Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-12-10; Planning Commission; ; CT 80-31|CP-113 - EVENT PROPERTIESSTAFF REPORT DATE: December 10, 1980 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CT 80-31/CP-113 - EVENT PROPERTIES - Request for a Tentative Subdivision Map and Condominium Permit to develop 9 units on the northwest corner of Uni- cornio Street and Cacatua Street in the RD-M zone. Continued from the Planning Coinmission meeting of November 12, 1980. As the Planning Commission will recall, this item was con- tinued from your meeting of November 12, 1980 to allow staff to prepare an approval resolution for the project. Attached for your review is the resolution containing the findings and conditions for approval of the project. If the Planning Coinmission agrees with the attached findings and conditions then your action is to adopt Resolution No. 1721. The Coinmission also requested maps showing existing zoning and land use in the area which are attached. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolu- tion No. 1721, APPROVING CT 80-31/CP-113 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 1721 Zoning and Land Use Maps Location Map Background Data Sheet Reduced Elevations and Site Plan BH: jt SFfZ- |cSp&. <SPP. 0(4 Its VAcAgt vAc^af VA«sA>vr s/Ao^Kit VAox^A-r V^t^t^-t- j^j^ 6FE. CT(5C?-3l/<: P 113 CVCMT PR0mTIE5 LAWD U5E: RO-Nl-Q r" } \ \ \ \ p-C \ \ st CT<50-3\/CP 113 am f=ROPCRTID ZOKJIMG arcbiteci STEM S. FASCBML m and associates mmimu - mmim' miwmm 7193 dairesiont mi M-m California 321U 7H'279-2t38i BACEOSPOUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CT 80-51/CP^i:^3 APPLICANT: PROPERTIES KECXIEST AND LOCATICa^I: "REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT TO DEVEtOP 9 UNITS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER QF UNICORNIO STREET AND CACATUA STREET. LEX3AL DESCRIPTICN: 1-OT ^85 OF LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO. 3, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7076, FILED'IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, OCT. 6/71. Assessors Parcel Number: 215 _ 350 _ 61 • ^8 sSn Ty-i+-0 1 Acres '^^ No. of Lots GENERAL PLAN AND ZKMNG General Plan Land Use Designation RMH Density Allowed 10-20 Density Pressed 19.25 Existing Zone Proposed Zone RDM Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use North RDM S R-l VACANT S SFR South RDM VACANT AND MULTIPLE FAMILY East RDM MULTIPLE FAMILY (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) West RDM VACANT S SFR PUBLIC FACILITIES School District SAN MARCOS UNIFIED Water District ^OSTA REAL : PERMIT NOS: Sewer District LEUCADIA COUNTY EDU's^'^^ 11563-68 S 10^93-95 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated MAY 16, 1980 (Other: ) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ^ Negative Declaration, issued AUG. 8, 1980 ^ ^7^+0 E.I.R. Certified, dated Other, rtoJECT • SUMMAKY 1 vnt • ROM OBVEKMae (ACTVM) - 11,13} # iwiT Tire A um » 4 • sios c nu • 1 sa4« p • I i"n6 icnALHOtUNns 1 let^n^ B ON emEET 6isr -sag Bsa - s a/a • cara .a is CmCKCD ' ~ iMtCT P0MB BBtlOMS UEST ELSiATIgN CU>4115C*P)— EAST ELBAri<?M UJHB/>,-B.<>.) U£ST EJ-E.WIOSJ (UMIT Ac-;^) va-.to- ~fi3UTH 'EL.E\AngVI eoui t«i'-r.o- ooMTcim J0«NOaQ>l2-48S STAFF REPORT DATE: November 12, 1980 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CT 80-31/CP-113 - EVENT PROPERTIES - Request for a Tentative Subdivision Map and Condominium Permit to develop 9 units on the northwest corner of Unicornio Street and Cacatua Street in the RD-M zone. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and Condominium Permit to develop 9 units on a .47 acre parcel, located, as described above. The subject property is a previously graded corner lot, fronting on both Unicornio Street and Cacatua Street. The proposed one-level, stacked units would range in size from 1923 to 2227 square feet. Resident parking would be provided in a common underground garage, gaining access from Unicornio Street. II. ANALYSIS 1. Does the project meet all development standards of the Condominium Ordinance? 2. Does the project justify the proposed density of 19.25 du/acre by the guidelines set in the Land Use Element of the General Plan? 3. Does the project meet all aspects of the design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance? Discussion The project satisfies the basic development standards of the Condominium Ordinance. Resident parking, storage areas, a trash enclosure and separate utility meters would be provided in the underground garage. Sufficient space exists, on-street, to exceed visitor parking requirements. Laundry facilities would be included in each unit. Also, the open recreation area requirement is met by a combination of private balconies and a common pool area. Staff's primary concern is the projects proposed density of 19.25 du/acre which appears inconsistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The land use designation for this property is RMH, Residential Medium High Density. The category would permit 10 du/acre and a potential maximum of 20 du/acre if certain criteria are met. The Land Use Element specifies: The criteria shall be reviewed on a project-by-project basis and shall include such things as slope of land, soil stability, compatibility with surrounding land uses, flood plain protection, adequacy of public facilities, on-site amenities and preservation of unique and desirable natural resources. In other words, the density allocation for any project starts at the low end and, if a higher density is desired, the proposed development must prove itself worthy of the higher designation. The project site is a flat parcel, with no unique features, separated by one lot, to both the north and west, from R-l zones. Although the applicant proposes to provide on-site amenities, in the form of recreation area, beyond those required by development standards of the Condominium Ordinance, staff feels that this alone does not justify the significant increase in density. Since the proposed development is in close proximity to property zoned R-l, staff feels a lower density would be more desirable and compatible with existing and future surrounding land uses. With respect to design criteria, the issue of land use compatibility is also a significant concern of staffs. As outlined in the Condominium Ordinance, proposed developments "shall be compatible with existing and planned land uses and shall not constitute a disruptive element to the neighborhood or community." Staff feels, therefore, that the project, at the density proposed, is inconsistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and does not meet the design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance. III. RECOr/IMENDATION It is recoinmended that the Planning Coinmission adopt Resolution No. 1721, DENYING CT 80-31/CP-113, based on the findings contained therein. ATTACHMENTS PC Resolution No. 1721 Background Data Sheet Location Map Disclosure Form Reduced site plans and elevations Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F and X dated Nov. 3, 1980 Exhibit H dated July 3, 1980 CDN:ar 11/4/80 -2- If after the information you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined that further information is required, you will be so advised. APPLICANT: AGENT: ^ffiMBERS; vont Properties, Name (individual. Inc California Corporation partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 922.9 Sunset Blyd, #41.'^; Ins AngelPS, Ca 90069 Business Address (?13) R74-5986 Telephone Number Joe Ayvasi Name Corn, Platz & Co, 515 N. Brand Blyd. Glendale, Ca, 92130 Business Address (213) 242^2152 Telephone Number Ajax N. V, Netherland Antilles Corporation Home Address Name (individual, partner, joint venture, corgoration, syndicatiori) ,, ,, c/o Curacao International Trusf Company N.V, 8 Handelskade P.O. Box 812 Curacao, Netfierland Antilles Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number Name Home Address Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the. information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. BY H.H. Hovsepian Agent, Owner, Partner If after the information you havo submitted has bcon reviewed, it is determined tliat further infonnation is quired, you v;il], be so advised APPLICANT: -£v^t-P^gGfier-t4-es, Inc Califoraia Cor-po)^atlQn Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) -9229-Suase4^EJ-vxL-iL4n; Ljai_i\ng£l£i^,^a_9i)Q&a- Business Address AGENT: .''lEMBERS : Telephone Number Joe Ayvasi Name Dorn, Platz & Co, 515 N. Brand Blyd, Glendale. Ca, 92130 Business Address (213) 242-2152 Telephone Mumber Ajax N. V. Netherland Antilles Corporation Name (individual, partner, joint jJome Address venture, corporation, syndj-cation) ,, ,, c/o Curacao international Trust Company N.y. 8 Handelskade P.O. Bex 812 Curacao, Netherland Antilles Business Address Telephone Number Telephone Number Name Home Address Business Address Telephone Nimiber Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. JiiMj^-bpysejiian Aoc;nt . O.jrinr. Partner