Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 97-46; Brindisi; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (4)city 0 June 16, 1998 Richmond O’Neill Brehm Communities Suite 220 2835 Camino de1 Rio South San Diego, CA 92 108 SUBJECT: MPA 177(W)/LCPA 97-lo/CT 97-17/PUD 97-15XDP 97-46: BFUNDISI COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW On March 9, 1998, you were informed that the above-listed applications were deemed complete. However, I had forgotten there was a Local Coastal Plan Amendment on this site pending before the Coastal Commission. This meant that your project could not be deemed complete until the legislative action had been approved. The subject amendment was approved by the Commission on June 9, 1998 which then became your Complete Date. This revised Complete Date will not affect the processing of your project In addition to the comments the Planning Department sent you in my letter of May 26, 1998, the Engineering Department has additional items related to your last submittal. Engineering Department staff has completed another review of the above-referenced project for resolution of issues. Engineering issues which remain and need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. The previously-approved grading plan shows an interim cul-de-sac slope and temporary access road; show proposed disposition of this plan. Check with Mark Steyeart (434-2824 x-2855) regarding grading of Park property. The park access, and the proposed grading have not been resolved. The latest tentative map revision is unclear exactly what is proposed to be graded and what is considered “existing”. City Standards GS 14 and GS 15 identify setbacks and drainage details that should be shown on this plan. 2. Please indicate pedestrian access (i.e., ramps) on all street corners with sidewalk. 2075 La Palmas Dr. l Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-l 161 l FAX (760) 438-0894 a9 MPA 177(W)/LCPA 97- 1 WT 97- 17/PUD 97-l S/CDP 97-46: BRImIS COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW June 16,1998 Page 2 3. The gated entry is still an issue. The design changes made pushed the turnaround area closer to Ambrosia Lane and did not improve the access, turnaround or queuing issue at the entrance. The detail and the plan view does not match the typical cross section on sheet one of both the PD and the TM. To clarify the issue, if you would widen the entrance to allow two lanes in and one lane out that would be acceptable. If you would check the “P” vehicle turnaround at the median/visitor call location you will see that a turn is impossible, unless a three-point maneuver is used. An offset bulb would be acceptable because the turn is only in one direction. 4. The typical courtyard (sixplex) on sheet 1 of the PD does not show the proposed 6’ tree well in the middle. The remaining dimension 10’ on each side is not identified. The turn around detail on the landscape plan should include all 8 moves (in and out) of the units. The “P” vehicle turn radius is 24’ minimum with a 25.8’ maximum overhang and a minimum 15.3 turn radius. The Volvo sedan used on the landscape plan is too small and not an AASHTO or CalTrans standard. Sewer. 1. Please indicate sewer laterals from the proposed buildings to public sewer facilities. Show or note that sewer clean outs and laterals are not located in driveways. Show water laterals and meter locations similar to sewer services with the same restrictions. A note on the drainage detail or typical will address this issue. Drainaae: 1. The drainage study submitted did not validate or determine storm drain facilities as requested (page 1 of study). Please revise or add to the report and consider the private drain system along top of slope of Poinsettia Lane. The area drains are subject to clogging and slope failure is eminent. We recommend a connection into the existing storm in Poinsettia Lane near the water line connection east of Ambrosia Lane to reduce overflowing issues and to improve the condition. An overflow in this area would have less of an impact (less slope) than at Cassia Road. 2. Please show the existing RCP on-the comer of Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane as “to be removed” or connect the private yard drain system to it. 3. It appears that a portion of the adjacent City Park drains through this site, a Brow ditch type “F” inlet and an easement/public storm drain should be shown. The approved grading plan for this site also shows a D-25 curb outlet on Ambrosia Lane not identified on this plan MPA 177(W)/LCPA 97-1oriT 97-17/PUD 97-lS/CDP 97-46: BRINDISI COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW June 16, 1998 Pane 3 Attached is a red-lined check print of the proposed project for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned along with the first review, to facilitate continued staff review. If you or the applicant have any questions, please contact Clyde Wickham at 438-l 161, extension 4353. Sincerely, Ik ., Adrienne Landers Principal Planner AL:mh c: Clyde Wickham Bob Wojcik Bobbie Hoder Data Entry File Copy