HomeMy WebLinkAboutAV 90-03; Pacific Point Business Center; Administrative Variance (AV) (15)8 i
Via Assistant City Engineer : '"Jww ced=+"
coMpLETENEssREVIEWANDINITIALISSUESSTATEMENT
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for applica 'on completeness. The application and plans submittted for this project are:
- J' Complete and suitable for continued review.
- Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please see attached cfi'cklist for missing or incomplete items.
In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues. (See attached initial review and assessment checklist.) Major 0 Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditoning of the project are as follows:
Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review.
-.
CTN OF CARISBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION
INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Date
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION EXPLANATION
- Inadequate traffic projections provided
- Street level of service problems
- Intersection level of service problems - Driveway problems - Corner sight distance problems
- Non standard street improvements proposed
edestrian circulation problems
Offsite street improvements needed
- Street parking problems - Intersection distance problems
Cul-de-sac length problems - Parking aisles lack turnarounds - Parking lot dimensions inadequate - Truck access inadequate - Parking lot lacks adequate circulation - Private street widths not to code
- End space necds 5' side backup area - Adjacent property access not considered - Surrounding circulation conflicts exist - Inadequate street/parking lot lighting
I -
SEWRAGE DISPOSAL
- Easement widths not to standard - Gravity flow not maintained - All weather access not provided - Offsite sewer improvements required
3_ Non-standard facilities proposed
- Facilities not in compliance with sewer master plan - Growth management requirements not met - Other (list)