Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 2023-0012; LEGOLAND CALIFORNIA PROJECT 2025; AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS; 2023-08-01CARLSBAD CLOVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO 3210 El Camino Real, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92602 949.553.0666 www.lsa.net MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: August 1, 2023 Bill Hofman, Hofman Planning Associates Cara Cunningham, Associate Bianca Martinez, Air Quality Specialist Air Quality Impact Analysis Memorandum for the LEGOLAND California 2025 Project in Carlsbad, California (LSA Project No. 20231502) INTRODUCTION LSA has prepared this Air Quality Impact Analysis Memorandum to evaluate potential impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed LEGOLAND California 2025 Project (project) in Carlsbad, California. This analysis follows the methodology identified by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD)1. This analysis includes an assessment of criteria pollutant emissions, an assessment of carbon monoxide (CO) hot-spot impacts, and an assessment of the project’s impact on sensitive receptors. PROJECT LOCATION The 2.38-acre project site is located within the Legoland Theme Park Carlsbad, in San Diego County, California, at the site of the existing “Driving School” and “Junior Driving School” attractions, which would be removed. The site is approximately 103,470 square feet (sq ft) (2.38 acres) in size with a generally flat topography. Local access to the project site is provided by Legoland Drive and Crossings Drive. The project location is shown in Figure 1 (all figures are provided in Attachment A). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The new attraction area would have a “space” theme where park guests would train for space exploration, meet other intergalactic travelers, and blast off on missions into the LEGO Galaxy! The proposed project would demolish the existing “Driving School” and “Junior Driving School” attractions and redevelop the site with a new attraction called “Project Mars.” Existing site development to be removed includes the driving school courses, queues, shade covers, a small retail 1 San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD). CEQA. Website: https://www.sdapcd.org/ content/sdapcd/planning/ceqa.html (accessed February 2023). 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 2 facility, and landscaping. Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. The major components of the proposed project are as follows: • Primary Ride: The ride consists of an indoor roller coaster housed inside a new single-story, 32,319 sq ft, 44-foot-high pre-manufactured steel building. Ancillary uses within the building include the ride queue, a LEGO brick building attraction, retail, and maintenance, as well as mechanical and storage spaces. • Secondary Ride: This ride has three cantilever arms that are lifted in the air by hydraulic actuators and carry a counter-rotating gyro element holding four gondolas at each end. The gondolas are designed to accommodate two riders to provide a capacity of up to 24 passengers. • A Playscape: This would be an approximately 1,755 sq ft exterior area featuring a children’s play structure with an alien spaceship theme. • A Toddler Play Area (“Tot Spot”): The project also includes an approximately 1,234 sq ft exterior area designed for the smallest guests, with LEGO DUPLO play features, shade cover, and seating. Proposed site development will include grading, utilities, new hardscape, planting, and retrofitting of existing recycled water irrigation systems. In addition, landscape would be installed throughout the project site and would consist of approximately 20,721 sq ft. The proposed project would utilize 100 percent recycled water for irrigation, and all plant species would be in the low to moderate water use category. The proposed project would be all electric and would not utilize natural gas for construction or operation. Construction would include demolition, site preparation, grading, and building construction activities. Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to commence in January 2024 and end in March 2025. The project would demolish approximately 811 sq ft of the existing attractions. Based on the preliminary grading plans, the project would require approximately 4,476 cubic yards of soil cut, 1,236 cubic yards of fill, for a net total of approximately 3,240 cubic yards of export. Demolition, grading, and building activities would involve the use of standard earthmoving equipment such as large excavators, cranes, and other related equipment. In addition, the proposed project would utilize Tier 2 construction equipment. EXISTING LAND USES IN THE PROJECT AREA For the purposes of this analysis, sensitive receptors are areas of the population that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include residences, schools, daycare centers, hospitals, parks, and similar uses that are sensitive to air quality. Impacts on sensitive receptors are of particular concern because those receptors are the population most vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. The project site is surrounded by a business park to the west across Legoland Drive and the existing theme park immediately to the north, east, and south. The closest sensitive receptor to the project site includes single-family residential uses located approximately 2,900 feet to the south. 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Air quality is primarily a function of both local climate and local sources of air pollution and regional pollution transport. The amount of a given pollutant in the atmosphere is determined by the amount of the pollutant released and the atmosphere’s ability to transport and dilute the pollutant. The major determinants of transport and dilution are wind, atmospheric stability, and terrain, and for photochemical pollutants, sunshine. A region’s topographic features have a direct correlation with air pollution flow and, therefore, are used to determine the boundary of air basins. The proposed project is located in the City of Carlsbad (City) within the jurisdiction of the SDAPCD, which regulates air quality in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB). The SDAB experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude) as a result of the Pacific high. This inversion limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. As the sun warms the ground and the lower air layer, the temperature of the lower air layer approaches the temperature of the base of the inversion (upper) layer until the inversion layer finally breaks, allowing vertical mixing with the lower layer. This phenomenon is observed in midafternoon to late afternoon on hot summer days when the air appears to clear up suddenly. Winter inversions frequently break by midmorning. Winds in the project area blow predominantly from the south-southwest, with relatively low velocities. Wind speeds in the project area average about 5 miles per hour. Summer wind speeds average slightly higher than winter wind speeds. Low average wind speeds, together with a persistent temperature inversion, limit the vertical dispersion of air pollutants throughout the SDAB. Strong, dry, north or northeasterly winds, known as Santa Ana winds, occur during the fall and winter months, dispersing air contaminants. The Santa Ana conditions tend to last for several days at a time. The combination of stagnant wind conditions and low inversions produces the greatest pollutant concentrations. On days of no inversion or high wind speeds, ambient air pollutant concentrations are the lowest. During periods of low inversions and low wind speeds, air pollutants generated in urbanized areas are transported predominantly onshore into Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. In the winter, the greatest pollution problems are CO and nitrogen oxides (NOX) because of extremely low inversions and air stagnation during the night and early morning hours. In the summer, the longer daylight hours and brighter sunshine combine to cause a reaction between hydrocarbons and NOX to form photochemical smog. Smog is a general term for naturally occurring fog that has become mixed with smoke or pollution. In this context, it is better described as a form of air pollution produced by the photochemical reaction of sunlight with pollutants that have been released into the atmosphere, especially by automotive emissions. Attainment Status Both the State of California (State) and the federal government have established health-based Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) for six criteria air pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead (Pb), and suspended particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10). The SDAB is designated as nonattainment for O3 for federal standards and nonattainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 for State standards. 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 4 Air quality monitoring stations are located throughout the nation and maintained by the local air districts and State air quality regulating agencies. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to identify regions as “attainment” or “nonattainment” depending on whether the regions meet the requirements stated in the applicable National Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Nonattainment areas are imposed with additional restrictions as required by the USEPA. In addition, different classifications of attainment, such as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme, are used to classify each air basin in the State on a pollutant-by-pollutant basis. The classifications are used as a foundation to create air quality management strategies to improve air quality and comply with the NAAQS. Attainment statuses for each of the criteria pollutants for San Diego County are listed in Table A. Table A: Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in San Diego County Pollutant Federal State O3 1 hour Nonattainment Nonattainment O3 8 hour Attainment1 Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment PM10 Unclassifiable2 Nonattainment PM2.5 Attainment Nonattainment NO2 Attainment Attainment SO2 Attainment Attainment Pb Attainment Attainment Sulfates No Federal Standard Attainment Hydrogen Sulfide No Federal Standard Unclassified Visibility No Federal Standard Unclassified Source: Attainment Status (San Diego County Air Pollution Control District 2021). 1 The federal 1-hour standard of 12 ppm was in effect from 1979 through June 15, 2005. The revoked standard is referenced here because it was employed for such a long period and because this benchmark is addressed in State Implementation Plans. 2 At the time of designation, if the available data do not support a designation of attainment or nonattainment, the area is designated as unclassifiable. CO = carbon monoxide NO2 = nitrogen dioxide O3 = ozone Pb = lead PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter ppm = parts per million SO2 = sulfur dioxide Air Quality Monitoring Results Air quality monitoring stations are located throughout the nation and are maintained by the local air pollution control district and State air quality regulating agencies. The SDAPCD, together with the California Air Resources Board (CARB), maintains ambient air quality monitoring stations in the SDAB. The air quality monitoring station closest to the project area is the Camp Pendleton ambient air quality monitoring station in Oceanside. The air quality trends from this station are used to represent the ambient air quality in the project area. Ambient air quality in the project area from 2020 to 2022 is shown in Table B. CO, PM2.5, PM10, and SO2 are not monitored at the Camp Pendleton station; therefore, Table B includes PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and CO data from the 533 First 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 5 Table B: Ambient Air Quality at Project Vicinity Monitoring Stations Pollutant Standard 2020 2021 2022 Carbon Monoxide (CO)1 – El Cajon Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 1.5 1.2 1.4 Number of days exceeded: State: >20 ppm 0 0 0 Federal: >35 ppm 0 0 0 Maximum 8-hour concentration (ppm) 1.4 1.1 1.1 Number of days exceeded: State: >9 ppm 0 0 0 Federal: >9 ppm 0 0 0 Ozone (O3)2 – Camp Pendleton Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 0.094 0.074 0.076 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.09 ppm 0 ND ND Maximum 8-hour concentration (ppm) 0.074 0.059 0.067 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.07 ppm 0 0 0 Federal: >0.08 ppm 0 0 0 Coarse Particulates (PM10)1 – El Cajon Maximum 24-hour concentration (µg/m3) 55.0 40.0 44.0 Number of days exceeded: State: >50 µg/m3 ND 0 0 Federal: >150 µg/m3 0 0 0 Annual arithmetic average concentration (µg/m3) ND ND ND Exceeded for the year: State: >20 µg/m3 ND ND ND Federal: >50 µg/m3 ND ND ND Fine Particulates (PM2.5)1 – El Cajon Maximum 24-hour concentration (µg/m3) 41.6 31.5 26.4 Number of days exceeded: Federal: >35 µg/m3 2 0 0 Annual arithmetic average concentration (µg/m3) 11.6 10.4 8.9 Exceeded for the year: State: >12 µg/m3 No No No Federal: >12 µg/m3 No No No Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)2 – Camp Pendleton Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 0.058 0.059 0.050 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.250 ppm 0 0 0 Annual arithmetic average concentration (ppm) 0.006 0.006 0.005 Exceeded for the year: Federal: >0.053 ppm No No No Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)1 – El Cajon Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 0.0017 0.0016 0.0008 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.25 ppm 0 0 0 Maximum 24-hour concentration (ppm) 0.0004 0.0003 0.0002 Number of days exceeded: State: >0.04 ppm 0 0 0 Federal: >0.14 ppm 0 0 0 Annual arithmetic average concentration (ppm) 0.0001 0.0001 0.00006 Exceeded for the year: Federal: >0.030 ppm No No ND Sources: Top 4 Summary (CARB 2023); Outdoor Air Quality Data: Monitor Values Report (USEPA 2023). 1 Data taken at the 533 First Street ambient air quality monitoring station in El Cajon. 2 Data taken at the ambient air quality monitoring station in Camp Pendleton. µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter CARB = California Air Resources Board ND = No data. There were insufficient (or no) data to determine the value. ppm = parts per million USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 6 Street monitoring station in El Cajon.2 As indicated in the monitoring results, no violations of the federal and State PM10 standard occurred during the 3-year period. PM2.5 levels exceeded the federal standard 2 times in 2020 only. The State 1-hour O3 standard was not exceeded in 2020, but no data were available for 2021 or 2022. Additionally, the federal and State 8-hour O3 standards were not exceeded during the 3-year period. The CO, SO2, and NO2 standards were not exceeded. REGULATORY SETTING Applicable federal, State, regional, and local air quality regulations are discussed below. Federal Regulations The 1970 federal Clean Air Act (CAA) authorized the establishment of national health-based air quality standards and set deadlines for their attainment. The CAA Amendments of 1990 changed deadlines for attaining national standards as well as the remedial actions required for areas of the nation that exceed the standards. Under the CAA, State and local agencies in areas that exceed the national standards are required to develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to demonstrate how they will achieve the national standards by specified dates. State Regulations In 1988, the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) required that all air districts in the State endeavor to achieve and maintain California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for CO, O3, SO2, and NO2 by the earliest practical date. The CCAA provides districts with the authority to regulate indirect sources and mandates that air quality districts focus particular attention on reducing emissions from transportation and area-wide emission sources. Each nonattainment district is required to adopt a plan to achieve a 5 percent annual reduction, averaged over consecutive 3-year periods, in district- wide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors. A Clean Air Plan shows how a district would reduce emissions to achieve air quality standards. Generally, the State standards for these pollutants are more stringent than the national standards. The CARB is the State’s “clean air agency.” The CARB’s goals are to attain and maintain healthy air quality, protect the public from exposure to toxic air contaminants, and oversee compliance with air pollution rules and regulations. Regional Regulations San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. The SDAPCD has adopted air quality plans to improve air quality, protect public health, and protect the climate. The San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) outlines SDAPCD plans and control measures designed to attain and maintain the State standards, while San Diego’s portions of the SIP are designed to attain and maintain federal standards. The RAQS was initially adopted in 1991 and is updated on a triennial basis. The RAQS was updated in 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, 2009, 2016, and most recently in December 2022. The RAQS does not currently address the CAAQS for PM2.5 and PM10. 2 California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2019. iADAM: Top 4 Summary. Website: www.arb.ca.gov/adam/ topfour/topfour1.php (accessed February 2023). 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 7 SDAPCD has also developed the SDAB input to the SIP, which is required under the CAA for areas that are out of attainment of air quality standards. Both the RAQS and SIP demonstrate the effectiveness of CARB measures (mainly for mobile sources) and SDAPCD plans and control measures (mainly for stationary and area-wide sources) for attaining the O3 NAAQS. The SIP is also updated on a triennial basis. SDAPCD adopted its attainment plan and Reasonable Available Control Technology Demonstration for the 2008 8-hour O3 NAAQS. In addition, the Measures to Reduce Particulate Matter in San Diego County Report3 proposes measures to reduce particulate matter emissions and recommends measures for further detailed evaluation and, if appropriate, future rule development (or non-regulatory development, if applicable), adoption, and implementation in San Diego County, in order to attain particulate matter CAAQS. The RAQS relies on information from the CARB and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), including mobile and area source emissions, as well as information regarding projected growth in the County, to project future emissions and then determine from that the strategies necessary for the reduction of emissions through regulatory controls. The CARB mobile source emission projections and SANDAG growth projections are based on population and vehicle trends and land use plans developed by the cities and by the County as part of the development of the County’s General Plan. As such, projects that propose development that is consistent with the growth anticipated by the General Plans would be consistent with the RAQS. In the event that a project would propose development that is less dense than anticipated by the County’s General Plan, the project would likewise be consistent with the RAQS. If a project proposes development that is greater than that anticipated by the General Plan and SANDAG growth projections, the project might be in conflict with the RAQS and SIP, and might have a potentially significant impact on air quality. The SIP relies on the same information from SANDAG to develop emission inventories and emission reduction strategies that are included in the attainment demonstration for the SDAB. The SIP also includes rules and regulations that have been adopted by the SDAPCD to control emissions from stationary sources. These SIP-approved rules may be used as a guideline to determine whether a project’s emissions would have the potential to conflict with the SIP and thereby hinder attainment of the NAAQS for ozone. SDAPCD Rules and Regulations. As stated above, the SDAPCD is responsible for planning, implementing, and enforcing NAAQS and CAAQS in the SDAB. The following rules and regulations apply to all sources within the jurisdiction of SDAPCD, and would apply to the proposed project: 1. SDAPCD Regulation IV: Prohibitions; Rule 50: Visible Emissions. Prohibits visible emissions from exceeding a determined visual threshold from being emitted, this rule applies to the discharge of any air contaminant other than uncombined water vapor.4 3 SDAPCD. 2005. Measures to Reduce Particulate Matter in San Diego County. Website: https://www. sdapcd.org/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Air%20Quality%20Planning/PM-Measures.pdf (accessed February 2023). 4 SDAPCD. 1997. Rule 50: Visible Emissions. Website: www.sdapcd.org/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/ Rules_and_Regulations/Prohibitions/APCD_R50.pdf (accessed February 2023). 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 8 2. SDAPCD Regulation IV: Prohibitions; Rule 51: Nuisance. Prohibits the discharge, from any source, of such quantities of air contaminants or other materials that cause or have a tendency to cause injury, detriment, nuisance, annoyance to people and/or the public, or damage to any business or property.5 3. SDAPCD Regulation IV: Prohibitions; Rule 55: Fugitive Dust. Regulates fugitive dust emissions from any commercial construction or demolition activity capable of generating fugitive dust emissions, including active operations, open storage piles, and inactive disturbed areas, as well as track-out and carry-out onto paved roads beyond a project site.6 4. SDAPCD Regulation IV: Prohibitions; Rule 67.0.1: Architectural Coatings. Requires manufacturers, distributors, and end users of architectural and industrial maintenance coatings to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the use of these coatings, primarily by placing limits on the VOC content of various coating categories.7 San Diego Association of Governments. The SANDAG adopted the San Diego Forward: The 2021 Federal Regional Transportation Plan (2021 Regional Plan), which serves as the long-term blueprint for the San Diego region that seeks to meet regulatory requirements, address traffic congestion, and create equal access to jobs, education, healthcare, and other community resources. The 2021 Regional Plan considers climate action planning, climate adaptation, curb management, electric vehicles, fix it first, housing, land use and regional growth, parking management, pricing, transportation demand management, transportation system management and operations, and vision zero.8 Local Regulations City of Carlsbad General Plan. The City of Carlsbad General Plan addresses air quality in its Open Space, Conservation, and Recreation Element which contains goals and policies that work to protect air quality within the City and support efforts for enhanced regional air quality. The following policies related to air quality are presented in the Open Space, Conservation, and Recreation Element9 and are applicable to the proposed project: 5 SDAPCD. 1976. Rule 51: Nuisance. Website: www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/apcd/ PDF/Rules_and_Regulations/Prohibitions/APCD_R50-1-51.pdf (accessed February 2023). 6 SDAPCD. 2009. Rule 55: Fugitive Dust Control. Website: www.sdapcd.org/content/dam/sdc/apcd/ PDF/Rules_and_Regulations/Prohibitions/APCD_R55.pdf (accessed February 2023). 7 SDAPCD. 2021. Rule 67: Fugitive Dust Control. Website: www.sdapcd.org/content/dam/sdc/apcd/PDF/Rules_and_Regulations/Prohibitions/APCD_R67-0-1-2021.pdf (accessed February 2023). 8 San Diego Association of Governments. 2021. 2021 San Diego Regional Plan. Website: sdforward.com/ (accessed February 2023). 9 City of Carlsbad. 2015. Carlsbad General Plan. Open Space, Conservation, and Recreation Element. September 22. Website: https://www.carlsbadca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/3424/ 637434861099030000 (accessed February 2023). 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 9 • Policy 4-P.56 Ensure that construction and grading projects minimize short-term impacts to air quality. ○ Require grading projects to provide a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) in compliance with City requirements, which include standards for best management practices that control pollutants from dust generated by construction activities and those related to vehicle and equipment cleaning, fueling, and maintenance. ○ Require grading projects to undertake measures to minimize mono-nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions from vehicle and equipment operations. ○ Monitor all construction to ensure that proper steps are implemented. METHODOLOGY Construction Emissions Construction activities can generate a substantial amount of air pollution. Construction activities are considered temporary; however, short-term impacts can contribute to exceedances of air quality standards. Construction activities include demolition, site preparation, earthmoving, and general construction. The emissions generated from these common construction activities include: fugitive dust from soil disturbance; fuel combustion from mobile heavy-duty; diesel- and gasoline-powered equipment; portable auxiliary equipment; and worker commute trips. The California Emissions Estimator Model version 2022.1 (CalEEMod) computer program was used to calculate emissions from on-site construction equipment and emissions from worker and vehicle trips to the site. As described above, the project would demolish approximately 811 sq ft of the existing park attractions to construct the “Project Mars” new theme park attraction, which was included in CalEEMod. This analysis assumes that construction would begin in January 2024 and end in March 2025, which was also included in CalEEMod. Based on the preliminary grading plans, the project would require a net total of approximately 3,240 cubic yards of soil export, which was included in CalEEMod. Demolition, grading, and building activities would involve the use of standard earthmoving equipment such as large excavators, cranes, and other related equipment. All other construction details are not yet known; therefore, default assumptions (e.g., construction duration, construction worker and truck trips and fleet activities) from CalEEMod were used. This analysis also assumes the use of Tier 2 construction equipment as allowed for under the CARB in-use off-road diesel fueled fleets regulation. Operational Emissions This air quality analysis includes estimating emissions associated with long-term operation of the project. Indirect emissions of criteria pollutants with regional impacts would be emitted by project- generated vehicle trips. In addition, localized air quality impacts (i.e., higher carbon monoxide concentrations or “hot-spots”) near intersections or roadway segments in the project vicinity would also potentially occur due to project-generated vehicle trips. 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 10 Consistent with SDAPCD guidance for estimating emissions associated with land use development projects, the CalEEMod computer program was used to calculate the long-term operational emissions associated with the project. As discussed previously in the Project Description section, the proposed project would construct an inside roller coaster and associated ancillary uses. CalEEMod does not have specific land use codes for amusement parks. As such, the analysis was conducted using the land use codes General Light Industry and Parking Lot to generally reflect the proposed project. The proposed project would replace the existing attractions with a new attraction; therefore, the proposed project would not generate new vehicle trips, which was assumed in CalEEMod. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The State CEQA Guidelines indicate that a project would normally have a significant adverse air quality impact if project-generated pollutant emissions would do any of the following: • Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project is nonattainment under applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards; • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people. Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines indicates that, where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to determine whether a project would have a significant impact on air quality. Regional Emissions Thresholds The SDAPCD does not provide quantitative thresholds for determining the significance of construction or mobile source-related impacts. However, the district does specify Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA) trigger levels for new or modified stationary sources (SDAPCD Rules 20.2 and 20.3). If these incremental levels for stationary sources are exceeded, an AQIA must be performed for the proposed new or modified source. Although these trigger levels do not generally apply to mobile sources or general land development projects, for comparative purposes, these levels may be used to evaluate the increased emissions which would be discharged to the SDAB from proposed land development projects. For CEQA purposes, the screening criteria can be used as numeric methods to demonstrate that the project’s total emissions (e.g., stationary and fugitive emissions, as well as emissions from mobile sources) would not result in a significant impact to air quality. The hourly and yearly screening-level thresholds are most appropriately used in situations when temporary emissions like emergency generators or other stationary sources are proposed as a part of a project. The daily screening-level thresholds are most appropriately used for the standard construction and operational emissions. As 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 11 such, this analysis will compare the proposed project’s emissions to the daily screening-level thresholds in Table C below. Table C: SDAPCD Air Quality Significance Thresholds Air Pollutant Construction Phase (lbs/day) Operational Phase (lbs/hour) (lbs/day) (tons/year) VOC 75 — 75 13.7 CO 550 100 550 100 NOx 250 25 250 40 SOx 250 25 250 40 PM10 100 — 100 15 PM2.5 55 — 55 10 Source: Regulation II: Permits; Rule 20.2: New Source Review—Non-Major Sources (San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, January 2016). CO = carbon monoxide lbs = pounds NOx = nitrogen oxides PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size SDAPCD = San Diego County Air Pollution Control District SOX = sulfur oxides VOC = volatile organic compound Local Microscale Concentration Standards The significance of localized project impacts under CEQA depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the project are above or below State and federal CO standards. Because ambient CO levels are below the standards throughout the SDAB, a project would be considered to have a significant CO impact if project emissions result in an exceedance of one or more of the 1-hour or 8-hour standards. The following are applicable local emission concentration standards for CO: • California State 1-hour CO standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) • California State 8-hour CO standard of 9 ppm IMPACT ANALYSIS This section identifies potential air quality impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project. Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plans The SDAPCD is responsible for developing and implementing the clean air plans for attainment and maintenance of the AAQS in the SDAPCD specifically, the SIP and RAQS. The federal O3 maintenance plan, which is part of the SIP, was adopted in 2012. The most recent O3 attainment plan was adopted in 2020. The SIP includes a demonstration that current strategies and tactics will maintain acceptable air quality in the SDAB based on the NAAQS. The RAQS was initially adopted in 1991 and is updated on a triennial basis (most recently in 2022). The RAQS outlines SDAPCD plans and control measures designed to attain the State’s air quality standards for O3. The SIP and RAQS rely on information from CARB and SANDAG, including mobile and area source emissions, as well as information regarding projected growth in the County as a whole and the cities in the County, to project future emissions and determine the strategies necessary for the reduction of emissions through regulatory controls. CARB mobile source emission projections and SANDAG growth 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 12 projections are based on population, vehicle trends, and land use plans developed by the County and the cities in the County as part of the development of their general plans. As discussed above, projects that propose development that is consistent with the growth anticipated by the General Plans would be consistent with the RAQS. In the event that a project would propose development that is less dense than anticipated by the General Plan, the project would likewise be consistent with the RAQS. If a project proposes development that is greater than that anticipated by the General Plan and SANDAG growth projections, the project might be in conflict with the RAQS and SIP, and might have a potentially significant impact on air quality. The proposed project would replace the two existing attractions with a new indoor rollercoaster. As such, the proposed project would not result in development in excess of that anticipated in the General Plan or increases in population/housing growth beyond those contemplated by SANDAG. As such, the proposed project would not increase the population, vehicle trips, or vehicle miles traveled beyond that anticipated in the RAQS and SIP. Because the proposed project activities and associated vehicle trips are anticipated in local air quality plans, the proposed project would be consistent at a regional level with the underlying growth forecasts in the RAQS and SIP. Criteria Pollutant Analysis The SDAB is currently designated nonattainment for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 standards. The SDAB nonattainment status is attributed to the region’s development history. Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of an ambient air quality standard. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project’s impact on air quality would be considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, SDAPCD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. If a project exceeds the identified significance thresholds, its emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, additional analysis to assess cumulative impacts is not necessary. The following analysis assesses the potential project-level air quality impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed project. Construction Emissions. During construction, short-term degradation of air quality may occur due to the release of particulate matter emissions (i.e., fugitive dust) generated by demolition, grading, building construction, paving, and other activities. Emissions from construction equipment are also anticipated and would include CO, NOx, VOC, directly emitted PM2.5 or PM10, and toxic air contaminants such as diesel exhaust particulate matter. Project construction activities would include demolition, grading, site preparation, building construction, architectural coating, and paving activities. Construction-related effects on air quality from the proposed project would be greatest during the site preparation phase due to the 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 13 disturbance of soils. If not properly controlled, these activities would temporarily generate particulate emissions. Sources of fugitive dust would include disturbed soils at the construction site. Unless properly controlled, vehicles leaving the site would deposit dirt and mud on local streets, which could be an additional source of airborne dust after it dries. PM10 emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the nature and magnitude of construction activity and local weather conditions. PM10 emissions would depend on soil moisture, silt content of soil, wind speed, and amount of operating equipment. Larger dust particles would settle near the source, whereas fine particles would be dispersed over greater distances from the construction site. Water or other soil stabilizers can be used to control dust, resulting in emission reductions of 50 percent or more. The SDAPCD has established Rule 55, Fugitive Dust Control, which would require the applicant to implement measures that would reduce the amount of particulate matter generated during the construction period.10 In addition to dust-related PM10 emissions, heavy trucks and construction equipment powered by gasoline and diesel engines would generate CO, sulfur oxides (SOx), NOx, VOC, and some soot particulate (PM2.5 and PM10) in exhaust emissions. If construction activities were to increase traffic congestion in the area, CO and other emissions from traffic would increase slightly while those vehicles idle in traffic. These emissions would be temporary in nature and limited to the immediate area surrounding the construction site. Construction emissions were estimated for the project using CalEEMod and summarized in Table D. Attachment B provides CalEEMod output sheets. Table D: Project Construction Emissions Project Construction Maximum Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Maximum (lbs/day) 2.0 23.0 16.1 <0.1 4.2 2.1 SDAPCD Thresholds 75.0 250.0 550.0 250.0 100.0 55.0 Exceeds? No No No No No No Source: Compiled by LSA (July 2023). CO = carbon monoxide lbs/day = pounds per day NOX = nitrogen oxides PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size SDAPCD = San Diego County Air Pollution Control District SOX = sulfur oxides VOC = volatile organic compounds The results shown in Table D indicate the proposed project would not exceed the significance criteria for daily VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS. 10 SDAPCD. 2009. op. cit. 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 14 Operational Air Quality Impacts. Long-term air pollutant emissions associated typically include emissions from area, energy, and mobile sources. PM10 emissions result from running exhaust, tire and brake wear, and the entrainment of dust into the atmosphere from vehicles traveling on paved roadways. Entrainment of PM10 occurs when vehicle tires pulverize small rocks and pavement and the vehicle wakes generate airborne dust. The contribution of tire and brake wear is small compared to the other particulate matter emission processes. Gasoline-powered engines have small rates of particulate matter emissions compared with diesel-powered vehicles. As discussed above, the proposed project would not generate any net new vehicle trips; therefore, the proposed project would not result in mobile source emissions. Energy-source emissions result from activities in buildings that use natural gas. The quantity of emissions is the product of usage intensity (i.e., the amount of natural gas) and the emission factor of the fuel source. The emission factor is determined by the fuel source, with cleaner energy sources, like renewable energy, producing fewer emissions than conventional sources. As mentioned above, the proposed project would be all-electric and would not utilize natural gas for operation of the proposed project. Typically, area source emissions consist of direct sources of air emissions located at the project site, including architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment. Area source emissions associated with the project would include emissions from the use of architectural coatings, consumer products, and landscaping equipment. This analysis assumes that the proposed project would not include any fire pumps or backup diesel generators. Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project were calculated using CalEEMod. Table E provides the proposed project’s estimated operational emissions. Attachment B provides CalEEMod output sheets. The results shown in Table E indicate the proposed project would not exceed the significance criteria for daily VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS. Table E: Project Operational Emissions Emission Type Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Mobile Sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Area Sources 1.0 <0.1 1.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Energy Sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Project Emissions 1.0 <0.1 1.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 SDAPCD Threshold 55.0 55.0 550.0 150.0 150.0 55.0 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Source: Compiled by LSA (July 2023) Note: Some values may not appear to add correctly due to rounding. CO = carbon monoxide lbs/day = pounds per day NOx = nitrogen oxides PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size SDAPCD = San Diego County Air Pollution Control District SOX = sulfur oxides VOC = volatile organic compounds 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 15 Long-Term Microscale (CO Hot Spot) Analysis. Vehicular trips associated with the proposed project would contribute to congestion at intersections and along roadway segments in the vicinity of the proposed project site. Localized air quality impacts would occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase as a result of the proposed project. The primary mobile-source pollutant of local concern is CO, a direct function of vehicle idling time and, thus, of traffic flow conditions. CO transport is extremely limited; under normal meteorological conditions, it disperses rapidly with distance from the source. However, under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels, affecting local sensitive receptors (e.g., residents, schoolchildren, the elderly, and hospital patients). Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with roadways or intersections operating at unacceptable levels of service or with extremely high traffic volumes. In areas with high ambient background CO concentrations, modeling is recommended to determine a project’s effect on local CO levels. An assessment of project-related impacts on localized ambient air quality requires that future ambient air quality levels be projected. Existing CO concentrations in the immediate project vicinity are not available. Ambient CO levels monitored at the El Cajon Monitoring Station located at 533 First Street (the closest station to the project site), showed a highest recorded 1-hour concentration of 1.5 ppm (the State standard is 20 ppm) and a highest 8-hour concentration of 1.4 ppm (the State standard is 9 ppm) from 2020 to 2022. The highest CO concentrations would normally occur during peak traffic hours; hence, CO impacts calculated under peak traffic conditions represent a worst- case analysis. Reduced speeds and vehicular congestion at intersections result in increased CO emissions. The proposed project is not expected to generate any net new vehicle trips during operation. Therefore, CO concentrations are not expected to significantly increase as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, given the extremely low level of CO concentrations in the project area and the lack of traffic impacts at any intersections, project-related vehicles are not expected to result in CO concentrations exceeding the State or federal CO standards. No CO hot spots would occur, and the project would not result in any project-related impacts on CO concentrations. Health Risk on Nearby Sensitive Receptors Sensitive receptors are defined as people that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include schools, parks and playgrounds, daycare centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential dwelling units. The project site is surrounded by a business park to the west across Legoland Drive and the existing theme park immediately to the north, east, and south. The closest sensitive receptor to the project site includes single-family residential uses located approximately 2,900 feet to the south. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would generate airborne particulates and fugitive dust, as well as a small quantity of pollutants associated with the use of construction equipment (e.g., diesel-fueled vehicles and equipment) on a short-term basis. However, construc- tion contractors would be required to implement measures to reduce or eliminate emissions by following SDAPCD Rule 55, Fugitive Dust Control, which would require the applicant to implement 8/1/23 (P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx) 16 measures that would reduce the amount of particulate matter generated during the construction period. In addition, project construction emissions would be well below SDAPCD significance thresholds. Once the project is constructed, the project would not be a source of substantial pollutant emissions. Therefore, sensitive receptors are not expected to be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during project construction and operation. Odors SDAPCD Rules 50, 51, and 55 require the project applicant to include implementation of standard control measures for fugitive dust and diesel equipment emissions. Additionally, operators of off- road vehicles (i.e., self-propelled diesel-fueled vehicles 25 horsepower and up that were not designed to be driven on road) are required to limit vehicle idling to five minutes or less; register and label vehicles in accordance with the CARB Diesel Off-Road Online Reporting System; restrict the inclusion of older vehicles into fleets; and retire, replace, or repower older engines or install Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategies (e.g., exhaust retrofits). Additionally, SDAPCD Rule 55 regarding nuisances states: “A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to business or property.” During project construction, some odors may be present due to diesel exhaust. However, these odors would be temporary and limited to the construction period. In addition, the proposed project would be required to comply with SDAPCD nuisance and odor rules. The proposed project would not include any activities or operations that would generate objectionable odors and once operational, the project would not be a source of odors. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis presented above, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed SDAPCD thresholds and mitigation measures are not required. Compliance with SDAPCD Rule 55: Fugitive Dust Control would further reduce construction dust impacts. The project would also be consistent with the applicable air quality plans. The proposed project is not expected to produce significant emissions that would affect nearby sensitive receptors. The project would also not result in objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Therefore, the proposed project’s emissions would be less than significant. Attachments: A: Figures: Figure 1: Project Location Figure 2: Site Plan B: CalEEMod Output Files A I R Q U A L I T Y Impact Analysis MEMORAN DUM A U G U S T 2 023 LEGOLAND CALIFORNIA PROJECT 2025 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx (08/01/23) ATTACHMENT A FIGURES S21 S21 5 Kelly Dr Hillsid e Dr A d a m s St N e blinaDr FrostAve SunnyhillDr Pas e o d el N orte Paseo d e l N orte Camino de las Ondas Daisy Ave E l A r b o l D r A r m a d a Dr A v e n i d a E n c i n a s F l e e t S t Legol a n d D r Faraday Av e Black Rail Rd Poinsettia Ln AstonAv e Tamar a c k A v e C a n n o n R d P o i n s e t t i a L n C o l l e g e B l v d Cannon Rd A v i a ra P k w y C olleg e Blv d AviaraPkw y P a l o m a r A i r p o r t Rd San D i e g o F w y S a n D i e g o F w y CourseCarlsbad Golf Crossings at CourseCarlsbad Golf Rancho ResortCaliforniaLegoland Cannon Park Poinsettia Park State Beach South Carlsbad Farr SOURCE: ESRI StreetMap, 2023 I:\20231502\G\Location.ai (7/14/2023) FIGURE 1 LEGOLAND California Project 2025 CA 78 Encinitas Oceanside Carlsbad Vista 5 Project Vicinity 0 1000 2000 FEET Project Location Project Location 727$/6,7($5($6) SOURCE: HHCP FEET 80400 FIGURE 2 I:\20231502\G\Site_Plan.ai (7/14/2023) LEGOLAND California Project 2025 Site Plan A I R Q U A L I T Y Impact Analysis MEMORAN DUM A U G U S T 2 023 LEGOLAND CALIFORNIA PROJECT 2025 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA P:\20231502-Legoland Mars Attraction\Product\AQ\Legoland California 2025 Project - AQ memo.docx (08/01/23) ATTACHMENT B CALEEMOD OUTPUT FILES Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 1 / 76 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated 3.2. Demolition (2024) - Mitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 2 / 76 3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated 3.4. Site Preparation (2024) - Mitigated 3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 3.6. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated 3.8. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated 3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated 3.10. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated 3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated 3.12. Paving (2025) - Mitigated 3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated 3.14. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated 3.15. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated 3.16. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 3 / 76 4.1.2. Mitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated 4.3.1. Mitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.4.1. Mitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.5.1. Mitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 4 / 76 4.6.2. Mitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.7.2. Mitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.8.2. Mitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.9.2. Mitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 5 / 76 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule 5.2. Off-Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated 5.2.2. Mitigated 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated 5.3.2. Mitigated 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies 5.5. Architectural Coatings 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies 5.7. Construction Paving 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 6 / 76 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.9.2. Mitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.11.2. Mitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.12.2. Mitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 7 / 76 5.13.2. Mitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.14.2. Mitigated 5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.15.2. Mitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 8 / 76 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 8. User Changes to Default Data Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 9 / 76 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Data Field Value Project Name Legoland California 2025 Project Construction Start Date 1/1/2024 Operational Year 2025 Lead Agency — Land Use Scale Project/site Analysis Level for Defaults County Windspeed (m/s)2.20 Precipitation (days)21.2 Location 33.128136049208564, -117.31223492023814 County San Diego City Carlsbad Air District San Diego County APCD Air Basin San Diego TAZ 6299 EDFZ 12 Electric Utility San Diego Gas & Electric Gas Utility San Diego Gas & Electric App Version 2022.1.1.14 1.2. Land Use Types Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft)Landscape Area (sq ft) Special Landscape Area (sq ft) Population Description Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 10 / 76 General Light Industry 33.7 1000sqft 2.00 33,702 20,721 0.00 —— Parking Lot 86.0 Space 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 —— 1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector #Measure Title Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction Water W-1 Use Reclaimed Non-Potable Water Water W-5 Design Water-Efficient Landscapes Area Sources AS-2 Use Low-VOC Paints 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Unmit.0.71 1.97 17.9 14.7 0.03 0.72 0.18 0.90 0.66 0.04 0.71 —2,640 2,640 0.11 0.04 1.02 2,657 Mit.0.71 1.95 17.9 14.7 0.03 0.72 0.18 0.90 0.66 0.04 0.71 —2,640 2,640 0.11 0.04 1.02 2,657 % Reduced —1%———————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Unmit.0.83 1.97 23.0 16.1 0.04 0.72 3.60 4.21 0.66 1.56 2.12 —5,517 5,517 0.27 0.50 0.18 5,672 Mit.0.83 1.95 23.0 16.1 0.04 0.72 3.60 4.21 0.66 1.56 2.12 —5,517 5,517 0.27 0.50 0.18 5,672 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 11 / 76 ————————————————1%—% Reduced Average Daily (Max) —————————————————— Unmit.0.48 0.73 12.6 10.1 0.02 0.48 0.22 0.70 0.44 0.07 0.51 —1,904 1,904 0.08 0.04 0.35 1,919 Mit.0.48 0.73 12.6 10.1 0.02 0.48 0.22 0.70 0.44 0.07 0.51 —1,904 1,904 0.08 0.04 0.35 1,919 % Reduced —1%———————————————— Annual (Max) —————————————————— Unmit.0.09 0.13 2.31 1.84 < 0.005 0.09 0.04 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.09 —315 315 0.01 0.01 0.06 318 Mit.0.09 0.13 2.31 1.84 < 0.005 0.09 0.04 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.09 —315 315 0.01 0.01 0.06 318 % Reduced —1%———————————————— 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily - Summer (Max) —————————————————— 2024 0.71 1.97 17.9 14.7 0.03 0.72 0.18 0.90 0.66 0.04 0.71 —2,640 2,640 0.11 0.04 1.02 2,657 Daily - Winter (Max) —————————————————— 2024 0.83 1.97 23.0 16.1 0.04 0.72 3.60 4.21 0.66 1.56 2.12 —5,517 5,517 0.27 0.50 0.18 5,672 2025 0.70 1.97 17.9 14.5 0.03 0.72 0.18 0.90 0.66 0.04 0.71 —2,625 2,625 0.11 0.04 0.03 2,641 Average Daily —————————————————— 2024 0.48 0.73 12.6 10.1 0.02 0.48 0.22 0.70 0.44 0.07 0.51 —1,904 1,904 0.08 0.04 0.35 1,919 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 12 / 76 2025 0.07 0.24 1.68 1.39 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 0.09 0.06 < 0.005 0.07 —243 243 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 244 Annual —————————————————— 2024 0.09 0.13 2.31 1.84 < 0.005 0.09 0.04 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.09 —315 315 0.01 0.01 0.06 318 2025 0.01 0.04 0.31 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 —40.2 40.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 40.4 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily - Summer (Max) —————————————————— 2024 0.71 1.95 17.9 14.7 0.03 0.72 0.18 0.90 0.66 0.04 0.71 —2,640 2,640 0.11 0.04 1.02 2,657 Daily - Winter (Max) —————————————————— 2024 0.83 1.95 23.0 16.1 0.04 0.72 3.60 4.21 0.66 1.56 2.12 —5,517 5,517 0.27 0.50 0.18 5,672 2025 0.70 1.95 17.9 14.5 0.03 0.72 0.18 0.90 0.66 0.04 0.71 —2,625 2,625 0.11 0.04 0.03 2,641 Average Daily —————————————————— 2024 0.48 0.73 12.6 10.1 0.02 0.48 0.22 0.70 0.44 0.07 0.51 —1,904 1,904 0.08 0.04 0.35 1,919 2025 0.07 0.24 1.68 1.39 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 0.09 0.06 < 0.005 0.07 —243 243 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 244 Annual —————————————————— 2024 0.09 0.13 2.31 1.84 < 0.005 0.09 0.04 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.09 —315 315 0.01 0.01 0.06 318 2025 0.01 0.04 0.31 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 —40.2 40.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 40.4 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit.TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 13 / 76 ——————————————————Daily, Summer (Max) Unmit.0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 606 643 3.82 0.04 8.77 759 Mit.0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 603 640 3.82 0.04 8.77 757 % Reduced ————————————< 0.5%< 0.5%———< 0.5% Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Unmit.0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.5 600 637 3.82 0.04 8.77 753 Mit.0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.5 597 634 3.82 0.04 8.77 751 % Reduced ————————————< 0.5%< 0.5%———< 0.5% Average Daily (Max) —————————————————— Unmit.0.13 0.89 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 603 640 3.82 0.04 8.77 756 Mit.0.13 0.88 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 600 637 3.82 0.04 8.77 754 % Reduced ————————————< 0.5%< 0.5%———< 0.5% Annual (Max) —————————————————— Unmit.0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 6.20 99.8 106 0.63 0.01 1.45 125 Mit.0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 6.20 99.3 106 0.63 0.01 1.45 125 % Reduced —< 0.5%——————————< 0.5%< 0.5%< 0.5%< 0.5%—< 0.5% 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 14 / 76 Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —6.03 6.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 —6.05 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Water ———————————14.9 88.3 103 1.54 0.04 —153 Waste ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Refrig.————————————————8.77 8.77 Total 0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 606 643 3.82 0.04 8.77 759 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area —0.77 ———————————————— Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Water ———————————14.9 88.3 103 1.54 0.04 —153 Waste ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Refrig.————————————————8.77 8.77 Total 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.5 600 637 3.82 0.04 8.77 753 Average Daily —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.13 0.89 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —2.97 2.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.98 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Water ———————————14.9 88.3 103 1.54 0.04 —153 Waste ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Refrig.————————————————8.77 8.77 Total 0.13 0.89 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 603 640 3.82 0.04 8.77 756 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 15 / 76 Annual —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.49 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —84.7 84.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —85.0 Water ———————————2.47 14.6 17.1 0.25 0.01 —25.3 Waste ———————————3.73 0.00 3.73 0.37 0.00 —13.0 Refrig.————————————————1.45 1.45 Total 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 6.20 99.8 106 0.63 0.01 1.45 125 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —6.03 6.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 —6.05 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Water ———————————14.9 85.5 100 1.54 0.04 —150 Waste ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Refrig.————————————————8.77 8.77 Total 0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 603 640 3.82 0.04 8.77 757 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area —0.77 ———————————————— Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Water ———————————14.9 85.5 100 1.54 0.04 —150 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 16 / 76 Waste ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Refrig.————————————————8.77 8.77 Total 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.5 597 634 3.82 0.04 8.77 751 Average Daily —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.13 0.88 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —2.97 2.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.98 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Water ———————————14.9 85.5 100 1.54 0.04 —150 Waste ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Refrig.————————————————8.77 8.77 Total 0.13 0.88 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 37.5 600 637 3.82 0.04 8.77 754 Annual —————————————————— Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.49 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —84.7 84.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —85.0 Water ———————————2.47 14.2 16.6 0.25 0.01 —24.8 Waste ———————————3.73 0.00 3.73 0.37 0.00 —13.0 Refrig.————————————————1.45 1.45 Total 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 6.20 99.3 106 0.63 0.01 1.45 125 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 17 / 76 Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.61 0.61 19.6 14.6 0.02 0.66 —0.66 0.61 —0.61 —2,494 2,494 0.10 0.02 —2,502 Demolitio n ——————0.05 0.05 —0.01 0.01 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.81 0.60 < 0.005 0.03 —0.03 0.03 —0.03 —102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 —103 Demolitio n ——————< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —17.0 17.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —17.0 Demolitio n ——————< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 18 / 76 Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 —114 114 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 116 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —48.9 48.9 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 51.3 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —4.73 4.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.01 2.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.11 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.78 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.33 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.35 3.2. Demolition (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.61 0.61 19.6 14.6 0.02 0.66 —0.66 0.61 —0.61 —2,494 2,494 0.10 0.02 —2,502 Demolitio n ——————0.05 0.05 —0.01 0.01 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 19 / 76 ——————————————————Average Daily Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.81 0.60 < 0.005 0.03 —0.03 0.03 —0.03 —102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 —103 Demolitio n ——————< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —17.0 17.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —17.0 Demolitio n ——————< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 —114 114 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 116 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —48.9 48.9 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 51.3 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —4.73 4.73 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.80 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.01 2.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.11 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.78 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.80 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 20 / 76 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.33 0.33 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.35 3.3. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.56 0.56 20.3 15.0 0.03 0.55 —0.55 0.50 —0.50 —2,716 2,716 0.11 0.02 —2,725 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.62 0.62 —0.07 0.07 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.56 0.41 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —74.4 74.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —74.7 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.02 0.02 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 21 / 76 12.4—< 0.005< 0.00512.312.3—< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.0050.080.10< 0.005< 0.005Off-Road Equipment Dust From Material Movement ——————< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 —68.5 68.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 69.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.89 1.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.92 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.31 0.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.4. Site Preparation (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 22 / 76 Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.56 0.56 20.3 15.0 0.03 0.55 —0.55 0.50 —0.50 —2,716 2,716 0.11 0.02 —2,725 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.62 0.62 —0.07 0.07 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.56 0.41 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —74.4 74.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —74.7 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.02 0.02 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 —12.4 Dust From Material Movement ——————< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 23 / 76 Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 —68.5 68.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 69.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.89 1.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.92 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.31 0.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.32 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.5. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.56 0.56 18.8 14.2 0.02 0.55 —0.55 0.51 —0.51 —2,454 2,454 0.10 0.02 —2,462 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 24 / 76 Dust From Material Movement ——————2.77 2.77 —1.34 1.34 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.39 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —67.2 67.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 —67.5 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.08 0.08 —0.04 0.04 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —11.2 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.01 0.01 —0.01 0.01 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 —91.3 91.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 92.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.22 0.06 4.14 1.44 0.02 0.05 0.75 0.80 0.05 0.21 0.26 —2,972 2,972 0.16 0.48 0.17 3,118 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 25 / 76 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.53 2.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.56 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —81.4 81.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 85.5 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.42 0.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —13.5 13.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 14.2 3.6. Grading (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.56 0.56 18.8 14.2 0.02 0.55 —0.55 0.51 —0.51 —2,454 2,454 0.10 0.02 —2,462 Dust From Material Movement ——————2.77 2.77 —1.34 1.34 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.02 0.52 0.39 < 0.005 0.02 —0.02 0.01 —0.01 —67.2 67.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 —67.5 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 26 / 76 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.08 0.08 —0.04 0.04 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —11.1 11.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —11.2 Dust From Material Movement ——————0.01 0.01 —0.01 0.01 ——————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 —91.3 91.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 92.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.22 0.06 4.14 1.44 0.02 0.05 0.75 0.80 0.05 0.21 0.26 —2,972 2,972 0.16 0.48 0.17 3,118 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —2.53 2.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.56 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —81.4 81.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 85.5 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.42 0.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.42 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 27 / 76 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —13.5 13.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 14.2 3.7. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.57 0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 —0.65 0.60 —0.60 —2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 —2,209 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.57 0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 —0.65 0.60 —0.60 —2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 —2,209 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.35 0.35 10.3 7.92 0.01 0.40 —0.40 0.37 —0.37 —1,365 1,365 0.06 0.01 —1,370 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.06 0.06 1.87 1.45 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.07 —0.07 —226 226 0.01 < 0.005 —227 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 28 / 76 Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 —137 137 0.01 < 0.005 0.55 139 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —141 141 0.01 0.02 0.36 147 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 —129 129 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 131 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —141 141 0.01 0.02 0.01 147 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 —80.9 80.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 82.1 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.12 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —87.3 87.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 91.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.6 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —14.5 14.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.8. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 29 / 76 2,209—0.020.092,2012,201—0.60—0.600.65—0.650.0212.816.50.570.57Off-Road Equipment Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.57 0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 —0.65 0.60 —0.60 —2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 —2,209 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.35 0.35 10.3 7.92 0.01 0.40 —0.40 0.37 —0.37 —1,365 1,365 0.06 0.01 —1,370 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.06 0.06 1.87 1.45 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.07 —0.07 —226 226 0.01 < 0.005 —227 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 —137 137 0.01 < 0.005 0.55 139 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —141 141 0.01 0.02 0.36 147 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 —129 129 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 131 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 30 / 76 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —141 141 0.01 0.02 0.01 147 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 —80.9 80.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 82.1 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.12 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —87.3 87.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 91.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.6 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —14.5 14.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 15.1 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.9. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.57 0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 —0.65 0.60 —0.60 —2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 —2,209 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.04 0.04 1.23 0.95 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.04 —0.04 —164 164 0.01 < 0.005 —164 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 31 / 76 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —27.2 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 —127 127 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 128 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —138 138 0.01 0.02 0.01 144 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —9.52 9.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 9.65 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —10.3 10.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.7 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.58 1.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.60 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.78 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.10. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 32 / 76 Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.57 0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 —0.65 0.60 —0.60 —2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 —2,209 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.04 0.04 1.23 0.95 < 0.005 0.05 —0.05 0.04 —0.04 —164 164 0.01 < 0.005 —164 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.22 0.17 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —27.2 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 —127 127 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 128 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 —138 138 0.01 0.02 0.01 144 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 33 / 76 ——————————————————Average Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —9.52 9.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 9.65 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —10.3 10.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.7 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.58 1.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.60 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 —1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.78 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.11. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.40 0.40 10.4 8.32 0.01 0.46 —0.46 0.43 —0.43 —1,244 1,244 0.05 0.01 —1,248 Paving —0.10 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —34.1 34.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —34.2 Paving —< 0.005 ———————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 34 / 76 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —5.64 5.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.66 Paving —< 0.005 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 —134 134 0.01 0.01 0.01 136 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.77 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.62 0.62 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.12. Paving (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 35 / 76 Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.40 0.40 10.4 8.32 0.01 0.46 —0.46 0.43 —0.43 —1,244 1,244 0.05 0.01 —1,248 Paving —0.10 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —34.1 34.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 —34.2 Paving —< 0.005 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —5.64 5.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.66 Paving —< 0.005 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 36 / 76 Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 —134 134 0.01 0.01 0.01 136 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.77 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.62 0.62 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.06 —0.06 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect ural Coatings —1.28 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 37 / 76 Off-Road Equipment 0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.06 —0.06 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect ural Coatings —1.28 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —28.0 28.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —28.1 Architect ural Coatings —0.27 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —4.63 4.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 —4.64 Architect ural Coatings —0.05 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —27.4 27.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 27.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 38 / 76 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —25.9 25.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 26.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.46 5.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.54 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.90 0.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.92 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.14. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.06 —0.06 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect ural Coatings —1.26 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 39 / 76 Off-Road Equipment 0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.06 —0.06 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect ural Coatings —1.26 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.20 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —28.0 28.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —28.1 Architect ural Coatings —0.26 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —4.63 4.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 —4.64 Architect ural Coatings —0.05 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —27.4 27.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 27.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 40 / 76 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —25.9 25.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 26.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —5.46 5.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.54 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.90 0.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.92 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.15. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.06 —0.06 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect ural Coatings —1.28 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 41 / 76 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —18.0 18.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —18.1 Architect ural Coatings —0.17 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —2.98 2.98 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.00 Architect ural Coatings —0.03 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.51 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 42 / 76 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.16. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.05 0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 —0.07 0.06 —0.06 —134 134 0.01 < 0.005 —134 Architect ural Coatings —1.26 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 —0.01 0.01 —0.01 —18.0 18.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 —18.1 Architect ural Coatings —0.17 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 43 / 76 3.00—< 0.005< 0.0052.982.98—< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.0050.020.03< 0.005< 0.005Off-Road Equipment Architect ural Coatings —0.03 ———————————————— Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite —————————————————— Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 —25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average Daily —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.46 3.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.51 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 44 / 76 4.1.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.1.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 45 / 76 Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 46 / 76 CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGLand Use Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————488 488 0.03 < 0.005 —490 Parking Lot ————————————23.4 23.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —23.5 Total ————————————511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————488 488 0.03 < 0.005 —490 Parking Lot ————————————23.4 23.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —23.5 Total ————————————511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————80.8 80.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 —81.1 Parking Lot ————————————3.87 3.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.89 Total ————————————84.7 84.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —85.0 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 47 / 76 ——————————————————Daily, Summer (Max) General Light Industry ————————————488 488 0.03 < 0.005 —490 Parking Lot ————————————23.4 23.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —23.5 Total ————————————511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————488 488 0.03 < 0.005 —490 Parking Lot ————————————23.4 23.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 —23.5 Total ————————————511 511 0.03 < 0.005 —513 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————80.8 80.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 —81.1 Parking Lot ————————————3.87 3.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 —3.89 Total ————————————84.7 84.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 —85.0 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 48 / 76 General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 49 / 76 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 0.00 —0.00 —0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Consum er Products —0.72 ———————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 50 / 76 ————————————————0.04—Architect ural Coatings Landsca pe Equipme nt 0.26 0.24 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —6.03 6.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 —6.05 Total 0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —6.03 6.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 —6.05 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Consum er Products —0.72 ———————————————— Architect ural Coatings —0.04 ———————————————— Total —0.77 ———————————————— Annual —————————————————— Consum er Products —0.13 ———————————————— Architect ural Coatings —0.01 ———————————————— Landsca pe Equipme nt 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.49 Total 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.49 4.3.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 51 / 76 Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Consum er Products —0.72 ———————————————— Architect ural Coatings —0.04 ———————————————— Landsca pe Equipme nt 0.26 0.24 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —6.03 6.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 —6.05 Total 0.26 1.01 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —6.03 6.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 —6.05 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Consum er Products —0.72 ———————————————— Architect ural Coatings —0.04 ———————————————— Total —0.77 ———————————————— Annual —————————————————— Consum er Products —0.13 ———————————————— Architect ural Coatings —0.01 ———————————————— Landsca pe Equipme nt 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.49 Total 0.02 0.16 < 0.005 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 < 0.005 —< 0.005 —0.49 0.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 —0.49 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 52 / 76 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————14.9 88.3 103 1.54 0.04 —153 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————14.9 88.3 103 1.54 0.04 —153 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————14.9 88.3 103 1.54 0.04 —153 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————14.9 88.3 103 1.54 0.04 —153 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————2.47 14.6 17.1 0.25 0.01 —25.3 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————2.47 14.6 17.1 0.25 0.01 —25.3 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 53 / 76 4.4.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————14.9 85.5 100 1.54 0.04 —150 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————14.9 85.5 100 1.54 0.04 —150 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————14.9 85.5 100 1.54 0.04 —150 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————14.9 85.5 100 1.54 0.04 —150 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————2.47 14.2 16.6 0.25 0.01 —24.8 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————2.47 14.2 16.6 0.25 0.01 —24.8 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 54 / 76 4.5.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————3.73 0.00 3.73 0.37 0.00 —13.0 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————3.73 0.00 3.73 0.37 0.00 —13.0 4.5.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 55 / 76 Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————22.5 0.00 22.5 2.25 0.00 —78.8 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ———————————3.73 0.00 3.73 0.37 0.00 —13.0 Parking Lot ———————————0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 —0.00 Total ———————————3.73 0.00 3.73 0.37 0.00 —13.0 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 56 / 76 CO2eRN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGTOGLand Use Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————————8.77 8.77 Total ————————————————8.77 8.77 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————————8.77 8.77 Total ————————————————8.77 8.77 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————————1.45 1.45 Total ————————————————1.45 1.45 4.6.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————————8.77 8.77 Total ————————————————8.77 8.77 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 57 / 76 Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————————8.77 8.77 Total ————————————————8.77 8.77 Annual —————————————————— General Light Industry ————————————————1.45 1.45 Total ————————————————1.45 1.45 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.7.2. Mitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 58 / 76 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 59 / 76 4.8.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 60 / 76 Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.9.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme nt Type TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio n TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 61 / 76 ——————————————————Daily, Winter (Max) Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Avoided —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 62 / 76 Sequest —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Remove d —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— ——————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Avoided —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Sequest ered —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Remove d —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— ——————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Avoided —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Sequest ered —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Remove d —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— ——————————————————— 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 63 / 76 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio n TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Total —————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Total —————————————————— 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 64 / 76 Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily, Summer (Max) —————————————————— Avoided —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Sequest ered —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Remove d —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— ——————————————————— Daily, Winter (Max) —————————————————— Avoided —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Sequest ered —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Remove d —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— ——————————————————— Annual —————————————————— Avoided —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Sequest ered —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 65 / 76 Remove —————————————————— Subtotal —————————————————— ——————————————————— 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 1/1/2024 1/19/2024 5.00 15.0 — Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/22/2024 2/3/2024 5.00 10.0 — Grading Grading 2/5/2024 2/16/2024 5.00 10.0 — Building Construction Building Construction 2/19/2024 2/7/2025 5.00 255 — Paving Paving 2/10/2025 2/21/2025 5.00 10.0 — Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 9/16/2024 3/10/2025 5.00 126 — 5.2. Off-Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Site Preparation Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 423 0.48 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 66 / 76 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 10.0 0.56 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 5.2.2. Mitigated Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Site Preparation Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 423 0.48 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 67 / 76 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37 Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 10.0 0.56 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition ———— Demolition Worker 12.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Demolition Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Demolition Hauling 0.67 20.0 HHDT Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT Site Preparation ———— Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 68 / 76 Site Preparation Worker 7.50 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Site Preparation Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Site Preparation Onsite truck ——HHDT Grading ———— Grading Worker 10.0 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Grading Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Grading Hauling 40.5 20.0 HHDT Grading Onsite truck ——HHDT Building Construction ———— Building Construction Worker 14.2 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 5.52 7.63 HHDT,MHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck ——HHDT Paving ———— Paving Worker 15.0 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Paving Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck ——HHDT Architectural Coating ———— Architectural Coating Worker 2.83 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Architectural Coating Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck ——HHDT 5.3.2. Mitigated Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 69 / 76 Demolition ———— Demolition Worker 12.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Demolition Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Demolition Hauling 0.67 20.0 HHDT Demolition Onsite truck ——HHDT Site Preparation ———— Site Preparation Worker 7.50 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Site Preparation Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Site Preparation Onsite truck ——HHDT Grading ———— Grading Worker 10.0 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Grading Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Grading Hauling 40.5 20.0 HHDT Grading Onsite truck ——HHDT Building Construction ———— Building Construction Worker 14.2 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Building Construction Vendor 5.52 7.63 HHDT,MHDT Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Building Construction Onsite truck ——HHDT Paving ———— Paving Worker 15.0 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Paving Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Paving Onsite truck ——HHDT Architectural Coating ———— Architectural Coating Worker 2.83 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 70 / 76 Architectural Coating Vendor —7.63 HHDT,MHDT Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Architectural Coating Onsite truck ——HHDT 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water unpaved roads twice daily 55%55% Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44%44% Sweep paved roads once per month 9%9% 5.5. Architectural Coatings Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Parking Area Coated (sq ft) Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 50,553 16,851 993 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards)Material Exported (Cubic Yards)Acres Graded (acres)Material Demolished (Building Square Footage) Acres Paved (acres) Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 811 — Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 15.0 0.00 — Grading 0.00 3,240 10.0 0.00 — Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 71 / 76 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day)PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61%61% 5.7. Construction Paving Land Use Area Paved (acres)% Asphalt General Light Industry 0.00 0% Parking Lot 0.38 100% 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O 2024 0.00 589 0.03 < 0.005 2025 0.00 589 0.03 < 0.005 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year General Light Industry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.9.2. Mitigated Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 72 / 76 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00General Light Industry Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft)Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Parking Area Coated (sq ft) 0 0.00 50,553 16,851 993 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Season Unit Value Snow Days day/yr 0.00 Summer Days day/yr 180 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated Season Unit Value Snow Days day/yr 0.00 Summer Days day/yr 180 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 73 / 76 5.11.1. Unmitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) General Light Industry 302,422 589 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 14,500 589 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 5.11.2. Mitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr)CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) General Light Industry 302,422 589 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 14,500 589 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year) General Light Industry 7,793,588 309,658 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 5.12.2. Mitigated Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year)Outdoor Water (gal/year) General Light Industry 7,793,588 133,026 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 5.13. Operational Waste Generation Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 74 / 76 5.13.1. Unmitigated Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year) General Light Industry 41.8 — Parking Lot 0.00 — 5.13.2. Mitigated Land Use Waste (ton/year)Cogeneration (kWh/year) General Light Industry 41.8 — Parking Lot 0.00 — 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced General Light Industry Other commercial A/C and heat pumps R-410A 2,088 0.30 4.00 4.00 18.0 5.14.2. Mitigated Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg)Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced General Light Industry Other commercial A/C and heat pumps R-410A 2,088 0.30 4.00 4.00 18.0 5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 75 / 76 5.15.2. Mitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor 5.16.2. Process Boilers Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr)Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day)Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr) 5.17. User Defined Equipment Type Fuel Type —— 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres 5.18.1.2. Mitigated Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres Legoland California 2025 Project Custom Report, 7/28/2023 76 / 76 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres 5.18.1.2. Mitigated Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) 5.18.2.2. Mitigated Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year)Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) 8. User Changes to Default Data Screen Justification Land Use Project site is 2.38 acres and would consist of an indoor roller coaster Construction: Construction Phases Construction is expected to start in January 2024 and end in March 2025. Overlap of building construction and architectural coating. Construction: Off-Road Equipment Default construction equipment with Tier 2 engine Operations: Vehicle Data The proposed project would result in net zero trips Operations: Energy Use Proposed project would be all electric