The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAV 05-05; Conlin Fence Variance; Administrative Variance (AV)SilsP CITY OF CARLSBAD vSQ^r LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CH LJ Administrative Permit pC| Administrative Variance LJ Coastal Development Permit Li Conditional Use Permit LJ Condominium Permit LJ Environmental Impact Assessment LJ General Plan Amendment 1 1 Hillside Development Permit 1 | Local Coastal Program Amendment LJ Master Plan 1 1 Non-Residential Planned Development [ 1 Planned Development Permit ECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) AV 05-65 LJ Planned Industrial Permit 1 1 Planning Commission Determination LJ Precise Development Plan LJ Redevelopment Permit LJ Site Development Plan LJ Special Use Permit LJ Specific Plan C Tentative Parcel Map Obtain from Engineering Department LJ Tentative Tract Map 1 1 Variance D Zone Change List other applications not specified . .(FOR DEPARTMENT . .USE ONLY) - 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 3) PROJECT NAME: frfg t( C*Aruu /*&,e£ 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: /3nA/ifA/fofi. 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) vT- 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS &.&&O G-tuci* MAILING ADDRESS P& /3oXr CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE6,0 EMAIL ADDRESS:EMAIL ADDRESS: /W*.Ts*kn*tS ^ &»**.(. Co*, 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATIO IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLE 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECTO THEgST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. DATE DATE BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (^ NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE AJPPLieATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATIONi BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. ic t r»c c 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10)PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 25) 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE INADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING (NAME OF STREET) 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24) HABITAT IMPACTS IF YES, ASSIGN HMP # IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPEC^AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTR^FOR THISxPURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED m 2 9 2005 CITY OF CARLSBADRECEIVED RECEIVED BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED Form 14 Rev. 12/04 PAGE 2 OF 5 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Receipt Applicant: LONGMORE BRIAN Description Amount AV050005 570.00 Not valid unless validated by Cash Register PLEASE RETAIN RECEIPT FOR REFUNDS OR ADJUSTMENTS Receipt Number: R0051000 Transaction ID: R0051000 Transaction Date: 06/29/2005 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1310 570.00 Transaction Amount: 570.00 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: GCWC//V F£tdce APPLICANT NAME: tT#A/ig$ Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Project Description This project consists of a request for an administrative variance for an over height fence. The owner of the property has constructed a fence that is over height for the established restrictions. The owner of the property received a notice of code violation from code Enforcement Officer Gene Kellog for the violation for this over height fence. In response to that letter the owner has reduced the height of the fence along the Eastern frontage and the Southern frontage to 6' and is requesting an Administrative Variance for the fence along the Western and Northern property lines. The over height fence is a 6' Cedar plank fence with an open lattice top rail that varies from 18" to 24". The topography of the property is such that the fence is along the bottom of a low area along the property line thus making the fence seem shorter then it really is. Project Description 10/96 Page 1 of 1 ,"**"•• JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE >•<• By law a Variance may be approved only if certain facts are found to exist Please read these requirements carefully and explain how the proposed project meets each of these facts. Use additional sheets if necessary. 1. Explain what special circumstances are applicable to the subject properly, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, whereby the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification: The natural contours of the land are such that to build the allowable height fence would result in a fence height that does not protect the property and its occupants and neighbors. In order to maintain the property and the landscaping ttefeaee needs to be at the property line thus creating a fence at the bottom of a dej»essiontbM creates the illusion of a short fence. Therefore, there are special circumstances that apply to the land. 2. Explain why the granting of the variance does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located and is subject to any conditions necessary to assure compliance with this finding: If the fence were to be constructed as required by the existing code the resulting fence would be inadequate in height to perform the required task of the fence. By granting the variance there will no granting of special privileges as the subject property will then enjoy the same privileges as other properties mat do not have the unique topographical issues. The fence will conform to city ordinances where these conditions do not apply. 3. Explain why the granting of the variance does not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the subject property: The local zoning for this property allows fences and the granting of this variance will not authorize construction of a, non-allowed use. 4. Explain why the granting of the variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the General Plan and any applicable specific or Master Plans: The General Plan for this location allows the construction offences and mere will be no deviation from Master Plan or General Plan granted by the granting of mis variance »»»«»*»»«•«•»»«»*»»»»«»«*«» + »»«*««»»««» T3~™-a K^c^jna/fu Page 4 of 4 City of Carlsbad—•. j ~ • —~_~~»_~1HIWW1ll_l_____ll_p_IH______^|__Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If aipflbliclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A^eparate P3f£>may be attached if necessary.) Person Title Corp/Part_ Title Address 9&&O Q-fo-tct*Address 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e. partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, apd, addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person. Title / Corp/Part. Title/ Address AfrOO Address 1635 Ffr'aday Avenue . CA 9i2K»73l4 » ^760) €02-4600 * FAX (7150) 602-6S&9 • vwaw.g <sswtsbad.ca.us 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? I I Yes [Vj No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that^l the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature ofownepfeppTIcant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 Of 2 n 216-18 l"= 100'/ CHANGES BLK OLD 4A/t>,n,/g, *a. 11 NEW 46>f0fi AC e*n YR 7& 72 CUT 4>X515 5fc30 \ XMAP 6117 - LA COSTA-SOUTH V"' NJNIT NO.1 - LOTS 64-106•*x. SAN DIEGO COUNTY 09 MATCHLINE "A" SAM DIEGO COUNTY iSSESSOR'S MAP 3K 216 PG !3 1 e CONDO : DOC 77-29555 GOLF VIEW CONDM 2 * CONDO : DOC 74-"'2529 SEVILLA WAY CONDO : DOC 77-349679 BADAJOZ PLACE CONDO : DOC 79-076154 PAR. I PM 8017 CONDO : DOC 79-076155 PAR I OF PM6939 6* CONDO PEND:DOC 80-304677 LEVANTE STREET CONDO : DOC 80-275260 PAR. A OF PM (0063 9* CONDO : DOC 81-080595 PAR I OF PM 10973 10* CONDO ! DOC8I-2I9306 LEVANTE STREET- PAR I PM 11431 3» 4« 5* II* CONDO : DOC 81-178934 2407-2409 SACADA CIRCLE PAR 1 PM 11364 12* CONDO 1 DOC 81-373432 PAR I PM 11147 13* CONDO:DOC.82-053117 PAR I PM 11947 MATCHLJNE "A" 7* 8*CONDO 1 DOC8I-OI9888 PAR A PM9837 19* CONDO POC85-I067W PAR. I PMI37i!DOC85-I47372 216-19 I l"= IOO' 4/12/02 JGRO 14* CONDOPAR 1 PM11724DOC82-136468 CONDO: DOC 82-042004 PAR. I OF PM I0326 16* CONDO BADAJOZ PLACE DOC83-422924 I7« CONDO PAR I PM I3234 DOC 84- 355822 !8* CONDO PAR. I PMI3044 DOC84-225I66 2o*(toNDO PEND) DOC 85-I067I6 2 1* CONDO. 22* CONDO PAR. I PM IO733 OOC.8I-I96280 23* CONDO LOT 143 MAP 6117 DOC91-418337 CHANGES BLK OLDINEW 57 25 46 47 45 42. 3S Bi.CfJ. £3 40 30 /o 37 34 44 29 COMPIA 79_ 19 81 62 82. 0Z 32 tONOH cuts PH. 77 CONDO CONDO CONDO CONDO YR 73 S4 99 98 99 02 02 CUT 355 472 486 657 548 5709 fit>tt8 5 BO 523 1033 581 557 RC 528 560cc CO. cc 24* CONDOLOT 140, MAP 6117DOC.98-424981 25* CONDO LA COSTA SOUTH UNIT 1 DOC01-040576 FOR 493'' *<• DETAIL NO SCALE MAP6604-LA COSTA - SOUTH UNIT NO. 6 MAP 6II7 -LA COSTA-SOUTH UNIT NO I THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDVISCN OR BuLDING ORDINANCES. 216-22 CHANGES BLK T^ OLD 47 5-8 >* NEW 5/fOP AC C0tl »v - / * YR 7/ 72 CUT ^ol3 St>30 SAN DIEQO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 216 PG 22 285 MAP 6545-LA COSTA-SOUTH UNIT NO. 4 - LOTS 260-267, 286-297,301-320,322-329 216-25 SHT. IOF2 " 100' 5-17 -?S Lc SLA Os HANGES OLD %*(r/ 2A IS h€W . 89 / /f of> 89f9D -/90-77 y^lcuT $ % % 3200 10/5 1033 CAHC. SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 216 - /J- - PG 25 - SHT I OF 2 THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSLWED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS WAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISCN OR BUI DING ORDINANCES MAP 660H - LA COSTA-SOUTH UNIT NO. 6 LOTS H38-H61.470-496 C City of Carlsbad Planning Department October 4, 2005 Brian Longmore PO Box 503943 San Diego, CA92150 SUBJECT: AV 05-05 - CONLIN VARIANCE The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for an Administrative Variance, AV 05-05 to construct an over-height fence in the front, side and rear yards at 2600 Galicia Way. After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the four findings required for granting an Administrative Variance cannot be made and therefore, denies this request based on the following findings and conditions. Findings: 1. There are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone because the subject property and surrounding properties meet all the zoning requirements for lot size and dimensions and the topography is not an extraordinary or unusual circumstance for this residential area. The owner's claim that the over-height fence is necessary to provide privacy for the back yard is unsupported. The neighbors to the west are approximately 10 feet lower in elevation, and the second-story windows, which face the owner's backyard, could be blocked by vegetation; therefore, alternatives exist. Also, the neighbor's windows to the north of the property are mostly blocked by tall vegetation and; therefore, the owners do not need an eight-foot high fence for privacy. In addition, the front yard fence, located at the southeast corner of the lot, does not need to be over six feet high for the owner's to be able to enjoy privacy in their back yard. 2. The requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question because the property is currently developed with a single-family home and has adequate usable (flat) areas for yards. The proposed over-height fence in the rear and side yards would provide a small amount of privacy from the neighbors to the west and north; however, this could also be accomplished with additional vegetation or moving the fence several feet towards the top of the pre-existing slope for a similar privacy effect. 3. The granting of this variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the improvements would not create sight distance or visibility 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us AV 05-05 - CONLIN VARIAl October 4, 2005 Page 2 problems for vehicles since the fence is set back several feet from the edge of the road. 4. The granting of this variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan because the property's land use designation is residential single-family. This decision may be appealed by you or any member of the public to the Planning Commission within ten days of receipt of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission at 1635 Faraday Avenue in Carlsbad, along with a payment of $500.00. The filing of such appeal within such time limit shall stay the effective date of the order of the Planning Director until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Pam Drew at (760) 602-4644. incerely, DON NEU Assistant Planning Director DN:PD:bd c: Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Kathleen Farmer, Project Engineer Gene Kellogg, Code Enforcement Data Entry File Copy James Conlin, 2600 Galicia Way, Carlsbad, CA 92009 - 7 (20/05- Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department July 20, 2005 James Conlin 2600 Galicia Way Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: AV 05-05 - CONLIN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Administrative Variance, application no. AV 05-05, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, June 29, 2005, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Pam Drew, at (760) 602-4644, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, DON NEU Assistant Planning Director DN:PD:bd c: Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Kathy Farmer, Project Engineer ile Copy Data Entry Planning Aide Brian Longmore, P.O. Box 503943, San Diego, CA92150 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us AV 05-05 - CONLIN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE July 20, 2005 Page 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Provide a cross-section of the rear yard fence including the owner's and neighbor's grade and all dimensions. Engineering: None ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: None Engineering: 1. Plot existing right-of-way width for Levante Street and Galacia Way on plans. 2. Plot intersection sight distance corridor on plans. City of Carlsbad Code Enforcement NOTICE Code Violation October 19, 2005 OLIVIER & LOUISA LAGUETTE 2600GALICIAWY CARLSBAD CA 92009 Dear Property Owners: According to our records, you are the owners of that property. It has come to our attention that the variance, regarding the fence at 2600 Galicia Way, has been denied. In response to the denial, the property was inspected yesterday. It was observed that the fence still exceeds six (6) feet in height. That is a violation of CMC 21 .46.130, enclosed. Correction Required: Reduce the height of the fence to lawful limits by removing the lattice on top, as soon as possible, and in no case later than November 1, 2005. The property must be maintained in a clean, safe condition, in full compliance with all applicable city codes. Full compliance is anticipated in this matter. Please call me at 602-2704 if you wish to discuss this matter further. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, GENE R KELLOG Code Enforcement Officer 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2703 • FAX (760) 6O2-8560 Pam Drew - Re: Conlin Fence Variance^« _ Page 1____. . ..^_M^^\ _„_ ......___ __ _____ ^^^ **o From: Gene Kellogg To: Pam Drew Date: 07/12/2005 9:07:59 AM Subject: Re: Conlin Fence Variance Hi Pam. The original complaint came from a Melany at 822-4671. She complained about the fence being over eight feet high all around the yard. When I checked the fence, it appeard to be six feet with two feet of lattice work on top. I advised Mr. Conlin that removing the lattice work would bring the fence into compliance however he decided to apply for the variance instead. I do have a couple of photos. Let me know if you want copies. Thanks. Gene. >» Pam Drew 07/11/05 2:32 PM >» Hi Gene, I received the Admin. Variance project for the Conlin fence at 2600 Galicia Way. I understand you gave him a notice of violation. Would you please give me a little background information on the over height fence? Also, did a neighbor turn him in or did code enforcement notice it. Any information is helpful. Thanks, Pam Pam Drew Assistant Planner City of Carlsbad (760) 602-4644 pdrew@ci.carlsbad.ca.us V V CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: 9/20/05 REVISED PLANS TO: * ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, ATTN: Kathleen Farmer POLICE DEPARTMENT - ATTN: J. SASWAY FIRE DEPARTMENT - KARYN VAUDREUIL BUILDING DEPARTMENT - PAT KELLEY RECREATION - MARK STEYAERT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS) - NIC ROQUE WATER/SEWER DISTRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT - LARRY BLACK SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEMPRA ENERGY- LAND MANAGEMENT • CALTRANS (send anything adjacent to 1-5) PARKS/TRAILS - LIZ KETABIAN * Always Send Exhibits FROM: Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): AV 05-05_ PROJECT TITLE: Conlin Fence Variance. APPLICANT: Brian Longmore PROPOSAL: Increase the height of the wood fence more than the allowed 6'._ Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to Pam Drew, the Project Planner in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 9/30/05. (If you have "No Comments", please so state.) If not received by the date indicated, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. If you have any questions, please contact Pam Drew at 602-4644. The request for conditions will follow at the appropriate time. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 07/05 o Memorandum TO: Pam Drew - Assistant Planner FROM: Kathleen Farmer - Engineering Tech DATE: July 19, 2005 AV 05-05 OVER-HEIGHT FENCE COMPLETNESS AND ISSUES REVIEW Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for engineering review are provided for determining the application as complete. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. Plot existing right-of-way width for Levante Street and Galacia Way on plans. 2. Plot intersection sight distance corridor on plans. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at 602-2741. c: John Maashoff, Senior Civil CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Prevention Division Land Use Review Report PROJECT NAME: Conlin Fence Variance Date: 07/07/05 Project number: AV 05-05 Staff Planner: P. Drew Engineer: Project conditions: (Note: The following identifies specific conditions necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire has reviewed this application and have no additional comments or conditions for this submittal. GR