HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 99-32; JENSEN RESIDENCE; Coastal Development Permit (CDP)CITY OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION
FOR ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK OR PROCESSING
Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable.
PROJECT NAME: JENSEN RESIDENCE DATE:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GRADING PLAN FOR SITE PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
PROJECT ADDRESS
LOTNO(S).: i _J MAP NO.: 18236
NO. OF DWELLING UNITS: i LFMP ZONE: R_I
APN(S).: ?io-i?n-3?
# LOTS: 1 # ACRES: ,5899
OWNER:
Mailing Address:
JON JENSEN
4S1 s. K.scnNnTnn Ri.vn.
ESCONDIDO. CA 9202S
Phone Number: ( 760 ) 743-7966
I certify that I an
information is/trije and cojf^ct to the best of my knowledge
Signature
and coETi ct to the best of my knowledge
APPLICANT:
Mailing Address:
SAME
Phone Number. (
Signature Date H-^I4C00
CIVIL EN(3^IN|EER: ko^SEiN ZOMORRODI
Firm: DGB SURVEY h MAPPING
Mailing Address: RS7 FAST .1. STBRKT
SOILS ENGINEE
Firm: AMTEX ENGINEERING GROUP
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
Phone Number: (619 ) 421-3042
Mailing Address: s«S« MT. AT.TFAW DB., tf?^s
SAN DIEGO, CA 92111
Phone Number: (858 ) 571-6271
State Registration Number: 43235 State Registration Number: 22Q96
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
IMPROVEMENT VALUATION
1. What water district is the proposed project located in? (circle one)
( Carlsbad Municipal Water District ) Olivenhain Vallecitos
2. If in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, what is the total cost estimate, including the 15%
contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements (if applicable)?
3. What is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for sewer (for Carlsbad
Municipal Water District only), street, public (median) landscape and irrigation, and
drainage improvements (if applicable)?
4. What is the total cost of landscape and irrigation improvements on private property (if applicable)?
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ N/A
cut 1100 cy fill 2600
GRADING QUANTITIES
cy remedial cy import/export i son cy
DOCS/MISFORMS/APPLICATION ENG PLANCHECK OR PROCESSING REV. 10/06/99
CITY OF CARLSBAD v
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1)
•
•
APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
' ^""-iBMriT-'''
Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
Administrative Variance
Coastal Development Permit
I I Conditional Use Permit
I ] Condominium Permit
I I Environmental Impact
Assessment
I I General Plan Amendment
I I Hillside Development Permit
I I Local Coastal Plan Amendment
I I Master Plan
I I Non-Residential Planned
Development
I I Planned Development Permit
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Planned Industrial Permit
Planning Commission
Determination
Precise Development Plan
Redevelopment Permit
Site Development Plan
Special Use Permit
Specific Plan
Tentative Porccl Map
Obtain from Engineering Department
Tentative Tract Map
Variance
Zone Change
List other applications not
specified
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
2)
3)
4)
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).
PROJECT NAME:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: t^lLL. JUARh^^K^UST f^e^ j Mfj-k-^L OSf^RL^ ^ FT.
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type)
J^A^s^ ffitMU-u r^usr ^ohJ icfit^c-
6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
MAILING ADDRESS ^ ^ MAILING ADDRESS
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INTORMATION IS^ TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
CORAECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE
A
DA SU
(I
NATURE
Ii
DA
,0
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED. MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED. MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2
r* A <^<^ ^-K^.
Mayor Bud Lewis
City of Carlsbad
City Clerks Office
June 11,2001
Dear Mayor,
Thank you for your immediate response to my inquiry on the coastal property, comprised
of 3 lots in the 5300 block of Carlsbad Blvd. However, the response does not speak to my
concern, nor that of the neighbors impacted by this construction, and signed below. I was
shocked to hear of a "9000" sq. ft. house being planited: that mus't be an error. I cannot
believe it could be built on any one of the three lots in question! The Jenson house, at 5139
(APN 210-120-32) was verbally given to me as approximately 6000 sq. ft. That is extremely
large as well. I believe, and never doubted, that permits were pulled. The problem is with
the extreme grading, and the reason for that grading, as given this week by the planning
and engineering departments. I would appreciate your reading the following and would
hope you could respond. This project is greatly impacting the neighbors immediately to
the east. Thank you: Nina Eaton
RE: Extreme Raised Grading of 3 ocean front lots at furthest southern end of Carlsbad
Blvd. (5139 Carlsbad Blvd. And 2 lots south)
We, as neighbors are facing an issue that (1) impacts the visual entrance to Carlsbad via
Carlsbad Blvd., (2) changes the entire neighborhood appearance, and (3) impacts homes
on the opposite (east) side of the street, (4) was decided City Engineering, based on the
future possibility of the widening /raising construction of Coast Hwy., and on the
possibility that it would be done just at this location.
This stretch of ocean front property begins at the extreme south end of Carlsbad with these
3 bare lots and continues north, where there are 19 existing homes and 2 lots. The existing
homes appear to have been built with the natural grade, which is in all cases higher at the
street, sloping down to the west, resulting in low profile coastal development along the
entire strip.
(1) Driving north on Coast Hwy. (Carlsbad Blvd.), one enters Carlsbad driving
up a slight incline to a straightaway. Until now, this entrance to Carlsbad has been low
profile. Beyond the 3 empty lots, the first visible ocean front home was built on the
natural slope, with only 1/2 story visible. This lot is unusually deep, so that
landscaping is all that is seen from the highway. The next home and all those
remaining north, are down slope to the west, creating a low profile. Even those that
are 2 story right at the street, are a low profile due to the slope on which they are built.
One was just completed this year, and the city engineers did not require that to be built
with a raised grade.
(2) These 3 lots are drastically out of conformance with the entire stretch of
homes that continues north, sweeping to the slopes of Carlsbad Beach. These are high
profile, and "right in your face". Fill has been added to raise the grading by more than
3 feet where the lots meet the highway. Then they were graded higher yet to the west,
to allow drainage of the front portions to go to the street. The back portions, which are
the largest portions the buildings, will drain south to the public stairway, then down to
the beach. One might guess that fill grading as it goes west toward the ocean, where it
originally sloped down, will raise that portion of the building pad 8 to 12 ft.!
In 1998, the planning dept. responded to one neighbor (Eaton) with a topographic map
of the lots in question. This was in response to Eaton's inquiry as to what we might
expect now that the 1^' lot appeared sold. Eaton was told that the builders would be
required to lower the grade at lease 3 ft. This may have been due to the steepness of
the existing slope, as well as the grading of the existing lots north. NOW engineering
has required the RAISING of grade by 3 ft. plus, so final grade is 6-7 ft. higher at street
level than we had been led to believe by the planning department.
(3) The current high grading on these 3 lots will impact the homes
immediately across the street by creating a tunnel affect from the hight of hard
construction, the loss of light, and the increased hwy. noise. The entrance to Carlsbad
will be a short tunnel of these 1 to 3 story structures: three of them jetting up there, all
by themselves, while the rest of the stretch of homes are a completely different profile.
The noise level of the hwy. has increased greatly with the current heavy use and
congestion. That noise will be more of an impact when there are high, hard structures
off which it can bounce. When we bought homes here, we realized that homes would
one day be built across the street on the ocean front. The sale of these lots suffered due
to slope instability, public usage, and lack of depth. Interestingly, the property was
allowed to subdivide a year or so ago. What we question is the extreme height now
that grade has been extremely increased.
(4) Finally, it is amazing that the city engineering department made this
decision based solely on the POSSIBILITY that Carlsbad would raise and widen Coast
Hwy. at this location, at some time in the FUTURE. Engineering reasoned that this
would be cost effective for the city, to have these 3 homes already raised to meet the
new raised hwy. grade. .. .Even though all the homes north will not meet the new
grade. What sense does this make? Can the city afford to mitigate all the homes on the
east and west side of the street to make this raised, widened hwy. a reality?
Where are these hwy. plans and why didn't we know of them before we invested in
our homes. Most of us have been here a while.
Some of the neighbors have been to meetings on these properties. Some have spoken, and
feel unheard. Eaton received no notice on these properties since 1998. The reason seems to
be an incorrect mailing address, even though all notices previous to that date were
addressed correctly. The files on these properties show the address label to have
"become" incorrect.
So far, one of these properties has been permitted. We ask for some assistance and imput
before the other 2 complete the process. We understand one is an owner build, one will be
built for speculation. We could have 30 ft. structures, on a 3 ft. raised grade, for a hight of
33 ft. on the highway! The city cannotallow this harsh an impact on us and our
properties. !^ •^.^^^^^ ^^y^ y^ (2(^^r,cfu^A.'
We appreciate your help in this matter. , . ^ t/y^&A.y ^-A ^u'^.-^i
\/l.^nanne Arcitlincono - Re. "Page 1
From: Christine Wauschak
To: Marianne Arcldiacono
Date: 6/7/01 7:58AM
Subject: Re:
Good Morninfl Mariannfl,
fon THIi INf^ORMATION OF
THE CITY COUNCIU
CITY MANAGER
(JAlff ASei CitYMA MANAGER
I jus! spoktj lo Jeff Cadien, the building inspector ai531>Carlshad Blvd.. where a new^^OOQ/sq fl house
is undor nonsiructlon. YBS the proper permits are pulled. The big pile of dirt on the lot oTlKls new home
IU from th(i sjinils frorn digging (for Ihe basement I think), and Ihe dirt will nol be used lo raise the grade. It
Will bo iruckod ulf or usod as biu;k(jll for walls. If you have any further questions call Ihe inspector at
no2-27ir) or myufill at 2/00
Christine
>>> Marianne Arcldiacono 06/0fi/01 0Q:'I9AM »>
,lijne6, 2001
Mfirly or.tiriyone Diijt rflceivcs this message:
1 ho M.iynr uiikori thai Ihe propKity be chocked In make sure the proper permits were obtained as the
(iropfirty looks «s though ll is in the process of being graded to tiuild up tiie lol^ The location given me is:
South on Carlsbad Boulevord on the West side before Palomar Airport Road - ll)ie last 2 lots before Ihe
redavGlopment area.
I hope this is enough description for you to find It. If not, let me know.
Thanks
Thank you,
Marlannw Arcidiucono
Thank you.
Mnnanno ArcitJIacono
(760) 4'J4-2R19 X5124
4- fAt-^A^*^^
City of Carlsbad
Public Works - Engineering
June 25, 2001
Nina Eaton
300 Carlsbad Village Drive, #108A-347
Carlsbad, CA 92008
LETTER TO THE MAYOR - DATED JUNE 11, 2001
Your letter to the Mayor has been forwarded to me for a response to the issues that you
have brought up. 1 will address those issues in roughly the same order that you have written
them in your letter.
In your first paragraph you state that you were shocked to hear that the house was
9,000 square feet. You state that you were verbally told that the house would be
approximately 6,000 square feet. The reason for the difference is in the terminologies used
for the habitable square footage of the house versus the total square footage of house,
garage, and basement. The original building permit for 5319 Carlsbad Boulevard shows
7,053 square feet of habitable space. Along with that was 1,737 square feet of unfinished
basement, which is not considered habitable, plus 738 square feet of garage, also not
considered to be habitable living space. Once all of those numbers are added together, it
does come approximately to the 9,000 square feet that you have been told about.
Your second issue appears to be your concern about what you have labeled extreme raised
grading. You mention this, or items very similar to it in several places in the letter, regarding
building heights and pad elevation along with a guess about grading to raise a pad 8 to 12
feet. The grading done on the subject lot totaled 690 cubic yards. We do not consider that
amount to be extreme in that all City ordinances pertaining to grading would allow that
amount of grading as being acceptable. The reason the Engineering Department required
the fill and drainage of that front portion of the lot to go to the street is based on one of your
other concerns having to do with the future design of Carlsbad Boulevard.
In 1992, the City Council gave direction to enter into a contract for the design of the
boulevard. That study was completed and the chosen design was signed by the City
Engineer in 1993. That approved design shows that the future street elevation at the subject
property will be approximately five feet higher at the curb line than the existing property
currently is. One of the goals of the design was to ensure that reasonable driveway access
would be maintained to serve the properties fronting along Carlsbad Boulevard. In order for
the subject property to comply with this goal, they had to do the grading to place their
driveway at the proposed elevation of the boulevard. This caused approximately five feet of
fill to be placed on the front portion of their lot. The fill area goes from the existing pavement
area of the boulevard to, and including, the garage of the property. None of the house is on
fill. In fact, portions of the house are on cut or reduced elevations.
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8J
June 21, 2001
LETTER TO THE MAYOR - DATED JUNE 11, 2001
Page 2
The building height does comply with City regulations. Those regulations state that a
maximum height of 30 feet of the building is allowed. That 30 feet is measured from
anywhere within the house straight up. This assures that none of the building is greater than
30 feet above what the pre-existing elevation of the property was at. This was approved by
the Planning Commission at a public hearing for the Coastal Development Permit for the
home. A cross-sectional detail drawing was on the exhibit that went to the Planning
Commission showing this fill.
From the future elevation of the curb line on Carlsbad Boulevard to the garage door is only
a rise of 1/2 foot to comply with the Engineering Departments requirement for that portion of
the property to drain towards the street and not back towards the cliff. The home was also
conditioned to install roof gutters with the roof gutters directing the drainage for the structure
to the driveway and out onto the boulevard. This was done in order to reduce the amount of
drainage that would flow back towards the cliff.
You had made mention that a home further north on Carlsbad Boulevard was recently
constructed and was not required to raise their grade. That home was required to raise their
grade at the future curb line approximately one foot. That one foot would bring their property
up to the proposed grade, unlike the subject property that was five feet off of the proposed
grade.
In your letter you also mentioned that in 1998 the Planning Department gave indication that
the area would be lowered in grade, not raised. Since the design for future roads is done by
the Engineering Department, it is easily understandable that the Planning staff working at
the front counter were unaware of these future design elevations approved in 1993.
To summarize, the exhibits for the Coastal Development Permit approved by the Planning
Commission on March 15, 2000, do match with the building as it exists. Those plans from
March of 2000 do show both the existing and the proposed elevations showing that fill
material was planned. There is an exhibit on those plans that show cross-sectional detail of
the proposed grade changes. At the public hearing, Mr. Sides was the only person who
spoke with any concerns at the Planning Commission hearing. From the minutes of that
meeting, his main question was what was the elevation of the residence and the future
boulevard. He was given those answers at the meeting and no one else raised any
concerns at that public hearing.
Since the home does comply with the approved permit and the approved permit complies
with all City standards, there is nothing inappropriate or illegal that was done with the
design, public hearing process, or construction ofthe home. I can understand your concern
about the change taking place in your neighborhood. Change of any kind is difficult to adapt
to. I can see where the impact to your view will be significant. However, you must realize
that the subject property does have property rights. As long as the proposed building
complies with all City ordinances and codes, it can be constructed as designed. That is the
case with this property.
June 21, 2001
LETTER TO THE MAYOR - DATED JUNE 11, 2001
Pages
If you would like to review any of the plans that I refer to in this letter, you may contact
David Rick of the Engineering Department at 602-2781. If you do want to come by the office
to review these materials, I would ask that you please call ahead of time so those materials
can be pulled from their various files so that the amount of time that you would have to
spend here would be greatly reduced.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. WOJCIK, P.E.
Deputy City Engineer
RJW:jd
City Manager
Public Works Director
Assistant Engineer, David Rick
Gale Sides, 5320 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad CA 92008
Imagene and Dale Goodwin, 5360 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad CA 92008
Valerie Neary, 5310 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad CA 92008
Mr. and Mrs. T. Gronstedt, 5380 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad CA 92008