Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 02-14; Bressi Ranch Residential; Tentative Map (CT) (12)o City of Carlsbad Planning Department August 13, 2002 Lennar Communities Kristine Zortman 5780 Fleet Street Suite 320 Carlsbad CA 92008 SUBJECT: MP 178(A)/CT 02-14/PUD 02-06/CUP 02-17 BRESSI RANCH RESIDENTIAL Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your development applications nos. MP 178(A), CT 02-14, PUD 02- 06, and CUP 02-17 as to their completeness for processing. The applications are incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, July 12, 2002, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Enclosed are redlined prints of your submittal. Please return the redlined prints as part of your re-submittal. Please contact your staff planner, Christer Westman, at (760) 602-4614 or staff engineer Clyde Wickham at (760) 602-2742, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director MJH:CW:jt c: Don Neu Clyde Wickham File Copy Data Entry Planning Aide Hofman Planning Associates Mike Howes 5900 Pasteur Court Suite 150 Carlsbad CA 92008 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us w LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION No. MP 178(A)/CT 02-14/PUD 02-06/CUP 02-17 Bressi Ranch Residential Planning: 1. Revise the "Lot Count/Density" table on sheet 2 to refer to Master Plan Units versus growth control based units and include all of the lot size information. 2. Line weights defining lots are inconsistent. Please rectify. 3. Park and passive open space lot designs must be submitted. 4. Architectural designs, floor plans and plotting must be submitted. Engineering: 1. Please list the CT number, CT 02-17, and the PUD number PUD 02-06 on all plan sets. 2. The legal description on the plans should be revised to reflect the map and lot numbers from the final map (CT 00-06) once it has recorded. 3. Please submit a current title report along with a copy of all easements, agreements, and other documents that encumber the property. A copy of Adjustment Plat 543 would help with the boundary determination. If there are bonds or assessment district information for the infrastructure a description of what is being constructed with a plat to detail the obligations is recommended. This project should "Stand Alone" as far as improvements. Sometimes doing this requires a double bond condition. 4. Poinsettia Lane is required, and other improvements needed to support this project must be shown as "Existing" should be shown as "proposed per drawing # DWG ". 5. Please complete the Generation and demand information on sheet 1. The owner / subdivider should include a name under the signature as well as a contact person with phone number. The application numbers should also be filled in. 6. Provide an amendment to the approved preliminary storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) that identifies "pollutants of concern" that could be generated by this type of project. The SWPPP should show how this project conforms to the SWPPP approved with the Master Plan. The preliminary SWPPP shall address what structural and non- structural best management practices BMP's are (or will be) implemented to capture and treat storm runoff to ensure compliance with new NPDES regulations. 7. The application submittal package needs to include a preliminary Geotechnical study that identifies feasibility of, and recommendations for, the proposed development as it relates to the site. 8. The typical street sections should be revised to reflect the City's "Livable Streets" design criteria. Traffic has asked a question regarding semi truck access (Moving & Storage vans) and for interface between Alicante as well as "D" Street. Show plan view details for traffic circles. 9. Verify (with NCTD) and show locations of bus stops/turnouts on street system. 10. Please include retaining walls on typical cross section for proposed lots with a retaining wall between them. It may affect all of the planning area typicals shown on sheet 2. 11. Please include the approved "Utility Plan for street cross sections (sheet 2). 12. Minimum text size is 1/10th ( _' walls between lots sheet 2 is a good example, are too small) 13. The knuckle return must comply with the approved livable street standard. Show the detail required to support this design. 14. Complete the slope condition near each intersection. The slope lines disappear, a sight distance corner issue is evident. Again include the intersection detail necessary to support this design, pop outs, sidewalks, parking, and landscaped corners. 15. Show all corner cutoffs for intersections and traffic circles. 16. Show alley type returns where alleys meet streets (driveway ramp condition is not supported). 17. The Tentative Map must use numbered lots (no lettered lots will be permitted). ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Some of the lots are deigned in such a way that the goal of having homes face the street to create community character and "eyes to the street" cannot be realized. The list of lots includes Nos. 8, 76, 77, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 270, 282, 337, 342, 425, and 439. 2. The number of retaining walls between lots seems high. 3. It seems appropriate to design lots 37 - 55 and 395 - 411 as alley lots. Both blocks front onto main roads and in part face parks. 4. Because of topography, Planning Area 12 is significantly separated from the community facilities which are the focus of the master plan. To offset the segregation, lots 475, 476, 485, and 486 could become a passive neighborhood park. 5. Please provide justification relating to the master plan goals and the Ahwahnee Principles for the slope heights greater-than 40 feet in Planning Area 9. Engineering: 1. The street frontage width of panhandle style lots must be 32' wide (lots 8 & 56). Check with Planning on this issue it may be 33' with a different width at the setback. 2. Lot 76 and 77 must be redesigned to incorporate street frontage, an alley fronting lot is not supported. Lot 76, 77 and 78 needs to have the minimum frontage required. 3. Consider Design Speed for profiles shown on sheets 10 through 12. Sight Distance issues, street lighting and safety concerns will stretch out proposed vertical curves.