Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 98-12; Forth Residence; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (6)CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW TO: Senior Planner - Chris Decerbo May 18, 1998 FROM: Associate Engineer - Clyde Wickham RE: CDP 98-12, SAMMIS - Rosalena Lot #24 VIA: $/rrfs Principal Civil Engineer - Land Use Review The Engineering Department has completed its review of the above referenced project and is recommending: X That the project be approved subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. _ That the project be denied for the following reasons: Grading: Quantities: Grading quantities were not identified on plans. Because of the p re- graded pads, It appears that a permit will be not be required. Grading plans will be part of the building permit process. Permit Required: No Offsite Approval required/obtained: Possible / NO Hillside Grading Requirements met: No Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Performed by: If required, will be part of building permit process Comment: No major grading issues are associated with this proposed project except that limits of grading and lot drainage to the street are critical. Again, no grading concept was shown. Drainage and Erosion Control: Drainage Basin: DA Preliminary Hydrology Study Performed by: N/A Erosion Potential: Low if pad drains to street and open space is not graded. Land Title: Conflicts with existing easement: No Easement dedication required: No Site boundary coincides with land title: Yes Comment: No major land title issues are associated with this proposed project. Improvements: Frontage Improvements Required: No Standard Variance Required: No Comment: Navigator Circle exists as a fully improved roadway. Engineering Conditions General Note: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following engineering conditions, Prior to the issuance of building permits. Fees/Agreements 33.C. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available. 50. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required. 47. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property. Grading 57. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from the site, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 58. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. 47. Rain gutters must be provided to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage course or street. The developer shall submit a letter from the project Soils Engineer supporting the proposed 3' distance to drainage swale from building, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If not approved by the Soils Engineer the project shall be redesigned to conform to City Standards. February 24, 1998 TO: PLANNING TECH. - GREG FISHER From: Engineer Tech. — Land Use Review CDP 98 -12 : JOHN FORTH RESIDENCE COMPLETENESS AND ISSUES REVIEW Location: 7566 Navigator Circle Carlsbad, CA 92009 Description: Single Family Residence Assessor Parcel No. 216-420-24-00 Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this proposed project are currently incomplete and unsuitable for further review due to the following incomplete items: 1. Please indicate the street called Navigator Circle on site plan. Include with the street dimensions, the curb and gutter and existing barricades. 2. Please modify plans to indicate that the top of driveway flare must be 3' from the property line. (Refer to Standard GS -15). 3. Please indicate the location of existing storm drains, inlets, sewer cleanouts, sewer mains, and sewer easements. Please indicate the location of water meters, mains and easements. Utilities cannot be located in the driveway. 4. Please indicate the type of driveway, i.e. concrete etc.? (Refer to Standard. DWG. G-14). Also distance from curb and easement lines. 5. Please indicate any proposed fences, their location in relation to property line, materials and heights. 6. Please indicate the distance of the Bluff Trail to your property line. Also indicate whether you have provided access to it, and if so, where. 7. Please show the Bluff and the existing topographic and vegitative conditions. 8. Please show limits of grading and development. If grading is not proposed, please indicate the criteria for this determination. PROJECT REVIEW MEMO DATE: TO: ENGINEER: FROM: / b ~~ I 8 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEW PROJECT REVISED PROJECT Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND RESPONSE ON APPLICATION NUMBER(S): NOTE: Please use this number on all correspondence. PROJECT TITLE: PROPOSAL: A&\CL<f H /- 0 / Please review and submit written comments (incompleteness items and issues of concern) or conditions of approval to C-4A t' '^ [J-/? (^ *• t36 _ , the Project Planner in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, by n^Rf _ . State Law requires that the applicant be notified of any incompleteness items and issues of concern in writing within 30 days of receipt of the project submittal. This submittal was received on i '-^ " / o Therefore, the completeness/issues letter must be mailed out by _ _ . If the planner has not received your items/issues by two (2) days before the necessary mail-out date, it will be assumed that you have no incompleteness items or issues of concern or that they will be sent out under separate cover by the Engineering Department at a later date. If you have any questions, please contact the Project Planner at 438-1161, extension i" i 2 . THANK YOU PLANS ATTACHED FRM26 - 12/97 PLANNING DEPARTMEN i BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST <r 8 £ £ 8S Plan Check No. CB Planner APM- Address 1 S c/ Phone (619) 438-1161, extension - era aO Type of Project and Use: fp F Zoning: \Q ^ General Plan: Project Density: _ Facilities Management Zone: CFD fin/out) # Circle One .Date of participation:Remaining net dev acres: <O o£E (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) Legend: | | X Item Complete U ) Item Incomplete - Needs your action^e=s^ Q Environmental Review Required: YES A NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: f Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions whjch require a9tion. Conditions of Approval: -^ ft Tr* (^ff^eJH^^a*L~ ^l( Discretionary Action Required: APPRO VAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. YES NO DATE ^ TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: II Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES A CA Coastal Commission Authority?YES _ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt) : NOCoastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. ] I f~| Inclusionary Ho ng Fee required: YES •/£ NO ' (Effective date of Indus, .tary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (Enter CB #; UACT; NEXT12; Construct housing Y/N; Enter Fee Amount (See fee schedule tor amount!; Return! Site Plan: j_J 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. | | | I fj 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. D Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Accessory structure Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation 3. Lot Coverage: Required Required Required Required setbacks: Required Required Required Required : Required Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown D D D *• Height:Required Shown |_| | I I | 5. Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required LI I I | I Additional Comments Shown Shown OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE