HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 00-62; Hamilton Residence; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (3)^. , •, FILE COPYCity of Carlsbad
Planning Department
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF DECISION
June 25, 2001
John and Barbara Hamilton
2335 Pio Pico
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SUBJECT: CDP 00-62 - HAMILTON RESIDENCE
At the Planning Commission meeting of June 20, 2001, your application was considered. The
Commission voted 5-0 (Compas/L'Heureux Absent) to APPROVE your request. The decision of the
Planning Commission became final on June 20, 2001.
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil
Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad
Municipal Code 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate
court not later than the ninetieth day following the date which this decision becomes final; however, if
within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied
by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record,
the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day
following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney
of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be
filed with the Planning Director, Michael J. Holzmiller, Secretary of the Planning Commission, 1635
Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning
Department at (760) 602-4600.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:GF:mh
Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolution No. 5001
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
May 29, 2001
John and Barbara Hamilton
2335 Pio Pico
Carlsbad CA 92008
SUBJECT:CDP 00-62 - HAMILTON RESIDENCE
The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be mailed to you
on Friday, June 1, 2001. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the
Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on June
11, 2001. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 10:30.
If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC
meeting.
It is necessary that you bring your required unmounted colored exhibit(s) with you
to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission.
Your colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the
Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for
their review, your project could be rescheduled to a later time. If you do not plan
to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s)
here by the scheduled time above.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your
Planner, Greg Fisher at (760) 602-4629.
CITY QFi CARLSBAD
uMry E. WAYNE/
Assistant Planning Director
GEW:GF:cs
c: File Copy
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
May 15, 2001
John & Barbara Hamilton
2335 Pio Pico Drive
Carlsbad Ca 92008
SUBJECT: CDP 00-62 - HAMILTON RESIDENCE
Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on
June 20, 2001. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If
the required items are not received by May 31, 2001, your project will be rescheduled for a later
hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply
with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted,
the project will be scheduled for denial.
1. Please submit the following plans:
A) 10 copies of your (site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor
plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 8!/25 x
11" size.
B) One SVz" x 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor
plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically
reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans.
2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the
following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form:
A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property
owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant
and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel
number from the latest equalized assessment rolls.
B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of
names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject
property, including the applicant and/or owner.
C) Mailing Labels - one (1) separate set of mailing labels of the property owners
within a 600 foot radius and occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject
property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified,
void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single family residence,
an apartment or suite number must be included but the Apartment, Suite and/or
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
CDP 00-62 -
May 15, 2001
Page 2
HAMILTO™ESIDENCE
Building Number must NOT appear in the street address line. DO NOT type
assessor's parcel number on labels. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes -
PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pt, Arial Rounded
MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt, Courier New 11 pt,), and MS Line Draw 11 pt.
Sample labels are as follows:
UNACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith
123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3
Carlsbad, CA 92008
UNACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith
123 Magnolia Ave.
Apt. #3
Carlsbad, CA 92008
ACCEPTABLE
MRS JANE SMITH
APT 3
123 MAGNOLIA AVE
CARLSBAD CA 92008
C)
D)
Sincerely,
Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely
and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property.
Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the
property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable
to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical.
Fee - a fee (check payable to the City of Carlsbad) shall be paid for covering the
cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the
total number of labels. Cash and credit cards are also accepted.
Greg Fi
Assistant Planner
GF:cs
Attachment
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED
TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE
INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES.
APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER
CDP 00-62 - Hamilton Residence
T'SJIEPRESENTATIVE
RECEIVED BY
DATE:
^jCj5pJp:62^Harn]ltonjancl u^reviewreport>& cpnditionj^doc _^^, Page J,
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
PROJECT REVIEW
May 8, 2001
TO: Greg Fisher - Assistant Planner
FROM: David Rick - Assistant Engineer - Development Services Division
VIA: Senior Engineer - Development Services Division
CDP 00-62: HAMILTON RESIDENCE
PROJECT REPORT AND CONDITIONS TRANSMITTAL
Engineering Department staff has completed the review of the above-referenced project and
are recommending:
X That the project be approved subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet.
That the project be denied for the following reasons:
X The following is a final Land Development Section project report for inclusion in the staff
report for this project.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
Project Report
LOCATION: On the west side of Pio PJeoriear YourelfSt.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION : A propo/ed 1,9f3\square foot single family residence on a 10,291
sq.ft. lot.
ENGINEERING ISSUES AND DISCUSSION:
Traffic and Circulation:
Projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 10
A Traffic study was not required because of the projected low impacts imposed by a
single family house.
Comment: All ROW dedications are in place. Frontage improvements will not be
built at this time and a NIA will be processed.
review report & conditions.doc
SEWER:
Sewer District: Carlsbad Municipal Water District
Sewer EDU's Required: 1
(1) edu/dwelling x 1 dwellings = 1 EDU's
Comment: Sewer facilities exist in Pio Pico Dr.
WATER:
Water District: Carlsbad Municipal Water District
GPD Required: 220gpd/edux1 edu's = 220 GPD
Comment: No major water issues are associated with this proposed project.
SOILS & GRADING:
Quantities: 395 cy
Cut: 0 cy Fill: 395 cy Export: 0 cy Import: 395 cy
Permit required: Yes
Off-site approval required: No
Hillside grading requirements met: N/A
Preliminary geo-technical investigation performed by: N/A
Comment: Fill primarily used to establish grade between the pad and proposed
retaining walls. The pad height will increase by only one to two feet. The fill will
extend to 6 feet at the southwest corner of the lot. Otherwise, fill is limited to 3 feet
or less throughout most of the lot. Landscaping of the crib wall shall be used to
mitigate any visual impacts.
DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL:
Drainage basin: A
Preliminary hydrology study performed by: N/A
Erosion Potential: Low
Comment: Drainage will be diverted such that the time of concentration is increased
to compensate for the increase in impervious surface. The drain inlets will also be
constructed with an open gravel base to allow infiltration into the soil. Overflow from
the drain box will flow out of a 3" pipe and discharge into a rip rap energy dissopator.
LAND TITLE:
Conflicts with existing easement: No
Easements dedication required: No
[Greg Fisher'^^cpp 00-62 Hamilton land ija&.review report & conditionslcloc
Site boundary coincides with land title: Yes
Comment: No major land title issues are associated with this project.
IMPROVEMENTS:
Off-site improvements: None required. Pio Pico is an alternative design street. The
driveway will be graded to ultimate right-of-way grades to reduce costs and grading for
future construction of Pio Pico Drive. The driveway will be constructed with AC to
reduce costs of future removal.
Standard variance required: None
Comment: No major improvement issues are associated with this proposed project.
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS
NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon
the approval of this proposed tentative map, must be met prior to approval of a grading
permit.
1. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within
this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer for the
proposed haul route.
2. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of the
City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formally
established by the City.
3. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall install rain gutters to convey roof drainage to an approved
drainage course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
4. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections in accordance with Engineering
Standards.
5. Prior to removing or relocating the palm tree located within the public right-of-way fronting Pio Pico
Drive, and prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall obtain a permit to
remove or relocate said tree in accordance with Chapter 11.12 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code.
Fees/Agreements
6. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the City Engineer for recordation
the City's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement regarding drainage across the
adjacent property.
"V
I. If the proposed development exceeds a building valuation of $75,000 as determined by the City
Building Department at the time of issuance of building permit, developer shall cause property
owner to enter into a "Neighborhood Improvement Agreement" with the City for the future
public improvement of paving, base, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, driveway, pedestrian ramp,
grading, undergrounding or relocation of utilities, a fire hydrant, a street light, and installation of
sewer, storm drain and water systems prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, Developer shall cause
Owner to give written consent to the City Engineer to the annexation of the area shown within
the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and
Landscaping District No. 1, on a form provided by the City Engineer.
Grading
9. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the site plan, a
grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit
from the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit for the project.
Coastal Conditions
10. If a Grading Permit is required, all grading activities shall be planned in units that can be
completed by October 1st. Grading activities shall be limited to the "dry season", April 1st to
October 1st of each year. Grading activities may be extended to November 15th upon written
approval of the City Engineer, obtained in advance, and only if all erosion control measures are
in place by October 1st.
Dedications/Improvements
I1. Developer shall have the entire drainage system designed, submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer, to ensure that runoff resulting from 10-year frequency storms of 6 hours and 24 hours
duration under developed conditions, are equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of the
same frequency and duration under existing developed conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour
storm durations shall be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to
accomplish the desired results.
Water/Sewer
12. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges for connection to public
facilities. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge(s) prior to
issuance of Building Permits.
13. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development
of the subject property, unless the Deputy City Engineer - Utilities has determined that adequate
water and sewer facilities are available at the time of occupancy.
•^^ —-
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
March 26, 2001
John and Barbara Hamilton
2335 Pio Pico Drive
Carlsbad Ca 92008
SUBJECT: CDP 00-62 - HAMILTON RESIDENCE
Your application for a Coastal Development Permit continues to be reviewed by the
Planning and Engineering Departments.
The application is complete. However, further issues need to be resolved or adequately
addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project. These issues
must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing.
Please contact your staff planner, Greg Fisher, at (760) 602-4629, if you have any
questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:GF:cs
c: Chris DeCerbo
David Rick
Data Entry
Planning Aide
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION
No. CDP 00-62 - Hamilton Residence
Planning:
None
Engineering:
None
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1. Please provide a separate fence/wall plan showing all proposed walls and fencing.
Include a detailed cross section. Do you propose a six foot fence on top of the
proposed retaining walls along the side and rear property lines? As a reminder, the
total height of all walls, fences and retaining walls, and combination fence/retaining
walls cannot exceed six feet in height in a required side or rear yard setback (Policy
21).
2. As shown, the site plan is not clear and difficult to read. Please call me to discuss
options prior to resubmitting.
Engineering:
1. Some pavement is encroaching into the private utility easement located at the north
end of the property. Provide a letter of permission to encroach from the easement
holder. In addition, obtain written authorization from the property owner to the
west to raise his retaining wall height and place fill on his lot.
2. Place the riprap energy dissipator located at the southwest end of the project within
the property.
3. The project does not comply with some of the City's infill grading standards. These
standards discourage retaining walls over 3 feet in height within 10 feet of the
property line. Currently, walls up to 7.67 feet high are proposed. Also, any grading
requiring over 100 cubic yards of import or export requires written justification
subject to the City Engineer's approval. One hundred seventy cubic yards of import
is proposed. Please address these issues.
4. On the site plan:
a. Indicate the existing and proposed height of the retaining wall west of the
subject property.
b. Provide a cross section of the rear yard, including the neighbor's retaining
wall. Also, provide a cross section of the retaining wall along the south
property line.
c. Show location of water service and sewer lateral.
d. Show grades on site plan to reflect change in grade shown on Cross Section
A-A.
5. Transition drainage which is concentrated at the edge of pavement to sheet flow
away from street at the southeast end of the property.
Enclosed is a redlined print to help you make your revisions. Please return this print with
your next submittal. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact
me at 602-2781.
Memorandum
TO: Greg Fisher-Assistant Planner
FROM: David Rick -Assistant Engineer
DATE: March 23, 2001
CDP 00-62 HAMILTON RESIDENCE
COMPLETNESS AND ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project
for engineering issues of concern. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or
adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are
as follows:
1. Some pavement is encroaching into the private utility easement located at the
north end of the property. Provide a letter of permission to encroach from the
easement holder. In addition, obtain written authorization from the property
owner to the west to raise his retaining wall height and place fill on his lot.
2. Place the riprap energy dissipator located at the southwest end of the project
within the property.
3. The project does not comply with some of the City's infill grading standards.
These standards discourage retaining walls over 3 feet in height within 10 feet of
the property line. Currently, walls up to 7.67 feet high are proposed. Also, any
grading requiring over 100 cubic yards of import or export requires written
justification subject to the City Engineer's approval. One hundred seventy cubic
yards of import is proposed. Please address these issues.
4. On the site plan;
a. Indicate the existing and proposed height of the retaining wall west of the
subject property.
b. Provide a cross section of the rear yard, including the neighbor's retaining
wall. Also, provide a cross section of the retaining wall along the south
property line.
c. Show location of water service and sewer lateral.
d. Show grades on site plan to reflect change in grade shown on Cross
Section A-A.
5. Transition drainage which is concentrated at the edge of pavement to sheet flow
away from street at the southeast end of the property.
Enclosed is a redlined print to help you make your revisions. Please return this
print with your next submittal. If you or the applicant has any questions, please
either see or contact me at 602-2781.
DAVID RICK
Assistant Engineer
Engineering Development Services Division
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
January 3, 2001
John & Barbara Hamilton
2335 Pio Pico Drive
Carlsbad, Ca 92008
SUBJECT: CDP 00-62 - HAMILTON RESIDENCE
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning
Department has reviewed your Coastal Development Permit, application no. CDP 00-63 -
Hamilton Residence, as to its completeness for processing.
The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your
application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the
date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application,
request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information
required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design
issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be
scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Department will begin processing your application
as of the date of this communication.
Please contact your staff planner, Greg Fisher, at (760) 602-4629, if you have any
questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:GF:cs
Chris DeCerbo
David Rick
$\\e Cop f
Data Entry
Planning Aide
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION
No. CDP 00-62 - Hamilton Residence
Planning:
None
Engineering:
None
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1. Please provide the maximum height on all elevations. As shown, it appears that the
proposed building height slightly exceeds the maximum allowed height of 24 feet
for a roof pitch less than 3:1 2.
Engineering:
1. Some pavement is encroaching into the private utility easement located at the north
end of the property. Provide a letter of permission to encroach from the easement
holder. In addition, please verify the width of the easement. According to county-
recorded doc #2000-0274481, the width of the easement is 6 feet, not 5 feet as
shown on the site plan.
2. This project will be conditioned to require the property owner to enter into a
"Neighborhood Improvement Agreement" in lieu of installing street and sidewalk
improvements on Pio Pico Drive and a potential future street fronting the south side
of the property. This comment is for informational purposes and no response is
necessary.
3. At the rear of the lot, drainage is shown to flow southward toward the southwest
corner of the lot. However, the topography shown does not support this direction
of flow. Please clarify whether the contour lines shown on the site plan are existing
or proposed? If any changes in the grade are proposed, then show said changes.
Also, provide spot elevations to identify proposed topography, especially at the rear
of the lot. Provide percent grade next to each drainage arrow.
If drainage is to concentrate at the southwest corner of the property as currently
shown on the site plan, then show detail of how this drainage will be concentrated
and how the increased energy from these concentrated flows will be controlled (i.e.
threw an energy dissipator). One option to consider is to place a berm and unlined
swale parallel with the western property line and direct drainage at a low grade (i.e.
one percent grade if achievable) to a drain inlet at the corner of the property. The
pipe to this inlet could daylight at the base of the slope and discharge into a riprap
energy dissipator or longitudinal perforated pipe, all which must be placed within
the property. Another option to consider is placing a small detention basin at the
southwest corner of the property. Whatever design is used, the post development
rate of runoff cannot exceed the existing rate of runoff.
4. If any grading is proposed, regardless of how insignificant, provide quantities in cubic
yards. Also, illustrate the change of grade on the site plan.
5. On the site plan;
A. Show the neighbor's retaining wall to the west and indicate its height.
B. Add the pad elevations of the garage and dwelling.
C. Provide a cross section of the rear yard, including the neighbor's retaining wall.
D. Add a brief legal description.
E. Show location of water service and sewer lateral.
F. Provide street cross section of Pio Pico Drive, identifying right-of-way width, edge
of pavement, and street centerline.
Enclosed is a redlined print to help you make your revisions. Please return this print with
your next submittal.
Memorandum
TO: Greg Fisher-Assistant Planner
FROM: David Rick -Assistant Engineer
DATE: January 2, 2001
CDP 00-62 HAMILTON RESIDENCE
COMPLETNESS AND ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project
for completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for engineering
review are provided for determining the application as complete. Engineering issues
which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a
determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. Some pavement is encroaching into the private utility easement located at the
north end of the property. Provide a letter of permission to encroach from the
easement holder. In addition, please verify the width of the easement.
According to county-recorded doc #2000-0274481, the width of the easement is
6 feet, not 5 feet as shown on the site plan.
2. This project will be conditioned to require the property owner to enter into a
"Neighborhood Improvement Agreement" in lieu of installing street and sidewalk
improvements on Pio Pico Drive and a potential future street fronting the south
side of the property. This comment is for informational purposes and no
response is necessary.
3. At the rear of the lot, drainage is shown to flow southward toward the southwest
corner of the lot. However, the topography shown does not support this direction
of flow. Please clarify whether the contour lines shown on the site plan are
existing or proposed? If any changes in the grade are proposed, then show said
changes. Also, provide spot elevations to identify proposed topography,
especially at the rear of the lot. Provide percent grade next to each drainage
arrow.
If drainage is to concentrate at the southwest corner of the property as currently
shown on the site plan, then show detail of how this drainage will be
concentrated and how the increased energy from these concentrated flows will
be controlled (i.e. threw an energy dissipator). One option to consider is to place
a berm and unlined swale parallel with the western property line and direct
drainage at a low grade (i.e. one percent grade if achievable) to a drain inlet at
the corner of the property. The pipe to this inlet could daylight at the base of the
slope and discharge into a riprap energy dissipator or longitudinal perforated
pipe, all which must be placed within the property. Another option to consider is
placing a small detention basin at the southwest corner of the property.
Whatever design is used, the post development rate of runoff cannot exceed the
existing rate of runoff.
4. If any grading is proposed, regardless of how insignificant, provide quantities in
cubic yards. Also, illustrate the change of grade on the site plan.
5. On the site plan;
a. Show the neighbor's retaining wall to the west and indicate its height.
b. Add the pad elevations of the garage and dwelling.
c. Provide a cross section of the rear yard, including the neighbor's retaining
wall.
d. Add a brief legal description.
e. Show location of water service and sewer lateral.
f. Provide street cross section of Pio Pico Drive, identifying right-of-way
width, edge of pavement, and street centerline.
Enclosed is a redlined print to help you make your revisions. Please return this
print with your next submittal. If you or the applicant has any questions, please
either see or contact me at 602-2781.
DAVID RICK
Assistant Engineer
Engineering Development Services Division