HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 98-40; Severino Residence; Coastal Development Permit (CDP) (10)Memorandum
TO: Assistant Planner, Van Lynch
FROM: Engineering Technician, David Rick
DATE: June 15, 1998
CDP 98-40: SEVERING CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for
application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this proposed project are
considered complete. Additionally, staff has conducted a review of the project for engineering
issues of concern. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior
to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. Show on the site plan and grading plan how vehicular access from Parcel 3 to Park
Drive will be eliminated in the event that the driveway connects with the future
installation of James Drive.
2. Remove note and illustration of "future gutter if surface drainage from Parcel 2 is
directed to driveway" unless you intend to add such gutter and redirect drainage as a
part of developing Parcel 3.
Please add the following conditions of approval to the governing resolution:
1. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site
within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions
and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
2. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
3. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless
regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to the issuance of building
permits or grading plan approval, whichever occurs first.
4. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the
site plan, a grading permit for this project appears to be required. The developer must
submit and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with city codes and
standards prior to issuance of a building permit for the project.
5. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the project unless
a grading or slope easement or agreement is obtained from the owners of the affected
properties and recorded. If the developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope
easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case the developer
must either amend the site plan or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside
the project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved site plan as
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
6. The owner shall enter into a lien contract for the future public improvement of the future
construction of James Drive along the project frontage for a half street width of 30
feet. Public improvements shall include, but not be limited to, paving, base,
sidewalks, curbs and gutter, and grading. Said improvements may also include
clearing and grubbing, relocation of utilities, instillation of sewer lines, water
lines, fire hydrants, street lights and/or retaining walls.
7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record an easement
for joint access between the owners of Parcels 2 and 3 for the benefit of shared
use of the proposed driveway connecting to Park Drive as shown on Exhibit "A".
If and when access to the future portion of James Drive is provided as shown on
Exhibit "A", rights of access to Park Drive must be relinquished for Parcel 3.
Relinquishing access to Park Dive may be accomplished by either quitclaiming
the aforementioned joint access easement by separate document or incorporating
language into the joint access easement stating that access rights for Parcel 3
will automatically be relinquished once access to James Drive is established.
8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record an easement
for cross drainage from Parcel 2 to Parcel 3.
9. As conditioned on Minor Subdivision No. 763, plans, specifications and supporting
documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. The developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate
security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative parcel map and the
following improvements to City Standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:
Half street improvements to Park Drive along the frontage of Minor Subdivision
No. 763.
If you or the applicant have any questions, please either see or contact me at extension 4324.
DAVID RICK
Engineering Technician"
Land Development Division
c: Robert J. Wojcik, P.E.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Project
CITY OF CARLSBAD
Inter-office Correspondence
PLANNING DEPARTMENT/SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
Engineering Department
Request for comments to GRADING" PLAN for Hillside Development
Ordinance / /
' 11/1 4(G J A^ /
Plancheck No. '
Project Planner ///A/ LWts^
Attached is a copy of the Grading Plan. Please /review and
the Engineering Plancheck Division, attention t\/(ljLU&
turn your comments to
Failure to respond to this request by *~r will be interpreted
to mean that the proposed project has yckir endorsement as submitted (no fee,
deposits, or specific conditions will be required).
Thank you for your cooperation.
Reply:
SIGNATURE DATE