Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCP 05-20; Urubumar Condominiums; Condo Permit (CP) (3)1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE: JULYS. 2005 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: URUBUMAR CONDOMINIUMS O'DAY CONSULTANTS, 2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: 271 OLOKERAVE. WEST, CARLSBAD, CA, 92009 3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: THOMAS GUINNN (760) 931-7700 4. PROJECT LOCATION: 6838-6840 URUBU STREET, CARLSBAD, CA 92010 JEROME STIRNKORB 5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: 2802 CAZADERO, CARLSBAD, CA 92009 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RM 7. ZONING: R-2 8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): LEUCADIA MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF CONVERTING AN EXISTING DUPLEX UNIT INTO TWO CONDOMINIU UNITS. THE EXISTING DUPLEX IS PART OF A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION BUILT IN 1971 AS PART OF LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO. 2. SEPERATE WATER, SEWER AND GAS SERVICES ALREADY EXIST ON-SITE ELIMINATING THE NEED FOR ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. 1 Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. | | Aesthetics I Agricultural Resources I | Air Quality I | Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Noise Hazards/Hazardous Materials LJ Population and Housing Hydrology/Water Quality Public Services | | Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources | _ | Recreation Transportation/Circulation | | Mandatory Findings of Significance | Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Part I", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the EIA-Part I analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTRAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact D D D 0 Z 0 Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Impact tributary areas that are environmentally sensitive? Potentially Significant Impact D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 0 0 D D D 0 Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi- cance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologi- cal resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 - 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact D D D D D 0 v\ n n n n n 0 Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D L 2 D D LZ n n 121 Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Impacts to groundwater quality? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? f) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface waters. m) Increased pollutant discharges (e.g., heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface waters or other alteration of receiving surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact D z n D D D D D D D 00 0 n n 0 Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during or following construction? o) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list? p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XI. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbourne vibration or groundbourne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D E D D D 0 \ D \z n 0 0 10 Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 11 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact n a D n n n n n n iz0 0 n n n Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in insufficient parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turn- outs, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 12 Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact n a n 7 D 17 n 0 n n D a Rev. 07/26/02 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.)Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact 171 D e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 13 Rev. 07/26/02 I • DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS I I. AESTHETICS I I I I I I I a) No scenic vista near project. b) The project is located in an existing residential development and not in the vicinity of any State scenic highways. c) No improvements or landscaping are proposed for this project. d) The existing features on-site will not be altered to create new source of substantial light or glare. II. AGRICULTRAL RESOURCES a) Existing residential lot will remain as is. (See "City of Carlsbad Zoning Map" attached) b) Project will remain zoned per the City of Carlsbad as "R-2." (See "City of Carlsbad Zoning Map" attached)I c) No changes are proposed for the project. (See "City of Carlsbad Zoning Map" attached) III. AIR QUALITY I a) Structure and ADT will remain in compliance with current air quality plan, b) Structure will not be altered and will not contribute any additional pollutants to the atmosphere, causing an air quality violation. I c) See response b) d) See response b) e) No new odor causing activities will take place as part of the proposed project. | IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES I a) Project is residential (See "City of Carlsbad Zoning Map" attached) with no sensitive natural community on or near the site, b) See response a) I c) The project is not near a federally protected wetland and will not produce any additional runoff that could a substantial adverse effect downstream, d) Residential project is fenced off with no existing fish, wildlife or wildlife I corridors on-site. e) Existing site currently complies with all Carlsbad ordinances and will not be altered. I f) Existing site complies with all local, regional and state habitat conservation plans. g) No new pollutants or drainage is anticipated for the site. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES a) No existing historical resource on or near site. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I b) No existing archeological resource on or near site. c) No construction activities to take place. d) Existing surroundings will remain unchanged. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS a) No grading or construction activities will take place on-site or off-site b) See response a) c) Existing topsoil and sub-grade soils will remain as is. d) See response c) e) Site will remain connected to Leucadia Municipal Sewer System (See "Leucadia Wastewater District Letter, dated July 8, 2005" attached). VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a) Hazardous materials will not be stored, used or transported on-site or off-site. b) See response a) c) See response a) d) The site is located within a residential subdivision and is not part of the list of hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. e) Project is part of a residential land use and not within two miles of an airport. f) No private airstrips within vicinity of project. g) Project will remain on private property and not associated with any emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. h) Project is adjacent to residential units and public roads. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a) Project will remain in compliance with all existing local, state and federal discharge requirements. b) The project will remain connected to Leucadia Municipal water service and will not create any additional impervious surfaces. c) Existing drainage will remain unchanged and no activities affecting ground water will take place. d) Existing drainage patterns will remain unchanged and no additional runoff will be produced on- or off-site. e) See response d) f) See response d) g) No construction activities will take place that effect water quality. h) Project is part of area determined to be outside 500-year floodplain (See "Flood Insurance Rate Map," panel 1051, attached), i) See response h) j) Existing drainage patterns and volumes to remain unchanged, k) Site surrounded by existing residential units and public streets. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1) No construction activities will take place that will produce erosion, increase drainage or create additional pollutant discharges that will alter the existing water quality. m) See response 1) n) See response 1) o) See response 1) p) See response 1) IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING a) Site will remain as residential land use and will consist of dividing an existing duplex into two condominium units. b) Condominium conversion will be in accordance with the City of Carlsbad general plan and zoning ordinance (See "City of Carlsbad Zoning and General Plan Map" attached). c) Existing site will remain unchanged and stay in accordance will all local, state and federal plans. X. MINERAL RESOURCES a) No known mineral resource located on- or off-site b) See response a) XI. NOISE a) No construction or noise producing activities will take place and the existing residence will remain in accordance withal city ordinances. b) No vibration or noise producing activities will take place on- or off-site. c) Existing residence will remain and will not produce any additional temporary or permanent ambient noise. d) See response c) e) See response VII, e) f) See response VII, f) XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING a) Project consists of converting duplex into condominiums, resulting in no increase or decrease in growth. b) See response a) c) See response a) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Existing public services will remain unchanged and no new construction will take place. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I XIV. RECREATION a) Project consists of converting a single duplex into two condominium units, resulting in no increase of residence. b) Project is residential and does not require recreational facilities per the city of Carlsbad subdivision ordinance. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC a) Average daily trips will remain unchanged (See "SANDAG - Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region" attached) b) See response a) c) Air traffic patterns are not within vicinity of project. d) No new improvements or construction is required with this project. e) Existing improvements, access and parking will remain as is. Alternative transportation policies, plans and programs will not be affected. f) See response e) g) See response e) XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS a) The existing wastewater system will remain connected and will not generate any additional flow. b) See response a) c) Yard area drains will remain and no new drainage facilities are proposed for the project. d) The existing Leucadia Municipal water service will remain in service and no new construction, or facility upgrades are proposed. e) The existing wastewater system will remain in place and the site will not generate any additional flow. f) The existing project CONCLUSION The project (6838-6840 Urubu Street) consists of converting an existing duplex into two condominium units through the approval of a Tentative Parcel Map, submitted to the City of Carlsbad. The project does not require any type of construction and will not involve modifying or altering any of the existing improvements. Currently, the property is serviced by separate utilities and will not require any additional, or modification to any, utilities. The project is consistent with the City of Carlsbad Zoning and General Plan uses and will remain in compliance with all city, state and federal regulations. ZONING MAP of Carlsbad E-A;| Exclusive Agricultural R-A| Residential Agricultural I^E] Rural Residential Estate R-1 | One - Family Residential l-ja] Two - Family Residential HHH Multiple - Family Residential m Residential Mobile Home Park H Residential Density- Multiple JR-P | Residential Professional |R-T| Residential Tourist Hgjjf Residential Waterway [ T-CJ Transportation Corridor m General & Neighborhood Commercial KB Office j | Heavy & Tourist Commercial 9H Industrial ITTI Beach Overlay Zone |P-M'| Planned Industrial ^$? Special Flood Hazard Area (A Special Use Permit is Required) Public Utility t="3 Commercial Visitor Serving Overlay Zone • ;*^" El Camino Real corridor Overlay Village Redevelopment x v' Arterial Roadway Planned Community /\/ other Roadway Limited Control Q 3,500 [OSj Open Space | | Multiple Designations Feet 7,000 UPDATED 18 NOVEMBER 2004 ©2004 City of Carlsbad CIS Plotted 14 December 2004 cargis2/products/planningfeoning/Zone11x17.mxd UNOFFICIAL GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP City of Carlsbad This map is unofficial. It is a partial depiction of the official General Plan Map. Ask for blueline copy of complete approved map. LEGEND •I[E] ELEMENTARY SCHOOL •i[H] HIGH SCHOOL • [HC] CONTINUATION SCHOOL 1B[J] JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL • [P] PRIVATE SCHOOL S[PI] PLANNED INDUSTRIAL M[G] GOVERNMENTAL FACILITIES n[OS] OPEN SPACE a[UA] UNPLANNED AREAS •i[TG] TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR CH[U] PUBLIC UTILITIES M[CF] COMMUNITY FACILITIES COMMERCIAL r: i[R] REGIONAL COMMERCIAL • [LJ LOCAL SHOPPING CENTER ra[T-R] TRAVEL/RECREATION COMMERCIAL H[0] OFFICE & RELATED COMMERCIAL •i[V] VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL •i[RL] LOW DENSITY (0-1.5 du/ac) •[RLM] LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY (0-4dufec) •I[RM] MEDIUM DENSITY (4-8 du/ac) •i[RMH] MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (8-15 du/ac) •i[RH] HIGH DENSITY (15-23 du/ac) ROADS S^ Prime Arterial ^**^*Major Arterial ,/'\,-*Secondary Arterial 'Collector Street Data Last Updated 18 November 2004 fcargis2productatjlanningftpdt/gplu11x17.mxd ffVlSI 0V/ BRIEF GUIDE OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION APRIL 2002 401 B Street. Suite 800 San Oiago. California 92101 (619)595-5300 • Fax (619)595-5305 MOTE: This luting only represents * guU* of average, or estimated, traffic generation -driveway" ratal and some very genera! trip data tor Ian) met |empha*ia on acreage and building square looraoe) in the San 01*90 region. These rates (both local am) national) are subject to change es future documentation becomes available, or as regionet sources ere updated. For more specific information regarding traffic data and trip rates, please refer to the San Diego Traffic Generators manual. Almay* cnee* •*(* loeml >«rierffef*MM far thtir pnffrrfd or •fplictbl* rmtmm. TRW CATEGORIES •VT ESTIMATIO WEEKDAY VEHICLE Tiar GENERATION RAT* (DWVEWAV) HIGHEST PEAK HOUR % (phu INrOUT ratio)T1UPLENOTH AGRICULTURE (Open Space)....... Commeflcial General Aviation Helipons AUTOMOBILE* CerWesh Automatic Self-serve Gesoline _ with/food Mart with/Food Man & Car Wash Older Service Station Design Sales (Dealer 6 Repeir) Auto Repair Center Auto Pens Sales Quick Lube Tire Store CEMETERY CHURCH (or Synagogue!— ...[80:18:2] ._. (78:20:2) ..(21:51:28) 164:25.11) L/RCTAM.' Supei Regional Shopping Center (More than 80 ecres. more then 800.000 sq. ft. w/usuatty 3+ major stores) Regional Shopping Center (54.35:11) (40-80acres. 40O.OOO-80O.OOO sq. ft. w/usuatty 2+ major stores) Community Shopping Center (47:31:22) (1S-40 acres. 125.0OO-4OO.OOO sq. ft.. w/usuatty 1 major store, detached restauramxs). giocoiy ana oruastofei Neighborhood Shopping Center (Less than IS acres, less than 12B.OOO sq. ft., w/usualty grocery 6 drugstore, cleaners, beauty ft barber shop. B fait food unices) Commercial Shops (45:40:1SJ Specially Retail/Strip Commercial Electronics Superstore Factory Outlet Supermarket Drugstore Convenience Market (16-16 hours) Convenience Market (24 hours) Convenience Market (w/gesokne pumps) Discount Club Discount Store Furniture Store Lumber Store Home Improvement Superstore Hardware/Paint Store Garden Nursery Mined Use: Commercial (w/supermaikeU/Residential 2/acre" BO/acre. lOO/flight 70/10OO sq. ft." " 6/acre. 2/flight 6/based aircraft' " 100/acre" 900/site. 600/ecre" too/wash stall" 160/vehicle fueling space" 155/vehicfa fueling space" 150/vehide lueHng space. 90O/station" 50/1000 sq. ft. 300/acre. 60/service stair 20/tOOO sq. ft. 4OO/acre. 2O/urvice stair 6O/10OO iq. h " 40/servica stall" 2S/10OO sq. ft. 30/iervice stall" 5/acre' 9/1OOO sq. tt.. 3O/acre" (quedruple rates for Sunday, or days of assembly) 35/1000 sq. ft.,' 4OO/ecre- 50/1000 sq. ft..1 SOO/acre* 80/1000 sq. ft. 700/ecre' " 12O/1OOO sq.ft. 1200/acra- " 4O/10OO sq. ft. 4OO/acro" 50/1000 sq. ft" 40/1000 sq.ft." 150/1 OOO sq. lt_ 2000/ecre' " 90/1000 sq. ft." 5OO/1OOO <q. ft" 700/1000 sq. ft" 850/1OOO sq. ft. 550/vehide fueling space" 6O/1OOO sq. ft., 6OO/acre' " 60/1 OOO sq. ft. 600/acre" 8/10OO sq. ft, lOO/acre" 30/1000sq.ft. ISO/acre" 40/1000 sq. ft" 60/10OO so, ft. 600/acre" 40/1000 sq. ft. 90/acre" r 110/1000 sq. ft. ZOOO/ecre' (commercial only) 15/dwellng unit 200/acre' (residential only) 1O8 12.5 5% 16:4) 9* (7:3) 4% (5:5) 4% (5:5) 7% (5:51 8% (5:51 7% (55) 5% (7:3) 8% (7:3) 4% 7% (6:41 7% (6:4) 5« (6:4) 4% (7:3) 4% (7:3) 4% (6:4) 4* (6.4) 3% (6:4) 3% (7-3) 4% (7:3) 4% (6:4) 8* (5.-S) 9% (5S) 5* (5:5) 1* (7:3) 3* (6:4) 4* (7.3) 7* (6:4) 5% (8:4) 2% (6:4) 3% (6:4) 3% (8:4) S* (3:7) 6* (5:5) 15* (5:5) 9% 155] 8* (5:5) 8* (5:51 9% (5:5) 9* (5:5) 8% (4:6) 11% (4:6) 10% 10% (5:5) 11% (5:51 8% (5:5) 10% (5:5) 9% (5:51 10% (5:5) 10% (5:5) 9% (5:5) 10% (5:5) 9% (5:5) 10% (5:5) 10% (5:5) 8% (5:5) 7% (5:5) 7% (5:5) 9% (5.5) 8% (5:5) 9% (531 9% (5:5) 8% <5:S) 9% (5:5) 10% (5:5) 9% (5:5) 13% (6:4) 3.6 4.3 LAND USE TRIP CATEGORIES (PAIMAflV.-tHVERTED:PASS-BYr ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VcHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE (DRIVEWAY) HIGHEST PEAK HOUR % {plus IN:OUT ratio)TRIP LENGTH EDUCATION University (4 years) Junior College (2 yea's). High School Middle/Junior High Elementary Day Care -•• (91:9:0) FINANCIAL* Bank (Walk-In only) with Drive-Through Drive-Through only Savings 6 Loan Drive-Through only _.(75:19:6) (63:25:12] (57.25:10] ._..{28:58:14] _. [35:42:23] .... (73:25:2]HOSPITAL.. — General Convalescent/Nursing INDUSTRIALIndustrial/Business Part (commercial induoxf) {79:19:2) Industrial Park (no commercial) Industrial Plant (muMp* shrtal (92:5:3] Manufacturing/Assembly Warehousing Storage Science Research & Development Landfill & Recycling Center LIBRARY 144:44:12] 2.4/student 100 acre' 1 2/studcnt 24/JOOO »q. ft. 120/»cre' 1 3/student 15/1000 sq. ft.. 60/acre' ' 1.4/sUident, 12/1000 sq. ft. 50/aere" 1 6/student. 14/1000 sq. ft, 90/acre' ' 5/chiNJ. 80/1000 sq. ft." 150/IOOOsq. ft, 1000/aere' " 200/1000 sq.«, 1500/acre' 250(125 one-wav)/larW 60/1OOO sq. ft.. 600/acre" 100 (50 one-v»ey)/Une" 20/bed. 26/1OOO sq. ft.. 25O/acre" 3/bed" 16/1 OOO sq. ft.. 20O/»cre- " 8/1000 sq. ft, 90/>cre" 10/1000 »q. ft~ 120/acre- 4/1000 sq. ft, 50/acre" 5/1 OOO sq. ft., 60/aere" 2/1000 sq. ft, 0.2/vauH. 3O/acre' 8/1000 sq. II, 80/»cre' 6/acre SO/1000 tq. ft. 400/acre" 10% (8:2) 12% (8:2) 20% (73) 30% (6:4) 32% (6:4) 17% (5:5) 4% (7:3) 5% (6:4) 3% (5:5) 2% 4% 8% (7:3) 7% (6:4) 9% (3:7) 9% (6:4) 10% (4:6) 9% (4:6) 9% (4:6) 18% (5:5) 8% (4:6) 10% (5:5) 13% (5:5) 9% 15% 10% (4:6) 7% (4:6) 12% 11% 14% 19% 13% 6% 16% 11% (8:2) (9:1) (8:2) (9:1) (7.3) (5:5) (9:1) (5:5) 12% 12% 15% 20% 15% 9% 14% 10% (2:8) (2.8) (3:7) (2:8) (4:6) (5:5) (1:9) (4:6) 8.9 9.0 4.8 5.0 3.4 37 3.4 8.3 9.0 11.7 LODGING —- (58:38:4] Hole! (w^^«»ni«*«.^.,i««nt) lO/occupWroomSOO/acre „ I 9/occupied room. 200/acre"SE.X. sass-— fWjffMY _ [82:16:2] 2.5/miiitarv ft civilian personnel* °7£Ld Commercial Off*. l™*«l 20^OO° *« *' 3°°/Kn' J££»$£££™- l«1*M 17/1000«.ft.o600/,cre- (more than 1OO.OOO sq. It, 6+ stories) |2/10OO so ft 2OO/acre' " ._„ 5ZX~ ^S*~ M^Hr,"!^0:^'"..., C60:30:,0, ltf™X"JSSS oAttifS —.«..—. „..«...«...•.- J6o.'2o^6} City (developed w/meeting rooms and sporll tacilities) 50/acte' ZSZSX5S, «undev^,p«,, 5/a^U fo, sr-cific spor, use,,. 6/picnic *• Staui (average 1000 acres) 1/«re. 10/p.cn* we AmuJm^tiTheme) 80/««. 130/^e (summ« onry) San Oiego Zoo ' 15/*cre Sea World 80/acre' 2% (7:3) 6% (6:4) 8% (4:6) 5% (6:4) 8% (4:6) 9% (9:1) 14% (9:1) 13% (9:1) 13% (9:1) 15% (9:1) 17% (9:t) 9% (9:1) 5% 6% (6:4) 7% (55) 7% (6:5) 6% (6:4) 6% (8:2) 4% 13% (5:5) 10% (5:5) 8% (6:4) 9% (6:4) 7% (4:8) 9% (6:4) 10% (2:8) 13% (2:8) 14% (2:8) 13% (2:8) 15% (2.8) 16% (1:9) 12% (3:7) 7% 9% (6:5) 10% (5:5) »2% (5.6) 10% (4:6) 11% (3:7) 8% 9% (5:5) 6% (6:4) 3.9 7.6 11.2 8.8 10.0 8.8 6.0 6.4 5.4 I JUL-H-ZUUO nuN ua;o/ HH bnuau facilities uept FHA NU. /ou MO z<ii4 r. ui San Marcos Unified School District 1 Ciuic Center Drive, Suite 300, San Marcos, CA 92069 (760) 7444776 FAX(760) 471-4928 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Received 07-11-05 10:01 From-7BO 736 2214 To-0'DAY CONSULTANTS Page 01 July 11, 2005 Thomas Guinn, Project Manager O'Day Consultants 2710 Loker Avenue West, Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Project Name: Urubu Street Duplex Developer: Unknown Location: 6838-6840, Carlsbad, CA 92009 APN: 215-340-23-00 Size: 2 Units (Condominium) To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 11010(b)(11)(A), we are providing the following information regarding the schools that are currently designated to serve this project: La Costa Meadows Elementary School, 6889 El Fuerte Street, Carlsbad, CA 92009 San Elijo School (6-8), 1600 School House Way, San Marcos, CA 92078 * San Marcos High School, 1615 W. San Marcos Boulevard, San Marcos, CA 92069 The elementary school is for grades K-5; the middle school is for grades 6-8; and the high school is for grades 9-12. According to the District's California Basic Education Data System (CBEDS) report for 2004, which was released in October, the District's enrollment for the 2004-05 school year was 15.414 students. The District's school facilities have a permanent capacity of 11,142 students. The District does not have the capacity in its school facilities should this project generate additional students. Please be advised that it is the policy of this District and the County of San Diego to require that school facilities be constructed on a timely basis in order to accommodate students generated by new development The above-referenced project is categorized as residential development, and therefore would be subject to assessment of applicable school fees at the rate in effect at the time a Certificate of Compliance is issued. While Letter- Tract Code 21170 (La Coala Meadows) Governing Board: Fbrn Bancella MarySoreulte AlanBroiun Sharon Jsnktns DauldHaracak Edward M. Brand, £d.£>., Superintendent I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HUN U8:bV Hn SnUSU facilities Uept O'Day Consultants July 11,2005 Page 2 NU. rOU (JO The Governing Board of the District from year to year may realign attendance areas. The schools assigned to serve any given area are subject to change. If you have any questions or comments with respect to this letter, please contact me at (760) 290-2677. Sincerely, / James W. Poltl Director Maintenance and Operations JWP/ntd White Letter- Tract Code 21170 (La Costa Meadows) Received 07-11-05 10:01 From-7SO 73B 22\i To-O'DAV CONSULTANTS Page 02