Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 01-02; Calavera Hills Village K; Tentative Map (CT)March 4, 2003 TO: BOBBIE HODER, PLANNING PLANNING DEPARTMENT - GRAPHICS TRAFFIC ENGINEER SCOTT BURNS, BUILDING DEPARTMENT ROBIN NUSCHY, BUILDING DEPARTMENT STEVE RUGGLES, STATION #3 FIRE DEPARTMENT GREG WOODS, PUBLIC WORKS - OAK ST OFFICE LORI ALLEN, POLICE DEPARTMENT KARL VON SCHLIEDER - GIS FROM: Planning Director STREET NAMES FOR CT 01-01 & CT 01-2 - CALVAVERA HILLS VILLAGES L-2 & K The following street names have been approved as a part of the final map processing for Calavera Hills Villages L-2 & K. A map delineating street locations is attached. CT 01-01 Village L-2 Public Street: Granite Court CT 01-02 Village K Public Streets: Rock Ridge Road Flat Rock Street Sand Court Pebble Street CSrmh Attachment I SCALE: r = 400' CONSULTA4ITS~ 2710 LOKER AVE. WEST Suite 100 Cortsbod, CA 9200B 760-931-770C Fax: 760-931-8680 e\a)sic\i»RDJS*i()fe*Hl(wtAtAUvB»\i^^ s-zr-tMs 9ta6-4S m ^jfiie City of Carlsbad Planning Departmel&r A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. ® P.C. AGENDA OF: October 16,2002 Application complete date: August 26, 2002 Project Plamier: Eric Munoz Project Engineer: Frank Jimeno SUBJECT: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - Request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84 unit single family development within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located at the northwest comer of Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 5289, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION ofthe Negative Declaration issued by the Planmng Director and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5290 and 5291 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Tentative Tract Map CT 01-02 and Planned Unit Development Permit PUD 01- 05, based upon the fmdings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The proposal involves the subdivision and construction of an 84-unit single-family project within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. Village K will be mass graded in accordance with the Calavera Hills Phase II Master Tentative Map (CT 00-02). A Tentative Tract Map is required for the subdivision of property and fmal grading. A PUD Permit is also being requested. The project meets all applicable regulations and staff recommends approval. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84-unit single-family project within Village K ofthe Calavera Hills Master Plan. The 51-acre site of Village K was previously the master plan's affordable housing site with a maximum of 420 multifamily units allowed. As part of the recently approved master plan amendment (MP 150(H) approved by City Council in January 2002), Village K was modified to accommodate a regionally significant wildlife corridor as part of the EIR process that accompanied the master plan amendment (EIR 98-02). MP 150(H) now allows up to 88 detached single-family homes on 16.95 net acres. This project proposes 84 units and complies with all necessary city policies, standards, and master plan criteria. Village K is bounded by College Boulevard to the east, Carlsbad Village Drive to the south. Village L-1 and Glasgow Drive to the west, and Tamarack Avenue to the north. Village K is designated Residential Medium (RM) in the City's General Plan, allowing up to 8 dwelling units Q c o CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CATAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K ^ October 16,2002 Page 2 per developable acre with a Growth Management Control Point of 6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density is 5.0 dwelling units per acre and is within the allowable General Plan range. The project site is zoned Planned Community (P-C) and, according to the Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H)), the site is to be developed in accordance with the Planned Development Ordinance, the Village K standards, and provisions of the Master Plan. The proposed development would consist of 84 single-family homes that comply with the master plan's single-family development criteria for architectural variety and articulation. These criteria include: minimum lot size, a mix of single-story/reduced second story homes and two story homes, architectural variety, plan variety, setbacks, garage placement, front porches, front entry features and recreation areas. The Village K proposal complies with or exceeds all of above noted master plan criteria for single-family development within Calavera Hills. Four versions of the following architectural styles will be represented in Village K: Mission, Monterey, Craftsman and Early Califomia. The single-story units will be under 17 feet in height with approximately 2,050 square feet (includes garage). The reduced second story units will be approximately 21 feet in height with the second story being no more than 25% of the first floor area. Total square footage of the reduced second story units (including garage area) is approximately 2,575 sq. ft. The proposed two-story units area will be under 25 feet in height with total square footage range of approximately 3,090 to 3,300. A 34-foot intemal street system will serve the project and sewer and water services will be available. Recreational amenities include active and passive areas. A swimming pool with a pool house and a tot lot with picnic facilities are proposed as common recreation areas. Every unit will also have the required amount of private rear yard recreation space. The project's fair share of affordable housing is being provided at the Master Plan level in Village Y (SDP 01-05), therefore none is included in this project. The proposed development would necessitate approximately 31,000 cubic yards of cut and fill, after the mass grading of CT 00-02. The development would also include retaining walls, with a maximum height of six feet. The project site would take access off of existing Tamarack Avenue to the north and would generate 840 average daily traffic trips, which can be accommodated by the collector street and the adjoining major arterial roadways of Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard. The project is required to comply with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit through the implementation of Best Management Practices, thus reducing the amount of pollutants entering the public storm drain system. Due to the project's proximity to College Boulevard, the master plan required that a site-specific noise study be conducted. That noise study indicates that noise attenuation walls are needed along some of the project's perimeter units facing southeast towards College Boulevard. These walls would range in height from 3 to 6 feet and are incorporated into the project design. The project is depicted on Exhibits "A"-"UU" dated October 16, 2002. The Calavera Hills Village K project is subject to the following regulations: A. General Plan; B. Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H)); CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K October 16, 2002 Page 3 C. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); D. Planned Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 ofthe Zoning Ordinance); E. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance); and F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7. IV. ANALYSIS The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis section discusses compliance with each of these regulations/policies utilizing both text and tables. A. General Plan The Calavera Hills Village K project is consistent with the applicable policies and programs of the General Plan. Particularly relevant to the residential development are the Land Use, Circulation, Noise, Housing, and Public Safety elements. Table 1 below indicates how the project complies with these particular elements of the General Plan. TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Element Use Classification, Goal, Objective or Program Proposed Use and Improvements Compliance Land Use Site is designated for medium density (RM) residential development. Proposed residential density of 5.0 dwelling units per acre is below the 6.0 dwellings per acre maximum allowed in the RM designation. Yes Circulation Minimize the number of access points to major and prime arterials to enhance the fimctioning of these streets and thoroughfares. The project design takes access off of Tamarack Avenue, in accordance with Engineering standards and traffic calming measures designed intemal to the site. Yes Noise Require that a noise study be submitted with all residential projects over five units. Enforce the City policy that 60 dBA CNEL is the maximum exterior noise level for residential units. The project includes a noise study with recommendations to reduce traffic noise from College Boulevard to 60 dBA CNEL. Yes Housing New housing developed with a diversity of types, prices, tenures, densities, and locations to meet the demand of anticipated City growth. The project provides a mixture of architectural styles; and the single-family product type in this master plan contributes to the diversity of housing within the City. Yes CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K October 16, 2002 Page 4 TABLE 1 - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE Element Use Classification, Goal, Objective or Program Proposed Use and Improvements Compliance PubUc Safety Provision of emergency water systems and all-weather access roads. All necessary water mains, fire hydrants, and appurtenances must be installed prior to occupancy of any unit and all- weather access roads will be maintained throughout constmction. Yes Given the above, the Calavera Hills Village K single-family project is consistent with the City's General Plan. B. Calavera Hills Master Plan The proposed 84-unit project is within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan area and, therefore, subject to the provisions of that master plan (MP 150(H)). Table 2 below summarizes the project's conformance with the requirements of the Master Plan. TABLE 2 - CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE Standard Proposed Conformance Allowed Uses: Maximum of 88 detached single-family residential units. Proposed project is 84 detached single-family residential imits Yes Setbacks: Per PD Ordinance (no arterial setbacks involved) Compliance Yes Architectural Criteria Compliance with elements of architectural criteria; includes architectural styles of: Mission, Early Califomia, Craftsman and Monterey Single-Story: 10 units Reduced 2-Story: 15 units Two-Storv: 59 units Total: 84 units Yes Building Height: Maximum of 30 feet to the peak of the roof Proposed highest stmctures measure 25 feet in height, to the roof peak. Yes Recreation Area: Minimum of 100 square feet The two proposed recreation areas Yes CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 October 16,2002 Page 5 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K TABLE 2 - CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN CONFORMANCE Standard Proposed Conformance per unit of common recreation area (for 84 imits, a minimum of 8,400 square feet is required). contain a total of 14,093 square feet of common recreation area. Design Criteria: Access via Tamarack Avenue. No pedestrian or vehicular access permitted through open space area to south of development within Village K. The project proposes access off of Tamarack Avenue and no intmsions or accesses via the open space preserve. Yes A fence/trellis plan shall be approved in conjunction with the condominium permit. A fence/trellis plan is provided on Exhibits "K"-"M". Yes The inclusionary affordable housing requirement for this village is being satisfied by the development of Village Y and the Calavera Hills Affordable Housing Agreement. Given the above, the proposed single-family project is consistent with the provisions of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. C. Subdivision Ordinance Since the Calavera Hills Village K project involves a subdivision into 92 lots (84 of which are residential lots), the proposal is subject to the regulations of Title 20, the Subdivision Ordinance. Chapter 20.16 of the Subdivision Ordinance addresses the requirements for a major subdivision, that being a subdivision that creates more than four parcels. These requirements deal mostly with providing the drainage, sewerage, and circulation dedications and improvements needed to serve the subdivision. There are also requirements conceming consistency with Title 21, the Zoning Ordinance, which is addressed in the other sections of this staff report. The proposed Calavera Hills Village K residential subdivision would provide all necessary facilities prior to, or concurrent with, constmction. The hydrology report, submitted by the applicant, indicates that all mnoff can be controlled on-site and conveyed into existing storm drain facilities. The on-site sewer system would be connected with the existing system in Carlsbad Village Drive. Water distribution would involve looped service from the existing lines in Tamarack Avenue. No standards variances are needed to approve the project. Given the above, the subdivision provides all necessary facilities and improvements consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 October 16, 2002 Page 6 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K D. Planned Development Ordinance The Calavera Hills Master Plan states that Village K shall develop in accordance to the Plarmed Development Ordinance (Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance), except as modified within the Master Plan. As indicated above, the Master Plan contains regulations goveming building setbacks, building separation, building height, and recreation areas. The Calavera Master Plan area already has a recreational vehicle storage area (Village I - RV Storage) that serves the entire master plan. Therefore, the proposed project is subject to the Planned Development Ordinance standards regarding visitor parking, private streets and driveway, and storage space. Table 3 below details the project's conformance with these remaining development standards of the Planned Development Ordinance. TABLE 3 - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CONFORMANCE Standard Proposed Conformance Visitor Parking: For projects over 10 units, 5 spaces for the first 10 units and 1 space per every 4 units above 10 (for 84 units, a minimum of 24 spaces is required). The project provides 64 guest parking spaces distributed throughout the project site. Yes Private Streets: Minimum of 34 feet wide streets from curb-to-curb with minimum 5.5 foot wide parkways. The proposed street measures 34 feet curb-to-curb and are adjacent to 4.5 foot wide parkways. Yes Storage Space: All units must contain a minimum of 480 cubic yards of storage space. Each unit has a minimum of 480 cubic yards of storage space via 2-car garages per unit Yes Given the above, the proposed single-family project is consistent with the applicable portions of the Plaimed Development Ordinance. E. Growth Management Ordinance The Calavera Hills Village K project is subject to the provisions of the Growth Management Program, as contained in Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance. As discussed above, the proposed project density of 5.0 dwelling units per net developable acre is within the Growth Management Control Point of 6.0 dwelling per acre for the Residential Medium density (RM) General Plan designation. Table 4 below outlines the project's conformance with the requirements ofthe Growth Management Program. CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 October 16, 2002 Page 7 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K TABLE 4 - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE Standard Impacts/Standards Compliance City Administration 311 sq. ft. Yes Library 166 sq.ft. Yes Wastewater Treatment 84 EDU Yes Parks .59 AC Yes Drainage 27.1 CFS Yes Circulation 840 ADT Yes Fire Station #3 Yes Open Space Satisfied through MP 150(H) Yes Schools Carlsbad Unified Yes Sewer Collection System 84 EDU Yes Water 18,480 GPD Yes The project is below the Growth Management dwelling unit allowance F. Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) Zone 7 The project site lies within LFMP Zone 7. There are no special conditions or requirements within the Zone 7 LFMP that apply to this residential project. The project is conditioned to pay the appropriate public facilities fee, water and sewer coimection fees, and traffic impact fees. The project site is located within a Mello Roos District that covers their proportionate obligation for school fees. All facility improvements necessary to accommodate the development will be in place prior to, or concurrent with, development. The Zone 7 LFMP requires the completion of a connection between College Boulevard and El Camino Real prior to building permit issuance beyond 2,500 ADT. Therefore, the Calavera Hills Village K residential development is consistent with the LFMP Zone 7. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The potential environmental impacts associated with the constmction of Village K were reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase II Master Plan Amendment (EIR 98-02, certified January 15, 2002). Village K was analyzed with up to 88 single-family imits. Mitigation affecting this village centers on monitoring during the Master Plan's mass grading (approved via CT 00-02). In addition, a revised noise study for Village K was required to determine the heights and locations of noise walls. The proposed Calavera Hills Village K project, as designed and conditioned, would not create any significant adverse environmental impact than previously identified and addressed in EIR 98-02. The project is consistent with the applicable regulations; will be graded in accordance with the City's Grading Ordinance and City Standards; will comply with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit; will provide all facilities necessary to serve the CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K October 16,2002 Pages development prior to, or concurrent with, constmction; and will provide noise attenuation walls along the College Boulevard; and is consistent with EIR 98-02. Given this environmental analysis, the Planning Director issued a Negative Declaration on June 24, 2002. No public comments were received during the 20-day public review period. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5289 (Neg Dec) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5290 (CT) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5291 (PUD) 4. Location Map 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 7. Background Data Sheet 8. Reduced Exhibits 9. Exhibits "A" - UU", dated October 16, 2002. EM:nih SITE CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 ty of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defmed as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and coimty, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this docimient; however, the legal name and entity of the apphcant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titie, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDP/IDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a pubhclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Calavera Hills II L.L.C. Titie Titie Address Address 2727 Hoover Ave. National City CA 91950 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) . Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titie, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of die shares. IF NO ESTDTVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, tities, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Calavera Hills 11 L.L.C. Titie Titie Address Address 2727 Hoover Ave. National City CA 91950 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ QG AMZATION OR TRUST ^ NON-PROFIT^GAMZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as tmstee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust Titie^ Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? I I Yes >0( No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is tme and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of applicaiit/date T)or\ mv^cJn>^U Don VY\\AcK»£.ti Print or type name of owner Print or type name of apphcant Signature of owner/apphcant's agent if apphcable/date Print or type name of owner/appHcant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTEmDISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 7 GENERAL PLAN: RM ZONING: PC - Calavera Hills Master Plan DEVELOPER'S NAME: Calavera Hills II L.L.C. ADDRESS: 2727 Hoover Avenue. National Citv. CA PHONE NO.: (619)336-3138 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 167-101-28.168-041-03/06/07/10 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 2004 A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage Library: Demand in Square Footage = Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Demand in Acreage = Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No. Open Space: Acreage Provided = Schools: Elementary: 21.9 Middle: 6 High: 11.4 Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = 311 = 166 84 EDU .58 27.1 Buena Vista 840 Per MP 150rA) Carlsbad Unified 84 SAH 18.480 The project is 1.0 units the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. BACKGROUND DATA SHEET ^ CASE NO: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS - VILLAGE K APPLICANT: MCMILLIN COMPANIES REQUEST AND LOCATION: 84 single-familv homes in Village K LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lots "D" and "J" ofthe Rancho Agua Hedionda. in the Citv of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. State of Califomia, according to Map 823. filed in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder on November 16, 1896, also being Lot 5 of Carlsbad Tract No. 00-02 APN: 167-101-28. 168-041-03/06/07/10 Acres: 16.95 net Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 84 units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RM Density Allowed: 4^8 Density Proposed: 5.0 Existing Zone: PC Proposed Zone: PC Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site PC RM Vacant North PC Collector Street Tamarack Avenue South PC Major Arterial Carlsbad Village Blvd. East PC Major Arterial College Blvd. West PC RM Village C-1 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 84 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued June 24. 2002 |~| Certified Enviroimiental Impact Report, dated I I Other, BOUNDARY DATA pqTA/BPtfBHG EASEMENTS: A muK Doom n rAm tr COSTA mt Mwcnv nxr wne7«c Ml K moMfuik. K-mm er cmcul * ffruc aanfir Pf er asa ITAI HUKTM MJET Ktavs AU ascmirs nm muc smrsar lamin: Aff vscwrrm MU- iBDnstn K nior tr oAms Mt/MXiK AC «c x^. JK tmAsn/m, to-SKomcr gmoM. Kom. K M/rr e» ioc*m amc>T K lemMce mn SMD BemmotT. Alt tMtiraiciM ascm rAwms eAsowK /xm cr souf itc turf, im AS at ft im-ojijns cr cmeui mows wimm ai 10CA7OI CAHNoi m vOBunm mm SAC AM iMBaoroM aecm rAoms ctiniPirT * rAioi trsoetf tfc Mff. imAs/Wo tm-OJtjm or fTKUi Kvows. wc m/^ ac lecAmr CAiim K tenmria mm SAID tamuuDti yiCINITY MAP 10 scur (S)2O02 O'Doy Consulttmis, Inc. MAP TO ILLUSTRATE REMAINDER PARCEL jc«£ f - teoo' GENERAL NOTES: Assrssen nucB «# m-iei-K w-**/-« M»-wr-« w-wr-m m-on^r ossnrKteme. K^OL^^H^ mswi nAu monsa iomie. w emct assme tiUBui HJu eesemwM . . . imprx auim mis lasia nMi AneatHi i0'-isoo<& mrosa toBtAL mm BOoiAwm. momt mumm fm tmime fm.isS3 SCHOa USWKT CAIUtAC IHm SCHOa asWKT mmtemr oMAommnn mnintmer srmiamcT omrcAAuue AWbvmrMAm. MJ iPTAi ACKs sin lertnaermfAem. ntiv toa w Kim. J HOKOmm ASSOtMW lOlS J etn snuz lets. / mm numnt nr uis K MMaermtf- sf taoTT. sfm*tTAe^ X sAiiHo Ann siimcrs Milft JMUMTft art Ameutmefuum jv-w PABIONG SUMMARY: Auata jMttw- m see 14 GRACING ANALYSrS: an 3t,mc.K mm? 9cr. mm FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION toir M - otnsK SCO wiaeo HAJH (la neeo MsuHAmr MW nAf. camMTT-Aim mmec mem omreAm-imm SEWER/WATER rw poams mm emim ^ tjte tm em v t»ai rmt meim jtmwr ponmi mm eonm - »B tm fUKHmmmwitoiAHDm mm Aiam xm laguweM • a.»m im LEGAL DESCRIPTION: KutA smnm er A mmm er ten VAMB Vtr NTMWW AeuAHawA. mrrarrercAmsm eoumerSAHem sax ercAirvm&t. AccoKm n IKnmwjwtu^ ntmrim vj na tiKematrweceurrrmaBBiersAeaxmrranieiamjr nt MM MsoiaiimAsiarserer»-a OWNER/DEVELOPER: ^ ffUMMT unm utivrr awMT BENCHMAHK: MscMnoK 5SHMV IK-* smw conpUT mu imimfT tocnm tengurctra CUMPJC* mn OAW. US.C 4ts SHEET I OF 5 SHEETS CT. 01-02 P.U.D. 01-05 TENTATIVE MAP FOR CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' LEGEND: » f > mmemvimi asmtWBimmikAJt. . . ctme sna met mm t AH . mama mrnme mu /mo ftxmsHom). snenumttM. amiur. . . . morCBft SIKtT UIHT. CIVIL ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR: \wm OWE WV m nt Mr mwirmrmmim Mmmn mm e fi M 1 UT T hAi T 6 PCTIWn wt. lUL MTti /Itt IWI **o«et • "f* mm w ; JiblfilB_ Ml NMWBW* mmtT—'^ tt mi «— i^B »Tii'i1 1 tNcacn or MNK Mil' iJi^l IWI KL KfU SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS CT. 01-02' P.U.D. 01-05 EXIST. TAMARACK AVE. HOSCAU Z SmEET •A'.'B'Ae'D' STREET 'C VILUGE 'K' LOT AREA SUMMARY lot AKA PAC Am LOT AKA PAD AKA 31 A2S7 4.953 62 7.315 4.817 ! 8.692 32 i36J 5563 63 6,557 4.827 2 e.3ii iSTS 33 4.397 4,997 64 6,113 4,947 J A 425 7.011 34 4.763 4,763 SS 5365 5007 4 iOSS 6.770 35 4.8*7 4,947 66 5278 <«» 5 5.281 6.281 36 5,778 5778 87 5061 5061 6 ifJS 5,233 37 4,482 4,463 88 5359 5339 7 5.158 5.168 38 4,249 4.249 69 5186 5106 $ <rs4 4.734 39 5,879 4,524 70 4,4/8 4,416 9 4,829 4.S29 40 7,025 4.538 71 4,416 4.418 W <fl95 4.90S 41 5370 72 4,621 4.621 If <J0) 4.303 42 5^399 4,595 73 4,293 <393 a 4.327 4.527 43 SS87 4957 74 if7J <973 rj 4.2Sf 4.251 44 10.074 5828 75 7,893 7.892 M 4,355 4,355 45 8,727 4,912 78 8,180 6,180 ts 4,847 4,847 48 7.160 4.441 77 6,081 6.081 IS ifJB 47 7,088 4,400 78 6.790 8,798 IT 4,521 4,21$ 48 7.759 4,495 79 5155 4«5 IB 4,573 4.283 49 8380 4,834 80 4,233 <2J3 19 4.826 4,518 SO 7,772 4.006 81 4.235 4.235 20 5,148 4,790 5t i,m 4,444 82 5W iJ23 21 5.490 5,135 52 4.861 4.372 83 5181 A0I7 22 5,279 3,279 S3 5.377 5377 84 6.269 5523 23 4,803 4.903 54 6.298 8.296 85 4.918 iiso* 24 4,823 4,S0t SS 580/ 5802 88 5473 25 4.5X 4,216 56 5845 5845 87 0,604 4.354' 26 *,774 4,774 57 A934 4.934 88 2,444 t//A 2B 4.521 4.821 58 4,899 4.137 89 N/A 27 4,47} 4,471 JS 4,556 4,063 90 154.775 M/H 29 4.596 4,996 80 8.343 4.833 91 503.840 W/( X 5,120 5,120 81 8.204 5254 92 878,788 N/A lOML LOT MCA - 2.045730 SF (47.0 AC) JOTAIMBAOA > 427,827 ST (9.82 AQ KSOOIJIAL SWtTS - 17^464 SF (4.1 AC} » KCKADON AKA - 14,093 SF (03 A0 stauHEO wcfSAnoH AVA " 84 tors »100 SF m ii4oo sr STREET -A CULDESAC msua SWEWALE DETAILS mscAu TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE DETAIL mscAu CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' ©2002 O'Doy ConsuHonts, he. tcsamm: $amm »-» smnr mnpur LOunoK ofntiut er a CAAmo ADH AT fwacm sTMmm 4S4*u mcmtmmt cetmrrKMCHuiaspn OMmrrn coma DATA) Qivun» mitt OAHM IIS.C it cs MC tr mtMumit JMMW n KBO C B WITT r^'T/w T S SHEETS orssnms KMBT w. pn. JM MP-- u-mt 1 Mir^i^ywS ' IBIHNM8I net Nom- imio<BP/'S m n BJMT GXML OUB K., AKKKDK XJ-T SHEET 3, OAs SHEETS iCiT^ 01-02 PiUlh, '01-05 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K: ©2002 O'Doy Consullonis, Inc. nrMiKM: m.4n anmusc*cs —C 6 H S tJ"IT'30nJ'T 5 nOJtCT MM i UeX Jot NO.: Jtmil— tHOMCOl flr MMM SHEH 4 OF 5 SHEETS CT. 01-02 f P.U.D. 01-05 ©2002 O'Doy ConsultanlSrJnci'"N'*>-, tmma Mtnf tuwRM M./r Mm use 4 cs onnmB 9f. M*- vat' tm. nm MKWCCT MM.. tJB- JOt NO i_fcBBB_ (02002 O'Doy Consullanls, Inc. VOWOt eBr/mUtVR CAimOACM AT oKMon smm 4s**tt mns mp-t utRMO nm eoairr9eioftr€UOn eetmrrwn cwmoL ma) luvMVK am oAum esc »ct CALAV£RA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' SIGHT DtSTANCE PROFILES icti tiWB wet 10? iT BOUNDARY DATA RADIUS LDlGTHj I -4-jwar —j- w «!>' .r.n i.a' — tt If JSASEMENTS; A cnuuet rAsPttfT m FAym er atm m. MI < nvASW A rmmr usBsm m FAm er tesTA mx tumara. mm (xsmr irc jAK 33, mo AS rti lo-mx cr <mM Ateans A rmM tAsaefT mrAm sr eosa MA mmmAi mm esmeritt. mnejx mrAsnrni* tt-ximeremeiAi meoKS AU [Aiaons mm nne smn sarnmmuiF. AH cAsorm m CAK£ mi\4SKmm FAWir er eAtms CAtimsicK mciiKcxr. 3t,moAs/irm. le-simmoF ermtt imons iir neait en IOCAKH CAimi m eimms me SAP msmami AH imBnmifmD nitm FAcvm tAsnviT m FAW or spev ACC Aur/. tm AS ne im-wjms or emcui Ktem. K tem lecAHOH CAMOTie irirmmtp FKm sAi> msmimorr. JU uKiiemm mme mtjits CAsoptr m r»m er siKM Art tuTF. imAs fiFut iMv-ftffjm or ernati Ammes K mum cn tecAm cA/mor ec ccmum flttm SAC msimup/T. •EAScmiTIOK WCAiai arr cr ccMSor SBrmiKmrm ft/men HAH VICINITY MAP ©2002 OOcy Consuttonls. Inc. AirutcaHrmivm WW AOKS nrr Bcmemai ACAts msettrm lois trafCAnemi tois Homemms AssocsAitoH ten _ emrMttois wiK mmBaorien tuanterans awrr _ aim _ H.tS GRADING ANALYSIS: ^ cum 4) evim TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE DETAIL PARKING SUMMARY: S.MCt Jimcr tr9*B0m M aroewHC sema . SAif-toAoui sunev mint MUAwr n im Atm emme rum OK. sm-m t MXOUAifmiaoemrimiee wfrnKAamtmrnenm noOD ZQNS DSSKmmK mti' wisBcam wmnoaonmi(xcnoaa taumrmw m*, emmmrf-nm. mma mam tmrmVMtm mt>j locMnm smoAiK K-H smmBtmur mumommion Wfmt ampuf <F a CAimv mm AT nmvt summ 4s**u miu mx^j KcoD nw camrKPKKitmj fin tamrmt mcma OAIA) SHEU I OF 4 SHEETS CT. 01-02 P.U.D. 01-05 P. U.D. FOR CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' LEGEND: tmsmm xm mm 8 AH BBmtxmrtiKi»4m8AM.. mmem mimm im (Bmem inmr aiom),., miettotB nx mmimn ,., xm mm # Ajt... memo swmn mum t ctf „. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: m wttrrxtxummtTmama trSAieta$maim W MM OM imm IS t/BI 8 9 ct 08-88. i CIVIL ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR: '.mam omremmti smrnsum (7IV93I-Fm ATM mm fllMK jngg Mr a MM e ff >i l "U '1 T T &— vcmmm vft AR. OMI: Hft iwi Monr MM.- m m <»• W-»*» b^»n^rwl^MtrM\M•>«l*^>'ILL.•-l•Ml HASJBf PLAN COHPUANCE TABLE tOTf lOTSlE' ITT PAD AKA rum SIBKS juunc XKtT' JDDM) scmAocs KTAL senm xmpcs ismr Am. cuwns sec tr set' mn. mmw AFC AKCf ouume coroua JT PAO COtlUX POKN/ cajRiiAO tAieanr 1 4,ftr Ifit 1 JS tA'-jl; t-s:- i-s' »• m ITiir l,t2S Jar ICS «ei t t,Stl 3.519 3 ts tJ-t^ t-lf; l-S' ft' no avr i,m MX US OPT J l.4» 7.011 17 ms ii'-r n-it) l-S' tr no IFMIF 3,984 jor no no t im 1,7)0 r IS t*-XT I-J' 7f icsftf'if) U-iiF ItTt m ra ATOV ! 1.291 iOf J ts tJ-fff I'S' If ICS (71 1} IfilF im xa no m 1 S«J StSJ 1 ss 11-4' ^^/5^ 1-9' to' m 19'iiF ZB»4 Jttf ns no T iiee iia 3 IS ij-nr ft-t; l-S' w no WVff ITK Jew rrs no » 4,734 4.7S4 IO KB 2f-r A-5': t-3' w m «>W i.tje 4IX no no t Am Al2t 7X 15 24'JH-•wj; 1^3' w yafuFA} iFiir lias MX rrs ne tv -(«J 4,905 J IS ts'-t'^ 9-7) I'S' «' res (Its't) }$W %79t m m m fl 4.J0J 1 ts 74-Ji: n-r; i-sf ut' HO IftlF %tii m ICS no 12 4.S27 4.327 IX SS »•-<* t-t) l-S-rr m ISilF i,t» 4JX no ne U 4.1S! <1SI 3X JS t4--JC 1-3' IF m WiW 1.815 4JX xs no 14 4.JSS iJSS 77 IS 34-^ A-3': t-3' »• K WJW 1,813 m in no 13 4.8*7 UT ns tl'-l' #-5f t-3' w no iFtlf-tut m PR no It SIX XfM J IS ly-tK 14' ne tf>W I7t2 JS> no no 17 <Stl 4,113 // ts A-5} i-r 14-no Witf' 1823 tJX rts no It <S7J t.ja tt IS *-5,' i-r 14' Its (If 9) WM' ins 4JX ns no » <m 4,918 3 ts 3J~»K A-Si l-f 14' ICS (I4HI4V WW' t.m m xs no to aw 4,790 3 IS 7J-tK t^s: t-r w Its (if*.i4D tw S7X no no Jf AtfO MSS 3 ts 7*-39! It's* (•#' IF xsflftj »vw itn S7X ra no 72 i/fi SlTt J IS iJ-»K Mj 1-7J' af nsfiFf) 1792 34X ns no IJ <jttj 4.I0J J IS AS* t-t' IF WSflFt} HtiF im XX no OPT 7* taa U KS 31-1' n-s) i-t' u-ne rsiir tern m ITS no 33 AUl 1 2S 34'-^ US': ff 14' SSfiFf) mir tiJi Ht xs mt K 4,774 4.274 J IS A-Si t-t' IF rcsftSXiJV IV'rW im m Its OPT 17 **« AtP 1 IS n-si i-ttF IF VSflFV »w ItTt 4JX xs mv It i.471 A 471 J JS tj-f)r iM? i-r If fTSflS'A) »>w im ta no OPT 71 *,m <JW 3 IS tr-J^ A-s; l-KF IF res (IS-u u'tir tM 4JX xs mv X iUD IW 3 IS tj-ifr IT'S) i-r If ne UVW IW S7X Its OPT Sf 3,797 AIS2 1 ss ff-4-IT'S) I'l' If ne iS'iiF tee* 4t» xs no 32 SSfJ SiSSJ J ts A-s:- i-to' IS' no u'tir im yr no OPT JJ 4.597 4.317 1 B if-r »-9: l-r IF no IS'ilS-leti ASM no no Jf 4.mj A7U 1 ts t*-J^ A-s': l-S' IC' no n-Mir itn *ox ns no Jt) <H7 At47 J IS tr-tlT A-S': t-3' 19' no tf>tf' im XX xs (PT Jt 3,771 1771 17 ns tf~r A-Si 1-3' »• no »>»' zet4 XX no no 37 t,t2 «B 3 IS M} t-F W m 19W 1979 *4t ns XOV JB 4.74S Am 3 IS A-F; t-F »• no WM' tttt 47M xs mv Jt 3,979 ASlf J IS W-19'; l-F If no ««r ttn m xs no te 7.023 A5X J X w-«!r A-f: i-it tr no »VW' IfSt m no no 41 mos SJ70 a ns 31-1' A-S': 1-1' tr no isiir 1094 XX xs no *2 ijst ASI3 J ts iJ-tK If no anr 1792 XX xs ne UASm PLAN CaiPUANCE TABLE tort UJTSS' XT PAD AKA wx siaxs oaum Moenr' smcrm scmAOs KM. wnm irmtcKs ismr AiKM Boam stcxm' m xc AKA' MOW OMXwr M MP cnow axmm Ham- 4S SX7 A357 X X A-7Jt; t-F i3.r no U'rir I.AtS m Its no 44 10074 SIX 1 X lt--4' 9-fi I'S' IX no BIrfJ' 1X4 JSX no no 43 iitF int 3 X ly ns(iriO mw (« m ra tPT 44 7.IX i44l J X A-W) t-F IS' ms mar l.7tt m no no 47 7,m A4eo ax MX 31--I' 9-iei t-F IF no a'Mir t9M 4tt xs no 41 7,7X A4t9 J X tF-tir n-ie": t-S' 13-no «Mr tfST 4m xs no 4t «3» 4,K4 1 B H--4-A-lf: 1-3' 17-no uwr im 4X no no 30 7.771 Am 17 nx 3i--r t-II) t-F ir ta nur tm SI* ne no SI *IX A444 J K »r-^ n-3t. l-F ir no wvw txr 4m xs m> 53 AMI Asrt 17 las ti'-r M; I'S-IF m tfW ICS* m XS no SJ SJ77 S377 1 X 11-4' n-lli l-F tr no IS-klF lex JX m no 54 WW KM 3 X x'-9fr lt-5i l-F 14' no miF tm m no OPT X sm Mtff 12 ns ti'-r ("»' tF no tSilf 1084 XX xs no X **« A949 J X a-«Sr K-Si I'lr M' no mar im Jtx XS VT S7 <«w AtX 3 X Mi IF xs(irv jvxr *'* J m xs mv 9t <t» iUF 3 X x-'Ufr «-9) t-lF It mpmxt} rnw IM? 4SX rts OPT X ASX <eu t e f-3^ »-F. i-ir ir xspri) mur 1.979 m xs mv to I.J4J iM 13 ns ti'-r A-Ki twf »' no ISW im 4JX no no tl UtI ua4 r X H'-4' A-t\ i-ir X-no mw tCH JU xs no tt 7JIS A9I7 J X 3j--tis-A'li I'S' M" xs(ifio WM' tm m ne OPT u AX7 4,X7 1 X X-Jlf f-t) t-F If nsoro m'lir 1979 m ns tPT t* 1,111 4.947 J X 9i-« 9-19; l-S" a-no m'tir UV JU Its OPT fJ S.X5 5X7 t X x'-jfr n-F. t-5-tr WS(iFIO W>«' l9At m rts OPT X um Am J X 11-9) l-F If nsorp mw IMt m no XT t7 SXI AXI 1 X 9-9) ImF 14' no mur um JX xs XT X S3SI 5m 1 X H'~4' 9-15) t-F IF no aw im JX xs no X Aim 4M* J X A-Si t-U' .V no mur tm JU rts OPT le <*M 44H 1 X n-3\ l-F IF no •wr I97t 4X xs Itttt 71 4414 <W 13 ns if'-r 9-fi l-r W no 0Vlf im 47X no no Tt Atn <«' t X l-r IT no WMT ttl9 4X xs KOV 7J 4J*J At*J t X A-9) l-F tr no I8'*ir tem m xs mp 74 4.t7J A97J J X n-s) I'F IT no mw tm m rts OPT 7S 7.m 7.m 13 ns p'-r M; l'7.F IIF no aim' tm XX ns no H i,im CW J X Mr-Ajc A-7) l-r ir XSpFiO miir tm m m OPT 77 tem tem J X tr-tSf n-s) i-iF UF XS(lF0 WM' tm Six xs OPT n 4,m tim It KX X'-l' 9-3) t-lF iir w tfM' im 3ft no no Tt AOS iix J X tr-tir 9-3) t-r «• no WM' ixt 37X XS XT K <3U AUJ 1 X »•-** P-7J) l-F ItF no WM' 1X4 m no no m AUS A3X 3 X n-lS) l-F a.F no WM' UM tn ns mv tt iW 4,JU 13 MX 31-1' *•»; t-F IT no tfVW tm m ns no u Smi s.ei7 I X x'-4C A-8) t-F ir XS(lTlt} WM* UX m ns XT X IHt SXJ J X ih-a) 1-9' a' rts (IF t} W>M' tm MX rn xr noiE Atoacc/mmr rm snrncjc - rtf ixis mm POKXJ m eourmm - x (TOJV IXT nrr xxm' rixrsmf I3F WAi s/rsmACK' ifssf nmts* 13* KOX 13 nmts* m 7X 1 mrisx J3* $7* J mnisM jtr m IDTAl im im m(mmv} mslBHj/ixcw. 'wgxa.) 'xma> •mxamv "mxixm TYPICAL SLOPE SETBACK COMPUANCE DETAIL SWSWALK BSTMUS noscAU ©2002 O'Ooy Consultants, Inc. ioc nia noertAm atim m AffOAT irtttmieen mcA/mixttrcm V CAAism m txmxorr. SECTIOH A-A noscmt SHEETS OF 4 SHEETS CT. 01-02 P.U.D. 01-05 K'lV 1 SNST. TAIURiCKAnS, mscxi W AOn 1 U' ir ir IF 5" 73' t'ACPAHmrom APpnexoOAX^. o ^ ACC aBrmt* STREET C mtetu ! f' »-1 w- ! ! 1 F ^ aj' 1 4'AC momt om ! ^ SWEBT 'A CUWESAQ' mtcAU BtMCHMAKK: oactmvtm stmm n-M smtrr anmimr itamt : watmM X a cttm ACAi AT pman sunen Asttx mitsttee-i RcoHinKM teamr seal IPGS (natoiXTrx. eemoL OAU) nxmot X47t BAUx use 8 Cl CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' smr t or 4 sums —nnmrmpfrn— lamm 9t JULiL. vn m. itti owM Wft , Kfc KMX.- JUML- MOJKT M—; 14 m MO. M-MBB MM ri-i\i^mm ^TT* PMMOR or MMM DUCi mm immcxjta FOA mmx AXMJC wmcvmc mvrr axin, wtff mr. e*r em Ano cotsnrn mm ARC mm. 303-1 SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETS ^ CT 01-02 dVY P.U.D. 01-05 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' ©2002 0'E}cy Consuttants, Inc. Kcon TiKM eeunrr xnai urns (no eeurrrmt amma mu} EUwiDN: m4n mm use * cs CONSULT V N T S DMW 1*1 If MMA- f • 4> MOJtCT H*tUUL_ JD* MO.! li-liaC MM taM M M l^iii' 1 noMcoi or IRMN ttm SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS CT. 01-02 P.U.D. 01-05 ©2002 O'Doy Corsullont!. Inc .K-m^nm. .ii\v.i.»-T..«oT«.t^ BALCONY/DECK DESIGN GUIDEUNES K Fouomne AX Bcmt taDamcs/srAmm rx Bttaxes Am tccKS mmm CAUXJU MUS must I MPimPoscvKBtsixtvmmBionmnmc eensmuciKn X SALcaxS/tcaa nur AX AarHCKAurruAxn A/O wxmusx. mc ersxi eaocimcs A« AceonPAnco trA 8wcenr/titac IMXT wur imms rteai amis MAY MAX 8Aicaxs/«m AHD rx lOCAm x mc tAieanr/tcac en A vmr§r vmrntms SHEET I OF 3 SHEETS CT 01-02 P.U.D. 01-05 BASIC REOUIREMENTS - (BALCONY / DECK) L men ro mc BSiuncc X A mMOne remnr m A iAiconr,Woc mer mar m snom mAt nx BAuXAfr^m nAS em tppma X mc noxomms ASSooAim A/mom. tr mr nommm Asscatmrn a efSCAcwmtxr AS eunm m mt tans (HOI una at HOA STAMP BMUMS^ J AOAumr/xvemsTXXeoLWAMDBtsoiiHATBanPAxicmm mcXBime IMT. 4 A/Aieenr,^ nvsr mmm AU xm*a Ammtmis X SPtxa m or CAtAxxA mus lasm run. PC mmo ecximoir xxanct Atm mc tAiconr/tax ecaen amama t. MiD-tcm OAieann/KCAS AAc nor prmtniR speanc DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - (BALCONY / DECK) J mctocAVoi X8ucaxs/UarsMAYKnmwB mm mc axmc AKA srccxcAur BonrtD 9r IX tKcetrr/tcx tmn suojccT 10 mcAPmrem xmc noxmms ABOeuten Atm TK arr ff CAHXAB Aumnt BcmixnT. TRELUS/PATIO COVER DESIGN GUIDEUNES IK miemne AK eema cAUircn* ms Mur • eetamucmx X imws>mAK corns mAi AK AamciKAurmcAsme Ano wcomusnc mc ecsten euetuiD AK AceemPAmcp tr A mcuis/fAWo tem cmm mtrunms mmatisnArntx UKUO/PAK) eoxns m txiecAm X nr maus^Ta com m A imtrimtASs BASIC REQUIREMENTS - (IRELUS/PAW) I mm TO 7K mmcc V meme rcmiT m A aaiS/AvK eoxit mov mar x xomi iHAT mc maus/PA^ COXA HAS 9CCII AmortB 9Y mc Kncomms ASsooATOt Amom tr mc noKomm Asseeum IS etscKiaunr X ounmi m mc cans fiat untx Anp/m MM sJAnf en KAHS) « A mtun*Ano eexw moT KAAium AU scmAcx Atrnmoxnis x xtcno m mc CAuitPA nusMsiXPiAK »€ AiAtmcD BCXUxoiTenmumec m fr muA/mBo eoxir ecsx amftrrs 7 AU lois nusT nAMTAm A KX nn> AKA X Acma X mtm mmtXfi X CAiAxnA mt nASTCA PUW AxncmcHTnp-iseM cnr CPcn-mxr mcujs en epm-pox PAW coxns (it, lAmcc PAnas en ntianAis *muneto PAxun 10 CAcn onm mm XAos tcirxDi nctQ nAr cmm mo IK Koumce SPEanC DEmOPMENT STANDARDS - (TRELUS /PAW) I AU BKWS/fAPO cotpts 9IAU lun A mumm iipm X no noK tm »rtCT X ncASumrmm mc ouismc V rex re a/mc x mr Am> nasT nxmrn A nmx s-toor SWAP! nm ACAA AM m rmiD roas, som xus xcomxTr muis. A nAxun x t nn exmune s Auem PAST mc POST. J nr ouisK tm V A wiu&*Aiio COXA mm ntmvim A imxim asmce X le tm xm Anr AMxm emume tm X onBtmaig/ntx COXA mi. A nAXAX X 3 rm oxmme B Auoncp PAST wc POST. « mc tecAm X wcwscs^m eoxK mr X nexTB rm 9€ exoAx AACA sptwcmrmcnxro or IK mcue/fAW conn tam seojecr v »e APPPOAH X IK nontomrfs AssooAm m V€ arr V cAAum PLAnmne xmmn. HRF PROlFCnON NOTES: I. eniois i-uoteKxmuemm iiKuati*Am coxns m mtmsKom rmc ptxxm taxK orsxt AAB tonsimxm nAwrs mm nusTX AmoxD X »€ car MUttw 181115 or OACLOnr/txpTS * Tmus/Mm emen (xt OESOH eaotMs ON SHEET I Fon juomom HmxamiTs) XC4LAtClU HUS tucmeme»a nammnffrxnaour Ano AK nor TO X tm m imarmm. on rnmou sunrramma BALCONY/DECK AND TRELUS/PATIO COVER EXHIBIT FOB CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' ©2002 O'Doy Consullonis, Inc. SEE SHEETJ SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS CT. 01-02 P.U.D. 01-05 or PKowcmi mm& BALCONY/DECK AND TRELLIS/PATIO COVER EXHIBIT FOR CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' tusiammAXMrncnrx'-iseoo, snp.iu ©2002 O'Doy Consultonts, tne. SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS CT. 01-02 P.U.D. 01-05 ffif fflpgcwvwia t ov lOfS i-ff umMONts m wom^w mm m mm vtai m mtiKKm mSSi «aai M taemacH mx—s Jl—mei m jmmta tr tt arr o CrOt SPACE LEGEHD BALCONY/DECK AND TRELUS/PATIO COVER EXHIBIT FOK . CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'nr' nAxmim mis X OAUi awMCBtx »x«u&Mie corns en pnr r roA AeenhnAt Acmiaintp ntcMMCxa na AK rm ntrmcna atr mv SK noT TO X vsa rm mmxTAt m iCTBMt 3wnfr ctwaa ©2002 O'Doy ConsuHonts. Inc. e fl w » u L T t i (flOWflPD flSSOCIflTfS UM^DSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2B3B CMTMO (M Rh> South SUM 210 Ban Oiago. CaWOmla S310B FAX (eia)7ia-oem m EES ^ ffl S & i e if* 5 S "I cl DATB. l/it/03 JOB NUMee*. W34> riLE. V«kig»«L6ri CT 01.02 PUD 01-05 PiBnIing Zone 2 - HOA Maintained ' Picnic Tables - BocceBall Playing Field ' Existing Landscape to be Maintained by HOA - Modified Fin fWeclion Zone 1 - Modified Fire Protection Zone 2 -iModltledFIre Protection Zone 3 All Side Yards Slopes to be Planting Zone 3 - IndMduel Property Owner Maintained Existing SIreel Trees per VUlage 'Q' Planting Plan - See Drawing No. 303-2L SheetL-12 Planting Zone 2 • HOA Maintained •ee Mass Grading plans for Slope Planting (HOA Maintained) 91 om ma See Mass QrmSng Plans for Slope Planting (Indivklual Properly Owner Malnlalned/ Fire Protection Zone A-3 Fire Protection Zorw A-2 Fire Protection Zone A-1 Ranting Zone 3- HOA Maintained Fire Protection Zone B-3 Fire Protection Zorje B-2 Fire Protection Zone B-1 See Sheet 6 for Ptonf Legend, Waler Conservation Inkmialion, Fire Protection Information and Percentage of Landscape Area. NORTH I" = 40' ({JOWfiPD ffiSOCIflTES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2830 Cwntno M R)D South Mm%\Z 8m Diapo. CaMomia 93108 <ei»}71B-«6M PAX (6i8)7iB-paeg m>f»is V' EE g l-SE 1% s tM I S I ^0-1 li Q PATB. pnArw or. Jci JOB MiMBCR. -U^i riLBi vtim9»ri,eP3 CT 014)2 PUDOmS FENCE & WALL LEGEND SOLID UASONRY VIEW WALL - J" Hr. UASONRY * J" Hr CUSS VIEW FENCE - ITON VIEW FENCE (IRON) TO BE BUILT IN NON-COMBUSTIBLE ZONE (UP TO HOUSE) - LOTS I-220NLY SPECIAL VIEW WALL (INCLINED GLASS) ON SOUTHERN BOUNDARY -LOTS 1-22 ONLY NORTH I" = bO' ctlOWflPD fllSOCItlTf^ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2836 Camino dai Rio Soul Sulta210 San Dtapa. CaMomta B21C (019)718-9860 FAX (619)718-9069 ra S » i i r _ PATt. T/P-l/o: JOB l**«ER. "3*1 CT 01-02 PUD 01-05 Home Owner Association irrigation and Maintenance Zone Private Home Owner Irrigation and Maintenance Zone Home <3wner Association Bnah Management Meintenance - Non Irrigation Zone (HOWflPD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 2835 Camkio (M Rio SoutI Sulla 210 Ban DIapo, CaMomta 9210 (819)718-9680 - FAX (819)718-9669 RLAII2919 NORTH I" • bO' Of ft E*CET! 5' Tubular Steel Fencing Seat Wall Restroom / Pool Equipment Building CT 01-02 PUD 01-05 Bocce Ball Court Turf Picnic Tables NEIGHBORHOOD PARK WITH TOT LOT NEIGHBORHOOD PARK WITH BOCCE BALL COURT LOT 86 Common Area Recreation Fadlities Fadllty'Type NORTH I" = lO' Lot 85 - Nelghbortiood Park Children's Playground FaclHty Picnic Table Benches Lot 86 - Neighborhood Park Bocce Ball Picnic Tables Open Tuf Area Lot 87 • Recreation Center Swimming Pool wKh Cabana Spa Facility Common Area Recreation Calculattons LIsfB' LIst'B' Ust'A' See Sheet 6 for Plant Legend, Water Conservation Infomiation, Fire Protection Intbrmatkin and Percentage of Ijindscape Area. Gross Area (S.F.) Net Area (S.F.) Lot B5 - Neighborhood Park Lot 86 - Neighborhood Park Lot 87 - Recreation Center 4,918 8,473 9,604 3,159 6,580 4,354 Total Net Area 14,093 Required Area 8,400 LOT 85 ctlOWflPD flSOCIflTfS LANDSCAPE M^CHTTtCTURE 263S Camino M Rio South 8una210 San Dtooo. CatfOmla 93106 (819)718-9880 RLA 83919 PATE. ifl'm DIM** or. J*J jcm Whvem, M34I ModHMZon* 1 ModKMZonsZ ModKladZonaS Nathra 12 to 25 ft. AddWorwHStDZSn ZonadopSito Beyond 80 feet Depandlngon bayond (ha (nfc) eraatatolalofOO' from a combuvflbta irtdhMual M wan and wMNnffw foralttiraatonas backyan) dapttila natlva vaeataOon trfaeR.hlgh non-oombutUbla {n/c}waH Yas TampofBiy, only No WA Backyanl 100%ramovalor lOOfbramovalof To be left In an lindscaplno with aK Ngh hiri vnhima alhlghlualvoluma undlslurtwd erdy Flra RaaMam •piclaSt wKh lha •padaa. wRh tha oortdlllon ptonU: axcopHonoT axcaptlDn of 1, No Iraaa In Ihli Budn^taat and BaMa spadai Sahiia apadai leno (aaga). SOHnf (•apa). 50% of 2. NoahnilMin lhaaa spadaa and thaoa tpadaa and tMinina 80% of ntodarala 70%0fmotfarala 3. MoatlylBwm hial volume bal vohvna and (round oovaf tpaciai wMba •paciaswftba plants rNonrtva rMmodarata •hntatalarttan hat mtuma shnib 36* bl halgt^ ara •padasamiDba siiowadtiM malnlabMdtoSe lona. Indwa kl hatght. i. AmuBlhand auapl lor a taw pna*ie ol ><• ilaad •cattarad nalhra raWnadnwdarata Km ratlatani (low or high hial VDkma and modarata) laiadtraaind •patiM. ahrub ipadas. 3. Thaotty 2. EaehtraaWvub grasaas wfilch wil wl bo prunod ol ril appruvad naUvo 3. Eachntafewd griBsastoba troanwstbt mahtamad al a prunad (torn Bw 4-Inch vtubWa Dreund to a halght halght. oT Bwaa Umas tha 4. An axtoctor wal halght of tfw fkia prolacfion undenloryfuol •prtnhlar ayalvn bad. wMtMplacad 4. Tha only and ihanaBva ba aHowad ara vagalatlon. Tha approvad naive Spflnklar ayilam griiiai, Thaee gratseilobe covar a awalh 80 maintained al i laalwWa out Into 4-Inch elubbia tianaHva haighi. vagalifan aloofl 5. Inalalatlonofa ttia anHra lanQth of norvcombuvtR)le wal end avtador — wN be raqulrad. v- ^ Clearanoa 3x helghl of underalory eiACK LETTERS :CLAIMEC> JNATER Typical Signs ir n 18* SZE .oie ALUUMUW. OSO ABS n>5tic OR STICK-ON WN-n. SIGMS Water Conservation Information Aw antf panwMva of aacA planMig 2on*,' Zona 1:4400:1:0.8% Zona 2:9500 :f.: IS % Zann 3:127.000 t.T4 10.0% Zorm4:SO3.000A.T.:r»% OseuaalanofZOrM ffifwitt)p.-2in» I i^rrOngmdnslgnmllebnunmlln •ctfManrfpa*iA*4Vanapacea,«n(fa/pR)laefair)Mn. AloulX3000t.f. oriuifmpmpon90.ii4iMixn9aanmo.3%XO>nxopondlKrdmmpn»^ ffMsM, Mnlhod>ti>inlnlrinntmmX»MlBrinmMu<lnndmtaX»9et pr^mKin ancf an opttna/tnlpalton eta^pt M<nM ull^ raMhaoA. TTw*nballonay»fcmw»fcea<ffj«»tf MaionagKloprawwf Fire Protection information TJmiMvfiotnJiiknOirottioanlbmmitentnOiOmGlyiifCmiibmi/ LanObo^MiHHtuafpaiDlMantffaguNnMnb. SpncKexntMlrnvmbtmi ktunX^nd tnr Om pixi. tAXntmmArcnX0iwpro4nxnn\normnmmb9 partamatf annual^ aa Ot4kmO on 9m pton. 5ealtao<»-f (Hlwuftcftratf aJgpaaJ Prnxnit mXi x^tmrdooimr oirfy^ Irrljjnlnd $neOimA-3(Umiul^eSurndmBpnaJ CT 01-02 PUD 01-06 Plant Legend Proiect Intwlor P>mirt»y) StnXJim-IBgnOenmXXmmitXn Uoun^anliKXum-Pmx rue*.- ffJkantt^naiatfnafraoMnatfwatw-tMVtoai ArHtaMtiViaM**. r7iai»r^albn«>«lwn N«badlMbnatf b Xnriaenp» Pinrdph*: PInnm Imm bnnn gioup&d In tiydnionn. 20na f plenfty/Ml baan oonoantaM ih fffvaa o^aibntfcanl MlK^ AfuDBfi N« ba uaatf HMtw af M afin* amaa Qaioni par jwar of wfw aart ptanXiQ aawa; lent 1:113.910 gm. ZormZBSA.OSOgm. ZomS- 1.0ia.049anl. Zorm 4:01X1. invasive Plant Contmi ApiioillylaOrtovmXIpioormrtaflmidncmpniimlnlnirnnenwIlhCXmmw HOmitOmoeifMakrtaXimnrrilVKXGinnnOtlitmtmKmtehmnitlMoOm nmOvmeBmslXAngnwmbnnOehnpnn^hnbmoonUen. TTmmwnndi aM ba conbolM boA OR fw par^VMO'of M naffM oomUan, antf *T naftw wtwgafaabn amf fta aMBpwwfaw arm. SucAmaAiMnanorMVba oo«rt<aWtyi'ia/fcmaowtiaf*>toaocfcfcaanrfaW6aaftwAllw/*^IW klomwnmmemnbnxmlkmlndbrvlQtvillrnirapamnoatnngiMm^bmm. OilmmKtiwtndiahnttmtptmynaoreulnndfinlfiMwthlmbkXmonnx moraMnastoAoRHVf^'WAarDoh. HmblMMmioulitbnutnOnpnifngly mriloniy¥i»r9mnMemAndwupx<tmianXm»enimndp*moontiilnOvmar. Village Landscaping Percentage Pmnmdmmikmrmlnrune, naiUnBn*VDEMe*«,-n«aitobrpton«etfno cAonnr Omij 30'Apmt InlpXmS ttmimmXNglrMmineXBlOBatltaflbyOmcKyXCnilXmiliPlmrlnOmOti XtntrXoo^mr Imtn than Aai^ltf Alo fraea ormmitt: Or^XnO PnmnvtFAeOtmOpxrBptmn Awaa- f50albnfnMnumite RteXtipkmmiL.Bmm^lim MnuhnrAt ¥m1nQnln *OxXttnn u^xomim RamoMf ^ aelPcM pnnhg w to W « of medMe ibar ^paolM.-riiMt antf topa afnAa be*v lafehatf afiar ba pn»W to J Iknea lha fMbAf Um mnwundhe ummXeiyorO'. wMehmftrlifitilmrOnmtanO MCMahw^'ftHpg!K0fOM<l aftal ba ramoMetf-bi^jMM SncOenB^ffM^nnnat) ftmoymXlrlohntalapnmnKRmeMlbrBtludhwxtninvuploOO%X modmto M ioaolaii-naaa anrf Iwpa aflRAs ba*v raMiatf aW ba pmnndloSllimtOmlmlghlXOmmnivuntnffinramXBfyarO: mNehmmr It IrlOTmt^ DnnO nrrd nmmnmvt^ TmlQfff xomth XmM bn rmrmtxiSi Non4nloXml Proposed Fire Protection Zones Adjacent to Sensitive Native Areas: InFutumVUngntKmrdKnmodKhazXrnlwmbnloeaXdwKmitm prapmlylmmdmlnnXlommahemrHOmmplmm. TM zona iMV/anga «iynf^»*a(dlipand»van#iad»plVidrrwmarjw*. AmodOM ZomgwSlbalocnmdoulamihnpivpmtl'Onnt.mXwOlmngmMm *a(MHtv«}llrafftrZonae famfZ Ana JMVbaJITiMklh maMv* toW Jbr lha tfna nnae of W. 7h9tnpmpotnaxiim.mt<l0mlrpnpenndtma»0om,nn9kmnwlmllntm drmt/lnff lo lh& mit I ^ft^motinrt pndOfMxr - tityopxtnrr Slopea TelXSimArm: LnridMMp»dAnn(iKAnidudlngnXln Pmmntngn XSHn luedlbrLnndncaping: Pea/f Inigation Water Demand July * 80 gpm 1.048.400 a.F. 147.730 S.F. U % Stona voneer wait - - Storw field behind aignage - Prpfect name and logo Slone veneer ' pflaiter 5aMito raoomarto eximrUt - Otpn hannynntm Altapa gnxntf COMT - flWi '^^^i Xyopottnn px^ntiOxn * ^hmOwIn irryoponnn Itomnmlnm toc^wcmf On flaiaef - ffnoeaaie fonmtrtny a«pa ODW Crap • f4«taaaatf TiXHum XyOoxrx^'-OCwawk ^puma ^)MfiborfMotfmrn*aa- f««altan mMnun al ^ ) OXn-amximr-nuXntnOOm fM«f>barfloDrf My Snnda - f gittn mhhwn afa <-UfyX»mH9» Nn^jhbottrouUCnOygnmtOtmixn Aixamxnx OBiw*wp.-aBenk PntxxxmnnpXmoxn'XftmxXm ua-n>r Entry Monument - Front Yard Condition Notes: 1. Refer to mateffelB and ook)r board for tetter malarte)», and colon, l-etter size to be conslttant wHh Master Plan requkement* 2. Refer to Sheet 1 fbr entry monument location Scale: 1/r « r-0" cHOWflPD flSOCIfllfS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 283S Cmlno del Rk> South 8(«a210 San Dtago. CMforrM 82108 (ei8)ri8-Be8o FAX (81»)71B.08Be m % II SI ill CM » i CT 01-02: PUD 01-05 I f CALAVERA HILLS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE VILLAGE K CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANffiS niG McKMUr UBOC tc A«OBiaCIUM«lljW 10.01.02 CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 PIR&T FLOOR PLAN PLAN PLANI Single-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS. McMJLLDSr COMP AMES CT 01-02: PUD 01-05 cMSRii IU nor (V Tire mmiuimxoiMi FRONT ELEVATION - PLAN IA FRONT ELEVATION - PLAN IB PLAN 1 Single-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES u THE MJUNLEr AaOC. OR. AilUniBLIUU*nANN~ ~ mm m CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 Mnm IU ap0p fv mf REAR ELEVATION - PLAN IA coneit TU BOOT pi> LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN IA RkSHT ELEVATION - PLAN IA tUttiX'ehX PLANI Single-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLE^ COMPANIES CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 -exammiurmxntAl REAR ELEVATION - PLAN IB B • oencmnzKcar tu LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN IB RiaHT ELEVATION • PLAN IB icnMwr4p PLAN 1 Single-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES m McKMLBV AtlOC. INC Amcxncnxr. a nAHitim mm 09 CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 n Cl REAR ELEVATION - PLAN lA villaga CLou 2 - 22; and villag* 'X' aou 2& - 43; Conrormanctt RsqulrafnanU of Section VIILIJ? oF tha Ma»tar Plan i)ri<i«i.Mwmai fira»««f.n«aKai»iwwmiimjniwwew^^ reMWWfN imMfwniBdri PLANI Single-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES m m 02 CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 U FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN IX PLAN IX Single-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES Tn kMUNLXY AiaOC INC AxxmcTUKEAnA.tt>nm mm 07. CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 REAR ELEVATION - PLAN IX tetlm¥r^^x Vlllaga '<' CLou 2 - 22) and villags 'X' CLote 3& - 43) Conformamaa Rsqulrsmsntt of 6«ctlon Vlll.njs of th« Ma»t«r Plan ii PLAN IX Single-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES THB McKlHLKT ASSOC, mc AiKHincnjue k riAmmn mm n-^ n • SECOND FLOOR PLAN PLAN IZ CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 FIRST FLOOR PLAN <>iu<p» mtt. IOO* OF 1>e PUWS RCOF U»C IS SINSLE STOW •ouwKr PLAN IZ PLAN IZ Reduced Second-Story Plani CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES 1 n r\i rx'y CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 FRONT ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-B f1 FRONT ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-A fALrCALFORMA IOO* OP Tte FLAWS ROOF UlC IS SINSt£ STOKT PLAN IZ Reduced Second-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES ii CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 lunexXTim f) REAR ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-A n m B LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-A RIOHT ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-A tmxTmrmmwexutmm PLAN IZ _ Reduced Second-Story pianf^^ CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES mm m CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 REAR ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-B wBiimwt-e LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-B RiaHT ELEVATION - PLAN IZ-B «M 0P-OR ruM RBBP UK • MU annr PLAN IZ Reduced Second-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 ceHocc tu Mer nr TffV f '1 REAR ELEVATION - PLAN IZ ICAA* IT • r-o* Vlllag* K' CLou 2 - 22; and Vltlags 'X' CtoU 2B - 43; Conformanca RaquiramsnU of fraction VIII.IJ^ or lha Maetar Plan I Him •DOTM L Mi.vmiri«iv0«iMiM«HU.MBaMwmiae«saiw M H vemfi mi* awjL m- AMK Me aniM mr R N » w MfMw w BOMMHiMaMM IMU ner am • ttLtumtma 1 iwvirftwawwpoea(iwawem<w»)»tiMairipaciiww>JWi>»MJt PLANIZ Reduced Second-Story Plan^^^ CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPAMES r' .L_r" tm/ \ 0 tD '1 • SECOND FLOOR PLAN PLAN IZ-X teAUiX'iV MunwmcPNMar, '4nx. CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN IZ-X Wimk ESS ammmt* «w. PLAN IZ-X Reduced Second-Story Plan CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES AmflTBCrrUtl ft PLANN1M0 mm n? CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 ciuwerrrrm REAR ELEVATION - PLAN IZX yillaga CLoU 2 - 22; and villaga 'X' CLou 2& - 43; Conrortnanca Raqulrafnant» of fraction vlli.lJb of tha Mastar Plan L Mi«iinu(M.BaBMiNusRBiLrrAfiWiiiameMM«LiEn»w 1 ML*M»«riMPo«e«w«aMiv NMraeMWVHU. •WL xiaa eemrnw ne * rmtxmH.immmmtnimimmmmimmiLiriMemmtmnmmirwamamim'miunm k MLMinvaMtia NUHWnBAAH) fM I Mrim4*r.rmmtmmtim.miimmtxxmxo» 91 geotrnm M Muw WMOff ID M Hme em ew9L PLAN IZX Reduced Second-Story pian^-^ CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 SECOND FLOOR PLAN PLAN 2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 2 -m PLAN 2 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES 10.01.02 CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 FRONT ELEVATION - PLAN 2B FRONT ELEVATION - PLAN 2A tUt^l/t.K^ CRAFTSMAN EARLY CAUFORNIA PLAN 2 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES AK»mcnjR8 AruNNDn mm m CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 o REAR ELEVATION - PLAN 2A •MaiM**iv LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN 2A RIOHT ELEVATION - PLAN 2A PLAN 2 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES TM McKMJT AiaOC, wc 10.01.02 CT 01-02: PUD 01-05 o REAR ELEVATION - PLAN 2B • •DD B MMnmaawrc/r -SS LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN 2B RIOHT ELEVATION - PLAN 2B PLAN 2 ^^siifl/^ CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 REAR ELEVATION - PLAN 2A villag* •<• (Loit 2 - 22; and Villaga 'X' CLoU 2& - 43; Confomancm R«qulpam«nU oT Ssellon Vlll.lJp of th« Maatar Plan L MLa> IWM a. te«r K MLSM 4. Mva % •evmia«MeitmRrnmM«i£ftvMM»riDicHWffeni»' PLAN 2 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES A*aiTTfcnjita * FONMMG mm m CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 »• SECOND FLOOR PLAN PLAN 2X miuenmx* untr. FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 2x m,m,^,,mm mtr. PLAN2X CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES TnifcKMUTASaOC.INC CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 SECOND FLOOR PLAN PLAN 3 mnamnxA. mtv FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 3 "is PLAN 3 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES FRONT ELEVATION • PLAN 3B CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 FRONT ELEVATION - PLAN 3A HSMONSTTLE PATIO TTP. » ALL PLAN 9 aEVATlOH TYPB PLAN 3 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES Btlilli CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 () REAR ELEVATION - PLAN 3A MM nr. • Ml ru« • umnsMTni LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN 3A RIOHT ELEVATION - PLAN 3A PLAN 3 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES TW IWCMLET AiaoC INC AacnmcruiB a riANNma mm n? CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 o REAR ELEVATION - PLAN 3B LEFT ELEVATION - PLAN 3B nuM m • Mi tuN • M<wva m RIOHT ELEVATION - PLAN 3B •CMAVraN^ PLAN 3 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES tXBXMiumixtfTim CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 REAR ELEVATION - PLAN 3A Villaga 'IC' CLot» 2 - 22; and villaga 'x' CLote 2& - 43; Conropmanca RaqulramanU of Saetlon Vlll.nJo of tha Maaiar Plan X IP AJTift^iBamipaewwieecmii K Mf»wraB«>a*wwMwi>u.iinaw»niii wmKa«MieMii»m la gy. m tram m mm ; mtmratmemmnxttnmrxxxm. mmEimmmMi.mxrK «MV IMUL W enUM* CK VMS ML I ,fiK en •mmtu. iwwMi A ii PLAN 3 CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES PLANI i9B>F.4. Mn-iro- tmtt.-*-mm'V)* <M tr. + toss • IM- tr. 4. M • r-is- AVBIMe 9em*£K 0SUM3 OK excB» t^' mMcM-tnoeucw AVSBAOB feiPS YARD HH. 4 crr-semw new njw mnjcc Uf c-sti IM wcEi tgsea.n'.oPAmA. HH 4 0n>«rnwtf rem ruws PLAH3 PLAN2 HM. 4 fflHETTHt mOHr PUWft PLAN3 HK 4 orr«nftf nuKT nxes PLANIZ FRONT 4 R6AR PUNI8 Off-6eTTINlQ REQUIRBMBNTfe CT 01-02; PUD 01-05 otHtoKrasm PLAN2 SINISLg STORY SPQB RBaUIRBIBNIT PLWIZ Tor4t.n»ciRi m ow.«om', tt'(4W ONE-&TORY eiBIBNT < SINiaUE 6T0RY BPQB REaUIRBIBNTS GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE 'K' McMILLIN COMPANIES AicwracnKE A riAiMwa in 1 m CTOl-02; PUD 01-05 ntmuu ntrmu irvmuu \P mvmm mmMS mmu () REAR ELEVATION •cAia. iM* • r-o" FRONT ELEVATION acMft iM*-rt«* RIOHT SIDE ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION toAim. iw • VILLAGE 'K' Pool Building CALAVERA HILLS McMILLIN COMPANIES vmvuKMMtmocoK. tnamnawa • fwaaw 10.01.02 j October 16, 2002 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Senior Planner, Eric Munoz ERRATA SHEET FOR CT 01-02 - VILLAGE K This Errata Sheet is being provided to aid and implement Master Plan compliance with regards to open space dedications. Add the following custom condition to Planning Commission Resolution No. 5290 for Village K: Open Space Lots 91 and 92, which constitute the 34-acre wildlife corridor through Village K in compliance with the Calavera Hills Master Plan and Certified EIR 98-02, shall be dedicated to a third party environmental manager with a conservation easement dedicated to the City of Carlsbad, prior to final map approval or grading permit issuance, whichever occurs first, all to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. ERRATA ITEM FOR CT 01-02 (K) and CT 01-01 (L-2) This Errata item is intended to clarify that staff report references to private streets within Village K or L-2 are incorrect; both villages proposed public street systems as allowed by the City's Planned Development Ordinance. PLANNING SYSTEMS LAND USE / COASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • LA3900 POLICY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION To: Eric Munoz City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Date: August 6,2002 Plarirung Departmerit RE: Calavera Hills Village K Carlsbad CA 92008 For your: Copies: Item(s): Review^ See below^ • 10 folded plari sets includir\g TM, PUD and architecture (10 copies) 8.5 X 11" reduced set of plans (1 copy) • Resubmittal Comment Response Table (1 copy) • Color Master Plan Compliance Analysis Composite Plan (1 copy) • Color Reclaimed Water exhibit (1 copy) • Color Scheme / material sample exhibit (1 copy) • Title Report (2 copies) • Updated Project Description (1 copy) • Larry Black redline plancheck print (1 set) • Van Lynch comment letter dated May 9 2002 • Frank Jimeno comment letter dater June 12, 2002 • Eric Munoz comment letter dated June 19, 2002 • Eric Mtmoz comment email dated June 20,2002 Remarks: For your records. By: Eric Johnston cc: Paul Klukas Don Mitchell AOS 0 6 2002 ^TY or CARLSBAD Brian Milich LANN/NG DEPT Please call if items indicated are not present or if you have any other questions. 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX (760) 931-5744 • planningsysteins@nctimes.net PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: Calavera Hills Village K APPLICANT NAME: Calavera Hills il L.L.C. Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: The proposed project is a single family detached residential development, with 84 dwelling units, located in what is commonly referred to as Calavera Hills Village K. The site is approximately 51 acres in size, and 64% of the site is proposed to remain in open space. This open space area will provide an important linkage for the Carlsbad HMP, in addition to adding aesthetic qualities for the development. The proposed dwelling lonits will range in size from approximately 1,858 to 3,300 square feet, including garages. The proposed project includes applications for a Tentative Tract Map and a Planned Development Permit, and is in compliance with Calavera Hills Master Flan MP-150 (H), approved January 15,2002 (Ordinance No. NS-616). The existing zoning is PC, the existing General Flan designation is RM; no change in zoning or General Plan is proposed. ity of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this infonnation is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in diis and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this docimient; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnershit), include the names, title, adcfresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a pubhclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Cort^/Part Calavera Hills II L.L.C. Title Title . Address Address 2727 Hoover Ave. National City CA 91950 OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part Calavera Hills II L.L.C. Title Title Address Address 2727 Hoover Ave. National City CA 91950 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K - RESUBMITTAL RESPONSES - August 6,2002 Van Lynch comments dated May 9 2002 / Frank Jimeno comments dated June 12 2002: Village K: Item / Issue Response Items to Complete Application: Planning 1. Please identify all utility lines as existing or proposed. All utility lines have been identified as either existing or proposed. 2. Please provide the total building coverage for lots with proposed structures. A column has been added to the Compliance Table for % of coverage; the "Pad Area" column has been changed to "Net Pad Area" on Sheet 2 of the PUD. 3. Please show all existing and proposed fire hydrants associated with the project, and all existing, off-site fire hydrants within 300 feet of the project boundary. Fire hydrants on commercial, industrial and multi-family residential sites should be installed at 300 feet intervals. Fire hydrants serving single- family residential projects should be installed at 500- foot intervals. When possible, fire hydrants should be installed at street intersections. Avoid cul-de-sac installations. All existing and proposed fire hydrants have been delineated on sheets 3 and 4 of the TM and PUD. Cul-de-sac installations are in addition to other installations. 4. Please provide average and peak potable water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). The average and peak potable water demand has been added to sheet 1 of the PUD. 5. Please provide peak irrigation water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). The peak irrigation water demand of 80 gpm in July has been added to Page 6 of the Landscape Plan. 6. Please provide average sewer generation in million gallons per day (mgd). The average sewer generation has been added to sheet 1 of the PUD. 7. Please provide colored recycled water use map for future areas to be irrigated with reclaimed water. A colored recycled water use map has been included with our resubmittal set. 8. Please provide contour lines for the slope areas. Contour lines have been added to TM sheets 3 and 4. 9. Please place all development application numbers in the upper right hand comer of the plan (i.e. CT and PUD). Application numbers have been added to the upper right hand comer of all sheets. Village K: Item / Issue Response 10. Please provide the quantity of all proposed trees per species and type (i.e. street, open space, and slope). The quantity of all trees per species type has been added to the Plan Legend on Page 6 of the Landscape Plans. 11. Please provide the percentage of the site used for landscaping. The landscaping percentage has been added to Sheet 6 of the Landscape Plans. 12. Please add a depth dimension to the garage. (20-foot minimum) (Elevation & Floor Plans). The garage depth has been added to all floor plans. 13. Please complete a new disclosure statement that is consistent with the title report. A new disclosure form is included in our resubmittal package. 14. Please provide two copies of the Preliminary Title Report current within the last six months. Two copies of a current tile report are included with our resubmittal. 15. Please provide a construction materials board for the homes and proposed retaining walls. See application submittal form for details. A materials / color scheme sample board is included in our resubmittal. 16. Please update the project description form for the project. The Project Description form has been updated. Master Plan Requirements: 17. Please submit a fence plan (with fence heights), sign program, and trellis/patio cover exhibit pursuant to the Master Plan. The fence plan shall incorporate the Master Plan fire suppression wall and noise walls required by the noise study. It appears that the fire suppression wall may serve as the noise wall in some places. Please specify that future improvements for the southemmost lots. Lots 2 through 22, shall comply with section VIII.D.7.b.7 of the master plan for fire-resistive construction. Fence Plan: Sheet 3 of Landscape Plans; Sign Program: Sheet 6 of Landscape Plan; Trellis/patio cover exhibit included with engineering drawings. 18. Please plot the top of slope setback line for single- and two-story building plate heights as described in the Master Plan. This should be plotted on the trellis/patio plan. 1 The top of slope setback line is included on the PUD sheets 3 and 4 per conversation with Van Lynch. As long as the top of slope remains outside of the line, the adjacent building is in compliance with the setback line. See PUD sheet 2 for a typical exhibit and further clarification. Village K: Item / Issue Response 19. Please add a separate rear elevation plan with detailed notes for the imits that must conform to the requirements of section VIII.D.7.b (Page 60) of the master plan. (Lots 2 through 22). The requested rear elevation has been added to the architectural drawings. Items to Complete Application: Engineering 1. Since this is a trailing tentative map to the Master Tentative map CT 00-02, the legal description for this tentative map should be the lot that CT 00-02 creates. Thus, the legal description should refer to "Lot 5 of CT 00-02..." The note is included on sheet 1 of the TM. 2. Change the name of the sewer district to the City of Carlsbad. Done; see sheet 1 of TM. 3. Avoid overlapping lettering; in some cases the wording/ numbering is unreadable. Done. 4. Remove shading of the streets. Shading removed. 5. Add "Street D" name in sheet 4. Added to sheet 4 of TM. 6. Add match lines so the same information doesn't have to be viewed twice. Matchlines added to all engineering and landscape sheets. 7. Are there any existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the project on Tamarack Avenue? Existing fire hydrants have been delineated on engineering sheets 1,3 and 4. Issues of Concern: Planning 20. The landscape plan does not conform to the civil drawings along the street parkways. The Landscape Plans now conform to the civil drawings along the street parkways. Issues of Concem: Engineering 1. Lot 2 width to depth ration exceeds the allowed 3:1. The issue of the width-to-depth ratio of lot 2 has been resolved with Frank Jimeno in a conversation with O'Day Consultants. 2. Show proposed fire hydrant locations. Proposed fire hydrant locations have been delineated. 3. Some required street lights are not shown; e.g., at cul-de-sac streets. Sheet 4 of the TM and PUD depict the required street light installations. Village K: Item / Issue Response 4. Use non-contiguous sidewalk aroimd knuckles. Non-contiguous sidewalks are in use around knuckles. 5. Use traffic calming measures from the appendix of the "Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program" publication. Specifically, incorporate the 'Intersection Bulb-ouf and the 'Mid-Blodc Checker' in the design of the residential streets. Traffic calming meastire have been added to sheets 3 and 4 of the TM and PUD. 6. Show intersection of 'Street B' with 'Street A' in the 'Street A' profile. Show vertical profile of the CalTrans intersection sight distances at this intersection. Same thing at 'Street D' intersection. Sheet 5 of the TM shows the intersections as requested, and a Sight Distance Profile Exhibit has been added to the set. 7. Show profile for 'Street D.' Analyze intersection sight distances at 'Street A' and Tamarack Avenue. See TM sheet 5. 8. Add a pedestrian access fi"om 'Street A' firom its easterly terminus to Tamarack Avenue at Cay Drive. See TM and PUD sheet 4. 9. Address the need for a reclaimed water main throughout the project streets. Are there HOA maintained slopes throughout? If the slopes are owner maintained they should not be irrigated with reclaimed water. The irrigation system has been designed to accommodate reclaimed water delivery. See Landscape Plan Sheet 6 for details. Eric Munoz comments dated June 19 2002: Village K: Item Response Architectural/Master Plan Compliance (p. 51-54 of master plan) a. Minimum lot size: of 4,000 square feet is complied with Noted. b. Single-stoiy/reduced-second story homes: (1) which streets exceed the 550-foot length threshold? (2) what is unit total and restilting 25% requirement for each of fhe 550^+ long street segments (3) provide calculation/ table with total tmits in K and 20% requirement for single story/reduced second story (ss/rss) and proposed 1. ) Streets exceeding 550-feet in length are shown as shaded on the Master Plan Compliance Analysis Composite Plan; 2. ) See Master Plan Compliance /^alysis Composite Plan (48 units total, 12 required, 13 provided); 3. ) See Master Plan Compliance Analysis Composite Plan for table with total imits of all types in. all Calavera HiUs Phase II villages; o Village K: Item Response ss/rss units. (4) provide overview of other single family units/villages in Phase II for compliance with 10% single story requirement (5) verify on floor plans that the RSS units comply with definition; and are strategically located 4. ) See Master Plan Compliance Analysis Composite Plan for table with total units of all types in all Calavera Hills Phase II villages; 5. ) Village K is in compliance with the Master Plan story-height variety requirements. a. Two story homes: of two home allowance, up to 33% may be 30'; rest @ 26'. Show compliance with this standard. See Elevation Plans. All homes are within the required height limits. b. Architectural variety: demonstrate architectural variety intemal to subject village and external to other villages. Master plan requires this prior to formal submittal of application. The submitted exhibit showing a composite of master plan compliance does satisfy several required architectural and building height provisions; but the requirement to demonstrate architectural variety (especially between villages) still needs to be addressed. For example, the elevations for the Plan 1 single-story and Plan 3 two-story plans (in fact all the elevation exhibits for Plans 1-4) are exactlv the same for villages K, L-2, X, W and R; so the architectural variety within and between villages is an outstanding issue. The plans have been regrouped accordingly: • All former Plan 1 types to remain Plan 1; • All former Plan 2 types to change to Plan IZ; • All former Plan 3 types to change to Plan 2; • All former Plan 4 types to change to Plan 3. The Villages have been regrouped accordingly: • Villages K, L-2 and R to have all Plan types with an 'A' and 'B' t5^e elevation (Mission, Early Califomia, Monterey, Craftsman and Spanish Colonial styles); •Village W to have all Plan types with a 'B' and 'C type elevation (Monterey, Craftsman, Italian, Spanish Colonial and Santa Barbara styles); • Village X to have all Plan types with an 'A' and 'C type elevation (Mission, Eeirly California, Monterey, Craftsman, Italian, Spanish Colonial and Santa Barbara types). c. Plan variety: 20% minimum of any plan in a 4-plan project. Demonstrate compliance. See Master Plan Compliance Analysis Composite Plan for a breakdown of plans per village. d. Setbacks: (1) 80% of units need to total 12.5' or more for setbacks; how many units does this apply to in K? (2) highlight on PUD exhibit where two two-story elements are side by side that require 12.5' of separation See the compliance table on sheet 2 of the PUD plans for a column identifying the lots that have 2-story elements side-by- side and the amount of separation provided. e. Garage placement: (1) no street-facing 3 car garages (2) verify on elevations that garages do not exceed 55% of width of home (3) max garage door width is 16' feet 1. ) There are no street facing 3 - car garages; 2. ) The percentage of garage widths has been identified on the elevations, and none exceed 55%; 3. ) Max garage door width of 16' is not exceeded. Village K: Item Response f. Front porch: 50% of homes in 4-plan project need porch, courtyard or balcony (60 sq feet minimum). Show/verify compliance. Porches need to have sides open, no enclosures. Show variety of roof elements over porches. 59 of the 84 proposed homes (70%) have a porch/courtyard feature which meet the Master Plan requirements; see Sheet 2 of the PUD plans for compliance table listing lots with porches/ courtyards. g. Front entry feature: 75% of home need front entry visible from street (on 4-plan project). Show compliance The front entry is visible from the sfreet on all three plans. h. Recreation areas: (1) provide calculation for private recreation space needed based on units proposed in K; with compliance verified/demonsfrated for yard size based on building heights per master plan p. 53 (2) provide calculation for active common recreation space needed. Note on exhibits which recreation areas are List A vs. List B in compliance with the master plan. Also note gross vs. net for recreation areas to confirm compliance (slopes do not count) This information is included in the Landscape Plan sheets. Noise 1. provide updated noise study to review walls covered in EIR vs. proposed walls An updated noise study was provided to Eric Munoz on June 14*. 2. noise notification procedures/deed restiictions to occur by final map approval Comment noted. Other Master Plan Compliance 1. Page 96, 8a. show required perimeter wall adjacent to open space on all exhibits. Shown on engineering (Sheets 3 and 4) and landscape plans (sheet 3). 2. Show compliance with requirement for contour grading on southern exposure of site Contour grading was reviewed and approved in conjunction with the Master Tentative Map mass grading. Grading shown on individual TMs is only the additional grading required for pads after the mass grading is complete. 3. Recreation area buildings not shown on elevation exhibits or floor plans A pool equipment / restroom building floorplan / elevation sheet has been added to the architectural plan set. 4. Provide traffic calming features Traffic calming features have been added to sheets 3 and 4 of the TM and PUD plans. Village K: Item Response 5. Provide a materials and color board A materials / color scheme sample board is included in our resubmittal. 6. Calculate total number of resident and guest parking spaces required. Provide calculations on cover sheet under Parking Summary and insure adequate dispersal of guest parking spaces on the PUD site plan Parking spaces added to sheet 1 of the PUD plans as requested. 7. On General Notes on the cover sheet: Distinguish between Total Acres (51.5) and Net Acres (16.95). Revise Density to reflect du/net acre. Do new calculation on cover sheet. Average added to sheet 1 of the PUD plans as requested. 8. What is box adjacent to each unit's footprints on the elevations Minimum required private recreation area space shown graphically. 9. Plot and show compliance with slope top setbacks for all slope top structures per page 93 of the master plan The top of slope setback line is included on the PD sheets per conversation with Van Lynch. As long as the top of slope remains outside of the line, the adjacent building is in compliance with the setback line. 10. Sign Program: needs to be part of exhibits. A signage elevation was noted in the landscape exhibits, however, a compliant sign program will include a site plan showing sign locations, sign heights (no scale on one shown), letter heights, materials, colors, lighting, etc. Sign Program: See Sheet 6 of Landscape Plan; 11. Provide fence and trellis plan per page 93 of the master plan Fence Plan: See Sheet 3 of Landscape Plans; Trellis/patio cover exhibit included with engineering drawings. Landscape Comments 1. Show areas of private vs. common maintenance for landscape and slope areas. See Sheet 4, Landscape plan. 2. All fire suppression stuff for K shown adequately? See Landscape Plans Sheets 1-2 and 6 for fire suppression zone information. 3. Larry Black review underway Comment noted. Larry Black plancheck set returned with resubmittal. ) Village K: Item Response 4. Demonsfrate compliance with the following master plan requirements/EIR mitigation measures for Visual Quality: (1) landscaping requirements for manufactured slopes adjacent to HMP open space; and (2) transitional landscaping plantings between development and native development on visible manufactured slopes and intemal project landscaping to reduce off-site aesthetic/visual impacts. Both mitigation measures have been incorporated into landscape plan and plant palettes for the Master Tentative Map, which addresses slopes adjacent to HMP open space. Minor Village K perimeter grading continues this palette. 5. Invasive plant confrol (per page 59 of master plan) will be required of the project's CC&R's and final map approval process. Also provide note on landscape plan exhibits referencing invasive plant control objectives and project CC&R's. See Sheet 6 of Landscape Plans for invasive plant control notes. 6. The proposal to locate street trees within the front yards of private lots may not meet livable communities concepts. This will need to be reviewed/discussed further before staff can support; also related to comment #4 above under master plan compliance. We are informed that the City's cul-de-sac standards still allow a contiguous sidewalk in cul-de-sac locations. Street trees in these contiguous sidewalk cul-de-sac locations have been located in front yards. Eric Munoz email comments dated June 20 2002: Village K: Item Response 1. Retaining wall over 6' in height around lot 1. Lot 1 has been changed to Lot 87 in this resubmittal, and the retaining wall has been deleted. 2. Grading analysis does not account for soil shrinkage/expansion. Your statement is correct and the reason is that the individual village maps are calculating the earthwork after the mass grading of the Master Tentative Map. All of the expansion/shrinkage will have been accounted for with the mass grading (all of the alluvial soils have been compacted and the rock has already been excavated). CJ From: Eric Munoz To: Brian Milich; Don Mitchell; Don Rideout; Eric Johnston; Frank Jimeno; Gary Wayne; Glenn Pruim; Mike Grim; Paul Klukas Subject: Re: Calavera Individual TM's Paul - On Village K, since you mention the Van Lynch Incomplete comments of May 9, you might as well reference formal written issues/comments from Munoz dated June 19 (which was the basis of your resubmittal dated 8.6.02). otherwise, the extent of staffs work on Village K is unjustly represented. L-2 is accurately reflected; issues went out on 6.20.02 by Planning and a resubmittal is pending nearly two months afterwards. I do owe issue statements on W and X, which are prioritized to occur after processing efforts on K and L-2. However, as we have discussed, the scope of Planning comments should be minimal if K was used as a pattern for issue resolution on these master plan villages (architecture, livable streets, rec areas, etc.) E. 8.15.02 »> "Paul Klukas" <pklukas@nctimes.net> 08/15/02 11:31AM »> Attached please find an updated status table ofthe Calavera Individual tentative maps - FYI. Please let me know any comments you have on it. Paul J. Klukas PLANNING SYSTEMS (760) 931-0780 phone (760) 931-5744 fax pklukas@nctimes.net Eric Munoz - Cala. Village Maps table.xl^ Page 1 Calaver a Hills Individual Tentative Map s Status Table ugus Village City Status Consultant Status Resub. Date PC Date CC Date Coi Y PC approval 07/17/02; CC hearing 09/10/02 Done 03/26/02 Approved 07/17/02 09/10/02 E-1 PC approval 08/07/02 Done 05/29/02 Approved 08/07/02 09/17/02 Confin date w K Resubmitted 08/06/02 (no formal Planning/engineering letter received except for Lynch comments) Done 08/06/02 10/16/02 11/15/02 L-2 Lynch formal planning comments received 05/09/02; Munoz email comments received 06/20/02; Jimeno engineering comments received 08/12/02 Architecture received, awaiting O'Day & Howard plans; Jimeno comments require City engineering consultation w/ traffic department prior to resubmittal Projected for 08/19/02 10/16/02 N/A U Draft Planning comments received from Mike Grim 04/16/02; no formal planning/engineering comments •eceived from City Architecture received from Starck, awaiting plans from Hunsaker & Wilkinson once final comments received; Hunsaker to provide check print based on draft engineering comments Need resubmittal week of 08/19 to make PC hearing date 10/16/02 11/15/02 W No formal planning/engineering comments received from City [except for Lynch comments) Architecture received, awaiting O'Day & Howard plans Projected for week of 08/19/02 11/06/02 12/05/02 X No formal planning/engineering comments received from City (except for Lynch comments) Architecture received, awaiting O'Day & Howard plans Projected for week of 08/19/02 11/06/02 12/05/02 R No formal planning/engineering comments received from City [except for Lynch comments) Architecture received, awaiting O'Day & Howard plans ?? Not scheduled N/A From: Eric Munoz To: Brian Milich; Don Mitchell; George O'Day; John Howard; Keith Hansen; Paul Klukas Date: 6/28/02 3:01PM Subject: Re: Meeting Notes Calavera Village K PK Thanks for the meeting notes. They are accurate with the following minor comments: Item 24 - please also depict any sign locations on the pud site plan exhibit. Timing for Planning Commission will be assessed after the next resubmittal effort and closure of all issues. Thanks to everyone for a good meeting this morning. EM 6.28.02 »> "Paul Klukas" <pklukas@nctimes.net> 06/28/02 02:18PM »> FYI - The following are my notes from this morning's meeting with Munoz, McKinley, O'Day, Hansen and Klukas regarding the Village K PUD Master Plan Compliance. I. . Minimum lot size - OK 2.. 550 ft. length streets identified OK. 3.. 25% Plans 1 and 2 along long streets OK. 4.. Table provided identifying percentages Single Story (SS) and Reduced 2nd Story (R2S) OK. 5.. Klukas to provide summary of bullet points justifying "strategically located" SS and R2S homes in Village K. 6.. 10% single story compliance OK 7.. Reduced 2nd Story units comply with definition OK 8.. Building height of all plans OK 9.. Architectural variety 1.. Floor plans are OK. McKinley to prepare composite map (Villages K, L-2, W and X) of architectural styles (vignettes of each). Need variety in architectural styles, major components of those styles, and colors from one village to another. One village Mediterranean, one village Spanish Colonial, one village French Craftsman, etc. 2.. McKinley to replace generic concept architectural plan sheets with specific concept architectural plans for Village K. 10.. Plan variety - MP requires a minimum 20% of each plan. Village K has only 14% of R2S (Plan 2). Four Plan 3 or 4's should he replaced with Plan 2 to comply with 20% requirement. O'Day/Milich. II. . Side yard setback table on O'Day plans looks good. Munoz to do spot checking for compliance. 12.. Garage widths OK. Garage door widths OK. 13.. Front porch 1.. McKinley to prepare a second composite map (all four villages) showing villages/plans (with vignettes) that will have porches, courtyards or balconies. 14.. Front entries visible OK 15.. Munoz to review recreation area calculations on O'Day tables. McKinley to provide architecture for recreation pool buildings. 16.. Munoz has revised noise study. 17.. O'Day revised plans show perimeter wall. 18.. Perimeter contour grading OK 19.. Transitional planting (EIR) landscaping (native to urban) on perimeter slopes to be addressed in MTM final landscape plans. John Howard to confirm that Larry Black is OK with this. Additional "slivers" of fill over MTM grading for Individual TM should also address transitional planting. 20.. O'Day revising street design for traffic calming. 21.. O'Day to show full equations (required and provided) on parking summary table. 22.. Use MP net acres for each village for General Notes on cover sheets. 23.. O'Day revising plans to show slope-top and trellis setbacks. 24.. Signage plan and fence plans to be added to concept landscape plans (Howard). 25.. Howard to show areas of private v. common landscape. Should be reproducible for inclusion in PC package. 26.. Howard note on landscape plans for invasive plant control. Let me know if you see something here that is not right, or if you have questions. Paul J. Klukas PLANNING SYSTEMS (760) 931-0780 phone (760) 931-5744 fax pklukastSnctimes.net CC: Don Rideout; Frank Jimeno From: Eric Munoz To: Dmitchell@mcmillin.com Subject: Village K - two more items Don In addition to the previous email on K, please also note: 1. Retaining wall over 6' in height around Lot 1 2. Grading Analysis does not account for soil shrinkage/expansion EM 6.20.02 CC: Don Rideout; Frank Jimeno 3 ^^0m^ ,<**w*»^ VILLAGE K Architectural/Master Plan Compliance (p. 51-54 of master plan) a. Minimum lot size: of 4,000 square feet is complied with b. Single-story/reduced-second story homes: (1) which streets exceed the 550-foot length threshold? (2) what is unit total and resulting 25% requirement for each of the 550'+ long street segments (3) provide calculation/table with total units in K and 20% requirement for single story/reduced second story (ss/rss) and proposed ss/rss units. (4) provide overview of other single family units/villages in Phase II for compliance with 10% single story requirement (5) verify on floor plans that the RSS units comply with definition; and are strategically located c. Two story homes: of two home allowance, up to 33% may be 30'; rest @ 26'. Show compliance with this standard. d. Architectural variety: demonstrate architectural variety intemal to subject village and extemal to other villages. Master plan requires this prior to formal submittal of application. The submitted exhibit showing a composite of master plan compliance does satisfy several required architectural and building height provisions; but the requirement to demonstrate architectural variety (especially between villages) still needs to be addressed. For example, the elevations for the Plan 1 single-story and Plan 3 two-story plans (in fact all the elevation exhibits for Plans 1-4) are exactly the same for villages K, L-2, X, W and R; so the architectural variety within and between villages is an outstanding issue. e. Plan variety: 20% minimum of any plan in a 4-plan project. Demonstrate compliance. f. Setbacks: (1) 80% of units need to total 12.5' or more for setbacks; how many units does this apply to in K? (2) highlight on PUD exhibit where two two-story elements are side by side that require 12.5' of separation g. Garage placement: (1) no street-facing 3 car garages (2) verify on elevations that garages do not exceed 55% of width of home (3) max garage door width is 16 feet h. Front porch: 50% of homes in 4-plan project need porch, courtyard or balcony (60 sq feet minimum). Show/verify compliance. Porches need to have sides open, no enclosures. Show variety of roof elements over porches. i. Front entry feature: 75% of home need front entry visible from sfreet (on 4-plan project). Show comphance j. Recreation areas: (1) provide calculation for private recreation space needed based on units proposed in K; with compliance verified/demonsfrated for yard size based on building heights per master plan p. 53 (2) provide calculation for active common recreation space needed. Note on exhibits which recreation areas are List A vs. List B in compliance with the master plan. Also note gross vs. net for recreation areas to confirm compliance (slopes do not count) Noise 1. provide updated noise study to review walls covered in EIR vs. proposed walls 2. noise notification procedures/deed restrictions to occur by final map approval other Master Plan Compliance 1. Page 96, 8a. show required perimeter wall adjacent to open space on all exhibits. 2. Show compliance with requirement for contour grading on southem exposure of site 3. Recreation area buildings not shown on elevation exhibits or floor plans 4. Provide fraffic calming features 5. Provide a materials and color board 6. Calculate total number of resident and guest parking spaces required. Provide calculations on cover sheet under Parking Summary and insure adequate dispersal of guest parking spaces on the PUD site plan 7. On General Notes on the cover sheet: Distinguish between Total Acres (51.5) and Net Acres (16.95). Revise Density to reflect du/net acre. Do new calculation on cover sheet. 8. What is box adjacent to each unit's footprints on the elevations 9. Plot and show compliance with slope top setbacks for all slope top structures per page 93 ofthe master plan 10. Sign Program: needs to be part of exhibits. A signage elevation was noted in the landscape exhibits, however, a compliant sign program will include a site plan showing sign locations, sign heights (no scale on one shown), letter heights, materials, colors, lighting, etc. 11. Provide fence and frellis plan per page 93 of the master plan Landscape Comments 1. Show areas of private vs. common maintenance for landscape and slope areas. 2. All fire suppression stuff for K shown adequately? 3. Larry Black review underway 4. Demonsfrate comphance with the following master plan requirements/EIR mitigation measures for Visual Quality: (1) landscaping requirements for manufactured slopes adjacent to HMP open space; and (2) fransitional landscaping plantings between development and native development on visible manufactured slopes and intemal project landscaping to reduce off-site aesthetic/visual impacts. 5. Invasive plant control (per page 59 of master plan) will be required of the project's CC&R's and final map approval process. Also provide note on landscape plan exhibits referencing invasive plant confrol objectives and project CC&R's. 6. The proposal to locate sfreet frees within the front yards of private lots may not meet livable communities concepts. This will need to be reviewed/discussed further before staff can support; also related to comment #4 above under master plan compliance. EM 6.19.02 c: Don Rideout, Principal Planner Frank Jimeno, Associate Engineer Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department May 9, 2002 Calavera Hills II, LLC Attn: Brian Milich 2727 Hoover Avenue National City, CA 91950 SUBJECT: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development permit, application numbers CT 01-02/PUD 01-05, as to their completeness for processing. All of the items requested of you earlier have not been received and therefore your application is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. Please contact your staff planner, Eric Munoz, at (760) 602-4608, or Van Lynch, interim project planner, at 602-4613, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:VL:cs Attachments c: Don Rideout Eric Munoz Frank Jimeno File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide Planning Systems, Paul Klukas,1530 Faraday Ave, Ste 100, Carlsbad CA 92008 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us C .,Axm^ LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CT 01-02 / PUD 01-05 Planning: SITE INFORMATION 1. Please identify all utility lines as existing or proposed. 2. Please provide the total building coverage for lots with proposed structures. 3. Please show all existing and proposed fire hydrants associated with the project, and all existing, off-site fire hydrants within 300 feet of the project boundary. Fire hydrants on comnnercial, industrial and multi-family residential sites should be installed at 300 feet intervals. Fire hydrants serving single-family residential projects should be installed at 500-foot intervals. When possible, fire hydrants should be installed at street intersections. Avoid cul-de-sac installations. 4. Please provide average and peak potable water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). 5. Please provide peak irrigation water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). 6. Please provide average sewer generation in million gallons per day (mgd). 7. Please provide colored recycled water use map for future areas to be irrigated with reclaimed water. 8. Please provide contour lines for the slope areas. 9. Please place all development application numbers in the upper right hand corner of the plan (i.e. CT and PUD) LANDSCAPE 10. Please provide the quantity of all proposed trees per species and type (i.e street, open space, and slope). 11. Please provide the percentage of the site used for landscaping. BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS 1 2. Please add a depth dimension to the garage. (20-foot minimum) OTHER DOCUMENTS 13. Please complete a new disclosure statement that is consistent with the title report. 14. Please provide two copies of the Preliminary Title Report current within the last six months. 15. Please provide a construction materials board for the homes and proposed retaining walls. See application submittal form for details. 16. Please update the project description form for the project. MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENTS 17. Please submit a fence plan (with fence heights), sign program, and trellis/patio cover exhibit pursuant to the Master Plan. The fence plan shall incorporate the Master Plan fire suppression wall and noise walls required by the noise study. It appears that the fire suppression wall may serve as the noise wall in some places. Please specify that future improvements for the southernmost lots. Lots 2 through 22, shall comply with section VIII.D.7.b.7 of the master plan for fire-resistive construction 18. Please plot the top of slope setback line for single- and two-story building plate heights as described in the Master Plan. This should be plotted on the trellis/patio plan. 19. Please add a separate rear elevation plan with detailed notes for the units that must conform to the requirements of section VIII.D.7.b (Page 60) of the master plan. (Lots 2 through 22). Engineering: To be sent under separate cover. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 20. The landscape plan does not conform to the civil drawings along the street parkways. Engineering: (Van Lynch - Re: Calavera Hills SF Villas iSSSil'SJii^ From: Van Lynch To: Paul Klukas Date: 5/1/02 8:40AM Subject: Re: Calavera Hills SF Villages Paul: In respective order: Yes, No, All, Yes, Yes, Yes. Please put all application numbers in the upper right hand corner of all sheets. For % landscaping, use all slope areas and passive/active rec areas provided. Basically take out public/private streets (except parkway planting) and privately held lots and the rest should be % landscaping. We do have some trellis/patio plans that have be done in the past that are available at the front counter for review/copying, we are looking at a plan that will show the potential development of structures in the rearyards and still maintain compliance with the PUD private passive yard requirement. Let me know if you need more direction, Thanks, Van »> "Paul Klukas" <pklukas@nctimes.net> 05/01/02 08:19AM »> Van: If you have a minute, could you please provide me with some direction on the following comments you have on the SF villages. Some may seem like insignificant questions, but I'm trying to get this stuff right. You want app. numbers in the upper right hand corner of plans. All app. numbers on all sheets? Only PUD nos. on PUD sheets? All sheets or just title sheets? Please clarify. You want the % of site used for landscaping. This is always difficult for us, because each planner calculates it differently. Including slopes? Including passive recreation? Please advise. Do you have an example of a trellis/patio plan that is acceptable to City Staff that we could use? Thanks Van Paul J. Klukas PLANNING SYSTEMS (760) 931-0780 phone (760) 931-5744 fax pklukas(5)nctimes.net PLANNING SYSTEMS LAND USE / COASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • LA3900 POLICY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION TEANSMIITITAIL LlinriE RECEIVED APR 0 3 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD PUNNING DEPT. To: Gary Wayne City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Date: April 3,2002 Planning Department RE: Calavera Hills VillaRe K Carlsbad CA 92008 For your: Copies: Item(s): Remarks: Review Ten sets Calavera Hills Village K Resubmittal package including: • Phase n Composite Master Plan Compliance Analysis * Village K Tentative Map • Village K PUD Plans • Village K Architecture • Updated Noise Technical Report for Village K • One set of plans reduced to 8..5x11" Please distribute this to the appropriate planner. By: Eric Johnston cc: Paul Klukas David Poole Don Mitchell Brian Milich Please call if items indicated are not present or if you have any other cjiiestions. 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SUITE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX (760) 931-5744 • planningsystems@nctimes.net e> 2— PROOF OF PUBLIC TION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at SAN MARCOS, Califomia Proof of Publication of writing to the PlannPnn nBni??rS! ^."''^111 comments in ^uimuaoijn the Planning Department at r760) 602 I DATED: JUNE 24, 2002 I CASE NO: CTO 1-02/PUD 01-05 CASE NAME: VILLAGE^^C^iL^A^VERA HILLS MASTER Planning Director This 17THday Of JULY, 2002 Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp City of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: Project Description: Village K within the Calavera Hills Master Plan, generally located northwest of the College Boulevard/Carlsbad Village Drive intersection 84 single-family detached homes consistent with the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an enviromnental review of the above-described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plamiing Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608. DATED: CASE NO: CASE NAME: PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 24,2002 CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 VILLAGE K/CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN JUNE 24, 2002 CHAEL J. HOLzklLttR MICHAEL Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 DATE: June 18.2002 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Calavera Hills Village K 2. APPLICANT: McMillin Homes ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2727 Hoover Ave. National Citv. CA 92950 (619U36-3138 DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: Mav 17.2001 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Map and Planned Unit Development for the construction of 84 single family dwelling units, on a 51.5 acre site (with 17 acres of net area) within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, located northwest of the intersection of College Boulevard and Carlsbad Village Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTLy^LY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checkUst on the following pages. I I Land Use and Planning I I Population and Housing I I Geological Problems • Water ^ Air QuaUty ^ Transportation/Circulation \Z\ Public Services r~| Biological Resources O UtiUties & Service Systems I I Energy & Mineral Resources I I Hazards r~l Noise • Mandatory Findings of Significance I I Aesthetics r~l Cultural Resources I I Recreation Rev. 03/28/96 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) I I I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. r~l I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ^ I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earUer document pursuant to appUcable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earUer analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. • I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earUer pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earUer, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. Plaimer Signature Date Plarming DirectOT*snSignafure Date Rev. 03/28/96 o ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checkUst. This checkUst identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an infomiation source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Sigmficant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR ifthe sigmficant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earUer EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earUer EIR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Rev. 03/28/96 If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to pubUc review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) b) Conflict with apphcable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an estabhshed community (including a low-income or minority commimity)? (#l:Pgs 5.6-1 - 5.6-18) Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local I I population projections? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly Q or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastmcture)? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable I I housing? (#l:Pgs 5.5-1 - 5.5-6) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • • • • Less Than Significant Impact • • • • • • • • No Impact Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Fault mpture? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Seismic ground shaking? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1-5.1-15) Seismic ground failure, including hquefaction? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 -5.1.15) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (#I:Pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15) Landslides or mudflows? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 -5.1-15) Subsidence ofthe land? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Expansive soils? (#l:Pgs 5.1-1 - 5.1-15) Unique geologic or physical features? (#l:Pgs 5.1- 1-5.1-15) Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (#l:Pgs 5.2- 1 -5..2-11) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groimdwater recharge capability? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 -5..2-11) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.2-1 - 5..2-11) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (#1 :Pgs 5.3- 1-5.3-12) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1-5.3-12) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Rev. 03/28/96 c Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3- 12) d) Create objectionable odors? (#l:Pgs 5.3-1 - 5.3- 12) VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 -5.7.22) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 -5.7.22) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 -5.7.22) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 -5.7.22) f) Conflicts with adopted poUcies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22) g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? (#l:Pgs 5.7-1 - 5.7.22) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 -5.4-24) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4- 24) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 -5.4-24) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (#l:Pgs 5.4-1 - 5.4-24) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wastefiil and inefficient manner? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1-5.13-9) Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than No Significant Impact Impact • ^ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation • Incorporated • ^ c) Result in the loss of availability of a known • • • ^ mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 & 5.13-1 - 5.13-9) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of • • • m hazardous substances (including, but not limited • • • m to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (#1 :Pgs 5.10.1-1-5.10.1-5) b) Possible interference with an emergency response • • • m plan or emergency evacuation plan? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1-5.10.1-5) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential • • • m health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential • • • m health hazards? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable • • • m bmsh, grass, or trees? (#l:Pgs 5.10.1-1 - 5.10.1-5) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (#l:Pgs 5.9-1 -• • • m 5.9-15) • • • m b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (#l:Pgs • • • m 5.9-1-5.9-15) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govemment services in any ofthe following areas: • • • m a) Fire protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.5-1 - 5.12.5-6) • • • m b) Police protection? (#l:Pgs 5.12.6-1 - 5.12.6-4) • • c) Schools? (#l:Pgs 5.12.7.1 - 5.12.7-5) • • • m d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? • • • m e) Other govemmental services? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 -• • • m 5.12.8-7) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: • • ^ a) Power or natural gas? (#l:Pgs 5.12.1-1 - 5.12.1-5 • • • ^ & 5.13-1 -5.13-9) • • • m b) Communications systems? • • • m c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution • • • m facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 - 5.12.3-7) • • • m d) Sewer or septic tanks? (#l:Pgs 5.12.3-1 - 5.12.3-7) • • • m e) Storm water drainage? (#l:Pg 5.2-8) • • • m f) Solid waste disposal? (#l:Pgs 5.12.4-1 - 5.12.4-3) • • • m g) Local or regional water supplies? (#l:Pgs 5.12.2-1 • • • m -5.12.3-7) 7 Rev. 03/28/96 o o Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mitigation Incorporated XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal- a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? • • • ^ (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 -5.11-5) • • • m b) Have a demonstrated negative aesthetic effect? • • • m (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 -5.11-5) c) Create light or glare? (#l:Pgs 5.11-1 - 5.11-5) • • xrv. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paieontological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 -• • • m 5.8-10) • • • ^ b) Disturb archaeological resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 -• • • ^ 5.8-10) • • • m c) Affect historical resources? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-• • • m 10) • • • m d) Have the potential to cause a physical change • • • m which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 -5.8-10) • • • m e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within • • • m the potential impact area? (#l:Pgs 5.8-1 - 5.8-10) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional • • • m parks or other recreational facilities? (#l:Pgs 5.12.8-1-5.12.8-7) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (#l:Pgs • • • m 5.12.8-1-5.12.8-7) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the • • quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? • • • m b) Does the project have impacts that are individually • • • m limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in coimection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? • • • M c) Does the project have environmental effects which • • • M will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 8 Rev. 03/28/96 Q O XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. The following site-specific technical studies were used in the analysis and design of this project and are on file in the City ofCarlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CaUfornia, 92008. (760) 602-4600. 1. Update of Geotechnical Report. Calavera Hills Village K. Citv of Carlsbad. CaUfornia. dated October 20,1999, Geosoils, hic. 2. Interim Report of Geotechnical Investigation. Calavera Heights Village K. Carlsbad. Cahfomia. dated March 20,1990, Southem CaUfornia Soil and Testing, Inc. 3. Noise Technical Report for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II Village K. City of Carlsbad. Califomia. dated Febmary 18,2002. Rev. 03/28/96 Q Q DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The project involves the constmction and occupation of 84 detached single-family units, within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The 51.5-acre site will be created through the recordation of the Master Tentative Map for Calavera Hills Phase II (CT 00-02) and will be graded in accordance with that map. As part of the master plan approval and EIR process. Village K is primarily being set aside as a wildUfe corridor leaving a net acreage of 17 acres to be developed with the single-family units. The potential environmental impacts associated with the grading of the Village K site were reviewed through the Environmental Impact Report for the Calavera Hills Phase II Master Tentative Map (EIR 98-02, SCH No. 99111082), certified January 15, 2002. The Environmental Impact Report also reviewed the impacts associated with the development of Village K with up to 88 single-family units, 4 units more than is proposed. EIR 98-02, as certified, also reviewed the potential environmental impacts associated with the major public improvements required for the buildout of the master plan including Village K. Since the development of Village K cannot proceed until the Master Tentative Map has been recorded, and the site has been graded in accordance with that map, the following environmental analysis deals only with the development of Village K and the project differences compared to the EIR. The differences center on a revised noise study (which does not result in more or higher walls than those analyzed in the EIR) and a reduced unit amount (84 instead of 88 units). The Village K site is bound by College Boulevard to the east, Carlsbad Village Drive to the south, Harwich Drive to the west and existing single-family residential development (Village Q), and fiiture single-family units in Village L-2, to the north. The proposed single-family residential use is compatible with all of the existing and fiiture uses in the area. The residential designation of the Village K site is designated Residential Medium (RM) in the City's General Plan, allowing up to 6 dwelling units per developable acre. The proposed density is 5.2 dwelling units per acre. The project site is zoned P-C (Planned Community) and, according to the Calavera Hills Master Plan (MP 150(H)), the site is to be developed in accordance with the R-l - Single Family Residential Zone, except as modified in the Master Plan. The proposed development would consist of 84 single-family residential units and two common, active recreation areas. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and meets all development standards and design criteria of the Master Plan and the R-l zoning district. The proposed development would necessitate approximately 31,000 cubic yards of balanced grading subsequent to the mass grading that creates Village K associated the above referenced master tentative map (CT 00-02). All grading operations would be required to conform to the recommendations ofthe site-specific geotechnical report, as well as the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance. In addition, an all-weather access road would be provided throughout constmction and Fire Marshal approval would be required prior to the storage of any hazardous materials on site. The residential project would take access off of existing Tamarack Drive and would generate 840 average daily traffic trips, which can be accommodated by existing and required road segments in the area. 10 Rev. 03/28/96 Q Q The project will be required to comply with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit through the implementation of Best Management Practices, thus reducing the amount of pollutants entering the pubUc storm drain system. All facilities needed to serve the 84 single family units would be provided prior to occupancy, in association with the Phase II Master Tentative Map grading and improvement plans. In addition, the Carlsbad Unified School District has stated that there are adequate school faciUties to serve the proposed apartment project. Noise wall locations and heights are not greater than those covered in the earUer analysis (EIR 98-02) and the proposed unit yield of 84 units is less than the 88 allowed by the master plan. These two elements represent the variation in the project as reviewed by the master plan's certified environmental review (EIR 98-02) and now proposed. Given the above analysis, the previous environmental documentation and the site-specific technical reports, the proposed Calavera Hills Village K project would not create any significant adverse environmental impacts as designed and conditioned. AIR OUALITY: In 1994 the City prepared and certified an EIR which analyzed the impacts which will result from the build-out of the City under an updated General Plan. That document concludes that continued development to build-out as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts in the form of increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles fraveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nifrogen and sulfiir, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to build-out as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan build-out, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage altemative modes of transportation including mass fransit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The appUcable and appropriate General Plan air quaUty mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design ofthe project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checkUst is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR. This project is within the scope of that MEIR. 11 Rev. 03/28/96 CIRCULATION: In 1994 the City prepared and certified a Master EIR which analyzed the impacts which would result from the build-out of the City under an updated General Plan. That document concluded that continued development to build-out as proposed in the updated General Plan will result in increased fraffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate build-out traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-fraffic over which the City has no jurisdictional confrol. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at build-out. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan build-out, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop altemative modes of fransportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation sfrategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-fraffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City sfreets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction ofthe City to confrol. The appUcable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at build-out of the General Plan due to regional through-fraffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR. This project is within the scope of that MEIR This document is available at the Planning Department. A MEIR may not be used to review projects if it was certified more than five years prior to the filing of an application for a later project. The City is currently reviewing the 1994 MEIR to determine whether it is still adequate to review subsequent projects. Although the MEIR was certified more than five years ago, the City's preliminary review of its adequacy finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the MEIR was certified. The only potential changed circumstance, the intersection failure at Palomar Airport Rd. and El Camino Real, is in the process of being mitigated to below a level of significance. Additionally, there is no new available information, which was not known and could not have been knovm at the time the MEIR was certified. Therefore, the MEIR remains adequate to review later projects. EARLIER ANALYSES USED The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Cahfomia, 92008. 1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01), dated March 1994, City ofCarlsbad Planning Department. 12 Rev. 03/28/96 Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II. Bridge and Thoroughfare District No. 4 & Detention Basins Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-02). dated November 2001, RECON. Noise Technical Report for Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II. Village K. dated Febmary 18,2002, RECON. 13 Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I CASE NO: DATE RECEIVED: (To be complete by staff) BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Calavera Hills Village K 2. APPLICANT: Calavera Hills 11, LLC 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: Calavera Hills II. LLC. c/o McMillin Companies; 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City, CA (619) 336-3735 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative subdivision map and planned unit development pennit for 88 detached single family units to be located on 51.5 gross acres, with 16.95 acres to be used for the development The balance of the property will remain as a biological open space reserve. The site is located on the south side of Tamarack Avenue, and on the north side of Carlsbad Village Drive. The proposed project will involve construction of two-story units on minimum 4.000 sq. ft. lots, with standard residential public streets. Access to the subdivision is proposed off Tamarack Avenue at three locations. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. X Land Use And Planning • Population and Housing • Geological Problems • Water X Air Quality X Transportation/Circulation X Biological Resources • Energy & Mineral Resources • Hazards X Noise • Mandatory Findings of Significance • Public Services X Utilities & Services • Aesthetics X Cultural Resources • Recreation Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II," if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an eariier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that eariier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed 3 Rev. 03/28/96 adequately in an eariier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that eariier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to cleariy reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Eariier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an eariier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting information Sources): Potentially (Supplemental documents may be referred to and Significant attached) 'mpact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (The proposed project will conflict with the existing Land Use Element of the General Plan and the Calavera Hills Master Plan, however a General Plan Amendment and Master Plan Amendment is in process with the City of Carlsbd and is expected to be approved prior to consideration of the proposed project. In the event this General Plan Amendment is not adopted, the proposed project is not consistent with the General Plan, which is considered a significant environmental impact. (#1, #2, #3) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing Calavera Hills Master Plan, however this Master Plan is presently in process of modification. Upon its adoption, the proposed project will be consistent. Additionally, the proposed project is consistent with the City of Carlsbad Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP). Nonetheless, potentially significant environmental impacts to land use will result if mitigation is not included. (#3, #6) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (The proposed project is not anticipated to be incompatible with the surrounding residential land uses in the area inasmuch as the most adjacent developed property is to the north, east and west, and the proposed project will be of a compatible density. (#1, #2, #3) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (The proposed project will not have a significant impact on soils or farmlands; the City's Final Master EIR and the Calavera Hills EIR anticipate and pian for urban development of the site. No agricultural operations exist or previously existed on the subject site in recent history; (#2, #3^ X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attactied) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (Existing urban develop- ment occurs to the south of the proposed project, however the proposed project will not divide the physical arrangement of any established community. The project will indirectly add to the stock of affordable housing through implementation of a future affordable housing agreement with the City of Carlsbad. (#1, #2, #3) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (The proposed project proposes no increase in regional or local population projections approved in conjunction with the City's Final Master EIR (#2, #3) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (The proposed single family development of Village K involves development of a site completely surrounded by urban lands, and located near the intersection of three arterial roadways. No significant extensions of major infrastructure is proposed. All improvements proposed are adjacent to the subject property, or along its direct frontage. (#1, #2, #3; c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (The proposed project site is presentiy undeveloped and will not displace any existing housing; (#2, #3) X X X GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (The proposed project is not located near active or potentially active faults. Standard engineering design and construction practices should mitigate potential impacts associated with earthquakes to a less than significant impact; f#2, #3, #11) Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) b) Seismic ground shaking? (Seismic risk on the subject site is considered low. The proposed project will mitigate the effects of potential seismic ground shaking by following all pertinent State and Local building codes for construction, including measures identified in the General Plan Public Safety Element Implementing Policies and Action Plans; (#2, #3, #11) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (The proposed project will mitigate the effects of potential seismic ground shaking by following all pertinent State and Local buiiding codes and standard regional engineering practices for design and construction as required in conjunction with the Carlsbad Master EIR; (#2, #3, #11) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (The proposed project is not located in an area susceptible to seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard; (#2) e) Landslides or mudflows? (The proposed project is located on land considered in previous environmental documents as suitable for development, and will mitigate the potential for landslides and mudflow on the site by grading in a manner consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance and as directed by the soils report; (#2, #3, #11) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (The proposed project has been previously mass graded. As a result of its future development, it will mitigate the potential for erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions on the site by grading in a manner consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance, and including mitigation measures identified in the General Plan Public Safety Element Implementing Policies and Action Programs; (#1, #2, #11) g) Subsidence of the land? (The previously-graded natural soils stability onsite is considered generally good. The proposed project will mitigate the potential for subsidence on the site by grading in a manner consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance and the recommendations set forth in the soils report; (#2, #3, #11) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 'Nil**' Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) h) Expansive soils? (The The City's Master EIR concluded that significant impacts associated with expansive soils can be mitigated to a level of less than significance through the implementation of mitigation measures identified in the General Plan Public Safety Element Implementing Policies and Action Programs. The proposed project will mitigate the potential for damage from expansive soil conditions on the site by grading in a manner consistent with these measures, and the City's Grading Ordinance; (#1, #2, #11) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (The proposed project is planned for a site not Iknown to be located in an area with unique geologic or physical features; (#2d, #3) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (The proposed project is not anticipated to adversely effect changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or surface runoff, in that it will comply with the City of Carlsbad's policies regarding surface runoff quantities and rates in compliance the Final Master EIR. In addition, the impacts of development have been considered in EIR 90-05 Calavera Hills EIR;f#2, #3, #11) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (The proposed project will be designed to not increase the amount of drainage runoff from the site in its developed, when compared to its existing state priorto development; (#2, #11) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (The proposed project will not discharge directly or in an uncontrolled manner into any surface waters or result in an alteration of water quality; (#2, #3) X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (Eventual development of the proposed project will not discharge directiy or in an uncontrolled manner into any surface waters or result in an alteration of water quality since mitigation measures including the use of temporary onsite. and permanent downstream sedimentation and retention basins will be incorporated into the project; (#3, #11) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (Development of the proposed project will result in no substantive change in the course or direction of water movement; (#2, #3) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (The City's General Plan and the General Plan Master EIR contemplate urban residential development of Village K, and the project will not result in any significant withdrawals or additions to the groundwater; (#2, #3) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (The City's General Plan Master EIR contemplates urban development of the subject villages, and the project will not result in any significant alteration in the direction or rate of flow of groundwater; (#2, #3, #11) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (All pesticides, oil grease and other toxic substances contained in typical urban runoff will be conhtrolled consistent with Federal and State law. As a result, the proposed project will not result in significant impacts to groundwater quality; the City's General Plan EIR contemplates urban development of this site consistent with the proposed project; (#2, #11) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (The proposed project will not result in significant impacts to groundwater; the City's General Plan EIR contemplates urban development of this site; (#2, #3, #9, #11) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) V. AIR QUALITY a) Would the proposal: Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Covered under the City's General Plan EIR. See Discussion of Environmental Evaluation at the end of this checklist). b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Other than the impacts described in the Discussion of Environmental Evaluation, the proposed project is not anticipated to create significant impacts to sensitive receptors; (#2, #3) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (The proposed project will not invoke or result in climatic, temperature, moisture or air mass changes; (#2, #3) d) Create objectionable odors? (The proposed project is a typical urban residential development. Residential uses are not generally considered to create noxious odors; (#2, #3) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (The proposed project involves development which will generate approximately 880 ADT. Although in and of itself, this increase is not considered significant, the City of Carlsbad has determined that a potential regional significant impact to traffic congestion could result from this and all other projects in the City. See Discussion of Environmental Evaluation at the end of this checklist. b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (The proposed project does not involve the design or development of sharp or hazardous design features. The project will be designed in compliance with all applicable City polices and codes regarding circulation design which were addressed in the City's General Plan Master EIR. f#2j X X 10 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (The project proposes the installation of circulation infrastructure concurrent with need. In order to be consistent with City standards, eventual development of the site will provide emergency access in compliance with applicable City codes and is designed in compliance with all applicable City polices regarding circulation design which were addressed in the City's General Plan EIR. (#1, #2, #5, #12) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (The proposed project does not involve actual design of development of the subject site, and as a result will not result in significant impacts to parking capacity. (#12) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (The proposed project does not involve actual design of development of the subject site, and as a result will not result in significant impacts to pedestrians or bicyclists. (#12) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (The proposed project will be developed in compliance with the existing City polices and codes regarding alternative modes of transportation which have been addressed in the City's General Plan Master EIR. (#1, #2, #12) g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? (The proposed project does not preclude and is in compliance with applicable City polices and codes regarding alternative modes of transportation which were addressed in the City's General Plan Master EIR; (#2, #3, #12) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X X 11 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (The proposed project involves residential lotting development of a site for which permits to conduct mass grading will already have occurred prior to development of the subject project. The site presentiy contains coastal sage scrub vegetation, and has historically been a nesting location for the coastal California gnatcatcher. a federally listed species. As a result, the coastal sage scrub which is considered a sensitive habitat. In the event that this mass grading, for which an EIR is being conducted, does not occur, the proposed project would result in potentially significant biological impacts, and mitigation would be necessary. The area of Village K that is not allowed for development pursuant to the master tentative map, must remain as open space conservation area; (#3, #6, #8) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (The proposed project does not involve disturbance to locally designated biological species; (#3, #6) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (The proposed project involves development of a site devoid of natural communities and as a result wil not affect locally designated natural communities. (#3, #6) d) Wetiand habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (The proposed project does not involve direct impacts to wetiand habitats, however indirect impacts could occur to downstream riparian scrub wetiand and sycamore woodland as a result of potential sedimentation resulting from development; (#2, #3, #6) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (The proposed project will not result in an impact on wildlife dispersal or migration corridors since the subject property will have been mass graded pursuant to the master tentative map. prior to development of the subject project. (#3, #6) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X 12 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (Development of the proposed project will be designed in conformance with all applicable federal, state and local polices and codes relating to energy conservation including State Titie No. 24. The project falls within the realm of urban uses anticipated under the City's General Plan Master EIR; (#2, #3, #5) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (Development of the proposed project will be designed in conformance with all applicable federal, state and local polices and codes relating to energy conservation; the project will comply and implement Housing Element Action Program 5.1 which implements residential energy efficient standards; (#2) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (The proposed project is located within an area with known mineral deposits however these minerals are not considered of significant value and urban development is planned for this area of the City, which has previously been found in the General Plan Master EIR to not constitute a significant impact; (#1, #2) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (The proposed project does not affect the previous findings of consistency with the City of Carlsbad Emergency Plan for Calavera Hills, and does not include any uses that would likely involve accidental explosions, or a release of hazardous materials. As a result, it is concluded that the project will not involve risk of these circumstances as determined in the City's General Plan Master EIR; (#2) X 13 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (The proposed project will comply with City standards for emergency response to the developed site; (#2) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (The proposed project is a typical residential project and is not expected to create any health hazards. A 138 KV electrical transmission line is located southerly of the subject site. The General Plan Master EIR addressed electro magnetic fields (EMF's) and concluded that scientific researcli has not established that EMF's are hamiful to human health; (#2, #3) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (There are no known existing potential health hazards in the vicinity of the proposed project as determined in the City General Plan Master EIR; (#2) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (Preserved habitat areas containing high fuel plant species are proposed in close proximity immediately to the south of the subject project. The proposed design incorporates provisions of the City Landscape Manual Fire Suppression standards as approved by the City Fire Marshal. As a result it is concluded that the proposed project will not increase fire hazard and will and comply with all applicable City policies regarding fire suppression, landscaping and low fuel planting; (#2, #7, #9) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (The proposed project involves residential development adjacent to College Blvd., a major arterial roadway, and Carlsbad Village Drive and Tamarack Ave., secondary arterial roadways. As a result, noise impacts from this roadway source could be significant and will necessitate mitigation. The exact form of mitigation must be addressed in a site specific noise analysis; (#2, #3, #12) X 14 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to attached) and b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Development of the subject village for residential purposes will result in the potential for significant noise impacts from College Boulevard and Carlsbad Village Drive. The potential significant adverse impacts relative to noise levels from these arterial roadways could be mitigated for the proposed project through the construction of noise walls of a height and density to minimize noise effects. The proposed project is not within the noise contour levels considered significant for McClellan-Palomar Airport. In addition, the Calavera Hills EIR concluded that, with appropriate mitigation.; (#2, #3, #10) Potentially Significant Impact Potenfially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (The proposed project will be serviced by Fire Stations 3 & 5 and as a result, it is projected to conform with the City of Carisbad General Plan, the Growth Management Plan and the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP). Additionally, at the time the Calavera Hills fire station comes on line (expected in 2004). fire protection to the area will be enhanced. No substantive need for additional fire protection beyond that anticipated in these documents will result from development of the proposed project; (#2, #3, #5) b) Police protection? (Police protection is provided by the City of Carisbad Police Department; no substantive need for additional police sen/ices beyond that anticipated in the City of Carisbad General Plan and the Growrth Management Plan will result from development of the proposed project; (#2, #3, #5) c) Schools? (The proposed project will not have a significant impact on schools because it has been annexed into CUSD Special District #3. which levies taxes for the construction of new schools. A new K-8 school is proposed to be constructed as part of this project; residential development of this site is anticipated in the City's Growth Management Program; (#2, #4, #5) X X X 15 Rev. 03/28/96 ""% Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (No substantive increase in road maintenance will be necessitated since the proposed project will be in conformance with the City's General Plan and Growth Management Plan; (#2, #4, #5) X e) Other governmental services? (No significant need for any other governmental services beyond those anticipated by the City of Carisbad General Plan and the Growth Management Program will result from development of the proposed project; (#2, #4, #5) X Xll. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (The proposed project is not anticipated to create a significant new demand for major facilities or to require substantial alterations to existing facilities; (#2, #4, #5) X b) Communications systems? (The proposed project may is not anticipated to create a significant new demand for major facilities or to require substantial alterations to existing facilities; city codes require that the applicant consult with cable and communications providers during the proposed project design/City review process; (#2) X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (Urban uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan EIR and Growth Management Plan; (#2, #4, #5, #7) X d) Sewer or septic tanks? (The proposed project will utilized existing and planned facilities, and will not create significant or unanticipated demand for sewer beyond that anticipated in the City of Carisbad General Plan Master EIR and the Master Sewerage Plan. No septic systems will be utilized; MEIR 93-01, pp. 5.12.3.1-5.12.3.5). X 16 Rev. 03/28/96 - '"N Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact e) Storm water drainage? (Urban residential uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan Master EIR and Growth Management Plan, and the proposed project is not likely to result in significant increase in storm water drainage beyond that identified in those documents. To ensure that no significant impact occurs, the project will comply with mitigation measures relative to storm water control identified in these documents; (#2, #3) X Tj Solid waste disposal? (Urban uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan EIR and Growth Management Plan, and the proposed project will not result in an increase in solid waste beyond that identified in those documents; (#2) X g) Local or regional water supplies? (Urban uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan EIR and Growth Management Plan, and the proposed project will not result in an increase in demand for local or regional water supply beyond that identified in those documents; (#2, #3) X XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (The proposed project will not significantiy affect City of Carisbad designated scenic vistas or highways; (#2) X b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (The City of Carisbad review process includes building architecture and quality of site design to insure that proposed developments harmonize adequately with existing development in the City. This review process prevents demonstrable negative aesthetic effects. As a result, eventual development of the proposed project will be designed in a tasteful and marketable manner and will not have a negative aesthetic effect; (#2, #3, #7) X c) Create light or glare? (The City's General Plan EIR anticipates residential uses on the subject site, and no significant light or glare will result from the proposed project; (#2) X 17 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paieontological resources? (The proposed project is located within an area which is expected to contain paieontological resources. As a result, grading of the site may impact paieontological resources unless mitigation measures are included to minimize the impacts; (#2, #3, #11) X b) Disturb archaeological resources? (The proposed project is not expected to disturb archaeological resources. (#3) X c) Affect historical resources? (There are no known historical features on the site; (#3) X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (The proposed project will not cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values: (#3) X e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (The proposed project will not restrict religious uses or impact sacred areas; (#3) X XV.RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (The proposed project will not create a significant additional need for parks or other recreation facilities other than identified in existing City policy documents which identify recreational plans for buildout of the City; (#2, #3, #4, #5) X b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (The proposed project will not significantiy affect existing recreation opportunities; (#2, #3, #4, #5) X 18 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referre attached) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directiy or indirectiy? Potentially Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Impact Mifigation Incorporated X X X 19 Rev. 03/28/96 XVll. EARLIER ANALYSES. Eariier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an eariier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Eariier analyses used. Identify eariier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an eariier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the eariier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the eariier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. ANALYSIS Earlier analyses and references utilized In this Assessment: 1. City of Carlsbad General Plan, September 6, 1994, as amended. Including Land Use Element, Circulation Element, Housing Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Public Safety Element. 2. General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR 93-01), September 6, 1994. 3. Draft Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II, Bridge & Ttiorouphfare District No. 4 and Detention Basins Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-02), January, 2001. 4. City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program (Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan), September 23, 1986. 5. Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan, October 18, 1989. 6. Draft Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad, December, 1999. 7. City of Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance, Title 21, as amended. 20 Rev. 03/28/96 8. Comprehensive Open Space and Resource Conservation Management Plan, May, 1992. 9. City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual, November 13, 1990. 10. Comprehensive Land Use Plan McClellan-Palomar Airport, October 1986. 11. City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance, Title 11, as amended. 12. City of Carlsbad Transportation Design Standards, March 3, 1991 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. LAND USE AND PLANNING: The proposed project conflicts with the present Land Use Element of the General Plan and the existing Calavera Hills Master Plan, and will require amendment to these Plans. Amendments to these plans are presently in process in the City, which will change the land use on the subject property to residential low-medium density, which would allow the single family development proposed in this project. Upon approval of these discretionary legislative actions, tlie proposed project will be consistent with Land use and Planning documents. In the event that this General Plan and Master Plan Amendment does not proceed to approval, the subject project cannot be found in conformance with the General Plan and Master Plan. AIR QUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin," any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in 21 Rev. 03/28/96 the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin," therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carisbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation 22 Rev. 03/28/96 measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout ofthe General Plan due to regional through- traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. NOISE: The proposed project will involve the potential for exposure of future residents to high levels of noise from College Boulevard and Carisbad Village Drive, both arterial transportation corridors. The Calavera Hills Draft EIR concludes that, with appropriate mitigation, significant adverse impacts relative to noise levels from these roadways can be mitigated for the proposed project. The proposed project is not within the noise contour levels considered significant for McClellan-Palomar Airport. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: The proposed project involves residential development of a site for which permits to conduct mass grading will already have occurred prior to development of the subject project. This mass grading will be undertaken in reliance on approvals of the master tentative map and its associated grading permit. The site however, presently contains coastal sage scrub vegetation, which is considered a sensitive habitat. It additionally has been historically identified as a location for nesting of the coastal California gnatcatcher, a federally listed "threatened" species, under the Endangered Species Act. In the event that this master tentative map mass grading, for which an EIR is being conducted, does not occur, the proposed project would result in potentially significant biological impacts, and mitigation would be necessary. All areas identified in the master tentative map as worthy of preservation, in conformance with the Habitat Management Plan program, are to remain in open space conservation area. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: The proposed project could result in a significant impact on storm water drainage facilities, and will be required to install temporary and permanent erosion control and pollution control facilities downstream of the project. Upon installtion of adequate erosion and pollution control devices, the project will be considered to have mitigated the impacts on storm water facilities to an adequate level. 23 Rev. 03/28/96 CULTURAL RESOURCES: The proposed project is located within an area which is expected to contain paieontological resources. As a result, future grading of the site may impact paieontological resources unless mitigation measures are included to minimize the impacts as determined in the Calavera Hills EIR. LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) LAND USE: 1. Prior to approval of the subject project, the City of Carisbad General Plan Land Use element, and the Calavera Hills Master Plan shall be amended to allow development in conformance with the subject project. NOISE: 1. Exterior Noise Levels -To reduce significant ground-floor exterior noise levels for residential use areas, the project applicant shall construct noise barriers varying from five to nine feet in height along the top of the slope as shown in Figure 3D-11 in the EIR. This measure reduces noise levels at all ground-floor usable areas within the village to a level at or below 60 CNEL.Moreover, if additional points of access from College Boulevard and, as a consequence, additional breaks are required, no usable exterior areas shall be placed adjacent to those breaks. Even with the construction of noise barriers, noise levels at the second floors of the units adjacent to the roadways could exceed 65 CNEL. Standard construction is not assumed to adequately reduce interior noise levels to below 45 CNEL at these locations. Therefore, the following mitigation is required: Interior Noise Levels - a) At the time building plans are available for the units in this village, and prior to the issuance of building permits, a detailed acoustical analysis for units exposed to 65 CNEL or greater will be required demonstrating that interior noise levels due to exterior sources will be at or below the 45 CNEL interior standard, b) For those areas where exterior noise levels are projected to exceed 60 CNEL, it will be necessary for the windows to remain closed to ensure that interior noise levels meet the City's interior standard of 45 CNEL and forced-air circulation or air conditioning is required. 2. If earthwork blasting is proposed, the project shall conform to San Diego County Blasting Ordinance Title 3, Division 5, Chapter III County Code of Regulatory Ordinances Sections 35.377.101-104, 35.377.301(a), 35.377.306 and 35.377.307) to 24 Rev. 03/28/96 reduce the temporary noise impacts due to blasting and Section 8.48.010 of the City's Municipal Code limiting allowable hours of activities. The allowable hours of activities associated with blasting will be from 9:00 AM. to 4:30 P.M. or one-half hour before sunset, whichever comes first, Monday through Friday. No blasting will be allowed on weekends or on the holidays specified in section 8.48.010 of the City's Municipal Code. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: 1. Prior to approval ofthe subject project, the mass grading associated with the master tentative map shall have been approved, including mitigation for the disturbance of coastal sage scrub habitat impacts. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: 1. The developer and the City of Carisbad shall, within 90 days of completion of grading activities, hydroseed/ landscape graded and common areas with appropriate ground cover vegetation consistent with any biological requirements (e.g., use of native or noninvasive plants). These revegetated areas shall be inspected monthly by a qualified landscape architect, biologist, or comparable professional until verification is provided to the City that vegetation has been firmly established as determined by the City's grading inspector. Compacted areas shall be scarified, where appropriate, to induce surface water infiltration and revegetation as directed by the project geologist, engineer, and/or biologist. 2. Grading and other suri'ace-disturbing activities either shall be planned to avoid the rainy season (i.e., November through March) to reduce potential erosion impacts or shall employ construction phase erosion control measures, including the short- term use of sandbags, matting, mulch, berms, hay bales, or similar devices along all graded areas to minimize sediment transport. The exact design, location, and schedule of use for such devices shall be conducted pursuant to direction and approval by the City Engineer. CULTURAL RESOURCES: 1. During the grading operation, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of excavations and, if necessary, salvage exposed fossils. The frequency of inspections will depend on the rate of excavations, the materials being excavated, and the abundance of fossils. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage. ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) To be determined by Planning Director. 25 Rev. 03/28/96 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the City Council of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia, at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 19, 2002, to consider a request for approval of a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84 unit single family development within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located at the northwest comer of Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as: Parcel A of Parcel Map 16233, file in the Office of the County Recorder on September 21, 1990, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San D.iego, State of Califomia. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after November 15, 2002. If you have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned unit Development Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map and/or Planned Unit Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice Or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad, Attn: City Clerk, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008, at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CT 01-02/PUD ^1-05 . . - .-, ^ CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K PUBLISH: SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL. srrE CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 Citv of Carisbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the Planning Commission of the City of Carisbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 16, 2002, to consider a request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of an 84 unit single family development within Village K of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located at the northwest corner of Carlsbad Village Drive and College Boulevard, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as: Parcel A of Parcel Map 16233, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on September 21, 1990, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after October 10, 2002. If you have any questions, please call Eric Munoz in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4608. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K PUBLISH: OCTOBER 3, 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us SITE CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE K CT 01-02/PUD 01-05 V . /' BERNICE C HILL 2 984 RIDGEFIELD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-6543 JEFF KUESTER 2 98 6 RIDGEFIELD AVE CARLSBAD CA. 32 0 08-654 3 CHARLES R CARTER 2 988 RIDGEFIELD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008-65- BARBARA A STROTHER 2 990 RIDGEFIELD AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6543 CARL J ESQUEDA-CRIMSON 2 858 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 CATHLEEN L ARMS 2 860 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 ROGER P SANTORA 2 8 62 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 KAREN J JEWETT 2 864 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 PAMELA LANGNESS 2 856 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 DENISE L KOLDE 2 854 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 JEANNINE MENGER 174 WALNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-3193 MARY J WALTER 2 855 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 ROGER A OUILLETTE 2 874 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 ROBERT W FILLER 2 872 NANTUCKET LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6552 TR WEIN-QUARTARONE 2 715 SPOKANE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-2188 DAMIEN B BROWER 2 8 76 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6553 J T Sc J SMITH 2 878 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-6553 JAMES L LYONS 2 880 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6553 ROSEMARIE R ROWLETT 2 8 84 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 TR EVYZIAN 2314 SHAWN CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-2078 MARA L WARMBRAND 2 886 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 008 6553 ADDIE M LYONS 2 88 8 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 LYNNE C WELKE 2 890 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 MARY E RORAPAUGH 10327 112TH CT NE KIRKLAND WA 98033-5175 DEBORAH A STILWAGEN 2 8 94 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 NOEL ALLANMEYER 2 893 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6553 JULIA RAGOZZINO 2 8 91 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-6553 RUTH I SABULA 2 889 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6553 TR SHAW 2 887 SANFORD CARLSBAD CA LN 92008-6553 BRIGHT LEE A 2 875 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 CAROL A LINCOLN 64 00 PULLMAN PL SW PORT ORCHARD 98367-7637 STEPHEN E JACOBS 2871 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 5^2 008-6553 LISA M CHAMNESS 3 766 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6554 DANIEL MILICH 3 768 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08 6554 VIRGIL CURRY 3770 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 STEVEN T TIPLITSKY 3 772 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 PETER A & LAURA WALSH 2 885 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 SAM D HERNANDEZ 2 883 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 SYLVIA A PHILLIPS 2 881 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-6553 GLENN T HAYASHI 2 879 SANFORD LN CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6553 MICHAEL HODELL 3774 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 KENNETH D MARTINEZ 3 776 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 ROOSEVELT CLEVELAND 3 78 6 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 JEFFREY H PIAYES 3788 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 MAURICE COHN 2261 MASTERS RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-3849 HARVEY P HARLIB PO BOX 2 564 CARLSBAD CA 92018-2564 DALE Sc MARY BODMAN 3242 CELINDA DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-2071 SANDRA L PEARSALL 3 782 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 TR JARVIS 3780 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 PAMELA M MONTANEZ 3 778 PORTLAND CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6555 CREST OF CALAVERA HILLS 3 90 0 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 CREST OF CALAVERA HILLS 3 900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 CREST OF CALAVERA HILLS 3900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 CREST OF CALAVERA HILLS 3900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 VILLAS OF CALAVERA HILL 3 900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 JONETTE C VOLLMER 3 540 RIDGEWOOD WAY 8 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012 JON Sc LISA TIMMERMAN 3 53 8 RIDGEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7012 MARY A Sc MAURA OGRADY 3 53 6 RIDGEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7012 STEPHEN T SHELLEY PO BOX 1286 SAN CLEMENTE 92674-1286 ROXANA J LUCAS PO BOX 44 51 CARLSBAD CA 92018-4451 MARION D SWIFT 3 550 RIDGEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7012 OLEARY ERIKA M 3 548 RIDGEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA- ".^008-7012 TR BLOZAN 3 546 RIDGEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7012 MARTHA F CAILLE 7544 RIDGEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7012 NORMAN DOBRUSKIN 3542 RIDGEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7012 DEBRA A BASOM 353 9 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 MARY E HOLLAND 3 53 7 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7013 JOHN P KRESSIN 3535 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 AILEEN L SCHICK 3 53 3 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 SHIRLEY J SOMMERS 3 531 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7013 DARIN M MCGHEE 3604 28TH ST SAN DIEGO CA 92104-3502 SALLY CHERNESKY 3 547 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 BAKER JANIS M 3 54 5 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 HENRY BYZAK 3543 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 PATRICK M FARLEY 3541 CEDARBRIDGE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7013 THIERRY PALLET 10 05 FOXGLOVE VW CARLSBAD CA 92009-4822 MICHAEL ANDREWS 22 0 PLUM AVE BREA CA 92821-5952 TR EMOA 32 7 LINDEN WAY PLEASANTON CA 94566-6881 ANNA DEMETRIS 2 87 0 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7003 JOHN S COLLINS 2727 ROOSEVELT ST A CARLSBAD CA 92008-1617 CLAIRE C FOSTER 2882 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7004 PATRICIA J YOUNG 31935 CALLE ESPINOSA TEMECULA CA 92592-3743 JERI T MUSE 3054 JUNIPER ST SAN DIEGO CA 92104-5437 PATRICIA M LINKINS 2 867 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003 RODNEY J Sc MARY BAI ROS 9 02 9 CALLE DEL VERDE SANTEE CA 92071-2984 ERIK K TAPPIN 2 863 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7003 CARL H TUTTLE 14089 24TH AVE NE SEATTLE WA 98125-3401 FRED L Sc CAROL CLARK 2 859 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003 SIGNE R JOHNSON 2 877 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7004 RICIIARD K JACOBS 2104 WEDGEWOOD DR OCEANSIDE CA 92056-3266 KARIN L DULAK 2 8 73 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003 DESHANO RODNEY A 15035 CALLE JUANITO SAN DIEGO CA 32129-1007 PHILIP J BOSTROM PO BOX 230934 ENCINITAS CA 92023-0934 LONI D SCHURR 2 856 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 RANDOLPH K WHITTINGTON 2 854 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 WILLIAM R BOLDT 6845 SHEARWATERS DR CARLSBAD CA 92009-3702 DARCY J BERGEN 2 850 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 GIESE 13 07 6 MARLETTE DR LA MIRADA CA 90638-1933 RIZZO 6533 VISPERA CARLSBAD CA PL 92009-5339 MICHAEL C DAQUILA 2 8 64 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003 THOMAS J SHIELDS 2862 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7003 DEENA L DISTEFANO 2 860 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7003 JONATHAN D CHESNUT 2 85 8 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 SCARLETT H MCCONNELL 2847 ANDOVER AVE 49 CARLSBAD CA 92 008-70 02 BRADLEY R SCOTT 2 845 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 TR DODD 218 CHAPALITA DR ENCINITAS CA 92 024-4826 JAMES J Sc JOAN OCONNELL 105 GAS LIGHT DR 4 S WEYMOUTH MA 02190-2147 STEPHEN W PAAP 2 855 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 CHRISTOPHER J LASKE 2 8 53 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7002 TIMOTHY G CAUFIELDS 2 851 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 PAT Sc MONICA MCDONNOUGH 2 84 9 ANDOVER AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7002 JAMES R HOWCROFT 2 83 6 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 DEBRA L KLOTZ 2 834 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 SALLY A HANNON 2 832 ENGLEWOOD WAY 107 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 CHARLES W CAGLIOSTRO 2 7 SEBASTIAN CT HOPEWELL JUNC 12533-6705 MADELINE R ARNOLD 2844 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 MICAHEL S GOTTES 2 842 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 DIANE H SAITO 2 84 0 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 JOHN K ROSS 2 83 8 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 ROBERT C Sc SUSAN LLOYD 18 09 HIGH RIDGE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-3760 MARILYN J BRYANT 2 852 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 ROBERT D JENSEN 2850 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA. -52008-7006 •WILLARD L ERICSON 2 84 8 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7005 SHERRIE L FERGUSON 2274 S 1300 E G8 SALT LAKE CIT 84106-2882 SVETLANA L FOUDA 2860 ENGLEWOOD WAY 118 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 WILFREDO R VALENZUELA 9212 BUTTERCUP AVE FOUNTAIN VALL 92 708-1906 CHERYL S SMITH 2 856 ENGLEWOOD WAY 12 0 CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7006 ALEXANDER K ARMOUR 2 872 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7006 WALKER 43 81 SHASTA PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7914 MARIO Sc PATRICIA DELEON 2 868 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 ROBERT J CONNOR 451 LEXINGTON CIR OCEANSIDE CA 92057-7355 TR ECK 2 880 ENGLEWOOD WAY 125 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 MARYLOU BELEW 2 8 78 ENGLEWOOD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 WASUNG 13 033 TRIUMPH DR POWAY CA 92 064-64 04 HARRY S Sc DOREEN MAY 2 874 ENGLEWOOD WAY 12 8 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7006 YOUNG 3 523 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 MELODIE A KELLEY 3 52 5 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 JOANN GARCIA 3 527 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 LORA A ZAROFF 3 52 9 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 JASMIN S KOCUR 3 531 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 RENEE COOPER 353 3 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CRONK TR 3 53 5 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 CLAUDIA JONES 3 537 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 NANCY HAGERMAN 13 02 LEMON PL ESCONDIDO CA 92027-4712 GUTIERREZ-TUNISON 3 817 PINNACLE PL ESCONDIDO CA 92025-7934 JESSICA L MOORE 3543 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 MURIEL M BRENNAN 3545 BROOKFIELD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7017 KATHRYN MCKEE 3 503 PROVIDENCE LN CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7016 MITCHELL A SALTZ 7234 E SHOEMAN LN 9 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251-3315 ELENOR F MCELLIOTT 3 507 PROVIDENCE LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 JULIA K BUTLER 3 50 9 PROVIDENCE LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 MICHELLE RICK 3 511 PROVIDENCE LN CARLSBAD CA -32 008-7016 CINDY L GIBBONS 3 513 PROVIDENCE LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 KARL E SAIMRE 3 515 PROVIDENCE LN CARLSBAD CA 92008-7016 WILLIAM Sc LEAH GOULD 3365 PAR DR OCEANSIDE CA 92056-1705 DAVY L MINGE 3516 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 MALLOY 3 514 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 MARVIN J MAROHN 3512 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 COLLETTE C EELLS 3 510 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 RALPH W Sc JEAN BLEAK 10422 LORENZO PL LOS ANGELES C 90064-4449 DONNA GUGLER 3 506 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 SUSAN B NIXON 352 8 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 JOSEPHINE G MAGDICH 188 0 LAUREL RD OCEANSIDE CA 92054-6152 ALBERT W WILSON 3 524 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 WILLIAM P LUND 3 522 SOMERSET WAY 2 08 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 KELLY KORSMEIER 3 52 0 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 GARY D FARMER 3 518 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 ROBERT G ANDERSON 1217 GOLD FLOWER RD CARLSBAD CA 92009-3422 ANDREW P MIRABELLI 3 513 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7014 CONSTANCE YANCHEWSKI 3 511 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7014 BRIAN TAYLOR 3509 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 AUDRIE E MCINNIS 3 507 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 ENCINAS 3505 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 J N PIERCE PO BOX 84 65 INCLINE VILLA 89452-8465 SHERRIAN K DEAN 3 52 5 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 BJORN L BOUWMEESTER 3 523 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 AMIELYN C DIZA 3 521 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7015 GEORGE J SHADE 3 519 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7014 FRED S Sc KRISTIE LITTLE 3517 SOMERSET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7014 CAROLYN R CATALDO 3 016 NEWSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 MIKE Sc JILL KENNY 3 02 0 NEWSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 TIMOTHY J BRENNAN 3 024 NEWSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA -52008-7031 PHILIP W Sc PAMELA WERTZ 3 02 8 NEWSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 PHILLIP SHECKLER 1811 IVY RD OCEANSIDE CA 92054-5642 VALERIE ESCALANTE 3641 CHESHIRE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7022 RICHARD H BROWN 1831 IRVING ST NW WASHINGTON DC 20010-2614 LYNDSAY L JACKSON 3 642 CHESHIRE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7021 WILLIAM M MARTINEZ 3 644 CHESHIRE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7021 ALEXANDER Sc LISA ORTEGA 3 64 6 CHESHIRE AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008-7021 EDUARDO D CONSUNJI 19320 SEGAL ST CERRITOS CA 90703-7143 CLAUDE A Sc MARY NASH 2 957 GREENWICH ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7028 KENNETH BROWN 2 963 GREENWICH ST CARLSBAD CA 92 008-702! FRED D Sc JANET WATSON PO BOX 325 CARLSBAD CA 92018-0325 KEITH H PATTERSON 2 976 GLENBROOK ST CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7023 CHRISTOPHER WESTROPP 2 972 GLENBROOK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7023 HUTCHINGS 2 977 GLENBROOK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7024 FRANCINDA T ROVEY 2 981 GLENBROOK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7024 RAFT O Sc SHARON RANGED 2 985 GLENBROOK ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7024 DONALD E ELLING 3639 WILSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7034 CLIFFORD SCHECHTEL 3641 WILSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7034 J T Sc KATHLEEN MARTIN 3 004 NEWSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 LEX M Sc JUDY COWSERT 3 0 08 NEWSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7031 ROBERT A VONDERHAAR 3 011 NEWSHIRE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7032 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3 900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3 900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 *** 205 Printed *** PAUL R RUNGE 3 527 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92Q08-7047 BARBARA L PRUIETT 3525 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA- -32 0 0.8 - 7 04 7 BERNARD R HEAD 3523 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 MATTHEW P Sc DONNA BRAGG 3 521 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 SHARON A RADT 3519 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7047 MARTHA M WOOLWEAVER 3 517 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7047 JACK B BROWN 3 515 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7047 JUDITH A GRIESHABER 3 511 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 7 JEFFREY D Sc MARY SAVAGE 3509 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 7 MARY RYAN 3 5 07 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7047 THOMAS H LUCAS 3 505 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7 04 7 KENNETH S WINFIELD 3 508 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7046 LINDA SHIRVANIAN 3 510 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7046 B WILSON 3512 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7046 JOHN ARCHDEACON 3514 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA 92008-7046 GEORGI 1875 BIENVENIDA CIR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-3 804 GEORGI 1875 BIENVENIDA CIR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-3 8 04 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3 90 0 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 RICHARD S ELDER 3 606 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7045 OHANNES KITABSIZIAN 3 608 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7045 HAZEL S Sc LINDA STEWART 3 610 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 5 STEPHEN P DONOHUE 3 612 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7045 CONRAD C Sc LYNN HAMMANN 3614 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 5 CHRISTIAN B COWDREY 6117 SUMMER PARK LN ALEXANDRIA VA 22315-5221 JENNIE L SMITH 3 618 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7045 KEVIN C WALKER 3 62 0 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7045 STEPHEN G LADLEY 3 622 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7045 PHILIP J CLARK 3 624 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045 SCHULZ TR 3 62 6 MILFORD PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7045 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 RICHARD M HANNASCH 3611 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7049 MARK T Sc BETTY BLONDIN 3 615 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA - 0 QB - 7 0 4 9 LIGIA C LEAKE 3 619 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-704 9 JOHN Sc JOANN LOPEZ 3 621 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-704 9 JERRY C SANDERS 3 623 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7049 WILLIAM & KARON MUNSON 134 CALIFORNIA ST ARCADIA CA 91006-3641 STEVEN A Sc JUDY JOHNSON 2 771 SOUTHAMPTON RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-2883 KAREN MORALES 3 674 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7048 JOHN M CASEMENT 3375 RAMBLA PACIFICO ST MALIBU CA 90265-5142 JOHN B Sc JANE TRAYER PO BOX 758 CARLSBAD CA 92018-0758 TY P Sc ANNE TURLEY 3668 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 8 ROBERT I CHEKERDJIAN 3666 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 JIMMIE C SEBRING 3 664 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7048 QUANEY 3 662 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 C R Sc JUDITH WALTERS 3660 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7048 GRAHAM J ESPIE 4 717 GATESHEAD RD CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6507 MICHAEL A AGUIRRE 3656 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 8 LINDA S BUTLER 3 654 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 PATRICIA L ZADRA 3 652 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7048 JACK Sc AIDA SHAKARIAN 3650 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 JACK K Sc MARILYN KARINS 3 634 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 8 RUDY W NOVOTNY 42 98 CORDOBES CV SAN DIEGO CA 9213 0-2221 WILLIAM T HOFFr^IAN 3630 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-704 8 ROBERT L TUCCI 1216 BASINBROOK DR N. LAS VEGAS 89032-7845 STAN TIGER 3 62 6 HARWICH CARLSBAD CA DR 92008-7048 GLENN Sc PATRICIA HAKIUS 3624 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7048 ROBERT E CULBERTSON 3 622 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7048 PETER E Sc JUNE HUEBER 34 61 CORVALLIS ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-2187 LARRY J Sc BRENDA BROWN 3 614 ASHBY CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050 RICHARD Y YONEMURA 3 612 ASHBY CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050 JOHN E SCHNEIDER 3610 ASHBY CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050 CHRISTOPHER S HELE 3521 LANDSFORD WAY CARLSBAD CA- 92008-7047 HERMAN W SMITH 8932 AMADOR CIR 1312D HUNTINGTON BE 92646-8731 JOHN D LINDSLEY 3 604 ASHBY CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7050 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3 900 flARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 TRAILS OF CALAVERA HILL 3 900 HARNEY ST SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2825 CYPRESS VALLEY LLC 2 72 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 CYPRESS VALLEY LLC 2 72 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 BRIAN C GALLAGHER 2900 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 ROBERT Sc JOAN PART IN 2904 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 RUDY Sc SHERRY GONZALEZ 3708 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 LOUIS F VELASCO 3712 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7062 RHETT W SAUNDERS 2952 CLIFF CIR 22 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 ROGER W BROWN 2956 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 MARFELO 0 MAGAOAY 2960 CLIFF CIR 24 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 TIMOTHY A MERCER 2964 CLIFF CIR 25 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 CHIUMAN Sc 5003 ROSE SMYRNA GA JULIE TSANG CT SE 30082-1860 DAVID R Sc SUSAN LEVINE 4 SIRIUS IRVINE CA 92612-5714 THEODORE Sc KAREN WAIT 296 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 KEITH S Sc MARY BADINER 2975 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058 GILBERT E Sc J GORDON 2959 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058 HARRY J Sc KAREN TAYLOR 2949 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058 CHIUMAN Sc JULIE TSANG 2 93 7 SEGOVIA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92009-8231 CAROLYN T MILARDO 2935 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058 MOHAMMAD H ASLAMI 2903 CLIFF CIR 35 CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058 WENQING WU 2920 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 GERALD M HEIT 2908 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7057 ALEXANDER R STRILER 2912 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 TAMARA S STOGNER 2916 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7057 NEVIL KIRWAN 2920 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 920 08-7057 ROBERT J MORRIS 2924 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 MARY M MILLS 2928 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 MARISA M LEE 2932 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 VICTOR J BAROTHY LANGER 2936 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 BONNIE M TIGLIO 2940 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7057 MICHAEL N Sc ANNA CALLAN 2944 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 R WYSMIERSKI 2948 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7057 JACOB MENDOZA 3 711 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 WENQING Sc ZHANG WU 3 7 07 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7062 ROY L Sc LYDIA PARKER 3703 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 DAVID Sc TRAGI TROXELL 3 700 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-7062 LAWRENCE J MALONE 3704 AZIMUTH PL CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7 062 LESLIE J SUTTLE 2919 CLIFF CIR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7058 CALAVERA HILLS II L L C 2 72 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 CYPRESS VALLEY LLC 2 727 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 CALAVERA HILLS II L L C 2 727 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 CALAVERA HILLS II L L C 2 72 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 KEVIN Y LEE 3 52 5 COASTVIEW CT CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6594 PAUL S CHRISTENSON 3 52 9 COASTVIEW CT CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6594 AZIN HATEFI 3 533 COASTVIEW CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-6594 WHITESELL T JUSTINE 3537 COASTVIEW CT CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-6594 ROBERT C Sc LINDA ALLEN 3174 SEABURY ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-7036 MICHAEL T BILTUCCI 16425 BRONCO LN POWAY CA 92064-1911 CHRISTOPHER D WOOLSEY 3579 CAY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072 JACK W Sc JOY HOOK PO BOX 2582 CARLSBAD CA 92018-2582 MARIAN L 3 571 CAY CARLSBAD KUKLA DR CA 92008-7072 JIANLI Sc ZHENG ZHU 3 567 CAY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072 DONALD C Sc JOAN HANNAY 3 824 STONERIDGE RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-70 73 RICHARD A Sc MARY ISAAC 3559 CAY DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7072 DAVID B Sc KRISTEN KUNCL 3 555 CAY DR CARLSBAD CA -22 008-7072 ROBERT R VESSINY 3551 CAY DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7072 PLAZA VINCENT-i-TEANIO-PL 3 731 WHITESANDS CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7070 HSIEN H Sc WEI MENG 3 73 5 WHITESANDS CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7070 IVAN X DCUNHA 3569 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7060 STEVEN L Sc BARBARA HILL 3109 DEL REY AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009-7512 RUSSELL R CURRAN 3 561 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7060 YU-REN Sc XIAO-XIA ZHANG 3 557 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7060 NANCY G MADDOCKS 3 553 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7060 DAVID N VINEGARD 4016 AGUILA ST CARLSBAD CA 92008-4150 CONRAD B KREUTZER 3552 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 PAUL Sc DYANNA BURAK 3 556 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 HEDTKE 3 560 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7059 MEHDI A SHARIFI 3 564 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 JOAN GARATAN 3 568 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-7059 LAWRENCE R MOORE 1914 BLUERIDGE ST OCEANSIDE CA 92 056-6021 RALPH W BROWN 3586 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7059 MATTHEW KILGORE 3 590 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7059 JIN Sc CHAOTING YAO 3594 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 JOHN L HJELT 3598 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7059 KENNETH H PAYNE 3 57 7 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7061 ROGER W Sc GEORGIA BEST 3581 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7061 DONALD C Sc JOAN HANNAY 3 824 STONERIDGE RD CARLSBAD CA 92008-7073 JOHN A Sc LORI TEKVERK 3 58 9 BLUFF CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-7061 ZHARGE Sc SU WANG 12865 POINTE DEL MAR WA DEL MAR CA 92014-3860 CALAVERA HILLS II L L C 272 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 GREGORY M Sc RUTH GAZDA 3566 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 KVEHWAN KIM 3 57 0 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 FRAZIN BAHRINY 3 574 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92 008-7065 JAY B Sc MICHELE KING 3578 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 MARK A Sc ANNA STONER 3582 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 5^2 008-7065 NADER NIKFAR 3586 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 MICHAEL E HARTSHORN 3590 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 MICHAEL V RAVAN 1485 GENOA DR VISTA CA 92083-5386 MICHAEL S GRIFFITHS 3598 HARWICH DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-7065 CALAVERA HILLS MASTER A 2 72 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 CYPRESS VALLEY LLC 2727 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-662 5 CHRISTINE J PALILEO 3699 STRATA DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6590 CAMERON C Sc 3 695 STRATA CARLSBAD CA AMY ALDER DR 92008-6590 CHAD E DUGAN 3 693 STRATA DR CARLSBAD CA 92008-6590 JAYKANT B PATEL 4 93 9 COMPOSITION CT OCEANSIDE CA 92057-7914 JOHN E FUTCHER 2 6 GRAND GARDEN CT SPRING TX 77381-6439 SCOT R Sc C BENSON 362 6 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593 SCOTT A HENRIKSON 3 63 0 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593 BRIAN Sc MELANIE LEE 3 534 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593 GREGORY J JACKSON 3 638 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593 JOHN Sc MONIQUE RUSSELL 3 642 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6593 KENNETH WATSON 3 63 9 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 ROBERT H HOFFMAN 3 63 5 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 N LE ANH 3 631 TERRACE CARLSBAD CA PL 92008-6592 KRISTOPHER J KOLLENDA 3 62 7 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92 0 08-6592 RICK E SCHWARTZ 3 623 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 KEVIN Sc ENNIFER LIPPERT 3 619 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 SCOTT D Sc MONICA BEITH 3 515 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 WEIDONG Sc JINGYI ZHENG 3 611 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6592 KURT ERIKSON 3 607 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6592 AN B Sc KIMCHI VU 3 603 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92008-6592 DARRELL DORTHICK PO BOX 1851 FREMONT CA 94538-0185 MIXHAEL W BROWN 3612 TERRACE PL CARLSBAD CA 92 008-6591 CYPRESS VALLEY LLC 2 72 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 HOWARD J KELLER 3805 SHALE CT CARLSBAD CA 220 08-5501 ROBERT S JENNINGS 3809 SHALE CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 JASON T WILLIAMS 3813 SHALE CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5501 GREGORY A & LINK AU 3823 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 TIN T St IVIAN TRIEU 3819 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 MICHEAL Sc LAUREN CONRAD 3 815 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92 008-5500 SAMUEL K AFOLAYAN 3 811 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 BRETT H POLLOCK 3 807 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 RAYMOND H DREIFUSS 3 8 08 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 PENG Sc WU ZHU 3 812 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 GEOFFREY M Sc JULIE LESS 3 816 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 KEVIN J HACKETT 3 82 0 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 KENNETH C KENDRICK 3 824 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 *** Printed *** DEVIN B CARNEY 3 8 04 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 920 08"-550 0 CYPRESS VALLEY LLC 2 72 7 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 519.50-6625 CARL SARRAZOLLA 3 803 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 JAMES W Sc SANDRA LEE 3 800 CROWNPOINT CT CARLSBAD CA 92008-5500 CYPRESS VALLEY LLC 2727 HOOVER AVE NATIONAL CITY 91950-6625 *** 5 Printed *** A notice has been mailed to all property owners/occupants listed hereia. Date: )o J /6Z^ Signature:::^. ^'^^^J^ CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECKBOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) Q Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit Q Administrative Variance Q Coastal Development Permit Q Conditional Use Permit Q Condominium Permit Q Environmental Impact Assessment Q General Pian Amendment Q Hillside Development Permit Q Local Coastal Plan Amendment Q Master Plan Q Non-Residential Planned Development (3 Planned Development Permit (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) 0 Planned Industrial Permit Q Planning Commission Determination 1 I Precise Development Pian Q Redevelopment Permit Q Site Development Pian O Special Use Permit • Sp*ecific Plan • Tentative Parcel Mop Obtain from Engineering Department [X] Tentative Tract Map • Variance n Zone Change CD List other applications not specified CTOl-OZ 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: VUl-lO\-2S) l(g%'"0<4\-03-j 1(0%"'0^4^I'0^ ... 0*7 j 1(^^-04-1-I 3) PROJECT NAME: Calavera Hills Village K 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A single familv residential proiect 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) Calavera Hills II L.L.C. 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Calavera Hills II L.L.C. MAILING ADDRESS 2727 Hoover Avenue MAILING ADDRESS 2727 Hoover Avenue CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-3735 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-3735 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE ANO CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEQAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE / DATE SIGNATURE / DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Subdivsion of a portion of Lot D, E & J of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State ot Calitornia, Partition map JNO. 6ZJ, tiled NO^ir'^'^'pR^P^dSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED. MUST BE SUBMl(-^^PfS^Qy^^ P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form! 6 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: Calavera Hills Village K ON THE North STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF Carlsbad Village Drive (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN Tamarack Avenue AND (NAME OF STREET) College Boulevard 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS Seven 1 3) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 1 6) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 93 Res. 64% 51.1 P-C 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 17) PROPOSED INCREASE'IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING Zero Zero 880 RM N/A (NAME OF STREET) 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 88 Zerc 88 N/A 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO EtJTBY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED TOTAL FEE REQUIRED 1^ > RECEIVED FEB 0 1 2001 CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE sF/bAN<rittJG\D5l|PT|[tCEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID SL-\-0\ RECEIPT NO. Form 16 City of Carlsbad ._ 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 CGF" •I94'?5 00 Applicant: CALAVERA HILLS II L L C Set Id: S000000544 Description CT010002 PUD01005 Total; Amount 11,525.00 7,900.00 19,425.00 Receipt Number: R0018167 Transaction Date: 02/01/2001 Pay Type lyiethod Description Amount Payment Payment Check Check 50377 29768 1,030.00 18,395.00 Transaction Amount: 19,425.00 0 Q PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: Calavera Hills Village K APPLICANT NAME: Calavera Hills II L.L.C. Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: The proposed project is a single family detached residential development, with 88 dwelling units, located in what is commonly referred to as Calavera Hills Planning Area K. The site is approximately 51 acres in size, and 64% of the site is proposed to remain in open space. This open space area will provide an important linkage for the Carlsbad HMP, dn addition to adding aesthetic qualities for the development. The proposed dwelling units will range in size from approximately 2,075 to 2,709 SF, and will be two stories in height. The proposed project includes applications for a Tentative Tract Map and a Planned Development Permit, and is in compliance with Calavera Hills Master Plan MP-150 (H). Project Description 10/95 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionar)' action on the part cf the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Comminee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venmre, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and count}', city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and propert>' owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO . INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) ^ • T n -^-n T T ^ calavera Hills II, LLC, liability company Address Corp/Part_ Title 272 7 Hoover Avenue Natinr^R-l City, CA 91950 Address_ Person a California limited Title 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person McMal'lin Companies, LLC ^ Corp/Part Tamarack Properties, Inc. d DbldWditi IxaiiLed liability^ a California corporation Title company Title n/n RronkfiP^IH HOTHPS 2727 Hoover Avenue Address Mat-innPil ri-t-y, rA Qiqsn Address. 12865 Pointe, Del Mar, Ste. 200 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 ® o o NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust N/A iMon Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of CitN' staff. Boards. Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) momhs? • Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/djlte Print or type name of owner Signature of applicant/<j6te Do^ H Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 VILLAGE K CALAVERA HILLS 2 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN rc cflOWflPD flSSOCIflTES CALAVERA HILLS ll, LLC CALAVERA HILLS Villages 'K', 'LT. 'R' McMILLIN COMPANIliS