Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 97-48; Poinsettia Shores Area D; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (7)February 23, 1998 Norika Saiga Suite 155 23 172 .Plaza Pointe Drive Laguna Hills, CA 92653 SUBJECT: CT 97-lS/CDP 97-48/CP 97-06 - POINSETTIA SHORES AREA “D” Attached is a list of Planning Department issues of concern for the above referenced project. Please note that these issues must be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. Please contact your staff planner, Elaine Blackburn, at (760) 438-l 161, extension 4471, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. ELAINE BLACKBURN Planning Director EB:mh . Attachment c: Gary Wayne Dennis Turner Clyde Wickham Bobbie Hoder File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 2075 Las Palmas Dr. l Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 - (760) 438-11610 FAX (760) 438-0894 @ ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Any approval of this project will be conditioned to pay agricultural mitigation fees (per the Master Plan). 2. The site plan (Sheet 3 of 3) will need to be corrected to match the landscape plan with regard to the noise wall. The site plan still shows ‘a noise wall which exceeds 6’ in height rather than the revised design (maximum 6’. in height combined with berming) shown on the landscape plan. 3. The proposed landscaping along the--noise wall is shown on railroad-owned or other- owned property (i.e., property not owned by the developer). This landscaping is also to be located on top of a 20’ easement for sewer access. The necessary landscaping may be incompatible with the need for vehicles (trucks) to use the easement. Also, the degree of slope of the easement may make it difficult for the trucks to use it. This situation could be exacerbated by the additional berming required to keep the noise wall to a maximum height of 6’. These conditions/problems will need to be resolved so that 1) the easement can be used by the necessary vehicles, 2) the noise wall includes berming to keep the height to 6’, 3) the noise wall is adequately landscaped, 4) the necessary maintenance arrangements can be made satisfactorily. Staff suggests you provide 2-3 cross-sections/profiles at the “worst case” points of the easement to assist in finding the best solution to this issue. (See next item for a related issue.) 4. You will need to incorporate a gate in the noise wall to allow vehicular access to the sewer access easement. You will need to provide a letter from the noise analyst regarding this issue. The letter should address the impacts of incorporating the required gate and any recommendations regafding the best location for it. (The current noise study assumes and depends upon there being no cracks or openings in the wall.)