o,ra.11 Mtthod , 1I~ 1I~ :;I~~, r;;. ~~ ~2 f?. CV~ ~. ""' IS~,:; •IE,,~,.,. m I, ~. 7 .. ,-" ~ .. ~ .;; 5-~ ·-~... ... ... ., -., .,. ., I xi ~ '!~! =~===~e~,1.z~~e~~n~~=~=~=~=~== I-1-1-· 1-· 1-I .. ,-·1-·1 ,,,-~1-·1-~1--1~· 1--1 ~ i.; < ~ < o ... o ~ ~ h ~ ,,( o ;; o "'· :, ~ o ., a < a ~ o ~ a ~ o FOR THERMAL RESISTIVITY PROVIDE (1 ,500g soil s:unplc): ---~ . . .. 0. E ., V) .. 0 .,, .., (2) Dry 0ensity{PCF) Geo Qu:id ~ Ig (3) Desired Compaction f' I i, 0 .,; ~ ~ a~-= ~ ~ t; "" 0:.;; • " :S 5 E -o .. -Q. ~ f ~ ·, V) ..... ; C> 5 ~ ..,. ., " ,G -::, •• ·;;; Q ~ ~ "' . li'.:~,,.f,:x,IL 1( ... "-~ = :1; .. .0 ., ,I( Cl Reports t: .E' E ~-g_ ?.-"" -" -~ E s ,:: :: "' E 5 8 -a ... 6 s ,; 0 0 0. " ..... 1 l~tl 1--j E ~ (I) Optimal Moisture %[_ --I Full Corrosion Series .l1 Date & Received By: ~ I ! l 1---------=====-=====:;::======~~ ]i~1~1~1c1=1~1~121 ojol"l"I~ . _ .. _ ..... _ . . -, Iv I"' I"' I< I z u_ a. _, "' a. ~ u SAMPLE ID -BORE #-Description OtP'fll(fll I" Q. -0 ,... ~ -~ 0 C 0 :i: :c -0 -., :, V) 0. v "' V) "'1 -a.,, E " : C: .. :i: u " ~ ~ ._ ~ a ., u: u ~ "' ~ ~ 1iii' ~ ~ ~ C ~ .. .. :-: n u.. ;; 0 ~ ~;.:: ~ 0 ·s ~ ~ ~ 0: "' Vl '1l ~..I:.~ I-VJ X ;:: I I i I I HA--} 0 \ 7 I O -1 I w,~ I 1>4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i - ' - 4 - ~ -• - 7 -• -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ - IO ---+----+--+--+-1--1-1--+-1--l-~-1--1-1-- ~ I} -•• ---1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I\ GeoTek -Vista 1384 Poinsettia Ave Suite A Vista, CA 83642 Phone: (760) 599-0509 Fax: (760) 599-0593 Proctor Report Cllent: Snap ADU Attn: Mr. Mike Moore Oceanside CA 92054 Project 3758.037-SD 1170 Tamarack Ave Sample Details ■ Report No: PTR:24-00040-801 CC: TI-US DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FUU Sample ID: 24-00040-S01 Date Sampled: 3/18/2024 Sampled By: Location: HA-1 88-1 Dry Unit Weight -Water Content Relationship "" C: :::, c:-0 128.0 • • • ••• • • • • .. • • • ., • • • • ... • • 127.0 126.0 125.0 123.0 122.0 .. 121.0 120 0 119.0 118.0 . . . ----------------· . . .......... ·,: .. I I•••.•'•.••••••••••'••••,• . . . . . . . . ,•, .... • ......... . 117.0 -+-+--+--+---+---+--+---+---+--+-+-+---t-,__t-t-+--+-~--t 5.0 6.0 7.0 8 0 9.0 10.0 11 .0 12.0 13.0 14.0 Water Content(%) Test Results ASTMD 1557 Maximum Dry Unit Weight (lbflftl): 127.7 Optimum Water Content (%): 9.7 Method: Preparation Method: Tested By: Date Tested: A Moist Melea Bailey 3/19/2024 Form No: 110031, Report No: PTR.24--00040-S01 0 2000-202.f QESTL.ab by Spectn,QEST.com Page 1 of 1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES 1. ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. 2. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 3. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR DUE TO INCOMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. 4. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PECENT ( 40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. 5. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL CONTAIN 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. 6. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. 7. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL HAYE THE AUTHORITY TO ALTER THIS PLAN DURING OR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STORM WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE: I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO AVOID THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO AVOID THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. Luis Calderon OWNER(S)/OWNER'S AGENT NAME (PRINT) L~ ~o;,v OWNER(S)/OWNER'S AGENT NAME (SIGNATURE) E-29 3/6/24 DATE STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP E-29 CB ___ _ SW_ BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES {BMP) SELECTION TABLE Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non-Storm Water Waste Management and Materials BMPs Control BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs C ..., C C 0 ..., 0 0 ~ C C -0 ~ ~ O> 0 Q) -0 Q) -0 en C 0 0 C C O> E C E C ..., 0 ::, ::, 0 'c •;:: ,Q-0 0 0 E ..., ... ... Q) ::::!E -0 II) O> ... Q) ..., ..... ~ C ... ::, >, O> C Q) ... C Q) c II) II) en g ·;:: '-O" ... 0 C O> o o a. Q) 'o.. ·;:: -C en C ... w Q) C 0 Best Management Practice* <I/:! C 0 CD ... 0 Q) 0 ... 0 Q) > ~ :c II) 31: en ~ Q) 0 C Q) ..... Q) 0 ..., C E u ... <..> en -0 II) i -0 Q) en ::::!E C Q) C {BMP) Description ➔ en 0 Q) V} ·e Q) en O> Q) O> CD 'i5 C O> C C Q ::, ~ ..., Q) Q) 31: C Cc :5 ~ Q) 0 ..., 0 o 0 ... 0 ~~ -0 >, 0 II) 0 Q) :g E ~ C Q CD V} ·-O> Q,_ <..> Q) Oo O> Q) X ::::!E Q O> Q C Q) 0::: E 0 ..... N en ~ 0 0 a,:;'.j Q) ~.!,; o Q) o 'o.. ,.__ 3:: Q) Q) 0 Q) E ,:,:. Q) ..., ::, .D E g =~ ::31: a;+' ::0 ·;:: g' ·;:: c.. 0 O> -0 ..C C Q) LL ... Q) ::, -0 ·--0 cO 0 C .Y. ... -0 0 ..., 0 ...,,_ a. 'c 0 Q) > Q) 0 ... ..., .D ... .D 0 ..., 0 ·-... 0 ·-0 Q) ... Q) 0 ;:C 0 ... 0 ..., Q) 0 C 00 ~ ~ ..., ..c Q) -o ..., 0 •-C Q) 0 0 ... 0 Q) ..c .D ... .!:;o 0 ..... ... 0 O> ..B 0 00 0 Q)_ o...., 0 ..... c..o co c., 3:: WO u5 en V} <..> ti: c., V}> V} V} c.. V) C V} 0::: 3:: ct C..0 c.. ><..> ::::!EV} ::::!E V} V} (.) V} ::::!E CASQA Designation ➔ ,-... 00 O> ,.,., ~ IJ') (0 ,-... 00 0 N ,.,., ,-... 00 -N ,.,., ~ IJ') ----I I I I 'T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I <..> <..> <..> (.) w w w w w w w w ~ ~ V} V} V} V} i i i i i Construction Activity w w w w V} V} V} V} V} V} V} V} z z z z Gradinq/Soil Disturbance )(.. Trench inq/Excavation X X X Stockpilina Drillinq/Borino Concrete/ Asphalt Sawcuttina Concrete Flatwork Paving ' Conduit/Pipe Installation Stucco/Mortar Work Waste Disposal Staoinq/Lav Down Area Eauioment Maintenance and Fuelina Hazardous Substance Use7Storaqe Dewaterina Site Access Across Dirt Other Clist ): Instructions: 1. Check the box to the left of all applicable construction activity (first column) expected to occur during construction. 2. Located along the top of the BMP Table is a list of BMP's with it's corresponding California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation number. Choose one or more BMPs you intend to use during construction from the list. Check the box where the chosen activity row intersects with the BMP column. 3. Refer to the CASQA construction handbook for information and details of the chosen BMPs and how to apply them to the project. SHOW THE LOCA T/ONS OF ALL CHOSEN BMPs ABOVE ON THE PROJECTS SITE PLAN/EROSION CONTROL PLAN. SEE THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS SHEET FOR A SAMPLE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. -BMP's are subject to field inspection- PROJECT INFORMATION Site Address: 1170 Tamarack Avenue Assessor's Parcel Number: 205-430-20-00 Emergency Contact: Name: Curt Green 24 Hour Phone: 760-259-2476 Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality (Check Box) 0 MEDIUM ~ LOW Q) ..., en 0 3::..., C II) Q) ::, E 0 Q) -0 O> 0 0 NC oo I::::!E (0 I i Q) ..., en O+' 3:: C Q) Q) E ..., Q) Q) C> b o CC oo <..>::::!E 00 I i Page 1 of 1 REY 02/16 ( City of Carlsbad PURPOSE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST B-50 Development Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue 442-339-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov This checklist is intended to help building permit applicants identify which Climate Action Plan (CAP) ordinance requirements apply to their project. This completed checklist (B-50) and summary (8-55) must be included with the building permit application. The Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) can be referenced during completion of this document by clicking on the provided links to each municipal code section. NOTE: The following type of permits are not required to fill out this form ❖ Patio I ❖ Decks I ❖ PME (w/o panel upgrade) I ❖ Pool Consultation with a certified Energy Consultant is encouraged to assist in filling out this document. Appropriate certification includes, but is not limited to: Licensed, practicing Architect, Engineer, or Contractor familiar with Energy compliance, IECC/HERS Compliance Specialist, ICC GS Energy Code Specialist, RESNET HERS rater certified, certified ICC Residential Energy Inspector/Plans Examiner, ICC Commercial Energy Inspector and/or Plans Examiner, ICC CALgreen Inspector/Plans Examiner, or Green Building Residential Plan Examiner. If an item in the checklist is deemed to be not applicable to a project, or is less than the minimum required by ordinance, check N/A and provide an explanation or code section describing the exception. Details on CAP ordinance requirements are available at each section by clicking on the municipal code link provided. The project plans must show all details as stated in the applicable Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) and/or Energy Code and Green Code sections. ,. ________________________________________ _ Project Name/Building Permit No.: Property Address/APN: Applicant Name/Co.: Applicant Address: Contact Phone: Application Information Macleod ADU BP No.: 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 / APN: 205-430-20-00 Whitney Hill -SnapADU CEO PO Box 2685, Carlsbad, CA 92018 760-259-2476 Contact Email: permits@snapadu.com Contact information of person completing this checklist {if different than above): Name: Company name/address: Whitney Hill Snap ADU Contact Phone: 760-259-24 76 Contact Email: permits@snapadu.com Applicant Signature: __ .;..;W.;..;h.;.:;itnc.;..:e'-"'y...:.H.;.;;il.;_I _....:....a.~.:.."'""= .. ~:...-=" ______ .Date: 9/11/23 B-50 Page 1 of 7 Revised 04/21 Use the table below to determine which sections of the Ordinance checklist are applicable to your project. For alterations and additions to existing buildings, attach a Permit Valuation breakdown on a separate sheet. Building Permit Valuation (BPV) $ breakdown ....;2;_0_0,_0_0_0 ____ _ Construction Type I Complete Section(•) I Notes: [!l Residential l!!I New construction □ Additions and alterations: □ BPV < $60,000 □ BPV ~ $60,000 □ Electrical service panel upgrade only □ BPV ~ $200,000 D Nonresidential □ New construction □ Alterations: □ BPV ~ $200,000 or additions~ 1,000 square feet □ BPV ~ $1 ,000,000 □ ~ 2,000 sq. ft. new roof addition Checklist Item A high-rise residential building is 4 or more stories, including a Low-rise High-rise mixed-use building in which at least 20% of its conditioned floor area is residential use 2A*, 3A*, 1B, 2B, *Includes detached, newly constructed ADU 4A*, 3B,4A NIA N/A All residential additions and alterations 1A,4A 4A 1-2 family dwellings and townhouses with attached garages only. *Multi-family dwellings only where interior finishes are removed 1A, 4A* 1 B, 4A* and significant site work and upgrades to structural and mechanical, electrical, and/or plumbing systems are proposed 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B and 5 1B,5 1B,2B,5 Building alterations of ~ 75% existing gross floor area 2B,5 1B also applies if BPV ~ $200,000 Check the appropnate boxes, explain all not applicable and exception items, and provK1e supportng calculations and documentation as neoessary. 1. Energy Efficiency Please refer to Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) 1821.155 and 18.30.190,and the CalWomia Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) for more information. Appropriate details and notes must be placed on the plans according to selections chosen in the design. A D Residentialadditionoralteration2:$60,000buildingpermitvaluation. D N/A __________ _ Detailsofselectionchosenbelowmustbe placedontheplansreferencingCMC □ Exception: Home energy score.:! 7 18.30.190. (attach certification) Year Built Single-family Requirements Multi-family Requirements ~ Before 1978 Select one option: ~ Ductsealing □Attic insulation □Cool roof D Attic insulation D 1978 andlater Select one option: D Lighting package D Water heating Package D Between1978and 1991 Select one option : D Ductsealing D Attic insulation □Cool roof D 1992 andlater Select one option: D Lighting package D Water heating package Updated 4/ I 6/2021 3 B. D Nonresidential* new construction or alterations? $200,000 building permit valuation, or additions? 1,000 square feel See CMC 18.21.166and CAL Green Appendix A6 □ N/A ---------- AS.203.1.1 Choose one:□ .1 Outdoor lighting D .2 Restaurant service water heating (CEC 140.5) □ .3Warehousedocksealdoors. 0.4DaylightdesignPAFs 0.5Exhaustairheatrecovery □ NIA AS.203.1.2.1 Choose one: D .95 Energy budget (Projects with indoor lighting OR mechanical) D .90 Energybudget (ProjectswithindoorlightingANDmechanical) □ NIA A6.211.1 ... D On-site renewable energy: □ NIA AS.211.3** D Green power: (If offered by local utility provider, 50% minimum renewable sources) □ N/A A6.212.1 D Elevators and escalators: (Projectw~h more than one elevator or two escalators) □ NIA AS.213.1 D Steel framing: (Provide details on plans for options 1--4 chosen) □ NIA • Includes hotels/motels and high-rise residential buildings ** For alterations~ $1,000,000 BPVand affecting> 75% existinggrossfloorarea, ORalterationsthatadd 2,000square feet of new roof addition: comply with CMC 18.30.130 (section 28 below) instead. 2. Photovoltaic Systems A. Iii Residential new construction (for low-rise residential building permit applications submitted after 1/1/20). Refer to 2019 California Energy Code section 160.1(c)14 for requirements. If project includes installation of an electric heat pump water heater pursuant to CAP section 3B below(low-rise residential Water Heating), increase system size by .3kWdc if PV offset option is selected. Floor Plan ID (use additional CFA #d.u. Calculated kWdc* sheets if necessary) Ground floor 497 SF 1 Total System Size: kWdc = (CFAx.572) 11,000 + (1.15 x #d.u.) •Formula calculation where CFA = conditional floor area, #du= number of dwellings per plan type If proposed system size is less than calculated size, please explain. kWdc Exception □ Tankless Natural Gas Water He, □ Tankless Natural Gas Water Hea □ Tankless Natural Gas Water Hea □ Tankless Natural Gas Water Hea B. D Nonresidential new construction or alterations ?$1,000,000 BPV AND affecting ?76% existing floor area, OR addition that increases roof area by ?2,000 square feet. Please refer to CMC 18.30.130 when completing this section. *Note: This section also applies to high-rise residential and hotel/motel buildings. Choose one of the following methods: ---- □ Gross Floor Area (GFA)Method GFA: Min. System Size: kWdc □ If< 10,000s.f. Enter: 5 kWdc D If ~ 1 O,OOOs.f. calculate: 15 kW de x (GFA/10,000) ** **Round building size factor to nearest tenth, and round system size to nearest whole number. Updated 4/16/2021 4 □ Time-Dependent Valuation Method Annual TDV Energy use:*** ______ .x .80= Min. system size: ______ kWdc ***Attach calculation documentation using modeling software approved by the California Energy Commission. 3. Water Heating A. Iii Residential and hotel/motel new construction. Refer to CMC 18.30.170 when completing this section. Provide complete details on the plans. □ For systems serving individual dwelling units choose one system: □ Heat pump water heater AND Compact hot water distribution AND Drain water heat recovery (low-rise residential only} □ Heat pump water heater AND PV system .3 kWdc larger than required in CMC 18.30.130 (high rise residential hotel/motel) or CA Energy Code section 150 .1 ( c) 14 (low-rise residential) □ Heat pump water heater meeting NEEA Advanced Water Heating Specification Tier 3 or higher □ Solar water heating system that is either .60 solar savings fraction or 40 s.f. solar collectors I!!!! Exception: Tankless Natural Gas Wat er Hear D For systems serving multiple dwelling units, install a central water-heating system with ALL of the following: □ Gas or propane water heating system D Recirculation system per CMC 18.30.150(8) (high-rise residential, hotel/motel) or CMC 18.30.170(8) (low- rise residential) □ Solar water heating system that is either: □ .20 solar savings fraction D .15 solar savings fraction, plus drain water heat recovery □ Exception: Tankless Natural Gas Water Hear B. D Nonresidential new construction. Refer to CMC 18.30.150 when completing this section. Provide complete details on the plans. D Water heating system derives at least 40% of its energy from one of the following (attach documentation): D Solar-thermal D Photovoltaics D Recovered energy D Water heating system is (choose one): □ Heat pump water heater D Electric resistance water heater( s) □Solar water heating system with .40 solar savings fraction D Exception: Tankless Natural Gas Water Hear It may be necessary to supplement the completed checklist with supporting materials, calculations or certifications, to demonstrate full compliance with CAP ordinance requirements. For example, projects that propose or require a performance approach to comply with energy-related measures will need to attach to this checklist separate calculations and documentation as specified by the ordinances. Updated 4/ I 6/21 5 4. Electric Vehicle Charging A [ii Residential New construction and major alterations* Please refer to CMC 18.21 .140 when completing this section. !!!!! One and two-family residential dwelling or townhouse with attached garage: □ One EVSE Ready parking space required !!!!! Exception : Detached ADU □Multifamily residential· -□ Exception • Total Parking Spaces EVSE Spaces Proposed EVSE (10% of total) I Installed (50% of EVSE) I Other "Ready" I I I Other "Capable" I Calculations: Total EVSE spaces= .10 x Total parking spaces proposed (rounded up to nearestwholenumber) EVSE Installed = Total EVSE Spaces x .50 (rounded up to nearest whole number) EVSE other may be "Ready" or "Capable" *Major alterations are: ( 1 )foroneandtwo-familydwellings and townhouses with attached garages, alterations have a building permit valuation~$60,000 or include an electrical service panel upgrade; (2) for multifamily dwellings (three units or more without attached garages), alterations have a building permit valuation~ $200,000, interior finishes are removed and significant site work and upgrades to structural and mechanical, electrical, and/or plumbing systems are proposed. *ADU exceptions for EV Ready space (no EV ready space required when): (1) The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile of public transit. (2) The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. (3) The accessory dwelling unit is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure. (4) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit. (5) When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit. B. D Nonresidential new construction (includes hotels/motels) D Exception : Tankless Natural Gas Water Hear Please refer to CMC 18.21.160 when completing this section Total Parking Spaces Proposed EVSE (10% of total) I Installed (50% of EVSE) l Other "Ready" I Other "Capable" I I I Calculation· Refer to the table below· Total Number of Parking Spaces provided Number of required EV Spaces Number of required EVSE Installed Spaces □ 0-9 1 1 □ 10-25 2 1 □ 26-50 4 2 D 51 -75 6 3 □ 76-100 9 5 □ 101-150 12 6 □ 151-200 17 9 □ 201 andover 10 percent of total 50 percent of Required EV Spaces Calculations: Total EVSE spaces= .10 x Total parking spaces proposed (rounded up to nearest whole number) EVSE Installed = Total EVSE Spaces x .50 (rounded up to nearest whole number) EVSE other may be "Ready" or "Capable" Updated 4/ I 6/2021 6 5. D Transportation Demand Management (TOM): Nonresidential ONLY An approved Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan is required for all nonresidential projects that meet a threshold of employee-generated ADT. City staff will use the table below based on your submitted plans todeterminewhetheror noryourpermtt requires a TDM plan. lfTDM is applicable to your permit, staff will contact the applicant to develop a site-specific TOM plan based on the permit details. Acknowledgment: Employee ADT Estimation for Various Commercial Uses Use EmpADTfor first 1,000 s.f. EmpADTI 1000 s.f.1 Office ( all)2 20 Restaurant 11 Retaib 8 Industrial 4 Manufacturing 4 Warehousing 4 1 Unless otherwise noted, rates estimated from /TE Trip Generation Manual, 1CJhEdition 13 11 4.5 3.5 3 1 2 For all office uses, use SAN DAG rate of 20 ADT/1,000 sf to calculate employee ADT 3 Retail uses include shopping center, variety store, supermarket, gyms, pharmacy, etc. Other commercial uses may be subject to special consideration Sample calculations: Office: 20,450 sf 1. 20,450 sf/ 1000 x 20 = 409 Employee ADT Retail: 9,334 sf 1. First 1,000 sf = 8 ADT 2. 9,334 sf -1,000 sf= 8,334 sf 3. (8,334 sf / 1,000 x 4.5) + 8 = 46 Employee ADT I acknowledge that the plans submitted may be subject to the City of Carlsbad's Transportation Demand Management Ordinance. I agree to be contacted should my perm;! ,.,,u;re a TOM plan a~tand that an !Jflf TOM plan;, a COOOffion of pem,;t ;ssuance ApplicantSignature:. ___ __,,/!!_ ___ h=--1-1----------Date:._9_1_11_1_2_3 __ _ Person other than Applicant to be contacted for TDM compliance (if applicable): Name(Printed):. ___________________ _ Phone Number: _____ _ Email Address: ___________________ _ Updated 4/16/2021 7 ( City of Carlsbad CAP Building Plan Template B-55 Development Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue 442-339-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP) COMPLIANCE The following summarizes project compliance with the applicable Climate Action Plan ordinances of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), current version. Use this form to summarize all applicable CAP measures for your project. IF CAP MEASURES ARE APPLICABLE, IMPRINT THIS COMPLETED FORM ONTO PROJECT PLANS. 1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY APPLICABLE: [Z]YES □ NO Complies with CMC 18.30.190 &18.21.155 @ ves O N/A Existing Structure, year built: _196_1 ___ ~___, Prepared Energy Audit? O Yes [l)No Energy Score: _____ _ Efficiency Measures Included in scope: 2. PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM APPLICABLE: [Z)YES □ NO Complies with CMC section 18.30.130 and 2019 California Energy Code section 150.l(c)l4 [Z] Yes D N/A Required Provided Size of PV system (kWdc): 2.19Kw Sizing PV by load calculations D Yes [Z] No If by Load Calculations: Total calculated electrical load: 80% of load: Hardship Requested D Yes OND Hardship Approved D Yes O No 3. ALTERNATIVE WATER HEATING SYSTEM APPLICABLE: (Z] YES □NO 4. Complies with CMC sections 18.30.150 and 18.30.170? [{]Yes O N/A Alternative Source: o Electric o Passive Solar Hardship Requested Hardship Approved ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING APPLICABLE: 0 Yes □Yes DYES [Z] No [Z]No IZ]No Complies with CMC section 18.21.140? Panel Upgrade? O Yes [ZIN/A O Yes O No Required Provided Total EV Parking Spaces: _o ______ _ No. of EV Capable Spaces: _o ______ _ No. of EV Ready Spaces: _o ______ _ No. of EV Installed Spaces: _0 ________ _ Hardship Requested Q ves Q No Hardship Approved □Yes □ No 5. TRAFFIC DEMAND MANAGEMENT APPLICABLE: □ YES I{] NO Compliant? O Yes 0 No TDM Report on file with city? D Yes O No Development Services Planning Division CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST P-30 {city of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov PURPOSE In September 2015, the City of Carlsbad adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP} that outlines actions that the city will undertake to achieve its proportional share of state greenhouse gas (GHG} emissions reductions. This checklist contains measures that are required to be implemented on a project-by-project basis to ensure that the specified emissions targets identified in the Climate Action Plan (CAP} are achieved. Implementation of these measures will ensure that new development is consistent with the CAP's assumption for relevant CAP strategies toward achieving the identified greenhouse gas (GHG} reduction targets. In this manner, a project's incremental contribution to a cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it complies with the requirements of the CAP, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h}(3}, 15130(d}, and 15183(b).* *City staff are currently not assessing the greenhouse gas impacts of California Environmental Quality Act projects by using the Climate Action Plan as a qualified GHG reduction plan under CEQA section 15183.S(b}. Please consult with the Planning Department for further guidance. Additional information may be found on the Climate Action Plan Update and Vehicle Miles Traveled ca lculations staff report. This checklist is intended to assist project applicants in identifying CAP ordinance requirements and demonstrate how their project fulfills those requirements. This checklist is to be completed and included in applications for new development projects that are subject to discretionary review or require a building permit. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The completed checklist must be included in the project submittal package or building permit application. Application submittal procedures ca n be found on the City of Carlsbad website. This checklist is designed to assist the applicant in identifying the minimum CAP-related requirements specific to their project. However, it may be necessary to supplement the completed checklist with supporting materials, calculations or certifications, to demonstrate full compliance with CAP requirements. For example, projects that propose or require a performance approach to comply with energy-related measures w ill need to attach to this checklist separate calculations and documentation as specified by the ordinances. If an item in the checklist is deemed to be not applicable to a project, or is less than the minimum required by ordinance, an explanation must be provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Division or building official. The requirements in the checklist will be included in the project's conditions of approval or issuance of building permit . • Details on CAP ordinance requirements are available on the city's website. P-30 Page 1 of 7 Revised 07/21 City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist STEP 1: LAND USE CONSISTENCY The first step in determining CAP consistency for discretionary development is to assess the project's consistency with the growth projections used in the development of the CAP. This section allows the city to determine a project's consistency with the land use assumptions used in the CAP. Project s found not to be consistent with the CAP's land use assumptions and that are projected to emit at or above the CAP screening threshold of 900 metric tons of CO2 equivalent (MTCO2e) GHG will be subject to a project-specific analysis of GHG emissions' impact on the environment in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This may result in GHG-reducing mitigation measures applied as a condition of project approval in addition to compliance with the CAP ordinance requirements identified in Step 2 of this checklist. Checklist Item (Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer) A. Is the proposed project consistent with the existing General Plan land use and specific/master plan or zoning designations? OR, If the proposed project is not consistent with the existing land use plan and 2oning designations, does the project include a land use plan and/or specific plan, master plan or zoning designation amendment that would result in an equivalent or less GHG-intensive project when compared to the existing designations? Yes No □ If "Yes", proceed to Step 2 of the checklist. For the second option under Question A above, provide estimated project-related GHG emissions under both existing and proposed designation(s) for comparison. GHG emissions must be estimated in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Guidance to Demonstrating Consistency with the Oimate Action Plan. If "No", proceed to Question B. B. The CAP established a screening threshold of 900 MfCOie/year for new development projects to assist in determining consistency with the CAP. The types and sizes of typical projects listed below have been determined to correspond to the CAP screening threshold. Will the proposed land use change result in the construction of less than any one of the following? • Single-Family Housing: SO dwelling units • Multi-Family Housing: 70 dwelling units • Office: 35,000 square feet • Retail Store: 11,000 square feet • Grocery Store: 6,300 square feet • Other: If the proposed project is not one of the above types, provide a project-specific GHG emissions analysis to determine whether It is below the 900 MTCOie/year screening threshold. If "Ye~'. proceed to Step 2 of the checklist. □ If "No", the project's GHG impact is potentially significant and must be analyzed in accordance with CEOA. Applicant must prepare a Self-developed GHG emissions reduction program in accordance with the Oty of Carlsbad Guidance to Demonstrating Consistency with the Oimate Action Plan to demonstrate how it would offset the increase in emissions over the existing designations. The project must incorporate each of the applicable measures identified in Step 2 to mitigate cumulative GHG emissions impacts unless the decision maker finds that a measure is infeasible in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15091. Mitigation in lieu of or in addition to the measures in Step 2 may be required, depending on the results of the project-specific GHG impact analysis. Proceed and complete a project-specific Self-developed GHG emissions reduction program and Step 2 of the Checklist. P-30 Page 2 of 7 Revised 07/21 City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist STEP 2: CAP ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS Completion of this checklist will document a project's compliance with CAP ordinances, and in turn, demonstrate consistency with the applicable measures and actions of the CAP. The compliance requirements in this Step 2 apply to development projects that require a building permit. All other development projects shall implement all emissions-related mitigation measures from the General Plan Update EIR. Project No./Name: 1170 Tamarack Avenue -Macleod ADU Property Address/APN: 1170 Tamarack Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008; APN: 205-430-20-00 Applicant Name/Co.: SnapADU Applicant Address: PO Box 2685, Carlsbad , CA 92018 Contact Phone: 760-259-2476 Contact Email: permits@snapadu.com Contact information of person completing this checklist (if different than above): Name: Company name/address: Whitney Hill SnapADU See above Contact Phone: 760-259-2476 Contact Email: permits@snapad u .com Use the table below to determine which sections of the Ordinance Compliance checklist are applicable to your project. If your project includes alterations or additions to an existing building, please contact the Carlsbad Building Division for assistance in estimating building permit valuation, by phone at 760-602-2719 or by email at building@carlsbadca.gov. Estimated Building Permit Valuation (BPV): $283,000 D Alterations: 0 BPV < $60,000 0 BPV ~ $60,000 D Electrical service panel upgrad 0 BPV ~ $200,000 D New construction D Alterations: P-30 N/A lA and 4A 4A lA and 4A Page 3 of 7 All residential alterations 1-2 family dwellings and townhouses with attached garages only Multi-family dwellings only where interior finishes are removed and significant site work and upgrades to structural and mechanical, electrical, and/or plumbing systems are proposed Revised 07/21 City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist D BPV 2: $200,000 or additions 2: 1B,5 1,000 square feet D BPV 2: $1,000,000 1B, 2B and 5 Building alterations of 2: 75% existing gross floor area D 2: 2,000 sq. ft. new roof addition 2B and 5 1B also applies if BPV 2: $200,000 Please refer to Carlsbad Ordinance No. CS-347 and the Calfornia Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) for more information when completing this section. A. D Residential addition or alteration ~ $60,000 building permit valuation. See Ord. CS-347, Section 8. Year Built Single-family Requirements )( Before 1978 Select one: □ Duct sealing □ Attic insulation □Cool roof □ 1978 and later Select one: □ Lighting package □ Water heating package □ Between 1978 and 1990 □ 1991 and later B. D Nonresidential• new construction or alterations(! $200,000 buiding permit valuation, or additions i? 1,000 square feet. See CALGreen Appendix AS, Discussion AS.2, as amended in CS-347, Section 3. A5.203.l.l.1 □ Outdoor lighting: .90 Allowed Outdoor Lighting Power AS.203.1.1.2 □ Restaurant service water heating (comply with California Energy Code Section 140.5, as amended) AS.203.1.2.1 Choose one as applicable: □ .95 Energy budget □ .90 Energy budget AS.211.1.•• □ On-site renewable energy A5.211.3° □ Green power (if offered by local utility provider, 50% minimum renewable sources) AS.212.l □ Elevators and escalators AS.213.l □ Steel framin P-30 Page4of7 0 N/A _________ _ □ Exception: Home energy score~ 7 (attach certification) Multi-family Requirements □ Attic insulation Select one: □ Attic insulation □ Duct Sealing Select one: □ Cool roof □ Lighting package □ Water heating package 0 N/A _________ _ □ N/A 0 N/A □ N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A □ N/A Revised 07/21 City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist 0 N/A • lndudes hotels/motels and high-rise residential buildings •• For alterations 2: $1,000,000 BPV and affecting> 75% existing gross floor area, or alterations that add 2,000 square feet of new roof addition: comply with California Energy Code section 120.10 instead. A. ~ Residential new construction (for building permit applications submitted after 1/1/20). Refer to 2019 California Energy Code section 150.l(c) 14 for requirements. Note: if project includes installation of an electric heat pump water heater pursuant to Carlsbad ordinance CS-348, inaease system size by .3kWdc if PVoffset option is selected. Floor Plan ID (use additional CFA #d.u. Calculated kWdc* Exception sheets if necessary) 1,860 SF 2 1.75 [)<{ Tankless natural gas water heater propose Total System Size: 1.75 kWdc = (CFAx.572} / 1,000 + (1.15 x #d.u.) *Fonnula calculation where CFA = conditional floor area, #du= number of dwellings per plan type If proposed system size is less than calculated size, please explain. D D D kWdc B. 0 Nonresidential new construction or alterations 2:$1,000,000 BPV and affecting 2:75% existing floor area, or addition that inaeases roof area by 2:2,000 square feet. Please refer to Carlsbad Ordinance CS-347, Section 6 when completing this section. Choose one of the following methods: □ Gross Floor Area (GFA} Method GFA: □ If< 10,000s.f. Enter: 5 kWdc Min. System Size: ___ kWdc □ If 2: 10,000s.f. calculate: 15 kWdc x (GFA/10,000} •• •• Round building size factor to nearest tenth, and round system size to nearest whole number. □ Time-Dependent Valuation Method Annual TDV Energy use:**• x .80= Min. system size: ____ kWdc ***Attach calculation documentation using modeling software approved by the California Energy Commission. P-30 Page 5 of 7 Revised 07 /21 d City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist A. )81 Residential and hotel/motel new construction Please refer to Carlsbad Ordinance CS-347 and CS-348 when completing this section. D For systems serving individual dwelling units choose one: D Heat pump water heater AND compact hot water distribution AND drain water heat recovery (low-rise residential only) D Heat pump water heater AND PV system .3 kWdc larger than required in CA Energy Code Section 120.10 (for high rise residential hotel/motel) or 150.l(c) 14 (for low-rise residential) D Heat pump water heater meeting Tier 3 or higher N EEA Advanced Water Heating Specification D Solar water heating system that is either .60 solar savings fraction or 40 s.f. solar collectors ~ Exception: Tankless natural gas water heater proposed D For systems serving multiple dwelling units, install a central wa ter-heating system with all of the following: D Gas or propane water heating system D Recirculation system per CS-347 (high-rise residential, hotel/motel) or CS-348 (low-rise residential) D Solar water heating system that is either: D .60 solar savings fraction or 40 s.f. solar collectors D .40 solar savings fraction, plus drain water heat recovery D Exception: B. D Nonresidential new construction Please refer to Carlsbad Ordinance CS-347 when completing this section. D Water heating system derives at least 40% of its energy from one of the following (attach documentation): D Solar-thermal D Photovoltaics 0 Water heating system is (choose one): D Heat pump water heater D Electric resistance water heater(s) 0 Solar water heating system with .40 solar savings fraction D Exception: A. ~ Residential New construction and major alterations* D Recovered energy Please refer to Carlsbad Ordinance CS-349 when com leting this section. One and two-family residential dwelling or townhouse with attached garage: D One EVSE ready parking space required )cl'. Exception :Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit D Multi-family residential· D Exception • Total Parking Spaces EVSE Spaces Proposed Caoable I Ready I calculations: Total EVSE spaces= .10 x Total parl<ing (rounded up to nearest whole number) EVSE Installed= Total EVSE Spaces x .50 (rounded up to nearest whole number) EVSE other= Total EVSE spaces -EVSE Installed (EVSE other may be "capable," "Ready" or "Installed.") I I Installed I I Total P-30 Page 6 of 7 Revised 07/21 City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan Consistency Checklist *Major alterations are: (1) for one and two-family dwellings and townhouses with attached garages, alterations have a building permit valuation~ $60,000 or include an electrical service panel upgrade; (2) for multifamily dwellings (three units or more without attached garages), alterations have a building permit valuation~ $200,000, interior finishes are removed and significant site work and upgrades to structural and mechanical, electrical, and/or plumbing systems are proposed. B. 0 Nonresidential new construction (includes hotels/motels) D Exception • Total Parking Spaces EVSE Spaces Proposed Capable Ready Installed Total Calculation: Refer to the table below: Total Number of Parking Spaces provided Number of required EV Spaces Number of required EVSE Installed Spaces D 0-9 1 1 D 10-25 2 1 D 26-50 4 2 D 51-75 6 3 D 76-100 9 5 D 101-150 12 6 D 151-200 17 9 D 201 and over 10 percent of total SO percent of Required EV Spaces A. List each proposed nonresidential use and gross floor area ( GFA) allocated to each use. 8. Employee AOT/1,000 square feet is selected from the Oty of Carlsbad Employee ADT Table. Use GFA Employee ADT /1,000 S.F. Total Employee ADT Total If total empl0yee ADT is greater than or equal to 110 employee ADT, a TDM plan is required. *NOTE: Notwithstanding the 110 employee ADT threshold above, General Plan Mobility Element Policy 3-P.ll requires new development that adds vehicle traffic to vehicle LOS-exempt street facilities to implement TDM and transportation system management strategies. Please consult with City of Carlsbad Land Development Engineering (LDE) staff to determine whether this policy applies to your project. TDM plan required: Yes □ No □ LOE StaffVerification: □, _____ (staff initials) P-30 Page 7 of 7 Revised 07/21 Building Permit Finaled Revision Permit Print Date: 09/10/2024 Job Address: 1170 TAMARACK AVE, CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3417 Permit No: Status: (city of Carlsbad PREV2024-0057 Closed -Finaled Permit Type: BLDG-Permit Revision Work Class: Residential Permit Revision Parcel#: Va luation: 2054302000 $0.00 Track#: Applied: 04/09/2024 Lot#: Issued: 04/23/2024 Occupancy Group: #of Dwelling Units: 1 Bedrooms: Project#: DEV2023-0132 Finaled Close Out: 08/28/2024 Bathrooms: Occupant Load: Code Edition: Sprinkled: Project Title: MACLEOD ADU Plan#: Construction Type: Orig. Plan Check#: CBR2023-4303 Plan Check#: Description: MACLEOD: REVISED TRUSS CALCULATIONS Applicant: SNAPADU WHITNEY HILL PO BOX 2685 CARLSBAD, CA 92018-2685 (760) 259-2476 FEE BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVISION ADMIN FEE THIRD PARTY REVIEW -Consultant Cost (BLDG) Total Fees: $215.00 Total Payments To Date: Building Division $215.00 Final Inspection: INSPECTOR: CoApplicant: SNAPADU LUIS CALDERON PO BOX 2685 CARLSBAD, CA 92018-2685 (760) 259-2476 Balance Due: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 I 442-339-2719 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov AMOUNT $35.00 $180.00 $0.00 Page 1 of 1 ('Cityof PLAN CHECK REVISION OR Deve/o12_ment Services DEFERRED SUBMITTAL Building Division Carlsbad APP LI CATION 1635 Faraday Avenue 442-339-2719 8-15 www.carlsbadca.gov Original Plan Check Number CBR2023-4303 (byCityStaflJ w 1 Plan Revision NumberfR UJ'l'1i.-0[B Project Address 1170 Tamarack Avenue General Scope of Revision/Deferred Submittal: Revised Truss Calculations CONTACT INFORMATION: Name Whitney Hill Phone 760-259-24 76 Fa "---------- Address PO Box 2685 city Carlsbad Zip 92018 Email Address permits@snapadu.com Original plans prepared by an architect or engineer, revisions must be signed & stamped by that person. 1 . Elements revised: [j] Plans Ii] Calculations D Soils O Energy D Other 2. 3. Describe revisions in detail List page(s) where each revision is shown Revised Truss Calculations and Cover Sheet G100. A011. A100, A200, TR1 and TR2 4. Does this revision, in any way, alter the exterior of the project? OYes [Z]No 5. Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? OYes IZ]No 6. Does this revision affect any fire related issues? OYes IZ]No 7. Is this a full set replacement (all sheets)? Wh ·1tne H"1II E~Ex--""-•"'··---,@'.) Sig nature e-,;i-:!?'3~~ OYes IZ]No Date 4.8.24 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ftl: 760-602-2719 m : 760-602-8558 Email: building@carlsbadca.gov www.carfsbadca,goy