The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 12-05; La Costa Residential; Tentative Map (CT) (2)• '&. «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION P-1 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov DeyeloDm!nt Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) Lea/s/at/Ve Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) D Administrative Pennlt D Coastal Development Permit n D Minor D Conditional Use Penni! (•) D Minor D Extension ~ Environmental Impact Assessment D Habitat Management Penni! D Hillside Development Permit (•) 0 Planned Development Permit D Minor IKJ Residential D Non-Residential D Planned Industrial Penni! D Planning Commission DetennlnaUon D Site Development Plan D Special Use Permit IKJ Tentative Tract Map ~ Variance D Administrative ..-:. ~l ' IVD I '2. -t11 rJI\1·00 v t 1.-~01, D General Plan Amendment D Local Coastal Program Amendment (•) D Master Plan D Speclnc Plan D Zone Change (•) 0Amendment 0Amendment D Zone Code Amendment South Carlsbad Coastal Review Area Permits D Review Penni! D Administrative D Minor D Major VIllage Review Area Permits 0 Review Penni! D Administrative D Minor D Major (•) = eligible for 25% discount NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULnPLE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPUCATION MUST BE SUBMinED PRIOR TO 4.;00 P.M. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 2:13 es-H f:k3 -Q?---o.]) (:Z,2 ?rO/,qO-21 1 -z,:z.:z-p sp -l./0) PROJECT NAME: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL ~~~~~~------------------------------------BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF 32 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNNITS AND TWO OPEN SPACE LOTS. BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of section 31, township 12 south and a portion of section 6, township 13 south, range 3 wes~ San Bernardino meridian together with portions of lots 4 & 5 of Rancho las Encinitas according to Map thereof no. 848. LOCATION OF PROJECT: NORTH OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD, SOUTH OF OLD RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AND ON THE: BETWEEN P-1 WEST (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD (NAME OF STREET) SIDE OF AND STREET ADDRESS PASEO LUPINO (NAME OF STREET) OLD RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD (NAME OF STREET) Page 1 of6 Revised 06/12 • • • • • OWNER NAME (Print):PROPEFITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS, LL( APPLICANT NAME (Print): TAYLOR MORRISON OF CAUFORNIA L MAILING ADDRESS: 5918 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD MAILING ADDRESS: 8105 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1450 CITY, STATE. ZIP: PLEASANTON, CA 94588 CITY, STATE. ZIP: IRVINE, CA 92013 TELEPHONE: (925) 738-1207 TELEPHONE: (949!341-1200 EMAIL ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAl. OWNER AND THAT All THE A80VE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER INFORMATION IS TRUE ~ CORRECT TO T;~ BEST OF MY AND THAT ALL Tl£ A80VE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO I~~-I(;;:£(@;/() cz J~l D THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~Y.TURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE APPLICANrS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): APRIL TORNILLO MAILING ADDRESS: 8105 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1450 CITY, STATE. ZIP: IRVINE. CA 92013 TELEPHONE: {949) 341-1289 EMAIL ADDRESS: ATomllloOtaylormorrlson.com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPUCANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. INVE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH TH LAND AND BIND ANY S SIN INTEREST. - FOR CITY USE ONLY P-1 Page 2 of 6 RECEIVED SEP 2 6 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: Revised 06112 c ' ' • • OWNER NAME (Print):PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS, LLC APPLICANT NAME (Print): TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA L MAILING ADDRESS: 5918 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD MAILING ADDRESS: 8105 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1450 CITY, STATE, ZIP: PLEASANTON, CA 94588 CITY, STATE, ZIP: IRVINE, CA 92013 TELEPHONE: (925) 738-1207 TELEPHONE: (949}341-1200 EMAIL ADDRESS: EMAIL ADDRESS: a..\-ov I'll'[( o@. ~I wtvl .r' ,, J I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I TIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY A D ~~ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO KNOWLEDGE. T~ B I! F NOWLEDGE. 4 I . \ 'llk/2- SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DA -r APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE (Print): ~PRit: =f6RI~It:t:e 1?1-\tUP '5· 'e7oD~M. MAILING ADDRESS: 81051RVINE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1450 CITY, STATE, ZIP: IRVINE, CA 92013 TELEPHONE: (949) 341-1289 EMAIL ADDRESS: AT omillo@laylormorrison.com I p~~ THAT I A~THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AP Ll NT AND THAT L THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CO RE T ::". :> F MY KNOWLEDGE. i /I J /\. ~~ qltx/12- SIGNATURE OAT~ IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. IN-IE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY P-1 Page 2 of 6 RECEIVED SEP 2 6 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: Revised 06/12 c ~ «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PROJECT DESCRIPTION P-1(8) PROJECT NAME: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Develooment Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov APPLICANT NAME: TAYLOR MORRISON-APRIL TORNILLO Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: THE LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL PROJECT REQUESTS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 32 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING UNITS AND TWO OPEN SPACE LOTS ON 9.96 ACRES. THE SITE WILL GAIN ACCESS OFF OF PASEO LUPINO VIA THE REALIGNED RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD. THE PROJECT MAINTAINS THE REQUIRED 1.9 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE AS WELL AS THE 50 FOOT SETBACK FROM RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD. THE PROJECT INCLUDES A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 5,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT AREA DEVELOPMENT REGULATION RESTRICTION. THE PROPOSED LOT SIZES RANGE FROM 3,500 TO 6,500 SQUARE FEET. P-1(B) Page 1 of 1 Revised 07/10 -------------------------------------------------~ • . • • «~ ~ CITY OF DISCLOSURE STATEMENT P-1(A) Develooment Services Plannlnc Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www .carlsbadca.gov CARLSBAD Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on ali applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, finn, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corpon~tion, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. 2. P-1(A) APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a conooration or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of ali individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corooration, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separat" page may be attached if necessary.) Person !" I A Corp/Part.--c"'-'-+-'='--f--+'::::;;;.j....+-'----'-~ Title rlf !A. Title·~~~~_j:j~::C..:;;L.jA.I:£..JQl;; Address 1'1 les ·~r---":~-v""'l""""""~~"-+"'¥- oWNER (Not the owner's agent) \ tlYJ tvt1 LA-4'd-yqg Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of & persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corooration or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of ail individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person ____ ~~~~~------------ Title. __ ___.J"'+';;""------ !("' Address. __ !J!.I..:...f~...J...----- Corp/Part. __________ _ Title __________________________ _ Address'------------- Page 1 of2 Revised 07/10 • • 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust (I( /A Non Profit!Trust._..:.,rL"'"*(o/...,_ ____ _ TiUe rvfA TiUe. _____ ~rr~-'------- Address. __ __,_f\)_,{!"-'1\____ Address. __ ___.JrJ~II?r~----- 1 t 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes ~No If yes, please indicate person(s): __________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. Signature of owner/date Print or type name of owner Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent P-1(A) ~2of2 Reviaed 07/10 ,4ilt. .[i' • • ~ ... ~ c.tlV Of DISCLOSURE STATEMENT P-1(A) Development Services Plannlnc Division 1635 faraday A'n!nue (760) 602-4610 www.c:artsbadca.sov CARLSBAD Appllcanfs statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following Information .MY§! be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this Information Is completed. Please print. Note: P81S0n is defined as 'Any individual, finn, co-partnel$/llp, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, CO/I)OI8tion, estate, trus~ recalvar, syndicate, In this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acUng as a unit. • Agents may slgn this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicanrs agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEQAL names and addresses of & persons having a financial interest In the application. If the applicant includes a COI'DOrBiion or padne[JhiD. Include the namea, titles, addresses of all Individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a oublicly-owned coroora!lon, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) =-T; ::"._a _________ _ Address ~ Address. __________ _ 2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent) P-I(A) Provide the COMPLEJE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property Involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnershlo. Include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a oub!!c!y-owntd corooratlon, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate ollicers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person W!A Corp/Pa215ff' bepet~,yeA]f ~ Title Ill/A Title __ 2_ Address he .n ~ ·n~, . q'l..J"i"ir? Page1ol2 R<Moed 07/10 ------------------·----· ---·· • • 3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit oroanjzation or a trust. list the names and addresses of Al!f! person serving as an oflloer or director of the non- profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. :ProM"'"~: :P-"'" ~ Address N{A Address. __ --ltl-l!Lt-f~.!:~~----- 4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? 0 Yes ~No If yes, please indicate person(s):. __________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Sig Signature of applicant/date Print or type n11mef owner Print or type name of applic11nt Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/11pplicanfs agent P·1(A) Page 2 ol2 RovileG07110 I i • • ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SOLE MEMBER IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PROPERTYDEVELOPMENTCENTERSLLC The following actions are taken by the Sole Member of PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company''), by written consent without a meeting as of September~ 2008, pursuant to its Limited Liability Company Agreement and as permitted by Section 18-302(d) of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act l. Appointment of Officers. RESOLVED, that the persons listed in Exhibit A hereto are hereby elected and designated as all of the officers of the Company, in the capacity and with the designation shown after each person's name, to serve as such at the pleasure of the Sole Member. 2. Certificate of Formation. RESOLVED, that any officer of the Company is hereby authorized and instructed to insert in the records of the Company a copy of the Company's Certificate of Formation as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State. 3. Adoption of Operating Agreement. RESOLVED, that the Limited Liability Company Agreement attached to these resolutions as Exhibit B is hereby ratified, approved and adopted as the Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Company. RESOLVED FURTHER, that any officer of the Company is authorized and directed to see that a copy of the Limited Liability Company Agreement is kept at the Company's office for the maintenance of records. 4. Principal Place of Business. RESOLVED, that the principal place ofbusiness of the Company shall be located at 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588. •I· \ ) • • 5. Expenses of Organization. RESOLVED, that subject to the Limited Liability Agreement, the Sole Member and officers are, and each acting alone is, hereby authorized and directed to pay on behalf of the Company the expenses of the organization of the Company and to reimburse the persons advancing funds for the Company for this purpose. 6. Approval of Qualifications to Conduct Business. RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company be, and each such officer hereby is, authorized and directed to take any and all steps that they deem to be necessary to qualify the Company to do business as a foreign corporation in Arizona, California, Hawaii and Washington and in each other state that the officers determine such qualification to be necessary or appropriate. 7. Omnibus Resolutions. RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company be, and each such officer hereby is, authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the Company and in its name, to prepare or cause to be prepared and to execute, deliver, verify, acknowledge, file or record any documents, instruments, certificates, ststernents, papers or any amendments thereto, as may be deemed necessary or advisable in order to perform and carry out the transactions contemplated by the foregoing resolutions. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the authority and power given herein be deemed retroactive, and any and all acts performed prior hereto with the same purpose and intent contemplated by the foregoing resolutions are hereby ratified and approved. The undersigned, being the Sole Member of the Company, does hereby consent to the foregoing actions as of the date first written above. SOLE MEMBER SAFEW A Y INC. By: _1_~~~~~~-- Robert A. Gordon Its: Senior Vice President and Secretary ·•· ) ) • • PROPERTYDEVELOPMENTCENTERSLLC SOLE MEMBER Safeway Inc. OFFICERS Don Wright David Zylstra Robert A. Gordon MichaelJ. Boylan Bradley S. Fox TomHanavan Don Shaw Gerry Wolfe Marilyn K. Beardsley Sharman K. Braff Laura A. Donald Genevieve Dougherty Ann C. Elliott Karen Elliott Steven J. Gouig Linda S. MacDonald Wendall Mitchell Denise M. Roman Dennis M. Stokely Dana Waller Robin H. Knight Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer Vice President & Secretary Vice President Vice President & Treasurer Vice President Vice President Vice President Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Secretary Assistant Vice President & Assistant Treasurer EXHIBIT A /") ' ' '-.. ) • • PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT This LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") of PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS LLC (the "Company'') is effective as of August 19, 2008. 1. · Formation of Limited. Liability Company. Safeway Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Initial Member"), hereby fonns the Company as a limited liability company pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the "Act''). The rights and obligations of the Member, as defined below, and the administration and termination of the Company shall be governed by this Agreement and the Act. This Agreement shall be considered the "Limited Liability Company Agreement" of the Company within the meaning of the Act. To the extent this Agreement is inconsistent in any respect with the Act. this Agreement shall control to the extent pennitted by the Act. 2. Member. The member (the "Member") who shall act as the sole and managing member of the Company shall be the Initial Member. 3. Pumose. The purpose of the Company is to engage in any and all lawful businesses or activities in which a limited liability company may be engaged under applicable law (including, without limitation, the Act). 4. Name. The name of the Company shall be "PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS LLC." 5. Registered Agent and Principal Office. The registered office and registered agent of the Company in the State of Delaware shall be as the Member may designate from time to time. The Company may have such other offices as the Member may designate from time to time. The mailing address of the Company is 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588-3229. 6. Tenn of Company. The Company shall commence on the date that a Certificate of Fonnation is properly filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and shall continue in existence in perpetuity unless its business and affairs are earlier wound up following dissolution at such time as this Agreement may specify. 7. Authorized Person. Naomi K. Bannister is hereby designated as an authorized person on behalf of the Member within the meaning of the Act, and shall have the power and authority to execute, deliver and file the Certificate of Formation of the Company with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Upon the filing of the Certificate of Formation, her powers as authorized person shall cease and the Member thereupon shall become the designated autho~ed person and shall continue as the designated authorized person within the meaning of the Act. EXHIBff S ·I· \ / • • 8. Management of Company. All decisions relating to the business, affairs and properties of the Company shall be made by the Member in its capacity as the managing member. The Member may appoint a President and one or more Vice Presidents and such other officers of the Company as the Member may deem necessary or advisable to manage the day-to- day business affairs of the Company (the "Officers''). The Officers shall serve at the pleasure of the Member. To the extent delegated by the Member, the Officers shall have the authority to act on behalf of, bind and execute and deliver documents in the name and on behalf of the Company. No such delegation shall cause the Member to cease to be a Member. Such Officers shall have such authority and responsibility as is generally attributable to the holders of such offices in corporations incorporated under the laws of Delaware. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, the Member, acting alone, is authorized to execute and deliver any document on behalf of the Company without any vote or consent of any other person. 9. Distributions. Each distribution of cash or other property by the Company shall be made 1 00% to the Member. Each item of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of the Company shall be allocated 100% to the Member. 10. Contributions. The Member has contributed capital to the Company in the amounts reflected on the books and records of the Company. The Member may not be required to contribute any additional capital without the Member's consent. 11. Capital Accounts. A capital account shall be maintained for the Member in accordance with Treasury Regulations Section 1. 704-1 (b )(2)(iv). 12. Indemnification. The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless the Member to the full extent permitted by law from and against any and all losses, claims, demands, costs, damages, liabilities, expenses of any nature (including attorneys' fees and disbursements), judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts (collectively, "Costs") arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings (civil, criminal, administrative or investigative) (collectively, "Actions'') in which the Member may be involved, or threatened to be involved as a party or otherwise, relating to the performance or nonperformance of any act concerning the activities of the Company. In addition, to the extent permitted by law, the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless any of its Officers from and against any and all Costs arising from any or all Actions arising in connection with the business of the Company or by virtue of such Officer's capacity as an officer of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any and all indemnification obligations of the Company shall be satisfied only from the assets of the Company, and the Member shall have no liability or responsibility therefor. 13. Dissolution and Winding Up. Upon execution by the Member of a written instrument authorizing the dissolution of the Company, the Company shall dissolve and its business and affairs shall be wound up. 14. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified from time to time only by a written instrument executed by the Member. ·•· ' ~_) \ / • • 15. Governing Law. The validity and enforceability of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to otherwise governing principles of conflicts of law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Limited Liability Company Agreement as of the date first set forth above. SOLE AND MANAGING MEMBER SAFEWAY INC. By: -L~-=:-:---:--:::-~-:------ Robert A Gordon Its: Senior Vice President and Secretary . J. • • • RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE SOLE MEMBER OF PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS LLC TAKEN WITHOUT A MEETING BY WRITTEN CONSENT The following actions are taken by the Sole Member of Property Development Centers LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company"), by written consent without a meeting as of ~\}J-Y,~t~~ :;, , 2009, pursuant to its Limited Liability Company Agreement and .) as permitted by Section 18-302(d) of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act. Election of Officers RESOL YEO, that David Moreno is hereby elected to the otlice of Vice President of the Company. to serve as such at the pleasure of the Sole Member. RESOL YEO, that Jim Reuter is hereby elected to the office of Vice President of the Company, to serve as such at the pleasure of the Sole Member. RESOLVED, that Jon Anderson is hereby elected to the otlice of Vice President of the Company. to serve as such at the pleasure of the Sole Member. The undersigned, being the Sole Member of the Company. does hereby consent to the foregoing actions as of the date first written above. SOLE MEMBER Safeway Inc. a Delaware corporation By: Robert A. Gordon Senior Vice President & Secretary • .. 1'\. I , • «~; ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT P-1(C) • Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Consu~ation of Lists of Sites Related to Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962,5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962,5, I have consulted the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): [R] The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. 0 The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application !!! contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962,5 of the State Government Code, APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC Name: PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS, LLC Address: 8105 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, STE1450 Address: 5918 STONERIDGE MALL RD IRVINE, CA 92013 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 Phone Number: (949) 341-1200 Phone Number:_,(9_2_5_:_)_738-_1_2_0_7 ____ _ Address of Site: NORTH OF RANCHO SANTA FE RD, SOUTH OF OLD RANCHO SANTA FE RD & WEST OF PASEO LUPINO Local Agency (City and County):, ____ C_ITY __ O_F_C_A_R_L_S_BA_Di_C_O_U_N_TY_O_F_SAN __ D_IE_G_O ___ _ Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:__;22=3..:-0:.::50..:..:-68..:..:&:..2:::2:::3-:...060-=:...3:..1:..,_ _________ _ Specify list(s): DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENVIROSTOR HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCE SITE LISTS Regulatory Identification Number: __ N_i_A ____________________ _ Date of List: FEBRUARY 16, 2012 u~ Applicant Signature/Date Property Owner Signature/Date The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (Cortese List) is used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites, P-1(C) Page 1 of2 Revised 07/10 . . • '• ... -~ ,( ... ' ·~ c.TY o• CARLSBAD • HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT P-1(C) • Development Services Planninc Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Consultation of Usts of Sites Related to Hazardous Wastes (Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, l have consulted the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): IRJ The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. 0 The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application!!! contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Name: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC Name: PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS, LLC Address: 8105 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, STE1450 Address: 5918 STONERIDGE MALL AD IRVINE, CA 92013 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 Phone Number. (949) 341·1200 Phone Number. . .;(_92_5.;.)_7_38_·_12_0_7 ____ _ Address of Site: NORTH OF RANCHO SANTA FE AD, SOUTH OF OLD RANCHO SANTA FE AD & WEST OF PASEO LUPINO Local Agency (City and County): CITY OF CARLSBAD/COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:._:22=3..:·05:::...:·7..:1 _______________ _ Specify list(s): DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES ENVIROSTOA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCE SITE LISTS Regulatory Identification Number.. _ _;NI=A:.._ __________________ _ Date of List: FEBRUARY 16, 2012 \ ,t~/\ ~ 9/;;z; ;,~ ~rty Owner Signature/Date J Applicant Signature/Date The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (Cortese List) is used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in providing Information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. P·1(C) Pago1 of2 Revised 07/10 • «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD TIME LIMITS ON DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS P-1(E) PLEASE NOTE: • Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upon the date of the completion letter. If you have any questions regarding application submittal requirements (i.e., clarification regarding a specific req~·rement or whether all requirements are necessary for your particular application) please call 6 602~ ' Applicant Signature: · ~ , Staff Signature: P==-JC'i#~~'==------------ Date: i · z.-1. . Lo• '!..--~~~----------------------------- To be stapled with receipt to the application P-1(E) Page 1 of 1 Revised 07/10 La Costa Town Center Carlsbad, California Taylor Morrison Omega Color Paint Match Stucco to Stucco 20130 Sand Usc same finish as the Color Coat "'' <all or trim 1 420 SW7002 Downy 2 TA979 SW6141 Softer Tan 3 718 405 SW7536 Bittersweet Stem 4 11/8221 SW6121 WholeWheat 5 I I/4 A83 SW7695 Mesa Tan Note1: • All paint is Sherwin Williams Paint Company. .Paint I Raised Foam I Trim Color Color """""' Egw!heD. finWI on wood flat finish 01\ ltUCCO and metal Sre-oo,· ., ... , SW7532 sw 2808 ll•h '"'"" Rookwood Dark Brown sw 6143 SW7509 S..kot Beigo Tiki Hut sw 7535 SW7041 Sondy Ridgo Van Dyke Brown SW7540 Sw 2807 Artisan Tan Rookwood Medium Brown SW7522 SW6083 Meadowlark Sable • All wrought iron is to be painted Sherwin Williams SW7020 "Black Fox" -Eggshell finish. Shutter Color Semi-gloss Finish SW6202 Cast Iron ow ov,. A> ""' .uh SW7076 c OWOU' Still Water OWO>M Shade-Grown Color and Material Palette Prepared by Ann Matteson Consulting, Inc. Original Documcmt: 1111112 Added llillcco fomwlaa: 11/9/12 Tierra Y Fueeo Belden Eagle Decorative Brick Cypress Ridge S.TIIe Profile Shake Profile Tiles Accents Stone .... 'Rooflna Concrete Roofing Selected from the Monterey &T118Can """" Spanish, Santa Barbi1ra -Santa Barbara Collection ·-...... ~ and Tuscan. Elevations -.~ ,~,roc, 30884 Countryside sec 8806 SCP 8803 Bella BlendA Tuscon Blend >Blend 30914 Winewood Orchard SHC 8709 SCP 8804 nJi, '· """'' BlendA El Morado Blend Hershey Blend 30852 Alamo Santa Maria 3646 5689 Jaen 2 BlendA Sunsel Blend Brown Ranl<e 30694 Bridgeport Countryside 3605 SCP 8803 Visalia BlendA ,, >Blend 30827 Winewood Orchard SHC 8708 SCP 8804 Daly BlendA Del Ore Blend Hershey Blend • All non-decorative items such as meter doors. non-deoorative vents etc. are to be painted the same color and finish as the surrounding field color. • All metal spark arrestors are to be painted Sherwin-Williams SW7047 "Porpoise"-Eggshell Finish. • All S-Tile roofing call outs are to have mud bird stops -smooth, not extruded. • All roof metal is to be painted to match the darkest color from the roofing blend. • • All Rain Guuers and Downspouts are to be "Bronze". • All Stained Entry Doors are to be Therma-Tru "English Walnut" • Eldorado Stone and Belden Brick are available through Thompson Building Materials -Contact: Tina Berkaw (714) 325-1716. • Mortar for a11 brick is to be Orco Blended Products MAC Plus Mortar. Color: "OBP Lt. Khaki. " All mortar joints are to be flush with the face of the masonry material with the faces remaining clean. • Grout for all decorative tile is to be Polyblend "Bone" or equal by another manufacturer. • All Terra Cotta elements are to be Arto Brick Artillo Tile, Color-"Josie Blend". RECEIVED CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION • Order Number: NCS·52471l·CC Pag.ber:l October 30, 2012 Update First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services October 30, 2012 Marilyn K. Beardsley Safeway, Inc. 11555 Dublin Canyon Road Pleasanton, CA 94588 Phone: (925)226-5662 Fax: (925)467-3224 Customer Reference: Escrow Officer: Phone: Buyer: Owner: Property: 1850 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 LaCosta Town Square (9.9 Acres) Kitty Schlesinger (925)927-2154 Taylor Morrison of California LLC Property Development Centers LLC Rancho Santa Fe Road, Carlsbad, CA PREUMINARY REPORT In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, this company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Polides of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Exhibit A attached. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause~ all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Umit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Exhibit A. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exduslons are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Pag.ber:2 It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. First American Title Insurance Company • Dated as of October 25, 2012 at 7:30A.M. The form of Policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: ALTA Extended Owner Policy -2006 Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.er:3 A specific request should be made if another form or additional coverage is desired. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: Property Development Centers LLC, a Delaware limited liability company The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: Fee The Land referred to herein is described as follows: (See attached Legal Description) At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: 1. This item has been intentionally deleted. 2. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2012-2013. First Installment: $13,632.15, PAYABLE Penalty: $0.00 Second Installment: $13,632.15, PAYABLE Penalty: $0.00 Tax Rate Area: 09045 A. P. No.: 223-050-68-00 {Affects a portion of the property) 3. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2012-2013. First Installment: $26,899.50, PAYABLE Penalty: $0.00 Second Installment: $26,899.50, PAYABLE Penalty: $0.00 Tax Rate Area: 09045 A. P. No.: 223-060-31-00 (Affects a portion of the property) First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Pag.ber:4 Note for information: The San Diego County Assessor has indicated a new tax identification number will come into use for the property in question in the future. At this time the new number is: 223-050-71-00. 4. Assessment liens, if applicable, collected with the general and special taxes, including but not limited to those disclosed by the reflection of the following on the tax roll: 1915 Bond for Olivenhain Municipal Water District; 96-1 and Levy & Drainage Maintenance. 5. This item has been intentionally deleted. 6. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 7. The privilege and right to extend drainage structures, excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of the right of way where required for the construction and maintenance of said right of way as granted in Deed recorded February 16, 1967 as Instrument No. 21426 of Official Records. 8. An easement for right, privilege to spill water and incidental purposes, recorded SEPTEMBER 28, 1972 as Instrument No. 72-260677 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: Olivenhain Municipal Water District as described therein 9. An easement for drainage channel and incidental purposes, recorded MAY 15, 1974 as Instrument No. 74-126972 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: San Diego County Flood Control District Zone 1 as described therein 10. An easement for enclosed or unenclosed flood drainage channel and all structures incidental thereto, and for the flowage of any waters and incidental purposes, recorded JANUARY 13, 1977 as Instrument No. 77-014212 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: San Diego County Flood Control District as described therein 11. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements in the document recorded JUNE 23, 1983 as Instrument No. 83-212476 of Official Records , but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, disability, handicap, familial status, national origin or source of income (as defined in California Government Code §12955(p)), to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 U.S.C. §3604(c) or California Government Code §12955. lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age of occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons shall not be construed as restrictions based on familial status. 12. This item has been intentionally deleted. 13. This item has been intentionally deleted. 14. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Agreement to Provide Water Service" recorded DECEMBER 14, 1993 as Instrument No. 1993-0838874 of Official Records. First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-S24711-CC Page.ber:S 15. This item has been intentionally deleted. 16. An easement for public street and public utility and incidental purposes, recorded JANUARY 30, 2002 as Instrument No. 2002-0079623 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation as described therein 17. An easement for public street and public utility and incidental purposes, recorded MARCH 27, 2002 as Instrument No. 2002-0258807 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation as described therein Said instrument also grants the privilege and right to extend and maintain drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of said right of way where required for the construction and maintenance thereof. Said document also provides for waiver of claims for any and all damages to Grantor's remaining property contiguous to the property hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction, landscaping or maintenance of said highway. 18. An easement for public street, public utility and incidental purposes, recorded APRIL 29, 2002 as Instrument No. 2002-0358072 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation as described therein 19. An easement for public street, public utility and incidental purposes, recorded JUNE 28, 2002 as Instrument No. 2002-0550474 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation as described therein Said instrument also grants the privilege and right to extend and maintain drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes beyond the limits of said right of way where required for the construction and maintenance thereof. Said document also provides for waiver of claims for any and all damages to Grantor's remaining property oontiguous to the property hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction, landscaping or maintenance of said highway. 20. An easement for water and incidental purposes, recorded JANUARY 06, 2003 as Instrument No. 2003-0014109 of Official Records. In Favor of: Affects: Olivenhain Municipal Water District as described therein 21. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Agreement for Construction within the City of Carlsbad, Rancho Santa Fe Road Realignment and Widening, Phase 1, Project No. 3190" recorded FEBRUARY 10, 2003 as Instrument No. 2003-0153044 of Official Records. 22. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Agreement Between Owner, Developer and The City of Carlsbad for an Uncontrolled Stockpile" recorded JANUARY 28, 2004 as Instrument No. 2004-0068114 of Official Records. First American 77tle Insurance Company ----· -------------------------------------, • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.ber: 6 ,--------------,::-:-,..,-:-c-:--c-c-----c----·------INFORMATIONAL NOTES 1. Supplemental taxes for the fiscal year 2012-2013 assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the california Revenue and Taxation Code. First Installment: $-41.31, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Second Installment: $-41.31, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Tax Rate Area: 09045 A. P. No.: 819-458-38-31 (Affects a portion of the property) 2. Supplemental taxes for the fiscal year 2012-2013 assessed pursuant to Chapter 3.5 commencing with Section 75 of the california Revenue and Taxation Code. First Installment: $-357.11, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Second Installment: $-357.11, PAID Penalty: $0.00 Tax Rate Area: 09045 A. P. No.: 819-458-38-22 (Affects a portion of the property) 3. The property covered by this report is vacant land. 4. According to the public records, there has been no conveyance of the land within a period of twenty four months prior to the date of this report, except as follows: A document recorded JANUARY 09, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012-0011559 of Official Records . From: La Costa Town Square, LLC, a california limited liability company To: Property Development Centers LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Affects this and other property) 5. Should this report be used to facilitate your transaction, we must be provided with the following prior to the issuance of the policy: A. WITH RESPECT TO A CORPORATION: 1. A certificate of good standing of recent date issued by the Secretary of State of the corporation's state of domicile. 2. A certificate copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the contemplated transaction and designating which corporate officers shall have the power to execute on behalf of the corporation. Rrst American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.ber:7 3. Requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the above material and other information which the Company may require. B. WITH RESPECT TO A CAUFORNIA UMITED PARTNERSHIP: 1. A certified copy of the certificate of limited partnership (form LP-1) and any amendments thereto (form LP-2) to be recorded in the public records; 2. A full copy of the partnership agreement and any amendments; 3. Satisfactory evidence of the consent of a majority in interest of the limited partners to the contemplated transaction; 4. Requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the above material and other information which the Company may require. C. WITH RESPECT TO A FOREIGN UMITED PARTNERSHIP: 1. A certified copy of the application for registration, foreign limited partnership (form LP-5) and any amendments thereto (form LP-6) to be recorded in the public records; 2. A full copy of the partnership agreement and any amendment; 3. Satisfactory evidence of the consent of a majority in interest of the limited partners to the contemplated transaction; 4. Requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the above material and other information which the Company may require. D. WITH RESPECT TO A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP: 1. A certified copy of a statement of partnership authority pursuant to Section 16303 of the California Corporation Code (form GP-I), executed by at least two partners, and a certified copy of any amendments to such statement (form GP-7), to be recorded in the public records; 2. A full copy of the partnership agreement and any amendments; 3. Requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the above material required herein and other information which the Company may require. E. WITH RESPECT TO A UMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: 1. A copy of its operating agreement and any amendments thereto; 2. If it is a California limited liability company, a certified copy of its articles of organization (LLC-1) and any certificate of correction (LLC-11), certificate of amendment (LLC-2), or restatement of articles of organization (LLC-10) to be recorded in the public records; 3. If it is a foreign limited liability company, a certified copy of its application for registration (LLC-5) to be recorded in the public records; 4. With respect to any deed, deed of trust, lease, subordination agreement or other document or instrument executed by such limited liability company and presented for recordation by the Compar1y or upon which the Company is asked to rely, such document or instrument must be executed in accordance with one of the following, as appropriate: (i) If the limited liability company properly operates through officers appointed or elected pursuant to the terms of a written operating agreement, such documents must be executed by at least two duly elected or appointed officers, as follows: the chairman of the board, the president or any vice president, and any secretary, assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer; (ii) If the limited liability company properly operates through a manager or managers identified in the articles of organization and/or duly elected pursuant to the terms of a written operating agreement, such document must be executed by at least two such managers or by one manager if the limited liability company properly operates with the existence of only one manager. 5. Requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the above material and other information which the Company may require. F. WITH RESPECT TO A TRUST: 1. A certification pursuant to Section 18100.5 of the California Probate Code in a form First American Title Insurance Company -------------·~-----------------------, • satisfactory to the Company. Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.er:B 2. Copies of those excerpts from the original trust documents and amendments thereto which designate the trustee and confer upon the trustee the power to act in the pending transaction. 3. Other requirements which the Company may impose following its review of the material require herein and other information which the Company may require. G. WITH RESPECT TO INDIVIDUALS: 1. A statement of information. The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American Title Insurance Company expressly disclaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to the extent coverage for such loss or damage is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the title insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached. *****To obtain wire instructions for deposit of funds to your escrow file please contact your Escrow Officer.***** First American Title Insurance Company • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.ber:9 Real property in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP 20982 IN THE OFACE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. APN: 223-050-68-00 and 223-060-31-00 NEW APN : 223-050-71-00 First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.er:lO The First American Corporation First American Title Company Privacy Policy We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal informCition regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of non public personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. First American Title Insurance Company • EXHIBIT A Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.ber: 11 LlST OF PRINTED EXCEPTlONS AND EXCLUSIONS (BY POLleY TYPE) 1. CALlFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLleY· 1990 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTlONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notice of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or enrumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the public records. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exerdse thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exerdse thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by their policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights taws. 2. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER"S POLleY FORM B • 1970 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions of area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse daims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.ber: 12 3. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER"$ POLICY FORM B -1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 2 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Part One I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct suiVey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. Unpatented mining claims; reseNations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. Any lien, or right to a lien, for seNices, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 4. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY-1970 WITH A.L. T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder, (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy). 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY-1970 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association Lenders Policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy, the exclusions set forth in paragraph 4 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Part One I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct suNey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. Unpatented mining claims; reseNations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. Any lien, or right to a lien, for seiVices, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY-1992 WITH A.L. T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.ber: 13 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any taw, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the ocrupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy; (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exerdse thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. 7. AMERICAN LAND lTTLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY-1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Assodation policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 6 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses} which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 8. AMERICAN LAND TTrLE ASSOCIATION OWNER"S POLICY-1992 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) My law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.er:14 any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. 9. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY-1992 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 8 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: Part One: I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 10. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POUCY-1987 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: * land use * land division * improvements on the land * environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: * a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date * the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking. 3. ntle Risks: * that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you *that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date -unless they appeared in the public records * that result in no loss to you * that first affect your title after the Policy Date -this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. First American Title Insurance Company • 5. Lack of a right: Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.ber: 15 *to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A, or * in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. 11. EAGLE PROTEcnON OWNER'S POUCY CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POUCY OF TITLE INSURANCE -2008 ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POUCY OF TITLE INSURANCE-2008 Covered Risks 16 (Subdivision Law Violation). 18 (Building Permit). 19 (Zoning) and 21 (Encroachment of boundary walls or fences) ate subject to Deductible Amounts and Maximum Dollar Limits of Liability EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building b. zoning c. land use d. improvements on the land e. land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk B.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date-this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, S.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21 UMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following C:Overed Risks is limited on the OWner's Coverage Statement as follows: Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Umit of Uability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Covered Risk 16: 1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 19: 1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 21: 1% of Policy Amount or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Uabilitv $10,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $5,000.00 12. THIRD GENERATION EAf;LE LOAN POUCY AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POUCY (1/01/08) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or reJating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or(iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.er:16 (b)Any govemrnental police power. This Exclusion l(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13{d), 14 or 16. 2. Rights of emin~nt domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the C:Ompany by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27 or 28); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mort9Cige and is based upon usury, or any consumer credit protection or truth·in·lending law. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 26. 6. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to Advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11. 7. Any lien on th~ Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching subsequent to Date of Policy. This Extlusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11(b) or 25. B. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion of it, to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 5 or 6. 13. AMERICAN LAND lYTLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY· 2006 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters ar~ expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, otdinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the cx:cupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, Sllffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Oaimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching Qr created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing· business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or Ut'lenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulel'lt conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.er:17 14. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POUCY • 2006 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS When the American Land Title Association policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 13 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses} which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 15. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY-2006 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion l(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion l(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Oaimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured daimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured daimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Oaimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. 16. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POUCY-2006 WITH REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS First American Title Insurance Company • Order Number: NCS-524711-CC Page.er:!B When the American land Title Assodation policy is used as a Standard Coverage Policy and not as an Extended Coverage Policy the exclusions set forth in paragraph 15 above are used and the following exceptions to coverage appear in the policy. SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or enrumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptiOns in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. First American 77tle Insurance Company • • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 11111111111111111111111111111 Applicant: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA LLC Description Amount EIA12004 1,667.00 Receipt Number: R0091457 Transaction ID: R0091457 Transaction Date: 09/26/2012 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 1,667.00 Transaction Amount: 1,667.00 • • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 11111111111111 Applicant: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA LLC Description Amount CT120005 11,220.00 Receipt Number: R0091458 Transaction ID: R0091458 Transaction Date: 09/26/2012 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 11,220.00 Transaction Amount: 11,220.00 • • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Applicant: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA LLC Description Amount PUD12007 8,064.00 Receipt Number: R0091459 Transaction ID: R0091459 Transaction Date: 09/26/2012 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 8,064.00 Transaction Amount: 8,064.00 ' ' • • . ' . City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 IIIII 111111111111111 1111111111111 Applicant: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA LLC Description Amount Vl200002 2,727.00 Receipt Number: R0091461 Transaction ID: R0091461 Transaction Date: 09/26/2012 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2,727.00 Transaction Amount: 2,727.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday CeGter Faraday Cac 'iering 001 1227001-2 09/26/2012 98 i'led, Sep 26, 2012 11:41 AM ·• Receipt Ref Nbr: R1227001-2/0029 PERMITS -PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 122700102 0029 0030 Trans/Pcpt#: R0091457 SET #: E!A12004 Amount: Item Subtota 1: Item Tot a 1: PERMITS -PERMITS 1 @ $1,667.00 $1,667.00 $1,667.00 Tran Ref Nbr: 122700102 0029 0031 Trans/Rcpt#: R0091458 SET #: CT120005 Amount: Item Subtota 1 : Item Tota 1: PERMITS -PERMITS 1 @ $11 '220. 00 $11,220.00 $11 ,220.00 Tran Ref Nbr·: 122700102 0029 0032 Trans/Rcpt#: R0091459 SET #: PUD12f:•i7 Amount: Item Subtota 1 : Item Tot a 1: PERMITS -PERMITS 1 ~ $8,064.00 $8,064.00 $8,064.00 Tran Ref Nbr: 122700102 0029 0033 Trans/Rcpt#: R0091461 SET #: V1200002 Amount: Item Subtotal : Item Tota 1: 4 ITEM(S) TOTAL: Check (Chk# 00021578) Check (Chk# 0134) Total Received: Have a nice day! 1 ~ $2,727.00 $2,727.00 $2,727.00 $23,678.00 $23,441.00 $237.00 $23,678.00 **************CUSTOMER COPY************* • • • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 11111111 11111111111111111~111111111~ IIi 111111 Applicant: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA LLC Description Amount CT120005 146.28 Receipt Number: R0094247 Transaction ID: R0094247 Transaction Date: 03/27/2013 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 146.28 Transaction Amount: 146.28 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1308601-3 03/27/2013 98 ~led, Mar 27, 2013 11:04 AM • • • Receipt Ref Nbr: R1308601-3/0019 PERMITS -PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 130860103 0019 0019 Trans/Rcpt#: R0094247 SET#: CT120005 Amount: Item Subtota 1 : Item Tota 1: ITEM(S) TOTAL: Check (Chk# 1101) Total Received: Have a nice day! 1 @ $146.28 $146.28 $146.28 $146.28 $146.28 $146.28 **************CUSTOMER COPY************* ~st J. Dronenburg, a COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 103 San Diego, CA 92101-2480 www.sdarcc.com RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 P.O.Box121750' ;CA92112-175Q. Tel. (619) 236-3771 • Fax (619) 557-4056 rei. (619)237-o C!'!""'m'ltl.flt:le38AD. MAY l 0 2013 Transaction#: 294382320130508 Deputy: HA YUY AO Location: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 08-May-2013 14:47 I PLAI\NiNG iJfJ'ARi MENT: -----' FEES: 50.00 Qty of 1 Fish and Game Filing Fee for Refll20130360 ----- 50.00 TOTAL DUE PAYMENTS: 50.00 Check 50.00 TENDERED SERVICES AVAILABLE AT OFFICE LOCATIONS • Tax Bill Address Changes • Records and Certified Copies: Birth/ Marriage/ Death! Real Estate • Fictitious Business Names (DBAs) * Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies * Assessor Parcel Maps • Property Ownership • Property Records • Property Values * Document Recordings SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT www.sdarcc.com • Forms and Applications * Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) * Grantor/ Grantee Index • Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs) • Property Sales * On-Line Purchases Assessor Parcel Maps Property Characteristics Recorded Documents ' . .• State of California-The Resource ,~ency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY LEAD AGENCY CITY OF CARLSBAD COUNTY/STAT~AGENCY OF FILING SAN DIEGO PROJECTTITLE LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • RECEIPT# SD2013 0360 STATE CLEARING HOUSE #(trapplieableJ DATE 05/08/2013 DOCUMENT NUMBER .20130081. PROJECT APPLICANT NAME PHONE NUMBER TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA LLC 949/341-1200 PROJECTAPPLICANTADDRESS CITY STATE ZIPCODE ;B~10;5~1~R~V~IN~E:~C~E~N~T~E~R~D~R~IV~E~S~U~IT~E~14~5~0 ________ ~1R~V~I~NE=---------------~C~A~ ____ _L9=26~1~8 __________ __ PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box): 1:1 Local Public Agency 0 School District CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: 1Zl Environmental Impact Report Cl Negative Declaration r:J Other Special District 0 Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) 0 Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Program 12) County Administrative Fee Q Project that is exempt from fees Q Notice of Exemption Q DFG No Effect Determination (Form Attached) CJ Other __________________ _ PAYMENT MEl"HOD: CJ Cash CJ Credit El Check CJ Other..:1~1_:1_::5 ___ _ SIGNATURE X H. Ayuyao REM: 09/21/2009 1RCT: SD2009 000899 I I CJ Statec_Ac;,9::::•nc:c:cy __ _,!ZI,__Pc;r.:.:iv.::at=e.:E:::nt:::it,_y __ _ $2,995.25 $ $0.00 $2,156.25 $ $850.00 $ $1,018.50 $ $50.00 $ $50.00 $ ---------- TOTALRECEIVED $ -----~$5~0::.::.0~0'-- 1111111 IIIII IIIII IIIII 11111111111111111111 11111111 ORIGINAL-PROJECT APPLICANT COPY-DFGIASB COPY -LEAD AGENCY COPY-COUNTY CLERK FG 753.5a (Rev. 7108) . . ' .• N o fD o o otice o etermmation To: D Office of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 SO County Clerk Attn: Jennifer Samuela Mail Stop A-33 1600 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92101 • From: CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 9200~ n l E'' o·· (7 60) 602-4600 IJ= u ~ J Dronellburg, Jr. Ro;o~r Coll1ll' Cle!k MAY 0 8 2013 BY H. Ayuyao Project No: CT 12-05/PUD 12-07N 12-0JJEPUTV Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. La Costa Residential Project Title NA City of Carlsbad, Jason Goff (760) 602-4643 State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person Telephone Number NW comer of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Paseo Lupino, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County Project Locations (include County) Name of Applicant: Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Applicant's Address: 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Applicant's Telephone Number: (949) 341-1200 Project Description: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified La Costa Town Square Project EIR and that the Project EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and Variance for the subdivision, grading and development of a 9.96-acre previously graded site into 41 lots (32 single-family residential, 5 open space, I private street, and 3 private drives) including the development of32 single-family detached residences. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on May I, 2013, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project I. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment 2. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR 01-02) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions ofCEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval ofEIR 01-02. 4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for EIR 01-02. 5. A statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for EIR 01-02. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQ A This is to certify that the final EIR 01-02 with comments and responses and record of project [' ibl"o"" O.,orn! Publio • THE CffY OF ~~BO~DZOIC . '":s: r;; -a DON NEU, City Planner ·· MAYO B ZClJ ,, -JUNU1l"1ll'IJ Date Date received for filing at OPR: ~;~-;,;-;-~c--:J ;;;-:-11~,..·Y"'_~ ....... ~: ... 0..-1i_·_· · __ Revised 04112 • PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 & 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego rna.,,,.. States and a resident am over the age of Jnterested in . clerk . ' ~. known as the Blade-Citizen and The ·Times-Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: April 19"' ,2013 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Escondido, California On This 19th day April, 2013 BEST COpy 4~~ CITY OF ~~~CARLSBAD • • FILE COPY 4·1'0·13 Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 1, 2013, to consider a request for the following: CASE NAME: CT 12-05/ PUD 12-07/ V 12-02-La Costa Residential PUBLISH DATE: April19, 2013 DESCRIPTION: Request for a determination that the project is within the scope of the previously certified La Costa Town Square Project EIR and that the Project EIR adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA; and a request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and Variance for the subdivision, grading and development of a 9.96-acre previously graded site into 41 lots (32 single-family residential, 5 open space, 1 private street, and 3 private drives) including the development of 32 single-family residences on property generally located on the northwest corner of Paseo Lupine and Rancho Santa Fe Road, in the La Costa Master Plan, Neighborhood SE-14 and Local Facilities Management Zone 11. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the staff report will be available online at http://www.carlsbadca.gov/cityhall/meetings/Pages/meeting-videos.aspx on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Jason Goff in the Planning Division at (760) 602-4643, Monday through Thursday 7:30a.m. to 5:30p.m., Friday 8:00a.m. to 5:00p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. D Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 • • \ // /// / I / / • N NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP La Costa Residential CT 12-05 I PUD 12-07 IV 12-02 ' ' \ i I ! 5 I g iE • i ~ i I ~ ! ~ 21 ~ 1!5 >-i ~ ~ ; ~ sa ~ il >' g "' I .... I ~ i ill ~ ~ • 09 ~ SHT 1 ~ @ SHT 2 • 4 SHT 2 PAR 4 22.~AC 1* ~ SHT 4 ~ SHT 1 PM 20982 ROS 12915 6i) SHT 4 ~ l.!.w-<1 SHT 2 1• CTRL#1 0293 NSP SN1 IJEOO CWHY ASSESSM'S liN' t 223-05 1" = 400' 223-050 o.-. 7/20/2rJI2fhR/& F"""'22J-060 '.H.ANC ~S 8IX --IEWNW Ill anN!. 0511 66~10 _. .. OJ -STGP !~1pl-5f, P(JII PC 61 OJ J2 67ot69 SifTS 1-8 fl6 -617-24 OJ lllfltlll 66 _. .. IN 5512 sras> 66~10 --~ II 55n sras> &1711 ~ 71 IIIIJJ 14 IJ 1007 NSP CI\RLSBAD TCT NO 08-03 LA COSTA TOYIN SQUARE -RESIDENTIAL 2° CTRLf1 0292 NSP CARLSBAD TCT NO 01-09 LA COSTA TO'NN SQUARE -COMERCIAL _j • • ,. .1 J • • • 'S • ..... - 09 0 '8 I ... <II .... <£-·!~ SAN DIEGO COUNTY ~~SSQR'S MKP BQOit la3 PAGE 20 SHT I OF'4 • • TitS IMP WAS PAEPAABl 101 ASSES9IENf Plii'OSES IJI.T. ICli.Mili.IIY IS KSSI.MEil fOR TIE Acruw:T Cf TIE DATA 9llWil ASSESSJI "S PARCB.S WIT IClT CIM'l Y WITH lOCAl SUIIDII'ISilll OR IIULOtG OAOh\NCES. I i I I / \ I* CONDO SHADY HOL.LOW-PHASEl:t DOC78-82fl4~ (SEE SHT 3) 2•CONDO SHADY HOLLOW-PHASEm OOC78-82644 (SEE SHT 3l 3*CONDO SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE rz: \ \ OOC78-82645 (SEE SHT.C.) \ LEV ANTE dT \J.V MAP 7950 -CARLSBAD TRACT NO 72-20 UNIT NO 3 223-20 SHT 1 OF 4 9/25/02 JGRO ~ CHANGES IILIC [OLD I""" rcuT li-18 17.: 15~ [11'?1 ~~-~ I <'2" I [J~ r ...... .,r /~ 1.-»o '" /§ .!12Y f: ;;.. ... A -z \ 1"=400' IT SAil DIEGO COUNTY qs£SSORS IIA P .SESSMENT PAR. NU.ER 223-200-15 SUB I . D. [QI] -~ NOTE: EACH SUB 1.0. INCLUDES '-N UNO. l/32 I NT. IN COMMON AREA ASSESSMENT PAR. NUMBER 223 -200 -16 S U B I . 0 . @21-~ NOTE: EACH SUB I.D. INCLUDES AN UNO. 1/26 INT. IN COMMON AREA ..a,I8AC 489 u ·· ... ~ ~{··1·~~·· ... \ J1\ ~ 0 rnJ ~ ~ ~ ~ :·.d ·. ~ IBrl . ~ IRl . a:: ~ l!i\ ~-; > \ .. CA!J . i3 ·-.. ~ •' .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........... -~~-~~-~~~~ .. . . .. . . : ~ ... ~ : BOOK.22).PAGE . .t•L. MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY -----!IHT 3 -9~ ~('~ ~-(?o9) a1 @) • S.!I3AC ... ·' ~ 490 : ~ ~ 0 · ... \]i\ t" .c:..A2.l ·. ~·. r1\ \!) ( ': ~ ~ -~ ·' .· Le ~ · .. 21J .. · .. ·· ~ ....... · ~ ~ . ' ·~::~. /~~ . I . 223-20 SHT 3 ~· ... ' .., LEVANTE ST : CONDOMINIUMS .-....--SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE II -LOT 489 DOC 78-82643 SHADY HOLLOW-PI-lASE Ill-LOT 490 DOC 78-82644 MAP 7950-CARLSBAO TCT 12-20 UNIT NO 3-LOTS 48944QO • • VENADO ST-.., .. .. 8.35AC 140 ·. ··.. . 145 223-20 1 SHT4 NO LE 'fl ~ • '~ "" · ,;. · ~ Qo9) fiJ ~ ~ <~~~v ~ r~~1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~ . r . . . ·.• ~:1 l!il >'"-P. .. ASSESSMENT PAR. NUMBER 223-200-32 SUB I.D.IQIJ-I!IJ NOTE: EACH SUB 1.0. INCLUDES AN UNO. 1/47 INT. IN COMMON A REA SAN DIEGO CDIJHTY ASSESSOR"$ MAP ~\ [J;J ,.,. 110D11.2n.PIIGE . .20 .. IOA~PED FOR ASSES5MFNT PURPOSES ONLY SHT4 CONDOMINIUM SHADY HOLLOW -PHASE IV DOC 78-82645 MAP 7950-CARLSBAO TCT 72-20 UNIT NO 3-LOTS 491&492 .@) SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP. 800M.223.PAGE.2~ .. • • 6}) SHT. I i ' ~94 ~ f: CAao WAy tJ .r-- 6}) SHT.Z 337 / 8 / / Tl - ,. 223-24 j , • .: 100' 'II E9 b'-''JJ 7/ ~ . CHANGE~ Iii OLD NIW an 1-.33 Z5 .551 ....... ..n: .., / / AP 7950 -CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 U.~IT NO. 3 -LOTS 3J8-Jq 1. 395-qJ2.q22-q27,qqt-qqs ------ • 478 0 0.89 AC. So\N DIEGO COUNlV ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK.&DMGE.U. 479 ® 0.88 AC 480 ® o.ee AC. 482 0 0 .. • 4® 0.88 />C.. 461 ® O.QO AC. 460 @) 0.83 AC 483 0 0.74 AC. ESFERA \ 459 ® 1.01 AC- 458 @ 1.04 AC. / .• ' /~ / / r ' I ~ SHT2 22.3-j ····100 ·'I' ; .2:1-17 :J.A. ~ 1-~125-~ / MAP 7950-CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 UNIT N0.3-LOTS qJJ-q2J. qJa-qaq • @ $AN DIEGO COUNTY ASStSSOIIS liiAI' ~ SHT 2 8001C2.23 PI'GE. 28 .. MAPI'ED FOil lSSESSMENT PURPOSE~ ONlY SHTIOF2 • 116 ~ SHT2 223-28 SHTIOF2 e 'fD. " CHANGES -2 ' 1"•100' ILK OI.D NIWIYIII CUT 241 '-.111'1} &Ml /-Hf r .. - \ MAP 8583 -CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 76 -3 . \ • 59 :s @ ~ "' !~ ' ;: 1.25 AC. 1\j • 116 \SHT I \ 65 SAA DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOifS MAP • IOOK.2.23.PAGE .28 MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT p;iRf<-'~~ ONLV SHT 2 01' 2 • -OPEN SPACE ESMT. SUBJECT TO SPECIAL. USE PERMIT ~ ~I I 223-28 SHT 2 OF 2 I . .).;}· 7) \ z I"• 100' CHANGES ILIC OLD NIW ~ CUT !.tie 1/-21111 ~ /•/Z 1211 ::¥ MAP 8583 -CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 76 - 3 • OPEN SPACE • ~ 28 2. AC ~ SHT 5 ~ SHT 1 ~ 31 1.8 AC OPEN SPACE SPACE MAP 14379-CARLSBAD CT 99-04-01 VILLAGES OF LA SAN IIEGO COON1Y ~ IIAP ~ 223-61 SHT 2 OF 7 . ,-= 1oo· t'~-Y 10/23/03 ASF J --UJ-050 6tt , 1HRfJ J1 ()] J2 Eii1 SHT 4 LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH _j ~ 1!1 I ... iE ~ ~ fQ I i! "" ! I ~ I "' ~ ~ I .;; "' 0 ~ "' i 8 !::! ~ "' g al ~ ~ • @ SHT 2 ~ (!?) 0.51 AC ri SHT 2 ~ 42 2.2 AC OPEN SPACE SAN DIEGO CWIIlY IIS5fSS(II'S liN' ! 223-61 SH T 5 OF 7~~.._L..- NI 1" "' 1oo' 9."" '! 11/06/03 ASF j -·"""" !It-'"""'12J-IJflJ HA N<...:: 1-,_::::; /11( 1'111111111'11 ID 11'11 llr ""~ '" 1-<1 111 J2 1,~10 ~ .. 5512 CT 99-04-01 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH _j -• I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITIED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY:~ DATE: &'2T }'2? RECEIVED BY DATE: ___________ _ • ATTACHMENT "2" CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I certify that the "Notice of Project Application" has been posted at a conspicuous location on the site on /J' I• 1'2:. (DATE) SIGNATURE:~ PRINT NAME: .f\f!2-\ L )&zf'lJL..LD PROJECT NAME: l.f'\ ~:fPr l?fc:;,\l?f!'vJJFJL-- PROJECT NUMBER: _ _..C'-1.........._.\ .... ;)_-_os-=---- LOCATION: ----Jrru...C£~W;:;........;U-\::::;......uf.....:l_tn ___ _ RETURN TO: -f-::V~ff=tJ~:::..nJLL-...J(2..~o~af)~fY.....~-___ _ U (Planner) P-21 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION 1635 Faraday Avenue carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 Page4of6 Revised 07/10 (~~CITY OF ~CARLSBAD • • FILE COPY /0· 31·1 0> Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov I EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT NAME: La Costa Residential PROJECT NUMBER: CT 12-05 I PUD 12-07 IV 12-02 This early public notice is to let you know that a development application for a single- family residential project within your neighborhood has been submitted to the City of Carlsbad on September 26, 2012. The project application is undergoing its initial review by the City. LOCATION: The project is located on the northwest corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Paseo Lupino. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project application proposes subdivision and grading of a 9.9-acre parcel for the development of 32 one-and two-story detached single-family homes ranging in size from 1,833 sq. ft. to 2,475 sq. ft. on lots ranging in size from 3,572 sq. ft. to 6,222 sq. ft. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments proposed project please contact Jason Goff, Associate jason.goff@carlsbadca.gov, 760-602-4643, City of Carlsbad Planning Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. regarding this Planner at Division, 1635 Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 I ® City of Carlsbad La Costa Residential CT 12-05/ PUD 12-07 IV 12-02 N A 0 300 600 1 ,200 ----=======-------Feet Map created by the City of Carlsbad GIS. Portions of the DERIVED PRODUCT contain geographic information copyrighted by SanG IS. All Rights Reserved PlANT LEGEND (SUCII AS UST) SIIRUBS""''"""---'"""""•--• E:l !I!OV'"" --~ ~-~---. .. ~..-~..,.c....,.•~~•~,.~,· ..,.,, .... , __ / / / -- , .......... ,...... ,_......., >ru.c _.,. .... -.......... ., !o11N11oru>1 PV.NTI!<(; MBQU!Rf!li{ENTS 1 A,U_'TilEI!S(EXCEI'TONSUJI'E.SJ.!OII!ITEEI'Eil)SIIALLBEA. MllilWUN"' '' GAU.ON SIZII-""'CIFTHI!SiillUBII(I!XCEI'TOI<SLOI'ESl·lOIIS'TEI'PHR)SIW,.I.BB A M!Nl""'M CIF l'!VE (>)GAU.QN SIZE. 1¥1'l!DYliiii.UIIS SllA.ll. BE ru.N!EDOVEJ. KI!RBA.CEOUS GAOUl<D COVl!R ... US TO COV£R-OF THE (liiOIJNDOOVI'Jt AREA (AT MA.TllUSIZE~ Sl'A.C1NC OF PI.ANTSSHA.U.AJUlli FOR TII£IR Sll.f AT MATUIUTY. "i AM tAMil.LU WiTH no• KilQUiO<M.Nts t1lll LA~ilSCA"" A~U IIWOATIOI< 11.Al<S COi'<TI!.lNW II< Tllf OTYOF c.ut.SaA.D'S I.A.I<DSCA.I'~ """"'""""" WATEI; Off!CW<T '""'ll6CA.PfJ.OOlJV.TIOI<S. )JIAVE .... AIW>Tm'S ft.AN IN COOfi'UANC[ WITH '!HM> .llGl!U.TTONS AND '!HI' ~~~~~~~~ ........ lloli'I.F.W!>ml TIIOSE RI!OOV.TJONS TO I'IWVIDEOffll'lENT USE Of WATEil" PICNIC TABLES • 0 f 13 R 0 A D __ .------ SAN>"' ---RANCH ~--------- GRAPHIC SCALE I ,,,. __ .... ,_ .. ___ ... ..... "''~"''"''"''H"Oono LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN LA COSTA 1"0\\tl SClUAIE -"""' 17 • .. f~C#U.IH'•I'# taylor . mornson -I!M• ~ .............. ,...,~ PLAN FORMAL SPANISH PLAN 2 MONTEREY STREET SCENE LA COSTA TOWN CENTER CARLS BAD. CALI FORNIA PLAN 3 SANTA Ot.l 1.11 Bassenian I Lagoni UCl>IICIIU•tlU.IU•ltlfll\111 ~ .. 0::.~~=---= ----6.S 1.1 1111 BARBARA LA COSTA TOWN CENTER """""""'- ' .. • • . / ~ SHT 2 / __ / / / EtiJ SHT 1 J / PAR 4 22.§lAC ,. Eii1 SHT 4 PM 20982 ROS 12915 Eii1 SHT 4 _j I • • • • -~.' :' ' . '. :,;. :•. • .'•'-·' '-II·· >• •• 223 ....... 2:. ~-. '> 4 • • CONDM: ~4AD':' HOL:...OW-PHASE. 1 J DOC 7~-8264~ ., • CONOMt SHADY HOLLOW-,HAS[ Ill DOC 78-82644 ••• CONDM: SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE. :v DOC 78-8264~ rf, ' 'e./ ESFERA ST. 223-20 :;HT I OF 4 .........., \ I"=H --- CHANGES fiLii I OLD fNI_w lv.:cur 11-18 ~$':'__ --,-"'II• !·nl"77 T: i/t;;~ R ,, .... ,.,·~ ~ ' l:.•. ' : lm'tA •o:r; ""' lTd I.J?::.- /~ I 32'"' ~ r,., -u~ '-= ! I ' ' I ; ; _l ' ; ' ' i ! ' SAN DIEGo COUNTV OSSESSORs MAP A'SESSMENT PAR. NUM~R 223-200-15 SUB I.D.[Q]J-~ NOTE: EACH SUB 1.0. INCLUDES l\N UNO. 1/32 I NT. IN COMMON ~.REA ASSESSMENT PAR. NUMBER 22.3 -200-16 S U 8 I. 0. (£)-!liD NOTE: EACH SUB 1.0. INCLUDES AN UNO. 1/26 I NT. IN COMMON AREA s~ ~ lBil ~ ~ ~ ~.\~ ' .. ' . •' rffijJ 'L2.!J BOOK22li.PAGE.J.II .... MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY !IHT 3 223-20 SHT3 ~ NO SCALE , LEVANTE ST CONDOMINIUMS SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE II -LOT 489 DOC 78 -82643 SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE Ill-LOT 490 DOC 78-82644 MAP 7950-CARLSBAD TCT 12-20 UNIT NO 3-LOTS 489&4QO • EsF"~ ""RA :' • VENADO Sl --;-... 223-20 ). SHT4 NO 'fl LE : 1!1 ·. ', 137 . 107 151 ·. () ·. I :' -.. . ~ -;' AGUA . ".. 09 @ ·. ~ ·. / <Jo D . . I!! ..... , ·,: ·.......... .: liil ~ ·~" " "<ce .. "> 0 0 liiL. ~ 1!!1 ' : Sl!l1 147 \:EQ--J . -~ ', .· wiJ J;; &?. 3 ~ , ~~.ro ~ ·. rk ··~ ,, ~\ . ~ rn 126 ~ SAN DIEGO o\l!SES COUNTY BOOK SOR'S MAP .zn PAGJf,P4· OIAI'PEO FOR ASSESSMFNT PURPOSE 5 O~LY ASSESSM 223 • 200. EN T pAR NOTE: et2 SUB 1' ~UMBER AN u N D c H suB I D.IQIJ -tnl . I /47 I NT . . I N C L U DE AREA' IN COMMO~ UNIT NO 3-LOT s 491&492 $ I "' ., "' ~ 6jJ SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASstSSORS MA~ BOOM 223. PAGE. Z~ .. • < =>· ~ -a. • 389 395 @ I.Oe AC. o~>e~y .... "'ce @ 1.;3 AC. 1~.01 407 aoJ..Itf. @ ® 4Z4 ~ SHT. I ta4j 7: ~~ tc.,. ; ' :l42 ~94 :of ~ CABo WAy If/ "J r--l.J, t i ~ SHT. 2. .. .... ·- 337 / . ~38 / @ SHT I t;{ SHT 2 223-24 b (ft.J 71 ~ &;~~ ----· .. ' /MAP 7950 -CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 U.~IT NO. 3 -LOTS 338-3'+1. / 395-412.422-427.4qJ-qqs • 478 0 o.ee AC. SAN COEGO COUNlV ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK .2.Z.1PAGE. Zll.. 480 0 O.B& AC. • \ 4® 0.88 AC. 461 ® 0.80 AC. 459 ® 1.01 AC· 483 0 0.74 AC. 484 ~ 0.57 AC. ESFERA -25 ~ ··~· 100' .· '1' i I ' / 4~8 @ 1.04 AC. ~· SHT 2 O.lle AC. 44-~6 e '~ / / ' LOZ AC. .>'. '~ / / rtJ SHll /' ~MAP 7950-CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 UNIT N0.3-lOTS 413-421. ~ 478-481+ .. "-.._1 6ij SHT.2 @ 1>.\N DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSD~'S MAP BOOK2.23 PAGE. 28 .. MAPPED FOR •SSESSMENT PURPOSE~ ONLY Slo4TIOf2 • • 59 I~I.H 116 ~ SHT .2 223-28 SHT I OF 2 CHANGES IIJ( OL D NIWIY.CUY l.t'6J I,:MD I 111.1! I ,__m If .,j w MAP 8583 -CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 76 - 3 \ \ ~ • 59 ~ (@) ~ GiJ "' ' 1.25 fi<C. 1:1 ., ~ 116 • SHT I \ I \ \ 65 ' SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR"S MAP . 800~.2Z3.PAGE .21 MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT p·.:RPc'~~ ONL\ SHT 2 OF 2 ,('~ ~.., "' (!) 90 <§)~ ~ f -OPEN SPACE E5t.IT. SUBJECT TO SPECIAL USE PERMIT ~I . c6 ~ 223-28 SHT 2 OF 2 I J.j;J.J) CHANGES I"= 100' ILIC OLD NIWlYICUT I Mil ~.~ ...... n 1 1-/·ti!TI ... ..,. MAP 8583 • CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 76 - 3 • • SAN Dt:GO caJHTY ASSESSOR'S WAP 6]j ~ 223-61 SHT 2 OF 7 Nl 1" = 1 00' j. 10/23/03 ASI' j DiO Ftrm: 22J-050 SHT 1 ~ 29 1.7 AC 1~ 28 2.5 AC ~ 31 1.8 AC OPEN E& SPI\CE SHT 5 EiiJ SHT 4 ~ SHT 2 MAP 14379-CARLSBAD CT 99-04-01 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH __j ~----------------------~~----------------------------------------~----· • I 09 @ SHT 2 I l!i I ~ ; i i !C .. I UJ I -' 5 ! ;:5 2i ~ l!s I ~ II! I fQ I i ... I I ~ I ..., II! ~ I ..., 0 r ..., ;: 0 0 £:! !I! ~ "' r !!! r ~ 17 0.5 AC \ \ \ \ \ ~ SHT 2 ~ -42 2.2 AC OPEN SPACE SAN CIEGO COONlY ASS£SStll'S 11.\P ! 223-61 ~ SHT 5 OF 7 ~ AP 14379-CARLSBAD CT 99-04-01 VILLAGES OF LA COSTA -LA COSTA OAKS SOUTH ..J • • ATTACHMENT "1" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAIL,A.BLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. -f>AtrNic:J"f'fr 7/3' /12 ... APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER c..-r \'koo-k CO?to-'f;e~kxBG..\ RECEIVED BY ~~~=--- DATE: "]/z.7/Zp!2 I I P-21 Page 3 of 6 Revised 07/10 • • ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Completed by Applicant) Date Filed: _<1...:....-.::'1-.::r..:...-..:ZO=I..:::'l..,____ _____ (To be completed by City) Application Number(s): _~.C.:..:TLll .l<'Z..c::-~0552..1j-J/ ?v.i::!<~.D!.Ll\J.'Z..:~:.so2..'7L.J/LV~IL7'-<<=<>=f2.1.7 __________ _ General Information 1. Nameofproject: ~Cd.:>h g..6j'dy0 b'w\ 2. Name of developer or project sponsor: _T:.:A.:..Y:..:L::O:.:R.:..:.:M::O::.R.::.R.::.IS=O:::..:N:...._ __________ _ Address: 81051RVINE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1450 City, State, Zip Code: CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Phone Number: ~(94~9~).::.34~1;_-1~2=00=------------------------ 3. Name of person to be contacted concerning this project: _AP_R_IL_T_O_R_N_I_L_LO ______ _ Address: 8105 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1450 City, State, Zip Code: CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Phone Number: (949) 341-1200 4. Address of Project: NORTH OF RANCHO SANTA FE RD. SOUTH OF OLD RANCHO SANTA FE RD. WEST OF PASEO LUPINO Assessor's Parcel Number: ..:2::2::3-....:0::50-:.:....:68::..:&:.22=3-0:....:.:60-=3:.1:...._ ____________ _ 5. List and describe any other related permHs and other public approvals required for this project, Including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT & VARIANCE 6. Existing General Plan Land Use Designation: RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM) 4-8 UNITS/AC 7. Existing zoning district: PLANNED COMMUNITY (LA COSTA MASTER PLAN-MP 149R) 8. Existing land use(s): ..:V:..;A::::C::..:A::.:N.:..T.:.R:::O::::U::::G::.H.:...G:::..:RA=D::.ED:::.._ __________________________ __ 9. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Project Description 10. Site size: __ 9_.9_A __ C_R_Es ____________________________________________ _ 11. Proposed Building square footage: Homes range in size from 1,800 to 2,500 square feet. 12: Number of floors of construction: One and two story level homes proposed. 13. Amount of off-street parking provided: 2 spaces per garage, 2 spaces per driveway plus 27 guest spaces. 14. Associated projects: .::LA:..:...:C:.::O::::S::.;T:.:.A:...T.:..:O:.W:..:.:..:N:...:S:::O::::U::::A:..:R:..:E::._ ______________ _ P-1(D) Page 2 of4 Revised 07/10 • • 15. If residential, include the number of units and schedule of unit sizes: _3_2_u_n_its;.:_ ______ _ Homes range in size from 1,800 to 2,500 square feet. 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: __.!.N!!./~A'-------------------- 17. 18. 19. P·1(D) If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: _:N~/~A:.._ __ _ If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived frcm the project: _.:..:N~/A~------ If the project involves a variance, conditional use '!r rezoning applications, sta.te this and indi"?Bte . clearly why the application is required: Due to the Irregular shape of the land, Its topography, Its umque entitlement history, and in order to meet the City's Growth Management Control Point for the RM zone, we are requesting a Variance from the required 5,000 sq. ft. lot area development regulation restriction. We have included the Variance findings attached for your review. Page 3 of4 Revised 07110 • • Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No 20. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or substantial D ~ alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or D roads. 22. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. D IZl 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. D IZI 24. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. D IZI 25. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or D IZI alteration of existing drainage patterns. 26. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. D I[] 27. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. D IKI 28. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, D lXI flammables or explosives. 29. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, D ~ etc.). 30. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). D ~ 31. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. IZI D Environmental Setting Attach sheets that include a response to the following questions: 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of myn·ty, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my kno le e and~ Date: q .[,0 '~ Signature: CJ~@ ' For: lAf\-Of ~{<::()~ OtCnrU...C P-1(0) Page 4 of 4 Revised 07/10 • EIA Form Supplemental Questions • 32. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. The La Costa Residential project is part of the La Costa Town Square approvals in 2009. The property was analyzed as part of Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 01-02. The EIR, Candidate Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were adopted per Planning Commission Resolution No. 6577. The site is graded and vacant of any structures. The property currently has and will continue to gain access off of Paseo Lupino. The graded pad is relatively flat. The site sits higher than neighborhoods to the west and lower than neighborhoods to the east. Maximum slopes on site are 2:1. A geotechnical investigation was performed and is included with this submittal for you reference. There is no historical significance associated with this property and the Initial Study found Cultural Resources to not be significant. Rancho Santa Fe Road is identified as a "community scenic corridor". The property sits higher than Rancho Santa Fe Road and will not disrupt the scenic corridor of the roadway. All homes will be either one or two story levels, which is consistent with the adjacent homes. 33. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. The surrounding properties include two existing single family developments located directly east and directly north of the property. The single family site to the north sits below the subject site and is separated by Old Rancho Santa Fe Road. As a part of the La Costa Master Plan, a new commercial and office shopping center will be located south of the site and Rancho Santa Fe Road. The adjacent areas do not contain any sensitive plants or animals. There is no significant cultural or historical value in the neighboring area. The proposed land use is consistent with the surrounding uses. . . • • The residential development is proposed as one and two stories and of similar character as the surrounding residential developments outside the project site. There is no state or local designated scenic vistas that would be impacted by the proposed project as the proposed project will implement visually appealing landscaping and building designs consistent with other appropriate City guidelines, no impact associated with scenic corridors would occur. Please find attached site photos for your reference. «t~ CITY OF "' CARLSBAD Memorandum August 27, 2013 To: From: Re: John Kim, Traffic Engineering Division Mike Peterson, Development Services Manager Nick Roque, Transportation -Streets Lori Allen, Police Department GIS Department Greg Ryan, Fire Department Glen Van Peski, Land Use Engineering Planning Technician STREET NAMES FOR CT 12-05 -LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL The following street names have been approved as a part of the final map processing for CT 12-05 -LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL. A map delineating street locations is attached. Private Streets: A Avenida Soria B Circulo Ronda C Calle Nerja D Calle Tarifa As much as you are able, please make sure approved street names are shown and spelled correctly on all final map and construction drawings. Attachment c: Jason Goff, Project Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Mario Remillard, Mtce. & Opr. Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax • • CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS DATE: MARCH 11, 2013 FINAL REVISED PLANS INCLUDED [8J TO: 1:8] LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING-TERIE ROWLEY D POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY ~FIRE DEPARTMENT-GREG RYAN cgj BUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS D RECREATION-MARK STEYAERT [8J LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT-PELA cgj PARKS/TRAILS-LIZ KETABIAN D M & 0-CMWD-STEVE PLYLER *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS ON PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 B"<<-" PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL +?iic · APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO PROPOSAL: 32 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES & 2 0/S LOTS w~ . ~ Please review and submit written conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by4/1/1r.'ityiluha\le "No Conditions1l, please so state. Please note that time is of the !!Ssence,~as the staff report preparation has begun. If you have any questions, please contact JASON GOFF, at 4643. THANK YOU -. COMMENTS: b~ r JJ6 ~w..e:.....n-C:. .OfZ:.-~rno~. <2z.];:AN> c: File Request for Conditions ' 3/10 ,-------------• • CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS DATE: MARCH 11. 2013 FINAL REVISED PLANS INCLUDED If.. TO: I:8J LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING-TERIE ROWLEY D POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY [gj FIRE DEPARTMENT-GREG RYAN 'ltBUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS D RECREATION-MARK STEYAERT [gj LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CONSULTANT-PELA [gj PARKS/TRAILS-LIZ KETABIAN D M & 0-CMWD-STEVE PLYLER *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS ON PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02..,." PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL ''"'"' .. APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO PROPOSAL: 32 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES & 2 0/S LOTS ~:(t/:/ .. \' . Please review and submit written conditions to the 'PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 4/1/13. it you have "No Conditions", please so state. Please note that time is of the e~ence, as'the staff report preparation has begun. If you have any questions, please contact JASON GOFF, at 4643. " THANK YOU coMMENTs: !;Jr;~n/ wM? ,&e aNB WJ/&!1 OJttJsrf2.ti?7C#J f'UJNs ~ >~.J&.Mt r rEV zz; 1'liG= &l!'f f?I>L- c: File Request for Conditions 3/10 • • CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS DATE: MARCH 11, 2013 FINAL REVISED PLANS INCLUDED ~ TO: ISJ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING-TERIE ROWLEY D POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY ~FIRE DEPARTMENT-GREG RYAN ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS D RECREATION-MARK STEYAERT ~ LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT-PELA '"PARKS/TRAILS-LIZ KETABIAN 0 M & 0-CMWD-STEVE PLYLER *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS ON PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 '~~'" ., PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL 'fl'' · APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO PROPOSAL: 32 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES & 2 0/S LOTS '· Please review and submit written conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, b/4'7:i.Zl3 .• 1fyou have "No Conditions", please so state. Please note that time is of the essence, 'as the staff report preparation has begun. If you have any questions, please contact JASON GOFF, at 4643. THANK YOU COMMENTS·. _ _. c: File Request for Conditions 3/10 ,• Liz Ketabian From: .$ant: To: Cc: • Don Neu Wednesday, March 20,2013 11:37 AM Jason Goff; Chris DeCerbo Liz Ketabian • Subject: RE: La Costa Residential (CT 12-05 ... )-Request for Conditions Jason, The proposed conditions are okay with me. I would recommend adding to the conditions that they be placed on the construction plans as notes so that the field inspectors are aware of the requirements. Thanks. Don From: Jason Goff Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:28 AM To: Don Neu; Chris DeCerbo Cc: Uz Ketabian' Subject: FW: La Costa Residential (CT 12-05 ... ) -Request for Conditions Importance: High Don/Chris, In the email below, Liz Ketabian has proposed a condition to the project that addresses interruption and possible encroachments onto the Citywide trail (i.e., Old Rancho Santa Fe Road) running adjacent to the project. This condition has not yet been integrated into the CT resolution that Chris has already looked at and Don you should have at present. Below are two bolded conditions I am planning to add to the resolution. If you see any issues with these, please let me know at your earliest convenience so I can adopt them. I have conferred with Liz regarding the modifications. She Is in agreement with the proposed changes. Condition 1: Developer shall provide a minimum 48 hour notification to the City of Carlsbad Parks Division regarding any use of the Old Rancho Santa Fe Road public trail for construction activities Including, but not limited to, access to overhead and underground utilities within the public trail right-of-way. Notification on such matters shall be made by contacting · i Michael Bliss, Parks SUpervisor at (760}434-2985, or by contacting the Parks Maintenance Division Office at (760) 434- 2824, 1166 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008. Condition 2: Prior to any construction activities commencing within any portion of the Old Rancho Santa Fe Road public trail right- of-way, developer shall close the trail and provide for trail closure signage at the Old Ranch Santa Fe Road trailheads located at Cadencla Street (northerly end of trailhead} and at La Costa Avenue (southerly end of trailhead). JASON GOFF 1 AsSOCIATo PLANNER 760.602.4643 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION From: Liz Ketablan Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:59AM To: Jason Goff cc: Kyle Lancaster; Michael Bliss 1 S~bject: RE: La Costa Residential (·2-05 ... ) -Request for Conditions • Importance: High Hi Jason, I am returning the plans in interoffice mail today, and have no further comments on the plans. However, from looking at the plans it is evident that there will be some encroachment into the public trail right of way for some of the construction operations mainly for some utility modifications. Therefore, we would like to put the responsibility for any trail closures and not open up the City for any potential liability that could arise from any construction activities that spill over into the public trail right of way. I've crafted this particular condition arid request that this be included as a condition for this project. Applicant and/or Contractor for the development of La Costa Residential, shall provide a 48 hour notification to the City of Carlsbad Parks Division regarding any use of the Old Rancho Santa Fe Rd. trail for any construction activities including, but not limited to, the access to overhead and underground utilities within the public trail right of way. Notification on such matters shall be by contacting Michael Bliss, Parks Supervisor at 760-434-2985 or the Parks Maintenance Division Office at 760-434-2824, 1166 Carlsbad Village Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92008. In addition, prior to any construction activities commencing within the public trail right of way the applicant and /or contractor for the La Costa Residential development shall close the trail and provide and be responsible for trail closure signage at the Old Ranch Santa Fe Rd. trailheads at the north end at Cadencia St. and at the La Costa Ave. trailhead at the south end of the trail prior to any construction activities commencing. Thanks. Liz From: Jason Goff Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 2:20 PM To: Tecla Levy; 'Michael Elliott (mikeelliott2@cox.net)'; Liz Ketabian; Gregory Ryan; Will Foss Subject: La Costa Residential (CT 12-05 ... ) -Request for Conditions Importance: High Please note that we just routed the latest version of plans to each of you for conditions. I believe on the last review Building, Fire, and Parks had no comments or conditions for the project, it was only Planning, Engineering, and PELA that had minor comments. I have scheduled this project for the PC Hearing of 5/1/2013. No major changes have occurred since the last submittal; just some clean-up consistency items. Please note that despite what the routing slip says regarding a due date (4/1) for conditions, in order to make the 5/1 PC hearing we really need your conditions no later than 3/21. I would greatly appreciate it if you all could please take a look at these plans as soon as possible and let me know if you will have conditions. If you see an issue that can be conditioned, then please do so instead. Thank you. Sincerely, Jason «~1'; ~CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Division Jason Goff Associate Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 2 • • March 12, 2013 TO: FROM: RE: Jason Goff, Associate Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review-Conceptual Review-4th Review La Costa Residential, CT 12-05, PUD 12-07 Rancho Santa Fe Road MELA file: 467. La Costa Residential-Con4 Landscape Architect: SJA, Phone: (949) 276-6500 All previous comments have been satisfactorily addressed. • • CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS DATE: MARCH 11. 2013 FINAL REVISED PLANS INCLUDED s• TO: .LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING TEIUE<R9NI !¥-r"t0-Ul ~VV D POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY FROM: ~ FIRE DEPARTMENT-GREG RYAN ~ BUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS D RECREATION-MARK STEYAERT ~LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT-PELA ~ PARKS/TRAILS-LIZ KETABIAN D M & 0-CMWD-STEVE PLYLER *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS ON PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02~e • PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL -· APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO PROPOSAL: 32 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES & 2 0/S LOTS ~'!'··· Please review and submit written conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the . . . . .· .. . Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by4(1/13.Jfyou have "No Conditions", please so state. Please note that time is of the essence, as the staff report preparation has begun. If you have any questions, please contact JASON GOFF. at 4643. '· THANK YOU COMM ENTS: _ _.:L=cl"-') 11><----...:.\-'i...::rM __ vw __ o..J..:._cJ_, t..:........'o_~_f __ CO_IM._M_e_vt_k_._~_d_vw ___ _ ch.~~ -G, ~ en51 t1eetl1 C.OY1&t.cttoV\ s-d~lid fe-br~ as 1 .20 !?; . c: File Request for Conditions 3/10 ~0 . ' CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO • DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2013 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-0S/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 ·!!&?:' PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL REVIEW NO: 3 . ··· -~--1 APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO TO: [8] :fi,, ~ D D D [8] D D D D ~ Land Development Engineering-Tecla Levy Police Department-J. Sasway Fire Department-Greg Ryan Building Department-Will Foss Recreation-Mark Steyaert Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque _____________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plan check Consultant -PELA _____________ School District North County Transit District-Planning Department Sempra Energy-Land Management Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION ~:·\~( •' .', ' J Please review and submit written comments and/orconditionsto the PLANNIN.GTRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, byJhi~,Zii: 1tyo~ have "No Comments," pleas~ so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. IJI( l'fU.utous I $AT! :J3 .eaf . l-27-Zor'2j Signature Date PLANS A IT ACHED Review & Comment 12/12 • CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Discretionary Review Checklist PROJECT NUMBER: CT 12-05/ PUD 12-07/ V 12-02 BUILDING ADDRESS: ~P_,_A.:::S:::E:.::O:..!L:.::U"-P.:.;.IN:_:O~----------------- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 32 SFD ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 223-050-71-00 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. By: G. RYAN Date: 2.27.2013 ATTACHMENTS COMMENTS DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with [iS]. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: --------Date: By: --------Date: By: --------Date: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON NAME: ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 602-4665 • Memorandum February 25, 2013 To: From: Subject: Jason Goff, Project Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V12-02 -La Costa Residential • The engineering department has completed its review of the project. The engineering department is recommending that the project be approved, subject to the following conditions: Engineering Conditions NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the · approval of this proposed subdivision, must be met prior to approval of a final map, building or grading permit whichever occurs first. General 1. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the city engineer for the proposed haul route. 2. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property, unless the district engineer has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of permit issuance and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. 3. Developer shall submit to the city planner, a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of the Site Plan and conceptual grading plan, preliminary utility plan reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body. The reproducible shall be submitted to the city planner, reviewed and, if acceptable, signed by the city's project engineer and project planner prior to submittal of the building plans, improvement plans, grading plans, or final map, whichever occurs first. 4. Developer shall provide to the City Engineer, an acceptable means, CC&Rs and/or other recorded document, addressing maintenance, repair, and replacement of shared private improvements within the subdivision including but not limited to the following as shown in the tentative map: Page 1 of 6 • • • a) Private Street "A", Private Drive "B", "C" and "D" including street trees, sidewalks, landscaping, street lighting, enhanced paving. b) Water quality treatment and hydromodification basins in lots 3S, 36,and 37 c) All storm drain facilities including outlet structures d) Open space slopes and retaining walls e) Landscaping within Rancho Santa Fe Road parkway at the project frontage. The costs of such maintenance shall be distributed in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the subdivision. 5. Developer shall prepare, submit and process for city engineer approval a final map to subdivide this project. There shall be one Final Map recorded for this project. 6. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in accordance with City landscape Manual and City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this condition. 7. The developer shall process street vacation of the excess right-of-way of Paseo lupino, north of Corte Brezo as shown on the tentative map and to the satisfaction of the city engineer. Fees/ Agreements 8. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation, the city's standard form Geologic Failure Hold Harmless Agreement. 9. Developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city engineer for recordation the city's standard form Drainage Hold Harmless Agreement. 10. Developer shall cause property owner to submit an executed copy to the city engineer for recordation a city standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Maintenance Agreement. 11. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, developer shall cause owner to give written consent to the city engineer for the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street lighting and landscaping District No. 1 and/or to the formation or annexation into an additional Street lighting and landscaping District. Said written consent shall be on a form provided by the city engineer. 12. Prior to approval of the Final Map, developer shall cause property owner to execute and submit to the city for recordation a Prepayment Agreement with the city for prepayment of the obligation for funding to improve Rancho Santa Fe Road, which will Page 2 of 6 ... • • satisfy the special condition in the Zone 11 LFMP requ1rmg a financing plan guaranteeing construction of Rancho Santa Fe Road. The Prepayment Agreement shall be in a form to the satisfaction of the city attorney and city engineer. Grading 13. Upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Developer shall prepare and submit plans and technical studies/reports for city engineer review, post security and pay all applicable grading plan review and permit fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 14. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, developer shall submit to the city engineer receipt of a Notice of Intent from the State Water Resources Control Board. 15. Prior to the issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first, developer shall submit for city approval a Tier 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (TIER 3 SWPPP). The TIER 3 SWPPP shall comply with current requirements and provisions established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and City of Carlsbad Requirements. The TIER 3 SWPPP shall identify and incorporate measures to reduce storm water pollutant runoff during construction of the project to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall pay all applicable SWPPP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 16. This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to city engineer approval, to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment requirements per the city's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), latest version. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, the developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches to ensure that runoff from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc.) are drained through landscaped (pervious) areas prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable SWMP plan review and inspection fees per the city's latest fee schedule. 17. Developer is responsible to ensure that all final design plans (grading plans, improvement plans, landscape plans, building plans, etc.) incorporate all source control, site design, treatment control BMP, applicable hydromodification measures, and Low Impact Design (LID) facilities. 18. Developer shall submit documentation, subject to city engineer approval, demonstrating how this project complies with hydromodification requirements per the city's SUSMP, latest version. Documentation shall be included within the Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP). 19. Supplemental grading plans may be required for the precise grading associated with the Page 3 of 6 • • project. Dedications/Improvements 20. Developer shall cause owner to dedicate to the city a 2-foot pedestrian easement for the proposed non-contiguous sidewalk along Rancho Santa Fe Road as shown on the tentative map. All land so offered shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the city. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. Additional easements may be required at final design to the satisfaction of the city engineer. 21. Developer shall design the private street "A" and private drive "B", "C" and "D", as shown on the tentative map to the satisfaction of the city engineer. The structural section of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R- value tests. All private streets shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees for private streets. 22. Developer shall design the private drainage systems, as shown on the tentative map to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All private drainage systems 12" diameter storm drain and larger shall be inspected by the city. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees for private drainage systems. 23. Developer shall prepare and process public improvement plans and, prior to city engineer approval of said plans, shall execute a city standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement to install and shall post security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 for public improvements shown on the tentative map. Said improvements shall be installed to city standards to the satisfaction of the city engineer. These improvements include, but are not limited to: a. Construct non-contiguous sidewalk including pedestrian ramps along Rancho Santa Fe Road and Paseo lupino. Developer shall pay the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 36 months of approval of the subdivision or development improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement. Non-Mapping Notes 24. Add the following notes to the final map as non-mapping data: A. Developer has executed a city standard Subdivision Improvement Agreement and has posted security in accordance with C.M.C. Section 20.16.070 to install public improvements shown on the tentative map. These improvements include, but are not Page 4 of6 ~ . • • limited to: a. Construct non-contiguous sidewalk including pedestrian ramps along Rancho Santa Fe Road and Paseo Lupino. b. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the appropriate agency determines that sewer and water facilities are available. B. Geotechnical Caution: 1) The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance. C. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor as defined by City of Carlsbad Engineering Standards or line-of-sight per Caltrans standards. D. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any diversion of waters, the alteration of the normal flow of surface waters or drainage, or the concentration of surface waters or drainage from the drainage system or other improvements identified in the city approved development plans; or by the design, construction or maintenance of the drainage system or other improvements identified in the city approved development plans. Utilities 25. Developer shall meet with the fire marshal to determine if fire protection measures (fire flows, fire hydrant locations, building sprinklers) are required to serve the project. Fire hydrants, if proposed, shall be considered public improvements and shall be served by public water mains to the satisfaction of the district engineer. 26. Developer shall design and construct public facilities within public right-of-way or within minimum 20-foot wide easements granted to the district or the City of Carlsbad. At the discretion of the district or city engineer, wider easements may be required for adequate maintenance, access and/or joint utility purposes. 27. Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges for connection to public facilities. Page 5 of 6 • • 28. The developer shall design landscape and irrigation plans utilizing recycled water as a source and prepare and submit a colored recycled water use map to the Planning Department for processing and approval by the district engineer. 29. The developer shall meet with and obtain approval from the Leucadia Wastewater District regarding sewer infrastructure available or required to serve this project. 30. The developer shall meet with and obtain approval from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District regarding potable water infrastructure available or required to serve this project. 31. Developer shall install recycled water services and meters at locations approved by the district engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 32. The developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at locations approved by the District engineer. The locations of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvement plans. 33. The developer shall design and construct public water, sewer, and recycled water facilities substantially as shown on the tentative map to the satisfaction of the district engineer. Code Reminders The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 34. This tentative map shall expire two years from the date on which the planning commission voted to approve this application. 35. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the tentative map are for planning purposes only. Page6 of6 • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2013 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-0S/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 (,\¥;'' PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO TO: 18) D IZJ IZJ D D D IZJ D D D D IZJ land Development Engineering-Tecla Levy Police Department-J. Sasway .-~ Fire Department-Greg Ryan Building Department-Will Foss Recreation -Mark Steyaert Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque _____________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA _____________ School District North County Transit District-Planning Department Sempra Energy-Land Management Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to th~PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, oy"i./2.8/ff lfy~~ h~v~ "No Comments," please' so state. If you determine that there are iteli1s'that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS : __ i',_{:.Lc,.:........;c::....:..cow..-+-r1-+---'v)<--i.f£1-'---Wl--"'-I~.:..:O_r---'co::..:;_II\-'-IIIM--h_e.t-'--'-fk...,:_~ _,pF-'IA__;,I\..,;..,~ ·--- ~ ()Je -e~r•1 C)I\Glih;,lt.l E>b t.tpp"'IIIU. SJ~ ~ature Date PLANS A IT ACHED Review & Comment 12/12 • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2013 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-0S/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 'i,'!f'*· PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • . REVIEW NO: 3 V · ,, APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO TO: IZI D IZI IZI D D D IZI D D D D ;l!Clll,,, ·IZ!5J" Land Development Engineering-Tecla Levy Police Department-J. Sasway Fire Department-Greg Ryan Building Department-Will Foss Recreation-Mark Steyaert Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque _____________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plan check Consultant -PELA _____________ School District North County Transit District-Planning Department Sempra Energy-Land Management Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION :•'':'-·. ' Please review and submit written comments and/o~,;.ollJ!L\,i.(?,IJ.HOJhe.PLAJ\lNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, bY,!'!l!~J3:, If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS: ' )J) ~~ iJM. y c?,£~~" I I Date PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 12/12 ..)q • • February 11,2013 TO: FROM: RE: Jason Goff, Associate Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review-Conceptual Review-3'd Review La Costa Residential, CT 12-05, PUD 12-07 Rancho Santa Fe Road MELA file: 467-La Costa Residential -ConJ Landscape Architect: SJA, Phone: (949) 276-6500 Please advise the applicant to make the following revisions to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-3 Completed. 4. At a minimum, plans shall include the following items: a. Existing conditions (grades, plants, property lines, easements. right -of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all above items. Insure no trees are located within utility easements. 3'd Review: Easements are difficult to see and some are not shown/labeled (water and sewer). Trees appear to be shown inside the water and sewer easements. Please clearly show and label all easements (darken and label) and insure no trees are located within the easements. b. Completed. c. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. d. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3-B in section 3 of the Landscape Manual) and Cal Trans sight distance standards (i.e.: stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. 3'd Review: Sight lines are difficult to see. Please darken lines to be easily seen e-h Completed. 5-12 Completed. 13. Please jlrovide a eojly ofjllaHs that Sjleeify all wallslfeHeiH~ with jlrojlosed materials aHd heights for review. Provide an elevationldetail ofeaeh. 2" Review: Walls to the east of Paseo Lupino appear to be split face block. Please revise to split face with cap to match existing walls to the east. 3'd Review: Please revise to "split face" block. 14-15 Completed. La Costa Residential Conceptual Plan Review • 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. • February II, 2013 Page2 a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. c. Completed. d. Completed. e. Landscape features (shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the Cal Trans sight distance lines. f. CalTrans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. 3'd Review: Both CalTrans and 25' corner sight lines are not legible. Please darken the lines so they can be seen. Please correct the callouts and leader. 17-18 Completed. 19. PFevide a minimt1m ef ene stfeet tFee fuF every 4 Q' ef stfeet frelltage. Trees may ae fllallted en eelltef ef gFet!ped. 2nd Review: Please continue the Jaeamnda and-Pines to the end of the project. See NEW COMMENT lA 3'd Review: Please continue the Pinus torreyana theme trees to the end of the project. 20-23 Completed. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 2nd Review: Is there a reason not to include these areas as recycled water use? Drip can be used around the picnic and BBQ areas. Please review with OMWD for a final determination and provide documentation ofOMWD direction. Revise water use calculations as appropriate. 3'd Review: The applicant has responded: "Reclaimed and domestic water crossings requirements make the use of reclaimed within the community prohibitive." Please provide documentation ofOMWD direction. It is not clear what makes this prohibitive. Please explain. 25. Completed. 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms as provided in appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 2nd Review: Please correct the MAW A and ETWU calculations as indicated. Please note that with corrections the ETWU exceeds the MAW A. Revise design as appropriate to provide an ETWU that does not exceed the MAW A 3rd Review: Although the ETWU is less than the MA WA, the calculation is still incorrect. Please make revisions as appropriate. 27. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored/hatched water use plan) for the next submittal. 1 A. Belew is an eJteeFpt frem Planned Develeflmellt Table C FegaFding arterial setilaek landseaping: ' La Costa Residential Conceptual Plan Review • ----~ ------------, • February 11, 2013 Page 3 Half(50%) eftile ref!Hirea arterial setbaek area leeatea elesest te tile arterial silall be fully lanaseapea te enilanee tile street seene ana bHffer ilemes H-em traffie en aajaeent arterials, ana: * Silall eentain a minimHm efene 24" bex tree fer every 30 lineal feet ef street R-entage; ana * Silall be eemmenly ewnea ana maintained Plans inaieate tilat tile street trees are 24" be)( size ana tiley are eurrently spaeea at an average 4 7 lineal feet aleng Raneile Santa Fe Read. Tilere are bael<greuna trees bHt plans inaieate tilat tiley are te be 15 galien size miniffilim. Please revise plans previaing fer ene 24" bel! size tree fer every 30 lineal feet efstreet R-entage. 3'd Review: The applicant has provided street trees (Jacaranda} at 30' on center and indicated that they are to be 24" box size. Although this does meet the requirement, in order to better maintain street scene continuity it is preferred that the spacing of the Jacaranda trees be 40' on center to better match spacing of existing Jacaranda trees to the east and upsize some of the Pinus torreyana theme trees to account for the additional required quantity of 24" box size trees. There is approximately 1,130 lineal feet of street frontage. Dividing by 30 equals a total of 38-24" box trees required. Jacaranda spaced at 40' on center equals about 28 trees leaving a total of 10 additional 24" box size trees required. Please revise spacing of the Jacaranda to 40' on center (approximately 28 trees) and revise 10 of the Pinus torreyana to 2 4" box size to provide a total of 38 ~ 24 " box size trees. 2A Completed. NEW COMMENTS 1 B. Pinus torreyana has been revised to Pinus eldarica. Please revise back to Pinus torreyana in order to match existing Pines to the east on Rancho Santa Fe Road and to meet requirements of Appendix D of the Landscape Manual. 28. Please identify the water use for this area and revise water use calculations as appropriate. 38. Please hatch all appropriate areas of private homeowner maintained areas. • • APPENDIX E: WI!LD WOilKSIIEETS Estimated Total Water Use A landscape project subject to tbe Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance shall include tbe ETWU for tbe plans, including tbe calculations used to detennine tbe ETWU. The ETWU for a proposed project shall not exceed tbe MAW A. The following equation shall be used to calculate tbe ET\X'U for each landscaped area and the entire project: The abbreviations used in the equation have the following meanings: I!1WU Estimated total water use in gallons per year. ETo Evapotranspiration in inches per year. 0.82 Conversion factor to gallons per square foot. PF Plant factor from WUCOLS Ill HA Hydrozone Area in square feet. Each HA shall be classified based upon tbe data included in the landscape and irrigation plan as high, moderate, low, or very low water use. II! Irrigation Efficiency of tbe irrigation method used in tbe hydro zone. SLA Special landscaped area in square feet. (Z'i .{t..l) (Q t;q'l" X .7) -{!z.'r,lic>~ .1)) t'1. ,~ { 'o~,I(JL.t ~ ~7, t;t;t)) RECEIVED FEB 0 6 2013 ~ITY OF CARLSBAD LANNING DIVISION -· M_A_w_~_-=_4"'-, r_7'i...:.,_,_z,_. fl_" _ _....-- 3of4 City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual • • APPENDIX E: WELO WORIC:SH8ETS Hydrozone T•bl• for C•lcu .. ttng ETWU Please complete the hyd.tozone table(s). Use as many tables as necessary. 1 Conversion Factor 2 (Step 1 X Step 2) 3 Plant Factor (PF)'* (From WUCOLS) (VLW-HW) 4 5 (Step 4 x Step 5) 6 Irrigation Efficiency (lEr' • 7 (Step 6 + Step 7) 8 Totlll Water Use in gallons per year (ETWU) ·Total shall not exceed MAW A ETo* West of l-5 = 40.0 9 10 EMst of l-5 and West of El c~mino Re~ = 44.0 East of El Camino Re~ = 47.0 AppbC:ant max provide II different ETo if supported by documenution subject to approval by the City Planning Division **Plant Factor & Water Use 0.1 = VL W-Very-Low Water Use Plants 0.3 = L W-Lou' W.2ter Use Plants 0.5 = MW-Mader-.lte Water Use Plants 0.8 = HW-High Water Use Plants 4of4 -IE Micro-spray= .80 Spray=.55 Rotor= .70 Bubbler=. 75 Drip=.80 Applicant may provide a different IE if supported by documeatation subject to approval by the City Planning Division (Turf and I...a.ndscape lrn"gation Best Management Practices, April 2005) City of cartsiNid Land_,. Manual • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2013 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 ~k:'t!i• .. · .· PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • REVIEW NO: 3 •>·· APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO TO: ISJ Land Development Engineering-Tecla Levy 0 Police Department-J. Sasway lSI Fire Department-Greg Ryan 'D•; Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets) -Nick Roque 0 Water/Sewer District lSI Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) lSI Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION ,. Please review and submit written comments and/or conditionsto the P~NNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue, 6iJ':Z2~7l~.)fv~~ h~ve :;No C~m~ents," pleas~ so state. If you determine that there are items 0\at need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS: /r Cgfr,-,ft-/37'F We /<QI(eM ./ MU,. B& {:t?Nfii cvr.ft;tv CL!N ~7f?u!C:Dolll f£1'ft1.JJ' AK.E' ~<1~& [7e7J TO S1gnature Date PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 12/12 • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON/APRIL TORNILLO TO: ··rgj Land Development Engineering-Administration 0 Police Department-J. Sasway IZJ Fire Department-Greg Ryan IZJ Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque • REVIEW NO: ---'2=----1 0 Water/Sewer District IZJ landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy -land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) IZJ Parks/Trails-liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 1/3/12. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. ~ · ~'i..aN 2... t. Z<!l/'5 Signature Date PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 03/10 "' • • CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Discretionary Review Checklist PROJECT NUMBER: CT 12-05/ PUD 12-07 IV 12-02 BUILDING ADDRESS: _cRc..:.'A..::::S::.=E:.::O:...!L::.::U~P.!!IN.!.:O~----------------- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 32 SFD ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 223-050-71-00 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. By: -------Date: ATTACHMENTS COMMENTS By: By: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with [8]. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: 2.1.2013 --------Date: --------Date: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON NAME: ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 602-4665 ' • • r\ REVIEW CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1ST• 2ND• 3RDo ll!l D D 1. Access: II Fire Department access. Provide fire access road in accordance with CMC 17.04.01 0. This access shall provide an unobstructed width of 24 feet, and a unobstructed vertical clearance or "clear-to-sky". II Fire Access Road surface. The surface of all fire department access routes shall be of an impervious "all-weather'' surface material, designed to carry a minimum load of 75,000 pounds axel weight. II Alternative road surface. Alternative road surface materials such as turf block or grass crete may be approved by the Chief if; the applicant requests by letter for an approval of the use of Alternate Means and Materials and provide performance specifications and construction details which have been reviewed and certified by a licensed engineer. Fire Lanes. For private drives A & B these accesses shall be designated as fire lanes and shall become the responsibility of the developer to have said access restrictions recorded, that the owner is responsible to provide and maintain to identify and ensure enforcement of those designated access. WATER IMPROVEMENT 1sTo 2ND• 3RDo ll!l D D 1. Hydrants Additional on-site public water mains and fire hydrants are required. II Provide additional fire hydrants at intervals of 300 feet along public streets and/or private driveways. Hydrants should be located at street intersections when possible, but no closer than 100 feet from the terminus of a street or driveway. FIRE SPRINKLERS 1sTo 2NDo 3RDo ll!l D D 1. An automatic fire sprinkler systems are required for each dwelling: ll!l D D 2. Provide notes on all plans submitted for review that indicate that fire sprinklers are required. WATER METERS ll!l D D 4. You will be required to install a one inch (1 ") or greater water service and water meter. This is to ensure that there is adequate water provided in the event of a fire sprinkler activation during periods of other uses and/or demands, e.g. irrigation. .A • I CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 13. 2012 PROJECT NO(S}: CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON/APRIL TORNILLO TO: ~ Land Development Engineering-Administration 0 Police Department-J. Sa sway ~ Fire Department-Greg Ryan ~ Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque ' REVIEWNO: 2 -----1 0 Water/Sewer District ~ Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) ~ Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 1/3/12. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMI):\ENTS: r&ew '"I a:JJa ~ ~ ~-~~ Signature Date PLANS A IT ACHED Review & Comment 03/10 • • MEMORANDUM Jan. 7,2013 TO: FROM: ASSOCIATE PLANNER, Goff PARK PLANNER RE: LA COSTA TOWN SQUARE PLAN CHECK NO. 2 CT 12-05/PUD12-07N 12-02 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANS I have reviewed the above plans for La Costa Town Square residential development. Please provide the below comments and attached red line mark-up of the plans to the applicant so that they may address these comments with the next plan review submittal for the project. Plan Review Comments: 1. Tentative Map-Connectivity of the housing development private trail connection to the existing Old Rancho Santa Fe Rd. trail could benefit from including a security gate and additional fencing. It is recommended that the same type of 6' combo fencing/wall ( sheet 45 of Landscape Plans) with plexi glass as shown on the Conceptual Landscape Plans, be extended to secure the community garden area and a security gate added to provide additional security at the trail connection that goes to the residential units. This will provide additional privacy and security separate from the public access trail that is provided further north. (public trail that connects Paseo Lupino trail to Old RSF Rd. trail. See also Sheets 1 & 5 red line comments and mark-up pertaining to this comment. 2. Landscape Plans-It is recommended that additional pedestrian access be provided to Rancho Santa Fe Rd. from the southern end of the planned development to allow for an additional pedestrian access from the planned development to the La Costa Town Center shops and the existing businesses available at the corner of La Costa Ave. and Rancho Santa Fe Rd. This additional path within the community that would connect to the sidewalk along Rancho Santa Fe Rd. would also provide for a few "loop" walking routes around the development as well affording the opportunity to utilize the old RSF Rd. trails, the Paseo Lupino trail and existing sidewalk connections along Rancho Santa Fe Rd. This recommendation is highly desireable and in line with the Livable Streets initiative and for providing a more walk friendly residential neighborhood and community. • • See also redline comments and mark-up pertaining to this comment on Sheet 41, 43 and 47, pertaining to this comment. Thank you for this opportunity for review the proposed residential project at La Costa Town _square and please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. vi· ~ LIZ cc: Senior Planner, De Cerbo ( memorandum text via email only) La Costa Town Square Trail Plan Check Project File • • • December 21, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: Jason Goff, Associate Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review-Conceptual Review-2"d Review La Costa Residential, CT 12-05, PUD 12-07 Rancho Santa Fe Road MELA file: 467-La Costa Residential-Con2 Landscape Architect: SJA, Phone: (949) 276-6500 Please advise the applicant to make the following revisions to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-3 Completed. 4. At a minimum, plans shall include the following items: a. Existing conditions (grades, plants, property lines. easements, right-of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all above items. Insure no trees are located within utility easements. b. Completed. c. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. d. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3-B in section 3 of the Landscape Manual) and CalTrans sight distance standards (i.e.: stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. e-h Completed. 5-12 Completed. 13. Please fJrevide a SSfl)' ef fllans that Sfleeify all walls/fenein~ with flrSflesed materials and heights fer review. Previde an elevatien'detail ef eaeh. 2" Review: Walls to the east of Pas eo Lupino appear to be split face block. Please revise to split face with cap to match existing walls to the east. 14. Completed. 15. Completed. 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. • La Costa Residential Conceptual Plan Review • • December 21,2012 Page 2 b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street comers within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. c. Completed. d. Completed. e. Landscape features (shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the Ca!Trans sight distance lines. f. CalTrans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. 17. Completed. 18. Completed. 19. Provide a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be planted on center or grouped. 2nd Review: Please continue the Jacaranda and Pines to the end of the project. See NEW COMMENT IA. 20. Completed. 21. Street trees shall be located: a. Completed. b. Completed. c. Outside of sight distance areas. d. A minimum of three (3) feet outside the public right of way, unless approved otherwise by the City as noted below. Street trees may ee leeatea vl'ithiH the pllelie right ef way, Sli!Jjeet te appreval ey the City, fer prejeets that are: a. WitlliH a p!:!elie street ( ie. arterial meaiaHS, traffie eire!es). e. WithiH the Village Re•l'iew (Y R) ZeHe (CMC Chapter 21.35). e. Sl!!Jjeet te the PlaHHea De\·e!epmeHt ReEjl:liremeHts (CMC Chapter 21.45). d. S~:~!Jjeet te City Cetmei! Peliey ee Livaele l'leigheerheeas. 22. Completed. 23. Completed. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 2nd Review: Is there a reason not to include these areas as recycled water use? Drip can be used around the picnic and BBQ areas. Please re}•iew with OMWD for a final determination and provide documentation ofOMWD direction. Revise water use calculations as appropriate. 25. The plaH shall previae that eHiy lew vel11me er sHes~:~rfaee irrigatieH shall ee 1:1sea te irrigate aH)' vegetatieH withiH tweHty fe11r iHehes ef aH impermeaele s1:1rfaee t~Hiess the aajaeeHt impermeaele s~:~rfaees are aesigHea aHa eeHstruetea te ea1:1se water te araiH eHtirely iHte a hmaseapea area. It appears that the t11rf may ee prepesea fer everheaa La Costa Residential Conceptual Plan Review • • December 21, 2012 Page 3 irrigatieH easeEI eH tlle irrigatieH effieieHey ttseEI. Please elarify aHEi iHsttre rettttiremeHts are met. 2"d Review: Revise "lawn" to "area". 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms as provided in appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 2"d Review: Please correct the MA WA and ETWU calculations as indicated. Please note that with corrections the ETWU exceeds the MA WA. Revise design as appropriate to provide an ETWU that does not exceed the MAWA. 27. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored/hatched water use plan) for the next submittal. NEW COMMENTS I A. Below is an excerpt from Planned Development Table C regarding arterial setback landscaping: Half (50%) ofthe required arterial setback area located closest to the arterial shall be fully landscaped to enhance the street scene and buffer homes from traffic on · adjacent arterials, and: * * Shall contain a minimum of one 24" box tree for every 30 lineal feet of street frontage; and Shall be commonly owned and maintained Plans indicate that the street trees are 24" box size and they are currently spaced at an average 4 7 lineal feet along Rancho Santa Fe Road. There are background trees but plans indicate that they are to be 15 gallon size minimum. Please revise plans providing for one 24" box size tree for every 30 lineal feet of street frontage. 2A. Wall vines or other plantings are needed along this wall to soften it from view. Please address. ' " 1-• CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 13, 20~1~2,--,-:::-::-:--:-::---::-=--------==-:-:-::-=-----::----, PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-0S/PUD=-1=.:2=--0"-'7-'-/_V-'-1 __ 2--'-0_2 _______ REVIEW NO: ....:2=-------j PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RES:.:.ID=-E::..:N.::..:T..:.:IA..:.:L=-------------------j APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON/APRIL TORNILLO ~~~~-'-'-~------------------------------~ TO: [gj Land Development Engineering-Administration i-l!.'/'1 D Police Department-J. Sasway [gj Fire Department-Greg Ryan [gj Building Department-Will Foss D Recreation -Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque D Water/Sewer District [gj Landscape Plan check Consultant-PELA D School District D North County Transit District-Planning Department D Sempra Energy-Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) [gj Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 1/3/12. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail! to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS: v~ s%ti ------ PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 11-ICZ-\'V Date 03/10 •, (~~ CITY OF ~CARLSBAD • • Memorandum December 18, 2012 To: Jason Goff, Planner From: Tecla levy, Associate Engineer Re: CT 12-05/ EIA 12-04/ PUD 12-07 / V 12-02 -La Costa Residential Engineering Department staff has completed the first review of the above application submittal documents for completeness. The application documents submitted for this project are complete. Prior to next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed: Issues of concern: 1. A combination of numbers and letters in lot numbering is not acceptable. Please revise lot numbering so lots, including residential, open space and private street lots, are numbered consecutively starting from one (1) throughout the subdivision. 2. Please add remedial (over excavation) grading quantity as recommended by the soils engineer (page 2 of soil's report dated November 16, 2012}. 3. The recent soils report update did not include design recommendations for the proposed bioretention basins. Please provide a soils update letter addressing the suitability of the proposed bioretention basins at the proposed locations as shown on the site plan. The update letter should include bioretention design recommendations, including set-back requirement from top of slopes. 4. Change the project title shown on the site plan and reports from "La Costa Town Square" to "La Costa Residential". 5. It is indicated on page 10 of the preliminary SWMP report that the orifice sizing calculations will be provided during final engineering. However, the bioretention detail shown on the site plan should include a detail of the outlet structure similar to the detail shown on page 93 of the City SUSMP (see attached detail), showing the location of the orifice and overflow catch basin to capture larger storm events. 6. Please verify sewer easement and water easement requirements from leucadia Wastewater District and Olivenhain Municipal Water District and show the required utility easement widths on the site plan. Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov • • \ CT 12-05/ EIA 12-04/ PU~2-07 / V 12-02-La Costa Residential. October 18, 2012 Page 2 7. Comply with comments shown in red on the preliminary site plan and tentative map. 8. Comply with minor comments shown on the red-lined preliminary SWMP report. 9. Comply with minor comments shown on the red-lined preliminary drainage report. 10. Please submit the following documents in the next review submittal: a) 2 copy of the revised preliminary site plan b) 2 copy each of the revised SWMP, hydrology report, and soils report. c) 2 copy of an updated title report d) 2nd review red lined plans and all red-lined reports • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: DECEMBER 13, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON/APRIL TORNILLO TO: C8J Land Development Engineering-Administration D Police Department-J. Sasway IZJ Fire Department-Greg Ryan IZJ Building Department-Will Foss D Recreation-Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque • REVIEW NO: _:2:___--1 D Water/Sewer District IZJ Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA D School District D North County Transit District-Planning Department D Sempra Energy-Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) IZJ Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 1/3/12. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives !via phone or e-mail! to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS: _ ____.!/WJ __ ...::{m«,=.:.:~'/k~t~!I./TS:...:....:::....._ ___________ _ Dlte PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 03/10 ~··of"' • • CITY OF CARLSBAD • REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/EIA 12-04/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 REVIEW NO: --=1=----J PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO TO: ~ land Development Engineering-Administration ~ Police Department-J. Sasway I8J Fire Department-Greg Ryan ~ Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque 0 Water/Sewer District ~ landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy -land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) 0 Parks/Trails -liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 10/17/12. If you have "No Comments," · please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS:_---J~V.)'-"0'--J..C...ro~"""'""""""""'"""'"""'fJ-'1L<<----------------- Date PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 03/10 :::,6 • CITY OF CARLSBAD • REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12·05/EIA 12-04/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 REVIEW NO: 1 -=------1 PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC/APRIL TORNILLO TO: ~ Land Development Engineering-Administration ~ Police Department-J. Sasway ~ Fire Department-Greg Ryan ~ Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation-Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque 0 Water/Sewer District ~ Landscape Plancheck Consultant · PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) 0 Parks/Trails -liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 10/17/12. If you have ,;No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail! to let them know, Thank you COMMENTS: H tl ~£JJ7T' e llft( ran fi, A Cl7n7 fl~ Ctmli l(ev;ezu NIL? {51;' C:ONf[ WfltW CiJA/fTK!{Cl!(U/ f"'NJ.( Az2tT SU6MIT77:?JO ('?!& ~t-.4,1\./ Clk..SZk- Signature ~Date PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 03/10 • • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2012 PROJECT NO(S): CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: TAYLOR MORRISON/APRIL TORNILLO TO: 0 Land Development Engineering-Administration 0 Police Department-J. Sasway 0 Fire Department-Greg Ryan 0 Building Department-Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque ""*' REVIEW NO: 1 - 0 Water/Sewer District 0 Landscape Plan check Consultant -PELA 0 School District 0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) ., Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, I please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing. please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives !via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Signature Date PLANSATTACHED • ~ ft> ~ ~ gJ ~ ~ ~ f;f!;;;;.~ ~ fv ~ ~~v~1 \:~~ Review & Comment 03/10 .,\b { ' . ~ ~ • • Memorandum October 17, 2012 To: Jason Goff, Planner From: Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer Re: CT 12-05 I EIA 12-04 I PUD 12-07 IV 12-02-La Costa Residential Engineering Department staff has completed the first review of the above application submittal documents for completeness. The application documents submitted for this project are incomplete. Prior to next submittal, it is suggested the following items are adequately addressed: Issues of concern: 1. The bioretention areas shown on the preliminary site plan appear to be less than the required areas calculated using the sizing factors given in Table 7-1 of the HMP manual. As previously commented (see item 4 of the City comment letter for PRE 12-13 dated July 24, 2012), the limit of the bioretention surface area is determined by the extent (area) of the engineered soil (planting mix) layer where pending and infiltration occurs, and is governed by the outlet spillway elevation. Please provide details and cross- sections for each of the proposed bioretention basins. On the preliminary grading plan, please delineate the surface area limit of the bioretention basins as defined above, show the bottom (flat area) and side slopes and ensure that the surface areas provided are greater than or equal to the required sizes per calculations shown in the SWMP report. 2. The bioretention labeled as BMP2 in the DMA map provided in the SWMP appears to be a linear swale. Please provide longitudinal and transverse cross-section details. Check dams should be provided to allow pending and infiltration. Provide treatment layer and storage volume. (See page 86 of City SUSMP for check dam design criteria). 3. The proposed bioretention basins located at the westerly corner of the site labeled as BMP1 appears to extend to the edge of the slopes. Please consult the soil engineer for a minimum edge distance required for slopes' stability. On page 3 of the of the update geotechnical investigation prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., it is indicated this preliminary site plan was not available during the preparation of the update geotechnical investigation. Please have the soils engineer review the preliminary site plan and obtain soils engineer approval for the suitability of the all proposed bioretention BMPs. Obtain design recommendations such as the minimum required Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. 1 Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov ' CT 12-05 I EIA 12-04 I PU~-07 IV 12-02-La Costa Residential. October 17, 2012 Page 2 distance to the edge of the slopes, impermeable lining requirements (if any), etc .. Submit an update letter from soils engineer with the next submittal. 4. If the soils engineer requires impermeable lining for bioretention basins, then bioretention basins must be sized using sizing factors for flow-through planters. A lined bioretention basin functions like a flow through planter since it does not allow infiltration into the native soil. The sizing factors for a flow through planter are much larger than that of the bioretention. Larger bioretention basins, if needed, will significantly impact the current design/layout. I suggest you explore other BMPs options such as bioretention plus vault, etc. 5. The preliminary grading plan shows that the outlet pipes from BMP3 and BMP4 are connected into a stormdrain that discharges into BMPl. It appears that the already treated run-off from BMP3 and BMP4 co-mingle with the untreated run-off in BMP1. BMPl is not designed to treat additional flows from BMP3 and BMP4. Please revise to route the already treated run-off from BMPs 3 and 4 directly to the off-site drainage system. Per hydrology report, the same storm drain system routes the 100-year storm to be detained in BMPl. This may overwhelm BMPl. Staff suggests that BMPs 1, 3 and 4 be designed to each handle both the water quality run-off and 100-year storm run-off from each of their tributary DMAs. The outlet pipe from each BMPs shall be connected directly to off-site stormdrain system. Please provide preliminary cross-section detail for the proposed bioretention BMP shown on the site plan. Include a detail of the outlet structure and show the locations of the required orifices (for hydromodification and 100-year storm flows). 6. The SWMP report indicates that DMA1 drains into two separate bioretention basins located at the westerly corner of the site, both labeled as BMPl. Show how these two basins are connected to act as one basin. I suggest that DMA1 be divided two separate DMAs, one DMA for each bioretention basins. 7. The proposed pervious pavers at the driveway entrance are labeled as BMPS to treat DMA5. Pervious pavers are not considered a treatment/hydromodification BMP since they have no numerically sized treatment or storage layer per SUSMP sizing criteria. A small portion of the driveway entrance that drains into Paseo Lupino, if paved with pervious pavement that meets certain criteria provided in the city SUSMP (see page 82 of City SUSMP) are considered self-treating. Self-treating areas do not require additional treatment or flow control BMP if they drain directly off-site. However, self- treating pervious pavers cannot treat additional area. Revise the limits of DMA5 on the DMA map and provide a separate BMP/IMP for DMA 5 or route DMA 5 to BMPl. f • CT 12-05 / EIA 12-04 I PU~-07 IV 12-02 -La Costa Residential. October 17, 2012 Page 3 8. Please show a meandering sidewalk along Rancho Santa Fe Road on the revised site plan, for consistency with the Rancho Santa Fe Road corridor. 9. The project site is shown as Parcel 1 in the recorded Parcel Map no. 20982. Please provide an updated title report reflecting this information. 10. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, etc.) All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 11. Obtain approval from Leucadia Wastewater District for the proposed sewer system shown on the site plan. 12. Obtain approval from Olivenhain Municipal Water District for the proposed water system shown on the site plan. 13. This project will be conditioned to submit CC&Rs or other recorded document addressing maintenance, repair and replacement of shared improvements such as private roads, BMP facilities, etc. 14. This project will also be conditioned to provide to the City Engineer, a recorded document that ensures maintenance of shared private improvements such as stormwater facilities and storm drains within the proposed subdivision. 15. Comply with all other comments shown on the red-lined preliminary SWMP report. 16. Comply with all other comments shown on the red-lined preliminary drainage report. 17. Please submit the following documents in the next review submittal: a) 1 copy of the revised preliminary site plan b) One copy each of the revised SWMP, hydrology report, and soils report. c) One copy of the April 20, 2004 SCT& T, Inc. geotechnical report d) One copy of an updated title report e) 1st review red lined plans and all red-lined reports • ' October 4, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: Jason Goff, Associate Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review-Conceptual Review-I" Review La Costa Residential, CT 12-05, PUD 12-07 Rancho Santa Fe Road MELA file: 467-La Costa Residential-Cool Landscape Architect: SJA, Phone: (949) 276-6500 Please advise the applicant to make the following revisions to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Please coordinate landscape plans with civil plans. Prepare landscape plans on a 50% screen of the most current civil plan at the same scale as the civil plans. 2. Please show the entire property and address landscaping of all areas. 3. Plans are too conceptual to provide an appropriate review. One symbol is used for all shrubs and ground covers which may be very different in size and character. Please provide a separate symbol for each type of shrub (i.e. large evergreen shrub, medium size shrub, small flowering accent shrub, etc.) and ground covers. Final comments are reserved pending receipt of more complete plans. 4. At a minimum, plans shall include the following items: a. Existing conditions (grades, plants, property lines, easements, right-of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all above items. Insure no trees are located within utility easements. b. Potable and reclaimed service locations and lines. c. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. d. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3-B in section 3 of the Landscape Manual) and CalTrans sight distance standards (i.e.: stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. e. Indicate positive surface drainage (2% grade in planting areas) away from structures and terminating in an approved drainage system. f All proposed outdoor elements including, but not limited to, recreational areas, outdoor eating areas, hardscape, trails, and water features. g. Provide a detailed description of any water features that will be included in the landscaped area. La Costa Residential Conceptual Plan Review • October 4, 2012 Page2 h. Other design features and details as needed for clarity (trails, fencing, parking lot lighting, trellis structures, raised planters, etc.). 5. Please indicate the approximate tree quantities in the plant palette/legend. 6. Invasive species shall not be added to a landscaped area. Please provide substitutes for Schinus molle and Stipa tenuissima. Check all plantings and insure no invasive species are used. 7. Platanus acerifolia is having severe problems with anthracnose in the Carlsbad area. Please provide an appropriate substitute. 8. Trees with broad branch structures shall be planted only where sufficient space is available. It is understood that the parkways may be reduced in size to 5. 5' in width on Private Street A. Quercus virginiana will be too large for the parkway area. Please insure appropriate size/and species trees for the area. Check all areas. See comment #20 below. 9. The Maintenance Responsibility Exhibit shall be prepared at a scale and size (preferably one sheet) that provides an overall view of the project and shall clearly identifY the various areas oflandscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners" association (HOA), City, etc). Please show responsibility for maintenance of all areas. I 0. Please clearly show the street sidewalks and parkways and provide parkway landscaping. 11. Landscaping shall enhance and be compatible with the positive character of existing neighborhoods and Carlsbad as a whole. Please provide plantings to match those to the east on Rancho Santa Fe Road. 12. Please obtain review and approval for all trails from Liz Ketabian in Recreation Administration. 13. Please provide a copy of plans that specify all walls/fencing with proposed materials and heights for review. Provide an elevation/detail of each. 14. Landscaping shall be used to provide and enhance opportunities for outdoor recreation, relaxing, and eating. Please provide a conceptual detail layout of the common space park area considering additional amenities to include BBQ' s, play area, etc. 15. Please sign the water efficient statement. 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. c. At medium to high use driveways, the 30 inch height limitation applies at driveways 25 feet from the edge of the apron outward along the curb, then 45 degrees in toward the property. d. Ensure that landscape elements at interior private driveway intersections do not obstruct sight lines, so that circulation and pedestrian safety can be maintained. •. La Costa Residential Conceptual Plan Review • • October 4, 2012 Page 3 e. Landscape features (shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the Cal Trans sight distance lines. f Ca/Trans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. 17. All utilities are to be screened. Landscape construction drawings will be required to show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Please also locate all light poles on the landscape plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 18. Turfgrass shall not be allowed: a. On a slope greater than 25% grade (4: 1 slope). b. Where any dimension of the landscaped area is less than six (6) feet wide. (It is understood that the parkways may be reduced in size to 5.5' in width on Private Street A.) c. On a center island median strip or on a parking lot island within a commercial, industrial, institutional, or multi-family project. d. In a landscaped area that cannot be efficiently irrigated, such as avoiding runoff or overspray. 19. Provide a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be planted on center or grouped. 20. Street trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. 21. Street trees shall be located: a. A minimum of seven (7) feet from any sewer line. b. In areas that do not conflict with public utilities. c. Outside of sight distance areas. d. A minimum of three (3) feet outside the public right of way, unless approved otherwise by the City as noted below. Street trees may be located within the public right-of-way, subject to approval by the City, for projects that are: a. Within a public street ( ie. arterial medians, traffic circles). b. Within the Village Review (V-R) Zone (CMC Chapter 21.35). c. Subject to the Planned Development Requirements (CMC Chapter 21.45). d. Subject to City Council Policy 66 -Livable Neighborhoods. 22. Street tree planting located on a major or prime arterial (Rancho Santa Fe Road) shall be designed to provide continuity with the established street scene. See Appendix 'D' of the Landscape Manual. Percentage of trees shall be as follows: Theme Trees -These trees set the overall character of the streetscape and are located along the roadside but outside the right -of- way. Support Trees-These trees complement the theme tree. Select trees which fit the PERCENTAGE TOTAL OF STREETSCAPE TREES 50% (100% OF STANDARD) 30% ---------------------------------------------------..... La Costa Residential Conceptual Plan Review • project site conditions. Project Identity/Accent Trees-The applicant can choose the best tree for the project and submit it for approval. 23. Please match symbol with legend. • 20% October 4, 2012 Page4 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 25. The plan shall provide that only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to irrigate any vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable surface unless the adjacent impermeable surfaces are designed and constructed to cause water to drain entirely into a landscaped area. It appears that the turf may be proposed for overhead irrigation based on the irrigation efficiency used. Please clarify and insure requirements are met. 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms as provided in appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 27. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored/hatched water use plan) for the next submittal. ,_ ~. • 'lrlcARLSBAD • Police Department www.carlsbadca.gov Date: Sept. 28, 2012 To: Planning Tracking Desk-Planning Department From: J. Sasway, Crime Prevention Specialist, Carlsbad Police Department Subject: La costa Residential-CT 12-05/EIA 12-04/PUD 12/07 /V12-02 Plan Review Recommendations Carlsbad Police Department's Crime Prevention Unit has provided the following optimal security recommendations. The purpose of this document is to safeguard property and public welfare by regulating and reviewing the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures. The standards used in this document represent model international standards. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design The proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life. The proper design influences this by positively affecting human behavior. The design includes the physical environment, the planned behavior of people, the productive use of space and an effective crime/loss prevention program. Natural Surveillance 1. Place and design physical features to maximize visibility. This will include building orientation, windows, entrances, walkways, landscape trees and shrubs, fences and any other physical obstruction. 2. Design the placement of persons and or activities to maximize surveillance possibilities. 3. Design lighting that provides for appropriate nighttime illumination of walkways, entrances and driveways. Natural Access Control L Use walkways, pavement, lighting and landscaping to clearly guide guests to and from selected entrances. 2. Use real or symbolic barriers like fences or landscaping to prevent and or discourage access to or from dark and or unmonitored areas. Provisions for territorial reinforcement L Use pavement treatments, landscaping and fences to define and outline ownership or property. Area if concern-Model 3 side entrances L Prevents surveillance of the main entrance from the street 2. Prevents surveillance of the street from the front entrance. 3. Removes eyes and ears from the street. An element of a healthy neighborhood. Ughting L Equip building on all sides with light fixtures. White florescent lights allow the best vision. «~ 2560 Orion Way, Carlsbad, CA 92010-7240 T 760-931-2100 F 760-931-8473 ® • • 2. Install lights on the building in the eaves to illuminate the perimeter of the house. 3. Choose light fixtures with dawn to dusk sensors or timers not motion sensors. 1. Plan a landscaping design that enhances surveillance and security. 2. Tree canopies should be no lower than six (6) feet and should not allow access to roofs or balconies. 3. Ensure landscaping plan does not deter from lighting and addressing. 4. Plant only low profile shrubs that can be maintained below two (2) feet. 5. Use security plants where necessary to prevent entering and tampering. 6. Install walls and fences that are see-through and enhance surveillance. 7. Install lockable gates that allow surveillance. Addressing 1. Locate numerals where they are clearly visible from the front street 2. Contrast the numeral's color to the background on which it is affixed. 3. Numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. Entrances 1. Allow front entrance design to provide vision from the front door to the front access street. Removing the main entrance from the front street takes the resident's eyes and ears off the street reducing the residents ability to protect themselves and provide surveillance for their neighbors thus decreasing the overall security of the neighborhood and decreasing the quality of life for the resident. 2. Keep entranceways clear of clutter. Doors 1. Do not use of glass within 42 inches of a locking device. 2. A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt with a bolt projection exceeding one inch or a hook-shaped or expanding dead bolt that engages the strike sufficiently to prevent spreading. The deadbolt lock shall have a minimum of five-pin tumblers and a cylinder guard. 3. Install wooden doors of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths (1-3/4) inches. 4. Provide a double door inactive leaf with metal flush bolts having a minimum embedment of five-eighths (5/8) of an inch into the header and footer of the doorframe. Strike Plates 1. Reinforce all deadbolt strike plates. Choose Strike plates constructed of a minimum 16 U.S. gauge steel, bronze, or brass and secure it to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, which should penetrate at least two (2) inches into the solid backing beyond the surface to which the strike is attached. Re-enforcement of the door area around the lock is also suggested. Viewer 1. Arrange entrance doors so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without opening the door. Except doors requiring a fire protection rating that prohibits them, such a view may be provided by a door viewer having a field of view of not less than 190 degrees. Mounting height should not exceed fifty-four (54) inches from the floor. .. • • Windows and sliding glass doors 1. All exterior sliding glass doors and windows should be equipped with locking devices which will keep the sliding panel of the door or window from being opened from the outside horizontally or vertically. 2. Ensure windows have security features preventing the window from being forced to slide or rise. Alarm system 1. When considering an alarm system, consider a verified system. This information is a representation of information gathered on a national level. The purpose is to provide effective and consistent information. If you would like additional assistance concerning building security or employee security issues, please contact the Crime Prevention Unit at (760) 931·2105. By, Jodeene R. Sasway Crime Prevention Specialist Carlsbad Police Department (760) 931-2195 • • I e/n L::.onsulling, In&. 44(, t:resf&Ourf Lane, FallbrooK t:.A '/202.6 phone 7(,o-471-12.5"/ www.ldn&Onsulfing.nef fal' 7(,o-{,£J'f-4'14"1 January 27, 2014 April Tornillo Taylor Morrison 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: Proposed Building Assembly Conformance for Noise -La Costa Town Square (Montecina) Residential Development, Carlsbad CA Ldn Consulting has reviewed the architectural plans provided by Bassenian Lagoni Architects dated September 25, 2013 and the proposed Milgard Styleline series windows and Milgard Montecito series sliding glass door ratings pertaining to the proposed La Costa Town Square (Montecina) Residential Development project in Carlsbad, CA. The architectural plans identify a standard exterior wall assembly made of wood studs and a stucco finish having a nominal Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 46 as modeled in the interior noise assessment. The window and glass door manufacture's specifications and STC ratings provided by Migard were reviewed and compared to the recommendations in the Final Noise Assessment. The Migard STC ratings are provided as an Attachment to this letter. These requirements are consistent with the mitigation findings identified in the Project's acoustical report prepared by Ldn Consulting (Source: La Costa Town Square (Montecina) Residential Development Final Noise Assessment-City of Carlsbad CA dated 10/7/13). Should you have any questions regarding the above conclusions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 473-1253. Sincerely, ~~ Jeremy Louden, Principal Attachment: Milgard STC ratings for Montecito and Styleline Series 1/27/2014 1 1298-06 La Costa Town Square Review -Noise Page 9 Sound Transmission Loss Test Reports The data below is the result of actual testing of specific product with a size that is defined in the test procedure. These tests will cover all sizes of the same series. When determining glass thickness combination, keep in mind that the size of your actual window or door may not be able to use a certain thickness combination due to the size and/or square footage of the individual lites. Below is a table showing the minimum glass thickness per each lites square footage. FT' Min Thickness -12 3/32 ss >12 & =25 1/8 OS >25 & =40 3/16 >40 1/4 ALSO (tempered glass only) If lite width > 40" & height> 40" then minimum thickness is 3/16" (difficult to maintain flatness with 1/8" glass). Updated 19-Apr-11 [LE] • • e~~l.d(·· 15 Df 1/8 1/8 -29 30 23 15 D~ 08-154 3/1, 7/32 ~M 30 33 18 4225 1 47.5 X 7 .5 Oi 7/32 ~M 3C 4225 H 47.5 X 71.5 2/1-08 3/ -3C _4225 H 47.5 X .5 211· 08 0: 7/3: AM 7/32 ~M -3C • Page 10 8120 D 8120 8120 IV IV IV IV HV HV HV 71.5 X 47.5 17.5 7" .5X 71.5 X 47.5 4/9/07 07-27' 1/8 29 30 22 ~ -27 l~~~ 4/9/1)7 71'<2 LAM 118 --- 4/10,07 m.2 LAM 1/4 - 4/9/ll7 07-274 7/32 LAM 7/32 LAM 35 36 30 4/10/07 07-278 7/32 LAM 3/16 35 37 28 o: o: ~:~~~~l=~~144~21t---~~g_--+---~~~--~~=--+--4~-+--~~~~~~~1~7~ 1-144 3 16 1/4 -l5 18 15 .5 :4· . 08-145 7/32 L 33 34 18 o: 8125 71.5 17.5 2/08 '132 3 8220 SH 47.5 X 71.5 4/12/07 07-294 1/1 29 30 8220 1 47.5X 1.5 4/1 07 ~:~~f---:;-;.~3lJI:+";;-,..-+---~---+-----=--I-~-+-~:;--t-~~-1 8220 1 47.5 X 1.5 <1/1 17 u ~ 7/32 ~M - ~0 47.5 X .5 7/32 O.M 3 -2' 8225 DH 47.5 x 71.5 7/11/07 1/8 -26 28 822 1 47.5 X .5 7/ 07 822 1 47.5 X .5 7, 17 _622 1 47.5 X ~-7/ 07 8320 PW 71.5 X 47.5 2/11/08 8320 PW 71.5 X 7.5 4/1: 07 PW PV\ PV\ PVI .5 )/( ? 07-7/3: _AM --21 08-136 1/8 31 32 7/3: LArv 1/4 -27 7/32 LAr.J 7/32 LAM -17 17 30 Updated 19-Apr-11 [LE] • Page 11 8420 4/11/07 7 : LAM _36 28 852( FA FA FA 59.5 X 35.5 59.5 X 35.5 59.5 X 35.5 17 ,_, ..A 17 ~ ..A 17 7 ,)1_ FC 35.5 X 59.5 4 17 -2!1 35.5X ~ ::: 7/3: ,AM_ '8 8 6 1-2!5 -=--- -=---- 8520 4/11/07 ~ 7/3: ..AM 3/16 'J"L 3( ~8~52CO~~~FI-+~~~:~59' .. 5~~4~/111~1,/0~J:7~~~~~-~~3~:..A~M-t-~~32~A~~M.-r-~-t--~3!:7~-T--~--r-~3~.~ 8520 FC 35.5 X 59.5 4/11/07 7/3: ..AM 1 _:_ 38 ~ 8621 )0 7 .5 X 79.5 12/11/09 1/8 1/4 ....33_ 34 ~8~6211~~>~CD~~7~.~5i~x~791 .. 5~~11,~2~/,11~11/0~9~~~~~--~1~6--r-~~--r-~_--r-~3~3~--~--+-~~ 8621 3D 7 .5 X 79.5 ''" ~ _ 862· 71.5 X -= 862· i X Jl ".M_ - 862" X I/( 7/ ..AM - 862 i x 1f· 1/09 7/32 ..AM 7/32 LAM 36 29 862 8621F 8621F D SD j X j X ix .5x 711.5 71.5 X 79.5 11 09 11 09 11 09 12/11/09 12/11/09 04-170 _31_ §_ _31_16 -~ .2Q_ 3/ 1/8 -__3_3 _26._ 04-167 1/• 1/8 3: 27 04-~~-~71,/~321l~..A~M-r~~11~/8~r-~-t~3~3~--~~--+--2~1:7,__ 04-169 7/32 LAM 7/32 LAM -' 34 ~ ~ Updated 19-Apr-11 [LE] • • Mil,~'3'(-(j (j 71.5x 24 7' ix '5 3 - ix 3 - HV 7 ix 7.75 0' 98-146 3/1 3/32 -33 6110 7 .75 X 47.75 0' !1/99 9 31:12 33 29 6110 71.5 X 47.5 04/27/98 9. 7/32 _AM 35 29 • _MjO 71.5 X 47.5 9 713< AM 7/32 _AM_ -~-30 6210 Sl 47.5 X 71.5 05/17/99 99-1 3 2 3/32 -28 2 23 € 47. ix 15/17/99 2! ix 15/' 7/99 ix - ix 17 '8 -31 iH ix .5 19 19-193 3/16 1/' 6 -34 !10 s~ 7.5 X 71.5 c 19 99-1 3/ 1/8 33 27 6210 s~ 47.5 X 71.5 05 18/99 ~ 7/32 \M 1/8 34 29 6210 Sl 47.5 X 71.5 05/17/99 _7/32 _A_M_ _Mj6 -35 29 6310 PIN 47.5 X 71.5 a 1/8 3/16 -32 3. 27 6310 PIN 47.5 X 71.5 c 98-185 1/8 7/32 LAM 33 3 28 6310 PW 47.5 X 71.5 98-187 7/32 LAM 7/32 LAM --36 3 30 PIN 17.5 X 71.5 0·~ 98-193 1/8 1/8 -30 31 25 PW 17.5 X 71.5 98-191 1/8 3/16 -33 27 • PIN 17.5 X 71.5 98-192 1/8 7/32 LAM 35 3 27 6340 PIN 47.5 X 71.5 1/4 7/32 _AM 36 29 ~ .5 X 79.5 0~ ![ 1/8 1/8 -28 30 23 .5X 79.5 99-215 3/16 3/16 -30 32 26 m .5X 79.5 05/2' 19 6 30 6610 SD '1.5 X 05/21/99 6610 SD 71.5X ~-J 7/3: AM_ - 6610 S[ 71.5 X J -15 Page 16 Updated 19-Apr-11 [LE] • • • I <In ~onsull'ing, In&. 44(, t:;resf&Ourf Lane, FallbrooK c.A '/2.02.6 phone 7(,0-471-12.7'1 www.ltlneonsulfing.nef fa" 7(,0-{,fJ'/-4'14~ October 7, 2013 April Tornillo Taylor Morrison 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 Subject: La Costa Town Square (Montecina) Residential Development Final Noise Assessment -City of Carlsbad CA The firm of Ldn Consulting, Inc. is pleased to submit the following exterior and interior noise impact analysis for the proposed La Costa Town Square (Montecina) Residential Development in the City of carlsbad CA. The purpose of the survey is to determine the estimated exterior noise levels at the primary outdoor use area and proposed building facades. In addition, the anticipated interior noise levels within the residential structures will be determined and recommend mitigation measures for compliance with the california Code of Regulations Title 24 and the City of carlsbad guidelines and requirements for interior noise. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located within the City of carlsbad, CA. More specifically, the project is located north of and adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road between La Costa Avenue and Paseo Lupino. Access to the project site is from Paseo Lupino via Rancho Santa Fe Road. The project vicinity can be seen in Figure 1 on the following page. The project site consists of 32 single family units within approximately 9. 9 acres. The project is proposing three different floor plans. The project site configuration is provided in Figure 2 on Page 3. 10/7/2013 1 1298-()5 La Costa Town Square Interior Noise April Tornillo Taylor Morrison 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 Figure 1: Project Vidnity AwttAGolf CINIM [ •• PJr.Hy A'Mfl +if' Golf Club t ...... " ~ ~ ~ Community a F11e>tn tts o.~t t l l lmJI(OV 'li Area 2 ~ ~ ~~ ~fA'ff • J A"-<9. 11' .. • It" r~ i f' ~ ... cJ i;j I LaCow1 ~t-yCU, ~c~p.~• c~ ~~ ~&l¥d " c~ • ....,·~'~' ~b ~~ I,: 0 cr ~ \ "'.oun!• n .... Dr ~ 10/7/2013 <( f 1' .. \. q~ .. ., • ® ~ Q Unrvefllly Cornmona S.nfltJO La Com H•lt OakiNonh 't "'.c-0,~ 1)~ La Colla ~kaSoulh • Sla~ P.O. \ cl Source: Google Maps, 2012 2 1298-QS La Costa Town Square Interior Noise April Tornillo Taylor Morrison • 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 • Figure 2: Proposed Project Site Plan Source: Latitude, 2012 10/7/2013 3 1298-QS La Costa Town Square Interior Noise ,---------------------------------------- April Tornillo Taylor Morrison • 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 ACOUSTICAL FUNDAMENTALS • Noise is defined as unwanted or annoying sound which interferes with or disrupts normal activities. Exposure to high noise levels has been demonstrated to cause hearing loss. The individual human response to environmental noise is based on the sensitivity of that individual, the type of noise that occurs and when the noise occurs. Sound is measured on a logarithmic scale consisting of sound pressure levels known as a decibel (dB). The sounds heard by humans typically do not consist of a single frequency but of a broadband of frequencies having different sound pressure levels. The method for evaluating all the frequencies of the sound is to apply an A-weighting to reflect how the human ear responds to the different sound levels at different frequencies. The A-weighted sound level adequately describes the instantaneous noise whereas the equivalent sound level depicted as Leq represents a steady sound level containing the same total acoustical energy as the actual fluctuating sound level over a given time interval. Mobile noise levels radiant in an almost oblique fashion from the source and drop off at a rate of 3 dBA for each doubling of distance under hard site conditions and at a rate of 4.5 dBA for soft site conditions. Hard site conditions consist of concrete, asphalt and hard pack dirt while soft site conditions exist in areas having slight grade changes, landscaped areas and vegetation. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is the 24 hour A-weighted average for sound, with corrections for evening and nighttime hours. The corrections require an addition of 5 decibels to sound levels in the evening hours between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. and an addition of 10 decibels to sound levels at nighttime hours between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. These additions are made to account for the increased sensitivity during the evening and nighttime hours when sound appears louder. CNEL values do not represent the actual sound level heard at any particular time, but rather represents the total sound exposure. Additionally, Sound Transmission Class (or STC) is an integer rating of how well airborne sound is attenuated by a building partition. STC is widely used to rate interior partitions, ceilings/floors, doors, windows and exterior wall configurations (see ASTM International Classification E413 and E90). The STC number is derived from tested sound attenuation values found at the 1/3 octave band frequencies. These transmission-loss (TL) values are then plotted and compared to a standard reference contour. Acoustical engineers fit these 10/7/2013 4 1298-05 La Costa Town Square Interior Noise April Tornillo Taylor Morrison • 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 • values to the appropriate TL Curve to determine a single STC value found at 500 Hertz. STC is roughly the decibel reduction in noise a partition can provide, abbreviated 'dB'. If an 85 dB sound on one side of a wall is reduced to 50 dB on the other side, that partition is said to have an STC of 35. This number does not apply across the range of frequencies because the STC value is derived from a curve-fit from the tested 1/3 octave band frequencies. Any partition will have less TL at lower frequencies. For example, a wall with an STC of 35 may provide over 40 dB of attenuation at 3000 Hz but only 20 dB of attenuation at 125Hz. INTERIOR NOISE STANDARDS California's Title 24 Noise Standards In 1974, the california Commission on Housing and Community Development adopted noise insulation standards for multi-family residential buildings (Title 24, Part 2, california Code of Regulations or CCR). CCR Title 24 establishes standards, based on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements, for interior room noise (attributable to outside noise sources). The regulations also specify that acoustical studies must be prepared whenever a multi-family residential or motel/hotel building or structure is proposed to be located near an existing or adopted freeway route, expressway, parkway, major street, thoroughfare, rail line, rapid transit line, or industrial noise source, and where such noise sources create an exterior CNEL (or Ldn) of 60 dBA or greater. Such acoustical analysis must demonstrate that the residence has been designed to limit intruding noise to an interior CNEL (or Ldn) of at least 45 dBA. City of Carlsbad Noise Standards The City of carlsbad's Noise Guidelines Manual (1995) requires that all exterior sensitive residential areas shall limit noise exposure. For noise sensitive residential land uses, the City has adopted a policy which has established an exterior noise level goal of 60 dBA CNEL for the outdoor living areas and an interior noise level of less than 45 dBA CNEL. For residential properties identified as requiring a noise study, a study shall be prepared by an acoustical professional. This study shall document the projected maximum exterior noise level and mitigate the projected exterior noise level to a maximum allowable noise level as identified in Noise Guideline Manual. 10/7/2013 5 1298-05 La Costa Town Square Interior Noise April Tornillo Taylor Morrison • 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Exterior Noise Levels • Ldn ~1111$ lne. 44/, C.restUHJrl Um. F~lllmwK CA fZ.IJU phone 7uo-477-lt51 F•• 7uo-~S1-4141 The primary source of noise impacts to the project site will be vehicular noise from Rancho Santa Fe Road is the principal source of community noise that could impact the site. Based on the future traffic projections along these roadway, portions of the site will along Rancho Santa Fe Road experience unmitigated exterior noise levels at the seoond floor building facades of Lots 1- 10 of 72 dBA CNEL (Source: La Costa Town Square Noise Study-Ldn Consulting dated January 17, 2013). The noise levels depend on the location of the buildings, shielding from existing and proposed structures and the proximity to the aforementioned roadway. Interior building facades not having a direct line of sight to the roadways were found to have a noise level of 62 dBA CNEL or less. The extemal acoustical report determined that with the incorporation of a sound barrier along Lots 1-10, adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road, the first floor areas would be mitigated below 60 dBA CNEL. Therefore, only the seoond floor building facades would be exposed to noise levels above 60 dBA CNEL and would require interior noise reductions. Since Building Plan 1 is a single story plan only the seoond floor areas of Plans 2 and 3 are affected by noise levels above 60 dBA CNEL from Rancho Santa Fe Road. The worst-case exterior noise level of 72 dBA CNEL was utilized for the seoond floor areas of the architectural floor Plans 2 and 3 of Lots 1-10. Interior Noise Levels The methodology used to determine the resultant interior noise levels is based upon the exterior noise level minus the sound transmission loss as identified in the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) guidelines: E413 &E90. Standard building construction will provide a noise reduction of approximately 12-15 dBA with a windows open condition and a minimum 20 dBA noise reduction with the windows closed. The exterior noise levels at the proposed structures calculated in terms of dBA are converted to the six octave band sound pressure levels between: 125 -4000 Hertz. Acoustical modeling of the proposed project dwelling units was performed in accordance with the above guidelines and included combining the transmission loss for each of the building components that will reduce the interior noise levels. Building components typically include the windows, exterior doors, and exterior walls. The total noise reduction is dependent upon 10/7/2013 6 1298-QS La Costa Town Square Interior Noise April Tornillo Taylor Morrison • 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 • the transmission loss of each building component, their subsequent surface area, quality of the building/construction materials, a building fac;ade and angle correction. The interior noise level is also dependent on the acoustical energy absorbed within the room based upon the Noise Reduction Coefficients (NRC). NRC is a scalar representation of the amount of sound energy absorbed upon striking a particular surface and the arithmetic value average of sound absorption coefficients indicating a material's ability to absorb sound. The absorption coefficients for individual surface areas such as carpet, drywall and furnishings are used to calculate the interior room effects. The calculated building noise reduction includes both the room absorption characteristics and the transmission loss from the exterior wall assembly. The interior noise reduction calculations were performed using Ldn's interior noise model. The model converts the exterior sound level to octave band frequencies and accounts for the transmission loss, correction factors and room absorption. The floor plans used for this analysis were provided by Bassenian Lagoni Architecture dated August, 2013. The following construction details were utilized for each of the building assemblies to determine the noise reduction characteristics: Exterior walls and roof assemblies must have a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 46 or better. Exterior walls with this rating consist of 2"x4" studs or larger, spaced 16" o.c. with R-13 insulation minimum and an exterior surface of 7/8" cement plaster (stucco). Interior wall and ceiling surfaces shall be at least 1/2" thick gypsum or plaster. Roof assemblies should have a minimum of 1/2" sheathing, R-19 insulation and sealed to prevent noise leaks. Exterior entry doors should be of solid core construction and glass assemblies should be dual-glazed and acoustical sealant applied around the exterior edges. The window and door assemblies are generally the weakest noise reducing component but are the most convenient and cost effective elements to change if additional attenuation is needed. The src ratings for the glass assemblies and exterior entry doors were calculated in the interior noise model and provided in the findings below. Bathrooms, kitchens, closets and corridors are not required to meet the 45 dBA CNEL standard and therefore were not modeled. All living areas where lower noise levels are essential for conversation and sleep should have carpeting installed; this includes bedrooms, living rooms and dining rooms. These rooms and were modeled to determine the interior noise reductions. If the modeled interior noise levels were found to be higher than 45 dBA CNEL in the living areas with the minimum assembly requirements described above additional modeling was performed to 10/7/2013 7 1298~05 La Costa Town Square Interior Noise April Tornillo Taylor Morrison • 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 • LJn ~ling, lnt:.. 44(, t:miUJurl L.3,., F•llbrtH>K t:/1 fUJUJ phDnl 7/,0-471-tt» F•• 7/,0-~61-414• detennine the minimum STC rating for the glass assemblies to further reduce interior noise levels below the acceptable interior threshold of 45 dBA CNEL FIN PINGS The worst-case exterior noise levels were detennined to be as high as 72 dBA CNEL at the second floor building facades of Lots 1-10. Basic calculations show that a windows open condition will typically reduce the interior noise levels 12-15 dBA CNEL and not provide adequate interior noise mitigation. To meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard, an overall minimum interior noise level reduction of an overall interior noise level reduction of 27 dBA CNEL is needed for the proposed project. Therefore a closed window condition is required to reduce interior noise levels to comply with CCR Title 24 and City of carlsbad requirements. The windows closed condition requires that mechanical ventilation is installed to move air within the structure and control temperatures. The mechanical ventilation must meet the jurisdictional requirements for these dwelling units. The proposed operable glass assemblies have an STC 28 rating, the fixed windows have an STC 29 rating and the sliding glass doors have an STC 30 rating. These STC ratings were entered into the interior noise model to determine compliance with the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. It was determined, based on the modeling, that the proposed STC ratings for the glass assemblies having direct line of sight to the roadways (i.e., northern, southern and eastern facades) of the second floor areas for Plans 2 and 3 of Lots 1-10 will reduce the interior noise levels below 45 dBA CNEL The modeled results with an anticipated interior noise level of 45 dBA CNEL or less are provided as an Attachmentto this report. The remainder of the proposed buildings will have noise levels that are more than 5 dBA CNEL lower and standard STC ratings of 26 for those glass assemblies would reduce the noise levels to be below the 45 dBA CNEL threshold. The necessary Sound Transmission Class and transmission losses for the glass assemblies are provided in Table 1. 10/7/2013 8 1298-QS La Costa Town Square Interior Noise April Tornillo Taylor Morrison • 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 • LJn ~Hng, lne.. 44(, C.r•IIUJUrl UM. F~/lbrfi(J~ t:.A fUU phon• 7(,()-47J-IZ5'# F•• 7t,o-~11-414J Table 1: Sound Transmission Class Ratings Lot STC Octave Band Transmission loss (Hz) Numbers ' Assembly Rating' 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Windows 28 19 16 26 32 38 39 1-10 Fixed Windows 29 19 14 26 32 37 36 Glass Doors 30 22 15 26 35 40 29 Windows 26 21 17 25 32 37 38 11-32 Fixed Windows 26 17 16 22 31 35 27 Glass Doors 26 16 19 22 30 31 28 ' Remainder of the Buildings will CJJmp/y with standard STC 26 ratings. 2 STC Ratings used in Model No impacts are antidpated with the inoorporation of the STC ratings provided above in Table 1. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to oontact me directly at (760) 473-1253 or jlouden@ldnoonsulting.net. Sincerely, w~ Jeremy Louden, Principal Attachments: Interior Noise Model calculations 10/7/2013 9 1298-QS La Costa Town Square Interior Noise • • INTERIOR NOISE CALCULATIONS Project Name: Building/ Lot(s) Floor Level La Costa Town Square (Montecina) 1-10 2 Arch Plan: 2 Room Type: Master Extenot NOJse Levels Source NBS W-S0-71 Champion Champion Champion IBcteri<or Door NBS Monograph 77 Room Absotpt1on {RAJ Interior Characteristics Source Carpet Army TM 5-805-4 Furnishings Army TM 5-805-4 Drywall Netwell Overall Absorption Factor (Furnished Room) N01se Reductwn Atea 414 42 0 40 0 Reduction from Absorption based upon Floor Area Level Increase for Defects and Exposed Surface Area STC 46 28 29 30 26 NRC 0.28 0.45 0.07 0.8 19 22 16 125 0.15 0.32 0.09 0.56 125 -23.2 17.7 IO\rer<lll Reduction from Tranmission Loss + Room Absorption -Surface Exposure Noise * Corrections for Fac;ade Level was accounted for in the modeling. 16 14 15 14 250 0.17 0.29 0.08 0.54 250 -23.2 17.7 Ldn Consulting, Inc. Date: 10/4/13 Project # 12-98 32 39 26 32 37 36 26 35 40 29 23 30 36 26 Absorption CoeffiCients Frequency {Hz.) 500 0.12 0.42 0.05 0.59 500 -23.2 17.7 1000 0.32 0.58 0.03 0.93 1000 -23.2 17 2000 0.52 0.60 0.06 1.18 2000 -23.2 17.7 4000 0.30 0.48 0.09 0.87 4000 • • INTERIOR NOISE CALCULATIONS Project Name: Building /Lot(s) Floor Level La Costa Town Square (Montecina) 1-10 2 Arch Plan: 2 Room Type: Bedroom 2 Extenor N01se Levels Glass Doors Exterior Door SDurce NBS W-50-71 Champion Champion Champion NBS Monograph 77 Room Abs01pt1on (RA} Interior Characteristics SDurce carpet Army TM 5-805-4 Furnishings Army TM 5-805-4 Drywall Netwell Overall Absorption Factor (Furnished Room) Notse Reduct1011 Area 216 55 0 0 0 Noise Reduction from Absorption based upon Floor Area Noise Level Increase for Defects and Exposed Surface Area STC 46 28 29 30 26 NRC 0.28 0.45 0.07 0.8 Overall Reduction from Tranmission Loss + Room Absorption -Surfa Building Fa~de Noise Level (dBA CNEL) 19 22 16 1.25 0.15 0.32 0.09 0.56 1.25 -20.7 16.1 ce Exposure ldn Consulting, Inc. Date: 10/4/13 Project # 12-98 16 26 32 14 26 32 37 36 15 26 35 40 29 14 23 30 36 26 Absorption Coefficients Frequency (Hz.) 250 500 1.000 2000 4000 0.17 0.12 0.32 0.52 0.30 0.29 0.42 0.58 0.60 0.48 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.54 0.59 0.93 1.18 0.87 250 500 1.000 2000 4000 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 27.8 72.0 Resultant Intenor No1se level (dBA CNEL) 44 *Corrections for Fac;ade Level was accounted for in the modeling. • • INTERIOR NOISE CALCULATIONS Project Name: Building 1 Lot(s) Floor Level La Costa Town Square (Montecina) 1-10 2 Arch Plan: 2 Room Type: Bedroom 3 Extenor N01se Levels Exterior Door Source NBS W-50-71 Champion Champion Champion NBS Monograph 77 Room Absotptwn {RAJ Interior Characteristics Source carpet Anmy TM 5-805-4 Furnishings Army TM 5-805-4 Drywall Netwell Overall Absorption Factor (Furnished Room) NOise Reductwn Area 252 35 0 0 0 Noise Reduction from Absorption based upon Floor Area Noise Level Increase for Defects and Exposed Surface Area STC 46 28 29 30 26 NRC 0.28 0.45 0.07 0.8 Overall Reduction from Tranmission Loss + Room Absorption -Surfa Building Fa~de Noise Level (dBA CNEL) 19 19 22 16 125 0.15 0.32 0.09 0.56 125 -21.4 16.0 ce Exposure Ldn Consulting, Inc. Date: 10/4/13 Project# 12-98 16 26 32 38 39 14 26 32 37 36 15 26 35 40 29 14 23 30 36 26 Absorption Coefficients Frequency (Hz.) 250 500 1000 2000 4000 0.17 0.12 0.32 0.52 0.30 0.29 0.42 0.58 0.60 0.48 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.54 0.59 0.93 1.18 0.87 250 500 1000 2000 4000 -21.4 -21.4 -21.4 -21.4 -21.4 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 30.0 72.0 Resultant Intenor No1se Level (dBA CNEL) 42 * Corrections for Fac;ade Level was accounted for in the modeling. • INTERIOR NOISE CALCULATIONS Project Name: Building /lot(s) Floor Level La Costa Town Square (Montecina) 1-10 2 Arch Plan: 3 Room Type: Master Extenor N01se Levels Source NBS W-50-71 Champion Champion Champion NBS Monograph 77 Room Abs01pt1on (RAJ Interior Characteristics Carpet Furnishings Drywall Source Army TM 5-805-4 Army TM 5-805-4 Netwell Overall Absorption Factor (Furnished Room) NOISe ReductiOn Area 297 40 0 40 0 Noise Reduction from Absorption based upon Floor Area Noise level Increase for Defects and Exposed Surface Area STC 46 28 29 30 26 NRC 0.28 0.45 0.07 0.8 19 19 22 16 125 0.15 0.32 0.09 0.56 125 -23.5 17.5 Overall Reduction from Tranmission loss + Room Absorption -Surface Exposure Building Fa91de Noise Level (dBA CNEL) 16 14 15 14 250 0.17 0.29 0.08 0.54 250 -23.5 17.5 • ldn Consulting, Inc. Date: 10/4/13 Project # 12-98 39 26 32 37 36 26 35 40 29 23 30 36 26 Absorption Coefficients Frequency {Hz.) 500 0.12 0.42 0.05 0.59 500 -23.5 17.5 1000 0.32 0.58 0.03 0.93 1000 -23.5 17.5 2000 0.52 0.60 0.06 1.18 2000 -23.5 17.5 4000 0.30 0.48 0.09 0.87 4000 -23.5 17.5 28.2 72.0 Resultant Intenor N01se Level (dBA CNEL) 44 * Corrections for Fae;ade Level was accounted for in the modeling. • • INTERIOR NOISE CALCULATIONS Project Name: Building I Lot(s) Floor Level La Costa Town Square (Montecina) 1-10 2 Arch Plan: 3 Room Type: Bedroom 2 Exten01 No1se Levels Source Area NBS W-50-71 216 Champion 35 Window Champion 0 Glass Doors Champion 0 Door NBS Monograph 77 0 Room Absotptwn (RA} Interior Characteristics Source Carpet Army TM 5-805-4 Furnishings Army TM 5-805-4 Drywall Netwell Overall Absorption Factor (Furnished Room) Notse Rc~ductJ0/1 Noise Reduction from Absorption based upon Floor Area Noise Level Increase for Defects and Exposed Surface Area STC 46 28 29 30 26 NRC 0.28 0.45 0.07 0.8 Overall Reduction from Tranmission Loss + Room Absorption -Surfa Building Fa91de Noise Level (dBA CNEL) 19 19 22 16 125 0.15 0.32 0.09 0.56 125 -20.7 15.9 ce Exposure Ldn Consulting, Inc. Date: 10/4/13 Project # 12-98 26 14 26 32 37 36 15 26 35 40 29 14 23 30 36 26 Absorption Coeffldents Frequency (Hz.) 250 500 1000 2000 4000 0.17 0.12 0.32 0.52 0.30 0.29 0.42 0.58 0.60 0.48 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.54 0.59 0.93 1.18 0.87 250 500 1000 2000 4000 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 29.4 72.0 Resultant Intenor No1se Level (dBA CNEL) 43 * Corrections for Facade Level was accounted for in the modeling. • • INTERIOR NOISE CALCULATIONS Project Name: Building I Lot(s) Floor Level La Costa Town Square (Montecina) 1-10 2 Arch Plan: 3 Room Type: Bedroom 3 Extenor N01se Levels Source NBS W-50-71 Champion Champion Champion IEx!teri1Jr Door NBS Monograph 77 Room AbSOlptJon (RAJ Interior Characteristics Source carpet Army TM 5-805-4 Furnishings Army TM 5-805-4 Drywall Netwell Overall Absorption Factor (Furnished Room) Notse ReductJon Area 216 25 0 0 0 Noise Reduction from Absorption based upon Floor Area Noise Level Increase for Defects and Exposed Surface Area STC 46 28 29 30 26 NRC 0.28 0.45 0.07 0.8 Overall Reduction from Tranmission Loss + Room Absorption -Surfa Building Fa<;ade Noise Level (dBA CNEL) 19 19 22 16 1.25 0.15 0.32 0.09 0.56 1.25 -20.7 15.7 ce Exposure Ldn Consulting, Inc. Date: 10/4/13 Project # 12-98 16 26 14 26 32 37 36 15 26 35 40 29 14 23 30 36 26 Absorption Coefficients Fl'fN[uency (Hz.) 250 500 1.000 2000 4000 0.17 0.12 0.32 0.52 0.30 0.29 0.42 0.58 0.60 0.48 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.54 0.59 0.93 1.18 0.87 250 500 1.000 2000 4000 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 30.6 72.0 Resultant Intenor No1se Level (dBA CNEL) 41 *Corrections for Fat;ade le'llel was accounted for in the modeling. • INTERIOR NOISE CALCULATIONS Project Name: Building I Lot(s) Floor Level La Costa Town Square (Montecina) 1-10 2 Arch Plan: 3 Room Type: Bonus Room Extenor N01se Levels Exterior Stucco Window Doors I Ext•!rior Door SDurr:e NBS W-50-71 Champion Champion Champion NBS Monograph 77 Room Abs01ptton (RAJ Interior Characteristics SDurr:e carpet Army TM 5-805-4 Furnishings Army TM 5-805-4 Drywall Netwell Overall Absorption Factor (Furnished Room) Notse Reduction Area 209 24 0 0 0 Noise Reduction from Absorption based upon Floor Area Noise Level Increase for Defects and Exposed Surface Area src 46 28 29 30 26 NRC 0.28 0.45 0.07 0.8 Overall Reduction from Tranmission Loss + Room Absorption -Surfa Building Fa91de Noise Level (dBA CNEL) 27 42 19 16 19 14 22 15 16 14 125 250 0.15 0.17 0.32 0.29 0.09 0.08 0.56 0.54 125 250 -20.7 -20.7 15.7 15.7 ce Exposure • Ldn Consulting, Inc. Date: 10/4/13 Project # 12-98 44 46 49 54 26 32 38 39 26 32 37 36 26 35 40 29 23 30 36 26 Absorption Coefficients Frequency (Hz.) 500 1000 2000 4000 0.12 0.32 0.52 0.30 0.42 0.58 0.60 0.48 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.59 0.93 1.18 0.87 500 1000 2000 4000 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 -20.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 30.7 72.0 Resultant Intenor No1se Level (dBA CNEL) 41 * Corrections tor racade level was accounted for In the modeling. • • (~.,.'-,CITY Of ~CARLSBAD • Memorandum August 27, 2013 To: From: Re: John Kim, Traffic Engineering Division Mike Peterson, Development Services Manager Nick Roque, Transportation-Streets Lori Allen, Police Department GIS Department Greg Ryan, Fire Department Glen Van Peski, Land Use Engineering Planning Technician STREET NAMES FOR CT 12-05-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL The following street names have been approved as a part of the final map processing for CT 12-05-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL. A map delineating street locations is attached. Private Streets: A Avenida Soria B Circulo Ronda C Calle Nerja D Calle Tarifa As much as you are able, please make sure approved street names are shown and spelled correctly on all final map and construction drawings. Attachment c: Jason Goff, Project Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Mario Remillard, Mtce. & Opr. ~ ~ Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax .. LEGeV YXl8.8 -PINEl L=:J -~_,_ -·-IWlOUT - 1ft -~ .df~.A_ C I T Y 0 f VcARLSBAD • Community & Economic Development May 8, 2013 April Tornillo Taylor Morrison of California, LLC 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 • DFILE www.carlsbadca.gov SUBJECT: NOTICE OF RESTRICTION-CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Dear Ms. Tornillo: Please find the enclosed Notice of Restriction that needs to be signed, notarized, and returned for recordation. This is to fulfill a condition of approval of the Tentative Tract Map (see Condition No. 23 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6967). Please ensure the following items are addressed prior to returning the Notice of Restriction: v" Correct Notary Acknowledgement Required (Effective January 1. 2008, all Certificates of Acknowledgement used by a California notary on a document that will be recorded in the State of California must NOT HAVE "PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME" in the acknowledgement. (Assembly Bill 886, Chapter 399)) v" Document must be properly notarized. v" Name on signature page and name on Notarial Acknowledgement must match. v" Property owner's signatures/initials must be the same as on Notary Acknowledgement. v" Notary Seal cannot be blurry/too light (County will not record the document if any portion af the Notary Seal is blurry or too light). v" Include property owner's name in the designated space above the owner's signature. v" Please pay particular attention to the signature requirements at the bottom of the signature page. It is our goal to assist you in getting the Notice of Restriction recorded as expeditiously as possible. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst at (760) 602-4615 or via email at michele.masterson@carlsbadca.gov. c;::; .IJLJI) JASONG;~ Associate Planner c: CED Senior Management Analyst File Copy Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 d~A._ CITY OF VcARLSBAD • Community & Economic Development MayS, 2013 April Tornillo Taylor Morrison of California, LLC 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 • u FILE www.carlsbadca.gov SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PROXIMITY-CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Dear Ms. Tornillo: Please find the enclosed Notice of Proximity that needs to be signed, notarized, and returned for recordation. This is to fulfill a condition of approval of the Tentative Tract Map (see Condition No. 27 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6967). Please ensure the following items are addressed prior to returning the Notice of Proximity: .,' Correct Notary Acknowledgement Required (Effective January 1. 2008, all Certificates of Acknowledgement used by a California notary on a document that will be recorded in the State of California must NOT HAVE "PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME" in the acknowledgement. (Assembly Bill 886, Chapter 399)) .,' Document must be properly notarized . .,' Name on signature page and name on Notarial Acknowledgement must match . .,' Property owner's signatures/initials must be the same as on Notary Acknowledgement. " Notary Seal cannot be blurry/too light {County will not record the document if ony portion of the Notary Seal is blurry or too light) . .,' Include property owner's name in the designated space above the owner's signature. " Please pay particular attention to the signature requirements at the bottom of the signature page. It is our goal to assist you in getting the Notice of Proximity recorded as expeditiously as possible. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst at (760) 602-4615 or via email at michele.masterson@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, 1\ U • Q~::~ Associate Planner c: CEO Senior Management Analyst File Copy Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ~~~CITY Of ' ~.~CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION May 2, 2013 Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Attn: April Tornillo 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 SUBJECT: CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • www.carlsbadca.gov At the May 1, 2013 Planning Commission meeting, your application was considered. The Commission voted 7-0 to approve your request. The decision of the Planning Commission is final on the date of adoption unless a written appeal to the City Council is filed with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days in accordance with the provisions of Carlsbad Municipal Code section 21.54.150. The written appeal must specify the reason or reasons for the appeal. If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please contact your project planner Jason Goff at (760) 602-4643 or jason.goff@carlsbadca.gov. DON NEU, AICP City Planner DN:JG:bd c: Data Entry File enc: Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6967, 6968 and 6969 II.,. 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 Planning. Division April9, 2013 Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Attn: April Tornillo 81051rvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 ' SUBJECT: CT 12-05/PUD 12·07N-12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL u FILE www.carlsbadca.gov The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be sent to you via email on Wednesday, April 17, 2013, after 8:00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on April 22, 2013. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 9:00 AM. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring the following required information with you to this meeting or provide it to your planner prior to the meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission: 1. Unmounted colored exhibit(s) of your site plan and elevations; and 2. A PDF of your colored site plan and elevations. The colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commis$ion at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your project could be rescheduled to a later time. The PDF of your colored site plan and elevations will be used in the presentation to the Planning Commission and the public at the Planning Commis$ion Hearing. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) and the PDF here by the scheduled time above. Should you wish to use visual materials in your presentation to the Planning Commission, they should be submitted to the Planning Division no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of a Regular Planning Commission Meeting. Digital materials will be placed on a computer in Council Chambers for public presentations. Please label all materials with the agenda item number you are representing. Items submitted for viewing, including presentations/digital materials, will be included in the time limit maximum for speakers. All materials exhibited to the Planning Commission during the meeting (slides, maps, photos, etc.) are part of the public record and must be kept by the Planning Division for at least 60 days after final action on the matter. Your materials will be returned upon written request. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Jason Goff at (760) 602-4643. Sincerely, D~E~ City Planner DN:JG:sm c: File Copy Tecla Levy, Project Engineer 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 • Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov March 18, 2013 Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Attn: April Tornillo 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 SUBJECT: CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-Q2-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Your application has been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on May 1, 2013. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by March 28, 2013, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A) 11 copies of the complete plan set on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 9" x 12" size. B) One (1) reduced 8W' x 11" copy of the complete plan set. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. C) One (1) electronic copy on compact disk of the complete plan set in .pdf format. D) One (1) electronic copy on compact disk of the color exhibits and/or renderings in .pdf format. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List -a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners, including all forms of interval ownership, within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. B) 100' Occupant List -(Coastal Development Permits Only) a typewritten list of names and addresses of all occupants within a 100 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® .. """\ CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-'-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL March 18, 2013 • Pa e 2 C) Mailing Labels-If the number of owners within the 600 foot radius is 1,000 or greater, a display advertisement in two papers of general circulation will be placed in lieu of direct mailing and labels will not be required to be submitted. If the number of owners within the 600 foot radius is less than 1,000, please submit two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. For any address other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes -PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Aria! 11 pt, Aria! Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt, courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 ACCEPTABLE (with APN) 209-060-34-00 MRS JANE SMITH APT3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the City Planner if the required scale is impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. In the case of ownership list that is 1,000 or greater, the fee is equal to the current cost of publishing a 1/8 page od in two newspapers of general circulation. Cash check {payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. ~~ JASON GOFF Associate Planner JG:sm Attachment c: File ... ..,. • • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY: ---------------------------- DATE:------------------------- RECEIVED BY DATE: _____________ _ Taylor Morrison March 27, 2013 City of Carlsbad Attention: Jason Goff 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 • • 1AYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC Southern California Division 8105 Irvine Center Drive Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92618 p. (949) 341-1200 f. (949) 341 -1400 taylormorrison.com Corp DRt: li009689/5 Subject: CT 12-05/PUD 12-0?N-12-02-La Costa Residential Dear Mr. Goff, This submittal is for the Planning Commission package for May 1, 2013 and includes the following information; 1. The Plans are as follows; A. 11 copies of the complete plan set on 24" x36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 9" x12" size. B. One (1) reduced 8 Y," x 11" copy of the complete plan set. These copies are of a quality to be photographical reproducible. C. One (1) electronic copy on compact disk of the complete plan set in .pdf format. D. One (1) electronic copy on compact disk of the color exhibits and/or renderings in .pdf format. 2. Noticing and Signed Certification Form; A. 600' Owners List, Mailing Labels, Radius Map, and Fee payable to the City of Carlsbad. Should you have any questions, please call me at 858-864-6206. ~::ef, ~~ Project Manager Taylor taylor . RECEIVED MAR 2 7 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Woodrow -~ • • mornson Cornmunities ~~ Homes lnsp1red b~'(ou 8105 lrv1ne'Center Drive, Suite 14::>0 • rvine, CA • Phone (949) 341-1200 • Fax (949) 585-9892 • • File: 1136.0 March 7, 2013 Chris DeCerbo City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 • PLA ~ ~~~~IIIINll 5355 Mlni smento 'f>taee/st.lite 650 San Diego, CA 92121 Tel858.751.0633 RE: Las Costa Residential-CT 12-05/ PUD 12-07/ V 12-02 3rd Plan Check Responses Dear Chris: • RECEIVED MAR I 1 2013 CITYoFc PLANNING ~~~~~z On behalf of our client, Taylor Morrison we are pleased to re-submit this package for the La Costa Residential project. Below is a point by point response to your letter dated January 14, 2013, our responses are in bold. Planning: Please revise the project design and plans to comply with the minor comments shown in red on the enclosed set of red-lined plans. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. Response: The project has been designed to be in compliance with the minor comments shown on the red-lined plans, the red-lined plans are being returned with the current submittal. On the Architecture Plans, Sheets 9-40, please revise the project title throughout to be consistent with the project title shown on the other plans (i.e. -"La Costa Town Center" should be changed to "La Costa Residential"). Response: The Architecture Plans have been updated to be titled "La Costa Residential". On the Landscape Concept Plans, Sheets 41-47, please revise the file number for the tentative map labeled in the upper right hand comer of the sheet. This number should be labeled as CT 12-05. Response: The label has been changed to CT 12-05. H:\La Costa\3rd ReSPoJllle Letter-3-7-13 -La Costa Residential 1136 OO.doc - Chris DeCerbo January 30,2013 Page2 • • To avoid the above ground utilities and grading constraints in this area, please abandon the design to construct a 10ft. wide trail connection with Old Rancho Santa Fe Road from the existing asphalt trail located on the east of the project. Also, please relocate the 4ft. wide private trail connection with Old Rancho Santa Fe Road to another area located somewhere before or at the entrance to the community garden passive recreation area. Please revise all plans to be consistent throughout. PELA: Response: The I 0' trail connection has been abandoned and the 4' trail connection has been updated to avoid the above ground utilities. 1. At a minimum, the plans shall include the following items; b. Existing conditions (i.e., grades, plants, property lines, easements, right-of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all above items. Insure that no trees are located within utilitv easements. 3'd Review: Easements are difficult to see and some are not shown/labeled (i.e., water and sewer). Trees appear to be shown inside the water and sewer easements. Please clearly show and label all easements (i.e., darken and label) and insure no trees are located within the easements. Response: The easements have been clearly identified on the plans including labels for reference to insure no trees are located within the easements. d. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. Response: The project does not propose any trees or large shrubs within public utility easements, including sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. e. All vehicular sigh lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3-B in section 3 of the Landscape Manual) and CalTrans sight distance standards (i.e. stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual plans. 3'd Review: Sight lines are difficult to see. Please darken lines to be easily seen. Response: The sight distance lines have been darkened and coordinated with the civil plans. H:\La C01ta\3nl Re.pon1e Letter· 3-7-13-La Costa Residentialll3ti OO.doc ·~····· Chris DeCerbo January 30,2013 Page 3 • • 13. 2"d Review: Walls to the east of Paseo Lupino appear to be split face block. Please revise to split face with cap to match existing walls to the east. 3'd Review: Please revised to "split face" block. Response: Per discussions with the planner in an impromptu onsite visit, the slump block with wash finish is an acceptable wall type to use on this project. 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. Response: The planting when installed at maturity is positioned to avoid obstructions to views of pedestrians crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street comers within a triangular zone drawn two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. Response: The landscape elements are not more than 30 inches in height along collector streets, see elevation on sheet 45 of the monument area. e. Landscape features (i.e. shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the Ca!Trans sight distance lines. Response: The landscape plans have been updated to ensure that the shrubs and trees are not creating a visual impairment or obstruction within the CalTrans sight distance lines. f. Ca!Trans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Please coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. 3'd Review: Both Caltrans and the 25' comer sight lines are not legible. Please darken the lines so they can be seen. Please correct the call outs and leader. Response: The landscape plans have been updated to comply with the CalTrans sight distance and the lines have been darkened. 19. 2"d Review: Please continue the Pines to the end of the project. Please see New Comment lA 3'd Review: Please continue the Pinus torreyana theme trees to the end of the project. H:\La Co1ta1Jrd Re1pon1e Letter· 3-7-13 ·La Costa kesidential11l6 OO.doc Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page4 • • Response: The project has been updated to include the Pinus Torreyana theme trees to the end of the project. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 2nd Review: Is there a reason no to include these areas as recycled water use? Drip can be used around the picnic and BBQ areas. Please review with OMWD for a final determination and provide documentation of OMWD direction. Revise water use calculations as appropriate. 3'd Review: The applicant has responded: "Reclaimed and domestic water crossing requirements make the use of reclaimed within the community prohibitive." Please provide documentation of OMWD direction. It is not clear what makes this prohibitive. Please explain. Response: OMWD is deferring the use of reclaimed water to DEH The purpose of the park is to be a place where parents would sit down on the lawn and watch their kids play and babies would be free to crawl around on the ground. Taylor Morrison is opposed to using reclaimed within the park area. Taylor Morrison is okay with providing additional reclaimed water as marked on the Landscape redlined plans. 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms a provided in appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 2nd Review: Please correct the MAWA and ETWU calculations as indicated. Please note that with corrections the ETWQU exceeds the MAW A. Revise design as appropriate to provide an ETWU that does not exceed the MA WA. 3'd Review: Although the ETWU is less than the MAW A, the calculation is still incorrect. Please make the revisions as appropriate. Response: The water use calculations have been revised and corrected. 27. Return Redlines and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored/hatched water use plan) for the next submittal. Response: The Redlines have been included in the plan submittal. NEW COMMENTS lB. Pinus torreyana has been revised to Pinus eldarica. Please revise back to Pinus Torreyana in order to match existing Pines to the east of Rancho Santa Fe Road and to meet requirements of Appendix D of the Landscape Manual. Ji:\La Costa\Jrd Reapon1e Letter· 3-7-13-La C01ta Realdentialll36 OO.dot Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 5 • • Response: The project has been updated to include the Pinus Torreyana theme trees along Rancho Santa Fe Road. 2B. Please identify the water use for this area and rev1se water use calculations as appropriate. Response: The project has been updated to identify the water use for this area. 38. Please hatch all appropriate areas of private homeowner maintained areas. Response: The project has been updated to show hatch of all private homeowner areas. Engineering: 1. Please revise project and plans to comply with the minor comments shown in red on the enclosed set of red-lined plans. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. Response: The project has been updated to comply with the minor comments shown in red. The redline plans have been returned with this submittal. We look forward to your review of this request. If you should have any questions please contact me at (858) 875-1731 or armando.urquidez@latitude33.com Sincerely, Armando Urquidez Senior Project Manager H:\La Costa\3rd Response Letter-3-7-13-La Costa Re~~identia11136 OO.doc • u FILE Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov February 28, 2013 Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Attn: April Tornillo 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 SUBJECT: CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Dear Ms. Tornillo, Your project was deemed complete on January 13, 2013. There are issues of concern with the project that remain to be resolved. The issues are listed on the attached page(s). All issues will need to be resolved prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing. Please contact me at (760) 602-4643, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. ~/ni/_ J JASON GOFF~, I Associate Planner JG:sm Attachments: 1. Planning Redlines-Sheets 1, 7, 8, 22-24, and 32 (2/22/13) 2. PELA Red lines-Sheets 41-47 (2/11/13) 3. Land Development Engineering (LDE) Red lines -Sheets 2, 5, 6, 41, and 42 (2/25/13) c: Property Development Centers, LLC, Attn: Jim Reuter, 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 Latitude 33 Planning & Engineering, Attn: Anna L. Yentile, 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650, San Diego, CA 92121 Don Neu, City Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Gregory Ryan, Deputy City Fire Marshal Michael Elliott, PELA File Copy Data Entry T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL February 28, 2013 Pa e 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please revise the project design and plans to comply with the minor comments shown in red on the enclosed set of red-lined plans. Please return all red lines with your next submittal. 2. On the Architecture Plans, Sheets 9-40, please revise the project title throughout to be consistent with the project title shown on the other plans (i.e. -"La Costa Town Center" should be changed to "La Costa Residential"). 3. On the Landscape Concept Plans, Sheets 41-47, please revise the file number for the tentative map labeled in the upper right hand corner of the sheet. This number should be labeled as CT 12-05. 4. To avoid the above ground utilities and grading constraints in this area, please abandon the design to construct a 10 ft. wide trail connection with Old Rancho Santa Fe Road from the existing asphalt trail located to the east of the project. Also, please relocated the 4 ft. wide private trail connection with Old Rancho Santa Fe Road to another area located somewhere before or at the entrance to the community garden passive recreation area. Please revise all plans to be consistent throughout. PELA: Please note that the numbers below are referenced on the enclosed set of red lined plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of comment concern. Please revise plans accordingly. REPEAT COMMENTS 1. Completed. 2. Completed. 3. Completed. 4. At a minimum, the plans shall include the following items: b. Existing conditions (i.e., grades, plants, property lines, easements. right-of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all above items. Insure that no trees are located within utility easements. 3'• Review: Easements are difficult to see and some are not shown/labeled (i.e., water·and sewer). Trees appear to be shown inside the water and sewer easements. Please clearly show and label all easements (i.e., darken and label) and insure no trees are located within the easements. c. Completed. d. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. e. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3- B in section 3 of the Landscape Manual) and CaiTrans sight distance standards (i.e.: stopping • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL February 28, 2013 Pa e 3 sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. 3'd Review: Sight lines are difficult ta see. Please darken lines ta be easily seen. f. Completed. g. Completed. h. Completed. 5. Completed. 6. Completed. 7. Completed. 8. Completed. 9. Completed. 10. Completed. 11. Completed. 12. Completed. 13. Please pre,.·i8e a eeray ef plaRs tRat spetify all walls#eAeiRg witR f3FBJ39Se8 ffiaterials aAS ReigRts fer re¥iew. Previ9e a A elevatieA/fJetail ef eaeR. 2nd Review: Walls to the east of Paseo Lupine appear to be split face block. Please revise to split face with cap to match existing walls to the east. 3'd Review: Please revise ta "split face" black. 14. Completed. 15. Completed. 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. c. Completed. d. Completed. e. Landscape features (i.e., shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the CaiTrans sight distance lines. f. Co/Trans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Please coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. 3'd Review: Both Co/Trans and the 25' corner sight lines are • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • February 28, 2013 Pa e 4 not legible. Please darken the lines so they can be seen. Please correct the co/louts and leader. 17. Completed. 18. Completed. 19. Previde a FTtiRiR:ti:JFR ef eRe street tree fer evept' 4Q' ef street freAtage. +rees R=tay l:ae f:llaAteS eR eeRter er grey~ea. 2"' Review: Please continue the JaearaRaa af\4-Pines to the end of the project. Please see NEW COMMENT 1A. 3'• Review: Please continue the Pinus torreyana theme trees to the end of the project. 20. Completed. 21. Completed. 22. Completed. 23. Completed. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 2"' Review: Is there a reason not to include these areas as recycled water use? Drip can be used around the picnic and BBQ areas. Please review with OMWD for a final determination and provide documentation of OMWD direction. Revise water use calculations as appropriate. 3'• Review: The applicant has responded: "Reclaimed and domestic water crossings requirements make the use of reclaimed within the community prohibitive." Please provide documentation of OMWD direction. It is not clear what makes this prohibitive. Please explain. 25. Completed. 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms as provided in appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 2"' Review: Please correct the MAWA and ETWU calculations as indicated. Please note that with corrections the ETWU exceeds the MAWA. Revise design as appropriate to provide an ETWU that does not exceed the MAWA. 3'• Review: Although the ETWU is less than the MAWA, the calculation is still incorrect. Please make revisions as appropriate. 27. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored/hatched water use plan) for the next submittal. lA. Belew is aA elEESFJ:~t freFTt PlaRAeB Qe,;eleJ:~FTteAt Table C regar8iRg arterial setbael< laR8S€3f3iAg: l-lalf (.fiQ94) ef tRe re~l:lirea arterial setbael< area leeateS elesest te tRe arterial sRall Be fwlly laRetseaf3e8 te eRRaRee tRe street seeRe aRB B~:.~Uer AeR=tes freFR traffie eA aeljaeeRt arterials, iiRffi * §Rail eeAtaiR a FRiRiFTti:JFR ef eRe 24" Be)E tree fer every 6Q liReal feet ef street freRtage: aM • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-'-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL February 28, 2013 • Pa e 5 * SAall Be EBR=IR=ISRI,; B'NReel aRB R=13iRtaiAe8 Pia As iReJieate tt=lat tAe street trees are 24 11 Be1E sii!e aAel tRey are e~::~rreRtl'/spaeeB at a A a ... erage '17 liReal f.eet aleRg RaReRe SaAta Fe Reael. TRere are 9aekgrewA9 trees B~:~~t plaRs iRelieate tRat tRe·,. are te Be 1§ galleR sii!e FNiAiRlYR=I. Please re¥ise plaAs previeliRg fer eRe 2'1" Be)E si2e tree fer e·;eFy ;ag liReal ~et ef street freAtage. 3'" Review: The applicant has provided street trees (Jacaranda) at 30' an center and indicated that they are to be 24" box size. Although this does meet the requirement, in order to better maintain street scene continuity it is preferred that the spacing of the Jacaranda trees be 40' an center to better match spacing of existing Jacaranda trees to the east and upsize some of the Pinus torreyana theme trees to account for the additional required quantity of 24" box size trees. There is approximately 1,130 lineal feet of street frontage. Dividing by 30 equals a total of 38- 24" box trees required. Jacaranda spaced at 40' on center equals about 28 trees leaving a total of 10 additional 24" box size trees required. Please revise spacing of the Jacaranda to 40' on center (approximately 28 trees) and revise 10 of the Pinus torreyana to 24" box size to provide a toto/ of 38-24 "box size trees. 2A Completed. NEW COMMENTS lB. Pinus torreyana has been revised to Pinus eldarica. Please revise back to Pinus torreyana in order to match existing Pines to the east on Rancho Santa Fe Road and to meet requirements of Appendix D of the Landscape Manual. 2B. Please identify the water use for this area and revise water use calculations as appropriate. 3B. Please hatch all appropriate areas of private homeowner maintained areas. Engineering: 1. Please revise project and plans to comply with the minor comments shown in red on the enclosed set of red-lined plans. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. Fire Prevention: No comments. Parks: No comments. Building: No comments. However, the Building Division noted that a complete code review will be prepared at the time construction plans are submitted for Building Division plan check. • File: 1136.0 February 6, 2013 Chris DeCerbo City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 • 41ft& PL.AN'NINGI & E:NilllNttERINill 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650 San Diego, CA 92121 Tel858.751.0633 RE: Las Costa Residential-CT 12-05/ PUD 12-07/ V 12-02 2nd Plan Check Responses Dear Chris: • RECEIVED FEB 0 6 2013 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION On behalf of our client, Taylor Morrison we are pleased to re-submit this package for the La Costa Residential project. Below is a point by point response to your letter dated January 14, 2013, our responses are in bold. Planning: 1. Noise Study. Please address the following issues: a. Figure 1-2, Figure 4-1, Figure 4-2, and Figure 5-1 are illegible as it relates to identifying the Lot #s. Please revise these exhibits within the document and resubmit. Response: The figures have been updated to be easier to determine lot numbers. b. In addition to Lot 1-9, the document discusses noise impacts to Lots 28 and 29. Is reference to Lot 29 a typo; and should this instead be Lot 27? Please confirm. Response: Correct, the noise study has been revised and Lot 29 has been removed from the mitigation list. The noise barrier needed for Lot 28 also reduces the noise at Lot 2 7 sufficiently. c. Figure 5-1 requires a 6 foot barrier extending in the easterly direction towards the edge of the existing trail separating this project from the adjacent homes. However, the proposed landscape submittal shows a 6 foot barrier following the lot lines of these proposed lots. Please address any inconsistencies. H:'' 11001 1136.00\Submittalsi:{QJ3-0l-30 TM THIRD SUBMlTfAL\Draft 2nd Response Letter-1-30-13 -La Costa Residential 1136.00.doc Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page2 • • Response: The noise study graphic has been revised to reflect the wall location consistent with the landscape plans. d. Please see attached redlines for clarifications of the above. Revise accordingly. Response: All red!ine comments have been addressed in the revised report. It should be noted: Exterior noise mitigation is needed for Lots I-9 & 28. Since second floor facades noise levels were found to be above 60 dBA CNEL at Lots I- IO & 27-28, an interior noise assessment is needed for those Lots. Language has been added to the report to help clarify. 2. Sheet 1 (Title Sheet). Please address the following issues: a. Please revise Development Summary Items #3 and #4 to include the Open Space (OS) Land Use designation that exists on this property in addition to the RM. Response: See revised plan for updated Items 3 and 4. b. Please revise the proposed density (3.2 dulac) that is labeled in Development Summary Item #8 as the project's density is based on the net developable acreage, and not gross acreage (9.96 acres). It is important to note that the net developable acreage should exclude the improved portion of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Paseo Lupino, along with the 1.9 acres of existing General Plan designated Open Space (OS). Based on this, the net developable acreage for this project should be 5.77 acres. Please confirm the following acreages (Gross Acreage (9.96 acres)-Improved Rancho Santa Fe Road!Paseo Lupino (2.2 acres)- Existing GP designated OS (1.9 acre)= Net Developable Acreage (5.77 acres)). If this is correct, then the project should have a density of 5.5 dulac. This would be within the RM density range, but just below the Growth Management Control Point. Response: Total developable area minus Rancho Santa Fe Rd and Paseo Lupino = 7.98 acres -I.9 acres of OS =5.78 acres. Therefore 32lots/5.78 ac.=5.54 DU per acre. See revised Item 8. H:\1100\1136.01)\Submittals\2013-01-30 TM THIRD SUBMITTAL\Draft Zud Response Letter-1-30-13-Ls Costa Resideotialll36.00.doc ~ PI..ANN_INI!I & EN.IaiNitltRINI;!I .- Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 3 • • c. Please revise Development Summary Item #19 as the 4.56 acres of open space does not match that shown in the Lot Summary Table on Sheet 8. Response: Lot Summary Table and Item 19 have been updated to 3.93 Acres d. Please revise any inconsistent lot numbers between the Key Map and other sheets. For example the Key Map has Open Space Lots A and C, whereas Sheet 5 has Lots 33 and 35 for the very same lots. Response: All lot numbering has been updated and only numbers are used. See revised sheet 5. 3. Sheet 2 (Typical Sections Lot Area). Please address the following issues: a. Please note, the lot area table is no longer on this sheet. Please rename the sheet. Response: Lot Summary Table move to sheet 8. Sheet 2 has been renamed. b. Please add cross section details for all of the Private Drive Aisles (A, B, and C). Be sure to label the location of the property lines as each of these are individual lots. Response: Added cross sections for Private Drives C and D. Cross sections for Private Street A and B already provided. Property lines have been identified on all sections. c. Please revise the cross section detail for Private Street A to identifY the location of property lines. Response: Property line has been identified. d. Instead of providing a note, please revise the Parallel Parking Space Detail to include an example of the 20ft. length where a parallel space is located adjacent to a drive aisle and/or driveway pan. This can easily be accomplished by converting one of the 24 ft. lengths. Response: Added a detail specifically for the parallel parking adjacent to a drive aisle or driveway. H:\1100\1136.00\Submittals\2013-01·30 TM TIDRD SUBMITIAL\Draft 2nd Response Letter-1-30...13-La Costa ResideDtialll36.00.doc ~ PLANH.(NII o!l I!:NQINEEIUNIJ Chris DeCerbo January 30,2013 Page4 • • e. Please note that the perpendicular parking spaces proposed in the plans do not match the Perpendicular Parking DetaiL If a parking overhang is to be used in order to meet the minimum area requirements for a parking space, then please revise the exhibit to match. Re-label this exhibit to also include Private Drive C. Response: • Parking detail dimensions have been revised to match the plan. • A 2-foot overhang has been added to the detail and to sheets 5 and 6. With the 2-foot overhang, the parking area per space is 9ft x20 ft = 180 SF. This exceeds the 170 SF minimum requirements. • The exhibit has been revised to include Private Drive C. [ Please relocate the Parking Summary table to the architectural site plan on Sheet 7 or Sheet 8. Response: The Parking Summary has been relocated to sheet 7. 4. Sheet 3 (Existing Conditions and Easements). The Easement Table that is provided on this sheet includes two (2) rows of the same easement information identified and listed under Item No. 17. However, the column entitled "Deposition" is different for each one of these rows; one indicating that the easement is "to be vacated," and the other indicating that the same easement is "to remain." Please revise these inconsistencies to clarify intent. Response: The portion of Item 17 north of Pas eo Lupino and Corte Brezo intersection and west of Pas eo Lupino centerline is to be vacated. A note to that effect has been added to Sheet 3. 5. Sheet 5 (Proposed Conditions). Please address the following issues: a. Please revise any inconsistent lot numbering/lettering. For example Lots 33 and 35 on this sheet are the same as Lots A and C on the Key Map (Sheet I, Title Sheet). Response: All lot numbering has been revised. All lettered lots are now numbered. H:\l100\1136.GQ\SubmittalsUOl3-01·30 TM THIRD SUBMIITAL\Draft 2nd Response ~tter-1-30-13 ·La Costa ResidentiaJ 1136.00.doc a PLA.NNINII. & ENIIIN~EitiNI!II Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 5 • • b. Please label lot numbering/lettering on this sheet for the Open Space recreation lot located in the center of the project and the Open Space lot that is adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road. Response: Lot has been numbered and is identified as lot 3 7. c. The perpendicular parking stalls located adjacent to Private Drives A and C do not meet the minimum area requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code chapter 21.44, nor do they match the typical detail provided on Sheet 2. They appear to scale at approximately 9' by 17', which equates to 153 sq. ft. in area, where 170 sq. ft. is required. Look to the vehicle parking overhang (C.M.C. Section 21.44.050(A)) allowance as a possible way to resolve this issue. This will likely require slightly widening the sidewalk in front of the spaces along Private Drive A in order to accommodate pedestrian accessibility. For the three spaces located in Private Drive C, be sure to label any proposed overhang. Revise all plans to be consistent. Response: • Parking detail dimensions have been revised to match the detail on sheet 2. • The parking area per space is 9ft x20 ft (18ft + 2ft overhang) = 180 SF. This exceeds the 170 SF minimum requirements. • Sidewalk along Private Dr. B has been widened by 2ft. • All overhangs have been labeled. 6. Sheet 6 (Proposed Conditions). Please address the following issues: a. Please revise the location of the proposed public trail connections to avoid any impacts with the existing utilities that are located within this area. Please revise all plans to be consistent. Response: Trail alignments have been revised to eliminate impacts to trails. b. Please revise the plans to extend the proposed trail next to the community garden area to also connect with the existing asphalt trail similar to what is proposed in the landscape plans. Please revise all plans to be consistent. Response: Trail has been extended. 7. Sheet 7 (Architectural Site Plan). Please address the following issues: H:\IIO(t\ll36.00\Submittals\2013-0I-30 TM TlDRD SUBMriTAL\Draft 2nd Respon~~e Letter· 1-30-13-La Costa Residentia11136.00.doc Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page6 • • a. Please increase the scale of this sheet to 1" = 40' scale. There is too much information on this plan, and at the 1" = 50' scale it is too difficult to read. Response: Plan scale has been changed to I "=40' b. Front setbacks for Lots 15-21 need to be measured to the property line behind the sidewalk, not the curb of the drive-aisle. Response: Setback dimensions are now to back of sidewalk. c. Please label all lots on the architectural site plan that are subject to the slope edge building setback (see C.M.C. 21.95.120(1)) and demonstrate project compliance with this standard. Our calculations indicate that Lots 2- 15 are subject to this requirement. Response: Note has been added identifying lots 2-5 as being subject to the slope edge building setback requirement. Cross sections are provided for worst case conditions, lots 8-12. d. Please revise Slope Edge Building Setback, Section Detail D-D to more accurately reflect the grading conditions of this slope with the 8 ft. combination retaining/glass noise wall. Be sure to include in the detail the locations of the noise wall, property line, and projected slope edge as recently discussed. Response: Section has been revised and reviewed by Jason Goff on 1123113 e. Please include additional Slope Edge Building Setback section details for Lots 7 and 9. Please note that the residential unit proposed on Lot 9 is subject to slope edge building setbacks on two (2) sides. At least two section details relating to the slopes facing Old Rancho Santa Fe Road and the existing Rancho Santa Fe Road are necessary to determine if the home proposed on Lot 9 is compliant. Response: Per email from Jason Goff on 1123/13, cross section for lot 7 is not required. Lot 9 pad has been lowered to increase pad size and two cross sections have been provided to show compliance. 8. Sheet 8 (Private Rec. Area and Lot Summary). Please address the following issues: H:\li00\1136.00\Submittals\2013-01·30 TM THIRD SUBMITIAL\Drafl2nd Response Letter-1-30-13-La Costa Resideotialll31i.OO.dot ~ Pl...ANII!INII 4 I!:NGINEC""INO Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 7 • • a. Please calculate the total lot area column and insert the figure into the m1ssmg space. Response: Total lot area has been calculated. b. Please add two (2) columns to the Lot Summary Table that identifies the minimum Side Yard Setback and Rear Yard Setback for each residential lot. See Planned Development TableD (C.M.C. 21.45.070) for the individual requirements. Response: Columns have been added with minimum yard setbacks requirements. c. For Lots 20, 26, and 28, please revise to include a similar dimension as provided on all other lots showing the degree of encroachment by the proposed covered patios for purposes of determining the minimum 15 ft. dimension requirement for private recreation areas. Response: Dimensions have been added for encroachment into patios. 9. Landscape Plans. Please address the following issues: a. The noise study identifies a requirement of Y," thick glass as one of the wall materials allowed to be used in properly mitigating noise levels within the project. The proposed "combo wall" details that are provided for both the 6 ft. and 8 ft. walls call for X" thick glass. Please revise plans to comply with the noise study. Response: Details have been updated to l6" thick glass. b. Please revise the location of the proposed public trail connections to avoid impacts with the existing utilities located in this area. Response: Completed. c. On Sheet 42 (Passive Park Enlargement), the note pointing to the Active Play Area needs to be revised. The Planned Development Regulations Table C (C.M.C. 21.45.060) allows for a grassy play area with a slope of "less than 5%." The plans are labeled "5% max." Please revise this and any other areas of the plans that could be impacted by this requirement. Response: Completed. H:\110011136,00\Submittalll\2013-01-30 TM THIRD SUBMITIAL\Draft 2nd Response Letter-1-30-13-La Costa ResldentialllJ6.00.doc Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 8 • • d. Please incorporate a decorative color concrete band adjacent to the enhanced paving at each street and driveway entrance to better separate the enhanced pavers and asphalt sections. Response: Completed. e. Please include a detail of the entry pilasters and low "sign" wall. These items should be approved as part of the development. However, the signage itself that will ultimately go on the low "sign" wall would be issued under separate permit. Please revise notes. Response: See monument elevation on sheet 44. 10. Meandering Sidewalk (Rancho Santa Fe Road). Please revise the sidewalk/parkway proposed along Rancho Santa Fe Road to instead provide for a fully detached sidewalk/parkway. Consultation between Engineering and Planning Division staff revealed that a physical separation between the sidewalk and Rancho Santa Fe Road is preferred. In addition, we have discussed an option to increase the parkway width along this frontage that we would like to share with you as a possible solution to increase the parkway without the need for retaining walls (please see the attached exhibit). Please review and follow up with a meeting to discuss. Response: Complete. 11. Please see the completed Planned Development -Tables C and D and also City Council Policy 44 and 66 tables. Please address all of the comments identified in red text and revise project accordingly. Response: See responses to Tables and City Council Policies, attached. Engineering: 1. A combination of numbers and letters in lot numbering is not acceptable. Please revise lot numbering so lots, including residential, open space and private street lots, are numbered consecutively starting from one (1) throughout the subdivision. Response: Lettered lots have been revised to numbers. 2, Please add remedial (over excavation) grading quantity as recommended by the soils engineer (page 2 of soil's report dated November 16, 2012). H:\tt00\1136.00\Submittals\2013-01-30 TM TIJIRD SUBMITTAL\Dnft Ind Response Letter· 1-30-13 · La Costa Resideotiaiii36.00.dot a PI..A.NNINIS ilir. E:NiliNitltiUNI!I Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page9 • • Response: Remedial grading quantities for overexcavation have been added to the Grading Analysis. 3. The recent soils report update did not include design recommendations for the proposed bioretention basins. Please provide a soils update letter addressing the suitability of the proposed bioretention basins at the proposed locations as shown on the site plan. The update letter should include bioretention design recommendations, including set-back requirement from top of slopes. Response: See updated Soils Report. 4. Change the project title shown on the site plan and reports from "La Costa Town Square" to "La Costa Residential". Response: Title has been revised on all sheets. 5. It is indicated on page 10 of the preliminary SWMP report that the orifice sizing calculations will be provided during final engineering. However, the bioretention detail shown on the site plan should include a detail of the outlet structure similar to the detail shown on page 93 of the City SUSMP (see attached detail), showing the location of the orifice and overflow catch basin to capture larger storm events. Response: Outlet detail provided on sheet 6. 6. Please verify sewer easement and water easement requirements from Leucadia Wastewater District and Olivenhain Municipal Water District and show the required utility easement widths on the site plan. Response: 20ft wide sewer and water easements provided as recommended by L WD and OMWD. 7. Comply with comments shown in red on the preliminary site plan and tentative map. Response: All comments have been addressed. 8. Comply with minor comments shown on the red-lined preliminary SWMP report. Response: All comments have been addressed. 9. Comply with minor comments shown on the red-lined preliminary drainage report. Response: All comments have been addressed. H:\1100\Jt36.00\SubmittalsUOl3-0l-JO TM TlURD SUBMITIAL\Draft 2nd Response letter-1-30-13-La Costa Residentialll36.00.doe Chris DeCerbo January 30,2013 Page 10 • • 10. Please submit the following documents in the next review submittal: a. 2 copy of the revised preliminary site plan b. 2 copy each of the revised SWMP, hydrology report, and soils report. c. 2 copy of an updated title report d. 2nd review redlined plans and all red-lined reports PELA: Please note that the numbers below are referenced on the enclosed set of red lined plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of comment concern. Please revise plans accordingly. REPEAT COMMENTS I. Completed. 2. Completed. 3. Completed. Response: 4. At a minimum, plans shall include the following items: a. Existing conditions (grades, plants, property lines, easements, right- of-ways drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all above items. Insure no trees are located within utility easements. Response: Complete. b. Completed. c. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. Response: Complete. H:\1100\1136.00\Submittals\2013-01-30 TM TIDRD SUBMITTAL\Draft 2nd Response Letter· 1-30-13-La Costa Resideutia11136.00.doc ·~-•3l .... Chris DeCerbo January 30,2013 Page 11 • • d. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3-Bin section 3 of the Landscape Manual) and CalTrans sight distance standards (i.e.: stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. Response: Complete. e. Completed. f. Completed. g. Completed. h. Completed. 5. Completed. 6. Completed. 7. Completed. 8. Completed. 9. Completed. 10. Completed. 11. Completed. 12. Completed. 13. Please provide a eopy of plans teat speeify all walls/feneeing with proposed materials and heights for review. Provide an elevation/detail of each. 2nd Review: Walls to the east of Paseo Lupino appear to be split face block. Please revise to split face with cap to match existing walls to the east. Response: Details have been updated to split face. 14. Completed. 15. Completed. H:\1100\1136.00\Subnaiuab\2013-01-30 TM TIDRD SUBMITTAL\Draft 2nd Response Letter-1-30-13-La Costa Residentia11136.00.doc PLAN.~R>NO Chris DeCerbo January 30, 20 I 3 Page 12 • 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. • a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. Response: Sight lines have been added. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. Response: Complete. c. Completed. d. Completed. e. Landscape features (shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the Cal Trans sight distance lines. Response: Complete. f. Cal Trans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. Response: Complete. 17. Completed. 18. Completed. 19. Provide a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be planted on center or grouped. 2nd Review: Please continue the Jacaranda and Pines to the end of the project. See NEW COMMENT lA below. Response: Complete. H:\1100\1136.00\Submittals\2013-01-30 TM THIRD SUBMITIAL\Draft 2nd Respoose Lener-l-30-13-La Costa Res.identlalll36.00.doe ~ PL.AN~IIIINQ Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page l3 20. Completed. • 21. Street trees shall be located: a. Completed. b. Completed. c. Outside of sight distance areas. Response: Complete. • d. A minimum of three (3) feet outside the public right of way, unless approved otherwise by the City as noted below. Response: Complete. 8tFeet tfees m.ay be leeated within the pllblie right ef way, sllbjeet te appreval by the City, fer prflj eels that are: a. Withia a pllblie stfeet (ie. Arterial raediaas, tFaffie eireles). e. \¥ithia the Village Rev-iew (V R) 6eae (CMC Chapter 21.35). e. 8H!tieet te the Plar.nedi>evelapm.eat ReljHirem.eats (CMC Chapter 21.45) d. S~eet te City Ceooeil Peliey 88 LiYaele Neighilerheeds. 22. Completed. 23. Completed. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 2nd Review: Is there a reason not to include these areas as recycled water use? Drip can be used around the picnic and BBQ areas. Please review with OMWD for a final determination and provide documentation of OMWD direction. Revise water use calculations as appropriate. Response: Reclaimed and domestic water crossings requirements make the use of reclaimed within the community prohibitive. H:\1100\1136.00\Submittals\2013-01·30 TM TIDRD SUBMITfAL\Draft 2nd Response Letter-1-30-13-La Costa Residentia11136,00.doc Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 14 • • 25. The pl8H shall previae that enl.y levi veffime er stlbsmfaee irrigatieH shall be Hsea te irrigate 8ft)' vegetatieH withiH tweH~' fell£ iHehes ef 8ft impe£Hleaale smfaee HHless the alijaeeHt impe£Hleaale smfaees are aesigHea aHa eeHstruetea te eoose water te ElraiH eHtirely iHte a laHaseapea area. It appears that the tllff Hl8'Y be prepesea fer 8'rerheaa irrigatieH basea 8ft the irrigatieH effieieHey HSea. Please elarify aHa iHsme re"!HiremeHts are met. 2nd Review: Revise "lawn" to "area". Response: Complete. 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms as provided in appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 2nd Review: Please correct the MA WA and ETWU calculations as indicated. Please note that with corrections the ETWU exceeds the MA WA. Revise design as appropriate to provide an ETWU that does not exceed the MA WA. Response: The water calc has been updated. 27. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored/hatched water use plan) for the next submittal. H:\1100\1136.00\SubmittalsUOIJ-01·30 TM TIDRD SUBMITIAL\Draft 2nd Response Letter· l-30-13 ·La Costa Resldentlall136.00.doc • • Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 15 NEW COMMENTS 1. lA. Below is an excerpt from Planned Development Table C regarding arterial setback landscaping: a. Half (50%) of the required arterial setback area located closest to the arterial shall be fully landscaped to enhance the street scene and buffer homes from traffic on adjacent arterials, and: * Shall contain a minimum of one 24" box tree for every 30 lineal feet of street frontage; and * Shall be commonly owned and maintained Plans indicate that the street trees are 24" box size and they are currently spaced at an average 47 lineal feet along Rancho Santa Fe Road. There are background trees but plans indicate that they are to be 15 gallon size minimum. Please revise plans providing for one 24" box size tree for every 30 lineal feet of street frontage. Response: The Jacaranda trees have be re-spaced accordingly. 2. 2A. Wall vines or other plantings are needed along this wall to soften it from view. Please address. Parks: Response: A 2 'planter has been created and additional plant material has been added at the base of the wall. 1. Connectivity of the housing development private trail connection to the existing Old Rancho Santa Fe Road trail could benefit from inclusion of a security gate and additional fencing. It is recommended that the same type of 6 ft. tall combo wall with glass, as shown on Sheet 45, be extended to secure the community garden area. In addition, it recommended that a security gate also be added to provide additional security at the trail connection interface. This will provide additional privacy and security separate from the public access trail that is providedfurther north (i.e., the public trail connecting Paseo Lupino with the Old Rancho Santa Fe Road trail). Response: Security gate and additional fencing has been provided. See detail, sheet 43. H:\1100\1136,00\Submittals\2013-01-30 TM "fHIRD SUBMITTAL \Draft 2nd Response Letter-1-30-13 ·La Co~ta Residentiall136.00.doc: ·~"~"'"" • Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 16 • 2. It is recommended that additional pedestrian access be provided to Rancho Santa Fe Road from the southern end of the planned development to allow for an additional pedestrian access from the development to the La Costa Town Center shops and the existing businesses at the comer of La Costa Avenue and Rancho Santa Fe Road. This additional path within the community would provide additional pedestrian connection to the sidewalk along Rancho Santa Fe Road .and would provide for additional walking routes around the development as well, affording the opportunity for residents to utilize the Old Rancho Santa Fe Road trails, the Paseo Lupino trail, and the existing sidewalk connections along Rancho Santa Fe Road. This recommendation is highly desirable and is in line with the City's Livable Streets initiative for providing a more pedestrian friendly residential neighborhood and community. Response: This is not feasible. This would require ramping for over 15 feet of elevation and 200 linear feet of ramp to access Rancho Santa Fe Road. in addition, this would be a safety concern by enticing pedestrian traffic to cross Rancho Santa Fe Road at mid- block. Onsite walks provide a safer, more direct route to the signalized intersection at Paseo Lupino and Rancho Santa Fe Road. 3. Please also see the attached set ofredlines for additional comments and further clarification of the issue items listed above. Please revise accordingly. Response: All comments have been addressed. Building: No comments. Fire: 1. Access a. Fire Department Access. Provide fire access road in accordance with CMC 17.04.010. This access shall provide an unobstructed width of24 feet, and an unobstructed vertical clearance or "clear-to-sky." Response: Added note to Fire Notes on sheet 1. b. Fire Access Road Surface. The surface of all fire department access routes shall be of an impervious "all-weather" surface material, designed to carry a minimum load of75,000 pounds axel weight. Response: Added note to Fire Notes on sheet 1. H:\t 100\1136.00\Submittals\2013-01-30 TM THIRD SUBMnTAL\Oraft 2nd Response Letter· 1-30-13-La Costa Residentialll36,00.doc Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 17 • • c. Alternative road surface. Alternative road surface materials such as turf block or grass crete may be approved by the Chief if, the applicant requests by letter for an approval of the use of Alternate Means and Materials and provide performance specifications and construction details which have been reviewed and certified by a licensed engineer. Response: Added note to Fire Notes on sheet I. d. Fire Lanes. For private drives A & B these accesses shall be designed as fire lanes and shall become the responsibility of the developer to have said access restrictions recorded, that the owner is responsible to provide and maintain to identify and ensure enforcement of those designated access. Response: Added note to Fire Notes on sheet 1. 2. Hydrants Additional on-site public water mains and fire hydrants are required. a. Provide additional fire hydrants at intervals of 300 feet along public streets and/or private driveways. Hydrants should be located at street intersections when possible, but no closer than 100 feet from the terminus of a street or driveway. Response: Added fire hydrants at intersection of Private Drive B with Private Drive A at cul-de-sac, and at Private Drive A at intersection with Pas eo Lupino, see revised sheet 5. 3. Fire Sprinklers a. Automatic fire sprinkler systems are required for each dwelling. Response: Added note to Fire Notes on sheet 1. b. Provide notes on all plans submitted for review that indicate that fire sprinklers are required. Response: See revised Fire Notes on sheet I. H:\1100\1136.00\Submlttals\2013-01·30 TM THIRD SUBMITTALID111ft 2nd Response Letter-1-30-13-La Costa Resideutialll36.00.doc: Chris DeCerbo January 30, 2013 Page 18 4. Water Meters • • a. You will be required to install a one inch ( 1 ") or greater water service and water meter. This is to ensure that there is adequate water provided in the event of a fire sprinkler activation during periods of other uses and/or demands, e.g., irrigation. Response: Added note to Fire Notes on sheet I. We look forward to your review of this request. If you should have any questions please contact me at (858) 875-1731 or armando.urguidez@latitude33.com Sin~ Armando Urquidez Senior Project Manager H:\ll00\1136.00\Submittl!ils\2013-01-30 TM TmRD SUBMITTAL \Draft 2nd Response Letter· l-JG-13-La Costa Re5ideotial IIJb.OO.dot ~ PLANHINCI 6. ii!:NCIINIE.IEI'itiNO • DFILE Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov February 4, 2013 Taylor Morrison of California, llC Attn: April Tornillo 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 SUBJECT: 2nd REVIEW FOR CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 -LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Dear Ms. Tornillo, This letter is considered to be supplemental to the January 14, 2013 completeness letter that the Planning Department sent out following our review of the December 12, 2012 resubmittal of the La Costa Residential project. In that letter it was stated that the Fire Department comments would follow under separate cover. The Fire Department has since reviewed the 2"• submittal of the project and has provided their comments on the attached page(s). All issues will need to be resolved prior to formal submittal of the project. If you should have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss your application, please contact me at (760) 602-4643. You may also contact Greg Ryan directly in the Fire Department at (760) 602- 4661. :3=~4l JASON GO;/( Associate Planner JG:sm Attachment: 1. Fire Department Discretionary Review Checklist dated 2/1/2013 (2 pages). c: Property Development Centers, LLC, Attn: Jim Reuter, 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 latitude 33 Planning & Engineering, Attn: Anna l. Yentile, 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650, San Diego, CA 92121 Don Neu, City Planner Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Greg Ryan, Deputy City Fire Marshal Tecla levy, Project Engineer Will Foss, CED-Building Michael Elliott, PElA' liz Ketabian, Parks & Recreation File Copy Data Entry T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® rnfl/U. b ,f/J.ltj' 3 • 4~A._ CITY OF VcARLSBAD Planning Division January 28, 2013 Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Attn: April Tornillo 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 u FILE www.carlsbadca.gov SUBJECT: CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL-CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the project is subject to the provisions of CEQA; however, the potential environmental effects of the project were adequately analyzed by the previously Certified Final Environmental Impact RepQrt (EIR OHJ2) for the La Costa Town Square project. No additional environmental review is required. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project planner, Jason Goff, at (760) 602-4643 or jason.goff@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AICP City Planner DN:JG:sm c: Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Tecla levy, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry • 'rv'\W:.Cxd t/rf+J \~ _,§~_A. C I T Y 0 F VcARLSBAD • FILE COPY Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov January 14, 2013 April Tornillo Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Suite 1450 8105 Irvine Center Dr Irvine, CA 92013 SUBJECT: 2nd REVIEW FOR CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL The items requested from you earlier to make your Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and Variance, applications no. CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Division. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. At this time, the City asks that you provide six (6) complete sets of the development plans plus one (1) additional set of the landscape plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Citv will complete the review of your resubmittal within 25 days. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Jason Goff, at (760) 602-4643, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2733. • Fire Department: Gregory Ryan, Fire Inspections, at {760) 602-4661. • PELA: Michael Elliott, Landscape Architect, at (760) 944-8463. • Building Division: Will Foss, Building Official, at (760) 602-2716. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:JG:bd .....,"""" Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 t COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 Pa e 2 Attachments: 1. Planning Division Redline -Planned Development Table C 2. Planning Division Red line -Planned Development Table 0 3. Planning Division -City Council Policy 44 4. Planning Division -City Council Policy 66 • 5. Planning Division-Rancho Santa Fe Rd (Preferred Parkway/Sidewalk Cross Section) 6. Planning Division Redlines-Noise Study (November 8, 2012) 7. PELA Redlines-City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual-Appendix E (WELO Worksheets, Pgs. 2 & 4) 8. PELA Redlines-Landscape, Sheets 41, 45, and 46 (12/21/12) 9. Land Development Engineering Redlines-Geotechnical Update ... (11/16/2012) 10. Land Development Engineering Red lines-Preliminary Drainage Report (12/11/12) 11. Land Development Engineering Red lines-Preliminary SWMP (12/11/12) 12. Land Development Engineering Red lines-Sheets 1-8 13. Parks Department/Trails Redlines-Sheets 1-8, 41, 43, and 47 (1/7/13) c: Jim Reuter, Property Development Centers, LLC, 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 Annal. Yentile, Latitude 33 Planning & Engineering, 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650, San Diego, CA 92121 Don Neu, City Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Will Foss, Building Official Gregory Ryan, Deputy City Fire Marshal Michael Elliott, PELA Liz Ketabian, Parks Department File Copy Data Entry CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 ~COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e 3 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Noise Study. Please address the following issues: a. Figure 1-2, Figure 4-1, Figure 4-2, and Figure 5-1 are illegible as it relates to identifying the Lot #s. Please revise these exhibits within the document and resubmit. b. In addition to Lots 1-9, the document discusses noise impacts to Lots 28 and 29. Is reference to Lot 29 a typo; and should this instead be Lot 27? Please confirm. c. Figure 5-1 requires a 6 foot barrier extending in the easterly direction towards the edge of the existing trail separating this project from the adjacent homes. However, the proposed landscape submittal shows a 6 foot barrier following the lot lines of these proposed lots. Please address any inconsistencies. d. Please see attached redlines for clarifications of the above. Revise accordingly. 2. Sheet 1 (Title Sheet). Please address the following issues: a. Please revise Development Summary Items #3 and #4 to include the Open Space (OS) Land Use designation that exists on this property in addition to the RM. b. Please revise the proposed density (3.2 du/ac) that is labeled in Development Summary Item #8 as the project's density is based on the net developable acreage, and not gross acreage (9.96 acres). It is important to note that the net developable acreage should exclude the improved portion of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Paseo Lupino, along with the 1.9 acres of existing General Plan designated Open Space (OS). Based on this, the net developable acreage for this project should be 5.77 acres. Please confirm the following acreages (Gross Acreage (9.96 acres) -Improved Rancho Santa Fe Road/Paseo Lupino (2.2 acres)-Existing GP designated OS (1.9 acre)= Net Developable Acreage (5.77 acres)). If this is correct, then the project should have a density of 5.5 du/ac. This would be within the RM density range, but just below the Growth Management Control Point. c. Please revise Development Summary Item #19 as the 4.56 acres of open space does not match that shown in the Lot Summary Table on Sheet 8. d. Please revise any inconsistent lot numbers between the Key Map and other sheets. For example the Key Map has Open Space Lots A and C, whereas Sheet 5 has Lots 33 and 35 for the very same lots. 3. Sheet 2 (Typical Sections Lot Area). Please address the following issues: a. Please note, the lot area table is no longer on this sheet. Please rename the sheet. b. Please add cross section details for all of the Private Drive Aisles (A, B, and C). Be sure to label the location of the property lines as each of these are individual lots. CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02~ COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e4 c. Please revise the cross section detail for Private Street A to identify the location of property lines. d. Instead of providing a note, please revise the Parallel Parking Space Detail to include an example of the 20ft. length where a parallel space is located adjacent to a drive aisle and/or driveway pan. This can easily be accomplished by converting one of the 24ft. lengths. e. Please note that the perpendicular parking spaces proposed in the plans do not match the Perpendicular Parking Detail. If a parking overhang is to be used in order to meet the minimum area requirements for a parking space, then please revise the exhibit to match. Re-label this exhibit to also include Private Drive C. f. Please relocate the Parking Summary table to the architectural site plan on Sheet 7 or Sheet 8. 4. Sheet 3 (Existing Conditions and Easements). The Easement Table that is provided on this sheet includes two (2) rows ofthe same easement information identified and listed under Item No. 17. However, the column entitled "Deposition" is different for each one of these rows; one indicating that the easement is "to be vacated," and the other indicating that the same easement is "to remain." Please revise these inconsistencies to clarify intent. 5. Sheet 5 (Proposed Conditions). Please address the following issues: a. Please revise any inconsistent lot numbering/lettering. For example Lots 33 and 35 on this sheet are the same as Lots A and Con the Key Map (Sheet 1, Title Sheet). b. Please label lot numbering/lettering on this sheet for the Open Space recreation lot located in the center of the project and the Open Space lot that is adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road. c. The perpendicular parking stalls located adjacent to Private Drives A and C do not meet the minimum area requirements of the Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.44, nor do they match the typical detail provided on Sheet 2. They appear to scale at approximately 9' by 17', which equates to 153 sq. ft. in area, where 170 sq. ft. is required. Look to the vehicle parking overhang (C.M.C. Section 21.44.050(A)) allowance as a possible way to resolve this issue. This will likely require slightly widening the sidewalk in front of the spaces along Private Drive A in order to accommodate pedestrian accessibility. For the three spaces located in Private Drive C, be sure to label any proposed overhang. Revise all plans to be consistent. 6. Sheet 6 (Proposed Conditions). Please address the following issues: a. Please revise the location of the proposed public trail connections to avoid any impacts with the existing utilities that are located within this area. Please revise all plans to be consistent. b. Please revise the plans to extend the proposed trail next to the community garden area to also connect with the existing asphalt trail similar to what is proposed in the landscape plans. Please revise all plans to be consistent. CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 ~COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e 5 7. Sheet 7 (Architectural Site Plan). Please address the following issues: a. Please increase the scale of this sheet to 1" = 40' scale. There is too much information on this plan, and at the 1" =50' scale it is too difficult to read. b. Front setbacks for Lots 15 -21 need to be measured to the property line behind the sidewalk, not the curb of the drive-aisle. c. Please label all lots on the architectural site plan that are subject to the slope edge building setback (see C.M.C. 21.95.120{1)) and demonstrate project compliance with this standard. Our calculations indicate that lots 2-15 are subject to this requirement. d. Please revise Slope Edge Building Setback, Section Detail D-D to more accurately reflect the grading conditions of this slope with the 8 ft. combination retaining/glass noise wall. Be sure to include in the detail the locations of the noise wall, property line, and projected slope edge as recently discussed. · e. Please include additional Slope Edge Building Setback section details for lots 7 and 9. Please note that the residential unit proposed on lot 9 is subject to slope edge building setbacks on two (2) sides. At least two section details relating to the slopes facing Old Rancho Santa Fe Road and the existing Rancho Santa Fe Road are necessary to determine if the home proposed on lot 9 is compliant. 8. Sheet 8 (Private Rec. Area and lot Summarvl. Please address the following issues: a. Please calculate the total lot area column and insert the figure into the missing space. b. Please add two (2) columns to the lot Summary Table that identifies the minimum Side Yard Setback and Rear Yard Setback for each residential lot. See Planned Development -Table D (C.M.C. 21.45.070) for the individual requirements. c. For Lots 20, 26, and 28, please revise to include a similar dimension as provided on all other lots showing the degree of encroachment by the proposed covered patios for purposes of determining the minimum 15ft. dimension requirement for private recreation areas. 9. landscape Plans. Please address the following issues: a. The noise study identifies a requirement of Yz" thick glass as one of the wall materials allowed to be used in properly mitigating noise levels within the project. The proposed "combo wall" details that are provided for both the 6ft. and 8ft. walls call for W' thick glass. Please revise plans to comply with the noise study. b. Please revise the location of the proposed public trail connections to avoid impacts with the existing utilities located in this area. c. On Sheet 42 (Passive Park Enlargement), the note pointing to the Active Play Area needs to be revised. The Planned Development Regulations-Table C (C.M.C. 21.45.060) allows for a grassy play area with a slope of "less than 5%." The plans are labeled "5% max." Please revise this and any other areas of the plans that could be impacted by this requirement. CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 ~COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e 6 d. Please incorporate a decorative color concrete band adjacent to the enhanced paving at each street and driveway entrance to better separate the enhanced pavers and asphalt sections. e. Please include a detail of the entry pilasters and low "sign" wall. These items should be approved as part of the development. However, the signage itself that will ultimately go on the low "sign" wall would be issued under separate permit. Please revise notes. 10. Meandering Sidewalk (Rancho Santa Fe Road}. Please revise the sidewalk/parkway proposed along Rancho Santa Fe Road to instead provide for a fully detached sidewalk/parkway. Consultation between Engineering and Planning Division staff revealed that a physical separation between the sidewalk and Rancho Santa Fe Road is preferred. In addition, we have discussed an option to increase the parkway width along this frontage that we would like to share with you as a possible solution to increase the parkway without the need for retaining walls (please see the attached exhibit). Please review and follow up with a meeting to discuss. 11. Please see the completed Planned Development-Tables C and D and also City Council Policy 44 and 66 tables. Please address all of the comments identified in red text and revise project accordingly. Engineering: 1. A combination of numbers and letters in lot numbering is not acceptable. Please revise lot numbering so lots, including residential, open space and private street lots, are numbered consecutively starting from one {1) throughout the subdivision. 2. Please add remedial (over excavation) grading quantity as recommended by the soils engineer (page 2 of soil's report dated November 16, 2012). 3. The recent soils report update did not include design recommendations for the proposed bioretention basins. Please provide a soils update letter addressing the suitability of the proposed bioretention basins at the proposed locations as shown on the site plan. The update letter should include bioretention design recommendations, including set-back requirement from top of slopes. 4. Change the project title shown on the site plan and reports from "La Costa Town Square" to "La Costa Residential". 5. It is indicated on page 10 of the preliminary SWMP report that the orifice sizing calculations will be provided during final engineering. However, the bioretention detail shown on the site plan should include a detail of the outlet structure similar to the detail shown on page 93 of the City SUSMP (see attached detail), showing the location of the orifice and overflow catch basin to capture larger storm events. 6. Please verify sewer easement and water easement requirements from Leucadia Wastewater District and Olivenhain Municipal Water District and show the required utility easement widths on the site plan. 7. Comply with comments shown in red on the preliminary site plan and tentative map. CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 'A COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e 7 8. Comply with minor comments shown on the red-lined preliminary SWMP report. 9. Comply with minor comments shown on the red-lined preliminary drainage report. 10. Please submit the following documents in the next review submittal: a. 2 copy of the revised preliminary site plan b. 2 copy each of the revised SWMP, hydrology report, and soils report. c. 2 copy of an updated title report d. 2nd review red lined plans and all red-lined reports PELA: Please note that the numbers below are referenced on the enclosed set of red lined plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of comment concern. Please revise plans accordingly .. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-3 Completed. 4. At a minimum, plans shall include the following items: a. Existing conditions (grades, plants, property lines, easements. right-of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all above items. Insure no trees are located within utilitv easements. b. Completed. c. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. d. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors {see Figures 3-A and 3- B in section 3 of the landscape Manual) and CaiTrans sight distance standards {i.e.: stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. e. Completed. f. Completed. g. Completed. h. Completed. 5-12 Completed. 13. Please J3Fe•;i8e a eefPt' ef ,a IaRs t~at SJ3eei~· all walls/feReiAg v.'ith pre,aeseB FAaterials aRB heights far re\•iew. Pra\•iEie a A elevatiaA/Eietail af eaell. 2"d Review: Walls to the east of Paseo Lupino appear to be split face block. Please revise to split face with cap to match existing walls to the east. 14. Completed. 15. Completed. CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02 !A COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e 8 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. c. Completed. d. Completed. e. Landscape features (shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the CaiTrans sight distance lines. f. Co/Trans sight distance lines have a horiZontal and vertical component (profile). Coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. 17. Completed. 18. Completed. 19. Provide a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be planted on center or grouped. 2"d Review: Please continue the Jacaranda and Pines to the end of the project. See NEW COMMENT 1A below. 20. Completed. 21. Street trees shall be located: a. Completed. b. Completed. c. Outside of sight distance areas. d. A minimum of three (3) feet outside the public right of way, unless approved otherwise by the City as noted below. Street trees Ffl3)' be leeateel witAiA tRe pi:J91ie right ef way, Si::ji::Jjeet ta appreval B·t tf::le City, fer J3FejeEts tRat are: a. '1/itRiR a pwBiie street (i.e., arterial meeliaRs, tra#ie eireles). B. 'J/itAiR tt:.e Village Re·1iew (V R) leAe (CMC Cl=lapter 21.~§). e. it::JI3jeet te tRe PlaAReel QevelepFReAt Re£tbliFeffleRts (CMC CRafjter 21.49). d. S1::1l:ljeet te City Cei::.IREil Peliey 66 livaBle ~JeigRI:lerReeEis. 22. Completed. 23. Completed. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 2"d Review: Is there o reason not to include these areas as recycled water use? Drip can be used around the picnic and BBQ areas. Please review with OMWD for a final CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 4t COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e 9 determination and provide documentation of OMWD direction. Revise water use calculations as appropriate. 25. TRe plaA sRall t:treviEie tRat eRI\· Ia\\' 'JSI\:Iff\e er s\:195\:IFface irrigatieR sRalllae yseQ te irrigate 3A\' \'egetatieR witl=liA t·NeRt'{ feyr iAel=les ef aR iFAperffieaBie Si::jr:faee ~::~Riess tRe aeijaeeAt iFAperFReaBie s~:ufaees are ElesigAeEt aRB eeAstrl:Jeteel te ea\:lse water te SraiA eAtirel'( iRte a laAetsea~eEI area. It af)peaFS tRat tRe tYr:f FAay Be fJFepeseEI fer everRear:t irrigatieR BaseEI eR tRe irrigatieA e#ieieRG'f t::~sed. Please elariP,« aAEI iAS\:Ire re~bliremeRts are FAet. 2nd Review: Revise "lawn" to "area". 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms as provided in appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 2"d Review: Please correct the MAWA and ETWU calculations as indicated. Please note that with corrections the ETWU exceeds the MAWA. Revise design as appropriate to provide an ETWU that does not exceed the MAW A. 27. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation, and colored/hatched water use plan) for the next submittal. NEW COMMENTS 1A. Below is an excerpt from Planned Development Table C regarding arterial setback landscaping: Half (50%) of the required arterial setback area located closest to the arterial shall be fully landscaped to enhance the street scene and buffer homes from traffic on adjacent arterials, and: • • Shall contain a minimum of one 24" box tree for everv 30 lineal feet of street frontage; and Shall be commonly owned and maintained Plans indicate that the street trees are 24" box size and they are currently spaced at an average 47 lineal feet along Rancho Santa Fe Road. There are background trees but plans indicate that they are to be 15 gallon size minimum. Please revise plans providing for one 24" box size tree for every 30 lineal feet of street frontage. 2A. Wall vines or other plantings are needed along this wall to soften it from view. Please address. Parks: 1. Connectivity of the housing development private trail connection to the existing Old Rancho Santa Fe Road trail could benefit from inclusion of a security gate and additional fencing. It is recommended that the same type of 6 ft. tall combo wall with glass, as shown on Sheet 45, be extended to secure the community garden area. In addition, it recommended that a security gate also be added to provide additional security at the trail connection interface. This will provide additional privacy and security separate from the public access trail that is provided CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 tt COSTA RESIDENTIAL January 14, 2013 • Pa e 10 further north (i.e., the public trail connecting Paseo Lupino with the Old Rancho Santa Fe Road trail). 2. It is recommended that additional pedestrian access be provided to Rancho Santa Fe Road from the southern end of the planned development to allow for an additional pedestrian access from the development to the La Costa Town Center shops and the existing businesses at the corner of La Costa Avenue and Rancho Santa Fe Road. This additional path within the community would provide additional pedestrian connection to the sidewalk along Rancho Santa Fe Road and would provide for additional walking routes around the development as well, affording the opportunity for residents to utilize the Old Rancho Santa Fe Road trails, the Paseo Lupino trail, and the existing sidewalk connections along Rancho Santa Fe Road. This recommendation is highly desirable and is in line.with the City's Livable Streets initiative for providing a more pedestrian friendly residential neighborhood and community. 3. Please also see the attached set of red lines for additional comments and further clarification of the issue items listed above. Please revise accordingly. Building: No comments. Fire: 1. Fire Department comments to follow under separate cover. .::,<;~} CITY OF ~CARLSBAD • Housing & Neighborhood Services December 31, 2012 April Tornillo Taylor Morrison of California 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, Ca. 92618 • www.carlsbadca.gov Re: La Costa Town Square Residential Property-Request to purchase housing credits Dear Ms. Tornillo: Thank you for your proposal dated December 12, 2012 regarding your client's request to purchase housing credits in an offsite combined housing development to satisfy the inclusionary obligation for the La Costa Town Square residential property (CT 12-05). Based on your correspondence, the property owner intends to build 32 single family homes and has determined it is not feasible to construct the low income affordable units on site. As requested, the Housing Policy Team did review and give serious consideration to your proposal and related arguments, and then determined that it could support your proposal to purchase housing credits from the City of Carlsbad to satisfy the inclusionary requirement for the said project. It should be noted, however, that the matter must still be considered by the City Council and approved. The Housing Policy Staff team, however, will recommend approval of the purchase of credits. Please note that if you satisfy your requirement offsite, and build 32 homes on the original La Costa Town Square site, you will be required to purchase six (6) housing credits total. You will also be purchasing those credits within the Cassia Heights Affordable Apartment project, rather than the Villa Lorna development (which has sold all of its credits). The current price for those housing credits in Cassia Heights is $57,465. Your client, however, will be required to pay the credit price in effect at the time of purchase (building permit). The credit price is scheduled to increase by the percentage of CPI each year (typically revised in September). Therefore, depending on when your client pulls the building permits, the credit price could be higher than it is today. The appropriate conditions will be set forth within the approving resolutions for the subject project. Once the Planning Commission has taken action to approve your project and assuming the Commission accepts the purchase of credits as the appropriate means for satisfying the inclusionary ordinance, our office will process an affordable housing agreement for your client's signature and then present said agreement to the City Council for approval to purchase credits. Housing & Neighborhood Services ! I 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive 1 Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-434-2810 I 760-720-2037 fax A.Tornillo Dec. 31, 2012 Page2 • • If you have questions regarding this correspondence or the Housing Policy Team's position of support, please contact my office at (760) 434-2935. Sincerely, ~~+--~ Debbie Fountain Housing and Neighborhood Services Director C: Jason Goff, Project Planner Housing Policy Staff Team j • • Taylor Morrison RECEIVED TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC Taylor December 12, 2012 Ms. Deborah K. Fountain DEC 2 7 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Housing and Neighborhood Services Director City of Carlsbad 2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 Southern California Division 8105 Irvine Center Drive Suite 1450 Irvine. CA 92618 p. (949) 341-1200 f. (949) 341-1400 taylormorrison.com Corp ORE i/00968970 Subject: La Costa Town Center Residential Development-Request to Purchase Off-site Affordable Housing Credits Dear Ms. Fountain: This letter serves as a formal request by Taylor Morrison of California, LLC, acting on behalf of the property owners of the La Costa Town Center Residential Property to satisfy the affordable housing obligations through the purchase of off-site affordable housing credits in the existing Villa Lorna development as permitted by CMC 21.85 and City Council Policy 57. The La Costa Town Center residential project proposes the construction of 32 single family detached condominium units on a 9.9 acre site located on the north side of Rancho Santa Fe Road at Paseo Lupino. The units are proposed to range from approximately 1800 to 2500 square feet, with an average projected sales price of approximately $615,000. The original proposal under the master development of La Costa Town Center, includin~ this property, was proposed to be multi-family residential condominiums. On July 15 2009, the multi-family residential condominium development was approved by Planning Commission. Subsequently in August 2009, City Council rejected a designation of multi- family residential condominium and conditioned the property to be single family detached residential. The current application and the preliminary review of the Tentative Map CT 12-05 is filed with the City as of last September. The present application is for a single family detached residential development of 32 units. This application is proposing under City Council policy 57 to enter into an agreement for the purchase of credits from Villa Lorna Combined Inclusionary Housing. Due to constraints imposed by the project setback requirements along Rancho Santa Fe Road and the City's Planned Development Ordinance, the project is highly constrained. The project is anticipated to be scheduled for Planning Commission consideration in June 2013. Woodrow · · · · Communities gM taylor . mornson .... Homes 1nsp1red hy You ~m ,----------· ------- . ' . • • The options that are available to a developer to satisfy the inclusionary housing obligations are: 1) construct affordable units on-site, 2) participate in an off-site combined inclusionary housing project in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and City Council Policy 57 dated August 8, 1995, or 3) enter into an agreement with the City to purchase credits from the Villa Lorna Combined Inclusionary Housing Project in accordance with City Council Policy 58 dated September 12, 1995. In the case of the La Costa Town Center Residential application, there are particular circumstances that warrant this project's participation in the purchase of credits in the Villa Lorna project, pursuant to Council Policy 58 criteria. Significant feasibility issues in addition to surrounding compatibility affect the provision of on site affordable units as discussed below. • Given the small size of the project (32 total units) and the restricted sale prices that would be associated with affordable units (approximately $200,000 based on a providing a 1400 square foot two bedroom unit affordable at 80% AMI), as discussed below, it will not be possible to make the project profitable and economically feasible with on-site affordable units. • The projected cost of land acquisition, carrying the land, improving the site on a 32 unit basis is in excess of $270,000 per unit. The cost of bringing a market rate unit to sale including permit fees, construction and sales costs is approximately $240,000. This leaves approximately $105,000 or 20% per unit for contingency and pre tax profit, based on an average sales price of $615,000. • The construction of the 5 affordable units on-site at a cost of $510,000 per unit and a sales price of $200,000 would result in the project's market-rate units being required to subsidize the 5 affordable units by over $55,000 per market unit or nearly $1.5 million dollars. This represents over 60% of the project's pre-tax profit and contingency funds. • The development cannot afford to build affordable housing product on-site. The purchase of 5 credits in the Villa Lorna combined affordable housing project at a cost of approximately $250,000 will reduce the projected profit and contingency funds to approximately I 0% and maintain the project's feasibility. • The project's density cannot be increased to absorb the onsite affordable housing as the average lot size are at a minimum of 3,500 SF, and this represents the minimum amount allowed under Section 24.4570 of the City's Zoning Code for Planned Developments. • Of the 9.9 acres, 3-acres will be dedicated open space due to existing site conditions and it is infeasible to increase the developable area. . . l • • • • This request complies with City Ordinances and City Council policies previously adopted by the City Council.: Contribution to the existing off-site project versus providing 5 affordable units on-site will also result in increased public benefit by returning funding into those affordable developments and contributing to the use in other affordable housing activities. In addition the project will be completing the last remaining pedestrian improvements along the northern frontage of Rancho Santa Fe Road. Please call if you need additional information or if we may be of any other assistance. We look forward to receiving your response to this request. Sincerely, April Tornillo Enclosure cc: Jason Goff, Planning Department Jim Kilgore, Latitude 33 Randi Coopersmith, Latitude 33 ,, . . • File: 1136.0 December 12, 2012 Chris DeCerbo City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 • 4 I i..AT1TUDE~ PL.ANNINGI & E:NI31NEERING 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650 San Diego, CA 92121 Tel 858.751.0633 RE: Las Costa Residential-CT 12~05/ PUD 12-07 I v 12-02 First Plan Check Responses Dear Chris: • RECEIVED OEC 1 2 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVIS!ON On behalf of our client, Taylor Morrison we are pleased to re-submit this package for the La Costa Residential project. Below is a point by point response to your letter dated October 25, 2012, our responses are in bold. Planning: 1. Constraints Map. It is unclear how the identified density of 5.2 du/ac is being determined based on the percentage (23%) of undevelopable acreage provided in the Development Summary section of the plans labeled on Sheet 1. Please provide a constraints map/analysis (density determination pursuant to 21.53.230 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) as a separate sheet to the submittal package identifying the net developable acreage of the project site. Please also see Pg. 5, Section D of the Development Permit (Form P-2) requirements. Response: The La Costa Residential site was a part of the La Costa Town Square approvals. This property is a previously graded parcel. According to the requirements for Planned Development Permits, the application checklist states the following under Constraints Map: "(NOTE: This information is not required for previously graded sites and the conversion of existing structures.) If the constraint does not apply to the property, list it on the map as not applicable." We have noted on the plans that a Constraints Map is not applicable. To assist Staff, we have clarified the density calculation as follows: The net area used to determine density excludes streets, private drives and steep slopes; see Slope H:\1 100\1!36.00\Docs\Draft Response Letttt.doc Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 2 • • Analysis included with this submittal. The resulting developable acreage is 5.2, yielding 32 units at 6 dwelling units per acre as desired by the Growth Management Control Point for this area. 2. Slope Analysis. Please provide a slope analysis in accordance with Section 21.95.110(A) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Response: A slope analysis is included with this submittal for staff's review. 3. Slope Profiles. Please provide slope profiles in accordance with Section 21.95.110(8) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Response: Slope profiles are shown on the Slope Analysis exhibit. 4. Noise Study. Please provide a noise study consistent with the City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. The noise study is required to identify the need for and to allow a noise wall within the 50 foot arterial landscape setback and any other requirements as deemed necessary to comply with the guidelines. Response: A Noise Study is included with this submittal. Walls and fences have been incorporated on the Landscape Concept Plan based upon the Noise Study. 5. Color Board(s). Please provide color boards (no larger than 9" x 12" in size) showing building materials and color samples of glass, reveals, aggregate, wood, etc. which is consistent the project proposal. Response: Color boards are included with this submittal for staff's review. 6. Architectural Site Plan. Please provide a detailed architectural site plan of the project that includes at a minimum the following information: a. Architectural plotting of all homes. Please be sure to label each of the plotted homes with the proposed plan type (i.e., Plan I, II, or Ill), architectural style (i.e., Spanish, Monterey, or Santa Barbara), and color scheme that will be associated with that specific lot. The overall site plan should demonstrate a well thought out and coordinated development pattern that is consistent with City Council Policy 44, shows variation between housing types and is aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood. b. Dimension all building setbacks. Please be sure to also include any optional patio covers, decks, balconies, etc. and also any architectural projections (i.e., fireplaces, median niches, etc.) H:\ll00\1136.00\DOd\Draft Response Letter.doc ' . • . ' I , t ' Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 3 • • Response: Homes have been plotted and all building setbacks have been shown. Please refer to the Architectural Site Plan, Sheet 7 as well as the architectural floor plans and elevations. 7. Architectural Summary. Please include as part of the plans, preferably within the architectural site plan, an architectural summary table describing the following: Response: The architectural summary table is shown on the Architectural Site Plan, Sheet 7. 8. Parking Summary. Please include as part of the plans, preferably within the architectural site plan, a parking summary table describing the following: Response: A parking summary has been added to Sheet 2. 9. Lot Summary. Please include as part of the plans, preferably within the architectural site plan, a table describing the following information. The lot summary table will need to be expanded beyond what is shown in the example below to include all lots within the subdivision. Please be aware that according to footnote #1 of C.M.C. 21.45.070(A) -Table D, lot width is to be measured 20ft. behind the front property line. Response: A lot summary table is added to Sheet 8 for staff's review. 10. Building Elevation Design Elements. Please include a building elevation design elements table as part of the plans identifying the following design elements as required by the City Council Policy 44 Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines. The table can be included within the architectural site plan or provided as a separate exhibit to be approved as part of the project staff report. The table will need to be expanded beyond the example shown below to include all plan types that are being proposed. Please check all design elements that apply. Please see City Council Policy 44-Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines on the specific number of design elements that are required for each plan type. Revise all elevations where any deficiencies are occurring. Response: A Building Elevation Design Elements table is shown on the Architectural Site Plan, Sheet 7. 11. Slope Edge Building Setbacks. Please label all lots on the requested architectural site plan (see above) that are subject to the slope edge building setback (see C.M.C. 21.95.120(1)) and demonstrate project compliance with this standard. In addition, please include a slope edge building setback exhibit. This exhibit must include a typical H:\1100\1136,00\Docs\Draft Respom~e Letter.d~H: ~ Put.NNI,N& 6 ENIIIN"IIINQ Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 4 • • detail for each plan type/architectural variation being proposed. Be sure to include any optional patio covers or balconies that you might be including. Attached is an example for you to follow of a typical detail that was prepared as part of PD -5-ll(B)-Villages of La Costa North, Neighborhood 3.1. Response: Lots subject to the slope edge building setback have been called out on the Architectural Site Plan. A typical detail for each plan type has been added. See Architectural Site Plan, Sheet 7. 12. For comparative analysis and making the findings to support a variance for smaller lot sizes, the Preliminary Review (PRE 12-13) letter dated July 26, 2012 (see Planning Item #3) required that you show the total dwelling unit yield if the project were developed with 5,000 sq. ft. lots. Please include this analysis as requested. Response: We have included an exhibit showing all 5,000 square foot lots per staffs request. At 5,000 square foot lots, the project would yield 26 units (4 dulac). With the Variance request for 3,500 square foot lots, the project increases to 32 units (5 dulac). 13. lnclusionary Housing. All residential projects are subject to the City's lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Please indicate how the project intends to satisfy its inclusionary housing component. Please consult with Debbie Fountain, Housing & Neighborhood Services Director, prior to resubmitting the revised project. Response: A letter of request to purchase off-site affordable housing credits is being contemplated and outlined in the letter dated 12-12-12 to Deborah Fountain. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please resubmit all revised plans on sheets no greater in size than 24" x 36". Response: All sheets have been modified and are now 24"x36". 2. Please label all related project numbers (i.e., CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02) associated with this project in the upper right hand corner of each sheet of the project plan set. Response: All sheets have been revised to show the related project numbers in the upper right corner. 3. The tentative map is only showing 35 lots (i.e., 1-35). What about Private Street A; Private Drive B; the two private drive aisles that are providing access to Lots 9-13 and ' . H:\1100\1136.00\DOCJ\Draft Respon.se Letter.doc a PLANNIN. 6. I:NQINI;II:IIINIJ ' . ' . Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 5 • • 22-24; the open space area east of Lots 29-32; and also the area of the project fronting along Rancho Santa Fe? Response: The tentative map title sheet has been revised to show all buildings, private streets/drives, and open space lots. 4. Please show sidewalk/parkway improvements for the areas of the project fronting along Paseo Lupine and Rancho Santa Fe Road. Response: Sidewalk/parkway improvements fronting along Paseo Lupino and Rancho Santa Fe are shown on Sheets 4 and 5. 5. Please show the existing sidewalk/parkway improvements along the north side of Corte Breza so that we can determine how the transition between the proposed project and the adjacent residential development is occurring. Please update all plans to be consistent throughout (especially the landscape plans). Response: See sheet 5 for connection to Corte Breza. 6. The "Typical Lot Setback" detail shown on Sheet 2 is not applicable to this project as setbacks and lot configurations are not typical, but instead are site specific to each lot per the Planned Development regulations and the plotting that is ultimately finalized and indicated on the required architectural site p_lan that has yet to be submitted (see incompleteness items above). Please remove this detail from plans. Response: We have removed the Typical Lot Setback from Sheet 2. 7. Please revise plans to show any noise walls, fences, courtyard walls, retaining walls, etc. Response: All walls and fences are shown on the landscape sheets for staff's review. 8. On the Architectural Site Plan and the Tentative Map sheets, please add Approval Block No. 2 to the plans. This can be found on the Planning Division's web page at the following address: http://www .ca rls b a dca. gov/servi ces Ide oa rtments/ o Ianni ng/Docu m ents/ Ap or ova I Blocks .odf Please note that several versions of this approval block are available on the Planning Division's Website depending on the computer program being used to draft plans. Please contact us if you have questions or problems accessing this information. H:\1100\1136.00\Docs\Draft Response Letter.doc c'f3':::, t -> ,, . ' . ' ' Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 6 • • Response: Approval Block 2 has been added to the Tentative Map and Architectural Site Plan per staffs request. 9. Planned Development Regulations. This project is subject to compliance with Table C (General Development Standards) and Table D (One-Family Dwelling and Twin Homes on Small Lot) of the Planned Development regulations outlined in Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Attached to this letter are the two tables, which will eventually accompany the project staff report demonstrating the project's overall compliance. We have provided comments in each of the compliance comment sections of the table where additional information, clarifications, or revision to the project plans are necessary. Please review these tables and revise the project and plans to meet each ofthese requirements as applicable. Response: Please refer to responses on Table C attached. 10. Council Policy 44 and 66. Pursuant to Table D of the Planned Development regulations Section 21.45.070, the project must demonstrate compliance with Council Policy 66 (Livable Neighborhood Policy) and Council Policy 44 (Architectural Requirements). Please find attached two tables covering each of these policies, which will eventually accompany the project staff report demonstrating the project's overall compliance. We have provided comments in each of the compliance comment sections of the table where additional information, clarifications, or revision to the project plans are necessary. Please review these tables and revise the project and plans to meet each of these requirements as applicable. Response: Please refer to responses on the Council Policy table attached. 11. Garage Setback. We do not support the minimum 18 ft. typical setback for garages as shown in the "Typical Lot Setback" detail provided on Sheet 2 of the proposed plans. The reason being is that a single-family home typically provides a minimum 20 ft. setback to the garage, which provides adequate distance between the face of the garage and the sidewalk for parking a vehicle in the driveway and avoiding any sort of vehicle overhang from projecting out into the sidewalk and furthermore inhibiting pedestrian maneuverability. Where we have developed similar projects, it is preferred that the homes be designed and plotted such that either a typical 20 ft. setback be provided (allowing for a vehicle to comfortably park in the driveway) or the minimum allowed under Planned Development Regulations. In this case, Table D of the Planned Development regulations (C.M.C. 21.45.070) would allow for a minimum garage setback of 3ft. when facing directly onto a private drive-aisle. While 3ft. is allowed by code, we find that a minimum of 5 ft. is more aesthetically preferred for designing the neighborhood, but will still provide the necessary effect for discouraging parking in the B:\1100'\1136.00\Doa\Dnilf't Re!lpoose Letter.4oc: ,, . Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 7 • • driveway. Please be aware that there is a minimum setback of 20 ft. for direct entry garages located on a private street. such as Private Street A. Response: The layout has been revised to provide at least 20 foot typical setback for garages. See Architectural Site Plan, Sheet 7. 12. Perpendicular/Parallel Parking Detail. Please provide a typical detail of the proposed perpendicular parking spaces and parallel spaces proposed along the private drive aisles and Private Street A. Development standards covering stall sizes can be reviewed in section 21.44.050{a) of the C.M.C. A standard parking space, such as the proposed perpendicular spaces, require at a minimum 170 sq. ft. in area and a minimum width of 8.5 ft. A maximum overhang of 2.5 ft. is allowed provided the overhang does not encroach into any required landscape setback areas. Parallel parking spaces require a minimum length of 24 feet, exclusive of driveway/drive-aisle entrances and aprons; minimum length of 20 feet if located immediately adjacent to a driveway/drive-aisle apron; and minimum width of 7ft. The spaces shown on the proposed plans do appear to meet these requirements. Response: Typical details have been added on Sheet 2. 13. For the purposes of calculating lot coverage, please include the area {sq. ft.) of any optional covered patios as part of the floor area tables that are included with each of the proposed floor plans. Response: Please refer to the lot summary which shows the lot coverage with and without covered patio option, see Sheet 8. 14. It is assumed from each of the floor plans that the optional covered patios would be structurally integrated into the architecture of the home based on their location and the design shown on the plans. However, what is unclear is how the patio covers would be covered or integrated into the proposed rooflines. It is your intent that the main roofline for each proposed home be revised to extend over these spaces, or are they going to consist of an open roof type cover that would extend out perpendicularly from the rear yard elevations? It is important to be clear on the plans and consider all impacts that could occur, in that the existing rooflines as proposed would not easily accommodate the optional patio cover given their slope orientations, and if they were to be extended or revised this could conflict with the slope edge building setbacks; the plan change requirements discussed in the City Council Policy 44; change the overall appearance and orientation of roofline as it relates to the hillside development guidelines; and furthermore it could significantly change the overall architecture that will ultimately be approved as part of this project necessitating subsequent consistency H:\110011136.00\Docs\Draft Response }..etter.doc • • Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 8 determinations or amendments to the project in the future. Please revise the elevations to clarify. Response: BLA has provided elevations of optional patios and decks on sheets 13-14, 16-17, 19-20, 23-24, 26-27, 29-30, 33-34, 36-37, and 39-40 to indicating the relationship of the optional patio and deck to each plan and elevation style. 15. Please revise plans to show how the project relates/connects with the existing trail system along the north and east sides of the project. The plans do not presently illustrate how the proposed trails will connect with these existing trails. It is expected that the trails connect. Please consult with Liz Ketabian in the Parks Department regarding this issue and revise plans accordingly to show compliance. Response: A note has been added to show connection to the trail on the Landscape Concept Plan. 16. Please include volume of grading calculation as part of the grading analysis provided on Sheet. For calculating volume of grading please see C.M.C. 21.95.120 (D). Response: The grading calculations per CMC 21.95.120(0} can be found on the Tentative Map, Sheet 1. 17. Please show the existing concrete spillway that is located on the northwesterly side of the site and label on the plan that it is to be removed. Response: The concrete spillway is shown on the Tentative Map and noted as "to be removed", see sheet 5. 18. The landscape concept plans need to be updated and revised to include the triangular piece of property extending along the public trail northeast of Lot 22, and also the area along the project frontage west of the location where the public trail intersects Paseo Lupine. Response: Completed. PELA: Please note that the numbers below are referenced on the returned set of redline plans where appropriate for ease of locating areas of comment concern: 1. Please coordinate landscape plans with civil plans. Prepare landscape plans on a SO% screen of the most current civil plan at the same scale as the civil plans. H:\lH)0\1136.00\Doa;\Draft RespoiW! Letter.doc ' .. ''' " ' Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 9 • • Response: Civil and Landscape plans are at the same scale. 2. Please show the entire property and address landscaping of all areas. Response: Entire property is now shown. 3. Plans are too conceptual to provide an appropriate review. Our symbol is used for all shrubs and ground covers which may be very different in size and character. Please provide a separate symbol for each type of shrub (i.e., large evergreen shrub, medium size shrub, small flowering accent shrub, etc.) and ground covers. Final comments are reserved pending receipts of more complete plans. Response: Additional shrub and tree symbols have been added to the plan. 4. At a minimum, plans shall include the following items: a. Existing conditions (grades, plants, property lines, easements, right-of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all of the above items. Insure no trees are located within utility easements. b. Potable and reclaimed service locations and lines. c. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. d. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3-B in section 3 of the Landscape Manual) and Caltrans sight distance standards (i.e., stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. e. Indicate positive surface drainage (2% grade in planting areas) away from structures and terminating in an approved drainage system. f. All proposed outdoor elements including, but not limited to, recreational areas, outdoor eating areas, hardscape, trails, and water features. g. Provide a detailed description landscaped area. H:\11 00\1136.00\Does\Dra.ft Response Letter .doe of any water features that will be included in the Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 10 • • h. Other design features and details as needed for clarity (trails, fencing, parking lot lighting, trellis structures, raised planters, etc.). Response: Complete. Drainage note was added to the landscape concept plan. No water features have been added to the plan. Enlargement sheets have been added to clarify site amenities at the park, community garden and entry. 5. Please indicate the approximate tree quantities in the plant palette/legend. Response: Quantities have been added to tree legend. 6. Invasive species shall not be added to a landscape area. Please provide substitutes for Schinus melle and Stipa tenuissima. Check all plantings and insure no invasive species are used. Response: Stipa, Schinus have been removed from the list. 7. Platanus acerifolia is having severe problems with anthracnose in the Carlsbad area. Please provide an appropriate substitute. Response: Platanus has been replaced with Lophostemon conferta. 8. Trees with broad branch structures shall be planted only where sufficient space is available. It is understood that the parkways (with curb adjacent (may be reduced in size to 5.5 ft. in width (including curb) on Private Street A. Quercus virginiana will be too large for the parkway area. Please insure appropriate size/and of species trees for this area. Check all areas. See comment #20 below. Response: The quercus has been replaced with Lophostemon conferta. 9. The Maintenance Responsibility Exhibit shall be prepared at a scale and size (preferably one sheet) that provides an overall view of the project and shall clearly identify the various areas of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners' association (HOA, City, etc.). Please show responsibility for maintenance of~ areas. Response: This has been updated and in color. 10. Please clearly show the street sidewalks and parkways and provide parkway landscaping. Response: This has been completed. H:lli00\1136.00\Docs\Draft Response Letter.doc ... Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 11 • • 11. landscaping shall enhance and be compatible with the positive character of existing neighborhoods and Carlsbad as a whole. Please provide plantings to match those to the east on Rancho Santa Fe Road. Response: Planting will blend with existing plant material on Rancho Santa Fe Road. See updated notes and legend on the landscape concept plan. 12. Please obtain review and approval for all trails from Liz Ketabian in Parks and Recreation Administration. Response: Trail connection is shown in the northern most point of the project. 13. Please provide a copy of plans that specify all walls/fencing with proposed materials and heights for review. Provide an elevation/detail of each. Response: Complete. See landscape concept plan and detail sheet. 14. Landscaping shall be used to provide and enhance opportunities for outdoor recreation, relaxing, and eating. Please provide a conceptual detail/layout of the community recreation area that identifies passive and active recreational amenities, including but not limited to BBQ's, play area, etc. Response: Complete. See Park enlargement sheet. 15. Please sign the water efficient statement. Response: Complete. 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. Response: Complete. See sheet 43. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. H:\1100\1136.00\Docs\Dralt Response Letter.doc Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 12 • Response: Complete. • c. At medium to high use driveways, the 30 inch height limitation applies at driveways 25 feet from the edge of the apron outward along the curb, then 45 degrees in toward the property. Response: Comment noted. d. Ensure that landscape elements at interior private driveway intersections do not obstruct sight lines, so that circulation and pedestrian safety can be maintained. Response: Complete. e. Landscape features (i.e., shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the CaiTrans sight distance lines. Response: Complete. f. CaiTrans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. 17. All utilities are to be screened. Landscape construction drawings will be required to show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Please also locate all light poles on the landscape plans and insure that there are not conflicts with trees. Response: Complete. 18. Turfgrass shall not be allowed: a. On a slope greater than 25% grade (4:1 slope). b. Where any dimension of the landscaped area is less than 6 ft. wide. (It is understood that the parkways (with curb adjacent) may be reduced in size to 5.5 ft. in width (including curb) on Private Street A.) c. On a center island median strip or on a parking lot island within a commercial, industrial, institutional, or multi-family project. d. In a landscaped area that cannot be efficiently irrigated, such as avoiding runoff or overspray. H:\1100\1136.00\Docs\Draft Response Letter.do(; Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 13 • Response: Lawn will only be in the park area. • 19. Provide a minimum of one (1) street tree for every 40ft. of street frontage. Trees may be planted on center or grouped. Response: Complete. 20. Street trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. Response: Complete. 21. Street trees shall be located: a. A minimum of 7ft. from any sewer line. b. In areas that do not conflict with public utilities. c. Outside of sight distance areas. d. A minimum of 3 ft. outside the public right-of-way, unless approved otherwise by the City as noted below. Response: Complete. Street trees may be located within the public right-of-way, subject to approval by the City, for projects that are: a. Within a public street (i.e., arterial medians, traffic circles). b. Within the Village Review (V-R) Zone (C.M.C. Chapter 21.35). c. Subject to the Planned Development Requirements (C.M.C. Chapter 21.45). d. Subject to City Council Policy 66-Livable Neighborhoods. Response: Complete, Trees are within the ROW on Street 'A'. H:\1100\llJii.OO\DoC!\Draft Response Letter.uoe Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 14 • • 22. Street tree planting located on a major or prime arterial (i.e., Rancho Santa Fe Road) shall be designed to provide continuity with the established street scene. See Appendix "D" ofthe Landscape Manual. Response: Jacaranda trees have been shown to match the existing street trees on RSFRd. 23. Please match symbols with legend. Response: Complete. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). Response: Complete for perimeter slopes only; all other areas to use potable irrigation water. (OMWD}. 2S. The plan shall provide that only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to irrigate any vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable surface unless the adjacent impermeable surfaces are designed and constructed to cause water to drain entirely into a landscaped area. It appears that the turf may be proposed for overhead irrigation based on the irrigation efficiency used. Please clarify and insure requirements are met. Response: Note added on the water conservation plan. 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas {SLA). Please use forms as provided in Appendix "E" of the Landscape Manual. Response: See attached red lines on the City form from appendix "E". 27. Please RETURN REDLINES and provide one (1) extra copy of the preliminary landscape plan set with your next submittal. Response: Complete. Land Development Engineering: H:\1100\l136.t)0\Doa\Draft Respoll!le Letter.doe Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 15 • • 1. The bioretention areas shown on the preliminary site plan appear to be less than the required areas calculated using the sizing factors given in Table 7-1 of the HMP manual. As previously commented (see Item 4 of the City comment letter for PRE 12-13 dated July 24, 2012), the limit of the bioretention surface area is determined by the extent (area) of the engineered soil (planting mix) layer where ponding and infiltration occurs, and is governed by the outlet spillway elevation. Please provide details and cross- sections for each of the proposed bioretention basins. On the preliminary grading plan, please delineate the surface area limit of the bioretention basins as defined above, show the bottom (flat area) and side slopes and ensure that the surface areas provided are greater than or equal to the required sizes per calculations shown in the SWMP report. Response: The bioretention areas have been designed according ta the minimum required areas/volumes from the HMP. Since the bioretention basins will contain an impervious liner, the flow-through planter sizing factors have been used. Cross section, details and surface areas are shown on Sheets 5 and 6. 2. The bioretention labeled as BMP2 in the DMA map provided in the SWMP appears to be a linear swale. Please provide longitudinal and transverse cross-section details. Check dams should be provided to allow ponding and infiltration. Provide treatment layer and storage volume. (See page 86 of City SUSMP for check dam design criteria). Response: BMP 2 has been reconfigured as a basin and is no longer a linear swale. 3. The proposed bioretention basins located at the westerly corner of the site labeled as BMP1 appears to extend to the edge of the slopes. Please consult the soil engineer for a minimum edge distance required for slopes' stability. On page 3 of the updated geotechnical investigation prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., it is indicated this preliminary site plan was not available during the preparation of the update geotechnical investigation. Please have the soils engineer review the preliminary site plan and obtain soils engineer approval for the suitability of the all proposed bioretention BMPs. Obtain design recommendations such as the minimum required distance to the edge of the slopes, impermeable lining requirements (if any), etc. Submit an update letter from soils engineer with the next submittal. Response: Per Leighton & Associates recommendation: Plans show a 20 mil HDPE liner with a 2 inch layer of sand below the liner to prevent puncturing liner due to rocky fill in the bioretention basins bottom. The bottom of the bioretention has fall away from the slope or fall towards the center towards the subdrain system. 4. If the soils engineering requires impermedable lining for bioretention basins, then bioretention basins must be sized using sizing factors for flow-through planters. A lined H:\1100\1136.00\Docs\Draft Response Lener.dot Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 16 • • bioretention basin functions like a flow through planter since it does not allow infiltration into the native soil. The sizing actors for a flow through planter are much larger than that of the bioretention. Larger bioretention basins, if needed, will significantly impact the current design/layout. I suggest you explore other BMPs options such as bioretention plus vault, etc. Response: The bioretention basins will contain impermeable linings, and have been sized as flow-through planters. 5. The preliminary grading plan shows that the outlet pipes form BMP3 and BMP4 are connected into a storm drain that discharges into BMP1. It appears that the already treated run-off from BMP3 and BMP4 co-mingle with the untreated run-off in BMPl. BMP1 is not designed to treat additional flows from BMP3 and BMP4. Please revise to route the already treated run-off from BMPs 3 and 4 directly to the off-site drainage system. Per hydrology report, the same storm drain system routes the 100-year storm to be detained in BMPl. This may overwhelm BMPl. Response: The plans have been revised to so that BMP 2, 3 and 4 will connect to the existing of/site storm drain so that they will not be comingled with BMP l. Flows into BMP 1 will be treated independently prior to discharging into the of/site storm drain system as well. Staff suggests that BMPs 1, 3 and 4 be designed to each handle both the water quality run-off and 100-year storm run-off from each of their tributary DMAs. The outlet pipe from each BMPs shall be connected directly to off-site storm drain system. Please provide preliminary cross-section detail for the proposed bioretention BMP shown on the site plan. Include a detail of the outlet structure and show the locations of the required orifices (for hydromodification and 100-year storm flows). Response: The BMP's will handle both water quality and 100-year flows with outlet pipes connecting to an of/site drainage facility. Preliminary cross-section details are now provided. 6. The SWMP report indicates that DMAl drains into two separate bioretention basins located at the westerly corner of the site, both labeled as BMPl. Show how these two basins are connected to act as one basin. I suggest that DMA1 be divided two separate DMAs, one DMA for each bioretention basin. Response: DMA l is no longer a split basin. Each bioretention basin/flow-through planter will have a unique upstream drainage area. H:\JI00\1 136.00\DocsiDI"IIIft Response Letter.doc ~>. 1.~.· .:.&TtTUDIE.. 3:$ 1"1-ANNtl'llll 4. il"Uiti'IC.t:RttNti Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 17 • • 7. The proposed pervious pavers at the driveway entrance are labeled as BMP5 to treat DMA5. Pervious pavers are not considered a treatment/hydromodification BMP since they have no numerically sized treatment or storage layer per SUSMP sizing criteria. A small portion of the driveway entrance that drains into Paseo lupine, if paved with pervious pavement that meets certain criteria provided in the City SUSMP (see page 82 of City SUSMP) are considered self-treating. Self-treating areas do not require additional treatment or flow control BMP if they drain directly off-site. However, self- treating pervious pavers cannot treat additional area. Revise the limits of DMA5 on the DMA map and provide a separate BMP/IMP for DMA 5 or route DMA 5 to BMPl. Response: The pervious pavers at the driveway entrance have been increased in area in order to act as self-treating BMPs. 8. Please show a meandering sidewalk along Rancho Santa Fe Road on the revised site plan, for consistency with the Rancho Santa Fe Road corridor. Response: Please refer to sheets 4 and 5. 9. The project site is shown as Parcel 1 in the recorded Parcel Map No. 20982. Please provide two (2) copies of an updated title report reflecting this information. Response: An updated Title Report is included with this submittal. Legal description has been updated. 10. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, etc.). All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. Response: We received positive comments from the Fire Department during our Preliminary Review. We were requested to follow up once detail is provided on our Tentative Map, which is included with this submittal. We will continue to coordinate with the Fire Department. 11. Obtain approval from leucadia Wastewater District for the proposed sewer system shown on the site plan. Response: We have included a letter received by the Leucadia Wastewater District and we will continue to coordinate with the district. 12. Obtain approval from Olivenhain system shown on the site plan. H:\110011136.00\Docs\Draft Response Letter.doe Municipal Water District for the proposed sewer Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 18 • • Response: We will coordinate with 0/ivenhain Municipal Water district for the proposed sewer system. 13. This project will be conditioned to submit CC&Rs or other recorded document addressing maintenance, repair and replacement of shared improvements such as private roads, BMP facilities, etc. Response: Comment noted. 14. This project will also be conditioned to provide the City Engineer, a recorded document that ensures maintenance of shared private improvements such as storm water facilities and storm drains within the proposed subdivision. Response: Comment noted. 15. Comply with all other comments shown on the redlined preliminary SWMP report (see attached). Response: The comments have been addressed. See revised SWMP. 16. Comply with all other comments shown on the redlined preliminary drainage report (see attached). Response: The comments have been addressed. See revised Drainage. 17. Please submit the following documents in the next review submittal: a. One (1) copy of the revised preliminary site plan. b. One (1) copy each ofthe revised SWMP, hydrology report, and soils report. c. One (1) copy of the April20, 2004 SCT&T, Inc., geotechnical report. d. Two (2) copies of an updated title report. e. 1'1 review redlined plans and all red lined reports. Response: All are included per staffs request. Parks Department: Please see the attached redlines and revise project to incorporate all comments. Please return all red lines with the next review submittal. Response: Comment noted. H:\110011136.110\Does\Draft Response Letter.doc .. Chris DeCerbo December 12, 2012 Page 19 Police Department: • • Please see the attached issues letter from the City of Carlsbad Police Department dated September 28, 2012. Response: Comment noted. Fire Department: Fire Department comments will follow under separate cover. Response: Comments were received on November 26, 2012. No response necessary. Building Division: Building Division comments will follow under separate cover. Response: Comments were received on November 26, 2012. No response necessary. We look forward to your review of this request. If you should have any questions please contact me at (858) 875-1715 or anna.colamussi@latitude33.com Sincerely, ' ,/ • /) ~._,/?::/·~v~f:;;'-( -L Anna Yent(!e/ Project Planner H:lll00\ll36.00\Doa\Dr:aft Response Lener.doc i\1ftJUi:J n/JD{t?- 4~A. CITY OF VcARLSBAD Planning Division November 20, 2012 April Tornillo • Taylor Morrison of California, LLC 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 • u FILE www.carlsbadca.gov SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR CT 12-0S/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Dear Ms. Tornillo, This letter is considered to be supplemental to the October 25, 2012 incompleteness letter that the Planning Department sent out following our review of the September 26, 2012 submittal of the La Costa Residential project. In that letter it was stated that the Fire Department and Building Division comments would follow under separate cover. Both have since reviewed the project and have provided their comments on the attached page(s). All issues will need to be resolved prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing. If you should have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss your application, please contact me at (760) 602-4643. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Fire Department: Gregory Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. • Building Division: Will Foss, Building Official, at (760) 602-2716. Sincerely, th j J C?,;;;o~lf-' Associate Planner JG:sm c: Jim Reuter, Property Development Centers, LLC, 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94S88 Anna L. Yentile, Latitude 33 Planning & Engineering, S355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650, San Diego, CA 92121 Don Neu, City Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Will Foss, Building Official· Gregory Ryan, Deputy City Fire Marshal Jodeene Sasway, Crime Prevention Specialist Michael Elliott, PELA Liz Ketabian, Parks Department File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-· LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL November 20, 2012 Pa e 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Fire Department: The Fire Department has no comments. Building Division: • The Building Division has no comments at this time. However, please note that a complete code review will be done when construction plans are submitted for building plan check. ' . (~~CITY OF ~.~CARLSBAD • • FILE COPY )0· .J&t.;> Community & Economic Development October 25, 2012 April Tornillo Taylor Morrison of California, LLC 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1450 Irvine, CA 92013 www.carlsbadca.gov SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR CT 12-0S/ PUD 12-07/ V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and Variance, application no. CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02, as to their completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. The second list is project issues of concern to staff. In order to expedite the processing of your application, the "incomplete" items and your response to the project issues of concern to Staff must be submitted directly to your staff planner; therefore, please contact your staff planner directly to schedule a re-submittal appointment. As part of your re-submittal package, please prepare and include with your re-submittal: (1) a copy of these lists, (2) a det~iled letter summarizing how all identified incomplete items and/or project issues have been addressed; and (3) five (5) sets of revised plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted, the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, September 26, 2012, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Jason Goff, at (760) 602-4643, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2733. • Fire Department: Gregory Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. • Police Department: Jodee Sasway, Crime Prevention, at (760) 602-2195 . .,.....,. Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 2 • PELA: Michael Elliott, landscape Architect, at (760) 944-8463. • Building Division: Will Foss, Building Official, at (760) 602-2716. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CO:JG:It Attachments: 1. Planning Division Red line-Planned Development Table C 2. Planning Division Red line-Planned Development Table D 3. Planning Division Redline -City Council Policy 44 4. Planning Division Redline-City Council Policy 66 5. Slope Edge Building Setback Exhibit example-PD 05-ll(B)-VLC Oaks North, Neighborhood 1.3. 6. Carlsbad Police Department letter dated September 28, 2012 7. PELA Red lines-Landscape, Sheets 27-29 (10/4/12) 8. land Development Engineering Redlines-Entire Plan Set, Sheets 1-29 9. Land Development Engineering Red lines-Preliminary Title Report 10. Land Development Engineering Red lines-Preliminary SWMP (9/22/12) 11. Land Development Engineering Red lines-Preliminary Drainage Report (9/21/12) 12. Parks Department/Trails Red lines-Sheets 1-6, and 27-29 (10/24/12) c: Jim Reuter, Property Development Centers, LLC, 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 Anna L. Yentile, latitude 33 Planning & Engineering, 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650, San Diego, CA 92121 Don Neu, City Planner Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Will Foss, Building Official Gregory Ryan, Deputy City Fire Marshal Jodee Sasway, Crime Prevention Specialist Michael Elliott, PELA liz Ketabian, Parks Department File Copy Data Entry . . • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 3 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Constraints Map. It is unclear how the identified density of 5.2 du/ac is being determined based on the percentage (23%) of undevelopable acreage provided in the Development Summary section of the plans labeled on Sheet 1. Please provide a constraints map/~nalysis (density determination pursuant to 21.53.230 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) as a separate sheet to the submittal package identifying the net developable acreage of the project site. Please also see Pg. 5, Section D of the Development Permit (Form P-2) requirements. 2. Slope Analysis. Please provide a slope analysis in accordance with Section 21.95.110(A) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3. Slope profiles. Please provide slope profiles in accordance with Section 21.95.110(B) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. Noise Study. Please provide a noise study consistent with the City of Carlsbad Noise Guidelines Manual. The noise study is required to identify the need for and to allow a noise wall within the 50 foot arterial landscape setback and any other requirements as deemed necessary to comply with the guidelines. 5. Color Board(s). Please provide color boards (no larger than 9" x 12" in size) showing buildil)g materials and color samples of glass, reveals, aggregate, wood, etc. which is consistent with the project proposal. 6. Architectural Site Plan. Please provide a detailed architectural site plan of the project that includes at a minimum the following information: a. Architectural plotting of all homes. Please be sure to label each of the plotted homes with the proposed plan type (i.e., Plan I, II, or Ill), architectural style (i.e., Spanish, Monterey, or Santa Barbara), and color scheme that will be associated with that specific lot. The overall site plan should demonstrate a well thought out and coordinated development pattern that is consistent with City Council Policy 44, shows variation between housing types and is aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood. b. Dimension all building setbacks. Please be sure to also include any optional patio covers, decks, balconies, etc. and also any architectural projections (i.e., fireplaces, media niches, etc.). • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • October 25, 2012 Pa e 4 7. Architectural Summarv. Please include as part of the plans, preferably within the architectural site plan, an architectural summary table describing the following: ARCHITECTURAL SUMMARY Plan #of %Unit #of 1'' Floor 2"" Floor Living Area Garage Total SQ. Type Units Mix Rooms SQ. FT. SQ. FT. SQ. FT. SQ. FT. Ft. I II Ill 8. Parking Summary. Please include as part of the plans, preferably within the architectural site plan, a parking summary table describing the following: PARKING SUMMARY Resident: Visitor/Guest: Total: REQUIRED: 2 Covered Spaces/Unit 32 X 2 = 64 32 X .25 = 8 72 PROVIDED: 2-Car Garage/Unit 64 spaces 9. Lot Summarv. Please include as part of the plans, preferably within the architectural site plan, a table describing the following information. The lot summary table will need to be expanded beyond what is shown in the example below to include all lots within the subdivision. LOT SUMMARY LOT AREA LOT BUILDING LOT LOT# (SQ. FT.) WIDTH PLAN TYPE COVERAGE COVERAGE (SQ. FT.) (%) 1 2 (Private Street A) NA NA NA (Private Drive B, NA NA NA etc.) (Open Space, etc.) NA NA NA Please be aware that according to footnote #1 of C.M.C. 21.45.070(A)-TableD, lot width is to be measured 20ft. behind the front property line. 10. Building Elevation Design Elements: Please include a building elevation design elements table as part of the plans identifying the following design elements as required by the City Council Policy 44 Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines. The table can be included within the architectural site plan or provided as a separate exhibit to be approved as part of the project staff report. The table will need to be expanded beyond the example shown • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 -LA COSTA RESIDENTI!IL October 25, 2012 Pa e 5 below to include all plan types that are being proposed. Please check all design elements that apply. Please see City Council Policy 44 -Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines on the specific number of design elements that are required for each plan type. Revise all elevations where any deficiencies are occurring. BUILDING ELEVATION DESIGN ELEMENTS Plan One Design Elements Santa Barbara Formal Spanish Monterey Front Street Rear Front Street Rear Front Street Rear side side side Balconies Decorative Eaves & Fascia Exposed Roof Rafter X X Tails Arched Elements X Towers Knee Braces Dormers Columns Exterior Windows Elements Accent Materials (i.e., brick, stone, shingles, wood or siding 11. Slope Edge Building Setbacks. Please label all lots on the requested architectural site plan (see above) that are subject to the slope edge building setback (see C.M.C. 21.95.120(1)) and demonstrate project compliance with this standard. In addition, please include a slope edge building setback exhibit. This exhibit must include a typical detail for each plan type/architectural variation being proposed. Be sure to include any optional patio covers or balconies that you might be including. Attached is an example for you to follow of a typical detail that was prepared as part of PD 05-ll(B) -Villages of La Costa Oaks North, Neighborhood 3.1. 12. For comparative analysis and making the findings to support a variance for smaller lot sizes, the Preliminary Review (PRE 12-13) letter dated July 26, 2012 (see Planning Item #3) required that you show the total dwelling unit yield if the project were developed with 5,000 sq. ft. lots. Please include this analysis as requested. 13. lnclusionary Housing. All residential projects are subject to the City's lnclusionary Housing Ordinance, Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Please indicate how the project intends to satisfy its inclusionary housing component. Please consult with Debbie Fountain, Housing & Neighborhood Services Director, prior to resubmitting the revised project. • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 6 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please resubmit all revised plans on sheets no greater in size than 24" x 36". 2. Please label all related project numbers (i.e., CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02) associated with this project in the upper right hand corner of each sheet of the project plan set. 3. The tentative map is only showing 35 lots (i.e., 1-35). What about Private Street A; Private Drive B; the two private drive aisles that are providing access to lots 9-13 and 22-24; the open space area east of lots 29-32; and also the area of the project fronting along Rancho Santa Fe? 4. Please show sidewalk/parkway improvements for the areas of the project fronting along Paseo lupino and Rancho Santa Fe Road. 5. Please show the existing sidewalk/parkway improvements along the north side of Corte Brezo so that we can determine how the transition between the proposed project and the adjacent residential development is occurring. Please update all plans to be consistent throughout (especially the landscape plans). 6. The "Typical lot Setback" detail shown on Sheet 2 is not applicable to this project as setbacks and lot configurations are not typical, but instead are site specific to each lot per the Planned Development regulations and the plotting that is ultimately finalized and indicated on the required architectural site plan that has yet to be submitted (see incompleteness items above). Please remove this detail from plans. 7. Please revise plans to show any noise walls, fences, courtyard walls, retaining walls, etc. 8. On the Architectural Site Plan and the Tentative Map sheets, please add Approval Block No. 2 to the plans. This can be found on the Planning Division's web page at the following address: http:Uwww.carlsbadca.gov/services/departments/planning/Documents/ApprovaiBiocks.pdf Please note that several versions of this approval block are available on the Planning Division's Website depending on the computer program being used to draft plans. Please contact us if you have questions or problems accessing this information. 9. Planned Development Regulations. The project is subject to compliance with Table C (General Development Standards) and Table D (One-Family Dwellings and Twin Homes on Small lot) of the Planned Development regulations outlined in Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Attached to this letter are the two tables, which will eventually accompany the project staff report demonstrating the project's overall compliance. We have provided comments in each of the compliance comment sections of the table where additional information, clarifications, or revision to the project plans are necessary. Please • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 7 review these tables and revise the project and plans to meet each of these requirements as applicable. 10. Council Policy 44 and 66. Pursuant to Table D of the Planned Development regulations Section 21.45.070, the project must demonstrate compliance with Council Policy 66 {livable Neighborhood Policy) and Council Policy 44 {Architectural Requirements). Please find attached two tables covering each of these policies, which will eventually accompany the project staff report demonstrating the project's overall compliance. We have provided comments in each of the compliance comment sections of the table where additional information, clarifications, or revision to the project plans are necessary. Please review these tables and revise the project and plans to meet each of these requirements as applicable. 11. Garage Setback. We do not support the minimum 18 ft. typical setback for garages as shown in the "Typical Lot Setback" detail provided on Sheet 2 of the proposed plans. The reason being is that a single-family home typically provides a minimum 20ft. setback to the garage, which provides adequate distance between the face of the garage and the sidewalk for parking a vehicle in the driveway and avoiding any sort of vehicle overhang from projecting out into the sidewalk and furthermore inhibiting pedestrian maneuverability. Where we have developed similar projects, it is preferred that the homes be designed and plotted such that either a typical 20 ft. setback be provided (allowing for a vehicle to comfortably park in the driveway) or the minimum allowed under Planned Development Regulations. In this case, Table D of the Planned Development regulations {C.M.C. 21.45.070) would allow for a minimum garage setback of 3 ft. when facing directly onto a private drive-aisle. While 3 ft. is allowed by code, we find that a minimum of 5 ft. is more aesthetically preferred for designing the neighborhood, but will still provide the necessary effect for discouraging parking in the driveway. Please be aware that there is a minimum setback of 20ft. for direct entry garages located on a private street, such as Private Street A. 12. Perpendicular/Parallel Parking Detail. Please provide a typical detail of the proposed perpendicular parking spaces and parallel spaces proposed along the private drive-aisles and Private Street A. Development standards covering stall sizes can be reviewed in section 21.44.050{A) of the C.M.C. A standard parking space, such as the proposed perpendicular spaces, require at a minimum 170 sq. ft. in area and a minimum width of 8.5 ft. A maximum overhang of 2.5 ft. is allowed provided the overhang does not encroach into any required landscape setback areas. Parallel parking spaces require a minimum length of 24 feet, exclusive of driveway/drive-aisle entrances and aprons; minimum length of 20 feet if located immediately adjacent to a driveway/drive-aisle apron; and minimum width of 7 ft. The spaces shown on the proposed plans do appear to meet these requirements. 13. For purposes of calculating lot coverage, please include the area {sq. ft.) of any optional covered patios as part of the floor area tables that are included with each of the proposed floor plans. 14. It is assumed from each of the floor plans that the optional covered patios would be structurally integrated into the architecture of the home based on their location and the • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 -lA COSTA RESIDENTIAL • October 25, 2012 Pa e 8 design shown on the plans. However, what is unclear is how the patio covers would be covered or integrated into the proposed rooflines. Is it your intent that the main roofline for each proposed home be revised to extend over these spaces, or are they going to consist of an open roof type cover that would extend out perpendicularly from the rear yard elevations? It is important to be clear on the plans and consider all impacts that could occur, in that the existing rooflines as proposed would not easily accommodate the optional patio cover given their slope orientations, and if they were to be extended or revised this could conflict with the slope edge building setbacks; the plan change requirements discussed in the City Council Policy 44; change the overall appearance and orientation of roofline as it relates to the hillside development guidelines; and furthermore it could significantly change the overall architecture that will ultimately be approved as part of this project necessitating subsequent consistency determinations or amendments to the project in the future. Please revise the elevations to clarify. 15. Please revise plans to show how the project relates/connects with the existing trail system along the north and east sides of the project. The plans do not presently illustrate how the proposed trails will connect with these existing trails. It is expected that the trails connect. Please consult with Liz Ketabian in the Parks Department regarding this issue and revise plans accordingly to show compliance. 16. Please include volume of grading calculation as part of the grading analysis provided on Sheet 1. For calculating volume of grading please see C.M.C. 21.95.120(0). 17. Please show the existing concrete spillway that is located on the northwesterly side of the site and label on the plan that it is to be removed. 18. The landscape concept plans need to be updated and revised to include the triangular piece of property extending along the public trail northeast of Lot 22, and also the area along the project frontage west of the location where the public trail intersects Paseo Lupino. PELA: Please note that the numbers below are referenced on the returned set of redline plans where appropriate for ease of locating areas of comment concern. 1. Please coordinate landscape plans with civil plans. Prepare landscape plans on a 50% screen of the most current civil plan at the same scale as the civil plans. 2. Please show the entire property and address landscaping of all areas. 3. Plans are too conceptual to provide an appropriate review. One symbol is used for all shrubs and ground covers which may be very different in size and character. Please provide a separate symbol for each type of shrub (i.e., large evergreen shrub, medium size shrub, small flowering accent shrub, etc.) and ground covers. Final comments are reserved pending receipt of more complete plans. • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 9 4. At a minimum, plans shall include the following items: a. Existing conditions (grades, plants, property lines, easements, right-of-ways, drainage elements, utilities, etc.). Clearly show and label all of the above items. Insure no trees are located within utility easements. b. Potable and reclaimed service locations and lines. c. All existing and proposed easements (labeled). Trees shall not be planted within a public utility easement unless otherwise approved by the City. Avoid planting trees and large shrubs above or near sewer laterals, water mains, meter boxes and other utilities. d. All vehicular sight lines, including intersection site distance corridors (see Figures 3-A and 3-B in section 3 of the landscape Manual) and CaiTrans sight distance standards (i.e.: stopping sight distance). Coordinate with the civil engineer to show and label this information on the conceptual landscape plans. e. Indicate positive surface drainage (2% grade in planting areas) away from structures and terminating in an approved drainage system. f. All proposed outdoor elements including, but not limited to, recreational areas, outdoor eating areas, hardscape, trails, and water features. g. Provide a detailed description of any water features that will be included in the landscaped area. h. Other design features and details as needed for clarity (trails, fencing, parking lot lighting, trellis structures, raised planters, etc.). 5. Please indicate the approximate tree quantities in the plant palette/legend. 6. Invasive species shall not be added to a landscaped area. Please provide substitutes for Schinus molle and Stipa tenuissima. Check all plantings and insure no invasive species are used. 7. Platanus acerifolia is having severe problems with anthracnose in the Carlsbad area. Please provide an appropriate substitute. 8. Trees with broad branch structures shall be planted only where sufficient space is available. It is understood that the parkways (with curb adjacent) may be reduced in size to 5.5 ft. in width (including curb) on Private Street A. Quercus virginiana will be too large for the parkway area. Please insure appropriate size/and of species trees for this area. Check all areas. See comment #20 below. 9. The Maintenance Responsibility Exhibit shall be prepared at a scale and size (preferably one sheet) that provides an overall view of the project and shall clearly identify the various areas ------------------ • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 10 of landscape maintenance responsibilities (private, common area/homeowners" association (HOA, City, etc.). Please show responsibility for maintenance of ill! areas. 10. Please clearly show the street sidewalks and parkways and provide parkway landscaping. 11. Landscaping shall enhance and be compatible with the positive character of existing neighborhoods and Carlsbad as a whole. Please provide plantin~s to match those to the east on Rancho Santa Fe Road. 12. Please obtain review and approval for all trails from Liz Ketabian in Parks and Recreation Administration. 13. Please provide a copy of plans that specify all walls/fencing with proposed materials and heights for review. Provide an elevation/detail of each. 14. Landscaping shall be used to provide and enhance opportunities for outdoor recreation, relaxing, and eating. Please provide a conceptual detail/layout of the community recreation area that identifies additional passive and active recreational amenities, including but not limited to BBQ's, play area, etc. 15. Please sign the water efficient statement. 16. Please show and label all vehicular sight lines. a. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel ways. b. On collector streets and larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. c. At medium to high use driveways, the 30 inch height limitation applies at driveways 25 feet from the edge of the apron outward along the curb, then 45 degrees in toward the property. d. Ensure that landscape elements at interior private driveway intersections do not obstruct sight lines, so that circulation and pedestrian safety can be maintained. e. Landscape features (i.e., shrubs, trees, fencing, etc.) shall be selected to ensure that no visual impairments or obstructions are located within the CaiTrans sight distance lines. f. Ca/Trans sight distance lines have a horizontal and vertical component (profile). Coordinate with the civil engineer to determine the location and height restrictions within the required sight distance area. ' " • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02 -LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 11 17. All utilities are to be screened. Landscape construction drawings will be required to show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Please also locate all light poles on the landscape plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 18. Turfgrass shall not be allowed: a. On a slope greater than 25% grade (4:1 slope). b. Where any dimension of the landscaped area is less than 6 ft. wide. (It is understood that the parkways (with curb adjacent) may be reduced in size to 5.5 ft. in width (including curb) on Private Street A.) c. On a center island median strip or on a parking lot island within a commercial, industrial, institutional, or multi-family project. d. In a landscaped area that cannot be efficiently irrigated, such as avoiding runoff or overspray. 19. Provide a minimum of one (1) street tree for every 40 ft. of street frontage. Trees may be planted on center or grouped. 20. Street trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. 21. Street trees shall be located: a. A minimum of 7ft. from any sewer line. b. In areas that do not conflict with public utilities. c. Outside of sight distance areas. d. A minimum of 3 ft. outside the public right-of-way, unless approved otherwise by the City as noted below. Street trees may be located within the public right-of-way, subject to approval by the City, for projects that are: a. Within a public street (i.e., arterial medians, traffic circles). b. Within the Village Review (V-R) Zone (C.M.C. Chapter 21.35). c. Subject to the Planned Development Requirements (C.M.C. Chapter 21.45). d. Subject to City Council Policy 66 -Livable Neighborhoods. • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 12 22. Street tree planting located on a major or prime arterial (i.e., Rancho Santa Fe Road) shall be designed to provide continuity with the established street scene. See Appendix 'D' of the Landscape Manual. Percentage of trees shall be as follows: PERCENTAGE TOTAL OF STREETSCAPE TREES Theme Trees-These trees set the overall SO% character of the streetscape and are located (100% OF STANDARD) along the roadside but outside the right-of- way. Support Trees-These trees complement 30% the theme tree. Select trees which fit the project site conditions. Project Identity/ Accent Trees-The 20% applicant can choose the best tree for the project and submit it for approval. 23. Please match symbols with legend. 24. Please clearly show and indicate which areas are proposed for recycled water use (HOA maintained areas?) and which are proposed for potable water use (private lots?) each with a separate hatch symbol. Please also indicate which water district services this area (OMWD or CMWD). 25. The plan shall provide that only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to irrigate any vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable surface unless the adjacent impermeable surfaces are designed and constructed to cause water to drain entirely into a landscaped area. It appears that the turf may be proposed for overhead irrigation based on the irrigation efficiency used. Please clarify and insure requirements are met. 26. Please revise water use calculations noting that recycled water use areas are considered special landscape areas (SLA). Please use forms as provided in Appendix 'E' of the Landscape Manual. 27. Please RETURN REDLINES and provide one (1) extra copy of the preliminary landscape plan set with your next submittal. Land Development Engineering: 1. The bioretention areas shown on the preliminary site plan appear to be less than the required areas calculated using the sizing factors given in Table 7-1 of the HMP manual. As previously commented (see item 4 of the City comment letter for PRE 12-13 dated July 24, 2012), the limit of the bioretention surface area is determined by the extent (area) of the engineered soil (planting mix) layer where ponding and infiltration occurs, and is governed by the outlet spillway elevation. Please provide details and cross-sections for each of the '• . ' " • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 13 proposed bioretention basins. On the preliminary grading plan, please delineate the surface area limit of the bioretention basins as defined above, show the bottom (flat area) and side slopes and ensure that the surface areas provided are greater than or equal to the required sizes per calculations shown in the SWMP report. 2. The bioretention labeled as BMP2 in the DMA map provided in the SWMP appears to be a linear swale. Please provide longitudinal and transverse cross-section details. Check dams should be provided to allow pending and infiltration. Provide treatment layer and storage volume. (See page 86 of City SUSMP for check dam design criteria). 3. The proposed bioretention basins located at the westerly corner of the site labeled as BMPl appears to extend to the edge of the slopes. Please consult the soil engineer for a minimum edge distance required for slopes' stability. On page 3 of the of the update geotechnical investigation prepared by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., it is indicated this preliminary site plan was not available during the preparation of the update geotechnical investigation. Please have the soils engineer review the preliminary site plan and obtain soils engineer approval for the suitability of the all proposed bioretention BMPs. Obtain design recommendations such as the minimum required distance to the edge of the slopes, impermeable lining requirements (if any), etc. Submit an update letter from soils engineer with the next submittal. 4. If the soils engineer requires impermeable lining for bioretention basins, then bioretention basins must be sized using sizing factors for flow-through planters. A lined bioretention basin functions like a flow through planter since it does not allow infiltration into the native soil. The sizing factors for a flow through planter are much larger than that of the bioretention. Larger bioretention basins, if needed, will significantly impact the current design/layout. I suggest you explore other BMPs options such as bioretention plus vault, etc. 5. The preliminary grading plan shows that the outlet pipes from BMP3 and BMP4 are connected into a storm drain that discharges into BMPl. It appears that the already treated run-off from BMP3 and BMP4 co-mingle with the untreated run-off in BMPl. BMP1 is not designed to treat additional flows from BMP3 and BMP4. Please revise to route the already treated run-off from BMPs 3 and 4 directly to the off-site drainage system. Per hydrology report, the same storm drain system routes the 100-year storm to be detained in BMPl. This may overwhelm BMPl. Staff suggests that BMPs 1, 3 and 4 be designed to each handle both the water quality run- off and 100-year storm run-off from each of their tributary DMAs. The outlet pipe from each BMPs shall be connected directly to off-site stormdrain system. Please provide preliminary cross-section detail for the proposed bioretention BMP shown on the site plan. Include a detail of the outlet structure and show the locations of the required orifices (for hydromodification and 100-year storm flows). 6. The SWMP report indicates that DMAl drains into two separate bioretention basins located at the westerly corner of the site, both labeled as BMP1. Show how these two basins are • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07 /V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 14 connected to act as one basin. I suggest that DMA1 be divided two separate DMAs, one DMA for each bioretention basins. 7. The proposed pervious pavers at the driveway entrance are labeled as BMP5 to treat DMA5. Pervious pavers are not considered a treatment/hydromodification BMP since they have no numerically sized treatment or storage layer per SUSMP sizing criteria. A small portion of the driveway entrance that drains into Paseo Lupino, if paved with pervious pavement that meets certain criteria provided in the city SUSMP (see page 82 of City SUSMP) are considered self-treating. Self-treating areas do not require additional treatment or flow control BMP if they drain directly off-site. However, self-treating pervious pavers cannot treat additional area. Revise the limits of DMA5 on the DMA map and provide a separate BMP/IMP for DMA 5 or route DMA 5 to BMP1. 8. Please show a meandering sidewalk along Rancho Santa Fe Road on the revised site plan, for consistency with the Rancho Santa Fe Road corridor. 9. The project site is shown as Parcel 1 in the recorded Parcel Map No. 20982. Please provide two (2) copies of an updated title report reflecting this information. 10. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, etc.). All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 11. Obtain approval from Leucadia Wastewater District for the proposed sewer system shown on the site plan. 12. Obtain approval from Olivenhain Municipal Water District for the proposed water system shown on the site plan. 13. This project will be conditioned to submit CC&Rs or other recorded document addressing maintenance, repair and replacement of shared improvements such as private roads, BMP facilities, etc. 14. This project will also be conditioned to provide to the City Engineer, a recorded document that ensures maintenance of shared private improvements such as stormwater facilities and storm drains within the proposed subdivision. 15. Comply with all other comments shown on the redlined preliminary SWMP report (see attached). 16. Comply with all other comments shown on the redlined preliminary drainage report (see attached). 17. Please submit the following documents in the next review submittal: a. One (1) copy of the revised preliminary site plan. . .. . .. • • CT 12-05/PUD 12-07/V 12-02-LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL October 25, 2012 Pa e 15 b. One (1) copy each of the revised SWMP, hydrology report, and soils report. c. One (1) copy of the April 20, 2004 SCT& T, Inc. geotechnical report. d. Two (2) copies of an updated title report. e. 1st review redlined plans and all redlined reports. Parks Department: Please see the attached redlines and revise project to incorporate all comments. Please return all redlines with the next review submittal. Police Department: Please see the attached issues letter from the City of Carlsbad Police Department dated September 28, 2012. Fire Department: Fire Department comments will follow under separate cover. Building Division: Building Division comments will follow under separate cover. ... • File: 1136.00 September 26, 2012 Van Lynch Development Services Pla11ning Division City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Van: • 4!& PLANl'llNG & £NGINEEFIIING 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650 San Diego, CA 92121 Tel858.751.0633 • On behalf of our client, Taylor Morrison of California, LLC, we are pleased to submit this request for a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, and Variance. The property is located between Old Rancho Santa Fe Road and Rancho Santa Fe Road, just west of Paseo Lupino, APN 223-05-71. The property is 9.96 acres, currently vacant and rough graded, and is a part of the overall La Costa Town Square approval. Specifically, Ordinance CS-051 and Resolution 2009-232 included the approval for an amendment to the La Costa Master Plan to change the land use on the subject property from Local Shopping Center and Office to Residential Medium and Open Space. The City Council Ordinance limited single family detached dwelling units at this site. The proposed project includes development of the site with 32 single family detached dwelling units and two open space lots. The site will gain access off of Paseo Lupino via the realigned Rancho Santa Fe Road. The project maintains the required 1.9 acres of open space as well as the 50 foot setback from Rancho Santa Fe Road. Due to the irregular shape of the land, its topography, its unique entitlement history, and in order to meet the City's Growth Management Control Point for the RM zone, we are requesting a Variance from the required 5,000 square feet lot area development regulation restriction. The project's proposed lot sizes range from 3,500 to 6,500 square feet (see attached Site Plan for lot areas). We have addressed the Justification for Variance as follows: 1. Explain what special circumstances are applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location of surroundings, whereby the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification: .. • Page 2 of3 • • Justification: The proposed La Costa Single Family Residential site was part of the overall La Costa Town Square approval. In the 2009 Planning Commission approval, the subject site was originally permitted as a Multi-Family development to include 128 dwelling units. Because of the site's adjacency to Single Family development, various conditions were placed upon the property, which were never modified when the City Council later restricted the site to Single Family detached dwelling units. There are unique characteristics in which developing the property with the strict application of zoning ordinance for minimum 5,000 square foot lots while maintaining all conditions creates a hardship for our client compared to the property privileges enjoyed by other properties in the RM zone. Additionally, the RM zone allows up to 8 units per acre. The site includes special circumstances including a triangular shape, steep slopes, requirement to preserve 1.9 acres of open space for a buffer between the site and the adjacent Single Family development, various easements, and a 50 foot setback requirement from Rancho Santa Fe Road when together result in hardships. None of the adjoining properties or in the RM zone contain the same development constraints. Strict application of the code to restrict the lot areas to 5,000 square feet would develop the property at less than 5 units per acre. The City's General Plan establishes Growth Management Control Points for various land use designations. The Growth Management Control Point for the RM zone is 6 dwelling units per acre. To more appropriately meet this requirement; we believe the granting of the lot area variance is required which would develop the property at 5.8 dwelling units per acre. 2. Explain why the granting of the variance does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is located and is subject to any conditions necessary to assure compliance with this finding: Justification: The granting of the lot area variance does not constitute a grant of special privileges because the proposed project is maintaining all restrictions and development standards placed on the site when the property was originally approved as a Multi-Family product. The proposed project with the variance request does not increase the density allowed for the site and is consistent with the surrounding properties in both land uses and densities. The project will remain as single family detached dwelling units and preserves the 1.9 acres of open space. 3. Explain why the granting of the variance does not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the subject property: Justification: The proposed project with the lot area variance does not change the use or activity which is authorized by the RM zone. The variance request is necessary to develop the property to more closely meet the City's Growth Management Control Point and the residential needs of the area given the sites unique and hardship circumstances. 4. Explain why the granting of the variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the General Plan and any applicable specific or Master Plans: Justification: The La Costa Master Plan calls for Single Family Detached dwelling units and open space within this area. The proposed project is for 32 single family detached dwelling units and two open space lots. Granting the lot area variance request is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the La Costa Master Plan as well as the General Plan by more closely meeting the City's Growth Management Control Point goals. Granting the variance request will • • • allow for 5.8 units per acre on this site where the General Plan identifies a desired 6 dwelling unit per acre Control Point. 5. If located within the coastal zone, explain why the variance is consistent with and implements the requirements of the certified local coastal program and that the variance does not reduce or in any manner adversely affect the protection of coastal resources: Justification: The proposed project is not located within the coastal zone. We will concurrently process the vacation of the westerly half of Paseo Lupino and designate it as Open Space with the processing of the Tentative Map. (Pursuant to the 2009 Planning commission approval for the site that stated that "once proposed collector roadway not be vacated until the site design of the multi-family site is completed.") Enclosed you will find the following material for your review: • Signed Applications • Title Report (2) • Leucadia Wastewater District Letter • Geotechnical Investigation (2) • Development Plans o Civil o Architect o Landscape • Public Notice Package • Check in the amount of $23,441 made payable to "City of Carlsbad" We look forward to your review of this request. If you should have any questions please contact me at (858) 875-1715 or anna.colamussi@latitude33.com. Sincerely, _ ~0Sb Anna L. Yentile Project Planner August 6, 2012 Anna Yentile • LEADERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Lattitude 33 Planning & Engineering 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 650 San Diego, CA 92121 • IOAID Of Dll!tTOIJ JUDY I KUIOI, Pl!IIOEII ElAIIE lllliVU, VICE PIBIOE!T AltAI JULIUIIEM. DIIHTOI WID lUl(Kii. DIIHTOl DONAlD f. OHI!ED, DIIEt!Ol PAll j. BUIKH, <EIEUl HAU6E! LWD 3252-:X:XX Re: La Costa Town Square (Rancho Santa Fe Rd. and Pa:seo Lupino) Sewer Availability Dear Ms. Y entile, This letter is to serve as confirmation from Leucadia Wastewater District (L WD) that the undeveloped section ofland located to the northwest of the intersection of Rancho Santa Fe Rd. and Paseo Lupino. The property is within L WD's bowtdaries and sufficient sewer capacity exists for the connection of the proposed 32 single family homes otherwise approved by the City of Carlsbad for development. To receive approval from L WD, the Owner shall submit all applicable plan check documentation stated herein, but not limited to the following: grading plans, sewer improvement plans, tract or parcel maps, preliminary title reports and easement documentation, etc. At the time of submittal, the Owner shall complete a Development application form, deposit a plan checking fee, and establish a project location code for plan check. For additional information regarding the plan check application requirements, please refer to the L WD Standard Specifications, latest edition available for purchase at L WD or online at www.lwwd.org. Further assistance can be provided by Frank Reynaga at (760) 753-0155. Best regards, ~~ District Engi cc: Frank Reynaga L WD Field Services Specialist Jeff Meyer, Dudek RECEIVED DFC 1 ? ~nj'l -"' ... f..\j;'"' CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DiViS~DI\1 1960 LA COSTA AVENUE, CARLSBAD. CA 92009 ·PHONE 760.753.0155 ·FAX 760.753.3094 · LWWD.ORG ·INFO@LWWD.ORG trill' I'<'& I> -r ( ~ I ;).. (~~CITY OF ~CARLSBAD • ........ • ~ LJ FILE Planning Division www.carlsbadca.gov July 26, 2012 Taylor Morrison of California, LLC Attn: April Tornillo 81051rvine Center Drive, Suite 1405 Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: PRE 12-13-LA COSTA TOWN SQUARE (RESIDENTIAL) APN: 223-050-68-00 AND 223-060-31-00 Thank you for submitting a preliminary review for a 32 lot residential subdivision project proposed at the northwesterly corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Paseo Lupino. The project site, an approximately 9.9 acre lot is currently undeveloped. In response to your application, the Planning Division has prepared this comment letter. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. This preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your proiect. It is intended to give you feedback on critical issues based upon the information provided in your submittal. This review is based upon the plans. policies. and standards in effect as of the date of this review. Please be aware that at the time of a formal application submittal. new plans. policies. and standards may be in effect and additional issues of concern may be raised through a more specific and detailed review. Planning: General 1. General Plan and zoning designations for the property are as follows: a. General Plan: Residential Medium (RM), 4 to 8 units/ac. Growth Management Control Point of 6 units/ac. b. Zoning: Planned Community (La Costa Master Plan-MP 149R) c. The project is within the La Costa Master Plan development area SE-14. 2. The project requires the following permits: a. Tentative Tract Map b. Planned Development Permit c. Variance (Please see discussion below) d. A Hillside Development Permit will not be required, but the project will be subject to the Hillside Design Guidelines. 3. Per the Planned Development Ordinance, the minimum lot size for One-family dwellings on properties with a General Plan Land Use designation of Residential Medium (RM) is 5,000 square feet of lot area. The project proposes lot sizes less than 5,000 square feet in area. Per the Planned Development ordinance, lot areas may be reduced to 3,500 square feet if the site is General Plan Land Use designated Residential Medium High 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® • ,.. ::PRE-12"13 -lA COSTA "TOWN SQUARE July ~~. ,2012 · Page2 (RMH) and also meets one of the "unique circumstances" Identified in the code. The site is not land use designated as RMH. However, the site does qualify as being unique as it is adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road, a Circulation Element Roadway. As proposed, the project density of 5.2 dulac Is below the Growth Management Control Point (6 dulac) for the RM Land Use designation. If the project were to be redesigned to meet the 5,000 sq. ft. minimum lot area, the project density would likely fall below the 4 units per acre minimum density for the RM land use designation. Additionally, the City Councils directive that the project be developed as single family detached homes furthers the inability to develop an alternative product type to meet the required Growth Management Control Point. Given the above, staff is supportive of a variance to the lot area requirements in order to develop the property within the range of the RM Growth Management Control Point. The project should show the number of dwelling units if developed with 5000 sq., ft. lots for analytical and comparative purposes. 4. Please provide a constraints analysis (density determination pursuant to 21.53.230 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) to clarify the net developable acreage of the site. The numbers provided in the "General Notes" section of the plans do not provide enough information. 5. Please correct the information in the "General Notes" section as follows: Zoning (existing and proposed) is Planned Community (PC), General Plan (existing and proposed) is Residential Medium (RM). 6. A noise study will be required to identify the need and to allow a noise wall within the 50 foot arterial landscape setback. 7. Be advised that future additions to homes may be precluded by the 50 foot arterial roadway setback, including free standing structures and decks, balconies, and patio covers. 8. The two drive-aisles shall be enhanced with decorative concrete. 9. Along Private Street "A", interior parallel parking spaces shall be a minimum of 24 feet long. End spaces may be 20 feet long. 10. For Lot 9, consider widening the lot to allow for a wider driveway where it narrows and provide a turnaround. Driveways over 40 feet in length qualify as providing one guest parking space. 11. Please identify the required active recreation area (6,400 sq. ft.) and the amenities provided. 75% (4,800 sq. ft.) of the recreational requirement must be active recreation. 12. Please review City Council Policy 44, Neighborhood Architectural Guidelines, as no detailed plot plans or elevations were provided. Please design the product and elevations to comply with this policy. 13. Please demarcate the required private recreational space (400 sq. ft. per unit with a minimum dimension of 15 feet) for each loVunit in the formal submittal. All necessary application forms, submittal requirements, and fee information are available at the Planning counter located in the Faraday Building at 1635 Faraday Avenue or on line at www.carlsbadca.gov. You may also access the General Plan Land Use Element and the ._, PRE 12-13-LA COSTA TOWN SQUARE July 26, 2012 Page 3 • 0 Zoning Ordinance online at the website address shown; select Department Listing; select Planning Home Page. Please review ail information carefully before submitting. Land Development Engineering: 1. Complete a Storm Water Standards Questionnaire, form E-34 (see attached). The form is also available on the City of Carlsbad web-site at: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/business/building/permittingprocess/pages/applicatlons_hand outs.aspx 2. This project is a priority project. A preliminary Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) will be required. SWMP must include appropriate analysis and sizing calculations for flow control and treatment control BMP facilities. The SWMP must demonstrate compliance with latest City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Stormwater Management Pian (SUSMP) for Treatment Control Best Management Practices (TCBMP), Low Impact Development (LID) and Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP). Please refer to Engineering Standard, Volume 4, Chapter 2 at: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/standards. 3. The preliminary hydromodification analysis prepared by Latitude 33 Planning and Engineering shows that the proposed bioretention basins were sized using sizing factors from the San Diego County Hydromodification Management Plan dated March 2011. Note that this sizing method is not adequate and does not comply with the current hydromodification sizing criteria. The sizing factors determine the required footprint sizes of the bioretention areas but do not determine the required orifices sizes to comply with the flow control requirements. A continuous simulation analysis of a series of storm events from .1 Q2 to Q1 0 is required using any acceptable simulation software such as SDHM. Alternatively, an integrated approach using the San Diego BMP sizing calculator by Brown and Caldwell will satisfy ail requirements for TCBMP, HMP and LID facilities. The BMP sizing calculator is available online at: http:l/www.projectcleanwater.org. 4. It appears that that the bioretention areas provided are less than the required areas per the calculations. Note that the bioretention surface area limit is determined by the extent (area) of the engineered soil (planting mix) layer, which is governed by the outlet spillway elevation (see attached bioretention facility detail). The areas provided may need to be increased. 5. The proposed IMP 2 appears to be a linear bioswale. In order to function as a bioretention, check dams may be needed to provide the required pending depth (V1 ). 6. Ensure that all proposed bioretention facilities have the capacity to handle the 100 year storm event. 7. Obtain approval from the soils engineer for the use of bioretention basins at locations shown on the preliminary BMP map. The preliminary soils report must include design recommendations for the proposed bioretention basins. Ensure that the proposed bioretention located on top of the slope at the south west corner of the property will not compromise the slopes' stability. 8. Provide a preliminary cross-section detail for the proposed bioretention BMP shown on the site plan. Show pending volume (V1 ), engineered soil layer for treatment, storage layer (V2), underdrain, and outlet structure. Include a detail of the outlet structure and show the locations of the required orifices (for hydromodification and 100-year storm flows). The outlet structure must provide easy access to the orifices for proper maintenance and prevent clogging. It is preferable to use the city standard bioretention • PRE 12-13-LA COSTA !OWN SQUARE July 26, 2012 Page4 detail provided in the city SUSMP (see attached details). • ~ 9. The preliminary hydromodification analysis shows no IMP proposed for DMA 5. Although the overall total IMP area provided is greater than the overall total area required, this does not exempt DMA 5 from treatment and hydromodification requirements. All runoff from each DMA requires treatment and flow control. Each DMA must be routed to an IMP. An excess IMP area from one DMA cannot be used to mitigate another DMA that does not drain to such IMP. 1 0. Show the locations of outlet structures for each proposed bioretention basins. Show where the outflow pipes connect. Show the connection point to existing off-site storm drain pipes or structures. Ensure that the there are no increases in flows (including 1 00 year storm event flows) at all discharge points. 11. Provide a preliminary hydrology study that determines the development discharge flows, (water quality flows, hydromodification flows and 100 year storm event flows). Provide preliminary recommendations on the anticipated storm drain facilities required as part of the development. 12. Clearly differentiate between existing and proposed contours. Identify existing slopes per the approved drawing number DWG 409-46. Show drainage arrows and % grade on all proposed streets. 13. Add adequate spot elevations to show direction of drainage. Ensure that run-off drains into the designated IMP per the DMA map. On sheet 2, typical lot drainage shows pads draining into the streets. This typical drainage may not be applicable to some of the proposed pads. Show how run-offs from the proposed streets and lots get routed to the designated IMP (bioretention basins). 14. A Preliminary Title Report (PR) issued within 6 months of formal application submittal will be required for the proposed project. 15. Label existing Paseo Lupine road easement; include document number and date of recordation. Clearly label/identify that portion proposed to be vacated. · 16. Indicate proposed ADT (traffic), EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable water), and GPM (reclaimed water) for this project. 17. Meet with the Fire Department to identify the necessary fire protection measures required for this project (access, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, etc.) All proposed fire hydrants must be served by public water mains. 18. Obtain approval from Leucadia Wastewater District for the proposed sewer system shown on the site plan. 19. Obtain approval from Olivenhain Municipal Water District for the proposed water system shown on the site plan. 20. This project will be conditioned to submit CC&Rs or other recorded document addressing maintenance, repair and replacement of shared improvements such as private roads, BMP facilities, etc. 21. This preliminary review does not constitute a complete review of the proposed project and additional items of concern may be identified upon formal project application submittal. • • PRE 12-13-LA COSTA ~WN SQUARE July 26, 2012 Page 5 Fire Prevention: 1. Fire Access Road surface. The surface of all fire department access routes shall be of an impervious "all-weather" surface material, designed to carry a minimum load of 75,000 pounds axel weight. 2. Fire Lanes. Private "Drive A" shall be designated as a FIRE LANE and become the responsibility of the developer to have said access restrictions recorded, that the owner/HOA is responsible to provide and maintain the enforcement of this designated access. 3. An automatic fire sprinkler system is required for all dwelling units. Provide notes on all plans submitted for review that indicate that fire sprinklers are required. 4. The Developer will be required to install a one inch ( 1 ") or greater water service and water meter. This Is to ensure that there is adequate water provided in the event of a fire sprinkler activation during periods of other uses and/or demands, e.g. irrigation. If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss this letter with the commenting departments, please contact Van Lynch at the number below. You may also contact each department individually as follows: • Planning Division: Van Lynch, Senior Planner, at (760) 602-4613. • Land Development Engineering: Tecla Levy, Project Engineer, at (760) 602-2733. • Fire Department: Greg Ryan, (760) 602-4665. Sincerely, ~ ~(1Ju CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:VL:sm c: Property Development Centers, LLC, Attn: Jim Reuter, 5918 Stoneridge Mall Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 Don Neu, City Planner Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Tecla Levy, Project Engineer Greg Ryan, Fire Prevention Bill Plummer, Utilities -Engineering File Copy Data Entry