HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 98-43; JPI Apartments at Aviara PA 18; Coastal Development Permit (CDP)CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C
Q] Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
[]] Administrative Variance
0 Coastal Development Permit
Q Conditional Use Permit
QI Condominium Permit
[X| Environmental Impact
Assessment
n General Plan Amendment
I | Hillside Development Permit
Q Local Coastal Plan Amendment
n Master Plan
Q Non-Residential Planned
Development
Q Planned Development Permit
HECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
<?&• V5
Q Planned Industrial Permit
Q Planning Commission
Determination
[~| Precise Development Plan
Q Redevelopment Permit
FXJ Site Development Plan
Q Special Use Permit
[~~| Specific Plan
n Tentative Parcel Mop
Obtain from Engineering Department
[U Tentative Tract Map
n Variance
PI Zone Change
[~| List other applications not
specified
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
<?8-fo
2)
3)
4)
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).:
PROJECT NAME:
?.1 S-and ?. IS -080-26
JPI Westcoast Development
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:2RR unit luxury apartment complex
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type)
Aviara Land Associates Ltd. Partnershi
MAILING ADDRESS
2011 Palomar Airport Road #206
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760 931-1190
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATIOM-^S TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWUEDGB1. '
— =^4, \ «. / /
j^T A — '1 <^ ft' 3/2 1 f •) *( ^^LJ-j^-^ V^'/7*
SIGNATURE DATE
6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
p JPI Westcoast Development , t--'.
MAILING ADDRESS
8910 University Center Lane #150
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
San Diego, CA 92122 (619) 458-1200
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
C\QS3cr^ 4fete?
SIGNATURE ~~~~— -—DATE
7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 & 2 of Carlsbad Tract CT 92-3
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
3o
Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2
o o
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: Aviara Phase ITT, SE corner of Polnsettia Ln. &
, , STREET ADDRESS Amhrnsi* T.n .
ON THE ' 'East
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
BETWEEN Poinsttia Lane
SIDE OF
AND
Ambrosia Lane
(NAME OF STREET)
(NAME OF STREET)
I Ambrosia Lane
(NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS
19
1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE
22) EXISTING ZONING
11) NUMBER OF EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/
SQUARE FOOTAGE
17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN
ADT
20) EXISTING GENERAL
PLAN
23) PROPOSED ZONING
12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
15) PROPOSED COMM
SQUARE FOOTAGE
18) PROPOSED SEWER
USAGE IN EDU
21) PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION
24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
TO ENT/RYFOR THIS PURPOSE
SIGNATURE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION
APPLICATION TYPE
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
FEE REQUIRED
677-0.00
0yiv.cz>
RECEIVED
JUN 0 1 1998
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DEPT.
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY:
DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO.
Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2
Sf
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECT NAME' JPI Apartments at Aviara Planning Area 18
APPLICANT NAME: JPI Westcoast Development Inc.
Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately
explain the scope' and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any
background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or
appropriateness of, the application. Use an^addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation.
The proposed project is a 288 unit luxury apartment complex located
within Aviara Planning Area 18 on the east side of Ambrosia Lane south of
the future Poinsettia Lane. The proposed project will have a gated entry,
carports, garages, extensive landscaping and a distinctive architectural
design which will complement the Aviara Master Plan.
fltv. 4/91 ProjO«C.frm
w V
+ SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR ALL
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
+ APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY
REGULAR & MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
(Application checklist for Non-Single Family Regular Coastal Development Remits covered under separate handouQ
This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal
Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad.
1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
A. Estimated Cost of Development:
Development costing $60,000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal
Development Permit. The Planning Director shall make the final determination
regarding a project's cost of development.
The primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of
dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential construction. These
costs are set by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and
are applied throughout San Diego County.
Please complete the following information to assist in the determination of this
project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for
consideration by the Planning Director).
=> New Residential Square Footage:
254.980 square feet x $78.00/sq. ft. = $ 19.888.440.00
=> Residential Addition Square Footage:
square feet x $94.00/sq. ft. = $
=> Any Garage Square Footage:
square feet x $22.00/sq. ft. = $ 930.028
=> Residential Conversion Square Footage:
square feet x $26.00/sq. ft. = $
=> For Non-Residential Uses, use the following figures for calculations:
Retail/Store @ $38.00/sq. ft.; Restaurant @ $69.007 sq. ft.; Office @
$55.007 sq. ft.; Manufacturing/Warehouse @ $24.00/sq. ft.:
square feet x $ 7sq. ft. = $
COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ 20,818,.468.00
B. Do you wish to apply for:
1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000)
2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more) X
Form 15 10/97 Page 1 of 8
C. Street address of proposed development
SE corner of interseptinn of Pm'ngpt-t-ia T.anp & Amhrnsi'a Tjmp
D. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development
215-040-25 & 215-080-26
E. Development Description:
1. Briefly describe project: A 2RR unit-, luxury apart-mpnf
located within Aviara Planning Area 18.
2. Estimated cost of development: 20,818,468.00
F. Describe the present land uses (i.e. Vacant land, single family homes,
apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the:
North: Future multi-family housing
South: Future single-family homes
East: Vacant land .
West: Future single-family homes
G. Is project located within a 100 year flood plain?
II. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
A. Are there existing structures on the property?
If yes, please describe.
Yes No
No
B. Will any existing structure be removed/demolished?Yes No
If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal,
including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans).
LOT COVERAGE
A. Existing and Proposed
Building Coverage
Landscaped Area
Hardscape Area
Unimproved Area
(Left Natural)
Existing New Proposed Total
Zero sq- ft- _L82^643sq. ft. i«7 6A^sq. ft.
Zero sq. ft. 271,000 sq. ft. 271,OOP sq. ft.
Zero sq. ft. 23,000 .sq. ft. 23,000 sq. ft.
29.400 sq. ft. 29.400 sq. ft. "29.400 sq. ft.
Form 15 10/97 Page 2 of 8
B.
C.
Parkin
Grade
Is any
If yes,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
g: dumber of existing spaces s
Number of new spaces proposed
Existing/Proposed TOTAL:
Number of total spaces required
Number of covered spaces
Number of uncovered spaces
Number of standard spaces
Number of compact spaces
Is tandem parking existing? Q
Is tandem parking proposed? | |
Alteration:
grading proposed? fc"|
please complete the following:
Amount of cut 33,000
Amount of fill 33,000
Maximum heiaht of fill slope 1 ^ fppi-
Maximum heiaht of cut slope 6 feet
Amount of import or export Zero
Location of borrow or disposal site N/A
"flero
588
588
581
288
300
967
33
Yes#
Yes#
Yes
HNO
0No
DNO
cu. yds.
cu. yds.
feet
feet
cu. yds.
Form 15 10/97 Page 3 of 8
c o
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR:
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Non-Single Family Regular Only/Including
Amendments)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (Including Amendments)
MASTER PLAN (Including Amendments)
REDEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Major, Minor and Amendments) - A Coastal
Development permit supplemental application may also be needed.
PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATIONS
PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS (Including Revisions)
SPECIAL USE PERMITS (Including Amendments; Excluding Floodplain SUPs)
SPECIFIC PLANS (Including Amendments)
A proposed project requiring multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to
3:30 p.m. A proposed project requiring only one application be filed must be submitted
prior to 4:00 p.m. All joint application exhibits, i.e. Site Plans, Landscape Plans and
constraint maps should be prepared at the same scale. (Use a scale no smaller than 1" =
40'} -• • ' • " •:>-- •••• : ..- ' •
The following materials shall be submitted for each application or for combined applications on
a single project, except as noted under "III. Other Requirements", A and B of Property Owners
List and Address Labels.
I. REQUIRED PLANS (folded, stapled and delivered in COMPLETE sets)
Q A. SITE PLAN: Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36" sheets folded to 81/2" x 11" size.
Fifteen (15) copies of the site plan shall be submitted by the applicant upon
request of the project planner prior to approval of the project. Each site plan
shall contain the following information:
| | 1. General Information:
| | a. Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, owner and
engineer or architect who prepared the plan.
| | b. North arrow and scale.
| | c. Vicinity map showing major cross streets.
| | d. Date of preparation/revisions.
. oo
| | e. Project name and application types submitted.
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (G19) 438-0894
f. Name of sewer, water and school districts providing service to the
project.
[~| g. All facilities labeled as "existing" or "proposed".
h. A summary table of the following:
(1) Street address and assessor parcel numbers.
(2) Site acreage.
(3) Existing zone and land use.
(4) Proposed land use.
\~] (5) Total building coverage.
\~\ (6) Building square footage.
(7) Percent landscaping.
(8) Number of parking spaces required/provided.
(9) Square footage of open or recreational space (if applicable), for
each unit and total common open space for the project.
(10) Proposed density.
(11) Area of the site which is undevelopable per Zoning Ordinance
Section 21 .53.230 (include the acreage in each category). If not
applicable, state on the plans.
(12) Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable). Show location.
f~] (13) Average daily traffic generated by the project, broken down by
separate uses.
2. Site Information:
\~\ a. General
(1) Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings and
permanent structures onsite and within 100' of site.
\~] (2) Location of all major vegetation showing size and type.
(3) Location of railroads.
(4) Bearings and distances of each exterior boundary line.
(5) Distance between buildings and/or structures.
(6) Setback dimensions for required front, rear and side yards for all
structures.
(7) Location, height and materials of walls
b. Street and Utilities
(1) Location, width and proposed name of all streets within and
adjacent to the proposed project. Show street grades and
centerline radii.
(2) Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys.
Include medians and adjacent driveway locations.
(3) Typical street cross sections for all streets within and adjacent to
the project.
Forml 10/97 Page 2 of 8
(4) Width, location and use of all existing and/or proposed public or
private easements.
(5) Public and private streets and utilities clearly identified.
[~~1 (6) Show distance between all intersections and medium and high
use driveways.
[~] (7) Clearly show parking stall and isle dimensions and truck turning
radii for all parking areas.
f~| (8) Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands.
| | (9) Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer,
water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone
facilities) within and adjacent to the project.
[~] (10) Show location of all fire hydrants within 300' of site.
c. Grading and Drainage
| [ (1) Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%; 2'
intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%; and 5' intervals for
slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and
proposed topographic contours within 100' perimeter of the
boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed
and those to be saved.
|~"1 (2) Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export.
| | (3) Spot elevations at the corners of each pad.
Q (4) Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken
parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage.
[~~| (5) Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage
facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Show
location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention
basins.
| [ (6) Clearly show and label 1 00 year flood line for the before and after
conditions for any project which is within or adjacent to a FEMA
flood plain.
B. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36" sheets drawn to the same
scale as site plan (See "I. A" on page 1). Fifteen (15) copies of the landscape
r^ plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner
b prior to approval of the project. Each landscape plan shall include the following
information:
[~| 1 . Landscape zones per the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual.
[~~| 2. Typical plant species, quantity of each species and their size for each
planting zone (use symbols).
| | 3. An estimate of the yearly amount of irrigation (supplemental) water
required to maintain each zone.
[ | 4. Landscape maintenance responsibility (private or common) for all areas.
[~~| 5. Percent of site used for landscaping.
I I 6. Water Conservation Plan.
Forml 10/97 Page 3 of 8
| |
BUILDING ELEVATION AND FLOOR PLAN: Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36"
sheets (See "I.A" on page 1). Fifteen (15) copies of the building elevations and
floor plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project
planner prior to project approval. Each building elevation and floor plan shall
include the following information:
1. Floor plans with square footage included.
2. Location and size of storage areas.
3. All buildings, structures, walls and/or fences, signs and exterior lights.
4. Include a scale on all floor plans and building elevations.
5. Indicate on all building elevations compliance with Carlsbad Height
Ordinance 21.04.065.
ROOF PLAN: Show location of roof appurtenances and mechanical equipment.
CONSTRAINTS MAP: (If the constraints map does not apply to the property, list
it on the map as not applicable. Constraint map shaJM5e the same scale as other
Exhibits, i.e. Site Plan, etc.) One (1) copy on/ax24" x 36" sheet (see "I.A" on
page 1) shall include the following information
tejor ridge lines.
Distant views.
Internal views.
Ripariarror woodlanc
Intermittenrxdrainaefe course.
25-40%slo|W/ , ^
Greater than4o\ slopes.
Major rocj*'outcrop|siings.
Easements.
Floodplains.
Archaeological sites.
Special Planning Areas.
Biological Habitats. Indicate the location of Coastal Sage Scrub and
chaparall plan communities existing^pn the project site.
Beaches.
Permanent bodies of water.
Wetlands.
Land subject to major power transmission eas\ments.
Railroad track beds.
F. COLORED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN: (Not required with first
submittal.) It is the applicant's responsibility to bring one (1) copy of a colored
site plan and one (1) copy of a colored elevation to the Planning Department by
12:00 noon, eight (8) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. DO
NOT MOUNT EXHIBITS.
G. REDUCED SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS: One (1) copy 8 1/2" x
11".
Forml 10/97 Page 4 of 8
[J H. LOCATION MAP: One (1) copy 8 1/2" x 11" (suggested scale 200" - vicinity
maps on the site plan are not acceptable).
II. DOCUMENTS
|~l A. Land Use Review Application Form
| | B Coastal Development Permit Supplemental Application
| [ C. Environmental Impact Assessment Form (separate fee required).
[ | D. Public Facility Agreement: Two (2) copies - One (1) notarized original and one
(1) reproduced copy (separate fee required).
| | E. Disclosure Statement.
| | F. Preliminary Title Report: Three (3) copies (current within the last six [6]
months).
[ | G. Sewer: Proof of availability of sewer if located in the Leucadia County Water
District or the Vallecitos Water District.
| | H. Potential Impacts: All projects must evaluate their potential impacts/on the
^regional transportation system, including the costs of mitigating the/associated
impacts, as required by the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP).
K\OV ^ For projects with an average daily traffic (ADT) generation rate greater than 500
\ ^^J^\ vehicles per day or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips:
Submit twbi (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. The
analysis must.be prepared by a Registered Traffi^tngineer or Registered Civil
Engineer. The^analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road
segments identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management
Plan or as otherwise determined in discussions with staff. The following
minimum information should be included With the study:
1. 8 Yz" x 11" or 8 1/2"\14" plats/showing zone impacted roads, background
and project AM and PM peax hour impacts and traffic distribution.
2. Project traffic generation rates and traffic assignment.
3. Necessary calculations and/o\analysis to determine intersection and
road segment levels of service.
4. Any proposed mitigation requireme)rt§ to maintain the public facility
standar
5. Qrfcollector streets and above, an analysis of^e need for a traffic signal
/will be required.
Form 1 10/97 Page 5 of 8
"Large" projects: Any project which, upon its completion will be expected to
generate either arTfequKfalent of 2,400 or more averagejiaHyyehicle trips or 200
or more peak-hour vehicte^trips, including large pnojecte that \nay have already
been reviewed under CEQA^butrequire addjikrfial local discretionary actions, is
defined as a "large project" undBf-Jbe^SANDAG Congestion Management
Program (CMP) and will be subject-tcTenFiaTK^d CEQA review as specified in the
CMP.
Depending uporrlfie complexity of the project, the City of Carlsbad reserves the
right to require a traffic study on any project.
| [ I. Noise Study: Must be consistent with City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines
Manual.
| | J. Preliminary Soils/Geological Report: Two (2) copies for all projects with cut or
fill depths exceeding 5'.
| | K. Completed "Project Description/Explanation" sheet.
| | L. Signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications".
III. OTHER REQUIREMENTS
| | A. Property Owners List and Address Labels:
NOTE: When the application is tentatively scheduled to be heard by the
decision making body, the project planner will contact the applicant and advise
him to submit the radius map, two (2) sets of the property owners list and labels.
The applicant shall be required to sign a statement certifying that the information
provided represents the latest equalized assessment rolls from the San Diego
County Assessor's Office. The project will NOT go forward until this information
is received.
1. A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners
within a 600' radius of subject property (including the applicant and/or
owner). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel
number from the latest assessment rolls.
2. Two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a
600' radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL
LETTERS, left justified, void of punctuation. For any address other than
single family residence, an apartment, suite or building number must be
included on a separate line. DO NOT include it in the street address line.
DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. DO
NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY.
Acceptable fonts are: Swiss 721, Enterprise TM or Courier New (TT) no
larger than 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows:
Form 1 10/97 Page 6 of 8
UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH
1 23 Magnolia Ave. , Apt #3 1 23 Magnolia Ave. APT 3
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE
Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
3. 600' Radius Map: A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each
lot within 600' of exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of
these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the
property owners list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale
acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical.
4. 100' Radius Occupants/Address List and Labels: For Coastal Zone
projects/CDPs Only. One (1) list of the occupants/addresses located
within a 100' radius of the project site; and two (2) sets of labels (as
described in "A" above) of the addresses within a 100' radius
B. Photographs: Pictures of the property taken from the north, south, east and
west.
C. Construction materials board and color samples: Roofing, exterior walls,
textured pavement, glass, wood, etc.
D. Fees: See Fee Schedule for amount.
IV. SPECIFIC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
A. For Master Plans and Specific Plans Only: Al°
1. It is strongly recommended the applicant meet with staff before
submitting text and maps for a master plan or specific plan.
2. After staff and the applicant have worked out the details of the master
plan or specific plan a minimum of twenty (20) bound copies of the
document will be required prior to scheduling the project for a public
hearing.
3. Generally the following information must be included in a Master Plan or
Specific Plan document:
a. Introduction
b. Environmental Constraints
c. Land Use and Development Standards
d. Open Space
e. Public Facilities and Phasing
f. Signage
B. For Density Bonus Projects: /vT*3
1 . A letter signed by the present owner stating what specific incentives are
being requested from the City. For any development standards
Forml 10/97 Page 7 of 8
W
modification or other additional incentive requested, the applicant shall
submit a project pro-forma to demonstrate that the standards modification
or other requested incentive is necessary to make the project
economically feasible.
2. A detailed vicinity map showing the project location and such details as
the location of the nearest commercial retail, transit stop, potential
employment locations, park or recreation facilities or other social or
community service facilities.
3. For condominium conversion requests, a report documenting the
following information for each unit proposed to be converted: the monthly
income of tenants of each unit throughout the prior year, the monthly rent
for each unit throughout the prior year and vacancy information for each
unit throughout the prior year.
4. Identify the number and location of lower income dwelling units.
C. For Senior Citizen Housing Projects: N°
1. A letter signed by the present owner stating what specific incentives are
being requested from the City. For any development standards
modification or other additional incentive requested, the applicant shall
submit a project pro-forma to demonstrate that the standards modification
or other requested incentive is necessary to make the project
economically feasible.
2. A detailed vicinity map showing the project location and such details as
the nearest market, transit stop, park or recreation area, medical facilities
or other related uses or services likely to be patronized by senior citizens.
3. Ten (10) copies of floor plans for each different type of unit indicating a
typically furnished apartment, with dimensions of doorways, hallways,
closets and cabinets.
4. Ten (10) copies of floor plans showing any common areas and
accommodations.
5. Identify the number and location of lower income inclusionary dwelling
units.
6. A plan for monitoring age restrictions for all units and income restrictions
for designated inclusionary units.
Forml 10/97 Page 8 of 8
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all
applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City
Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information must be disclosed:
1. APPLICANT
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the
application.
2. OWNER
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the
property involved.
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership,
list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares
in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a
trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of
the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad. CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 - FAX (619) 438-O894
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECT NAME:
APPLICANT NAME:
Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately
explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any
background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or
appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation.
R«v. 4/91 PfojOwc.frm
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2010& 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of
North County Times
formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The
Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been
adjudged newspapers of general circulation by the
Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of
California, under the dates of June 30, 1989
(Blade-Citizen) and June 21, 1974 (Times-
Advocate) case number 171349 (Blade-Citizen)
and case number 172171 (The Times-Advocate)
for the cities of Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad,
Solana Beach and the North County Judicial
District; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
July 24, 1998
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
San Marcos
Dated at California, this ?4i-h day
July,of
Signature
NORTH COUNTY TIMES
Legal Advertising
This space is *>the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of
Public notice
The City of CARLSBAD Planning Departme
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: November 4,1998
Application complete date: July 1, 1998
Project Planner: Michael Grim
Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno
SUBJECT: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPI - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 18 - Request for a
Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow the construction
of a 288 unit apartment development on a pregraded pad located in Aviara
Planning Area 18, at the southeast corner of Ambrosia Lane and Poinsettia Lane,
in Local Facilities Management Zone 19.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4415 and 4416,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Site Development Plan SDP 98-10 and Coastal
Development Permit CDP 98-43, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained
therein.
II. INTRODUCTION
The proposal involves a 288 unit apartment development on a pregraded pad in Aviara Planning
Area 18, located on the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane. The Site
Development Plan is required prior to development of any Aviara Planning Area and the Coastal
Development Permit is required for any development in the Coastal Zone. The project conforms
to all applicable regulations and staff has no issue with the proposal.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant, JPI Westcoast Development L.P., is requesting approval of a Site Development
Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow construction of a 288 unit apartment development
in Aviara Planning Area 18. The site is located on the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and
Ambrosia Lane in Phase III of the Aviara Master Plan. To the north, across Poinsettia Lane, is
another multifamily planning area (PA 19), with the Zone 19 Community Park beyond. To the
south and west of the project site is Serenata (PA 17 and 21), two single-family developments by
Brehm Communities. West of the northern portion of the site lies Planning Area 32B, the master
plan's future church/daycare site. The project site is bordered on the east by the master plan
boundary, with agriculture and native habitat on the adjacent properties. The site is currently
mass-graded in accordance with the Aviara Phase III Final Map and all facilities necessary to
serve the site are already in place. The project would take access off of Ambrosia Lane at two
entry points, with no access allowed onto Poinsettia Lane. Planning Area 18 in the Aviara
Master Plan is designated for uses in accordance with the RD-M (Residential Density - Multiple)
r
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JP^T- AVIARA PA 18
November 4,1998
Page 2
Zone. Such uses must comply with the standards of the RD-M Zone, except as modified in the
Aviara Master Plan. The General Plan designation on the property is RH (Residential High
Density) allowing from 15 to 23 dwellings per acre, with a Growth Control Point of 19 dwellings
per acre.
The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal involves a total of 288 apartment units in 16
buildings. The site would gain access from Ambrosia Lane at two locations, matching the
intersections of Docena Road and Calliandra Road in Planning Area 21 across the street. The
buildings are grouped into pods, with circulation aisles, carports, surface parking, landscaping
and pedestrian walkways within each pod. Each building has both dedicated and non-dedicated
one car garages built into the building. The proposed recreation facility/clubhouse would be
located at the main project entry, at Docena Road and Ambrosia Lane, and would include both
active and passive recreation opportunities. All buildings are separated by at least 20 feet and are
arranged in a non-uniform manner around the project site. The proposed site plan accommodates
adequate vehicular and pedestrian circulation while providing landscaping and passive recreation
opportunities throughout the site.
As shown on Exhibits "A" - "BB", dated November 4, 1998, there are three different building
types proposed, each with two stories of apartment units; two of the building types include lofts
for four of the upstairs units. All residential buildings measure between 34 and 35 feet high.
Each apartment building would include enclosed one-car garage, some with internal access,
measuring the minimum 12 feet by 20 feet inside dimension. The architectural theme for all
structures would be Mediterranean, in keeping with the design criteria of the Aviara Master Plan.
The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project is subject to the following regulations:
A. General Plan;
B. Local Coastal Program;
C. Aviara Master Plan (MP 177 and its amendments);
D. Parking Ordinance (Chapter 21.44 of the Zoning Ordinance);
E. P-C - Planned Community Zone (Chapter 21.38 of the Zoning Ordinance);
F. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance);
G. Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan.
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and
tables.
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JlT- AVIARA PA 18
November 4, 1998
Page 3
A. General Plan
The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs
of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the apartment development project are the Land
Use, Circulation, Housing, Public Safety and Open Space and Conservation Elements. Table 1
below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan.
TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE
ELEMENT
Land Use
Circulation
Housing
Public Safety
Open Space
and
Conservation
USE CLASSIFICATION, GOAL,
OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM
Site is designated for residential land
use at a density of 15 to 19 du/ac.
Require new developments to
construct all roadways needed to
serve the development prior to or
concurrent with needs.
Ensure that all master planned
communities and qualified
subdivisions provide a range of
housing for all economic income
ranges.
Design all structures in accordance
with the seismic design standards of
the UBC and State building
requirements.
Provision of emergency water
systems and all weather access roads.
Minimize environmental impacts to
sensitive resources in the City.
PROPOSED USES AND
IMPROVEMENTS
Proposed density of 16
du/ac is consistent with
land use designation.
All street improvements
will be completed prior to,
or concurrent with,
development
Project provides market
rate units within Aviara
while the master plan
developer has constructed
sufficient units in the Villa
Loma development to
cover PA 18's affordable
housing requirement.
All building will meet UBC
and State seismic
requirements.
All necessary water mains,
fire hydrants and
appurtenances must be
installed prior to occupancy
of any unit and all weather
access roads will be
maintained throughout
construction.
Project maintains amount
of native habitat and
erosion control during
grading reduces
sedimentation of the
lagoon.
COMPLIANCE
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JrT- AVIARA PA 18
November 4, 1998
Page 4
B. Local Coastal Program
The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 site lies within the Mello I segment of the City's Coastal
Zone and is subject to the corresponding land use policies and implementing ordinances. The
implementing ordinance for those portions of the Mello I within Aviara are contained in the
Aviara Master Plan. This section addresses only conformance with the Land Use Plan since
implementing ordinance conformance is addressed in section C below. The policies of the Mello
I segment emphasize topics such as preservation of agriculture and scenic resources, protection
of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access and prevention of geologic
instability and erosion.
The land uses allowed through the LCP segments are the same as those allowed through the
Aviara Master Plan, therefore the proposed residential uses are consistent with the LCP. All
steep slopes with native vegetation were preserved through the tentative tract map for Aviara
Phase III (CT 92-03) and no encroachment is proposed with the residential construction. The
current erosion control standards of the Engineering Department will be maintained throughout
the project site to deter erosion and potential lagoon sedimentation. No agricultural lands exist
on the project site, therefore no impacts to such will occur. The project site is located 0.19 miles
from the Batiquitos Lagoon and 0.39 miles from the Pacific Ocean, therefore no existing or
future coastal access routes exist through the site. No significant visual resources exist on or
near the graded project site. Given the above, the project is consistent with the Mello I land use
policies.
C. Aviara Master Plan
According to the Aviara Master Plan, all development within Planning Area 18 is to follow the
requirements of the RD-M (Residential Density Multiple) zone, except as modified in the master
plan. Most of the development standards, such as use allocation, building height, setbacks and
design criteria are contained in the master plan and are therefore discussed below. Table 2 below
details the project's conformance to these master plan standards and criteria.
TABLE 2 - AVIARA MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE
MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT
Building Height:
35 feet maximum
50% units maximum of two stories
Easterly PA boundary setback:
Minimum of 50 feet
PROPOSED PLAN
All buildings range from 34 to 35
feet high.
All buildings have two stories, two
building types have small loft
areas.
All structures setback a minimum
COMPLIANCE
Yes
Yes
Yes
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPT- AVIARA PA 18
November 4, 1998
PageS
TABLE 2 - AVIARA MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE
MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT
Building Separation:
Minimum 20 feet separation
Public Utility easement setback:
Minimum 30 foot setback
PROPOSED PLAN
of 50 feet from the easterly PA
boundary.
All buildings are a minimum of 20
feet apart.
All structures setback a minimum
of 30 feet from the SDG&E
easement.
COMPLIANCE
Yes
Yes
As shown in Table 2 above, the developer has met all of the building height and setback
requirements of the master plan. Therefore the JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal is
consistent with the Aviara Master Plan. Since the Aviara Master Plan serves as the
implementing ordinance of the Local Coastal Program for this site, consistency with the master
plan also represents consistency with the LCP implementing ordinances.
D. Parking Ordinance
With regard to parking requirements, the Aviara Master Plan defers to Chapter 21.44 of the
Zoning Ordinance, the City's Parking Ordinance. According to Section 21.44.020(a)(3), the
proposed 288-unit apartment complex requires a total of 581 spaces, based upon the number of
units and the number of bedrooms for each unit. For resident parking, the Parking Ordinance
requires 1.5 spaces per unit for studio and one-bedroom units and 2.0 spaces per unit for two-
and more bedroom units. Given these ratios, Table 3 below details the resident parking
calculations.
TABLE 3 - RESIDENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Bedroom Mix by
Building Type
Building Type I
12 one-bedroom
units
6 two+ bedroom
units
Parking Calculations by
Building Type
1 .5 spaces/unit x 12 units =18
spaces
2.0 spaces/unit x 6 units = 12
spaces
Total parking per building = 30
spaces
Number
of
Buildings
Total of 6
Building
Type I
Total Number of
Spaces
30
spaces/building x
6 buildings =
180 spaces
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPT- AVIARA PA 18
November 4, 1998
Page 6
TABLE 3 - RESIDENT PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Building Type II
8 one-bedroom units
1 0 two+ bedroom
units
Building Type III
4 one-bedroom units
1 4 two+ bedroom
units
1 .5 spaces/unit x 8 units =12
spaces
2.0 spaces/unit x 10 units = 20
spaces
Total parking per building = 32
spaces
1 .5 spaces/unit x 4 units = 6
spaces
2.0 spaces/unit x 14 units = 28
spaces
Total parking per building = 34
spaces
Total of 7
Building
Type II
Total of 3
Building
Type III
32
spaces/building x
7 buildings =
224 spaces
34
spaces/building x
3 buildings =
102 spaces
Based upon the above calculations, the total amount of resident parking is 506 spaces
(180+224+102=506). The amount of guest parking required is also based upon the unit count,
namely one space per every two units up to ten units, then one space for every four units over
ten. For a total of 288 units, this requirement calculates as:
(0.5 spaces/unit x 10 units) + (0.25 spaces/unit x 278 units) = 75 guest spaces
Therefore the total amount of parking required for the 288-unit apartment development is 581
spaces (506+75=581). The proposed amount of parking is 581 spaces, 110 of which are
contained in one-car garages and 178 of which are located in carports. Given the above, the JPI -
Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal meets the requirements of the Parking Ordinance.
E. Planned Community Zone
The underlying zoning of the proposed JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project site is P-C, Planned
Community. In accordance with that designation, the Aviara Master Plan was created to
implement that zoning. No specific development standards or design criteria exist in the P-C
zone, however, and all applicable standards and criteria are contained within, or referenced by,
master plan documents. Therefore, conformance with the master plan requirements also
indicates conformance with the Planned Community Zone.
F. Growth Management Ordinance
The JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 proposal is a residential project and, therefore, subject to the
provisions of the City's Growth Management program. Table 4 below details the project's
compliance with the standards of the Growth Management Ordinance.
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPl - AVIARA PA 18
November 4, 1998
Page?
TABLE 4 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE
Standard
City Administration
Library
Waste Water Treatment
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Water
Impacts/Standard
2,320.79 sq ft
1,23 7.59 sq ft
288 EDU
4.64 acres
PLDAD
1J28ADT
Station # 4
N/A
C.U.S.D.
63,360 GPD
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The project is 47 units below the Growth Management Control Point.
Given the above, the JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18 project is consistent with the Growth
Management Ordinance.
G. Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan
Local Facilities Management Zone 19 covers the entire Aviara Master Plan, including Planning
Area 18. No special development requirements, such as roadway construction or other
infrastructure requirements, apply to this 288 unit residential development. The LFMP does
require that all facilities needed to serve the development be in place concurrent with, or prior to,
need. The JPI - Aviara PA 18 project, as conditioned, will be served with all utilities and
improvements prior to occupancy of any unit and will pay the required public facilities fee prior
to issuance of building permits. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the Zone 19 LFMP.
V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Earlier environmental analyses have been completed for the project site on several occasions.
One is the Master Environmental Impact Report for the City's 1994 General Plan Update (MEIR
93-01) reviewed the potential impacts of buildout of the City's General Plan, including
transportation and air quality impacts. Another source is the Environmental Impact Report for
the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort (EIR 83-02(A) for CT 85-35/MP 177) certified on
December 8, 1987, analyzed all of the potential impacts for the development and occupation of
the over 2,000 units residential master plan (now known as Aviara) with its associated 18 hole
golf course, 550 room hotel, sports club and neighborhood commercial site, including
development of Planning Area 18 with residential uses. The third previous environmental
document is the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Aviara Phase III Master Plan
Amendment (CT 92-03/MP 177(G)), approved January 25, 1994, which reviewed the grading
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - Jpf- AVIARA PA 18
November 4, 1998
Paee8
and construction related to the development of Phase III, including development of Planning
Area 18. The fourth previous environmental document is the Negative Declaration and MEIR
Addendum for the Aviara Phase III North Master Plan Amendment and General Plan
Amendment (MP 177(U)/GPA 97-06), which reviewed the potential environmental impacts
associated with development of the Aviara PA 18 with up to 335 residential units. The proposed
apartment complex involves only 288 units. Without exception, the proposed action has no
additional impacts not previously analyzed in the earlier environmental review and no additional
review or mitigation measures are necessary.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4415
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4416
5. Location Map
6. Disclosure Statement
7. Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance, dated July 24,1998
8. Environmental Impact Assessment Form, dated July 20,1998
9. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
10. Background Data Sheet
11. Exhibits "A" -"BB", dated November 4,1998
MG:kc:mh
LJ
JPI APARTMENTS
ATAVIARAP. A. 18
SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43
6-01-1998 1:42PM FROM ANNING SYSTEMS 760 9315744P qg> ,P. 2
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note: . • -....• :- • •" ; ••;•" '•'.' " ' ' -.';•" :••'' ••'V;-'v '•'"'' """•"' ' '•• '
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in Ais and any odier county, city and county, city
municipality, district or oraer political subdivision or any other :group or :combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity, .of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1 .
2.
APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
Person A'/Jr '• f*0 IrtaH/tflft/Cu Corp/Part J« J*
Title flLOn^ iMO^ 4-^U*>"> Title
Address Address %°l(O
OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person (^ I A
Title
Com/Part
Title \hCE TttCSt'P&Jr/G&a.Mc.Q. "O.L.
Address Address 2ot\
2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 - (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894
l0i -1 998 1 : 43PM FROM ANNING SYSTEMS 760 9315744 J\^ °\¥> - P- 3
3 . NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to ( 1 ) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust _ Non Profrt/Trust__ _
Title _ Title _
Address Address.
4. Have you had more than £250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
| [ Yes f)(] No If yes, please indicate person(s):
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
1 certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
T>. L.
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2
o
City of Carlsbad
^ ••••^^^•^••^iBiBHPiiH^^^HHHII^^HH^BBMHPlanning Department
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Please Take Notice:
The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the
project described below have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional
environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed.
Project Title:
Project Location:
JPI - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 18
Southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane,
Aviara Planning Area 18, in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California.
Project Description: Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to
allow construction of a 288-unit apartment complex on a
pregraded pad.
Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las
Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited.
Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of
date of publication.
DATED:
CASE NO:
CASE NAME:
July 24, 1998
SDP98-10/CDP 98-43
JPI - AVIARA PA 18
PUBLISH DATE: July 24, 1998
MICHAEL jrTHOLZlvllLLER
Planning Director
2O75 La Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43
DATE: July 20.1998
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18
2. APPLICANT: JPI Westcoast Development. L.P.
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 8910 University Center Lane. #150.
San Dieeo. CA 92122 (619)458-1200
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: June 1. 1998
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow
construction of a 288-unit apartment complex on a pregraded lot within Aviara Planning Area
18. located at the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane. City of Carlsbad.
County of San Diego.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
| [ Land Use and Planning
[ | Population and Housing
| [ Geological Problems
Q Water
M Air Quality
|^[ Transportation/Circulation f] Public Services
| | Biological Resources [~~| Utilities & Service Systems
| | Energy & Mineral Resources [~~| Aesthetics
[ | Hazards | | Cultural Resources
| | Noise [""] Recreation
| | Mandatory Findings of Significance
Rev. 03/28/96
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
| | I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
| | I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
[~~| I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
| | I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An is required,
but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
^ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in earlier EIRs and a Negative
Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIRs and Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior
Compliance has been prepared.
Planner Signature ( / Date
Planning Directors Signature Date
Rev. 03/28/96
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant
effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following
pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human
factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative
Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
• A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information
sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A
"No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or
it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards.
• "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the
potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted
general standards and policies.
• "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the
City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level.
• "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant.
• Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant
effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable
standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated
Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior
environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional
environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
• When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required
to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of
Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR.
• A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that
the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment.
Rev. 03/28/96
• If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an
EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and
those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this
case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated"
may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
• An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including
but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has
not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and
the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than
significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has
not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce
the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant
effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the
form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention
should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined
significant.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source #(s): (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 -
4-26, #3, pgs 11-12; #4, pg 5)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
the project? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 -
4-26,#3, pgs 11-12; #4,pg5)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-
26, #3, pgs 11-12; #4,pg5)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18;
#2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26, #3, pg 11; #4, pg 5)
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)? (#1, pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18; #2,
pgs 4-1 - 4-26, #3, pgs 13-14; #4, pg 5)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
Less Than No
Significant Impact
Impact
D
D
D
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? (#1, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6; #2,
pgs 4-1-4-26; #3, pg 13; #4,pg5)
D D D
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? (#1, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6; #2, pgs 4-1 -
4-26; #3, pg 13; #4,pg5)
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? (#1, pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6; #2, pgs 4-1 - 4-26;
#3,pgl3-14; #4,pg5)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-
150-4-156; #3, pg 7; #4,pg5)
b) Seismic ground shaking? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15;
#2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pg 7; #4, pg 5)
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3,
Pg7; #4,pg5)
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#1, pgs 5.1-1
- 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pg 7; #4, pg 5)
e) Landslides or mudflows? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15;
#2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs 7-8; #4, pg 5)
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#1,
pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs
7-8; #4,pg5)
g) Subsidence of the land? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15;
#2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs 7-8; #4, pg 5)
h) Expansive soils? (#1, pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-
150-4-156;#3,pg7; #4,pg5)
i) Unique geologic or physical features? (# 1, pgs 5.1-
1 - 5.1-15; #2, pgs 4-150 - 4-156; #3, pgs 7-8; #4,
Pg5)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#1, pgs
5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4,
Pg5)
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11;
#2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4, pg 5)
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2,
pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 5)
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110
-4-118;#3)Pg9; #4,pg6)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs
4-110-4-118; #3, pg 8; #4,pg6)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 -
4-118; #3, pg 9; #4,pg6)
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
(#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3,
pg8; #4,pg6)
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 -
5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 6)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies? (#1, pgs 5.2-1 - 5.2-11; #2, pgs 4-110 -
4-118;#3,Pg8; #4,pg6)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
Less Than No
Significant Impact
Impact
D El
D
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? (#1, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-
12; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4, pg 6)
d) Create objectionable odors? (#1, pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3-
12; #2, pgs 4-110 - 4-118; #3, pg 8; #4, pg 6)
D
D
D
n
a
a
aa
a
a
a
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-
22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3, pgs 14-15; #4, pg 6)
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80;
#3,pgl5; #4,pg6)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
(#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3, pg
14; #4,pg6)
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
(#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3,
pgs 14-15; #4,pg6)
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (#1, pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-
63-4-80; #3, pg 14; #4,pg6)
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (#1, pgs
5.7-1 - 5.7-22; #2, pgs 4-63 - 4-80; #3, pg 14; #4,
Pg6)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24;
#2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3, pgs 10-11; #4, pg 6)
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
(#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3,
pgs 10-11; #4,pg6)
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-
24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3, pgs 10-11; #4, pg
6)
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)? (#1, pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-
149; #3, pgs 10-11; #4,pg6)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#1, pgs
5.4-1 - 5.4-24; #2, pgs 4-119 - 4-149; #3, pg 11;
#4,pg7)
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal?
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
(#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109;
#3,pg9; #4,pg7)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5;
#2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 7)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State? (#1, pgs
5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 9;
#4,pg7)
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#1, pgs
5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg
13; #4,pg7)
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#1, pgs
5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg
15; #4,pg7)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazards? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2,
pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12-13; #4, pg 7)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2,
pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12-13; #4, pg 7)
e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees? (#1, pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-3; #2,
pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 13; #4, pg 7)
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
D D
a a
Rev. 03/28/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#1, pgs 5.9-1 -
5.9-15; #2, pgs 4-81 - 4-84; #3, pg 12-13; #4, pg
7)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (# 1, pgs
5.9-1 - 5.9-15; #2, pgs 4-81 - 4-84; #3, pg 12-13;
#4,Pg7)
D
D
D
D
D
D
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? (#1, pgs 5.12.5-1 -5.12.5-6; #2,
pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7)
b) Police protection? (#1, pgs 5.12.5-1 -5.12.5-6; #2,
pgs 4-94-4-109; #3, pg 12)
c) Schools? (#1, pgs 5.12.7-1 -5.12.7-5; #2, pgs 4-94
-4-109; #3, pg 12; #4,pg7)
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
(#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109;
#3,pgl2; #4,pg7)
e) Other governmental services? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 -
5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg
7)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (#1, pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5;
#2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 9; #4, pg 7)
b) Communications systems? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 -
5.12.8-7; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7; #2, 4-94 -
4-109; #3, pg 12; #4,pg7)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7;
#2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7)
e) Storm water drainage? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-
7; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 7)
f) Solid waste disposal? (#1, pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3;
#2) 4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 8)
g) Local or regional water supplies? (#1, pgs 5.12.2-1
- 5.12.3-7; #2,4-94 - 4-109; #3, pg 12; #4, pg 8)
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (#1,
pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5; #2, pgs 4-35 - 4-62; #3, pg 15;
#4,pg8)
b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (#1,
pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5; #2, pgs 4-35 - 4-62; #3, pg 15;
#4, Pg 8)
D
a
a
a
a
a
8 Rev. 03/28/96
c
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources).
c) Create light or glare? (#1, pgs 5.10.3-1 - 5.10.3-2;
#2, pgs 4-35 - 4-62; #3, pg 15; #4, pg 8)
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 -
5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4,
Pg8)
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 -
5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4,
Pg8)
c) Affect historical resources? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10;
#2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4, pg 8)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
(#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3,
pgs 9-10; #4, pg8)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? (#1, pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10; #2,
pgs 4-157-4-167; #3, pgs 9-10; #4, pg 8)
XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? (#1, pgs
5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pg
15; #4, pg8)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#1, pgs
5.12.8-1 - 5.12.8-7; #2, pgs 4-157 - 4-167; #3, pg
15; #4, Pg8)
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish
or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause the substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Less Than No
Significant Impact
Impact
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D D
D
D
D D
Rev. 03/28/96
c
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Referenced in the above checklist are the earlier environmental analysis that have been
conducted for the project site. Source #1 is the Master Environmental Impact Report for the
City's 1994 General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01) that reviewed the potential impacts of buildout
of the City's General Plan, including transportation and air quality impacts. Source #2 is the
Environmental Impact Report for the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort (EIR 83-02(A) for
CT 85-35/MP 177) certified on December 8, 1987, that analyzed all of the potential impacts for
the development and occupation of the over 2,000 units residential master plan (now known as
Aviara) with its associated 18 hole golf course, 550 room hotel, sports club and neighborhood
commercial site, including development of Planning Area 18 with residential uses. Source #3 is
the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Aviara Phase III Master Plan Amendment (CT 92-
03/MP 177(G)), approved January 25,1994, which reviewed the grading and construction related
to the development of Phase III, including development of Planning Area 18 with multi-family
residential uses. Source #4 is the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MEIR Addendum for the
Aviara Phase III North Land Use Proposal (MP 177(U)/GPA 97-06/LCPA 97-06), approved
January 6, 1998, that evaluated the impacts of up to 315 multi-family units, either apartments or
condominiums, for Planning Area 18. Without exception, the proposed action has no additional
impacts not previously analyzed in the earlier environmental review and no additional review or
mitigation measures are necessary.
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposal involves the construction of a 288-unit apartment complex on a pregraded pad
within Aviara Planning Area 18. The proposed development meets all applicable standards and
policies, including setbacks, building height and architectural style. No environmentally
sensitive resources exist on the previously graded site and no significant adverse impacts to the
environment are anticipated.
AIR QUALITY:
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated
1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles
traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive
organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the
major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the
San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered
cumulatively significant; therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the
updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region.
To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety
of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions
for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures
to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand
Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass
transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5)
participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and
appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the
design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
10 Rev. 03/28/96
Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is
located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked
"Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the
preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City
Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air
quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent
projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no
further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the
Planning Department.
CIRCULATION:
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated
1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate
to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely
impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These
generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad
Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections
are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout.
To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous
mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1)
measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to
develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks,
pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation
strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or
State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to
control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either
been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval.
Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the
failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore,
the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is
consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the
recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included
a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of
Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's
Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation
impacts is required.
LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
11 Rev. 03/28/96
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43 - JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RH
ZONING: P-C - Planned Community
DEVELOPER'S NAME: JPI Westcoast Development
ADDRESS: 8910 University Center Lane. Suite 150. San Diego. CA 92122
PHONE NO.: (619)458-1200 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 215-840-01/215-841-01
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 288 units
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: August. 1999
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
City Administrative Facilities:
Library:
Demand in Square Footage = 2.320.79
Demand in Square Footage = 1.237.59
288 EDU
4.64
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin = PLDAD
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADT = 1.728
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = No. 4
K.
L.
Open Space: Acreage Provided =
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demands in EDU
Identify Sub Basin =
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPD =
N/A
Carlsbad Unified
288
63.360
The project is 47 units below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance.
o
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: SDP 98-10/CDP 98-43
CASE NAME: JPI - Aviara Planning Area 18
APPLICANT: JPI Westcoast Development
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Site Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to
allow construction of a 288 unit apartment development on a pregraded site in Aviara Planning
Area 18, located at the southeast corner of Poinsettia Lane and Ambrosia Lane.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2 of Carlsbad Tract CT 92-3. Phase III. Unit 1.
according to Map No. 13434. filed in the Office of the County Recorder on June 23, 1997, in the
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
APN: 215-840-01/215-841-01 Acres: 18.11 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 288
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Residential High Density fRH)
Density Allowed: 15 - 19du/ac Density Proposed: 16.0du/ac
Existing Zone: P-C Proposed Zone: P-C
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning
Requirements)
Site
North
South
East
West
P-C
h P-C
h P-C
L-C
t P-C
Carlsbad
Zoning Land Use
Vacant multifamily
Vacant multifamily
Vacant single-family
Vacant & agriculture
Vacant single-family
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 288 EDU
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: June 1.1998
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_
Other, Prior Environmental Compliance, dated July 24.1998