Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 77-06; Chestnut Village; Tentative Map (CT) (2)ENVIRONMENTAL IMF&I-'AC^KSIIE>(T-' Receipt No. [^AR 0 3 197/ EIA NO CITY OF CARLSBAD Date: Planning Dspartment Name of Applicant: Bob Bryan & Tommy Carroll Address :2u7Q Garnet Street. San Diego. Ca. 92109 Permit Applied For: pup-io & CT-^Mtt-^jSys^jT ^ Case Nos.: Location of Proposed Acti vi ty: .qn„th ^if^a nf c-hegtnut Highland & Adams BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1., Givea brief description of the proposed activity (attach any preliminary development plans), construction of a U Lot, 13 unit single family planned unit development. 2. Describe the activity area, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropri ate .The project site is presently used to grow t<Hnatoes. The terrain is generally f3-at.with a gentle slope running from east to west. 3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. 1. R-11 3 1/2" thick insulation in all fjxterior walls. 2, R-19 b" thick insulation in all ceiling. 3» No natural gas lines to feed wood-buiming fireplaces. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM II. Environmental Impact Analysis Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. Yes No 1. Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2. Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? 3. Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? 4. Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? 5. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity . area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the County, State, or nation? 6. .Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaelogical site or its setting? 7. Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural res- ource? . _._X- • 8. Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source of water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife or» fish species? 9. Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? 10. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? n. Could the activity change existing features of any.of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? 12. Could the activity change existing features of any of the City's beaches? . 13. Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of .agricultural lands? iL 14. Could the activity serve to encourage development of .presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already developed areas? L Yes No 15. WiU the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? %, 16. Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any. local. State or Federal environmental control agency? X 17. Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? 18. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 19. Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood •plain? 20. Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 21. Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 22. Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? 23. Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? 24. wm the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? • 25. Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore). 26. Will there be a significant change to existing land form? _ (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards.Negllgable (b) percentage of alteration to the present land form. i% (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes. . ..27. Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? X III. State of No Significant Environmental Effects If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section II but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your leasons below: IV; Comments or Elaborations to Any of the Questions in Section II. (If additional space is needed for answering.^a^ny questions, attach additional sheets as may be needed.) / Signature Date Signed: (Pefsbn completing report) Conclusions (To be completed by the Planning Director). Place a check in the appropriate box. ( ) Further information is required. ( ) It has been determined that the project will not have significant environmental effects. ( ) You. must submit a preliminary environmental impact statement by the following date . ( ) You should make an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss further processing of your project, in accordance with Chapter 19.04 of the Municipal Code. DATE RECEIVED: BY: Planning Director, or. Revised 7/3/74 FORM PLANNING 40 CITV OF CARLSCAD EflVIROlTfTENTAL PROTECTION ORDINANCE OF 1^72 DECLARATION OF liEGATIVE (NONSIGNIFICANT) ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT APPLICANT vrv^i7 I & . • . TYPE OF APPLICATION JfT^T rl^^T? ^ nT^mTt^, PERMIT AND/OR FILE NO. yf 77^T - p//n - /n THE ENVIRONI/iENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN .RECEIVED FOR: 7r^^ Mc=?p cW WD 7o. oil PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ '" •f / ' I'll ' / '• -^7^r-jj70^ ^'^h^iA 7n-.t- ^'TS-A-^ . . .• I declare that I have examined the information for the above project as submitted by the applicant, and on the basis of the Environmental Impact Assessment questionnaire on file in my office as a public document, it is my determijiation that this project v/ill not have any significant impact upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 for the following reasoi)s: / ill. <;7v))4/-^/7f /^:'.{^'ir=/'//-n CJF - .^"t -' 'Al 'A- ^ -r-y^ <^yr' • , ' . --'ft • t^ '-•^•^y',r\ \>^^^r:^'^r<; {A • -lyfflzj • ' J The Environmental Impact Assessment will be available for public review and comaient for FIVE DAYS from date. DATED: V I • / \, Acting Planning Director E.I.S, Log No.^ STAFF REPORT DATE: APRIL 13, 1977 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NO: CT 77-6/PUD-lO APPLICANT: R.J. BRYAN REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A TRACT MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE A 12 LOT 11 DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. SECTION I; RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of CT 77-6 and PUD-10 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS (CT 77-6) 1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan because: a) The Land Use Plan Map designates the subject site for Residential low-medium density (o-4 dwelling units per acre). The subject project will provide approximately 4.8 dwelling units per acre under the provision allowing a 25% increase in density under certain circumstances. 2) The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is con- sistent with the General Plan because: a) The project will provide orderly residential development; and b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer; and 3) The site is physically suitable for the type of development because: a) The proposed development will not effect any unusual topographic or geologic features on the site; b) No significant natural vegetation exists on the site. 4) The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because: a) Proposed dwelling units per acre do not exceed the allowable maximum. b) There are no significant physcial features on the site that would hinder development as planned. .1 5) The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or sub- stantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because: a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the proposed development. 6) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because: a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. 7) The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with the easements required by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision because: a) Conditions of approval will insure the above. 8) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to public waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines or shorelines because: a) The subdivision does not front on any of the above. 9) The subject application has complied with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordiance of 1972 because: a) A Negative Declaration has been issued for the project based on the following findings: 1. The project is within an urbanized area. 2. No significant vegetation or landforms exist on the site. 3. The existing street systems are capable of handling the increase in traffic. 10) The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with applicable City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because: a) At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. However, sewer facilities may not be avail- able when applications are made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not available at the time of building permit application, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. CONDITIONS (CT 77-6) 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto and as shown on the plot plan submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated April 5, 1977. 2) Park-in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the final map. No credit shall be given for the open space or recreational facilities provided by this development. 3) A 30' offer-of-dedication shall be made to the City along the westerly and southerly boundaries of this tract prior to, or concurrent with final map approval. 4) All necessary hydrants as required by the Fire Department shall be in service prior to combustables being placed on site. FINDINGS (PUD-10) 1) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community because: a) The development will allow the subject property to be developed to its allowable potential and density. 2) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the persons residing or wcrking in the vicinity or in- jurious to property or improvements in the vicinity because: a) The proposed PUD will be developed in a manner similar to the anticipated future density in the area. 3) The design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.11-0 and all minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.120 will be met because: a) The plot plan and additional exhibits include all development aspects required. b) The plot plan and additional exhibits include adequate provisions for open space, recreational facilities, circulation and parking. c) The project will be developed in a manner to be compatible with surrounding development. d) Internal circulation is acceptable to the City Engineer as shown on the plot plan and by conditions of approval. e) Private recreational facilites are readily accessible. f) Dwelling unit density does not exceed the density allowed in the underlying zone (R-1-7500). CONDITIONS (PUD-10) 1) The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the Plans submitted labeled Exhibits B &C dated March 3, 1977; Exhibit D / dated March 23, 1977; and Exhibit E &F, dated April 6, 1977. The location of all roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other facilities or features shall be located substantially as shown on Exhibit D,E & F unless otherwise provided herein. 2) All conditions shall be appropriately completed and the project commenced within 18 months from final City action. 3) In addition to the required details to be shown on the final PUD plan, the following shall be included: a) Proper lot numbers in sequence b) 24' minimum driveway width c) An acceptable redesign of the quest parking area, showing not less than 11 spaces. d) Fencing plan for the recreational vehicle storage area. 4) Building locations and setbacks shall be shown on the final PUD plan in substantial conformance with Exhibit C, and in no case shall they exceed the provisions of section 21.45.120 No. 13. 5) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit landscape and irrigation plans to the Director of Parks & Recreation for review and approval. .All improvements shall be installed prior to final occupancy. 6) Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of final occupancy. 7) All utilities shall be placed underground. The C.C&R's for this project shall state that individual, exterior television antennas are not permitted. 8) One-hour fire-resistive construction shall be utilized for all separation walls, floors and ceilings. A separate utility system shall be provided for each dwelling unit. SECTION II: BACKGROUND Location and Description of Property The 2.25 acre parcel is located on the south side of Chestnut between Highland and Adams. The property has approximately 211 feet of frontage on Chestnut and 462 feet of depth. The flat site is currently under cultivation and is adjacent to other cultivated land. Woodland Way, a cul-de-sac, is located on the north side of Chestnut across the street from the project site. Street improve- ments (curbs, gutters, sidewalks) exist on Chestnut between Highland and Pio Pico. Existing Zoning: Subject Property: R-1-7500 North: R-1-7500 South: R-1-7500 East: R-1-7500 West: R-1-7500 Existing Land Use; Subject Property: Agriculture North: Single family residential South: Agriculture and SFR's East: Agriculture, PUD West: SFR's History and Related Cases The property was owned for a number of years by a church group and was planned for development by the group for a church. A Tract Map and Planned Unit Development for six residences was approved for property fronting on Highland Drive (CT 76-8, PUD-2). The parcel is 1.45 acres and the dwelling units constitute 4 dwelling units per acre. The development utilizes a private street that could at some future date be used for a portion of a through public street. This previously approved CT & PUD abut the subject site on the south east. Environmental Impact Information An Environmental Impact Assessment has been filed and the project issued a Negative Declaration based on the following findings: 1. The project is within an urbanized area. 2. No significant vegetation or landforms exist on the site, 3. The existing street systems are capable of handling the increases in traffic. General Plan Information fhm %0m$- 'iNii tki^ il^sif-i^at^ thm s^j^ct sit© iot Bsdidmtial The proposed project provides 4.8 dwelling units per acre. This density is compatible with the General Plan under the following provision in the Land Use Element page 23: EXPLANATORY NOTE ON DENSITY RANGES: The densities established for the low and low-medium density residential classifications simply designate the maximum number of dwelling units per gross acre that would be permitted if all requirements are met. In those exceptional cases where the base zone is consistent with the land use designation but would permit a slightly higher yield than that recommended in the low and low-medium density residential classifications, the City may find that the project is consistent with this element if it is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs expressed herein and does not exceed twenty five (25) percent the maximum allocation. The underlying zoning (R-1-7500) would allow 13 dwelling ^its oa'tfc® sgaar© footage of subject, pare©!. Wit-iboAiit the a(b©'V© "2S% ^^©vision; thm subject parcel wuld yield 10 #ir©lli]5tf wiits. ( The Residential Guidelines of the Land Use Element state the following in regard to other than the standard single family detached residences. 1) Retain the present predominance of single-family residences throughout the community; while providing a variety of housing types in the communities within the City, including townhouses, condominiums,.apartments, mobile homes, modular and prefab- ricated housing. 7) . Achieve a variety and choice of housing in all economic ranges throughout the City. 8) Offer safe, healthful, attractive residential areas with a wide range of housing types, styles and price levels in a variety of locations. 9) Encourage cluster-type housing and other innovative housing design that provides adequate open areas around these developments. Staff feels that the propsed residential design (common wall con- dominium residential) achieves a number of positive results. 1) The design of the subdivision allows the property owner to achieve the allowable density under the General Plan. 2) The design allows the site to accommodate adequate provision for future public street systems. 3) The design provides for an alternative housing type within the area, while main- taining the established density. Guideline six of the Residential Guidelines provides for the pre- servation of neighborhood atmosphere and identity in existing residential areas. Staff does not feel that the project design will have a negative impact on the existing neighborhood. Con- ditions of approval will insure Residential Low-Medium density consistency. The project will be developed with a common architec- tural theme, much like the Spanish Village project across Chestnut on Spanish Way. Public Facilities At this time, all necessary public facilities, including sewer service, are available to serve the subject project as proposed. However, sewer facilities may not be available when applications are made for building permits. If sewer facilities are not avail- able at the time of building permit application, building permits will not be issued until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council can be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilities will be available prior to occupancy. The site is within the Carlsbad Unified School District. A letter from the District is on file assuring the City that school physical facilities will be available concurrent with need for this development. .6 • Major Planning Considerations Is the request consistent with the General Plan? Does the request meet the intent and purpose and development standards as provided in the PUD section of the ordinance? SECTION III DISCUSSION Staff feels that the proposed requests are consistent with the General Plan (See the General Plan section of the background report). Staff considers the proposed project to be in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance under the following categories of Section 21.45.010 2) Encourage imaginative and innovational planning of residential neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas by offering a wide variety of dwelling units and building types and site arrange- ments with well-integrated community facilities and services; 4) Permit greater flexibility in design than is possible through strict application of conventional zoning and subdivision regulation, In addition to the above, staff feels that the proposed project relates well to the surrounding area, as stated in number three in the above section; because of the provision for future ded- ication for internal block circulation. The following summarizes the development standards in the PUD Ordinance and how these requirements are met by the proposed plan: Density allowed: proposed: Yards allowed: allowed: Coverage allowed: proposed: Height allowed: proposed: 5 du per acre (GP - 25% increase permitted) 4.8 (structures) proposed (garages) proposed 40% max. 28% 35' max. 27' 10' min. 20' 25 70 ' + mm. 5. Parking required: 22 covered - 11 guest proposed; 22 covered - 13 guest 6. Storage Space required: 440 Sq.Ft. Min. proposed: 1196 Sq.Ft. 7. Refuse Areas (5 residences or more/nonresidential) Refuse areas as shown will function adequately. 8. Screening of Parking Area Landscape plan requirement will assure fulfillment of this condition. 9. Usuable Open Space required: 6600 Sq.Ft. proposed: 9000 Sq.Ft. 10. N/A 11. Landscaping (not used for recreation) Landscape plan requirement will assure fulfillment of this condition. 12. Signs (in addition to underlying zone) proposed: Type: Hand Carved Wood Location: On 42' stumpstone wall on Chestnut Height: 3' Size: 2X8, 16 Sq.Ft. 13. Placement of Buildings Proposals meets ordinance requirements. 14. Streets Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. 15. Pedestrian Walkways Proposal meets ordinance requirements. 16. Lighting Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. 17. Utilities Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. 18• Building Construction Requirements: Conditions of approval will assure fulfillment of this requirement. 19. Planned Unit Development Lots Proposal meets ordinance requirements. TH: ar 4/6/77 Exhibits: Location Map CT 77-6, Exhibit A, dated April 5, 1977 PUD-10, Exhibit B, dated March 3, 1977 Exhibit C, dated March 23, 19 77. Exhibit D, dated March 23, 1977 Exhibit E, dated April 6, 1977 Exhibit F, dated April 6, 1977. .9 o PUD - 10 CT 77-7 C2S£ Ho,^7 772732te Rec'd: 3/5^^:7 _DCC Date:__^V^5zP^ Date 4^:^77_ Pescription of nequest:_^Vl:W^/__^/^A::^^ 7diz7^7'7^7\z7ztf^7j.yAA77A'A- J I ; Adaross cr Locat/on ot yo'^r^p^V. Ac^^r^^^ y.^.tA'^4^^^--7775t6S^ : A p p 1 -1 c e : _ £ .X. B^o.^JXJ [nqr. or l\^.^ch.^£^7ElA^_^At Brief Le-cal: J AsQs0r CoDj'.: 7X777.^ '^'i^'^'- _777P>-. Parcel: General Plan Land Use Description: 77AA7 i Lxistinq Zone: \Z7P751^ Froposeo Zone: AJA Acres: \ T.TAAA^^^ '-'^'O- LoTl: _~ AA DU's^i^ ^__D-/''^-cre„^J? • S c! 1 r. 01' r. i's 11- i c _ ^AAjd^t^ Aj^. _l l.'.-.t?r Saiiitdtion District: Ar^Ai^A^TA l.'i chin Cc:?.st Plan Area: \ ^ Coast Permit Area: nD . 1 I \ u 3 C City of Carlsbad Planning Commission Case No. Exhibit No. Dale 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: CARLSBAD TRACT CT 77-^ AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD 10 cP NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a Public Hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, April 13, 1977 to consider an application for a tentative subdivision map for a 14 lot land division and a plalnned unit development for 13 units on property of approximately 2.25 acres, generally located on the south side of Chestnut between Highland and Adams, and more particularly described as: That portion of Tract 240 of Thum Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County, December 9, 1915, located in Assessor's Book 205, Page 210, Parcel 07, and more particularly described in the files of the Carlsbad Planning Department. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call 729-1181 and ask for the Planning Department. APPLICANT: ROBERT J. BRYAN Publish March 30, 1977 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 500 PUD -- 10 Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of Son Diego County 3088 PIO PICO AVENUE • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 Proof of STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 55 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, 77 r I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter, principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carisbad, Count>' of San Diego, State of California, and paper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general ind which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription iPPLICANT: PACIFIC SCENE. INC. .OCATION: 8 acres north ofthe Alta ra Development on the west side of 500 del .Norte. CTIVITY; Change General Plan m Neighborhood Commercial to . .. i i • I i L .i i i- i I • i i i f i i .. i mned Industrial and Residential ) suDScribers, and v.'nich newspoper hos been established, printed and published at regular (i:um High Density. £ASOX FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- TION: a) The project is small in ..<» and in a developed area, b) The tfcted property consists of two jied pads whicli are devoid of vege- tPPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD .OCATION: Adjacent to the Squires m Reservoir. LCTIVITY; Construct a 12' x 12' con- te block transmitter building and :ct a 50' steel mast for antenna sup- n. SEASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- LTION: a) The projecl will involve nimal disruption to the project area. The tower is to be located in an un- pulated area. c)The tower will be lit avoid air navigation hazards. U-PLICANT: D. K. DEWHURST AND )NY HOWARD-JONES ..OCATIO.N: West side of Roosevelt between Grand Ave. and Beech Ave. iCTIVITYi.Zone Change (ZC-188) >m R-P (Residential ProfessionaD.toy. 2 (General Commercial). REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- «iTION: a) Proposal is consistent with e General Plan, b) The project area is lall in scale and In a deve loped a rea. APPLICANT; C.C.iF. PALOMAR lOPERTlES, INC. • LOCATION: East side of El Camino iaI between Palomar Airport Rood id Alga Rd. ACTIVITY; Zone change (ZC-189) jm L-C (Limited Control) to R-A (Res- cntlal Agricultural). REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- 4TI0N; a) Proposal Is consistent with e General Plan, b) The project area is lall In scale. APPLICANT: C.C.iF., PALOMAR !OPF,RTIES, INC. LOCATION: South side of Palomar rport Road, both sides of Yarrow Dr. ACTIVITY; Zone Change (ZC-ISO) ora L-C (Limited Control) to P-M lanned Industrial). REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- ^.TION: a) Proposal Is consistent with e General Plan, b)Thc project area Is lall In scale. CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 705w; March 16,1977 he said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GITCN that the following projects have submitted en- vironmental impact information to the City ofCarlsbad in accordance with the Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 (Ord. 1150) and have been de- clared to have a nonsignificant envi- ronmental impact. For further informa- tion, contact the Carlsbad Planning De- partment. APPLICANT: THOMAS E. STEVEN- SON LOCATION: 545 Tamarack. ACTIVITY; Residential Care Facility for six (6) persons. REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION; The use has been established for a number of years. The area is within an established residential envi- ronment. The requested use will not in- crease traffic. APPLICANT: R. J. BRYAN i LOCATION: South side of Chestnut between Highland and Adams. ACTIVITY: CT and PUD for 13 units on 14 lols. REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION: The project is within an ur- banized area. No significant vegetation or landforms exist on the site. Street systems can handle traffic increase. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD LOCATION; City of Carlsbad sewet i service area. ACTIVITY; Raise sewer connection fees from $250 to J500. REASON FOR NEGATIVE DECLA- RATION: a) The project will have a neg- ligible effect on the physical environ- ment, b) The project will reapportion costs for expanding sewer service to those users which increase the demand for that service. APPLICANT: JAMES SCANLON, et al LOCATION: N/S of Laguna Dr. be- tween Elmwood and Pio Pico. ACTIVITY; Change General Plan from I/)w Medium Residential and Of- fice to Medium High RcsidcniinI Densi- March. .16 1977.. 19, 19. 19. 19, I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad. County of San Oiego, State of California on tho Ipt.h day of March . " 1 977 Clerk of the Printer MEMORANDUM - APRIL 29, 1977 TO: PAUL BUSSEY, CITY MANAGER FROM: JAMES C. HAGAMAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR RE: PUD-10 / CT 77-6 (R.J BRYAN) Upon further analysis of this proposed PUD scheduled for the City Council meeting of May 3, 1977, staff is reconmending the following: The PUD, which reserves future street right-of-way on the south 30' of the property, did not fully recognize that the area betv/een the future street and the proposed structures becomes a front yard, in concept, if not by ordinance. There is no provision within the City Ordinance to deal with this situation, nor is there a condition within the PUD which would preclude fencing of this future front yard area with a 6' fence. Since the purpose of this future street right-of-way is for the ultimate development of parcels within this block which would front on this street, we are recommending the following additional condition to the PUD. "No wall or fence shall be constructed closer than 20' from an area designated for possible future street alignment along the south property line (this would not preclude building a normal 42" high fence in that 20' area)." In addition because the Planned Unit Development Ordinance does not deal with fence heights we would also recomimnend as a matter of clarification for fencing the following condition. "No wall or fence shall exceed 6' in height within the project area." Finally, staff recommends that in order to insure that private development standards within the PUD are in conformance with the conditions of approval and other city regulations that the following condition be added: "CC&Rs for the PUD shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits." JCH:ar M "-^^'''''' 801 pineovenue corlsbodcolifornlQ 92000 729-9291 ^ Qp^i.^i SBAO Banning Department March 29, 1977 Reference: CT 77-7^ Thomas W. and Jean C. Carroll and Robert J. Bryan Mr. Eric Larson, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Attention: Mr. Bud Plender, Acting City Planning Director Gentlemen: Our district has reviewed the proposed Carlsbad Tract No. 77-7 generally located on the south side of Chestnut Avenue between Highland Drive and Adams Street as referenced above and has evaluated the impact of that development on the facilities of our district. The Governing Board wishes to advise the City officials and the residents of Carlsbad that as residential units are added to the community, it is likely that many classes in the district will be crowded, resulting in possible impairment to the educational and transportational services offered to the students. It is also likely that school schedules may have to be changed, resulting in an increase in the year-round school program, or double sessions, or both. However, the district is able to assure you that school physical facilities will be available concurrent with need for this development as it is presently proposed. Very truly yours. A. Crawford District Superintendent FHL:RAC:aw CC: Thomas W. and Jean C. Carroll and Robert J. Bryan ROBERT A. CRAWFORD DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT BOARD OF EDUCATION THOMAS L. CURTIN, M.D. W. ALLAN KELLY RICHARD R. O'NEIL. M.D. MARY A. SCHERR HOPE WRISLEY V • • ). \ • ) • i IHFORMATIOII RrOUCST FORM ' ' ' z • ' ' • • . 4 DATE •• J TO: . y pv/eA" AA^iE-Fi-r FROH: • ".V CARLSBAD PLANNING DFPARTMEIJT . - RE: CASE NO. dP 7-?' ^ ' < AttacbeiJ is a copy of the location map and information sheet on subject case. ; Th'is item will be reviev/ed by Carlsbad Development Review Committee on \ S-''^'^" 7 7 • Therefore, if you have comments or conditions tha't should be considered, please complete this comment request and return by S~^'7y • i For further information, please contact the Planning Department at 729-1181, Ext. 25. 4 Bud Plender, Assistant Planning Director • . ' COMMENTS: Q/C/.C^TZT /A^y^^^T >f- .^^rlt ^-^^ ^t^a^Ai^^,--^ ^o/>.--c/ f (attach additional sheet if necessary) Formnnnninp -^i Date '^""'^ ""^^^ Receipt Wo/^pg.IK C li^ / B D APPLICATION NO. CARLSBAD TRACT JTzA^^ CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department (PleaseTypeor Print) Date: _Marc.h %P3Tl_ 1. REQUEST: Tentative Subdivision Map for: i^"lot land ^ivlsioni XLand di vl s ion - air space d i v i s i o n - combinalTon land and ai r space diVIsion) 2.. LOCATION: The subject property is generally located on the South s i d e o f Chestnut , b e t w e e n Highland a"cl_M^ 3. ASSESSOR'S NUMBER: Book__2u^ Page 21^. Parcel Book Page Parcel (If more, please list on bottom of page). 4. OWNER(S): Name Address City Zip Phone Bob Bryan & Tcanmy Carroll 2079 Garnet Street San Diego, q2l()9 272-2m 5. Person responsible for preparation of Name Add.-ess Map Cit^ Zi p Phone _gpPAG 2551 State Street Garlsbad,, Ca. Q20nfi 7?Q-R«xi Registration or License No.: ' APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: I hereby declare that all information contained within this application is true; and that all standard conditions as indicated on the attachment have been read, understood and agreed to. Name Address City Zip Phone Representing (Company or Corporation) . Relationship to Property Owner(s) ; The City of Carlsbad Planning Department would appreciate the opportunity to worL with the applicant throughout the Planning Stages of the proposed development. In an effort to aid the applicant, the Planning Department requests that it be given an opportunity to evaluate and discuss the application and plans prior to submittal. This request is not a requirement; however, it may avoid major redrafting or revision of the plan which only serves to lengthen the processing time. ATTACHMENTS: Supplemental Inform'ation Form - Planning 20 ^ Time Extension Agreement - Planning 37 Standard Conditions - Planning 28 Preparation Check List - Planning 33 Procedures - Planning 36 : m J ;i \\ i n q f5 I'l .> o o f P 1 ru; n i n fi C oinz i r; s 1 o n A11 \) roval SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM SPECIFIC PLAN/TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL USE PERMIT 1. Gross Acres (or square footage if less than acre)2.25 Ac. 2. Number of Lots TA : 3. Type of Development _E,eaMeniial._ . '. TResidential, Commercial, Industrial ) 4. Present Zone R-I-7500 Proposed Zone same (if change requested) 5. General Plan Land Use Designation RU^ 6. Source of Water Supply City of Carlsbad 7. Method of Sewage Disposal Disposal will be by means of an undergrmin/^ public sewer line connecting to a sewer main in Chestnut. 8. Types of Protective Covenants to be Recorded Covenants that regulate landscape maintenance,, residence upkeep, on-site activities, and the formation of a Homeowner's Assoc. . 9. Transportation Modes Available to Service the Devel0pment North County Bus Lines stop at the entersection of Highland & Chestnut. 10. If residential development please complete the following: a) . School District Serving the property . Carlsbad Unified School ni-gtrlRt b) Are school facilities capable of serving this project: (Written confirmation of this requirement must be received by the Planning Department at least one week prior to Planning Commission hearing. If not received by this time the request will be denied.) 11. Methods proposed to reduce sound levelSR-n 3 i/gn think in«.niB+.inn in all exterior vails. R-19 6" thick Insulation in all ceiling..:; anri r>nniTn«r. vails w:lth a STC' rating of 59 [ • 12. Methods proposed to conserve energy MQ gas iine« wrii. ...ftr^vp t.h>. fireplaces, low maintenance landscaping & insulation in all the w«li-ci , • the residences. Additional sheets may be attached if necessary to answer any of the above questions. 4-8-75 FORM fnanning 20 _ Hate of Planninc) Commission Approval STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF CARLSBAD The Subdivision Map Act sets a fifty (50) day time restrirtinn nn Planning Commission processing of Tentat ve Maos ThiT^Jml ?• \ can on y be extended,by the mStual concurrance' f tS ica ^ d I'l otler appHca'? nn^ appl i ca ti o.ns for tentative map^concu e y cess the f?ftl H.:, A ^^^^^empt to speed up the overall pro- 7 ^ ^^-y limit is often exceeded If vnu IjAh ?gnen; ^ll^l^lr^l^n^^' concurrently, this-agrLm^°St'mu t the statement thP^f Ju -i?'^ ^'J '^ent. If you choose not to sign tentative man u^tii n n'-^ ''"P* application for the ^ cessed and approved ' ''''''''y entitlements have been pro- In either circumstance, the City will process your request within the earliest time period, however, in no circumstance shall this delay be greater than 150 days from the day of submittal of appli- cation. The undersigned understands that the processing time required by the City may_exceed fifty (50) days, therefore the undersigned agrees to extend the fifty (50) day processing limitation and fully concurs with any extensions of time up to one hundred and fifty (150) days that may be required to properly review all of my appli- cations in order that the environmental impact report and any other prerequisites to this application may be processed concurrently. Date yA:PP AT 'SJ^^^^ yAoye^ f.y C7ajfve.^. le (Print; ^ Relationship to Application (Property Owner-Agent) PyoP'eAr .y (yu. FORM Planning 37 Date of Planning Commission Approval STANDARD CONDITIONS ^ * CITY 0 CARLSBAD . t/ ^^NTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP^ Subdivision and development shall meet all requirements of the subdivision, zoning, building codes, and General Plan and other laws, ordinances or regulations of the City of Carlsbad, and other governmental agencies. Some of the more jjertinent requirements and procedures of the City are listed below for your information and concurrence. Please read this list carefully and feel free to ask for further information or explanation. 1. Final Map shall be completed within 18 months from the date of final City Council action on the Tentative Subdivision Map. Two extensions of one year each may be approved by City Council upon staff review of the original decision. 2. The Final Map shall substantially conform to the Tentative Subdivision Map. If otherwise, the Final Map will be rejected and new Tentative Subdivision Map hearings will be required for the revised plan. 3. All public improvements shall be made in conformity with the Subdivision Ordinance and other City Standards, to the satis- faction of the City Engineer, without cost to the City of Carlsbad and free of all liens and encumbrances. 4. Prior to any construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the appropriate entity providing domestic water to the proposed development, for its approval of the location, type and adequacy of water lines. 5. Prior to any construction, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Fire Department of the location and size of fire hydrants. 6. The applicant shall install all required fire hydrants and dry-stand pipes prior to framing construction, and said fire appurtenances shall be functional prior to commencing such work. 7. Street trees, as required by the City, shall be installed by the applicant at his expense. Trees shall be of a type approved by the Parks Department and shall be installed to their specifications. If removal of any existing trees is required by the City, said removal shall be at the applicant's expense. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to make all arrangements with the Parks Department concerning the requirements of this condition. 8. A detailed grading plan which includes proposed drainage and erosion control landscaping and for other measures such as desilting basins shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Map. 9. Immediately after grading, erosion control landscaping and/or other measures such as desilting basins shall be installed. This control may be the final landscaping, if so approved. 10. A detailed landscape and sprinkler plan shall be sub- mitted for Planning Director's approval for all graded slopes 5' or greater in height and any other areas re- quired by the City. n. Prior to final building inspection clearance, all land- scaping shall be installed or adequate bonding accepted. Said landscaping shall be maintained in a manner accept- able to the Planning Director. •12. No signs or advertising of any type whatsoever shall be erected or installed until plans thereof have been approved by the City of Carlsbad. As part of the approval process, the City may modify these conditions or add others, especially those of a more specific nature. The sub- divider will be notified of these modifications or additions by Rf- sIJ 1 ul i 0n . CITY OF CARLSBAD DECEIVED 17.R 0 2 ]377 Cn-y OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE • CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 729-1181 r /) c—^ - RECEIVED FBDM/' * A . ,K f2_.''' '-'^ Z" DATE ADDRESS A/C. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT F lA .7c^ •.7o .— QZZ/ ' '7.'' — 0003S TOTAL 3^5