The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 76-16; McKeand John; Tentative Map (CT)NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following projects have submitted environmental impact information to the City of Carlsbad in accordance with the Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 (Ord. 1150) and have been declared to have a non- significant environmental impact. For further information, contact the Carlsbad Planning Department. OCTOBER 27, 1976 CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT LOCATION ACTIVITY REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION David Koyl South side of Magnolia Change of between Madison & Jeff- zone from erson R-1-75 RD-M to Norm Starr NE corner of Tam- arack & Jefferson Victor Fisher 1211 Chestnut Speci fi c Plan for 40 unit apartment CUP for greenhouse Samuel W. Pearlman NW side of Gibra- ter St. between Romeria St. & San Marcos Canyon 1) The project s i te is within an urban- ized area in which natural landforms and vegetation have been i nalterably mod i fi ed; 2) The project wi11 not significantly increase air pol- lution, water run- off, traffic or noise in the area. No significant vege- tation or landforip will be impacted. The site is in an ur- ban'zed area. The site is in agri- culture now. No significant atten- tion of landforms or natural vegeta- ti on will occur . The site has been graded & building pads created. Provision for ade- quate drainage has been created. No vegetation exists on site. r NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following projects have submitted environmental impact information to the City of Carlsbad in accordance with the Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 (Ord. 1150) and have been declared to have a non- significant environmental impact. For further information, contact the Carlsbad Planning Department. OCTOBER 27, 1976 CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT LOCATION ACTIVITY REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION John McKeand West side of Jefferson be- tween Buena Vista & Laguna Significant vegetation on site will be retain ed. Minimal grading will occur - none on lagoon slopes. The site is surrounded by urbani zation. 7777'' • ':• 77}^ ' z'7777- 77771 '7.7i - ...-.-..lOzi-ie Ma>ii a 0 f Ap D 1 i c a n t: jQhii..„McKeAnd. - ^''^ '-••' ^•'-- „, 2525 Jeff erson^.^Apt._.N^,,-Carlsbad PfM-nii t. Appl ied loy : Location of P; oposod Activity: jeffers^^^ 7777'--^'^^-^ iNS-OjinATTON 1. ' Give a br-l af descri ptioH of the proposed activity (attacli any p re 1 i r:: i a ry devcl opin^n" plans). To construct a 7 unit condominium with recreational facilities on a 1.00 acre lot, as an addition to the existing condominium to the North, existing C.C.. & R.S. provide for this and community of recreational facilities. 2. Dfisrri bc tliG; e.ctivity area , including d ; sti nci; S shI ng natural and ins n made ciuiractc si; i ; also provide s'irecice slope analysis whon appropriate. Property has a single family home on it at present, which will be demolished, otherwise property is in a more or less natural state with some trees planted many years ago. No real distinguishing natural characteristics except slope at West end which is not to be changed 3. Descri he energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. Cluster design of complex is energy conserving. Also insulation will be used to conserve energy. ENVIROfjHEMAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM II. Environmental Inio.ict Ar Answer the forioi-ring questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. Yes No 1. Could the project significantly c'nange present land uses in the vicinity of tlie activity? __X_ 2. Could the ectivity affect the use of a recreational area, cr area of important aesthetic value? x 3. Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighboriiood? _x_ 4. Could the activity result in the displacement of community .residents? , ^_ 5. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity . area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the County, States or nation? 6. .Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaelogical site or its setting? 7. Could the activity significantly affect the potential use., extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural res- ource? 14. Could the activity serve to encourage development of .presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already developed areas? X X X 8. Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source of water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife or. fish species? x_ 9. Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? X^ 10. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? A 11. Could the activity change existing features of any.of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? ' . 12. Could the activity change existing features of any of the City's beaches? , x_ 13. Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of .agricultural lands? ^ x Yes No 15. V'ilT the activity require a variance from established environinental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? 16. Will the activity require certification, autliorization or issuance of a permit by any. local, State Oi" Federal environinental control agency? 17. Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit l.;y the City? 18. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially liaxardous inato'ials? __X 19. Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood •plain? 20. Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of , 25 percent or gr-eater? 25. Could the activity result in a significant change in the . quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Sliould note surface, ground v/ater, off-shore). X X 21. Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? ^ 22. Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? _^ 23. Could the activity result iii the generation of significant amounts of dust? ^ 24. Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or • ' other materials? • . • X 26. Win there be a significant change to existing land form? ^ (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards. 600 (b) percentage of alteration to the present land form, essentially none (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes. no visible slopes to be created. .27. Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities^ sewers, drains or streets? x State of No Significant Environmental Effects If you have ansv/ered yes to one or more of the questions in Section II but you think t!ie activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: Coastal commission requirement really is only formality in this instance. IV: Consents or Elaborations to Any of tho Question? in Section II. (If additional space is rioeded for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as may be needed.) Signature Date Signed (Person completing report} AO_^__j7Z^.^^^. : 2.'!?. (To be completed by the Planning Director). Place a check in the appropriate box. ( ) Further information is required. ( ) It has been determined tiiat the project will not have significant environmental effects. ( ) You. must submit a preliminary environmental impact statement by the following date . ( ) You • should make an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss further processing of your project, in accordance with Chapter 19.04 of the I^iunicipal Code. DATE RECEIVED:_Jo^_2i;^ BY: Planning Director, or, Revised 7/3/74 FORM PLANNING 40 ^ CITY OF CARLSBAO ^ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE OF 1972 DECLARATION OF NEGATIVE (NONSIGNIFICANT) ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT - APPLICANT Mc \y^X:l TYPE OF APPLICATION l^^p=dyV<f /;?^r /TT:J> f <^.fci^^/yO)V))M^ PERMIT AND/OR FILE NO. //7 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED FOR: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7 fjy^ri(y/^Jnif\?/ifuA7\ Li^rTC t^ilijir<; I declare that I have examined the information for the above project as submitted by the applicant, and on the basis of the Environmental Impact Assessment questionnaire on file in my office as a public document, it is my determination - that this project will not have any significant impact upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 for the following reasons: , 1?K^f7^l L^y^A.7A Q-n 7fW ^7// rr cfknAc, '^A-^717 H 7/:icr^7riAr { ly i^ irT^iry-^^ The Environmental Impact Assessment will be available for public review and comment for FIVE DAYS from date. MAIJD A. AGATEP, Planning Director DATED: 1 Rev. 3/31/75 • E.I.S. Log No. (9 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE OF 1972 DECLARATION OF NEGATIVE (NONSIGNIFICANT) ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT - APPL I CANT do/ll^ Mc k^^-W TYPE OF APPLICATION ^/liRTlVcT' Ti^r '^I'TTy ^/%y\n'>JVl)'y\i Uvi^ PERMIT AND/OR FILE NO. zzl^nf^'ify __7 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED FOR: nil PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7 7/7)1 yryA.-lrTn'\?C}'iuj/A 6//^ r^)l)vr<; I declare that I have examined the information for the above project'as submitted"^ by the applicant, and on the basis of the Environmental Impact Assessment questionnaire on file In my office as a public document, it is my deterjnination - that this project will not have any signifleant impact upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 for the following reasons: . 4>>i'/ccnjni/ . j-^cri^My-\ oil <!17 uJfll r77-Aii'7rl _ //lli ri^.i rr^-\\r\^ 7)ll :0^:.\kr- HcnA PA fyrm^ ^:^CCS Tt^ AA ^A <^^Oi77^7r! .4/ / ir-lWi ^ ' * / The Environmental Impact Assessment will be available for public review and comment for FIVE DAYS from date. ONAU) A. AGATEP, Planning Director DATED: i / r —^ t xo .-7 6 Rev. 3/31/75 • E.I.S. Log No. STAFF REPORT November 8, 1976 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NO.: CT 76-16 APPLICANT: JOHN McKEAND REQUEST: Approval of a 7 unit, 1 lot, condominium with recreational facilities on a 1 acre parcel SECTION I: RECOMMENDATION It is recommendation that CT 76-16 be APPROVED because of the following findings and subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS 1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because: a) The Land Use Element designates the area for Residential Medium-High density (10-20 dwelling units per acre). The project provides 7 dwelling units per acre. 2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan because: a) The project will provide orderly residential development; and b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer. 3) The site is physically suitable for the type of development be- cause: a) The parcel has sufficient flat area with no significant vegetation to accommodate the proposed structures within ordinance requirements. 4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because: a) Clustering the dwelling units allows for reduced land coverage and elimination of interference with the existing bank or mature vegetation; and b) The dwelling units requested are fewer per acre than allowed by the General Plan. 5) The design of the subdivision or the Imposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably Injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because: a) A negative declaration has been issued based on the follow- ing findings: 1) Significant vegetation on site will be retained; 2) Minimal grading will occur - none on lagoon slopes; and 3) The site is surrounded by urbanization. 6) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public helath problems because: a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. 7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements required by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision because: a) Conditions of approval will insure necessary easement service access. 8) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public water- ways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or shorelines because: a) No public access was aval 1able. over the subject property under the previous land use (single-family residence). b) The subject property does not legally front on any of the above. CONDITIONS 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto and as shown on the Plot Plan submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated 10/5/76. The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantially as shown on the plot plan labeled Exhibit A, except or unless indiated otherwise herein. 2) Final Map shall be completed within 18 months from the date of City Council action on the Tentative Map. Two extensions of one year each may be approved by City Council upon staff review of the original decision. 3) All public improvements shall be made in conformity with the Subdivision Ordinance and other City standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad and free of all liens and encumbrances. -2- 4) In order to prov^it for reasonable fire proJI^tion during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings, and adequate fire hydrants with required fire flows shall be installed as recommended by the Fire Department. 5) All land and/or easements required shall be granted to the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City and free of all liens and encumbrances. No easements shall be recorded prior to recorda- tion of the final map unless approved by the City Engineer. 6) The Improvement and grading plans shall include a report of a geological investigation and a complete grading plan of the entire site, when required by the City Engineer. The report and Plan shall be prepared by civil engineers licensed by the State of California and experienced in erosion control, who shall be acceptable to the City Engineer. They shall certify that they have investigated the site and prepared data with full consideration of the consequences to the included and neighbor- ing properties and in conformance with the Geologic and Seismic Safety Element of the General Plan. 7) Storm drainage collected within the Improved surfaced of the proposed condominium shall be directed to the lagoon through a closed conduit drainage system. 8) Prior to recordation of the final map, reciprocal easements shall be recorded to protect the joint use of a 24 foot wide driveway strip between the owners of the lot and the northerly adjacent lot. 9) An onsite fire hydrant shall be installed, as required by the Fire Marshall, and served by a public waterline extension approved by the City Engineer. A 12 foot public waterline easement shall be dedicated on the final map. Meters for domestic and landscape irrigation water shall be Installed at the end of the waterline extension. 10) The existing driveway opening in the lot frontage shall be re- moved and a 24 foot driveway opening shall be installed, accord- ing to City of Carlsbad standards, at the entrance to the proposed joint driveway. 11) All mature vegetation on site will be retained to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Director. 12) A landscape and sprinkler system plan shall be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Director for evaluation and approval prior to recordation of the Final Map. SECTION II: BACKGROUND Location and Description of Property: The parcel is located on the west side of Jefferson between Laguna and Buena Vista. The site is rectangular with 88 feet of frontage and 495 feet of depth. The western edge of the property is adjacent to Buena Vista Lagoon. The site is generally flat, ranging from 60 to 55 feet in elevation. There is a rapid drop in elevation from 50 feet to about 30 feet along the western property boundary. The eastern part of the property is the site of a vacant single family residence and shed in dilapidated condition. These are to be demolished A number of mature trees and shrubs are located around the existing structures. They appear to be in good condition. Existing Zoning: Subject Property: R-3 North: R-3 South: R-3 East: R-3 West: R-l-10,000 Existing Land Use: Subject Property: Vacant Single Family Residence North: Condominiums South: Apartments East: Single Family Residences West: Vacant and Buena Vista Lagoon Past History and-Related Cases: City Council Resolution No. 2039 (July 5, 1972) approved Carlsbad Tract 72-10 for 15 condominium units on approximately 1 acre. This development was built on the northerly property adjacent to the subject property. The applicant for the subject request had an approval for a 15 unit condominium project on the subject property under City Council Resolu- tion No. 3284, dated December 18, 1973 (CT 73-50). CT 73-50 expired, therefore, the applicant has reapplied. The new request is for half of the originally approved units. This eliminates two major structures previously proposed. Environmental Impact Information: A negative declaration has been issued for the project based on the following findings: 1) Significant vegetation on site will be retained; 2) Minimal grading will occur - none of lagoon slopes; and 3) The site is surrounded by urbanization. General Plan Information: The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject property for Residential Medium High Density (10-20 dwelling units per acre). Public Facilities: Water and sewer service to the site is available from the City. The Carlsbad Unified School District Indicated availability of school facilities for the previously approved Tract Map (CT 73-50). Major Planning Consideration: Arethere new considerations that would change the previous circumstances resulting in approval? DISCUSSION Staff does not feel that circumstances have changed since approval was granted for CT 73-50. Presumably, the elimination of seven units is the result of the anti- cipation of Coastal Commission requirements. Staff is happy to see the retention of existing mature trees on the property. The previously approved plan would have eliminated some of the trees. The condition of approval requiring reciprocal access easements for the use of the interior driveway will insure common use of the drive and guest parking facilities for the subject project and CT 72-10 to the north. As a practical matter, staff considers CT 72-10 and the subject project the same subdivision. The subject project is similar to a "second phase". TH:mdp (10/28/76) Attachments: Exhibit A, dated 10/5/76 Location Map Area Map BUENA VISTA WAY Case Wo.CT^^'/lf Date Rec'd:Z^g:/. S' /fz^^DCC Date:AA^. ^ ^;^PC DateA^j^X^ Description of Request: App^^^^ Z-,/^/ r'^^Z>r^AiJA^/U}^ r lo Address or location of Reques't: kJ^e^sr s:)^.F Af" J:fe^,zr^>PCQV f^A^'T-Zf tfi^z^l Applicant: ' ."TgAiA/ /v;^ <^>f^y2> Engr. or Arch ^^/^y -^M/^-M J^A/C^ • Brief Legal: T^/er'/aA/ ^ ^/A-'AO^I I 7-/Z. s ye . 7 7^ S8 3 ^ Assessor Book: Page: Parcel: 33 General Plan Land Use Description: /^M)-^ (/o-z<o X^tA^I/^e.^ Existing Zone: jp - ^ ^Proposed Zone:~" '/Jo Acres; No. of Lots; DU's -7 DU/Acre 7 SchooVDi strict: cAElS5Ab fJA)iPJ/Li:> ^_M/or^^ Z?/sr^^(Lr Water Sanitation District: " A; c-f C/9e^cX 7^/)t:> Within Coast Plan Area: Ip^^ Coast Permit Area: f^j" A \ Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County 3088 PIO PICO AVENUE • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, js COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of Son Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the dote of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CT 76-16 NOTICE IS HEflEBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 p.m.. on Monday, November 8, 1976, to consider an application for adoption of a 7 unit, 1 lot. condominium project with recreational facilities on a 1 acre parcel, on property located on the west side of Jefferson between Laguna and Buena Vista, and m^ore particularly de- scribed as: A portion of Section 1. T-12-S, R-5-W, S B.B, & M. in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califor- nia, Those-persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially -invited to attend the public hearing. Ifyou have any questions, please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department, Applicant: JOHN McKEAND CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION CJ 157s: October 30, 1976 October.. .30 19.76. 19 19 19 . 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on tb R 1 .s t day of ioveinber I 976 / Clerk of the Printer Carlsbad J oh mal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County 3088 PIO PICO AVENUE • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 55 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am prmcipa I clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published twice weekly intheCity of Carl sbad. County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has NOTICE OF DECLARATION been published in each regular and entire issue of ENV^ROTSTSMK^ newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following projects have submitted en- vironmental impact information to the city of Carlsbad in accordance with the r-i 4 o--? '-/C Environmental Protection Ordinance .0?.'O-:'?r. (. . 1 9 /. V . of 1972 (Ord. 1150) and have been de- clared to have a nonsignificant en- vironmental impact. For ftirther infor-mation, contact the Carlsbad Planning Department. i p APPLICANT: John McKeand IT ... . LOCATION: West side of Jefferson between Buena Vista & Laguna REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION: Significant vegetation on site will be retained. Minimal grading will occur—none on lagoon slopes. The site is surrounded by urbanization. CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT CJ 582w: October 27, 1976 1 9 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the ?7th day of • October y/y77^7t<. jAa-yK^^-y--^' Clerk of the Printer NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CT 76-16 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 P.M., on Monday, November 8, 1976, to consider an appli- cation for adoption of a 7 unit, 1 lot, condominium project with recreational facilities on a 1 acre parcel, on property located on the west side of Jefferson between Laguna and Buena Vista, and more particularly described as: A portion of Section 1, T-12-S, R-5-W, S.B.B.& M. in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department. APPLICANT: JOHN McKEAND PUBLISH October 30, 1976 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION BUENA VISTA V\/AY - ^' BUENA PL KNOV/LES AVE 5>oo SCALE RiAi\'SMITH ENGINEERING. ^ CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 2G',.,G STATE STREET • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • 'HONE-729 December 21, 1976 City Council City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Tentative Map CT 76-16, McKeand Our J. N. 3529-A This letter is a request on behalf of John McKeand that the action on the subject tentative map, shown as Agenda Bill 4024, Resolution No. 4061 on the City Council agenda of December 21, 1976, be tabled. We wish to have the map withdrawn so that we may file a new tentative map on the subject property. Sincerely, BRIAN SMITH ENGINEERS, INC. larry L. KLT:ab cc: John McKeand ^7 ^r (g(siir[lglb@]^ [y][n)io^ Mm§li dM^ki 601 pine avenue CQrlsbQd,cQliforniQ 92000 729-9291 November 10, 1976 Reference: CT 76-16 City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Donald A. Agatep, City Planning Director Gentlemen: The Governing Board of this school district has reviewed the information sent from your office concerning a proposed development planned by Mr. John McKeand to construct from 10 to 20 condominium units in accordance with the above referenced application. It is necessary for the school district administration to meet with Mr. McKeand to enter into a new agreememt with him for providing contributions for school facilities. We, therefore, cannot at this time provide you with information that the district can provide school facilities for this proposed development. Sincerely yours R. A. Crawford District Superintendent FHL:RAG:aw RECEIVED NOV 12 1976 CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department ROBERT A, CRAWFORD DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT BOARD OF EDUCATION THOMAS L. CURTIN. M D. W. ALLAN KELLY RICHARD R. O'NEIL. M.D. MARY A. SCHERR HOPE WRISLEY STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SAN DIEGO REGION 6154 MISSION GORGE ROAD, SUITE 205 SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA 92120 TELEPHONE: (7U) 286^114 OCTOBEIR 18, 1976 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92088 ATTENTION: PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENTLEMEN: SUBJECT: CARLSBAD TRACT 76-16 RECEIVED OCT 1 9 1976 CITY OF CARLSBAD Engineering Department WE HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE SUBJECT MATERIAL AND HAVE NO COMMENT AT THIS TIME. YOURS VERY TRULY. 1 FOR: LAD IN H. DELANEY SUPERVISING ENGINEER OCT 19 1976 CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department I- Receipt W o^"-^ APPLICATION NO. CARLSBAD TRACT CITY OF CARLSBAp (Please Type or Print) ' Date; 10-4-76 1. REQUEST: Tentative Subdivision Map for; Air Space Division (Land division - air space division- combination land and air space division) 2. LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the West _side of Jefferson between Laauna • Rnpna Vista 3- ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: Book 155 Page 17 Parcel 33 Book Page Parcel (If more, please list on bottom of page). 4. OWNER(S): Name ' Address City Zip Phone John xMcKeand, 2525 Jef fer-dnn . Apl- N, r-ar-ish^i^ Q:?nn« 779-8892 5. Person responsible for preparation of Map Name Address City ' Zip Phone Harry L. Truax Brian Smith Engineers. Inc., 2656 State. Carlsbad 92008 729-8981 Registration or License No.: L.S. 3802 APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: I hereby declare that all information contained within this application is true; and that all standard conditions as tndicate-d on the attachment have been read, understood and agreed to. ^^zr ^ Name ^^^r^d?jBSs City Zip Phone Representing (Company or Corporation) Relationship to Property Owner(s) A)/jy4/^^jP^_^^ The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the opportunity to work with the applicant throughout the Planning Stages of the proposed development. In an effort to aid the applicant, the Planning Department requests that it be given an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application and plans prior to submittal. This request is not a requirement; however, it may avoid major redrafting or revision of the plan which only serves to lengthen the processing time. ATTACHMENTS: Supplemental Information Form ~ Planning 20^ Time E.xtension Agreement - Planning 37 Standard Conditions - Planning 28 Preparation Check List - Planning 33 Procedures - Planning 36 FORM: Planning 8 Date of Planning Commission Approval SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM SPECIFIC PLAN/TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN . SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1. Gross Acres (or square footage if less than acre) l.OO Acres 2. Number of Lots 1 Lot 3. Type of Development Residential . (Residential', Commercial, Industrial) 4. Present Zone Proposed Zone (if change requested) 5. General Plan Land Use Designation RMH - Medium high density 15 - 20 py/AC : , j5. Source of Water Supply city of Carlsbad 7. Method of Sewage Disposal city sewer system 8. Types of Protective Covenants to be Recorded Same as CT-72-10 Transportation Modes Available to Service the Development Bus 10. If residential development please complete the following: a) School District Serving the property carlsbad Unified District b) Are school facilities capable of serving this project: See CT-73-50 - Approvals on file (Written confirmation of this requirement must be received by the Planning Department at least one week prior to Planning Commission hearing. If not received by this time the request will be denied.) 11. Methods proposed to reduce sound levels insulation 12. Methods proposed to conserve energy insulation Additional sheets may be attached if necessary to answer any of the above questions. 4-8-7 5 FORM Planning 20 Date of Planning Commission Approval \ STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CITY -OF CARLSBAD' The Subdivision Map Act sets a fifty (5D) day time restrictinn nn the statement th^'^r J. 1-7?'' ^'A '3^"*- ^^^^o^^ not to sign tentative man unt?l an nil """P* ^^""^ application for the ^ . cessed and app^Sved necessary entitlements have been pro- In either circumstance, the City will process your request within the earliest time period, however, in no circumstance shall this delay be greater than 150 days from the day of submittal of appli- cation. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed fifty (50) days, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the fifty (50) day processing limitation and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one hundred and fifty (150) days that may be required to properly review all of my appli- cations in order that the environmental impact report and any other prerequisites to this applicatioturoy-b^processed concurrently. Name (Print) tionship to Appli Relationship (Property Owner- ppli cati on Agent) FORM Planning 37 Date of Planning Commission Approval