Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 03-12; ADAMS STREET SFR NORTH; Coastal Development Permit (CDP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR. (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ON!-Y) CD Administrative Permit - 2nd • Planned lndustria! Permit Dwelling Unit Administrative Variance 0 Planning Commission Determination Coastal Develomentt Precise Development Plan J Conditional Use Permit 0 Redevelopment Permit Condominium Permit 0 Site Development Plan O Environmental Impact D Special Use Permit Assessment O General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Hillside Development Permit O Local Coastal Plan Amendment D Master Plan O Non-Residential Planned Development- Planned Development Permit Teit:ivc PQrcc' Obtain from- Engineering Department Tentative Tract Map Variance J Zone Change 0 List other applications not fFO DEPAR,N- eSE Oty 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: - 2J%-I921 3) PROJECT NAME: Pr7,4/fl5 57ACaf SF 9 NORTH 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Lo -r)n..i c- tt * - 1.. 14 1.cir1-i tAid --10 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) 5 enh K\\u Cs MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS" 702_9 fliura//o L. 7029 ThurHo CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE 92_007 8qo xo 9Z0O9 go CERTIFY THAT lAM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF T IN' FORMAT(ON IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE EEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE A KOWLEDGE. CORRECT TO I E BEST OF A KNO 'LEDGE. SIGNATURE DT SV3NAT R DAT 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESdRIPTION .1 O Z 711 DQ-vO! H NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED. MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form l6 PAGE 1O . .. Si LOCATION OF PROJECT: - P>ks C...&tL~t Ar 11oop STREET ADDESS - - ON THE I SIDE OF j (NORTH. SOUTH. EAST. WESTI srREEE'— BETWEEN j 'Z AND L (NAME OF STREET J (NAME OF 9? LOCAL LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE [ £ 101 PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS I '') NUMBER O= EXISTING 12) PROPOSED NUMSER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 0 j RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION I i/ 114) IND OFFICE! LL j 15) PROPOSED COMM I i t I SQUARE FOO PROPOSED TAGE ___ SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED } 117) PROPOSED INCREASE IN L 118) PROPOSED SEWER PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE AOT ______ USAGE IN EDU 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 21) Wu I PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 22) EXISTING ZONING "— 23) PROPOSED ZONING J 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CIT' STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBER TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF .THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSEN SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIV RECEIVED BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT ND. Form 16 PAGE . SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR ALL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY REGULAR & MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Applicailon checklist for Non-Single Farnity Regular Coastalflevelopment Painits cow,edunctsante hanclouQ This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. I. GENERAL BACKGROUND A. Estimated Cost of Development: Development costing $60,000 or more does- not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Permit. The Planning Director shall make the final determination regarding a project's cost of development. - The .primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential construction. These costs are set by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and are applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the following information to assist in the determination of this project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for consideration by the Planning Director). r New Residential Square Footage: __________ square feet x $78.00/sq. ft. = $_S /7,772 - . Residential Addition Square Footage: square feet x $94.00/sq. ft. = $__________________ Any Garage Square Footage: ICZS square feet x $22.001sq. ft. = $_22 5$ = Residential Conversion Square Footage: square feet x $26.001sq. ft. = $_________________ For Non-Residential Uses, use the following figures for calculations: Retail/Store @ $36.00/sq. ft.; Restaurant © $69.001 sq. ft.; Office @ $55.001 sq. ft.; Manufacturing/Warehouse © $24.001sq. ft.: square feet x $ /sq. ft. COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $____ B. Do you wish to apply for: - 1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000) 2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more) C. Street address of proposed development Form 15 1101 Page lof8 P. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development 2c6142- 34 E. Development Description: - Briefly describe project:£OiKIZOCIS oF (N&i. E Em ily REIi t9&cE tMIThCIci-iw4 Lot lb BE PE~EF'EO Pn CitY Lb/TE1C 12A-VE/) I-il- zow. F. Describe the present land uses (i.e. Vacant land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: '~(MI60 FAMILY - South: 5 I W41-E FM4 fLY East: SlgbLE F,4niId West: S)t/atp P,4in/cY S. Is project located within a 100 year flood plain? DYes No PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY A. Are there existing structures on the property? Yes Nb -If yes, please describe. B. Will any existing structure be removed/demolished? f:JYes No If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal, including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans). LOT COVERAGE - K. Existing and Proposed - . Existing New Proposed Total Building Coverage £7 sq. ft. 011,.34 sq. ft. 'z14 sq. ft. Landscaped Area 0 sq. ft. 2-00 sq. ft. 2400 sq. ft. Hardscape Area 0 sq. ft. I?I$__sq. ft. 3WC_sq. ft. Unimproved Area (Left Natural) _______sq. ft - sq. ft. &Qsq. ft. Page 2ofB B. Parking: Number of existing spaces (7 Number of new spaces proposed 3 Existing/Proposed TOTAL: 3 Number of total spaces required Number of covered spaces 3 Number of uncovered spaces 0 Number of standard spaces 3 Number of compact spaces C) Is tandem parking existing? DYes #____ No Is tandem parking proposed? LJYes # fNo C. Grade Alteration: Is any grading proposed? 9yes, MNo If yes, please complete the following: 1 Amount of cut 2570 Cu yds. 2. Amount of fill - 2.2-0 cu. yds. 3. -.Maximum height of fill slope feet 4. Maximum height of cut slope (2 feet 5. Amount of import or export - _6 e'fr1 Cu. yds. 6. Location of borrow or disposal site Form 15 1/01 Page 3of8 AV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Submit Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Part I with Regular Coastal Development Permits; check with Planning Staff regarding Minor Coastal Development Permits and Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permits for any environmental review requirements. V. GENERAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (For Single Family Regular and Minor Coastal Development Permits; Regular CoastafDevelopment Permits covered under separate handout) A. Site Plan: Four (4) copies for a Minor Coastal Development Permit, four (4) copies for a Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permit prepared on a 24" x 36 sheet(s) folded to 8W x 11". The site plan shall include the following information: 1. General Va. Name and addtess of applicant, engineer and/or architect, etc. - Location, size and use of all easements.- Dimensions and locations of: access, both pedestrian and vehicular, showing service areas and points on ingress and egress, off-street parking and loading areas showing location, number and typical dimension of spaces, and wheel stops. - - Distance between building and/or structures. Building setbacks (front, rear and sides). '.4 . Location, height and materials of walls and'fences. - g. Dimensions/location of signs. - h. A summary table indicating the following information (if applicable to the application):' (1) Site acreage (2) Existing zone and land use j? Proposed land use () Total building coverage Building square footage g5— Percent landscaping Number of parking spaces @)' Square footage of open/recreational space (if applicable) (97 Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable) '11. Show all applicable Fire Suppression Zones as required by the City's Landscape Manual. B. Building elevations (all sides of all buildings) and floor plans: Four (4) copies for a Minor Coastal Development Permit and four (4) copies for a Single Family Regular Coastal Development Permit, prepared on 24' x 36" sheets folded to 8%" x 11" size. The building and floor plans shall include the following: 1. Location and size of storage areas (if applicable) 2. All buildings, structure, walls and/or fences, signs and exterior lights. -3. Existing and proposed construction. C. Grading and Drainage: Grading and drainage plans must be included with this application. In certain areas, an engineering geology report ML 5t also be included. Please consult the City Planning and Engineering Department Page 4 of 8 . representative for a determination on -. any grading plan gebtechnical requirements if the project is in an overlay zone. The following information shall be submitted at a minimum: Approximate contours at 1' intervals for Elopes less than 5%; 2' intervals for slopes between 55 10 and 10%; and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within 100' perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved. - 2. Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export. 3. Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. -4. Method of draining each lot Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. Location, width and/or èize of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Show location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. Clearly show and label 100 year flood line for the before and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain. D. Reduced site plan: One (1).copy of 3 1/f x 11". (Not required for Single Family Residence). E. Location Map: One (1) copy of SW x 11" (suggested scale 200" - vicinity maps on the site plan are not acceptable). F. Colored Site Plan and Elevation Plan: (Not required with the first submittal) It is the Applicant's responsibility to bring one (1) copy of a colored site plan and one (1) copy of a colored elevation to the Planning Department by 12:00 noon, eight (8) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Do not mount exhibits. VI. REQUIRED DOCUMENTS A. Land Use Review Application Form B. Completed Coastal Development Supplemental Application Form C. Disclosure Statement D. Completed "Project Description/Explanation' Sheet E. Title Report (required for sites in Coastal Commission Appeal Area and for single family residential) Form l5 1101 Page 5ofB . . VII. OTHER REQUIREMENTS A. Property Owners List and Address Labels NOTE: When the application is tentatively scheduled to be heard by the decision making body, the project planner will contact the applicant and advise him to submit the radius map, two (2) sets of the property owners list and labels. The applicant 'shall be required to sign a statement certifying that the information provided represents the latest equalized assessment rolls from the San Diego County Assessor's Office. The project will NOT go forward until this information is received. 1. A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 600' radius of subject property (including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel- number from the latest assessment rolls. * 2. Two (2) separate sets of mailing - labels of the property owners within. a 600' radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of punctuation. For any address other than single family residence, an apartment, suite or building number must be included on a separate line. DO NOT include it on the street address line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. DO NOT, provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Swiss 721, Enterprise TM or Courier NEW (TT) no larger than 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MFS JANE SMITH 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 123 Magnolia Ave. APT3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE - Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 3. 600' Radius Map: A map to scale not less than 1"=20"W showing each lot within 600' of exterior boundaries of the subject property: Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owners list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. 4. 100' Radius OccupantslAddress List and Labels (for coastal zone/CDPs only): One (1) list of the ocbupants/addresses located within a 100' radius of the project site; and two (2) sets of labels (as described in "A" above) of the addresses within a 100' radius. B. Fees and Deposit for Publication of Notices: See Fee Schedule for amount. VIII. SPECIFIC APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (May apply to single family, regular and minor coastal development permits) Coastal Overlay Zones require additional information to be submitted as follows: (refer to the Municipal Code for a full description): A. Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone Pae6 of a . . 1. Refer to the Carlsbad Municipal Code Section .21.202.060 for specific requirements. B. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone 1. Slope analysis/mapping for 25% and greater subject to Section 21.203.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. Topographic and vegetation mapping/analysis subject to Subsection 21.203.040(B)(1) of the Carisbéd Municipal Code, if project is located along the first row of lots bordering Buena Vista Lagoon including the Lagoon mouth. 3. Topographic, drainage and wetland mapping subject to Subsections 21 .203.040(B)(2)(a) and (b) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if located east of Interstate 5 in the Batiquitos Lagoon watershed. 4. Drainage study subject to Subsection 21.203.040(B)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if project is located west of existing Paseo del Norte, west of Interstate 5 or along El Camino Real immediately upstream of existing storm drains. 5. Geologic report addressing landslides and slope stability subject to Subsection 21.203.040(B)(4) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 6. Geologic report addressing land slides and seismic hazards subject to Subsection 21.203.040(C) and (D) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. C. Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone 1. Geotechnical report subject to 21.204.110 if project is located adjacent to an existing seabluff edge between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea; also may be required by Planning Director if deemed necessary consistent with Section 21.204.110 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 2. Show all structures and decks on adjacent north and south properties to perform "stringline" test subject to Subsection 21.204.050(B) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3. Unless otherwise submitted project in this zone must also be submitted with plans showing: a. Boundaries and topography b. Existing and proposed structures C. Circulation d. Drainage e. Finished topography f. Landscaping D. Coastal Resource Overlay Zone Mello I LCP Segment 1. Erosion, sedimentation and drainage report subject to Section 21.205.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if project is located in the Batiquitos Lagoon watershed, Form 15 1101 Page 7offi IX. REQUIRED COASTAL PERMIT FINDINGS - - I Approval of a regular or minor coastal development permit is based on the ability to I make three coastal related findings. These three findings are presented below for your review and information. 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local • . Coastal Program and all applicable policies. - • -. That the developrnenf is in conformity with the publiO access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the-Coastal•AcL • 3. That the development Conforms with any applicable deôision pertinent to thi - proposal and/or site as set by the Coastal Commission on a previously related appeals decision per Public Resources Code §30604(c). Page 8 of 8 0 I PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION- PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME J S? __ ( / 'Seci,, 8E ke/lu Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: 7 T2t r 7 / • / 2Z'c7u Ai op , 14 //J 7i/S (D iCit of Carlsbad DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require 'discretionary action on the pan of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal or.anizaticn, corporation, estate, mist, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit" Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. I. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corvoration or varmershin, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals awning more than - 10% of the shares, if NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE, SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON.- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officer. (A separate page may be attached if Ôorp/Part 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) - -- Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnershin, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE E\'DICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned cornoration. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate paste m ' attached if necessary. pers5'Th B1-1ty orpTPart________________ Tide O.tv2ñ/- Title________________________ Address ilJt.or1 Address________________________________ cS. 1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad. CA 92008-7314 - (760) 602-4600 - FAX (760) 602-8559 € a 3. N05-PROFIT ORCA?s1ZAtION OR TRUST- If any person identified pursuant to (I) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. - - NonProfit.Trust - -- Non Profit/Trust ____________________ Title - Address_- - . - Address - - 4. Have you had mor an S250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff; Boards, Cortrni6ns. Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes I.VIJ Io If yes, please indicate-person S). _-_-_- NOtE Attach additional sheets if necessary. rcertify tMj.atl the above inf I -is true and correct to the best ojR1 knowledge. nature of owner/date / Sjgp&f appltcanødate / Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature ofowner/applicant's agent if aplicableIdate print or type name of osvnerlapplicant's agent ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO:____________ DATE: BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: St. Claire Residence Pasco Engineering, Inc. 2. LEAD AGENCYNAv1E AND ADDRESS: 535 N. Hwy 101, #A, Solana -Beach 92075 Mike Smith or Justin Suiter 3. CONTACTPERSONAND PHONE NUMBER. _858-259-8212 West side of intersection between Adams St. and 4. PROJECT LOCATION?ark Drive John St. Claire 5. 839 Freda Lane, Cardiff, 92007 6. - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: _M - 7. ZONING: R-1-15000 - 8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, finan6ing approval or participation agreements): Grad 1 na Pc.rnii t- CDP 9. PROJECI' DESCRIPTION! ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: The project consists of the construction of one single family dwelling and asocaited yard and driveway grading. The property is currently vacant, with some grading disturbance nearest the w-ster1y property lines. The majority of the property is steeply sloped (greater than 25% and up to 50-60%). The existing groi*v cover consists mainly of Coastal Sage Scrub. Please refer to the attached Biological REport tor specitics. surrounding land uses are exclusively single family residential. Rev. 07/26/02 . . ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," or 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. F] Aesthetics []Agricultural Resources El Air Quality [J Biological Resources Li Cultural Resources E] Geology/Soils LI Hydrology/Water Quality LI Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources fl Mandatory Findings of Significance LI Noise O Public Services [J Recreation LI TransportationtCirculation LI Utilities & Service Systems L] Hazards/Hazardous Materials fl Population and Housing Please refer to the attached letter from the City of Carlsbad dated January 19, 2000, regarding case no. PRt 99-54—Adams St. SFR signed by Barbara Kennedy, and the updated Biological Resources Impact Assessment, dated October 24, 2002 and letter of addendum to Biological Impact Assessment dated }IoWfii&t Weare preserving4tS% of the Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat on this property in conformance with the above mentioned letter. Also, less than 10% encroachment into the dual criteria lands (25% and steeper with C.S.S. Habitat). 2 Rev. 07/26/02 . H ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may base a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. - • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects 111cc the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substaittial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EtA-Part F', if a proposed project could liâe a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier BIB, or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental BIB. are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. When 'Potentially Significant Impact" is checked tk project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier FIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier BiB. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. - If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing anEIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 07126102 . C An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impacf' is checked and including but not Iiinited to the following circumstances: (I) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier LIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR4 (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the ELk-Part I analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a thitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. 4 Rev, 07/26/02 . . . Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? III U b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including.but [J [] , E] nx not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or El L] LI U quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, El [1 lI] U which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? IL AGRICULTRAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California Department of Conservation as ah optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would - the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique'Farmland, or U [1 IF] Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or U [1 a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, •[] [] [] El which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the El[1 F1 D applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute El UF1 LI substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 5 Rev, 07,26102 . Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents maybe referred to and attached.) . Potentially - Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Cess Than Significant No Impact Impact c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of El [] [J any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment wader an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant [J [] [3 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial U LI [I Li number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or [] Rx [1 [11k through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of-Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? - - b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, [3 [3 aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or- regional plans, policies, or regulations or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? e) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally [3 [3 [j] protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) though direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any 0* native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances [3 []. protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? I) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat [] U [] Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Impact tributary areas that are environmentally [3 [1 nx [} sensitive? (Please refer to the updated Biological Resources Impact Assessment for the Adams Street residential parcels 206-192-34 & 206-192-38, City of Carlsbad, Can Die 6go County, California atta#7n-aeto} Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the LI N] [I] significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifl- [] EJ [l LI cance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologi- LI LI ON LI cal resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Aiquist-Priolo. Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fink? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? LI H LI (No known records exist) D.LI LI U NI El El iv. Landslides? LI U El [1J* b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of LI El [} []* c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, LI LI [] LI * or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 fl El Ex [I] * - I-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? * Refer to Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation undeveloped hillside lots, 4588 Adams Street, Carlsbad, California attached. 7 Rev. 07126/02 . . Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). . Potentially (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) Sigmficant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the Li [II] 11 Rx use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the (Sewer is available) disposal of wastewater? vii. HAziu)s AM) azjwous MATERIALS - Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the [J 0 [I [1 environment through the routine transport use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or Li LI [] U environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or Li [1 El Li acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? - - d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of Li Li [I] [1 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, (See soils report) would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or Li U GJ [1 where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people - residing or -working in the project area? 1) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, Li Li Ci would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (not in vicinity of private g) linpair implementation of or physically interfere with Li jLrport) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? - h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Li E2 Li Li loss, injury or death involving svildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized 50' buffer required as fire areas or where residences are intermixed with mitigation by Fire Department, wildlands? - SilL HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste Li Li W1 Li discharge requirements? (will provide eroision, siltation control measures as a part of the Grading Pland for this budget 8 Rev. 07126102 oteritially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated LI LI Less Than Significant No Impact Impact LI LI I F! I a F Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Impacts to groundwater quality? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? LI LI U LI LI U a: Create or contribute runoff water, which would El exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources ofpolluted runoff? g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? [] h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as EJ mapped on a Federal Hood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? 1) Place within 100.-year flood hazard area structures, LI 1-1 0 [Fl which would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or structures to a significant .risk of [1 LI [Fl loss injury or death involving flooding, including - flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Ic) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or rnudflow? [] [1 L] [Fl 1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface I I [1 D Li m) waters. (Construction EMP's will control Increase ofl*ec'em&&dietais, LI siltation/eedjmentatjon LI LI El pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface waters or other alteration of receiving surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? 9 Rev. 07126102 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents -may be referred to and attached.) . Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or LI U M [I] wetland waters) during or following construction? (BMP's in place during construction) Q) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired [] U U kIll water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list? p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater fl [J El] receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING -Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? 0 U U El] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or [] [J regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or - - mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation U U U plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MDc RAL RESOURCES-Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral U U U El] resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally U U U El important mineral resource recovery site delineated - - on a local general plan; specific plan, or other land use plan? XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels U ll U in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or, applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive U U R1 U groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise [J U U levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in LI U El U ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 10 Rev. 07126/02 . . Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) - Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan [] [} fl or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or vorking in the project âea to excessive noise levels? 1) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, [] [I] would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly fl El nx [] (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, throughThl5 . is an existing legal lot. extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No further splitting possible,. Li U El El b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? XIS'. RECREATION U U 0 E Li U Mx M Li U Mx F1 U U Fxl El U LI [U LI U Mx 0 a) Would the project increase the use of existing [I] neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? U 2 U 11 Rev. 07/26102 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Does the project include recreational facilities or [] [1] require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in [] U [ii U relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level fl. [] nx U of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including [] U U LI either an increase in tafflc -levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) - Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature Li El El (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses '(e.g., farm equipment)? e) - Result in inadequate emergency access? [1 [J [J [] Result in insufficient parking capacity? LI] [II El U g) Conflict With adopted policies, plans, or programs [] [] [] - [] - supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn- outs, bicycle racks)? - XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the [J [J FO [J applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or U U LII wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm [TI [] U II] water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the U U U [] project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 12 Rev. 07126/02 S - . Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially (Supplemental documents maybe referred to and attached.) - Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater [1 [] []EA treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted U Li [1 El capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and L] Li regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the [] U F] El quality of the environment substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does -the project have impacts that are individually 9 9 [1 N] limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable fUture projects?) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which 9 -U U will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program ErR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier ErR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on -attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state *here they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project 13 Rev. 07/26102 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AIR QUALITY—Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a federal and state non-attainment area for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PM10). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state- mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having serious ozone problems and used to create Ac California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10th in 1994, and was forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-I 996. - The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into the air quality planning document These growth assumptions are based on each city's .and the County's general plan. if a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project presumably has been antidipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact Section 15125(B) of the State of California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part Df the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the following: • Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area? • Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan? The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being implemented. The project is consistent with the growth assumptions of the City's General Plan and the RAQS. Therefore, the project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict or obstruct implementation of the regional plan. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than SignifiCant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site -is in the City of Oceanside. Data available for this monitoring site through April, 2002 indicate that the most recent air quality violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (one day in both 2000 and 2001) and one thy in 2001 for the federal 8-hour avenge for ozone and one day for the 24-hour state standard for suspended particulates in 1996. No violations of any other air quality standards have been recorded recently. If there is grading associated with the project, the project would involve minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions ou1d be minimized through standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and from the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard (comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? 14 Rev. 07/26/02 .- . Less Than Significant Impact. The Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions asothted with the proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project, air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 (a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered de minimus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue ; Carlsbad, California, 92008. 1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01). City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994. 15 Rev. 07,26/02 . LIST OF MiTIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) AflACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLTCABLF) 16 Rev. 07126/02