Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCP 99-13; Navarra; Condo Permit (CP)CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (C I | Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit Q Administrative Variance Q] Coastal Development Permit Q Conditional Use Permit \<J\J Condominium Permit f~ Q Environmental Impact Assessment Q General Plan Amendment Q Hillside Development Permit I | Local Coastal Plan Amendment I | Master Plan Q] Non-Residential Planned Development Q Planned Development Permit HECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) , , OP 93- ft n Planned Industrial Permit Q Planning Commission Determination I | Precise Development Plan I | Redevelopment Permit Q Site Development Plan PI Special Use Permit [~| Specific Plan H Tentative Parocl Map ^^ Obtain from Engineering Department I | Tentative Tract Map I I Variance [~| Zone Change Pi List other applications not specified (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) i4-r — q-£^K)rer/ — x/-~ /.? 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 5) OWNER NAME (Print or /}/rf£&/<34^ £6/;7££. Type) MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE £6<33V£> /£>£>; ^2/4- ZIP TELEPHONE 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE 7 DATE 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) ^S/4A4£. MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. <3^r^Xj JT- /n\AO prPsS'Ujf <T~^ * THE AND SIGNATURE ' DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 7) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 8) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY ^STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TC\ ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION TO DA APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED Cf CT TAL FEE REQUIRED vTE FEE PAID \£oo- o- UQO - y/^/3> RECEIVED AUG 2 0 1999 CITY OF CARLSBAD RECEIVED BY: / "\ ,^uv RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 City of Carlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: AMERICAN UNITED DEVELOPMENT CORP Set Id: S000000201 Description CP990013 Total: Amount 3194 08/20/99 0001 01 02 1,800.00 c-PRHT 1800.00 1,800.00 Receipt Number: R0005874 Transaction Date: 08/20/1999 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2142 1,800.00 Transaction Amount: 1,800.00 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME: Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. . 4/91 ProjOwe.frm STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF CARLSBAD The Subdivision Map Act and the Carlsbad Municipal Code sets a fifty (50) day time restriction on Planning Commission processing of Tentative Maps and a thirty (30) day time limit for City Council action. These time limits can only be extended by the mutual concurrence of the applicant and the City. By accepting applications for Tentative Maps concurrently with applications for other approvals which are prerequisites to the map; i.e., Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Plan, Planned Unit Development, etc., the fifty (50) day time limits and the thirty (30) day time limits are often exceeded. If you wish to have your application processed concurrently, this agreement must be signed by the applicant or his agent. If you choose not to sign the statement, the City will not accept your application for the Tentative Map until all prior necessary entitlements have been processed and approved. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed the time limits, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the time limits for Planning Commission and City Council action and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one year from the date the application was accepted as complete to properly review all of the applications. Signature Date A-^ — '4*'*fro Name (Print) Relationship to Application (Property Owner-Agent) FRM0037 2/96 PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upon fyfy date"o)f the^ompletion letter. ^——Applicant Signature: Staff Signature: Date: To be stapled with receipt to application Copy for file PROJECT FACILITY AV/~.ABILITY FORM -CARLSBAD SCHOOL Please type or use pen (Two lows are needed If project is 10 be.servea by separata school districts) Owner's Name Owner's Mailing Address vutfrStreet City State Zip ORG. ACCT. ACT_ TASK. DATE. ELEMENTARY . HIGH SCHOOL. UNIFIED ' DISTRICT CASHIER'S USE ONLY SECTIONS.v.PROJECT;DESCRIPTION TO-BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. LEGISLATIVE ACT Rezone from zone density/intensity to. General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Specific Plan A-nendmant B. ___ DEVELOPMENT PROJECT HB Major Subdivision (TM) Minor Subdivision (TPMj2£— Boundary Adjustment Major Use Permil (MUP). purpose:. Time Extension... Case No Expired Map... Case No Other zone density/intensity. Assessor's Parcel Number(s) (Add e*>ra if necessary) \10 Thomas Bros. Page Gnd C.39- Residential Total number of dwelling units .Project address.AlfrV/H/tt-ft- Commercial Gross floor area. Industrial Gross floor area. Other Gross floor area. D. Total Project acreage 'Q.2_'ElTotal number of lots 1 *-"^ CoiTvnuniiy Planning A/avSub'egion Applicant's Signature , Address . Date Otf- (On compleelon of above, present 10 the school district to complete Section 2 below) ^ BYV DISTRICT District Name;.ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT If not in a unified district, which elementary or high school district mu?t also till,puta term' _j. .San Dieguito Union HTgh School qist Indicate the location and distance of proposed schools of attendance. FJementaryLA COSTA HEIGH^ies. 1.5 junior/Middle: miles- ^ High school1 ', miles- elementary Q junior/middle Q high school.This project will result in the overcrowding of the (check all that apply} (2) Fees will be levied either in accordance with Government Code Section 53080 or Section 65970 prior to the issuance of building permits. Q Project is located entirely within the district and is eligible for seryjce. D The project is not located entirely within the district and a potential boundary issue may exist with the school district. FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTS (Rezones, General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans) ONLY: D Pursuant to County Ordinance and the Public Facility Element of the General Plan, facilities to serve the project have been committed through a binding agreement satisfactory to the school district. D A binding agreement has not yet been signed, but one will be required prior to legislative approval. D No binding agreement is necessary. ^ Dated: August 4, 1999 . Print name- Sharon R. South (760) 944 - 4300 X161 Authorized signature: Printtitte- Chief Financial Officer .Phone:. At this time any project in this area will result in unmitigated school impacts even with payment of statuatory fees. We cannot guarantee the local school will have capacity for ar students generated from this project. City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) /- / iy ~f~Zfrl Corp/Part_Person_ Title Title Address Address OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person_ Title Corp/Part Title Address Address *3<9&/ 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-O894 3 NON-PROFIT ORG. .NIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes xlslo If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date . U^. Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date tsfLfLy ffrl VytyJU e name of owner/applicant'Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 Of 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR: TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS (AND REVISIONS) CONDOMINIUM PERMITS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS ONLY) A proposed project requiring that multiple applications be filed must be submitted prior to 3:30 p.m. A proposed project requiring that only one application be filed must be submitted prior to 4:00 p.m. All joint application exhibits, i.e. Tentative Map and Planned Development Site Plan should be prepared at the same scale (use a scale no smaller than 1" - 40). In addition all plans shall be fully dimensioned (i.e., setbacks, height, road widths, parking spaces, planters, yards, etc.) The following materials shall be submitted for each application except as noted in "HI. OTHER REQUIREMENTS" Item K, Property Owner's List and address labels. REQUIRED PLANS (folded and delivered in complete sets) Z)A. SITE PLAN - Ten (10) copies on 24" x 36" sheet! s) folded to 8 1/2" x 11" size. Fifteen (15) , copies of the site plan shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to approval of the project. Each site plan shall contain the following information: A 1. b. c. g- h. . GENERAL INFORMATION Name and address of owner whose property is proposed to be subdivided and the name and address of the subdivider. Name and address of registered civil engineer, licensed surveyor, landscape architect or land planner who prepared the maps. North arrow and scale. Residential, commercial industrial or other uses. j Tentative Map number in upper right hand corner (City to provide number at time of application). Number of units to be constructed when a condominium or community apartment project is involved. Total number of lots proposed. Name of sewer and water district providing service to the project. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project, broken down by separate uses. Name of School District providing service to the project. Proposed density in lots or dwelling units per acre. Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 1 of 8 A k. Existing Zone and General Plan Designation. 1. Site acreage. 2. SITE INFORMATION a. General (1) Approximate location of existing and proposed building and permanent structures. (2) Location of all major vegetation, showing size and type. (3) Location of railroads. (4) Legal description of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision (approximate bearings, distances and curve data). (5) Lot lines and approximate dimensions and number of each lot. (6) Lot area for each proposed lot. (7) Setback dimensions for the required front, rear and side yard setbacks for all structures. r$f (8) Indicate top and bottom elevations for all fences, walls, and retaining walls. Show these elevations at each end of the wall and in the middle. Also show the worst condition elevation. (9) Show site details for all recreation lots or areas (when applicable). (10) Total building coverage for lots with proposed structures, b. Street and Utilities (1) The location, width and proposed name of all streets within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision, show proposed street grades and centerline radii. Provide separate profile for all streets with grades in excess of 7%. Street should be conformance with City Standards and Engineering Department Policies. (2) Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys. (3) Typical street section for all adjacent streets and streets within the project. (4) Width and location of all existing and/or proposed public or private easements. (5) Public and private streets and utilities clearly identified. *««««»*««««««««««»«»*«««««««»«««««««««« Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 2 of 8 (6) Show distance between all intersections and medium and high use driveways. a ffl (7) Clearly show parking stall and aisle dimensions and truck turning radii for all parking areas. (8) Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands. (9) Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer, water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. ( 1 0) Show location of all fire hydrants within 300 feet of site. Grading and Drainage (1) Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%; 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%; and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees: those to be removed and those to be saved. (2) Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import and export. (3) Spot elevations at the comers of each pad. (4) Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. (5) Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision; show location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. (6) Clearly show and label the 1 00 year flood line for the before and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain. ",/JB. LANDSCAPE PLAN - For all condominium and planned development projects, ten (10) copies -ir im*r\r-v\ (f°ur (4) copies for projects with four or fewer units) on 24" x 36" sheet(s) folded to S'/z" x 11" r/ Wfeott^o^size. Fifteen (15) copies of the landscape plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to approval of the project. The scale should be consistent with all other exhibits. Each landscape plan shall include the following information: 1. Landscape zones per the City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. 2. Typical plant species, quantity of each species and their size for each planting zone in a legend. (Use symbols). 3. An estimate of the yearly amount of irrigation (supplemental) water required to maintain each zone. Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 3 of 8 4. Landscape maintenance responsibility (private or common,) for all areas. 5. Percent of site used for landscaping. / 6. Water Conservation Plan. C. BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS - For all condominium and planned development projects, ten (10) copies prepared on 24" x 36" sheet(s) folded to 8 1/2" x 11". Fifteen (15) copies of the building elevations and floor plans shall be submitted by the applicant upon request of the project planner prior to project approval. Each building elevation and floor plan shall include the following information: 1. Floor plans with square footage included. 2. Location and size of storage areas. 3. All buildings, structures, walls and/or fences, signs and exterior lights. 4. Include a scale on all floor plans and building elevations. [ | 5. Indicate on all building elevations, compliance with Carlsbad Height Ordinance 21.04.065. WJD. CONSTRAINTS MAP - At the same scale as other exhibit, i.e., Tentative Maps, Site Plan. etc. one (1) 24" x 36" sheet folded to 8 1/2" x 11" shall include the following information: (NOTE: This information is not required for previously graded sites and the conversion of existing structures.) If the constraint does not apply to the property, list it on the map as not applicable. 1. Major ridge lines. 2. Distant views. 3. Internal views. 4. Riparian or woodlands. 5. Intermittent drainage course. 6. 25 - 40% slopes. [~~] 7. Greater than 40% slopes. 8. Major rock outcroppings. [ | 9. Easements. 10. Floodplains. Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 4 of 8 11. Archaeologic, i sites. 12. Special Planning Areas - Type of special planning area. 13. Biological Habitats. Indicate the location of Coastal Sage Scrub and chaparral plant communities existing on the project site. 14.Beaches. 15. Permanent bodies of water. 16. Wetlands. . 17. Land subject to major power transmission easements. 18. Railroad track beds. E. COLORED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN - Not required with first submittal and not required for tentative parcel maps. It is the Applicant's responsibility to bring one (1) copy of a colored site plan and one (1) copy of a colored elevation to the Planning Department by 12:00 noon, eight (8) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Do not mount exhibits. vjF. REDUCED SITE PLAN - One (1) copy of 8 1/2" x 11". These plans must be of quality that is photographically reproducible. These are not required with first submittal but will be f\ requested at a later time by your project planner. . LOCATION MAP - One (1) copy of 8 1/2" x 11" (suggested scale 200" - vicinity maps on the site plan are not acceptable). II.REQUIRED DOCUMENTS (IN ADDITION TO A COMPLETED LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION) <,£& ~7~ N/A. Environmental Impact Assessment Form (Fee not required with initial submittal. Fee to be *Qr determined after review of project and environmental impact assessment form.) Required for '»*\ tentative parcel maps only where significant grading is proposed. Check with Planning staff to L / * determine if required for your application. . Public Facility Agreement - Two (2) copies: One (1) notarized original and one (1) reproduced copy. (Separate fee required.) C. Disclosure Statement. (Not required for tentative parcel maps). / . Three (3) copies of the Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six (6) months). E. Proof of availability of sewer if located in the Leucadia County Water District or the Vallecitos Water District. . School District letter indicating that school facilities will be available to the project. Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 5 of 8 G. Statement of agreement to waive tentative parcel map time limits. Required for tentative parcel only when project requires concurrent processing of planning application or environmental review. ]H. All projects must evaluate their potential impacts on the regional transportation system. including the costs of mitigating the associated impacts, as required by the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP). For projects with an average daily traffic (ADT) generation rate greater than 500 vehicles per day or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips. Submit two (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. The analysis must be prepared by a Registered Traffic Engineer or Registered Civil Engineer. The analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management Plan or as otherwise determined in discussions with staff. The following minimum information should be included with the study: 1.8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14" plats showing zone impacted roads, background and project AM and PM peak hour impacts and traffic distribution. 2. Project traffic generation rates and traffic assignment. 3. Necessary calculations and/or analysis to determine intersection and road segment levels of service. 4. Any proposed mitigation requirements to maintain the public facility standards. 5. On Collector streets and above, an analysis of the need for a traffic signal will be required. "Large" projects: Any project which, upon its completion will be expected to generate either an equivalent of 2,400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips, including large projects that may have already been reviewed under CEOA but require additional local discretionary actions, is defined as a "large project" under the SANDAG Congestion Management Program (CMP) and will be subject to enhanced CEQA review as specified in the CMP. Depending upon the complexity of the project, the City of Carlsbad reserves the right to require a traffic study on any project. I. Noise study consistent with City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. l\Wj. Two copies of preliminary soils/geologic report for all project with cut or fill depths exceeding 5 V feet. K. For all condominium conversions, a signed statement by the owner stating Section 66427.1 of the State Map Act will be complied with. JL. For all condominium conversions, a letter from San Diego Gas and Electric company stating that plans to convert the gas and electric system to separate systems have been submitted and are acceptable. Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 6 of 8 III. OTHER REQUIREMENTS A. Preliminary Hydrology map and calculations for lots exceeding one acre. Show before and after discharges to each including drainage basin. |]B. For all condominium conversions, one copy of a compliance inspection performed by the Building Department. (Separate Fee Required). |C. Submit architectural guideline compliance summary if applicable. (See Council Policy No. 44 for the development of small lots, as attached). D. Photographs of the property taken from the north, south, east and west. Construction materials board and color samples, i.e., roofing, exterior walls, pavement, glass, wood, etc. F. Pursuant to Section 21.45.040(6) of Title 21 applications for planed developments on properties designated or zoned for single family development shall be accompanied by a preliminary tentative map. This map shall illustrate how many standard lots conforming to applicable zoning and subdivision standards served by public streets could fit on the site. The design of this preliminary tentative map shall comply with all applicable City Ordinances and Standards except for the design standards of the Planned Development Ordinance. The applicant shall also submit maps, diagrams, plans and a report showing that the proposed planned development will result in superior residential development consistent with the purpose and intent of the Planned Development Ordinance. The density on the developed portion of the planned development site shall be similar to and compatible with surrounding development. G. Signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications." H. Completed "Project Description/Explanation" sheet. If your project will include signage at some time in the future, you must submit a proposed sign program as part of this application. The program shall be provided as separate exhibits and should include the following information: Proposed sign location, dimensions, area, materials, sign copy and colors. J. Property Owners List and Addressed Labels. NOTE: WHEN THE APPLICATION IS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD BY THE DECISION MAKING BODY, THE PROJECT PLANNER WILL CONTACT THE APPLICANT AND ADVISE HIM TO SUBMIT THE RADIUS MAP. TWO SETS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN A STATEMENT CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REPRESENTS THE LATEST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLLS FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT GO FORWARD UNTIL THIS INFORMATION IS RECEIVED. Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 7 of 8 A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of subject property (including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest assessment rolls. Two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included but Apt., Suite, and Bldg. # must NOT appear in the street address line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes -PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Swiss 721, Enterprise TM, Courier New (TT) no larger than 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH 123 Magnolia Ave,. Apt #3 123 Magnolia Ave. APT #3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 600 Foot Radius Map A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within 600 feet of exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owners list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. For tentative parcel maps, a map to scale on an 8'/2" x 11" sheet, showing each lot within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject project. Form 3 Revised 3/98 Page 8 of 8 CITY OF CARLSBAD TENTATIVE PARCEL NO. MS 99- LA COSTA GOLF COURSE PKOEC1 T ~-\Sill /. Cjj VICINITY MAP iA COSTA SOtTH UNil N0.1 ,,i MAP NO. 660!) __V- - S.V -i- * NAVARRA DRIVE twt com ornoi * TYP. STRECT SECTION SOU MCKC WP •«. W» \ (J -"IWD • «ruu» \ C) DBF »' <C SW ORT. r *c wn» »00'j,r1 C IV1It • -NAVARRA DRIVE TYP. BROW DITCH & RIP-RAP PAD SECTION - B 101 3/ SECTION - A SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET LEGAL DESCRIPTION BCHG ALL ff lOT M Or IA CCSTA SWW JUT HO 1. W THE CfT" Of OPLS»«O, COUNTY cr **M neco. sw^ e»- O^TCJWM. ACCOTOMC TC tw TMtflEOf 10. «i»UD ** WE OFFICE of iw coirrrr necrwwR or SAH DT.CO cow*. JJNE 3. I GENERAL NOTES P*tS£MT HO PHOP05CP ZtMMC: RDW-mi (19 UMTS / CADSS MKA 0.44 AC MET JWifc 9 3* «C TOTN. LOTS: I MP*OVfVfNT ON WMMRA DR. CCMTtE*L WTI» CWLS3W MIWCT^L WTE" Per. SOtft ITUCNM COUNTV BAtfl DtSTItltTT. CAS * octrnw:. SOCK . SCHOttS: fMt CTEOUrn) JMTHI SCHOOL z COVMWTT PVN* sw t*cowro> PAK. NO ne-170-n TAK WTt AREA: 4046 3. MS 1#W IS KM) FUD TOT A 4 UMT FWJPPSU) MMIE FOT THJ MOXCt IS IMVARftA MO raCCS Off *MTtM«. VECTiinON ON 5^t. MOTGE DNLV tWXr 37 AflT CONSTRAINTS NOTE THS POOJCCT fi A DCMLOPWEHT OF Ml £<?SliMC VWWfO ON ™-5 LOT AW A COMSTKAtm HA" IS MO I RtOJWtO, SUMMARY TABLE 7.510 5F 11.4*0 ST 19.020 V 10 NOTE EACH UNtf CONTAINS 23OO-7379 GRADING QUANTITIES !«™""*° <*<«*•mwviw* ««•«.- rfnatmm-ruialrCB. Hff "* amimiM ftttMcr a iHTntfOM !«™""*° <acrtrr"t sniFor aumnrt'j innate* Mams ji wnniH er t mix. ail nrnurf r**tf Mf*/y-«wr/« vfF COMMON */re*s * AS pe rriteo w seer. WfCtl** M? cttfwt* fiv.-i. eco£. EKMEE& OHO A. JOTO 2)9 MEADC* VST* HIT,TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. MS 99-01 FOR LOT 56. LA COSTA SOUTH NO.l, MAP 6U7 VICINITY MAP SCALE NONE ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY PD 88-4 & 80(A) 8/11/89 REV. 1/22/90 | GUIDELINE ] JJHD 1. WHERE (3) TWO-STORY UNITS OCCUR IN A ROW AND THEY ARE SITUATED LESS THAN 15 FEET APART, AT LEAST (1) UNIT MUST HAVE A SINGLE STORY BUILDING EDGE NOT LESS THAN 10 FEET IN DEPTH. 2. WHERE (3) TWO-STORY UNITS OCCUR IN A ROW AND THEY ARE SITUATED 15 TO 20 FEET APART, AT LEAST (I) UNIT MUST HAVE A SINGLE STORY BUILDING EDGE NOT LESS THAN 5 FEET IN DEPTH. 3. PER PROJECT, 33% OF ALL UNITS SHALL HAVE A SINGLE STORY EDGE A MINIMUM OF 40% OF THE TOTAL PERIMETER. 4. PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WITH A LOT FRONTAGE GREATER THAN 45 FEET MUST HAVE (4) SEPARATE BUILDING PLANES ON THE FRONT ELEVATION . 5. PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS WITH A LOT FRONTAGE GREATER THAN 45 FEET MUST HAVE (4) SEPARATE BUILDING PLANES ON THE STREET SIDE ELEVATION. 6. ' PER PROJECT, 50% OF ALL UNITS SHALL HAVE ONE SIDE ELEVATION WITH A 7 FEET AVERAGE SIDE YARD SETBACK. 7. THREE-CAR GARAGES LIMITED TO 75% OF THE TOTAL UNITS WHERE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS 5,000 SF OF LESS. THREE-CAR GARAGES SHALL INCORPORATE A MIXTURE OF 2 DOOR, 3 DOOR, AND OFFSET 2 DOOR DESIGNS. 8. 50% OF EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS SHALL BE PROJECTED OR RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES. MINIMUM STANDARD 1 OF 3 1 OF 3 33% 50% 50% 50% 75% 50% PRODUCT A VILLAGES M,N,O 1 OF 3 NA 35% 85% 85% 100% 100% 100% PRODUCT B VILLAGES Q,F 2 OF 3 NA 45% 85% 85% 85% 100% 100% PRODUCT C VILLAGES H,G 2 OF 3 NA 100% 85% 85% 100% 100% 100% PRODUCT D VILLAGES B,K,I,C 2 OF 4 NA 45% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% PRODUCT E VILLAGES D,E,F 3 OF 3 NA 45% 70% 70% 100% 100% 100% RESULTS EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN FOUR OF FIVE PRODUCTS. PRODUCT A COMPLIES WITH STANDARDS. ALL PRODUCTS WERE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH GUIDELINE 1. IN THAT THE ONE STORY ELEMENT IN PRODUCTS ONE THROUGH FIVE HAS A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10 FEET THEY ALSO COMPLY WITH GUIDELINE 2. EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL FIVE PRODUCTS. EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL FIVE PRODUCTS. EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL FIVE PRODUCTS. EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDARD IN ALL FIVE PRODUCTS. THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IN ALL FIVE PRODUCTS GREATLY EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM 5,000 SF. STATED IN GUIDELINE 7, THEREFORE GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT APPLICABLE. HOWEVER, ALL FIVE PRODUCTS COMPLY WITH THIS GUIDELINE. EXCEEDING MINIMUM STANDAKD IN ALL FIVE PRODUCTS. In projects where there are three 1 story units in a row situated less than 15 feet apart, at least one of the threeunits shall have a single atory building edge with a depth ofnot less than 10 feet adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the single story elemnt shall be substantially lower than the roof for the J story element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roots falling toa single-story element). CONCLUSION: ELEVATIONS AND STREET SCKNE PROFILE SHOW SEUW OEHOHSTIIATES THE ABILITt TO PLOT THIS PRODUCT IN COMPLIANCE WITH GUIDELINEONE. M1H1HUH. CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED OH STREET PROFILE BELOW. THE FINAL SITE PLAN HILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE. 10 FT. HIM. PLAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX) IYeiC*L_BUlLDING ELEVATIONS .10 FT. M1N.1 STORY ELEMENT STREET PROFILE MINIMUK/TCRITERIA COMPLIANCE > VILLAGES Q,P > TOWNHOMES LA COSTA, CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT/ WATER CONSERVATION PLAN In project* vh«r* th*r* ar* thr** 2 atory unit* In •' row•ituatad !••* than 15 f**t apart, at l*a*t on* of tt» thr** unit* aha 11 h*v* • alngl* *tory building *do,* with • d*pth o( not !••• th*n 10 f**t adj*c*nt to on* of th* oth*r unit*. Tli* roof covarlng th* ilngl* *tory *l*>*nt shall b* *ub*t*nti*lly low*r than th* roof Cor th* 3 itory *l*B*nt to th* unit (thl* 1* not lnt*nd*d to prvclud* long *h*d*typ* root* falling to• *lngl***tory *l*B*nt). CONCLUSIOHl ELEVATIONS AND STREET 6CENE ttOULt SHONN RtUW OEHOMTMTES THE AKILITI TO PLOT THIS PRODUCT IK COHPLIAKC* KITH GUI OIL I HI ONE. HININUH CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET PROFILE 1ELOU. THE FINAL SITE PLAN MILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE. 10 FT. PLAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX) IYPICAL_BUILDING ELEVATIONS .10 FT HIN. STORY ELEMENT VILLAGES B,K,I,C STREET PROFILE MINIMUK/TCRITERIA COMPLIANCE On « project basis, thirty-thru percent (33») of all units shall have • single story edge tor forty percent (40%) of the perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge shall be a • iniama depth of three feet (3'). The units qualifying under the III shall be distributed throughout the project. CONCLUSION: AS SHOW IN THE DI SCRAMS BELOW. TWO OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE FORTY PERCENT MINIMUM SINGLE-STORY PERIMETER. THESE TWO PLANS PROVIDE 35« OF THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE. EXCEEDING THE ]Jt REQUIRED. 1 STORY ELEMENT PLAN 1 (15% MIX) PLAN 2 (20% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 217 FT. TOTAL PERIMETER = 183 FT. ONE STORY = 217 FT. (100%) ONE STORY = 94 FT. (51%) PLAN 3 (30% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 202 FT. ONE STORY = 58 FT. (29%) PLAN 4 (35% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 190 FT. ONE STORY = 73 FT. (38%) VILLAGES M.N.O SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER t PLAN 1 (,15% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 261 FT. 1 STORY = 261 FT. (100%) PLAN 2 (20% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 207 FT. 1 STORY = 90 FT. (43%) 1 STORY ELEMENT CONCLUSION: AS SHOWN IH THE DIAGRAMS BELOW. FOUR OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE FORTY PERCENT MINIMUM SINGLE-STORY PERIMETER. THESE FOUR PLANS PROVIDE 100% OF THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE, EXCEEDING THF )3t REQUIRED. PLAN 3 (30% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 217 FT. 1 STORY = 124 FT. (57%) PLAN 4 (35% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 217 FT. 1 STORY = 104 FT. (48%) SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER On a project basis, thirty-three percent (lit) of all units •hall have a single story edge for forty percent (40%) of the perimeter of the building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge shall be a elnleue depth of three feet (}•). The unite qualifying under the 33% shall be distributed throughout the project. CONCLUSION: AS SHOWN IH THE DIAGRAMS BELOW, THREE Or THE MVE PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE FORTt PERCENT MINIMUM SINGLE-STORY PERIMETER. THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE (51 or THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE. EXCEEDING THE 33t REQUIRED. PLAN 1 (10% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 278 FT. 1 STORY = 278 FT. (100%) PLAN 2 (15% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 295 FT. 1 STORY = 295 FT. (100%) 1 STORY ELEMENT PLAN 3 (20% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 290 FT. 1 STORY = 191 FT. (66%) PLAN 4 (25% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 254 FT. 1 STORY = 95 FT. (37%) PLAN 5 (30% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 255 FT. 1 STORY = 76 FT. (30%) SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER BUILDING PLANE A (441 SF)A I 111 SF)->- _ ~ *~~ * ~^~- • B(41 SF) CONCLUSION: THREE OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT COHPLI WITH BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA IN GUIDELINES « AND 3. THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE »« Of THE TOTAL HIX. THEREFORE EXCEEDING Till 3Ot REQUIRED. For At leaat sot of the unit* in • project, there ahall be at laaat thru eeparate building planee on etraat aide elavatione of lot* with 45 feet of frontage or !•••, and four eeparate building .planea on etreet aid* elevatlone of lota with a frontage graatar than 43 fact. Tha •inimu offaat In planaa ahall ba II Inchaa and shall Includa but not ba llaitad to building walla, windowa and roofa. Tha Bininui dapth batwaan tha facaa of tha forward-Boat plana and tha raar plana on tha front alavatlon ahall ba 10 faat and a plana mat ba a •Inlaiu of 30 aq. ft. to raeaiva credit under thla aaetion. JUar alavationa ahall adhere to the aave criteria outlined in number 4 above for front alevationa except that the Minima depth between front and back planaa on the rear elevation ahall be J feet. /-BI167 SF) ^5(84 SF) BUILDING PLANE 1 IT- (53 SF)- 2(93 .SF)- £-0(169 SF) SF) PLA.N 1 ( 15% MIX) V.K44 SF) 2(84 SF) PLAN 2 (20% MIX) V4 ( 72 SFI SF) ^3(143 SF) ,.,^6(96 Sd. SF)T^2(143 PLAN 3 (30% MIX) /-CI319SF) ^3(50 SF) 2(187 SF)- PLAN 4 (35% MIX) BUILDING PLANE.CRITERIA VILLAGES Q,P CONCLUSION: ALL fOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT COHPL» HITII BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA III GUIDELINES 4 AND 5. THESE FOUR PLANS PROVIDE 1001 OF Tilt TOTAL HIX, THEREFORE EXCEEDING THE JO» REQUIRED. For at leaat 50% of th* unlt« In • pro)«ct, th*r* ihall b* at l***t thraa aaparata bulldlnq plan** on atraat aid* *l*vatlon* of lots with 45 f**t of front*?* or 1***, *nd four **p*r*t* buildlnq plan** on atraat *14* *l*v*tlon* of lot* with • front*?* greater thin 4S f**t. Th* *lniMum> off**t In pl*nm •h*ll b* 11 Inch** and «hall Include but not b* ll*it*d to building vail*, window* and roof*. Th* *lnleu* depth b*tw**n th* faca* of tha forv*rd-*»*t plan* and tha raar plan* on th* front *l*v*tlon aha 11 b* lo f**t and • plan* *uat b* a •InLeUB of 30 *q. ft. to racalve credit und*r thla **ction. JUar alavatlona aha11 adhere to th* *aee criteria outlined In mmb*r 4 above for front elevation* *xcapt that th* alnlMUM depth between front and back plane* on th* r*ar *l*vatlon •hall b* 3 f**t. SF) E f.SF) CI119 SF) SF) ~T~l /-D(198 SF) V- ' /-E(17B SF) /-DI593 SF) E(80 SF)~ 8(154 SF) ^4(130'SF) 112 SF) 'BUILDING PLANE 1 (35 SF) PLAN 1 (15% MIX) /-5(42 SF) _* ---- 1 3(37 SF)• SF) ) 26 SF)-' V-4I192 SF) -3(119 SF) S(F) C(37 SF) j B(35 SF) I ' A(34 SF) I SECOND FLOOR LJINE FIRST FLOOR -U.NE I I /-4C115 SF) I »(77 SF) ^•1(65 2(126 SF)- PLAN 2 (20% MIX) SF) V-51127 SF)/-CI198 SF) SF) D(6B 8(135 SF)-v /-7(95 SF) \U-L~ i_J v:6(200 SF) 5(56 SF) V-4(40 SF) 3(49 SF)in / 2(119 PLAN 3 (30% MIX) SF) 2(91 SF)- PLAN 4 (35% MIX) SF) BUILDING PLANE.CRITERIA At laaat 501 of tha unit* In • project shall h«v« ana aida alavatlon vhara thara ara aufficiant offaata or cutouta ao that tha aida yard aatback avaraaaa a BlnlMUH of 7 Caat. CONCLUSION, ALL FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE 7 SETBACK REQUIREHENT.rr. AVCRACE siorrAno 8.2 FT. AVERAGE 9.7 FT. AVERAGE Y///777, 8.0 FT. AVERAGE 1 8.6 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 1 (15% MIX) 529 SF f 64 FT. 8.2 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 2 (20% MIX) 411 SF - 51 FT. = 8.0 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 3 (30% MIX) 592 SF '- 61 FT. = 9.7 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 4 (35% MIX) 527 SF f 61 FT. = 8.6 FT. AVERAGE SIDEYARD SETBACK CRITERIA VILLAGES M.N.O At l«»t 50% of th« unit* in • project ihall hav« one aid*•lavatlon vh«r* th«r« mrm •ufClcl«nt off«*t* or cutout* »ottiftt th« Bid* ymr4 •«tb*ck ftv*rBq«« a minimum of 7 t««t. CONCLUSION; ALL FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCKD THE ' FT. AVERAGE SIDIVARD SETBACK REQUIREnCNT. 8.1 FT. AVERAGE 14.7 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 1 (15% MIX) 537 SF. r 66. FT. 8.1 FT. AVERAGE 16.2 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 2 (20% MIX) 901 SF. f 55.5 FT. 16.2 FT.. AVERAGE 12.6 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 3 (30% MIX) 734 SF. 7 58 FT. = 12.6 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 4 (35% MIX) 914 SF. f 62 FT. 14.7 FT. AVERAGE SIDEYARD-SEIBACK-CRITERIA At l«a«t 901 of th« units in • project shall h*v« one eld* slsvation vh«r* th«r« ara aufficiant offasts or cutouts so that th« aid* yard sstback avaragxs a ainiBUB of 7 tact. ALL FIVE PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT. PLAN 2 (15% MIX) 976 SF. r 66 FT. 14 .7 FT. AVERAGE 711 SF. T 67 FT. 10.6 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 3 (20% MIX) 894 SF. f 64 FT. = 13.9 FT. AVERAGE 71 VILLAGES D.E.F 930 SF. - 65 FT. 14.3 FT. AVERAGE PLAN .4 (25% MIX) 788 SF f 65 FT. 12.1 FT.AVERAGE SIDE YARD SETBACK CRITERIA IsX. r~-*~ Projects with an average lot alia of 5,OOO »q. ft. or Immm shall Halt th« number of units with three car garages to 7M of th« plans in tha project. Project units with three car garages shall be a mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset (2 planes Bin. 12") two door garages. CONCLUSION: IN viLLAces O.P me AVERAGE LOT SIZES ARE 7132 sr. MID 7905 sr. RESPECTIVELY. IN THAT THIS MIEA EXCEEDS THE 5000 ST. AVERAGE LOT CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE NOTE HOVCVER, THAT PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE PROMT VARIETY AND THERrORE DOES COHPL» KITH GUIDELINE 7. 1 PLAN 1.(15% MIX) 2 CAR GARAGE PLAN 2 (20% MIX) RECESSED 1 CAR DOOR .AND OFFSET 2 CAR DOOR PLAN 3 (30%.MIX) RECESSED 1 CAR AND 2 CAR DOORS PLAN 4 (35% MIX) 3 SINGLE CAR DOOR RECESSED AND OFFSET GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA. VILLAGES Q,P AVERAGE LOT Slit VILLAGE 0 - 7,112 SF. P - 7.SOS sr. UDLFfiM Projacts with an avaraga lot aita of 3,000 sq. ft. or laaa shall li»it tha nuBbar of units with thraa car garagaa to 751 of tha plans in tha pro}act. Projact units with thraa car garages shall ba a mix of two door garagas, thru door garagas. and offsat (2 planaa Bin. 12-) two door garages CONCLUSION: IN VI LUGES B.K.I.C THE AVERAGE IOT SUES ARE »5»5 ST.. »J5« 'ST. . »«43 St.. AND 1IS1 Sf. RZSPECTIVELt. IN THAT THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE 5000 ST. AVERAGE LOT CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE NOTE HOWEVER, THAT PRODUCT I DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT VARIETY AND THEREFORE DOES CONPL> WITH GUIDELINE 7. E - 1 1 z M£ I I --J 1 PLAN 1 (15% MIX) RECESSED 2 dAR DOOR AND OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR r H-T PLAN 2 (20% MIX) 2 CAR DOOR AND 1 CAR DOOR PLAN 3 (30% MIX) RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR AND OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR PLAN 4 (35% MIX) 3 SINGLE CAR DOOR RECESSED AND OFFSET (3ARAGE FRONT CRITERIA. VILLAGES B,K,I,C AVERAGE LOT SHE VILLAGE B - 9.595 ST. K - «,)54 SF. I - 9.634 SF. C - B.IS1 SF. Fifty percent (50%) of exterior openings (doors/windowsI shall be recessed or projected a Minimum of 2" and shall be trimmed with wood or colored aluminum window frames (no mill finishes). COHCU1SIOH: ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS SHALL BE RECESSED OR PROJECTED AND TRIMMED WITH STUCCO OR HOOD. SEE ELEVATION DESIGNS. WOOD OR STUCCO TRIM MINIMUM 2" THICK RECESSED WINDOW MINIMUM 2" DEEP WINDOW TRIM CRITERIA raomu 10 FT. WIN. •I In project* where there are three 3 atory units In • row situated leas than IS rut apart, at laaet on« of tha three unit! (ball have a single *tory building edge with • depth of not less then 10 feet ad)tont to on* of th« other unit*. The roof covurlnq the alnql* atory *l*B*nt (hall ba substantially lowar than th« roof for tha 2 story eleawnt to tha unit (this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to a sin9le-atory element). CONCLUSION! ELEVATIONS AND STREET SCENE PROFILE SIIOMH BELOW DEMOMSTKMES THE OBlLlTt TO PLOT THIS PRODUCT IN COMPLIANCE HITII GUIDELINE ONE. HIN1HUH CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET PROFILE BELOW. THE HNAL SITE PLAN HILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE. PLAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX) TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS 10 FT, MIN. 1 STORY ELEMENT STREET PROFILE MINIMUM CRITERIA COMPLIANCE VILLAGES M.N.O 10 FT. HIM. In projecte where there are three 2 atory unite in a" rov eltuated leee than II feet (pert, at leeet one of the three unit* aha 11 have • single etory building edge with • depth of not leee then 10 fMt edjacent to one of the other unit*. The roof covering the (Ingle ctory eleaent (hell be eubvtentielly lower then the roof for the 2 etory elevjent to the unit ft hi*la not intended to preclude long abed-type roof a falling i •.a aingle-etory eleaent). CONCLUSION! ELCVItTIOHS AND STREET SCENE rHOFILE SHOW* BBLOM DEHOHST«ATEI THE MltlTY TO PLOT THIS PKOOUCT 1H COHrLlANCE HITII GUIDELINE ONE. MINIMUM CKITCK1K COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET PROFILE BELOW. THE FINAL SITE FLAN HILL REFLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE. ELAN 1 (15% MIX)PLAN 2 (20% MIX)PLAN 3 (30% MIX)PLAN 4 (35% MIX) TYPICAL_BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1 STORY ELEMENT 1 STORY ELEMENT STREET PROFILE MINIMUM'CRITERIA COMPLIANCE In projects vhara thara ara thraa I atory unit* In a'row aituatad laaa than IS faat apart, at laaat ana of th« thraa unite ahall hava a aingla atory building adga with a dapth of not iaaa than io faat adjacant to on* of tha othar unlta. Tha roof eovarlng tha aingla atory alavant ahall b* aubatantlaily lo«ar than tha roof for tha 1 atory alaMnt to tha unit (thla • im not intandad to pracluoa long (had-typ* roof* falling to • a ainqla-atory ala*ant). CONCLUSIONi ELEVATIONS AND STUEET SCENE FKOflLE SNOHH (ELOM DEHONSTDATES THE AB1LITT TO PLOT THIS PKOOUCT IN COHCLIABCE WITH GUIDELINE ONE. HININUH CRITERIA COMPLIANCE IS ILLUSTRATED ON STREET PROFILE BELOW. THE riHAL SITE PLAN WILL RErLECT ACTUAL COMPLIANCE. PLAN 1 (10% MIX)PLAN 2 (15% MIX) ,10 FT. fllN. y!0 FT .1, HIM. PLAN 3 (20% MIX)PLAN 4 (25% MIX) TYPICAL.BUILDING ELEVATIONS PLAN 5 (30% MIX) 1 STORY ELEMENT 1 STORY ELEMENT- STREET PROFILE MINIMUM" CRITERIA COMPLIANCE 171 VILLAGES D.E.F 1 STORY ELEMENT On • project baaia, thlrty-thraa parcant (311) of all unit! •hall hava • aingla story adga for forty parcant (40%) of tha pariitatar of tha building. For tha purpoaa of thia guidalina lha aingla atory adga ihall b< • ilnliua d«pth of thr«» t>«t (]') • Th« unit* qualifying undir the III (hall b« diatributad throughout tha projact. CONCLUSION! AS SHOWN IN THE DIAGRAMS BELOH. THO OF THE rOU* PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE TORT> PERCENT MINIMUM SIHCLE-STORI PERIMETER. THESE THO PLANS PROVIDE 4S% OF THE TOTAL MIS. THEREFORE, EXCEEDING THE )J« REQUIRED. PLAN 1 (15% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER =215 FT. 1 STORY = 215 FT. (100%) PLAN 2 (20% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 197 FT. 1 STORY = 49 FT. (24%) PLAN 3 (30% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 208 FT. 1 STORY = 112 FT. (54%) PLAN 4 (35% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 211 FT. 1 STORY = 65 FT. (31%) SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER VILLAGES Q,P On a project basis, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a single etory edge for forty percent (40%) of th« perimater of tha building. For the purpoaa of this guideline the single etory edge shall be a Mlnimm depth of three feet (V) . Tha units qualifying under the 13% shall be distributed throughout tha project. 1 STORY ELEMENT AS SHOHH IH Tilt DIAGRAMS BCLOH, TWO Or TtlC FtVE PLANS IH THIS PRODUCT tXCtED THE fORTt PEFCKHT MIHIHUM SIMSLl-STDRY PEKimm. THESE TWO PLANS PROVIDE 15« OT THE TOTAL KIX. THEREFOR!. EXCEEDIHC THE 13% REQUIRED. PLAN 1 ,(15« MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 206 FT. 1 STORY = 96 FT. (47%) PLAN 2 (20% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 230 FT. 1 STORY = 57 FT. (25%) PLAN 3 (30% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 220 FT. 1 STORY = 112 FT. (51%) PLAN 4 (35% MIX) TOTAL PERIMETER = 221 FT. 1 STORY = 25 FT. (11%) VILLAGES B,KJ,C SINGLE STORY BUILDING PERIMETER BUILDING PLANE AI328 SF|- B(227 SF)A(400 SF) 4(45 SF) 2(112 SF) BUILDING PLANE 1(119 5(31 SF) PLAN 1 (15% MIX) L 11.3(157 SF) ^ 6(30 .SF) ^ [L. • f\. -E(45 SF) //~B(620 SF) A(97 SF) \_C(63 SF)t SECOND FLOOR LINE 1 1 1 11 L. DJ(32 SF)V •P1 4"(B5 SF)->I 1-FIRST FLOOR 71 -| LINE .^6(56 SF) -* 1 5(57 SF i r— 1 mirsF)!/ < ^ rV.3133 SF) ->. i ~V~t2(117 SF) For at l*a*t 50% ot the unlti In • project, th«r* *h*ll b* itl***t thr** «*p*r*t* building plan** on *tr**t aid* *l«v>tlon> of lot* with 45 f««t of frontaq* or !*••, «nd four ••pkrtt* bulldinq plan» on >tr**t lid* •IcvitioM of lot* with • Irontaqa qr«>t«r than 45 fmt. Th« »lni»UB oCtmmt in pl*n*> •hall b* II Inch** and *h*ll ineluda but not b* Halted to buildinq wall*, window* and roof*. Th* Blnlxj* d*pth b«tv**n th* f*c*« of th* forv*rd-i*o*t pl*n* and th* r**r plan* on th* front *l*vation ihall b* 10 t**t and a plan* »u*t b* • •Iniau* of 10 *q. ft. to r*c*lv* cr*dlt under thl> **ctlon. R**r *l*v*tlon* *hall *dh*r* to th* •*•• criteria outlined innu*b*r 4 abov* for front *i*vatton* *icc*pt that th* •ini*UBd*pth b*tv**n front and back plan** on th* rear *l*vatlonahall b* 3 f**t. COHCUISIOMl nut or THE rotm PUMI m THIS nwoucr court* KITH «uiu>ina runCKITZIII* IK CU10EUKCS 4 »0 5. THEM nOUtl riAMS PltOVIDB 11% orTHI TOTHL MIX. THCMrOM IXCtCDINC THI 50* UQUIWD. SF) (20% MIX) 7(40 SF) C(161 SF) 5(46 SF) 1(62 SF) 2(115 SF) ,-5(40I '-, |4U£6_SP)-^J PLAN MIX) V-K116 SP) 2(172 PLAN 4 JSP)-(35% MIX) VILLAGES M.N.O BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA BUILDING PLANE Av "(248 SF)CU4 SF)/-CO* : CONCLUSION: THREE Of Tilt FOUR PUNS IN THIS PRODUCT COMPLY WITH BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA III GUIDELINES 4 AND 5. THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE «51 Of THE TOTAL HI*. THEREFORE EXCEEDING THE S0« REQUIRED. For at leaet 901 of the unit* In • project, there ahall b* it l*aat three aeparate building plane* on atr**t aid* *l*v*tlon* of lota with 4} fact of frontage or laaa, and four aeparate building plane* on atreet aid* *l«v*tlon* of lot* with a frontag* greater than 41 f**t. Th. alnimw offeet In plan** •hall b« II Inch** and ahall Includ* but not b* Halted to building wall*, window* and roofa. Th* »ini.u» dapth b*tw**n th* fac*a of th* (orvard-eoat plan* and th* r*ar plan* on th* front *l*vatlon ahall b* 10 f**t and a plan* »uat b* • •IniBUK of JO aq. ft. to r*c*iv* cr*dlt und*r thl* aectlon. -Rear *l*vatlon* ahall adhere to th* aa*a criteria outlined in nuab*r 4 abov* for front elevation* *xc*pt that th* BinlBUB depth b*tw**n front and back plan** on th* rear elevation ahall b* 3 feet. V-B<378 SF) X-FO8 SF) SF) /-CI419 SF) 4(54 SF) 2(202 SF) 3(54 SF) •LANE 1 86 SFX- -5(36 SF) PLAN 1 (15% MIX). 8(367 EI97 SF) 4(126 SF) X-CI147 SF) U" "~"i |p(102 SF)J 'T L SECOND FLOOR~Ll| /-AI42 SF) * FIRST FLOOR LINE "\},6(30 SF) 3(72 SF /~7(287 SFI 903 SFL/~ .1 lit ill U _/-"<"«> SF) ' 1 •E Mil '"X V.5I180 SF) ^-4(61 SF) SF) SF) SF) 1 /-DllBZ SFI 1 1 1 1 ]__. M(85 SF) / 2(202 SF)-/ PLAN 3 (30% MIX) SF) /-5I40 SF) 1 1 1 1 1 ~L.ci(60 SF) ! /"""7 ( 101 ,' V.4I10 V3U17 SF) SF) (149 2(202 - m SF) SFM PLAN 4 (35% MIX) BUILDING PLANE.CRITERIA 1 VILLAGES H,G ror »t i**at sot of th* unit* In • project, th*r* ah*ll b* at laa«t three *aparato bulldlnq pian*a on etre*t *ld* *l*v*tlon* of lot* with 45 f**t of front«q* or 1***, end four **par*t* building plan** on *tr**t «ld* elevation* of lot. with • frontage greater than 45 fMt. Th« •InlBtm off»t in plan** •hall b* II inch« and (hall Includ* but not b* Halted to building walla, vindov* and roof*. Th« BinlBu* dapth batw*«n th* facaa of th* forward-Boat plana and th* raar plan* on tha front *l*v*tlon 'ahall b* 10 f**t and a plan* Buat b* a •lnl*u» ot JO *<t. ft. to r*e*iv* credit under thl* **ctlon. _R**r *l*vatlona *h*ll adh*r* to th* ••»• criteria outlined In number 4 above (or front *l«atlona axcapt U»t th* •inlmui depth b*tw**n front and back plan** on th* rear *l*vation •hall b* J (**t. COHCUISION: THREE Of THE FIVE PLMI9 IM THIS MIODUCT COMPLY HITH tUILOlMa HJOI* CRITERIA IN'CUIDELIMES 4 AMD 5. THISC THREE PUWS PROVIDI 70t HI THE TOTAL MIX. THE*EroaE EXCEEDING THE 10% REQUIRED. 6(255 SF) SF) PLAN 1 (10% MIX) '8(131 SF) AU98 SF) V.6O2 SF) 2(200 SF|- PLAN 2 (15% MIX) 81, M72 SF)-\C(121 SF) 0(204 SF) V-7139 SF) SECOND FLOOR LINE /-C(120 SF) FIRST FLOOR LINE OOR r-l ~"\ A3II30I SF) r-r^ 1—4 . 4(40 SF) SF) I | 8(66 SF) LCl!!r bf l-sSFJ.A V-K36 SF) 2(165 SF) PLAN 3 (20% MIX) V4I131 SF) f ^ 63 SF) / 143 SFl> d V.,, 4 PLAN 4 (25% MIX) 1(632(143 PLAN 5 (30% MIX) 4I35SF) SF)17* VILLAGES D.E.F J BUILDING PLANE CRITERIA At l«a«t SOI of th« unit* in A pro)«ct ah«ll hav« one cltf* • l«v»tlon wh*r« th«r« «r« iu(rici«nt o(f»t« or cutout* that th* Bid* ykrd ••tback «v«rA9*« « viniBUM of 7 C««t. CONCLUSION: THREE OF THE FOUR PLANS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED TIIZ 7 FT. AVCRAGI SIDEIARO StTBUCK REQUIREMENT. THESE THREE PLANS PROVIDE 15% Or THE TOTAL MIX, THEREFORE, EXCEEDING THE 50% REQUIRED. 5.8 FT.. AVERAGE 9.0 FT. AVERAGE 10.0 FT. AVERAGE 8.2 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 1 (15%. MIX) 387 SF. r 66 FT. 5.8 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 2 (20% MIX) 535 SF. '- 59 FT. = 9.0 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 3 (30% MIX) 632 SF. 7 63 FT. 10.0 FT. AVERAGE 1 ft. in VO r1 I t 1 • ~ ^///) c; ^-'•i "/ r I ''. PLAN 4 (35% MIX) 538 SF. f 65 FT. = 8.2 FT. AVERAGE SIDEYARD SEIBACHLCRITERIA VILLAGES Q,P MUDD1S At least 501 of the units in A project shall hsvs on* side elevation where there srs sufficient offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a sinlmm of 7 feet. CONCLUSION: M.I. FOUR FLAMS IN THIS PRODUCT EXCEED THE 7 FT. AVenAGIS SIDMARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT. 16.7 FT.AVERAGE 12.3 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 1 (15% MIX) 666 SF. 7 54 FT. = 12.3 FT.AVERAGE PLAN 2 (20% MIX) 1072 SF. T 64 FT. = 16.7 FT.AVERAGE 10.4 FT. AVERAGE 13.9 FT.AVERAGE PLAN 3 (30* MIX) 617 SF. 7 59 FT. 10.4 FT. AVERAGE PLAN 4 (35% MIX) 839 SF. T 60 FT. 13.9 FT.AVERAGE SIDEYARD SETBACK.CRITERIA PMIO VILLAGES B,K,I,C Projects with An avaraqa lot Bit* of 5,000 sq. ft. or lass shall ll«it th« nuabar of units with tht«« car qaragas to 75% of th« plans In tha projact. Project units with thraa car garaqas shall ba a mix of two door garages, threa door garages, and offsat (2 planas min. 12") two door qaraq**. CONCLUSION: IN VILLAGES M.H.O TIIC AVERAGE LOT SIZES ARE 1471 ST.. 7264 ST.. AND 7460 SF. RESPECTIVELY. ,1M THAT THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE 5OOO SP. AVERAGE LOT CRITERIA, CUIDELIHK 7 IS HOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE HOTI HOWEVER, THAT PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT VARIETY AMD THEREFOPE DOES COMPLY WITH GUIDELINE I. r £ (N PLAN 1 (15% MIX) (1 ) 2 CAR DOOR PLAN 2 (20% MIX) (.3) 1 CAR DOORS PLAN 3 (30% MIX) (1)2 CAR DOOR AND (1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR PLAN 4 (35% MIX) (1) 2 CAR DOOR AND (1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA VILLAGES M.N.O AVERAGE LOT SIZE VILLAGE M - 1.472 ST. H - 7,2(4 Sr.o - 7,4«t sr. CONCUISIOM: IN VILLAGES H,G THE AVERAGE LOT SUES ARE 7(13 St. AMD •«!• ST. RESPECTIVELY. IH THAT THIS AREA EXCEEDS THE JOOO Sf. AVERACE LOT CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS HOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE NOTE HOWEVER, THAT PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT VARIETY AND THEREFORE DOESCOMPLY KITH GUIDELINE 7, z hH£ 1 PLAN 1 (15% MIX) 3 RECESSBD SINGLE DOORS PLAN 2 (20% MIX) 2 CAR DOOR AND (1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR PLAN 3 .( 30% MIX) RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR AND 1 CAR DOOR •I—i 1 l-t PLAN 4 (35% MIX) 3 RECESSED SINGLE DOORS GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA. 1 VILLAGES H,G AVERAGE LOT Silt Project* with an avaraga lot aiza of 9,000 aq. ft. or laaa •hall Halt tha mmbar of unlta with thraa car garagaa to 75% of tha plana in tha projact. Projact unlta with thraa car garagea ahall ba a nix of two door garagaa, thraa door garagaa, and offaat (2 planaa min. 12") two door garagaa. CONCLUSION: IN VILLAGES D.t.r THE AVERAGE LOT SIZES ARE 10. •«! ST., II. 001 ST.. AND 11,747 SF. RESPECTIVELY. IN THAT THIS Wit A EXCEEDS THE 5000 SF. AVERAGE LOT CRITERIA, GUIDELINE 7 IS NOT APPLICABLE. PLEASE NOTE HOWEVER, THAT PRODUCT 1 DOES PROVIDE GARAGE FRONT «RIET» AND THEREFORE DOES COMPLY WITH GUIDELINE 7. PLAN 1 (10% MIX) RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR AND OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR PLAN 2 (15% MIX) 3 RECESSED SINGLE DOORS -. 1 PLAN 3 (20% MIX) RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR AND 1 CAR DOOR PLAN 4 (25% MIX) RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR AND OFFSET 2 CAR DOOR PLAN 5 (30% MIX) RECESSED 2 CAR DOOR. 1 CAR DOOR AND (1) OFFSET 1 CAR DOOR GARAGE FRONT CRITERIA VILLAGES D.E.F. AVERAGE LOT SHE VILLAGE D - 10.H« SF. E - 11.001 SF. F - 11,747 SF.