Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 81-27; Sweatte Howard; Tentative Map (CT)STAFF REPORT DATE: August 12, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CT 81-27/CP-171, SWEATTE - Request for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and Condominium Permit to develop 17 units on the west side of Tyler Street between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue in the RD-M zone. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting approval of a tentative subdivision map and condominium permit to develop 17 units on 1.01 acres, located, as described above. The subject property is a flat, previously graded rectangular lot fronting on Tyler Street and rearing on the railroad right-of-way. The applicant is proposing to develop 11 two-bedroom townhouse units, 5 two-bedroom flats and 1 three-bedroom flat. The units would range in size from 960-1260 sq.ft. The project would be enclosed by a six foot masonry wall and security gates. The density of the project would be 16.8 units per acre which is towards the high end of the general plan density range of 10-20 du's/acre. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1) Does the project meet all development standards of the Condominium Ordinance? 2) Does the project meet all aspects of the design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance? III. DISCUSSION The proposed development fulfills the basic development standards of the Condominium Ordinance . A combination of private garages and carports would be utilized to satisfy all resident and guest parking requirements on-site. As shown on Exhibit "A", each townhouse unit would have a single-car garage and an additional space in an adjacent carport or open parking area. Flats 1, 2 and 3 will each have a two-car garage. Flat 4 has been designed to be accessible to the handicapped, therefore, the first level has been designed as a living unit with a second flat above. Flats 4, 5, and 6 would each have a single space in the garage below flat 6 and an additional space in an open parking area. Each unit would have 480 cubic feet of storage space in their respective garage. All units would be provided with individual laundry facilities. Two trash enclosures have been designed at the end of Buildings 1 and 2. Separate utility meters would also be provided. Open recreation requirements would be satisfied by a common area designed to include a recreation building, spa, pool and gazebo. Additionally, each townhouse unit would have three decks and flat 6, two decks. The recreation area would be centrally located and linked to the units by sidewalks throughout the project and a brick walkway. A total of 280 square feet of recreational area per unit would be provided. The proposed development satisfies all aspects of the design criteria. The recreation areas, buildings and parking facilities appeal well-integrated. Pedestrian circulation has been well-designed and all pertinent amenities would be provided. It is anticipated that the development would be compatible with planned surrounding land uses. Also, the project's density appears compatible with surrounding and potential future development, and staff can support the proposed density of 16.8 units per acre. Staff is satisfied that all apsects of the development standards and design criteria of the Condominium Ordinance have been met, as shown on the attached exhibits. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on July 27, 1981. V. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resolution No. 1844, recommending APPROVAL of CT 81-27/CP-171, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ATTACHMENTS; T;^ PC Re so No. 1844 2. Background Data Sheet 3. Location Map 4. Disclosure Form 5. Environmental Documents 6. Exhibits "A" - "M" dated June 23, 1981 CDN:ar 7/28/81 -2- BACKGROUND DATA SHEET ^^0= OT 81-27./CP-171 APPLICANT: HOWARD SV7EATTE REQUEST AND LOCATION; Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to construct 17 units, 3363 Tyler LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . Lot 10 of Industrial Tract in Carlsbad, according to map 174 3 filed January 3, 19 23 Assessors Parcel Number: - Acres 101 No. of Lots 17 070 14 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING General Plan Land Use Designation RMH Density Allowed 10-20 Existing Zone .RDM Density Proposed 16 . 8 Proposed Zone N/A Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning North RDM South RDM East R-P West TRACKS Land Use SFRS SFRS SFRS/.MULTI RR RO^'7 PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Water District Sewer District CARLSBAD CARLSBAD CARLSBAD EDU's Pi±>lic Facilities Fee Agreement, dated JUNE 18, 19 81 (Other: EIWIRONMENTAL IMPACT' ASSESSMHxiT ^ Negative Declaration, issued JULY 27, 1981 Log No. E.I.R. Certified, dated ' Other, i > I— AO O CHESTNUT AVE _WALNUT . AVE m TO —1 CASE NO.CIBULZfcEJZL A P P LIC A r^T_SV\fEAIIt VICINITY MAP If after the informatioi^ *^u have submitted has been rei^ '"^ed, it is determined that further informaticSnfc^ required, you will be so adi>w^d. APPLICANT: HOWARD L. SWEAHE Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication) P.O. BOX 11321, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92111 Business Address (714) 279-9247 Telephone Number AGENT: Name Business Address ^EMBERS: Telephone Number CLIFFORD C. SWEATTE 450 SERPENTINE DRIVE, DEL MAR, CA. . Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address venture, corporation, syndication) P.O. BOX 481, CARDIFF, CA. 92007 Business Address (714) 755-8115 Telephone Number Telephone Number JIM WARING (LIMITED PARTNER) Name Home Address 110 JUNIPER STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA. Business Address (714) 235-4040 Telephone Number Telephone Number (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/V/e declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. BY rTrartner^PPLICANT 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438-5591 €itp of Carlig^ab NEGATIVE DBa.ARATICN PROJECT AEORESS/LOCATICN: West side of Tyler Street between Chastnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative subdivision mc^ and condoninium permit to develop 17 uaits cn 1.01 acres. Tha City of Carlsbad has conducted an environn-^ntal review of tie above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califorru-a Environmental Quality Act and tlie Envircnmental Protection Ordinanoe of tta City of Carlsbad. As a result of said reviev/, a Negative Declaration (declaration tliat the project wil-l not have a significant inpact on the environment) is liereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in tha Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Depearbnent, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Carrsnents frcm the public are invited. Please subtdt comients in writing to tte Planning Department v;ithin ten (10) days of date of issuance. r^ DATED: July 27, 1981 ' ' x ^ CASE KO: CT 81-27/CP~17l// Plannirq Director %^A^ APPLICANT: SWEATE PUBLISH DATE: July 27, 1981 ND-4 5/81 JAMES C. HAGAMAN 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 Citp of Carljgbab PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: The Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a Negative Declaration for the following project: Project Description: Tentative subdivision map and condominium permit to develop 17 units on 1.01 acres Project address/Location: 3363 Tyler Street - West side of Tyler Street between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue Anticipated significant impacts: None We need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have on the environment and your suggestions for ways the project could be revised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage. Your ideas will help us decide what issues to analyze in the environ- mental review of this project. Your comments on the environmental impact of the proposed project may be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than 21 days fr^p»--^ssuance. DATED: July 6, 1981 W^^^^^^^^^C^ CASE NO: CT 81-27/CP-171 SII JAMES C. HAISAMAN APPLICANT: Sweatte ^ Planning Director, PUBLISH DATE: July 11, 1981 438 - 5591 ENVIRONMEIirAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part II (To Be Completed By The PLANNING DEPARTMENl^) CASE NO.^g,\ .-^-7/^-01 BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: VAQWA5=^U:> i^\A/gAJT^ 2, ADDRESS AND PHOiv'E NUMBER OF APPLICANT: C~I\Ay'?^l^-^'2A'^ 3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED: /a/ZA/^\ II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (EXPLANATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ANSIVERS ARE TO BE WRITTEN UNDER Section III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or ero- sion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ND 2 if 2. Air: Will the proposal have signi- results in: . a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, mositure or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi- ficant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount.of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? gv Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yes jNfaybe No -2- Yes Maybe No Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- . ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ____ ' 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (Thirds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ' ; c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?, d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? . 6. Noise, Will the proposal signi- ficantly increase existing noise levels? • 7. Light and Glare. Will the pro- posal significantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? f' 9. Natural Resources. IVi 11 the pro- posal have significant results in: a. increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal significantly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal signi- ficantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal have significant re- sults in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing trans- portation systems? d. Alterations to present pattems of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -4- Yes Maybe No •f" 14. Public Services. Will the pro- posal have a significant effect .upon, or have significant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d; Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal have significant results in; a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b.. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. . Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Ikiman Health. Will the proposal Bave signigicant results in the creation of any health liazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Yes Maybe No •5- Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. ANALYZE VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) PHASED DEA/ELOPMiNT OF \m PROJECT; b) ALlEPx>>!ATE SITE DESIGNS; c) ALTEPaNATE SCAI.E OF DEVELOPMENT; d) ALTERNATE USES FOR THE SITE; e) DEWLOPMENT AT SOME FUTURE TIME RAIM TH^N NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. Yes Maybe No 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. • a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE Ttffi POTEN- TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL Trffi DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONNENT? b) DOES lllE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE- LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE PERIOD OF TIME IVFHLE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO THE FUTURE.) c) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED, BUT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE? (A PRO.TECT MAY IMPACT ON TK'O OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES WHERE THE IMPACT ON EACH RE- SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL, BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE TOTAL OF THOSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) d) DOES THE PROJECT RAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS IVHICH WILL CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? III.' DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION v:^><:^v4rr} -^Kxr ve? ^:^r^-u^&o ^y-THf^f=f= \A>fe:^3c:?^ tM^A^ I^^^^S^^CV -7- A^rPL4<^v^ AcV^cMf^5x\^;5^ v^PPt=^CXVV^^ IV. DETERMINATION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative declaration will will be prepared. I find the proposed proje^ct MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. "ate: Ve/f=S\ C ^^^^^^^^.^^^^^ Sighati V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) -9- MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIBVED THE ABOVE MITIGATIONG MEA- SURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date: Signature of Applicant -10- ^$100.00 'RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMI^ACT .ASSESSNENT F0RI»1 - Part I (To be"completed by APPLICANT) CASE m: ^xf^\-'^-7/ciF'''n I DATE: Appiicant: HOWARD L. SWEAHE • Address of Applicant: P.O. BOX 11321, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92111 Phone Number: (714) 279-9247 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): GENERAL INF0RI4ATI0N:- ' .. ' Description of Project: 17 UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT WHICH ALSO INCLUDES A RECREATION BUILDING WITH A SWIMMING POOL. SPA AND GA7EBQ • Project Location/Address: 3363 TYLER STREET. CARLSBAD. CA. Assessor Parcel Number: 204 - 070 - 14 Zone of Subject Property: RDM ^ Proposed Use of Site: RESIDENTIAL List all other applicable applications related to this project: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MAJOR CONDOMINIUM PERMIT ND 1 • EIR' 1 2. Describe -the activity area, including distinguishing • natural and• manir*ade characteristics; also provide precise slope a.nalysis • when appropriate. •RK^SPK^^ "^"^ ^"^^^ "A^T^ S'^'^DUAL SLOPE TO THE 3, Describe energy conservation, measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discussion of" energy conservation requirements see • of the City's SIR Guidelines). SOLAR ASSISTED HOT WATER COLLECTORS. 4. 5. If residential/ include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, a.nd type of household size expected. , • 17 - UNITS, • • IWOWNHOUSE UNITS @ 1.260 S.F.. 5 - FLATS ? 960 S.F. AND 1 - FLAT @ •S^^^ OH INTEREST If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square-footage of sales area, . c..id loading facilities. ;. . . N/A "6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A • »• , • • . • * s« • . • • 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the • project. . . N/A ^* KNyiROHM-gNTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Ansv;er the follov/irxg questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all., items checked yes. Attach .additional sheets as necessary).. YES NO 1) Could the project significantly change present 'land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec- reational area, or area of important • aesthetic value? 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? 4) Could the activity result in the displacement • of community residents? 5) • Could the activity increase the number of low •and moderate cost housing units in the city? 6) Could tho activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? .7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not' found in other parts of the County, State, or Nation? 81 Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaeological site or its settings? 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation .'of a scarce natural resource? 10) Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source"of water, etc, for rare or endangered wildlife on fish species? •. 11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? •12) Are there any rare or endangered plant "species in thq activity area? 13) Could the activity change existing features. " of any of the city's lagoons,, bays, or ' . . tidelands? " X * 14) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? 15) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agriculture\l lands"? 16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify development of already developed areas? 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? ' • 18) ' Will the activity requiire certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? 19.) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permdt by the city? 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 21) . Will the activity involve construction of facilities in i-. flood plain? 22) VJill the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 23) Will the activity involve construction of• facilities in the area of an active fault? 24) ' Could the activity result in the generation . of significant amounts of noise?• 25) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, 'trees, or other materials? • 27) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any poi-tion.of the region's air or water resources? (Should note, surface, ground water, off-shore). , ' ; ; ' ' ''X^ 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel .consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? • . • . . ' : X 29) Will there be a significant change to existing • . ' land form? ...nf (a) indicate astim.ated grading to be done in • cubic yards LESS THAN 50 X (b) percentage of "alteration to the present land form . LESS THAN 1% . X (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes S/A 3,0) Will the activity result in. substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains, or streets? X 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger" project or series of projects? ' ____ II, STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO HOUSE EMPLOYEES IN THE CARLSBAD AREA AND WE FEEL THE PROJECTED MODERATE COST WILL HELP EASE THE CURRENT HOUSING SHORTAGE. GRADING INDICATED FOR THIS PROJECT IS "FINE GRADING". THERE WILL BE NO SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF EARTH MOVED IN ORDER TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY. Ill, CCivMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions attach additional sheets as may be needed). Signature (i'ei*sdir cdmplelii^report) Date Signed JUNE 19. 1981 -6- 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 Citp of Carlsfbab PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: •The Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a Negative Declaration for the following project: Project Description: Approximately 1100 cubic yards of grading to prepare a 1.01 acre site for construction of a previously approved 17 unit condominium project. Project address/Location: 3363 Tyler Street - west side of Tyler Street between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue. Anticipated significant impacts: None. We need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have cn the environment eind your suggestions for ways the project could be revised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage. Your ideas will help us decide what issues to analyze in the environ- mental review of this project. Your comments on the environmental impact of the proposed project may be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than Noveinber 21, 198.1. DATED: October 26, 1981 CASE NO: CT 81-27/CP-171 APPLICANT: SWEATTE PUBLISH DATE: October^31, 1981 JAIvlES C. HAGAMAN Planning Director ND 3 5/81 ENVIRO^MENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMFM FORM - Part II (To Be Completed By The PLANTs'ING DEPARTMEOT) CASE m.cx*^\-^Ic^-siK DATE: C^T'g.\,\^f=^l BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: V=^?=jr>i= F^>^>^ F^TV-.lNh=-7n=^lh\^ 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NTUMBER OF APPLICANT: ^7 l^T'^-/04^=^ Q^.vs A^yg-V -^rr^i4 3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED: c:i:Or. IRg^V II. ENVIRONNffiNTAL IMPACTS (EXPLANATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ANS\^RS ARE TO BE WRITTEN UNDER Section III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground •surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or ero- sion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ND 2 2. Air: Will the proposal have signi- results in: . a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, mositure or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi- ficant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? • - c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ' ' ' //^ Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms, insects or ^ microfauna)? ' b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ' c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6, Noise. Will the proposal signi- ficantly increase existing noise levels? « 7. Light and Glare. Will the pro- posal significantly produce new light or glare? ^' Land Use. Will the proposal have "significant results in the alteration of the present or pljmned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the pro- posal have significant results in: b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 12. Housing. Will the proposal signi- ficantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal have significant re- sults in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing trans- portation systems? d. Alterations to present pattems of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Yes Maybe No a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ___ ____ A^ 11. Population. Will the proposal significantly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 14. Public Services. Will the pro- posal have a significant effect upon, or have significant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a, Power or natural gas? b.. Communications systems? c, Ifeter? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f, Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal Rave signigicant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Yes Maybe No •5- Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational op)portunities? 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. AN.ALYZF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) PHASED DEA/ELOPMILNl' OF THE PROJECT; b) AI/IFRNIATE SITE DESIGNS; c) ALTEPuNATE SCALE OF DEVELOPME,NT; d) ALTERNATE USES FOR n-IE SITE; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SOME FL'TURE TIME RATHER TIIAN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. -6- 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. c) DOES Tim PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WHICH AEE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED, BUT CUMULATR/ELY CONSIDERABLE? . (A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TWO OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES WHERE THE IMPACT ON EACH RE- SOURCE IS RELATFVELY SMALL, BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE TOTAL OF THOSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) d) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? III.' DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION Yes Maybe No a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE TFE POTEN- TIAL TO DEGRADE Ttffi QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL THE DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT? b) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IHE POTEN- TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE- LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE PERIOD OF TIME WI-IILE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO THE FUTURE.) -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) IV. DETERMINATION. (TO BE CWLETED BY IHE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) the basis of this initial evaluation; I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative declaration will will be prepared. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: \CD(ZXI^\ ( ^^g^^^ l^^y^^ Signature ^ V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) -9- MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATIONG MEA- SURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF IFESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date: Signature of Applicant -10- FEE'YlOO.OO n^^A/ RECEIPT NO: // ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSNENT FORM - Part I 7^^^ (To be Completed by APPLIGWI) CASE NO: Applicant: /='^£r/P£/ZtC4^ ^//M^^^/^^ Address of Applicant: ^y<? OAK.^I/^, tJ, Mf^i^Sm, 09, 92008 Phone Number: (y/t^ 7J?9-<A>4/?£ Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant) GEKTiRAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: <^jQ^///^^ p^jj /f /y- M'^r Project Location/Address: ? T/'AB^ SrSSS^eT Assessor Parcel Number: 2'0^ - f!^70 - Zone of Subject Property: y^l^M Proposed Use of Site: /.7 C^/U/T C!<?AJ4>C/f/Ay/<^/^ List all other applicable applications related to this project: /J//^ ND 1 EIR 1 2. Describe the activity area, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. r^ees. r^e^ s/r^ scopes a^AJriy 7z:> u^^sr M^t^/^G 3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discussion of' energy conservation requirements see • of the City's .EIR Guidelines). 4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 7c>TAc A/Ufi0£^^ c/^ cfAJ^ys - / 7 // /ir /-^^^ s<ii./=r. ^ 5. If conunercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, . c. id loading facilities. 6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. H< • 1. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loadi.ng facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the p.roject. I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Ansv;er the follov/ing questions by placing a check in tho appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach additional sheets as necessary).. 1) Could the project significantly change px-esent 'land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec- reational area, or area of important aesthetic value? 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? 4) Could the activity result in the displacement • of community residents? 5) Could the activity increase the number of low •and moderate cost housing units in the city? YES NO 7) Are any of the natural or man-made, features in tlie activity area unique, that is, not' found in other parts of the County, State, o.r Nation? 8) Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaeological site or its settings? 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? 10) Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source'of water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish species? 11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? •12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? 13) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low / and modest cost, housing units in the city? y 14) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? _______ 15) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agriculturcil lands? 16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify development of already developed areas? _______ 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, ' noise, etc)? ' • 18) Will the activity require certification, • • authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control , agency? ' ' y 19) V7ill the activity require issuance of a / variance or conditional use permit by the city? • V 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 22) V7ill the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 23) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 25) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? 26) Will the activity involve the bu.rning of brush, trees, or other materials? 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a . sig)iif icant change to existing land form? 21) . Will the activity involve construction of . facilities in a flood plain? ' • v 24) Could the activity result in the generation , . of significant amounts of noise? ' ' ' ' ' v £. J 27) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any por-tion of the region's air or v/ater resources? (Should note, A surface, ground v/ater, off-shore) . , ' '_; ' ' ' ' ' J L JL )' (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yard.s^^^^^^^_ y^/^^yCr^^SO (b) percentage of alteration to the present land form ro ^ ^" (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes 4.3^ 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains, or / streets? ; ' \J 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger / project or series of projects? _______ \J V, II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: /v<^/?<i=^7iF ^sr /^€?c/s/AJc i//u^rs /AJ d/rt^ /^or Afs y'sr r//^ ^a>^r r/^'e c^AJ/rs /s Ajcr ^/uacUA/. III. CCMffiNTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions attach additional sheets as may be needed). Signature •vV^^^^gw Tcc^^yje^ Person completing repor'tj Date Signed /a/A^jP/ •6- 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 County of San Diego 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 438 - 5591 €itp of Carl!E(bab NOTICE CF DETEEMENATICN This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad on September 1, 1981, approved the follcwing project: Project Description: Tentative subdivision m^ and condcminium permit to develop 17 units. Project Address/Location: West side of Tyler Street between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue. The City made the follcwing determinations regarding the environmental impact of the above described project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the ^proval of this project. A ccpy of tte Negative Declaration with supporting document is available for public review at the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. DATE: September 10, 1981 ( CASE NO: CT 81-27/CP-171 APPLICANT: Sweatte JAMES C. HAGAMAN Planning Director City of Carlsbad JCH/CN/nar 09/10/81 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438-5591 Citp of Carli^bati NEGATIVE DBCLAEATICN PPQJBCT AEORESS/LOCATICN: West side of Tyler S-treet between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue. J PROJECT DESCRIPnCN: Tentative subdivision m^ and oondcitdnium pennit to develop 17 units ai 1.01 acres. The City of Carlsbad has ocxiducted an enviroiraental review of the above described project parsuant to the Guidelines for Implanentation of the Califomia Envircaimental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinanoe of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (dedaraticxi that the project will not have a significant inpact cxx the envirconent) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justificaticm for this acticxi is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supporti've documents is c« file in tte Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Ccranents frcm the public are invited. Please submit ccrmients in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: July 27, 1981 CASE NO: CT 81-27/CP-171^ APPLICANT: SWEATE JAMES C. HAGAMAN Planning Director PUBLISH DATE: July 27, 1981 ND-4 5/81 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438 - 5591 Citp of CarliEftiab NEGATIVE DECLARATICN PROJECT AIX)RESS/LOCATICN: Avenue and Walnut Avenue. West side of Tyler Street between Chestnut PRCJBCT DESCRIPTICN: Tentative subdivision m^ and condominium permit to develop 17 units oi 1.01 acres. The City of Carlsbad has ocoducted an envirainiental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Envircotental Quality Act and the Envircaimental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaraticai (declaraticn that the project will not have a significant inpact on the envircaiment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justificatico for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Qarments fron the public are invited. Please subrdt ocmnents in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: July 27, 1981 CASE NO: CT 81-27/CP-171, APPLICANT: SWEATE JAMES C. HAGAMAN Planning Director PUBLISH DATE: July 27, 1981 ND-4 5/81 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the City Council Chambers, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, at 7:00 P.M. on Wednesday, August 12, 1981, to consider approval of a tentative subdivision map and condominium permit to develop 17 units on property generally located on west side of Tyler Street, between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue and more particularly described as: Lot 10 of industrial tract, in accordance with map thereof No. 1743, filed in the office of the County Recorder, January 3, 1923. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. If you have any questions please call the Planning Department at 438-5591. CASE FILE: APPLICANT: PUBLISH: CT 81-27/CP-171 SWEATTE AUGUST 1, 1981 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION it? CHESTNUT AVE L. \YAINUT .AVE CASE NO.CI8L27/CE1ZL. Carlsbad Journal Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County 3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 [Proof of Publicationi STATE OF CALIFORNIA, js. ! COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, i I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal a nev\/spaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published forthe dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City OfCarlsbad will hold a public iiearing at the City Council Cham- bers. 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, California, at 7:00 p m. on Wednes- day. August 12. 1981, to consider approval of a tentative subdivision map and condominium p'ermit lo develop 17 units on property gener- ally l ocated on the west side of Ty- ler SIreel, between Chestnut Ave- nut' and Walnut Avenue and more particularly described as: Lot 10 of industrial tract, in.J accordance with map thereof No. * 1743, filed in the office ofthe Coun- ! ty Recorder, January 3. 1923. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially in- i vited to attend the public htlaring. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 438-5591. Case File. CT 81-27/CP-171 Applicant: SWEATTE CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION CJ S506: August 1, 1981 August_ 1 _ _ 19 ,§1 . 19 19, 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on Ml^ ^ st_ I.St. 1QR1 Clerk of the Printer Carlsoad Journal Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County 3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 ' [Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; ' I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published forthe dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA- TION: West sjde of Tyler Street be- tween Chestnut Avenue and Wal- nut Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tenta- tT\e subdivision map and condomi- nium permit to develop 17 units on 1.01 acres. The City of Carlsbad has con- ducted an environmental review of the above described project pur- .suant to the Guidelines for Imple- mentation of the California En- vironmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordi- nance of the City ofCarlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration .(declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issded for the subject proj- ect. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declara- tion with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carls- bad. CA. 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. Dated: June 27, 1981 Case No: CT 81-27/CP-171 Applicant: SWEATE JAIVTES C HAGAMAN Planning Director CJ W935: July 29, 1981 July. .29 19.81 19 19. 19, 1.9. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the_ 29th day of July 1981 Clerk of the Printer Carlsbad Journal Decreed a Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County 3138 ROOSEVELT ST. • P.O. BOX 248 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • 729-2345 Proof of Publication. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, gs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am princi pal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Journal a newspaper of general circulation, published twice weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: The Planning Department ofthe City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a Negative Declaration for the fol- lowing project: Project Description: Approx- imately HOC cubic yards of grading to prepare a 1.01 acre site for con- struction of a previously approved 17 unit condominium project Project Address/Location: 3363 Tyler Street — west side of Tyler Street between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue. Anticipated Significant Impacts: None. We need to know your Ideas about the effect this project might have on the environment and your sugges- tions for ways the project could be revised to reduce or avoid any sig- nificant environmental damage. Your ideas will help us decide what issues to analyze in the environ- mental review of this project. Your comments on the environ- mental impact of the proposed project may be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than November 21, 1981. Dated: October 26, 1981 Case No: CT 81-27/CP-171 Applicant: SWEATTE JAMES C. HAGAMAN Planning Director CJ S671: October 31, 1981 .Qctobar .31. 1961.. 19 19. 19, 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Oiego, State of California on tho 31st tiay of October 1Q81 1M/6/81 Clerk of the Printer 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438•5591 Citp of Carl!E(bab PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: The Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a Negative Declaration for the following project: Project Description: Approximately 1100 cubic yards of grading to prepare a 1.01 acre site for construction of a previously approved 17 unit condominium project. Project address/Location: 3363 Tyler Street - west side of Tyler Street between Chestnut Avenue and Walnut Avenue. Anticipated significant impacts: None. We need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have cn the environment and your suggestions for ways the project could he revised to reduce or avoid any significant environmental damage. Your ideas will help us decide v^at issues to analyze in the environ- mental review of this project. Your comments on the environmental impact of the proposed project may be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than November 21, 1981. DATED: October 26, 1981 CASE NO: CT 81-27/CP-171 APPLICANT: SWEATTE PUBLISH DATE: October-isi, 1981 JAMES C. HAGAMAN Planning Director ND 3 5/81 AP^LICATIOIM r REQUEST • Zone Change • ^aeral Plan Amendment GB'feitative Tract Map • Planned Unit Development : C&mjor Condominium Pennit /t^M^^ • Minor Condominium Permit • Master Plan • Precise Developnent Plan • specific Plan • Site Development Plan • Conditional Use Pennit • Variance • Planrujig Ccrrmission Determination • Special Use Pennit OompletB Description of project (attach additional sheets if necessary) A 17 UNIT rnNnOMTNTIIM nFVFinPMFNT WHirH Will TNrilinF A RFr.RFATTnN RIITinTNr, MTTH fl SWIMMING POOL. SPA AND GAZEBO. Location of Project CURRENT ADDRESS: 3363 TYLER STREET, CARLSBAD. CA. Legal Description (cotplete) LOT 10 OF INDUSTRIAL TRACT. IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. COUNTY QF SAN DIEGO. STATE QF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 1743, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER. JANUARY 3, 1923 Assessors Parcel Number 204-070-14 Zone RDM Gaieral Plan RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY Existing Land Use SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Proposed Zone SAME AS EXISTING Proposed General Plan SAME AS EXISTING Site Acreage 1.01 ACRE Owner Applicant Name (Print or Type) TYLER PROPERTIES. LTD. Name JlEcint-orJI^pe)^^ HOWARD L. SWEATTE -ficfctiJQly Ailckefab Mailing Address P.O. Box 481, P.O. Box 11321, City" and State Zip Telephone CARDIFF, CA. 92007 (714) 755-8115 Citi' and State Zip SAN DIEGO, CA. 92111 Telephone . (714) 279-9247 I CERTIFY imT I THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATICN IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNCT'JLEDGE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE CMSER'S REPRESENTT.'E AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE DATE SIGNATURE DATE 15ate fi Bec'd riate Application f^ceived Statf A^sioned Fees Becexved Receipt Ito. 1 Case Number his + associates • DESIGN STUDIO P.O. BOX 11321, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 June 24, 1981 Carlsbad Planning Conmission City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA. 92008 To Whom It May Concern: I am formally submitting plans and required docunents to acquire a major condominium permit and approval of a tentative map. Prior to this submittal, I have met with Staff Member, Catherine Nicholas, and received a preliminary approval from a Staff Review Meeting. If you have any questions or would like additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, HOWARD L. SWEATTE HLS/vas ENCLOSURES 714/279-9247 • 4 CRSE NO.: CT 81-27/CP-171 DATE RECSIVED: June 24, 1981 APPLICANT: Howard L. Sweatte/TyIer Properties gg^^jg2T- construct a 17-unit condominium- project EXEMPT OR EXCEPTED: Posted: Prior Qatpliance: Published: Filed: Filed: NEGftTEVE DBCLRRATrai: Posted: l'X\'^\ Published; 7 2-1- t\ Kotioe of Detegnixiatdan:7-/P S"/ BlWIRCNMENTMi IMPACT REPORT: . Notice of Nbtice of Nbtice of Preparation: ' Ccnpletion: Determination: • PIANNING OOMMISSICIN 1. Date of Hearing; ^5" IZ^ S" ! 2. PubUcation: ^- ) ' %\ 3. Notice to Property Owners: " ' %\ 4. Resolution NO. 18^4 Date: ^r-fZ-C"/ ^ -^OmMt AppfG^/dJI (Continued to: 5. Appeal: CITY COUNCIL 1. Date of Hearing: ^'( - %\ 2. Nbtices to City Clerk; S"- i3'R\ 3. Agenda Bill: Yo 13^ 4. Pesolution MD. rate: " { ' ^1 ACTION: ^^XOUCof 5. Ordinance No. Date: CORRESPQSPENCE Staff Report to Applicant: 8'' 1 ' 2\ ' ' • Resolution to applicant: S'' JS~ ^1 ff