Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 99-05; Parkside; Coastal Development Permit (CDP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C Q Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit Q Administrative Variance Q Coastal Development Permit Q] Conditional Use Permit O Condominium Permit n Environmental Impact Assessment [3 General Plan Amendment n Hillside Development Permit n Local Coastal Plan Amendment Q Master Plan n Non-Residential Planned Development [2 Planned Development Permit Amendment HECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) Q Planned Industrial Permit Q Planning Commission Determination Q Precise Development Plan Q Redevelopment Permit 0 Site Development Plan Amendment Q Special Use Permit n Specific Plan O Tentative Parcel Mop Obtain from Engineering Department 0 Tentative Tract Map Amendment Q Variance Q Zone Change O List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) 2) 3) 4) 214-544-04ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Amendments to previous approvals (CT 92-02 / Parkside PUD 92-03 / SDP 92-06) to allow for 48 single family homes. 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Shea Homes Land Holdings LLC MAILING ADDRESS 10721 Treena Street, Suite 200 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE San Diego, CA 92131 (619) 549-3156 I CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY '^£n^^^ ////eS^r* SIGNATURE Rick Schroeder DATE 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Shea Homes Land Holdings LLC MAILING ADDRESS 10721 Treena Street, Suite 200 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE San Diego, CA 92131 (619) 549-3156 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE CORRECTTJUUE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. THE AND X SIGNATURE Rick Schroeder DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 141 of CT 92-02, City of Carlsbad, according Map No. 13378, filed in the office of the County Recorder, December 9, 1996 NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN c_N/A EAST (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD (NAME OF STREET) PLUM TREE ROAD (NAME OF STREET) AND DE LAS ONDAS 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING (NAME OF STREET) rfENT ZONE 3 RES 18.9 7.51 RDM-Q 11) 14) 17) 20) 23) 20 NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPOSED ZONING 0 0 480 RM RDM-Q 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY £©RT0tS PURPOSE SIGNATURED Rick Schroeder FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 * SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION QORM FOR ALL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS + APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY REGULAR & MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Application c/iecW&farAfan-SfrigfefS^^ This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. I. GENERAL BACKGROUND A. Estimated Cost of Development: Development costing $60,000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Permit. The Planning Director shall make the final determination regarding a project's cost of development. The primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential construction. These costs are set by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and are applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the following information to assist in the determination of this project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for consideration by the Planning Director). => New Residential Square Footage: 100.547 square feet x $78.00/sq. ft. = $7,842,666 => Residential Addition Square Footage: °-° square feet x $94.00/sq. ft. = $ NA Any Garage Square Footage: 19,200 square feet x $22.00/sq. ft. = $422,400 Residential Conversion Square Footage: °«0 square feet x $26.00/sq. ft. = $ NA => For Non-Residential Uses, use the following figures for calculations: Retail/Store @ $38.00/sq. ft.; Restaurant @ $69.00/ sq. ft.; Office @ $55.007 sq. ft.; Manufacturing/Warehouse @ $24.00/sq. ft.: 0.0 square feet x SNA /sq. ft. = $ NA COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ 8,265,066 B. Do you wish to apply for: 1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000) 2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more) x Form 15 10/97 Page 1 of 8 _^ C. Street ad^ss of proposed development NA D. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development 214-544-044 E. Development Description: 1. Briefly describe project: 48 single family homes on condominium lots 2. Estimated cost of development: $8>265f066 F. Describe the present land uses (i.e. Vacant land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: vacant (future community facility site) South '.vacant (future elementary school site) East* single family homes West" Poinsettia Community Park G. Is project located within a 100 year flood plain? Q] Yes jx] No II. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY A. Are there existing structures on the property? Q Yes QjcJ No If yes, please describe. B. Will any existing structure be removed/demolished? Q Yes (3 No If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal, including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans). III. LOT COVERAGE A. Existing and Proposed Existing New Proposed Total Building Coverage 0.0 SQ. ft. 78.900 sq. ft. 78,900 sq. ft. Landscaped Area 0.0 sq.ft. 95,511 sq.ft. 95,511 sq.ft. Hardscape Area 0.0 Sq. ft.152,768 sq. ft.152,768 sq. ft. Unimproved Area (LeftNatural) °-° sq.ft. 0-0 sq.ft. 0.0 sq.ft. Form 15 10/97 Page 2 of 8 B. Parking: ^ Number of existing.spaces w P_ Number of new spaces proposed Existing/Proposed TOTAL: 121 Number of total spaces required 111 Number of covered spaces 96 Number of uncovered spaces 25 Number of standard spaces 121 Number of compact spaces ?_ Is tandem parking existing? Q Yes # (3 No is tandem parking proposed? Q Yes # [x] No Grade Alteration: Is any grading proposed? [x] Yes Q No If yes, please complete the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Amount of cut Amount of fill Maximum heiqht of fill slope Maximum heiqht of cut slope Amount of import or export Location of borrow or disposal site 400 21 ,000 9 6 20,600 to be cu. yds. cu. vds. . 3 feet feet cu. yds. determined Form 15 10/97 Page 3 of 8 Hofman Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis January 12,1999 Jeff Gibson City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: CT 92-02(B) - Parkside; Submittal of Coastal Development Permit Application Dear Jeff: As we discussed at the DCC meeting for Parkside (CT 92-02(8)) on January 11,1999, we are applying for a Coastal Development Permit for this project. This letter accompanies the Coastal Development Permit application form for the project along with a check for the processing fee in the amount of $1,590. A third set of noticing labels also accompanies this letter. If you have any questions or need any additional information please call me at 438-1465. Sincerely, Stuart Fisk attachments cc. Paul Barnes 5900 Pasteur Court • Suite 150 • Carlsbad • CA 92008 • (760)438-1465 • Fax: (760)438-2443 xnifie City of CARLSBAD Planning Departmem A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION P.C. AGENDA OF: February 17,1999 Item No. Application complete date: April 1, 1998 Project Planner: Jeff Gibson Project Engineer: Mike Shirey SUBJECT: CT 92-02rBVPUD 92-03(BVSDP 92-06(CVCDP 99-05 - PARKSIDE - Request for a Tentative Tract Map Revision, Planned Development Permit Amendment, Site Development Plan Amendment, and a Coastal Development Permit to develop 48 single-family units on a 7.5 acre graded site located on the southeast comer of Hidden Valley Road and Plum Tree Road, within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4456, 4457, 4458, and 4486 APPROVING CT 92-02(B), PUD 92-03(B), SDP 92-06(C), and CDP 99-05 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.INTRODUCTION The application is a request for a revised tentative map and an amendment to a Planned Development Permit, Site Development Plan, and a Coastal Development Permit for Planning Area "D", which is a small part of the larger Sambi Seaside Heights project (see attached exhibits). The original project, Sambi (CT 92-02), was approved by the City Council in March 1994 and included 349 dwelling units. In 1996 the City Council approved an amendment to the Sambi project (Sambi Seaside Heights - CT 92-02(A)) which reduced the Sambi project's total dwelling units to 277. The proposed revisions and amendments (CT 92-02(B)) to Planning Area "D" would result in the replacement of the 58 approved twin-home units with 48 single-family homes. This latest amendment request would reduce the overall Sambi Seaside Height's total dwelling units from 277 to 267 units. Planning Area "D" is located at the southeast comer of Hidden Valley Road and Plum Tree Road and is within the Coastal Zone and Specific Plan 203(A). Planning Area "D" is graded into a large flat and vacant building pad. The necessary surrounding infrastructure, including public streets, curbs and gutters, has been constructed. Affordable townhomes are currently being constructed in Planning Area "A" to satisfy the inclusionary housing for the entire Sambi Seaside Heights project, including the requirements for Planning Area "D". The project complies with City standards and all the necessary findings can be made for the approvals being requested. In conclusion, staff believes that the project has addressed all issues and, therefore, recommends approval. CT 92-02(B)/PUD 92-03(BySDP 92-06(C)/CDP 99-05 - PARKS February 17, 1999 Page 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The project site, approximately 7.5 acres in size, is located on the southeast comer of Hidden Valley Road and Plum Tree Road, and is within the Coastal Zone and Specific Plan 203(A). The site has been rough graded into a large flat building pad and all the public roadway (Hidden Valley Road & Plum Tree Road) and utility (sewer, drainage, & water) infrastructure around the parcel has been constructed. All the proposed development would occur within the boundaries of the existing rough graded pad area. The surrounding neighborhood consists of a graded and vacant 1.8 acre community facility site to the north, single-family homes on 7,500+ square foot lots to the east, a vacant 8 acre elementary school site to the south, and Poinsettia Community park to the west. The site is zoned RD-M-Q and the project consists of 32 foot wide private streets with sidewalks on both sides leading to 48 single-family air space condominium units containing from 3,500 to 5,300 square feet of exclusive use yard area. There would also be two common passive neighborhood recreational areas totaling 8,125 square feet in size and a 1,050 square foot recreational vehicle storage area. The proposed two-story homes would range in size from 1,880 to 2,251 square feet and range in height from 25 to 26 feet. The proposed products include four floor plans (each with different architectural treatments). They would also contain two-car attached garages. The architectural style is generally described as a mix of beach cottage, craftsman, and Spanish motif with concrete tile roofing, stucco building walls, exposed rafter tails, paned windows, wood fascia, wood shutters, and gabled roofs. All homes feature front porches or second story balconies. Garages (many with "Pasadena" driveways) are recessed 5 to 58 feet from the front of the houses which creates the opportunity for additional off-street guest parking. Each home will have a minimum 15' x 15' private rear yard. The site plan consists of a private street leading from Plum Tree Road. The homes are situated along this private street which forms a circular loop through the 7.5 acre site. The Parkside project is an amendment to plans approved by the Planning Commission and City Council and includes the following comparative features: A. A reduction from 58 approved twin-home units on small lots to 48 proposed single- family air space condominium units; B. An increase in the common recreational area from 6,724 square feet to 8,125 square feet; C. A reduction in the building height from 28 feet to 25 to 26 feet; D. The addition of a perpendicular guest parking bay with 5 parking spaces; and, E. An enhanced street scene with traffic calming median islands in the private street, two-car garages located near the rear of the homes and away from the private street, and the addition of some turf lined "Pasadena" driveways. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following regulations and requirements: A. Carlsbad General Plan - RM (Residential Medium Density) designation; O ••'*:•• OCT 92-02(B)/PUD 92-03(B7SDP 92-06(C)/CDP 99-05 - PARKSIDF February 17, 1999 Page 3 B. Specific Plan 203(A) (Zone 20 Specific Plan); C. Planned Development Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.45) and, RD-M- Q Zone (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.10 and Chapter 21.06); D. Subdivision Regulations (Carlsbad Municipal Code Title 20); E. Mello II Segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program; and, F. Growth Management. The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan The General Plan land use designation for the Parkside property is Residential Medium (RM). The City Council approved Specific Plan 203(A) in 1996 and made the finding that the specific plan implements the General Plan and is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The finding was based on the fact that the specific plan provides for the following: (1) the provision of the necessary circulation element roadways and improvements (Aviara Parkway, Hidden Valley Road, and Poinsettia Lane); (2) the protection and enhancement of the native habitat areas; (3) the provisions for affordable housing; and (4) compliance with the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 for public facilities and services, including utility infrastructure (sewer, water, drainage), open space, a park, and a school. Based on this implementation and consistency relationship between Specific Plan 203 (A) and the General Plan, it can be assumed that if the Parkside project is consistent with the specific plan it is also consistent with the General Plan. B. Specific Plan 203( A) The project is located within Specific Plan 203(A) which provides a framework for the development of the vacant properties within Zone 20. The plan ensures the logical and efficient provision of public facilities and community amenities for the residents of the planning area. The Parkside project is consistent with Specific Plan 203(A) and meets all applicable requirements as demonstrated in Table A below: Table A - SPECIFIC PLAN 203(A) COMPLIANCE STANDARD Land Use - Residential Medium 6 du/ac/RD-M-Q Inclusionary Housing - 15% of all market rate dus PROPOSED Single-family at 6.4 du/acre Clustered development with transfer of density via PUD 42 affordable housing units under construction - Area "A" COMPLIES? Yes Yes CT 92-02(B)/PUD 92-03 February 17,1999 Page 4 (KjfSDP 92-06(C)/CDP 99-05 - PARKSIDE Architectural Standards: Window/door enhancements Individualized entry treatments - Articulated building forms - Curvilinear street design - Recessed windows with border treatment/several door styles with differing details 4 plans, each with 3 different front building elevations (see Table B small lot guidelines) Circular looping street system Yes Yes Yes Landscaping:Landscaped slopes, project entryway, and front yards with a combination of trees, shrubs and ground cover Yes Special Design Criteria: Enhanced Street Planting Hidden Valley Road - Earth Tone Roof Colors - Street trees, shrubs, and ground cover along Hidden Valley Road Grey-green/grey- brown/brown-red Yes Yes C. Planned Development & RD-M-Q Zone The utilization of the Planned Development (PD) Ordinance in conjunction with the tentative map for this project provides a method to approve the separate ownership of the air space condominium single-family homes located on the one common 7.5 acre lot. Planning Area "D" currently has an approved PD Permit (PUD 92-03 (A)) for 58 twin-home units and the Parkside project represents an amendment to that permit. The zoning for the property is RD-M-Q and the RD-M zone allows one-family homes, in addition to two-family and multiple-family product types. The PD Ordinance states that, in addition to the general provisions and development standards in the PD regulations, the requirements of the underlying zone shall also apply. In general, the City's PD regulations supersede the development standards contained within the RD-M zone. However, where the PD regulations are silent, the RD-M zone is in effect. Single-family units may be clustered using any of several options and variations of the standard PD regulations for lot size, setbacks, and lot frontage. In return for these more flexible regulations, the City Council, via its Policy 44, established special architectural guidelines for small lot subdivisions. These guidelines require the project's architecture to be enhanced on certain percentages of the homes. Among other things, the enhancements include requirements for a minimum number of offsetting planes in both front and rear building elevations and roof lines. Based on all this, the project meets or exceeds all applicable requirements of the PD regulations, the RD-M-Q Zone, and the small lot single-family guidelines as demonstrated in Table B below. CT 92-02(B)/PUD 92-03 February 17, 1999 PaseS i/SDP 92-06(C)/CDP 99-05 - PARKS Table B - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARD Min lot area: (PD) 3,500 sq.ft. Setbacks (Minimum) Front (PD) (off private street) Garage: 20 ft. Home: 10 ft. with 15 ft average Front (off public street): (RD-M) 20ft. Street Side - Hidden Valley Road: 10 ft. Interior Side: 5 ft. Rear: 10 ft. Min distance between structures: (PD) 10 ft. Parking (PD) Resident: 2 covered spaces per unit - 96 spaces Visitor: 15 spaces RV Storage: (PD) 960 sq. ft. Storage Space: (PD) 480 cf/du Height Limit: (PD) 30 ft. Private Street: (PD) 30 ft. min Common Rec. Area (PD) 200 sq. ft./du = 9600 sq. ft. Private Passive: Rear Yard 15x1 5 ft. S.F. Common, Passive: 4,800 sq. ft. PROPOSED 3,500 - 5,300 sq. ft. exclusive use yard area** 20ft. 10ft. with 15 ft. average 20 ft. from Plum Tree Rd 30 ft. from Hidden Valley Rd 50ft. 10ft. 10ft. Two-car garage per home 25 spaces -along private street and in parking bay 1,080 sq.ft. provided within individual two-car garages 25 - 26 ft. 32 ft. wide, parking one side 15x15 ft. rear yards - 225 sq. ft. x 48 = 1 0.800 sa. ft. 8.125 sq. ft. COMPLIES? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ** Note - With an air space condominium project there is one large common lot. Residents own the structure and the air space within their single-family home. They do not own the land under or around it. To meet the intent of the PD regulations for single-family development, the Planning Department requires that each home have a minimum of 3,500 sq. ft. of area under and around the home for the exclusive use of the homeowner. This exclusive use right is established, defined, and protected through the project's approved site and landscaping plan, conditions of approval of the tentative map, and eventually the required CC&Rs. The project entry area, streets, slopes, front yard landscaping, drainage facilities, and other common areas will be maintained by the homeowners' association. Rear and side yard landscaping will be maintained CT 92-02(B)/PUD 92-03(Sj7sDP 92-06(C)/CDP 99-05 - PARKS February 17, 1999 Page 6 by the individual homeowner. The zoning for the property includes the Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q) which also requires the processing of a Site Development Plan. The Q Overlay ensures compatibility with the public park and surrounding development, as well as requiring attractive and harmonious site design. A Site Development Plan has been submitted with the project in compliance with Chapter 21.06. D. Subdivision Regulations The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has concluded that it complies with all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision regulations as designed and conditioned. The project will not result in any environmental damage to the site since it contains no sensitive species or habitat. The site is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate the proposed development while complying with all development standards, including structure setbacks and separation requirements. The proposed building height, setbacks, structure separations, and the design of the homes will allow adequate opportunities for passive heating and cooling. The project is conditioned to require and install private interior street improvements to a 32 foot wide right-of-way, including curbs, gutters, parkways, sidewalks, street lights, and fire hydrants. Adequate drainage facilities will be provided and maintained by the project's homeowners' association. The existing slopes within the project site have terrace drains; the homes will have roof drains; and there will be subterranean drains in the rear and side yards to protect the yards from flooding. Hidden Valley Road, Plum Tree Road, and the associated frontage improvements and utilities for Planing Area "D" have all been constructed and would adequately serve the needs of the project. E. Mello II Segment The project is located within the Coastal Zone. A coastal development permit for the approved Sambi Seaside Heights project (CT 92-02(A)), which included the subdivision of the original 68 acre property into separate legal lots, infrastructure location and construction, and mass grading was issued by the California Coastal Commission. The permit was approved based on findings of project consistency with the policies and standards of the Mello II Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone and Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone. The City of Carlsbad has taken over permit jurisdiction in the coastal zone, therefore, since the proposed project does not change or affect the original coastal development permit the changes will be subject to a new coastal development permit reviewed by the Planning Commission. The Sambi Seaside Heights project, including Area "D", has been mass-graded in compliance with the approved coastal development permit. The project was conditioned to mitigate impacts to sensitive coastal resources including riparian and coastal sage scrub habitat. The required project resource mitigation, including receipt of various Federal and State permits and the purchase of mitigation credits from the Carlsbad Highlands Mitigation Bank have already been implemented. The Sambi Developer has also paid the required "Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee" to the California Coastal Conservancy. The project site is already graded, and contains no native habitat. The project will not impact agricultural resources or operations in the area. The site is not located in any coastal viewshed CT 92-02(B)/PUD 92-03(Bj7sDP 92-06(C)/CDP 99-05 - PARKSIDE February 17, 1999 Page? area and will not negatively impact coastal view resources. The project must comply with the City's Storm Water Management Ordinance and meet all standards of the City's NPDES Permit to reduce urban pollutant runoff from the site. Therefore, the project is in compliance with the Mello II Segment policies and will not negatively impact the resources of the Coastal Zone. F. Growth Management An amendment to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20 was approved concurrently with Specific Plan 203(A). At that time all facility impacts were analyzed and it was determined that all facilities would be provided prior to or concurrent with need pursuant to the facilities performance standards of Growth Management. Since the proposed project is consistent with the specific plan in which all facilities were determined to be in compliance with adopted performance standards and the project has been conditioned to comply with all requirements of the LFMP for Zone 20, no further growth management analysis is necessary. Facility impacts are noted on the attached Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was included in the Program EIR prepared with Specific Plan 203. The Program EIR addressed subsequent discretionary approvals of the specific plan, including actions such as tentative maps and site plans. The proposed project is consistent with the land uses, design guidelines, and facility improvements required in the specific plan. No new impacts are anticipated and no new mitigation measures are necessary, therefore, no further environmental review is required. Through an Initial Study, the Planning Director has determined that the proposed residential project is pursuant to and in conformance with Specific Plan 203 for which a Program Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified, therefore, the project is exempt from further environmental review under Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4456 (CT) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4457 (PUD) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4458 (SDP) 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4486 (CDP) 5. Location Map 6. Background Data Sheet 7. Disclosure Statement 8. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 9. Exhibit "XX", Sambi Seaside Heights 10. Reduced Exhibits 11. Exhibit "YY" Maintenance Responsibility 12. Small Lot Single-Family Architectural Guidelines Summary 13. Full Size Exhibits "A" - "Z" dated January 20,1999 JG:eh:mh I I I I I I I I Hill ! PARKSIDE CT 92-02(B)/PUD 92-03(B)/ SDP 92-06(C)/CDP 99-05 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CT 92-02rBVPUD 92-03rBVSDP 92-06CCVCDP 99-05 CASE NAME: PARKSIDE APPLICANT: SHEA HOMES REQUEST AND LOCATION: 48 single-family homes on a previously graded 7.5 acre lot located at the southeast corner of Hidden Valley Road and Plum Tree Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 141 of CT 92-02. City of Carlsbad. San Diego County. State of California, according to Map No. 13378. filed in the office of the County Recorder. December 9.1996. APN: 214-544-04 Acres: 7.5 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 48 units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: Residential Medium Density Allowed: 4-8 du/acre Density Proposed: 6.4 du/acre - Clustered development Existing Zone: RD-M-0 Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site RD-M-Q RM/VACANT North RD-M-Q ,. RM/COMMUNITY FACILITY SITE South RD-M-Q RM/SCHOOL SITE East RD-M-Q RM/SINGLE-FAMILY West PC OS/PARK PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: CARLSBAD Water District: CARLSBAD Sewer District: CARLSBAD Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 48 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: Augusts. 1998 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated PROGRAM EIR 90-03/SPECIFIC PLAN 203(A) Other, EXEMPTION PER SECTION 15182 OF THE CEOA GUIDELINES c City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1 . APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person _ Corp/Part shea Homes L^ Holdings VLC Title _ Title__ _ Address _ Address 10721 Treena Street, Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92131 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person _ Corp/Part Shea Honies Land Holdings Title _ Title Address _ Address 10721 Treena Street, Ste. 200 San Diego, CA 92131 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 - FAX (760) 438-O894 Disclosure Statement, Attachment Parkside - CT 92-02(8) / PUD 92-03(B) and SDP 92-06(C) Shea Homes Land Holdings, LLC The following individuals own more than 10% of the shares of Shea Homes Land Holdings, LLC: General Partner Limited Partner Limited Partner Limited Partner Limited Partner Limited Partner Limited Partner J.F Shea Company, Inc. Shea Investments Tahoe Partnership I Balboa Partnership John F. Shea, Trustee John F. Shea Family Trust Peter O. Shea Edmund H. Shea, Jr. Trustee Edmund and Mary Shea Real Property Trust 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 655 Brea Canyon Road, Walnut, CA 91789 9profit' NON-PROFIT OQANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust, Title Non Profit/Trust, Title Address Address Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards. Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes [~X No If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. //• Signature of owner/date Rick Schroeder Signature of applicant/date Rick Schroeder Rick Schroeder Print or type name of owner Rick Schroeder Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: PARKSIDE - CT 92-02rBWUD 92-02(BVSDP 92-06(CVCDP 99-05 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 20 GENERAL PLAN: RM ZONING: RD-M-O DEVELOPER'S NAME: SHEA HOMES LAND HOLDINGS LLC ADDRESS: 10721 TREENA STREET. SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO CA 92131 PHONE NO.: N/A ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 214-544-04 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 7.5 AC/48 DU ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: N/A A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 166.88 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 89.0 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) N/A D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .33 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS= N/A Identify Drainage Basin = N/A (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 480 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = No. 4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = 1.1 I. Schools: Carlsbad Unified (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 48 Identify Sub Basin = D (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD= 10.560 L. The overall Sambi Seaside Heights project is 45.17 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. EXHIBIT "XX" SAMBI SEASIDE HEIGHTS A PLANNING AREA "A" 82 DU B PLANNING AREA "B" 35 DU C PLANNING AREA "C" 102 DU D PLANNING AREA "D" 58 DU E PLANNING AREA "E" COMMUNITY FACILITY SITE SAMBI SEASIDE HEIGHTS CT 92-02(A)/PUD 92-03(A)/ SDP 92-06(A) GENERAL INFORMATION: UVUCA110N:SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - PARKSIDE CARLSBAD TRACT CT 92-02(B). PUD 92-03(8). SDP 92-06 (C) (PLANNING AREA D') PROJECT DATA: IOCM. fMUKS MMUOOtfNT lOMt ZON( 10 •Cam KM KM«K ««* nui. KHMd cowuab mm v (Km OP TOT« «n toi i4i, IUP wa tun, arv or ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MO. 814-M4-04i-nw smn) uw r H UMH >-<TM nan) au> v • j-fw nan) iw» v i* Mm *-[TW miY) 19)0 V » UMB (ff< 1 •" "• SBlSfUT ZJXJT w "" II MONOID KMT* - TKTt£ - " NOTES: SERV1CES DISTRICTS: »T H6mm TfFlCAL LOT CRADmC. DM1MACE * SETBACK REQUIREMENTS [o *1 I O o 938 sf PLAN No 1 I,owcrl.cvcl Total 1880 sf " "1)42 sf SHEA HOMES CARI^BAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ^ 3 ROOF PLAN REAR ELEVATION TVT1CAL FINISH MATERIALS •uw i-noFiu1: CONCRETE WMIF TII.R •EXPOSED RAF1EH TAIL •STUCCO •VINVL WINDOWS •WOOD SIIUTIERS o O LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 1 A n_r~i 024 SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 t~t-+-*-t~ I- t-- R\Gl IT SIDE ELEVATION n LEF-TSIDE ELEVATION \REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS •LOW PROFILE CONCRETE ROOK TILE •WOOD KASC1A •snicro O O FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 1 B run SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE .,„„„ I 1 ft =£ I ^ ' JAN 2 8 1999 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LOW PROFILE coNcm-re Hour IILE WOOD FASCIA WOOOSIft/rfERS STUCCO VINYL WINDOWS LEFP SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 1 C o C) SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE IflM 2 8 1999 , o o PLAN No 2 l![>pe^Leyel 922 sf PLAN No 2 Lower_Level Tolal 2033 sf "" 1111 sf run SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 m RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION I—~\—J-*--»l-»- REAR ELEVATION ROOF PI .AN~ TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS •LOW PROFILE CONCRPre ROOF TILE •WOOD FASCIA •WOOD SHt/ITERS •S1TJCCO •VINYL WINDOWS o o LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 2 A n_rn SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ROOF I'LAN W 'Al-E I 7'lG1-1 REAR ELEVATION TVPICALFINISH .MATERIALS •U)W pnoFILE CUNCRKIE IWJf tf 'Ill-K •WOOD FASCIA •VINYI.WINIM.iWS I ll ll o LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 2 B nrn SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS •LUW PROFILE CXJNCRETE ROOF TILE "WOOD FASCIA •WOOD SinnTERS •STUCCO •VINYL WINDOWS •STONE LEFT SIDE ELEVATION R_QOf. PLAN FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 2 C o 034 SCAI.E l'V-1 O" SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD IAN ?, 8 1999 o PLAN _Ny_? _ Upper Level 1156"sf PLAN No 3 Lower 1-eyej total 2100 sf "945 sf SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE REAR ELEVATIONRIGHT SIDE ELEVATION TYPICAL FINIS! I MATERIALS LOW PROFILE CONCRETE RCXJK TTLE EXIttSBI) RAPTOR TAB. smcco VINYL WINDOWS WOOD SIIIITTEKS O UEI-T vSIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 3 A run SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE inn o o 1OOO RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ROOF PLANSTAIJ: 17iir-1 REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS •LOW PROFILE CONCRPIZ ROOFIILE •EXI1JSE1) KAPTEIt TAIL •S'tTJClX* •VINYL WINDOWS C) LEIT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 3 B O ru~~i SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 REAR ELEVATIONRIGHT SIDE ELEVATION TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS •tOW PROFILE CX)NCIIEIB ROOF TILE •WOOD FASCIA •SIUCCO •VINYL WINDOWS •WOOD SHUTTERS o LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 3 C nr~] SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 o PLAN No 4 Upper Uyej 1085 si PLAN_No4 _\jower Level total 2~2,51 sf " 1160 si SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE IAN 9! 8 1999 V-, RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS •LOW PROFILE CONCRETE ROOF TILE • EXPOSED RAFTER TAIL •WOODSHirrTCHb •STUCCO •VINYL WINDOWS O FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 4 A O run 9CAUE IM'-l 0' SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE JAN 2 8 1999 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS LOW PROFILE CONCRCre ROOF TILE EXPOSED RAFfER TAB. S1UCCO VINYL WINDOWS o LEFT SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 4 B O ru—i SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE 15 1AM 9 R 1QQQ RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LEFTSIDE ELEVATION SHEA HOMES CARLSBAD PARKSIDE REAR ELEVATION TYPICAL FINISH MATERIALS •LOW PROFILE CONCRE1X ROOF HUE •WOOD FASCIA •WOODSIIimERS •snxxo •VINYL WINDOWS •STONE o o FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 4 C run I/IM O P 1OQQ EXHIBIT "YY" Wdated February 17, 1999 PARKSIDE - CT 92/02(B)/PUD 92-03(B)/SDP 92-06(C) UNIT OWNER MAINTENANCE RE5PONS1BIUTY AREA (TYP.) STORM DRAIN PIPE TO BE MAINTAINED BY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION EASEMENT UNE SIDEWALK LEGEND FENCE UNE UNIT OWNER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY AREA HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION MAINTENANCE RESPONSJBILTY AREA . _, AREA (TYP.) HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILTY DETAIL - MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBLTTY N.T.S. PARKSIDE by UDC SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY GUIDELINES 5/6/98 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. GUIDELINE In projects where there are three 2-story units in a row situated less than 15 feet apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge. The depth of the single-story edge shall not be less than 10 feet and shall run the length of the building pad, except that courtyards setback a minimum of 15 feet from the property line and which are a minimum 5 feet wide are not required to have a single story building edge. The roof covering the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-tupe roofs falling to a single-story element). In projects where there are three 2-story units in a row situated between 15 and 20 feet apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single story building edge with a depth of not less than 5 feet running the length of the building pad. The roof of the single story element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the two story element of the building (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to a single-story element). On a project basis, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single story edge for forty percent (40%) of the perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge shall be a minimum depth of three feet (3'). The units qualifying under the 33% shall be distributed throughout the project The main purpose of this guideline is to ensure some building relief on the front and sides of each unit Per project, 50% of all units with a lot frontage greater than 45 feet must have (4) separate building planes on the front elevation. Per project, 50% of all units with a lot frontage greater than 45 feet must have (4) separate building planes on the rear elevation. Per project, 50% of all units shall have one side elevation with a 7 feet average side yard setback Three-car garages limited to 75% of the total units where average lot size is 5,000 SF or less. Three-car garages shall incorporate a mixture of 2 door, 3 door and offset 2 door designs. 50% of exterior door and window openings shall be projected or recessed a minimum of 2 inches. The predominant roof framing for each floor plan in a project shall exhibit directional variety to the other floor plans and to the street MINIMUM SIANUARU 1of3 1of3 33% 50% 50% 50% 75% 50% 100% %OF CUMPLIANCh 50% 2 of 4 100% 33% 100% 73% 100% N/A 100% 100% COMMENTS Plans 2 & 4 have a single story building edge which is interrupted by a 30' x 13' courtyard. The average building separation between 1 & 2 and 3 & 4 is appro* 20' (see sideyard setback guideline 6). < Plans 2, 3 & 4 all have single story roof edge. Plan 1 has single story edge at front and rear. All plans have single story edges. Plan 2 has a 44% single story edge and Plan 3-C has a 41% single story edge. Lots 7, 17, 19, 21, 40 and 42 will be plotted with a Plan 3-C which has a single story front and rear porch to accommodate the 33% requirement All Plans/elevations comply for 100%. Exceeds min. standard. j Plans 1, 2 & 4 comply for 73%. Exceeds min. standard. All Plans exceed the 7' average setback: P1 1 = 12.1 ft, PI 2 = 7.3 ft, PI 3 = 1 1.5 ft, PI 4 = 9.2 ft. No 3-car garages used; all are 2 car garages. All windows have trim surround. Exceeds min. stnd. White vinyl windows will be used with exterior trim. All elevations have directional and design variety as required on the roof framing. n ; j