The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011-01-05; Planning Commission; ; CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLASThe City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: January 5, 2011 Application complete date: June 29, 2010 Project Planner: Greg Fisher Project Engineer: David Rick SUBJECT: CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS - Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Coastal Development Permit, and Planned Development Permit to demolish a single family dwelling and accessory structures and develop a twelve unit multi-family residential air-space condominium project on a .70-acre infill site generally located on the south side of Tamarack Avenue between Garfield Street and Hibiscus Circle, just west of the San Diego Northern Railway right-of-way within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6740, 6741 and 6742 APPROVING a Tentative Tract Map (CT 10-01), Coastal Development Permit (CDP 10- 11), and Planned Development Permit (PUD 10-03), based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes to demolish an existing residence and accessory structures and develop a 12-unit multi-family residential air-space condominium project on a .70-acre infill site in the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ). The project is located on the south side of Tamarack Avenue and just west of the San Diego Northern Railway right-of-way. Development of the condominium project requires the processing and approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Coastal Development Permit, and Planned Development Permit. The site lies within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and therefore, the Coastal Development Permit will be issued by the City of Carlsbad. The project is not located within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone and the Coastal Development Permit is therefore not appealable to the California Coastal Commission. The proposed twelve unit project has a density of 17.1 du/ac, which is within the Residential High (RH) density range of 15 - 23 du/ac, but is below the 19 dwelling units per acre Growth Management Control Point (GMCP) for the property's Residential High Density (RH) General Plan designation. In order to meet the City's Inclusionary Housing requirement, the applicant will request approval from the City Council to purchase two housing credits within the Roosevelt Gardens Condominium Project. The project meets the City's standards for planned developments and subdivisions, and as designed and conditioned, the project is in compliance with the Mello II Local Coastal Program, General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and relevant zoning regulations of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment and qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the Planning CT 10-01/CDP 10-11/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGE 2 Director upon final project approval. The project complies with all applicable standards, there are no outstanding project issues, and findings can be made for approval of the project. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The 0.70 acre project site is rectangular in shape and is located south of Tamarack Avenue, immediately to the west of the San Diego Northern railway right-of-way. The site currently contains a single-family residence and accessory structures which will be demolished. The site has been previously graded and is devoid of any significant or sensitive vegetation. The site is zoned Residential Density-Multiple (RD-M) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Residential High (RH). Surrounding properties to the south and west are designated RH and zoned RD-M and are developed with multi-family apartment and condominium projects. Properties to the north of Tamarack Avenue are designated RH but zoned R-l and are developed with single-family residences. Properties to the east of the railway are designated RLM, zoned R-l, and developed with single family residences. The applicant proposes to develop a twelve-unit residential airspace condominium project on the subject site. Access to the garages and three open bay guest parking spaces is via a private driveway enhanced with earth tone decorative pavers off Tamarack Avenue. The condominium units are arranged in a 6-plex, 4-plex, and duplex configuration within three separate buildings around the common driveway. The buildings are two-story (maximum 25.8 feet tall) structures with attached two car garages. There are four separate floor plans consisting of two and three bedroom units. The four two-bedroom units are 1,120 square feet in size. The remaining eight three-bedroom units range in size from 1,360 square feet to 1,478 square feet. Each unit will have its own two-car garage and private storage space. The project configuration will allow for individual trash pickup in front of each unit. Each unit has a large ground level patio/yard area and a deck off the second story. There are two common recreation areas. The larger (1,720 sf) centralized common recreation area located along the eastern property line consists of a grassy play area, patio with tables and chairs, a bench seat, fireplace and BBQ, and is surrounded by decorative landscaping. The other smaller (330 sf) common recreation area is located along the western property line and consists of a grassy play area. The Santa Barbara architectural style structures will have stucco and stone veneer siding, mission style concrete roof tile, foam detailing around and underneath windows, wood rafter tails, and decorative wood deck rails on the private decks. The proposed colors for the buildings are beige/tan (Oatmeal & Cafe Mocha Merlex) colored stucco walls with taupe colored facia and trim elements, earthy/brown with orange and burnt red variegated roof tile and earth tone stone work. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following regulations: A. Residential High Density (RH) General Plan Land Use designation; B. Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ), Residential Multiple-Density Zone (RD-M), and Planned Development regulations (Chapters 21.82, 21.24, and 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGE 3 C. City Council Policy No. 66 (Principals for the Development of Livable Neighborhoods); D. Local Coastal Program (Mello II Segment); E. Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); F. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance); and G. Growth Management Ordinance (Chapter 21.90 of the Zoning Ordinance) and Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan. The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan Residential High Density (RH) Land Use Designation The General Plan Land Use designation for the property is Residential High (RH) density. The RH Land Use designation allows for the development of two-family and multiple-family residential units within a density range of 15 - 23 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) and at a Growth Management Control Point (GMCP) of 19 du/ac. At the RH GMCP, 13.3 dwelling units would be permitted on this 0.70 acre property. The proposed 12-unit project has a density of 17.1 du/ac, which is within the RH density range of 15 - 23 du/ac, but is 1.30 dwelling units below the GMCP of 19 du/ac. The GMCP is used for the purpose of calculating the City's compliance with Government Code Section 65863. However, consistent with Program 3.8 of the City's certified Housing Element, all of the dwelling units, which were anticipated toward achieving the City's share of the regional housing needs that are not utilized by developers in approved projects, will be deposited in the City's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank. This project will deposit 1.30 dwelling units into the Dwelling Unit Bank and these excess dwelling units are then available for allocation to other projects. Accordingly, there is no net loss of residential unit capacity and there are adequate properties identified in the Housing Element allowing residential development with a unit capacity, including second dwelling units, adequate to satisfy the City's share of the regional housing need. The project complies with the Elements of the General Plan as outlined in Table A below: TABLE A - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Land Use Site is designated for Residential High density, (RH-15-23 du/ac) with a GMCP of 19 du/ac. 13.3 dwellings units could be constructed on the site at the GMCP (.70 acres x 19 du/ac). Residential project density at 17.1 dwelling units per acre (12 DUs) is within the RH density range of 15 - 23 du/ac. 1.30 dwelling units will be deposited into the City's Excess Dwelling Unit Bank. Yes CT10-01/CDP January 5, 2011 PAGE 4 0-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS TABLE A - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ELEMENT USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS COMPLIANCE Housing Provision of affordable housing.The project is conditioned to enter into an affordable housing agreement to purchase two (2) housing credits within the Roosevelt Garden Condominium Project. Yes Public Safety Reduce fire hazards to an acceptable level. The project meets the fire code. The project is required to provide an automatic sprinkler system within each dwelling unit and is located within a five minute response of Fire Station Nos. 1 and 3. Yes The project will not have any environmental impacts to the previously developed site. The project is conditioned to conform to all NPDES requirements and has been designed to include Low Impact Design (LID) elements. Open Space & Conservation Minimize the environmental impacts to sensitive resources within the City. Utilize Best Management Practices for control of storm water and to protect water quality. Yes Yes CT 10-01/CDP 10-11/PUD 10-03 January 5, 2011 PAGE 5 SEABREEZE VILLAS TABLE A - GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ELEMENT Noise Circulation USE, CLASSIFICATION, GOAL, OBJECTIVE OR PROGRAM Comply with the residential exterior noise standard of 60 dB(A) CNEL in private and common recreation areas and interior noise standard of 45 dB(A) CNEL. Construct roadway improvements needed to serve proposed development. PROPOSED USES & IMPROVEMENTS A noise study was prepared and concluded that the project with the inclusion of a perimeter six foot tall block wall complies with the exterior 60 dB(A) CNEL noise standard. However, the project has been conditioned to implement the recommendations of a supplemental acoustical analysis in order to ensure a 45 dB(A) CNEL interior noise level. All public facilities including curb, gutter and sidewalk have been constructed along the property Tamarack Avenue frontage. COMPLIANCE Yes Yes B. BAOZ/RD-M Zoning/Planned Development The proposed project is required to comply with all applicable use and development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) including the BAOZ regulations (CMC Chapter 21.82), the Residential Density-Multiple zone (CMC Chapter 21.24) and the Planned Development Ordinance (CMC Chapter 21.45). Projects located within the BAOZ require the processing of a Site Development Plan (SDP) or a Planned Development Permit to ensure consistency with the BAOZ standards per Section 21.82.040 of the CMC. Because the project is processing a Planned Development Permit of over four units, the SDP is not required. The BAOZ is intended to supplement the underlying zoning by providing additional development regulations to:,l) ensure that proposed development is compatible with existing surrounding uses; 2) provide adequate parking for residential developments; 3) ensure that public facilities exist to serve the beach area; and, 4) protect the unique mix of residential development and aesthetic quality of the area. The RD-M zone allows for the development of multi-family residential housing and the Planned Development Ordinance allows for the development of a condominium use in the RD-M zone. The PD Ordinance provides the development standards for a twelve-unit residential airspace condominium project. The proposed project, which consists of three two-story structures with CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5,2011 PAGE 6 __ attached garages, a building height of 25.8 feet with a roof pitch of 5:12, is compatible with the existing surrounding and proposed multi-family condominium projects, and complies with the BAOZ regulations. The proposed parking (2 spaces per unit and 3 guest parking spaces) also meets the BAOZ requirements. All public facilities including curb, gutter and sidewalk have been constructed along the property frontage. The building elevations have been designed to include elements currently found in the neighborhood in order to blend into the surrounding development. The twelve-unit residential air space condominium project meets or exceeds the requirements of the BAOZ (Chapter 21.82), RD-M (Chapter 21.24), and Planned Development regulations (Chapter 21.45) as outlined in Table B below: TABLE B - BAOZ, RD-M, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) Building Height RD-M Standards Setbacks Required 30 feet with minimum 3:12 roof pitch is provided or 24 feet if less than a 3:12 roof pitch is provided. Required Front: 10' Interior Side Yard: 5' Rear: 10' Provided 25.8 feet with 5:12 roof pitch provided. Provided Front: 15.5' Interior Side Yard: 5' Rear: 10' CT 10-01/CDP 10-11/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5,2011 PAGE? TABLE B - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CONTINUED REF. NO.GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ALL PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED C.5 Drive-aisles • Minimum driveway width of 20 feet. • No parking permitted in the minimum required width of a drive-aisle. • 24 foot back up in front of garages. • No more than 24 dwelling units on a single entry drive aisle. • Enhanced with decorative pavement. 24 feet proposed. No parking proposed within drive-aisle. Complies Complies Complies C.6 Visitor Parking for projects with 11 units or more .25 space per each unit (Three spaces total) Three open bay parking spaces(12DUsx.25 = 3) Complies C.8 Screening of Parking Areas Open parking areas should be screened from adjacent residences and public ROW. The guest parking spaces are adequately screened by landscaping and a six foot high block wall. 150 square feet per unit 1,800 square feet total. C.9 Community Recreational Space 2,050 square feet of community recreation space (grassy play area, patio area with tables & chairs, bench seat, BBQ and fireplace) is provided in two separate areas. CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGES TABLE B - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CONTINUED REF. NO. C.10 C.ll C.13 E.I E.2 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ALL PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS Lighting Recreational Vehicle (RV) Storage Storage space City Council Policy No. 66 (Livable Neighborhoods) Architectural Design Elements REQUIRED Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety shall be provided. Required for projects with 100 or more units. 480 cubic feet per unit or 392 cubic feet per unit if located in one area. See Table C below There shall be at least three separate building planes on all building elevations. The minimum offset in planes shall be 1 8 inches and shall include but not be limited to building walls, windows and roofs. PROVIDED Existing street lighting will provide adequate lighting for both pedestrian and vehicular safety. The project is twelve units therefore the standard does not apply. Storage is located within each separate enclosed parking garage and satisfies the storage requirement. See Table C below The buildings include a minimum of three building planes with a minimum offset of 1 8 inches between planes. CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS Januarys, 2011 PAGE9 TABLE B - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CONTINUED REF. NO. E.2, Cont'd. E.3 E.4 E.5 CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS Architectural Design Elements, Cont'd. Maximum Coverage (net developable acreage) Maximum Building Height Minimum Building Setbacks from a Public Street. NOTE: The building setbacks from a side or rear perimeter property line shall be the same as required by the underlying zone. REQUIRED All building elevations shall incorporate a minimum of four complementary design elements, including but not limited to: a variety of roof planes; windows and doors recessed a minimum of 2 inches; decorative window or door frames; exposed roof rafter tails; dormers; columns; arched elements; varied window shapes; exterior wood elements; accent materials such as brick, stone, shingles, wood, or siding; knee braces; and towers. 60% Must comply with the BAOZ. Residential Structure: Front: 10 Feet Interior Side Yard: 5 Feet Rear: 10 Feet Direct Entry Garage: 20 Feet From a drive-aisle: Zero Feet for residential structure and garage. PROVIDED The project includes a variety of architectural design elements including windows and doors recessed a minimum of 2 inches, a variety of roof planes, exposed roof rafter tails, arched elements, accent materials including stone veneer, decorative trim around windows, and varied window shapes. 37% Complies with the BAOZ (see above). Front: 15. 5 Feet Interior Side Yard: 5 Feet Rear: 10 Feet N/A - There are no direct entry garages. Complies CT 10-01/CDP 10-11/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGE 10 TABLE B - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE CONTINUED REF. NO.CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS REQUIRED PROVIDED E.6 Minimum Building Separation 10 Feet 23.5 Feet E.I Resident Parking Two spaces per unit provided as a two-car garage (minimum 20' x 20') located within 150 feet of unit entry. 24 total parking spaces. Each unit has an attached two-car garage with minimum 20 x 20 foot dimensions. E.8 Private Recreation Space shall be designed so as to be 1) functional, usable, and easily accessible from the dwelling it is intended to serve; 2) located adjacent to the dwelling unit: and 3) may not be located within any required front yard setback area, driveways, parking areas, storage areas, or common walkways. 60 square feet minimum total area per unit (patio, porch, or balcony); and six feet minimum dimension of patio, porch, or balcony. Each unit has a private exclusive use rear yard patio ranging from 215- 900 square feet in size. C. City Council Policy No. 66 (Livable Neighborhoods) The proposed project complies with the applicable guidelines of City Council Policy No. 66, Livable Neighborhoods as shown in Table C below. CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGE 11 TABLE C - CITY COUNCIL POLICY 66 - LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS Principle Compliance Comments Building Facades, Front Entries, Porches Facades create interest and character and should be varied and articulated to provide visual interest to pedestrians. Clearly identifiable front doors and porches enhance the street scene and. create opportunities for greater social interaction within the neighborhood. Building entries and windows should face the street. Front porches, bay windows, courtyards and balconies are encouraged. The project proposes a building fa9ade with interest and character by using a variety of roof planes, exposed roof rafter tails, arched elements, accent materials including stone veneer, decorative trim around windows, and varied window shapes. The project provides clearly identifiable front entry ways and windows as well as balconies designed with decorative guardrails for the units that front Tamarack Avenue. Garages Homes should be designed to feature the residence as the prominent part of the structure in relation to the street. A variety of garage configurations should be used to improve the street scene. This may include tandem garages, side-loaded garages, front-loaded garages, alley-loaded garages and recessed garages. The project has been designed to feature the residence as the prominent part of the structure in relation to the street to the extent possible. The street scene is enhanced due to the absence of garage doors as parking has been provided within attached garages that are not readily visible from Tamarack Avenue. Street Design An interconnected, modified (grid) street pattern should be incorporated into project designs when there are no topographic or environmental constraints. Interconnected streets provide pedestrians and automobiles many alternative routes to follow, disperse traffic and reduce the volume of cars on any one street in the neighborhood. Streets should be designed to provide both vehicular and pedestrian connectivity by minimizing the use of cul-de-sacs. The project is not of scale implement this policy. to CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGE 12 TABLE C - CITY COUNCIL POLICY 66 - LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS CONTINUED Principle Compliance Comments Street Design, Cont'd. The street network should also be designed to create a safer, more comfortable pedestrian and bicycling environment. Local residential streets should have travel and parking lanes, be sufficiently narrow to slow traffic, provide adequate access for emergency and service vehicles and emergency evacuation routes for residents and include parkways with trees to form a pleasing canopy over the street. Local residential streets are the public open space in which children often play and around which neighborhoods interact. Within this context, vehicular movement should be additionally influenced through the use of City-accepted designs for traffic calming measures. This project does not include any new streets. Parkways Street trees should be planted in the parkways along all streets. Tree species should be selected to create a unified image for the street, provide an effective canopy, avoid sidewalk damage and minimize water consumption. Tamarack Avenue is a publicly dedicated roadway and no additional improvements including parkways with landscaping is required. The existing sidewalk also precludes the parkway landscape design. Pedestrian Walkways Pedestrian walkways should be located along or visible from all streets. Walkways (sidewalks or trails) should provide clear, comfortable and direct access to neighborhood schools, parks/plazas and transit stops. Primary pedestrian routes should be bordered by residential fronts, parks or plazas. Where street connections are not feasible (at the end of cul-de-sacs), pedestrian paths should also be provided. A pedestrian walkway with direct access to the front units has been provided along and visible from Tamarack Avenue. CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGE 13 TABLE C - CITY COUNCIL POLICY 66 - LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS CONTINUED Principle Compliance Comments Centralized Community Recreation Areas Park or plazas, which serve as neighborhood meeting places and as recreational activity centers should be incorporated into all planned unit developments. As frequently as possible, these parks/plazas should be designed for both active and passive uses for residents of all ages and should be centrally located within the project. Parks and plazas should be not be sited on residual parcels, used as buffers from surrounding developments or to separate buildings from streets. The proposed project includes a 1,720 square foot centralized community recreation area. The proposed passive grassy area is centrally located to all proposed units. This area will consist of a grassy area, patio with fireplace, barbeque, tables and chairs providing opportunities for common recreation activities. There is also a separate smaller (330 si) community recreation area located along the western property line consisting of a grassy play area. D. Local Coastal Program compliance The proposed site is located outside the appeal area of the City's Coastal Zone and lies within the Mello II Segment of the LCP. Mello II Segment The proposed project is consistent with the Mello II Segment of the LCP which contains land use policies for development and conservation of coastal land and water areas within its boundaries. The policies of the Mello II Segment emphasize topics such as preservation of agriculture and scenic resources, protection of environmentally sensitive resources, provision of shoreline access and prevention of geologic instability and erosion. The project is consistent with the coastal act policies as follows: a) no agricultural lands exist on the project site, therefore no impacts to such will occur; b) the site does not contain or impact environmentally sensitive habitats, water or marine resources; c) the site is geologically stable and the proposed grading for the site has been limited to the area necessary to develop the site; d) the project has been designed to reduce the amount of off-site runoff and has been conditioned to implement the NPDES standards to ensure the quality of the water leaving the site; e) the project meets the parking requirements for condominiums; f) the project does not preclude any recreational opportunities or shoreline access as the property is located on the south side of Tamarack Avenue just west of the San Diego Northern railway right-of-way; and, g) the development of twelve residential air-space condominiums will not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way. Given the above, the project is consistent with the Mello II segment land use policies. CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 - SEABREEZE VILLAS January 5, 2011 PAGE 14 E. Subdivision Ordinance The project includes twelve (12) residential airspace condominium units and is therefore subject to the regulations of Chapter 20.16 of the Subdivision Ordinance. These subdivision regulations require the project to include required street dedications and improvements (streets, sewer, water, and drainage) to serve the proposed subdivision. The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed Tentative Map and has concluded that the subdivision, as conditioned, complies with all the applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Tamarack Avenue is a publicly dedicated roadway and no additional improvements or dedication of streets is required. All infrastructure improvements, including street frontage, drainage, sewer, and water facilities exist. General utility and access easements will be dedicated to allow for the construction of project drainage, sewer, and water facilities on the final map. No standards variances are needed to approve the project. Given the above, the proposed subdivision would provide all necessary facilities and improvements without producing land conflicts; therefore, the project is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. F. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance The proposed project involves the creation of twelve residential units through a subdivision and, therefore, must provide affordable housing to lower-income households as specified in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance). For residential development of seven or more units, not less than fifteen percent of the total units approved shall be constructed and restricted both as to occupancy and affordability to lower-income households. This 12 unit project is therefore responsible for providing two inclusionary units. Whenever reasonably possible, inclusionary units should be built on the residential development project site. However, based on the project's small size, the Housing Policy Team is recommending support of the purchase of two housing credits within the Roosevelt Gardens Condominium Project to satisfy their inclusionary housing obligations. Therefore, the applicant has been conditioned to satisfy the inclusionary housing requirement for lower-income households by entering into an Affordable Housing Agreement to purchase two (2) credits of affordable housing in the Roosevelt Gardens Condominium Project, subject to City Council approval. By entering into the agreement prior to final map recordation the Seabreeze Villas residential condominium development is providing its fair share of housing affordable to lower income households and, therefore, is consistent with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. G. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the northwest quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table D below. CT 10-01/CDP 10-1 I/PUD 10-03 January 5, 2011 PAGE 15 SEABREEZE VILLAS TABLE D - GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STANDARD City Administration Library Waste Water Treatment Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection System Water IMPACTS 4 1.72 sq.ft. 22.24 sq. ft. 12EDU .0834 acre .81 CFS 96ADT Station No. 1 & 3 0 acres Carlsbad Unified (E=1.07/M=. 47/HS = .59) 12 EDUs 2,600 GPD COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes The project proposes 12 dwelling units whereas the maximum unit yield at the GMCP of the property is 13.3 dwelling units. The proposed project is 1.30 units below the Growth Management Control Point density for this RH designated property. Consistent with the General Plan and Policy No. 43, 1.30 DUs will be deposited into the City's excess dwelling unit bank. V.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project qualifies as a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 Categorical Exemption. The project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with the Zoning Ordinance, the project site is within the City limits, is less than 5 acres in size, and is surrounded by urban uses; there is no evidence that the site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; approval of the project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project is exempt from further environmental documentation pursuant to Section 15332 of the State CEQA guidelines. A Notice of Exemption will be filed by the Planning Director upon final project approval. ATTACHMENTS; 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6740 (CT) 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6741 (CDP) 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 6742 (PUD) 4. Location Map 5. Background Data Sheet 6. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 7. Disclosure Statement 8. Reduced Exhibits 9. Exhibits "A" - "N" dated January 5, 2011 NOT TO SCALE SITEMAP CT 10-017 CDP 10-11 / PUD 10-03 SEABREEZE VILLAS BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CT 10-01/CDP 10-11/PUD 10-03 CASE NAME: SEABREEZE VILLAS APPLICANT: Tony Sfreddo REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map. Coastal Development Permit, and Planned Development Permit to demolish a single family dwelling and accessory structures and develop a twelve unit multi-family residential air-space condominium project on a .70-acre infill site generally located on the south side of Tamarack Avenue between Garfield Street and Hibiscus Circle, just west of the San Diego Northern Railway right-of-way within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of lot 6 in Block S of Palisades Number Two, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map Thereof No. 1803, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on August 25, 1924 APN: 206-020-08 Acres:/TO Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 12 units GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Existing Land Use Designation: Residential High Density (RH) Proposed Land Use Designation: N/A Density Allowed: 15-23 du/ac Density Proposed: 17.1 du/ac Existing Zone: Residential Density Multiple Zone (RD-M) Proposed Zone: N/A Surrounding Zoning, General Plan and Land Use: Zoning General Plan Current Land Use Site RD-M RH SFR North R-l RH SFR South RD-M RH Multi-family East T-C TC SD Northern Railway West RD-M RH Multi-Family LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Coastal Zone: [X] Yes [ j No Local Coastal Program Segment: Mello II Within Appeal Jurisdiction: I I Yes [X] No Coastal Development Permit: [)<] Yes | | No Local Coastal Program Amendment: | | Yes [x] No Existing LCP Land Use Designation: RH Proposed LCP Land Use Designation: N/A Existing LCP Zone: RD-M Proposed LCP Zone: N/A Revised 01/06 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: Carlsbad Unified Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): 12 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT [X] Categorical Exemption, Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) I I Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated_ Other, Revised 01/06 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Seabreeze Villas - CT 10-01/CDP 10-11/PUD 10-03 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 1 GENERAL PLAN: RH ZONING: RD-M DEVELOPER'S NAME: Tony Sfreddo ADDRESS: 32 Sylvan. Irvine. CA 92603 PHONE NO.: 951-801-0888 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 206-020-08 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): .70 acres ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: December 2011 A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 41.72 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 22.24 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) 12 EDU D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .0834 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS - .81 Identify Drainage Basin = B (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADT = 96 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 1 & 3 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided = N/A I. Schools: E:=1.07M:=0.47HS:=0.59 2.13 (Carlsbad) J. Sewer: Demands in EDU 12 Identify Sub Basin = Vista/Carlsbad K. Water: Demand in GPD = 2,600 L. The project is 1.30 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CITY OF CARLSBAD Development Services Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: , ^; ':/.••./.;.,; ';_..•; ' . . ^ - . . ' , . Person is defined as °Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social dub, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.* Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of this applicant and property owner must be provided below; 1 . 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership. include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Title Title Address52.Of Address OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and address^ ownership interest in the property involved. Also, proyji ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-pro, ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include tf all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NO SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, in ALL persons having any the nature of the legal rporation, etc.). If the titles, addresses of 'IDUALS OWN MORE ff LICABLE (N/A) IN THE the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be?attached if necessary.) Corp/Part^ Title Address Address Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/09- 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust. list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non ProfiVTrust Non Profit/Trust Title Title Address Address Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? Yes IAI No If yes, please indicate person(s):_ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of ownpr/date Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent Page 2 of 2 Revised 04/09 I I II I I I I II I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I 114 rrr __™_Site Plan Sea Breeze Villas 12-unit Residental Condominium Project 391 TAMARACK AVE. CARLS6AO, CA APH: 20W20-08application type* project data Coufel Developmsnl Pwmilfimril'Piin- $i's(iwiMi.Hiolt DtmtfPlannoe Devatopmert PenrH Zwi*na:H««HnS»JO«nst,-M1J)K*i (6 TenlaUre Tract Map •JSe»» *ft* Owrmy Axw {B gvnarnl Information TMS DEVELOPMENT33 SYLVAN(RVwe CA 92603SB- soi QBMafGhrttcr: 8EGOVICH+HAUG ARCH<T€CTS34SCE SPRWGST »l:HLONOB^ACH CASOIK*5«2 BSB 1174 D MS CO hiSULTANTS!23TTuewlSST »10'GARDEN 0«OV£. CA 02MOM-S '4C 9MO GARCIA LAhJSsCAPE^IBKEM^R AVESAMTA ANA CA 0770S . . n me C«» * C«rtib«o. Coo-S'Jiwo^ CA. accortng w map Hereof"603. tfled m Plan i (i-CM mi): 4-una »-.i?C KJ own 2 (3-bed rm) 4-una *' 360 MRan 3 (3-Md rm) 9-umc *' 430 *q -ms SchoolrCwtabad 'JoCud Sctioil Disrnc DMMtty Aflow*0 -e unnUBc-t Ca-unnt)ocnctty wopoMil: '71 utns'»c'«r!-mtnsjExMlng L«nd UH: SKi^la 'r*r*l^ F1»fr<l»no»l PrtwWPrta A CwiwmjnHy tt*c. «f •» fUqdnd: CT 10-01 PU01MW COP 19-11 A-1 Roof plan BldgC U"! »OoiGd- w * ZLU n. LU O Roof plan BldgB Roof Plans ROOT plan Bldg A A-1.1 test* '^-.rc Sacond Fkx>r Plan Plan 2:1,380 sf Plan 3:1.430 >fBuilding A sEh CL3LU>LU d II. A-2 Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan P Ian 1: 1,120 sfBuilding B . . _A___ __^ -| __ ,_____.J .... ... .?_» j ,EM z01 CL O da? A-3 00 i C h-j « LJ D- 3in>LUO • oo I Second Floor Plan •an:,*.v.e- PlMl * t,478 »f First Floor Plan Building C I5 s| me 53i co ? §:r ,S ~ = s A-4 Driveway Etevallon: North-E9S1 Side 1Ul UJ I? Si ,SII? Driveway Elevation: North-West Side Building A A-5 Side Elevation: South-Wast SJde Building A Driveway Eloviiion EHu«: 2UJ D.3LJJ>UJQ ; C/3 : A-6 South-East Elevation Building B Tamaraeir Ave ElevationSouth-Wrat Elevation similar Building A Driveway Elevation Building C Building C OMSfi SM OOi §<! CL3 LLJ LU 1 ill!H ai s A-7