HomeMy WebLinkAboutCP 99-13; Navarra; Condo Permit (CP)CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C
I | Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
Q Administrative Variance
Q] Coastal Development Permit
Q Conditional Use Permit
\<J\J Condominium Permit
f~
Q Environmental Impact
Assessment
Q General Plan Amendment
Q Hillside Development Permit
I | Local Coastal Plan Amendment
I | Master Plan
Q] Non-Residential Planned
Development
Q Planned Development Permit
HECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
,
,
OP 93- ft
n Planned Industrial Permit
Q Planning Commission
Determination
I | Precise Development Plan
I | Redevelopment Permit
Q Site Development Plan
PI Special Use Permit
[~| Specific Plan
H Tentative Parocl Map
^^ Obtain from Engineering Department
I | Tentative Tract Map
I I Variance
[~| Zone Change
Pi List other applications not
specified
(FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY)
i4-r — q-£^K)rer/ — x/-~ /.?
2)
3)
4)
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).:
PROJECT NAME:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
5) OWNER NAME (Print or
/}/rf£&/<34^ £6/;7££.
Type)
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY AND STATE
£6<33V£> /£>£>; ^2/4-
ZIP TELEPHONE
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE 7 DATE
6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
^S/4A4£.
MAILING ADDRESS
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF
OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE
CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
<3^r^Xj JT- /n\AO prPsS'Ujf <T~^ *
THE
AND
SIGNATURE ' DATE
7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2
8) LOCATION OF PROJECT:
ON THE
BETWEEN
STREET ADDRESS
SIDE OF
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
AND
(NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS
1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE
22) EXISTING ZONING
11) NUMBER OF EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/
SQUARE FOOTAGE
1 7) PROPOSED INCREASE IN
ADT
20) EXISTING GENERAL
PLAN
23) PROPOSED ZONING
(NAME OF STREET)
(NAME OF STREET)
12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS
15) PROPOSED COMM
SQUARE FOOTAGE
1 8) PROPOSED SEWER
USAGE IN EDU
21) PROPOSED GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION
24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY
^STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT
TC\ ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE
SIGNATURE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION
TO
DA
APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED
Cf
CT
TAL FEE REQUIRED
vTE FEE PAID
\£oo-
o-
UQO -
y/^/3>
RECEIVED
AUG 2 0 1999
CITY OF CARLSBAD
RECEIVED BY:
/ "\ ,^uv
RECEIPT NO.
Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad CA 92008
Applicant: AMERICAN UNITED DEVELOPMENT CORP
Set Id: S000000201
Description
CP990013
Total:
Amount
3194 08/20/99 0001 01 02
1,800.00 c-PRHT 1800.00
1,800.00
Receipt Number: R0005874
Transaction Date: 08/20/1999
Pay Type Method Description Amount
Payment Check 2142 1,800.00
Transaction Amount: 1,800.00
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION
PROJECT NAME:
APPLICANT NAME:
Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately
explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any
background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or
appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation.
. 4/91 ProjOwe.frm
STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
CITY OF CARLSBAD
The Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code sets a fifty (50) day time restriction
on Planning Commission processing of Tentative Maps and a thirty (30) day time limit for City
Council action. These time limits can only be extended by the mutual concurrence of the
applicant and the City. By accepting applications for Tentative Maps concurrently with
applications for other approvals which are prerequisites to the map; i.e., Environmental
Assessment, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Plan, Planned Unit Development, etc.,
the fifty (50) day time limits and the thirty (30) day time limits are often exceeded. If you wish
to have your application processed concurrently, this agreement must be signed by the applicant
or his agent. If you choose not to sign the statement, the City will not accept your application
for the Tentative Map until all prior necessary entitlements have been processed and approved.
The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed the time
limits, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the time limits for Planning Commission and
City Council action and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one year from the date
the application was accepted as complete to properly review all of the applications.
Signature Date
A-^ — '4*'*fro
Name (Print) Relationship to Application
(Property Owner-Agent)
FRM0037 2/96
PLEASE NOTE:
Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law
do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The
City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine
whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal
of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application
is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is
needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the
processing period will start upon fyfy date"o)f the^ompletion letter.
^——Applicant Signature:
Staff Signature:
Date:
To be stapled with receipt to application
Copy for file
PROJECT FACILITY AV/~.ABILITY FORM -CARLSBAD SCHOOL
Please type or use pen
(Two lows are needed If project is 10 be.servea by separata school districts)
Owner's Name
Owner's Mailing Address
vutfrStreet
City State Zip
ORG.
ACCT.
ACT_
TASK.
DATE.
ELEMENTARY .
HIGH SCHOOL.
UNIFIED '
DISTRICT CASHIER'S USE ONLY
SECTIONS.v.PROJECT;DESCRIPTION TO-BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
A. LEGISLATIVE ACT
Rezone from zone density/intensity to.
General Plan Amendment
Specific Plan
Specific Plan A-nendmant
B. ___ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
HB Major Subdivision (TM)
Minor Subdivision (TPMj2£—
Boundary Adjustment
Major Use Permil (MUP). purpose:.
Time Extension... Case No
Expired Map... Case No
Other
zone density/intensity.
Assessor's Parcel Number(s)
(Add e*>ra if necessary)
\10
Thomas Bros. Page Gnd
C.39- Residential Total number of dwelling units .Project address.AlfrV/H/tt-ft-
Commercial Gross floor area.
Industrial Gross floor area.
Other Gross floor area.
D. Total Project acreage 'Q.2_'ElTotal number of lots 1 *-"^
CoiTvnuniiy Planning A/avSub'egion
Applicant's Signature ,
Address
. Date
Otf-
(On compleelon of above, present 10 the school district to complete Section 2 below)
^ BYV DISTRICT
District Name;.ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
If not in a unified district, which elementary or
high school district mu?t also till,puta term' _j. .San Dieguito Union HTgh School qist
Indicate the location and distance of proposed schools of attendance. FJementaryLA COSTA HEIGH^ies. 1.5
junior/Middle: miles- ^ High school1 ', miles-
elementary Q junior/middle Q high school.This project will result in the overcrowding of the
(check all that apply}
(2) Fees will be levied either in accordance with Government Code Section 53080 or Section 65970 prior to the
issuance of building permits.
Q Project is located entirely within the district and is eligible for seryjce.
D The project is not located entirely within the district and a potential boundary issue may exist with the
school district.
FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTS (Rezones, General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans) ONLY:
D Pursuant to County Ordinance and the Public Facility Element of the General Plan, facilities to serve the project
have been committed through a binding agreement satisfactory to the school district.
D A binding agreement has not yet been signed, but one will be required prior to legislative approval.
D No binding agreement is necessary.
^ Dated: August 4, 1999
. Print name- Sharon R. South
(760) 944 - 4300 X161
Authorized signature:
Printtitte- Chief Financial Officer .Phone:.
At this time any project in this area will result in unmitigated school impacts even with
payment of statuatory fees. We cannot guarantee the local school will have capacity for ar
students generated from this project.
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require
discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot
be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city
municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be
provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial
interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the
names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO
INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-
APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation, include the
names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if
necessary.)
/- / iy ~f~Zfrl Corp/Part_Person_
Title Title
Address Address
OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership
interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e,
partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a
corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES,
PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-
owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate
page may be attached if necessary.)
Person_
Title
Corp/Part
Title
Address Address *3<9&/
2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894
3 NON-PROFIT ORG. .NIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust
Title Title
Address Address
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff.
Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months?
Yes xlslo If yes, please indicate person(s):.
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
. U^.
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
tsfLfLy ffrl VytyJU
e name of owner/applicant'Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 Of 2
CITY OF CARLSBAD
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR:
TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS (AND REVISIONS)
CONDOMINIUM PERMITS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ONLY)
A proposed project requiring that multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to 3:30 p.m. A
proposed project requiring that only one application be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m.
All joint application exhibits, i.e. Tentative Map and Planned Development Site Plan should be prepared
at the same scale (use a scale no smaller than 1" - 40). In addition all plans shall be fully dimensioned
(i.e., setbacks, height, road widths, parking spaces, planters, yards, etc.) The following materials shall be
submitted for each application except as noted in "HI. OTHER REQUIREMENTS" Item K,
Property Owner's List and address labels.
REQUIRED PLANS (folded and delivered in complete sets)
Z)A. SITE PLAN - Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36" sheet! s) folded to 8 1/2" x 11" size. Fifteen (15)
, copies of the site plan shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner
prior to approval of the project. Each site plan shall contain the following information:
A
1.
b.
c.
g-
h.
.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Name and address of owner whose property is proposed to be subdivided and the name
and address of the subdivider.
Name and address of registered civil engineer, licensed surveyor, landscape architect or
land planner who prepared the maps.
North arrow and scale.
Residential, commercial industrial or other uses. j
Tentative Map number in upper right hand corner (City to provide number at time of
application).
Number of units to be constructed when a condominium or community apartment project
is involved. Total number of lots proposed.
Name of sewer and water district providing service to the project.
Average Daily Traffic generated by the project, broken down by separate uses.
Name of School District providing service to the project.
Proposed density in lots or dwelling units per acre.
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 1 of 8
A
k. Existing Zone and General Plan Designation.
1. Site acreage.
2. SITE INFORMATION
a. General
(1) Approximate location of existing and proposed building and permanent
structures.
(2) Location of all major vegetation, showing size and type.
(3) Location of railroads.
(4) Legal description of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision (approximate
bearings, distances and curve data).
(5) Lot lines and approximate dimensions and number of each lot.
(6) Lot area for each proposed lot.
(7) Setback dimensions for the required front, rear and side yard setbacks for all
structures.
r$f (8) Indicate top and bottom elevations for all fences, walls, and retaining walls.
Show these elevations at each end of the wall and in the middle. Also show the
worst condition elevation.
(9) Show site details for all recreation lots or areas (when applicable).
(10) Total building coverage for lots with proposed structures,
b. Street and Utilities
(1) The location, width and proposed name of all streets within and adjacent to the
proposed subdivision, show proposed street grades and centerline radii. Provide
separate profile for all streets with grades in excess of 7%. Street should be
conformance with City Standards and Engineering Department Policies.
(2) Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys.
(3) Typical street section for all adjacent streets and streets within the project.
(4) Width and location of all existing and/or proposed public or private easements.
(5) Public and private streets and utilities clearly identified.
*««««»*««««««««««»«»*«««««««»««««««««««
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 2 of 8
(6) Show distance between all intersections and medium and high use driveways.
a
ffl
(7) Clearly show parking stall and aisle dimensions and truck turning radii for all
parking areas.
(8) Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands.
(9) Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer, water, major gas
and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the
project.
( 1 0) Show location of all fire hydrants within 300 feet of site.
Grading and Drainage
(1) Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%; 2' intervals for
slopes between 5% and 10%; and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing
and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot
perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees: those to be
removed and those to be saved.
(2) Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import and export.
(3) Spot elevations at the comers of each pad.
(4) Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the
frontage for lots with less than standard frontage.
(5) Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and
adjacent to the proposed subdivision; show location and approximate size of any
proposed detention/retention basins.
(6) Clearly show and label the 1 00 year flood line for the before and after conditions
for any project which is within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain.
",/JB. LANDSCAPE PLAN - For all condominium and planned development projects, ten (10) copies
-ir im*r\r-v\ (f°ur (4) copies for projects with four or fewer units) on 24" x 36" sheet(s) folded to S'/z" x 11"
r/ Wfeott^o^size. Fifteen (15) copies of the landscape plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request
of the project planner prior to approval of the project. The scale should be consistent with all
other exhibits. Each landscape plan shall include the following information:
1. Landscape zones per the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual.
2. Typical plant species, quantity of each species and their size for each planting zone in a
legend. (Use symbols).
3. An estimate of the yearly amount of irrigation (supplemental) water required to maintain
each zone.
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 3 of 8
4. Landscape maintenance responsibility (private or common,) for all areas.
5. Percent of site used for landscaping.
/ 6. Water Conservation Plan.
C. BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS - For all condominium and planned
development projects, ten (10) copies prepared on 24" x 36" sheet(s) folded to 8 1/2" x 11".
Fifteen (15) copies of the building elevations and floor plans shall be submitted by the applicant
upon request of the project planner prior to project approval. Each building elevation and floor
plan shall include the following information:
1. Floor plans with square footage included.
2. Location and size of storage areas.
3. All buildings, structures, walls and/or fences, signs and exterior lights.
4. Include a scale on all floor plans and building elevations.
[ | 5. Indicate on all building elevations, compliance with Carlsbad Height Ordinance
21.04.065.
WJD. CONSTRAINTS MAP - At the same scale as other exhibit, i.e., Tentative Maps, Site Plan. etc.
one (1) 24" x 36" sheet folded to 8 1/2" x 11" shall include the following information: (NOTE:
This information is not required for previously graded sites and the conversion of existing
structures.) If the constraint does not apply to the property, list it on the map as not applicable.
1. Major ridge lines.
2. Distant views.
3. Internal views.
4. Riparian or woodlands.
5. Intermittent drainage course.
6. 25 - 40% slopes.
[~~] 7. Greater than 40% slopes.
8. Major rock outcroppings.
[ | 9. Easements.
10. Floodplains.
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 4 of 8
11. Archaeologic, i sites.
12. Special Planning Areas - Type of special planning area.
13. Biological Habitats. Indicate the location of Coastal Sage Scrub and chaparral plant
communities existing on the project site.
14.Beaches.
15. Permanent bodies of water.
16. Wetlands. .
17. Land subject to major power transmission easements.
18. Railroad track beds.
E. COLORED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN - Not required with first submittal and not
required for tentative parcel maps. It is the Applicant's responsibility to bring one (1) copy of a
colored site plan and one (1) copy of a colored elevation to the Planning Department by 12:00
noon, eight (8) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Do not mount exhibits.
vjF. REDUCED SITE PLAN - One (1) copy of 8 1/2" x 11". These plans must be of quality that is
photographically reproducible. These are not required with first submittal but will be
f\ requested at a later time by your project planner.
. LOCATION MAP - One (1) copy of 8 1/2" x 11" (suggested scale 200" - vicinity maps on the
site plan are not acceptable).
II.REQUIRED DOCUMENTS (IN ADDITION TO A COMPLETED LAND USE REVIEW
APPLICATION) <,£& ~7~
N/A. Environmental Impact Assessment Form (Fee not required with initial submittal. Fee to be
*Qr determined after review of project and environmental impact assessment form.) Required for
'»*\ tentative parcel maps only where significant grading is proposed. Check with Planning staff to
L / * determine if required for your application.
. Public Facility Agreement - Two (2) copies: One (1) notarized original and one (1) reproduced
copy. (Separate fee required.)
C. Disclosure Statement. (Not required for tentative parcel maps).
/
. Three (3) copies of the Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six (6) months).
E. Proof of availability of sewer if located in the Leucadia County Water District or the Vallecitos
Water District.
. School District letter indicating that school facilities will be available to the project.
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 5 of 8
G. Statement of agreement to waive tentative parcel map time limits. Required for tentative parcel
only when project requires concurrent processing of planning application or environmental
review.
]H. All projects must evaluate their potential impacts on the regional transportation system.
including the costs of mitigating the associated impacts, as required by the SANDAG Congestion
Management Program (CMP).
For projects with an average daily traffic (ADT) generation rate greater than 500 vehicles per
day or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips.
Submit two (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. The analysis must be
prepared by a Registered Traffic Engineer or Registered Civil Engineer. The analysis must
show project impacts to all intersections and road segments identified as impacted within the
included Local Facilities Management Plan or as otherwise determined in discussions with staff.
The following minimum information should be included with the study:
1.8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14" plats showing zone impacted roads, background and project
AM and PM peak hour impacts and traffic distribution.
2. Project traffic generation rates and traffic assignment.
3. Necessary calculations and/or analysis to determine intersection and road segment levels
of service.
4. Any proposed mitigation requirements to maintain the public facility standards.
5. On Collector streets and above, an analysis of the need for a traffic signal will be
required.
"Large" projects: Any project which, upon its completion will be expected to generate either an
equivalent of 2,400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips,
including large projects that may have already been reviewed under CEOA but require additional
local discretionary actions, is defined as a "large project" under the SANDAG Congestion
Management Program (CMP) and will be subject to enhanced CEQA review as specified in the
CMP.
Depending upon the complexity of the project, the City of Carlsbad reserves the right to require a
traffic study on any project.
I. Noise study consistent with City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual.
l\Wj. Two copies of preliminary soils/geologic report for all project with cut or fill depths exceeding 5
V
feet.
K. For all condominium conversions, a signed statement by the owner stating Section 66427.1 of
the State Map Act will be complied with.
JL. For all condominium conversions, a letter from San Diego Gas and Electric company stating that
plans to convert the gas and electric system to separate systems have been submitted and are
acceptable.
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 6 of 8
III. OTHER REQUIREMENTS
A. Preliminary Hydrology map and calculations for lots exceeding one acre. Show before and after
discharges to each including drainage basin.
|]B. For all condominium conversions, one copy of a compliance inspection performed by the
Building Department. (Separate Fee Required).
|C. Submit architectural guideline compliance summary if applicable. (See Council Policy No. 44
for the development of small lots, as attached).
D. Photographs of the property taken from the north, south, east and west.
Construction materials board and color samples, i.e., roofing, exterior walls, pavement, glass,
wood, etc.
F. Pursuant to Section 21.45.040(6) of Title 21 applications for planed developments on properties
designated or zoned for single family development shall be accompanied by a preliminary
tentative map. This map shall illustrate how many standard lots conforming to applicable zoning
and subdivision standards served by public streets could fit on the site. The design of this
preliminary tentative map shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances and Standards except
for the design standards of the Planned Development Ordinance. The applicant shall also submit
maps, diagrams, plans and a report showing that the proposed planned development will result in
superior residential development consistent with the purpose and intent of the Planned
Development Ordinance. The density on the developed portion of the planned development site
shall be similar to and compatible with surrounding development.
G. Signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications."
H. Completed "Project Description/Explanation" sheet.
If your project will include signage at some time in the future, you must submit a proposed sign
program as part of this application. The program shall be provided as separate exhibits and
should include the following information: Proposed sign location, dimensions, area, materials,
sign copy and colors.
J. Property Owners List and Addressed Labels.
NOTE: WHEN THE APPLICATION IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD BY
THE DECISION MAKING BODY, THE PROJECT PLANNER WILL CONTACT THE
APPLICANT AND ADVISE HIM TO SUBMIT THE RADIUS MAP. TWO SETS OF THE
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED
TO SIGN A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED
REPRESENTS THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLLS FROM THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT GO FORWARD
UNTIL THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED.
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 7 of 8
A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot
radius of subject property (including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include
the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest assessment rolls.
Two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius of
the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified,
void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single family residence, an
apartment or suite number must be included but Apt., Suite, and Bldg. # must NOT
appear in the street address line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
ON LABELS. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes -PROVIDE LABELS ONLY.
Acceptable fonts are: Swiss 721, Enterprise TM, Courier New (TT) no larger than 11 pt.
Sample labels are as follows:
UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE
Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH
123 Magnolia Ave,. Apt #3 123 Magnolia Ave. APT #3
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE
Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008
600 Foot Radius Map
A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within 600 feet of exterior
boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered
and correspond with the property owners list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a
scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. For
tentative parcel maps, a map to scale on an 8'/2" x 11" sheet, showing each lot within 300
feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject project.
Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 8 of 8
CITY OF CARLSBAD TENTATIVE PARCEL NO. MS 99-
LA COSTA GOLF COURSE
PKOEC1 T ~-\Sill /. Cjj
VICINITY MAP
iA COSTA
SOtTH UNil N0.1 ,,i
MAP NO. 660!) __V-
- S.V -i- *
NAVARRA DRIVE
twt com ornoi *
TYP. STRECT SECTION
SOU MCKC
WP •«. W» \ (J -"IWD • «ruu»
\
C)
DBF »' <C SW
ORT. r *c wn»
»00'j,r1
C IV1It • -NAVARRA DRIVE
TYP. BROW DITCH & RIP-RAP PAD
SECTION - B
101 3/
SECTION - A
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BCHG ALL ff lOT M Or IA CCSTA SWW JUT HO 1. W THE CfT" Of OPLS»«O,
COUNTY cr **M neco. sw^ e»- O^TCJWM. ACCOTOMC TC tw TMtflEOf 10. «i»UD ** WE OFFICE of iw coirrrr necrwwR or SAH DT.CO cow*. JJNE 3. I
GENERAL NOTES
P*tS£MT HO PHOP05CP ZtMMC: RDW-mi (19 UMTS /
CADSS MKA 0.44 AC MET JWifc 9 3* «C
TOTN. LOTS: I
MP*OVfVfNT ON WMMRA DR. CCMTtE*L
WTI» CWLS3W MIWCT^L WTE" Per.
SOtft ITUCNM COUNTV BAtfl DtSTItltTT.
CAS * octrnw:. SOCK
. SCHOttS: fMt CTEOUrn) JMTHI SCHOOL
z COVMWTT PVN* sw t*cowro> PAK. NO ne-170-n
TAK WTt AREA: 4046
3. MS 1#W IS KM) FUD TOT A 4 UMT
FWJPPSU) MMIE FOT THJ MOXCt IS IMVARftA
MO raCCS Off *MTtM«. VECTiinON ON 5^t.
MOTGE DNLV tWXr 37 AflT
CONSTRAINTS NOTE
THS POOJCCT fi A DCMLOPWEHT OF Ml £<?SliMC VWWfO
ON ™-5 LOT AW A COMSTKAtm HA" IS MO I RtOJWtO,
SUMMARY TABLE
7.510 5F
11.4*0 ST
19.020 V
10
NOTE EACH UNtf CONTAINS 23OO-7379
GRADING QUANTITIES
!«™""*° <*<«*•mwviw* ««•«.- rfnatmm-ruialrCB. Hff "* amimiM ftttMcr a iHTntfOM !«™""*° <acrtrr"t sniFor aumnrt'j innate* Mams ji wnniH er t mix. ail nrnurf r**tf Mf*/y-«wr/« vfF COMMON */re*s * AS pe rriteo w seer. WfCtl** M? cttfwt* fiv.-i. eco£.
EKMEE& OHO A. JOTO
2)9 MEADC* VST* HIT,TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. MS 99-01
FOR LOT 56. LA COSTA SOUTH NO.l, MAP 6U7
VICINITY MAP
SCALE NONE
ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY
PD 88-4 & 80(A) 8/11/89 REV. 1/22/90
| GUIDELINE
]
JJHD
1. WHERE (3) TWO-STORY UNITS OCCUR
IN A ROW AND THEY ARE SITUATED
LESS THAN 15 FEET APART, AT
LEAST (1) UNIT MUST HAVE A
SINGLE STORY BUILDING EDGE NOT
LESS THAN 10 FEET IN DEPTH.
2. WHERE (3) TWO-STORY UNITS OCCUR
IN A ROW AND THEY ARE SITUATED
15 TO 20 FEET APART, AT LEAST
(I) UNIT MUST HAVE A SINGLE
STORY BUILDING EDGE NOT LESS
THAN 5 FEET IN DEPTH.
3. PER PROJECT, 33% OF ALL UNITS
SHALL HAVE A SINGLE STORY EDGE
A MINIMUM OF 40% OF THE TOTAL
PERIMETER.
4. PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WITH
A LOT FRONTAGE GREATER THAN 45
FEET MUST HAVE (4) SEPARATE
BUILDING PLANES ON THE FRONT
ELEVATION .
5. PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WITH
A LOT FRONTAGE GREATER THAN 45
FEET MUST HAVE (4) SEPARATE
BUILDING PLANES ON THE STREET SIDE
ELEVATION.
6. ' PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS SHALL
HAVE ONE SIDE ELEVATION WITH A 7
FEET AVERAGE SIDE YARD SETBACK.
7. THREE-CAR GARAGES LIMITED TO 75% OF
THE TOTAL UNITS WHERE AVERAGE LOT
SIZE IS 5,000 SF OF LESS.
THREE-CAR GARAGES SHALL INCORPORATE
A MIXTURE OF 2 DOOR, 3 DOOR, AND
OFFSET 2 DOOR DESIGNS.
8. 50% OF EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW
OPENINGS SHALL BE PROJECTED OR
RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES.
MINIMUM
STANDARD
1 OF 3
1 OF 3
33%
50%
50%
50%
75%
50%
PRODUCT A
VILLAGES
M,N,O
1 OF 3
NA
35%
85%
85%
100%
100%
100%
PRODUCT B
VILLAGES
Q,F
2 OF 3
NA
45%
85%
85%
85%
100%
100%
PRODUCT C
VILLAGES
H,G
2 OF 3
NA
100%
85%
85%
100%
100%
100%
PRODUCT D
VILLAGES
B,K,I,C
2 OF 4
NA
45%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
PRODUCT E
VILLAGES
D,E,F
3 OF 3
NA
45%
70%
70%
100%
100%
100%
RESULTS
EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN FOUR
OF FIVE PRODUCTS. PRODUCT A
COMPLIES WITH STANDARDS.
ALL PRODUCTS WERE DESIGNED TO COMPLY
WITH GUIDELINE 1. IN THAT THE ONE
STORY ELEMENT IN PRODUCTS ONE THROUGH
FIVE HAS A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10 FEET
THEY ALSO COMPLY WITH GUIDELINE 2.
EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL
FIVE PRODUCTS.
EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL
FIVE PRODUCTS.
EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL
FIVE PRODUCTS.
EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL
FIVE PRODUCTS.
THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IN ALL FIVE
PRODUCTS GREATLY EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM
5,000 SF. STATED IN GUIDELINE 7,
THEREFORE GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT
APPLICABLE. HOWEVER, ALL FIVE
PRODUCTS COMPLY WITH THIS GUIDELINE.
EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDAKD IN ALL
FIVE PRODUCTS.
In projects where there are three 1 story units in a row
situated less than 15 feet apart, at least one of the threeunits shall have a single atory building edge with a depth ofnot less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The
roof covering the single story elemnt shall be substantially
lower than the roof for the J story element to the unit (this
is not intended to preclude long shed-type roots falling toa single-story element).
CONCLUSION:
ELEVATIONS AND STREET SCKNE PROFILE SHOW SEUW OEHOHSTIIATES
THE ABILITt TO PLOT THIS PRODUCT IN COMPLIANCE WITH GUIDELINEONE. M1H1HUH. CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED OH STREET
PROFILE BELOW. THE FINAL SITE PLAN HILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE.
10 FT. HIM.
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
IYeiC*L_BUlLDING ELEVATIONS
.10 FT. M1N.1 STORY ELEMENT
STREET PROFILE
MINIMUK/TCRITERIA COMPLIANCE
> VILLAGES Q,P
>
TOWNHOMES
LA COSTA, CALIFORNIA
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT/ WATER
CONSERVATION PLAN
In project* vh«r* th*r* ar* thr** 2 atory unit* In •' row•ituatad !••* than 15 f**t apart, at l*a*t on* of tt» thr**
unit* aha 11 h*v* • alngl* *tory building *do,* with • d*pth o(
not !••• th*n 10 f**t adj*c*nt to on* of th* oth*r unit*. Tli*
roof covarlng th* ilngl* *tory *l*>*nt shall b* *ub*t*nti*lly
low*r than th* roof Cor th* 3 itory *l*B*nt to th* unit (thl*
1* not lnt*nd*d to prvclud* long *h*d*typ* root* falling to• *lngl***tory *l*B*nt).
CONCLUSIOHl
ELEVATIONS AND STREET 6CENE ttOULt SHONN RtUW OEHOMTMTES
THE AKILITI TO PLOT THIS PRODUCT IK COHPLIAKC* KITH GUI OIL I HI
ONE. HININUH CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET
PROFILE 1ELOU. THE FINAL SITE PLAN MILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE.
10 FT.
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
IYPICAL_BUILDING ELEVATIONS
.10 FT HIN.
STORY ELEMENT
VILLAGES B,K,I,C
STREET PROFILE
MINIMUK/TCRITERIA COMPLIANCE
On « project basis, thirty-thru percent (33») of all units
shall have • single story edge tor forty percent (40%) of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline
the single story edge shall be a • iniama depth of three feet
(3'). The units qualifying under the III shall be distributed
throughout the project.
CONCLUSION:
AS SHOW IN THE DI SCRAMS BELOW. TWO OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS
PRODUCT EXCEED THE FORTY PERCENT MINIMUM SINGLE-STORY PERIMETER.
THESE TWO PLANS PROVIDE 35« OF THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE. EXCEEDING
THE ]Jt REQUIRED.
1 STORY ELEMENT
PLAN 1 (15% MIX) PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 217 FT. TOTAL PERIMETER = 183 FT.
ONE STORY = 217 FT. (100%) ONE STORY = 94 FT. (51%)
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 202 FT.
ONE STORY = 58 FT. (29%)
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 190 FT.
ONE STORY = 73 FT. (38%)
VILLAGES M.N.O
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER t
PLAN 1 (,15% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 261 FT.
1 STORY = 261 FT. (100%)
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 207 FT.
1 STORY = 90 FT. (43%)
1 STORY ELEMENT
CONCLUSION:
AS SHOWN IH THE DIAGRAMS BELOW. FOUR OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS
PRODUCT EXCEED THE FORTY PERCENT MINIMUM SINGLE-STORY PERIMETER.
THESE FOUR PLANS PROVIDE 100% OF THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE, EXCEEDING
THF )3t REQUIRED.
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 217 FT.
1 STORY = 124 FT. (57%)
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 217 FT.
1 STORY = 104 FT. (48%)
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER
On a project basis, thirty-three percent (lit) of all units
•hall have a single story edge for forty percent (40%) of the
perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline
the single story edge shall be a elnleue depth of three feet
(}•). The unite qualifying under the 33% shall be distributed
throughout the project.
CONCLUSION:
AS SHOWN IH THE DIAGRAMS BELOW, THREE Or THE MVE PLANS IN THIS
PRODUCT EXCEED THE FORTt PERCENT MINIMUM SINGLE-STORY PERIMETER.
THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE (51 or THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE. EXCEEDING
THE 33t REQUIRED.
PLAN 1 (10% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 278 FT.
1 STORY = 278 FT. (100%)
PLAN 2 (15% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 295 FT.
1 STORY = 295 FT. (100%)
1 STORY ELEMENT
PLAN 3 (20% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 290 FT.
1 STORY = 191 FT. (66%)
PLAN 4 (25% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 254 FT.
1 STORY = 95 FT. (37%)
PLAN 5 (30% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 255 FT.
1 STORY = 76 FT. (30%)
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER
BUILDING PLANE A (441 SF)A I 111 SF)->- _
~ *~~ * ~^~- •
B(41 SF)
CONCLUSION:
THREE OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT COHPLI WITH BUILDING PLANE
CRITERIA IN GUIDELINES « AND 3. THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE »« Of
THE TOTAL HIX. THEREFORE EXCEEDING Till 3Ot REQUIRED.
For At leaat sot of the unit* in • project, there ahall be at
laaat thru eeparate building planee on etraat aide elavatione
of lot* with 45 feet of frontage or !•••, and four eeparate
building .planea on etreet aid* elevatlone of lota with a
frontage graatar than 43 fact. Tha •inimu offaat In planaa
ahall ba II Inchaa and shall Includa but not ba llaitad to
building walla, windowa and roofa. Tha Bininui dapth batwaan
tha facaa of tha forward-Boat plana and tha raar plana on tha
front alavatlon ahall ba 10 faat and a plana mat ba a
•Inlaiu of 30 aq. ft. to raeaiva credit under thla aaetion.
JUar alavationa ahall adhere to the aave criteria outlined in
number 4 above for front alevationa except that the Minima
depth between front and back planaa on the rear elevation
ahall be J feet.
/-BI167 SF)
^5(84 SF)
BUILDING
PLANE 1 IT-
(53 SF)-
2(93 .SF)-
£-0(169 SF)
SF)
PLA.N 1 ( 15% MIX)
V.K44 SF)
2(84 SF)
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
V4 ( 72 SFI
SF)
^3(143 SF)
,.,^6(96 Sd.
SF)T^2(143
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
/-CI319SF)
^3(50 SF)
2(187 SF)-
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
BUILDING PLANE.CRITERIA
VILLAGES Q,P
CONCLUSION:
ALL fOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT COHPL» HITII BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA
III GUIDELINES 4 AND 5. THESE FOUR PLANS PROVIDE 1001 OF Tilt TOTAL
HIX, THEREFORE EXCEEDING THE JO» REQUIRED.
For at leaat 50% of th* unlt« In • pro)«ct, th*r* ihall b* at
l***t thraa aaparata bulldlnq plan** on atraat aid* *l*vatlon*
of lots with 45 f**t of front*?* or 1***, *nd four **p*r*t*
buildlnq plan** on atraat *14* *l*v*tlon* of lot* with •
front*?* greater thin 4S f**t. Th* *lniMum> off**t In pl*nm
•h*ll b* 11 Inch** and «hall Include but not b* ll*it*d to
building vail*, window* and roof*. Th* *lnleu* depth b*tw**n
th* faca* of tha forv*rd-*»*t plan* and tha raar plan* on th*
front *l*v*tlon aha 11 b* lo f**t and • plan* *uat b* a
•InLeUB of 30 *q. ft. to racalve credit und*r thla **ction.
JUar alavatlona aha11 adhere to th* *aee criteria outlined In
mmb*r 4 above for front elevation* *xcapt that th* alnlMUM
depth between front and back plane* on th* r*ar *l*vatlon
•hall b* 3 f**t.
SF)
E
f.SF)
CI119 SF)
SF)
~T~l /-D(198 SF)
V- '
/-E(17B SF)
/-DI593 SF)
E(80 SF)~
8(154 SF)
^4(130'SF)
112 SF)
'BUILDING
PLANE 1
(35 SF)
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
/-5(42 SF)
_* ---- 1
3(37 SF)• SF) )
26 SF)-'
V-4I192 SF)
-3(119 SF)
S(F)
C(37 SF) j
B(35 SF) I '
A(34 SF) I
SECOND FLOOR LJINE
FIRST FLOOR -U.NE
I
I /-4C115 SF)
I
»(77 SF)
^•1(65
2(126 SF)-
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
SF)
V-51127
SF)/-CI198 SF)
SF)
D(6B
8(135 SF)-v
/-7(95 SF) \U-L~ i_J
v:6(200 SF)
5(56 SF)
V-4(40 SF)
3(49 SF)in /
2(119
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
SF)
2(91 SF)-
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
SF)
BUILDING PLANE.CRITERIA
At laaat 501 of tha unit* In • project shall h«v« ana aida
alavatlon vhara thara ara aufficiant offaata or cutouta ao
that tha aida yard aatback avaraaaa a BlnlMUH of 7 Caat.
CONCLUSION,
ALL FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE 7
SETBACK REQUIREHENT.rr. AVCRACE siorrAno
8.2 FT. AVERAGE 9.7 FT. AVERAGE
Y///777,
8.0 FT. AVERAGE
1
8.6 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
529 SF f 64 FT.
8.2 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
411 SF - 51 FT. =
8.0 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
592 SF '- 61 FT. =
9.7 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
527 SF f 61 FT. =
8.6 FT. AVERAGE
SIDEYARD SETBACK CRITERIA
VILLAGES M.N.O
At l«»t 50% of th« unit* in • project ihall hav« one aid*•lavatlon vh«r* th«r« mrm •ufClcl«nt off«*t* or cutout* »ottiftt th« Bid* ymr4 •«tb*ck ftv*rBq«« a minimum of 7 t««t.
CONCLUSION;
ALL FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCKD THE ' FT. AVERAGE SIDIVARD
SETBACK REQUIREnCNT.
8.1 FT. AVERAGE
14.7 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
537 SF. r 66. FT.
8.1 FT. AVERAGE
16.2 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
901 SF. f 55.5 FT.
16.2 FT.. AVERAGE
12.6 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
734 SF. 7 58 FT. =
12.6 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
914 SF. f 62 FT.
14.7 FT. AVERAGE
SIDEYARD-SEIBACK-CRITERIA
At l«a«t 901 of th« units in • project shall h*v« one eld*
slsvation vh«r* th«r« ara aufficiant offasts or cutouts so
that th« aid* yard sstback avaragxs a ainiBUB of 7 tact.
ALL FIVE PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE
SETBACK REQUIREMENT.
PLAN 2 (15% MIX)
976 SF. r 66 FT.
14 .7 FT. AVERAGE
711 SF. T 67 FT.
10.6 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 3 (20% MIX)
894 SF. f 64 FT. =
13.9 FT. AVERAGE
71 VILLAGES D.E.F
930 SF. - 65 FT.
14.3 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN .4 (25% MIX)
788 SF f 65 FT.
12.1 FT.AVERAGE
SIDE YARD SETBACK CRITERIA
IsX.
r~-*~
Projects with an average lot alia of 5,OOO »q. ft. or Immm
shall Halt th« number of units with three car garages to 7M
of th« plans in tha project. Project units with three car
garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door
garages, and offset (2 planes Bin. 12") two door garages.
CONCLUSION:
IN viLLAces O.P me AVERAGE LOT SIZES ARE 7132 sr. MID 7905 sr.
RESPECTIVELY. IN THAT THIS MIEA EXCEEDS THE 5000 ST. AVERAGE LOT
CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE NOTE HOVCVER, THAT
PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE PROMT VARIETY AND THERrORE DOES COHPL»
KITH GUIDELINE 7.
1
PLAN 1.(15% MIX)
2 CAR GARAGE
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
RECESSED 1 CAR DOOR
.AND OFFSET 2 CAR DOOR
PLAN 3 (30%.MIX)
RECESSED 1 CAR AND
2 CAR DOORS
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
3 SINGLE CAR DOOR
RECESSED AND OFFSET
GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA.
VILLAGES Q,P
AVERAGE LOT Slit
VILLAGE 0 - 7,112 SF.
P - 7.SOS sr.
UDLFfiM
Projacts with an avaraga lot aita of 3,000 sq. ft. or laaa
shall li»it tha nuBbar of units with thraa car garagaa to 751
of tha plans in tha pro}act. Projact units with thraa car
garages shall ba a mix of two door garagas, thru door
garagas. and offsat (2 planaa Bin. 12-) two door garages
CONCLUSION:
IN VI LUGES B.K.I.C THE AVERAGE IOT SUES ARE »5»5 ST.. »J5« 'ST. .
»«43 St.. AND 1IS1 Sf. RZSPECTIVELt. IN THAT THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE
5000 ST. AVERAGE LOT CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT APPLICABLE.
PLEASE NOTE HOWEVER, THAT PRODUCT I DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT
VARIETY AND THEREFORE DOES CONPL> WITH GUIDELINE 7.
E
-
1 1
z
M£
I
I
--J 1
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
RECESSED 2 dAR DOOR
AND OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR
r H-T
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
2 CAR DOOR AND
1 CAR DOOR
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR
AND OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
3 SINGLE CAR DOOR
RECESSED AND OFFSET
(3ARAGE FRONT CRITERIA.
VILLAGES B,K,I,C
AVERAGE LOT SHE
VILLAGE B - 9.595 ST.
K - «,)54 SF.
I - 9.634 SF.
C - B.IS1 SF.
Fifty percent (50%) of exterior openings (doors/windowsI
shall be recessed or projected a Minimum of 2" and shall be
trimmed with wood or colored aluminum window frames (no mill
finishes).
COHCU1SIOH:
ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS SHALL BE RECESSED OR PROJECTED AND TRIMMED
WITH STUCCO OR HOOD. SEE ELEVATION DESIGNS.
WOOD OR STUCCO TRIM
MINIMUM 2" THICK
RECESSED WINDOW
MINIMUM 2" DEEP
WINDOW TRIM CRITERIA raomu
10 FT. WIN.
•I
In project* where there are three 3 atory units In • row
situated leas than IS rut apart, at laaet on« of tha three
unit! (ball have a single *tory building edge with • depth of
not less then 10 feet ad)tont to on* of th« other unit*. The
roof covurlnq the alnql* atory *l*B*nt (hall ba substantially
lowar than th« roof for tha 2 story eleawnt to tha unit (this
is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to
a sin9le-atory element).
CONCLUSION!
ELEVATIONS AND STREET SCENE PROFILE SIIOMH BELOW DEMOMSTKMES
THE OBlLlTt TO PLOT THIS PRODUCT IN COMPLIANCE HITII GUIDELINE
ONE. HIN1HUH CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET
PROFILE BELOW. THE HNAL SITE PLAN HILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE.
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS
10 FT, MIN.
1 STORY ELEMENT
STREET PROFILE
MINIMUM CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
VILLAGES M.N.O
10 FT. HIM.
In projecte where there are three 2 atory unite in a" rov
eltuated leee than II feet (pert, at leeet one of the three
unit* aha 11 have • single etory building edge with • depth of
not leee then 10 fMt edjacent to one of the other unit*. The
roof covering the (Ingle ctory eleaent (hell be eubvtentielly
lower then the roof for the 2 etory elevjent to the unit ft hi*la not intended to preclude long abed-type roof a falling i •.a aingle-etory eleaent).
CONCLUSION!
ELCVItTIOHS AND STREET SCENE rHOFILE SHOW* BBLOM DEHOHST«ATEI
THE MltlTY TO PLOT THIS PKOOUCT 1H COHrLlANCE HITII GUIDELINE
ONE. MINIMUM CKITCK1K COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET
PROFILE BELOW. THE FINAL SITE FLAN HILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE.
ELAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
TYPICAL_BUILDING ELEVATIONS
1 STORY ELEMENT
1 STORY ELEMENT
STREET PROFILE
MINIMUM'CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
In projects vhara thara ara thraa I atory unit* In a'row
aituatad laaa than IS faat apart, at laaat ana of th« thraa
unite ahall hava a aingla atory building adga with a dapth of
not iaaa than io faat adjacant to on* of tha othar unlta. Tha
roof eovarlng tha aingla atory alavant ahall b* aubatantlaily
lo«ar than tha roof for tha 1 atory alaMnt to tha unit (thla •
im not intandad to pracluoa long (had-typ* roof* falling to •
a ainqla-atory ala*ant).
CONCLUSIONi
ELEVATIONS AND STUEET SCENE FKOflLE SNOHH (ELOM DEHONSTDATES
THE AB1LITT TO PLOT THIS PKOOUCT IN COHCLIABCE WITH GUIDELINE
ONE. HININUH CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET
PROFILE BELOW. THE riHAL SITE PLAN WILL RErLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE.
PLAN 1 (10% MIX)PLAN 2 (15% MIX)
,10 FT. fllN. y!0 FT .1, HIM.
PLAN 3 (20% MIX)PLAN 4 (25% MIX)
TYPICAL.BUILDING ELEVATIONS
PLAN 5 (30% MIX)
1 STORY ELEMENT
1 STORY ELEMENT-
STREET PROFILE
MINIMUM" CRITERIA COMPLIANCE
171 VILLAGES D.E.F
1 STORY ELEMENT
On • project baaia, thlrty-thraa parcant (311) of all unit!
•hall hava • aingla story adga for forty parcant (40%) of tha
pariitatar of tha building. For tha purpoaa of thia guidalina
lha aingla atory adga ihall b< • ilnliua d«pth of thr«» t>«t
(]') • Th« unit* qualifying undir the III (hall b« diatributad
throughout tha projact.
CONCLUSION!
AS SHOWN IN THE DIAGRAMS BELOH. THO OF THE rOU* PLANS IN THIS
PRODUCT EXCEED THE TORT> PERCENT MINIMUM SIHCLE-STORI PERIMETER.
THESE THO PLANS PROVIDE 4S% OF THE TOTAL MIS. THEREFORE, EXCEEDING
THE )J« REQUIRED.
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER =215 FT.
1 STORY = 215 FT. (100%)
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 197 FT.
1 STORY = 49 FT. (24%)
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 208 FT.
1 STORY = 112 FT. (54%)
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 211 FT.
1 STORY = 65 FT. (31%)
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER
VILLAGES Q,P
On a project basis, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units
shall have a single etory edge for forty percent (40%) of th«
perimater of tha building. For the purpoaa of this guideline
the single etory edge shall be a Mlnimm depth of three feet
(V) . Tha units qualifying under the 13% shall be distributed
throughout tha project.
1 STORY ELEMENT
AS SHOHH IH Tilt DIAGRAMS BCLOH, TWO Or TtlC FtVE PLANS IH THIS
PRODUCT tXCtED THE fORTt PEFCKHT MIHIHUM SIMSLl-STDRY PEKimm.
THESE TWO PLANS PROVIDE 15« OT THE TOTAL KIX. THEREFOR!. EXCEEDIHC
THE 13% REQUIRED.
PLAN 1 ,(15« MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 206 FT.
1 STORY = 96 FT. (47%)
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 230 FT.
1 STORY = 57 FT. (25%)
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 220 FT.
1 STORY = 112 FT. (51%)
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
TOTAL PERIMETER = 221 FT.
1 STORY = 25 FT. (11%)
VILLAGES B,KJ,C
SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER
BUILDING PLANE AI328 SF|-
B(227 SF)A(400 SF)
4(45 SF)
2(112 SF)
BUILDING PLANE 1(119
5(31 SF)
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
L 11.3(157 SF)
^ 6(30 .SF)
^
[L.
• f\.
-E(45 SF)
//~B(620 SF)
A(97 SF)
\_C(63 SF)t
SECOND FLOOR
LINE
1
1
1
11 L.
DJ(32 SF)V
•P1
4"(B5 SF)->I 1-FIRST FLOOR 71 -|
LINE
.^6(56 SF)
-* 1 5(57 SF
i
r—
1
mirsF)!/
<
^ rV.3133 SF)
->.
i
~V~t2(117 SF)
For at l*a*t 50% ot the unlti In • project, th«r* *h*ll b* itl***t thr** «*p*r*t* building plan** on *tr**t aid* *l«v>tlon>
of lot* with 45 f««t of frontaq* or !*••, «nd four ••pkrtt*
bulldinq plan» on >tr**t lid* •IcvitioM of lot* with •
Irontaqa qr«>t«r than 45 fmt. Th« »lni»UB oCtmmt in pl*n*>
•hall b* II Inch** and *h*ll ineluda but not b* Halted to
buildinq wall*, window* and roof*. Th* Blnlxj* d*pth b«tv**n
th* f*c*« of th* forv*rd-i*o*t pl*n* and th* r**r plan* on th*
front *l*vation ihall b* 10 t**t and a plan* »u*t b* •
•Iniau* of 10 *q. ft. to r*c*lv* cr*dlt under thl> **ctlon.
R**r *l*v*tlon* *hall *dh*r* to th* •*•• criteria outlined innu*b*r 4 abov* for front *i*vatton* *icc*pt that th* •ini*UBd*pth b*tv**n front and back plan** on th* rear *l*vatlonahall b* 3 f**t.
COHCUISIOMl
nut or THE rotm PUMI m THIS nwoucr court* KITH «uiu>ina runCKITZIII* IK CU10EUKCS 4 »0 5. THEM nOUtl riAMS PltOVIDB 11% orTHI TOTHL MIX. THCMrOM IXCtCDINC THI 50* UQUIWD.
SF)
(20% MIX)
7(40 SF)
C(161 SF)
5(46 SF)
1(62 SF)
2(115 SF)
,-5(40I '-,
|4U£6_SP)-^J
PLAN MIX)
V-K116 SP)
2(172
PLAN 4
JSP)-(35% MIX)
VILLAGES M.N.O
BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA
BUILDING
PLANE Av
"(248 SF)CU4 SF)/-CO* :
CONCLUSION:
THREE Of Tilt FOUR PUNS IN THIS PRODUCT COMPLY WITH BUILDING PLANE
CRITERIA III GUIDELINES 4 AND 5. THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE «51 Of
THE TOTAL HI*. THEREFORE EXCEEDING THE S0« REQUIRED.
For at leaet 901 of the unit* In • project, there ahall b* it
l*aat three aeparate building plane* on atr**t aid* *l*v*tlon*
of lota with 4} fact of frontage or laaa, and four aeparate
building plane* on atreet aid* *l«v*tlon* of lot* with a
frontag* greater than 41 f**t. Th. alnimw offeet In plan**
•hall b« II Inch** and ahall Includ* but not b* Halted to
building wall*, window* and roofa. Th* »ini.u» dapth b*tw**n
th* fac*a of th* (orvard-eoat plan* and th* r*ar plan* on th*
front *l*vatlon ahall b* 10 f**t and a plan* »uat b* •
•IniBUK of JO aq. ft. to r*c*iv* cr*dlt und*r thl* aectlon.
-Rear *l*vatlon* ahall adhere to th* aa*a criteria outlined in
nuab*r 4 abov* for front elevation* *xc*pt that th* BinlBUB
depth b*tw**n front and back plan** on th* rear elevation
ahall b* 3 feet.
V-B<378 SF)
X-FO8 SF)
SF)
/-CI419 SF)
4(54 SF)
2(202 SF)
3(54 SF)
•LANE 1
86 SFX-
-5(36 SF)
PLAN 1 (15% MIX).
8(367
EI97 SF)
4(126 SF)
X-CI147 SF)
U" "~"i
|p(102 SF)J 'T
L SECOND FLOOR~Ll|
/-AI42 SF) *
FIRST FLOOR LINE
"\},6(30 SF)
3(72 SF
/~7(287 SFI
903 SFL/~
.1 lit ill U
_/-"<"«> SF)
' 1
•E
Mil
'"X V.5I180 SF)
^-4(61 SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
1 /-DllBZ SFI
1
1
1
1
]__.
M(85 SF) /
2(202 SF)-/
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
SF)
/-5I40 SF)
1
1
1
1
1
~L.ci(60 SF)
! /"""7 ( 101
,'
V.4I10
V3U17 SF)
SF)
(149
2(202
- m
SF)
SFM
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
BUILDING PLANE.CRITERIA
1 VILLAGES H,G
ror »t i**at sot of th* unit* In • project, th*r* ah*ll b* at
laa«t three *aparato bulldlnq pian*a on etre*t *ld* *l*v*tlon*
of lot* with 45 f**t of front«q* or 1***, end four **par*t*
building plan** on *tr**t «ld* elevation* of lot. with •
frontage greater than 45 fMt. Th« •InlBtm off»t in plan**
•hall b* II inch« and (hall Includ* but not b* Halted to
building walla, vindov* and roof*. Th« BinlBu* dapth batw*«n
th* facaa of th* forward-Boat plana and th* raar plan* on tha
front *l*v*tlon 'ahall b* 10 f**t and a plan* Buat b* a
•lnl*u» ot JO *<t. ft. to r*e*iv* credit under thl* **ctlon.
_R**r *l*vatlona *h*ll adh*r* to th* ••»• criteria outlined In
number 4 above (or front *l«atlona axcapt U»t th* •inlmui
depth b*tw**n front and back plan** on th* rear *l*vation
•hall b* J (**t.
COHCUISION:
THREE Of THE FIVE PLMI9 IM THIS MIODUCT COMPLY HITH tUILOlMa HJOI*
CRITERIA IN'CUIDELIMES 4 AMD 5. THISC THREE PUWS PROVIDI 70t HI
THE TOTAL MIX. THE*EroaE EXCEEDING THE 10% REQUIRED.
6(255 SF)
SF)
PLAN 1 (10% MIX)
'8(131 SF)
AU98
SF) V.6O2 SF)
2(200 SF|-
PLAN 2 (15% MIX)
81,
M72 SF)-\C(121 SF)
0(204 SF)
V-7139 SF)
SECOND FLOOR LINE
/-C(120 SF)
FIRST FLOOR
LINE
OOR r-l
~"\ A3II30I SF)
r-r^ 1—4 .
4(40 SF)
SF)
I
| 8(66 SF)
LCl!!r
bf l-sSFJ.A
V-K36 SF)
2(165 SF)
PLAN 3 (20% MIX)
V4I131 SF)
f
^
63 SF) /
143 SFl>
d V.,, 4
PLAN 4 (25% MIX)
1(632(143
PLAN 5 (30% MIX)
4I35SF)
SF)17* VILLAGES D.E.F
J
BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA
At l«a«t SOI of th« unit* in A pro)«ct ah«ll hav« one cltf*
• l«v»tlon wh*r« th«r« «r« iu(rici«nt o(f»t« or cutout*
that th* Bid* ykrd ••tback «v«rA9*« « viniBUM of 7 C««t.
CONCLUSION:
THREE OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED TIIZ 7 FT. AVCRAGI
SIDEIARO StTBUCK REQUIREMENT. THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE 15% Or
THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE, EXCEEDING THE 50% REQUIRED.
5.8 FT.. AVERAGE 9.0 FT. AVERAGE 10.0 FT. AVERAGE 8.2 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 1 (15%. MIX)
387 SF. r 66 FT.
5.8 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
535 SF. '- 59 FT. =
9.0 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
632 SF. 7 63 FT.
10.0 FT. AVERAGE
1
ft.
in
VO
r1
I t 1 • ~
^///)
c; ^-'•i
"/
r
I
''.
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
538 SF. f 65 FT. =
8.2 FT. AVERAGE
SIDEYARD SEIBACHLCRITERIA
VILLAGES Q,P
MUDD1S
At least 501 of the units in A project shall hsvs on* side
elevation where there srs sufficient offsets or cutouts so
that the side yard setback averages a sinlmm of 7 feet.
CONCLUSION:
M.I. FOUR FLAMS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE 7 FT. AVenAGIS SIDMARD
SETBACK REQUIREMENT.
16.7 FT.AVERAGE
12.3 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
666 SF. 7 54 FT. =
12.3 FT.AVERAGE
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
1072 SF. T 64 FT. =
16.7 FT.AVERAGE
10.4 FT. AVERAGE 13.9 FT.AVERAGE
PLAN 3 (30* MIX)
617 SF. 7 59 FT.
10.4 FT. AVERAGE
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
839 SF. T 60 FT.
13.9 FT.AVERAGE
SIDEYARD SETBACK.CRITERIA PMIO VILLAGES B,K,I,C
Projects with An avaraqa lot Bit* of 5,000 sq. ft. or lass
shall ll«it th« nuabar of units with tht«« car qaragas to 75%
of th« plans In tha projact. Project units with thraa car
garaqas shall ba a mix of two door garages, threa door
garages, and offsat (2 planas min. 12") two door qaraq**.
CONCLUSION:
IN VILLAGES M.H.O TIIC AVERAGE LOT SIZES ARE 1471 ST.. 7264 ST.. AND
7460 SF. RESPECTIVELY. ,1M THAT THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE 5OOO SP.
AVERAGE LOT CRITERIA, CUIDELIHK 7 IS HOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE HOTI
HOWEVER, THAT PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT VARIETY AMD
THEREFOPE DOES COMPLY WITH GUIDELINE I.
r
£
(N
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
(1 ) 2 CAR DOOR
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
(.3) 1 CAR DOORS
PLAN 3 (30% MIX)
(1)2 CAR DOOR AND
(1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
(1) 2 CAR DOOR AND
(1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR
GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA
VILLAGES M.N.O
AVERAGE LOT SIZE
VILLAGE M - 1.472 ST.
H - 7,2(4 Sr.o - 7,4«t sr.
CONCUISIOM:
IN VILLAGES H,G THE AVERAGE LOT SUES ARE 7(13 St. AMD •«!• ST.
RESPECTIVELY. IH THAT THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE JOOO Sf. AVERACE LOT
CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS HOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE NOTE HOWEVER, THAT
PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT VARIETY AND THEREFORE DOESCOMPLY KITH GUIDELINE 7,
z
hH£
1
PLAN 1 (15% MIX)
3 RECESSBD SINGLE DOORS
PLAN 2 (20% MIX)
2 CAR DOOR AND
(1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR
PLAN 3 .( 30% MIX)
RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR
AND 1 CAR DOOR
•I—i
1
l-t
PLAN 4 (35% MIX)
3 RECESSED SINGLE DOORS
GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA.
1 VILLAGES H,G
AVERAGE LOT Silt
Project* with an avaraga lot aiza of 9,000 aq. ft. or laaa
•hall Halt tha mmbar of unlta with thraa car garagaa to 75%
of tha plana in tha projact. Projact unlta with thraa car
garagea ahall ba a nix of two door garagaa, thraa door
garagaa, and offaat (2 planaa min. 12") two door garagaa.
CONCLUSION:
IN VILLAGES D.t.r THE AVERAGE LOT SIZES ARE 10. •«! ST., II. 001 ST..
AND 11,747 SF. RESPECTIVELY. IN THAT THIS Wit A EXCEEDS THE 5000
SF. AVERAGE LOT CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE
NOTE HOWEVER, THAT PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT «RIET» AND
THEREFORE DOES COMPLY WITH GUIDELINE 7.
PLAN 1 (10% MIX)
RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR
AND OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR
PLAN 2 (15% MIX)
3 RECESSED SINGLE DOORS
-. 1
PLAN 3 (20% MIX)
RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR
AND 1 CAR DOOR
PLAN 4 (25% MIX)
RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR
AND OFFSET 2 CAR DOOR
PLAN 5 (30% MIX)
RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR.
1 CAR DOOR AND
(1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR
GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA
VILLAGES D.E.F.
AVERAGE LOT SHE
VILLAGE D - 10.H« SF.
E - 11.001 SF.
F - 11,747 SF.