Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 01-11; Ocean Breeze Condominiums; Tentative Map (CT)CITY OF CARLSBAD W LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPUCATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) • Administrative Permit - 2nd Dwelling Unit • Planned Industrial Permit • Administrative Variance • Planning Commission Determination Coastal Development Permit • Precise Development Plan • Conditional Use Permit • Redevelopment Permit Condominium Permit • Site Development Plan • Environmentai Impact Assessment • Special Use Permit • General Plan Amendment • Specific Plan • Hillside Development Permit • Tentative Parcel Mop Obtain from Engineering Department • Local Coastal Plan Amendment Tentative Tract Map troi-H • Master Plan • Variance • Non-Residential Planned Development • Zone Change • Planned Development Permit • List other applications not specified 2) 3) 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO{S).: PROJECT NAME: 0.04" ISO ^03 - OO (j^^J^pUtU^ Pernio 3n^^ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: SCIHA^ C<^yt^^lfkKtkit<m. /j^Jecf 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TEl^PHONE \ CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. . j . SIGNATURE DATE / 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED. MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 9^ OF 2 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) C^STT^-f SIDE OF AND STREET ADDRESS (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 1 6) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 7) PROPOSED INCREASE IN ADT 20) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 23) PROPOSED ZONING 1 2) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS |j£t|/j^ri5) PROPOSED COMM f^^L SQUARE FOOTAGE 30 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EDU 21) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. lAA/E CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPDSE SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE TOTAL FEE REQUIRED FEE REQUIRED RECEIVED ^^AY 2 5 2001 DATE STAlWPWftflCicTTON RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. Form 16 PAGE 2 OF 2 ^^^^ City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 9200! Receipt Applicant: PACKARD GARTH Description Amount CTOlOOll 6,525.00 Not valid unless validated by Cash RegiM^ ^^^^^S/Ol ^02 01 02 _ PLEASE RETAIN RECEIPT FOR REFUNDS OR ADJUSTMENTS CGF" 6525..00 Receipt Number: R0020549 Transaction Date: 05/25/2001 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Credit Crd MC 6,525.00 Transaction Amount: 6,525.00 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: <£^^^Bf ^H^M/ka«»<^ ^C^U^ Sir€e^ APPLICANT NAME: Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: / / D /i Project Description 10/96 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fratemal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, ia. this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Title &t^er$( Cff^/tM/^tr Address /^^' / Corp/Part_ Title Address OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Scc^ Ahcctifdi4/ci^ r /^QjcJinJal Title 6Ct4tt4r<J^ Pt^the^ Address Corp/Part_ Title Address Tt 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ® 3. NON-PROFIT WGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Tmst Non Profit/Tmst Title_ Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? tnmissioi I I Yes 5 If y^s, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge Signature of ownei-/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTIVIENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFG 753.5a (6-01) I Agency:' Date: 210091 T Count// State Agency of Filing: Project Title: Document No.: Project Applicant Nanne: t. Phone isTumbi Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency |^ Sctiool District Other Spjctal District CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: state Agency | | Private Entity • ) Environmental Impact Report $850.00 $ ) Negative Declaration $1,250.00 $ ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) $850.00 $ ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $ ) !2Dunty Administrative Fee $25.00 $ t^O Project that is exempt from fees TOTALRECEIVED $ Signature and title of person receiving payment: WHITE-PROJECT APPLICANT YELLOW-DFG/Fi PINK-LEAD AGENCY GOLDENROD-STATE AGENCY OF FILING NOTICE OF EXEMPTION ^ ? To: County Clerk _ - « M^^W' CITY OF CARLSBAD j,, County of San Diego ^o,yj.smhh,Recorder/coun(yCteih Planning Departmei^^^ '' Mailstop 833, Attn: Wendy APR 1 0 Oflfi? 1635 Faraday Avenue Ofy g?'^^""^ PO Box 121750 Arn i mc Carlsbad CA 92008 c,„sb3^ SanDiego CA 92112-175QL. dlM (760)602-4600 Subject: Filing of this Notice of Exemption is in compliance with Section 21152b of the Public Resources Code (Califomia Environmental Quality Act). Project Title; Ocean Breeze Condos - CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 Project Location - Specific; East side of Garfield Street to the south of Chestnut Avenue Project Location - City; Carlsbad Project Location - County; San Diego Description of Project; Five unit residential condominium Name of Public Agency Approving Project; City of Carlsbad Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project;, Name of Applicant; Garth Packard Applicant's Address; PO Box 1724. Carlsbad. CA 92018 Applicant's Telephone Number; 760-802-5107 Exempt Status; (Check One) ^ Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268); ^ Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c)); ^ Categorical Exemption - State type and section number: Section 15303(b) I Statutory Exemptions - State code number: Reasons why project is exempt; Construction of 6 or fewer dwelling units in an urban area. Lead Agency Contact Person: Chris DeCerbo Telephone; (760)602-4611 If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? MICHAEL J. HOtZMILEER, Planning Director Date Signed by Lead Agency I I Signed by Applicant Revised December 2001 MLED IN TFIE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK f SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APR 1 2 2002 s APR 12 2002 RpMovFn MAY U 2002 | POSTED. RETURNED TO AGENCY ON DEPUTY MAY 1 3 2002 ru ru ru • i-n • 1=1 a 1=1 i-=i i a (=) U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ Postmark Here street, Apt No.; or PO Box No. City, State, ZIP+4 PS Form 3800, January 2001 See Reverse for Instructions City o Fill OOP of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the project has been acted upon. SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION ON ^' '^J- Application #: CDP 01-22 Filing Date: Mav 24. 2001 Case Name: Ocean Breeze Condos Applicant: Garth Packard Decision Date: April 3. 2002 Agent (if different): Address: Phone: Address: PO Box 1724. Carlsbad. CA 92018 Phone: 760-802-5107 ACTION: I I APPROVED /I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I DENIED ' (Copy of final resolution/decision letter is sent to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it, and the applicant). COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS; NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION. APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days following Coastal Commission receipt of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date the Coastal Commission's appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be made in writing to the Coastal Commission's district office at the following address: Califomia Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103, San Diego, Califomia 92108-4402, Telephone (619) 767-2370. The lime wilhin which judicial review of this decision must be sought is govemed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been made appUcable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seeldng judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than ninety (90) days following the date on which this decision becomes fmal; however, if within ten (10) days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost ofpreparation of such a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended lo not later than thirty (30) days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed lo the party, or his attomey of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92008. • 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ® PROOF OF PUBLIC TION (2010 & 2011 CCP.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been pubUshed in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: March 21, 2002 This space is the County Clerk's FiUng Stamp City or • CartjM <:' Proof of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at this San Marcos 21st , California day Mawch, 2002 of. ) Ignature JORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETE DATE: June 26, 2001 DESCRIPTION; Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condo-minium Permit and Coastal Development Permit to de-velop a five-unit residential condominium. LOCfATION: Ttlis project is within the City of Carlsbad's Coastal Zone located along the eastside of Garfield Street to the south of Chestnut Avenue within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 204-150-03 APPUCANT: Garth Packard PO. Box 1724 Carlsbad, CA 92018 A public hearing on the above proposed project will be held by the Planning Commission in the Council Cham-bers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, on April 3, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Perrsons are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. The project will be described and a staff recommendation given, followed by public testimony, questions and a de-cision. Copies of tne staff report will be available on or after March 28, 2002. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Chris DeCerbo at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department, Monday through Thurs- day 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, (760)602-4611. APPEALS If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit and Coastal Development Permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or some- one else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad prior to the public hearing. 1. Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is ap- pealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Pfanning Commission. 2. Coastal Commission Appealable Project; This site is not located witnin the Coastal Zone Appeal- able Area. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Com- mission, appeals must be tiled with the Coastal Commis- sion within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Com-mission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Com- mission is located at 7575 fwetropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CASE FtLE: CT 01 -11 /CP 01 -04/CDP 01 -22 CASE NAME: OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 Legal 72619. March 21, 2002 City of Carlsbad Planning Department INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR FILLING OUT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I This Enviromnental Impact Assessment (EIA) Form - Part I will be used to determine what type of environmental documentation (i.e., Enviroimiental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Negative Declaration or Exemption) will be required to be prepared for your application, per the Cahfomia Enviroimiental Quality Act (CEQA) and Title 19 of Carlsbad's Municipal Code. The clarity and acciu-acy ofthe information you provide is critical for pinposes of quickly determining the specific environmental effects of your project. Recent judicial decisions have held that a "naked checkUst," that is checklist that is merely checked "yes" or "no," is insufficient to comply with the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality act. Each "yes" or "no" answer must be accompanied by a written explanation justifying the "yes" or "no" answer. This is especially important when a Negative Declaration is being sought. The more infonnation provided in this form, the easier and quicker it will be for staff to complete the Environmental Impact Assessment Form - Part II. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: 2. APPLICANT: CfyJjOS CASE NO: DATE RECEIVED: (To be completed by staff) 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in the checklist on the following pages. I I Land Use and Plaiming I I Population and Housing I I Geological Problems I I Water I I Air Oualitv I I Transportation/Circulation Q Public Services I I Biological Resources Utilities & Service Systems I I Energy & Mineral Resources Q Aesthetics I I Hazards Q Culmral Resources I I Noise Q Recreation I I Mandatory Findings of Significance Rev. 03/28/96 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to detennine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checkUst. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and htraian factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information soiu-ce cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and poUcies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect fi-om "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. • Based on an "EIA-Part If, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration piu-suant to appUcable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earUer EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made ptu-suant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Rev. 03/28/96 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation meastu-es to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measiu-es that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earUer EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the forni under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #(s): ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? ( ) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an estabhshed community (including a low-income or minority community)? ( ) IL POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal resuh in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rapture? ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) f) Erosion, changes in topography or imstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) Subsidence of the land? ( ) Expansive soils? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact g) h) •i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • m m m m m Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?( ) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? •; ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? . ( ) • • b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) Potentially Significant Impact • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact • • • IS • m • • • • • • • X • • • • • • IS • • • • • • • • • VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: .' a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? • b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? . ( ) • e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? • ( ) g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? ( ) • • • v: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. m • • • VIL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal resuh in impacts to: Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats F"! f 1 I 1 ^ (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ( ) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? |^ |^ a) b) Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( ) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)? ( ) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal? a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wastefiil and inefficient manner? ( ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents ofthe State? ( ) IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brash, grass, or trees? ( ) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govemment services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ( ) b) Police protection? ( ) c) Schools? ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) e) Other govemmental services? ( ) XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) b) Communications systems? ( ) '>^^^ Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significan t Impact • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • No Impact m m m 13 m m Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Potentially Less Than (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Significant Significant Significan (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated t Impact . c) Local or regional water treatment facilities? ( ) or distribution • • • d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) • • • e) Storm water drainage? ( ) • • • f) Sohd waste disposal? ( ) • • • g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) • • • No Impact XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? ( ) b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical resources? ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect imique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing rehgious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) XVL MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildhfe species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? • • • • • • ta • • • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • • X • • • m • • • • • • Rev. 03/28/96 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in coimection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • Less Than Significan t Impact No Impact • m • • [?i XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, piu-suant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earUer EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects fi-om the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earUer document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. Rev. 03/28/96 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any infonnation citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. AIR OUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage altemative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design ofthe project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation ofan EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no fiirther environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 flill and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. Rev. 03/28/96 To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop altemative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 10 Rev. 03/28/96 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department February 13, 2002 Robert Richardson Karnak Architecture 2802 State Street, Suite C Carisbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: CT 01-11/CDP 01-22/CP 01-04 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on April 3, 2002. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by March 12, 2002, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 10 copies of your (site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 872' X 11" size. B) One 872" X 11" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which Is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. C) Mailing Labels - two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius and occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of any punctuation. For any address other than a single family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included but the Apartment, Suite and/or Building Number must NOT appear in the street address line. DO NOT type assessor's parcel number on labels. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us CT 01-11/CDP 01-22/CP of-04 February 13, 2002 Page 2 are: Arial 11 pt, Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt. Courier 14 pt. Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave. Apt. #3 Cadsbad, CA 92008 MRS JANE SMITH APT 3 1 23 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's and occupant's lists. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. Cash check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. Sincerely, Chris DeCerbo Principal Planner CD-.cs Attachment I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS LISTS AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY: DATE: RECEIVED BY DATE: Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department July 31, 2001 Mr. Garth Packard P.O. Box 1724 Carlsbad, CA 92018 RE: OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS - CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 Dear Mr. Packard: Please find attached Engineering and Planning Department issues and concerns for the above referenced project. Engineering and Planning individually have previously faxed drafts of these comments to Karnack Architecture to give them some advance notice of our issues. Please utilize this letter as your official departmental issues and concerns listing. If you have any questions regarding Planning Department concerns, please call Paul Godwin at 760-602-4625. If you have any questions regarding Engineering Department concerns, please call David Rick at 760-602-2781. Sincerely, PAUL GODWIN Planning Technician PG:cs c: Robert Richardson 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 * FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us Ocean Breeze Condos - CT 01-11, CP 01-04, CDP 01-22 Planning Department Concerns: 1. Please call out exactly how the private and common recreation requirements are being met. Please see section 21.45.090 (G) ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code for details on how this requirement may be met. 2. Storage space, exclusive of closets and other indoor storage areas normally a part of a residential dwelling unit, must be provided. This space should be at least 480 cubic feet, but may be reduced to 392 cubic feet if provided all in one area. Please see section 21.45.090(1) ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code for more information. 3. Please provide a basement exhibit which clearly delineates what percentage of the perimeter basement walls are at least 50% below grade. In order to qualify as a basement and therefore not count as a story, at least 75% of the basement perimeter walls must be at least 50% below grade. Please see section 21.04.045 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code for the complete basement definition. 4. Please call out height of building for existing grade on all elevations, it appears the structure may exceed the 30' height limit. Building height is measured from existing or finished grade, whichever is more restrictive. Please see section 21.04.065 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code for a complete definition of how building height is measured. 5. Please note that in the Beach Area Overlay Zone, a roof deck may satisfy no more than 25% ofthe required open space/recreational requirements of any proposed development. Engineering Department Concerns: 1. On the tentative map: a. Provide several property cross sections. Include a scaled profile of the driveway and illustrate a 10 foot vertical curve at the top and bottom ofthe driveway; b. If an air space condominium is proposed, add the following note on the tentative tract map: "This is a tentative tract map of an airspace condominium project as defined in Section 1351(f) ofthe Civil Code ofthe State of California. The project contains a maximum of 5 units". c. Cleariy distinguish with a separate symbol the location of all retaining wall. d. Show proposed preliminary grading with elevation points and contour lines. Use several flow line points on drainage swales. Provide finish pad and finish floor elevations. Add elevations at each property corner. e. Provide TW and BW elevations on driveway retaining wall at the front property line. Is a portion of this wall proposed within the City Right-of- ^^^^ Way? The drainpipe and wall appear to cross near the front property line making it difficult to distinguish the two and determine where the wall terminates. Also, provide TW and BW elevations on the wall located along the south property line, f Is the fence located along each side property line existing or proposed? How high is this fence and is it located on the property line or on the neighbor's property. g. Show all street utilities, laterals and service lines. h. Include the rear yard retaining wall and fence in Section B-B. Also, show existing grade line. i. Place bearings and distances outside P.L. so that characters do not overlap with other lines. j. Use a thinner line for the property line, k. Add ADT = 40 under notes. 2. Is curbside trash pick up proposed or will a trash bin be used? If a trash bin is used, how will mechanics of pick up work If no access to the bin is provided? 3. The minimum parking stall width permitted next to a wall is 10 feet. Several appear to be 9.5 feet wide. Please revise accordingly. 4. Provide a detail/cross section of the proposed storm drain vault and pump. Provide grate elevations and invert elevations for the storm drain vault and 8 inch catch basins. In addition, investigate whether a storm drain exists within the rear yards of the apartment complex to the east. If one does exist, an alternative to pumping water to Garfield would be to obtain permission to connect into such a storm drain. 5. Sewer - Abandon the existing sewer lateral and place new 6-inch lateral outside the driveway and at least 5 horizontal feet from any water lines. Install a manhole at the point of connection with the main. 6. Water - Install separate water service lines for each unit A less desirable but acceptable connection would be to install one line serving up to four meters via a manifold. Determine the required water line size. Similar projects have used a two-inch service line. A separate meter will be needed for the landscape irrigation and a separate service line will be required for the fire sprinkler system. The service line shall be equipped with a double check valve to be located at the property line and on private property. 7. Tentative Order No. 2001-01 was recently issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. This action leads to updates in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit whereby the City of Carisbad is a co-permittee to the City of San Diego. These new regulations involve significant changes to this project and other projects processed throughout the San Diego region. In order to facilitate the compliance of this o project, the following are some criteria that must be incorporated into the design of the project: a. All efforts must be made so that there can be no increased peak runoff rate from the developed site over the greatest discharge expected from the existing undeveloped site. This can be proved via engineering calculations in the project hydrology report. In the hydrology study, using the 10-year frequency storm, calculate the existing property Q and determine the difference in cfs between the proposed and existing. You may want to consider using an onsite catchment basin in conjunction with the proposed drainage vault to control the peak runoff rate. b. Revise the plan to incorporate Best Management Practices (BMP's) as outlined in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks, latest edition. Inciude measures to capture anticipated pollutants from the project and street. c. Offsite and downstream siltation will not be permitted at any time during construction or after. d. The applicant will be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that addresses design, construction and post- construction phases of the project. The final SWPPP will be required before issuance of development permits. A preliminarv SWPPP must be submitted for staff review with the next submittal. We encourage you to review the draft permit requirements (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb9/Programs/Storm_Water/storm_water.html) so that you understand the nature of our comments when they are made on projects. Per Section F.1.b. (1) of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region Order No. 2001-01, the project must ensure that pollutant discharges and runoff flows from the development are reduced to the maximum extent practicable using best management practices for the existing and proposed portions of the project site. Numeric sizing of all filtration and volume control facilities is required. 8. Provide a second water pump as a backup to the primary pump. 9. Either raise the existing 18" masonry wall a couple of feet along the rear property line or add a new wall on the subject property to dam any potential flooding that could occur do to a inoperable pump. 10. A grading permit will be required and the project can only be approved upon the condition that a grading permit be issued prior to development of the project. This comment is for informational purposes and no response is necessary. 11. Submit a preliminary soils report. Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department June 26, 2001 Mr. Garth Packard P.O. Box 1724 Carlsbad, CA 92018 SUBJECT: CT 01-11/CDP 01-22/CP 01-04 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOMINIUMS Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Tract Map, Coastal Development and Condominium Permits, application nos. CT 01-11, CDP 01-22 and CP 01-04, as to their completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Department will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. Please contact your staff planner, Paul Godwin, at (760) 602-4625, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH.PGxs c: Chris DeCerbo David Rick i/f^le Copy Data Entry Planning Aide 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. CT 01-11, CDP 01-22, CP 01-04 Planning: None. Engineering: None. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: Issues will be sent under separate cover letter. Engineenng: Issues will be sent under separate cover letter. The City of CARLSBAD Planning Department A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No ® P.C. AGENDA OF: April 3,2002 Application complete date: June 26,2001 Project Planner: Chris DeCerbo Project Engineer: David Rick SUBJECT: CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS - Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit and Coastal Development Permit to develop a five-unit residential condominium on a site located along the east side of Garfield Street to the south of Chestnut Avenue within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5166, 5167 and 5168 APPROVING CT 01-11, CP 01-04 and CDP 01-22 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The appUcant proposes to demolish an existing single-family residence, detached garage and storage shed and constract a new five-unit condominium project on a .31 acre infill site located along the east side of Garfield Street to the south of Chestnut Avenue. The development ofthe condominium project requires the processing and approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Condominium Permit and Coastal Development Permit. The project is located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) and would normally require a Site Development Plan (SDP). However, because the project is concurrently processing a condominium permit (pursuant to Chapter 21.45 of the Zoning Ordinance), an SDP is not required. The site lies within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program and therefore, a Coastal Development Permit will be issued by the City of Carlsbad. The project's proposed density of 15.9 dwelling units per acre is below the 19 dwelling units per acre allowed per the growth management confrol point for the property's Residential High (RH) General Plan designation. The proposed project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. The project conforms to all applicable City development standards and regulations; there are no outstanding project issues and findings can be made for the approval of the project. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The .31 acre project site is rectangular in shape and located along the east side of Garfield Street to the south of Chestnut Avenue. The infill site has been previously graded and is relatively level. The site is currently developed with an existing single-family residence, detached garage and storage shed, concrete paving, non-native grasses and is void of any significant or sensitive vegetation. o )l52 CT OI-l 1/CP 01-04/CDP Ol52 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS Aprils, 2002 Page 2 The site is zoned R-3 and is within the Beach Area Overlay Zone. It has a General Plan designation of RH (Residential - High Density). Surrounding properties to the north, south, east, and west are also zoned R-3 and designated RH. The surrounding development consists of an attached multi-family apartment building to the east and older single-family dwellings to the north, south and west. Surrounding properties within the immediate neighborhood have aheady been developed with a variety of residential uses, including older single-family residences, and newer two family and multi-family projects. The appUcant is proposing to develop a five-unit residential condominium project on the subject site. The five condominium units are proposed in an "L" - shaped single building. The two-story units range between 1,843 and 2,528 square feet in area and are located above an underground parking garage. The single entry garage includes 13 parking spaces (2 resident parking spaces per unit and 3 guest parking spaces) and enclosed storage space for each unit. Each unit has an at-grade private patio and the project also includes a common patio and roof deck. The meditenanean style stmcture will have stucco siding with custom window molding and fascia trim and a decorative tile roof The proposed colors and materials for the building are Ught tan colored stucco walls with complementary colored trim. Other features of the proposed project include private patios, balconies with vsTought iron railings and roof decks. Building height for the proposed stmcture is 29 feet. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following regulations and requirements: A. General Plan R-H (Residential - High Density) designation; B. Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ), R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) Zone, and Condominium Permit (Planned Unit Development) regulations (Chapters 21.82, 21.16, and 21.45 respectively of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); C. Local Coastal Program (Mello II segment); D. Subdivision Ordinance (Titie 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) E. Inclusionary Housing (Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and F. Growth Management (Chapter 21.90 ofthe Carlsbad Municipal Code). The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable City regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan The proposed project is consistent with the poUcies and programs of the General Plan. The property has a General Plan designation of RH (Residential - High Density). The RH designation allows the development of multi-family residential units at a density of 15 - 23 dwelling units per acre. The growth confrol point is 19 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project involves five condominium units being developed on a 13,695 square foot (.31-acre) rectangular shaped lot. Development at the growth control point would allow 5.9 units on the property. The proposed project is for five condominium units at a density of 15.9 dwelling units CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01^2 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS April 3,2002 Page 3 per acre. The project compUes with all the Elements of the General Plan as outlined in the table below: GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLY Land Use Site is designated for Residential High at 19 du/ac. Multi-family residential units at 15.9 du/ac. Yes Housing In-Ueu contribution for the inclusionary requirement per Objective 3.6 Project conditioned to pay an in-lieu contribution on a per unit basis per Program 3.6c Yes PubUc Safety Provide project review that allows consideration of seismic and geologic hazards. Project improvements will not significantly impact or be impacted by geologic or seismic conditions. Yes Open Space & Conservation Minimize environmental impacts to sensitive resources within the City. UtiUze Best Management Practices for confrol of storm water and to protect water quality. Project will not have any environmental impacts to the existing developed site. Project will conform to aU NPDES requirements. Yes Circulation Requires new development to constract improvements needed to serve proposed development. All pubUc facilities including curb, gutter and sidewalk exist along the property frontage. Yes B. Beach Area Overlay Zone/R-3 Zoning/Condominium (Planned Unit Development) The proposed project is subject to the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) regulations, the R-3 Zone regulations, and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) regulations. (The PUD regulations are the development standards for condominium projects.) Projects located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) require the processing of a Site Development Plan (SDP) or a Planned Development to ensure consistency with the BAOZ standards per Section 21.82.040 of the Carlsbad Mimicipal Code. The BAOZ is intended to supplement the underlying zoning by providing additional development regulations to: 1) ensure that proposed development is compatible with existing surrounding uses; 2) provide adequate CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01 April 3,2002 Page 4 o 1T2 2 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS parking for residential developments; 3) ensure that public facilities exist to serve the beach area; and 4) protect the unique mix of residential development and aesthetic quality ofthe area. The proposed two-story stracture, with a building height of 29 feet, will be compatible with existing and proposed developments and compUes with the BAOZ regulations. The underground parking garage (2 spaces per unit and 3 guest parking spaces) provides enough parking to satisfy the BAOZ requirements. All pubUc faciUties including curb, gutter and sidewalk exist along the property frontage. The proposed project will have building elevations to include elements currently found in the neighborhood attempting to blend into the surrounding development. The proposed five-unit condominium project is also subject to the regulations of the R-3 Zone and the PUD (condominium standards) regulations. Table A (below) illusfrates how the project complies with the applicable BAOZ, R-3 zoning, and PUD development regulations. Table A: BAOZ, R-3 ZONING, AND PUD (CONDOMINIUM) STANDARDS COMPLIANCE STANDARD PERMITTED/ REQUIRED PROPOSED Min. Lot Size 7,500 sf 13,695 sf Max. Lot Coverage (R-3) 60% 44% Min. Front Setback (PUD) 20' (public sfreet) measured from ROW 20' Min. Side Setback (R-3) 10' 10' Max. Building Height (BAOZ) 30'/2 stories 29'/2 stories Resident Parking (PUD) 10 covered spaces (2 fiill-sized covered spaces/du) 10 covered spaces Visitor Parking (PUD) 1 space (1 sp/2 du) 3 spaces Recreational Space (PUD) 1. Private 2. Common passive I. Total: 1,000 sf(200 sf/du) 1. 200s£'du 2. 200 sf (total) 1. Total: 1,504 sf (Balconies, decks & patios) 200+ sf/du 200 sf (total) C. Local Coastal Program compliance The proposed project site is located outside the appeal area ofthe City's Coastal Zone and lies within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP). Mello II Segment The proposed project is consistent with the Mello II segment ofthe LCP which contains land use policies for development and conservation of coastal land and water areas within the Segment boundaries. The poUcies of the Mello II segment emphasize topics such as preservation of o CT Ol-I I/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS April 3,2002 Page 5 agriculture and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The project is consistent with the coastal act policies as follows: A) no agricultural lands exist on the project site, therefore no impacts to such will occur; B) the site does not contain environmentally sensitive habitats, water or marine resources; C) the site is geologically stable and the proposed grading for the site has been limited to the area necessary to develop the site; D) the project has been designed to reduce the amount of off-site runoff by surface drains and has been conditioned to implement the NPDES standards to ensure the quality of the water leaving the site; E) the project meets the parking requirements of the zoning ordinance; F) the project does not preclude any recreational opportunities or shoreline access as the property is not a shorefront property; G) and the development does not obstract views of the coastline as seen from public lands or pubUc right-of-way. Given the above, the project is consistent with the Mello II segment land use policies. D. Subdivision Ordinance The Engineering Department reviewed the proposed tentative map and concludes that the subdivision complies with all appUcable requirements ofthe Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The project is conditioned to install all infrastracture improvements concurrent with development. Access to the site will be from a private driveway off of Garfield Sfreet. The proposed building setbacks will allow for adequate air circulation and the opportunity for passive heating and cooling. E. Inclusionary Housing The City's Inclusionary Housing regulations require that a minimum of 15% of all approved units in any residential project be made affordable to lower income households. The inclusionary housing requirement for this project would be 0.75 dwelling units. However, residential projects involving six or fewer dwelling units may satisfy their lower income inclusionary housing requirement by paying an in-lieu fee or other in-lieu contribution. Therefore, this project has been conditioned to pay an in-lieu fee prior to building permit issuance. F. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local FaciUties Management Zone 1 in the Northwest quadrant ofthe City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table B below. CT OI-II/CP 01-04/CDP 01 April 3,2002 Page 6 Q 1^2 2 - OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS Table B: GROWTH MANAGEMENT STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration 17.38 sf Yes Library 9.89 sf Yes Waste Water Treatment n/a Yes Parks .034 ac Yes Drainage Basin A Yes Circulation 40 ADT Yes Fire Stations No. 1 & 3 Yes Open Space n/a Yes Schools CUSD Yes Sewer Collection System 5 EDU Yes Water 1,100 GPD Yes The project is .96 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling Unit allowance of 5.96 dwelling units for the subject property. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This project is exempt from CEQA per the exemptions listed below: Section 15303(b) of CEQA exemptions (Class 3) exempts the constmction of apartments, duplexes, and similar stractures, with no more than six dwelling units in urban areas. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the Planning Director upon project approval. ATTACHMENTS; 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5166 (CT) 2. Plaiming Commission Resolution No. 5167 (CP) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 5168 (CDP) 4. Location Map 5. B ackground Data Sheet 6. Local FaciUties Impact Assessment Form 7. Disclosure Statement 8. Reduced Exhibits 9. Exhibit "A" - "E" dated April 3,2002 CD:cs SITE OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 o BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CTOl-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 CASE NAME: OCEAN BREEZE CONDOS APPLICANT: Garth Packard REQUEST AND LOCATION: 5 Condominium Units along the east side of Garfield Sfreet to the south of Chestnut Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lots 3. 4. and 5. block P of PaUsades Map No. 1747. Citv of Carlsbad. Counfy of San Diego. State of Califomia. filed in the Office of the County Recorder on March 13.1985. APN: 204-150-03 Acres: ,31 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 5 units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: RH Densify Allowed: 19 du/ac Density Proposed: 15.9 du/ac Existing Zone: R::3 Proposed Zone: Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site R-3 R-H Single family unit North R-3 R-H Single family unit South R-3 R-H Single family unit East R-3 R-H Multi family West R-3 R-H Single family unit PUBLIC FACILITIES School Distiict: CUSD Water Distiict: Carlsbad Sewer Distiict: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT I I Negative Declaration, issued r~l Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated, ^ Other, Exempt Q Q CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development AppUcation) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Ocean Breeze Condos CT 01-11/CP 01-04/CDP 01-22 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 GENERAL PLAN: RH ZONING: R-3 DEVELOPER'S NAME: Garth Packard ADDRESS: PO Box 1724. Carlsbad. CA 92018 PHONE NO: 760-802-5107 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 204-150-03 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 5 DU ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 17.38 sf_ B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 9.89 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) n/a D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .034 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = Basin A (Identify master plan faciUties on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 40 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = I and 3 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = n/a. I. Schools: 1.265 (Elem.). .36 (Jr.). .68 (Sr.) J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 5 Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD = 1.100 L. The project is .96 imits below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all.applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fratemal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other coimty, city and coimty, city municipality, district or other poUtical subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, adA-esses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-ov^Ticd corooration. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Corp/Part_ Title Address Tide (rt^erJ Cotcff^xshr Address ^^X. /7J / OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% ofthe shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Title ^Gt^t^rJl ^A^Aer Title Address XfSf ^/-^ttoWfty Corp/Part_ Tide Address 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 ^ 3. NON-PROFIT ^CANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trastee or beneficiary of the. Non ProfitTrust. Title Non Profit/Tmst_ Tide Address Address Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? • Yes mmissio; No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is tme and correct to the best of my knowledge. 5-22-01 Signature of owner/date Print or type name of owner Signature of applicant/date ' / Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 NNQ PUM BROUN tmjNK E UOUHMMBM SmuClfU* 21-SOX s-3'•«URNUMJ'>POMICA SMUON 5-* ROSA vwieo HYBtwareces (mcMDBOfirawte'*) 5-7 nuCHELSPERWUM >S«K)OeE LANDSCAPE INDEX eik5rv«w.t5-iQMUM OROUND covat I L.ONICBtAi'KMCA'HJU.IMM' WILL'S HOICYSUCM-E iro.c COVOTEBUBM WO.C TRMUNOUtNTMU trOC 4 H€DBi* »ej:>: WME' H'OC TiMUNo aMMHA iroc- T MNUOt. COLOR 4-nnSa 0 C fM SE'SDK 1 M.t-IRRIGA110N.LIUIDSC«fCI«WrEM'C£1MUBE POUCIES MO DETMLS I JILL WfWBS TO BE PWJNED TO \«g<lLC0WT)ICT LANDSCAPE OATA LANDSCAPE PLAN acAUiii'ate.a' LAIffiSCAFE U.0 M/1,WRFUW FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES tl FLO(« PLAN GENERAL NOTES JMSi fill 0 y - 5 1 ^1 li FIRST FLOOR PLAN Al.l FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES FLOOR PLAN OENERAL NOTES DOOR AND WINDOW NOTES o 0 S ? I I If () BASEMENT PLAN Al.O FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES ' tUKtWUMMMMtMHSf" ^ 1 3 I as*! r (J 1 SECOND FLoraiPLAN A1.2 ROOF NOTES ATnC VENTILATION ATM MOE » WMTI Q i ? 1 ^ i ^ 3 I 3 1 3 "^4 o il ROOF PLAN •SOTmiRLFVATION F.A.STRT.RVATION ELEVATION KEYED NOTES 1=-- a ? 3 e^lllilli EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.1 Q 0 w - 1 ? s ! 1 I ifilJllUI ^4w il SITE ELEVATlOi SECTION A5.0