Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CT 04-10A; Poinsettia Place; Tentative Map (CT) (2)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - INITL^L STUDY CASE NO: GPA 04-12/ZC 04-08/LCPA 04-08/CT 04-10/CP 05-05/HDP 04-05/SDP 04-07/CDP 04-23 DATE: March 21. 2006 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Poinsettia Place 2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: Citv ofCarlsbad 3. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Christer Westman (760) 602-4614 4. PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast comer of Poinsettia Lane and Cassia Road 5. PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: Sierra Linda Development Companv 219 Meadow Vista Wav Encinitas CA 92024 6. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Low Medium (RLM) and Residential Medium (RM) 7. ZONING: Limited Control (L-C) 8. OTHER PUBLIC-AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED: Caiifomia Coastal Commission j 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: Subdivision and construction of 60 townhome and 30 stacked-flat condominiums on 20.4 gross acres. Additional improvements include various passive recreation areas, a common swimming pool, a small RV storage yard, surface parking and landscaped areas. The proiect includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change the property's existing General Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Medium (RLM) to Residential High (RH) and Open Space (OS): and Zoning designation of Limited Control (LC) to Residential Density-Multiple (RD-M") and Open Space (OS). The Local Coastal Program land use designations will be changed to match those of the General Plan and Zoning. The proiect site contains both disturbed and natural vegetation areas. The development of the site is proposed within the areas that have been disturbed. The site .-topography includes small hills and a flat sloping area created by the development of the existing townhouse proiect across Cassia Road. East of the proiect site is Open Space and an apartment complex. Property south of the site is vacant with native vegetation and is currently proposed for development as town houses and stacked-flat condominiums. West of the proiect site it is developed with apartments. Poinsettia Lane has 1 Rev. 02/22/06 been constmcted up to this point and is planned for extension to the east to make its final connection to El Camino Real. Rev. 02/22/06 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. I I Aesthetics I I Agricultural Resources I i Air Quality ^ Biological Resources ^ Cultural Resources I I Geology/Soils ^ Noise • Ha..ds«a.a.do„s Materials • Population and Ho„si„, I I Hydrology/Water Quality Q Public Services i I Land Use and Planning I I Mineral Resources I I Mandatory Findings of Significance i I Recreation ^ Transportation/Circulation [^Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 02/22/06 DETERMINATION. [ I I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [" I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I fmd that the proposed project MAY have "potentially significant impact(s)" on the environment, but at least one potentially significant impact 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been-avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, mcluding revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, nothing further is required. Date Dat/ Rev. 02/22/06 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the enviromnent. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an infonnation source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to" projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source" document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supportmg evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to .a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Initial Study", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but aU potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. • If there is one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 02/22/06 • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and includhig but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or (4) through the EIA-Initial Study analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears after each related set of questions. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined- significant. Rev. 02/22/06 AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality ofthe site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • • • X • • • X • • • • • m • m (a, b, c, & d) No Impact. This potential impact has been previously addressed in the General Plan EIR, which states that the aesthetic character of Carlsbad will be substantially altered fi-om implementation of the General Plan, and that the aesthetic quality of scenic corridors (such as Poinsettia Lane) will be degraded. This document provides project- level mitigation measures which will be applied to the project to mitigate this potential impact to an insignificant level. . • ; Potential impacts will also be mitigated by the project's use of enhanced architectural elements and landscaped setback buffers, as well as the project's compliance with the City's Livable Neighborhoods Policy, Hillside Development Ordinance, and the Development Standards for Plarmed Developments and Multiple Dwellings. The project site is in a topographic depression that is the low point of a small valley. Because of this, the project will not be readily visible outside of its immediate surroundings. Therefore the project will not significantly impact public views, obstruct a scenic vista, or create an aesthetically offensive public view II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califomia Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the Califomia Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Califomia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • • • Kl Rev. 02/22/06 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, |^ which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? • • • M • m (a, b, & c) No Impact. The site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Califomia Resources Agency; and, is not under Williamson Act contract. III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following detenninations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstmct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attauiment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially • Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • • • Kl • • • K - • • • S • • • • K • • • Kl Rev. 02/22/06 (a) No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a state non-attainment area for ozone (O3) and for particulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PMio). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed oufiining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Govemments (SANDAG). A Plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state- mandated plan. This local pian was combined with plans fi'om all other Califomia non-attainment areas having serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9* through 10* in 1994, and was forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP m mid-1996. The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS through the land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact. Section 15125(B) ofthe State of Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelmes contains specific reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management plan. Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient au- quality standards. The Califomia Air Resources Board provides criteria for determining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the following: • Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area? • Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan? The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being implemented. The project is consistent with the regional au- quality plan and will in no way conflict or obstmct implementation of the regional plan. (b) Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is at Camp Pendleton. Data available for this monitoring site from 2000 through December 2004 indicate that the most recent air quality violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (a total of 10 days during the 5-year period). No other violations of any air quality standards have been recorded during the 5-year time period. The project would involve minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized through standard constmction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and from the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard (comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. Rev. 02/22/06 (c) Less Than Significant Impact. The air basin is currently in a state non-attainment zone for ozone and suspended fine particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project, air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered de minimus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. (d) No impact. As noted above, the proposed would not result in substantial pollutant emissions or concentrations. In addition, there are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools or hospitals) located in the vicinity of the project. No impact is assessed. (e) No Impact. The constmction of the proposed project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposure would be short-term or transient. In addition, the number of people exposed to such transient impacts is not considered substantial. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially 'Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat- modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? • Kl • • • b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defmed by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means?. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? • • Kl • • • • • ,• • • • m • Kl 10 Rev. 02/22/06 f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Significant Impact • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact • No Impact • 11 Rev. 02/22/06 (a) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Federally listed threatened coastal Califomia gnatcatcher was observed onsite m two locations in the southem maritime chaparral. A red-tailed hawk was also observed. The project will not have direct impacts to either locations where the species were observed, however the project will have direct impacts to the fringe areas of what is assumed to be habitat used by the gnatcatchers and red-tailed hawk. Mitigation for the impacts to the habitat fringes will include onsite habitat creation within areas of preservation. (b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Habitats impacted include 1.17 acres of Southem Maritime Chaparral, 0.04 acres of disturbed Southem Maritime Chaparral, and 0.03 acres of disturbed Southem Maritime Chaparral/Coastal Sage Scmb ecotone. In total, 11% of the Southem Maritime Chaparral onsite is affected. The majority of the impacts to Southem Mixed Chaparral and all of the Southem Willow Scmb are within the Poinsettia Lane area of constmction which is a Circulation Element Roadway in the City of Carlsbad General Plan. Impacts to the Southem Maritime Chaparral and riparian habitats from the residential portion of the project have been minimized to the extent practicable but are considered significant because these native communities are considered sensitive. Mitigation for all habitat types will include onsite creation at a ratio of 1:1. The remaining mitigation shall be accomplished through the purchase of credits within a suitable mitigation bank at a ratio of 2:1. The open space lot(s) which are being conserved for natural habitat shall be conserved by a recorded easement; shall be managed by a conservation entity; and, shall be endowed with an appropriate sum determined by a PAR. (c) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. A formal jurisdictional delineation has not been completed to determine if a there is Army Corps jurisdictional areas onsite. The 0.2 acres of southem willow scmb habitat present onsite is Califomia Department of Fish and Game jurisdictional habitat. The 0.2 acres of southem willow scmb habitat will be directly impacted by the improvement ofthe project's Poinsettia Lane improvements. Mitigation for the impact is proposed through the purchase of wetland credits at a ratio of 3:1. (d) No Impact. The project development area is largely restricted to areas of previous disturbance. Habitat areas are for the most part in the onsite preserve and are adjacent to preserve areas offsite. (e) No Impact. The project is not in conflict with any local protection/preservation ordinances. (0 Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan (HMP) requires the conservation of narrow endemic species. A community of 199 individuals of Nuttall's Scmb Oak is located onsite. As a "small" community, 60% or more of the community must be preserved. 52 plants are impacted and 147 individuals, 74% of the total, are preserved. A population of 58 Del Mar Manzanitas is located onsite, of which 7 Del Mar Manzanita plants are impacted. Mitigation for the impact must either be avoidance or transplantation of the seven individuals. The Biological Technical Report dated October 25, 2004 and prepared by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. is attached for additional information. CITY OF CARLSBAD HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN A summary of consistency with the City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan is attached. 12 Rev. 02/22/06 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signifi- cance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique pale ontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • • • • • Kl • • • Kl • Kl • • • K (a, b, & d) No Impact. No evidence has been presented for the site to establish it as a significant historical resource, or as a location with the presence of significant archeological resources or human remains. (c) - - Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The site was previously studied in conjunction with the Sfregola Stockpile Permit. At that time the study indicated the site potentially contained paieontological fossils, and mitigation measures were applied to the project to reduce this potential impact to a level of less than significant. The work conducted for the stockpile was monitored and completed. The potential for any impacts associated with the fiirther development of the site will be mitigated wherein a qualified paleontologist will perform a site survey, review the grading plan, and monitor grading operations. If paieontological resources are unearthed, then standard recovery methods shall be implemented. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or stmctures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • K ii. Stron" seismic groimd shaking? • • • K Rev. 02/22/06 iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soils, as defmed in Table 18 - 1-B ofthe Unifonn Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are. not available for the disposal of wastewater? Potentially Significant Impact • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • • K • • • • • • • • • • Kl K • • ^ • Kl 14 Rev. 02/22/06 (a & b) . No Impact. A geotechnical evaluation was prepared by GeoTek, Inc. dated April 2004, for the site which states that the proposed development appears feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided that the recommendations included in the evaluation are incorporated into the design and constmction phases of the project. The recommendations included in the evaluation have been incorporated into the design and will be required as conditions of approval for the constmction phase of the project. As stated in the geotechnical evaluation, the site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone; no active or potentially active fault is known to exist at the site; the potential for liquefaction is low due to the dense and clay like nature of the of the subsurface soils and lack of a shallow water table; the potential for dynamic settlement due to liquefaction or soil densification is negligible; and the potential for secondary seismic hazards such as seiche and tsunami is negligible due to the site's elevation and distance from an open body of water. (c) Less Than Significant Impact. The geotechnical evaluation for the project prepared by GeoTek, Inc., dated April 2004, states that the proposed development appears feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided that the recommendations included in the evaluation are incorporated into the design and constmction phases of the project. The recommendations included in the evaluation will be incorporated into the design and construction phases ofthe project and will be project conditions of approval. (d&e) No Impact. systems. Expansive soils have not been identified onsite. The project will connect to existing City sewer VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Potentially Significant Impact • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • Kl • Kl • K 15 Rev. 02/22/06 d) e) 0 Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Govemment Code Section 65962.5 and, as a resuh, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? • • • K • • • S h) • • • • • • • • • K K Kl Expose people or stmctures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fu-es, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, & h) No Impact. The project does not involve the use, transport or disposal of hazardous materials. The project site is not on the State Hazardous Waste and Substances List. The project will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The project site is within two miles of the McClellan-Palomar Airport, however is not within the flight path, within the flight activity zone or airport influence area. The project has been designed with an intemal private road that serves as a buffer between the proposed stmctures and the project Open Space in compliance with fire safety regulations as they relate to stmcture protection from wildlands. Vin. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY project: Would the Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering'of the local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? • • • • • S • K 16 Rev 02/22/06 c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the |^ |^ ^ site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a sfream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the |^ ^ site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a sfream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface mnoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? e) Create or confribute mnoff water, which would |^ Q ^ exceed the capacity of existing or planned stonnwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted mnoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? [ [ [ [ ^ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ^ mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? h) Place within lOQ-year flood hazard area stmctures, ^ QT] ^ which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or stmctures to a significant risk of |^ |^ ^ loss injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? | j | | | | ^ (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, I, & j) No Impact. As described in the Storm Water Management Plan prepared for Poinsettia Place by Hunsaker and Associates, dated June 30, 2005, the project conforms to best management practices for preserving water quality prior to discharging into the public storm water system. There is no existing significant water drainage pattern onsite nor is the project located within an area that is subject to flooding. The site is not within a 100-year floodplain. The potential for secondary seismic hazards such as seiche and tsunami is negligible due to the site's elevation and distance from an open body of water Due to the routing of developed flows to below that of existing natural flows, the development has no negative impact upon the existing flow of the tributary to which the site drains. Existing peak flows are 19.7 cfs and developed condition peak flows are projected to be 18.5 cfs. IX. LANDUSE AND PLANI^ING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • • • X 17 Rev. 02/22/06 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? • • K • • • S • (a) No Impact. The site is vacant and planned for residential development in the City's General Plan. This area has a General Plan designation of Residential Medium Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The development will be clustered on the northem one-third of the site and will be an integral part of the developing, sunounding residential community. The project will not divide an established community. The southem two-thirds ofthe site will remain in natural open space. (b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project mcludes a request for an amendment to the General Plan and Zoning designations for the site as well as the Land Use and Zoning designations for the Local Coastal Program. The changes are as a result of clustering development on the disturbed portions of the site and changing the General Plan designation to Residential High (RH) and preserving the remaining areas as Open Space (OS). (c) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan acknowledges both public and private development within the City liiriits. The project is consistent with the intent of allowing development to occur within the City with the implementation of appropriate preservation and conservation measures. The development of the site is limited to 25% of the gross site area. The project as proposed will include some quantifiable impacts to the natural community, however, mitigation measures can be applied to limit the impacts to levels of less than significant. The proposed density and type of development are consistent with the General Plan, Growth Management Program, Zone 21 Local Facilities Management Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of fiiture value to the region and the residents of the State? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • m • • • s b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? (a, & b) No Impact. No significant mineral resources were identified in the area through the field exploration performed by GeoTek, Inc. and disclosed in their report dated April 2004. 18 Rev. 02/22/06 XL NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundboume vibration or groundboume noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people'residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airsfrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporated Impact Impact Kl • • • • • • • • Kl m • • K • • • s 19 Rev. 02/22/06 a) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the findings of the Acoustical Site Assessment prepared for the project by Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc. dated April 20, 2004, future exterior noise levels sunounding the project would not exceed the City threshold of 60 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Thus, no exterior mitigation would be required. Future interior noise levels within the project could potentially exceed the City threshold of 45 dBA CNEL due to noise from fraffic on Poinsettia Lane and Cassia Road. Thus, interior noise mitigation, i.e. specialized door and window freatments, would be required for certain units as specified in the Acoustical Site Assessment. The Acoustical Site Assessment also states that an interior noise study would be required prior to issuance of building permits to demonsfrate that the architectural design would limit interior noise levels to 45 dBA CNEL. Implementation of the suggested mitigated measures will redupe the impacts to a level of less than significant. (b & c) No Impact. The project is a residential subdivision. There is no historical evidence that condominium development will generate groundboume noise or vibration or that it will generate a substantial increase above existing ambient noise levels. (d) Less Than Significant Impact.. The project will generate a short-term, temporary, increase ia existing noise levels due to constmction activities. This is not considered a significant impact. In addition, this potential impact has been previously addressed in the General Plan EIR. This document provides project-level mitigation measures which will be applied to the project to mitigate this potential impact to an insignificant level. (e & f) No Impact. The site is far enough away from the McClellan-Palomar Airport to be oijtside of the airport 60 dBA CNEL noise contour and that it will not be significantly impacted by noise generated by airport operation and use. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly ^ (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastmcture)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, [ [ ^ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating |^ j~j ^ the constmction of replacement housing elsewhere? (a, b, & c) No Impact. The project site is vacant and undeveloped. No property immediately adjacent to the site is developed. There is an existing multi-family residential development located across Cassia Road to the north. The project is located in an area that is designated for residential development. Development of the site will not induce substantial growth but will accommodate the growth anticipated by the General Plan. Because there is no existing development onsite there will not be displacement of any kind. 20 Rev. 02/22/06 xm. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemment facilities, a need for new or physically altered govemment facilities, the constmction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other perfonnance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact i) Fire protection? • • • X ii) Police protection? • • • X iii) Schools? • • • X iv) Parks? • • • X v) Other public facilities? ^ • • • . X (a) No Impact. In accordance with the General Plan EIR, the project will be conditioned to comply with the Zone 21 Local Facilities Management Plan performance standards for public facilities and services to ensure that adequate public facilities and services are provided prior to or concunent with the development. No new or physically altered govemment facilities will be requfred with the approval of this project. The site is within a five-minute response time from Ffre Stations 2 and 4. Police Department staffmg is at an adequate level to provide services. The project will pay school fees to the Carlsbad School District and Park In-Lieu fees to the City of Carlsbad. XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or dther recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the constmction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • Less Than Significant Impact No Impact • K • m 21 Rev. 02/22/06 (a,&b) No Impact. In accordance with the General Plan EIR, the project will be conditioned to comply with the Zone 21 Local Facilities Management Plan performance standards for recreation facilities to ensure that adequate public recreation is available and will adequately serve the development. Typically payment of a "Park-in-Lieu Fee" is required for all new residential development. Public parks have been provided within the southwest quadrant of the City to satisfy the individual Zone Plan requirements. All private recreation will be provided onsite and is within the development envelope established for the project. Provision of the private recreation will not result in "additional" impacts to the envfronment. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation. Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in fraffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing fraffic load and capacity of the sfreet system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle frips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in afr fraffic pattems, including either an increase m fraffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in insufficient parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting altemative fransportation (e.g., bus tum- outs, bicycle racks)? • • • • Kl • Kl • • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X • • • X 22 Rev. 02/22/06 (a) Less Than Significant Impact. A fraffic impact analysis was prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Traffic Impact Analysis Poinsettia Place, dated October 11, 2005. According to that report the project will generate 720 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 58 a.m. and 70 p.m. peak hour frips. This fraffic will utilize the following roadways: Poinsettia Lane and El Camino Real. Existing traffic (ADT 2005) on these arterials are 32,000 on El Camino Real and 3,700 on Pomsettia Lane. The 2004 peak hour level of service at the arterial mtersection of El Camino Real and Poinsettia Lane has not been monitored because Poinsettia Lane has not been fiilly constmcted west of El Camino Real. The design capacities of the arterial roads effected by the proposed project is(are) up to 40,000 vehicles per day on Poinsettia Lane and over 40,000 vehicles per day on El Camino Real. The total project fraffic without considering disbursement would represent 5% and 1.8% of the existing fraffic volume and the design capacity respectively of Poinsettia Lane and the percentage will be less for El Camino Real. While the increase in fraffic from the proposed project may be slightly noticeable, the sfreet system has been designed and sized to accommodate fraffic from the project and cumulative development in the City of Carlsbad. The proposed project would not, therefore, cause an increase in fraffic that is substantial in relation to the existing fraffic load and capacity ofthe sfreet system. The impacts from the proposed project are, therefore, less than significant. (b) Less Than Significant Impact. SANDAG acting as the County Congestion Management Agency has designated three roads (Rancho Santa Fe Rd., El Camino Real and Palomar Airport Rd.) and two highway segments in Carlsbad as part of the regional cfrculation system. The Existing and Buildout average daily fraffic (ADT) and Existing LOS on these designated roads and highways in Carlsbad is: Existing ADT* LOS Buildout ADT* Rancho Santa Fe Road 17-35 "A-D" 35-56 El Camino Real 27-49 "A-C" ' 33-62 Palomar Airport Road 10-57 . "A-D" :. 30-73 SR78 124-142 "P" 156-180 1-5 199-216 "D" 260-272 * The numbers are in thousands of daily frips. The Congestion Management Program's (CMP) acceptable Level of Service (LOS) standard is "E", or LOS "F" if that was the LOS in the 1990 base year (e.g., SR 78 in Carlsbad was LOS "F" in 1990). Accordmgly, all designated roads and highways are cunently operating at or better than the acceptable standard LOS. Note that the buildout ADT projections are based on the full implementation of the region's general and community plans. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and, therefore, its fraffic was used in modeling the buildout projections. Achievement of the CMP acceptable Level of Service (LOS) "E" standard assumes implementation of the adopted CMP sfrategies. Based on the design capacity (ies) of the designated roads and highways and implementation of the CMP sfrategies, they will function at acceptable level(s) of service in the short-term and at buildout. (c) No Impact. The proposed project does not include any aviation components. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the McClellan-Palomar Airport. It would not, therefore, result in a change of afr traffic patterns or result in substantial safety risks. No impact assessed. (d) No Impact. All project circulation improvements will be designed and constmcted to City standards; and, therefore, would not result in design hazards. The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning. Therefore, it would not increase hazards due to an incompatible use. No impact assessed. (e) No Impact. The proposed project has been designed to satisfy the emergency access requfrements ofthe Ffre and Police Departments. No impact assessed. 23 Rev. 02/22/06 (0 No Impact. The proposed project is not requesting a parking variance. Additionally, the project would comply with the City's parking requfrements to ensure an adequate parking supply for the dwelling units and guests. No impact assessed. (g) No Impact. The project site is located at the intersection of Pomsettia Lane and Cassia Road. Bus service to the project or to a location near the project and facilities for the service will be determined by North County Transit Disfrict. Approval and constmction of the project will not be in conflict with the programs supporting altemative modes of fransportation. XVL UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS project: Would the a) Exceed wastewater freatment requfrements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Confrol Board? b) Require or result in the constmction of new water or wastewater freatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the constmction of which would cause significant envfronmental effects? c) Requfre or result in the" constmction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,. the constmction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitiements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater freatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Potentially Significant Impact • • • • • • Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated • • • • • • • • Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • • • • Kl Kl • Kl Kl Kl • K • Kl 24 Rev. 02/22/06 (a, b, c, d, e, f, & g) No Impact. The project is a residential development of 90 new condominiums. The addition of 90 dwelling units will not requfre the creation of new wastewater freatment or storm water drainage facilities. Potable water is available to the project through the Carlsbad Water Disfrict and sewer capacity for the project is available also at the Encinas Wastewater Treatment Facility. Sufficient land fill capacity is available in San Diego County according to the San Diego County Integrated Waste Management Plan Countywide Siting Element, 2005 5-Year Revision Final, dated September 2005. Potentially Significant XVIL MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the envfronment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or resfrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation , Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • • • X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively- considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in coimection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other cunent projects, and the effects of probable fiiture projects?) • • • - Kl • • • Kl Does the project have envfronmental effects, which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either dfrectly or indfrectly? a) No Impact. The project is proposed for development within an area that has been previously disturbed and therefore does not have the potential to substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or resfrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) No Impact. . Impacts associated with the project are identified to be at a level of less than significant after mitigation. Similarly, past, cunent and probable future project impacts have been or can be mitigated and therefore will not have a cumulative considerable envfronmental impact. c) No Impact. The project is intended for and for the benefit of human beings. 25 Rev. 02/22/06 XVin. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the followfrig on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refmed from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 26 Rev. 02/22/06 EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, Califomia, 92008. 1. Final Master Envfronmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01). City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994. 2. Biological Technical Report prepared by Helix Environmental Planning, Inc., dated October 25,2004 3. Traffic Impact Analvsis: Poinsettia Place prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan, dated October 11, 2005 4. Drainage Studv for Poinsettia Place prepared by Hunsaker and Associates San Diego Inc., dated September 22,2004 5. Storm Water Management Plan for Poinsettia Place prepared by Hunsaker and Associates San Diego, dated June 30, 2005 6. Geotechnical Evaluation for Proposed Residential building SRWB Propertv prepared by GeoTek, Inc., dated April 13,2004 7. Acoustical Site Assessment, prepared by Investigative Science and Engineering, Inc., dated April 20, 2004 27 Rev. 02/22/06 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES 1. Impacts to 1.17 acres of Southem Maritime Chapanal (SMC) shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 3.51 acres that shall be created and/or substantially restored onsite. Altematively, up to 2.34 acres, two-thfrds of the total mitigation required, may be provided through purchase of mitigation bank credits. 2. Impacts to 0.04 acres of disturbed SMC shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 0.12 acres that shall be created and/or substantially restored onsite. Altematively, up to 0.08 acres, two-thfrds of the total mitigation requfred, may be provided through purchase of mitigation bank credits. 3. Impacts to 0.03 acres of disturbed SMC/Costal Sage Scrub (CSS) shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 0.09 acres that shall be created and/or substantially restored onsite. Altematively, up to 0.06 " acres, two-thfrds of the total mitigation required, may be provided through purchase of mitigation bank" credits. 4. Impacts to 0.02 acres of Southem Willow Scrub (SWS)/CDFG jurisdictional riparian wetiand shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 0.06 acres. Mitigation shall be in the form of mitigation credit purchased from the proposed North County Habitat Bank in Carlsbad. 5. Impacts to 7 Del Mar Manzanita plants (a Nanow Endemic) will be mitigated by on-site preservation of the remaining 51, and avoidance of 7 Del Mar Manzanita plants, or fransplantation of the 7 Del Mar Manzanita plants within the project preserve area. 6. Impacts to 52 Nuttall's Scmb Oak plants will be mitigated by on-site preservation ofthe remaining 147 (74%) which is in excess of the HMP minimum 60% preservation requfrement. 7. All disturbed areas, disturbed habitats and Non-native Grassland that will be'preserved in open space will be restored to SMC to ensure no net loss of SMC. - . . '. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall pay mitigation fees as established by the City ofCarlsbad Habitat Management Plan for impacts to specified habitat types. 9. Prior to recordation of the fmal map or prior to issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs fu-st, the Developer shall take the following actions to the satisfaction of the Planning Dfrector in relation to the open space lot(s) which are being conserved for natural habitat in conformance with the city's Habitat Management Plan: a. Select a conservation entity, subject to approval by the City, that possesses qualifications to manage the open space lot (s) for conservation purposes. b. Prepare a Property Analysis Record (PAR) or other method acceptable to the City for estimating the costs of management and monitoring of the open space lot(s) in perpetuity. c. Based on the results of the PAR, provide a non-wasting endowment or other fmancial mechanism acceptable to the Plarming Director and conservation entity, if any, in an amount sufficient for management and monitoring ofthe open space lot(s) in perpetuity. d. Record a Conservation Easement over the open space lot(s) which includes an Inevocable Offer to Dedicate fee title to the open space lot(s) in favor of the City. The Conservation Easement shall provide that the non-wasting endowment shall fransfer to the City if the City accepts the Inevocable Offer to Dedicate fee title to the open space lot(s). e. Prepare an Interim Management Plan which will ensure adequate management of the open space lot(s) until such time as a permanent preserve management plan is prepared and approved by the City. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall confract with a qualified paleontologist for monitoring the grading operations and performmg duties as outiined in the City of Carlsbad's Cultural Resources Guidelines manual. 28 Rev. 02/22/06 11. Prior to . issuance of a building permit, evidence shall be provided to the City that interior noise levels for the condominiums will be mitigated to an interior noise level no greater than 45 dBA CNEL when the windows and doors are closed. 29 Rev. 02/22/06 APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature 30 Rev. 02/22/06 Page 1 of 3 PROJECT NAME: Poinsettia Place FILE NUMBERS: GPA 04-12/ZC 04-08/LCPA 04-08/CT 04- 10/CP 04-05/CP 05-05/HDP 04-05/SDP 04-07/CDP 04-23 APPROVAL DATE: TBD The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated Into the Conditions of Approval for this project in order to mitigate identified environmental impacts to a level of Insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure Indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the City's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). Mitigation Measure Monitoring , Type Mpnitoring' Department Shown on Plans Verified Implementation Remarks Impacts to 1.17 acres of Southern Maritime Chaparral (SMC) shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 3.51 acres that shall be created and/or substantially restored onsite. Alternatively, up to 2.34 acres, two-thirds of the total mitigation required, may be provided through purchase of mitigation bank credits. Project Planning Impacts to 0.04 acres of disturbed SMC shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 0.12 acres that shall be created and/or substantially restored onsite. Altematively, up to 0.08 acres, two-thirds of the total mitigation required, may be provided through purchase of mitigation bank credits. Project Planning Impacts to 0.03 acres of disturbed SMC/COstal Sage Scrub (CSS) shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 0.09 acres that shall be created and/or substantially restored onsite. Altematively, up to 0.06 acres, two-thirds ofthe total mitigation required, may be provided through purchase of mitigation bank credits. Project Planning Impacts to 0.02 acres of Southern Willow Scrub (SWS)/CDFG jurisdictional riparian wetland shall be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio for a total of 0.06 acres. Mitigation shail be in the form of mitigation credit purchased from the proposed North County Habitat Bank in Carlsbad. Project Planning Impacts to 7 Del Mar Manzanita plants (a Narrow Endemic) will be mitigated by on-site preservation ofthe remaining 51, and avoidance of 7 Del Mar Manzanita plants, or transplantation of the 7 Del Mar Manzanita plants within the project preserve area. Project Planning Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. information. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be Initialed and dated. Remarks = Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other RD - Appendix P. Page 2 of 3 Mitigation Measure Monitoring Type Monitoring Department Shown on Plans Verified Implementation Remarks Impacts to 52 Nuttall's Scrub Oak plants will be mitigated by on- site preservation of the remaining 147 (74%) which is in excess of the HMP minimum 60% preservation requirement Project Planning All disturbed areas, disturbed habitats and Non-native Grassland that will be preserved in open space will be restored to SMC to ensure no net loss of SMC. Ongoing Planning Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall pay mitigation fees as established by the City of Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan for impacts to specified habitat types. Project Planning Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall take the following actions to the satisfaction of the Planning Director in relation to the open space lot(s) which are being conserved for natural habitat in conformance with the city's Habitat Management Plan: Ongoing Planning 1.Select a conservation entity, subject to approval by the City, that possesses qualifications to manage the open space lot(s) for conservation purposes. 2. Prepare a Property Analysis Record (PAR) or other method acceptable to the City for estimating the costs of management and monitoring of the open space lot(s) in perpetuity. Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. information. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Fjemai1<s = Area for describing status of ongoing rpitigation measure, or for other RD - Appendix P. Page 3 of 3 Mitigation Measure Monitoring •;r;r:'-Type' Monitoring Department Shown on Plans Verified Implementatiori Remarks 3. Based on the results of the PAR, provide a non-wasting endowment or other financial mechanism acceptable to the Planning Director and conservation entity, if any, in an amount sufficient for management and monitoring of the open space lot(s) in perpetuity. 4. Record a Conservation Easement over the open space lot(s) which includes an Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate fee title to the open space lot(s) in favor of the City. The Conservation Easement shall provide that the non-wasting endowment shall transfer to the City if the City accepts the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate fee title to the open space lot(s). 5. Prepare an Interim Management Plan which will ensure adequate management of the open space lot(s) until such time as a permanent preserve management plan is prepared and approved by the City. Ongoing Planning Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall contract with a qualified paleontologist for monitoring the grading operations and performing duties as outlined in the City of Carlsbad's Cultural Resources Guidelines manual. Project Planning Prior to issuance of a building permit, evidence shall be provided to the City that interior noise levels for the condominiums will be mitigated to an interior noise level no greater than 45 dBA CNEL when the windows and doors are closed. Project Building • Explanation of Headings: Type = Project, ongoing, cumulative. Monitoring Dept. = Department, or Agency, responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure. Verified Implementation = When mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated. Remat^ks = Area for describing status of ongoing rnitigation measure, or for other information. Shown on Plans = When mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be initialed and dated. RD - Appendix P. POINSETTIA PLACE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS Revised February 2006 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH ZONE 21 CONSERVATION GOALS: GOAL CONSISTENT JUSTIFIFICATION/COMMENTS Yes Conserve the majority of remaining natural habitats and ensure a net loss of no more than 10% of coastal sage scrub and southem maritime chaparral. The project alone, not including the extension of Poinsettia Lane, impacts none of the southern willow scrub (SWS), 4% (0.46 acre) of the southern maritime chaparral (SMC) and disturbed SMC, none of the disturbed SMC/coastal sage scrub (CSS), and none of the non- native grassland (NNG). The project alone impacts less than 10% of the specified habitats and conserves the majority of the natural habitats on site. Impacts to SMC and disturbed SMC will be mitigated at a 3:1 ratio, including at least a 1:1 creation component to ensure no net loss. The extension of Poinsettia Lane impacts 100% ofthe southern willow scrub (SWS), 7% ofthe SMC, none ofthe disturbed SMC, 10% of the disturbed SMC/coastal sage scrub, and none of the NNG. With the exception of impacts to SWS, the additional impacts from the extension of Poinsettia Lanfe still conserve the majority of natural habitats on site, impacts to SWS, SMC, and disturbed SMC/CSS will be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio including at least a 1:1 creation component to ensure no net loss. Impacts that can not be mitigated onsite will be mitigated by purchase of offsite mitigation credits. [General Note- For details, see project Biological Technical Report, by Helix Environmental Planning, Oct. 2004, incorporated by reference.] Ensure no net loss of wetland habitats, vemal pools, and oak woodlands within the zone. Yes The extension of Poinsettia Lane impacts 0.2 acre of SWS, which is CDFG jurisdictional riparian wetland habitat. This impact will be mitigated at a 3:1 ratio through purchase of credits in an off- site mitigation bank within the Coastal Zone. No vernal pools or oak woodland occurs on site. Conserve habitats in a continuous configuration across the zone to allow for continued east-west connectivity and animal movement between El Camino Real (Zone 10) and Linl<age Area F (Zones 19 and 20). Yes The site is within Core Area 6, Zone 21, and maintains continuity to Zone 10 and Linkage Area F by limiting development to the previously graded northern portion of the site adjacent to existing development on Cassia Road and by preserving the majority of the extant habitat on site and mairitaining habitat connectivity to the south and east. The project does not significantly impact regional preserve design. Conserve Narrow Endemic plant populations. Yes The site contains 58 Del Mar Manzanita plants. The project impacts 7 (12% of total) of these plants and the remaining 88% are preserved. The project will be redesigned to avoid the 7 individuals or they will be transplanted to the onsite Open Space preserve. PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH ZONE 21 PLANNING STANDARDS: STANDARD CONSISTENT JUSTIFICATION/COMMENTS Additional field surveys at the appropriate time of year are needed in this zone to determine the extent and location of sensitive species. Yes The project's biology consultant performed field surveys to identify sensitive species on-site in both September and April when all sensitive species that might occur on site would have been detectable. Major areas of development should be restricted to agricultural areas and disturbed habitat. Yes Over 90% of the proposed development is on the previously disturbed northern portion of the site. This area was previously used for agriculture and as a dirt stockpile for off-site grading projects. Avoid removing maritime succulent scrub, southem maritime chaparral, and any Narrow Endemic plant populations identified during planning. Yes The site does not contain maritime succulent scrub. Impacts to SMC have been minimized but not completely avoided. The HMP standard directly below and HMP Section 7-14 (below) allow impacts to SMC provided they are minimized. The project alone impacts 4% (0.46 acre) of the SMC and disturbed SMC. These impacts are minirtial since the project preserves the majority of these habitats (96%). Seven Del Mar Manzanita plants (a Narrow Endemic) will be impacted and the remaining 51 will be preserved. As a result, the population will be adequately conserved, consistent with the Z 21 Conservation Goal above. ' The extension, of Poinsettia Lane impacts 7% (0.75 acre) of the SMC and 10% (0.03 acre) of the disturbed SMC/CSS. See project Biological Report Table 2. Minimize removal of coastal sage scrub and southem maritime chaparral; avoid impacts within the watersheds of vemal pools and to oak riparian forest. Yes Impacts to SMC have been minimized. See cornments directly above. The project alone does not impact disturbed SMC/CSS. The extension of Poinsettia Lane impacts 10% of the disturbed SMC/CSS. The site does not contain vernal pools or oak riparian forest. Ensure continuous habitat connectivity and wildlife movement east-west across the zone with an average habitat width of 500 to 1,000 feet and a minimum constriction of 500 feet (where narrower constrictions don't already exist). However, in no case shall this standard deny a property owner some reasonable use of their property. Yes Habitat linkages to adjacent Core Area 10 and Linkage Area F are maintained by the project design to the maximum extent allowed by the distribution of habitat on site. The project does not have a significant impact pn the regional preserve design because the development area is limited to the northern, previously disturbed portion ofthe site. If impacts to natural habitats cannot be avoided, they must be limited to disturbed, low quality portions of the site. Yes The development area is focused on the northern, previously disturbed portion of the site. Impacts to natural habitats are primarily avoided by the project design. The impacts to natural habitats ^re minimized and limited to brush management impacts along the southern fringe of the developn ), area adjacent to the disturbed habitat. Project impacts to natural habitats are minimized to maximum extent practicable. Areas of tiighly disturbed, low quality southem maritime chaparral and coastal sage scrub may be mitigated by a combination of on-site enhancement and off-site mitigation in locations of higher quality habitat. Yes Areas of disturbed habitat, disturbed SMC, disturbed SMC/CSS and NNG in the southern portion of the site that will be preserved in open space will be restored to SMC to ensure no net loss of SMC. See project Biological Report Figure 4. Mitigation for any allowed impacts shall be as stated in Table 11 on Page D-113. Yes The mitigation ratios applied to the project are taken from Table 11, pg. D-113 of the HMP. See project Biological Report Table 3. PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION 7- ADDITtONAL CONSERVATION STANDARDS TO BE APPLIED TO PROPERTIES JN THE COASTAL ZONE: STANDARD CONSISTENT JUSTIFICATION/COMMENTS 7-1 Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas shall be protected against any significant disruption of habitat values. Yes Mitigation measures, as provided in the HMP, have been applied to the project to ensure no significant impacts to habitat values and no net loss of environmentally sensitive habitats. 7-2 Preservation of at least 67% of onsite Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) Yes The extension of Poinsettia Lane impacts 10% and conserves 90% of all of the CSS onsite which is disturbed SMC/CSS. 7-3 Oak Woodland Not Applicable This section is a description of habitat type 7-4 Sfreams Not Applicable This section is a description of habitat type 7-5 Ephemeral Drainages and Streams Not Applicable This section is a description of habitat type 7-6 Wetlands shall be delineated and no impacts shall be allowed except as allowed in CPRC Section 30233. Yes The extension of Poinsettia Lane impacts 0.2 acre of Southern Willow Scrub (SWS), which is CDl-o riparian wetland jurisdictional habitat. No net loss of wetlands will be achieved with purchase of wetland mitigation credit at a 3:1 ratio from the North County Habitat Bank on Palomar Airport Rd in Carlsbad. 7-7 Wetland mitigation is required at a ratio of 3:1 and 4:1 for saltwater and freshwater wetland or marsh impacts. Yes The extension of Poinsettia Lane impacts 0.2 acre of Southern Willow Scrub (SWS), which is CDFG riparian wetland jurisdictional habitat. No net loss of wetlands will be achieved with purchase of wetland mitigation credit at a 3:1 ratio from the North County Habitat Bank on Palomar Airport Rd in Carlsbad. 7-8 No Net Loss of Coastal Sage Scrub, Maritime Succulent Scmb, Southern Maritime Chaparral, Native Grassland, and Oak Woodland within the Coastal Zone. Yes Impacts to SMC.'disturbed SMC and disturbed SMC/coastal sage scrub will be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio which includes a 1:1 creation component on site in disturbed portions of the preserve area on the south side of the site to ensure no net loss. The remaining mitigation will be achieved through the purchase of mitigation credits from an appropriate mitigation bank. 7-9 Upland Habitat Mitigation Requirements include "No Net Loss", no mitigation credit for onsite preservation, 1:1 ratio for Southern Mixed Chaparral, 2:1 ratio for Coastal Sage Scrub, 3;1 ratio for Southern Maritime Chaparral and Maritime Succulent Scrub and Native Grassland and Oak Woodland, Yes Impacts to SMC, disturbed SMC and disturbed SMC/coastal sage scrub will be mitigated at a minimum 3:1 ratio which includes a 1:1 creation component on site in disturbed portions of the preserve area oq | the south side of the site to ensure no net loss. The remaining mitigation will be achieved through purchase of mitigation credits from an appropriate mitigation bank. 7-10 Highly Constrained Properties Not Applicable 7-11 Buffers shall be provided from wetlands of a minimum 100 feet from wetlands, 50 feet from riparian areas, and 20 feet from all other habitat areas. Yes There is a consistent 60-foot wide area between the open space preserve and the housing units. This area includes mostly circulation aisles and parking. The open space habitat preserve lot has a hard edge against the project at which there is a brow ditch, then a six foot retaining wall and wrought iron fence combination. The sum of these improvements create an environment where access to the habitat from the development is limited. These improvements also act as a barrier to minimize edge effects and encroachment into the preserve and meet the intent ofthe required 2Q-foot buffer. 7-12 Grading and Landscaping Requirements Yes These requirements apply to the grading/construction phase of the project. The project will be conditioned to comply with these requirements during grading/construction. 7-13 City Owned Lands Not Applicable 7-14 Other Parcels- Specific Standards Yes See separate section directly below. PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH SECTION 7-14 OTHER PARCELS- SPECIFIC HABITAT PROTECTION STANDARDS: STANDARDS FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY f. APN 215-020-06 (RWSB) CONSISTENT JUSTIFICATION/COMMENTS Development shall be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane constmction, and shall be clustered to the maximum extent feasible along disturbed portions ofthe property adjacent to Cassia Road and the future Poinsettia Lane extension. ^ Yes The proposed development area conforms to the standard as stated. Impacts to the SMC habitat shall be minimized. Yes The project design minimizes impacts to SMC. The project alone impacts 4% (0.46 acre) of the SMC and disturbed SMC. The extension of Poinsettia Lane impacts 7% (0.75 acre) of the SMC and 10% (0.03 acre) of the disturbed SMC/coastal sage scrub. See project Biological Report Table 2. A wildlife corridor linkage oriented generally north- south shall be provided on the eastem portion ofthe property and designed to connect to neighboring properties with existing or potential wildlife corridor linkages. Yes A wildlife corridor linkage has been provided as stated on the east side of the site that includes virtually all the habitat along the eastern portion of the site (see project Biological Report Figure 4). Impacts to native habitat shall require on-site mitigation through restoration and/or creation of habitat within the designated corridor linkage, in addition to any other required mitigation. Yes Areas of disturbed habitat, disturbed SMC, disturbed SMC/CSS and NNG in the southern portion of the site that will be preserved in open space will be restored to SMC to ensure no net loss of SMC. See project Biological Report Figure 4. Impacts to SWS will be mitigated with purchase of mitigation at a 3:1 ratio, including a 1:1 ratio of creation credits at the North County Habitat Bank on Palomar Airport Rd. in Carisbad. Planning Division February 7, 2012 Sarah Beckman Shea Homes 9990 Mesa Rim Road San Diego CA 92121 RE: (.."T 04-iO(A)-POINSETTIA PLACE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING CREDITS FEE Dear Ms. Beckman: www.carlsbadca.gov The Poinsettia Place (aka Vitalia) project is subject to the purchase of 14 inclusionary housing credits from the Villa Loma Housing Credit Bank. The current fee for housing credits within the Villa Loma Housing Credit Bank is $49,000 per credit. The total amount necessary to satisfy the housing credit condition of approval is $686,000. Please submit a check payable to the City of Carlsbad in the amount of $686,000 for deposit into the City of Carlsbad Housing Trust Fund (ACCT# 133-0000-5562). If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (760) 602-4614. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN, AICP Senior Plar.~er CW:bd c: Frank Boensch, Senior Analyst 1~,lll·.--------------------------------------- :-1 ' 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® ·, .M ,ift_A. CITY OF VcARLSBAD l\'\cui£d 0 /1e/11 FILE COPY Planning Division August 17, 2011 Sarah Beckman Shea Homes 9990 Mesa Rim Road San Diego CA 92121 RE: CT 04-l0(A)-POINSETTIA PLACE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN MITIGATION FEE Dear Ms. Beckman: www.carlsbadca.gov The Poinsettia Place (Vitalia) project is subject to the Habitat Management Plan Mitigation Fee for impacts to 4.75 acres of Disturbed Land (Group F) as described in the Poinsettia Place Biological technical Report updated October 23, 2006. The current fee for Group F land pursuant to the City of Carlsbad Development Fees schedule dated September 1, 2010 is $2,729.00 per acre impacted. Please submit a check payable to the City of Carlsbad in the amount of $12,962.75 for deposit into account# 1725110-5598. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (760) 602-4614. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN, AICP Senior Planner CW:bd FILE COPY City of Carlsbad Planning Department November 24, 2009 Sierra Linda Development Company Attn: Dave Jacinto 219 Meadow Vista Way Encinitas, CA 92024 SUBJECT: CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05{A)/SDP 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A) - POINSETTIA PLACE The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be sent to you via email on Wednesday, December 4, 2009, after 8.00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on December 7, 2009. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:30 AM. If you have any questions conceming your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring the following required information with you to this meeting or provide it to your planner prior to the meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission: 1. Unmounted colored exhibit(s) of your site plan and elevations 2. A PDF of your colored site plan and elevations ' The colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, vour proiect could be rescheduled to a later time. The PDF of your colored site plan and elevations will be used in the presentation to the Planning Commission and the public at the Planning Commission Hearing. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) and the PDF here by the scheduled time above. Should you wish to use visual materials In your presentation to the Planning Commission, they should be submitted to the Planning Department no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of a Regular Planning Commission Meeting. Digital materials will be placed on a computer in Council Chambers for public presentations. Please label all materials with the agenda item number you are representing. Items submitted for viewing, including presentations/digital materials, will be included in the time limit maximum for speakers. All materials exhibited to the Planning Commission during the meeting (slides, maps, photos, etc.) are part of the public record and must be kept by the Planning Department for at least 60 days after final action on the matter. Your materials will be returned upon written request. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please .contact your Planner, Christer Westman at (760) 602-4614. Sincerely, DON NEU Planning Director DN:CW:sm c: File Copy Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ ^ FILE COPY City of Carlsbad""'^ Planning Department November 2, 2009 Dave Jacinto Sierra Linda Development 219 Meadow Vista Way Encinitas, CA 92024 SUBJECT: CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05(A)/SDP 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A) - POINSETTIA PLACE Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on December 16, 2009. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by November 23, 2009, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 10 copies of your (site plans, landscape plans, building elevation plans, floor plans) on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded Into 9" x 12" size. B) One SV2" xll" copy of your reduced site plan, building elevation and floor plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following Information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form; A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 100' Occupant List - (Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property, Including the applicant and/or owner. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05(A)/^ 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A) - POINSET^ PLACE November 2, 2009 Page 2 C) Mailing Labels - two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius and occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property. For any address other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial 11 pt, Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt, Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE (with APN) 209-060-34-00 Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 MRS JANE SMITH Carlsbad, CA 92008 APT 3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is Impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. Cash check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN Senior Planner CW:lt Attachment c: File FILE COPY jO'l-O^ City of Carlsbad Planning Department September 30, 2009 Dave Jacinto Sierra Linda Development 219 Meadow Vista Way Encinitas, CA 92024 SUBJECT: CT 04-10(A)/ CP 04-05(A)/ SDP 04-07(A)/ CDP 04-23(A) - POINSETTIA PLACE- CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: The project is subject to the provisions of CEQA; however, the potential environmental effects of the project were adequately analyzed by the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for CT 04-10/CP 04-05/SDP 04-07/CDP 04-23 - Poinsettia Place. No additional environmental review is required. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project planner, Christer Westman, at (760) 602-4614 or christer. westman(gcarlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU Planning Director DN;CW:it c; Chris, DeCerbo, Team Leader Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Carlsbad Poinsettia Land 2834 La Mirada Drive, ste. E Vista, CA 92081 760 809-7473 September 28, 2009 Mr. Christer Westman Planning Department City ofCarlsbad, CA Re: Poinsettia Place Cassia Road & Poinsettia Lane APN: 215-020-06 CT-04-10, CP 05-04 Dear Christer: This is intended as a commentary on the issues outlined in the comments letter for the subject project. Some are comments provide by Hunsaker Engineering and some follow- up that I have done: Planning: 1. The TM has been revised to include the higher density on the easterly end of the project within the lot 1 property lines. The unit 7B will be shown as a "0" lot line on the conmion property line as currently approved 2. This item has been resolved with the planning Director and engineering as well as fire 3. See the landscape plans that have addressed this issue. The walls and fence do not exceed 42" 4. See the TM and the Landscape Plans 5. See the TM and the Landscape Plans 6. New additional parking provided. Parking dimensions are corrected 7. The rec areas are now appropriately labeled. 8. See the architectural corrections showing the corrected dimensions 9. The cover sheet has been modified to reflect the appropriate designations. 10. Inclusionary Housing is currently preparing a letter to allow fees to be paid for this project. Engineering: 1. The tuming movements are shown on the TM. Pvt driveway "C" east of bidg 9 has a gate now for "out only as discussed with Planning and Fire as well as engineering. 2. Project is conditioned to construct Poinsettia. TM sheet 2 has additional street sections showing interim and ultimate road conditions. Ms. Mary Goetz, Presid^^FO Brindisi Board of Directors Brindisi at Aviara Homeowner's Association November 12, 2006 Page 2 3. TM has been revised to reflect locations of public sewer and water lines. See TM sheet 1 details. Public Utility Easement have been revised as requested. 4. TM has been revised to reflect the typical locations of the water meter locations. See TM sheet 2 details. 5. The TM has been revised to show the location of the reclaimed water irrigation meter(s). 6. TM sheet 3 has a lotting detail which now reflects the Public Utility Easement along Pvt Dr "C". The Easement is also shown on Sheets 4 and 5, but for simplicity added to Sheet 3 as well. 7. The storm drain easement east of building 1 has now been eliminated as the storm drain is private and no easement is necessary. 8. The TM now reflects as storm filter vinit or approved equivalent and a note added to the TM. It is acknowledged that LID techniques shall be required as part of the review of the final engineering drawings. A note for LID's has been added to the Cover sheet of the TM as well. 9. The City's redlines are included with this resubmitted. Building 1. Comment acknowledged and accessible/adaptable units will be accommodated. Police 1. Comments acknowledged. Fire 1. Comment acknowledged. 2. TM revised as requested to move Fire hydrants to the north side of the street. 3. North side of street and auto courts will be marked as a Fire lane as requested. 4. The secondary gate is now an "out-only" gate. 5. Applicant has met with Fire Department. This building has been move 10' further fi'om the 60' fire zone (now 50'). 6. Redlines are include with a resubmitted package. David A Jacinto Carlsbad Poinsettia Land Carlsbad Poinsettia Land Company LLC 2834 La Mirada Drive, Vista, CA 92081 760 598-8988 fax 760 598-8288 September 25, 2009 Gillespie Moody Mr. Gary T. Barberio Assistant Planning Director City of Carlsbad \ : 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Re: Poinsettia Place, CT 04-lOA, SDP 04-07A, CP 04-05A r'Review Comments Response Letter GMP# 09-033-00 Dear Mr. Barberio: In response to the T' review comments for the above-referenced project, the following are our responses: Planning Review - Conceptual Review - Review - Chris Westman (8/3/09") Comment 3: No walls greater than 42 inches in height are allowed within twenty feet of the Poinsettia Lane right-of-way unless they are for noise attenuation purposes. Either provide evidence that the garden wall along the Poinsettia Lane right-of-way is necessary for noise attenuation or move the wall to twenty feet or more from the right-of-way. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; C2). Responses: The wall heights within 20' of the Poinsettia Lane right-of-way has been reduced to 42" in height. Comments: The project drive aisles include a minimal amount of decorative pavement which does not meet the intent of the Planned Development Ordinance. Additional decorative pavement must be included in the project drive aisles. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; C5). Response 5: We feel that the decorative paving provided meets the intent of the Planned Development Ordinance and that this design is consistent with the previously approved TM submittal. Comment 7: Illustrate how 75% of the recreational area is dedicated to active recreation. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; C9) Response 7: 75% of the recreational area is dedicated to active recreation due to the proximity to other outdoor use areas. The turf area adjacent to the tot lot provides a large space to run, kick or throw a ball as well as interpretive active play. The turf area east of the main entry is adjacent to a shuffleboard and BBQ area and accommodates both activities for parents and children. The www.gniplandarch.con CAUFORNIA 4125 Sorrento Valley Blvd. Suite D San Diego, California 92121 Tel 858 558 8977 Fax 858 558 9188 Mr. Gary T. Barberio City ofCarlsbad Poinsettia Place, CT 04-1 OA, SDP 04-07A, CP 04-05A 1 ^' Review Comments Response Letter GMP# 09-033-00 September 25, 2009 Page 2 of 7 remaining turrf areas around the project area designed to be large enough for kids to run around and play ball with friends and or pets and are adjacent to a looped walkway system intended to provide an exercise option for the residents. Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - T* Review - Michael Elliott (6/23/09) Comment 1: Please clearly show and label all property lines and easements on the plans. Insure no trees are located within easements. Response 1: All property lines and easements are shown. Comment 2: Please indicate the proposed quantities of each tree type.. Response 2: Quantities are shown on sheet 7. Comment 3: Please indicate the approximate quantities of shrubs. Response 3: Exact quantities cannot be shown until construction drawings are done. We have shown the areas where the plants will be used with notes indicating that all planting areas will be covered with shrubs to meet the City requirements. Sheets 4 & 5 depict enlargements of typical areas with shrub symbols shown to give a representation of what the final construction drawings will show. Comment 4: Please indicate the proposed ground covers to be used in each zone. Response 4: Groundcovers have been added to the planting legend on sheet 7. Comment 5: Please indicate the proposed plant sizes (either by number or percentage of the total quantity). 50% of the shrubs (except Response 5: Plant sizes are shown on sheet 7. Comment 6: Generally identify all existing woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over 12" in caliper diameter shall be identified on the plan individually as to caliper size and type and labeled to be retained or removed. Response 6: None are to remain and there are no trees over 12" in caliper diameter.. Comment 7: All planting areas shall be outlined as one of the four planting zones. Please indicate the planting zone for the two hydroseed mixes. Response 7: The hydroseed mixes are shown as part of zone 3. Mr. Gary T. Barberio City ofCarlsbad Poinsettia Place, CT 04-lOA, SDP 04-07A, CP 04-05A 1 ^' Review Comments Response Letter GMP# 09-033-00 September 25, 2009 Page 3 of 7 Comment 8: Show any bio-swales/detention basins or underground drainage collection systems (in or under planting areas that could impact the planting) and work these facilities into the design. Response 8: All facilities for water collection are shown and addressed appropriately with planting. Comment 9: Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shrubs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Landscaping shall be used to accentuate and enhance architecture. Additional mediimi to large scale trees are needed in locations as shown on the plans to soften building elevations. Please add trees as appropriate to meet these requirements. Response 9: Trees have been added to the plans where feasible. Many of the trees requested cannot be added due to the location of the Fire Protection Zones. Comment 10: Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. Landscape elements over 30" in height (including planting measured at maturity) are not allowed at street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' outward from the beginning of curves and end of curves. In addition to the requirement above, on collector streets and greater, Cal Trans Sight Distance Standards shall apply to the height restriction stated. Response 10: Vehicular sight lines are shown on the plans. Comment 11: Prunus does not perform exceptionally well in zones 23 and 24. It is recommended that the use of this tree be limited and a substitute be provided where large quantities are proposed. Response 11: Prunus has been removedfrom the legend. Comment 12: All utilities are to be screened. Landscape construction drawings will be required to show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Please also locate all light poles on the landscape plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. Response 12: Note has been added on sheet 7. Light poles are shown on the plan and trees are kept away from them. Comment 13: Please provide Pine background trees along Cassia Road to match the opposite side of the street in order to provide street scene continuity. Please also provide compatible shrubs and ground covers. Response 13: Pine background trees have been added along Cassia Road. Comment 14: Provide a minimum of one tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be planted on center or grouped. Please provide street, theme, support and median trees on Poinsettia Lane per the Landscape Manual Streetscape Program. The Mr. Gary T. Barberio September 25, 2009 City of Carlsbad Page 4 of 7 Poinsettia Place, CT 04-lOA, SDP 04-07A, CP 04-05A 1 ^' Review Comments Response Letter GMP# 09-033-00 specific trees creating a streetscape theme have been pre-selected by the City. Each theme shall be made up of four (4) types of trees: "Theme", "support", "Median", and "Project Identity/Accent Trees". (See Appendix C) Tree Type % of Total Streetscape Trees (includes street tree requirement plus adjacent setbacks) a. Median Island Trees N/A (These trees shall be installed as part of the required street improvements) b. Theme Trees 50% (These trees set the overall character of the streetscape and are located along the roadside but outside the right-of-way (See D.3-1.2-3) c. Support Trees 30% (These trees were selected to complement the theme tree. Select trees from those listed which fit the project site conditions.) d. Project Identify/Accent Trees 20% (These trees are not pre-selected, rather the applicant can choose the best tree for their project and submit it for City approval. See Appendix C for the required tree species to match existing trees to the northwest on Poinsettia Lane. Please also provide compatible shrubs and ground covers for street scene continuity. Response 14: The trees have been revised as requested. Total of 19 trees have been added, 9 (50%) - Magnolia grandiflora (Theme Tree), 6 (30%) - Brachychiton acerifolius (Support Tree), 4 (20%) - (Flowering Accent Trees). Comment 15: Please address median landscaping. The median layout shall be in conformance with the "Arterial Median Layout" (see Appendix C.2). Concrete color and pattem shall be as specified under "Arterial Streetscape Themes" (see Appendix Cl) and as approved by the Parks and Recreation Director. Trees and shmbs shall be as specified in the "Arterial Street Themes" (see Appendix Cl). Trees shall be 24" box minimum size; one or more per planter. Shrubs shall be 5 gallon minimum size. Shmb spacing shall be such that 100% coverage will occur within one year. Response 15: Plans are being submitted with the understanding that we are required to show the same improvements as per the previously approved TM submittal. The previous approval did not require median improvements. Comment 16: Locate street trees: Mr. Gary T. Barberio City of Carlsbad Poinsettia Place, CT 04-lOA, SDP 04-07A, CP 04-05A 1 ^' Review Comments Response Letter GMP# 09-033-00 September 25, 2009 Page 5 of 7 a. A minimum of 3' outside the public right-of-way. b. A minimum of 5' from paving. c. A minimum of 7' from any sewer line. d. Not in conflict with public utilities. e. Not to be allowed on street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25' from the beginning of curves and end of curves or within sight lines as described under "Sight Distance" above (See Appendix C.4). Response 16: Trees are shown as required and this note has been added to sheet 7. Comment 17: Plans are too conceptual to provide an appropriate review. Plan symbols reference many shrub types which differ in size and character. Please revise plans to either show where small versus medium versus large shmbs are to be used or provide typical detail sketches with appropriate notes to indicate where each size shmb is to be used. Response 17: Sheets 4 & 5 shown enlargements of the planting area with shrub locations depicted. A general hierarchy is established with the use of small to medium shrubs in the foreground and the large shrubs in the background. Comment 18: Please address landscaping of all areas within the property line. Response 18: Done. Comment 19: Please address landscaping of all graded areas both on-site and off-site. Response 19: Done. Comment 20: Trees shall be provided at the minimum rate of one per every four parking stalls. Trees pertaining to this requirement shall be located within the parking area, exclusive of parking lot setbacks. The trees shall be located in close proximity to the spaces they are to shade. Small landscape trees are not appropriate parking area trees. Please provide medium and large scale trees along the south side parking to provide for this requirement. Response 20: Trees have been added to the plans where feasible. Many of the trees requested cannot be added due to the location of the Fire Protection Zones. Comment 21: Planting or any combination of planting, mounding, and decorative walls shall be used to provide screening from adjacent property or streets of the parking area to a height of 3'. Response 21: Shrubs will be used to screen the parking areas. Mr. Gary T. Barberio City ofCarlsbad Poinsettia Place, CT 04-lOA, SDP 04-07A, CP 04-05A r' Review Comments Response Letter GMP# 09-033-00 September 25, 2009 Page 6 of 7 Comment 22: Landscaping consisting of ground cover, shmbs, and trees shall be used to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. Landscaping shall be used to accentuate and enhance architecture. Please provide a detail of the proposed plantings at the face of the garages. These plantings need to include appropriate height plants that will soften these elevations (i.e. vines on trellises, tall shrubs, etc.). If vines are to be used, please provide a detail of the trellis. Response 22: Plans have a note added that a tall vertical shrub will be used at the faces of garages. Comment 23: Please provide a colored plan showing proposed potable and recycled water use areas. Recycled water appears to be available and should be used. Projects must be designed to utilize reclaimed water and/or other altemative non-potable water sources for landscaping to the satisfaction of the City. When received, the plan will be forwarded to Public Works Maintenance and Operations for review. Response 23: Se sheet 10. Comment 24: Landscape design shall include water conservation as a primary criterion. There is a very high percentage of zone 1 plantings proposed. It is recommended that this percentage be reduced by at least half. Please review. Response 24: Plant palette has been revised to eliminate high water use plantings. All plantings used Jit within zone 2 requirements. Comment 25: Per the water conservation section of the manual (C.3-4.6), woody shmbs must be planted over herbaceous groundcover to cover 60% of the groundcover area at maturity. Please address. Response 25: Note has been added to the plans, sheet 7. Comment 26: Please identify the pilaster and cap materials and coordinate with other pilasters. Response 26: Done, sheet 6. Comment 27: Where does this fence end? Response 27: Fence ends at property line. Comment 28: Please fully address slope plantings per the Landscape Manual slope revegetation requirements on the plans. Clearly show/address how each standard will be met. Response 28: Notes are on sheet 2. Mr. Gary T. Barberio ^ September 25,2009 City of Carlsbad Page 7 of 7 Poinsettia Place, CT 04-lOA, SDP 04-07A, CP 04-05A 1 ^' Review Comments Response Letter GMP# 09-033-00 Comment 29: Plant materials used on slopes shall be those species that are known to have low water requirements and rooting systems of various depths that will minimize erosion and soil slippage. Please address. Response 29: Plantings chosen on legend provide such protection. Comment 30: Plant materials used on slopes shall be compatible in cultural requirements and aesthetic appearance to adjacent natural landscapes. Response 30: Plantings chosen are native species and are compatible with natural slopes. Comment 31: Jute mesh is no longer allowed per the Engineering Department. Please revise to reinforced straw mat. Response 31: Revised to reinforced straw mat on sheet 2. Comment 32: Please provide a fire protection plan per the Landscape Manual and address all requirements. Please revise plant list and hydroseed mix as appropriate eliminating any high fuel species in appropriate zones (i.e. Acacia, Rosmarinus, etc. are high fuel species). Response 32: Done, sheet 8 & 9. Comment 33: RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all revised plans (concept, water conservation, fire protection, and colored water use plan) on the next submittal. Response 33: Done. This response letter and the attached revised plans are being resubmitted to the City of Carlsbad to address the above review comments. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions or require additional information for this project. Sincerely, Gillespie Moody Patterson, Inc. Erofa Streza /J Senior Project Manager H:\09-PROJECTS\09.033-00\Landarch\Admin\l st Plan Review Comments 09-25-09.doc film City of Carlsbad Planning Department August 3, 2009 Dave Jacinto Sierra Linda Development 219 Meadow Vista Way Encinitas, CA 92024 SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05(A)/SDP 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A) - POINSETTIA PLACE Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Tentative Map, Condominium Permit, Site Development Plan, and Coastal Development Permit applications no. CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05(A)/SDP 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A), as to their completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic Information required for the application. The project has been reviewed relative to the most recently amended Planned Development Ordinance standards. Based on this review various design issues exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Department will begin processing your application as ofthe date of this communication. At this time, the City asks that you provide ten (10) complete sets ofthe development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss this letter or your application, please contact your staff planner Christer Westman at the phone number listed below. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Planning Department comments: Christer Westman, Senior, at (760) 602-4614. • Engineering Department comments: Steve Bobbett, Associate Engineer - Engineering Development Services, at (760) 602-2747. • Fire Department comments: James Wiegand, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. Sincerely, 'I A GARY T. BARBERIO Assistant Planning Director GTB:CW:lt c: Hofman Planning and Engineering, 3152 Lions Head Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92010 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05(A)/^ 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A) - POINSEI^ PVACE August 3, 2009 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. The project site includes two parcels, each of which has a different General Plan land use designation. The first 1.2 acre parcel has a Residential High Density (RH) designation which will allow for 23 units at the Growth Management Control Point (GMPC) of 19 Dwelling Units Per Acre. The second 5.38 acre parcel has a Residential Medium-High Density (RMH) designation which will allow for 61 units at a GMPC of 11.5 dwelling units per acre. The two properties together will allow up to 84 dwelling units with the application of the GMPC for each parcel. Since the site plan does not follow the parcel line between the two properties, in order for the project density to be consistent with the General Plan, an average of the two parcels must be used for the overall project density calculation. In addition, the application Includes the consolidation of the 1.2 acre and 5.38 acre lots. Consolidation of the lots or relocation of the lot line is necessary because the revised site plan shows buildings located on the existing parcel line. However, this action creates a single lot with two defined General Plan Land Use designations which is not allowed by the City. The Planned Development Ordinance states "When two or more general plan land use designations exist within a planned development, the density may be transferred from one general plan designation to another with a general plan amendment. Therefore, a General Plan and a Local Coastal Program amendment will be required. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; Cl) Staff will be happy to meet with you to discuss the project and alternatives to the proposal which will eliminate the need for both the General Plan and Local Costal Program amendments. In addition, please be aware that any project redesign will need to be checked for consistency with the City's Habitat Management Plan (HMP) 2. Please complete the Planned Development Ordinance Tables C and E. Electronic versions are available form your staff Planner. 3. No walls greater than 42 inches In height are allowed within twenty feet of the Poinsettia Lane right-of-way unless they are required for noise attenuation purposes. Either provide evidence that the garden wall along the Poinsettia Lane right-of-way is necessary for noise attenuation or move the wall to twenty feet or more from the right-of-way. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; C2) 4. No more than 24 dwelling units may be located along a single entry drive-aisle. Solutions to this issue and alternatives to the proposed design may be discussed with Planning and Fire Inspections staff. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; C5) 5. The project drive aisles include a minimal amount of decorative pavement which does not meet the Intent of the Planned Development Ordinance. Additional decorative pavement must be included in the project drive aisles. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; C5) 6. Seven of the parallel parking stalls proposed along Private Drive Aisle C do not meet the minimum required length. Parallel parking stalls must be 24 feet In length unless they are adjacent to driveway aprons, then they may be 20 feet in length. The site plan includes several 20 foot long spaces that are adjacent to raised curb "bump-outs"; however they must be 24 feet In length. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; C7) 7. Illustrate how 75% of the recreational area is dedicated to active recreation. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table C; 09) CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05(A)/d^ 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A) - POINSETH PLACE August 3, 2009 Page 3 8. All required private outdoor patios/decks/balconies must have a minimum dimension of six feet and a total area of at least 60 square feet. The stacked flat unit balconies have a depth dimension of only 5.5 feet and the townhouse model #1 patios have a depth dimension of only 5 feet. Please revise the design of the balconies and patios to achieve the minimum 6 foot dimension. (Planned Developments CMC Section 21.45.060 Table E; E8) 9. Please revise the plan cover sheet to reflect the current General Plan and Zoning land use designations. 10. The project proposal must meet the requirements of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, whether through the provision of onsite income restricted units or through the purchase of affordable housing credits, which will require review and recommendation by the Housing Policy Team. Engineering: 1. Demonstrate non-emergency truck turn around movement on Private Drive "C", east of Private Drive "B". 2. Project is conditioned to construct full improvements for onsite Poinsettia Lane. Revise sheet 4 to reflect this. 3. Please show the location of any proposed public water and sewer lines within the driveway area of each building. The sewer location shown on the Typical Drainage Detail, Sheet 2 does not match with the sewer manhole locations shown on sheets 4 and 5. Extend public utility easements as necessary. 4. Show the typical location of the water service and separate water meter for each separately owned unit. As an alternative, submit a letter. Attention: Director of Public Works, requesting that one service connection and one master meter be provided for each building. All requests are considered on a case by case basis. See sections of CMWD Ordinance 45 attached to redlined prints for reference. 5. Show the location of the reclaimed water irrigation meter(s). 6. Clarify the location, width, and extent of the public utility easement along Private Drive "C". 7. Identify the beneficiary of the proposed storm drain easement east of building 1. Unless there is public water in the storm drain, no easement should be required. 8. The 'water quality unit' east of building 1 Is no longer an acceptable BMP. Please propose alternative water quality measures. This project will be conditioned to, and final design drawings must comply with the following: Developer shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) design techniques, on all final design plans submitted to the City, to reduce the amount of run-off by mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site by preserving natural open-spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing impervious surfaces, promoting infiltration and evaporation of run-off before run-off leaves the site. Developer shall incorporate LID techniques using current County of San Diego Low Impact Development Handbook (Storm water Management Strategies). LID techniques include, but are not limited to: vegetated CT 04-10(A)/CP 04-05(A)/d© 04-07(A)/CDP 04-23(A) - POINSET^ PLACE August 3, 2009 Page 4 swale/strip, rain gardens, and porous pavement, which can greatly reduce the volume, peak flow rate, velocity and pollutants. Developer shall submit documentation, subject to City Engineer approval, demonstrating how this project complies with Interim Hydromodification requirements per the City's SUSMP, latest version. Documentation shall be included within the Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP). 9. Please review additional redlined comments on the enclosed copy of the tentative map and return with the next submittal. Building: 1. Please review the requirements for accessible/adaptable units per Section 1104A.1 of the California Building Code. Police: 1. Attached is a list of recommendations from the Carlsbad Police Department's Crime Prevention Unit. Please review and incorporate the methods wherever possible. Landscape: 1. Attached is a list of comments specifically for the conceptual landscape plan. Please address the comments and return the redlines with the resubmittal. Fire: 1. Fire Department turn-around must be unobstructed. 2. Fire hydrants shall be provided on the north side of the street. 3. The north side of the street and auto-courts will be marked as a fire lane. 4. Move the secondary access gate so that there enough space to pull a fire truck off of the street and the gate needs opticon and knox switches. 5. Any structures within 40 feet of the open space preserve may require 20 feet of thinning within the 60 foot fire buffer. Please contact your staff Fire Inspector to discuss alternatives to thinning in the fire buffer. 6. Refer to the redline plans. Please return the redline plans with the next formal project submittal. FILE COPY Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION December 17, 2009 Sierra Linda Development 219 Meadow Vista Way Encinitas, CA 92024 SUBJECT: CT 04-10(A)/ CP 04-05(A)/ SDP 04-07(A)/ CDP 04-23(A) - POINSETTIA PLACE At the Planning Commission meeting of December 16, 2009, your application was considered. The Commission voted 7-0-0 to RECOMMEND APPROVAU RECOMMEND RESCISSION. The decision of the Planning Commission is advisory and will be forwarded to the City Council. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. Sincerely, DON NEU Planning Director DN:CW:lt cc: Data Entry File Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolution No. 6650, 6651, 6652, 6653 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carisbad.ca.us PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 CCP.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and vvUich nevvspapei-s have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not In any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: December 04*, 2009 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Escondido, California On this 04"\ day of Decernb^t7^09 Jane Airshouse NORTH COUNTY TIMES Legal Advertising NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be affected, that ttie Planning Commission of tfie Citv of Carlsbad will hold a public hear- i ing at the Council Chambers, ,1200 carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 16, 2009, to consider the follpwing; mp 02-03(BVCT 09-01/SDP 09-01/PUD p9-pi - BOBERT-• . .. ^ Tiequest tor a recommendation ot adoption ot a Mitigaieo 5Iegative ueclaTalion and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Adden-dum: a recommendation of approval lor a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Master Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map, and Site Develooment Plan, and a re-quest for approval of a Non-Residential Planned Development Permit to allow for the subdivision of a 10.07 acre site into four lots with 49 airspace condominium ofTice units and the development of a 66,000 square foot three-story office building and pennanent RV storage area on property generally located south of Cannon Road, east of El Camino Real, at the southeast comer oi the intersection of Wind Trail Way and Can-non Road, within the Robertson Ranch Master Plan, Planning Area 22 and the 'Option Parcel,'in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. . The Planning Director has determined that the project will not result in potentially sig-nificant impacts and has issued a Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mitigated Negative Dedaratidn for &?i?'ll<^mCPA'04-T1/ZC d4-08/CT '04-fCi/CP 04-05/SDP 04-07/CDP 04-23 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration adequately described the project for the purposes of CEQA and a recommendation of approval of amendments (o a previously approved Tentative Tract Map CT 04-10, Condominium Permit CP 04-05, Site Development Permit SDP 04-07, and Coastal Development Permit CDP 04-23 to subdivide 20.4 acres Into 82 airspace condominium units on property generally located-southeast of the Intersection of Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane in fie Mello 11 segment of the Local Coastal Program and In Local Facilities Management Zone 21. The proposed revisions to the Poinsettia Place project are such that they do hot alter Ihe findings made with the original project and a determination has been made that the project is within tha scope of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. This project is not located within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. V7' / 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 31SDP09-03/CDP 08-25 - DATE BLUFFS BEACH HOMES - Request for approval of a site uevelopment h'lan and a coastal ueveiopment permit tb demolish an existing single-family residence and to allow for the development of a three-unit detached single-family residential air-space condominium project on a .469 gross acre infill site generally located on. the north side of Date Avenue and east of Garfield Street, in Local Facilities Management Zorie 1. . ^ ' , ' ^ The project Is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. This project is not located within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. I If you challenge these projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to. the City of Carlsbad at oc.prior to the public hearing. Copies of the environmental documents are available at the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue during regular business hours from 7:30 am to 5:30 pm Monday through Thursday and 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Friday. Those persons wishing to speak on these proposals are cordially invited to attend the •jublic hearing. Copies of the staff reports will be available online at ht .p://www:carlsbadca.gov/pdfdoG.html?pid=295 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. PUBLlStH: December 4, 2009 NCT 2240201 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT fp Fif copy City of Carlsbad Planning Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 16, 2009, to consider a request for the following: CASE NAME: PUBLISH DATE: CT 04-10(A)/ CP 04-05(A)/ SDP 04-07(A)/ CDP 04-23(A) - Poinsettia Place December 4, 2009 DESCRIPTION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for GPA 04-12/LCPA 04-11/ZC 04-08/CT 04- 10/CP 04-05/SDP 04-07/CDP 04-23 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration adequately described the project for the purposes of CEQA and a recommendation of approval of amendments to a previously approved Tentative Tract Map CT 04-10, Condominium Permit CP 04-05, Site Development Permit SDP 04-07, and Coastal Development Permit CDP 04-23 to subdivide 20.4 acres into 82 airspace condominium units on property generally located southeast ofthe intersection of Cassia Road and Poinsettia Lane in the Mello II segment ofthe Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 21. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the staff report will be available online at http://www.carlsbadca.gov/planning/pcvideo.html on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Christer Westman in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4614, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects. If approved. Is established by State law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. • Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. • Coastal Commission Appealable Project: ^ This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area. ^ Application deemed complete: 08/03/2009 Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission Is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ® SITEMAP NOT TO SCALE POINSETTIA PLACE CT 04-10(A) / CP 04-05(A) / SDP 04-07(A) CDP 04-23(A) OCCUPANT 6400 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6610 AMBROSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1715CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1707 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1703 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6471 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6463 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1702 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1706 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1710,CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1714 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1729 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1765 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1752 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1760 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1782 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1794 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 1793 CALLISIA CT CARLSBADCA 92011 OCCUPANT 1777 CALLISIA CT CARLSBADCA 92011 OCCUPANT 1778 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6359 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6373 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6390 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6396 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 OCCUPANT 6398 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ACACIA INVESTORS LLC UNIT 200 1650 HOTEL CIR N SAN DIEGO CA 92108 MANZANITA PARTNERS LLC UNIT 100 3990 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 SSR WESTERN MULTI UNIT 310 3645 RUFFIN RD SAN DIEGO CA 92123 OLEG TANCHUK UNIT 282 3511 CAMINITO EL RINCON SAN DIEGO CA 92130 GEORGE F SHOWAH 1711 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBADCA 92011 STANLEY PEDERSEN 10735 RIVENDELLAVE LAS VEGAS NV 89135 GORO FUJIWARA 724 W HOWELL AVE RIDGECREST CA 93555 SRI NI VAS SARMA 6475 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 KRISTINE A ROLAND 1546 AVENIDA LA POSTA ENCINITAS CA 92024 ERIC ROSS 6467 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 LEKVEN PO BOX 9615 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 MICHAEL & SUSAN DEBBAS 6459 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 SHARON L RODAK 6455 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DOUGLAS HAIRABEDIAN 6451 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 . NICK MATSUKEVICH 6447 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ZEMON 1015 MUIR WAY BELMONT CA 94002 OCONNOR 1706 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 FRANCIS KATTUS 1710 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 PAUL E SMITH 20065 N TEALSTONE DR SURPRISE AZ 85374 DANIEL SWIGER 1726 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 GARY H REYNOLDS 1730 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 JO C MURPHY 1734 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DONALD I DEITCH 1738 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DUK & CLARA HAN 6458 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 MAXIM KHRUSTINSKIY 6462 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 NAIDA L MALCHIODI 6466 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 CARMINE TARANTINO 6470 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 TIMOTHY J INNES 1741 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROLAND MINK 1737 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 STEPHEN R CANTER 1733 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 STEPHEN R STEWART 10947 VENICE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034 PATSY HO UNIT 201 4751 WILSHIRE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90010 ROBERT K YOUNG 1761 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROBERT MCCALL 1757 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 L EDMISTON 1753 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 JUDITH B DUNHAM 6477 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 JEAN C SARGIS 6473 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROBERT O & LEAH KOENIG 6469 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 MILO J & ELLEN HALLACK 6465 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 RILEY UNIT 104 7040 AVENIDA EUCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92011 MARILYN BILLINGS 1756 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 EDWARD COTTER 1465 LAUREN CT ENCINITAS CA 92024 ANNAVEDDER 1764 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 107 2385 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBADCA 92011 " POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 224 6725 MESA RIDGE RD SAN DIEGO CA 92121 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 224 6725 MESA SAN D\EGi>CA 92121 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA^ UNIT 224 6725 MESA RiDGE RD SAN DIEJGO^A 92121 CAROL J CRAVEN 7114 LANTANA TER CARLSBAD CA 92011 LEWIS M ELTING 1786 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 JUDITH A SEGERSON 1790 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 PAUL SAVIGNANO 917 23RDAVE EASTMOLINE IL 61244 JAMES P MENDOZA 1801 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROBERT D CULVER 1797 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 DARRELL HOLT 1309 SHOREBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 GREEN 1789 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 WILLIAM A ISAACS 1785 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 THOMAS F HANCHETT 1781 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 HAYEDEH TAGHAVI 27 TEAK BRG IRVINE CA 92620 ERB 1773 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 KRISTIN KAIELLO 1769 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 ANNE M MARTIN 1766 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 BARBARA R SMITH 1770 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 SEAN SCHULZE 1774 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 BRADLEY A POULOS 625 LANCASHIRE PL SAN MARCOS CA 92069 MEADOW VISTA HOLDINGS 219 MEADOW VISTA WAY ENCINITAS CA 92024 DAVID E SHARAK 6355 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 BARBARA J LEVENTHAL 6357 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 FORNEY PO BOX 64 LINCOLNVILLE ME 4849 KATHRYN ADEEB 6361 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 KEVIN SUN 6363 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 PATRICIA A KAUFMAN 6365 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 BEDELL 6334 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROSALIE DOSTAL 6336 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 WILLIAM CARROLL 6338 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 NANCY R HALEY 6369 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 LESTED 6371 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 KRAUSS UNIT 413 4729 E SUNRISE DR TUCSON AZ 85718 RICHARD LILLEY 6377 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 WARD 6379 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 MORGAN 6381 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 PAMELA J GIVENS 6383 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 SHARON J DEERING 6385 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROSS FOCKLER 6387 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 RANDAL B HOPWOOD PO BOX 230383 ENCINITAS CA 92023 JOHN BROWN 6392 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 WILLIAM S SHAYMAN 6394 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 SCOTT MORROW 26 CALLE MATTIS SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 NEAL R HOSS 5553 COYOTE CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 DARRELL HOLT 1309 SHOREBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ACACIA INVESTORS LLC UNIT 200 1650 HOTEL Ci SAN DIEGCrdA 92108 MANZANITA PARTNERS UNIT 100 3990 RUFFU SAN DiedOCA 92123 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 107 2385 CAMIN^VtDA ROBLE CARLSBADCA 92011 CITY OF CARLSBAI CITY OF CARLSBAD^ POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA^ UNIT 107 2385 CAMINp-VtDA ROBLE CARLSBAt5CA 92011 MANZANITA PARTNERS L UNIT 100 3990 RUFFIN SAN DIEG<rCA 92123 SSR WESTERN MULTI UNIT 310 3645 RUFFIN SAN DIEGO^A 92123 HOWARD HERRERA 6416 .GADWALL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 DIANA L KILLIAN 6420 GADWALL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 SARAH E STEKLOV 4735 PANORAMA DR SAN DIEGO CA 92116 STEPHEN N & HAEJA SPITZER 6428 GADWALL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 VACLAV &VERASOURADA 6106 BLUFFDALE CT CLIFTON VA 20124 CHOI 7029 CRYSTALLINE DR CARLSBADCA 92011 . CARYN N ROSEN 6419 GADWALL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 JEHU & ANNA ROBISON 6415 GADWALL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 GRANT W & BRENDA LOHR 6400 CROSSBILL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 NAHID KASRA 6404 CROSSBILL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 FRED C & SANDRA SANDQUIST 6408 CROSSBILL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 DANIEL J CAIN 6412 CROSSBILL CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 JOANNE T MIRDAS 1700 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROBERT C SIMMONS 1704 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 COLLETTE R NICOLETTI 1708 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ERIC J & MARCIA FOURNIER 1712 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 MELANIE A BERNARDINI 6419 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 MARK J BUA 6415 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 TANG-ZHANG 6411 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 KYE Z DOWNEY 6407 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 LINDSAY N MONGE 1748 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 ARKADY & IRENE LEVITANSKY 1752 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 RICHARD J POMMER 1756 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 RAGHUPATI B IYER 1760 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 SATYEN A PANDHARE 1764 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 KAREN NAMY 1768 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 JOHN MCCARTHY 1772 VERDIN CT CARLSBADCA 92011 CARNEY 1776 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 MICHAEL & MICHELLE ENGEN 1761 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 KRISTIN & JOANNE WILMES 6447 RUBY WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 CRAIG S DUCK 1753 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 KIMBERLY A GOODMAN 1749 VERDIN CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HO/ UNIT 107 2385 CAMINQMDA ROBLE CARLSBABTCA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 224 6725 MESARIDGE'RD SAN DJE-GOCA 92121 GREENIG 1743 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 224 6725 MESA Rl[ SAN DIEGO^ 92121 SHARI L ALLISON 1739 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 KEITH A & MARI NICHOLS 1735 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 LEACHMAN 1731 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 MICHAEL YAMAMOTO 1727 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 MERCEDES L SETON 1723 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 COGBILL 1719 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 LOUIS S & MICHELLE MAYBAUM 1715 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 BHARAT & MEERA KAMDAR 2722 ASCOT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92009 YAMAGATA 1720 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 JANET G PRICE 1724 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 CLIFFORD & BECKY KAHN 1728 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 NICHOLAS & AMANDA VALENZUELA 1732 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DEVREKER 2940 HAWKRIDGE DR LA CRESCENTA CA 91214 JAMES V WALSH 1740 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 PEDRO ARELLANO 1744 BLUEBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 SREENIVAS R KATAREY 6406 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 CHERYL MAST 6410 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 ALLISON A PICO 6414 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 MEHTA 6418 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 OLEG TANCHUK UNIT 282 3511 CAMINITO SAN D\EGS>aC92^30 GORO FUJIWARA 724 W HOWELL - RIDGECREST-CA 93555 GEORGE F SHOWAH 1711 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CI SRINIVAS SARMA 6475 KINGBIRD Li CARLSBAC STANLEY K & DIANA PEDESSEN 10735 RIVENDELL LAS VEGAS WVWl 35 KRISTINE A ROLAND 1546 AVENIDA LA ENCINITAS ERIC ROSS 6467 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD Cl SHARON L RODAK 6455 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD C^^^ll LEKVEN PO BOX 9615 RANCHO SAN CA 92067 DOUGLAS & NANCY HAIRABEDIAN 6451 KINGBIRBXN CARLSBAdCA 920ll MICHAEL & SUSAN DEBBAS 6459 KINGBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 NICK & KAREN MATSUKEVi 6447 KINGBIRD Lr CARLSBADJGA-S2011 ZEMON 1015 MUIR WAY BELMONT OCONNOR 1706 CAMASSIA CARLSBA FRANCIS D & SHARON KAI 1710 CAMASSIA U CARLSBADJSA^11 PAUL E SMITH 20065 N TEALSTONE SURPRISE AZ.8S57^" MARK A LULU 7405 PELICAN ST CARLSBAD CA 92011 MONROE PO BOX 676026 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 WILLIAM T KALLOP PO BOX 4780 JACKSON WY 83001 HOLLISTER 1701 CARISSA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 WILLIAM E & JANICE LOWRIE 6443 KIWI PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 TAYLOR 6439 KIWI PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 SHARON A FREED 6435 KIWI PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 TAMBURINI-IBARRA 6431 KIWI PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 RYAN R & JULIE BLANCHARD 1700 CARISSA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 DOROTHY J WHITE 4688 SUN VALLEY RD DEL MAR CA 92014 RONALD A GREAUX 1708 CARISSA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 SILVER REAL ESTATE PARTNERS 1712 CARISSA WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA^ UNIT 107 2385 CAMINpjwTOA ROBLE CARLSBADXA 92011 DANIEL R & FRANCES SWIGER 1726 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 GARY H REYNOLDS 1730 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 JO C MURPHY 1734 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DONALD I DEITCH 1738 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DUK & CLARA HAN 6458 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 MAXIM KHRUSTINSKIY 6462 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 NAIDA L MALCHIODI 6466 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 CARMINE C & CONSTANCE TARANTINO 6470 FICUS PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 TIMOTHY J INNES 1741 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROLAND MINK 1737 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 STEPHEN R CANTER 1733 CAMASSIA LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 STEPHEN R STEWART 10947 VENICE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90034 SAMONS 1750 NOLINA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 HARNEK S & GENEVIEVE BRAR 19502 WOODLANDS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 JUDY VANDIVORT 1763 NOLINA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 HERRINGTON 1759 NOLINA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 LORRAINE FROMSON 1755 NOLINA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 GROSS 1751 NOLINA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 BARBARA L ARTMAN 6457 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 HANSEN FAMILY 6453 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 LINDIA RIVERS 6449 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DOUGLAS M & SHIRLEY GUDMUNDSON 6445 BLUEGRASS LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 PATSY HO UNIT 201 4751 WILSHIRE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90010 ROBERT K YOUNG 1761 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROBERT MCCALL 1757 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 L EDMISTON 1753 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 JUDITH B DUNHAM 6477 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 JEAN C SARGIS 6473 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROBERT O & LEAH KOENIG 6469 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 MILO J & ELLEN HALLACK 6465 CALTHA PL CARLSBAD CA 92011 RILEY UNIT 104 7040 AVENIDA EUCINAS CARLSBAD CA 92011 MARILYN BILLINGS 1756 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 EDWARD J & EVELYN COTTER 1465 LAUREN CT ENCINITAS CA 92024 ANNAVEDDER 1764 VESPER LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA- UNIT 224 6725 MESA^IDGE RD SAN DI^6t5CA 92121 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 107 2385 CAMINO VIDA-ROBLE CARLSB^D<r?C92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS Hi UNIT 224 6725 MES^^^GE RD SAN^DteOOCA 92121 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA. UNIT 107 2385 CAMINOyiDA ROBLE CARLSBAD^ 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA. UNIT 107 ^--"'"^ 2385 CAMINOyfDAROBLE CARLSBAD^ 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 224 6725 MESA SAN DIEGO^JA 92121 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HO/ UNIT 224 6725 MESA^IDGE RD SAN DlEGdCA 92121 ROBERT TREED 6430 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA^ UNIT 107 2385 CAMIN93/rDA ROBIE CARLSBA0^ 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA UNIT 107 2385 CAMINAVtDA ROBLE CARLSBAlSCA 92011 POINSETTIA HEIGHTS HOA. UNIT 224 6725 MESARiDGE RD SAN DtEtoOCA 92121 JOHN SANTHOFF 6434 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 JEAN M TOBIN 6438 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 GERALD & PATRICIA HAGAN 6442 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 DARRELL E & CHARLENE HOLT 1309 SHOREBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 JEFFREY C & MOON WATERBURY 6450 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 REZA MAHASSENI 6454 KINGLET WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 CATHY HERSCH 1743 PIPIT CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 HOGAN 1739 PIPIT CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 SUZANNE L BECKSTROM 1735 PIPIT CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 ELLENA 1731 PIPIT CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 VICTORIA HOWELL 1738 PIPIT CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 WAINFORD 1742 PIPIT CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 RAYMOND SULITEANU 6445 LILIUM LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 KIM K HEARN 6441 LILIUM LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 KENNETH P BACKES 6437 LILIUM LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 PBRAO 24040 SPALDING AVE LOS ALTOS CA 94024 JEFFREY & CANDY CARNEY 6426 LILIUM LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 MASSIMILIANO & ELENA DIVENTRA 7026 CINNAMON TEAL ST CARLSBADCA 92011 DOUGLAS B & LISA WHITE 6434 LILIUM LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DOUGLAS A & CHRISTINE EVANS 7125 MOORING HEIGHTS CT SE GRAND RAPIDS Ml 49546 SUSAN JOHNSON 6442 LILIUM LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 MICHELE A WEISS 1323,CALLE SCOTT ENCINITAS CA 92024 JOSEPH R & MARIAN STEINER 1785 NERINE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 NINA DODSON 1781 NERINE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 GODDARD 1777 NERINE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 DONALD D & DIANA DEXTER 2720 RYAN RD CONCORD CA 94518 K & S LEE 1769 NERINE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 MATTHEWS 1765 NERINE WAY CARLSBAD CA 92011 CAROL J CRAVEN 7114 LANTANA TER CARLSBAD CA 92011 LEWIS M ELTING 1786 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 JUDITH A SEGERSON 1790 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 PAUL V & JILANE SAVIGNANO 917 23RD AVE EAST MOLINE IL 61244 JAMES P MENDOZA 1801 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROBERT D CULVER 1797 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 DARRELL & CHARLENE HOLT 1309 SHOREBIRD LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 GREEN 1789 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 WILLIAM A ISAACS 1785 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 THOMAS F HANCHETT 1781 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 HAYEDEH TAGHAVI 27 TEAK BRG IRVINE CA 92620 ERB 1773 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 KRISTIN KAIELLO 1769 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 ANNE M MARTIN 1766 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 BARBARA R SMITH 1770 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 SEAN SCHULZE 1774 CALLISIA CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 BRADLEY A POULOS 625 LANCASHIRE PL SAN MARCOS CA 92069 BRINDISI AT AVIARA PREMIER 1935 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD CA 92008 BRINDISI AT AVIARA PREMIER 9610WAPLES ST SAN DIEGO CA 92121 GLENDA MACREADY 6319 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 MAX H & DIANE ANDERSON 6321 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 SCOTT M & KIMBERLY HALL UNIT 300 701 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD CARLSBAD CA 92011 KATHRYN L MUSSO 6327 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 GARY D & MARTHA BADER 6329,ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 WAYNE &MARYGIFFORD 6331 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 MARY GOETZ 6341 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 DAVID &TERA DENIAL 6343 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 STEVEN E SIPE 6345 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ALLYSON R MAURER 6347 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 JOSEPH V & OKSANA HIRNIAK 6349 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 PAUL G CLOWMINZER 6351 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 COLLEEN G REAGAN 6403 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 DEREK & SUSAN NOBLE 6405 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 DIANNE S CHRISMAN 6407 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 REBECCA BATTERSON 6409 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 CYNTHIA G CACHUELA 6411 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 GARY E & CORINNA VANETSKY 6413 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 DIANE F FABIANO 6417 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ANDREW L & SUSAN MOSES 6491 DEERBROOK RD OAK PARK CA 91377 Jl YU 6421 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 SANDRA M BARTELS 6423 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 STANLEY T & RAOME MIKUTA 1319 SAVANNAH LN CARLSBAD CA 92011 DREW E HYATT 6427 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ZACHARY R & MARY MCCALEB 6481 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ALTUNGY MARCHAL UNIT 1550 701 BRICKELL AVE MIAMI FL 33131 SCHER 132 CRESCENT AVE PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 DENTON 550 TORREY POINT RD DEL MARCA 92014 JASON S & JOANNE HAEUSSINGER 6491 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 MARIE MANDROIAN 6493 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 JOHN W STEPP 6495 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 ARIC & DANA STARCK 6497 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 STORMY & ELIZABETH HICKS 6499 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 JARED SIMONS 3311 CAMINITO CABO VIEJO DEL MAR CA 92014 MEADOW VISTA HOLDINGS LLC 219 MEADOW VISTA WAY ENCINITAS CA 92024 DAVID E SHARAK 6355 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 BARBARA J LEVENTHAL 6357 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 FORNEY PO BOX 64 LINCOLNVILLE ME 4849 KATHRYN ADEEB 6361 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 KEVIN SUN 6363 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 PATRICIA A KAUFMAN 6365 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 BEDELL 6334 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROSALIE DOSTAL 6336 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 WILLIAM R & CAROL CARROLL 6338 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 NANCY R HALEY 6369 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 LESTED 6371 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 KRAUSS UNIT 413 4729 E SUNRISE DR TUCSON AZ 85718 RICHARD LILLEY 6377 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 WARD 6379 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 MORGAN 6381 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 PAMELA J GIVENS 6383 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 SHARON J DEERING 6385 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROSS A & GRACE FOCKLER 6387 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 RANDAL B HOPWOOD PO BOX 230383 ENCINITAS CA 92023 JOHN BROWN 6392 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 WILLIAM S SHAYMAN 6394 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 SCOTT MORROW 26 CALLE MATTIS SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 NEAL R HOSS 5553 COYOTE CT CARLSBAD CA 92010 DARRELL E & CHARLENE HOLT 1309 SHOREBIRD LN CARLSBADCA 92011 RILEY CAPITAL LLC PO BOX 807 SOLANA BEACH CA 92075 KIMBERLY A AKERS 6303 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBADCA 92011 MIKSA 6305 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 CHRISTOPHER L MASS 10525 TENNESSEE AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90064 JOSEPH YU 5233 BRICKFIELD LN SAN DIEGO CA 92130 HEATHER AMBLER UNIT 626 2005 COSTA DEL MAR RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 ELEANOR L FITZGERALD 6437 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 STEVEN R & KAREN WIRRIG 6439 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 SUSAN J MALONE 6441 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 LINDA M FANNING UNIT 318 225 THE CROSSROADS CARMEL CA 93923 JOHN P & JULIE DAVIS 6446 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 . DENISE M SCALZO 6448 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 LESLIE S MAYO 6450 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 JIMMY MALGET 6452 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 EVEREKLIAN 6454 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 LAURA TADDEI 1660 PRESTWICK CT SAN MARCOS CA 92069 BIDWELL 6309 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 EDWARD W & JEAN STERNAGLE 2668 GARDEN HOUSE RD CARLSBAD CA 92009 SANDRA C MARTIN 444 LAKE WABASSO CT SHOREVIEWMN 55126 JOHNSON 6315 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ANDREW & JULIE BEDELL 6317 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 JACQUELINE J MATZAT 6457 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 DEBORAH E WEST 6459 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 ROGER POWELL 6461 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 RONALD L & DONNA FALLER 6463 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 GERALD J CWYNAR 6465 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 A TZAFEROS 6467 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 MARK & LAUREL EICHKORN 2640 WYNNCREST RIDGE DR CHESTERFIELD MO 63005 BERG 6472 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 TIM L FRIGON 6474 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 MARILYN J GRAF 6476 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 LINDHOLM PO BOX 482 MOUNT HERMON CA 95041 SIEGLINDE MERWIN 6480 ALEXANDRI CIR CARLSBAD CA 92011 Califomia Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 SD County Dept. of Planning Suite B 5201 Ruffin Rd. San Diego, CA 92123 !:otice has been mailed to &i! property owners/'occupi.nts listed herein. Oate; Ap.^.n? Signature: /rr U.S. Postal Service™ CERTIFIED MAIL™ RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage P dec For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.como F F I C I A L Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Postmarl< Here Sent To 'Streei,'A'pt'l< orPOBoxN City, state, Z Califomia Coastal Commission Attn: Toni Ross Suite 103 7575 Metropolitan Drive San Diego, CA 92108-4402 CITT OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 5 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) Development Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) • Environmental Impact Assessment 1 1 Variance 1 1 Administrative • Administrative Permit Legislative • Coastal Development Pennit (d) 1 1 Minor 1 1 General Plan Amendment • Conditional Use Permit (d) 1 1 Minor Q Extension 1 1 Zone Change (d) Condominium Permit^6«fpW|5(v/f 1 i Local Coastal Program Amendment (d) • Habitat Management Pemiit 1 1 Minor 1 1 Zone Code Amendment • Hillside Development Permit (d) 1 1 Master Plan |^ Amendment • Planned Development Permit 1 1 Non-Residential 1 1 Specific Plan Q Amendment • Planned Industrial Permit List other applications not specified • Planning Commission Determination • Site Development Plan /ScMJiJpMei^ • • Speciai Use Permit • Tentative Tract Map AM^MTM^^KTT • 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 2/S - " 3) PROJECT NAME: 4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: /^'^ ^r>^/^?^r?/.<i/a'ryJS , 2<P, ^ £iCr£ Sy-Ze. y 15) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Tvpe) C_5v^/V-e^ ^/j^^<et <^ei^^/o/i?,rz7^-/^ MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE > EMAIL ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS: 1 teRTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFGIRMATION IS TRUE AND-CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 1 C15RTIFY THAT 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER ANDNTHAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO ^THE B^ST OF MY KNOWIEDGE. Y SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRINQ MULTIPLE APPUCATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMnTTEO PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMnTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. (d) - eligible for 25% dlwsount Form 14 Rev. 01/09 PAGE 1 OF 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ^ ^U/'/y ^e^g^/g^ Sl^'/^ (C?a/lr'/.^'< ^3^ LOCATION OF PROJECT: ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ 7) BRIEF 8) STREET ADDI ADDRESS ON THE BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) SIDE OF AND (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 9) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. 10) NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF R^RICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPIJICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY RECEIVED JUN I l 2009 CITY OF CARLSBAD DATE IM^JPl!!SA?liP3"ECEIVED RECEIVED BY: Form 14 Rev. 01/09 PAGE 2 OF 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: /^/rjJie^T^/A APPLICANT NAME: C^^/A/;^ , C^/^Z.^. Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background infomiation and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation; Project Description 10/96 Page 1 of 1 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part ofthe City Councit or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: ' , ' - ' Person is defined as '^nyindlviduali:firmjicp^partnjsrshiprjointyenture^^^ organization;; corporatlon^estate, trust,:receive^ syndlcatei ihittifs and any other countyi'city aridxounty^ city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." , • Agents may sign; this document; however, the: legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided beiow. i,, 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) ^ Person 'Z>^^^0 ^. /A/re> Corp/Part Ox-^ /Ctna^^i^ JUi/: Title A^i^rrj^*^ ./^^na^f/y^f Title. Address /\4a^tWi>^y^/jLt^ Address cSif9ry7< 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership- interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person 2^&i^<'0 A LJarr^n/^ Corp/Part Q^JUSB^JO /hy^7r^^r^ Z^t>^^ Title A^^r7a^^'T^ Title Address 2./^ Ma^/J^jZ/S^ Address 0^/^-^ 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602.4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us ^ 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit/Trust , Title Title Address Address 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? I I Yes X_ No If yes, please indicate person(s):. NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. tify that all the above Information is true and correct t^ the best of my knowledge. Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMir«ftCOUNTER\OISCLOSURE STATEMENT 12/06 Page 2 of 2 HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT Consultation Of Lists of Sites Related To Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Govemment Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of Califomia Government Code Section 65962.5,1 have consulted the Hazardous Wastes and Substances Sites List compiled by the Califomia Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one); (3^ The development project and any altematives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code. r~1 The development project and any altematives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 ofthe State Govemment Code. Name APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Address: 2./^ i^£^t^c^ iy<r^ Address:. Phone Number: B<S<^ - "^3 Phone Number: ^ g- Address of Site: j^Se^:!^^ ^i^r7^ ^ d^^S/c^. ^QO-t:/ ' Local Agency (City and Countv): ^/T^y^ C^t'/s' Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: ^2./S "£>Z^ -r £>C^ Specify list(s): Regulatory Identification Number: Date of List: Applicant Signature/Date Property Owner Signature/Date Admin/Counlec/HazWastc City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 (OS4R0076965) Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT CO Description Amount CDP0423A 1,235.63 Receipt Number: R0076965 Transaction ID: R0076965 Transaction Date: 11/06/2009 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2074 1,235.63 Transaction Amount: 1,23 5.63 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 0931001-1 11/06/2009 96 Fri, Nov 06, 2009 11:34 AM Receipt Ref Nbr: R0931001-1/0026 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 093100101 0026 0027 Trans/Rcpt#; R0076965 SET #: CDP0423A Amount: 1 @ $1,235.63 Item Subtotal; $1,235.63 Item Total; $1,235.63 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $1,235.63 Check (Chk# 002074) $1,235.63 Total Received: $1,235.63 Have a nice day! **************CUSTOMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 (OS4R0076965) Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT CO Description CDP0423A Amount 1,235.63 Receipt Number: R0076965 Transaction Date: 11/06/2009 Transaction ID: R0076965 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2074 1,235.63 Transaction Amount: 1,235.63 SIERRA UNDA DEVELOPMENT LLC City of Carlsbad m Date Type Reference 9/30/2009 Bill Original Amt. 1,235.63 10/14/2009 Balance Due Discount 1,235.63 Check Amount Payment 1,235.63 1,235.63 Pacific Western Cliec Coastal Development Amendment Permit Fee 1,235.63 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 0931001-1 11/06/2009 96 Fri, Nov 06, 2009 11:34 AH Receipt Ref Nbr: R0931001-1/0026 PERMITS - PERMITS Iran Ref Nbr; 093100101 0026 0027 Trans/Rcpt#; R0076965 SET #; CDP0423A Amount; 1 i $1,235.63 Item Subtotal; $1,235.63 Item Total: $1,235.63 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL; $1,235.63 Check (Chk# 002074) $1,235,63 Total Received; $1,235.63 Have a nice day! ****4:*********CUST0MER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT Description CT04010A Amount 343.20 Receipt Number: RO076895 Transaction Date: 11/02/2009 Transaction ID: R0076895 Pay Type Method Payment Check Description Amount 343.20 Transaction Amount: 343.20 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 0930601-1 11/02/2009 32 Mon, Nov 02, 2009 03:46 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R093060M/0029 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 093060101 0029 0030 Trans/Rcpt#: R0076895 SET #: CT04010A Amount: 1 8 $343.20 Item Subtotal: $343.20 Item Total: $343.20 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL; $343.20 Check (Chk# 026048) $343.20 Total Received: $343.20 Have a nice day! **************CUSTQMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT Description SDP0407A Amount 7,124.00 Receipt Number: R0075066 Transaction Date: 06/11/2009 Transaction ID: R0075066 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7,124.00 Transaction Amount: 7,124.00 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA •IIIHIIIilllllllil 92008 Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT Description CT04010A Amount 7,864.00 Receipt Number: R0075065 Transaction Date: 06/11/2009 Transaction ID: R0075065 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7,864.00 Transaction Amount: 7,864.00 city of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA •[•llllllllllllll 92008 Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT Description CP04005A Amount 7,749.00 Receipt Number: R0075064 Transaction Date: 06/11/2009 Transaction ID: R0075064 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7,74 9.00 Transaction Amount: 7,749.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 0916201-2 06/11/2009 35 Thu, Jun 11, 2009 05:13 PM Receipt Ref Nbr; R0916201-2/0013 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr; 091620102 0013 0014 Trans/Rcpt#: R0075064 SET #: CP04005A Amount: 1 @ $7,749.00 Item Subtotal: $7,749.00 Item Total: $7,749.00 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 091620102 0013 0015 Trans/Rcpt#: R0075065 SET #: CT04010A Amount; 1 @ $7,864.00 Item Subtotal; $7,864.00 Item Total; $7,864.00 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 091620102 0013 0016 Trans/Rcpt#; R0075066 SET #: SDP0407A Amount: 1 @ $7,124.00 Item Subtotal: $7,124.00 Item Total: $7,124.00 3 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $22,737.00 Check (Chk# 002046) $22,737.00 Total Received: $22,737.00 Have a nice day! *******+******CUSTOMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA IIIIIII 92008 Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT Description SDP0407A Amount 7,124.00 Receipt Number: R0075066 Transaction Date: 06/11/2009 Transaction ID: R0075066 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7,124.00 Transaction Amount: 7,124.00 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA lilllilllllHIIIil 92008 Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT Description CT04010A Amount 7,864.00 Receipt Number: R0075065 Transaction Date: 06/11/2009 Transaction ID: R0075065 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7,864.00 Transaction Amount: 7,864.00 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin 92008 Applicant: SIERRA LINDA DEVELOPMENT Description CP04005A Amount 7,749.00 Receipt Number: R0075064 Transaction Date: 06/11/2009 Transaction ID: R0075064 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7,749.00 Transaction Amount: 7,749.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 0916201-2 06/11/2009 35 Thu, Jun 11, 2009 05:13 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R0915201-2/0013 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr; 0916201u2 0013 0014 Trans/Rcpt#: R0075064 SET #; CP0400bA Amount: 1 @ $7,749.00 Item Subtotal: $7,749.00 Item Total: $7,749.00 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 091620102 0013 0015 Trans/Rcpt#: R0075065 SET #; CT04010A Amount; 1 i $7,864.00 Item Subtotal: $7,864.00 Item Total; $7,864.00 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr; 091620102 0013 0016 Trans/Rcpt#; R0075066 SET #; SDP0407A Amount; 1 ® $7,124,00 Item Subtotal: $7,124.00 Item Total; $7,124.00 3 ITEM(S) TOTAL; $22,737.00 Check (Chk# 002046) $22,737.00 Total Received; $22,737.00 Have a nice day! **************CUSTOMER COPY*************