Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 10-13; CA-SDG5871 701 Palomar Airport; Coastal Development Permit (CDP)jope>;/o /a V" CARLSBAD Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov October 27, 2010 M&M Telecom, Inc. Attn: Danielle Goldman 6886 Mimosa Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-13 - CA-SDG5871 701 PALOMAR AIRPORT - Request for approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Minor Coastal Development Permit (MCUP 10- 12/CDP 10-13) to allow the installation, operation, and maintenance of a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) for Clearwire Wireless consisting of three (3) Wimax panel antennas, three (3) DAP head units, four (4) directional antennas and one (1) equipment cabinet located on an existing steel beam platform with one (1) GPS antenna attached to the cabinet all of which are located on the roof behind an existing and proposed RF screen wall that is textured and painted to match the existing parapet. The project site is located at 701 Palomar Airport Rd, in the Industrial (M) Zone, Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 3. Dear Danielle Goldman, The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Minor Coastal Development Permit MCUP 10-12/CDP. 10-13 - CA-SDG5871 701 PALOMAR AIRPORT for the installation, operation, and maintenance of a Wireless Communication Facility at 701 Palomar Airport Rd. A notice was sent to property owners within a 300' radius of the subject property requesting comments regarding the above request. No comments were received within the ten day notice period (ending on September 8, 2010). After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, and a review of the application's consistency with City Council Policy No. 64, the Planning Director has determined that the findings required for granting a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Minor Coastal Development Permit can be made and therefore, APPROVES this request based on the following findings and conditions. Findings: 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, and is in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, including, if applicable, the certified local coastal program, specific plan or master plan in that, (a) the use is necessary and desirable for the development of the community because of the benefit and demand for digital communications and data transmissions for businesses, individuals, public agencies and emergency service systems in this part of the City; (b) the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program in that the Planned Industrial (PI) Land Use designation does not preclude the provision of Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) uses. The proposed WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64, Wireless Communication Facilities, in that it is in a preferred location (Industrial zone) and has a stealth design. The project's location and stealth design comply with General Plan objectives that seek to maintain and enhance Carlsbad's appearance. 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-1 a - CA-SDG5871 701 PAlOMAR AIRPOKT October 27, 2010 Page 2 ; : 2. That the requested use is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located in that the proposed WCF is located within a preferred location (Industrial zone) as listed in Location Guideline A.1.a of City Council Policy Statement No. 64, and all aspects of the WCF exhibit stealth design and are completely hidden by the existing and proposed RF screen wall, which is painted and textured to match the existing building. The WCF use is not precluded by the project site's Industrial (M) zoning. Furthermore, the placement of the antennas behind an existing and proposed RF screen wall and associated WCF equipment cabinet located on the rooftop on an existing steel beam platform does not result in any additional building coverage, nor does it visually impact the existing site or building design as the RF screen wall is existing and proposed and blends in with the building architecture, and does not interfere with nor are the antennas visible to other* surrounding uses. The project has been conditioned to comply with FCC RF' Exposure Guidelines. 3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, parking, loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this code and required by the Planning Director in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood in that the proposed antennas and associated equipment cabinet are located on trie rooftop behind an existing and proposed RF screen wall which is painted and textured to match the existing building thereby exhibiting stealth design techniques. When completed, the installation of the new antennas and associated WCF equipment cabinet will not impact the appearance of the building as the existing and proposed RF screen wall is designed to blend in with the existing building. 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use in that the proposed WCF requires, on average, only monthly maintenance visits and occasional visits in response to operational problems. 5. That the existing and proposed WCF is consistent with City Council Policy No. 64 in that it is located in a preferred location (Industrial zone) as listed in Location Guideline A.1.a. of City Council Policy Statement No. 64 and exhibits stealth design, as the new antennas and equipment cabinet are located on the rooftop behind an existing and proposed RF screen wall which is designed to match the existing building. 6. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies in that the project is consistent with the Mello II Segment of the Certified Local Coastal Program in that the proposed WCF use is permitted in the PI Land Use designation identified on the LCP Land Use Plan; no agricultural activities, sensitive resources, geological instability, flood hazard or vertical coastal access opportunities exist onsite and the proposed WCF will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way or otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. 7. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that the project is located outside of the coastal shoreline development overlay zone. Therefore, compliance with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act is not required. 8. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the proposed antennas and MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-13 - CV, -SDG5871 701 PALOMAR AIRPORT - October 27, 2010 Paqe3 : equipment cabinet will be concealed behind an existing and proposed RF screen wall that is painted and textured to match the existing building. The project will adhere to the City's Master Drainage Plan, Chapter 15.16 - Grading and Erosion Control, Chapter 15.12 - Storm Water Management and Discharge Control, Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) to avoid increased urban runoff, pollutants, and soil erosion. Furthermore, no evidence of landslide or slope instability is identified on the site, nor is it located in an area susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods, or liquefaction, the site is void of steep slopes and no native vegetation is located on the subject property. 9. The project is not located in the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone, according to Map X ,-bfr the Land Use Plan, certified September 1990, and therefore, is not subject to the provisions' of the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.202 of the Zoning Ordinance). 10. The project is not located between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.201 of the Zoning Ordinance). 11. That the Planning Director has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15303 - (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), of the state CEQA Guidelines. Additionally, as Clearwire Wireless must comply with FCC regulations, radio frequency emissions from the proposed facility are below levels established as acceptable by the FCC, and are therefore not considered a health hazard. In making this determination, the Planning Director has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. 12. The Planning Director has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-13 - CA-SDG5871 701 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD as shown on Exhibits "A-H" dated October 27, 2010 on file in the Planning Division and incorporated herein by reference. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 2. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Minor Conditional Use Permit and Minor Coastal Development Permit. MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-to'- CA-SDG5871 701 PALOMAR AIRPUKT October 27, 2010 Page 4 3. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-13 documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development different from this approval shall require an amendment to this approval. 4. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Minor Conditional Use Permit and Minor Coastal Development Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit pr* action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated' herein, and (c) Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. 5. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures, which are required as part of the Zone 3 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-13 shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a substantial negative effect on surrounding properties or the public health, safety and general welfare. If the Planning Director determines that: 1) the minor conditional use permit was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation; or 2) the use for which such approval is granted is not being exercised; or 3) the conditions of approval have not been met; or 4) the minor conditional use permit is being or recently has been exercised contrary to any of the terms or conditions of approval; or 5) the use for which such approval was granted has ceased to exist or has been suspended for one year or more; or 6) the use is in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation; or 7) the use permitted by the minor conditional use permit is being or has been so exercised as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or so as to constitute a nuisance, the Planning Director shall hold an informal public hearing and after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, the Planning Director may revoke and terminate the minor conditional use permit in whole or in part, reaffirm the minor conditional use permit, modify the conditions or impose new conditions. 8. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of ten (1°) years from October 27, 2010 to October 26, 2020. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed ten (10) years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. The Planning Commission may not grant such extension, unless it finds that there are no substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare. If a substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will eliminate or substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-13 - CV, 3DG5871 701 PALOMAR AIRPORT October 27, 2010 Page 5 : 9. Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Minor Coastal Development Permit on the property. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the owner/applicant or successor in interest. 10. Developer/Operator shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's guidelines^ on limits for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Within six (6)i months after the issuance of occupancy, and with any time extension or amendment request, the Developer/Operator shall submit to the Planning Director either (1) verification that the project is categorically excluded from having to determine compliance with the RF exposure guidelines per 47 CFR §1.1307(b)(1); or (2) a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of RF emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site. The report shall quantify the RF emissions and compare the results with the . exposure limits established by the FCC guidelines. Said report shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director for consistency with the Project's preliminary report on RF exposure submitted with the initial project application and for consistency with the FCC guidelines. If, on review, the City finds that the Project does not meet the FCC guidelines, the City may revoke or modify this conditional use permit. 11. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 24 months from the date of project approval. 12. Developer shall report, in writing, to the Planning Director within 30 days, any address change from that which is shown on the permit application, any change in the telecommunications provider, or any transfer in ownership of the site. Engineering: 13. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. Code Reminders: 14. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 1 (MCUP 10-12/CDP 10-1'cT- CA-SDG5871 701 PALOMAR AIRPUrtT October 27, 2010 Page6 : NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. { t < You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. This decision may be appealed by you or any other member of the public to the Planning Commission within ten days of the date of this letter. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue in Carlsbad, along with a payment of $613.00. The filing of such appeal within such time limit shall stay the effective date of the order of the Planning Director until such time as a final decision on the appeal is reached. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Gina Ruiz at (760) 602-4675. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:GR:sm California Coastal Commission (NoFA), 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402 Clearwire Wireless, LLC, Attn: Danielle Goldman, 5761 Copley Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92111 Cognac Carlsbad Pacific Center, LLC, 4 Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA 94111 Don Neu, City Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Christer Westman, Senior Planner David Rick, Project Engineer Glen Van Peski, Senior Civil Engineer Mike Peterson, Development Services Manager File Copy Data Entry