Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 99-12; Chadwick Residence; Coastal Development Permit (CDP)c Carlsbad Municipal Water District emo To: Greg Fisher, Planning From: Kelly Efimoff, CMWD Date: April 1,1999 Re: Chadwick Residence (CDP 99-12/SDU 99-04) CMWD 99-C.517 APN 206-180-49 The Developer's should be aware of the following: a) Meet with the District's Project Engineer to discuss potable water meter and sewer lateral locations. The Developer must establish in cooperation with the Water District the adequacy of the existing connections or the necessity for a new service. These improvements must be shown on an approved set of design plans to be signed by the District Engineer. b) The Developer must also establish in cooperation with the District the areas required to be irrigated with recycled water, if any. • Pagel of 2 Greg Fisher-GDP 99-12 Chadwick /"""> <|<M^ ' ' ''' " _ '''' '' Page 1 ^~^^^^^^^~~~~~~~ '' """" ' *""~~^""^" ~~~~ ^^ ^___ __ From: Mike Smith To: Greg Fisher Date: 4/2/99 5:24PM Subject: CDP 99-12 Chadwick Fire Department comments: Proposed driveway width is inadequate to serve new construction. Driveway must be widened to twenty feet, or proposed construction must be protected by automatic fire sprinklers. o MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Fisher, Planning Dept. FROM: Kathy Farmer, Engineering Technician DATE: March 30, 1999 SUBJ: CHADWICK RESIDENCE, CDP 99-12 COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REVIEW Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project for application completeness. The application and plans submitted for this proposed project are currently incomplete and unsuitable for further review due to the following incomplete item: 1. Current title report required. (Preferably within last 6 months.) Additionally, staff has conducted a review of the project for engineering issues of concern. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed project are as follows: 1. The decrease in permeable surface will result in an increase in runoff to the back of the lot. Provide solution to reduce runoff intensity onto adjacent property. (Possible solution may be to add rain gutters with rip rap energy dissi paters.) If you or the applicant have any questions, please contact me at extension 4374. cc: Principal Civil Engineer CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW August 17, 1999 TO: Greg Fisher - Assistant Planner FROM: David Rick - Assistant Engineer COMPLETENESS REVIEW PROJECT ID: CDP 99-12/SDU 99-04: Chadwick Residence The Engineering Department has completed its review of the above referenced project. Engineering staff does not have any comments to add to the project. Please add the following conditions of approval to the approving resolution: 1 . The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required. 2. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property. If you or the applicant have any questions regarding the above, please either see or call me at extension 4324. David Rick Engineering Technician - Land Use Review V H:\LIBRARY\ENG\WPDATA\MISC\COMPREV ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PROJECT STATUS UPDATE FORM To: Senior Office Specialist From: AVw M FARM E"8 Date: Please update the computer records for the referenced project as follows, and return form to Project Engineer. Project No. Project Name (LDP Log In Date: «3///8/32 _ Log Out Date: Acceptance Date: Approval Date: Expiration Date: APPLICATION STATUS: As of this review of Application (PLEASE CHECK ONE) [^Incomplete - Application has been found incomplete and not ready for further review. |~i Active - Application has been found complete and ready for further review C] Approved - Application has been* formally approved no appeal submitted. H] Denied - Application has been formally denied, no appeal submitted. |~1 Appeal - Application action has been appealed. d Withdrawn - Application has been formally withdrawn. n Expired - Application has been incomplete for six months. SYSTEM STATUS: Where, within Engineering, the Department Project is (PLEASE CHECK ONE) |~i Land Development Division - Project is undergoing Land Use Review. PI Complete - Project requires no further Engineering actions. f~| Denied - Project has been formally denied, no appeal submitted. HI Expired - Project has gone beyond time limit of approval. Cl Inspection - Project plans have been signed, ready for construction. O Plancheck - Map/Grading/Improvement plans in plancheck. O Pre-Check - Project has been approved, waiting for plan check submittal. CH Withdrawn - Project applicant has formally withdrawn project from further review. L.U.R. LOG IN/OUT ACTIVITY: What action happened to the application. (PLEASE CHECK ONE) [H Conditioned [H Reviewed