Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CT 77-05; Pelican Properties; Tentative Map (CT) (2)
'^z f -z-^-m NOTicr or iui-ijc HKAIUNG Ril: CARLSBAD TRAGI Cl 77-5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GlVEIi that thr: Plaiminy Co lission of the City of Carlsbad v/ill hold a Public Hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1?00 Eliii Avenue, Carlsbad, California at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, March I'i, 1 977 to consider an application for a tentative subdivision iii a p for a one- 1 o t cond o in i n i u ni project (48 units), generally located on the South side of Walnut Avenue be twee n L i nco 1 n Street and Wasiiinyton Street, and more particularly descri i.ied as: Tract 220 of County of San .Thuni Lands, in the City of Diego, State of California the office December 9. Parcel 1 . Carlsbad, according to ['lap theeof No. 1581, filed in of the County Recorder of San Diego•County, 1915. Tract 224 of Thum Lands, in the City of County of San Diego, State of California, to Map thereof i.'o. 1C81, filed in the the County Recorder of San Diego County, 9, 1915 and more particularly described in Parcel 2. Carlsbad, 'according office of December the files of the Carlsbad Planning Department. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Ifyou have anv questions, please call 729-1181 Departinent, a n m n > APPLICANT: PELICAN PROPERTIES, INC. CITY DF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 77 SCALE. I"=2.00'. STAFF REPORT DATE: MARCH 23, 1977 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NO: CT 77-5 APPLICANT: PELICAN PROPERTIES REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO PROVIDE A 48-UNIT, 1-LOT AIR SPACE SUBDIVISION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends APPROVAL of Carlsbad Tract 77-5 for the following reasons and subject to the following conditions. FINDINGS: 1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because: a) The Land Use Element designates the site for residential land use at 20-30 dwelling units per acre. The project provides 24 dwelling units per acre. 2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with the General Plan because: a) The project will provide orderly residential development; and b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer. 3) The site is physically suitable for the type of development because: a) The site has been rough-graded and is relatively flat; and b) No significant vegetation or topography exists on-site that would hinder appropriate improvements. 4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of devel- opemnt because: a) Dwelling units to be provided per acre are consistent with General Plan density; and b) No unusual circumstances exist that would necessitate a lesser density. 5) The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because: A Me^a-tive Declaration has feeen 1S'S»#d fot b) The site has been rough-graded and is relatively flat; . c) The project is surrounded by urbanization; and d) No significant vegetation exists on-site. 6) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not like- ly to cause serious public health problems because: a) Conditions of approval will insure adequate public health facilities. 7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements required by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision because: a) Easements may be created to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or shore- lines because: «) The subdivisi&R does not front on any of the above. 9) Th© subject application has complie(^ with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environaental Protection Ordinance of 1972 because: a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for a similar project (CT 73-13) on the subject site. The project is, therefore, is considered consistent by Prior Compliance. 10) The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because: a) At this time all necessary public facilities, including sewer service, are available to serve the subject project as pro- posed. However, sewer facilities may not be available when applications are made for building permits. If sewer facili- ties are not available at the time of building permit appli- cation, building permits will not be issed until arrange- ments satisfactory to the City Council can be made to gtiarantee that all necessary s«w@r fa<;ilities will be available prior to occupancy. CONDITIOHS 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto and as shown on the Plot Plan submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated February 9, 1977. 2) Final Map shall be completed within 18 months from the date of final City Council action on the Tentative Subdivision Map. Two extensions of one year each may be approved by the City Council upon staff review of the original decision. 3) Park-in-lieu fees will be required to the satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Director prior to Final Map issuance. -2- 4) In order to provide for reasonable fire protection during the construction period, the subdivider shall maintain passable vehicular access to all buildings. 5) Ornamental street lighting shall be provided for as required by Municipal Ordinance. The developer shall deposit cash in the amount necessary to energize said street lights for an eighteen month period after construction, to permit the incorporation of the subdivision into a maintenance district. 6) All land and/or easements required shall be granted to the City of Carlsbad without cost to the City, and free of all liens and encumbrances. No easements shall be recorded prior to recordation of the final map unless approved by the City Engineer. 7) Half street frontage improvements based on a 30 foot half street section, shall be installed dn Lincoln Street and Walnut Avenue. 8) Washington Street shall be improved to a special section along the property frontage, having a 28' curb to curb dimension (no parking) and a standard sidewalk. A walkway easement for the sidewalk shall be dedicated on the final map. 9) Twenty foot radius property line returns shall be dedicated on the final map at the intersections. 10) The proposed storm drain is not specifically approved as shown, but shall be installed according to the approved improvement plans. 11) On site fire hydrants, if any, shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshall. They shall be served by public water line extensions having an alignment and capacity approved by the Fire Marshall and City Engineer. Twelve foot water line easements shall be dedicated and construction shall be guaranteed by bond or cash deposit prior to issuance of building permits. BACKGROUND Location and Description of Property: The 2-acre parcel is located on the south side of Walnut Avenue between Lincoln Street and Washington Street. The parcel has been rough-graded and does not contain any significant vegetation or topography. The parcel is relatively flat with a slight depression running north-south across the middle of the site. Street improvements do not exist on Walnut Avenue, Lincoln Street or Washington Street. The site is^adjacent'to the AT&SF~right-of»-way a^ng Washington Street. Existing Zoning Subject Property: R-3 North: R-3 South: R-3 East: AT&SF, R-O-W & RD-M West: R-3 Existing Land Use Subject Property: Vacant North: SFR'-s and Apartments South: SFR's and Apartments East: AT&SF, R-O-W West: SFR's and Apartments Past History and Related Cases: The subject site was approved for an 87-unit condominium project by City Council Resolution No. 3187 on August 7, 1973. The project was subsequently approved by the Coastal Commission with modification and lowering of density to 24 dwelling units per acre. Environmental Impact Information: A Negative Declaration was issued for a similar project under the previous Tract Map consideration (CT 73-13). The current project therefore meets the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 by Prior Compliance. General Plan Information: The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the site for Residential High Density (20-30 d.u.'s per acre). Public Facilities: At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. However, sewer facilities may not be available when applications are made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not available at the time of building permit application, building permits will not be issued until arrange- ments satisfactory to the City Council can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. Major Planning Consideration: Is the proposed subdivision consistent with the General Plan? DISCUSSION The proposed subdivision will provide density within that allowed by the General Plan. Conditions of approval will insure adequate public improvements as required by the various City Departments. The review of site design for the project and the evaluation of the project in the context of the various applicable ordinances will take place at the building permit stage. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A, dated 2/9/77 Location Map CC. Resolution No. 3187 TH:cpl i sam 3-17-77 AR: 3/25/77 - 5 Car/sbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County 3088 PIO PICO AVENUE • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, js COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principo I clerk of the printer of the Carisbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: CARLSBAD TRACT CT 77-5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a Public Hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue. Carlsbad, California at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, March 23, 1977 to consider an application for a tentative subdivision map for a one-lot con- dominium project (48 units), generally located on the South side of Walnut Av-enue between Lincoln Street and Wash- ington Street, and more particularly described as: Parcel 1. Tract 220 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office of the County Recordfer of San Diego County, December 9,1915. Parcel 2. Tract 224 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbaci, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, December9,1915and more par- ticularly described in the files of the Carlsbad Planning Department Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to at- tend the public hearing. Ifyou have any questions, please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department. Applicant: PELICAN PROPERTIES, INC, CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION CJ 245s: March 12, 1977 rch 12 19.7.7. 19 19 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed at Carlsbad. County of San Diego, state of California on the 14th day of -iyrch -IS'77 1 . J777j/y- /(. Clerk of the Printer Carlsbad Unified Schcii District 801 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008 729-9291 "Excellence In Education' BOARD OF TRUSTEES RICHARD R. O'NEIL, M.D. President MARY A. SCHERR Vice President JOHN J. MAMAUX Clerk THOMAS L. CURTIN, M.D. Member W. ALLAN KELLY Member DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION , PHILIP GRIGNON, Ed. D. District Superintendent RICHARD BREEN Maintenance/Operations SUSAN H. LARCEN Instructional Services GLEN WHITENER Business Services September 3, 1981 ecmved SEP 03 1981 ^^'1 Y OF CARLSBAD Mary Ann Gigure I Orange Coast Title Company 640 North Tustin Avenue, Suite lOi; Santa Ana CA 92705 Reference: Escrow No. 763 j Dear Ms. Gigure: The enclosed Request for Full Recilveyance is provided at this time based on the representailtSfi that within Escrow No. 763, Pelican PropertielLjinc., has withdrawn Tentative Tract No. 77-5 from further consideration by the Planning Conmission, City of Mrlsbad. It is further understood that the buyers in said Escrow No. 763 will be required to subrai|fnew plans for develop- ment of the subject property and a developer fee in accordance witI Sincerely, Philip Gr^non, Ed.D. District Superintendent n be obligated to pay 1 ibis tri ct procedures. !':• ^ cm cc: James Hagaman, Planning DireCftpr, City of Carlsbad Dorothy Doan, President, Pel||can Properties, Inc. Hector Marsach (g@iite[b@dl mMmi i/^^mM MM ^'"^" ^ 1977 001 pine avenue cQrlsbQd,CQliforniQ 92000 729-929^J^Y QF CARLSBAD Planning Department March 1, 1977 •y3 i%/^^ *77'"<! Lican Properties, Inc. Reference: "SS Peli 48-unit Condominium (formerly Harold Thompson) Mr. Eric Larson, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Bud Plender, Acting City Planning Director Gentlemen: Our district has reviewed the proposed 48-unit condominium develop- ment generally located on Walnut Avenue between Lincoln Street and Washington Street as referenced above and has evaluated the impact of that development on the facilities of our district. The Governing Board wishes to advise the City officials and the residents of Carlsbad that as residential units are added to the community, it is likely that many classes in the district will be crowded, resulting in possible impairment to the educational and transportational services offe red to the students. It is also likely that school schedules may have to be changed, resulting in an increase in the year-round school program, or double sessions, or both. However, the district is able to assure you that school physical facilities will be available concurrent with need for this development as it is presently proposed. Very truly yours R. A. Crawford District Superintendent FHL:RAC:aw CC: Pelican Properties, Inc. ROBERT A. CRAWFORD DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT BOARD OF EDUCATION THOMAS L. CURTIN. M.D. W. ALLAN KELLY RICHARD R. O'NEIL, M.D. MARY A. SCHERR HOPE WRISLEY MEMORANDUM April 14, 1977 TO: Paul Bussey, City Manager FROM: James C. Hagaman, Planning Director^^^?^— RE: CT 77-5, Pelican Properties During Planning Commission consideration of this case (CT 77-5), a concern was voiced that there was no process for a site plan review of the proposed development. Historically, the Planning Commission has been advised that condominium maps deal with only the subdivision ordinance and not with the proposed development. This means that the Planning Commission, staff and interested citizens have little if any indication of the type of development being proposed, such as height of structure, placement of buildings on the property, driveway location, etc. This has been of concern .to the parties involved since condominium units are occupied by homeowners who are permanent residents and who require certain amenities to compliment their particular choice of housing type. This housing type is different than apartment house requirements which provide a temporary residence. This is a legitimate concern not only in the site plans of proposed condominiums, but also of conversion of apartments to condominiums. The staff .found in fact that the condominium map deals with the sub- division ordinance and does not concern itself with the proposed development plans. However, the staff finds there is justification in the General Plan to require plan review since the General plan establishes a range of densities as a guide. The minimujm density established in the General Plan is essentially guaranteed; however, any density over the minimum must be justified on the basis rhat the property development and public facilities are proper for the higher requested density. In essence, the subdivision Ordinance requires that all Tract Maps be in compliance with the General Plan. Therefore, it may not be possible to make a determination of consistency for over the minimum density without having a development plan along with a subdivision map for condominiums. The Planning staff along with the City Attorney have been working for some time on developing a comprehensive code amendment dealing with density consistency. The amendment (ZCA 91) is extremely complex, and goes into many more issues and may be months away from adoption. However, there are simpler methods to solving the above stated problem with condo- miniums that could be implemented very quickly. Methods to be considered would be to require a CUP. for all condominiums and condominium conversions, or the Q zone requiring site review by the Planning Commission or- to require a PUD for all condominiums. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that if the City Council concurs with staff that there is a problem of density control with condominiums in- relation to the General Plan and that you are not currently getting the results that you are seeking in condominium development, that this matter should be referred to staff to suggest methods to accomplish your desires. JCH:s APPLICATION NO. CARLSBAD TRACT 77^S CITY or CARLSBAP (PI ease Type or Print) .. Datej' 2-7-77 1. liEQUEST: Tentative Subdivision Map for:|^LOT 2. 3. 4. 5. . COMDO(viINIUn PROJECT (48 UMIT.SV . CL i> n d d i v i s i on - air sp a c c division - c 6 nil) i n a t i o n la ii d"~a nd air space division) LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the SOUTH ide 0f UALNUT AWENUE bet\ieen INC0LJ,_STREET and UASHINGTOlM STREET ASStSSOK'S NUMBLR: Book 204 Page 132 Parcels 10-11-12-13 Book Page Parcel (If more, plense list on bottom of page). OWNLR(S): Name_ Address City Phone PELICAN PROP.. INC. 225 N. STAR LANE. NEWPORT BEACH 92660 TEL-645-6501 ' Person responsible fbr preparation of Map • Name Address Ci ty „Zip._ _ Phone ' ' 745-3222 ROY L. KLEI^A. ENGINEERS. INC. 431 .Jo^th,.Hale APR., F-qnonriirin, CA 92025 Registration or License No.: • 6486 .APPLICANTS SIGNATURE.: I.hereby declare that all information contained within this application is true; and that all standard conditions as indicated on the attachment have been read, understood and agreed to. N a me Address Ci Zip Phone Representing (Company or Corporation) / PELICAN PROP., INC. Relationship to Property Owner(s) The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the opportunity to work with the applicant throughout. the Planning Stages of the proposed development. In an effort to aid the applicant, the Planning Department requests that it be given dn opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application and plans prior to submittal. This request is not a requirement; however, it may avoid m^jor redrafting or revision of the plan which only serves to lengthen the processing time. ATTACHMENTS: • • . * Supplemental Information Form - Planning 201' Time Extension Agreement - Planning 37 Standard Conditions - Planning 28 iLo^i; fc// Preparation Check List - Planning 33 P r 0 c 0 d 11 r n - P1 .-i n n 1 n n 3 G QE .CARLSB/ ill 5 # • 4 ^ MI L F. M E N T A L INFORMATION F 0 R M li'i^ECIFIC PLAN/TFNTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PLAMilED UNIT DLVLLOPMLNT/SITL DLVLLOPMLNl PLAN ii i- • SPEC }AL . USE PEKtUT \, Gross Acres (or square footage if less than acre) 2.02 ACRES 2, Humber of Lots^ 1 (48 UNITS) 3. - Type of Development RESIDENTIAL X^^esi dent! al', Commercial,' IndustriaT] Present Zone R-3 _Proposed Zone R-3 (if change requested) General Plan Land Use Designation RH 6. Source of Water Supply CITY OF CARLSBAD 7. Method of Sewage Disposal CITY OF CARLSBAD SEUER DISPOSAL 8. Types of Protective Covenants to be Recorded cCR's UILL BE •RECORDED THAT UILL REGULATE THE FORMATION OF A HOriEOUNERS ASSO- CIATION TO CONTROL (MAINTENANCE. DUES, ETC.. 9. Transportation Modes Available to Service the Development^ THE NORTH COUNTY' TRANSIT (niNI-BUS) UILL SERVE THE AREA ,10. If residential development please complete the following: ?i) School District Serving the property "CARLSBAD b) Are school facilities capable of serving this project: . -YES (Written,confirmation of this requirement must be . received by the Planning Department at least one week prior to Planning Commission hearing. If not received by'this time the request will be denied.) • 11. Methods proposed to reduce sound levels IN THE LII/ING UNITS. FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION, SOUNDBOARD. RESILIENT CHANNELS, AND DOUBLE GLAZED GLASS UILL BE USED. OUTSIDE THE UNITS, PLUSH LAND ^1 SCAPING AND LARGE EARTH BER.nS UILL BE USED. • . 12. Methods proposed to conserve energy R-19 and R-1I BATT INSULATION UILL BE USED IN ALL CEILINGS AND EXTERIOR UALLS, RESPECTI-VELY. ALSO BY ATTACHING THE TOUNHOIMESj THERE UILL BE A REDUCTION IN ENERGY LOSS Additional sheets may be attached If necessary to answer any of the above questions. r01(11 PJ .101)1 Of] _?n Da in of Plannint) Coiaiirl s', 1 on ApprovaV 7 on \ STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ^ CITY,OF CARLSBAD' The Subdivision Map Act sets a fifty (5b) day time re-trin-inn llV'lVll Tentative Ma lM r i.it III ?? i be extended by the mutual c.oncurrance of the app can ,id Jll^.M J^cepting applications for tentative maps concS're^ v c t e%??fw?^rr* ^";^"^-'Pt to speed up thL o^er ' cess, the fifty (50) day time limit is often exceeded- If vm. w ch Xl.TZ r"?"" "ncurrent,y"?Ms-agJc'ej; t", t tentative maJ'u^Hl ^f V • "I'Pl ication for the c«sed a,'d apVovoJ. ""essary ent i 11 cent = have been pro- In either circumstance, the City will process your request within the earliest time period, however, in no circumstance shall this delay be greater than 150 days from the day of submittal of appli- cation. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may exceed fifty (50) days, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the fifty (50) day processing limitation and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one hundred and fifty (150) days that may be required to properly review all of my appli- cations in order that the environmental impact report and any other prerequisites .to this application may be processed concurrently. Signature Date ^_ ^ y-^ ^At>cz^o Arv/c/ -7)6^/7 ifLi.^^^-^, Name (PrinT) '• ~ \ Relationship to Application ' (Property Owner-Agent) R-ECEIVED FEB 0 9 1977 CITY OR CARLSBAD Planning Department FORM Planning 37' Date of Planning Commission Approval ' ( ) cnv a :;A!';LSI;AI) • ) ^ 0aATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP ^ Subdivision and development shall meet all requirements of the subdivision, zoning, building codes, apd General Plan and other laws, ordinances or regulations of the Dity of Carlsbad, and other governmental agencies; Some-of the more pertinent re(|u i renuMi I s and procedures of the City are l.isted below for your information and concurrence. Please read this list carefully and feel free to ask for further information or explanation. 1. Final Map shall be completed within . 10months from the date of final City Council action on the Tentative Subdivision Map. Two, extensions of one year each may be approved by City Council upon staff review of the original decision. 2. The Final Map shall substantially conform to the Tentative Subdivision Map. If otherwise, the Final Map will be rejected and new Tentative Subdivision Map . hearings will be required for the revised plan. 3. ' All public improvements shall be made in conformity with the ''^ • Subdivision Ordinance and other City Standards, to the satis- faction of the City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad and free of all liens and encumbrances. 4. Prior to.any construct.ion, the applicant shall submit plans to the•appropriate entity providing domestic water,to the proposed development, for its approval of the location, type and adequacy of water lines. 5. Prior to any construction, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City F.ire Department of the location and size of f1 re hydrants. 6. The applicant shall install all required- fire iiydrants and •dry-stand pipes prior to framing construction, and said fire appurtenances shall be functional prior to commencing such work. 7. Street trees, as required by the City, shall be installed by the applicant at his expense. Trees shall be of a • . type approved by the Parks Department and shall be installed to their specifications. "If removal of any existing trees is.required by the City, said removal shall be at the applicant's expense. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to make all arrangements with the Parks Department concerning the requirements of this condition. 8. A detailed grading plan which includes proposed drainage and erosion control landscaping and for other measures such as desilting basins shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Map. 9;- Immediately after grading, erosion control landscaping and/or other measures such as desilting basins shall be installed. This control may be the final landscaping, if so approved. i 10. .A detailed landscape and sprinkler plan shall be sub- 1' tnitted for PI anni ng. Di rector ' s approval for all graded slopes 5' or greater in height and any other areas re- quired by the City, . .11. Prior to final building inspection clearance, all land- scaping shall be Installed or adequate bonding accepted. Said landscaping shall be maintained In a manner accept- able to the Planning Director. <12. No signs or advertising of any.type whatsoever shall be. erected or installed until plans thereof have been approved by the City of Carlsbad. As part of the approval process, the City may modify these conditions or. add others, especially thc-.e of a-more specific nature, The sub- . (HviiliM I.'ill In (iT IIWM' inn d 1 f i < ,I I i d n(i) ,-i d d i M iMr, IM' lU' SO lull '111 . PREPARATION CHECK LIST TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP A. Documents Required for Submittal ^T-r" Application with suppl omental' i nformati on sheet completed. g-r"" Time extension agreement signed, if desii ed. 3. Photostatic copy of deed w'ith complete legal description of subject property or other form of description acceptable the Planning Director. - .f. Twenty-eight ozalid prints of the Tentative Subdivision ^ Rap: Environmental Impact Statement or Report with Fees (if required). Fee for tentative subdivision map: $200.00 + $5.00 for each lot between 1 - 25, + $3.00 for each lot between 26 - 100, + $1.00 for each lot over 100, Extension $100.00 and Revision $100.00. <a. » . C4.*<J^ Street name list for new streets (3 names for each street in conformance to Street Name Policy or one name chosen from approved Street Name List for each street). 300 Foot Radius Mao - A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within 300 feet of the exterior '.boundaries of the subject property. Each- of these lots shall bc consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owners' list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. Property Owners' List - A typewritten list of the name and address of all property owners within 300 feet as noted on the property owner map. This list must be accurate and taken from the latest equalized assessment roll on file in the office of the Assessor of San Dieqo County, 2945 Harding, Room 101, Carlsbad (Phone 714-729-5959). Bi Drafting of Tentative Subdivision Map * y^. Sheets to be 24" x 36"-with T" border (Standard "D" size) ^2. 'A 3.- 4. 8. Scale to be indicated: 1" = 80' is generally sufficient, however, the scale is to be appropriate for sheet size North arrrow oriented to top or left side of sheet. Lettering must be legible. It is preferred that it be drawn by mechanical means, in. ink, and heavy upper case. • Location map showing, the distance to the center line of the nearest intersection. Title block with name of subdivision, name and address of subdivider and drafter and pertinent information such as number of. lots, total acreage and date prepared. Name and address of registered Civil Enqineer. Carlsbad Tract Number", placed top right portion of sheet. FORM Planning 33 First Page' C. Information on Map y 2. 7. t/4. /6. Existing adjacent public rights-of-way, showing dimensions and distance from, property line to center line. Location of existing improvements, pavement, curbs, side- wal ks, etc Easements; type and location. Location and dimension of all proposed public rights-of-way Radii of street curves. ... Location and dimension of all. public or private easements. (/ 7. Location of rail road tracts within 300 feet of site. Location and description of existing utilities. ' •- . • y 9. Proposed streets to be labeled by alphabetical letters. A'lO. Grades of all proposed streets .yu. Topographic contours at two-feet intervals, with indication of manufacturing slopes. 12. Elevation of proposed building pads or sites. y^\3. Lot lines and dimensions y\^. Lots to be numbered. ^yXS. Location of watercourse or areas subject to flood. y.^^. Location of proposed storm drains, or other means of drainage (grades and size). 1^17. Location of existing building and structures. .^18. Location of existing trees within both private and public . lands. * Street sections (may be submitted on separate sheet). Delineation of development phasing. Form - Planning 33 Date of Planning Commission Approval PROCEDURES ^) Application to Planning Commission; -In an effort to aid the appficant, the Planning Department requests that it be given • an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application in its various stages of development prior to submittal. It is more effective If applicant meets directly with staff; however, •• written or telephone comm.unica.tion'1 s acceptable. It is tlie responsibility of the applicant to make the initial contact for such meeting. 2) Submittal: Application will be accepted only if the applica- tion, pl"ans and other pertinent materials are complete. Generally, the date application will be heard will be deter- • • mined by the submittal date as indicated within the approved planning Commission calendar. 3) Planning Commission Calendar; The Planning Commission adopts an annual calendar that indicates application closing dates, staff review dates, staff report completion dates, and Plan- ning Commission hearing dates. You may acquire this calendar at the Planning Department. • ^) Staff Review: On the date as indicated on the Planning Commission Calendar, City Staff conducts a review meeting on all items on the Planning Commission agenda. The applicant is invited to attend and to explain the project and respond to staff preliminary recommendations. Upon completion of this review, Staff will pre- pare final staff recommendations' to be submitted to the Planning Commission. The final report with recommendations will be available at the Planning Department five days prior to the Planning Commission hearing (Friday afternoon prion to the Planning Commission meeting date). 5) Heari ng: The Planning Commission meets every 2nd and 4th Tfednesday of the month at 7:30 p.m. or as indicated on the Planning Commission calendar. Depending on the type of appli- • cation, the Planning Commission will either make a finding and forward to City Council or make final action. 6) Appeal s'; Final action by Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council, provided such appeal is filed within ten (10) days after the Planning Commission action. The applicant should review with staff the procedure on the various types of applications. . , 7) Final Decision: The City will notify the applicant and property owner of the final decision.