HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 97-46; Brindisi; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (4)city 0
June 16, 1998
Richmond O’Neill
Brehm Communities
Suite 220
2835 Camino de1 Rio South
San Diego, CA 92 108
SUBJECT: MPA 177(W)/LCPA 97-lo/CT 97-17/PUD 97-15XDP 97-46: BFUNDISI
COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW
On March 9, 1998, you were informed that the above-listed applications were deemed
complete. However, I had forgotten there was a Local Coastal Plan Amendment on this site
pending before the Coastal Commission. This meant that your project could not be deemed
complete until the legislative action had been approved. The subject amendment was approved
by the Commission on June 9, 1998 which then became your Complete Date. This revised
Complete Date will not affect the processing of your project
In addition to the comments the Planning Department sent you in my letter of May 26, 1998, the
Engineering Department has additional items related to your last submittal. Engineering
Department staff has completed another review of the above-referenced project for resolution of
issues. Engineering issues which remain and need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior
to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. The previously-approved grading plan shows an interim cul-de-sac slope and
temporary access road; show proposed disposition of this plan. Check with Mark
Steyeart (434-2824 x-2855) regarding grading of Park property. The park access, and
the proposed grading have not been resolved. The latest tentative map revision is
unclear exactly what is proposed to be graded and what is considered “existing”. City
Standards GS 14 and GS 15 identify setbacks and drainage details that should be
shown on this plan.
2. Please indicate pedestrian access (i.e., ramps) on all street corners with sidewalk.
2075 La Palmas Dr. l Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-l 161 l FAX (760) 438-0894 a9
MPA 177(W)/LCPA 97- 1 WT 97- 17/PUD 97-l S/CDP 97-46: BRImIS COMPLETENESS &
ISSUES REVIEW
June 16,1998
Page 2
3. The gated entry is still an issue. The design changes made pushed the turnaround area
closer to Ambrosia Lane and did not improve the access, turnaround or queuing issue
at the entrance. The detail and the plan view does not match the typical cross section
on sheet one of both the PD and the TM. To clarify the issue, if you would widen the
entrance to allow two lanes in and one lane out that would be acceptable. If you
would check the “P” vehicle turnaround at the median/visitor call location you will
see that a turn is impossible, unless a three-point maneuver is used. An offset bulb
would be acceptable because the turn is only in one direction.
4. The typical courtyard (sixplex) on sheet 1 of the PD does not show the proposed 6’
tree well in the middle. The remaining dimension 10’ on each side is not identified.
The turn around detail on the landscape plan should include all 8 moves (in and out) of
the units. The “P” vehicle turn radius is 24’ minimum with a 25.8’ maximum
overhang and a minimum 15.3 turn radius. The Volvo sedan used on the landscape
plan is too small and not an AASHTO or CalTrans standard.
Sewer.
1. Please indicate sewer laterals from the proposed buildings to public sewer facilities.
Show or note that sewer clean outs and laterals are not located in driveways. Show
water laterals and meter locations similar to sewer services with the same restrictions.
A note on the drainage detail or typical will address this issue.
Drainaae:
1. The drainage study submitted did not validate or determine storm drain facilities as
requested (page 1 of study). Please revise or add to the report and consider the private
drain system along top of slope of Poinsettia Lane. The area drains are subject to
clogging and slope failure is eminent. We recommend a connection into the existing
storm in Poinsettia Lane near the water line connection east of Ambrosia Lane to
reduce overflowing issues and to improve the condition. An overflow in this area
would have less of an impact (less slope) than at Cassia Road.
2. Please show the existing RCP on-the comer of Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane as “to
be removed” or connect the private yard drain system to it.
3. It appears that a portion of the adjacent City Park drains through this site, a Brow ditch
type “F” inlet and an easement/public storm drain should be shown. The approved
grading plan for this site also shows a D-25 curb outlet on Ambrosia Lane not
identified on this plan
MPA 177(W)/LCPA 97-1oriT 97-17/PUD 97-lS/CDP 97-46: BRINDISI COMPLETENESS &
ISSUES REVIEW
June 16, 1998
Pane 3
Attached is a red-lined check print of the proposed project for the applicants use in making
the requested revisions. This check print must be returned along with the first review, to
facilitate continued staff review.
If you or the applicant have any questions, please contact Clyde Wickham at 438-l 161, extension
4353.
Sincerely,
Ik .,
Adrienne Landers
Principal Planner
AL:mh
c: Clyde Wickham
Bob Wojcik
Bobbie Hoder
Data Entry
File Copy