HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 81-26; La Breteche Ltd.; Tentative Map (CT)STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 26, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: CT 81-26/CP-170 - LA BRETECHE Request for 24 unit ten-
tative tract map and condominium project on property
located on the north side of Navarra Drive between
Viejo Castilla Way and the cul-de-sac in the RD-M
zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct a 24 unit condominium
project involving four buildings with subterranean parking lo-
cated underneath the two front buildings on a 1.3 acre parcel as
described above. Construction of this project will require ap-
proximately 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork, primarily excavation
work. The project will result in a net density of 18.5 dwelling
units per acre, below the allowable range for 20 to 30 du/ac for
this area. The property to the north is the La Costa golf course
and that to the west, east and south are similar condominium pro-
jects. With the exception of the golf course, all surrounding
properties are zoned for multiple family residential develop-
ment .
II. PLANNING ISSUES
1) Does the project conform with the development standards
of the condominium ordinance?
2) Does the project conform with the design criteria of the
condominium ordinance?
III. DISCUSSION
Development Standards
The subject property slopes mildly from the street, northward
down toward the golf course, providing a pleasurable view for all
the units. Additionally, as proposed, a large landscaped recrea-
tion area dominates the center of the project. As shown by Ex-
hibit "E", the project has been designed around these two fea-
tures.
Subterranean resident parking for all of the units is provided
beneath the buildings fronting on the street. As shown by Exhi-
bit "D", the underground parking garage will provide all required
parking for tenants including one additional guest space. Access
will be taken from a 16' wide one-way driveway at the east end of
the project. The drive at the opposite (west) end of the project
is proposed to be an "exit only" to avoid traffic conflicts in
the garage. Staff feels this one-way access should not cause
problems as all parking spaces except one within the garage area
are designated for tenant use. Of the nine required visitor
parking spaces, eight are to be located on-street, in front of
the project. Based upon several field checks of the site at dif-
ferent times of the day, staff does not anticipate the 10 on-
street visitor spaces (8 required) to be a problem. To discour-
age tenant parking in this area, no walkways from the street dir-
ectly to any units will be allowed. Additionally, the close
proximity of the cul-de-sac to the west and the fact that this is
one of the few remaining vacant parcels on this side of Navarra
indicate that the cumulative effect of such on-street spaces
should not be a problem when all parcels are developed.
As proposed, each unit will possess a minimum of 480 cubic feet
of storage space, mostly located within cubicles in the garage.
Approximately 230 square feet of common recreation area, includ-
ing a large sun deck, gymnasium, sauna and pool is provided with-
in the project. Private balconies are also to be located on the
golf course side of all units. A decorative six foot high mason-
ry wall will confine each trash enclosure, located between the
buildings and the front yard setbacks just inside the drives.
The entire front yard setback will be heavily landscaped, as
shown on Exhibit "E". Several retaining walls will be located
throughout the project, up to a maximum of 7 feet high at the
point where the exiting driveway meets the building. Additional-
ly, each building will conform to the 35 foot height limit for
the area.
Overall, this project meets all the development standards of the
condominium ordinance.
Design Criteria
The proposed project also satisfies all design criteria aspects
as defined in the condominium ordinance. The project appears
basically well designed and will be compatible with similar ex-
isting projects in the area. The recreation area is well inte-
grated into the project, easily accessible, linked to all build-
ings through a logical series of walkways and is the single most
dominant feature of the development. Landscaping or active re-
creation area covers half of the site and the view of the golf
course afforded each unit is a considerable amenity. The project
takes into account and adapts to the topographic constraints of a
sloping lot and minimizes any asphalt areas through the use of
subterranean parking.
-2-
The Land Use Element of the General Plan specifies high residen-
tial density for this property (20-30 du/ac). The proposed den-
sity of 18.5 du/ac is below this designation but is compatible
with previously approved projects in the area.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not
have a significant impact upon the environment and, therefore,
has issued a Negative Declaration on August 5, 1981.
V. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Nega-
tive Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Plan-
ning Commission Resolution No. 1856, recommending APPROVAL of CT
81-26/CP-170, to the City Council based on the findings and sub-
ject to the conditions contained therein.
ATTACHMENTS
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1856
Location Map
Background Data Sheet
Disclosure Form
Environmental Documents
Exhibits "A" through "I", dated June 23, 1981
PJK:wl
8/12/81
-3-
LOC^TiO MAP
CASE MIO.CT81-26/CP-170
APPI 8rAMT La Breteche
Viejo
Costilla Way
VICINITY MAP
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET w
^0: CT 81-26/CP170
APPLICANT: Breteche
REQUEST AND I/XATION: Tentative tract man and condo pfirim-f- i-n (^r•ng^-•r^^r^^- ?4 unit
N .rth side of Navarra Driye approx. 250 ft. west of Vieio Castilla Wav
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All of lots 53, 54, and 55 of La Costa Unit No. 1 '
according to map 6117 filed in the countv o:^ Pan Dieao
Assessors Peircel Number: 216 - 170 - 32, 33, -34
Acres l'34f> j^^g 3
GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING
General Plan Land Use Designation R-H
Density Allowed 20 - 30 Density Proposed 18.5
Existing Zone Proposed Zone N/a
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning Land Use
North P-C Golf couT-HP
^•^^ -^-D-'"^ ^ Multi-familv
East RDM Multi-familv
^^st Rd-n Vacant - multi-family
PUBLIC FACILI11ES
School District Dieguito and Encinitas Union
Water District Leucadia
Sewer District Leucadia County Water District .EDQ..
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated 5-5-81
(Other:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued 8-5-81 Log No. CT 81-26
E.I.R. Certified, dated
Otiier, .
.£ after the infonnation you have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined
that further informati " '* s required, you will be so a sd.
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
La Breteche Ltd., A Partnership
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
1888 Century Park East, Siiite 809 Century City, CA 90067
Business Address
213-533-6512
Telephone Number
Herb Lewis
Nam?
6502 Morro Heights Itoad Oceanside, CA 92054
Business Address
714-724-0302
Telephone Number
MEMBERS: attarhprl list CVnershio Interest
Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address
venture, corporation, syndication)
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
1/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
La Breteche Ltd.
Applicant
-Agent, -Owner, Partner
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAO, CALIFORNIA 92008
438-5591
Citp of Carii^tiab^
NEGATIVE DECLARATICN
PRQJHJT ADDRESS/LOCATICN:
Viejo Castilla Way.
North side of Navarra Drive, east of
PROJECT DESCRIPnCN: Tentative tract map and major ocaidcminium
pentd-t to ccaistruct 24 condcminium units on a 1.33 acre parcel of
prc^rty involving three adjacent lots. The proposed project will
require ^proximately 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an envircnmantal review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Impletientation
of the Califomia Envircranental Quality Act and the Envirconental
Protecticxi Ordinanoe of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaraticsi (dedaratioi that the project will not
have a significant inrpact on the envircanouent) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this acticn is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaratioi with supportive documents is on
file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
CA. 92008. Catments frcm the public are invited.. Please sutmit
ocraments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of
date of issuance.
DATED: August 5, 1981
CASE NO: CT 81-26/CP-170
APPLICANT: LA BRETECHE, LTD.
PUBLISH DATE: August 8, 1981
JAMES C. HAGAMRN
Planning Director
ND-4
5/81
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Citp of Carlifftali
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
The Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a
Negative Declaration for the following project:
Project Description: Tentative tract map and major condonimium permit
to construct 24 condominium units on a 1.33 acre parcel of property
Involving three adjacent lots. The proposed project will require
approximately 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork.
Project address/Location: North side of Navarra Drive, east of Viejo
Castilla Way.
Anticipated significant Impacts: NONE
We need to know your Ideas about the effect this project might have
on the environment and your suggestions for ways the project could be
revised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage.
Your ideas will help us decide what Issues to analyze in the environ-
mental review of this project.
Your comments on the environmental Impact of the proposed project may
be submitted In writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than August 4, 1981.
DATED: July 14, 1981
CASE NO: CT 81-26/CP-170
' ' JAMES C. HAGAMAhK
APPLICANT: LA BRETECHE, LTD. // Planning Director
PUBLISH DATE: July 18, 1981
C
438•5591
i-t^i}>o;^4i-:^i7\L m\\\c.T Assiissyiixr roiy>i - Pnrt ii
(To ]te Completed By Tlie '
DATE
I. IVvCKGl^OIIND -. ' : •
1. APPLIDWr: CA 'S^Tg^H^ LTD-.
CASE NO. ct^Bi-z^^cp-no
.2. /dM-SS A\T) PHONE NUMBER OE APPLICANT:
3.- DATE QiECICLIST SIBMIITED
lUXPLA\ATiC:;S Or A1.L AF¥lV^mi\m .ANS'.THRS MUI TO BE imiTTEN UNDER
Section III - DISCUSSION OF E\7IR0NME\TAL EVALUATION)
Yes ' Maybe No
1. • Taith vriil tlie proposal have signi
ficant resiilts in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in • .
changes in geologic substructures? ' ' " " " ' ' A'
b. Disruptions, displacements, com- • . > .•
paction or overcovcring of the soil? _____ X
G. 'Qiangc; "in topogra]:)hy or ground - • '
surface relief features? ' ' ' " "'/' ' '' A
d, Tlie destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic \j
or pliysical features? ' ^ ' ''' '''' ' '''
e, AJiy increase in vsrind or water ^
erosion of soils, cither oji or off
tlie sito? . .. • • • • - • • • • • • y ' y
•
f, Clianges in deposition or cro- . •
sio)) of bcv'iclj sands, or changes • '
in siltation, reposition or erosion •
i\'})ic]) may rioJii")' tJic cJiannc] of a .
ri.vc;r or sl.)'ea;;i or ihe hod of the . ; '•
ocean or any bay, inlet or lalco? • ' ' ' '.ill— . ^
A""
Yes >iaybe No
2. Air: V.'ill the proposal have s-j-givrp^/,y'/-
rcsults in: • . "
a. Air emissions or deterioration . •
of ajiibicnt air quality?
b. Tlie creation of'objectionable
odors? .....
f. Alteration of the direction
or rate of flow of .ground waters?
c. Alteration of air mo\''cmcnt, . _
• mositure or temperature, or any .
• change in clijiiatc, either locally . .
. or regionally? ^ .. ' '/ X
3. Vfeter: Will the proposal have sigi-
Ticant results in: ' • . ' •.
a. Changes in currents, or the
'• course or direction of water move- . .
ments, in. eitiier marine or fresh ^ •'
, waters? • . ^ • • _ ' ' y
b. Clianges in absorption rates, . ' ; • ' '
drainage patterns, or tlie rate and ' ' '
. ' amouiit of surface water ruiioff? . • X
c. Alterations to the course or ' -
• flow of flood waters? ' • X
Change in the ajfiOunt of sur- • ' • "
face v:ater in any water body? \ • " _ ' ' '' ' "')(
Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface . . "
..water quality, including but not . •
limited to temperatiu'e, dissolved ' '
ox)'^p,cn or tur])idity? • . . ' ' . • ' 1_1_ ' r
Change in the quantity of •• • '
ground waters, either tiirough ' • •
direct additions or withdrawals, . ' '
or tlirougj) intcrceptio)! of an •
aquifer by cuts or exxavations? ' . ' '' ' ' .'' y
h. Reduction in the amount of •
Av'atcr otherwise availal;Ic for ' • •
public u-atcr su])j)Iies? • ^ •;' ' \ *1H__ ,
A. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
JB.cant results in: •
a. Change in the diversity of
. species, or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants}?
b. . Reduction of the numbers of
• any un.ique, rare or endangered . ..
.." species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species
• «of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to tlie non;;al replenish-
'ment of existing species?
d. . Reduction m acreage of any
agricultural crop?
\ , • *
5. • Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
jcicant results in: . - •
a. Changes in tlie diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of-aniiiials (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
• fish, bentliic organisms, insects or
jnicrofauna) ? • . /
Yes Maybe No
d. Deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat?
6, • 'No2^s£, Will the proposal signi-
Hcajitly increase cxistiiig noise
levels?
7, • •L3rJlt_[ind_ r.l ar£. Will the pro-
p6.';aJ sig.nj ficantl y produce new
light or glare?
8, ' Land Use. Will tlie proposal have
sigiirncant )-e;-.ults in the alteration
of Ihe ni-er.e/u. or planned land use of
b. Reduction of the numbers of • , • • •
any unique, rare or endangered _ . •
species of animals? , ' . . •• 1_1__ A
• • c. Introduction of new species
• of animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or .
movement of animals? ' ' '/ X
I- . • *
9. Natural Resources. Will the pro-
posal Iicive signiTicant results in:
• a. Increase in the rate of use
of. any natural resources?
b. Depletioii of any nonrencv.'able
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of haz-
..• ardous substances (including, but
^not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiatioii) in the
. event of an accident or upset
conditions?
f. Increase in traffic har.ards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
Yes Maybe No
"• 'PopuIatio7i. Will the proposal . . . ..
• • significantly alter the location, ...
. distribution, density, or growth ' . . '
rate of the human population of . ' • •
an area? . .• .' HI l_ll_ . A
12. Housing. Will the proposal signi- . •
HB-Cantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional ' ^
housing? ^ ' // . ' '"'" '' ^ A
13. • Transporta tion/Circula tion. Will • •
• the proposal Jiave signifipajit re- '
suits in: ' .
• • a. Generation of additional- • xd
vehicular movement? •' ** "A
b^ Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new " ' ' ••
parking? . • . . . ^ ' 'J/__ ' '.l..; „•. ' 'iJL
Iinjiact upon existing trans-
portation systems? . • ' *111„ ' "111_. * X
d^ Alterations to present " " - »
patterns of circulation or move- • ' .
went.of people ajid/or g,oods? "'Ul^ "111__ . A
0^ Alterations to v.-atei-bornc,
rail or air. t7\'iffic? ' . , '''.';"'• ''' X
Yes Maybe No
14. Public Services. Will the pro-
})osal have a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the need for new or altered
govcinmental sei"vices in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
• c. Schools? ' •.
' d. Parks or other recreational
• facilities?
• • *
e. Maintenance of public facili-
• tics, including roads?
f. Other goveininental services? '
15. Energy. Will the "proposal have
. • significant results in:
a* Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energ)'?
b^ Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
ment of new sources of energy?
16. " Utilities. Will the proposal have'
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
•a. Power or natural gas?
b^ Communications systems?
c. Water? • •
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainage?
i:. Solid waste and disposal?
17v • IKiman Hcaltj). Will the proposal
liaver iTigjirgleant rcuilts in the
creation of any healtii hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
1.
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
19. lieCTcatlon. Will the proposal have
si"gnificant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
20. Archeological/Ilistorical. Will the
• . proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
• •'. archeological or historical site,
. • structure, object or building?
Yes Haybe No
21. ANALYZE VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJI-CT SUCH AS:
• a) PHASED UEVILOmnXT OE 11 IE PROJECT'; b) ALTi^l^;AIE SITE
DESIGNS; c) ALlTRN^MIf SCALE OF DEVELOP.ME.NT: d) . .'XLTPRNATE
USES EOI^ THE SIIT:; e) DEVnLOP^vENT AT SOTi EU'IURE TL\E Pv/VITT.R
THAN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) • NO
PROJECT ALTE1<N.'VTIVE.
22. ^^ANDATORY FINDINGS OF STGNTFICANCE,
III.' DISCUSSION OF EWIROXiNlENTyU EVJ\LUTION
• yps Maybe No
a) DOES im Pl^vOJECT !I'\VE HE POIW- ' •
TIAL TO DEGI^vADE 'HH- QUALIT\' OF
•• THE EN\aRONME.\T, OR CUl^TAIL HE
DRTBRSriY IN HE EAYIRONMEINT? ' •_ <
. • , . *~ " •'
b) WES TIE PROJECT ILWE TIE POTEN- '
TIAL TO AC11IE\T: S110RT-7TRM, ID '
. Tim DIS.M)VA\TAGE OF LONG-T]:re>I,
BIWIRON^U^HAL GOALS? (A SHOin- •, : ' •
'nmi IMPACl' ON HE IHNVIROXMoNT
IS ONE WHICH OCCbT^S INA RE- ••• ' • • ' v
• DATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE ' ' ..'
PERIOD OF TI>E WHILE LONG-TERM
IMPACTS WILL ENDUPKE VELL INTO
THE RJHJ]^.) • . • • A
c) -DOES HE PROJECT HA\E IMPACTS . . .• . . •
WHICH. Mm INDIVIDUULY LIMITED, . ' •'
• BUT CU^^ULATIVELY CONSIDER/VBLE?
••(A PROJECT M\Y HJTACT ON TWO
•• -OR MORE SEPARATE W:SOURCES -•• . -
WHERE HE Bfl^ACT ON F.^ai 1^- ' * • • • . :
•• • SOURCE IS RELVriA^ELY S>.LALL, " . •
•BUT MERE H-E EFFECT OF HE . . •• • • -
TOTAI. Ol- HTOSE I^?PACTS ON HIE
•' ENVIRO.vMENT IS SIGNIFIOVNT.) ' ' " " ' • X
d) DOES HIE PROJECT IL\VE FAVI]^^ON- ' • ' •
MENTAL EFFECTS V.IIICH IVILL
• CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE * • ' ' •' . •
•• EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, ' ••
EIH115R DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? X
Wiuu pe(i\)\(^ ^Piu%\\/\AA^^^' Qoo cmc ^ptMi of
PISQISSION OF ENVTR0N7>ENTAL R^ALU.VrTON (Continued) •
rv. pEH:RMINATTON. (TO BE COr^ELEIED BY HE PLmNING DEPAJiT>IENT)
On. tlie basis of this initial evaluation:
)L 1 find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a ^JEGATIVE DECLM^/VTION will
be prepared,
, I find that although the proposed project could have a . '
sifjnificant effect on the environment, there v/ill not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
vriil be prepared.
I "find the proposed project have a significant effect
on the environment, and aji ENVIlTODiNTAL IMPACT IMPORT
is required. . . • . -
Date: lfn|[ 7
V. MITIC^TUNIG ME^\SURES (IE APPLICABLE)
MITIGATING MFASURES (Cpntinued)
VX •'APPLICANT CONCURrxENCE V.THI MITIG.ATING MEA5HPvES • • • ' •
THIS IS'TO CERTIFY' HL\T I M'WE RRaEAED HE ABO\Ti MITIQ/ITIONG ME/v-
SUraZS AND CONCbTv IVIHT HE ADDITION OF HffiSE JNEASURES T'O HiE PROJI'.CT
Date:
Signature of Applicant
^ F^irfflOO. 00
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMEOT FORM - Part I
(To be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO: CT^CLfo /CP IlO
EATE:
Applicant: LA BRETECHE LTD.
Address of Applicant: 1888 Century Park East Suite 809
Century City, CA 90067
Phone Number: (213) ^^•^-f.^^7
Najne^ address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant)
Herb Lewis. 6502 Morro Heights Rd. Oceanside, CA 92054
GENERAL INF0RMATIC3N:
Description o£ Project: (see attached project description)
Project Location/Address: The project is located on the North side of
Navarra Drive, approximately 250 feet West of its interection with
Vieja Castilla Way
Assessor Parcel Number: 216 - 170 - 32,33 & 34
Zone of Subject Property: R.D.-M . _
Proposed Use of Site: The applicant proposes to build a 24-unit condbminiijm
project
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
Cnndnmininm Permit ; ..
Tfantativp .qnhH i iH .c; i nn Map
ND 1
EIR 1
'-^ t- .
2. Describe the activity area, including distinguishing
natural and manmade charactsristics; also provide precise
slope analysis when appropriate.
The project is located along the South portion of the La Costa Golf
Course. It is approximately midway between the Clubhouse and the
entrance to San Marcos Canyon. The site was graded in the late 60's.
There are existing condominium projects an the West, South and approximately
200 feet to the East.
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into
the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more
specific discussion of' energy conservation requirements
see of the City's EIR Guidelines).
The buildings are oriented so that the windows and patios are on the South and North
side's to take advantage of passive solar heating. All units in the project will have
solar heated hot water and heat pumps.
4. If residential, include the nianber of units, schedule of
unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type cf
household size expected.
The project will contain 24 units, the smallest unit being 2,375 square feet, r">
the largest being 2,973 square feet. Units will range In price from $273,000 to.
$341,000 - mostly owned by older adults or as vacation'homes.
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,-
city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,
. c.id loading facilities.
This question does not apply.
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per
shift, and loading facilities.
•This question does not apply.
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, leading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived frcm the
project. _ .
This question does not apply.
-2-
1. ENVIRONM-SNTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the follov/ing questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach
additional sheets as necessary)..
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly change present
'land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec-
reational area, or area of important •
aesthetic value?
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established coramionity or neighborhood?
4) Could the activity result in the displacement
• of community residents?
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area unigu-3, that is, not"
found in other parts' of the County, State,
or Nation?.
8) Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
10) Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source nesting place, source'of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish
species?
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant
species in the activity area?^
5) Could tha activity increase the number of low
•and moderate cost housing units in the city? X
X
X
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? •
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the'city's lagoons, bays, or
tidelands? »
C f • 3 • €
- X
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? . x_
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands? X_
16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify
development of already developed areas? •
17), Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water, _______ ^
noise, etc)?
18) Will the activity require certification,
authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state or federal environmental control
agency? '
19.) Will the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city?
20) Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) . Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain? '
22) VJill the activity involve construction of
facilities on. a slope of 25 percent or greater? ^
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
24) Could the activity result in the generation
. of significant amounts of noise?. • " x -
25) Could the activity result in the generation
of significant amounts of dust? ' x •
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials? • '
27) Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any por-tion of the
region's air or water resources? (Should note,
surface, ground water, off-shore). . • • • -
28) Will the project substantially increasie fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)? '
29) Will there be .a - significant'change to existing -.^
land form?
X
(a) indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards 5000
(b) percentage of alteration to the present
land form 90% •_
(c) maximim height of cut or fill slopes
will not be changed
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains, or
streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
..5-
V"
II. STATEMENT OF N0N-SI(3^IFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF TOE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions
attach additional sheets as may be needed).
Signature "^^^-"o^ (j^-y^^^hT^^^fk
(Personcomplet leting report)
Date Signed
-6-
LA BRETECHE PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project proposes to construct 24 airspace condominium units
on approximately 1.33 acres of land. The site consists of three
existing multi-residential (R.D.-M) zoned lots. They are located
on the North side of Navarra Drive in that portion of the La Costa
Land Company development known as La Costa South Unit No. 1. These
lots and the related public improvements were graded and improved
in the late 1960's. There are several existing condominium projects
located adjacent to and in the immediate vicinity of the La Breteche
project. The developer proposes to construct a building adjacent to
and parallel with Navarra Drive that will contain underground parking
and 16 units. The units in this building will be the type commonly
referred to as "stacked" units; that is one ownership over the top
of another ownership. In addition to these units there will be
eight more units along the North boundary of the site adjacent to
the main playing area of the La Costa Golf Course. These units will
be the type commonly referred to as "Townhouses." They will be
multi-level units that conform to the manufactured slope along this
portion of the Golf Course. A portion of the larger building of this
complex will house recreation facilities to serve the owners of all
the units of this project. In addition to this recreation facility,
the project will contain a swimming pool and spa. The developer
wishes to construct luxury units with total security and continue to
maintain the relaxed suburban atmosphere of the City of Carlsbad.
II.
22.) The slope along the North boundary of the site will be
terraced and multi-level townhouses will be constructed
on the terraces.
24.&25.) Significant amounts of noise and dust will be generated
during the construction of the project. This disturbance
will be temporary and will be partially mitigated by the
City Ordinances regulating working hours and grading
procedures.
29.) The grading required to construct the townhouses and the
underground parking will change the existing ground quite
substantially. The changes, however, will make this site
look quite similar to the projects on the East and West.
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
County of San Diego
220 West Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
438 - 5591
Citp of Carl^eitiab
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad on September 15, 1981, approved
the following project:
Project Description: Tentative tract map and major condominium permit to
construct 24 condominium units on a 1.33 acre parcel of property involving
three adjacent lots. The proposed project will require approximately
5,000 cubic of earthwork.
Project Address/Location: North side of Navarra Drive, east of Viejo
Castilla Way.
The City made the following determinations regarding the environmental
inpact of the above described project:
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of this
project.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supporting document is available
for public review at the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA 92008.
DATE: September 22, 1981
CASE NO: CT 81-26/CP-170
APPLICANT: LA BRETECHE, LTD.
JAMES C. HAGAMAN
Planning Director
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
438 - 5591
Citp of Carlflibab
NEGATIVE DECLARATICN
PRQJBCT ADDRESS/LOCATICN: North side of Navarra Drive, east of
Viejo Castilla Way.
PROJECT DESCRIPTICN: Tentative tract and major oondominiura
permit to construct 24 condominium units on a 1.33 acre parcel of
property involving three adjacent lots. The prcposed project will
require approximately 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Envirconental
Protectioi Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaraticai (declaration that the project will not
have a significant inpact on the envirconent) is hereby issued for tte
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
CA. 92008. Comients from the public are invited. Please subnit
ocmnents in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of
date of issuance. ^
c
DATED: August 5, 1981
JAMES C. HAGAMAN
CASE NO: CT 81-26/CP-170K Planning Director
APPLICANT: LA BRETECHE, LTD.
PUBLISH DATE: August 8, 1981
Wh-A
5/81
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 •.
[Proof of Publicatiofr
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am prmci pal clerk of the printer of the CarlSbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
. of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA-
TION: North side of Navarra Drive,
east of Viejo Castilla Way
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tenta-
tive tract map and major condomi-
nium permit to construct 24 con-
dominium units on a 1.33 acre par-
cel of property involving three
adjacent lots. The proposed project
will require approximately 5,000
cubic yards of earthwork.
The City of Carlsbad has con-
ducted an environmental review of
the above described project pur-
suant to the Guidelines for Imple-
mentation ofthe California En-
vironmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordii-
nance of the City ofCarlsbad. As a
result of said review, a Negative
Declaration (declaration that the
project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is
hereby issued for the subject proj-
ect. Justirication for this action is
on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declara-
tion with supportive documents is
on file in the Planning Department,
City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue. Carls-
bad, CA. 92008. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit
comments in writing to the
Planning Department within ten
(10) days of date of issuance.
Dated: August 5, 1981
Case No: CT 81-26/CP-170
Applicant: LA BRETECHE, LTD.
JAMES C. HAGAMAN
Planning Director
CJ S523: August 8, 1981
AUf^USt_ 8 _ ; _ [\ , , 1^1,
19.
19
19
19....
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California on t. r'l (: 1' • i'.Yi
day of . AuEUst, W8^
Clerk of the Printer
1M/6«1
Ca rish a d jo urn a I
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, js.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation,
published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
City of Carisbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to-wit:
PUBLIC NOTICE
OF PREPARATION
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: The
Planning Department ofthe City of
Carlsbad intends to prepare a
Negative Declaration for the fol-
lowing project:
Project Description: Tentative
tract map and major condominium
permit to construct 24 condomi-
nium units on a 1.33 acre parcel of
property involving three adjacent
lots. The proposed project will re-
quire approximately 5,000 cubic
yards of earthworlc.
Project Address/Location: North
side of Navarra Drive, east of Viejo
Castilla Way.
Anticipated Significant Impacts:
None.
We need to know your ideas about
the effect this project might have on
the environment and your sugges-
tions for ways the project could be
revised to reduce or avoid any sig-
nificant environmental damage.
Your ideas will help us decide what
issues to analyze in the environ-
mental review of this project.
Your comments on the environ-
mental impact of the proposed
project may be submitted in writing
to the Planning Department, 1200
Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008,
no later than August 4, 1981.
Dated: July 14, 1981
Case No: CT 81-26,CP-170
Applicant: LA BRETECHE, LTD.'
JAMES C H.AGAMAN
Planning Director
CJ S487: July 18. 1981
.Jul.y. .18 19 8.1.
19
19. .
19
19.
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Carload, County of San Diego,
State of California on the 18th
day of July 1QR1 /
Clerk of the Printer
1M/6/81
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 •CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 i
[Proof of Publicationj
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the
I am over the age of
I am principal clerk
published twice weekly
newspaper is published
which newspaper at all
subscribers, and which
City of Carlsbad, Cou
NOTICE O
HEA';
United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; |
eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter,
of the printer of the Carlsbad JOUmal a newspaper of general circulation,
in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which
for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and
times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said
nty of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year
next preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
F PUBLIC
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the Planning Commission of the
City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the City Council Cham-
bers, 1200 Elm Avenue. Carlsbad,
California, at 7:00 p.m. on Wednes-
day, August 26, 1981. to consider
approval of a tentative tract map
and condominium permit to con-
struct 24 condominium units on a
1.33 acre parcel of property gener-
ally located on the north side of
Navarra Drive between Viejo Cas-
tilla Way and the cul-de-sac and
more particularly described as:
"All of lots 53, 54. and 55 of La
Costa South Unit No. 1 in the city of
Carlsbad, county of San Diego, state
of California, according to map
thereof No. 6117."
Those perso,ns wishing to speak
on this proposal are cordially in-
vited to attend the public hearing.
If you have any questions please
call the Planning Department at
438-5591.
Case File: CT 81-26/CP-170
Applicant: La Breteche, Ltd,
CITY OF CARLSBAD
• PLANNING COMMISSION
CJ S538: August IS, 1981
the following dates, to-wit:
August _ 15 .' ... 19.81
19
19. . .
19,
19,
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at.Carlstiad^County of San Diego,
State of California,fln "^S^ -f?,^?
day of August,
1M/6/81
Clerk of the Printer
WOOOSIDE/KUBOTA « ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULT! NoT
ENOINMKR:
2465 Pio Pico Drive • P.O. Box 1095 • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (714) 729-1194
RECEIVED
SEP 81981
CITr OF CARL; AD
September 4, 1981 Planning Departi. t
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: Carlsbad Tract 81-26/Condominium Plan 170
(A Resubdivision of Lots 53, 54, and 55 of
La Costa South Unit No. 1)
Costa Real Municipal Water District
Gentlemen:
This office has just been apprised at the fact that the subject
tentative subdivision map is now being processed by the City of
Carlsbad, and we regret very much that we were unable to submit
to you prior to the consideration of the Planning Commission a
report as to the public water service requirements of the devel-
opment.
As we now understand matters, the City Council will consider the
subdivision map as a result of the favorable action of the Planning
Commission, and we would appreciate very much having you convey to
the City Council the information and recommendations that we have
for the Costa Real Municipal Water District in providing public
water service to the new proposed subdivision.
Our most important concern for the project is the fact that public
water service will be made available to the entire development;
however, the property is currently burdened by an existing right-
of-way and high-pressure pipeline, which was constructed at the
time of the original subdivision of La Costa South Unit No. 1.
This being the case, in order for the proposed development to pro-
ceed, there will have to be a relocation of the existing pipeline
facilities and all of the requirements of the Water District will
have to be in conformity.
In Orange County, Santa Ana
• NOINBBRS
September 4, 1981
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
Page 2
We have had discussions with the consulting engineers of the
developer for some time now; however, we have not reached a
definitive conclusion. In any event, we recommend that your
department include as a part of the conditions of the approval
of the subdivision a requirement that the existing public water
system facilities will be relocated in accordance with the rules
and regulations and requirements of the Water District.
The Costa Real Municipal Water District has a vigorous and de-
tailed set of rules and regulations regarding public water service
developments. We recommend that the approval
also include a condition that the developer
for the construction of all of the required
facilities that are required for condominium
with the existing rules and regulations,
will be responsible for all of the
to condominium-type
of this subdivision
will be responsible
public water system
developments
Furthermore,
in accordance
the developer
financial obligations involving the expenses for the construction
of the water services and installation of all of the water meters
and fire protection facilities.
Please contact the undersigned immediately if you have any questions
regarding the project or the recommendations and comments that we
have made herein.
VerV
Jack Y. iK'ubota, District Engineer
Cos^a Real Municipal Water District
cc: Costa Real Municipal Water District
Manitou Engineering
JYK:mtw
CMWD 79-404
CT 81-26/CP-170 (LA BRETECHE)
Add Engineering Conditions:
1) The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations,
and design requirements of the respective sewer and water
agencies regarding services to the project.
2) The applicant shall relocate the water line and easement,
that currently crosses Lot 54, to the satisfaction of the
Costa Real Municipal Water District prior to the issuance of
any building permits.
f*^^ A*<»t^
WOODSIDE/KUBOTA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
UJ..-....;,: J
CONSULTIMC "™«J f
L JL J ENGINEERS
2465 Pio Pico Drive • P.O. Box 1095 • Carlsbad, Catifornia 92008 • (714) 729-1194
RECEIVED
SEP 81981
CITr' OF CARLi AD
September 4, 1981 Planning Departr. t
City of Carlsbad
Pianning Department
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: Carlsbad Tract 81-26/Condominium Plan 170
(A Resubdivision of Lots 53, 54, and 55 of
La Costa South Unit No. 1)
Costa Real Municipal Water District
Gentlemen:
This office has just been apprised at the fact that the subject
tentative subdivision map is now being processed by the City of
Carlsbad, and we regret very much that we were unable to submit
to you prior to the consideration of the Planning Commission a
report as to the public water service requirements of the devel-
opment.
As we now understand matters, the City Council will consider the
subdivision map as a result of the favorable action of the Planning
Commission, and we would appreciate very much having you convey to
the City Council the information and recommendations that we have
for the Costa Real Municipal Water District in providing public
water service to the new proposed subdivision.
Our most important concern for the project is the fact that public
water service will be made available to the entire development;
however, the property is currently burdened by an existing right-
of-way and high-pressure pipeline, which was constructed at the
time of the original subdivision of La Costa South Unit No. 1.
This being the case, in order for the proposed d'evelopment to pro-
ceed, there will have to be a relocation of the existing pipeline
facilities and all of the requirements of the Water District will
have to be in conformity.
In Orange County, Santa Ana
BHOIHEERS
September 4, 1981
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
Page 2
We have had discussions with the consulting engineers of the
developer for some time now; however, we have not reached a
definitive conclusion. In any event, we recommend that your
department include as a part of the conditions of the approval
of the subdivision a requirement that the existing public water
system facilities will be relocated in accordance with the rules
and regulations and requirements of the Water District.
the Costa Real Municipal Water District has a vigorous and de-
tailed set of rules and regulations regarding public water service
developments. We recommend that the approval
also include a condition that the developer
for the construction of all of the required
facilities that are required for condominium
with the existing rules and regulations,
will be responsible for all of the
to condominium-type
of this subdivision
will be responsible
public water system
developments
Furthermore,
in accordance
the developer
financial obligations involving the expenses for the construction
of the water services and installation of all of the water meters
and fire protection facilities.
Please contact the undersigned immediately if you have any questions
regarding the project or the recommendations and comments that we
have made herein.
truly yo,ur/s ,
Jack, Y. K^ubota, District Engineer
Costa Real Municipal Water District
cc: Costa Real Municipal Water District
Manitou Engineering
JYK:mtw
^ 3h J(0
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE
Ov^ner's Name INTECHCO of U.S.A. Claude Buchert, Pres. P^one No.
Mailinq Address ^^^^ Century Park East, Suite 809
""Century Citv, CA 90067
Service Address; Navarra Drive
Tract Description: lots 53 & 54, South #1
Assessor's Parcel No
Type of Building condos
Lateral Size: 4"
Extra Footage: (3 $
216-170-32 & 216- 170-33
(213) 553-6512
^EWER PERMIT ISSUED UPON
RECEIPT OF BUILDINS PERMIT.
BUiLDiNG PEP.MIT MU5T iP -
APPLIED FOR B¥ .^A^/^
No. Units 20 Connection Fee $12,000.00
6" 8" Saddle Easement Connection^P^^'^^ 4,000.00)
Extra Depth: & $
Amount Rec'd $q,ror).r>r
Ck. No/Cash dtfcj2£i2°3S?^'V
Date Q-tQ7l-A
Rec'd By V;L^
Lateral Fee
Prorated Sewer
Service Fee
Total
8,000.00
The application must be signed by the owner (or his authorized representative) of
the property to be served. The total charges must be paid to the District at the
time the application is submitted.
If a service lateral is required, it will be installed by the Leucadia County Water
District. The service lateral is that part of the sewer system that extends from
the main collection line in the street (or easement) to the point in the street (at
or near the applicant's property line) where the service lateral is connected to
the applicant's building sewer. The applicant is responsible for the construction,
at the applicant's expense, of the sewer pipeline (building sewer) from the appli-
cant's plumbing to the point in the street (or easement) where a connection is made
to the service lateral.
The connection of the applicant's building sewer to the service lateral shall be
made by the applicant at his expense. The connection must be made in confonnity
with the District's specifications, rules and regulations; and IT MUST BE INSPECTED
AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFORE THE SEWER SYSTEM MAY BE USED BY THE APPLICANT,
THE APPLICANT, OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MUST NOTIFY THE DISTRICT AT THE
TIME INSPECTION IS DESIRED. ANY CONNECTION MADE TO THE SERVICE LATERAL OR COLLEC-^
TION LINE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL AND INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT WILL BE CONSIDERED
INVALID AND WILL NOT BE ACKNOWLEDGED.
The prorated sewer service fee is based upon the date the District estimates that
service will begin and covers the balance of the fiscal year. There will be no
additional fee or refund if service actually conmences on a different date. For
succeeding fiscal years, the sewer service fee will be collected on the tax roll
in the same manner as property taxes.
The undersigned hereby agrees that the above information given is correct and agrees
to the conditions as stated.
Account No. Owner's Signature
.1 h ' - *.",n;.;ir ISSUED UPON
LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE
Owner's Name Hwei-Chih Hsiu Phohg -No }^Q4fty-4ga6,
CUILDING PERMIT.
•> I'lPsUn MUST BE
/S3
Mailing Address 17218 Cloudcroft Drive
Poway, CA 92064
Service Address:,X'^2>o Navarra-itreeL
Tract Description: int 55, South #1
Assessor's Parcel No. 216-170-34
Type of Building rnndn
Lateral Size: 4" __ 6" _
Extra Footage: @ $_
3,000.00
No.
8"
Units i2 Connection Fee $77?na"nn
Saddle _ Easement Connection (Pf^ pd 2,400.00)
Extra Depth: @ $ 600.00
Amount Rec'd $600.00
Ck. No/Cash 5477
Date 8-27-79
Rec'd By .i.q.
Lateral Fee
Prorated Sewer
Service Fee
Total $3,000.00
The application must be signed by the owner (or his authorized representative) of
the property to be served. The total charges must be paid to the District at the
time the application is submitted.
If a service lateral is required. It will be installed by the Leucadia County Water
District. The service lateral is that part of the sewer system that extends from
the main collection line in the street (or easement) to the point in the street (at
or near the applicant's property line) where the service lateral is connected to
the applicant's building sewer. The applicant is responsible for the construction,
at the applicant's expense, of the sewer pipeline (building sewer) from the appli-
cant's plumbing to the point in the street (or easement) where a connection Is made
to the service lateral.
The connection of the applicant's building sewer to the service lateral shall be
made by the applicant at his expense. The connection must be made in confonnity
with the District's specifications, rules and regulations; and IT MUST BE INSPECTED
AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFORE THE SEWER SYSTEM MAY BE USED BY THE APPLICANT.
THE APPLICANT, OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MUST NOTIFY THE DISTRICT AT THE
TIME INSPECTION IS DESIRED. ANY CONNECTION MADE TO THE SERVICE LATERAL OR COLLEC-
TION LINE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL AND INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT WILL BE CONSIDERED
INVALID AND WILL NOT BE ACKNOWLEDGED.
The prorated sewer service fee Is based upon the date the District estimates that
service will begin and covers the balance of the fiscal year. There will be no
additional fee or refund if service actually commences on a different date. For
succeeding fiscal years, the sewer service fee will be collected on the tax roll
in the same manner as property taxes.
The undersigned hereby agrees that the above information given is correct and agrees
to the conditions as stated.
Owner's Signat/re
'I i.'
Date
9841-9845
Account No.
AI^LICATICXN
REQUEST
• Zone Change
• General Plan Amendment
^ Tentative Tract Map
• Planned Unit
^ Major Oondoaninivim
Ll Minor Oondaminixam Permit
• Master Plan
act Map ^ ^
• Precise Development Plan
• Specific Plan
• site Development Plan
• Conditional Use Permit
• Variance
• Planning Ocnmission Detennination
• Special Use Pennit
Conplete Description of project (attach additional sheets if necessary)
See attached proiect description
Location of Project
The project is located on the North side of Navarra Drive approximately 250 feet west
of its intersection with Viejo Castilla Way
Legal Description (conplete)
lots 53, 54, 55, La Costa South Unit No. 1, Map No. 6117
J^sessors Parcel Number
216-170-32, 33,34
Zone
R.D.M.
General Plan
R.H. - High Density(20-30(Dtt/AC)
Existing Land Use
Vacant, graded building lots
Proposed Zone
Same
Proposed General Plan
Same
Site Acreage
1.349 Acs.
Owner Applicant
Name (Print or Type)
La Breteche Ltd.
Name (Print or Type)
Same
Mailing Address
1888 Century Park East Suite 809
Mailing Address
City and State Zip Telephone
Century City, CA 90067 (213)553-6512
City and State Zip Telephone
I CERTIFy TCAT I AM THE LEGAL CmSER AND
THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATIOSF IS TRUE
\pm CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTTVE
AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE
AND CORRECT 10 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
sIGtlATORE DAIE SIGNATURE DATE
tt tio. Receipt
[r-irh is^plicfetim received
1 ''-'41-/s^' ~-''H
taif ' Assigned Nvinber I Case b
If after the informationyou have submitted has been reviewed, it is determined
that further informaticf^s required, you will be so ad sd.
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
MEMBERS;
La Breteche Ltd., A Partnership
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
1888 Century Park East, Suite 809 Century City, CA 90067
Business Address
213-533-6512
Telephone Number
Herb Lewis
Name
6502 Morro Heights Road Oceanside, CA 92054
Business Address
714-724-0302
Telephone Number
Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address
venture, corporation, syndication)
Business Address
Telephone Niomber Telephone Number
Naone Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/V/e declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
La Breteche Ltd.
Applicant
Agen^, O.meg, Partner
LA BRETECHE PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project proposes to construct 24 airspace condominium units
on approximately 1.33 acres of land. The site consists of three
existing multi-residential (R.D.-M) zoned lots. They are located
on the North side of Navarra Drive in that portion of the La Costa
Land Company development known as La Costa South Unit No. 1. These
lots and the related piablic improvements were graded and improved
in the late 1960's. There are several existing condominium projects
located adjacent to and in the immediate vicinity of the La Breteche
project. The developer proposes to construct a building adjacent to
and parallel with Navarra Drive that will contain underground parking
and 16 units. The units in this building will be the type commonly
referred to as "stacked" units; that is one ownership over the top
of another ownership. In addition to these units there will be
eight more units along the North boundary of the site adjacent to
the main playing area of the La Costa Golf Coiirse. These units will
be the type commonly referred to as "Townhouses." They will be
multi-level units that confoinm to the manufactured slope along this
portion of the Golf Course. A portion of the larger building of this
complex will house recreation facilities to serve the owners of all
the units of this project. In addition to this recreation facility,,
the project will contain a swimming pool and spa. The developer
wishes to construct luxury units with total security and continue to
maintain the relaxed suburban atmosphere of the City of Carlsbad.
CASE KO.: _
APPtrCANT:
HT ai-?fi/CP-17n DATE REChlLVED: 6-22-81
-La. Breteche. Ltd.
REQUEST: Construction of 24 airspace condominium units
ENVIRONMENTaL
EXEMPT OR EXCEPTED:
Posted: S' 8'
Filed:
Prior Ccitpliance:
NEXSaUVE DECLARATICN:
Published:
Filed:
Ibsted: ^- S~ Bri
ENVIBCEIMENTMJ IMPACT REPORT:_
Nbtice of
Preparation:
PubUshsd:_g_Sj_gJ_ Itotioa of Determination: 7^^^'8: |
Notice of
Conpletion:
Nbtice of
Determination:
PLANNING COMMISSION
1. Date of Hearing:
2. Publication: -•'
3. Notice to Property Owners
4. Pesolution Nb._
(Continued tO:_
5. j^ipeal:
Date
CITY OOUNCIL
1. Date of Hearing: /j^-f/
2. Nbtices to City Clerk:
3. Agenda Bill: Cd^'^
4. Pesolution No.^^^,^ Af0M.'^4. ^^/lAl^l ^- Date; 75" g/ ACTION: Af^/o</eo(
Ordinance tb. Date:
CORRESPONDENCE
Staff Report to l^licant: ^- i t- g f
Resolution to j^aglicant: ^ ' ' ff
THOMAS BROS. MAP PAGE NO. 20