Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 97-51; Cristalla; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (8)June 8,1998 Richmond O’Neill Brehm - Aviara Ill Development Assoc. 2835 Camino del Rio North, Suite 220 San Diego CA 92018-3882 SUBJECT: MP 177(X)/LCPA 97-II/CT 97020/PUD 9747/CDP 97-51 - CRISTALLA - AVIARA PA 23 The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmittal of your Master Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, Tentative Tract Map, Planned Unit Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit, application no. MP 177(X)/LCPA 97-l l/CT 97-20/PUD 97-17/GDP 97-51. Listed below are the Engineering issues of concern. These concerns, coupled with the Planning Department correspondence, dated May 18, 1998, constitute the entire comments on your proposed development. Enclosed are the Engineering Department’s red-lined checkprints to assist in your revisions. These checkprints should be returned with any subsequent submittal. Please feel free to contact me at (760) 438-l 161, extension 4499, if you have any questions. Enclosure c: Clyde Wrckham File Copy 2075 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92009-l 576 l (760) 438-l 1610 FAX (760) 438-0894 @ ISSUES OF CONCERN No. MP 177(X)/LCPA 97-l l/CT 97-20/PUD 97-17/GDP 97-51 - CRISTALLA Engineering: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Number of lots proposed is not identified on the tentative map (this should be near note #2, with note #I 1 and #I2 next). Please clarify the exact boundaries of the specific lots, open space, deed restricted areas, recreation areas, R.V. storage and internal slopes. Both gated entries are unacceptable. The turnaround, queuing and lane configuration are not detailed as requested on the previous check. It is not clear how R.V. turnaround will be handled at the proposed entry gate for “A” Street. The 11 foot high retaining wall at the entrance to “A” Street is unacceptable, please reduce or redesign. Please clarity the drainage system on top of the wall along “C” Street. Please show the X-Gutter at Black Rail Road and “G” Street. R.V. access, turnaround, drainage, utilities and improvements are not shown. The proposed 20 foot wide access is too narrow. A minimum width of 24 feet is recommended, 32 feet is preferred. Please show the connection to “existing” improvements on Black Rail Road and indicate the grades and City Drawing Numbers for those areas. The removal of end treatment is not identified. Please also show the extension/continuation of improvements and utilities in Black Rail Road and indicate the City Drawing Numbers for those improvements. 10. Please clarify the existing topography in the open space as well as the building or land uses, fences and greenhouses on the north side of the project. 11. Please clarify the areas proposed to use reclaimed water and indicate all necessary improvements for this use. 12. The sump/overflow drainage conditions on Lot 1 and Lot 40/41 is not shown. Please clarify. 13. Please add the following declaration to the notes/details: “all sewer cleanouts and water meters to be located clear of driveways”.