HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 97-46; Brindisi; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (7)March 16, 1998
Larry Noreen
Brehm Communities
2835 Camino del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
SUBJECT: MPA 177(W)/LCPA 97-IO/CT 97-17/PUD 97-15KDP 97-46 - BRINDISI
Enclosed please find a list of issues of concern from the Planning and Engineering
Departments. They were inadvertently left off the complete letter mailed to your office on
March 6, 1998. Please feel free to call me at 438-l 161, extension 4451, if you have any
questions regarding the planning items or Clyde Wickham, at extension 4353, if you have
any engineering questions.
Sincerely,
ADRIENNE LANDERS
Principle Planner
AL:mh
Attachment
c: Gary Wayne
Clyde Wickham
Bobbie Hoder
File Copy
Data Entry
Planning Aide
2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-l 576 l (760) 438-11610 FAX (760) 438-0894 49
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
The wall along Poinsettia Lane near Cassia Road should follow the top of slope,
rather than extending beyond the slope to increase buildable area. The last unit of
the structure at this location should be deleted,‘the wall relocated, and the height of
the wall reduced to a maximum of 6 feet.
Floor plans do not indicate second floor balconies. Are any planned because it does
not appear that the noise analysis will permit them without some type of noise
barrier.
Redesign the parking spaces at northeast corner to provide a 24’ backup space.
Modify to the same design as northwest corner.
Provide a turning radius for a typical courtyard indicating that adequate backup can
be provided.
Modify tentative map to indicate that 29 guest parking spaces are both required and
provided. Only 25 guest parking spaces are indicated, please provide 4 more
spaces. Guest parking spaces located along the interior street must be 24’ feet in
length unless located next to a driveway apron.
Not all the submitted tentative maps include guest parking spaces, patio slabs, etc.
Please indicate that these are different pages as they are both currently labeled as
Sheet 2 of 2. On the sheet indicating the patio slabs, etc., please modify the
tentative map number to CT 97-17 instead of 97-l 5.
Patio structures along Poinsettia and Ambrosia-not 15’ from top of slope
Indicate the location and design of proposed monument signs.
Provide distances from garages to front property lines.
Provide a typical indicating: width of driveways from I”’ floor to I”’ floor and from
second floor living space to second floor living space; turning radius; and tree well
location.
Indicate where fountains or benches will be located. Provide additional benches
and/or features in other common areas to function as gathering areas.
Provide larger scale detail of recreation area, trellises at courtyards and trellises
between buildings.
Provide materials and color boards.
Engineering:
Staff has conducted a review of the project for engineering issues of concern. Engineering
issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a
determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. The previously approved grading plan shows an interim cul de sac slope and temporary
access road, show proposed disposition of this plan.’ Check with Mark Steyart (434-
2824 x 28551 regarding grading of Park property. The park access, and the proposed
grading (“limits of grading”) on the future park have not been resolved.
2. On our last review we were referring to the park access and any access on Ambrosia
Ln. (across from street “A”). Please show any existing driveways which are located
within 300’ of the proposed project. Check with Mark Steyart for proposed park
access.
Traffic and Circulation:
1. The Aviara Master Plan identified a monument sign that, if proposed, should be shown
and pulled back, clear of sight distance or clear areas. Indicate the sight lines on the
tentative map, the site plan and the landscape plan. The landscape plans have 2 areas
of concern. The intersection of Poinsettia in. and Ambrosia Ln., and at the corner
return at the clubhouse/cabana should be corrected to correspond to the corner sight
distance issue.
2. Please indicate the path of access for this project.
3. The proposed access to end units (check phase 3 (OK) vs the Model end (NG) will need
a hammerhead turn-around. The only place this is an issue is at the model location.
Se wet
1. Please indicate sewer laterals from the proposed buildings to public sewer facilities.
Show or note that sewer clean outs and laterals are not located in driveways. Show
water laterals and meter locations similar to sewer services with the same restrictions.
Drainaoe:
1. Please show the terminus of the off-site drainage at the north end of the site. Indicate
the proposed public easement that follows the storm drain through this subdivision.
2. Submit a drainage study to validate capacity in the existing system considering the
proposed project and allowing for upstream development.
3. The proposed drainage pattern at the entrance to this project is unclear. Add spot
elevations or contours as required. Cross gutters should be provided at the intersection
of Ambrosia Lane with “A” Street. The public street drainage through this project was
not the designed pattern specified in the Aviara Master Phase III Hydrology study.
Please reconsider and if necessary, extend storm drain.
4. Again, the extension of a storm drain in Ambrosia may be required to handle the
proposed design.
Attached is a red-lined check print of the proposed project for the applicants use in making
the requested revisions. This check print must be returned along with the first review, to
facilitate continued staff review.