Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 98-43; JPI Apartments at Aviara PA 18; Coastal Development Permit (CDP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C Q] Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit []] Administrative Variance 0 Coastal Development Permit Q Conditional Use Permit QI Condominium Permit [X| Environmental Impact Assessment n General Plan Amendment I | Hillside Development Permit Q Local Coastal Plan Amendment n Master Plan Q Non-Residential Planned Development Q Planned Development Permit HECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) <?&• V5 Q Planned Industrial Permit Q Planning Commission Determination [~| Precise Development Plan Q Redevelopment Permit FXJ Site Development Plan Q Special Use Permit [~~| Specific Plan n Tentative Parcel Mop Obtain from Engineering Department [U Tentative Tract Map n Variance PI Zone Change [~| List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) <?8-fo 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: ?.1 S-and ?. IS -080-26 JPI Westcoast Development BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:2RR unit luxury apartment complex 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Aviara Land Associates Ltd. Partnershi MAILING ADDRESS 2011 Palomar Airport Road #206 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760 931-1190 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATIOM-^S TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWUEDGB1. ' — =^4, \ «. / / j^T A — '1 <^ ft' 3/2 1 f •) *( ^^LJ-j^-^ V^'/7* SIGNATURE DATE 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) p JPI Westcoast Development , t--'. MAILING ADDRESS 8910 University Center Lane #150 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE San Diego, CA 92122 (619) 458-1200 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. C\QS3cr^ 4fete? SIGNATURE ~~~~— -—DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 & 2 of Carlsbad Tract CT 92-3 NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. 3o Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 o o 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: Aviara Phase ITT, SE corner of Polnsettia Ln. & , , STREET ADDRESS Amhrnsi* T.n . ON THE ' 'East (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) BETWEEN Poinsttia Lane SIDE OF AND Ambrosia Lane (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) I Ambrosia Lane (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 19 1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENT/RYFOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED 677-0.00 0yiv.cz> RECEIVED JUN 0 1 1998 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 Sf PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME' JPI Apartments at Aviara Planning Area 18 APPLICANT NAME: JPI Westcoast Development Inc. Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope' and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an^addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. The proposed project is a 288 unit luxury apartment complex located within Aviara Planning Area 18 on the east side of Ambrosia Lane south of the future Poinsettia Lane. The proposed project will have a gated entry, carports, garages, extensive landscaping and a distinctive architectural design which will complement the Aviara Master Plan. fltv. 4/91 ProjO«C.frm w V + SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR ALL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS + APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY REGULAR & MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Application checklist for Non-Single Family Regular Coastal Development Remits covered under separate handouQ This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. 1. GENERAL BACKGROUND A. Estimated Cost of Development: Development costing $60,000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Permit. The Planning Director shall make the final determination regarding a project's cost of development. The primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential construction. These costs are set by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and are applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the following information to assist in the determination of this project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for consideration by the Planning Director). => New Residential Square Footage: 254.980 square feet x $78.00/sq. ft. = $ 19.888.440.00 => Residential Addition Square Footage: square feet x $94.00/sq. ft. = $ => Any Garage Square Footage: square feet x $22.00/sq. ft. = $ 930.028 => Residential Conversion Square Footage: square feet x $26.00/sq. ft. = $ => For Non-Residential Uses, use the following figures for calculations: Retail/Store @ $38.00/sq. ft.; Restaurant @ $69.007 sq. ft.; Office @ $55.007 sq. ft.; Manufacturing/Warehouse @ $24.00/sq. ft.: square feet x $ 7sq. ft. = $ COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ 20,818,.468.00 B. Do you wish to apply for: 1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000) 2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more) X Form 15 10/97 Page 1 of 8 C. Street address of proposed development SE corner of interseptinn of Pm'ngpt-t-ia T.anp & Amhrnsi'a Tjmp D. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development 215-040-25 & 215-080-26 E. Development Description: 1. Briefly describe project: A 2RR unit-, luxury apart-mpnf located within Aviara Planning Area 18. 2. Estimated cost of development: 20,818,468.00 F. Describe the present land uses (i.e. Vacant land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: Future multi-family housing South: Future single-family homes East: Vacant land . West: Future single-family homes G. Is project located within a 100 year flood plain? II. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY A. Are there existing structures on the property? If yes, please describe. Yes No No B. Will any existing structure be removed/demolished?Yes No If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal, including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans). LOT COVERAGE A. Existing and Proposed Building Coverage Landscaped Area Hardscape Area Unimproved Area (Left Natural) Existing New Proposed Total Zero sq- ft- _L82^643sq. ft. i«7 6A^sq. ft. Zero sq. ft. 271,000 sq. ft. 271,OOP sq. ft. Zero sq. ft. 23,000 .sq. ft. 23,000 sq. ft. 29.400 sq. ft. 29.400 sq. ft. "29.400 sq. ft. Form 15 10/97 Page 2 of 8 B. C. Parkin Grade Is any If yes, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. g: dumber of existing spaces s Number of new spaces proposed Existing/Proposed TOTAL: Number of total spaces required Number of covered spaces Number of uncovered spaces Number of standard spaces Number of compact spaces Is tandem parking existing? Q Is tandem parking proposed? | | Alteration: grading proposed? fc"| please complete the following: Amount of cut 33,000 Amount of fill 33,000 Maximum heiaht of fill slope 1 ^ fppi- Maximum heiaht of cut slope 6 feet Amount of import or export Zero Location of borrow or disposal site N/A "flero 588 588 581 288 300 967 33 Yes# Yes# Yes HNO 0No DNO cu. yds. cu. yds. feet feet cu. yds. Form 15 10/97 Page 3 of 8 c o City of Carlsbad Planning Department APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Non-Single Family Regular Only/Including Amendments) CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (Including Amendments) MASTER PLAN (Including Amendments) REDEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Major, Minor and Amendments) - A Coastal Development permit supplemental application may also be needed. PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATIONS PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS (Including Revisions) SPECIAL USE PERMITS (Including Amendments; Excluding Floodplain SUPs) SPECIFIC PLANS (Including Amendments) A proposed project requiring multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to 3:30 p.m. A proposed project requiring only one application be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. All joint application exhibits, i.e. Site Plans, Landscape Plans and constraint maps should be prepared at the same scale. (Use a scale no smaller than 1" = 40'} -• • ' • " •:>-- •••• : ..- ' • The following materials shall be submitted for each application or for combined applications on a single project, except as noted under "III. Other Requirements", A and B of Property Owners List and Address Labels. I. REQUIRED PLANS (folded, stapled and delivered in COMPLETE sets) Q A. SITE PLAN: Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36" sheets folded to 81/2" x 11" size. Fifteen (15) copies of the site plan shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to approval of the project. Each site plan shall contain the following information: | | 1. General Information: | | a. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, owner and engineer or architect who prepared the plan. | | b. North arrow and scale. | | c. Vicinity map showing major cross streets. | | d. Date of preparation/revisions. . oo | | e. Project name and application types submitted. 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (G19) 438-0894 f. Name of sewer, water and school districts providing service to the project. [~| g. All facilities labeled as "existing" or "proposed". h. A summary table of the following: (1) Street address and assessor parcel numbers. (2) Site acreage. (3) Existing zone and land use. (4) Proposed land use. \~] (5) Total building coverage. \~\ (6) Building square footage. (7) Percent landscaping. (8) Number of parking spaces required/provided. (9) Square footage of open or recreational space (if applicable), for each unit and total common open space for the project. (10) Proposed density. (11) Area of the site which is undevelopable per Zoning Ordinance Section 21 .53.230 (include the acreage in each category). If not applicable, state on the plans. (12) Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable). Show location. f~] (13) Average daily traffic generated by the project, broken down by separate uses. 2. Site Information: \~\ a. General (1) Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings and permanent structures onsite and within 100' of site. \~] (2) Location of all major vegetation showing size and type. (3) Location of railroads. (4) Bearings and distances of each exterior boundary line. (5) Distance between buildings and/or structures. (6) Setback dimensions for required front, rear and side yards for all structures. (7) Location, height and materials of walls b. Street and Utilities (1) Location, width and proposed name of all streets within and adjacent to the proposed project. Show street grades and centerline radii. (2) Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys. Include medians and adjacent driveway locations. (3) Typical street cross sections for all streets within and adjacent to the project. Forml 10/97 Page 2 of 8 (4) Width, location and use of all existing and/or proposed public or private easements. (5) Public and private streets and utilities clearly identified. [~~1 (6) Show distance between all intersections and medium and high use driveways. [~] (7) Clearly show parking stall and isle dimensions and truck turning radii for all parking areas. f~| (8) Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands. | | (9) Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer, water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. [~] (10) Show location of all fire hydrants within 300' of site. c. Grading and Drainage | [ (1) Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%; 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%; and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within 100' perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved. |~"1 (2) Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export. | | (3) Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. Q (4) Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. [~~| (5) Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Show location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. | [ (6) Clearly show and label 1 00 year flood line for the before and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain. B. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36" sheets drawn to the same scale as site plan (See "I. A" on page 1). Fifteen (15) copies of the landscape r^ plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner b prior to approval of the project. Each landscape plan shall include the following information: [~| 1 . Landscape zones per the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. [~~| 2. Typical plant species, quantity of each species and their size for each planting zone (use symbols). | | 3. An estimate of the yearly amount of irrigation (supplemental) water required to maintain each zone. [ | 4. Landscape maintenance responsibility (private or common) for all areas. [~~| 5. Percent of site used for landscaping. I I 6. Water Conservation Plan. Forml 10/97 Page 3 of 8 | | BUILDING ELEVATION AND FLOOR PLAN: Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36" sheets (See "I.A" on page 1). Fifteen (15) copies of the building elevations and floor plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to project approval. Each building elevation and floor plan shall include the following information: 1. Floor plans with square footage included. 2. Location and size of storage areas. 3. All buildings, structures, walls and/or fences, signs and exterior lights. 4. Include a scale on all floor plans and building elevations. 5. Indicate on all building elevations compliance with Carlsbad Height Ordinance 21.04.065. ROOF PLAN: Show location of roof appurtenances and mechanical equipment. CONSTRAINTS MAP: (If the constraints map does not apply to the property, list it on the map as not applicable. Constraint map shaJM5e the same scale as other Exhibits, i.e. Site Plan, etc.) One (1) copy on/ax24" x 36" sheet (see "I.A" on page 1) shall include the following information tejor ridge lines. Distant views. Internal views. Ripariarror woodlanc Intermittenrxdrainaefe course. 25-40%slo|W/ , ^ Greater than4o\ slopes. Major rocj*'outcrop|siings. Easements. Floodplains. Archaeological sites. Special Planning Areas. Biological Habitats. Indicate the location of Coastal Sage Scrub and chaparall plan communities existing^pn the project site. Beaches. Permanent bodies of water. Wetlands. Land subject to major power transmission eas\ments. Railroad track beds. F. COLORED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN: (Not required with first submittal.) It is the applicant's responsibility to bring one (1) copy of a colored site plan and one (1) copy of a colored elevation to the Planning Department by 12:00 noon, eight (8) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. DO NOT MOUNT EXHIBITS. G. REDUCED SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS: One (1) copy 8 1/2" x 11". Forml 10/97 Page 4 of 8 [J H. LOCATION MAP: One (1) copy 8 1/2" x 11" (suggested scale 200" - vicinity maps on the site plan are not acceptable). II. DOCUMENTS |~l A. Land Use Review Application Form | | B Coastal Development Permit Supplemental Application | [ C. Environmental Impact Assessment Form (separate fee required). [ | D. Public Facility Agreement: Two (2) copies - One (1) notarized original and one (1) reproduced copy (separate fee required). | | E. Disclosure Statement. | | F. Preliminary Title Report: Three (3) copies (current within the last six [6] months). [ | G. Sewer: Proof of availability of sewer if located in the Leucadia County Water District or the Vallecitos Water District. | | H. Potential Impacts: All projects must evaluate their potential impacts/on the ^regional transportation system, including the costs of mitigating the/associated impacts, as required by the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP). K\OV ^ For projects with an average daily traffic (ADT) generation rate greater than 500 \ ^^J^\ vehicles per day or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips: Submit twbi (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. The analysis must.be prepared by a Registered Traffi^tngineer or Registered Civil Engineer. The^analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management Plan or as otherwise determined in discussions with staff. The following minimum information should be included With the study: 1. 8 Yz" x 11" or 8 1/2"\14" plats/showing zone impacted roads, background and project AM and PM peax hour impacts and traffic distribution. 2. Project traffic generation rates and traffic assignment. 3. Necessary calculations and/o\analysis to determine intersection and road segment levels of service. 4. Any proposed mitigation requireme)rt§ to maintain the public facility standar 5. Qrfcollector streets and above, an analysis of^e need for a traffic signal /will be required. Form 1 10/97 Page 5 of 8 "Large" projects: Any project which, upon its completion will be expected to generate either arTfequKfalent of 2,400 or more averagejiaHyyehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicte^trips, including large pnojecte that \nay have already been reviewed under CEQA^butrequire addjikrfial local discretionary actions, is defined as a "large project" undBf-Jbe^SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) and will be subject-tcTenFiaTK^d CEQA review as specified in the CMP. Depending uporrlfie complexity of the project, the City of Carlsbad reserves the right to require a traffic study on any project. | [ I. Noise Study: Must be consistent with City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. | | J. Preliminary Soils/Geological Report: Two (2) copies for all projects with cut or fill depths exceeding 5'. | | K. Completed "Project Description/Explanation" sheet. | | L. Signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications". III. OTHER REQUIREMENTS | | A. Property Owners List and Address Labels: NOTE: When the application is tentatively scheduled to be heard by the decision making body, the project planner will contact the applicant and advise him to submit the radius map, two (2) sets of the property owners list and labels. The applicant shall be required to sign a statement certifying that the information provided represents the latest equalized assessment rolls from the San Diego County Assessor's Office. The project will NOT go forward until this information is received. 1. A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 600' radius of subject property (including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest assessment rolls. 2. Two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600' radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of punctuation. For any address other than single family residence, an apartment, suite or building number must be included on a separate line. DO NOT include it in the street address line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Swiss 721, Enterprise TM or Courier New (TT) no larger than 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: Form 1 10/97 Page 6 of 8 UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH 1 23 Magnolia Ave. , Apt #3 1 23 Magnolia Ave. APT 3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 3. 600' Radius Map: A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within 600' of exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owners list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. 4. 100' Radius Occupants/Address List and Labels: For Coastal Zone projects/CDPs Only. One (1) list of the occupants/addresses located within a 100' radius of the project site; and two (2) sets of labels (as described in "A" above) of the addresses within a 100' radius B. Photographs: Pictures of the property taken from the north, south, east and west. C. Construction materials board and color samples: Roofing, exterior walls, textured pavement, glass, wood, etc. D. Fees: See Fee Schedule for amount. IV. SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS A. For Master Plans and Specific Plans Only: Al° 1. It is strongly recommended the applicant meet with staff before submitting text and maps for a master plan or specific plan. 2. After staff and the applicant have worked out the details of the master plan or specific plan a minimum of twenty (20) bound copies of the document will be required prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing. 3. Generally the following information must be included in a Master Plan or Specific Plan document: a. Introduction b. Environmental Constraints c. Land Use and Development Standards d. Open Space e. Public Facilities and Phasing f. Signage B. For Density Bonus Projects: /vT*3 1 . A letter signed by the present owner stating what specific incentives are being requested from the City. For any development standards Forml 10/97 Page 7 of 8 W modification or other additional incentive requested, the applicant shall submit a project pro-forma to demonstrate that the standards modification or other requested incentive is necessary to make the project economically feasible. 2. A detailed vicinity map showing the project location and such details as the location of the nearest commercial retail, transit stop, potential employment locations, park or recreation facilities or other social or community service facilities. 3. For condominium conversion requests, a report documenting the following information for each unit proposed to be converted: the monthly income of tenants of each unit throughout the prior year, the monthly rent for each unit throughout the prior year and vacancy information for each unit throughout the prior year. 4. Identify the number and location of lower income dwelling units. C. For Senior Citizen Housing Projects: N° 1. A letter signed by the present owner stating what specific incentives are being requested from the City. For any development standards modification or other additional incentive requested, the applicant shall submit a project pro-forma to demonstrate that the standards modification or other requested incentive is necessary to make the project economically feasible. 2. A detailed vicinity map showing the project location and such details as the nearest market, transit stop, park or recreation area, medical facilities or other related uses or services likely to be patronized by senior citizens. 3. Ten (10) copies of floor plans for each different type of unit indicating a typically furnished apartment, with dimensions of doorways, hallways, closets and cabinets. 4. Ten (10) copies of floor plans showing any common areas and accommodations. 5. Identify the number and location of lower income inclusionary dwelling units. 6. A plan for monitoring age restrictions for all units and income restrictions for designated inclusionary units. Forml 10/97 Page 8 of 8 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information must be disclosed: 1. APPLICANT List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. 2. OWNER List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad. CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 - FAX (619) 438-O894 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME: Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. R«v. 4/91 PfojOwc.frm PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010& 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the dates of June 30, 1989 (Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times- Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen) and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate) for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Solana Beach and the North County Judicial District; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: July 24, 1998 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. San Marcos Dated at California, this ?4i-h day July,of Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is *>the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Public notice The City of CARLSBAD Planning Departme A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: November 4,1998 Application complete date: July 1, 1998 Project Planner: Michael Grim Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno SUBJECT: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPI - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 18 - Request for a Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow the construction of a 288 unit apartment development on a pregraded pad located in Aviara Planning Area 18, at the southeast corner of Ambrosia Lane and Poinsettia Lane, in Local Facilities Management Zone 19. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4415 and 4416, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Site Development Plan SDP 98-10 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 98-43, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposal involves a 288 unit apartment development on a pregraded pad in Aviara Planning Area 18, located on the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane. The Site Development Plan is required prior to development of any Aviara Planning Area and the Coastal Development Permit is required for any development in the Coastal Zone. The project conforms to all applicable regulations and staff has no issue with the proposal. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant, JPI Westcoast Development L.P., is requesting approval of a Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow construction of a 288 unit apartment development in Aviara Planning Area 18. The site is located on the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane in Phase III of the Aviara Master Plan. To the north, across Poinsettia Lane, is another multifamily planning area (PA 19), with the Zone 19 Community Park beyond. To the south and west of the project site is Serenata (PA 17 and 21), two single-family developments by Brehm Communities. West of the northern portion of the site lies Planning Area 32B, the master plan's future church/daycare site. The project site is bordered on the east by the master plan boundary, with agriculture and native habitat on the adjacent properties. The site is currently mass-graded in accordance with the Aviara Phase III Final Map and all facilities necessary to serve the site are already in place. The project would take access off of Ambrosia Lane at two entry points, with no access allowed onto Poinsettia Lane. Planning Area 18 in the Aviara Master Plan is designated for uses in accordance with the RD-M (Residential Density - Multiple) r SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JP^T- AVIARA PA 18 November 4,1998 Page 2 Zone. Such uses must comply with the standards of the RD-M Zone, except as modified in the Aviara Master Plan. The General Plan designation on the property is RH (Residential High Density) allowing from 15 to 23 dwellings per acre, with a Growth Control Point of 19 dwellings per acre. The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal involves a total of 288 apartment units in 16 buildings. The site would gain access from Ambrosia Lane at two locations, matching the intersections of Docena Road and Calliandra Road in Planning Area 21 across the street. The buildings are grouped into pods, with circulation aisles, carports, surface parking, landscaping and pedestrian walkways within each pod. Each building has both dedicated and non-dedicated one car garages built into the building. The proposed recreation facility/clubhouse would be located at the main project entry, at Docena Road and Ambrosia Lane, and would include both active and passive recreation opportunities. All buildings are separated by at least 20 feet and are arranged in a non-uniform manner around the project site. The proposed site plan accommodates adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation while providing landscaping and passive recreation opportunities throughout the site. As shown on Exhibits "A" - "BB", dated November 4, 1998, there are three different building types proposed, each with two stories of apartment units; two of the building types include lofts for four of the upstairs units. All residential buildings measure between 34 and 35 feet high. Each apartment building would include enclosed one-car garage, some with internal access, measuring the minimum 12 feet by 20 feet inside dimension. The architectural theme for all structures would be Mediterranean, in keeping with the design criteria of the Aviara Master Plan. The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan; B. Local Coastal Program; C. Aviara Master Plan (MP 177 and its amendments); D. Parking Ordinance (Chapter 21.44 of the Zoning Ordinance); E. P-C - Planned Community Zone (Chapter 21.38 of the Zoning Ordinance); F. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); G. Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JlT- AVIARA PA 18 November 4, 1998 Page 3 A. General Plan The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the apartment development project are the Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Public Safety and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan. TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT Land Use Circulation Housing Public Safety Open Space and Conservation USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Site is designated for residential land use at a density of 15 to 19 du/ac. Require new developments to construct all roadways needed to serve the development prior to or concurrent with needs. Ensure that all master planned communities and qualified subdivisions provide a range of housing for all economic income ranges. Design all structures in accordance with the seismic design standards of the UBC and State building requirements. Provision of emergency water systems and all weather access roads. Minimize environmental impacts to sensitive resources in the City. PROPOSED USES AND IMPROVEMENTS Proposed density of 16 du/ac is consistent with land use designation. All street improvements will be completed prior to, or concurrent with, development Project provides market rate units within Aviara while the master plan developer has constructed sufficient units in the Villa Loma development to cover PA 18's affordable housing requirement. All building will meet UBC and State seismic requirements. All necessary water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances must be installed prior to occupancy of any unit and all weather access roads will be maintained throughout construction. Project maintains amount of native habitat and erosion control during grading reduces sedimentation of the lagoon. COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JrT- AVIARA PA 18 November 4, 1998 Page 4 B. Local Coastal Program The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 site lies within the Mello I segment of the City's Coastal Zone and is subject to the corresponding land use policies and implementing ordinances. The implementing ordinance for those portions of the Mello I within Aviara are contained in the Aviara Master Plan. This section addresses only conformance with the Land Use Plan since implementing ordinance conformance is addressed in section C below. The policies of the Mello I segment emphasize topics such as preservation of agriculture and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The land uses allowed through the LCP segments are the same as those allowed through the Aviara Master Plan, therefore the proposed residential uses are consistent with the LCP. All steep slopes with native vegetation were preserved through the tentative tract map for Aviara Phase III (CT 92-03) and no encroachment is proposed with the residential construction. The current erosion control standards of the Engineering Department will be maintained throughout the project site to deter erosion and potential lagoon sedimentation. No agricultural lands exist on the project site, therefore no impacts to such will occur. The project site is located 0.19 miles from the Batiquitos Lagoon and 0.39 miles from the Pacific Ocean, therefore no existing or future coastal access routes exist through the site. No significant visual resources exist on or near the graded project site. Given the above, the project is consistent with the Mello I land use policies. C. Aviara Master Plan According to the Aviara Master Plan, all development within Planning Area 18 is to follow the requirements of the RD-M (Residential Density Multiple) zone, except as modified in the master plan. Most of the development standards, such as use allocation, building height, setbacks and design criteria are contained in the master plan and are therefore discussed below. Table 2 below details the project's conformance to these master plan standards and criteria. TABLE 2 - AVIARA MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT Building Height: 35 feet maximum 50% units maximum of two stories Easterly PA boundary setback: Minimum of 50 feet PROPOSED PLAN All buildings range from 34 to 35 feet high. All buildings have two stories, two building types have small loft areas. All structures setback a minimum COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPT- AVIARA PA 18 November 4, 1998 PageS TABLE 2 - AVIARA MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT Building Separation: Minimum 20 feet separation Public Utility easement setback: Minimum 30 foot setback PROPOSED PLAN of 50 feet from the easterly PA boundary. All buildings are a minimum of 20 feet apart. All structures setback a minimum of 30 feet from the SDG&E easement. COMPLIANCE Yes Yes As shown in Table 2 above, the developer has met all of the building height and setback requirements of the master plan. Therefore the JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal is consistent with the Aviara Master Plan. Since the Aviara Master Plan serves as the implementing ordinance of the Local Coastal Program for this site, consistency with the master plan also represents consistency with the LCP implementing ordinances. D. Parking Ordinance With regard to parking requirements, the Aviara Master Plan defers to Chapter 21.44 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City's Parking Ordinance. According to Section 21.44.020(a)(3), the proposed 288-unit apartment complex requires a total of 581 spaces, based upon the number of units and the number of bedrooms for each unit. For resident parking, the Parking Ordinance requires 1.5 spaces per unit for studio and one-bedroom units and 2.0 spaces per unit for two- and more bedroom units. Given these ratios, Table 3 below details the resident parking calculations. TABLE 3 - RESIDENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS Bedroom Mix by Building Type Building Type I 12 one-bedroom units 6 two+ bedroom units Parking Calculations by Building Type 1 .5 spaces/unit x 12 units =18 spaces 2.0 spaces/unit x 6 units = 12 spaces Total parking per building = 30 spaces Number of Buildings Total of 6 Building Type I Total Number of Spaces 30 spaces/building x 6 buildings = 180 spaces SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPT- AVIARA PA 18 November 4, 1998 Page 6 TABLE 3 - RESIDENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS Building Type II 8 one-bedroom units 1 0 two+ bedroom units Building Type III 4 one-bedroom units 1 4 two+ bedroom units 1 .5 spaces/unit x 8 units =12 spaces 2.0 spaces/unit x 10 units = 20 spaces Total parking per building = 32 spaces 1 .5 spaces/unit x 4 units = 6 spaces 2.0 spaces/unit x 14 units = 28 spaces Total parking per building = 34 spaces Total of 7 Building Type II Total of 3 Building Type III 32 spaces/building x 7 buildings = 224 spaces 34 spaces/building x 3 buildings = 102 spaces Based upon the above calculations, the total amount of resident parking is 506 spaces (180+224+102=506). The amount of guest parking required is also based upon the unit count, namely one space per every two units up to ten units, then one space for every four units over ten. For a total of 288 units, this requirement calculates as: (0.5 spaces/unit x 10 units) + (0.25 spaces/unit x 278 units) = 75 guest spaces Therefore the total amount of parking required for the 288-unit apartment development is 581 spaces (506+75=581). The proposed amount of parking is 581 spaces, 110 of which are contained in one-car garages and 178 of which are located in carports. Given the above, the JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal meets the requirements of the Parking Ordinance. E. Planned Community Zone The underlying zoning of the proposed JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project site is P-C, Planned Community. In accordance with that designation, the Aviara Master Plan was created to implement that zoning. No specific development standards or design criteria exist in the P-C zone, however, and all applicable standards and criteria are contained within, or referenced by, master plan documents. Therefore, conformance with the master plan requirements also indicates conformance with the Planned Community Zone. F. Growth Management Ordinance The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal is a residential project and, therefore, subject to the provisions of the City's Growth Management program. Table 4 below details the project's compliance with the standards of the Growth Management Ordinance. SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPl - AVIARA PA 18 November 4, 1998 Page? TABLE 4 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE Standard City Administration Library Waste Water Treatment Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Water Impacts/Standard 2,320.79 sq ft 1,23 7.59 sq ft 288 EDU 4.64 acres PLDAD 1J28ADT Station # 4 N/A C.U.S.D. 63,360 GPD Compliance Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes The project is 47 units below the Growth Management Control Point. Given the above, the JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project is consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance. G. Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan Local Facilities Management Zone 19 covers the entire Aviara Master Plan, including Planning Area 18. No special development requirements, such as roadway construction or other infrastructure requirements, apply to this 288 unit residential development. The LFMP does require that all facilities needed to serve the development be in place concurrent with, or prior to, need. The JPI - Aviara PA 18 project, as conditioned, will be served with all utilities and improvements prior to occupancy of any unit and will pay the required public facilities fee prior to issuance of building permits. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the Zone 19 LFMP. V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Earlier environmental analyses have been completed for the project site on several occasions. One is the Master Environmental Impact Report for the City's 1994 General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01) reviewed the potential impacts of buildout of the City's General Plan, including transportation and air quality impacts. Another source is the Environmental Impact Report for the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort (EIR 83-02(A) for CT 85-35/MP 177) certified on December 8, 1987, analyzed all of the potential impacts for the development and occupation of the over 2,000 units residential master plan (now known as Aviara) with its associated 18 hole golf course, 550 room hotel, sports club and neighborhood commercial site, including development of Planning Area 18 with residential uses. The third previous environmental document is the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Aviara Phase III Master Plan Amendment (CT 92-03/MP 177(G)), approved January 25, 1994, which reviewed the grading SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - Jpf- AVIARA PA 18 November 4, 1998 Paee8 and construction related to the development of Phase III, including development of Planning Area 18. The fourth previous environmental document is the Negative Declaration and MEIR Addendum for the Aviara Phase III North Master Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment (MP 177(U)/GPA 97-06), which reviewed the potential environmental impacts associated with development of the Aviara PA 18 with up to 335 residential units. The proposed apartment complex involves only 288 units. Without exception, the proposed action has no additional impacts not previously analyzed in the earlier environmental review and no additional review or mitigation measures are necessary. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4415 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4416 5. Location Map 6. Disclosure Statement 7. Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance, dated July 24,1998 8. Environmental Impact Assessment Form, dated July 20,1998 9. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 10. Background Data Sheet 11. Exhibits "A" -"BB", dated November 4,1998 MG:kc:mh LJ JPI APARTMENTS ATAVIARAP. A. 18 SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 6-01-1998 1:42PM FROM ANNING SYSTEMS 760 9315744P qg> ,P. 2 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: . • -....• :- • •" ; ••;•" '•'.' " ' ' -.';•" :••'' ••'V;-'v '•'"'' """•"' ' '•• ' Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in Ais and any odier county, city and county, city municipality, district or oraer political subdivision or any other :group or :combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity, .of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1 . 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person A'/Jr '• f*0 IrtaH/tflft/Cu Corp/Part J« J* Title flLOn^ iMO^ 4-^U*>"> Title Address Address %°l(O OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person (^ I A Title Com/Part Title \hCE TttCSt'P&Jr/G&a.Mc.Q. "O.L. Address Address 2ot\ 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 - (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 l0i -1 998 1 : 43PM FROM ANNING SYSTEMS 760 9315744 J\^ °\¥> - P- 3 3 . NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to ( 1 ) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust _ Non Profrt/Trust__ _ Title _ Title _ Address Address. 4. Have you had more than £250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? | [ Yes f)(] No If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. 1 certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date T>. L. Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 o City of Carlsbad ^ ••••^^^•^••^iBiBHPiiH^^^HHHII^^HH^BBMHPlanning Department PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Take Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed. Project Title: Project Location: JPI - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 18 Southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane, Aviara Planning Area 18, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Project Description: Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow construction of a 288-unit apartment complex on a pregraded pad. Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date of publication. DATED: CASE NO: CASE NAME: July 24, 1998 SDP98-10/CDP 98-43 JPI - AVIARA PA 18 PUBLISH DATE: July 24, 1998 MICHAEL jrTHOLZlvllLLER Planning Director 2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 DATE: July 20.1998 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 2. APPLICANT: JPI Westcoast Development. L.P. 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 8910 University Center Lane. #150. San Dieeo. CA 92122 (619)458-1200 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: June 1. 1998 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow construction of a 288-unit apartment complex on a pregraded lot within Aviara Planning Area 18. located at the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane. City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. | [ Land Use and Planning [ | Population and Housing | [ Geological Problems Q Water M Air Quality |^[ Transportation/Circulation f] Public Services | | Biological Resources [~~| Utilities & Service Systems | | Energy & Mineral Resources [~~| Aesthetics [ | Hazards | | Cultural Resources | | Noise [""] Recreation | | Mandatory Findings of Significance Rev. 03/28/96 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) | | I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. | | I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [~~| I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. | | I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in earlier EIRs and a Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIRs and Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. Planner Signature ( / Date Planning Directors Signature Date Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Rev. 03/28/96 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26, #3, pgs 11-12; #4, pg 5) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26,#3, pgs 11-12; #4,pg5) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4- 26, #3, pgs 11-12; #4,pg5) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26, #3, pg 11; #4, pg 5) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26, #3, pgs 13-14; #4, pg 5) Potentially Significant Impact D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D Less Than No Significant Impact Impact D D D II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (#1, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6; #2, pgs 4-1-4-26; #3, pg 13; #4,pg5) D D D Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (#1, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26; #3, pg 13; #4,pg5) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (#1, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26; #3,pgl3-14; #4,pg5) Potentially Significant Impact D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D Less Than Significant Impact No Impact III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4- 150-4-156; #3, pg 7; #4,pg5) b) Seismic ground shaking? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pg 7; #4, pg 5) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, Pg7; #4,pg5) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pg 7; #4, pg 5) e) Landslides or mudflows? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs 7-8; #4, pg 5) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs 7-8; #4,pg5) g) Subsidence of the land? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs 7-8; #4, pg 5) h) Expansive soils? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4- 150-4-156;#3,pg7; #4,pg5) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (# 1, pgs 5.1- 1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs 7-8; #4, Pg5) D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D a a a a a a a a a IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4, Pg5) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4, pg 5) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 5) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 -4-118;#3)Pg9; #4,pg6) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110-4-118; #3, pg 8; #4,pg6) D D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 9; #4,pg6) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg8; #4,pg6) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 6) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118;#3,Pg8; #4,pg6) Potentially Significant Impact D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D Less Than No Significant Impact Impact D El D V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (#1, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3- 12; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4, pg 6) d) Create objectionable odors? (#1, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3- 12; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4, pg 6) D D D n a a aa a a a VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7- 22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3, pgs 14-15; #4, pg 6) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3,pgl5; #4,pg6) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3, pg 14; #4,pg6) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3, pgs 14-15; #4,pg6) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4- 63-4-80; #3, pg 14; #4,pg6) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3, pg 14; #4, Pg6) D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3, pgs 10-11; #4, pg 6) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3, pgs 10-11; #4,pg6) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4- 24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3, pgs 10-11; #4, pg 6) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4- 149; #3, pgs 10-11; #4,pg6) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3, pg 11; #4,pg7) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3,pg9; #4,pg7) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 7) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 9; #4,pg7) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 13; #4,pg7) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 15; #4,pg7) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12-13; #4, pg 7) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12-13; #4, pg 7) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 13; #4, pg 7) Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D a a Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#1, pgs 5.9-1 - 5.9-15; #2, pgs 4-81 - 4-84; #3, pg 12-13; #4, pg 7) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (# 1, pgs 5.9-1 - 5.9-15; #2, pgs 4-81 - 4-84; #3, pg 12-13; #4,Pg7) D D D D D D XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (#1, pgs 5.12.5-1 -5.12.5-6; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7) b) Police protection? (#1, pgs 5.12.5-1 -5.12.5-6; #2, pgs 4-94-4-109; #3, pg 12) c) Schools? (#1, pgs 5.12.7-1 -5.12.7-5; #2, pgs 4-94 -4-109; #3, pg 12; #4,pg7) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3,pgl2; #4,pg7) e) Other governmental services? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7) D D D D D D D D D D D D D D XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 7) b) Communications systems? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.8-7; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7; #2, 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4,pg7) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7) e) Storm water drainage? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3- 7; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7) f) Solid waste disposal? (#1, pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3; #2) 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 8) g) Local or regional water supplies? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 8) D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#1, pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5; #2, pgs 4-35 - 4-62; #3, pg 15; #4,pg8) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (#1, pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5; #2, pgs 4-35 - 4-62; #3, pg 15; #4, Pg 8) D a a a a a 8 Rev. 03/28/96 c Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). c) Create light or glare? (#1, pgs 5.10.3-1 - 5.10.3-2; #2, pgs 4-35 - 4-62; #3, pg 15; #4, pg 8) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4, Pg8) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4, Pg8) c) Affect historical resources? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4, pg 8) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4, pg8) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157-4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4, pg 8) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (#1, pgs 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pg 15; #4, pg8) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#1, pgs 5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pg 15; #4, Pg8) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D Less Than No Significant Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 03/28/96 c XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Referenced in the above checklist are the earlier environmental analysis that have been conducted for the project site. Source #1 is the Master Environmental Impact Report for the City's 1994 General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01) that reviewed the potential impacts of buildout of the City's General Plan, including transportation and air quality impacts. Source #2 is the Environmental Impact Report for the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort (EIR 83-02(A) for CT 85-35/MP 177) certified on December 8, 1987, that analyzed all of the potential impacts for the development and occupation of the over 2,000 units residential master plan (now known as Aviara) with its associated 18 hole golf course, 550 room hotel, sports club and neighborhood commercial site, including development of Planning Area 18 with residential uses. Source #3 is the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Aviara Phase III Master Plan Amendment (CT 92- 03/MP 177(G)), approved January 25,1994, which reviewed the grading and construction related to the development of Phase III, including development of Planning Area 18 with multi-family residential uses. Source #4 is the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MEIR Addendum for the Aviara Phase III North Land Use Proposal (MP 177(U)/GPA 97-06/LCPA 97-06), approved January 6, 1998, that evaluated the impacts of up to 315 multi-family units, either apartments or condominiums, for Planning Area 18. Without exception, the proposed action has no additional impacts not previously analyzed in the earlier environmental review and no additional review or mitigation measures are necessary. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposal involves the construction of a 288-unit apartment complex on a pregraded pad within Aviara Planning Area 18. The proposed development meets all applicable standards and policies, including setbacks, building height and architectural style. No environmentally sensitive resources exist on the previously graded site and no significant adverse impacts to the environment are anticipated. AIR QUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant; therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. 10 Rev. 03/28/96 Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 11 Rev. 03/28/96 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RH ZONING: P-C - Planned Community DEVELOPER'S NAME: JPI Westcoast Development ADDRESS: 8910 University Center Lane. Suite 150. San Diego. CA 92122 PHONE NO.: (619)458-1200 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 215-840-01/215-841-01 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 288 units ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: August. 1999 A. B. C. D. E. City Administrative Facilities: Library: Demand in Square Footage = 2.320.79 Demand in Square Footage = 1.237.59 288 EDU 4.64 F. G. H. I. J. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = PLDAD (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = 1.728 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = No. 4 K. L. Open Space: Acreage Provided = Schools: (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = N/A Carlsbad Unified 288 63.360 The project is 47 units below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance. o BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 CASE NAME: JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 APPLICANT: JPI Westcoast Development REQUEST AND LOCATION: Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow construction of a 288 unit apartment development on a pregraded site in Aviara Planning Area 18, located at the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2 of Carlsbad Tract CT 92-3. Phase III. Unit 1. according to Map No. 13434. filed in the Office of the County Recorder on June 23, 1997, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. APN: 215-840-01/215-841-01 Acres: 18.11 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 288 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: Residential High Density fRH) Density Allowed: 15 - 19du/ac Density Proposed: 16.0du/ac Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: P-C Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Site North South East West P-C h P-C h P-C L-C t P-C Carlsbad Zoning Land Use Vacant multifamily Vacant multifamily Vacant single-family Vacant & agriculture Vacant single-family PUBLIC FACILITIES Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 288 EDU Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: June 1.1998 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_ Other, Prior Environmental Compliance, dated July 24.1998