Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 00-16; Poinsettia Properties PA 2, 3, & 4; Tentative Map (CT)PROJECT NAME: •CAZL&&A&OO- /6, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Sufi PROJECT ADDRESS: LOT NO(S).: / -Z-5<9 NUMBER OF LOTS: 2^ MAP NO.APN(S).: NUMBER OF ACRES: 27O OWNER: Mailing Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: I certify that I am the legal owner and that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature:Date: APPLICANT: Mailing Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: Signature:Date: CIVIL ENGINEER: FIRM: P/g.O-5erc.r pcr CL. DLClc.SOILS ENGINEER: FIRM: Mailing Address: J.QL & Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: State Registration Number: L 5 52? 6 BILL Mailing Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: State Registration Number: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: IMPROVEMENT VALUATION i. What water district is the proposed project located in? (check one) Qcarlsbad Municipal Water District Qdlivenhain Qvallecitos 2. If in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, what is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements, sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal Water District only), street, public (median) landscape and irrigation, and drainage improvements (if applicable)? $_ cut .cy GRADING QUANTITIES . cy remedial cy import.export..cy SEE REVERSE SIDE H:/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Application for Engineering Plan Check [] Adjustment Plat (ADJ) £] Certificate of Compliance (CE) Dedication of Easement (PR) Type: Type: Type: [] Encorachment Permit (PR) Q Final Map (FM) [] Grading Plancheck (DWG) [~] Improvement Plancheck (DWG) [] Parcel Map (PM) D Quitclaim of Easement (PR) Type: Type: Type: Reversion to Acreage (RA) [] Street Vacation (SW) Q Tentative Parcel Map (MS) Certificate of Correction (CCOR) Covenant of Easement (PR) Substantial Conformance Exhibit (SCE) Other APPLICATION ACCEPTED RBCETVEB DEC £22005 DEPARTMENT DATE STAMPAPPLICATON RECEIVED u./nc\/ci notJCMT OCD\/ll~CC«J»CTCDQI4r,r>lir-o«nn fnr Cnninoorinn Plan Chork Pane 7 Revised 1/14/02 C^K OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPA^MENT ^-/ APPLICATION ^ ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. PROJECT NAME: \Kkxkv ' S £wA DATE: 1 4|o^? PROJECT DESCRIPTION: [\)0-Kv'S t5^H ?YV)1 Quvuk- pDViA^tho. UJLIAJB : t \ of P o { /XVfyM-t dft £\A 6 1 <A <vj1 1 i PROJECT ADDRESS: LOTNO(S).: 2-60 MAP NO.: |44o"l APN(S).: NUMBER OF LOTS: | NUMBER OF ACRES: OWNER: sJokviA- U^U^A H^YWjlJ Mailing Address: 1^\'|1 PfiLlOYVwA CtUtSUM Phone Number: ~l U 0 ' 4-4- £ - 3^ tl Fax Number: ~1 IpO ' 44^ 4^1 1 7 E-Mail: iA CL CUtW a) y>k(A lAWM I certify that I am the legal owner and that altthe aoove fjjy^ information is |rue and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature: f\/(A^/JL^U^. Date: l/3//0$=> — / ' — CIVIL ENGINEER: £^^"9^^ FIRM: PfOW L\ tk-Sv<r\V\ C^VtSalWxfe Mailing Addr^s: ""|O\ ^ ^\^-€Ju\ £ (M bt gO 0 6<5MA Oic^ ,CA Phone Number: (i W' P-^)^>- UA""! \ ^U Fax Number: (j t (\- '3-'b A - Q2)%*\ E-Mail: C\V^Aa)pYroW-^C^^c)v».t»^ State Registration Number: K.C e • 42^ fy\ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: APPLICANT: ^X^wU. Mailing Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-Mail: Signature: Date: SOILS ENGINEER: T\ W\ LiVXlS^^ FIRM: U^MjOStFVA fytO\tt,(s\W C%J Mailing Address: ^l ^\ ^AtlC ^V^U^^At" l6>OtM C^t4VUU/tt i 6(/t ^ ^ Phone Number: ^ ^-^- 3U ^ - C< t ^ 1 Fax Number: ^[*\^^ -^ ^ " ^ ^ "^ E-Mail: 4" ^fiuM*>0VlA) 1 ^1 CfttO- MW State Registration Number: I^C^ ^ £b^7>??^ RECEIVRn SEP 1 4 20ut) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IMPROVEME i. What water district is the proposed project located in? (ch Qcarlsbad Municipal Water District £ 2. If in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, what is ttie tota contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water impro Water District only), street, public (median) landsc; (if applicable)? NT VALUATION eck one) loiivenhain [~|vallecitos 1 cost estimate, including the 15% vements, sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal ipe and irrigation, and drainage improvements $ GRADING QUANTITIES cut cy fill cy remedial cy import cy export cy SEE REVERSE SIDE HVOEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Application lor Engineering Plan Check Revised 1/14/02 CrpQF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPAJWENT ^ APPUCATJON ',,'-• ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. APPLICATION FOR ( ^ all that apply) [] Adjustment Plat (ADJ) [] Certificate of Compliance (CE) Quedication of Easement (PR) Type\ ^&~**~r*jt tjH~VWVx£Type: r- Type: [] Encorachment Permit (PR) [] Final Map (FM) [] Grading Plancheck (DWG) [] Improvement Plancheck (DWG) [] Parcel Map (PM) [] Quitclaim of Easement (PR) Type: Type: Type: [] Reversion to Acreage (RA) [] Street Vacation (STV) [] Tentative Parcel Map (MS) [] Certificate of Correction (CCOR) [] Covenant of Easement (PR) Q Substantial Conformance Exhibit (SCE) [] Other FOR CITY USE ONLY PROJECT I.D. C$~0o^/ fc DRAWING NUMBER HiOS'-W DEPOSIT/FEES PAID /Y^00- COMMENTS APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY JA*J 3 1 D6PARTMENT DATE STAMPAPPLJCATON RECEIVED Cr0*-S)F CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPAPQENT *** APPLICATION ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. PROJECT NAME: \f\J(XW 5 6wA DATE: (\ V*\\fr PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C"T- 00\U \H "VVv-e Cx^xi o^- CtM/\sk>^4 PROJECT ADDRESS: UoY ^Wl 04- V\)(LVcrvs &A-<\ LOTNO(S).: I/IA- MAP NO.: \AOVO APN(S).: NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 NUMBER OF ACRES: £ . 0 1 OWNER: (NftVtv '> t=W<A ftoA Mailing Address: 'M^ QjAb\ ^ $tf(l.\ S>UUti ^?00 'S&flVft ^Ui CA^ Phone Number: ^4"^ """Z^^" T/k'l^L Fax Number: E-Mail : \M| \V\ft.lAAT.flU 1/AlASD Ati H£ • C^W I certify that I am the legal owner and that aU^B above information is true a^cS^5stJ^^^^^ny knowledge. CIVIL ENGINEER: C^^ '^ud^-S FIRM: Pv^OVCCAi C^b^vv ^?i?v\SU_lV£!t.^t5 Mailing Address: ~7oi B^-V^^t SvA^ CL &OQ ^>c^y\ 0\ C«\* , CA Phone Number: U> |^-<3.^6- U^TI 'li!0! Fax Number: C#i ^-^2 5^v - 0^4^ E-Mail: fllf€4->DYVovecV A^Si«\h-C€^ State Registration Number: K.C6; ^VZ^\^» ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: APPLICANT: CTohw UXvr\c\ VVxrVVU^ Mailing Address: lcl\"1 V^xVo-vwaJV 0<xWs \AJ<W 0^7 ^^jbo. C&Msfe'tf.A. eft ^^cj Phone Number: "l^o -<V\^> 3^oC Fax Number: 1k>0 -^4^'^OlVl E-Mail: YVaatvm £>(^K\a4Hftb0YH<: SOILS ENGINEER: Jj'yM 1 JHA)^<m FIRM: UtUx)5cv> 4eok.cU^\\ e^iJ Mailing Address: ^25|A^.II6 (\)J(Al/\Uidp GA-IA C\cwic\A&tCb qwz Phone Number: ^(4*\~"*)b4~'[ffl4>\ Fax Number: °^^\0( ~ %>te^ - (f\4-"2- E-Mail: ^\£UA)StfYYft) 1 <\(J\CO- OJVH State Registration Number: RC6 * ^^^XlT IMPROVEMENT VALUATION i. What water district is the proposed project located in? (check one) [^Carlsbad Municipal Water District Qoiivenhain Qvallecitos 2. If in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, what is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements, sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal Water District only), street, public (median) landscape and irrigation, and drainage improvements (if applicable)? $ GRADING QUANTITIES cut cy fill cy remedial cy import cy export cy SEE REVERSE SIDE tt/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/MASTERS/Application for Engineering Plan Check Revised 1/14/02 CITY/"^ CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPARKNT ^ APPLICATION ^ ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. APPLICATION FOR ( ^ all that apply) [] Adjustment Plat (ADJ) [] Certificate of Compliance (CE) Q] Dedication of Easement (PR) Type: Type: Type: [] Encorachment Permit (PR) [] Final Map (FM) [] Grading Plancheck (DWG) £] Improvement Plancheck (DWG) [] Parcel Map (PM) Q Quitclaim of Easement (PR) Type:f£AKJT Type: Type: [] Reversion to Acreage (RA) [] Street Vacation (STV) [] Tentative Parcel Map (MS) [] Certificate of Correction (CCOR) [] Covenant of Easement (PR) [] Substantial Conformance Exhibit (SCE) [] Other FOR CITY USE ONLY PROJECT I.D. e~ix>i(, DRAWING NUMBER PK0WUi DEPOSH/FEES PAID j 44^'v COMMENTS •»• RECEIVED DEC 0 1 2004 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE STAMP APPLICATON RECEIVED H-/DFVH OPMFNT RFRVir.FS/MASTFRR/Annliralion for Enoineerino Plan Check Pane 2 Revised 1/14/02 CITY OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK OR PROCESSING Complete all appropriate information. Write N/A when not applicable. PROJECT NAME: Waters End DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: . Of f site drainage- easement over .the San Diego Northern Railroad Riqht-of-Way PROJECT ADDRESS:. Located north of Poinsettia Lane and west of Avenida Encinas LOT NO(S).: .. . . MAP NO.: • - - APN(S).: 214-150-12 ' # LOTS:NO. OF DWELLING UNITS:LFMP ZONE:# ACRES: OWNER: : Mailing Address: c/o 895 Dove Street, #110 TJ^tjp-rrt- Bp»ar;hr f!A 92660 Phone Number: (949 )265-6854 ' I certify that I am the legal owner and that all the above information is true\bnd correct to the best of my knowledge Signature My——— Datef APPLICANT: ViLEfcms, Enc-.d/tvlaJcta laiig Itnes Mailing Address: 895 Dove Street, #110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone Number: (949 ) 265-6854 / ; Signature Date CIVIL ENGINEER: Greg Shields Firm:ProiectDesign Consultants Mailing Address: 7m -TV st.rPP.t.. #800. SOILS ENGINEER: Firm: Mailing Address: San Dieao. CA 92101 Phone Number ( 619 ) 265-6471 Phone Number: ( ) State Registration Number: RCE 42951 State Registration Number: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: Firm: Mailing Address: "-" ' ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Phone Number: ( State Registration Number: IMPROVEMENT VALUATION-i- 1. What water district is the proposed project located in (circle one)? Carlsbad Municipal Water District \ Olivenhain. : - Vailecitos- 2. If in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,* what is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements (if applicable)? 3. What is the total cost estimate; including the 15% contingency fee, for sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal Water District only), street^ public (median) landscape and irrigation, and drainage improvements (if applicable)? 4. What is the total cost of landscape and Irrigation improvements on private property (if applicable)? " ' r; - - cut fill GRADING QUANTITIES cy remedial _cy import/export cy CT Q.D: \LP APPLICATION FOR; ., (/ all that apply) P Adjustment Plat Q jBellificate of Compliance /Q Dedication of Easement Type: Type: Q Encroachment Permit P Engineering Standards Variance Q Final Map Q Grading Plancheck Q Grading Q Improvement Plancheck P Landscape Plancheck P Parcel Map • .. - Q Quitclaim of Easement Typer Type: Q Reversion to Acreage Q Street Vacation P" Tentative Parcel" Map . . , Q Certificate of Correction Q Covenant for Easement .,. P Substantial Conformance.Exhibit APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: -.-.,, ., / FOR CITY USE ONLY Plancheck . Number P/?e1'- /O— - -. -..•"•'• ' :;Type ADJP COC ' DOE . •--• - ENCROACH ESV FM GRPC GRADING IPC LPC PM i QUITC RTA STV . ..; MS • . CCOR - COVE . SCE i ' * " * MASTER-PROJECT ID:- -^~4 & T -7 /- T' ii . . .... . . „., .. , v - - ',,•_ -. RECEIPT NUMBER: ,.....: . " >, J' PRELIMINARY SIERRA SYSTEM INPUT INITIAL: SIERRA SYSTEM INPUT INITIAL: ••"'•• - • R:BASE INPUT INITIAL:' / ''*'"' MASTER FILE NUMBER: F ., .-.iiv;-,-:;: . •-."' Q OTHER: .. .;. - .-.--...•.-. v-- .--••—••"• ••• - :-<--•"- --':--='-- •••••-••-•- >• Drawing •;, Number • . - • -..-•-- f: 1 •f 'J i\* &d$ Project I.D. C/-^'\\J ._. .. • _ . , Deposit/Fees Paid " ;= ' ••'-: V^o . < •;•'•- ' L • •-••si'- ----- I-.' • • -••• 1 • -..-• ••• •; f::-:-;" ..'•' :• . , ; .. - . i .1 • f~ - i .-:•>,., ;:^-^: - •-' . •t^^^l^-^ - DATESTAMPV1 _ APPLICAfiON RECEIVED CITY C•- CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPAP***V1ENT APPLICATION FOR ENGINEERING PLAN CHECK OR PROCESSING Complete all appropriate information._.VVnte-N/A when not applicable. PROJECT NAME: Waters End DATE: 09/10/01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 219-unit single-family subdivision in'Carlsbad, CA. PROJECT ADDRESS:i_ocated north of Poinsettia Lane and west of AveriTda Encinas. LOT NO(S).: 1.2.3 MAP NO.: 13785 ..__ APN(S).: 214-450-26.27.28 NO. OF DWELLING UNITS: 219 LFMPZONE: 22 #LOTS: 250 # ACRES: 41.6 OWNER:OBSLP CARLSBAD LLC Mailing Address: c/o 895 Dove .Street., #110 Newport Beach. CA 92660 Phone Number: (949 ) 265-6854 certify that I am the legal owner and that all the above information i%&U@ and^rrect to the best of my knowledge Signature ^S^ J^AV*^^ Date c\\\'b\Q\ APPLICANT: ML Homes.. LL£.. ..•-.." " Mailing Address: 895 Dove . . .-.. Jofin Laing, HDove Street, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone Number: ( 949 ) • 265-6854 Signature Date CIVIL ENGINEER: Greg Shields Firm: ProjectDesicm Consultants Mailing Address: 701 B Street v #800 • San Diego. CA 92101 Phone Number: ( 619) 235-6471 David F. LeakeSOILS ENGINEER: Firrn: _geocon Mailing Address: 6960 Flanders Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Phone Number (858 ) 558-6900 State Registration Number. RCE 42951 State Registration Number:' 22527. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: IMPROVEMENT VALUATION 1. What water district is the proposed project located in? (circle one) Carlsbad Municipal Water District^) Olivenhain Vallecitos 2. If in the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, what is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for water and reclaimed water improvements (if applicable)? 3. What is the total cost estimate, including the 15% contingency fee, for sewer (for Carlsbad Municipal Water District only), street, public (median) landscape and irrigation, and drainage improvements (if applicable)? 4. What is the total cost of landscape and irrigation improvements on private property (if applicable)? $ S 1,6,24.370 $ cut GRADING QUANTITIES cy remedial import/export cy H:WORWOOCS'MISFORMS'APPLICAT10N SN6 PLANCH6CK OR PROCESSING t-oo/200® SNOO Noisaa xoaroaT CO- ( 6T9 XVd TO/TT/60 PROJECT MAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION REVIEW COMPLETION The following project maps have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: WATERS END Project No.:CTOO-16 Dwg No.:FM 00-16 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION FOR LOT CORNERS. DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the review of this project as defined in Section 8703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the documents are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Plan review of these project easements does not relieve the Land Surveyor or Engineer of Work of the responsibilities with state and local ordinances. Signed Helming Engineering Co., Inc. 1650 Linda Vista Drive, Suite 202 San Marcos, CA 92078 (760) 744-9801 Date Douglas L. Helming, RCE 23874 Expiration Date 12/31/07 PROJECT MAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION REVIEW COMPLETION The following project maps have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: WATERS END Project No.: CT 00-16 Dwg No.: FM 00-001603 CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION FOR LOT CORNERS. DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the review of this project as defined in Section 8703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the documents are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Plan review of these project easements does not relieve the Land Surveyor or Engineer of Work of the responsibilities with state and local ordinances. Helming Engineering Co., Inc. 1650 Linda Vista Drive, Suite 202 San Marcos, CA 92078 (760) 744-9801 •••' >'>' r •// // ' / 1Signed .i / frUAfc'&? O^ . NOJ/W^f Date 4? ~c^ - Douglas L. Helming, RCE 23874 Expiration Date 12/31/07 PROJECT PLAN REVISION REVIEW COMPLETION The following project plan revisions have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: Project No.: Dwg.. No.: Sheet No's.: WATERS END CTOO-16 396-7 1, 31, 32 & 33 Total Sheet = 4 DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the plan review of this project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the plans are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Plan review of these project drawings does not relieve the Engineer of Work of the responsibilities with state and local ordinances. Signed Helming Engineering Co., Inc. 1650 Linda Vista Drive, Suite 202 San Marcos, CA 92078 (760)744-9801 Date Douglas L. Helming, RCE 23874 Expiration Date 12/31/05 ^ESS/CV^s7^^0V.f\mf^m<-!> //"?> «r>\\ m \\ -r NO. 23*74 I* | II tX?.iZ-ol- // // ^V-vr ///W > V^(; x^/^//Vv /yv ^--s=rS>-^ ^ Cl // ^^^^^CF Q^ PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETION EASEMENT and COVENANT FOR EASEMENT The following project maps have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: Project No.: Easement No.: 2-'/ 3 CT 00- -JO Sheets No.: Legal Description,sheet(s) (Exhibit "A) & Plat, ^sheet(s) (Exhibit "B") DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the easement review of this project as defined in Section 8703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the easements are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Review of these project easements does not relieve the Land Surveyor or Engineer of Work of the responsibilities with state and local ordinances. Signed Helming Engineering Co., Inc. 200 E. Washington Ave., Suite 221 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 233-4900 Date Douglas L. Helming, RCE 23874 Expiration Date 12/31/05 cr V,rf PROJECT MAP REVIEW COMPLETION The following project maps have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: Project No.: CST r*S-eiT7fl P»eop. ; fj\ Z-> "5 4 H- Map No.: FM QQ ~ Sheets No . : _ I _ through DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the map review of this project as defined in Section 8703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the maps are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Map review of these project maps does not relieve the Land Surveyor or Engineer of Work of the responsibilities with state and local ordinances. Helming Engineering Co., Inc. 200 E. Washington Ave., Suite 221 Escondido, CA 92025 (760)233-4900 Signed Date Douglas L. Helming, RCE 23874 Expiration Date 12/31/05 PROJECT PLAN REVIEW COMPLETION The following project plan have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: JfrtKSETTM *Px.Qf>€XTltt , I A 2, 5 r <*/- Project No.: C / QQ- Dwg. No.: J°l 6 ~ 7 A Sheets No.:1 through DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the plan review of this project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the plans are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Plan review of these project drawings does not relieve the Engineer of Work of the responsibilities with state and local ordinances. Signed Helming Engineering Co., Inc. 200 E. Washington Ave., Suite 221 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 233-4900 Douglas L. Helming, RCE 23874 Expiration Date 12/31/05 /**, PROJECT PLAN REVIEW COMPLETION The following project plan have been reviewed and are recommended for approval: Project Name: 1*6//J SB7TW /^Qf^T? F S , pfl £, 5 Project No.: C 7 Dwg. No.: 3 \(p 7 Sheets No.:I through J?y DECLARATION OF RESPONSIBLE CHARGE I hereby declare that I have exercised responsible charge over the plan review of this project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code to determine that the plans are found to be in substantial compliance with applicable codes and standards. Plan review of these project drawings does not relieve the Engineer of Work of the responsibilities with state and local ordinances. Helming Engineering Co., Inc. 200 E. Washington Ave., Suite 221 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 233-4900 Signed Date Douglas L. Helming, RCE 23874 Expiration Date 12/31/05 £> 2 - ( NCTD June 28, 2002 John Maashoff City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: John Laing Homes: Storm Sewer License Dear Mr. Maashoff: Enclosed is the License Agreement signed by Marty Minkoff on behalf of NCTD. Please call me at (760) 966-6538 with any comments or questions. Sincerely, Cunningham anager of Real Estate Enclosure cc: John Mecklenburg, w/enclosure NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 810 Mission Avenue, Oceonside, CA 92054-2825 760-967-2828 r "CEIVED APR 012002 For pick-up March 27, 2002 John Maashoff City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: John Laing Homes: Storm Sewer License Dear Mr. Maashoff: Enclosed is the License Agreement for the 60-inch storm sewer crossing the NCTD right-of-way proposed by John Laing Homes for their Poinsettia Planning Area 2, 3, and 4 project. Please have the License signed by the City of Carlsbad and return the signed document to me so that I may get Board approval and obtain the signature of Mr. Minkoff Note that 1 will need to substitute a final signed version of the plat and legal as exhibits. Please call me at (760) 966-6538 with any comments or questions. Sincerely, fim Cunningham ianager of Real Estate Enclosure cc: Leland C. Ayers, w/enclosure NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, CA 92054-2825 760-967-2828 T D RECEIVED OCT 16 2001 October 15, 2001 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Mr. John Maashoff City of Carlsbad 1653 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Poinsettia Properties Planning Areas 2, 3, & 4 Dear Mr. Maashoff, Thank you for the opportunity to review the development plans for the proposed residential development located on the northwest corner of Avenida Encinas and Poinsettia Lane in Carlsbad. North County Transit District (NCTD) has reviewed the above referenced project several times since December of 2000, and would like to reiterate the following comments: Existing Bus Service NCTD currently operates two bus routes along Avenida Encinas that serves the area proposed for development. Route 344 provides 60-minute service seven days a week. This route is a regional service between Carlsbad Poinsettia Station and Palomar College in San Marcos. It operates in a one-way loop to serve Poinsettia Station (south on Avenida Encinas, west on Poinsettia Lane, and north on Carlsbad Boulevard), and then operates bi-directionally along Palomar Airport Road, San Marcos Boulevard, Las Posas Road, and Mission Avenue. Key destinations along this route included Poinsettia Station, Legoland, the Carlsbad Business Parks, San Marcos High School, and Palomar College. Route 321 provides 40-minute along Avenida Encinas, Monday through Saturday only. This route is a community circulator that connects various locations in Carlsbad, including Plaza Camino Real, Carlsbad Village, Carlsbad Village Station, the Carlsbad Senior Center (on Harding Street), Car Country Carlsbad, the Carlsbad Company Stores, the Flower Fields, Spinnaker Hills, Lakeshore Garden Mobile Home Park, and Carlsbad Poinsettia Station. Future Bus Service NCTD is currently restructuring bus routes for the North County region. As part of our Fast Forward Service Plan, we will update our current bus routes in order to provide simpler and faster service to the community. The goal is to increase ridership by providing more convenient services. With the implementation of the second phase of Fast Forward in August of 2002, our new route 321 will operate on Avenida Encinas, six days a week. This new route will provide a NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 810 Mission Avenue, Oceonside, CA 92054-2825 760-967-2828 H-e-O-,-1 ">(l7/« I Mr. John Maashoff October 15, 2001 Page 2 direct connection between Carlsbad Village Station, Carlsbad Poinsettia Station, and Encinitas Station. This new route 321 will operate every 60 minutes, Monday through Saturday. Requested Bus Stop Improvement Locations After reviewing the application, we request the following infrastructure improvements for this development project: • Sidewalks Being able to access transit stops by foot is one of the major factors in determining if someone will ride transit or not. Knowing this, it is important that the developer provide sidewalks to allow pedestrians to freely access transit stops from this new development. NCTD understands that the developer will widen Avenida Encinas and construct sidewalks along the west side of the street as part of this project. Thus, we would like to ensure that all sidewalks for this development at least 5'-0" in depth, on the interior of the project as well as along Avenida Encinas to ensure this pedestrian friendly access. NCTD currently has three bus stops along the east side of Avenida Encinas that are across from this development. On the west side of Avenida Encinas, NCTD only has one existing bus stop, opposite Raintree Drive, because a chain-link fence abutting the street does not allow passengers a safe place to wait for the bus. And even the bus stop across from Raintree Drive is currently substandard due to the lack of any existing sidewalks on the west side of the street. • Bus Stop Improvements As previously mentioned, the closest bus stop is currently located on the west side of Avenida Encinas, opposite Raintree Drive. When the proposed Street "C" is built, NCTD would request that this above-mentioned bus stop be relocated approximately 65 feet south of this newly built intersection on the west side of Avenida Encinas (near lot #13). Due to the increased number of transit passengers that are associated with this type of development, we would like to see this bus stop improved to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and NCTD standards. Improvements should include a bench, bus shelter, trash receptacle and a lO'-O" deep from face of curb by 15'-0" boarding pad that meets ADA standards. The maintenance of this facility should be the responsibility of the applicant. NCTD also requests that improvements be made for a new bus stop approximately 65 feet south of Embarcadero Way, on the west side of Avenida Encinas (near lot #241). For similar reasons noted for the previous bus stop, NCTD also requests a bench, bus shelter, trash receptacle and a lO'-O" deep from face of curb by 15'-0" boarding pad that meets ADA standards at this location. The maintenance of this facility should also be the responsibility of the applicant. Both of these bus stops loading zones should include at least 80 feet of red curb (65 feet before the stop and 15 feet after) to ensure that buses can safely pull into and out of the bus stop loading zones. Mr. John Maashoff October 15, 2001 PageS Infrastructure Dimensions • Accessible Bus Stop Pads Dimensions for our shelter stop have been included as a part of this package. The new bus stops must contain an accessible bus pad as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as well as additional concrete area for the installation of a bench and/or passenger shelter. • Passenger shelter and bus bench We recommend a 13-foot Tolar non-advertising shelter with a dome roof (model number 13NALD-GL), and a Wabash Valley metal bench (model number P521). If the requested bus stop location is not currently lit (i.e. located under or near a streetlight) we would also request that a solar panel be installed on the bus shelter to light the structure at night. I have enclosed additional information regarding the bus shelters and benches we would like the developer to use. When it is time to install the shelters and benches, please contact me so our transportation services staff can review the siting and installation of the bus facilities. Once again, all bus stop facilities (i.e. benches, shelters) will be purchased, installed and maintained by the developer. The developer shall also be responsible for the general upkeep of the stop itself. NCTD will be responsible for the installation and maintenance of all bus stop signage. Thank you again for the opportunity to review the plans for this project. If you have any questions regarding my comments, please contact me at (760) 966-6546 or email me at kluhrsen@nctd.org. Sincerely, Kurt F. Luhrsen Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Tim Eisenhower, Project Design Consultants Jim Cunningham, NCTD Real Estate NCTD Shelter Stop Dimensions Trash Receptacle J L 8 feet if Bus Stop Pad O JM*MM*rMMt.**MM*l Passenger Shelter / O Sidewalk T 6 feet i t | Assumes 5 feet JL Bus Stop Sign The shelter specification should be used when the number of boardings in the area are greater than 25 passengers per hour. This stop incorporates all features of the bench stop and provides additional concrete for the installation of a passenger shelter. We prefer a Tolar dome roof bus shelter (Model 13NALD-GL) featuring: Bronze tint Lexan Thermoclear roof panels, solar lighting in roof, perforated metal panels at the rear and 1/2 end walls - held in place with stainless steel support assemblies which anchor to the concrete, durable baked powder coat finish color (RAL5005 - royal blue), four adjustable leveling shoes and all installation hardware. An end wall map case/schedule holder should be installed and should be powder coated to match the shelter. A Wabash Valley bench (Model P2516) in the diamond and welded wire should also be installed so that it is enclosed by the passenger shelter. The shelter, bench and wall map case should be royal blue in color. PRESTIGE/PROFILE SERIES P3001 W/SMPC2 (sold separately) BENCHES — DIAMOND AND WELDED WIRE The Prestige/Profile Series offers two styles of benches: the split back and seat displayed above, and the contour bench shown on pages 46-49. The split back and seat bench is available in four different metal patterns. Above we show the diamond and welded wire patterns. The rib and weave patterns are shown on page 45. The seats and backs are 12" wide to provide plenty of relaxation. It can be ordered with or without a back, and with mounting choices of portable, inground or surface mount (portable option is only available for benches with backs). As an optional feature, we are offering the use of mounting plate covers. These are sold separately and are used only with the surface mount and inground leg models. Model Description Wgt.Price Diamond Pattern P2515 6'Bench w/back - Portable 122 Ibs. $260.00 P2516 6' Bench w/back - Inground*116 Ibs. P2520 8' Bench w/back - Portable 151 Ibs. P2521 8' Bench w/back - Inground"144 Ibs. P2522 8' Bench w/back - Surface Mount" 136 Ibs. P2525 6' Bench w/o back - Inground*62 Ibs. P2530 8' Bench w/o back - Inground*76 Ibs. P2531 8' Bench w/o back - Surface Mount* 73 Ibs. 260.00 P2517 6'Bench w/back-Surface Mount* 108 Ibs. 260.00 303.00 303.00 303.00 175.00 P2526 6'Bench w/o back - Surface Mount* 59 Ibs. 175.00 205.00 205.00 SMPC2 Sm. Mounting Plate Covers (Set of 2) 11b. 12.00 * Surface mount and inground legs must be adequately anchored. Model Description Wgt.Price Welded Wire Pattern P3000 P3001 P3002 P3010 P3011 P3012 P3020 P3021 P3030 P3031 SMPC2 6' Bench w/back - Portable 6' Bench w/back - Inground* 6' Bench w/back - Surface Mount* 8' Bench w/back - Portable 8' Bench w/back - Inground* 8' Bench w/back - Surface Mount* 6' Bench w/o back - Inground* 6' Bench w/o back - Surface Mount" 8' Bench w/o back - Inground* 8' Bench w/o back - Surface Mount" Sm. Mounting Plate Covers (Set of 2) 137 Ibs. 131 Ibs. 113 Ibs. 160 Ibs. 153 Ibs. 145 Ibs. 70 Ibs. 67 Ibs. 81 Ibs. 78 Ibs. 1lb. $289.00 289.00 289.00 335.00 335.00 335.00 198.00 198.00 219.00 219.00 12.00 " Surface mount and inground legs must be adequately anchored. Measurements will vaiy with leg options. i \,£t-Jv ^ WVl bt \ \ t) C2375/TCL BuyLine 1142 DOMED ROOF SHELTERS Mode! 9NALD-PM 9' Dome roof non-advertising bus shelter with perforated metal panels at the rear and III end walls Optional features shown: Painted Lexan reef panels in lieu of standard bronze tint Street name plaques with vinyl letters 5' Perforated metal bench with anti-vagrant bars Model 13NALD-WG 13' Dome roof non-advertising bus shelter with decorative wire grid facia at the roofline perimeter Optional features shown: Painted Lexan roof panels in. lieu of standard bronze tint Solar security lighting system in the roof 8' wire grid contour bench with back and armrests-US Patent DES 365,455 Model 13NALD-GL 13' Dome roof non-advertising bus shelter with bronze tint tempered safety glass panels at the rear and 1/2 end walls. Optional features shown: Paintsd Lexan roof panels in lieu of standard bronze tint 5' Steel slat bench with back L "CL inUCTtJIAL ITttL. UCCtI D1XXVISCICTI1. DULL «C AjtH «-X. KlXMMTKLD tntDCTM 14JOO «t t ILL AUXNX WMIOtS. ULTH OT>CXV!SCicru. BULL ic or »ujt MM-n. 1 «L KLCS SHU4. K BULLO OR PUOC&4. ntXL vtuioe »wa mnM TD WMUUMi BCCTT STWDMD II l-«airnoncs BWU. tofatt TD «smcnxi. END ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION END ELEVATION sun SHOULD ontNOotmwvi or turmm a uxsi <• 8 3/16'— 4'-B' ROOF PLAN CONCKCTT SIAS SHOULD DCTIMI or SUPPORTS AT UAST <* AND BOWS o City of Carlsbad ^F~ ^^^•IP^HHHHHHHVHil^^^^^H^SIi^BiBH^PiHWmHBPublic Works - Engineering May 16, 2001 Mr. John Sherrit, Sherrit Development Services 7428 Capstan Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Maintenance of Detention Basin C~f 94 - 04 (Area A-1) and CT 94-05 (Area A-2) Dear Mr. Sherrit: We have received your correspondence dated February 2, 2001 and have concluded that the associated projects of Poinsettia Shores are responsible to maintain the erosion control basin. The "associated projects" are those that are under construction or with outstanding bonds in place. You asked if we could calculate a percentage of responsibility for all development or "associated projects". I would like to stress that everyone upstream from the basin who is technically under construction or bonded to maintain the basin is responsible. If only one project was bonded to do the work it would be that project's responsibility. Rosalina and Area B-2 are occupied and I believe the bonds have been released. Planning Area "C", Planning Area A-1 A- 2, A-3, A-4 and Planning Area B-1 and Planning area C are considered active and developing. I have asked Jennifer Gowen to look into what projects are still bonded with respect to this issue. I have also turned the matter back to inspection Division. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this further please contact myself at (760) 602- 2742 or Inspection Division at 602-2780 or 438-3891. Sincerely, ClydeWickham, Land Use Review Division C: Skip Hammann Senior Civil Engineer, Development Services Bob Wojcik Deputy City Engineer, Development Services Jennifer Gowen Administrative Secretary, Inspection Division Grant Eklund Construction Manager, Inspection Division 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (76O) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8562 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES SAN DIEGO, INC. PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING 10179 Huennekens Street San Diego, CA 92121 (858) 558-4500 PH (858) 558-1414 FX PROJECT COMMUNICATION DATE: PROJECT: W.O.#: April 18, 2001 Pointsettia Property 2341-04 TYPE OF COMMUNICATION: D Meeting D Phone Kl Letter D Fax DISTRIBUTION: [X] Project File [x] Project Manager DISCUSSION: D Attendees Q \v -»""* ^ Detention Capability of Existing Regional Desiltation Basin SUBMITTED: Eric Mosolgo Per Hunsaker's HEC-1 analyses of the watershed draining to the location of the existing desiltation basin: Total Drainage Area = 277.5 acres (0.434 square miles) 10-Year, 6-Hour Design Rainfall =1.6 inches Lag Time = 0.417 hr. Pre-Development Condition Curve Number = 82 Developed Condition Curve Number = 88.4 QlO-PRE = 51 Cfs QIO-DEV = 106 cfs Thus, the basin must reduce the 10-year developed peak flowrate to 51 cfs or less. Per Figure 8-5 of the Federal Highway Administration's "Urban Drainage Design Manual," the required storage volume of a detention basin can be estimated given the SCS rainfall distribution (Type 1 in the San Diego region), peak outflow discharge (51 cfs), peak inflow discharge (106 cfs), and the runoff volume. According to the developed condition 10-year HEC-1 output, the rainfall excess from the 277.5 acres watershed is 0.68 inches (0.92 inches infiltrates). Thus, the 10-year, 6-hour runoff volume is determined to be 15.73 acre-feet (277.5 * 0.68 /12). The ratio of the peak outflow discharge to the peak inflow discharge is 0.48 (51 /106). From the figure, this ratio corresponds to a Storage Volume / Runoff Volume ratio of 0.19. Since the runoff volume was determined to be 15.73 acre- feet, the required storage volume is 0.19 * 15.73 - or 2.99 acre-feet. The existing basin has a bottom elevation of 7 feet. At that elevation, the surface area is 0.30 acres. The top of basin elevation of 13 feet has a corresponding surface area of 0.71 acres. These dimensions provide for a total storage volume of roughly 3.03 acre-feet. With modification of the existing basin's inlet and outlet structures, the 10-year, 6-hour design storm can be attenuated to pre-development levels. £ .3 (f.v- .2 TYPES .3 A .5 .8 Peak Outflow Discharge Peak Inflow Discharge , flPR-18-2001 17-.29 tr r— TOTflL P-02 Ron Grunow From: Eric Mosolgo Y^£i vovA Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:51 PM To: Dave Hammar; Ron Grunow Subject: Pointsettia Update - MORE CLIFF NOTES!!! HERE ARE THE CLIFF NOTES VERSION OF THE EXISTING BASIN ANALYSIS-FOLLOWED BY THE BACKING DATA Total 10-Year HEC-1 Inflow Upstream of Basin = 106 cfs Total Diverted Flow to Desiltation Basin = 9 cfs Total Runoff to 84-Inch RCP Around Basin = 97 cfs Peak Routed Outflow from Desiltation Basin = 1 cfs Total Combined Runoff Downstream of Basin = 97 cfs Since the total combined 10-year developed runoff (97 cfs) is greater than the pre-developed 10-year runoff (51 cfs), the basin must be revised. The inlet to the basin must convey more flow to the basin. Our calculations show that only 9 cfs gets to the basin in the 10-year event. O'Day's report predicted a maximum flow of 37 cfs to the basin in the 100-year event. However, they used the continuity equation to get this value. They should have used the orifice equation, which is far more restrictive. Further revisions will also need to be made. I ran the hypothetical case of the entire 10-year runoff draining directly to the basin. In that event, the basin would overtop. Before trying any modifications to the existing basin, we need to know how much detention is provided by the basin in its current state. According to the O'Day study, the basin is designed to accomodate the urban pollution runoff from the first 1/2 inch of rainfall. The basin is dewatered by (4) 2-inch orifices in the side of the riser (bottom elevations of orifices are 7, 8, 9, and 10 feet per Grading Plans). Runoff enters the basin via an 18-inch RCP diversion from the main 84-inch RCP storm drain line which conveys high flows around the basin. At the diversion location, the 84-inch RCP has an invert elevation of 9.67 feet and normal depth calculations indicate a flow depth of 5.3 feet in the 7-foot diameter pipe. The 18-inch RCP has an upstream invert elevation of 9.40 feet, longitudinal slope of 0.5 percent, a length of 80 feet, and a downstream invert of 9.0 feet. FlowMaster and PondPack calculations predict the following peak flowrates through each pipe (flows analyzed only to 10-year developed peak flow of 106 cfs - higher flows will bypass the basin via the 84-inch RCP). Water Surface Elev Flow Through 18-Inch RCP Flow Through 84-Inch RCP TOTAL FLOW 9.4 0 0 0 9.5 0.04 0 0.04 9.6 0.17 0 0.17 9.7 0.37 0.02 0.39 9.8 0.64 0.45 1.09 9.9 0.98 1.53 2.51 10.0 1.39 3.31 4.70 10.1 1.86 5.83 7.69 10.2 2.37 9.08 11.45 10.3 2.95 13.09 16.04 10.4 3.55 17.84 21.39 10.5 4.22 23.34 27.56 10.6 4.91 29.58 34.49 10.7 5.63 36.55 42.18 10.8 6.36 44.24 50.60 10.9 7.37 52.64 60.01 11.0 7.84 61.74 69.58 11.1 8.29 71.52 79.81 11.2 8.72 81.96 90.68 11.3 9.12 93.04 102.16 11.4 9.51 104.75 114.26 The table is then used to generate a diversion table for input to HEC-1. At elevation 11.0, for instance, we tell HEC-1 that 7.84 cfs is entering the basin and that 61.74 cfs is bypassing via the 84-inch RCP. The flows are recombined downstream of the basin after detention routing. Detention routing includes routing through the (4) 2-inch orifices initially. After the water surface exceeds elevation 11.0 feet, runoff spills into the riser structure via (4) modified Type F catch basin openings. Calculations show that a maximum flow of 37 cfs can pass through the modified Type F openings below the emergency spillway elevation of 12.0 feet. Above that elevation, runoff spills over a 8-foot wide emergency spillway. Runoff that spills over the riser exits the basin via a 36- inch RCP with an upstream invert elevation of 6.67 feet and a slope Of 0.5 percent. PondPack calculations predict the following stage-discharge relationship for the existing basin. Water Elevation Outflow from Basin Control 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 0 0.07 0.10 0.20 0.25 0.36 0.43 0.55 0.64 19.22 37.80 45.96 62.75 Orifice Orifice Orifice Orifice Orifice Orifice Orifice Orifice Type F + Orifice Type F + Orifice Type F + Orifice + Spillway Type F + Orifice + Spillway Finally, the basin's stage-storage relationship is as follows: Elevation Surface Area (acres) 7.0 10.0 13.0 0.30 0.59 0.88 Storage (acre-feet) 0 1.04 3.24 Ron Grunow From: Eric Mosolgo vrt/vM . Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 5:00 PM To: Dave Hammar; Ron Grunow Subject: Cliff Notes Version of This - We Need to Reduce the 10-Year Developed Peak of 106 cfs to a Routed Peak of 51 cfs To analyze the detention capability of the existing desiltation facility downstream of the Pointsettia Property site, I prepared a pre-developed and developed condition HEC-1 model of the contributing watershed to the basin. I used the "Avenida Encinas & Offsite Storm Drain Hydrology Study", prepared by O'Day Consultants in July 1994, to generate the HEC-1 modeling parameters. The O'Day study prepared an AES analysis to the basin. Per that study, the total developed condition drainage area is 277.5 acres (0.434 square miles), the 10-year, 6-hour rainfall total is 1.6 inches, the time of concentration is 31.3 minutes (corresponding lag time = 0.417 hr.), and the runoff coefficient for the overall developed watershed is 0.58 (composite calculation assumes ultimate development of the Pointsettia Property site). Per County of San Diego design standards, runoff coefficients relate to SCS runoff curve numbers as follows (soil group D assumed): Open Space Area...C = 0.45 & CN = 82 Single-Family Residential...C = 0.55 & CN = 88 Multi-Family Residential...C = 0.70 & CN = 90 Commerical Development...C = 0.85 & CN = 92 Using these relationships, the developed condition composite runoff coefficient of 0.58 would correspond to a runoff curve number of 88.4. For this analysis, the pre-developed condition runoff curve number was assumed to be 82 and the area was assumed to be the same as in developed conditions (277.5 acres). For now, I'm assuming the pre-developed condition time of concentration to be the same as the developed condition Tc. We may need to do another calc for this later. Per the HEC-1 calcs, the pre-developed condition 10-year peak flow to the basin location is 51 cfs. After full development of the contributing watershed, the 10-year peak flow increases to 106 cfs. Thus, the desiltation basin must reduce the developed condition peak 10-year flow of 106 cfs to a peak outflow of 51 cfs or less. I will continue this analysis tomorrow and keep you posted on the results. Ron Grunow From: Eric Mosolgo Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:48 AM i /, \ To: Dave Hammar; Ron Grunow; Lex Williman y 0V""'T c >£ Subject: Pointsettia Storm Water Quality Treatment Vault To meet State Board requirements, we will be installing a storm water treatment vault just upstream of the proposed detention basin. Per the Santa Barbara Small Hydrograph Method, the peak runoff rate from the site's first flush volume is 3.46 cfs. This value corresponds only to runoff from our site - it does not account for upstream runoff from Planning Areas 5 and 6. According to the Vortechs Stormwater Treatment System information sheet, the Vortechs Model 3000 can accomodate a peak design flow of 4.5 cfs, which is greater than our peak design flow of 3.46 cfs. The Model 3000 has a length of 11 feet and a width of 5 feet. Although some Vortechs systems can be constructed online, this will not be the case for this system. Online systems can only accomodate a total flow of 25 cfs. Since the vault is located upstream of the detention basin and the total 10-year inflow to the basin is 36 cfs, the vault must be constructed offline. -Eric- Ron Grunow From: Eric Mosolgo Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 5:36 PM To: Dave Hammar; Lex Williman; Ron Grunow Subject: Pointsettia Detention Basin THE PROPOSED POINTSETTIA DETENTION BASIN WORKS!!! """ \\ *> f/ /; All results based on HEC-1 analysis: Q(10)-Pre-Developed from Site and Upstream Offsite Area = 26 cfs Q(10)-Developed Condition without Detention = 36 cfs Proposed detention basin has the following parameters... Bottom Elevation = 33.5 feet Top Elevation = 47.5 feet Maximum Surface Area = 0.12 acres Maximum Storage Capacity ^ 0.72 acre-feet Outlet via 18-inch orifice...runoff then passes through 30-inch RCP at 0.005 slope to junction with 54-inch outlet from site. After routing through the detention basin: Q(10)-Developed with Detention = 25 cfs 10-Year WSE = 43.6 feet Freeboard in Basin = 3.9 feet I will finalize the rest of the design tomorrow. -Eric- y /T. r- v N C T D Service Development Division MEMORANDUM RECEIVED DEC 2 7 2000 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: December 22, 2000 TO: M. K. Ryan Castlelyons Corporation 315 South Coast Highway, Suite U-3 Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: 760 432 2626 Fax: 760 943 7800 Mobile 760 943 7800 FROM: Stefan Marks, Manager of Service Development Phone: 760-966-6539 Fax: 760-967-0941 Email: smarks@nctd.org SUBJECT: Poinsettia Lane COPY: Rod Surber, John Clark, Robert Silk, Dan Gayson, Transportation Services Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposed development of 233 homes located at the north-west corner of Avenida Encinas and Poinsettia Lane. North County Transit District (NCTD) operates hourly bus service along Avenida Encinas to Poinsettia Train Station. We request the following infrastructure improvements at your development at the following locations: 1. 60 feet east of Raintree Drive by lot 13: Accessible bus stop pad, passenger shelter pad and passenger shelter. A sixty feet parking area reserved for buses only should be designated with red curb. 2. 60 feet east of Embarcadero Drive by lot 64: Accessible bus stop pad, passenger shelter pad and passenger shelter. A sixty feet parking area reserved for buses only should be designated with red curb. Memorandum - Poinsettia Lane December 22, 2000 Page 2 Infrastructure Dimensions: A. Accessible bus stop pad (required by Americans with Disabilities Act). 6 feet wide parallel to curbline and 8 feet deep perpendicular to curbline. The sidewalk can count as part of the accessible bus stop pad. B. Accessible shelter pad. The pad should be located behind the sidewalk and be of sufficient size to accommodate a 13 feet passenger shelter. Dimensions are 16 feet long parallel to the sidewalk and 6 feet deep perpendicular to the sidewalk. C. Passenger shelter. We recommend a 13 feet Tolar shelter with a dome roof, non-advertising bus shelter with perforated metal panels at the rear and Vz end walls (attached specification). The model number is 13NALD-PM with a perforated metal bench with anti-vagrant bars. NCTD does not maintain passenger shelters and maintenance of the shelter is the City's or your responsibility. Please call me at (760) 966-6539 should have any additional questions. When you are ready to install the shelters, please contact me so our transportation services staff can review the installation and siting the bus stops. Thank you for your assistance. Street Design Considerations: The bus stop zones and travel lanes on Avenida Encinas need to be sized such that a standard 40-foot transit coach can safely stop, board passengers, and re- enter traffic without impeding through-traffic flow. Generally, this requires that the right-hand pavement area/bike lane, combined with the right-hand through lane, total at least 20 feet in width. Please contact us if you need further information on the specifications for these bus stop zones. cc: Robert Johnson, City of Carlsbad 02875/TOL Buy Line 1142 DOMED ROOF SHELTERS Model 9NALD-PM 9' Dome roof non-advertising bus shelter with perforated metal panels at the rear and 112 end walls Optional features shown: Painted Lexan roof panels in lieu of standard bronze tint Street name plaques with vinyl letters 5' Perforated metal bench with anti-vagrant bars ECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS |TS | Technical Specifications GENERAL: The work specified includes the design, fabrication and delivery of Bus Stop Shelters including wall frame, roof and glazing panels, all required accessories and hardware for installation. Shelters shall be designed and structurally engineered. Shelters shall be vandal-resistant, maintenance-free and completely weather proof. Shelters shall be prefabricated and shipped K.D. for ease of handling and fast on-site installation. STANDARDS: All aluminum shall con- form to the standards of the Aluminum Association. Shelter construction shall conform to the standards of ASCE. Shelters shall be designed to withstand minimum dead loads of 40 psf and minimum windload of 75 mph. All steel components must be welded in accordance with AWS DI. I (97 edition). Welding is to be performed by certified welders; certification to be submitted 'ith bid. All aluminum components must j welded in accordance with AWS D1.2 (97 edition). Welding is to be performed by certified welders; certification to be submitted with bid. CONSTRUCTION: Shelters shall be constructed of modular interchangeable components. All structural framing member and mullions shall be I-piece seamless extruded aluminum tubes of 6061T6 or 6063T5 alloy. SNAP TOGETHER OR 2-PIECE TUBES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Window frames, facias and roof "hold downs" shall be multifunction extrusions of 6063T5 alloy. Window frames and Facias shall permit use of various interchangeable glazing and roofing materials. SELF TAPPING CONNECTORS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Shelter based connections shall be adjustable to varying mounting conditions with internal or external flange details: Depending upon shelter model. Finish of external flanges shall match shelter finish. All joints shall be neat and clean and all edges free of burrs. GLAZING: %" clear or tinted tempered glass or optional glazing of V*" clear or bronze tinted acrylic, polycarbonate, or mar-resistant polycarbonate optional glazing frames shall be gasketed with continuous extruded PVC dry set splines. Manufacturer's Qualifications Shelter framework, wall and roof paneling, equipment and related hardware shall be furnished by a manufacturer regularly engaged in the manufacturing of such products for a minimum of five (5) years, and shall be of premium grade material, construction, and finish. Submittals The following drawings and documentation will be furnished: Shop drawings shall show wall and roof panels; details of materials, fabrication, and assembly: framing profiles: fastener types and locations, flashing, and seal details if applicable. Erection drawings: Provide instruction and drawings, and develop erection procedures to enable field installation or repair of shelter. Manufacturer's literature and data provide manufacturer's information for wall and roof panels, and all accessories and equipment furnished. Product Framing The shelter framework shall be fabricated using 6063-T5 extruded aluminum members (FEDSPECQQ-A-200/9C(I). Extrusion shapes shall be engineered to provide a framework of adequate structural integrity to satisfy the Uniform Building A.DA Code (UBC).and to meet All Tolar Mfg. Co. Inc. the requirements for products comply with snow. wind, and seismic *-DA-Guidelm e loading for the location (s) being considered. The framework shall be assembled with stainless steel fasteners to prevent rusting or electrolytic interaction with framing members. Shelter framing components and the method of fastening them to supporting foundations shall be capable of withstanding lateral loads per ANSI ASS, I the UBC, or applicable local building codes, whichever is more stringent GENERAL NOTES: 1. All structural steel, unless otherwise noted, shall be ASTM A-36, minimum yield strength 36,000 PSI. 2. All aluminum members, unless other- wise noted, shall be of alloy 6063-T5. 3. All holes shall be drilled or punched. 4. Steel welding shall conform to America welding society standard DI. I -80. Electrodes shall conform to ASTM A233, class E70XX. All Tolar products are built to these specifications UBC '94 ED - LightWeight Metal, Concrete, Load Criteria ANSI - Load criteria ACI - Concrete Design AISC - Steel Design Guarantee Materials and workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year, starting on the date of acceptance. Tolar Manufacturing Company, Inc 730 Monroe Way, Placentia, CA 92870 SEE US IN DIRECTORY CATALOG CD ONLINEFILES http ://www.tolarmf g. com Phone (714) 985-9100 Fax (714) 985-9111 USA (800) 339-6165 © I999 TOLAR SHELTERS 02875/TOL BuyLine 1142 SHELTER OPTIONS MODEL NUMBER Roof Length Advertising kiosk or No Advertising kiosk Roof elevation - High or Low Dome, Peak or Flat Roof Wall material G_L = glass, MR = Lexan MRIO, PM = Perforated Metal, WG =Wire grid facia, NW = no walls 13 NA L D -GL SHELTER OPTIONS ALDseries NALDseries ALP/AHPseries NALP/NAHP series AFseries NAF series LENGTH 9' 13' 17' 20' x x X X x x X X x x X X x x X X x x X X x x x x WALL MATERIAL %" tempered safety glass - clear or tinted Lexan MR- 10 with MarGard - clear or tinted Perforated metal panels Decorative Wire Grid Facia No Walls X X X not avail x X X X X not avail X X X not avail x X X X X not avail X X X not avail x x x x x not avail ENCLOSURE End legs set mid-roof span for 'A end wall(s) End legs span roof width for full end wall(s) Full end wall(s) with % front wall x x x x x x X X X x X X x x x x X X ROOF MATERIAL Lexan Thermoclear panels, clear or tinted Painted acrylic panels Powder coated aluminum panels Corrugated steel Double wall construction - aluminum/steel x x x not avail not avail x x x not avail not avail not avail not avail x not avail not avail not avail not avail x not avail not avail not avail not avail not avail x x not avail not avail not avail x x r~? j LJ • E5 send me more information onTolar Shelters j Name . j Tide or Dept § Address f City State Zip Telephone ___^_^_ D I am interested in a Catalog TOLAR SHELTERS Tolar Manufacturing Company, Inc. 730 Monroe Way Placentia, CA 92870 H C T To, Barbara Kennedy Project Planner Planning Department City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Poinsettia Properties, Application no. CTOO-16/PUD01-01/SDPOO- 12/CDPOO-44 Dear Ms. Kennedy: We have reviewed the plans for the Poinsettia Properties Project, and have the following comments on the project. 1. On the key map and other site plans a Railroad Pedestrian Open Space corridor is shown along the western edge of the property. A sound wall is shown on the eastern edge of the corridor. We would prefer that a physical separation be planned between the Pedestrian Open Space corridor and NCTD Railroad Property, for pedestrian safety reasons and to prevent trespassing on to the railroad tracks. 2. The key map and other site plans also indicate pedestrian access to the Railroad Pedestrian Open Space. Without a physical separation between the corridor and the railroad property this could lead to direct access to the railroad property. Property owners adjoining the NCTD railroad property cannot provide direct access on to the Railroad property. 3. Sheet 4 of 5 of the Tentative map, shows drainage facilities extending on to the NCTD property. Any storm water drainage work or other improvements to be done on NCTD property would require NCTD review and approval. 4. NCTD would recommend that reports and other legal documents related to this project add language similar to that provided below regarding conditions for properties adjoining the railroad property. "Owner of Properties adjoining the NCTD right-of-way hereby recognizes and acknowledges that railroad tracks are located adjacent to the Premises, and that the operation of trains over the tracks does and will produce vibrations NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 810 Mission Avenue, Oceans.de, CA 92054 760-967 2828 and noise levels that may be considered objectionable. With knowledge and understanding of these facts, owner of properties adjoining the NCTD right-of- way accepts the Premises and agrees that no legal action or complaint of any kind whatsoever shall be instituted against the North San Diego County Transit Development Board ("NCTD") by Property Owner or on Property Owners behalf as result of vibrations and noise levels or as a result of the use of the railroad tracks in general. The term "NCTD" as used in this Section includes any railroad company operation on the tracks." 5. A pedestrian connection should be provided at the end of the cul-de-sac between lot no 205 and 204, on the northeastern corner of the property, and Avenida Encinas. The pedestrian connection would provide a direct connection to Avenida Encinas and the proposed bus stop at that location. Other NCTD comments regarding bus stop locations and service requirements have been previously provided. We thank you for giving us an opportunity to review the project. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact me at (760) 967 2817. Sincerely, Zigisha Mhaskar Assistant Planner RUSSELL \DGROSSE DEVELOPMENT co., INC. 5850 Avenida Encinas, Suite A Carlsbad, California 92008 Phone 760/438-3141 FAX 760/438-7615 November 17, 1997 NOV | 8 1997 VIA FACSIMILE 431-1601 William E. Plummer, P.E. District Engineer CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 5950 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Offsite Sewer Dear Bill: Enclosed please find the addresses for the people involved with the Rancho Carlsbad lease and ownership. If you have any questions regarding this list, please contact me. Sincerely, H. D. "Mike" O'Hara Enclosure Pat\mo\cor\Plummer.addresses Contractors License No. 378383 Rancho Carlsbad Kelly Property Bill Geary (Property Owner) Carlsberg Management Co. Lucia Kelly Sippel 2800 - 28th Street 1287 Vera Cruz Santa Monica, CA 90405 Oceanside, CA 92056 Mike Churchill Rancho Carlsbad Partners 5200 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 L. Sue Loftin, Esq. (Attorney for Rancho Carlsbad) 4330 La Jolla Village Drive, #330 San Diego, CA 92122-6203 Abraham Keh Rancho Carlsbad Country Club Estates 5200 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008 Steve Weed Rancho Carlsbad Country Club Estates 5200 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008