The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 01-04; Calavera Hills Village U; Tentative Map (CT)CITYQFCARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) • Administrative Permit - 2n,d . Dwelling Unit Planned Industrial Permit • Administrative Variance • Planning Commission Determination • Coastal Development Permit • Precise Deveiopment Plan Conditional Use Permit • Redevelopment Permit Condominium Permit cpo\ -OZ. • Site Development Plan • Environmental Impact Assessment • Special Use Permit General Plan Amendment • Specific Plan • Hillside Development Permit • Tentative Parcol Map Obtain from Engineering Departnnent • Local Coastal Plan Amendment Tentative Tract Map CTo\ -oH • Master Plan • Variance • Non-Residential Planned Development • Zone Change • Planned Deveiopment Permit • List other applications not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 3) PROJECT NAME: 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE tJATioioau CA ^\<^St> CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE (C'^^H^tr-50-73 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. \ CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. A/^ii^Oz/ h f- Of SIGNATURE / DATE SIGNATURE / DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5ofOi*;v&>oU C><^A "t^cnoU 0^ LOTS "P. g •»7 "We "gA^JCtVO NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED. MUST BE SUBMITrED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. ?A«i-c»-no»:k MA? ido. Pxue"D \\-iW'-v?'it^. Form 16 PAGE 1 OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: STREET ADDRESS ON THE 6*^ ST SIDE OF Cx>L\.ec£ 'e»UNn3. (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) BETWEEN AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1 0) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 1 6) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 1 9) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 7) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 15) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION JlA IM) (d Ivi 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO^TRY FOR THIS PURPOSE ^IvITRY FOR THIS PURPOSE SIGNATURE / FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED TOTAL FEE REQUIRED RECEiVED FEB 0 1 2001 CITY OF CARLSBAD . PLANNING DEPT DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: CALAVERA HILLS II L L 0 Description CT010004 Amount 224.95 8689 10/15./02 0002 Oj CGP Receipt Number: R0030243 Transaction Date: 10/15/2002 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 51204 224.95 Transaction Amount: 224.95 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: CALAVERA HILLS II L L C Set Id: S000000546 Description CP010002 CT010004 Total Amount 7,900.00 12,245.00 20,145.00 Receipt Number: R0018169 Transaction Date: 02/01/2001 0467 02/01/01 0002 01 02 CGP 201H5'00 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Payment Check Check 29774 50380 19,115.00 1,030.00 Transaction Amount: 20,145.00 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary' action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Coniminee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fratemal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property' owner must be provided below. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if "^""^""^^ la ver a Hills II, LLC, Person a California limited Title liability company Corp/Part_ Title 2727 Hoover Avenue Address National City, CA 91QSn Address. 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) pg^jQi^ McMillin Companies, LLC d Deldwdie llmlLfaid llabili Title compamy Title. 2 727 Hoover Avenue Address Kl a H-i on ^1 rity, CA 919 5 0 orp/Part Tamarack Properties, Inc. a California corporation r./n Rrnnkfjpld Hnme.g Ste. 200 . 12865 Pointe.^Del.Mar, Address n^T M^r, r^A 9!^iit4 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to f 1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust N/A Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address, 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? [ I Yes JXfNo If yes. please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of own^/date Signature of applicaj^'t/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 Of 2 City of Carlsba Planning Department November 18, 2002 Calavera Hills II LLC c/o McMillin Companies LLC 2727 Hoover Avenue National City, CA 91950 PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION SUBJECT: CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U At the Planning Commission meeting of November 6, 2002, your application was considered. The Commission voted 6-0 (Commissioner Segall Absent) to RECOMMENDING ADOPTION/ RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. The decision of the Planning Commission is advisory and will be forwarded to the City Council. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. Sincerely, (hi. MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:MG:mh Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5304, 5305, 5306 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us / PPROOF OF PUBLK TION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) This space is f he County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of Califomia, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: OCTOBER 17, 2002 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at this of SAN MARCOS 17TH Califomia day / 0X681 Proof of Publication of *CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: East of future College Boule-vard, south ot Carlsbad Village Drive, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Project Description: Tentative Tract Map and Condonnin-lum Permit for the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development within Village li of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The City or Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environ-mental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Garlsbad. As a result of said re-view, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the proiect will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action IS on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive doc-uments IS on tile in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date of. issuance. If youTiave any questions, please call sJjS'l.^.^L'^''"" '^^ Planning Department at (760) 602-4623 DATED: OCTOBER 17^2002 CASE NO: CT Ol-Ot/Cf' 01-02 CASE NAME:-CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U /s/Michael J Holzmiller, Planning Director NCT1411766 October 17, 2002. OCTOBER, 2002_ Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFG 753.6a (6-01) 214733 Lead Agency: CAY 0^ ^oun^ State Agency of Filing; Project Title: 03 Docurfjent No 011 Mlcl Project Applicant Name: aecial District Calavera mUs IE LLC, la ^ Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant Cc/?ec/< appropnate box): Local Public Agency Q Schobraj|trict State Agency CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ) Environmental Impact Report ) Negative Declaration ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs ) County Administrative Fee 'TJ^<l_Project tnat is exempt from fees I yOrOTAL RECEIVED Signature and title of person receiving payment: W/HITE-PROJECT APPLICANT YELLOW-DFG/FASB v / PINK-LEAD AGENCY ' jG()LDENROD-STATE AGENCY OF FILING $850.00 $1,250.00 $850.00 $850.00 $25.00 $ ^L Notice of Detemiination nni 01 U72 To: Office ofPlanning and Research From: CITY OF C P.O. Box 3044 Planning Dj Sacramento, CA 95812 F D L IE [D) 1635 Far a Gregory J. Smith, Recoider/County Clerk Carlsbad, DEC 3 0 2002 (760) 602-4 DEPOT? County Clerk County of San Diego Mailstop 833, Attn: Wendy' PO Box 121750 San Diego, CA 92112-1750 Project No: CT 01-04/CP 01-02 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Calavera Hills Village U Project Title City of Carlsbad, Michael Grim (760) 602- 4623 State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number East of future College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego Project Locations (include County) Name of Applicant: Calavera Hills II LLC Applicant's Address: 2727 Hoover Ave, National City, CA 91950 Applicant's Telephone Number: 619-336-3138 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Pennit to subdivide 6.16 acres *^ into a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan on a pregraded site. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on December 17, 2002, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition ofthe approval ofthe project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. MICHAEL J. HOLZMTLLER, banning Director Date received for filing at OPR: Date Revised December 2001 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: Project Description: East of fixture College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of CaHfomia Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit for the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. Comments from the pubUc are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. DATED: CASE NO: CASE NAME: OCTOBER 16, 2002 CT 01-04/CP 01-02 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2002 MICHAEL/ HOLZMILJt IJ ' Planning director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME PO BOX 944209 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2090 CERTIFICATION OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (Include County): Calavera Hills Village U - CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - East of future College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego Name and Address of Applicant: Calavera Hills II LLC 2727 Hoover Ave National City, CA 91950 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to subdivide 6.16 acres into a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan on a pregraded site. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial Study for the above referenced property, including evaluation of the proposed project's potential for adverse environmental impacts on fish and wildlife resources. 2. Based on the complete Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning Department finds that the proposed project will not encroach upon wildlife habitat area, will have no potential adverse individual or cumulative effects on wildlife resources, and requires no mitigation measures to be incorporated into the proposed project which would affect fish or wildlife. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. [ViLHD IN THE'oFFiCF OF THE '~ ! SAN Dfl-GO COUNTY ON 3 ^S^^"^^ ^^^^^ [VIIOTA?LT^^JJ^^ I ^'^^'^^' -^NED TO AGENCY ON ? ^ W lanning Director Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD Date: (T^Jl^Z^ Section 71 L4, Fish and Game Code DFG: 1/91 PROOF OF PUBLIC nON (2010 & 2011 CCP.) This space is the County Clerk's Filing Stamp STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Proof of Publication of 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. y\aA^<J>^ , California Dated at this day of. 1^— Signature NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you. because your inter-est may be affected, ttiat ttie F'lanning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carls-bad . California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 6, 2002, to consider a request for a Negative Declara-tion, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit to al-low the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multi-family air-space condominium development within Village U of the Calavera Hills (fas-ter Plan on property generally located on the east side of the future extension of College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as: A portion for Lot "D" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, ac-cording to Map No. 823, tiled in the Office of the County Recorder on f^ovember 16.1896, in the City of Carlsbao. County of San Diego, State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after October 31, 2002. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit, if ap-proved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit in court, you may be limit-ed to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: OT 01-04/CP 01-t)2 CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U PUBLISH: OCTOBER 25, 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, November 6, 2002, to consider a request for a Negative Declaration, Tentative Tract Map, and Condominium Permit to allow the subdivision and construction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development within Village U of the Calavera Hills Master Plan, on property generally located on the east side of the future extension of College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 7 and more particularly described as: A portion for Lot "D" of the Rancho Agua Hedionda, according to Map No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder on November 16, 1896. in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after October 31, 2002. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. The time within which you may judicially challenge this Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit, if approved, is established by state law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit in court, you may be limited to raising oniy those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. CASE FILE: CT 01-04/CP 01-02 CASE NAME: CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U PUBLISH: OCTOBER 25. 2002 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ® CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U CT01-04/GP 01-02 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: Project Description: East of future College Boulevard, south of Carlsbad Village Drive, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit for the subdivision and constmction of a 135 unit multifamily air-space condominium development within Village U ofthe Calavera Hills Master Plan. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. Comments from the pubhc are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Michael Grim in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4623. DATED: CASE NO: CASE NAME: OCTOBER 16, 2002 CT 01-04/CP 01-02 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U PUBLISH DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2002 MICHAEL J/HOLZMILI Planning Director 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ fe itv of Carlsbad Planning Department HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Govemment Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of Califomia Govemment Code Section 65962.5,1 have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the Califomia Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): ><] The development project and any altematives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. r~l The development project and any altematives proposed in this appUcation are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code, Name: APPLICANT Calavera Hills 11 L.L.C Address: 2727 Hoover Ave. Phone Number: (619) 336-3673 Name: National City, CA 91950 PROPERTY OWNER Calavera Hills ll L.L.C. Address: 2727 Hoover Ave. National City, CA 91950 Phone Number: (619) 336-3673 Address of Site: ^^^^ side of future College Blvd. in Zone 7 (Village U) Local Agency (City and County'): City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 168-040-29 (Portion) & 168-OtH-n Specifylist(s): Propertv not on attached list. Regulatory Identification Number: N / A Date of List: ^prii 15, 1998 Applicant Signature/Date Pfoperfy"Uwner Signature/Date Adjirin/Counter/HazWastE 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST CITY LIST 04/15/98 DTSC FACILITY INVENTORY OATA BASE HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST PGM: CALEPA5 PAGE 37 SORT BY CITY. ST NAME. ST NBR (1 STREET NBR STREET NAME CITY ZIP FACILITY NAME CO REG SY - REG ID 5600 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD 920080000 UNISYS CARLSBAD 37 WBC&D 9 0000a4N94 1044 CARLSBAD VILLAGE CARLSBAD 92008 CHEVRON SERVICE STATION 37 LTNKA 9UT1000 1044 CARLSBAD VILLAGE CARLSBAD 92008 CARLSBAD CHEVRON 37 LTNKA 9UT2801 571 CARLSBAD VILLAGE CARLSBAD 93164 ITT CONTINENTAL BAKING C 37 LTNKA 9UT2611 920 CARLSBAD VILLAGE CARLSBAD 92008 GASCO SERVICE STATION 37 LTNKA 9UT2724 2100 COSTA DEL MAR CARLSBAD 92009 LA COSTA HOTEL &.SPA 37 LTNKA 9UT242 2500 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD 92008 CHEVRON SERVICE STATION H 37 LTNKA 9UT6a5 2545 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD FIRESTONE 37 LTNKA 9UTiei3 2545 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAO d.C.PENNYS AUTO CENTER 37 LTNKA SUT 1 17 2590 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAO 92008 SHELL OIL SERVICE STATION 37 LTNKA 9UT224 1 7654 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD 92008 WALTS ARCO SERVICE STATIO 37 LTNKA SUT1503 3701 HAYMAR CARLSBAD 920080000 SOUTH COAST MATERIALS 37 LTNKA 9UT3452 405 OAK CARLSBAD 92008 PUBLIC WORKS YARD 37 LTNKA 9UT1950 2160 PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD 920080000 PALOMAR AIRPORT 37 LTNKA 9UT2041 2210 PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD 92008 MCCLELLAN-PALOMAR AIRPORT 37 LTNKA 9UT2227 2210 PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD 92008 FLIGHT INTERNATIONAL 37 LTNKA 9UTB46 850 PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD 92008 PEASOUP ANDERSON/UNION S/ 37 LTNKA 9UT394 850 PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD 92008 CARLSBAD PROPERTIES. LTD 37 LTNKA 9UT1953 899 PALOMAR AIRPORT CARLSBAD MOBIL OIL STATION 37 LTNKA 9UT149B 5335 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD 92008 WESELOH CHEVROLET 37 LTNKA 9UT1183 5434 PASEO DEL NORTE CARLSBAD 920080OO0 NORTH COUNTY LINCOLN MERC 37 LTNKA 9UT3254 601 PINE CARLSBAD 92008 CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL 37 LTNKA 9UT1080 2615 STATE CARLSBAD 920O800OO PAUL'S AUTOMOTIVE 37 LTNKA 9UT3043 2779 STATE CARLSBAD 92008 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT 37 LTNKA 9UT3065 April, 1998 INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR FILLING OUT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Form - Part I will be used to determine what type of environmental documentation (i.e., Environmental impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration or Exemption) will be required to be prepared for your application, per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Title 19 ofCarlsbad's Municipal Code. The clarity and accuracy ofthe information you provide is critical for purposes of quickly determining the specific environmental effects of your project. Recent judicial decisions have held that a "naked checklist," that is checklist that Is merely checked "yes" or "no," is insufficient to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality act. Each "yes" or "no" answer must be accompanied by a written explanation justifying the "yes" or "no" answer. This Is especially important when a Negative Declarations being sought. The more information provided in this form, the easier and quicker it will be for staff to complete the Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part II. Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I CASE NO: DATE RECEIVED: (To be complete by staff) BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Calavera Hills Village U 2. APPLICANT: Calavera Hills II, LLC 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: Calavera Hills II, LLC, c/o McMillin Companies; 2727 Hoover Avenue, National City, CA (619) 336-3735 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative subdivision map and condominium permit for 141 attached conominium units to be located on a 61.8 gross acre property, with development proposed on a 13.5 net acre pad, located on the east side of future College Boulevard. The proposed project will involve construction of 28 three- and six-plex buildings, with access proposed at two locations on College Boulevard. The site is anticipated to have been mass graded through processing of a separate master tentative map, prior to the subject project. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. X Land Use And Planning • Population and Housing • Geological Problems • Water X Air Quality X Transportation/Circulation X Biological Resources • Energy & Mineral Resources • Hazards X Noise • Public Services X Utilities & Services • Aesthetics X Cultural Resources • Recreation • Mandatory Findings of Significance Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mifigafion Incorporated" applies where the incorporafion of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potenfially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mifigafion, and the City must describe the mitigafion measures, and briefiy explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potenfially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substanfial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part II," if a proposed project could have a potenfially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mifigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mifigated Negafive Declarafion, including revisions or mifigafion measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mifigafion measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no addifional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potenfially Significant Impact" is checked the project Is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed 3 Rev. 03/28/96 o adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mifigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declarafion may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potenfially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mifigafion measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigafion measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potenfially Significant Impact Unless Mifigafion Incorporated" may be checked and a Mifigated Negafive Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potenfially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potenfially significant effect has not been discussed or mifigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mifigafion measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potenfially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potenfially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mifigafion measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attenfion should be given to discussing mitigafion for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact LAND USE AND PLANNING a) Would the proposal:. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (The proposed project will conflict with the existing Land Use Element of the General Plan and the Calavera Hills Master Plan, however a General Plan Amendment and a Master Plan Amendment is in process with the City of Carlsbd and is expected to be approved prior to consideration of the proposed project. In the event this General Plan Amendment and/or Master Plan Amendment is not adopted, the proposed project is not consistent with the General Plan, which is considered a significant environmental impact. (#1, #2, #3) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing Calavera Hills Master Plan, however this Master Plan is presently in process of modification. Upon its adoption, the proposed project will be consistent. Additionally, the proposed project is consistent with the City of Carlsbad Draft Habitat Management Plan (HMP). Nonetheless, potentially significant environmental impacts to land use will result if mitigation is not included. (#3, #6) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (The proposed project is not anticipated to be incompatible with the existing residential land uses west of the site in the area inasmuch as the proposed project will be of a compatible density. (#1, #2, #3) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? (The proposed project will not have a significant impact on soils or farmlands; the City's Final Master EIR and the Calavera Hills EIR anticipate and plan for urban development of the site. No agricultural operations exist or previously existed on the subject site in recent history; (#2, #3) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (Existing urban develop- ment occurs to the west of the proposed project, however the proposed project will not divide the physical arrangement of any established community. The project will indirectly add to the stock of affordable housing through implementation of a future affordable housing agreement with the City of Carisbad. (#1, #2, #3) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than No Significant impact Impact II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (The proposed project proposes no increase in regional or local population projections approved in conjunction with the Citys Final Master EIR (#2, #3) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (The proposed concominium development of Village U involves a small extension of future College Boulevard southerly from its existing terminus at Carlsbad Village Drive. All improvements proposed are within the subject property, or along its direct frontage; (#1, #2, #3; c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (The proposed project site is presently undeveloped and will not displace any existing housing; (#2, #3) X X X GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (The proposed project is not located near active or potentially active faults. Standard engineering design and construction practices should mitigate potential impacts associated with earthquakes to a less than significant impact; (#2, #3, #11) X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) b) Seismic ground shaking? (Seismic risk on the subject site is considered low. The proposed project will mitigate the effects of potential seismic ground shaking by following all pertinent State and Local building codes for construction, including measures identified in the General Plan Public Safety Element Implementing Policies and Action Plans; (#2, #3, #11) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (The proposed project will mitigate the effects of potential seismic ground shaking by following all pertinent State and Local building codes and standard regional engineering practices for design and construction as required in conjunction with the Carlsbad Master EIR; (#2, #3, #11) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (The proposed project is not located in an area susceptible to seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard; (#2) e) Landslides or mudflows? (The proposed project is located on land considered in previous environmental documents as suitable for development, and will mitigate the potential for landslides and mudflow on the site by grading in a manner consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance and as directed by the soils report; (#2, #3, #11) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (The proposed project has been previously mass graded. As a result of its future development, it will mitigate the potential for erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions on the site by grading in a manner consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance, and including mitigation measures identified in the General Plan Public Safety Element Implementing Policies and Action Programs; (#1, #2, #11) g) Subsidence of the land? (The previously-graded natural soils stability onsite is considered generally good. The proposed project will mitigate the potential for subsidence on the site by grading in a manner consistent with the City's Grading Ordinance and the recommendations set forth in the soils report; (#2, #3, #11) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) h) Expansive soils? (The The City's Master EIR concluded that significant impacts associated with expansive soils can be mitigated to a level of less than significan through the implementation of mitigation measures identified in the General Plan Public Safety Element Implementing Policies and Action Programs. The proposed project will mitigate the potential for damage from expansive soil conditions on the site by grading in a manner consistent with these measures, and the City's Grading Ordinance; (#1, #2, #11) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (The proposed project has been previously graded, and is not located in an area with unique geologic or physical features; (#2d, #3) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant impact No Impact X X IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (The proposed project is not anticipated to adversely effect changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or surface runoff, in that it will comply with the City of Carlsbad's policies regarding surface runoff quantities and rates in compliance the Final Master E1R;(#2, #3, #11) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (The proposed project will be designed to not increase the amount of drainage runoff from the site in its developed, when compared to its existing state prior to development; (#2, #11) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (The proposed project will not discharge directly or in an uncontrolled manner into any surface waters or result in an alteration of water quality; (#2, #3) X X X Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to attached) and Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (Eventual development of the proposed project will not discharge directly or in an uncontrolled manner into any surface waters or result in an alteration of water quality since mitigation measures including the use of temporary onsite. and permanent downstream sedimentation and retention basins will be utilized; (#3, #11) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (Development of the proposed project will result in no substantive change in the course or direction of water movement; (#2, #3) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (The City's General Plan and the General Pian Master EIR contemplate urban development of Village U, and the project will not result in any significant withdrawals or additions to the groundwater; (#2, #3) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (The City's General Plan Master EIR contemplates urban development of the subject villages, and the project will not result in any significant alteration in the direction or rate of flow of groundwater; (#2, #3, #11) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (All pesticides, oil grease and other toxic substances contained in typical urban runoff will be conhtrolled consistent with Federal and State law. As a result, the proposed project will not result in significant impacts to groundwater quality; the City's General Plan EIR contemplates urban development of this site consistent with the proposed project; (#2, #11) \) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (The proposed project will not result in significant impacts to groundwater; the City's General Plan EIR contemplates urban development of this site; (#2, #3, #9, #11) X X X X X X Rev. 03/28/96 c Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Covered under the City's General Plan EIR. See Discussion of Environmental Evaluation at the end of this checklist). b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Other than the impacts described in the Discussion of Environmental Evaluation, the proposed project is not anticipated to create significant impacts to sensitive receptors; (#2, #3) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (The proposed project will not invoke or result in climatic, temperature, moisture or air mass changes; (#2, #3) d) Create objectionable odors? (The proposed project is a typical urban residential development. Residential uses are not generally considered to create noxious odors; (#2, #3) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (The proposed project involves development which will generate approximately 1.432 ADT. Although in and of itself, this increase is not considered significant, the City of Carlsbad has determined that a potential regional significant impact to traffic congestion could result from this and all other projects in the City. See Discussion of Environmental Evaluation at the end of this checklist. b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (The proposed project does not involve the design or development of sharp or hazardous design features. The project will be designed in compiiance with all applicable City polices and codes regarding circulation design which were addressed in the City's General Plan Master EIR. (#2) X X 10 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (The project proposes the installation of circulation infrastructure concurrent with need. In order to be consistent with City standards, eventual development of the site will provide emergency access in compliance with applicable City codes and is designed in compliance with all applicable City polices regarding circulation design which were addressed in the City's General Plan EIR. (#1, #2, #5, #12) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (The proposed project does not involve actual design of development of the subject site, and as a result will not result in significant impacts to parking capacity. (#12) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (The proposed project does not involve actual design of development of the subject site, and as a result will not result in significant impacts to pedestrians or bicyclists. (#12) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (The proposed project will be developed in compliance with the existing City polices and codes regarding alternative modes of transportation which have been addressed in the City's General Plan Master EIR. (#1, #2, #12) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (The proposed project does not preclude and is in compiiance with applicable City polices and codes regarding alternative modes of transportation which were addressed in the City's General Plan Master EIR; (#2, #3, #12) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X X 11 Rev. 03/28/96 o Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds?) (The proposed project involves multi family residential development of a site for which permits to conduct mass grading will already have occurred prior to development of the subject project. The site presently contains coastal sage scrub and chaparral vegetation, prime habitat for the coastal California gnatcatcher, a federally listed species. In the event that the mass grading associated with the master tentative map application, for which an EIR is being conducted, does not occur, the proposed project would result in potentially significant biological impacts, and mitigation would be necessary; ((#3, #6, #8) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (The proposed project does not involve disturbance to locally designated biological species; (#3, #6) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (The proposed project involves development of a site devoid of natural communities and as a result wil not affect locally designated natural communities, (#3, #6) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (The proposed project does not involve direct impacts to wetland habitats, however impacts to "waters of the US", and indirect impacts could occur to downstream riparian scrub wetland and sycamore woodland as a result of potential sedimentation resulting from development;; (#2, #3, #6) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (The proposed project will not result in an impact on wildlife dispersal or migration corridors since the subject property is devoid of natural communities and resources. (#3, #6) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X X X Vlll. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? 12 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to attached) and a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (Development of the proposed project will be designed in conformance with all applicable federal, state and local polices and codes relating to energy conservation including State Title No. 24. The project falls within the realm of urban uses anticipated under the City's General Plan Master EIR; (#2, #3, #5) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (Eventual development of the proposed project will be designed in conformance with all applicable federal, state and local polices and codes relating to energy conservation; the project will comply and implement Housing Element Action Program 5.1 which implements residential energy efficient standards; (#2). c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (The proposed project is located within an area with known mineral deposits however these minerals are not considered of significant value and urban development is planned for this area of the City, which has previously been found in the General Plan Master EIR to not constitute a significant impact; (#1, #2) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X X X IX. H/^RDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (The proposed project does not affect the previous findings of consistency with the City of Carisbad Emergency Plan for Calavera Hills, and does not include any uses that would likely involve accidental explosions, or a release of hazardous materials. As a result, it is concluded that the project will not involve risk of these circumstances as determined in the City's General Plan Master EIR; (#2) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (The proposed project does not propose modifications to the Calavera Hills Master Plan which would impede emergency response to any significant degree; (#2) X X 13 Rev. 03/28/96 c Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? (The proposed project is a typical residential project and is not expected to create any health hazards. A 138 KV electrical transmission line is located southeasteriy of the subject site. The General Plan Master EIR addressed electro magnetic fields (EMF's) and concluded that scientific research has not established that EMF's are harmful to human health; (#2, #3) X d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (There are no known existing potential health hazards in the vicinity of the proposed project as determined in the City General Plan Master EIR; (#2) X e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (Preserved habitat areas containing high fuel plant species are proposed in close proximity to the subject project. The proposed design incorporates provisions of the City Landscape Manual Fire Suppression standards as approved by the City Fire Marshal. As a result it is concluded that the proposed project will not increase fire hazard and will and comply with all applicable City policies regarding fire suppression and low fuel planting; (#2, #7, #9) X X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (The proposed project involves residential multi family development adjacent to a College Blvd., a major arterial roadway. As a result, noise impacts from this roadway source could be significant and will necessitate mitigation. The exact form of mitigation must be addressed in a site specific noise analysis; (#2, #3, #12) X 14 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Development of the subject village for residential purposes will result in the potential for significant noise impacts from College Boulevard. The potential significant adverse impacts relative to noise levels from these arterial roadways could be mitigated for the proposed project through the construction of noise walls of a height and density to minimize noise effects. The proposed project is not within the noise contour levels considered significant for McClellan-Palomar Airport. In addition, the Calavera Hills EIR concluded that, with appropriate mitigation,; (#2, #3, #10) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No impact X XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (The proposed project will be serviced by Fire Stations 3 & 5 and as a result, it is projected to conform with the City of Carlsbad General Plan, the Growth Management Plan and the Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP). Additionally, at the time the Calavera Hills fire station comes on line (expected in 2004), fire protection to the area will be enhanced. No substantive need for additional fire protection beyond that anticipated in these documents will result from development of the proposed project; (#2, #3, #5) b) Police protection? (Police protection is provided by the City of Carisbad Police Department; no substantive need for additional police services beyond that anticipated in the City of Carisbad General Plan and the Growth Management Plan will result from development of the proposed project; (#2, #3, #5) c) Schools? (The proposed project will not have a significant impact on schools because it has been annexed into CUSD Special District #3. which levies taxes for the construction of new schools. A new K-8 school is proposed to be constructed as part of this project; residential development of this site is anticipated in the City's Growth Management Program;; #2, #4, #5) X X X 15 Rev. 03/28/96 c Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (No substantive increase in road maintenance will be necessitated since the proposed project will be in conformance with the City's General Plan and Growth Management Plan; (#2, #4, #5) X e) Other governmental services? (No significant need for any other governmental services beyond those anticipated by the City of Carisbad General Plan and the Growth Management Program will result from development of the proposed project; (#2, #4, #5) X XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the foiiowing utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (The proposed project is not anticipated to create a significant new demand for major facilities or to require substantial alterations to existing facilities; (#2, #4, #5) X b) Communications systems? (The proposed project is not anticipated to create a significant new demand for major facilities or to require substantial alterations to existing facilities; city codes require that the applicant consult with cable and communications providers during the proposed project design/City review process; (#2) X c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (Urban uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan EIR and Growth Management Plan; (#2, #4, #5, #7) X d) Sewer or septic tanks? (The proposed project will utilized existing and planned facilities, and will not create significant or unanticipated demand for sewer beyond that anticipated in the City of Carisbad General Plan Master EIR and the Master Sewerage Plan. No septic systems will be utilized; MEIR 93-01, pp. 5.12.3.1-5.12.3.5). X 16 Rev. 03/28/96 c 3 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact e) Storm water drainage? (Urban uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan Master EIR and Growth Management Plan, and the proposed project is not likely to result in significant increase in storm water drainage beyond that identified in those documents. To ensure that no significant impact occurs, the project will comply with mitigation measures relative to storm water control identified in these documents; (#2, #3) X f) Solid waste disposal? (Urban uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan EIR and Growth Management Plan, and the proposed project will not result in an increase in solid waste beyond that identified in those documents; (#2) X g) Local or regional water supplies? (Urban uses on the subject property are anticipated in the City's General Plan EIR and Growth Management Plan, and the proposed project will not result in an increase in demand for local or regional water supply beyond that identified in those documents; (#2, #3) X Xlll. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? (The proposed project will not significantly affect City of Carisbad designated scenic vistas or highways; (#2) X b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? (The City of Carisbad review process includes building architecture and quality of site design to insure that proposed developments harmonize adequately with existing development in the City. This review process prevents demonstrable negative aesthetic effects. As a result, eventual development of the proposed project will be designed in a tasteful and marketable manner and will not have a negative aesthetic effect; (#2, #3, #7) X c) Create light or glare? (The City's General Plan EIR anticipates residential uses on the subject site, and no significant light or glare will result from the proposed project; (#2) X 17 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (The proposed project is located within an area which is expected to contain paleontological resources. As a result, grading of the site may impact paleontological resources unless mitigation measures are included to minimize the impacts; (#2, #3, #11) X b) Disturb archaeological resources? (The proposed project is not expected to disturb archaeological resources. (#3) X c) Affect historical resources? (There are no known historical features on the site; f#3j X d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (The proposed project will not cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values: (#3) X e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (The proposed project will not restrict religious uses or impact sacred areas; (#3) X XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (The proposed project will not create a significant additional need for parks or other recreation facilities other than identified in existing City policy documents which identify recreational plans for buildout of the City; (#2, #3, #4, #5) X b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (The proposed project will not significantly affect existing recreation opportunities; (#2, #3, #4, #5) X 18 Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X 19 Rev. 03/28/96 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the fiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declarafion. Secfion 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should idenfify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Idenfify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mifigafion measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mifigafion Incorporated," describe the mifigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific condifions for the project. ANALYSIS Earlier analyses and references utilized in this Assessment: 1. City of Carlsbad General Plan, September 6, 1994, as amended. Including Land Use Element, Circulation Element, Housing Element, Parks and Recreation Element, and Public Safety Element. 2. General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR 93-01), September 6, 1994. 3. Draft Calavera Hills Master Plan Phase II, Bridge & Thoroughfare District No. 4 and Detention Basins Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-02), January, 2001. 4. City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program (Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan), September 23, 1986. 5. Zone 7 Local Facilities Management Plan, October 18, 1989. 6. Draft Habitat Management Plan for Natural Communities in the City of Carlsbad, December, 1999. 7. City of Carlsbad Zoning Ordinance, Title 21, as amended. 20 Rev. 03/28/96 8. Comprehensive Open Space and Resource Conservation Management Plan, May 1992. 9. City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual, November 13, 1990. 10. Comprehensive Land Use Plan McClellan-Palomar Airport, October 1986. 11. City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance, Title 11, as amended. 12. City of Carlsbad Transportation Design Standards, March 3, 1991 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potenfially Significant Impact" or "Potenfially Significant Impact Unless Mifigafion Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulafion impacts resulfing from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. LAND USE AND PLANNING: The proposed project conflicts with the present Land Use Element of the General Plan and the exisfing Calavera Hills Master Plan, and will require amendment to these Plans. Amendments to these plans are presenfiy in process in the City, which will change the land use on the subject property to residenfial medium-high density, which would allow the development proposed in this project. Upon approval of these discrefionary legislafive acfions, the proposed project will be consistent with Land use and Planning documents. In the event that this General Plan and Master Plan Amendment does not proceed to approval, the subject project cannot be found in conformance with the General Plan and Master Plan. AIR QUALITY: The implementafion of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumpfion and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequenfiy result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollufion in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin," any addifional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, confinued development to buildout as proposed in 21 Rev. 03/28/96 the updated General Plan will have cumulafive significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mifigafion measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congesfion and Transportafion Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternafive modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) condifions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participafion in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mifigafion measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as condifions of project approval. Operafion-related emissions are considered cumulafively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin," therefore, the "Inifial Study" checklist is marked "Potenfially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparafion of an EIR is not required because the certlficafion of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerafions" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersecfions will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdicfional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementafion of roadway improvements, a number of intersecfions are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mifigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportafion such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participafion in regional circulafion strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulafion mitigation 22 Rev. 03/28/96 measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as condifions of project approval. Regional related circulafion impacts are considered cumulafively significant because ofthe failure of intersecfions at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through- traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparafion of an EIR is not required because the certlficafion of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolufion No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerafions" for circulafion impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerafions" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulafion impacts is required. NOISE: The proposed project will involve the potential for exposure of future residents to high levels of noise from College Boulevar, a major arterial roadway. The Calavera Hills Draft EIR concludes that, with appropriate mifigafion, significant adverse impacts relative to noise levels from these roadways can be mitigated for the proposed project. The proposed project is not within the noise contour levels considered significant for McClellan-Palomar Airport. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: The proposed project involves residential development of a site for which permits to conduct mass grading will already have occurred prior to development of the subject project. This mass grading will be undertaken in reliance on approvals of the master tentafive map and its associated grading permit. The site however, presenfiy contains coastal sage scrub vegetafion, which is considered a sensifive habitat. This habitat is considered prime habitat for use by the coastal California gnatcatcher, a federally listed "threatened" species, under the Endangered Species Act. In the event that this master tentative map mass grading, for which an EIR is being conducted, does not occur, the proposed project would result in potenfially significant biological impacts, and mifigation would be necessary. All areas identified in the master tentafive map as worthy of preservation, in conformance with the Habitat Management Plan program, are to remain in open space conservafion area. In addition, the proposed project is located in an area that contains "waters of the U.S.", in which federal and state permits, and mifigafion will be required. This permitfing process will be conducted in conjuncfion with the master tentative map mass grading process, and as a result will be completed prior to consideration and approval of the subject project. In the event that this master tentafive map does not occur, and this subject project will be required to permit and mifigate for impacts to the "waters of the U.S.", this is considered a significant impact to biological resources. 23 Rev. 03/28/96 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: The proposed project could result in a significant impact on storm water drainage facilifies, and will be required to install temporary and permanent erosion control and pollufion control facilities downstream of the project. Upon installfion of adequate erosion and pollufion control devices, the project will be considered to have mitigated the impacts on storm water facilities to an adequate level. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The proposed project is located within an area which is expected to contain paleontological resources. As a result, future grading of the site may impact paleontological resources unless mifigafion measures are included to minimize the impacts as determined in the Calavera Hills EIR. 24 Rev. 03/28/96 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) LAND USE: 1. Prior to approval of the subject project, the City of Carlsbad General Plan Land Use element, and the Calavera Hills Master Plan shall be amended to allow development in conformance with the subject project. NOISE: 1. Exterior Noise Levels -To reduce significant ground-floor exterior noise levels for residential use areas, the project applicant shall construct noise barriers varying from five to nine feet in height along the top of the slope as shown in Figure 3D-11 in the EIR. This measure reduces noise levels at all ground-floor usable areas within the village to a level at or below 60 CNEL.Moreover, if addifional points of access from College Boulevard and, as a consequence, addifional breaks are required, no usable exterior areas shall be placed adjacent to those breaks. Even with the construction of noise barriers, noise levels at the second fioors of the units adjacent to the roadways could exceed 65 CNEL. Standard construcfion is not assumed to adequately reduce interior noise levels to below 45 CNEL at these locafions. Therefore, the following mifigafion is required: Interior Noise Levels - a) At the time building plans are available for the units in this village, and prior to the issuance of building permits, a detailed acousfical analysis for units exposed to 65 CNEL or greater will be required demonstrafing that interior noise levels due to exterior sources will be at or below the 45 CNEL interior standard, b) For those areas where exterior noise levels are projected to exceed 60 CNEL, it will be necessary for the windows to remain closed to ensure that interior noise levels meet the City's interior standard of 45 CNEL and forced-air circulation or air condifioning is required. 2. If earthwork blasting is proposed, the project shall conform to San Diego County Blasting Ordinance Tifie 3, Division 5, Chapter III County Code of Regulatory Ordinances Secfions 35.377.101-104, 35.377.301(a), 35.377.306 and 35.377.307) to reduce the temporary noise impacts due to blasfing and Secfion 8.48.010 of the City's Municipal Code limifing allowable hours of acfivlfies. The allowable hours of acfivifies associated with blasting will be from 9:00 AM. to 4:30 P.M. or one-half hour before sunset, whichever comes first, Monday through Friday. No blasfing will be allowed on weekends or on the holidays specified in secfion 8.48.010 of the City's Municipal Code. 25 Rev. 03/28/96 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: 1. Prior to approval ofthe subject project, the mass grading associated with the master tentative map shall have been approved, including federal, state and City permitfing and mifigation for the disturbance of coastal sage scrub and "waters of the U.S." habitat impacts. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: 1. The developer and the City of Carlsbad shall, within 90 days of complefion of grading activifies, hydroseed/ landscape graded and common areas with appropriate ground cover vegetafion consistent with any biological requirements (e.g., use of native or noninvasive plants). These revegetated areas shall be inspected monthly by a qualified landscape architect, biologist, or comparable professional unfil verification is provided to the City that vegetafion has been firmly established as determined by the City's grading Inspector. Compacted areas shall be scarified, where appropriate, to induce surface water infiltration and revegetafion as directed by the project geologist, engineer, and/or biologist. 2. Grading and other surface-disturbing acfivities either shall be planned to avoid the rainy season (i.e., November through March) to reduce potenfial erosion impacts or shall employ construcfion phase erosion control measures, including the short- term use of sandbags, matting, mulch, berms, hay bales, or similar devices along all graded areas to minimize sediment transport. The exact design, locafion, and schedule of use for such devices shall be conducted pursuant to direcfion and approval by the City Engineer. CULTURAL RESOURCES: 1. During the grading operation, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of excavafions and, if necessary, salvage exposed fossils. The frequency of inspections will depend on the rate of excavafions, the materials being excavated, and the abundance of fossils. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil to facilitate evaluafion and, if necessary, salvage. ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) To be determined by Planning Director. 26 Rev. 03/28/96 CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U (CT 01-04 / CP 01-02) RESUBMITTAL RESPONSES - September 13,2002 City Comment Letter Dated August 19,2002 (attached) Village U: Item Response Items to Complete Application: Planning: 1. The lot proposed for development (Lot 4 of CT 00-02) does not exist. Therefore the boimdaries of the proposed subdivision do not match existing property lines and are incomplete. According to Engineering Department records, the second plzincheck for the final map FM 00-02 was returned to the applicant on February 11, 2002. The associated grading, improvement, and landscape plans (DWG 390-9,390-9A, 390-9B, 390-9L) are also out to the applicant. To resolve this incomplete item you may either revise the submitted exhibits to shows the existing project boundaries, or, preferably, complete the processing of the Final Map and related plans to create Lot 4 of CT 00-02. You should be advised that the project cannot be scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing with a recommendation of approval vintil all incomplete items are received or completed and all issues are resolved. Note added to Sheet 1 of CT/CP. 2. Please provide the heights of the retaining walls at the end of each wall, at the middle of each wall, and the worst condition elevation. Please note that the maximum height of retaining walls in residential areas is six feet. Added to CT plan sheets 3-5. 3. Please dimension the width of the proposed private streets, as well as the width of the proposed driveways. Streets dimensioned; driveways dimensioned in typical exhibit. Sheet 2 of CT/CP. O o Village U: Item Response 4. Please dimension the interior clear space within each garage (please note that the mirumum clear floor area for single car garages is 12 feet by 20 feet). Garage interiors have been dimensioned; see Architecture Sheet 1 of 11. 5. Please indicate the location, dimensions and area (in cubic feet) of the required storage areas. See Architecture Compliance Sheet 1 of 6 for storage compliance exhibit. 6. Please provide a noise study, consistent with the City of Carlsbad Noise Gtiidelines Manual, as required by Noise mitigation measure 6 on page S- 15 of the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-02) A project-specific noise study is included in our resubmittal package. 7. Please provide a letter from the Carlsbad Unified School District indicating that school facilities will be available to the project. A copy of the CFD #3 Annexation agreement (indicating annexation into the CUSD) is included in our resubmittal package. 8. Please provide a signed "Hazardous Waste and Substance Statement," copy enclosed The signed Hazardous Waste and Substance Statement is included with our resubmittal. 9. Please provide a signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications," copy enclosed. A signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications" form is included in our resubmittal. 10. The Calavera Master Plan development standards for Village U require the submittal and approval of a fence/trellis plan; please provide this plan. The fence exhibit is included as sheet 5 of the Landscape Plans; the trellis exhibit is included in the engineering drawings. Items to Complete Application: Engineering: 1. Add name and address of engineer in regular size font; the company logo information will not be legible in the Document Management System (DMS) format. All lettering needs to be 0.10" in height. Check Project Summary Table also. The font has been changed as requested. 2. Draw key map to scale. The key map is now drawn to scale. 3. Add project numbers to map sheets. Project numbers (CT 01-04 / CP 01-02)have been added to all sheets. o () Village U: Item Response 4. Change name of sewer district to City of Carlsbad. Done. 5. Since this is a trailing tentative map to the Master Tentative Map CT 00-02, fhe legal description for this tentative map should be the lot that CT 00-02 creates. Thus, the legal description should refer to Lot 4 of CT 00-02. Note added to Sheet 1 of the CT/CP. 6. Change parallel parking space width to 7 feet on Typical Parking Detail. Done. 7. Change "Typical Private Drive" to "Typical Private Street" and make sections consistent, use "Public Access and Public Utility Easement" in both sections. Done. 8. Avoid overlapping lettering; in some cases the wording/numbering is uiu-eadable. Also add match lines so the same information doesn't have to be viewed twice. Matchlines added; overlapping lettering removed. 9. Add approximate dimensions to open space lot line between lots 5 and 6. Added to CT/CP sheets 3-5. 10. Add street names to plans. Added to CT/CP sheets 3-5. 11. Clarify limits of Public Access and Public Utility easement in plans. Noted and added to plan sheets. 12. Add stations to streets and show street grades. Street grade shown near Recreation Center is not 2%. CT/CP sheet 9 depicts grades for Street A. o Village U: Item Response 13. Show centerline radius of road at Recreation Center area. Shown on sheet 4 of CT/CP. 14. Label and show more clearly the entrance to Village Y (SDP 01-05). Label added to sheet 5 of CT/CP. 15. Show adequate queuing fiom call box location for both entrances (Streets "A" and "B"). Shown on sheets 3 & 5 of CT/CP. 16. Demonstrate P-vehicle tum radius and 407E Cal- Trans truck radius (3 point turn) on plans. Use true scale detail when demonstrating compliance. See sheet 2 of CT/CP and sheets 1-2 of Turning Exhibit. 17. Make cul-de-sacs on Street "C" conform to standard cul-de-sac design (add tangents). Street C cul-de-sac redesigned as directed. 18. Show all utilities on College Boulevard as existing per Dwg. 390-9, not proposed. Corrected on CT/CP sheets 3-5. 19. Show existing fire hydrants located within 300 ft. of project site. Verify with Fire Department that College Boulevard does not need additional fire hydrants. Added where applicable. 20. Show 25 ft by 25 ft sight distance triangles at private street intersections per Public Street Design Criteria section 8.B.3 of the engineering standards. Added to CT/CP sheets 3-5. 21. Show additional detail on Typical Drainage Detail. Add high/low points emd top of grate. Added to sheet 2 of CT/CP. 22. Label "private drain" in Typical Drainage Detail. Added to sheet 2 of CT/CP. o Village U: Item Response 23. Clarify where cross section 'C occtirs. Added to sheet 5 of CT/CP. Issues of Concem: Planning: 1. Please provide the project identification numbers on the title sheet of the tentative map/site plan. The project identification numbers have been added to fhe Title Sheet of the Site Plan. 2. The sound walls shown on the site plan do not match those shown in Figure 3D-9 of the Master Plan Enviroimiental Impact Report (EIR 98-02). It may be that these walls will mitigate the arterial roadway noise to the required level, however a project-specific noise study is needed to confirm this possibility. Please see incomplete item number 5 above. A project-specific noise study has been included our resubmittal, and the proposed walls conform to that noise study. 3. Please dimension the required 40-foot setback from the College Boulevard right-of-way. Please note that, according to Section Vn.C.2.1 of the Master Plan, a maximum of two encroachments into this setback area are allowed per building - some notation to the effect needs to be made with regard to the proposed optional decks on some buildings. Added to sheets 3-5 of CT/CP. 4. With regard to the recreation areas, please provide calculations for each of the common areas. It is difficult to determine if the common recreation area meets the 13,500 square feet required by the Master Plan. In addition, at least two recreation facilities from List B on page 54 of the Master Plan are required. These include childrens playground facilities, putting green, volleyball court, horseshoe pits, bocce ball and/or recreation rooms and buildings. The proposed restroom building does not qualify as a recreation room or building. Common area recreation calculations added to sheet 3 of Landscape Plans; Two List B items are now included: Children's playground facilities and Bocce Ball o o Village U: Item Response Given the information proved, it is difficult to ascertain if the project complies with the required 100 square feet per unit of passive recreation eireas. No plans guarantee a minimum 60 square foot balcony. The Master Plan requires that there be an average of 100 square feet per unit of private recreation areas. Please provide an exhibit showing how this standard is being met. Please also note that balconies along College Boulevard frontages may not count towards providing recreation area if the noise level is not mitigated to Master Plan required levels and the balcony extends into the arterial setback area. The "downstairs" units (Units 2 and 3) of each plan each have over 100 square feet of private recreation area/rear yards (see CT/CP sheet 2 and trellis exhibit). In conjunction with the 60 square feet of balcony space for the Unit 1 units, an average of 600 square feet of private recreation area exists for each six-plex. 5. In the "Project Summary" table on the title sheet, common slope areas are shown as private passive areas. Since slopes do not count towards the passive recreation area requirement, this notation coiild be confusing. Please revise the table to show the accurate private passive recreation areas. Notations as to the total amount of slope or common space areas (from an HOA maintenance perspective) can be made as long as they are not represented as passive open space areas. The slope areas listed on the title sheet have been removed from the private passive recreation area amounts. 6. The parking provide appears to meet the minimum amount however it is not distributed evenly throughout the project. There are 11 spaces along the access road (between the northem and southem portions of the development) that are not located within 150 feet walking distance to any dwelling unit and, therefore, should not be counted in the total amount of guest parking provided. While they may provide parking opportunities, they do not meet the requirements of the Parking Ordinance. Two street spaces exist in front of each six-plex building, providing the required visitor/guest parking throughout the project. O 6 Village U: Item Response Guest parking is disproportionately provided in the northern section of the project (26 guest spaces for 33 dwelling units), whereas the central portion does not contain one guest parking space within 150 feet of walking distance of every four units without counting a guest parking space twice. 7. The proposed motor courts, provided they measure at least 24 feet wide and provide adequate maneuvering areas, are allowed by the ordinance. They must be consfructed of concrete and accented with enhanced paving freatment. Please indicate these features on the project plans. None of the driveway areas are dimensioned (see incomplete item number 2 above). The proposed motor courts have been dimensioned on the plans, and all are at least 24 feet in width (see CT/CP sheet 2 for typical detail and sheets 3-5; the landscape plan defails the enhanced paving proposed for the motor courts. All driveways are now dimensioned. 8. The required setback for multifamily units from driveways is eight feet (fully landscaped) from residences and five feet from garages. All garages facing directly onto a driveway must be equipped with an automatic garage door opener. Staff is researching the intent of these regulations as they apply to motor court style developments. The Calavera Hills Master Plan allows motor court style developments to have a building separation of 10 feet if the front facade massing is separated by a minimum of 22 feet and at least 10 feet deep. The PD Ordinance requires a 20-foot average building separation, with a 10-foot minimum. Staff has had previous discussions with the applicsint on this exact topic; the results being that it is okay to reduce building separation to 10 feet in the rear of the buildings, provided that the street frontage separation maintains the Master Plan requirement Garages that face directly onto the private streets shall be equipped by the builder with automatic garage door openers. The proposed project is in compliance with the setback requirements delineated in the approved Calavera Hills Master Plan Sec. IX.G.4 (pgs. 108-109). Please see Don Rideout or Paul Klukas for any additional clarification necessary. i) Village U: Item Response of 22 feet. You could also opt to follow the Plarmed Development standard of minimum 20 foot separation for all parts of the stmcture. 9. According to the PD ordinance, street frees within multifamily projects shall be spaced no further than 30 feet on center within the parkway. Please indicate these dimensions on the project landscape plan. Sfreet trees have been placed no further apart than 30 feet on center where possible; however, due to the project's 24-foot motor court enfrance widths (plus driveway skirts), 30 feet on center minimum distance is not possible in all locations. Trees have been placed as close as possible to the sides of the motor court entrances to ensure an aesthetically pleasing landscape design. O 10. The Calavera Hills Master Plan calls for the encouragement of variety in sfreetscape massing and aesthetics, as well as strong architectural relief. It also states that projects within the master plan area are subject to the requirements of the PD Ordinance, with the exception of the site design standards listed on pages 54 and 55 of the Master Plan (arterial setbacks, front yard setback measurement, recreation areas, and building separation). Therefore, the architectural design is subject to the provisions of 21.45.080 - Table E of the PD Ordinance. This section requires at least 3 separate building planes (minimum offset of 18 inches) on all building elevations. It also requires incorporation of at least four of the design elements listed within Table E for each building fagade. The standard end and rear elevations do not appear to meet these criteria. Given the level of detail on the submitted plans, it is not clear that the project complies with these requirements. Please augment the architectural plans to indicate compliance with the PD Ordinance Architectural Design Element standards. It may be necessary to vary the product and/or floor plan to Architectural compliance sheets 1-6 have been added to the building elevations and floor plans detailing the required setback planes and fagade elements per 21.45.080 - Table E of the PD Ordinance. O Village U: Item Response provide the necessary variety of massing and aesthetics. 11. The Master Plem^ requires a top-of-slope setback pursuant to the Hillside Development Ordinance. This setback equals 0.7 feet of horizontal setback for every one (1) foot of verticeil height of the structure. Based upon a building height of 33.6 feet. Buildings 1 through 11 do not appear to meet the required 23.45 foot setback. The 0.7 setback plane intersects the buildings a the top of the second-story plate (see typical detail exhibit, sheet 2 of CT/CP). As long as 11.9 feet of setback is maintained, the building does not fall within the 0.7 setback plane. Buildings 1-11 have been adjusted so they are at maintain at least 11.9 feet of setback. 12. According to the Master Plan, a community frail shall be installed through the length of the northerly open space corridor as permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Please show the alignment of this community trail on the project exhibits. Trail alignment has been added to plans. 13. The Master Plan requires that bus stop facilities be provided at the southerly enfrance to Village U. Please coordinate with North County Transit District on the exact location of the bus stop and the necessary improvement then show these features on the project plans. Bus-stop facilities have been included on CT/CP sheet 4. Issues of Concem: Engineering: 1. On the northem unit of building 26 align the driveway to be more perpendicular to the street. The driveway is now more perpendicular. 2. Show College Boulevard right-of-way dedication for project entrances at Streets "A" and "B". Pedestrian ramps, including the 4-ft sidewalk area, need to be fully within public right-of-way. Included on sheets 3 and 5 of CT/CP. 3. Show installation of fraffic signals at both project entrances. Added to CT/CP sheets 3 and 5. 4. Use non-contiguous sidewalk throughout the project. Meandering sidewalks have been incorporated throughout the project based on the project's unique building design and discussions with staff. o o Village U: Item Response 5. Use fraffic calming measures from the appendix of the "Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program" publication. Incorporate the 'Intersection Bulb-out' and the 'Mid-Block Choker' (offset) in the design of the sfreets. There is a neck-down along the inside curb at the recreation area and at each end on the outside curb, placed at the request of Frank Jimeno. Based on the project's unique building design, further calming measures are not required. 6. Show proposed street lighting in the project streets. Also show fire hydrants as required by the Fire Department. Sfreet lighting and fire hydrants have been added to CT/CP sheets 3-5. 7. Clarify sheet 8 sfreet profile. It is labeled as Sfreet "A" profile at both entrances. Where is Sfreet "B"? Sfreet profile is now sheet 9; profile is for Sfreet A only; Street B is not steep enough to warrant a profile. 8. Address sump condition at Sfreet "B". How is it going to drain? Also show secondary drainage overflow. A storm drain has been added in the vicinity of BIdg. 20 to facilitate sump condition at Sfreet B; a secondary drainage note and storm drain inlet (near BIdg. 11) have been added to sheet 5 of the CT/CP plans. 9. Contact Recreation Department regarding trail and frail head parking requirements. Noted. 10. Refer to the red-lined check prints of the project for additional comments. These check prints must be retumed with the re-submittal to facilitate continued staff review. Comments in redline checkprint incorporated, and redline checkprint retumed with this resubmittal.; o 10 AgG-Z1-02 16:21 FROI*-McMl11 in Land Development +6)9-3363150 T-289 P.02/07 F-705 City Of Carlsbad Plar»nitig Departnnent AUG 21 2002 August 19, 2002 Don Mitchell Calavera Hills 11, LLC 2727 Hoover Ave National City CA 91950 SUBJECT: CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - CALAVERA HIUS VIUA6E U Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in ttie Cixy of Carlsbad. The Ranning Departmeni has reviewed your Tentaiive Tract Map and Condominium Permit, application no. CT 01-04/CP 01-02. as to its connpleteness for processing. The application is incomplete, as sutimitted. AttacnecJ are two lists. The first list is inf ormaiion which must De submitted to complete your application. This tin of items must be submitted directiy to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your Mbmittals. No processing of your appiication can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted tiie Ciiy has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the appiication is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on tne application will be initiated. If the appiication is withdrawn, a new application must be submined. Please contact your staff planner, Michael Grim, at (760) 602--4623. if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOUMILLER Planning Director IVUH:MG:inn Don Rideout Frank Jimeno Rie Copy Data Entry tMe, Farsiriau Avenue • CarlsDaa. CA 92Q08-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlSt>aa.ca.uS ^ AllG-21-02 16:21 FROW-McMil II n Land Devel opment +619-3363150 T-289 P.03/07 F-705 • , • LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U Planning: 1. The lot proposed for development (Lot 4 of CT 00-02) does not exist. Therefore the boundaries of the proposed subdivision do not match existing property lines and are incomplete. According to Engineering Department records, the second plancheck for the Final Map FM 00-02 was returned to the applicant on February n, 2002. The associated grading, improvement, and landscape plans {DWG 390- 9, 390-9A, 390-9B, 390-9L) are also out to the applicant. To resolve this incomplete item you may either revise the submitted exhibits to show the existing project boundaries or, preferably, complete processing of the Final Map and related plans to create Lot 4 of CT 00-02. You should be advised that the project cannot be scheduled for a Planning Commission bearing with a recommendation of approval until all incomplete items are received or completed and all issues are resolved. 2. Please provide the heights of the retaining walls at xhe end of each wall, at the middle of each wall, and the worst condition elevation. Please also note that the maximum height of retaining walls in residential areas is six feet. 3. Please dimension the width of the proposed private streets, as well as the width of the proposed driveways. 4. Please dimension the interior clear space within each garage (please note that the minimum clear floor area for single-car garages is 12 feet by 20 feet). 5. Please indicated the location, dimensions and area (in cubic feet) of the required storage areas. 6. Please provide a noise study, consistent with the City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual, as required by Noise mitigation measure number 6 on page S-15 of the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (ElR 98-02). 7. Please provide a letter from the Carisbad Unified School District indicating that school facilities will be available to the project. 8. Please provide a signed "Hazardous Waste and Substance Statement," copy enclosed. 9. Please provide a signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications," copy enclosed. 10. The Calavera Master Plan development standards for Village U require the submittal and approval of a fence/trellis plan; please provide this plan. AUG-21-02 16:21 FROM-McMlIIin Land Development +619-3363150 T-Z89 P.04/07 F-705 Engineering: 1. Add name and address of engineer in regular size font; the c»mpany logo information will nol be legible in the Document Management System (DMS) format. All lettering needs to oe O.lO" In height. Check Project Summary Table also. 2. Draw key map to scale. 3. Add project numbers to map sheets. 4. Change name of sewer district to City of Carlsbad. 5. Since mis Is a trailjng tentative map to the Master Tentative Map CT 00-02, the legal description for this tentative map shouW be the lot tnat CT 00-02 creates. Thus, the legal description should refer to Lot 4 of CT 00-02. 6. Change parallel parking space width to 7 feet on Typical Parking Detail. 7. Change "Typical Private Drive" to "Typical Private Streef and make sections consistent, use "Public Access and PubUc Utility Easemenf in both seclions. 8. Avoid overlapping lettering; in some cases the wording/numbenng is unreadable. Also add match lines so the same information doesnt have to be viewed twice, 9. Add approximate dimensions to open space lot line between lots 5 and 6. 10. Add street names to plans. 11. Clarify limits of Public Access and Public Utility easement in plans. 12. Add stations to streets and show street grades. Street grade shown r>ear Recreation Center is not 2%. 13. Show centerline radius of road at Recreation Center area. 14. Label and show more clearly the entrance to Village Y (SDP 0i-05). 15. Show adequate queuing from call box location for both entrances {Streets "A' and "B"). 16. Demonstrate P-vehicie tum radius and 407E Cal-Trans tnjck radius (3 point turn) on plans. Use true scale detail when demonstrating compliance, 17. Make cul-de-sacs on Street "C conform to standard cuhde-sac design (add tangents). 18. Show ali utilities on College Boulevard as existing per Dwg. 390-9, not prc^xised. 19. Show existing fire hydrants located within 300 ft. of project site. Verify with Fire Department that College Boulevard does not need additional fire hydrants. 20. Show 25 ft by 25 ft sight distance triangles at private street intersections per Public Street Design Criteria seclion 8.B.3 ofthe engineering standards, 21 Show additionai detail on Typical Drainage Detail, Add high/low points and top of grate. 22. Label 'private dram" in Typical Drainage Detail. ^UG-21-02 16:22 FROH-McMi11 in Land Development +619-3363150 T-289 P.07/07 F-705 11. The Master Plan requires a top-of-slope setback pursuant to the Hillside Development Ordinance. This setback equals 0.7 feet of horizontal setback for every one (1) foot of vertical height of the structure. Based upon a building height of 33.6 feet, Buildings 1 through 11 do not appear to meet the required 23.45 foot setback. 12. According to the Master Plan, a community trail shall be installed through the length of the nonherty open space corridor as permined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Please show the alignment of this community trail on the project exhibits. 13. The Master Plan requires that bus stop facilities be provided ax the southerly entrance to Village U, Please coordinate with North County Transit District on the exact location of the bus stop and the necessary improvement then show these features on the project plans. Engineering: 1. On the northern unit of building 26 align the driveway to be more perpendicular to the street. 2. Show College Boulevard right-of-way dedication for project entrances at Streets "A" and "B". Pedestrian ramps, including the 4-ft sidewalk area, need to be fully within public right-of-way. 3. Show installation of traffic signals at both project entrances. 4. Use non-contiguous sidewalk throughout the project. 5. Use traffic calming measures from the appendix of the "Carlsbad Residential Traffic Management Program" publication, incorporate the 'Intersection Bulb-out' and the 'Mid-Block Choker' (offset) in the design of the streets. 6. Show proposed street lighting in the project streets. Also show fire hydrants as required by the Rre Department. 7. Clarify sheet 8 street profile. It is labeled as Street "A" profile at both entrances. Where is Street "B"? 8. Address sump condition at Street "B". How is it going to drain? Also show secondary drainage overflow. 9. Contact Recreation Depaament regarding trail and trailhead parking requirements. Refer to the red-lined check prints of the project for additional comments. These check prints must be returned with the re-submittal to facilitate continued staff review. Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department August 19, 2002 Don Mitchell Calavera Hills II, LLC 2727 Hoover Ave National City CA 91950 SUBJECT: CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit, application no. CT 01-04/CP 01-02, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. If the application is withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Michael Grim, at (760) 602-4623, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:MG:mh c: Don Rideout Frank Jimeno File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CT 01-04/CP 01-02 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U Planning: 1. The lot proposed for development (Lot 4 of CT 00-02) does not exist. Therefore the boundaries of the proposed subdivision do not match existing property lines and are incomplete. According to Engineering Department records, the second plancheck for the Final Map FM 00-02 was returned to the applicant on February 11, 2002. The associated grading, improvement, and landscape plans (DWG 390- 9, 390-9A, 390-98, 390-9L) are also out to the applicant. To resolve this incomplete item you may either revise the submitted exhibits to show the existing project boundaries or, preferably, complete processing of the Final Map and related plans to create Lot 4 of CT 00-02. You should be advised that the project cannot be scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing with a recommendation of approval until all incomplete items are received or completed and all issues are resolved. 2. Please provide the heights of the retaining walls at the end of each wall, at the middle of each wall, and the worst condition elevation. Please also note that the maximum height of retaining walls in residential areas is six feet. 3. Please dimension the width of the proposed private streets, as well as the width of the proposed driveways. 4. Please dimension the interior clear space within each garage (please note that the minimum clear floor area for single-car garages is 12 feet by 20 feet). 5. Please indicated the location, dimensions and area (in cubic feet) of the required storage areas. 6. Please provide a noise study, consistent with the City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual, as required by Noise mitigation measure number 6 on page S-15 of the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-02). 7. Please provide a letter from the Carisbad Unified School District indicating that school facilities will be available to the project. 8. Please provide a signed "Hazardous Waste and Substance Statement," copy enclosed. 9. Please provide a signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications," copy enclosed. 10. The Calavera Master Plan development standards for Village U require the submittal and approval of a fence/trellis plan; please provide this plan. Engineering: 1. Add name and address of engineer in regular size font; the company logo information will not be legible in the Document Management System (DMS) format. All lettering needs to be 0.10" in heighL Check Project Summary Table also. 2. Draw key map to scale. 3. Add project numbers to map sheets. 4. Change name of sewer district to City of Carisbad. 5. Since this is a trailing tentative map to the Master Tentative Map CT 00-02, the legal description for this tentative map should be the lot that CT 00-02 creates. Thus, the legal description should refer to Lot 4 of CT 00-02. 6. Change parallel parking space width to 7 feet on Typical Parking Detail. 7. Change "Typical Private Drive" to "Typical Private Street" and make sections consistent, use "Public Access and Public Utility Easement" in both sections. 8. Avoid overiapping lettering; in some cases the wording/numbering is unreadable. Also add match lines so the same information doesn't have to be viewed twice. 9. Add approximate dimensions to open space lot line between lots 5 and 6. 10. Add street names to plans. 11. Clarify limits of Public Access and Public Utility easement in plans. 12. Add stations to streets and show street grades. Street grade shown near Recreation Center is not 2%. 13. Show centeriine radius of road at Recreation Center area. 14. Label and show more cleariy the entrance to Village Y (SDP 01-05). 15. Show adequate queuing from call box location for both entrances (Streets "A" and "B"). 16. Demonstrate P-vehicle turn radius and 407E Cal-Trans truck radius (3 point turn) on plans. Use true scale detail when demonstrating compliance. 17. Make cul-de-sacs on Street "C" conform to standard cul-de-sac design (add tangents). 18. Show all utilities on College Boulevard as existing per Dwg. 390-9, not proposed. 19. Show existing fire hydrants located within 300 ft. of project site. Verify with Fire Department that College Boulevard does not need additional fire hydrants. 20. Show 25 ft by 25 ft sight distance triangles at private street intersections per Public Street Design Criteria section 8.B.3 ofthe engineering standards. 21. Show additional detail on Typical Drainage Detail. Add high/low points and top of grate. 22. Label "private drain" in Typical Drainage Detail. 23. Clarify where cross section 'C occurs. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please provide the project identification numbers on the title sheet of the tentative map/site plan. 2. The sound walls shown on the site plan do not match those shown in the Figure 3D-9 of the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-02). It may be that these walls will mitigate the arterial roadway noise to the required level, however a project-specific noise study is needed to confirm this possibility. Please see incomplete item number 5 above. 3. Please dimension the required 40-foot structural setback from the College Boulevard right-of-way. Please also note that, according to Section Vlll.C.2.1 of the Master Plan, a maximum of two encroachments into this setback area are allowed per building - some notation to the effect needs to be made with regard to the proposed optional decks on some buildings. 4. With regard to recreation areas, please provide area calculations for each of the common areas. It is difficult to determine if the common recreation area meets the 13,500 square feet required by the Master Plan. In addition, a least two recreation facilities from List B on page 54 of the Master Plan are required. These include children playground facilities, putting green, volleyball court, horseshoe pits, bocce ball, and/or recreation rooms and buildings. The proposed restroom building does not qualify as a recreation room or building. Given the information provided, it is difficult to ascertain if the project complies with the required 100 square feet per unit of passive recreation areas. No plans guarantee a minimum 60 square foot balcony. The Master Plan requires that there be an average of 100 square feet per unit of private recreation areas. Please provide an exhibit showing how this standard is being met. Please also note that balconies along the College Boulevard frontages may not count towards providing recreation area if the noise level is not mitigated Master Plan required levels and the balcony extends into the arterial setback area. 5. In the "Project Summary" table on the title sheet, common slope areas are shown as private passive areas. Since slopes do not count towards the passive recreation area requirement, this notation could be confusing. Please revise the table to show the accurate private passive recreation areas. Notations as to the total amount of slope or common open space areas (from an HOA maintenance perspective) can be made as long as they are not represented as passive open space areas. 6. The guest parking provided appears to meet the minimum amount however it is not distributed evenly throughout the project. There are 11 spaces along the access road (between the northern and southern portions of the development) that are not located within 150 feet walking distance to any dweljing unit and, therefore, should not be counted in the total amount of guest parking provided. While they may provide parking opportunities, they do not meet the requirements of the Parking Ordinance. Guest parking is disproportionately provided in the northern section of the project (26 spaces for 33 dwelling units), whereas the central portion does not contain one guest parking space within 150 feet of walking distance of every four units without counting a guest parking space twice. 7. The proposed motor courts, provided they measure at least 24 feet wide and provide adequate maneuvering areas, are allowed by the ordinance. They must be constructed of concrete and accented with enhanced pavement treatment. Please indicate these features on the project plans. None of the driveway areas are dimensioned (see incomplete item number 2 above). 8. The required setbacks for multifamily units from driveways is eight feet (fully landscaped) from residences and five feet from garages. All garages facing directly onto a driveway must be equipped with an automatic garage door opener. Staff is researching the intent of these regulations as they apply to motor court style developments. The Calavera Hills Master Plan allows motor court style developments to have a building separation of 10 feet if the front facade massing is separated by a minimum of 22 feet and at least 10 feet deep. The PD Ordinance requires a 20-foot average building separation, with a 10-foot minimum. Staff has had previous discussions with the applicant on this exact topic; the results being that it is okay to reduce building separation to 10 feet in the rear of the buildings, provided that the street frontage separation maintains the Master Plan requirement of 22 feet. You could also opt to follow the Planned Development standard of minimum 20 foot separation for all parts of the structure. 9. According to the PD ordinance, street trees within multifamily projects shall be spaced no further than 30 feet on center within the parkway. Please indicate these dimensions on the project landscape plan. 10. The Calavera Hills Master Plan calls for the encouragement of variety in streetscape massing and aesthetics, as well as strong architectural relief. It also states that projects within the master plan area are subject to the requirements of the PD Ordinance, with the exception of the site design standards listed on pages 54 and 55 of the Master Plan (arterial setbacks, front yard setback measurement, recreation areas, and building separation). Therefore, the architectural design is subject to the provisions of 21.45.080 - Table E of the PD Ordinance. This section requires at least 3 separate building planes (minimum offset of 18 inches) on all building elevations. It also requires incorporation of at least four of the design elements listed within Table E for each building facade. The standard end and rear elevations do not appear to meet these criteria. Given the level of detail on the submitted plans, it is not clear that the project complies with these requirements. Please augment the architectural plans to indicate compliance with the PD Ordinance Architectural Design Element standards. It may be necessary to vary the product and/or floor plan to provide the necessary variety of massing and aesthetics. 11. The Master Plan requires a top-of-slope setback pursuant tc the Hillside Development Ordinance. This setback equals 0.7 feet of horizontal setback for every one (1) foot of vertical height of the structure. Based upon a building height of 33.6 feet, Buildings 1 through 11 do not appear to meet the required 23.45 foot setback. 12. According to the Master Plan, a community trail shall be installed through the length of the northeriy open space corridor as permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Please show the alignment of this community trail on the project exhibits. 13. The Master Plan requires that bus stop facilities be provided at the southeriy entrance to Village U. Please coordinate with North County Transit District on the exact location of the bus stop and the necessary improvement then show these features on the project plans. Engineering: 1. On the northern unit of building 26 align the driveway to be more perpendicular to the street. 2. Show College Boulevard right-of-way dedication for project entrances at Streets "A" and "B". Pedestrian ramps, including the 4-ft sidewalk area, need to be fully within public right-of-way. 3. Show installation of traffic signals at both project entrances. 4. Use non-contiguous sidewalk throughout the project. 5. Use traffic calming measures from the appendix of the "Carisbad Residential Traffic Management Program" publication. Incorporate the 'Intersection Bulb-out' and the 'Mid-Block Choker' (offset) in the design of the streets. 6. Show proposed street lighting in the project streets. Also show fire hydrants as required by the Fire Department. 7. Clarify sheet 8 street profile. It is labeled as Street "A" profile at both entrances. Where is Street "B"? 8. Address sump condition at Street "B". How is it going to drain? Also show secondary drainage overflow. 9. Contact Recreation Department regarding trail and trailhead parking requirements. Refer to the red-lined check prints of the project for additional comments. These check prints must be returned with the re-submittal to facilitate continued staff review. July 14, 2003 TO: BOBBIE HODER, PLANNING PLANNING DEPARTMENT - GRAPHICS TRAFFIC ENGINEER SCOTT BURNS, BUILDING DEPARTMENT KAREN GARBRY, BUILDING DEPARTMENT GREG WOODS, PUBLIC WORKS - OAK ST OFFICE LORI ALLEN, POLICE DEPARTMENT KARL VON SCHLIEDER - GIS FROM: Planning Director STREET NAMES FOR CT 01-04 - CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U The following street names have been approved as a part of the final map processing for CT 01- 04. A map delineating street locations is attached. Private Streets: Peninsula Drive Inlet Drive Karst Road CSibd Attachment PROJECT VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SCALE: 1"= 400' 400 800 SCALE l''=400' HUNSAKER k ASSOCIATES SAN DIECO, INC PLANNING 10179 Huemekens Street ENQNEERINC San Diego, a 92121 SURVEYING PH(858)55M500- FX(858)558-1414 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE (EXISTING) 1200 KARST ROAD NOTE: COLLEGE BLVD (EXISTING) PENINSULA DRIVE 6 INLET DRIVE (> INDICATES PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION STREET NAME/FIRE HYDRANT EXHIBIT FOR CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U Ri\0227\Exhlbl-ts\Eng\s-tree-t nones.dwgC 1275]Jul-10-a003il3!56 CTOl-M CPOI-02 TRIPLEX A< ^TRIPLEX B G SEPARATE BLDQ. PLANES 6 0£S«3NEL.EieiTS TRIPLEX C< ^ ^TRIPLEX D ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELEMENTS ENHANCED HEAR ELEVATIONS* CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U CALAVERA n, L.L.C. 99916 6 SEFWBATE BUXl PLANES a CeSIGH REhENTS • SITE SPECFIC, OCCURS WCRE VGBLE FROM COMMON M£A% SCTE PLAH ' Sffi 10 OF 10 FOR OPTIONAL REAB DeCK& r" ^•i!!m!'t'iTi,!!^!^,MH,\ ,ii,,b niiLim. • E«poJ! mT^ta*iSt"" I VMwiMAnrllnWK K AecMt (nd v«<M MMM ••<«»•: EXHKT 60F6 oi.n2Ai (&2\xa SIXPLEX B-A STREET SCENE FRONT ELEVATIONS CALAVERA HILLS VILLAGE U CALAVERA II, L.L.C. Villlage U Calavera Hills X^arlsbad Ca ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN V 4cr en- Sea* •• - Aa-or