HomeMy WebLinkAboutCD 13-12; La Costa Oaks Neighborhood 3.1; Administrative Permits (ADMIN) (2)..df~_A C IT Y 0 F
VcARLSBAD
Community & Economic Development
August 19, 2013
Peter Hemphill
Standard Pacific Corp.
15360 Barranca Parkway
Irvine CA 92618
SUBJECT: CD 13-12-LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1
www.carlsbadca.gov
The City Planner has completed a review of your application for a Consistency Determination, CD 13-12,
which is a modification to Lot 3 (APN: 223-830-03-00) of Planned Development Permit Amendment
(PUD 05-11(B)) for La Costa Oaks North Neighborhood 3.1 generally located north of San Elijo Road and
west of Rancho Santa Fe Road in Local Facilities Management Zone 11. The proposed modifications
include:
• Change Lot three home plotting from a Plan two to a Plan four
The proposed unit change will maintain the same Craftsman Architectural Style and color scheme of the
original plan. The new Plan four provides similar setbacks which meet or exceed the requirements of
the Master Plan. The Plan four also has additional architectural variation on the front and rear
elevations and provides a front porch that Plan two did not.
In order for a Discretionary Permit Consistency Determination to be approved, all of the following
findings must be made:
1} No project condition, feature, facility or amenity is changed or deleted that had been considered
essential to the project's design, quality, safety or function.
2} The request represents an upgrade in overall design features and or materials and improves
upon the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood.
3) The proposed revision does not change the density or boundary of the subject property.
4} The proposed revision does not involve the addition of a new land use not shown on the original
permit.
5} The proposed revision does not rearrange the major land uses within the development.
6} The proposed revision does not create changes of greater than ten percent provided that
compliance will be maintained with the applicable development standards of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
7} The proposed change will not result in any significant environmental impact, and/or require
additional mitigation.
B) The proposed change would not result in any health, safety or welfare impacts.
9} There were not any major issues or controversies associated with the original project which
would be exacerbated with the proposed change.
10} The proposed change would not be readily discernable to the decision makers as being
substantially different from the project as originally approved.
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559
CD 13-12-LA COSTA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 3.1
.~ugust }1.9;· 2.013
Page 2.. ·
After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the City Planner has
determined that the application qualifies for a consistency determination with the approved permit and
therefore, approves the changes to the project based on Planning Division Administrative Policy No. 35.
Please submit two (2) blueline copies (24" X 36") of all applicable exhibits for the project file. The
bluelines must be submitted, stamped "Consistency Determination," and signed by the City Planner
prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. The Consistency Determination Title Block
stamp, and other Title Block stamps, can b.e downloaded from the City's website at
http://www.carlsbadca.gov/services/departments/planning/Pages/applications.aspx. The Title Block
(stamp) is located under "Resources" on the right side of the page.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DON NEU, AICP
City Planner
DN:VL:fn
c: Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner
Tecla Levy, Project Engineer
File Copy
Data Entry
--------~. -.--. -----------------------
PLANNING
ENGINEERING
SURVEYING
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
HUNSAKER
&ASSOCIATES
5 A N D I E G 0, I N C.
August 12, 2013
RIVERSIDE Van Lynch
sAN DIEGo Senior Planner
ARIZONA City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
DAVE HAMMAR
LEX WILLIMAN
ALISA VIALPANDO
DAN SMITH
RAY MARTIN
CHUCK CATER
9707 Waples Street
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 558-4500 PH
(858) 558-1414 FX
www.HunsakerSD.com
lnfo@HunsakerSD.com
Re: La Costa Oaks North -Consistency Determination Request-Lot 3
Project Reference: PUD Amendment 05-11 (B)
Dear Van:
On behalf of our client, Standard Pacific Corporation, please find enclosed our
request for a Consistency Determination for the La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.1 project (also known as Westcott). Our current project
submission includes both an updated PUD Site Plan as well as a copy of the
approved PUD Site Plan from December 2010. We have only provided Sheets
1 and 5 for both since these are the only sheets that have proposed revisions.
Updated Tables are also provided for your review.
Below is a brief summary of the revision:
• The plan type plotted on Lot 3 originally was a Plan 2 Craftsman
Bungalow Elevation with a color scheme 5. The requested revision
proposes a Plan 4 Craftsman Bungalow Elevation with a color scheme
5.
• The Plan 4 provides for similar setbacks which meet or exceed the
minimums required in the La Costa Master Plan. See the attached
revised Section B Tables for the specific setback revisions highlighted in
red. The average front yard setback as approved was 22.01' and with
the proposed revision the average front setback will increase to 22.04'.
• The· plotting of a Plan 4 provides some additional architectural variation
on the front and rear elevations compared to the previously approved
Plan 2 plotting. A Plan 4 will increase the number of units that provide a
front porch. It will also provide-for an additional offsetting plan in the
rear of the home which was not included on the original Plan 2 rear
elevation. The will help to enhance the visibility along Rancho Santa Fe
Road.
MM.kc k:\2240\2013~37 docx
w o 2240-39 8/12/2013 1 46 PM
.•
City of Carlsbad
Consistency Determination Request -Lot 3
August 12, 2013
Page 2
• The side yard setbacks to the property line that are being proposed with a
Plan 4 will be similar to that of the Plan 2. The right side setback will remain
exactly the same and the left side will increase slightly for the porch
dimension (from 1 0.4' to 12') but decrease slightly for the building dimension
(from 15.8' to 12.4').
• The Plan 2 did incorporate a side yard cutout for a courtyard and the Plan 4
does not. However, the requirement that at least 50% of the units provide
sufficient side offsets or cutouts in order to maintain a project average of 7'
will still be met since the minimum setback on Lot 3 with a Plan 4 plotted will
be 12'.
Please let us know if you require any additional information and do not hesitate to
call or email me should you have any questions. Thanks in advance for your
consideration of our request.
Sincerely,
Hunsaker & Associates
o Inc.
Cc: David Blalock, Hunsaker & Associates
Pete Hemphill, Standard Pacific Corp.
MM:kc k \2240\2013\)37 docx
w o. 2240-39 8/12/2013 1 46 PM
-f CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION
PROJECT NAME: .......westcott (La Costa Oaks NeftH Nei 3.1)
Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 223-830-03
~~~~~--------------------------------------------
Description of proposal (add attachment if necessary): request for Consistency Determination regarding
revision to plotting on Lot 3 of Approved PUD Amendment 05-11 (B). Proposal is to plot a Plan 4
in place the current Plan 2 plotting.
Would you like to orally present your proposal to your assigned staff planner/engineer? Yes D No
Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so state.
Van Lynch
OWNER NAME (Print): Standard Pacific Corp.
MAILING ADDRESS: 15360 Barranca Parkway
CITY, STATE, ZIP: Irvine, CA 92618
TELEPHONE: 949-789-1600 -=~~=-~~-------------
EMAIL ADDRESS: PHemphiii@Stanpac.com
*Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary
review for a development proposal.
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE
ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY OWLEDGE.
APPLICANT NAME (Print): Standard Pacific Corp.
MAILING ADDRESS: 15360 Barranca Parkway
CITY, STATE, ZIP: Irvine, CA 92618
TELEPHONE: 949-789-1717
EMAIL ADDRESS: PHemphiii@Stanpac.com
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE
AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
~ flcz/1.3
DATE
APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): Hunsaker & Associates San Diego, Inc. (Contact: Marybeth Murray)
MAILING ADDRESS: 9707 Waples Street
CITY, STATE, ZIP: San Diego, CA 92121
TELEPHONE: 858-558-4500
EMAIL ADDRESS: MMurray@Hunsakersd.com
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
CORRECT TO THE OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
· ~-1a-t3
DATE
RECEIVED
AUG 1 3 2013
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DIVISION
~~~~REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF TO INSPECT AND
RTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE.
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE
FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID:
RECEIVED BY: ~
--~----------------------------------------------------------
(
P-16 Page 2 of 2
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008
~~~~~lilll~m 1 11~ llllllml~ llllllllllllll ~~
Applicant: STANDARD PACIFIC CORP
Description Amount
CD130012 682.00
7092 SITIO FRONTERA CBAD
Receipt Number: R0096445 Transaction ID: R0096445
Transaction Date: 08/12/2013
Pay Type Method Description Amount
Payment Credit Crd VISA 682.00
Transaction Amount: 682.00
I .
City of Carlsbad
Faraday Center
Faraday Cashiering 001
1322501-2 08/13/2013 149
Tue, Aug 13, 2013 10:31 AM
Receipt Ref Nbr: R1322501-2/0011
PERMITS -PERMITS
Tran Ref Nbr: 132250102 0011 0013
Trans/Rcpt#: R0096445
SET #: CD130012
Amount:
Item Subtotal :
Item Total:
ITEM(S) TOTAL:
Check (Chk# 301967)
Total Received:
Have a nice day!
1 @ $682.00
$682.00
$682.00
$682.00
$682.00
$682.00
**************CUSTOMER COPY*************
\ I Unit Summary Table
1st Floor 2nd Floor Garage % of 2nd Floor Total
Plan Area Area Area vs. 1st Floor 11 Area
1 2,078 485 0.0% 2,563
2 1,440 1,590 580 78.7% 3,610
3 1,440 1,722 712 80.0% 3,874
3X 1,398 1,684 712 79.8% 3,794
4 1,582 1,750 606 80.0% 3,938
1/ The 2nd story of any house does not exceed 80% of the 1st story square footage, including all garage
area.
2/ Building heights shown indicate the maximum building height for each proposed plan type.
Plan 2 includes an additional 30 sf for the for cantilever area and Plans 3/3X includeds an additional12 SF.
8/8/2013
Building
Height 21
18'-2"
25'-3"
27'-1"
27'-1"
24'-8"
Neighborhood 3.1
Section B
Table 1
Page 1 of 1
Floor Plan# Plane #1
1 Frontage 19.9
% of total Frontage 51.03%
2 Frontage 13.5
% of total Frontage 36.19%
3 Frontage 12.6
% of total Frontage 32.73%
3X Frontage 12.6
% of total Frontage 32.73%
4 Frontage 17
% of total Frontage 45.58%
8/8/2013
Front Building Plane Data
Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4
19.1
48.97% 0.00% 0.00%
20.3 3.5
54.42% 9.38% 0.00%
13.3 12.6
34.55% 32.73% 0.00%
13.3 12.6
34.55% 32.73% 0.00%
20.3
54.42% 0.00% 0.00%
Plane #5 Plane #6
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
Total
Frontage
39.0
100.0%
37.3
100.0%
38.5
100.0%
38.5
100.0%
37.3
100.0%
Neighborhood 3.1
Section B
Table2
Page 1 of 1
'
lot# Floor Plan
1 4R
2 3
3 4
4 1
5 3
6 4
7 1
8 4
9 3
10 r------4 i-------11 1
12 3
13 2
14 4
15 1
16 4R
17 3
18 4
19 2R
20 2 r-------------21 3X R
22 4R
23 1 R
24 3R
25 4
26 3
27 2R
28 4
29 2R
30 4 -----r-------31 3X
32 2R
33 4R
34 3R
35 4R
36 4R
37 2R
38 4R
39 3R
40 4R -----r-------41 3R
42 2R
43 4R
44 3R
45 2R
46 4R
47 3
48 3
8/8/2013
Front Yard Setbacks
Individual Building Plane Setbacks in Feet Weighted
Plane #1 Plane#2 Plane#3 Plane#4 Plane #5 Plane #6 Average
21.30 23.20 22.33
23.30 32.80 22.70 26.39
22.80 22.30 22.53
20.50 21.40 20.94
22.20 31.80 21.60 25.32
19.10 20.40 19.81
19.10 20.90 19.98
20.70 20.00 20.32
22.00 31.60 21.30 25.09
20.90 22.30 21.66 -----------------------------------------------19.50 21.00 20.23
20.90 31.40 20.90 24.53
20.30 24.80 20.84
21.00 23.00 22.09
20.00 21.50 20.73
21.40 22.80 22.16
21.70 31.70 21.20 24.99
22.20 21.10 21.60
18.40 22.90 19.12
17.80 22.80 18.85 -----------------------------------------------20.00 30.00 20.00 23.45
19.40 20.00 19.73
16.50 20.20 18.31
22.10 30.90 20.20 24.52
16.00 21.00 18.72
28.40 32.20 20.00 26.96
15.00 29.40 15.00
23.90 21.50 22.59
18.50 23.00 19.21
19.00 21.00 20.09 -----------------------------------------------20.30 30.80 20.30 23.93
16.40 21.20 17.47
18.80 21.50 20.27
21.80 32.40 23.00 25.85
20.30 21.40 20.90
21.10 23.10 22.19
17.70 22.20 18.49
19.50 21.30 20.48
20.40 31.00 21.60 24.45
17.30 20.10 18.82 -----------------------------------------------20.00 30.60 20.70
16.00 21.50
19.30 20.50
21.00 31.50 22.00
16.00 21.10
19.40 20.00
20.90 30.90 21.00
20.20 30.20 20.20
23.89
17.49
19.95
24.95
17.27
19.73
24.39
23.65
Neighborhood 3.1
Section B
Table 3
Page 1 of 2
Lot# Floor Plan
49 2
50 1------4 1--------51 3
52 4
53 2
54 4
55 3X
56 2
57 3X
58 2
59 4R
60 3R ------------61 4R
62 3R
63 4R
64 2R
65 3R
66 4R
67 3
68 4
69 3
70 4 1-------------71 2
72 3X
73 4
74 2
75 4
76 2R
77 2
78 4R
79 2R
80 3R
I
8/8/2013
Front Yard Setbacks
Individual Building Plane Setbacks in Feet Weighted
Plane #1 Plane #2 Plane #3 Plane #4 Plane #5 Plane#6 Average
18.90 23.60 19.68
20.30 21.50 20.95 -----------------------------------------------22.10 31.60 21.30 25.12
20.20 20.10 20.15
20.90 24.90 21.12
19.90 21.10 20.55
23.10 33.00 22.30 26.26
19.80 23.80 20.12
22.00 32.00 22.00 25.45
17.10 22.10 18.22
20.10 22.30 21.30
21.90 30.90 20.60 24.58 -----------------------------------------------19.50 20.60 20.10
21.50 31.10 20.20 24.39
20.50 21.10 20.83
22.70 26.80 22.80
31.50 35.00 20.10 28.98
27.70 20.00 23.51
25.20 30.80 20.00 25.43
17.90 20.40 19.26
34.00 38.80 26.20 33.11
19.20 20.00 19.64 -----------------------------------------------17.40 21.90
22.20 32.20 22.20
18.10 22.00
17.00 23.50
40.70 34.50
18.20 22.70
19.20 23.70
22.90 24.40
18.50 23.40
23.50 33.40 23.00
18.22
25.65
20.22
18.94
37.33
18.94
19.85
23.72
19.43
26.76
NEIGHBORHOOD AVERAGEd 22.04
Neighborhood 3.1
Section B
Table 3
Page 2 of 2
I
Average
Lot# Plan Elevation Color Front Rear
1 4R A 1 22.33 19.9
2 3 c 9 26.39 27.4
3 4 B 5 22.53 20.8
4 1 B 7 20.94 22.5
5 3 A 3 25.32 22.6
6 4 c 10 19.81 21.3
7 1 A 1 19.98 17.3
8 4 B 7 20.32 21.1
9 3 c 10 25.09 21.2
10 4 A 3 21.66 21.3
11 1 c 12 20.23 20.9
12 3 B 7 24.53 21.9
13 2 A 2 20.84 23
14 4 c 10 22.09 20.9
15 1 B 5 20.73 18
16 4R A 4 22.16 25.3
17 3 c 9 24.99 18.5
18 4 B 6 21.60 26.4
19 2R c 11 19.12 24.7
20 2 B 8 18.85 23.1
21 3X R A 2 23.45 17
22 4R c 10 19.73 15
23 1 R A 1 18.31 15.6
24 3R B 6 24.52 15
25 4 A 3 18.72 45.4
26 3 c 11 26.96 30.5
27 2R B 5 15.00 49.4
28 4 B 7 22.59 54.5
29 2R c 9 19.21 43.7
30 4 A 1 20.09 27.8
31 3X B 5 23.93 79.4
32 2R A 3 17.47 74.1
33 4R c 12 20.27 63.4
34 3R A 1 25.85 51.4
35 4R B 8 20.90 52.5
36 4R A 4 22.19 48.1
37 2R c 11 18.49 48.3
38 4R B 6 20.48 43.7
39 3R A 2 24.45 42
40 4R c 9 18.82 49.7
41 3R B 5 23.89 45.8
42 2R A 4 17.49 53
43 4R B 8 19.95 45.3
44 3R c 11 24.95 41.8
45 2R c 12 17.27 50.2
46 4R B 6 19.73 47.5
47 3 A 2 24.39 48.3
48 3 B 7 23.65 15
49 2 B 6 19.68 17.3
50 4 A 2 20.95 15.1
51 3 c 11 25.12 15.2
52 4 B 8 20.15 15
53 2 A 1 21.12 15.6
54 4 A 3 20.55 15.4
55 3X B 5 26.26 15
56 2 c 9 20.12 17.6
57 3X A 1 25.45 15.1
58 2 B 8 18.22 19.2
59 4R c 9 21.30 15
60 3R A 4 24.58 15
61 4R B 6 20.10 15.2
62 3R B 5 24.39 20.2
63 4R A 2 20.83 22.3
64 2R B 8 22.80 29.6
65 3R c 11 28.98 40.1
66 4R B 5 23.51 27.7
67 3 A 3 25.43 15
68 4 c 12 19.26 18.6
69 3 B 7 33.11 39.7
70 4 A 1 19.64 24
71 2 c 9 18.22 29.4
72 3X A 4 25.65 24.9
73 4 c 10 20.22 31.2
74 2 B 7 18.94 31.2
75 4 A 3 37.33 53
8/8/2013
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.1
Setbacks (ftl
Side Yard
Left Right Combined
6.8 11.4 18.2
7.3 10 17.3
12.4 15.5 27.9
9.4 11.5 20.9
11.6 13 24.6
11.3 13 24.3
7.3 14.5 21.8
9.1 11.7 20.8
11.4 11.9 23.3
12.5 12.5 25
11.2 12 23.2
9.1 8 17.1
7.3 11 18.3
8.6 11 19.6
8.5 12.5 21
6.5 16.7 23.2
11 8.6 19.6
8.9 10.7 19.6
6.1 6.7 12.8
7.4 5.3 12.7
6.2 6.5 12.7
6 8.4 14.4
6.3 6.3 12.6
7 7.2 14.2
5.3 9.8 15.1
12 7.8 19.8
5.3 7.4 12.7
5.9 6.8 12.7
5.3 7.4 12.7
6.3 6.4 12.7
7.2 5.3 12.5
7.8 6.3 14.1
11.7 7.3 19
9.2 8.5 17.7
22 10.9 32.9
13.4 37 50.4
11.5 7.5 19
9.8 7 16.8
9.3 5.6 14.9
9.4 10.8 20.2
9.2 6.8 16
10.4 6.4 16.8
8.8 8.4 17.2
9 6.2 15.2
10.5 7.1 17.6
10.1 6.3 16.4
28.2 9 37.2
8.5 21.8 30.3
9.8 10.4 20.2
7.5 10.2 17.7
8.2 8 16.2
5.5 11.9 17.4
10.6 9.8 20.4
7.7 10 17.7
8.9 9 17.9
8.3 12.7 21
5.3 8.8 14.1
29 8 37
10.8 27.5 38.3
7.6 9.3 16.9
9.1 8.9 18
7 11 18
12 8.6 20.6
10 12.3 22.3
11 11.2 22.2
8.5 10.6 19.1
24 12.5 36.5
16.7 13 29.7
17.1 6.5 23.6
10.1 10 20.1
6.7 6.4 13.1
5.1 7.8 12.9
7.6 8.4 16
6.7 7.5 14.2
20.4 21.8 42.2
Garage
23.2
22.7
22.3
21.4
21.6
20.4
20.9
20
21.3
22.3
21
20.9
24.8
23
21.5
22.8
21.2
21.1
22.9
22.8
20
20
20.2
20.2
21
20
29.4
21.5
23
21
20.3
21.2
21.5
21.8
21.4
23.1
22.2
21.3
20.4
20.1
20
21.5
20.5
21
21.1
20
20.9
20.2
23.6
21.5
21.3
20.1
24.9
21.1
22.3
23.8
22
22.1
22.3
20.6
20.6
20.2
21.1
26.8
20.1
20
20
20.4
24.8
20
21.9
22.2
22
23.5
34.5
Net Pad
Porch Area (SF)
15.3 5,468
20.8 6,330
15.7 7,178
12.6 6,666
24.9 6,725
12.9 6,353
19.9 6,412
13 6,211
19.6 6,488
14.8 6,725
16.5 6,596
24.6 6,018
5,838
15 5,968
12.2 6,430
14.9 5,917
19.3 6,076
14.6 6,691
5,345
5,271
23.2 5,271
13 5,760
5,656
24.1 5,374
10 7,054
20.3 7,231
7,393
16.3 7,334
6,592
13 5,827
24 5,319
5,147
12.8 5,731
25.5 5,765
12.5 5,849
15.1 7,909
5,999
12 5,708
24.2 5,611
11.4 5,940
23.9 5,647
5,593
11.7 5,654
19.5 5,581
5,676
11.8 5,561
24.1 5,643
23.4 5,995
5,745
14.1 5,811
19.6 5,761
12.7 5,766
5,741
13.7 5,803
26.1 5,344
5,176
25.2 5,357
5,428
14.1 6,203
24.1 5,925
11.7 6,029
24.2 6,511
14.1 6,824
7,424
24.5 8,173
18.4 7,080
24.1 9,888
11.9 10,593
32.1 9,762
12.6 6,780
5,044
25.4 5,311
12.2 5,888
5,046
33.3 9,982
Building
Coverage 11
Sq. Footage
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,563
2,152
2,188
2,563
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,563
2,152
2,020
2,188
2,563
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,020
2,020
2,110
2,188
2,563
2,152
2,188
2,152
2,020
2,188
2,020
2,188
2,110
2,020
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,188
2,020
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,152
2,020
2,188
2,152
2,020
2,188
2,152
2,152
2,020
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,020
2,188
2,110
2,020
2,110
2,020
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,020
2,152
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,152
2,188
2,020
2,110
2,188
2,020
2,188
%of Net Pad
40.0%
34.0%
30.5%
38.4%
32.0%
34.4%
40.0%
35.2%
33.2%
32.5%
38.9%
35.8%
34.6%
36.7%
39.9%
37.0%
35.4%
32.7%
37.8%
38.3%
40.0%
38.0%
45.3%
40.0%
31.0%
29.8%
27.3%
29.8%
30.6%
37.5%
39.7%
39.2%
38.2%
37.3%
37.4%
27.7%
33.7%
38.3%
38.4%
36.8%
38.1%
36.1%
38.7%
38.6%
35.6%
39.3%
38.1%
35.9%
35.2%
37.7%
37.4%
37.9%
35.2%
37.7%
39.5%
39.0%
39.4%
37.2%
35.3%
36.3%
36.3%
33.1%
32.1%
27.2%
26.3%
30.9%
21.8%
20.7%
22.0%
32.3%
40.0%
39.7%
37.2%
40.0%
21.9%
Neighborhood 3.1
Section B
Table 4
Page 1 of 2
Lot# Plan Elevation Color
Average
Front Rear
Individual Lot Data
La Costa Oaks North
Neighborhood 3.1
Side Yard
Left Right Combined Garage Porch
Net Pad
Area (SF)
Coverage"
Sq. Footage % of Net Pad
1/ "Building Coverage"= net pad area of a site occupied by the habitable area of any building or structure as measured from the outside of its surrounding external walls or supporting members. Includes garages
and the perimeter area of a basement. Excludes exterior structures such as covered porches, permanent structural elements protruding from buildings such as overhanging balconies that project less than 8ft.
from the building, and porte cocheres not exceeding a length of 22 feet and a width of 8 feet. Also excluded are roof eaves extending less than 30 inches from the face of any building, awnings, open parking
areas, structures under 30 inches in height and masonry walls not greater than 6 feet in height such as wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retaining walls.
8/8/2013
Neighborhood 3.1
Section B
Table4
Page 2 of 2