HomeMy WebLinkAboutGPA 2019-0001; Chick-fil-A; Greenhouse Gas Analysis; 2021-07-15
APPENDIX D
GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS
Greenhouse Gas Analysis
for the
Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Submitted To:
Eilar Associates 210 S. Juniper Street, Suite 100 Escondido, CA 92025
Prepared By:
1328 Kaimalino Lane
San Diego, CA 92109
(858) 488-2987
August 7, 2020
Greenhouse Gas Analysis i 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................................... 2
2.1 Global Climate Change .......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Greenhouse Gases .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Existing Site ........................................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................. 5
3.1 Federal Action ............................................................................................................................ 5
3.1.1 Clean Air Act ......................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.3 Energy Independence and Security Act ................................................................................................. 7
3.2 State Action ................................................................................................................................ 8 3.1.2 Executive Orders and Legislation Establishing Overarching State Climate Policies ............................ 8 3.2.2 Energy-Related Sources ....................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.3 Mobile Sources .................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Water Sources ...................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.5 Solid Waste Sources ............................................................................................................................ 19
3.3 Local Action ............................................................................................................................. 19 3.3.1 San Diego Forward .............................................................................................................................. 19 3.3.2 City of Carlsbad Requirements ............................................................................................................ 20
4.0 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ................................................................................ 23
5.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS .............................................................................. 24
5.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................. 24
5.2 Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................................................................. 28
5.3 Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................... 29 5.3.1 Area Sources ........................................................................................................................................ 29 5.3.2 Energy Use........................................................................................................................................... 29 5.3.3 Water Usage ......................................................................................................................................... 29 5.3.4 Vehicle Emissions ............................................................................................................................... 30 5.3.5 Solid Waste .......................................................................................................................................... 31 5.3.6 Operational Emissions Summary ......................................................................................................... 31 5.3.7 Operational Emissions Summary – Future Years ................................................................................ 43
6.0 CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE PLANS, POLICIES, AND REGULATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 46
6.1 California GHG Scoping Plan ................................................................................................ 46
6.2 San Diego Regional Plan ......................................................................................................... 46
6.3 City of Carlsbad GHG Requirements.................................................................................... 47
7.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................. 49
8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 50
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 08/07/20
Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The project is proposing to construct a 3,427-square foot Chick-fil-A restaurant on a site at 5850
Avenida Encinas in the City of Carlsbad. The project site is located near the intersection of
Interstate 5 and Palomar Airport Road. The site is currently occupied by a 10,977-square foot
office building. The office building will be demolished and replaced by the restaurant as part of
the project. Figure 1 presents the proposed plot plan for the project.
Greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts will be attributable to emissions associated with construction and
operational emissions associated with traffic; energy use; water use, transport, and treatment; area
sources; and solid waste handling. This report presents an evaluation of existing conditions at the
site, thresholds of significance, and potential GHG impacts associated with construction and
operation of the project.
Figure 1. Preliminary Site Plan – Chick-fil-A Carlsbad
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 2 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 Global Climate Change
Global climate change (GCC) refers to changes in average climatic conditions on the Earth as a
whole, including temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Global climate change may
result from natural factors, natural processes, and/or human activities that change the
composition of the atmosphere and alter the surface and features of land. Human-caused emissions
of GHGs in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for intensifying the
greenhouse effect1 and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of Earth’s climate, known as
(GCC) or global warming.
California law defines GHGs as any of the following compounds: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane
(CH4), nitrous oxides (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur
hexafluoride (SF6), and sulfur hexafluoride (NF3) (Health & Safety Code, §38505(g)). CO2,
followed by CH4 and N2O, are the most common GHGs that result from human activity.
Climate change is a global problem; and, GHGs are global pollutants, unlike criteria air pollutants
and toxic air contaminants, which are pollutants of regional and local concern.
2.2 Greenhouse Gases
The California Air Resources Board (ARB) annually prepares a GHG inventory that identifies and
quantifies statewide anthropogenic GHG emissions and sinks. The current inventory covers the
years 1990 to 2017, and is summarized in Table 1, State of California GHG Emissions by Sector.
The inventory is divided into nine broad sectors and categories: Agriculture, Commercial,
Electricity Generation, Forestry, Industrial, Residential, Transportation, Solvents and Chemicals,
and Forestry Sinks.
1 GHGs allow solar radiation (sunlight) into the Earth’s atmosphere, but prevent radiative heat from escaping, thus warming the Earth’s atmosphere.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 3 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
GHGs have varying global warming potentials (GWP) (i.e., the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap
heat in the atmosphere). The reference gas for GWP is CO2; therefore, CO2 has a GWP of 1. The
other main GHGs that have been attributed to human activity include CH4, which has a GWP of
25, and N2O, which has a GWP of 298. (The GWP values used in this section are sourced to the
Fourth Assessment Report (2007) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.) When
accounting for GHGs, emissions are expressed in terms of CO2 equivalents (CO2e), are typically
quantified in metric tons (MT) or millions of metric tons (MMT), and are shown as MT CO2e.
Human-caused sources of CO2 include combustion of fossil fuels (e.g., coal, oil, natural gas,
gasoline). CH4 is the main component of natural gas and also arises naturally from anaerobic decay
of organic matter. Human-caused sources of methane include landfills, fermentation of manure,
and cattle farming. Human-caused sources of N2O include combustion of fossil fuels and industrial
processes such as nylon production and production of nitric acid. Other GHGs are present in trace
amounts in the atmosphere and are generated from various industrial or other uses.
Table 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GHG EMISSIONS BY SECTOR
Sector
Total 1990 Emissions (MMTCO2e) Percent of Total 1990 Emissions
Total 2017 Emissions (MMTCO2e) Percent of Total 2017 Emissions
Agriculture 23.4 5% 32.42 8%
Commercial 14.4 3% 15.14 4%
Electricity Generation 110.6 26% 62.39 15%
Forestry (excluding sinks) 0.2 <1% N/A N/A
Industrial 103.0 24% 89.40 21%
Residential 29.7 7% 26.00 6%
Transportation 150.7 35% 169.86 40%
High-GWP Gases N/A N/A 19.99 5%
Recycling and Waste N/A N/A 8.89 2%
Forestry Sinks (6.7) N/A N/A N/A
Total 425.3 100% 424.10 100%
N/A – data not provided Source: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/tables/ghg_inventory_scopingplan_sum_2000-17.pdf
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 4 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
In their Climate Action Plan, Amendment No. 1 (City of Carlsbad 2020), the City provided an
updated GHG inventory for the City for the baseline year of 2012. Table 2 presents the City’s
baseline GHG inventory.
Table 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2012 COMMUNITY GHG EMISSIONS Emissions Category GHG Emissions, MTCO2e Percentage of Total Emissions, % On-Road Transportation 488,000 49.9
Electricity 301,000 30.8
Natural Gas 134,000 13.7 Solid Waste 25,000 2.5
Off-Road Transportation 14,000 1.4
Water 12,000 1.2
Wastewater 3,000 <1 Total 977,000 100
Source: City of Carlsbad Climate Action Plan, Amendment No. 1. https://cityadmin.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45370
2.3 Existing Site
As it currently exists, the existing office building is a source of GHGs from traffic, energy use,
area sources, water use, treatment, and conveyance, and solid waste disposal. Emissions of GHGs
have been quantified in this analysis to address existing conditions.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 5 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
3.0 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
3.1 Federal Action
3.1.1 Clean Air Act
In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (2007) 549 U.S. 497, the U.S. Supreme
Court held that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has authority under the Clean
Air Act to regulate CO2 emissions if those emissions pose an endangerment to the public health or
welfare.
In 2009, the USEPA issued an “endangerment finding” under the Clean Air Act, concluding that
GHGs threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations and that motor
vehicles contribute to GHG emissions. These findings provide the basis for adopting national
regulations to mandate GHG emission reductions under the Clean Air Act.
To date, the USEPA has exercised its authority to regulate mobile sources that reduce GHG
emissions via the control of vehicle manufacturers, as discussed immediately below.2
3.1.2 Federal Vehicle Standards
In response to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling discussed above, the Bush Administration issued
Executive Order 13432 in 2007 directing the USEPA, the Department of Transportation (DOT),
and the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish regulations that reduce GHG emissions from
motor vehicles, non-road vehicles, and non-road engines by 2008. In 2009, the National Highway
2 The USEPA also has adopted standards that set a national limit on GHG emissions produced from new, modified, and reconstructed power plants, and has issued the Clean Power Plan, which is targeted toward the reduction of carbon emissions from existing power plants. The Clean Power Plan requires states to develop and implement plans that ensure that the power plants in their state – either individually, together or in combination with other measures – achieve interim performance rates over the period of 2022 to 2029 and final performance rates, rate-based goals or mass-based goals by 2030. In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed implementation of the Clean Power Plan pending judicial review. Additionally, in March 2017, President Donald Trump’s Executive Order on Energy Independence directed the USEPA to undertake a review of the Clean Power Plan.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 6 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued a final rule regulating fuel efficiency and GHG
emissions from cars and light-duty trucks for model year 2011; and, in 2010, the USEPA and
NHTSA issued a final rule regulating cars and light-duty trucks for model years 2012–2016.
In 2010, President Obama issued a memorandum directing the same federal agencies to establish
additional standards regarding fuel efficiency and GHG reduction, clean fuels, and advanced
vehicle infrastructure. In response to this directive, the USEPA and NHTSA proposed stringent,
coordinated federal GHG and fuel economy standards for model years 2017–2025 light-duty
vehicles. The proposed standards are projected to achieve 163 grams/mile of CO2 in model year
2025, on an average industry fleet-wide basis, which is equivalent to 54.5 miles per gallon (mpg)
if this level were achieved solely through fuel efficiency. The final rule was adopted in 2012 for
model years 2017–2021.
In addition to the regulations applicable to cars and light-duty trucks described above, in 2011, the
USEPA and NHTSA announced fuel economy and GHG standards for medium- and heavy-duty
trucks for model years 2014–2018. The standards for CO2 emissions and fuel consumption are
tailored to three main vehicle categories: combination tractors, heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans,
and vocational vehicles. In August 2016, the USEPA and NHTSA finalized the next phase (Phase
2) of the fuel economy and GHG standards for medium- and heavy-duty trucks, which will apply
to vehicles with model year 2018 and later. In 2018, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed the Safer
Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and
Light Trucks’’ (SAFE Vehicles Rule). The SAFE Vehicles Rule would amend certain existing
CAFE and tailpipe carbon dioxide emissions standards for passenger cars and light trucks and
establish new standards, all covering model years 2021 through 2026. In short, whereas both EPA
and DOT had previously adopted standards that would become more stringent over time, as of
March 2020, they have adopted the SAFE Rule that now proposing freezes vehicle standards after
MY2020.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 7 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
3.1.3 Energy Independence and Security Act
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 facilitates the reduction of national GHG
emissions by requiring the following:
• Increasing the supply of alternative fuel sources by setting a mandatory Renewable Fuel
Standard (RFS) that requires fuel producers to use at least 36 billion gallons of biofuel in
2022;
• Prescribing or revising standards affecting regional efficiency for heating and cooling
products, procedures for new or amended standards, energy conservation, energy
efficiency labeling for consumer electronic products, residential boiler efficiency, electric
motor efficiency, and home appliances;
• Requiring approximately 25 percent greater efficiency for light bulbs by phasing out
incandescent light bulbs between 2012 and 2014; requiring approximately 200 percent
greater efficiency for light bulbs, or similar energy savings, by 2020.
While superseded by the USEPA and NHTSA actions described above, (i) establishing mpg targets
for cars and light trucks and (ii) directing the NHTSA to establish a fuel economy program for
medium- and heavy-duty trucks and to create a separate fuel economy standard for trucks.
Additional provisions of this Act address energy savings in government and public institutions,
promote research for alternative energy, additional research in carbon capture, international energy
programs, and the creation of “green jobs.”
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 8 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
3.2 State Action
3.1.2 Executive Orders and Legislation Establishing Overarching State Climate Policies
Executive Order S-3-05
In 2005, former Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-3-05, which established the
following GHG emission reduction goals for California: (1) by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to
2000 levels; (2) by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; and (3) by 2050, reduce GHG
emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.
Assembly Bill 32
Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, was enacted after
considerable study and expert testimony before the Legislature. The heart of AB 32 is the
requirement that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020 (Health & Safety
Code, §38550). In order to achieve this reduction mandate, AB 32 requires the ARB to adopt rules
and regulations in an open public process that achieve the maximum technologically feasible and
cost-effective GHG reductions.
In response to the adoption of AB 32, in 2007, the ARB approved a statewide limit on the GHG
emissions level for year 2020 consistent with the determined 1990 baseline. The ARB’s adoption
of this limit is in accordance with Health & Safety Code section 38550.
Further, in 2008, the ARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change
(Scoping Plan) in accordance with Health & Safety Code section 38561. The Scoping Plan
establishes an overall framework for the measures that have been adopted to reduce California’s
GHG emissions for various emission sources/sectors to 1990 levels by 2020.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 9 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
In 2014, the ARB adopted the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the
Framework (First Update).3 The stated purpose of the First Update is to “highlight California’s
success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lay the foundation for establishing a broad
framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990
levels by 2050.”4 The First Update found that California is on track to meet the 2020 emissions
reduction mandate established by AB 32. The First Update also noted that California could reduce
emissions further by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed to stay on track to reduce
emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 if the State realizes the expected benefits of
existing policy goals.5
In conjunction with the First Update, the ARB identified “six key focus areas comprising major
components of the State’s economy to evaluate and describe the larger transformative actions that
will be needed to meet the State’s more expansive emission reduction needs by 2050.”6 Those six
areas are: (1) energy; (2) transportation (vehicles/equipment, sustainable communities, housing,
fuels, and infrastructure); (3) agriculture; (4) water; (5) waste management; and, (6) natural and
working lands. The First Update identifies key recommended actions for each sector that will
facilitate achievement of the 2050 reduction target.
Based on the ARB’s research efforts, it has a “strong sense of the mix of technologies needed to
reduce emissions through 2050.”7 Those technologies include energy demand reduction through
efficiency and activity changes; large-scale electrification of on-road vehicles, buildings and
industrial machinery; decarbonizing electricity and fuel supplies; and, the rapid market penetration
of efficient and clean energy technologies.
In December 2017, the ARB adopted California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan (Second
Update). The Second Update addresses the statewide emissions reduction target established
3 Health & Safety Code section 38561(h) requires the ARB to update the Scoping Plan every five years. 4 ARB, First Update (May 2014), p. 4. 5 Id. at p. 34. 6 Id. at p. 6. 7 Id. at p. 32.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 10 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 32 and Executive Order B-30-15, as discussed below. The Second
Update includes continuation of the Cap-and-Trade Program through 2030, and incorporates a
Mobile Source Strategy (also developed by the ARB) that is intended to increase zero emission
vehicle fleet penetration and establish a more stringent Low Carbon Fuel Standard target by 2030.
When discussing project-level GHG emissions reduction actions and thresholds in the Second
Update, the ARB states “[a]chieving no net additional increase in GHG emissions, resulting in no
contribution to GHG impacts, is an appropriate overall objective for new development.”8
However, the ARB also recognizes that “[a]chieving net zero … may not be feasible or appropriate
for every project … and the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to net zero does
not imply the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significant
environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.”9 To the extent that a project’s CEQA
analysis recommends mitigation to reduce GHG emissions, the ARB “recommends that lead
agencies prioritize on-site design features that reduce emissions, especially from vehicle miles
traveled (VMT), and direct investments in GHG reductions within the project’s region that
contribute potential air quality, health, and economic co-benefits locally.”10
2015 State of the State Address
In his January 2015 inaugural address, Governor Brown identified key climate change strategy
pillars, including: (1) reducing today’s petroleum use in cars and trucks by up to 50 percent; (2)
increasing the amount of electricity derived from renewable sources from one-third to 50 percent;
(3) doubling the energy efficiency savings achieved at existing buildings and making heating fuels
cleaner; (4) reducing the release of methane, black carbon, and other short-lived climate
pollutants; (5) managing farm and rangelands, forests and wetlands so they can store carbon; and
(6) periodically updating the State’s climate adaptation strategy. As discussed below, the second
and third pillars have been codified via legislation (SB 350).
8 ARB, Second Update (November 2017), p. 101. 9 Id. at p. 102. 10 Id. at p. 102.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 11 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Executive Order B-30-15
In April 2015, Governor Brown signed Executive Order B-30-15, which established the following
GHG emission reduction goal for California: by 2030, reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below
1990 levels. This Executive Order also directed all state agencies with jurisdiction over GHG-
emitting sources to implement measures designed to achieve the new interim 2030 goal, as well
as the pre-existing, long-term 2050 goal identified in Executive Order S-3-05 (see discussion
above). Additionally, the Executive Order directed the ARB to update its Scoping Plan (see
discussion above) to address the 2030 goal. In November 2017, CARB published the 2017 Climate
Change Scoping Plan, which offers the framework for achieving the 2030 reductions set forth in
EO B-30-15 and SB 32.
2016 State of the State Address
In his January 2016 inaugural address, Governor Brown identified a statewide goal to bring per
capita GHGs down to two tons per person. The origin of this goal is the Global Climate Leadership
Memorandum of Understanding (Under 2 MOU), which established limiting global warming to
less than two degrees Celsius as the guiding principle for the reduction of GHG emissions by 2050.
The parties to the Under 2 MOU have agreed to pursue emissions reductions consistent with a
trajectory of 80 to 95 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 and/or achieve a per capita annual
emissions goal of less than two metric tons by 2050. The Under 2 MOU has been signed or
endorsed by 127 jurisdictions (including California) that represent 27 countries and six continents.
Senate Bill 32, and Assembly Bill 197
Enacted in 2016, SB 32 codifies the 2030 emissions reduction goal of Executive Order B-30-15
by requiring the ARB to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40 percent below
1990 levels by 2030.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 12 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
SB 32 was coupled with a companion bill: AB 197. Designed to improve the transparency of the
ARB’s regulatory and policy-oriented processes, AB 197 created the Joint Legislative Committee
on Climate Change Policies, a committee with the responsibility to ascertain facts and make
recommendations to the Legislature concerning statewide programs, policies and investments
related to climate change. AB 197 also requires the ARB to make certain GHG emissions
inventory data publicly available on its web site; consider the social costs of GHG emissions when
adopting rules and regulations designed to achieve GHG emission reductions; and, include
specified information in all Scoping Plan updates for the emission reduction measures contained
therein.
3.2.2 Energy-Related Sources
Renewable Portfolio Standard
California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard requires retail sellers of electric services to increase
procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 33 percent of total retail sales by 2020.
Further, as amended in 2015 by SB 350, retail sellers of electric services must increase
procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 40 percent of total retail sales by 2024,
45 percent of total retail sales by 2027, and 50 percent of total retail sales by 2030. In 2018, SB
100 updated SB X1-2 and requires 100 percent of electric retail sales and 100 percent of electricity
procured to serve state agencies be carbon-free by 2045.
Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24)
Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations regulates the design of building shells and
building components. The standards are updated periodically to allow for consideration and
possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. The California Energy
Commission’s (CEC) 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards became effective on January 1,
2017. The 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards became effective on January 1, 2020.
According to the report prepared for the California Energy Commission (CEC) by NORESCO
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 13 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
(NORESCO 2018), the 2019 standards would provide first-year energy savings for energy use,
energy demand, and natural gas use of 10.7%, 9%, and 1%, respectively
The California Public Utilities Commission, CEC, and the ARB also have a shared, established
goal of achieving Zero Net Energy (ZNE) for new construction in California. The key policy
timelines include: (1) all new residential construction in California will be ZNE by 2020, and (2)
all new commercial construction in California will be ZNE by 2030.
The ZNE goal generally means that new buildings must use a combination of improved efficiency
and renewable energy generation to meet 100 percent of their annual energy need, as specifically
defined by the CEC:
“A ZNE Code Building is one where the value of the energy produced by on-site renewable energy
resources is equal to the value of the energy consumed annually by the building, at the level of a
single ‘project’ seeking development entitlements and building code permits, measured using the
[CEC]’s Time Dependent Valuation (TDV) metric. A ZNE Code Building meets an Energy Use
Intensity value designated in the Building Energy Efficiency Standards by building type and
climate zone that reflect best practices for highly efficient buildings.”11
In addition to the CEC’s efforts, in 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted
the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part
11 of Title 24) are commonly referred to as CALGreen, and establish voluntary and mandatory
standards pertaining to the planning and design of sustainable site development, energy efficiency,
water conservation, material conservation, and interior air quality. The mandatory standards
require the following:
• Mandatory reduction in indoor water use through compliance with specified flow rates for
plumbing fixtures and fittings;
11 CEC, 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report (2015), p. 41.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
• Mandatory reduction in outdoor water use through compliance with a local water efficient
landscaping ordinance or the California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water
Efficient Landsca.pe Ordinance;
• Sixty five (65) percent of construction and demolition waste must be diverted from
landfills;
• Mandatory inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency;
• Inclusion of electric vehicle charging stations or designated spaces capable of supporting
future charging stations; and,
• Low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials, such as paints, carpets, vinyl
flooring, and particle boards.
• CALGreen is periodically amended; the most recent 2019 standards became effective on
January 1, 2020.
Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20)
The CEC periodically amends and enforces Appliance Efficiency Regulations contained in Title
20 of the California Code of Regulations. The regulations establish water and energy efficiency
standards for both federally-regulated appliances and non-federally regulated appliances. The
2017 Appliance Efficiency Regulations, dated January 2017, cover 23 categories of appliances
(e.g., refrigerators; plumbing fixtures; dishwashers; clothes washer and dryers; televisions) and
apply to appliances offered for sale in California. The Appliance Efficiency Standards were
updated in January 2019, and cover additional appliances including desktop computers, thin
clients, mobile gaming systems, portable all-in-one units, notebook computers, portable electric
spas, LED light bulbs, and computer monitors.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 15 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
3.2.3 Mobile Sources
Pavley Standards
AB 1493 required the ARB to adopt regulations to reduce GHG emissions from non-commercial
passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks for model years 2009–2016, which are often times
referred to as the “Pavley I” standards. The ARB obtained a waiver from the USEPA that allows
for implementation of these regulations notwithstanding possible federal preemption concerns.
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Executive Order S-1-07 requires a 10 percent or greater reduction in the average fuel carbon
intensity for transportation fuels in California regulated by the ARB by 2020.12 In 2009, the ARB
approved the Low Carbon Fuel Standard regulations, which became fully effective in April 2010.
The regulations were subsequently re-adopted in September 2015 in response to related litigation.
Advanced Clean Cars Program
In 2012, the ARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) program, a new emissions-control
program for model years 2017–2025. (This program is sometimes referred to as “Pavley II.”) The
program combines the control of smog, soot, and GHGs with requirements for greater numbers of
zero-emission vehicles. By 2025, when the rules will be fully implemented, new automobiles will
emit 34 percent fewer GHGs. In September 2019, the EPA withdrew the January 9, 2013 waiver
of Clean Air Act preemption for California vehicle emission standards set for model years 2021
through 2025.
12 Carbon intensity is a measure of the GHG emissions associated with the various production, distribution and use steps in the “lifecycle” of a transportation fuel.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 16 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Senate Bill 375
The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) coordinates land use
planning, regional transportation plans, and funding priorities to reduce GHG emissions from
passenger vehicles through better-integrated regional transportation, land use, and housing
planning that provides easier access to jobs, services, public transit, and active transportation
options.13 SB 375 specifically requires the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) relevant to
the project area (here, the San Diego Association of Governments [SANDAG]) to include a
Sustainable Communities Strategy in its Regional Transportation Plan that will achieve GHG
emission reduction targets set by the ARB by reducing vehicle miles traveled from light-duty
vehicles through the development of more compact, complete, and efficient communities.
For the area under SANDAG’s jurisdiction, including the project site, the ARB adopted regional
targets for reduction of mobile source-related GHG emissions by 7 percent for 2020 and by 13
percent for 2035. (These targets are expressed by the ARB as a percent change in per capita GHG
emissions relative to 2005 levels.)
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65080(b)(2)(K), a Sustainable Communities Strategy does
not: (i) regulate the use of land; (ii) supersede the land use authority of cities and counties; or (iii)
require that a city’s or county’s land use policies and regulations, including those in a general plan,
be consistent with it.
Zero Emission Vehicles
Zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) include plug-in electric vehicles, such as battery electric vehicles
and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles.
13 ARB, First Update (May 2014), pp. 49-50.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 17 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
In 2012, Governor Brown issued Executive Order B-16-2012, which calls for the increased
penetration of ZEVs into California’s vehicle fleet in order to help California achieve a reduction
of GHG emissions from the transportation sector equaling 80 percent less than 1990 levels by
2050. In furtherance of that statewide target for the transportation sector, the Executive Order also
calls upon the ARB, CEC and the California Public Utilities Commission to establish benchmarks
that will: (1) allow over 1.5 million ZEVs to be on California roadways by 2025, and (2) provide
the State’s residents with easy access to ZEV infrastructure.
In its First Update, the ARB recognized that the light-duty vehicle fleet “will need to become
largely electrified by 2050 in order to meet California’s emission reduction goals.”14 Accordingly,
the ARB’s ACC program – summarized above – requires about 15 percent of new cars sold in
California in 2025 to be a plug-in hybrid, battery electric or fuel cell vehicle.15 Further, one of the
elements of SB 350 (2015) – the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act –establishes a
statewide policy for widespread electrification of the transportation sector, recognizing that such
electrification is required for achievement of the State’s 2030 and 2050 reduction targets (see
Public Utilities Code section 740.12). The ARB’s Second Update also identified, as an element
of its framework to achieve the statewide 2030 emissions reduction target codified by SB 32, the
objective to put 4.2 million zero emission and plug-in hybrid light-duty electric vehicles on the
road by 2030.
The proliferation of ZEVs is being supported in multiple ways. For example, California is
incentivizing the purchase of ZEVs through implementation of the Clean Vehicle Rebate Project
(CVRP), which is administered by a non-profit organization (The Center for Sustainable Energy)
for the ARB and currently subsidizes the purchase of passenger near-zero and ZEVs. Additionally,
CALGreen requires new residential and non-residential construction to be pre-wired to facilitate
the future installation and use of electric vehicle chargers (see Section 4.106.4 and Section
5.106.5.3 of 2016 CALGreen Standards for the residential and non-residential pre-wiring
requirements, respectively). As a final example, in January 2017, San Diego Gas & Electric
14 Id. at p. 48. 15 Id. at p. 47.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 18 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Company (SDG&E) applied to the California Public Utilities Commission for authority to
implement numerous programs intended to accelerate the electrification of the transportation
sector. SDG&E’s application includes, but is not limited to, proposals to: (i) install up to 90,000
charging stations at single-family homes throughout the company’s service area; (ii) install
charging infrastructure at various park-and-ride locations; (iii) provide incentives for electric taxis
and shuttles; and, (iv) provide educational programs and financial incentives for the sale of electric
vehicles.
Also of note is AB 1236 (2015), as enacted in California’s Planning and Zoning Law, which
requires local land use jurisdictions to approve applications for the installation of electric vehicle
charging stations, as defined, through the issuance of specified permits unless there is substantial
evidence in the record that the proposed installation would have a specific, adverse impact upon
the public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the
specific, adverse impact. The bill requires local land use jurisdictions with a population of 200,000
or more residents to adopt an ordinance, by September 30, 2016, that creates an expedited and
streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations, as specified.
3.2.4 Water Sources
In response to an ongoing drought in California, Executive Order B-29-15 (April 2015) set a goal
of achieving a statewide reduction in potable urban water usage of 25 percent relative to water use
in 2013. The Executive Order includes specific directives that set strict limits on water usage in
the State, and many of the directives have since become permanent water-efficiency standards and
requirements. In response to this Executive Order, the California Department of Water Resources
modified and adopted a revised version of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance that,
among other changes, significantly increases the requirements for landscape water use efficiency
and broadens its applicability to include new development projects with smaller landscape areas.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 19 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
3.2.5 Solid Waste Sources
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, as modified by AB 341, requires each
jurisdiction’s source reduction and recycling element to include an implementation schedule that
shows: (1) diversion of 25 percent of all solid waste by January 1, 1995, through source reduction,
recycling, and composting activities; (2) diversion of 50 percent of all solid waste on and after
January 1, 2000; and (3) diversion of 75 percent of all solid waste on or after 2020, and annually
thereafter. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is
required to develop strategies, including source reduction, recycling, and composting activities, to
achieve the 2020 goal.
CalRecycle published a discussion document, entitled California’s New Goal: 75 Percent
Recycling, which identified concepts that would assist the State in reaching the 75 percent goal by
2020. Subsequently, in August 2015, CalRecycle released the AB 341 Report to the Legislature,
which identifies five priority strategies for achievement of the 75 percent goal: (1) moving organics
out of landfills; (2) expanding recycling/manufacturing infrastructure; (3) exploring new
approaches for State and local funding of sustainable waste management programs; (4) promoting
State procurement of post-consumer recycled content products; and, (5) promoting extended
producer responsibility.
3.3 Local Action
3.3.1 San Diego Forward
In October 2015, and in accordance with the requirements established by SB 375 (discussed
above), SANDAG adopted San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. The plan establishes a
planning framework and implementation actions that increase the region’s sustainability and
encourage “smart growth while preserving natural resources and limiting urban sprawl.”
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 20 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
In December 2015, the ARB accepted SANDAG’s GHG emissions quantification determination
for the San Diego Forward plan and found that it would meet the regional emission reduction
targets adopted by the ARB in furtherance of SB 375 (see ARB Executive Order G-15-075).
Emission reduction targets beginning October 1, 2018 for SANDAG are 15% in 2020 and 19% in
2035.
3.3.2 City of Carlsbad Requirements
In September 2015, the City of Carlsbad adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that outlines actions
that the City will undertake to achieve its proportional share of GHG reductions. As part of the
CAP, the City developed programs designed to require new development to meet the City’s GHG
reduction goals.
In March 2019, the City Council adopted several ordinances aimed at reducing GHGs in new
construction and alterations to existing buildings. Projects requiring building permits will be
subject to these ordinances, which include the following:
• Energy Efficiency – Ord. No. CS-347
• Solar Photovoltaic Systems – Ord. No. CS-347
• Water Heating Systems using Renewable Energy (Ord. Nos. CS-347 and CS-348)
• Electric Vehicle Charging – Ord. No. CS-349
• Transportation Demand Management – Ord. No. CS-350
In January 2020, the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) was withdrawn due to errors in VMT
calculations. The City has subsequently developed an updated CAP. The updated CAP was
adopted by the City in June 2020 (City of Carlsbad 2020). The CAP is designed to reduce
Carlsbad’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and streamline environmental review of future
development projects in the city in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 21 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
The CAP includes goals, policies, and actions for Carlsbad to reduce GHG emissions and combat
climate change and includes:
• An inventory of Carlsbad’s citywide and local government GHG emissions;
• Forecasts of future citywide and local government GHG emissions;
• A comprehensive, citywide strategy and actions to manage and reduce GHG emissions,
with emission targets through 2035; and
• Actions that demonstrate Carlsbad’s commitment to achieve state GHG reduction targets
by creating enforceable measures, and monitoring and reporting processes to ensure targets
are met.
The timeframe for the Plan extends from the date of adoption through 2035.
The forecast emissions in the CAP incorporate reductions from (1) state and federal actions, (2)
General Plan land use and roadways, and (3) additional General Plan policies and actions. This
chapter describes additional GHG reduction measures to close the emissions “gap” between
emissions targets and forecast emissions for 2035. These are:
• Residential, commercial and industrial photovoltaic systems
• Building cogeneration
• Single-family, multi-family and commercial efficiency retrofits
• Commercial commissioning
• CALGreen building code
• Solar water heater/heat pump installation
• Efficient lighting standards
• Increased zero-emissions vehicle travel
• Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
• Citywide renewable projects
• Water delivery and conservation
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 22 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 3 presents a summary of the forecast community emissions for 2020 and 2035 with
implementation of the CAP GHG reduction measures.
Table 3 FORECAST CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY EMISSIONS WITH CAP GHG REDUCTION MEASURES AND TARGETS
Year Business as Usual Forecast, MTCO2e
Total Modified Baseline Forecast
CAP GHG Reduction Measures, MTCO2e
Forecast Community Emissions with CAP GHG Reduction Measures, MTCO2e
GHG Emission Targets, MTCO2e
Emission Target Met?
2020 926,000 N/A N/A N/A 939,000 Yes 2035 956,000 588,817 142,918 445,899 472,000 Yes
Source: City of Carlsbad CAP Amendment No. 1, https://cityadmin.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45370
The City’s General Plan (City of Carlsbad 2015) adopted policies to implement the Climate Action
Plan, including the following:
• 9-P.1 Enforce the Climate Action Plan as the city’s strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
• 9-P.2 Continue efforts to decrease use of energy and fossil fuel consumption in
municipal operations, including transportation, waste reduction and recycling, and efficient building design and use
As discussed in the Transportation Impact Analysis (Linscott, Law and Greenspan 2020), the City
has also adopted a Mobility Element within the General Plan. General Plan Policy 3-P.11 requires
implementation of transportation demand management (TDM) and transportation systems
management (TSM) strategies. The TDM is discussed in detail in the Transportation Impact
Analysis.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 23 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
4.0 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the following criteria are considered to
establish a significance threshold for GCC impacts:
Would the project:
• Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
• Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The City of Carlsbad has adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that serves as an environmental
review tiering document pursuant to Seciton 15183.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. According to the
CAP, any discretionary project that will have GHG emissions greater than 900 MT CO2e must
either demonstrate consistency with the CAP or submit a project-specific GHG analysis for review
and approval. The CAP states that new projects demonstrated to emit less than 900 MT CO2e
would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts, and therefore do not
need to demonstrate consistency with the CAP.
All projects requiring building permits are subject to the City’s ordinances discussed in Section 3
of this report, as applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases. Projects within the state of California are also required to be
consistent with state and regional plans designed to reduce GHG emissions as described in Section
3.
To address the project’s consistency with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for
the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, a discussion of the project’s proposed features to comply
with local GHG ordinances is provided in Section 5.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 24 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
5.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
GHG emissions associated with the Chick-fil-A project were estimated for six categories of
emissions: (1) construction; (2) area sources (including landscape equipment use, routine
maintenance activities); (3) energy use, including electricity and natural gas usage; (4) water
consumption, use, and treatment; (5) solid waste disposal, and (6) vehicles. The analysis also
includes an estimate of GHG emissions from energy use that assumes the restaurant will be
constructed to 2019 Title 24 standards. The complete emissions inventory is summarized below
and included in the Appendix.
5.1 Existing Conditions
As discussed above, the site is currently occupied by a 10,977-square foot commercial office
building. The building is currently occupied and is in use. As it exists, the site is a source of GHG
emissions.
To calculate the GHG emissions associated with the existing building, California Emissions
Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 was used. The model was run for 2022 operations
to provide a basis of comparison with the project. CalEEMod was run using historial data
(CalEEMod option) for energy efficiency because the building was constructed in 1972 and was
not built to current Title 24 standards. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, the historical
energy use reflects Title 24 as of 2005, which likely underestimates the energy use of the existing
building, and provides a conservative estimate of net GHG emissions for the project.
The carbon intensity of electricity was adjusted based on the statewide target of 60% renewable
energy by 2030, assuming an operational year of 2022. CalEEMod includes energy intensity
factors for utilities that are based on emission factors for electricity that are based on Power Utility
Protocol reports submitted to the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) with the year 2009
emissions reported in CalEEMod. Based on the SDG&E Provisional Closing Report (SDG&E
2012), SDG&E obtained 10.2% of its electricity from renewable sources in 2009. SDG&E would
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 25 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
therefore be required to obtain an additional 22.8% of its electricity from renewable sources to
meet the 33% RPS by 2020. As mandated by SB 350 and further updated by SB100, SDG&E
would ultimately be required to meet a 60% RPS by 2030. Because the project would be
operational in 2022, assuming a linear increase in renewables, the carbon intensity of SDG&E’s
energy was adjusted downward by 6.99% from 2020 RPS implementation, which exceed the
CalEEMod default values by 22.8%.
Trip generation rates from the traffic analysis prepared for the project (Linscott, Law and
Greenspan 2020) were used to calculate vehicular GHG emissions for weekday trips. CalEEMod
default values for Saturday and Sunday trips were used in the analysis. According to SANDAG
(SANDAG 2002), trip lengths for office buildings would be 8.8 miles. CalEEMod default values
for weekday trips were overridden within the model to provide a region-specific estimate of trip
lengths based on SANDAG data rather than statewide default values that are used within
CalEEMod.
Table 4 presents a summary of the GHG emissions from the existing building for the year 2022,
which represents the first fully operational year of the project. GHG emissions associated with the
project include CO2, CH4, and N2O. As discussed in Section 2.2, CO2 has a GWP of 1, CH4 has a
GWP of 25, and N2O has a GWP of 298. To calculate CO2e, the emissions of each of these three
gases were multiplied by their GWP, and the total adjusted emissions are summed to provide an
estimate of CO2e.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 26 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 4 SUMMARY OF EXISTING OPERATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS - 2022
Emission Source Annual Emissions (Metric tons/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Operational Emissions
Area Sources 2.00E-04 0.0000 0.0000 2.10E-04
Energy Use 54 0.00191 0.00057 55 Water Use 9.7 0.0640 0.00157 12
Solid Waste Management 1.0 0.0612 0.0000 3
Vehicle Emissions 168 0.0088 0.0000 168 Total 233 0.1359 0.0021 237
Global Warming Potential Factor 1 25 298
CO2 Equivalent Emissions 233 3 1 237
Note: CO2 is defined as having a global warming potential factor of 1; therefore, CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions are calculated based on multiplication of the emissions of each GHG times its global warming potential factor. This provides an estimate of the contribution of each GHG based on the contribution of equivalent amounts of CO2.
Because the State of California has established a target reduction of 40% below 1990 levels by
2030, net GHG emissions for 2030 were calculated with CalEEMod for the existing office
building. 2030 emissions for the existing office building are presented in Table 5. The 2030
operational scenario results in a decrease in GHG emissions due to further implementation of the
RPS to 60% renewables by 2030, and due to emission standards accounted for within the
EMFAC2014 model that are included within CalEEMod. No other future reductions in GHG
emissions are included in Table 5.
Also, because the City of Carlsbad has set forth its GHG reduction goals based on 2035, net GHG
emissions for 2035 were calculated with CalEEMod for the existing office building for 2035. 2035
emissions for the existing building are presented in Table 6. For the purpose of this analysis, the
only change in the emission estimates are attributable to emission standards for vehicles in 2035.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 27 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 5 SUMMARY OF EXISTING OPERATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS - 2030
Emission Source Annual Emissions (Metric tons/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Operational Emissions
Area Sources 2.00E-04 0.0000 0.0000 2.10E-04
Energy Use 42 0.00144 0.00049 42 Water Use 7.0 0.0639 0.00155 9
Solid Waste Management 1.0 0.0612 0.0000 3
Vehicle Emissions 134 0.0065 0.0000 134 Total 184 0.1330 0.0020 188
Global Warming Potential Factor 1 25 298
CO2 Equivalent Emissions 184 3 1 188
Note: CO2 is defined as having a global warming potential factor of 1; therefore, CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions are calculated based on multiplication of the emissions of each GHG times its global warming potential factor. This provides an estimate of the contribution of each GHG based on the contribution of equivalent amounts of CO2. Table 6 SUMMARY OF EXISTING OPERATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS - 2035
Emission Source Annual Emissions (Metric tons/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Operational Emissions
Area Sources 2.00E-04 0.0000 0.0000 2.10E-04
Energy Use 42 0.00144 0.00049 42 Water Use 7.0 0.0639 0.00155 9
Solid Waste Management 1.0 0.0612 0.0000 3
Vehicle Emissions 127 0.0061 0.0000 127
Total 177 0.1326 0.0020 181
Global Warming Potential Factor 1 25 298
CO2 Equivalent Emissions 177 3 1 181
Note: CO2 is defined as having a global warming potential factor of 1; therefore, CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions are calculated based on multiplication of the emissions of each GHG times its global warming potential factor. This provides an estimate of the contribution of each GHG based on the contribution of equivalent amounts of CO2.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 28 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
5.2 Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction GHG emissions include emissions from demolition of the existing building and
construction of the Chick-fil-A building, including use of heavy construction equipment, truck
traffic, and worker trips. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod, Version 2016.3.2, which is
the newest land use emissions model developed by the California Air Pollution Control Officers
Association (CAPCOA) () (CAPCOA 2016), for completed and proposed construction.
Construction is anticipated to be carried out in three main phases. The first phase of construction
involves demolition of the existing office building. The second phase of construction involves site
preparation/grading. Grading will occur over the entire site (33,964 square feet), and will include
2,360 cubic yards of cut and 20 cubic yards of fill, with approximately 2,290 cubic yards of export
for a total of 286 haul truck trips. The project includes the building and construction of site
parking, including 36 parking spaces. It was assumed that following demolition and grading,
construction of the building, paving, and architectural coatings application could occur
concurrently during the final month of construction. It was assumed based on input from the
project applicant that the entire construction project would be completed within 6 months, starting
in the summer of 2021 and ending at the end of 2021. Table 7 presents the construction-related
emissions associated with construction of the project.
Table 7 Construction GHG Emissions, Construction Year 2021 Total MT Construction Phase MTCO2e
Construction 115
Per guidance from the SCAQMD (SCAQMD 2008), construction emissions are amortized over a
30-year period to account for the contribution of construction emissions over the lifetime of the
project. Amortizing the emissions from construction of the project over a 30-year period would
result in an annual contribution of 4 MT CO2e. These emissions are added to operational emissions
to account for the contribution of construction to GHG emissions for the lifetime of the project.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 29 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
5.3 Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG emissions associated with operation of the Chick-fil-A restaurant would include emissions
from area sources, energy use, water use, solid waste disposal, and vehicles.
5.3.1 Area Sources
CalEEMod assumes that area source emissions associated with the project would include minor
emissions from landscaping equipment and maintenance of the building.
5.3.2 Energy Use
As discussed above, CalEEMod assumes a baseline of 2016 Title 24 standards. To account for
implementation of the 2019 Title 24 standards, Title 24 electricity use was reduced by 10.7% and
Title 24 natural gas use was reduced by 1% based on reductions from the 2016 Title 24 standards
(CalEEMod defaults) for electricity and natural gas usage as discussed in Section 1.2, Page 7, for
Non-residential Newly Construction Buildings in Impact Analysis – 2019 Update to the California
Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Buildings (NORESCO 2018).
The Title 24 energy use within CalEEMod was adjusted based on these reductions.
An additional feature that will be included in the project design include installation of a 5 kW solar
array which generates approximately 15.12 kWh/day on the building to generate electricity (based
on design information from the project engineering team). This feature was taken into account in
CalEEMod.
5.3.3 Water Usage
Water usage was estimated based on CalEEMod. The GHG emissions associated with water
usage, conveyance, and treatment, are included within CalEEMod calculations. For the purpose
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 30 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
of this analysis, it was assumed that the project would be equipped with low-flow fixtures and
would utilize water-efficient irrigation. These measures were taken into account in CalEEMod
within the “mitigation” section of the model, by selecting low-flow fixtures and assuming the
CalEEMod default value for water-efficient irrigation of 6.1% reduction in water use.
5.3.4 Vehicle Emissions
The analysis of GHG emissions from vehicles is based on total vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
annually. According to the traffic analysis, the restaurant would generate 700 daily trips per 1,000
square foot of building space, and the pass-by trip rate would be 25%, the diverted trip rate would
be 25%, and primary trips would be 50% (Linscott, Law, and Greenspan 2020). The traffic
analysis does not differentiate between vendor trips, employee trips and other trips; the fleet mix
within CalEEMod accounts for this distribution. The traffic analysis does not differentiate
between weekend and weekday trips; the restaurant is open Monday through Saturday and the
traffic analysis trip generation rate was used for all 6 days of operation. According to SANDAG
guidance (SANDAG 2002), trip lengths would be 4.7 miles. These trip generation rates were
included in the analysis.
According to the traffic analysis, the project is proposing a traffic signal at its main entrance to
provide a controlled pedestrian crossing to the west side of Avenida Encinas. The west side of
Avenida Encinas is developed with office/employment uses. The pedestrian access would
therefore encourage pedestrians from these locations to walk to the restaurant.
Based on CAPCOA’s Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (CAPCOA 2010),
Measure SDT-1, Neighborhood/Site Enhancements, providing pedestrian network improvements
such as installing a traffic signal at the main entrance to the project to allow pedestrian access from
the existing employment center would reduce VMT. The range of effectiveness is from 0 to 2%
reduction in VMT. In urban/suburban areas, the VMT reduction for this measure ranges from 1%
(for on-site pedestrian improvements) to 2% (for pedestrian improvements on-site and connecting
to off-site). While the signal would connect the project with off-site uses, for conservative
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 31 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
purposes, it was assumed within CalEEMod that the signal would reduce VMT by 1%. Therefore,
the on-site pedestrian improvements selection was used within CalEEMod under measure SDT-1.
5.3.5 Solid Waste
The disposal of solid waste produces GHG emissions from anaerobic decomposition in landfills,
incineration, transportation of waste, and disposal. Solid waste generation rates were estimated
from CalEEMod Model, and GHG emissions from solid waste disposal were estimated using the
model, assuming landfilling of solid waste with flaring. It was assumed based on statewide solid
waste reduction goals per SB 341 that solid waste generation would be reduced by 50%.
5.3.6 Operational Emissions Summary
The results of the inventory for operational emissions for the project are presented in Table 8.
These include GHG emissions associated with buildings (natural gas, purchased electricity), water
consumption (energy embodied in potable water) and wastewater treatment and conveyance, solid
waste disposal (including landfill gas generation), and vehicles.
As shown in Table 8, the net CO2e emissions from the project would be 712 MTCO2e. This level
is below the City’s CAP threshold of 900 MT CO2e. The project’s contribution to GHG emissions
would therefore be less than significant.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 32 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 8 SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS - 2022
Emission Source Annual Emissions (MT/year) CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Operational Emissions
Area Sources 7.00E-04 0.0000 0.0000 7.50E-04
Energy Use 63 0.00189 0.00083 64
Water Use and Wastewater Treatment/Conveyance 3 0.0273 0.00066 4
Solid Waste Disposal 4 0.2370 0.0000 10
Vehicle Emissions 866 0.0558 0.0000 867 Amortized Construction Emissions 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Total 940 0.3220 0.0015 949
Global Warming Potential Factor 1 25 298
CO2 Equivalent Emissions 940 8 1 949 Existing CO2 Equivalent Emissions 233 3 1 237 Net CO2 Equivalent Emissions 707 5 0 712
Note: CO2 is defined as having a global warming potential factor of 1; therefore, CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions are calculated based on multiplication of the emissions of each GHG times its global warming potential factor. This provides an estimate of the contribution of each GHG based on the contribution of equivalent amounts of CO2.
According to the City’s CAP guidance, projects that are projected to emit fewer than 900 MTCO2e
annually would not make a considerable contribution to the cumulative impact of climate change,
and therefore, do not need to demonstrate consistency with the CAP. Regardless of this screening
threshold, all projects requiring building permits are subject to the above-referenced CAP
ordinances. The project is therefore required to show compliance with the ordinances. The
following discussion presents the project’s consistency with CAP ordinances.
The project has implemented all feasible GHG reduction measures within the project design,
including the following:
• Solar Photovoltaic Systems - The project will install a 5 kW rooftop solar photovoltaic
system. The solar system will provide 1.5% of the restaurant’s annual electricity
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 33 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
consumption needs based on information from the applicant’s architect. Additional solar
panels are not feasible due to the size of the panels and the configuration of the rooftop and
building.
• Water Heating Systems using Renewable Energy - The project will utilize electric water
heating, and will utilize electricity generated by the photovoltaic system to provide 40% of
the electricity for service water heating.
• Electric Vehicle Charging - The project will install four Level 2, 240 V connection electric
vehicle (EV) charging stations; two stations will be equipped with chargers installed and
two with conduit writing to pullboxes at the spaces, such that there will be 2 EV-ready
spaces and 2 EV-capable spaces. EV charging stations are open to both employees and
customers. For conservative purposes, GHG reductions were not calculated for the EV
charging stations.
• Transportation Demand Management – The project will prepare a Tier 1 TDM to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. A Tier 1 TDM Plan requires the following elements:
o Existing conditions and context
o Agreement to implement the following strategies:
Designation of a transportation point of contact who will attend at least one
annual citywide program event/meeting
Promotion of at least one citywide program per year (if available)
Distribution of the citywide program flyer to all new hires
Agreement to adhere to monitoring and reporting requirements as described
in Section 2.7 of the Carlsbad TDM Handbook
Chick-fil-A Carlsbad has reviewed the CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Measures (CAPCOA 2010) to determine which measures could be implemented to reduce GHG
emissions on site. Table 9 presents a summary of the measures and a discussion of their
applicability and feasibility.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 34 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures
Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project
Energy BE-1 Buildings exceed Title 24 standard by X% 0.2-5.5% for electricity, 0.7-10% for natural gas
The building is already energy efficient in both electricity and natural gas use, and additional efficiencies would not reduce GHG emissions appreciably.
BE-4 Install energy efficient appliances 2-4% electricity for residential N/A
BE-5 Install energy efficient boilers 1.2-18.4% boiler emissions No boilers proposed
LE-1 Install higher efficiency public street and area lighting 16-40% of electricity used by outdoor lighting
LEDs will be used for outdoor lighting. No credit was taken for this feature.
LE-3 Replace traffic lights with LED traffic lights 90% of emissions from electricity from existing traffic lights
The project is not replacing traffic lights and will use LED lighting at the new signal AE-1 Establish onsite renewable or carbon-neutral energy systems Dependent on amount of energy generated
The site is proposing to use renewable energy for water heating and will install rooftop solar PV AE-2 Establish onsite renewable energy systems – solar power Dependent on amount of energy generated
The project will install rooftop solar PV AE-3 Establish onsite renewable energy systems – wind power Dependent on amount of energy generated
The site is not appropriate for a wind power installation
AE-4 Utilize a combined heat and power system 0-46% of emissions associated with electricity use.
The project will utilize renewables for water heating
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 35 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project Transportation LUT-1 Increase density 0.8-30% of emissions associated with vehicles
N/A
LUT-2 Increase location efficiency 10-65% of emissions associated with vehicles
The project is a restaurant to be located in an employment center
LUT-3 Increase diversity of urban and suburban developments (mixed use) 9-30% of emissions associated with vehicles
The project increases the diversity of the immediate vicinity by providing a restaurant in an employment center
LUT-4 Increase destination accessibility 6.7-20% of emissions associated with vehicles
The project is located adjacent to the I-5 freeway and includes a traffic signal for pedestrian access LUT-5 Increase transit accessibility 0.5-24.5% of emissions associated with vehicles
N/A
LUT-6 Integrate affordable and below market rate housing 0.04-1.2% of emissions associated with vehicles
N/A
LUT-7 Orient project toward non-auto corridor 0.25-0.5% of emissions associated with vehicles
The project is located adjacent to the I-5 freeway and includes a traffic signal for pedestrian access
LUT-8 Locate project near bike path/bike lane 0.625% of emissions associated with vehicles
Bike lanes exist on Avenida Encinas
SDT-1 Provide pedestrian network improvements 0-2% of emissions The project includes a traffic
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 36 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project associated with vehicles signal for pedestrian access SDT-2 Provide traffic calming measures 0.25-1% of emissions associated with vehicles
N/A
SDT-3 Implement a neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) network 0.5-12.7% of emissions associated with vehicles
N/A
SDT-4 Create urban non-motorized zones 0.01-0.2% annual VMT reduction N/A
SDT-5 Incorporate bike lane street design (on-site) 0.05-0.14% GHG reduction N/A
SDT-6 Provide bike parking in non-residential projects 0.625% VMT reduction Bike parking will be incorporated into the site plan. No additional GHG reductions were assumed.
SDT-7 Provide bike parking with multi-unit residential projects No reduction quantified N/A
SDT-8 Provide electric vehicle parking No reduction quantified The project will include four EV charging stations for electric vehicle parking SDT-9 Dedicate land for bike trails No reduction quantified N/A
PDT-1 Limit parking supply 5-12.5% of emissions associated with vehicles
The project must comply with parking requirements within the City of Carlsbad Limiting the parking supply is infeasible
PDT-2 Unbundle parking cost from property cost 2.5-13% of emissions associated with vehicles
N/A
PDT-3 Implement market price public parking 2.8-5.5% of emissions N/A
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 37 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project associated with vehicles
PDT-4 Require residential area parking permits 0.08% GHG reduction N/A
TRT-1 Implement commute trip reduction program – voluntary 1-6.2% of emissions associated with commuting
The project will prepare a Transportation Demand Management Program to address trip reductions
TRT-2 Implement commute trip reduction program – required implementation/monitoring
4-21% of emissions associated with commuting
The project will prepare a Transportation Demand Management Program to address trip reductions TRT-3 Provide ride-sharing programs 1-15% of emissions associated with commuting
The project will prepare a Transportation Demand Management Program to address trip reductions
TRT-4 Implement subsidized or discounted transit program 0.3-20% of emissions associated with commuting
The project is located along bus routes 444 and 445 within the BREEZE bus system. Since the majority of trips are associated with customers and not employees, no credit was taken for proximity to bus routes
TRT-6 Encourage telecommuting and alternative work schedules 0.7-5.5% of emissions associated with commuting
The project is a restaurant and cannot be operated with telecommuting
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 38 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project TRT-7 Implement commute trip reduction marketing 0.8-4.0% of emissions associated with commuting
The project will prepare a Transportation Demand Management Program to address trip reductions
TRT-9 Implement car-sharing programs 0.4-0.7% of emissions associated with vehicles
The project will prepare a Transportation Demand Management Program to address trip reductions TRT-10 Implement a school pool program 7.2-15.8% of emissions associated with school trips
N/A
TRT-11 Provide employer-sponsored vanpool/shuttle 0.3-13.4% of emissions associated with commuting
N/A
TRT-13 Implement school bus program 38-63% of emissions associated with school trips
N/A
TRT-14 Price workplace parking 0.1-19.7% of emissions associated with commuting
N/A
TRT-15 Implement employee parking “cash-out” 0.6-7.7% of emissions associated with commuting
N/A
VT-1 Electrify loading docks and/or require idling reduction systems No reduction quantified The project is not designed with loading docks as it is not a warehousing or distribution center. Idling of construction vehicles will be reduced to five minutes in accordance with
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 39 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project ARB idling restrictions No signage is proposed but construction managers will monitor activity. VT-2 Utilize alternative fueled vehicles No reduction quantified Because the project does not own vehicles, this measure is not applicable. VT-3 Use electric or hybrid vehicles 0.4-20.3% GHG reduction The project will include four EV charging stations for electric vehicle parking Water WSW-1 Use reclaimed water Up to 81% of emissions associated with water use
It is not feasible to use reclaimed water at the site due to the nature of the project as a restaurant, the small size of the site and the lack of extensive landscaping.
WSW-2 Use gray water Up to 100% of emissions associated with outdoor water use
It is not feasible to use gray water at the site due to the small size of the site and the lack of extensive landscaping. WSW-3 Use locally sourced water supply 11-75% of emissions associated with water use
N/A
WUW-1 Install low-flow water fixtures 20% of emissions associated with indoor water use
The project will install low-flow fixtures
WUW-2 Adopt a water conservation strategy Varies depending on system The site will include drip irrigation and drought-tolerant landscaping. No additional credit
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 40 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project was taken for this measure.
WUW-3 Design water efficient landscapes 0-70% of emissions associated with outdoor water use
The landscaping will be water efficient. No additional credit was taken for this measure. WUW-4 Use water-efficient landscape irrigation systems 6.1% of emissions associated with outdoor water use
The project will use water-efficient landscape irrigation systems
WUW-5 Reduce turf in landscapes and lawns Varies No turf is proposed. WUW-6 Plant native or drought resistant trees and vegetation No reduction quantified Drought tolerant landscaping has been included in the plan.
Area Landscaping A-1 Prohibit gas powered landscape equipment Varies The landscaping crew will use battery-powered landscaping equipment.
A-2 Implement lawnmower exchange program No reduction quantified N/A
A-3 Electric yard equipment compatibility No reduction quantified N/A
Solid Waste SW-1 Institute or extend recycling and composting services Varies The project will include recycling bins to meet statewide requirements for solid waste reduction
SW-2 Recycle demolished construction material Varies 65% of demolished construction material will be recycled per City / CALGreen requirements. Vegetation V-1 Urban tree planting Varies The project does not have the ability to individually
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 41 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project plant trees to the extent that they would reduce GHG emissions substantially V-2 Create new vegetated open space Varies N/A Construction C-1 Use alternative fuels for construction equipment 0-22% reduction in GHG emissions
Due to the small size of the project and the limited duration and extent of construction, this measure is not feasible and would not result in substantial GHG emission reductions.
C-2 Use electric and hybrid construction equipment 2.5-80% reduction in GHG emissions
Due to the small size of the project and the limited duration and extent of construction, this measure is not feasible and would not result in substantial GHG emission reductions. C-3 Limit construction equipment idling beyond regulation requirements Varies Construction equipment idling will be limited on site. No credit was taken for this measure.
C-4 Institute a heavy-duty off-road vehicle plan No reduction quantified Due to the small size of the project and the limited duration and extent of construction, this measure is not feasible and would not result in substantial GHG emission reductions.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 42 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project C-5 Implement a construction vehicle inventory tracking system No reduction quantified A construction vehicle inventory tracking system will be implemented during construction. No credit was taken for this measure. Miscellaneous Misc-1 Establish a carbon sequestration project Varies The project will purchase offsets as mitigation which may include carbon sequestration programs Misc-2 Establish off-site mitigation Varies The project will provide offsets as mitigation Misc-3 Use local and sustainable building materials Varies Concrete from Coronado Stone will be used in the construction of the building. This material is sourced locally and contains recycled materials.
Misc-4 Require best management practices in agriculture and animal operations No reduction quantified N/A
Misc-5 Require environmentally responsible purchasing Varies The project has proposed a steel instead of wood trellis and complies with CALGreen requirements. While steel production results in higher GHG emissions, Structural steel contains over 90% recycled content and does
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 43 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 9 CAPCOA Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures Applicability to Project
Category Measure Number Description GHG Reduction Applicability to Project not require continued maintenance as does wood, thus reducing GHG emissions from continued maintenance.
Misc-6 Implement an innovative strategy for GHG mitigation Varies The project will provide offsets as mitigation which may include innovative GHG reduction strategies
5.3.7 Operational Emissions Summary – Future Years
Because the State of California has established a target reduction of 40% below 1990 levels by
2030, net GHG emissions for 2030 were calculated with CalEEMod for the project. Net 2030
emissions for the project are presented in Table 10. The 2030 operational scenario results in a
decrease in GHG emissions due to further implementation of the RPS to 60% renewables by 2030,
and due to emission standards accounted for within the EMFAC2014 model that are included
within CalEEMod. No other future reductions in GHG emissions are included in Table 10.
Also, because the City of Carlsbad has set forth its GHG reduction goals based on 2035, net GHG
emissions for 2035 were calculated with CalEEMod for the project for 2035. Net 2035 emissions
for the project are presented in Table 11. For the purpose of this analysis, the only change in the
emission estimates are attributable to emission standards for vehicles in 2035.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 44 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 10 SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS - 2030
Emission Source
Annual Emissions (MT/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Operational Emissions
Area Sources 7.00E-04 0.0000 0.0000 7.50E-04
Energy Use 54 0.00153 0.00077 54
Water Use and Wastewater
Treatment/Conveyance
2 0.0272 0.00066 3
Solid Waste Disposal 4 0.2370 0.0000 10
Vehicle Emissions 699 0.0399 0.0000 700
Amortized Construction Emissions 4 0.0000 0.0000 4
Total 763 0.3056 0.0014 771
Global Warming Potential Factor 1 25 298 CO2 Equivalent Emissions 763 8 0 771
Existing CO2 Equivalent Emissions 184 3 1 188
Net CO2 Equivalent Emissions 579 5 0 583
Note: CO2 is defined as having a global warming potential factor of 1; therefore, CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions are calculated based on multiplication of the emissions of each GHG times its global warming potential factor. This provides an estimate of the contribution of each GHG based on the contribution of equivalent amounts of CO2.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 45 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Table 11 SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS - 2035
Emission Source Annual Emissions (MT/year) CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Operational Emissions
Area Sources 7.00E-04 0.0000 0.0000 7.50E-04
Energy Use 54 0.00153 0.00077 54
Water Use and Wastewater Treatment/Conveyance 2 0.0272 0.00066 3
Solid Waste Disposal 4 0.2370 0.0000 10
Vehicle Emissions 664 0.0373 0.0000 664 Amortized Construction Emissions 4 0.0000 0.0000 4 Total 728 0.3030 0.0014 736
Global Warming Potential Factor 1 25 298
CO2 Equivalent Emissions 728 8 0 736 Existing CO2 Equivalent Emissions 177 3 1 181 Net CO2 Equivalent Emissions 551 5 0 555
Note: CO2 is defined as having a global warming potential factor of 1; therefore, CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions are calculated based on multiplication of the emissions of each GHG times its global warming potential factor. This provides an estimate of the contribution of each GHG based on the contribution of equivalent amounts of CO2.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 46 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
6.0 CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE PLANS, POLICIES, AND
REGULATIONS
6.1 California GHG Scoping Plan
The project would be consistent with the 2017 Scoping Plan as it would be consistent with the
policies of the Plan, as discussed below:
• Ensure the State achieves the 2030 Target By implementing GHG reduction measures
in its project design, the project will be consistent with the State of California and the City
of Carlsbad’s goals of reducing emissions by 40% below 1990 levels in 2030.
• Provide Air Quality Co-Benefits The project would provide co-benefits to air quality
through its GHG reduction measures, including meeting CALGreen requirements,
installation of a solar photovoltaic system, use of renewable energy for water heating, and
installation of EV charging stations on site.
• Reduce GHG Emissions in the Electricity Sector The project would install a solar
photovoltaic system and would use renewable energy for water heating, thus reducing its
grid-based electricity demand.
• Mobile Source Strategy The project would install EV charging stations which would
encourage the use of EVs. Furthermore, the project would provide pedestrian access
through installation of a traffic signal between the existing employment uses and the
restaurant.
• Waste Reduction The project would be consistent with statewide solid waste reduction
goals and include waste recycling.
6.2 San Diego Regional Plan
The San Diego Regional Plan does not provide specific regulations or requirements that apply to
restaurant uses. The project would not conflict with the plan and would provide an additional
contribution to mixed uses within the immediate vicinity.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 47 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
6.3 City of Carlsbad GHG Requirements
The project would be consistent with the City’s CAP because it would be consistent with the CAP
policies designed to reduce GHG emissions. The CAP measures have been adopted by the City
as ordinances. The project will be consistent with the applicable ordinances, as discussed below:
• Energy Efficiency – Ord. No. CS-347 The project will be constructed to CALGreen
standards to include Appendix A5 – Nonresidential Voluntary Measures, Energy
Efficiency. These measures include installation of the solar photovoltaic system and water
heating using renewable energy as discussed below.
• Solar Photovoltaic Systems – Ord. No. CS-347 The project will install a 5 kW rooftop
solar photovoltaic system as required under Ordinance CS-347 Section 6, California
Energy Code 120.10(a)(2). Additional solar panels are not feasible due to the size of the
panels and the configuration of the rooftop and building.
• Water Heating Systems using Renewable Energy (Ord. Nos. CS-347 and CS-348) The
project will utilize electric water heating, and will utilize electricity generated by the
photovoltaic system to provide 40% of the electricity for service water heating as required
under Ordinance CS-347 Section 7, California Energy Code 120.11.
• Electric Vehicle Charging – Ord. No. CS-349 The project will install four electric
vehicle (EV) charging stations as required under Ordinance CS-349 Section 6, as specified
under CALGreen Code 5.106.5.3.3. The EV charging stations will be available for both
employees and visitors.
• Transportation Demand Management – Ord. No. CS-350 The TDM ordinance
requires new nonresidential development where the employees generate a minimum of 110
average daily trips (ADT) to develop a Transportation Demand Management plan.
According to the traffic analysis, the project proposes to add 3,427 SF of fast-food
restaurant commercial development with a maximum of 10-15 employees per shift, which
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 48 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
will not exceed the 110 employee ADT threshold. However, according to the traffic
analysis, the project is still required to prepare a TDM plan on the basis of adding in excess
of 110 total ADT to the exempt segment of Palomar Airport Road. To meet the
requirements of the Mobility Element policy 3-P.11 , the Project shall prepare a Tier 1
TDM to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A Tier 1 TDM Plan requires the following
elements:
o Existing conditions and context
o Agreement to implement the following strategies:
Designation of a transportation point of contact who will attend at least one
annual citywide program event/meeting
Promotion of at least one citywide program per year (if available)
Distribution of the citywide program flyer to all new hires
Agreement to adhere to monitoring and reporting requirements as described
in Section 2.7 of the Carlsbad TDM Handbook
Furthermore, the projet’s net emission increases are below the CAP threshold of 900 MTCO2e.
The project would therefore not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for
the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 49 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
Emissions of GHGs were calculated for both the existing office building and the proposed Chick-
fil-A restaurant. The project would result in a net increase of 712 MT CO2e for construction and
operation. The project’s emissions would be below the CAP significance threshold of 900
MTCO2e. Emissions are therefore less than significant.
The project would be consistent with the State of California’s 2017 Scoping Plan, the San Diego
Regional Plan, and the City’s CAP and plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of
reducing GHG emissions. The project’s GHG impacts are therefore less than significant.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 50 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
8.0 REFERENCES
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2008. CEQA and Climate Change –
Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act. January. California Air Resources Board. 2008. Climate Change Scoping Plan. December
California Air Resources Board. 2017. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. December. California Energy Commission. 2015. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, Adoption
Hearing. June 10.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/rulemaking/documents/2015-06-10_hearing/2015-06-10_Adoption_Hearing_Presentation.pdf. California Energy Commission. 2019. 2019 Energy Efficiency Standards.
https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Buildi
ng_Standards_FAQ.pdf. City of Carlsbad. 2020. Climate Action Plan Amendment No. 1. https://cityadmin.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45370
Energy and Environmental Economics. 2015. Summary of the California State Agencies’
PATHWAYS Project: Long-Term Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scenarios. April 6. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/html/fact_sheets/e3_2030scenarios.pdf.
Linscott, Law and Greenspan. 2020. Transportation Impact Analysis: Chick-fil-A, I-5 & Palomar
Airport Road, Carlsbad, California. May 12. NORESCO. 2018. Impact Analysis – 2019 Update to the California Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Buildings. CEC-400-15-012. June 29.
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). 2002. Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region. April. San Diego Gas & Electric. 2012. Provisional Closing Report for California Renewables Portfolio
Standard 20% Program. August 17.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008. Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold
for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. December 5.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2016. CalEEMod Model, Version 2016.3.2.
Greenhouse Gas Analysis 51 08/07/20 Chick-fil-A Carlsbad Project
Appendix A Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculations
Waste Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - RPS
Land Use -
Vehicle Trips - SANDAG trip lengths
Area Coating - Rule 67.0.1 coatings
Energy Use - Building constructed in 1972
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
517.31 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.021 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2022
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 10.98 1000sqft 0.25 10,977.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/12/2020 4:54 PM
Chick fil A Carlsbad Existing - San Diego Air Basin, Annual
Chick fil A Carlsbad Existing
San Diego Air Basin, Annual
Mitigated Operational
2.6917 231.1976 233.8892 0.1972 2.1400e-
003
239.45560.1603 2.4900e-
003
0.1628 0.0429 2.3900e-
003
0.0453Total0.0921 0.2098 0.5343 1.9000e-
003
0.6191 9.0807 9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-
003
11.76720.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
2.0725 0.0000 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.13460.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 167.7738 167.7738 8.8100e-
003
0.0000 167.99420.1603 1.5300e-
003
0.1618 0.0429 1.4300e-
003
0.0443Mobile0.0446 0.1971 0.5235 1.8200e-
003
0.0000 54.3428 54.3428 1.9100e-
003
5.7000e-
004
54.55949.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
Energy 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 20.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 8.80
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 8.80
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 517.31
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.004
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.021
0.0000 167.7738 167.7738 8.8100e-
003
0.0000 167.99420.1603 1.5300e-
003
0.1618 0.0429 1.4300e-
003
0.0443Mitigated0.0446 0.1971 0.5235 1.8200e-
003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
38.50 0.00 0.44 31.06 0.00 1.070.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
1.6554 231.1976 232.8530 0.1359 2.1400e-
003
236.88830.1603 2.4900e-
003
0.1628 0.0429 2.3900e-
003
0.0453Total0.0921 0.2098 0.5343 1.9000e-
003
0.6191 9.0807 9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-
003
11.76720.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
1.0363 0.0000 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.56730.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 167.7738 167.7738 8.8100e-
003
0.0000 167.99420.1603 1.5300e-
003
0.1618 0.0429 1.4300e-
003
0.0443Mobile0.0446 0.1971 0.5235 1.8200e-
003
0.0000 54.3428 54.3428 1.9100e-
003
5.7000e-
004
54.55949.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
Energy 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 40.5420 40.5420 1.6500e-
003
3.1000e-
004
40.67660.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity
Mitigated
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: Y
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
0.023976 0.001926 0.001932 0.006016 0.000753 0.001122
SBUS MH
General Office Building 0.598645 0.040929 0.181073 0.106149 0.015683 0.005479 0.016317
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCYLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
48.00 19.00 77 19 4
4.4 Fleet Mix
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Office Building 8.80 8.80 8.80 33.00
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-
W
Total 219.54 27.00 11.53 425,286 425,286
Annual VMT
General Office Building 219.54 27.00 11.53 425,286 425,286
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 167.7738 167.7738 8.8100e-
003
0.0000 167.99420.1603 1.5300e-
003
0.1618 0.0429 1.4300e-
003
0.0443Unmitigated0.0446 0.1971 0.5235 1.8200e-
003
Unmitigated
13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
Total 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
258618 1.3900e-
003
0.0127
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO
13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
Mitigated
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009
13.8829
Total 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
General Office
Building
258618 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.88299.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.88299.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
NaturalGas
Mitigated
1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 40.5420 40.5420 1.6500e-
003
3.1000e-
004
40.67660.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity
Unmitigated
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
40.6766
Total 40.5420 1.6500e-
003
3.1000e-
004
40.6766
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
172778 40.5420 1.6500e-
003
3.1000e-
004
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
40.6766
Total 40.5420 1.6500e-
003
3.1000e-
004
40.6766
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
172778 40.5420 1.6500e-
003
3.1000e-
004
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
3.1800e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping1.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0429
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
3.1800e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
11.7672
Total 9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-
003
11.7672
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
1.95152 /
1.19609
9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-
003
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-
003
11.7672
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-
003
11.7672
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping1.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0429
Unmitigated 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.1346
to
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.5673
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
11.7672
Total 9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-003 11.7672
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
1.95152 /
1.19609
9.6998 0.0640 1.5700e-
003
Mitigated
Indoor/Outdoor Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power
2.5673
Total 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.5673
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
5.105 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5.1346
Total 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.1346
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
10.21 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.00
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorVal
ue
250 0
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorVal
ue
250 0
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Fleet Mix -
Area Coating - Rule 67.0.1 coatings
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
361.69 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.015 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.003
40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2030
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 10.98 1000sqft 0.25 10,977.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/12/2020 5:06 PM
Chick fil A Carlsbad Existing - San Diego Air Basin, Annual
Chick fil A Carlsbad Existing
San Diego Air Basin, Annual
0.6191 6.3490 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.02760.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
2.0725 0.0000 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.13460.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 134.1636 134.1636 6.5300e-
003
0.0000 134.32690.1602 9.4000e-
004
0.1612 0.0429 8.7000e-
004
0.0438Mobile0.0304 0.1318 0.3559 1.4400e-
003
0.0000 42.1468 42.1468 1.4400e-
003
4.9000e-
004
42.32829.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
Energy 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 20.00
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 8.80
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 8.80
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 361.69
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.015
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,980.00 10,977.00
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
38.50 0.00 0.56 31.52 0.00 1.350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
1.6554 182.6596 184.3150 0.1331 2.0400e-
003
188.25030.1602 1.9000e-
003
0.1621 0.0429 1.8300e-
003
0.0447Total0.0778 0.1445 0.3667 1.5200e-
003
0.6191 6.3490 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.02760.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
1.0363 0.0000 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.56730.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 134.1636 134.1636 6.5300e-
003
0.0000 134.32690.1602 9.4000e-
004
0.1612 0.0429 8.7000e-
004
0.0438Mobile0.0304 0.1318 0.3559 1.4400e-
003
0.0000 42.1468 42.1468 1.4400e-
003
4.9000e-
004
42.32829.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
Energy 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
2.6917 182.6596 185.3513 0.1943 2.0400e-
003
190.81760.1602 1.9000e-
003
0.1621 0.0429 1.8300e-
003
0.0447Total0.0778 0.1445 0.3667 1.5200e-
003
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: Y
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
0.025476 0.001931 0.001677 0.005617 0.000785 0.000782
SBUS MH
General Office Building 0.616428 0.037185 0.177402 0.097684 0.012090 0.005279 0.017663
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCYLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
48.00 19.00 77 19 4
4.4 Fleet Mix
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Office Building 8.80 8.80 8.80 33.00
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-
W
Total 219.60 27.01 11.53 425,402 425,402
Annual VMT
General Office Building 219.60 27.01 11.53 425,402 425,402
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 134.1636 134.1636 6.5300e-
003
0.0000 134.32690.1602 9.4000e-
004
0.1612 0.0429 8.7000e-
004
0.0438Unmitigated0.0304 0.1318 0.3559 1.4400e-
003
0.0000 134.1636 134.1636 6.5300e-
003
0.0000 134.32690.1602 9.4000e-
004
0.1612 0.0429 8.7000e-
004
0.0438Mitigated0.0304 0.1318 0.3559 1.4400e-
003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
2.5000e-
004
13.88299.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
258618 1.3900e-
003
0.0127
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO
13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
Mitigated
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009
13.8829
Total 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
General Office
Building
258618 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.88299.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.88299.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
NaturalGas
Mitigated
1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 28.3459 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.44540.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 28.3459 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.44540.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity
Mitigated
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
28.4454
Total 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.4454
Land Use kWh/yr to
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
172778 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
28.4454
Total 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.4454
Land Use kWh/yr to
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
172778 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000Total1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
Mitigated
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping1.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0429
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
3.1800e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-004 2.0000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-004 0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.0276
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-003 9.0276
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping1.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0429
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
3.1800e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
to
n
MT/yr
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
9.0276
Total 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-003 9.0276
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
1.95152 /
1.19609
6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
Mitigated
Indoor/Outdoor Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
9.0276
Total 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-003 9.0276
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
1.95152 /
1.19609
6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.0 Operational Offroad
2.5673
Total 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.5673
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
5.105 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000
Mitigated
Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5.1346
Total 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.1346
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
10.21 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.1346
Mitigated 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.5673
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorVal
ue
250 0
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingValue 250 0
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorVa
lue
250 0
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExterio
rValue
100 0
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialInterior
Value
50 0
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Fleet Mix -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
361.69 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.015 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.003
40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2035
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 10.98 1000sqft 0.25 10,977.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/24/2020 11:35 AM
Chick fil A Carlsbad Existing - San Diego Air Basin, Annual
Chick fil A Carlsbad Existing
San Diego Air Basin, Annual
2.0725 0.0000 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.13460.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 126.6351 126.6351 6.1400e-
003
0.0000 126.78870.1603 7.0000e-
004
0.1610 0.0429 6.5000e-
004
0.0435Mobile0.0260 0.1242 0.3128 1.3600e-
003
0.0000 42.1468 42.1468 1.4400e-
003
4.9000e-
004
42.32829.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
Energy 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.0000e-004 2.0000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-004 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 20.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 8.80
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 8.80
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 8.80
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.015
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 361.69
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,980.00 10,977.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.00
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
38.50 0.00 0.58 31.58 0.00 1.400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
1.6554 175.1311 176.7865 0.1327 2.0400e-
003
180.71200.1603 1.6600e-
003
0.1619 0.0429 1.6100e-
003
0.0445Total0.0734 0.1369 0.3235 1.4400e-
003
0.6191 6.3490 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.02760.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
1.0363 0.0000 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.56730.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 126.6351 126.6351 6.1400e-
003
0.0000 126.78870.1603 7.0000e-
004
0.1610 0.0429 6.5000e-
004
0.0435Mobile0.0260 0.1242 0.3128 1.3600e-
003
0.0000 42.1468 42.1468 1.4400e-
003
4.9000e-
004
42.32829.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
Energy 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
2.6917 175.1311 177.8227 0.1939 2.0400e-
003
183.27930.1603 1.6600e-
003
0.1619 0.0429 1.6100e-
003
0.0445Total0.0734 0.1369 0.3235 1.4400e-
003
0.6191 6.3490 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.02760.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: Y
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
0.026503 0.001944 0.001632 0.005548 0.000800 0.000709
SBUS MH
General Office Building 0.617626 0.036451 0.176904 0.096837 0.011340 0.005282 0.018425
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCYLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
48.00 19.00 77 19 4
4.4 Fleet Mix
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Office Building 8.80 8.80 8.80 33.00
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-
W
Total 219.60 27.01 11.53 425,402 425,402
Annual VMT
General Office Building 219.60 27.01 11.53 425,402 425,402
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 126.6351 126.6351 6.1400e-
003
0.0000 126.78870.1603 7.0000e-
004
0.1610 0.0429 6.5000e-
004
0.0435Unmitigated0.0260 0.1242 0.3128 1.3600e-
003
0.0000 126.6351 126.6351 6.1400e-
003
0.0000 126.78870.1603 7.0000e-
004
0.1610 0.0429 6.5000e-
004
0.0435Mitigated0.0260 0.1242 0.3128 1.3600e-
003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
CO2ePM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO
13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
Mitigated
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009
13.8829
Total 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
General Office
Building
258618 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-004 2.5000e-004 13.88299.6000e-004 9.6000e-004 9.6000e-004 9.6000e-004NaturalGas Unmitigated 1.3900e-003 0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-005
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.88299.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
NaturalGas
Mitigated
1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 28.3459 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.44540.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 28.3459 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.44540.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity
Mitigated
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
28.4454
Total 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.4454
Land Use kWh/yr to
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
172778 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
28.4454
Total 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
28.4454
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
172778 28.3459 1.1800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000
2.5000e-
004
13.8829
Total 1.3900e-
003
0.0127 0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
0.0000 13.8009 13.8009 2.6000e-
004
0.0107 8.0000e-
005
9.6000e-
004
9.6000e-
004
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
258618 1.3900e-
003
0.0127
Mitigated
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping1.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0429
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
3.1800e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-004 2.0000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-004 0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Unmitigated 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.0276
Category to
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.0276
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0461 0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 2.0000e-
004
2.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 2.1000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping1.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.0000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0429
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
3.1800e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
9.0276
Total 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.0276
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office Building 1.95152 / 1.19609 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-003
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
9.0276
Total 6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
9.0276
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
1.95152 /
1.19609
6.9681 0.0639 1.5500e-
003
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2.5673
Total 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.5673
Land Use tons ton
MT/yr
General Office
Building
5.105 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
5.1346
Total 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.1346
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
General Office
Building
10.21 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 2.0725 0.1225 0.0000 5.1346
t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 1.0363 0.0612 0.0000 2.5673
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power
Architectural Coating - Rule 67.0.1 coatings
Vehicle Trips - Based on SANDAG trip lengths and traffic analysis
Area Coating - Rule 67.0.1 coatings
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - RPS
Land Use -
Construction Phase - 6 month construction schedule
Grading - Net export
Demolition -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
517.31 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.021 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2022
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 3.43 1000sqft 0.08 3,427.00 0
Floor Surface Area Population
Parking Lot 36.00 Space 0.32 14,400.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/13/2020 11:31 AM
Chick fil A Carlsbad - San Diego Air Basin, Annual
Chick fil A Carlsbad
San Diego Air Basin, Annual
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 2,290.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 35.92 35.56
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.00 0.89
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/7/2021 11/1/2021
tblEnergyUse T24E 8.23 7.35
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/20/2021 9/1/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/16/2021 7/17/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/13/2021 12/31/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 12/14/2021 12/1/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/14/2021 7/16/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/19/2021 8/31/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/20/2021 12/31/2021
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/6/2021 12/31/2021
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 32.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 45.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 88.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 12.00
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 23.00
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00
Energy Mitigation -
Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Energy Use - Title 24 as of 2019
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
0.0000 113.8686 113.8686 0.0265 0.0000 114.53030.0295 0.0379 0.0674 0.0106 0.0353 0.0459Maximum0.0907 0.7394 0.7046 1.2900e-
003
0.0000 113.8686 113.8686 0.0265 0.0000 114.53030.0295 0.0379 0.0674 0.0106 0.0353 0.045920210.0907 0.7394 0.7046 1.2900e-
003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 500.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 716.00 700.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 51.00 50.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 696.00 700.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 37.00 25.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 12.00 25.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 4.70
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 517.31
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.004
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.021
0.0000 872.9070 872.9070 0.0561 0.0000 874.31030.7527 8.5800e-
003
0.7613 0.2016 8.0000e-
003
0.2096Mobile0.4197 1.6141 3.4656 9.4400e-
003
0.0000 63.4195 63.4195 1.8900e-
003
8.3000e-
004
63.71352.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Energy 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Highest 0.3222 0.3222
2.2 Overall Operational
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 7-1-2021 9-30-2021 0.3222 0.3222
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0037.56 0.00 16.43 43.38 0.00 10.00
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10
0.0000 113.8685 113.8685 0.0265 0.0000 114.53020.0184 0.0379 0.0563 5.9900e-
003
0.0353 0.0413Maximum0.0907 0.7394 0.7046 1.2900e-
003
0.0000 113.8685 113.8685 0.0265 0.0000 114.53020.0184 0.0379 0.0563 5.9900e-
003
0.0353 0.041320210.0907 0.7394 0.7046 1.2900e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
12
2 Grading Grading 7/17/2021 8/31/2021 5 32
End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/1/2021 7/16/2021 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
48.81 0.85 1.28 43.13 10.24 1.901.00 0.65 0.99 1.00 0.59 0.98
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.20 0.32 0.53 0.83
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
4.2743 931.6541 935.9284 0.3219 1.4900e-
003
944.42080.7452 0.0107 0.7560 0.1996 0.0102 0.2097Total0.4379 1.6381 3.4719 9.5400e-
003
0.2642 2.7075 2.9717 0.0273 6.6000e-
004
3.85020.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
4.0101 0.0000 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000 9.93480.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 865.5276 865.5276 0.0558 0.0000 866.92270.7452 8.5100e-
003
0.7537 0.1996 7.9400e-
003
0.2075Mobile0.4189 1.6089 3.4469 9.3600e-
003
0.0000 63.4184 63.4184 1.8900e-
003
8.3000e-
004
63.71232.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Energy 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
8.3505 939.6815 948.0320 0.5661 1.6600e-
003
962.67670.7527 0.0108 0.7635 0.2016 0.0102 0.2118Total0.4388 1.6433 3.4905 9.6200e-
003
0.3303 3.3542 3.6845 0.0341 8.3000e-
004
4.78250.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
8.0202 0.0000 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000 19.86960.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTDemolition410.00 0.00 50.00 10.80
Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle
Class
Hauling Vehicle
Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 247 0.40
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Pavers 1 7.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 231 0.29
Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56
Load Factor
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power
23
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0.89
Acres of Paving: 0.32
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,141; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,714; Striped Parking Area: 864
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/1/2021 12/31/2021 5
88
4 Paving Paving 11/1/2021 12/31/2021 5 45
3 Building Construction Building Construction 9/1/2021 12/31/2021 5
0.0000 1.9041 1.9041 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.90844.3000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
1.4000e-
004
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9000e-
004
6.5300e-
003
1.6100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
1.1600e-
003
0.0000 6.2747
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO
8.3000e-
004
2.3300e-
003
3.1600e-
003
0.0000 6.2456 6.2456
6.2747
Total 4.7800e-
003
0.0435 0.0454 7.0000e-
005
5.4700e-
003
2.4400e-
003
7.9100e-
003
2.3300e-
003
0.0000 6.2456 6.2456 1.1600e-
003
0.00007.0000e-
005
2.4400e-
003
2.4400e-
003
2.3300e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 4.7800e-
003
0.0435 0.0454
0.0000 5.4700e-
003
8.3000e-
004
0.0000 8.3000e-
004
0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 5.4700e-
003
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00
Building Construction 5 7.00 3.00 0.00 10.80
10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading410.00 0.00 286.00
0.0000 2.3244 2.3244 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 2.32909.1000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.3000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
004
Total 4.0000e-
004
6.6800e-
003
3.1100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4203 0.4203 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.42064.8000e-
004
0.0000 4.8000e-
004
1.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
Worker 2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.5000e-
003
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 1.9041 1.9041 1.7000e-
004
0.0000 1.90844.3000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
1.2000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
1.4000e-
004
Hauling 1.9000e-
004
6.5300e-
003
1.6100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 6.2456 6.2456 1.1600e-003 0.0000 6.27472.1300e-003 2.4400e-003 4.5700e-003 3.2000e-004 2.3300e-003 2.6500e-003Total4.7800e-003 0.0435 0.0454 7.0000e-005
0.0000 6.2456 6.2456 1.1600e-
003
0.0000 6.27472.4400e-
003
2.4400e-
003
2.3300e-
003
2.3300e-
003
Off-Road 4.7800e-
003
0.0435 0.0454 7.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00002.1300e-
003
0.0000 2.1300e-
003
3.2000e-
004
0.0000 3.2000e-
004
Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.3244 2.3244 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 2.32909.1000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
9.3000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
2.7000e-
004
Total 4.0000e-
004
6.6800e-
003
3.1100e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.4203 0.4203 1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.42064.8000e-
004
0.0000 4.8000e-
004
1.3000e-
004
0.0000 1.3000e-
004
Worker 2.1000e-
004
1.5000e-
004
1.5000e-
003
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
0.0000 12.0120 12.0120 1.0100e-
003
0.0000 12.03743.7300e-
003
1.2000e-
004
3.8500e-
003
1.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.1300e-
003
Total 1.6300e-
003
0.0378 0.0132 1.2000e-
004
0.0000 1.1208 1.1208 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.12161.2800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2900e-
003
3.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.5000e-
004
Worker 5.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 10.8912 10.8912 9.8000e-
004
0.0000 10.91582.4500e-
003
1.1000e-
004
2.5600e-
003
6.7000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
7.8000e-
004
Hauling 1.0700e-
003
0.0374 9.2100e-
003
1.1000e-
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 16.6550 16.6550 3.1000e-
003
0.0000 16.73260.0127 6.5200e-
003
0.0192 6.7000e-
003
6.2200e-
003
0.0129Total0.0127 0.1161 0.1211 1.9000e-
004
0.0000 16.6550 16.6550 3.1000e-
003
0.0000 16.73266.5200e-
003
6.5200e-
003
6.2200e-
003
6.2200e-
003
Off-Road 0.0127 0.1161 0.1211 1.9000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0127 0.0000 0.0127 6.7000e-
003
0.0000 6.7000e-
003
Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 44.0361 44.0361 0.0142 0.0000 44.39220.0197 0.0197 0.0181 0.0181Off-Road 0.0341 0.3513 0.3196 5.0000e-
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 12.0120 12.0120 1.0100e-
003
0.0000 12.03743.7300e-
003
1.2000e-
004
3.8500e-
003
1.0100e-
003
1.2000e-
004
1.1300e-
003
Total 1.6300e-
003
0.0378 0.0132 1.2000e-
004
0.0000 1.1208 1.1208 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 1.12161.2800e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.2900e-
003
3.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.5000e-
004
Worker 5.6000e-
004
4.0000e-
004
4.0000e-
003
1.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 10.8912 10.8912 9.8000e-
004
0.0000 10.91582.4500e-
003
1.1000e-
004
2.5600e-
003
6.7000e-
004
1.1000e-
004
7.8000e-
004
Hauling 1.0700e-
003
0.0374 9.2100e-
003
1.1000e-
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 16.6549 16.6549 3.1000e-
003
0.0000 16.73254.9400e-
003
6.5200e-
003
0.0115 2.6100e-
003
6.2200e-
003
8.8300e-
003
Total 0.0127 0.1161 0.1211 1.9000e-
004
0.0000 16.6549 16.6549 3.1000e-
003
0.0000 16.73256.5200e-
003
6.5200e-
003
6.2200e-
003
6.2200e-
003
Off-Road 0.0127 0.1161 0.1211 1.9000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00004.9400e-
003
0.0000 4.9400e-
003
2.6100e-
003
0.0000 2.6100e-
003
Fugitive Dust
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 44.0361 44.0361 0.0142 0.0000 44.39210.0197 0.0197 0.0181 0.0181Total0.0341 0.3513 0.3196 5.0000e-
004
0.0000 44.0361 44.0361 0.0142 0.0000 44.39210.0197 0.0197 0.0181 0.0181Off-Road 0.0341 0.3513 0.3196 5.0000e-
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 5.6086 5.6086 3.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.61663.3500e-
003
5.0000e-
005
3.3900e-
003
9.1000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
Total 1.4800e-
003
0.0143 0.0113 6.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.1576 2.1576 6.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.15922.4700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.4900e-
003
6.6000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
Worker 1.0700e-
003
7.6000e-
004
7.6900e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.4510 3.4510 2.6000e-
004
0.0000 3.45748.8000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
2.8000e-
004
Vendor 4.1000e-
004
0.0136 3.6200e-
003
4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 44.0361 44.0361 0.0142 0.0000 44.39220.0197 0.0197 0.0181 0.0181Total0.0341 0.3513 0.3196 5.0000e-
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2ePM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 21.1331 21.1331 6.1600e-
003
0.0000 21.28697.9500e-
003
7.9500e-
003
7.3900e-
003
7.3900e-
003
Total 0.0167 0.1512 0.1595 2.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving4.2000e-
004
0.0000 21.1331 21.1331 6.1600e-
003
0.0000 21.28697.9500e-
003
7.9500e-
003
7.3900e-
003
7.3900e-
003
Off-Road 0.0162 0.1512 0.1595 2.5000e-
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Paving - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 5.6086 5.6086 3.2000e-
004
0.0000 5.61663.3500e-
003
5.0000e-
005
3.3900e-
003
9.1000e-
004
5.0000e-
005
9.5000e-
004
Total 1.4800e-
003
0.0143 0.0113 6.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.1576 2.1576 6.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.15922.4700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
2.4900e-
003
6.6000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
Worker 1.0700e-
003
7.6000e-
004
7.6900e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.4510 3.4510 2.6000e-
004
0.0000 3.45748.8000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
9.0000e-
004
2.5000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
2.8000e-
004
Vendor 4.1000e-
004
0.0136 3.6200e-
003
4.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 21.1330 21.1330 6.1600e-
003
0.0000 21.28697.9500e-
003
7.9500e-
003
7.3900e-
003
7.3900e-
003
Total 0.0167 0.1512 0.1595 2.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving4.2000e-
004
0.0000 21.1330 21.1330 6.1600e-
003
0.0000 21.28697.9500e-
003
7.9500e-
003
7.3900e-
003
7.3900e-
003
Off-Road 0.0162 0.1512 0.1595 2.5000e-
004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.8371 2.8371 8.0000e-005 0.0000 2.83923.2500e-003 2.0000e-005 3.2700e-003 8.6000e-004 2.0000e-005 8.8000e-004Total1.4100e-003 1.0000e-003 0.0101 3.0000e-005
0.0000 2.8371 2.8371 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.83923.2500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.2700e-
003
8.6000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
8.8000e-
004
Worker 1.4100e-
003
1.0000e-
003
0.0101 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
0.0000 0.0806 0.0806 0.0000 0.0000 0.08069.0000e-005 0.0000 9.0000e-005 2.0000e-005 0.0000 3.0000e-005Total4.0000e-005 3.0000e-005 2.9000e-004 0.0000
0.0000 0.0806 0.0806 0.0000 0.0000 0.08069.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.0000e-
005
Worker 4.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
2.9000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2.9362 2.9362 2.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.94131.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
Total 0.0175 0.0176 0.0209 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.9362 2.9362 2.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.94131.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
Off-Road 2.5200e-
003
0.0176 0.0209 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0149
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10
0.0000 2.8371 2.8371 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.83923.2500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.2700e-
003
8.6000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
8.8000e-
004
Total 1.4100e-
003
1.0000e-
003
0.0101 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.8371 2.8371 8.0000e-
005
0.0000 2.83923.2500e-
003
2.0000e-
005
3.2700e-
003
8.6000e-
004
2.0000e-
005
8.8000e-
004
Worker 1.4100e-
003
1.0000e-
003
0.0101 3.0000e-
005
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Improve Pedestrian Network
0.0000 0.0806 0.0806 0.0000 0.0000 0.08069.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.0000e-
005
Total 4.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
2.9000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0806 0.0806 0.0000 0.0000 0.08069.0000e-
005
0.0000 9.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.0000e-
005
Worker 4.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
2.9000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.9362 2.9362 2.0000e-004 0.0000 2.94131.0800e-003 1.0800e-003 1.0800e-003 1.0800e-003Total0.0175 0.0176 0.0209 3.0000e-005
0.0000 2.9362 2.9362 2.0000e-
004
0.0000 2.94131.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
1.0800e-
003
Off-Road 2.5200e-
003
0.0176 0.0209 3.0000e-
005
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0149
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.000753 0.001122
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
0.005479 0.016317 0.023976 0.001926 0.001932 0.006016Parking Lot 0.598645 0.040929 0.181073 0.106149 0.015683
0.023976 0.001926 0.001932 0.006016 0.000753 0.001122
SBUS MH
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Thru
0.598645 0.040929 0.181073 0.106149 0.015683 0.005479 0.016317
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCYLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
79.50 19.00 50 25 25
Parking Lot 4.70 4.70 4.70 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Thru
4.70 4.70 4.70 1.50
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-
W
Total 2,398.90 2,398.90 0.00 1,997,444 1,977,470
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 2,398.90 2,398.90 0.00 1,997,444 1,977,470
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 872.9070 872.9070 0.0561 0.0000 874.31030.7527 8.5800e-
003
0.7613 0.2016 8.0000e-
003
0.2096Unmitigated0.4197 1.6141 3.4656 9.4400e-
003
0.0000 865.5276 865.5276 0.0558 0.0000 866.92270.7452 8.5100e-
003
0.7537 0.1996 7.9400e-
003
0.2075Mitigated0.4189 1.6089 3.4469 9.3600e-
003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
32.0135
Mitigated
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
32.0135
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
596367 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
32.0135
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000
6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
32.0135
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244
31.7000
NaturalGas
Mitigated
3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 31.5951 31.5951 1.2800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
31.5940 31.5940 1.2800e-
003
2.4000e-
004
31.6988
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
30.5129
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
129607 30.4119 1.2300e-
003
2.4000e-
004
31.7000
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 31.5951 1.2800e-
003
2.5000e-
004
30.5135
Parking Lot 5040 1.1826 5.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.1866
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
129609 30.4125 1.2300e-
003
2.4000e-
004
32.0135
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
32.0135
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
596367 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping3.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0143
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
1.4900e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-004 7.0000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-004 0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
31.6988
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 31.5940 1.2800e-
003
2.5000e-
004
Parking Lot 5037.5 1.1820 5.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.1860
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping3.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0143
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
1.4900e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
3.8502
8.0 Waste Detail
Total 2.9717 0.0273 6.6000e-
004
3.8502
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
0.832897 /
0.0624008
2.9717 0.0273 6.6000e-
004
4.7825
Mitigated
Indoor/Outdoor Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 3.6845 0.0341 8.3000e-
004
4.7825
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
1.04112 /
0.0664545
3.6845 0.0341 8.3000e-
004
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Outdoor Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 3.6845 0.0341 8.3000e-
004
4.7825
Mitigated 2.9717 0.0273 6.6000e-
004
3.8502
19.8696
Mitigated
Total 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000
19.8696
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons to
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o Drive Thru
39.51 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000 19.8696
CO2e
t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000 9.9348
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
9.9348
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
Total 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000
9.9348
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
19.755 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorVal
ue
250 0
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorVal
ue
250 0
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Fleet Mix -
Area Coating - Rule 67.0.1 coatings
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
361.69 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.015 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.003
40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2030
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 3.43 1000sqft 0.08 3,427.00 0
Floor Surface Area Population
Parking Lot 36.00 Space 0.32 14,400.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/13/2020 11:44 AM
Chick fil A Carlsbad - San Diego Air Basin, Annual
Chick fil A Carlsbad
San Diego Air Basin, Annual
2.2 Overall Operational
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 716.00 700.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 696.00 700.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 500.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 12.00 25.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 51.00 50.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 4.70
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 37.00 25.00
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 4.70
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 4.70
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.015
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 361.69
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,430.00 3,427.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00
tblEnergyUse T24NG 35.92 35.56
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.00
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
tblEnergyUse T24E 8.23 7.35
4.2743 755.2187 759.4930 0.3056 1.4300e-
003
767.55710.7455 7.6200e-
003
0.7531 0.1995 7.2300e-
003
0.2068Total0.2979 1.2280 2.3302 7.6800e-
003
0.2642 1.8930 2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-
004
3.03330.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
4.0101 0.0000 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000 9.93480.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 699.4109 699.4109 0.0399 0.0000 700.40750.7455 5.4000e-
003
0.7509 0.1995 5.0100e-
003
0.2046Mobile0.2789 1.1988 2.3053 7.5000e-
003
0.0000 53.9141 53.9141 1.5300e-
003
7.7000e-
004
54.18072.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Energy 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
8.3505 761.5362 769.8867 0.5497 1.5900e-
003
784.10080.7530 7.6600e-
003
0.7607 0.2016 7.2700e-
003
0.2088Total0.2986 1.2308 2.3432 7.7400e-
003
0.3303 2.3452 2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
3.77060.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
8.0202 0.0000 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000 19.86960.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 705.2754 705.2754 0.0401 0.0000 706.27830.7530 5.4400e-
003
0.7584 0.2016 5.0500e-
003
0.2066Mobile0.2795 1.2015 2.3182 7.5600e-
003
0.0000 53.9149 53.9149 1.5300e-
003
7.7000e-
004
54.18152.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Energy 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-
W
Total 2,401.00 2,401.00 0.00 1,999,193 1,979,201
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 2,401.00 2,401.00 0.00 1,999,193 1,979,201
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 705.2754 705.2754 0.0401 0.0000 706.27830.7530 5.4400e-
003
0.7584 0.2016 5.0500e-
003
0.2066Unmitigated0.2795 1.2015 2.3182 7.5600e-
003
0.0000 699.4109 699.4109 0.0399 0.0000 700.40750.7455 5.4000e-
003
0.7509 0.1995 5.0100e-
003
0.2046Mitigated0.2789 1.1988 2.3053 7.5000e-
003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Improve Pedestrian Network
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
48.81 0.83 1.35 44.40 10.06 2.111.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.98
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.21 0.22 0.55 0.78
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
Unmitigated
31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
32.0135
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000
6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
32.0135
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244
22.1680
NaturalGas
Mitigated
3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 22.0905 22.0905 9.2000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
22.0897 22.0897 9.2000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
22.1672
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalROGNOxCOSO2
0.000785 0.000782
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
0.005279 0.017663 0.025476 0.001931 0.001677 0.005617Parking Lot 0.616428 0.037185 0.177402 0.097684 0.012090
0.025476 0.001931 0.001677 0.005617 0.000785 0.000782
SBUS MH
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Thru
0.616428 0.037185 0.177402 0.097684 0.012090 0.005279 0.017663
LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCYLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
79.50 19.00 50 25 25
Parking Lot 4.70 4.70 4.70 0.00
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Thru
4.70 4.70 4.70 1.50
21.3383
Parking Lot 5040 0.8269 3.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.8298
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
129609 21.2637 8.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
32.0135
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
32.0135
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
596367 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
32.0135
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
32.0135
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
596367 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
6.2 Area by SubCategory
0.0000 7.0000e-004 7.0000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-004 0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
22.1672
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Total 22.0897 9.1000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
21.3379
Parking Lot 5037.5 0.8265 3.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.8294
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
129607 21.2632 8.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
22.1680
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 22.0905 9.1000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping3.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0143
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
1.4900e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping3.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0143
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
1.4900e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
3.7706
Mitigated
Total 2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
3.7706
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
1.04112 /
0.0664545
2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
3.7706
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-
004
3.0333
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Unmitigated 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000 19.8696
CO2e
t
on
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000 9.9348
3.0333
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O
Total 2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-
004
3.0333
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
0.832897 /
0.0624008
2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-
004
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
9.9348
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
Total 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000
9.9348
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
19.755 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000
19.8696
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000
19.8696
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
39.51 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
tblEnergyUse T24E 8.23 7.35
tblEnergyUse T24NG 35.92 35.56
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorVa
lue
250 0
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorVal
ue
250 0
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Fleet Mix -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
361.69 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.015 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.003
40
Climate Zone 13 Operational Year 2035
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days)
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 3.43 1000sqft 0.08 3,427.00 0
Floor Surface Area Population
Parking Lot 36.00 Space 0.32 14,400.00 0
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2
Page 1 of 1 Date: 7/24/2020 11:55 AM
Chick fil A Carlsbad - San Diego Air Basin, Annual
Chick fil A Carlsbad
San Diego Air Basin, Annual
CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
2.2 Overall Operational
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 500.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 716.00 700.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 51.00 50.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 696.00 700.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 37.00 25.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 12.00 25.00
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 4.70
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 4.70
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 361.69
tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.015
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,430.00 3,427.00
48.81 0.82 1.37 44.61 10.06 2.171.00 0.48 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.99
NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.23 0.20 0.56 0.82
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive
PM10
4.2743 719.3123 723.5867 0.3030 1.4300e-
003
731.58600.7456 6.2000e-
003
0.7518 0.1996 5.9200e-
003
0.2055Total0.2498 1.1925 2.0398 7.2600e-
003
0.2642 1.8930 2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-
004
3.03330.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
4.0101 0.0000 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000 9.93480.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 663.5046 663.5046 0.0373 0.0000 664.43640.7456 3.9800e-
003
0.7496 0.1996 3.7000e-
003
0.2033Mobile0.2308 1.1632 2.0149 7.0800e-
003
0.0000 53.9141 53.9141 1.5300e-
003
7.7000e-
004
54.18072.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Energy 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
8.3505 725.2812 733.6317 0.5470 1.5900e-
003
747.78070.7531 6.2300e-
003
0.7594 0.2016 5.9400e-
003
0.2076Total0.2504 1.1949 2.0513 7.3200e-
003
0.3303 2.3452 2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
3.77060.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water
8.0202 0.0000 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000 19.86960.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste
0.0000 669.0204 669.0204 0.0375 0.0000 669.95820.7531 4.0100e-
003
0.7571 0.2016 3.7200e-
003
0.2053Mobile0.2314 1.1657 2.0263 7.1400e-
003
0.0000 53.9149 53.9149 1.5300e-
003
7.7000e-
004
54.18152.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Energy 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
SBUS MHLHD2MHDHHDOBUSUBUSMCYLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
79.50 19.00 50 25 25
Parking Lot 4.70 4.70 4.70 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 4.70 4.70 4.70 1.50
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-
W
Total 2,401.00 2,401.00 0.00 1,999,193 1,979,201
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 2,401.00 2,401.00 0.00 1,999,193 1,979,201
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
0.0000 669.0204 669.0204 0.0375 0.0000 669.95820.7531 4.0100e-
003
0.7571 0.2016 3.7200e-
003
0.2053Unmitigated0.2314 1.1657 2.0263 7.1400e-
003
0.0000 663.5046 663.5046 0.0373 0.0000 664.43640.7456 3.9800e-
003
0.7496 0.1996 3.7000e-
003
0.2033Mitigated0.2308 1.1632 2.0149 7.0800e-
003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Improve Pedestrian Network
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
32.01352.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
596367 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10
31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
32.0135
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000
6.1000e-004 5.8000e-004 32.0135
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-003 2.2200e-003 0.0000 31.8244 31.8244
22.1680
NaturalGas Mitigated 3.2200e-003 0.0292 0.0246 1.8000e-004 2.2200e-003 2.2200e-003
0.0000 0.0000 22.0905 22.0905 9.2000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
22.0897 22.0897 9.2000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
22.1672
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.000800 0.000709
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated
0.005282 0.018425 0.026503 0.001944 0.001632 0.005548Parking Lot 0.617626 0.036451 0.176904 0.096837 0.011340
0.026503 0.001944 0.001632 0.005548 0.000800 0.000709Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Thru
0.617626 0.036451 0.176904 0.096837 0.011340 0.005282 0.018425
22.1680
Mitigated
Total 22.0905 9.1000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
21.3383
Parking Lot 5040 0.8269 3.0000e-005 1.0000e-005 0.8298
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
129609 21.2637 8.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
32.0135
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
32.0135
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.2200e-003 0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-004 5.8000e-0041.8000e-004 2.2200e-003 2.2200e-003 2.2200e-003
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Fast Food Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
596367 3.2200e-003 0.0292 0.0246
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
32.0135
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 31.8244 31.8244 6.1000e-
004
5.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
2.2200e-
003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 3.2200e-
003
0.0292 0.0246
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2ePM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7.0000e-004 7.0000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-004 0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
22.1672
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10
Total 22.0897 9.1000e-
004
1.9000e-
004
21.3379
Parking Lot 5037.5 0.8265 3.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.8294
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
129607 21.2632 8.8000e-
004
1.8000e-
004
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping3.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0143
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
1.4900e-
003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0158 0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 7.0000e-
004
7.0000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 7.5000e-
004
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping3.0000e-
005
0.0000 3.6000e-
004
0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer
Products
0.0143
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural
Coating
1.4900e-
003
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
3.7706
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
3.7706
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o Drive Thru
1.04112 /
0.0664545
2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 2.6755 0.0340 8.2000e-
004
3.7706
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-
004
3.0333
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
19.8696
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
39.51 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000 19.8696
CO2e
t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000 9.9348
3.0333
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O
Total 2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-004
3.0333
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
0.832897 /
0.0624008
2.1572 0.0272 6.6000e-
004
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
9.9348
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year
Total 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000
9.9348
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
19.755 4.0101 0.2370 0.0000
19.8696
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 8.0202 0.4740 0.0000