Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-07-30; Planning Commission; ; GPA/LU 86-08|ZC-347|LCPA 86-01 - CITY OF CARLSBAD.• DATE: TO: FROM: STAPP ·••oaT JULY 30, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( \. \. SUBJECT: GPA/LU 86-8/ZC-347/LCPA 86-1 -CITY OF CARLSBAD - General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendments to bring the General Plan, Zoning and Local Coastal Plan maps into conformance. I • RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the Negative Declarations issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Resolution Nos. 2584, 2585, and 2586 recommending APPROVAL of GPA/LU 86- 8/ZC-347/LCPA 86-1 per staff's recommendation to the City Council based on the findings contained therein. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this report and the recommendations in it is to bring the land use designations on the General Plan, zoning Map and Local Coastal Plan into conformancy. Presently there are a number of inconsistencies between the designations on these three documents. This has caused some confusion as to which document provides the correct land use designation on a particular parcel. During the preparation of this report, staff has also discovered a number of drafting errors on the General Plan and Zoning Map that will be corrected as a part of this review. In addition, the land use designations on approximately 20% of the City are being reviewed as either part of a proposed master plan, an adopted master plan under review or other special study. These master plan reviews and special studies will probably result in requests for additional General Plan Amendments, zone Changes, and Local Coastal Plan Amendments at some future date. The areas covered by these studies were not considered for any changes at this time. The land use designation inconsistencies discovered by this review will be corrected by either a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Local Coastal Plan Amendment or a combination of any of the above mentioned actions. This report will be divided into two sections. The first section will deal with General Plan and Zoning inconsistencies outside of the Coastal Zone. They consist of five sites, one which will require a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, one a General Plan Amendment and three a Zone Change. . . ; . The second part of this report deals with General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes and Local Coastal Plan Amendments within the area covered by the Carlsbad Local C~astal Plan. Many of the recommended changes will bring the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map designations into conformance with the recently adopted Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan. The recommended changes to the Local coastal Plan will change LCP land use designations to reflect existing land uses and General Plan land use designations. Staff has discussed these recommended changes to the Local Coastal Plan with Coastal Commission staff members and received their support on most of the proposed changes. III. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1) Are the recommended General Plan Amendments consistent with the Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan? 2) Are the recommended zone Changes consistent with the General Plan and/or the Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan? 3) Do the recommended amendments to the Land Use Plan of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan to bring it into conformance with the Carlsbad General Plan Land Use Map accurately represent the existing land use on the property, or provide a more appropriate land use designation? Discussion Exhibit "A" -Harding Street The first site consists of a General Plan Amendment and zone Change for a .67 acre parcel at 3334 Harding Street, see Exhibit "A". The General Plan Amendment will be from RVH, Residential Very High Density, 30-40 du/ac to RH, Residential High Density 20-30 du/ac. The Zone Change would be from RD-H, Residential Density High to R-3, Multiple Family Residential. The recommended General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will bring this site's General Plan designation and zoning into conformance with recent changes to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. During the Citizen's Committee review of the Land Use Element of the General Plan the RVH, Residential Very High Density designation was eliminated. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will have no impact on the recently constructed apartment project on this site. This project was developed at a density of 32.8 du/ac in conformance with the site's RVH General Plan designation. The change would permit the existing apartment complex to remain,. but would prevent future expansion of the apartment building. -2- : I ' - Exhibit "B" -Altiva Place The next recommendation is a General Plan Amendment from RMH, Residential Medium High, 8-15 du/ac to RLM, Residential Low Medium 0-4 du/ac for a 2.04 acre parcel on the west side of Altiva Place, north of an SDG&E easement, see Exhibit "B". The recommended General Plan Amendment will bring this site's General Plan designation into conformance with its existing R-1-10, Single Family Residential 10,000 square foot minimum lot size Zoning. The proposed General Plan Amendment would reduce the site's density potential from 16-30 units to a maximum of 8 units. Staff believes it is more appropriate to change this site's General Plan designation to bring it into conformance with its Zoning rather than the reverse for a number of reasons. Steep slopes along the westerly portion of this property will limit its development potential. The existing 150 foot wide SDG&E powerline easement separates this site from an approved multi- family project at the intersection of Altiva Place and Alicante Road. This SDG&E easement serves as an excellent boundary between multi-family and single family development. All of the lots north of this easement on the east side of Altiva Place have been developed with, or will be developed with, single family homes on large lots. This site is separated from the recently approved Alga Hills project by a large ravine which will be left in its natural state. In addition, the portion of the Alga Hills project closest to this site consists of the single family residences on the larger lots. If the Commission and Council approved the recommended General Plan Amendment all of the development on Altiva Place north of the easement would consist of single family residences. Staff believes that this would be more compatible than having multi- family development and single family residences on opposite sides of the same cul-de-sac. The owner of this site has requested that this site's General Plan designation be changed to RM, 4-8 du/ac rather than RLM, 0-4 du/ac and it's Zoning be kept at R-1-10000. He has submitted preliminary plans for City review which would create eight 10,000 square foot lots on this two acre site. He feels that recent actions by the City Council would make it impossible to get more than six lots on this property if it had a General Plan designation of RLM. Staff believes that his argument has some merit, however R-1-10000 is the implementing Zone for the RLM General Plan designation. In addition, if this site was designated RM, at a later date a future property owner could request a Zone Change to RD-M which is the implementing Zone for the RM, 4-8 du/ac General Plan designation. -3- : I Exhibit •c• -Monroe Street Staff is recommending that the zoning on 12 lots with a combined area of 2.23 acres be changed from R-3, Residential Multiple to R-1-7500, Single Family Residential, 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, see Exhibit •c•. This zone Change will bring the properties Zoning into conformance with their General Plan designation of RLM, Residential 0-4 du/ac. The Planning Commission discussed these properties two years ago when an application for a condominium conversion of two existing apartment buildings at this site was submitted. The Commission denied the request and approved a Resolution of Intention directing staff to rezone the properties from R-3 to R-1. The applicant appealed the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council, then requested a continuance and finally withdrew the application. Due to the applicant withdrawal and the amount of projects being processed in the past few years, staff did not follow through with the Resolution of Intention. The proposed rezone from R-3 to R-1 would not adversely impact the existing, older multi-family residences on the property. These units are already non-conforming because they exceed the density allowed by the RLM, 0-4 du/ac General Plan designation. The recommended Zone Change would merely bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan. Exhibit •o• -Costa Real Property -El Camino Real Staff is recommending that this 6.09 acre site's zoning be changed from R-1-10, Single Family Residential 10,000 square foot minimum lot size to M-Q, Industrial with a Q {Qualified Overlay), see Exhibit •o•. This zone change would bring its zoning into conformance with it's PI, Planned Industrial General Plan designation. The properties to the north, east and west are zoned M-Q, while the property to the south is zoned OS, Open Space. The recommended zone change would have no impact on the existing building on this site which appears to be a single family residence being used as an office by the Costa Real Municipal Water District. Exhibit •E• -Carlsbad Raceway Area As shown by Exhibit •E•, this site consists of five parcels with a combined area of 124.2 acres. The Carlsbad Raceway is located on the two northernmost lots which are zoned c-2, General Commercial. The three southerly lots are part of the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan and are zoned P-C, Planned Community. Staff is recommending that all of these lots be rezoned to PM which is in conformance with their General Plan designations of PM, Planned Industrial and PM/0 Planned Industrial/Office. -4- The recommended P-M, Planned Industrial zoning will not adversely impact the Carlsbad Raceway or the vacant properties affected by this change. The existing use, the Carlsbad Raceway, is occupying this site th-rough a CUP, conditional use permit, that would be valid even if this site was zoned P-M. A revision to the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan, in process, will eliminate the three southerly parcels from the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan. Staff has already seen some preliminary development proposals for these properties and the Carlsbad Raceway property. Whether these properties develop separately or with the Raceway property, they will be required to prepare a specific plan because they are in the Palomar Airport Influence area. These parcels are being removed from the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan because they are separated from the rest of the Master Plan area by Palomar Airport Road, a six lane arterial. In addition, the industrial uses that will take place on these parcels does not relate to the rest of the Master Plan which will be developed with residential and neighborhood commercial uses. General Plan -Local Coastal Program (LCP) Consistency Carlsbad has six LCP segments (see Map •A•) that combined, form the City's Local Coastal Program. Although these segments have been prepared and adopted at different times over the past ten years, it has only been since October 1985 that the City has been willing to adopt the two segments Mello I and II that cover a majority of the City's Coastal Zone. Subsequently, west Batiquitos Lagoon segment was approved in November 1985 and the east Batiquitos Lagoon segment is still pending. The fact of the City's refusal to adopt the Mello I and II segments led to a situation where two separate and distinct sets of regulations governed all development in the Coastal Zone. The City did not recognize the LCP and, therefore, approved development consistent with the General Plan and Zoning. The Coastal Commission on the other hand, based it's approvals on consistency with the certified LCP's. Under this situation a project could receive City approval, only to be denied by the Coastal Commission. In October of 1985, Carlsbad and the Coastal Commission adopted amendments to the Mello I and II segments which resolved the long standing conflicts. By adopting these LCP segments the City has agreed to assume its State mandated responsibility to implement and administer the LCP. several of the implementing procedures involve Planning commission and City Council actions. -s- First, the City must amend its General Plan to incorporate the LCP Land Use Policy Document. This document contains regulations that deal with protecting coastal resources (e.g., agriculture, wetlands, recreation, shoreline access, etc.). The document also contains specific land use designations for each parcel in the Coastal Zone. The Land Use Element Map of the General Plan must also be amended to reflect the land use designations of the LCP. Second, the City's Zoning Ordinance must be amended to incorporate all of the LCP Ordinances and modifications. This involves the adoption of several new ordinances (e.g., Coastal Agricultural Overlay zone, Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone, etc.). Also, it involves modifications to existing ordinances to provide additional requirements or restrictions of the LCP. Finally, in order to implement the LCP land uses, the official zoning map will have to be modified to eliminate any conflicts. Third, the City must process •clean-up• LCP amendments where the LCP no longer reflects existing land use or it would allow uses that would be incompatible with surrounding land uses. •clean- up" amendments would also involve changes to the land uses designations to bring them into conformance with official actions that have occurred subsequent to the certification of the LCP. The Planning Department and the City Attorney's office will be scheduling future Planning Commission hearings to consider incorporating the LCP into the text of the City's General Plan and Zone Code. The following proposed General Plan and LCP amendments plus the recommended zone changes deal only with map changes necessary to implement the LCP. 1 ) Exhibit •F• -Hughes Property, Highway 78 and Jefferson Street This is a General Plan amendment (GPA) from Intensive Regional Commercial (RRI) to Open Space (OS) for that portion of the property containing Buena Vista Creek in order to provide consistency with the LCP. In addition, a zone change from C-2-Q to OS for the same area would be required to implement the proposed modification. 2 ) Exhibit •a• -First row of lots adjacent to Buena Vista Lagoon along Jefferson Street This is a recommendation that the Local Coastal Plan designation of RLM, Residential Low Medium for the first row of lots adjacent to Buena Vista Lagoon along Jefferson Street be changed to RMH, Residential Medium High. This would bring the Local Coastal Plan's designation into conformance with the properties existing General Plan designation of RMB and Zoning of R-3. These properties were given the RLM, 0-4 du/ac designation by the Local Coastal Plan because of their steep slopes and location adjacent to the sensitive wetlands of Buena Vista Lagoon. -6- However, staff believes that a number of recently approved changes to the General Plan and new City ordinances will ensure that these properties are developed in a site sensitive manner, that will protect the wetland areas and preserve at least a portion of the views from Jefferson Street overlooking Buena Vista Lagoon. These ordinances along with recent changes to the method used for calculating allowable density will make it difficult for many of these properties to obtain any density above the minimum allowed by the RMB, 8-15 du/ac General Plan designation. 3 ) Exhibit "H• -Single family neighborhood around Buena Vista Creek This is a GPA from RMH to RLM to be consistent with the LCP. The area is currently zoned R-1-10 which is consistent with the RLM designation of the LCP. Almost all of these lots are currently developed with detached single family homes. 4 ) Exhibit •r• -Lots on north side of Laguna Drive between State and Roosevelt Streets This is a recommended amendment to the Local Coastal Plan from RH to RMH/O for the above-mentioned properties. The two westerlymost parcels are located in an area covered by the Village Redevelopment Plan which the Coastal Commission has already adopted. The RMH/O General Plan designation would allow these properties to be developed with multifamily or office uses. Some of the properties have already been developed by office uses, while others are occupied by single family residences. 5) Exhibit "J" -Ticer (APN 155-101-65 and 155-190-13) and Native Sun (APN 203-010-21) located near the mouth of Buena Vista Lagoon This would be a GPA from RM/OS, Residential Medium/Open Space to RLM, Residential Low Medium to be consistent with the LCP. It would also involve a zone change from R-A to R-1-20 for the Ticor parcels and from R-A to R-1-10 for the Native Sun parcel. The proposed zone changes are consistent with the LCP and they will provide for a gradual decrease in land use intensity for two low- lying parcels adjacent to a sensitive coastal resource, Buena Vista Lagoon. 6) Exhibit "K" -State Beach parking lot south of Oak Street This would be a proposed LCP amendment to correct an apparent drafting error. The LCP map shows a RH designation for the parking area. The area is designated open space on the General Plan which is consistent with both the use and the State Department of Parks and Recreation ownership. -7- 7 ) Exhibit "L" -Area on the north side of Pine Avenue between Lincoln Street and the railroad tracks This would be a GPA from RVH (Residential Very High)to RH (Residential High) to be consistent with the LCP and the Land Use Element of the Carlsbad General Plan. Revisions to the General Plan by the Citizen's Committee eliminated the RVH, Residential Very High designation. This would also be a zone change from RD- H to RD-M. These changes would not adversely impact the existing apartment project, which would become a legal non-conforming use, because the apartment has been built at a density in excess of that permitted by the RH, General Plan designation. 8 ) Exhibit "M" -Southeast corner of Pio Pico and Magnolia (APN 205-270-30, 39, 33 portion) This would be a GPA from RC/O (Recreation Commercial and Office) to TS/O (Travel Service and Office) to be consistent with the LCP. This action would also involve a zone change from R-3 to CT-Q to provide consistent zoning. The existing R-3 zoning does not allow for Travel Service type of uses. 9 ) Exhibits "N" and "O" -Area in the vicinity of Harrison and Adams Streets and Chinquapin Avenue This would involve a GPA from RLM to RM for the area bounded by Locust Street, Adams Street and Chinquapin Avenue to the existing RMH boundary east of Harrison Street. This amendment will also require a zone change from R-1 to RD-M for consistency. The GPA and zone change would provide consistency with the LCP. In addition, a zone change for APN 206-120-1, 2, 10, 11, 23 and 24 from R-1 to RD-M will be required since both the GP and LCP designates these parcels as RMH. Finally, a GPA will be required for APN 206-120-13 and portions of 12 and 14 to change the designation from RLM to RMH for conformance with the LCP. Also, the zoning will require a change from R-1 to RD-M for all of the parcels in the block bounded by Locust, Adams, and Harrison Streets to bring their zoning into conformance with their RM and RMH General Plan/Local Coastal Plan designations. This block includes APN 206-120-12, 13, 14, 15. See Exhibit "N" for General Plan amendments and Exhibit "O" for zone changes. 1 0 ) Exhibit •p• -Snug Harbor area This will require a GPA from RM (Residential Medium) to RC (Recreational Commercial) for the snug Harbor area's designation to be consistent with the LCP. This areas current zoning of RD-M would not be consistent with the RC designation. To be consistent with the LCP the zoning in this area would need to be changed to R-T from RD-M. -8- 1 1 ) Exhibit "Q•·-Kelly Ranch Master Plan This would be a GPA to bring the General Plan Map into conformance with the Local Coastal Plan. The GPA's would designate portions of the site near the lagoon as open space. These areas were originally approved for development when the City approved the Master Plan. However, subsequent Coastal Commission action redesignated portions of Planning Areas A, c, D and F to Open Space because of their resource value. The developer has already agreed to the changes as a condition of the issuance of a coastal development permit for the master plan. No zone change is necessary since the entire site is zoned PC, however, the master plan will need to be amended to reflect the changes. See Exhibit •Q•. 1 2 ) Exhibit "R" -Frontage lots, west side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Shore Drive loop Staff is recommending that the zoning of these ten lots be changed from R-2, Residential Duplex to R-1-7500, Residential Single Family. This would bring the zoning of these lots into conformance with their General Plan designation and Local Coastal Plan designation of RLM, Residential Low Medium, 0-4 du/ac. These properties involved are rather small in size for duplex lots, 6,000 square feet. When developed with a duplex they have density of 15.3 du/ac which would put them in the RH, Residential High, 15-23 du/ac General Plan range. Of the ten lots involved, six are developed with duplexes, one with a single family home and three are vacant. They are surrounded by single family homes and because of their small lot size, are forced to back directly onto Carlsbad Boulevard. Because of these constraints, staff believes it is more appropriate to change the zone to conform with the General Plan and Local Coastal Plan designations rather than the reverse. 13) Exhibit •s• -Property owned by the State, west side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Cerzo and Manzano Drives This would be GPA RLM (Residential Low Medium) to OS (Open Space) and zone change R-1 (Single Family Residential) to OS (Open Space) to conform to the LCP, which designates this site as open space. 14) Exhibits "T• and •u• -Paseo Del Norte between Palomar Airport Road and Encinas Creek This would be a proposed LCP amendment to provide consistency with the General Plan. The LCP currently designates the entire area east and west of Paseo Del Norte, except for the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte, as PI (Planned Industrial). The City's General Plan, however, -9- designates the area for Travel Service and Office (TS/O). The General Plan also designates the Caltrans maintenance yard as G (Government}. The proposed LCP amendment would provide consistency with the General Plan and Specific Plan for the area, as well as compatibility with existing development. It should be noted the Coastal Commission has already granted several permits consistent with the proposed LCP amendment. The proposed amendment would also require a zone change from·c-2 to CT-Q for the area north of the Caltrans property on both sides of Paseo Del Norte. This would be consistent with the General Plan's (Travel Service), TS designation for the area. All other zoning is compatible with the General Plan designations. See Exhibit "T" for zone change and Exhibit "U" for Local Coastal P 1 an amendments. 15) Exhibit "V" -Sudan Mission This would be a proposed LCP amendment from PI (Planned Industrial) to RM (Residential Medium). The proposed amendment would bring the LCP into conformance with the General Plan and the existing residential development. The zoning for the property is RDM-Q which is consistent with the RM General Plan designation. 1 6) Exhibit "W" -Residential designated area north of Cobblestone Sea Village This proposed LCP amendment would modify the allowable residential density for the area from RLM (0-4 du/ac) to RL (0- 1.5 du/ac) to conform to the General Plan. The amendment would also create a new LCP designation. Currently the lowest residential density category for the LCP is RLM. Coastal staff has indicated that the RL designation (consistent with the General Plan) may be more appropriate considering the site is completely within the airport influence zone. The proposed amendment would not require a zone change at this time since the subject area is within the County. The appropriate zone change would occur with annexation. 1 7) Exhibit "X" -Area south of Cobblestone Sea Village This would be a GPA from RL to RLM to be consistent with the LCP. The area doesn't have the same development constraints as that mentioned in the previous amendment for the property to the north. Additionally, future College Boulevard and Poinsettia Lane would be adjacent to the area so that the area would not be as isolated as once envisioned. Therefore, the RLM designation of the LCP is probably more appropriate. -10- 1 8 ) Exhibit "Y" -Hunt property along El Camino Real (APN 215- 020-13) This would be a proposal to amend the LCP designation from PC (Planned Community) to RM (4-8 du/ac). The Carlsbad General Plan does not include the PC designation. Instead the PC is a zoning designation which is generally applied to large parcels (100 acre minimum). Staff has discussed this inconsistency with the Coastal Commission staff. They have agreed that since the LCP requires development pursuant to the PC zone (with special coastal regulations), the LCP designation could be modified to be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed action would not require a zone change because the land is still in the County. It is presumed that with annexation the property will be rezoned PC in conformance with the requirements of the LCP. 19) Exhibit •z• -East side of Avenida Encinas north of Marie Callenders Restaurant This would be a GPA from RS (Regional Service) to PI (Planned Industrial) to provide consistency with both the LCP and the existing office use. A zone change will not be required since the site is zoned PM consistent with the proposed GPA. 20) Exhibit •AA• -Northeast corner of Avenida Encinas and Palomar Airport Road This would be a proposed LCP amendment from PI (Planned Industrial)to TS (Travel Sevice) to reflect the General Plan and zoning on the site. In addition, the recent restaurant developments (McDonalds and Marie Callenders) were approved by the Coastal Commission. Those developments would not be consistent with the LCP's PI designation but would be with the General Plan's TS designation. The area is zoned CT-Q consistent with the existing General Plan designation. 21) Exhibit "BB• -Occidental Master Plan, northwest of I-5 and Poinsettia Lane This would be a proposed LCP amendment to change the designation from TS/N (Travel Service/Neighborhood Commercial) to TS/C (Travel service/General Commercial). The area is currently developing with a mix of travel service uses (motels) and general commercial (auto dealerships and medical offices). The proposed amendment is consistent with recent Coastal Development permit approvals by the Coastal Commission to allow the general commercial uses. There are no pending proposals for Neighborhood Commercial. Furthermore, the southeast corner of I-5 and Poinsettia Lane is designated for Neighborhood Commercial thus providing an area that would satisfy adjacent demands. The existing zoning is consistent with the proposed designation. -11- 22) Exhibit •cc• -Southwest corner of I-5 and Poinsettia Lane This proposed LCP amendment from TS/N (Tiavel Service/ Neighborhood) to TS/C (Travel Service/Commercial) would bring the LCP into conformity with both the General Plan and recent Coastal Commission permit approvals. The existing zoning of C-2 is consistent with the proposed designation. 23) Exhibit •DD" -Spinnaker Hills This would be a proposed LCP amendment from RM to RLM to bring the LCP into conformance with both the exisitng General Plan, zoning and the existing single-family detached development. The existing R-1 zoning is also consistent with the existing General Plan designation. 24) Exhibit "EE" -Commercial area, northwest of Alga Road and El Camino Real. This would be two separate actions to establish the boundary between commercial uses on the south and residential uses on the north side of the future westward extension from El Camino Real of Dove Lane. The first action would be a GPA from C (General Commercial) to RM (Residential Medium 4-8 du/ac) for the portion of the area north of Dove Lane which is designated General Commercial (C) on the General Plan. The second action would involve a proposed LCP amendment from RM to C to extend the commercial area on the northwest side of Alga Road and El Camino Real northward to Dove Lane. The area is currently in the County so that upon annexation it would be rezoned consistent with the proposed amendments. 25) Exhibit •pp• -south of Alga Road between El Camino Real and Manzanita Drive This would be a GPA from RMH (Residential Medium High) to RM (Residential Medium) to provide consistency with the LCP. The RD-M zoning is consistent with the proposed change. 26) Exhibits •GG• and "HR" -South end of Batiquitos Drive (Savage and Lyman Properties) This would be a GPA from RMH/OS (Residential Medium High/Open Space) to RM/OS (Residential Medium/Open Space) to provide consistency with the LCP. It should be noted that the General Plan currently designates the flatter developable portions of the site as open space and designates the steep slopes for RMB uses. Based on the General Plan the development potential of the site would be severely limited. -12- The LCP designates the entire site RM except for a continous open space strip for the steep slopes on the western portion of the site. In addition, the LCP contains specific incentives for developing the site. The LCP would allow a maximum of 12 du/ac but requires that 2/3 of the development be concentrated on 50% of the site furthest from the lagoon. The LCP also restricts development on steep slopes. In addition to the GPA, a zone change would be required to provide consistency. The site is currently zoned L-C (Limited Control). To provide consistency with the LCP, a zone change to RD-M for the flatter areas and OS for the steep slopes is proposed. 2 7 ) Exhibit "II" -East and west corner of Avenida Encinas at Cannon Road This would be a zone change from R-A (Residential Agricultural) to PM (Planned Industrial) to provide consistency with both the LCP and the General Plan designation of PI (Planned Industrial). 28) Exhibit "JJ" -Cannon Lake Park This would be a zone change from RDM-Q (Residential Density Multiple -Overlay) to OS (Open Space) to be consistent with the open space designation of both the LCP and the General Plan. 2 9 ) Exhibit "KK" -SDG&E property, northwest corner of I-5 and Cannon Road This would be a zone change from C-2 (General Commercial) to CT-Q (Tourist Commercial -Q Overlay) to be consistent with the TS (Travel Service) designation of both the LCP and the General Plan. 30) Exhibit "LL" -Southeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Jefferson Street intersection This would be a zone change from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to RD-M (Residential Density Multiple) to provide consistency with the RMH designation of both the LCP and the General Plan. This zone change pertains to five parcels ranging in size from 6,875 to 19,094 square feet. The proposed RD-M zone would allow development at densities consistent with the RMH General Plan designation. 3 1 ) General Plan amendment to the LCP -Density Ranges This would be a proposed amendment to revise the LCP residential density ranges to correspond with the residential density ranges of the General Plan. The LCP residential density ranges reflect those that were in effect in 1980. Since that time the City has -13- amended the General Plan to lower all residential density. The proposed LCP amendment would provide consistency with the General Plan. In addition, the amendment would allow development in the Coastal Zone at the same intensity as that in other portions of the City. If the Planning Commission determines that the above LCP amendments are warranted and, therefore, necessary to implement the City's Local Coastal Program, it should establish the State mandated six-week review period. During the period which would begin on July 30, 1986 and end September 10, 1986 all interested parties including other agencies would have the opportunity to comment on the merits of the proposed amendments. Staff would then present the proposed LCP amendments and comments to the City Council. After this review period is completed, staff will also present to the Planning Commission a summary of the comments received. In conclusion, staff realizes that this is a rather lenghty, complex report with recommendations that affect many properties. In an attempt to simplify this matter staff has prepared four charts "A" -"D" which summarize all of the proposed changes. The Commission should keep in mind that the City Council has already agreed to many of these changes when they adopted the Carlsbad Local coastal Plan. The recommended changes in this report should bring the Carlsbad General Plan Land Use Element Map, Carlsbad Local Coastal Plan and Carlsbad Zoning Maps into conformance. This will put an end to years of confusion as to which map someone should refer, to determine a parcels designation and development potential. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that the projects outside the Coastal Zone will not have a significant effect on the environment and issued Negative Declarations on July 12, 1986. The projects within the Coastal Zone are exempt from environmental review per Section 15265 Al of the California Environmental Qu~lity Act. ATTACHMENTS 1) Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2584, 2585 and 2586 2) Charts "A" -"D", dated July 14, 1986 3) Maps "An and "B", dated July 16, 1986 4) Environmental Documents 5) Exhibits "A" -•z• and "AA" -"LL", dated July 14, 1986 MH:bn 7/14/86 -14- EXHIBIT A B C D E CHA..,....._ "A" JUL. 14, 1986 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMEMNTS AND ZONE CHANGES OOTSIDE OF 'mE COASTAL ZONE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FROM 3334 Harding St. General Plan RVH Zone RD-H Altiva Place General Plan RMH North of SDG&E easement 12 lots on zone R-3 Monroe St. across from the High School Costa Real zone R-1-10 Property Carlsbad Raceway Zone C-2 & P-C Area TO RH R-3 RLM R-1 M-Q PM CHAP--. •s• JUL·. . 4, 1986 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS TO CX>NFORM TO 'fflE LCP EXHIBIT F H J L M PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Hughes Property that lies in Buena Vista Creek Single family neighborhood bordering Buena Vista Circle Ticor and Native Sun Parcels near the mouth of Buena Vista Lagoon Area on the north side of Pine Avenue between Lincoln Street and AT&SF RR Southeast corner of Pio Pico and Magnolia N Area in the vicinity of Chinquapin, Adams and Harrison Streets a) APN 206-120-3 to 9 b) APN 206-120-13 and portions of 12 and 14 P Snug Harbor Q Kelly Ranch a) Portion of Planning Area A b) Portion of Planning Area C c) Planning Area D d) Portion of Planning Area F s State coastal property south of Terra Mar z East side of Avenida Encinas, north of restaurants x Area south of Cobblestone Sea Village EE Northwest of Alga Road and El Camino Real to Dove Lane FF South of Alga Road, El Camino Real to Manzanita GG South end of Batiquitos Drive (Savage and Lyman Properties) Proposed Changes FROM RRI ( Intensive Regional Comm. ) RMH RM/OS RVH RC/O RLM RLM RM RMH RMH RM RC RLM RS RL C RMH RMR/OS OS TO OS(Open Space) RLM RLM RH TS/O RM RMH RC OS OS OS OS OS PI RLM RM RM RM/OS RM EXHIBIT F G I K N+Nl u V w X y AA BB cc DD EE CHART ~C" JULY 1986 PROPOSED "CLEAN-UP" LCP AMENDMENTS DESCRIPTION Portion of Hughes property north of Buena Vista Creek First row of lots adjacent to Buena Vista Lagoon along Jefferson Street Lots on northside of Laguna Drive between State and Roosevelt Streets State beach parking lot south of Oak Street Lots in the area surrounded by Harrison Street, Adams Street and Chinquapin Avenue Paseo Del Norte between Palomar Airport Road and Encinas Creek Sudan Mission Residentially designated area north of Cobblestone Sea Village in Palomar Airport Influence area Residentially designated area south of Cobblestone Sea Village Hunt Property along El Camino Real Northeast corner of Avenida Encinas/Palomar Airport Road Northwest corner of I-5 and Poinsettia Lane Southwest corner of I-5 and Poinsettia Lane Spinnaker Hills West side of El Camino Real, north of Alga Road Residential Density Ranges a. b. c. d. e. Proposed Change FROM TO OS RRI RLM RMH RH RMH/0 RH OS RMH and RM RLM Pl TS,TS/0,G Pl RM RLM RL RL RLM PC RM PI TS TS/N TS/C TS/N RM RM No Category RLM (0-4 du/ac) RM (4-10 du/ ac) RMH (10-20 du/ac) RH (20-30 du/ac) TS/C RLM C RL (0-1.5 du/ac) RLM (0-4 du/ac) RM (4-8 du/ac) RMH (8-15 du/ac) RH (15-23 du/ac) EXHIBIT F J J L M 0 p s T EE HH II JJ KK LL PROPOSED ZONE CHANGES TO IMPLEMENT THE LCP PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Hughes property that lies in Buena Vista Creek Ticor parcels near mouth of Buena Vista Lagoon Native Sun parcel near mouth Buena Vista Lagoon North side of Pine Avenue between Lincoln Street and AT&SF RR Southeast corner of Pio Pico and Magnolia Two lots on the west side of Harrison Street adjacent to 1-5 Snug Harbor State coastal property south of Terra Mar Paseo Del Norte between Palomar Airport Road and Encinas Creek West side of El Camino Real north of Alga Road South end of Batiquitos Drive (Savage and Lyman properties) East and west corners of Avenida Encinas at Cannon Road Cannon Lake Park Portion of SDG&E property on the northwest corner of I-5 and Cannon Road Southeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Jefferson Street intersection PrOfO&ed FROM C-2-Q R-A R-A RD-H R-3 R-1 RD-M R-1 C-2 C-2-Q LC R-A RD-M-Q C-2 R-1 Change TO OS CHART "D" JULY 14, 1986 R-1-20 R-1-10 RD-M CT-Q RD-M R-T OS CT RD-M RD-M PM OS CT-Q RD-M DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE Citp of Carlsbab 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Carlsbad Raceway and adjacent property along the north side of Palomar Airport Road adjacent to the easterly City boundary. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone change fran C-2, General Canmercial and P- C, Planned Community to PI, Planned Industrial for five parcels with an area of 124.4 acres. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA., 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: July 12, 1986 CASE NO: ZC-347 APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH DATE: July 12, 1986 ND4 11/85 <;~utfA Planning Director DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE Citp of Carlsbab NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: West side of Altiva Way north of the San Diego Gas and Electric p<>werline easement. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General Pla amendment from RMB, Residential Medium High 8-15 du/ac to RLM, Residential Low Medium 0-4 du/ac to bring a 2.04 acre site's General Plan designation into conformance with its existing R-1-10 zoning. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supp<>rtive documents is on file in the Planning Depart.,ent, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA., 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: July 12, 1986 CASE NO: GPA/LU 86-8 APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH DATE: July 12, 1986 ND4 11/85 MI Planning Directo't DEVELOPMENT AL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE <! ttp of ({ arl£Sbab NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 3334 Harding Street. 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from RVH and RD-H, Residential Very High Density 30-40 du/ac and Residential Density High to RH and RO-M, Residential Density High and RD-M, Residential Density Multiple for a .67 acre parcel. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA., 92008. Comments fran the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: July 12, 1986 CASE NO: GPA/LU 86-8/ZC-347 APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH DATE: July 12, 1986 ND4 11 /85 ~£:n Planning Director DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ~ itp of ~arl~bab NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: East side of Monroe Street adjacent to Carlsbad High School. (619) 438-5591 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone change from R-3, Residential Multiple to R-1-7500, Single Family Residential 7500 square foot minimum lot size for 12 properties with a combined area of 2.23 acres. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA., 92008. comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: July 12, 1986 CASE NO: ZC-347 APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH DATE: July 12, 1986 ND4 11/85 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER /,~-'r Planning Director L' DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE <! itp of <!arlsbab 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 5950 El Camino Real, on the east side of El Camino Real, approximately a quarter of a mile north of Palanar Airport Road. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone change from R-1-10, Single Family Residential 10,000 square foot minimum lot size to M-Q, Industrial with a Q overlay for a 6.09 acre parcel. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA., 92008. Comments £ran the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: July 12, 1986 CASE NO: ZC-347 APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad PUBLISH DATE: July 12, 1986 ND4 11/85 'L ~-~ 14: MIJ. HOLZMILLF,i / Planning Director L,, CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM (LCP) LCP SEGMENT ■ MELLO I Ea MELLO II ■ AGUA HEDIONDA Im EAST BATIQUITOS LAGOON/HUNT ~ WEST BATIQUITOS LAGOON/SAMMIS ■ REDEVELOPMENT AREA A. -A SEGMENTS BOUNDARY MAP '1AP /A JULY 16, 1986 .. AREAS UNDER REVIEW APPROXIMATELY 5700 ACRES 20% OF CARLSBAD :: :: MAP B JULY 18, 1986 ... • ~~~-. ·::""":::::,Jll/1111/1111!1/I~ i1! i SCHOOL CITY OF CARLSBAD EXHIBIT A JULY 14,1986 PROJECT SITE RVH TO RH RD-H TO R-3 ~ GPA/LU 86-8 .. ZC-347 \ .\ CITY OF CARLSBAD EXHIBIT B JULY 14, 1986 GPA/LU 86-6 AlfEA l'lfOl'OSEO FOIi ll•ZON• FIIOM 11•3 to II• 1 CAIILIIAD. HIGH ICHOOL 08 R-1 R-1 CITY OF. CARLSBAD EXHIBIT C JUL V 14, 1986 R-1 ZC-347 DETAfL "E, f'=200 \ CM AVE. CITY OF CARLSBAD EXHIBIT D JULY 1.1, 1988 ® 26.28AC MO OS R-1-10 TO MQ ZC-347 •••. s. • 0 : ' ,, ... , 0 IS.II N.. 'l ., 't ... . , .. ( 11 • • 0 117.!4AC. 4 --~c ,a , ''"·':~ _ SEC r9 !C-2 TO PM © 37 SZAC . IJZ/ ... Q ..... CITY OF CARLSBAD EXHIBIT E JULY 14, 1988 ® 37.93 AC !JZ6os ®;, PC TO PM ·- ZC-347 3UENA VISTA AGOON LC~A from 08 to RRI zc from C.-2-0 to OS [i r,T>A .crom RRI to OS EXHIBIT F PLAZA CAMINO REAL 0 .... "' 33 34 35 36 @ 23.73AC .. G) 20.:.u,c. i ~:' ----------- LCPA 86-1 LCPA from OS to RRI GPA/HJ 86-8 ZC-347 GPA from RR! to OS ZC from C-~ to OS PORTIONS OF APN 156-301-1 -2 -5 JULY 14, 1986 2.14 AC 29 .... 27 ~ 25 .. ~ !l ~S4- ! 0 't 0 l.-4~AC "' .. 26 "' "' ,,oz~ ~ -~ ..... -.s.s (No-,. ~-•:•.:.- ;' ~ .. ·;.- ·~ ·:~::·· ··. ~~, LCPA 86-l J~E~ A lfr4om RLM to RttH • 1986 EXHIBIT G _:,Kfi t ' 12.20 •c r; U E NA VIS T A. LA GOON GPA'LU 86-8 GPA from RMH to APN 155-221-1 -2 -4 -9 -16 -17 JULY 14,1986 RLM 155-222-1 -2 -3 155-223-1 -7 EXHIBIT H .,. ,.. LCPA 86-1 LCPA from RH to Rt-1H/0 · APN 155-221-11 -15 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT I ' s I-' •· " , BUENA VISTA LAGOON OE TAIL SCALE I"•~ - ,,.1-1 .•• ••~ .,·,ii l ,.-1~. ~-,; .-\-~.;-,• --. : -"".., -~ ""Z "\; C' ~"" -(r. ,.~ 0 . ',., ,. ,.,, '-.../ i..' ..;::"- ""/ /y c.CNlM· tME. BE-CH 00C. 85 • 201949 lSCC St<' 2l GPA/LU 86-8 ZC-347 GPA from RM/OS to RL /OS ZC from RA to OS & R-1-30 APN 155-101-65 155-190-13 203-010-21 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT ~J RA to ruvos to os· ZC RA to R-1-30 GPA RH/OS to ~L ,.;~) -1·•:.·" 47 , ... @ '=i• AC .... ' ---~ / • LCPA 86-1 RH to OS LCPA from 1 APN 204-310-0 JUL y 14 • 1986 ,,. ,,. ✓ .,. 4, .. ,, :1; ~ ' ~ ; .. ~ -~ ;, .4" .,,, . ~ ... ..... . .. . ,,. w,. w •• ~ • .-..... , ~~ ·» . ~ -~ '·. ..,. • \ ,I-; ·,. :#'' .. •: '\_ .,., .. •• ',tt:• -e:\ ", EXHIBIT K , • ··•' (: , .. ,:,;;;.' C. 'I"' I GPA /LU 86-8 ZC-347 GPA from RVH to RH ZC from RO-H to RO-H APN 203-260-~ -10 JULY 14, 1986 F.XHIAIT L 4 , .. GPA;Lu ss .. a zc .. 347 GPA from RC/0 to TS/0 ZC from R-3 to CT-Q APN 205-270-JO -39 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT f,f J I I I I I I I I, ' .... ' .; .. ~· r I I I LCPA , ... ,.. @ "'O-OC', N a,(Q'\ ,.,.~ ,~ .. .. \jl .. ,. -. .. ... :i CHINQUAPIN S$]:,a .oo: ~ ;,;,.sa ,,. ""' !! s :t )> D D (/) 0 z ,. .. i If ~ .. ~ .. 0 e @ 0 ~ " .. a ,,sa ,,. "" 0 i:,, ,..., .. '-=-' > n LOCUST From RM to RLMlru-m to RLM. APN 206-120-3 to 9, 12,lJ, 14 EXHIBIT N August 5, 1986 AVE . ST. ... .. t ~ 1,# > 0 > ~ II) $;- L__ RM TO RLM HARBORVIEW LN • RMH TO RLM .,_ ·-CAPE AIRE LN, N l>tO'\ "''21 I~ GPA and LCPA Fror.t RMH to RLM ,.. .. .: .. Ir CHINQUAPIN LOCUST EXHIBIT N.l August 5, 1986 AVE. ~ :,;, 4111 !! 0 .. -Clo • "' 0 0 0 0 .... • .. ST. t ,,,, APN 206-120-1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 15 L__ -, ~ ► 0 ► s: In HARBORVIE'N LN. ---CAPE AIRE LN. I ' ~ " ,: .. , ~/ ,· I I ZC-347 From Rl to ROM i :0 :0 ~ z l ! !! " ? " ~ • Q t ' le ~ ., CHINQUAPIN ,J.SII ~;,"o -.. 0 0 @ @ 0 • . ,~SIi ~, ,,, LOCUST ✓.S~ .,. ® I ' " i ...2">.ll!t,._ -.:I APN 206-120-23 and 24 EXHIBIT 0 August 5, 1986 AVE. t ,;,~ ~ ~ 0 " ' Q "' • "' ~ G 0 0 ~ ,, 0 0 0 • .... • ~ " 1. ,,.,,, ST. t ,,,,,,,•1,1~ ,,,,. ,,,,., ' ~~ loo .. "' .., le • --. lo ~ .. ' ~® .. ~ . ' ... C. ~"; "· II> I l! ©~~ l~ .,.,,,,0 . .. "(!/ '" t__ HARBORVIEW L.N • . -- '-CAPE AIRE L.N . I I I ~/ ,., ,, , ....... _ ' • .. ZC-3 47 0-M to zc from R GPA /LU 86-8 RC GP A from RM to APN 206-120-19 -21 -28 -29 -30 ~ t . EXHIBIT P JULY 14, 1986 4 "e: I I /-...._ --...... I I I J I \\\ \ \ \ ,.4"'c: t -{ "' ). c:, Ji. 5/ I I GPA/LU 86-8 GPA from RMH, RM, & RC to OS JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT fl :• ; E · I , .. "·· ·'·. 8WflLIMGUlllr■ , ,...,, .,ac ... \ ----- ... ... ' ,:,•O•"'-•·• •<--I _,, ....... J,1 ... ~ ...... ,.,.)/,I I"\ ,,, ., l ~ // i·~~,,, ◄ ~ \.,_ : I { l \ ~ \ .... 0 ,,-. . !1-----~~::.,_·"~•~•L--li .. ,.. . . . ' I t > • •,# L.AACl-4 OR t EXHIBIT R ZC-347 ZC from R-2 to R-1 APN 210-032-1-8 210-062-1-3.5-13 JULY 14, 1986 .... , .... 0 > :D r-111 CD > 0 6 l\t ca -- n > 21 ,- Ill all . ,. ;o ~ ... :a m r-< g~ g z I . i - EXHIBIT R -··•·6 . ··-~•~·, ~ .. 0 : I .SJ • ,,.,....;t ~ ,. :9, 1 ...... , ,. f ' ,.. ·~ .. ,, ,. , ' S>. ··• ,,-..• • •o : 8 .11) ~ .s,. ,., r;, ''.V ..SJ "ca 0 G ~.s,. IJ r. ..J @ .s., '• \.~ '0 s~ ~s ,. . _..., . '!) I s, ~ , .. . l:)c • ... @ . ·- I 0. (3) • .s,_,• ~> ~ 0 0 ~9 5~ 01@ ·~ 6g ~~ G ~ 0 G) ·~ ;,, 0 ~ "s ~ 0 e .,., >J 0 @ ., J >., .. r. . @ ~ '--'. .,~ ' -'l ~ @,~ 1:0 ; ~,,)J ._, I~ -~ lt .. .. I ... •· .. r 0 VI :a 0 CD r '"' VI •• .. ,- 0 en ]) 0 a, r ,.., (.n 0 l2 < ,.., " ~ ! : ( GPA/Ll! 86.:.8 ZC-347 GPA from RL~ t~ OS ZC from R-1 to OS APN 210-120-29 JULY 14, 1986 EXHI8IT S - JULY \4 1 1986 lC-347 !C c-2 to CT-Q il.PN 211-oso-1 -2 -3 -5 -6 -10 -11 C-2 TO C-T-Q • ✓ R·A• 1 O RP PM JULY g, 1986 LCPA 86-1 LCPA PI to TS,~,TS/0 EXHIBIT U ..-Pl TOG· Pl Re-Pl TO TS/O APN 211-050-4 -12 211-040-20 ,21,24,25 ,26 ,27 ,28,2 -5 .. -6 -8 -9 -,,., ..... • I .. . r I (9 ... _ .... LCPA 86-1 LCPA from PI to RM APN 212-040-23 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT V ·•-.... . . . /:. ... LCPA 86-l LCPA from RLM to RL APN 212-040-29 JULY 14, 1986 ,.. >, C ~ "' ,.. ..., :z, "' "' EXHIBIT ti e,,~__.--• \ ',, © l---~ JNf I EXHIBIT X LCPA 86-1 LCPA RL to RLM APN 215-070-15 JULY 14, 1986 0 ... ao, -- 0 0 I 0 0 0 EXHIBIT '.< 0 _s,., l • -----l ; ... ._ ~ ~ fl\ 1,14 •• I•"•'•'•' . : . .. . .. • '0 IOU 00: .. , .... LCPA 86-1 LCPA from PC to RM APN 215-020-13 JULY 14. 1986 .... .. o '-u. CAMINO ~AL ALOA ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE • EXHI?.IT Y I ' I ""'l•-C.. GP,4/LU 86-8 GPA from RS to Pt APN 210-170-8 -9 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT Z LCPA 86-1 LCPA from Pl to TS APN 210-170-6 -7 -10-13 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIPIT AA LCPA 86-1 LCPA from TS/N to TS/C APN 214-450-2 -1 -14 -22 JULY 14, 1986 \ i \ ' EXHIBIT f:3R \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LCPA 86-1 LCPA from TS/N to TS/C APN 241-43-1-12 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT CC SHT I -3 // 1\ LCPA 86-1 LCPA from RM to RLM SPINNAKER HILLS JULY 14. 1986 i Q ►• h -, ' )I Z Z7 0 .JJ l4 EXHIBIT D~ G -SUNFLOWER WAY H-CARNATION DP.. J -euTTERCVP RD. I-'--G INGl='.R AVE. L-IVY ST '-1-DAISY AVE N -ORCHID ,VAY 0 -PRIMROSE WAY P-AZALEA -PL. Q-POPPY LN R-WISTERIA WAY S-JASMINE CT T-oEGOtJIA CT U-LILY PL. V-1 RIS CT W-TULI P WAY ,-FOXGLOVE VIE,V y--"')A.FFCDI L ~L Z-!=lC~E DR A:... -.:.LVSSUM AD 88-':,NAPGRAGGN DR CC· IVY ST DO-MACADAM IA OR 6E -R~INTRE~ DR F'F'-GARDENIA C GG ·MARGUERl:c HH· NUTMEG \/1 JJ -rlOSEMARY I EL ,21,111,. ,1 ( /fos ,;u, 1 €) a.JS u 1rt1P••t,11l' """2 S9~ J ~ ~6 2 II OOAC. 16. ll< ~ ,. ":~•,.;~• . . @ :: 0 9.Z7AC .,. PM2Z44 ""•• •~ s ·•o··, ,, ... •7 CITY • @ "I s 0 !', 07 A, ' ~ 20.J4 .. (. ... e 0 ~ 07AC fl-... ;r CARLSB"O /3#0.74 ~~. ?, "' 0 G) ::: IOOOAC. IOOOAC ~ () ., ·--··.· ~ ' "I .... 20 OOl'C ;; ' Of CARLSBAD ,~~~.::,, t:133 ;lJl -K••s-a.._,,~,r.,... I ALGA r--- ,~ ~ -:i ... .. ~ <' ~ ~ @ . -••n~ LCPA FROM RM TO C ZC-347 zc from c-2-n to RD-~1 GPA/LU 86-8 LCPA 86-1 LCPA from RM to C GPA from C to RM APN 215-050-portion of 61 JULY 14, 1986 86-8 ,.,,? di POR I (~3) IJor!~ A'L .... 3 EXHIBIT EE tel C, f •~) C::4 •17a£. - rot-1"4OOO { l.'IIIH~ IP," v, t .wr,,11.",flt,w ..,, •. .,..,.,. ,, ~,., ,c, · ,,.. r r , I ,i ~,,, I I ..,,, , •t: CO"'Ot.,, Fl ~ .. , ~"""'», 1w,-,., ..,"',.., GPA/LU 86-6 GPA from RMH to RH APN 215-504-11 JULY 14, 1986 EXHIBIT FF - >-1 ~£ ~ i •) ~ <5 (,) ~o '-! ~ > I• z . ' N > ~ ~ ; ~ : ·--~ U.SA GPA 86-8 GPA from RMH & OS to RM & OS JULY 14, 1986 • IA~~ 4\ SPINNAKER HILLS . . . ' G) -. ' \ I I g .. EXHIBIT GG l ------16 --7, J . ; : ... -.. : " ,,. .. ~ j A~EA \ -10 QEMA\N c~ A~EA 2 -.Zl'I\~ -\'0 CC, J:-cfl. e A. ~ -iZ"" \-\ ;-o 12. ti\ ~~eA. 4 -oc::";) -+o e t-1'.. Ae_eA C, -~~ +c ~~ .. -, •"" I NTElf~TAT£ ,. . . \ ZC-347 ZC from LC to RO-M July 14, 1986 ' '\ ' SPINNAKER HILLS 9ATIQUITO~ 0 > ... -< > < I"'\ I ' L .:..:-.OON 16 EXHIRIT ~If.I 0 .. ) -, " . Q .. .. .. : "' ~ .. .. .. I ~ ZC-347 ZC from R-A to PM APN 210-090-23 -24 JULY 14, 1986 \ : _...\-~ _, .. ,. ..& ... \ t..' • " . . . .,;-t· \ :_ \ . \ \ \ :P. ' \ ' . "" ' \ ' ' EXHIBIT I I ZC .. 347 zc from RD-M-Q to os APN 210-090-17 JULY 14, 1986 : ·~ : i :,; : ' I I ' I l --, I· : ,c I I ., I I ' ' ' ' "' " .., EXHIBIT JJ ........... ZC-347 ,, -· ZC from C-2 to CT-Q APN 210-010-32 JULY 14, 1986 - .. _.,. ........ _, -4 EXHIBIT KK \ . ,.. ZC--347 ZC from R-1 to RD-H APN 204-280-5 -7 -8 -26 -27 - EXHIBIT LL