Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 90-36; Aviara PA 26; Tentative Map (CT)PA 26 South D CITY OF CARLSSAD LANO USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (For Dept. Use Only) (For Dept. Use Only) • • • • • • • • • Master Plan Specific Plan , Precise Development Plan.., Tentative Tract Hap Planned Development Permit Non-Residential Planned Development Permit Condominium Permit , Special Use Permit...... Redevelopment Permit..., Tentative Parcel Hap ^ Administrative Variance. ^ General Plan Amendment • • • Site Development Plan.. Zone Change Conditional Use Permit. • • • • • • Hillside Development Permit. Environmental Impact Assessment Variance Planned Industrial Permit... Coastal Development Permit.. Planning Commission Deter... 2) LOCATION OF PROOECT: ON THE North SIDE OF Batiquitos Drive BETWEEN Aviara Drive (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAME OF STREET) 1-5 (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Sections 27.28 and 34 Township 12 .Smith, Range 4 West, .San RernarHino MerifJian City nf rari shaxl. Cnnnty of San Diego 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).|,,^.-^,0.3,^ 2i5-n4n-7,. r 7i6-m-n« 5) LOCAL FACILITIES 19 6) EXISTING GENERAL MANAGEMENT ZONE ' " PLAN DESIGNATION fiLM,RM PC N, OS 7} PROPOSEO GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Same 8) EXISTING ZONING 9) PROPOSEO ZONING Same 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 45.8 11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 95 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 98 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION SF 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS N/A (RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTIRAL) 15) PROPOSEO INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A 16) PROPOSEO COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A 9 CITY OF CARLSBAD LANO USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 46% 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 20) PROJECT NAME: I AVIARA 95 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 950 21)BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Map for 95 single family homes on 7500 square foot lots 22) OWNER 23) APPLICANT MAMc /DDTMT rto TVDc\ Aviara Land Associs fRINT OR TYPE),^^„.^^j Partiership m (PRINT OR ^^Vl-^^^^ MAILING ADDRESS 2011 Palomar Airport Rd. Suite 206 HAILING ADDRESS .. ^"i''®^*'^?.,^. 2011 Palomar Airport Road, #206 CITY AND STATE Carlsbad, CA ZIP TELEPHONE 92009 931-1190 CITY ANO STATE Carlsbad, CA ZIP TELEPHONE 92009 931-1109 I CERTIFY THAT I AH THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE /\ DATE AviaraT^aii ship; BY otiates Limited Partnei Vice Piesideut I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRE- SENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HY KN0WL5SfiE. HGNATUFJ^L,,^^ / \ DATE , . . Aviara Lantr-As&ocrates Limited Partnersfciy^fl^^ ^1 KK Clcmenj/ ViWe jRregldcnt -Mr. ************** FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED Cf 70 - 3i> 110 . oo P-f-h '^^^^ ^d. oo Received DEC 04 1990 CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOR. PROa SERV. PiY. DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVhU RECEIVEO BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED t PA 26 South Citv of Carlsharl Rl3rininc| Oepartment DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPUCANTS STATEMENT OF OlSCLOSUBE OF COTAIN OWNCFSHIP IMTW6STS ON AU. APPUCATJ0N8 WHICH WIU PEQUISg OlSCSenONABY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE OTY COUNCU. 0« ANY APPOtNTEO 80A«0. COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE (Please Print) The following information nnust be disclosed: 1. Applicant Ust the names and addresses of all persons having a finandal interest in ttie appiication. Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership ZOII Palomar Airport Rd., 1206 carlsbad, CA 92009 Owner Ust the names and addresses of ali persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Aviara [.and r.napany, a Delaware PApnMir- nAVi»if»p«oti» rn rorporatinn a rai i fomi a rnrpnratinn 450 Ngwpqrt Center Drive. »*Suite 304 180 Ni RiverYieif Drivg Newport Beach. CA 92660 Suite 130 Anaheim. CA 92808 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above ia a corporation or partnership, list the names anc addresses of ail individuals owning more than 10% of ttie shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Henry Hillaan Address: 450 Newport Center Drive Suite 3o4 Newport Beach, CA 92660-7640 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above ia a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names anc addresses of any person sen^ng as officer or director of tha non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust N/a 0 Disclosure Statement (Over) Page 2 Have you had more than S2S0 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boar: Commissions, Committees and Council wtthin the past twelve months? Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s)^ P^rten ia d«fin«d ••: 'Any individual. Ann. eopartnarahip. j«<nt vantura, aaaociaiion. racaivar. tyndieata, ttiia and any othar Munty, eity and county, eity muniaipaMy, eombination acting aa a unit' dub. fraiamai organisation, corporation, ••uta. trust, or othar poiiticat aubdiviaton. or any einar grouo or (NOTE: Anach additionai pages as necessary.) U/?0/9O Signature oh€Wner/date Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership Prim or type name of owner By: D. L. Clemens Vice President • - ^ 11/30/90 Signatur*.jf^piicant/date Aviara Land'Associates Limited Partnership Print or type name of applicant By: 0. L. Clemens Vice President FRM00013 8/90 # OTY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FAOLmES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO.: AVIARA PA 26(S^ - CT 90-36 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: _PC_ DEVELOPER'S NAME: AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES • ADDRESS: 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.. CARLSBAD. CA 92009 PHONE NO.: (619^ 931-1190 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 214-170-51: 215-040-23: 216-111-08 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 47 AC/99 DU'S ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: A. • (Jitv Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 3bt>.94 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 195.82 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) N/A D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .733 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A Identify Drainage Basin = N/A (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 990 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 & 4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - N/A I. Schools: N/A (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 99 Identify Sub Basin - N/A (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD - 2178 L. The project is 11 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. CDD:lh CASE NO.: CT 90-36 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NAME: AVIARA PA 26fS') APPUCANT: AVL\RA LAND ASSOCL\TES REQUEST AND LOCATION: Tentative Tract Map to create 99 minimum 7500 SF Single Familv Residential Lots and 3 Open Space Lots on a 47 acre site located at the NW comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Section 27. 28 and 34 Tovynshio 12 South. Range 4 West San Bemardino Meridian. Citv of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. APN: 214-170-51 / 215-040-23 / 216-111-08 (Assessor's Parcel Number) Acres _1Z Proposed No. of Lots/Units 102/99 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RLM Density Allowed 2.35 Density Proposed 2.10 Existing Zone _PC Proposed Zone _PC Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site JPg VACANT/GRADED North _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-26N) South JP£ VACANT/GRADED fPA-27^ East _P£ AVIARA GOLF COURSE West PC VACANT/GRADED fPA-30) PUBLIC FACILITIES School District CARLSBAD Water District CARLSBAD Sewer District CARLSBAD Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 99 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated DECEMBER 3. 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT JC Negative Declaration, issued June 20. 1991 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, CDO:lh Notice of Detemiination 911009 To: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 Coimty Clerk County of San Diego Attn: Mail Drop C-11 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 From: City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (6l9) 438-mi Q . Ir^ Annette J. Evans, Clerk LLi DEC 2 7 1991 ProjectNo.: CT 90-36 Filing of Notice of Determination in conq)Iiance with Section 21108 or 21152 ofthe Public Resources Code. Aviara Planning Area 26 (S) Project Title 91061061 Citv of Carlsbad/Chris DeCerbo 619-438-1161. Ext. 4445 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension Northeast comer of the Batiquitos Drive/Kestrel Drive intersection. Carlsbad. CA San Diego Countv Project Location (include county) Project Description: Tentative Tract Map to include 99 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 sf) and 3 open space lots over the 47 acre site. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on December 17, 1991 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approvzd of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Negative Declarations with comments and responses and record of project approval are available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. MICHAEL J. HOtZMILLfeR Date PLANNING DIRECTOR TITLE Date received for filing at OPR: CDC:km PILED IST THB OPFIGB OF THB COUITTY CLERK, I SAFD.isaaponHTYQ¥ Die 2 7 t99H j| POSTED ^ ^ ^ BEHOVED JAN 2 7 1992 ' BBTTJEHJBDTOAQBlfOTON f/>g/9^ p^yj^^^ Ltober 1989 DlPTTTY NOTICE OF COMPLETION Mail to: State Clearinghoose, 1400 Tenth Project Title: Aviara PA 26(3) it et, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 - 916/44^1Pri3 ^ "/ f / Lead Agency: Citv of Carlsbaci Street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive City: Carlsbad Zip: 92009 See NOTE Belou: SCH « Contact Person: Chris DeCerbo _ Phone: (619) 438-1161. ext. 4445 County: San Diego PROJECT LOCATION: County: San Diego City/Nearest Conniunity: Carlsbad Cross Streets: Batiquitos Drive/Kestral Drive Total Acres: Twp. ^ 45.8 Assessor's Parcel No. 214-170-51 215-040-23 216-111-08 Section: --- Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 Waterways: Batiquitos Lagoon Airports: Palomar Railways: Range: Base: Schools: Carlsbad DOCUMENT TYPE CEQA: NOP Early Cons Neg Dec Draft EIR Supplement/Subsequent EIR (Prior SCH No.) _ Other HEPA: NOI EA Draft EIS FONSI OTHER: Joint Document Final Document Other LOCAL ACTION TYPE General Plan Update General Plan Amendment General Plan Element Conmunity Plan Specific Plan Master Plan Planned Unit Development Site Plan Rezone Annexation Prezone Redevelopment Use Permit Coastal Permit J( Land Division (Subdivision, Other Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) DEVELOPNENT TYPE J< Residential: Office: Conmercial: Industrial: Educational Recreational Units Sq. FtT Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. 95 Acres Acres Acres Acres 45.8 Employees Employees Employees Water Facilities: Transportation: Mining: Power: Waste Treatment: Hazardous Waste: Other: Type Type Mineral Type Type Type MGD Watts PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUNENT _X Aesthetic/Visual Agricultural Land Air Quality X Archaeological/Historical _X Coastal Zone Drainage/Absorption Economic/Jobs Fiscal Flood Plain/Flooding Forest Land/Fire Hazard Geologic/Seismic Minerals Noise Population/Housing Balance Public Services/Facilities Recreation/Parks Schools/Universities Septic Systems Sewer Capacity Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading X Solid Waste X Toxic/Hazardous Traffic/Circulation X Vegetation Water Quality Water Supply/ Ground Water Wetland/Riparian Wildlife Growth Inducing Landuse Cumulative Effect Other Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use Vacant and graded/P-C (Planned CoB«nunity)/RLM-RM Project Description Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots. NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. If a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. from 8 Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill it in. Revised October 1989 CDC:rvo Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Enviroimiental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call^Chris DeCerbo in the Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4445. DATED: CASE NO: JUNE 20, 1991 CT 90-36 MfCHAELJ/H0LZMILLEF( Plarming Director APPLICANT: AVIARA PA 26(S) PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 20, 1991 CDCrrvo 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 t • Carlsbad Joumal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal, a newspaper of general circulation, published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the follow- ing dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBUCHEARING NOnCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Comntiuion of the City OfCarlsbad wlUhold a pubUc hearing at the Council Chamben. 1200 Carllbad Village Drive (formerly Elm AvenueX Carlabad, Califgmia, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednet-day, October It, IMI, to conilder approval of a rvtuelt for a Tenta- tive Tract Map to include 9S linfle fami^ residential lots (minimum TSOO square foot) and 3 open ipac« lots on a 47 acre site on properQr generally located at the northeast comer of the inten^ction of Bati-quitos Drive and Kestral Drive, in Local FaciUttes^ilanuement Zone 10 and more particularly described as: Portian of Sections 27,28, and 34 iqTo«BsUpi2touth,Range4West, in the Cily oir Arisbad. Those persMis wishing to spfiA on this propotal are eoidlally invit- ed i9 attend the ipublic hear}i£ Copi«s of the siaff report will & available en and after October 9. mi. If you ltav# any questioi)^, piiase call Chris DeCerbo in pe Planning Department at 438-1II91. ext 444S. If you challenge the Tentative M-' - 'if .or samepne eUe raised at the ml jTract Map in foiM you may be Ited to raitiiit only those issues Uc Hei^ig described in this nc^ice or in written correspondence mil-vsred to the City of Carlsbad a^ or prior U tke public hearing. ' Case tile: CTOOM " Applicant: Aviara Planning 26(S) CITY0FCABU3BAD PLANNING COIOaSSION . October 03 19 91 19_ 19_ 19_ 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on_ the 3rd day of October, 1991 Clerk of the Printer CJ«S40:Octobw3,lWl Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Nev\/spaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal, a newspaper of general circulation, published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the follow- ing dates, to-wit: NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA-TION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast comer of the intersection ofBatlquitoi Drive and Kestral Drive. PROnCCT DESCRIPTION: Tenta- tive Tract Hap te create (8 mini-mum 7,100 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots. The City of Carlsbad has con-ducted an environmental review of the above described project pur-suant to the Ouidellnes (br Imple- mentation of the California En-vironmental Quality Act and the Envinnmental Protection Ordi- nance of the City ofCarlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative' Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a signiflcant Impact on the environment) is hereby Issued tor the subject pro-ject Justifleation tor this action is on flie in the Planning Department A copy of the Negative Declara-tion with supportive documents is on (Ue In the Planning Department a07B Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92000. Comments tnm the public are Invited. Please sub-mit comments Is writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. Ifyou have any questions, please call Chris De- Cobo In the Planning Department at 438-1181, extension 444B. Dated: June 20, U01 Case No: CT 8048 AppUcant: Aviara PA 28(8) GARY S. WAYNE (br MICHAELJ. HOLZMILLER Planning Director CJ 8084: June 20, UBI June 20 19_ 19_ 19_ 19_ 19 91 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Cali- fomia on the 20th day of_ ilune, 1991 lerk of the Printer STATE OF CAUFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME O O C O ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE WBH RECEIPT ^ ^ O b O DFG 753.5a (6-91) - Lead Agency: QAJJI Ouf- (SAJ\jAi}--r-JL Date: County/State Agency of Fmng: Document No.: Project Title: tA^<AX(?J<-'^ Project Applicant Name: Phone Number: Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant (ctmck appropriate box): Local Public Agency Q School District Q Other Special District I I State Agency CH Private Entity I I CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: Environmental Impact Report $850.(X) $ Negative Declaration $1,250.00 $ Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) $850.00 $ Projects Subject to (Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $ County Administrative Fee $25.00 $ _ Project that is exempt from fees TOTALRECEIVED $ <3 Signature ancHhle of person receiving payment: ^ TO copyCipo A( fiST COPY-PROJECT APPUCANT SECOND COPY-DFG/FASB THIRD COPYJLEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY<X)UNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FlUNG % state of Califbmia Project Notification and Review Sy^HH Office of the Govemor (916) iW5-06l3 SCH NLMEEE: 91061061 TTILE: AVIARA PA 26 (S) SCH Contact: Ton Loftus D^Hrtmant Date: 06/21/91 CLearEnoe Date: 07/22/91 (If (tocunait recieved after 10 AM review starts on nect d^.) Please use the State CLearingixise NuniDer on fiiture correspcndenoe with this office and with a^icies ^Dpraving or reviewing your project. This card does not verifV caifiLianoe with envinxmaitaiL review requirorrats. A letter containir^ the Staters cxniiBits or a letter c3onfinmng no State carmants will be forwarded to yoa after the review is coiplete. Fron: Cff ice of the Govemor Cf f ice of Planning and Research State ELearingiouse ' 1400 Tenth Street, Roon 121 SacraTHito, CA 95814 To: CHRESDECERBA . CUYCFCAR^BftD 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARJSBAD, CA 92009 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an envirormiental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Enviroiunental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call^Chris DeCerbo in the Planmng Department at 438-1161, extension 4445. DATED: CASE NO: JUNE 20, 1991 CT 90-36 iL J/HOLZMILLEF Planning Director APPLICANT: AVIARA PA 26(S) PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 20, 1991 CDC:rvo 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 t ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART U (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 90-36 DATE: June 14. 1991 ACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Aviara PA 26(5) 2. APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 Palomar Airport Road. Suite 206 Carlsbad. CA 92009 (619) 931-1190 4. DATE EL\ FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 4. 1990 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Subdivision Map and grading for eventual constmction of 95 single familv. detached residential units. NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an nvironmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment, he Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and rovides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental mpact Report or Negative Declaration. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. An EIR must be prepared if the City detennines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. ; discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under )ISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing litigation for impacts which would otherwise be detennined significant. PHYSICAL ENVIRO WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig) YES (insig) NO 10. .1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? Result in or be affected by erosion of soils . either on or off the site? Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, groimd water or public water supply? Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or lustorical site, structure or object? X -2- t BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT UL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? \. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? X S. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? _)(_ 3. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X HUMAN ENVIRONMENT ILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO Csig) (insig) Alter the present or planned land use of an area? X Substantially a^ect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? X t HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? Increase existing noise levels? Produce new light or glare? Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Generate substantial additional traffic? Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? Impact existing transportation systems or alter present pattems of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alter waterbome, rail or air traffic? Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES YES (sig) NO (insig) t MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIRCANCE VILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 3. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory. X Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable fiiture projects.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? -5- t DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed project involves the finish grading (28,200 cubic yards) of a previously mass-graded site, construction of residential streets, drainage and other infrastructure, and tentative subdivision of Planning Area 26(S) of Aviara Phase II. The tentative map includes 95 single family residential lots on minimum 7,500 sq. ft. lot areas. Three open space lots are also proposed over the 45.8 acre site. The area proposed for finish grading has been previously graded per subdivision map CT 89-37. No encroachment into previously designated open space areas are proposed by the project. It is located in an area anticipated for residential development per the City's General Plan, and the Local Coastal Program for the affected area. For this environmental analysis, staff conducted several field trips to the subject property and reviewed the Pacific Rim Coimtry Club and Resort Master Plan' Environmental Impact Report (EIR 83-2(A)) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map which akeady covered this property. In that: (1) the proposed project site has already been reviewed imder the Master Plan EIR 83-2(A) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II (CT 89-37), (2) as designed, the project implements all recommended mitigation measures of EIR 83-2 (A) and the Phase II Mitigated Negative Declaration, and (3) the project will preserve in open space the previously deed restricted coastal habitat areas, no environmental impacts are anticipated. There were no public comments received in response to the Notice for a Negative Declaration. Phvsical Environment 1. The project is a previously graded site containing no unstable earth conditions as discussed in the Soils Report for CT R9-37. 2. Relatively minor topographic changes will result from the project. Only 28,200 cubic yards of balanced earthwork are proposed. This equates to approximately 615 cu/yds of soil movement per gross acre. Such minor topographic changes are not considered to be significant. 3. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be incorporated into the project to adequately reduce potential soil erosion impacts. A downstream permanent desiltation basin has been constructed in Planning Area 28. 4. Potential erosion impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon will be adequately mitigated as discussed in response #3 above. 5. Constmction emission and minor fugitive dust generation impacts associated with project grading are considered short term and insignificant. Dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering operations. Air quality impacts associated with future development of housing upon this area is not considered significant in itself. Long term full mitigation of regional air quality impacts will require that dependence upon the automobile be reduced regionally and statewide. 6. In that no stmctural development is proposed at this time, impacts to air movement are not anticipated. Air quality impacts fi-om dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering operations during project grading. -6- J y W PA 26 South CASE NO. DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (To be Completed by APPLICANT) Applicant: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership Address of Applicant: 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206 Carlsbad. CA 92009 Phone Number: (619 ) 951-1190 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): D.L. Clemens (same as above) GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please be specific) Project Description: Tentative Map for 95 single-family homes on maximum 7500 square foot lots and three open space lots. Project Location/Address: North of Batiquitos Drive between Aviara Drive and 1-5 Assessor Parcel Number: 214 - 170 . 51 215-040-23 216-111-08 General Plan/Zone of Subject Property: Combinatin Dist;:ict/PC Zone Local Facilities Management Zone: 19 Is the site within Carlsbad's Coastal Zone? Please describe the area surrounding the site to the North: Open Space Phase II East: Open Space Phase II South: Batiquitos Drive West: Open Space Phase II List all other applicable permits & approvals related to this project; MP 177 I f^-'^l (Please be Specific. Attach Additional Pages or Exhibits, if necessarv) Please describe the project site, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. Also provide precise slope analysis when a slope of 15' or higher and 15% grade or greater is present on the site. Planning Area 26 South is 45.8 acres, located in Phase II of the approved Aviara (Pacific Rim) Master Plan. Planning area is directly North of Batiquitos Drive and South of Planning Area 26 North. Please describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. UBC energy requirements PLEASE AHACH A PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: a. If a residential project identify the number of units, type of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates). See attached sheet- b. If a commercial project, indicate the exact type, activity(ies), square footage of sales area, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), parking provided, and loading facilities. N/A :. If an industrial project, indicate the exact type or industry(les), average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), estimated employment per shift, time of shifts, and loading facilities. N/A d. If an institutional project. Indicate the major project/site function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Please Answer each of the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. Then, fully discuss and explain why each Item was checked yes or no. Provide supporting data if applicable. Attach additional sheets as necessary. YES NO 1) Could the project significantly impact or change present or future land uses in the vicinity of the activi ty? EXPLANATION: The Tentative Map is consistant with the approved Master Plan for this planning area and is an anticipated land use.for this site. 2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of aesthetic value? EXPLANATION: The overall project provides for golf and sporting recreation. Aesthtics should not be affected. 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? EXPLANATION: The project should have no net affect on any surrounding neighborhoods. It is not located in a highly urbanized area. 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? EXPLANATION: No residents live in the area. YES NO 5) Could the activity increase the number of low and ^ moderate cost housing units in the city? EXPLANATION: Proposed housing is not anticipated to be low or moderate cost. 6) Could the activity significantly affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? EXPLANATION: Additional 95 housing units is not considered to be a significant effect. 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that Is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? EXPLANATION: No unique features exist on site. Batiquitos Lagoon is approximately 500 feet to the south. No impact on Batiquitos Lagoon is anticipated as concluded xn hlR 83-2tAJ. 8) Could the activity significantly affect an ^ historical or archaeological site or its settings? EXPLANATION: On-site archaelogical sites have been mitigated as directed by EIR 85-2 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? EXPLANATION: proposed project will in no way affect any identified scarce natural resource, as concluded in EIR 85-2(A). YES NO 10) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant resources? EXPLANATION: Binlngiral resources have been n^^r^j-ifi^H in FTR «5-2fA1. These identified areas hgyp hPPTi Tftstriced and are preserved in their natural state. 11) Are there any rare or endangered plant or animal species in the activity area? EXPLANATION: None on-site. Per EIR 83-2 (A). AHjarent Batiquitos Lagoon contains both rare plants and animals but no encroachment into these areas or font buffer is proposed. 12) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's stream, lagoons, bays, tidelands or beaches? EXPLANATION: The proiect does not encroach into or affprt any of the above water bodies. 13) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimin- ation of agricultural lands? EXPLANATION: Agricultural mitigation for the entire Aviara project has been mititgated per State law. 14) Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? EXPLANATION: Development in this area has been anticipated bv the City of Carlsbad General Plan, and the Local Coastal Program and it's Implementing Ordinances. No intensification ot the anticipated development is proposed. YES NO 15) Will the activity require a variance from estab- lished environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? EXPLANATION: No variance required. 16) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? EXPLANATION: The proposed proiect is a part of the approved Pacific Rim (Aviara) Master Plan. 17) Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? EXPLANATION: City of Carlsbad; City Council and Planning Commission and the California Coastal Commission approval. 18) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? EXPLANATION: No variance or conditional use permit required. 19) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? EXPLANATION: No hazardous materials anticipated. YES NO 20) Will the- activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? X EXPLANATION: No structures to be constructed wii-Tiin finnd plain. 21) Will the activity Involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? EXPLANATION: Nn active faults in the area as state in EIR 85-2(A). 22) Could the activity result In the generation of significant amounts of dust? EXPLANATION: Short term construction dust will he created but this is not a significant impact, as concluded in EIR 85-2(A). 23) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? EXPLANATION: No burning is proposed within this proiect. ^^^^^ 24) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) EXPLANATION: The proposed project should not generate an increase in traffic from the approved plan and therefore, will not change the air quality. YES NO 25) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? EXPLANATION: No increase in fuel consumption over the approved project is expected. 26) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? EXPLANATION: No grading to occur on slopes 25% and greater. 27) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? (a) Indicate estimated grading to be done In cubic yards: 28,200 . (b) Percentage of alteration to the present land form: 56% . (c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: 50J . EXPLANATION: The additional 95 homes anticipated by the project would not be considered a substantial increase in the use of the above facilities. 28) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? EXPLANATION: The 95 sewer EDU's have been anticipated in the City's approved Local Facilities Management Plan which was found to have no negative effect on the environment. YES NO 29) Will the project significantly Increase wind or water erosion of soils? X_ EXPLANATION: The area will he 1anH.;raped wh4>-h win afi-iially t^errea«;e the ern«;ivity nf l-'hp. citP 30) Could the project significantly affect existing fish or wildlife habitat? Y EXPLANATION: The pmjert j.; He.;igned tn avoid f i c;h nr wildlife area*;. 31) Will the project significantly produce new light or glare? EXPLANATION: The project proposes no additional light or glare over that already approved and determined to be non-significant impact by EIR 85-2(A) 10 II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section I but think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons" below: 16. The proposed project is Planning Area 26 South of the Avaira Master Plan. 17. The City of Carlsbad and the Coastal Commission approve the project. III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE OUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature (Pers>Qa/lu0mplet1ng Report) Paul J. Klukas Date Signed 12/5/90 Instruct.eia LBS:lh 11 # APPLJJPION COMPLETE DATE: April 25. 1991 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 16, 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING DEPARTMENT (D I. CT 90-36 - AVIARA PLANNING 26(S) - Request for a Tentative Tract Map to include 99 single family residential lots (minimum 7500 square foot) and 3 open space lots on a 47 acre site located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive, in Local Facilities Management Zone 19. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3304 APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3305 APPROVING CT 90-36, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. IL PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND This project is a Tentative Tract Map to create 99 single family residential lots (minimum 7500 SF) and 3 open space lots (21.82 acres) upon the southem half of Planning Area 26 of the Aviara Master Plan. Planning Area 26(S) is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive. The 47 acre subject property is zoned PC and is under a combination General Plan designation of RLM/RM/OS/RC/N. The project would have a density of 2.10 du/ac. This density is consistent with the Planning Areas maximum permitted density of 2.35 du/ac. The property is also located within the Coastal Zone (Mello I and East Batiquitos Lagoon) and will require a Coastal Permit issued by the Califomia Coastal Commission. As shown on Exhibit "B" the project would be accessed via Kestral Drive, which is located along the northem perimeter of the property. Two 60 foot wide Local Streets (Black Swan Lane and Kingbird Terrace) would be constmcted to intersect with Kestral Drive, to provide access to the project's residential lots. The project has been designed to double load all project residential lots along the intemal cul-de-sac street system. Proposed project grading includes 28,200 cubic yards of cut and fill to be balanced onsite. This minor amount of grading is regarded as finish grading for this site which is in the process of being graded consistent with the previously approved Aviara Phase II tentative map (CT 89-37). 0 CT 90-36 AVIARA P OCTOBER 16, 1991 PAGE 2 'ARMING AREA 26 This project piroposes no encroachment into the previously Coastal Commission deed restricted open space lots approved through the Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map. These open space lots are vegetated with Coastal Sage Scmb vegetation. The project site is surrounded by future single family residential to the north (PA 26N) south (PA 27), and west (PA 29 and 30), and by the Aviara Golf Course to the east. Since the project is not proposing stmctures at this time, a Site Development Plan will be required to be processed subsequent to the development of the planning area. ra. ANALYSIS Planmng Issues 1. Does the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map satisfy all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act? 2. Is the design of the proposed subdivision consistent with the intent of Master Plan 177? 3. Does the proposed project grading substantially comply with the mass grading approved through the Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map (CT 89-37)? 4. Is the proposed project in compliance with the Mello I and East Batiquitos Lagoon Local Coastal Programs? 5. Is the proposed project consistent with the Zone 19 Local Facility Management Plan? DISCUSSION The 47 acre, 102 Lot Tentative Map for Planning Area 26(S) satisfies all requirements of the R-1-75(X) zone, Carlsbad's Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act. All proposed residential lots will fix>nt on publicly dedicated streets and meet the minimum development standards of the R-1-7500 zone. Specifically, all lots are: 1. A minimum of 7500 square feet in area; 2. A minimum of 60 feet in width; 3. A minimum of 90 feet in depth; and 4. Do not exceed a depth to width ratio of 3:1. All lots have also been designed to drain adequately. CT 90-36 AVIARA P OCTOBER 16, 1991 PAGE 3 J LWNI ING AREA 26 Tentative Map CT 90-36 has also been designed to be consistent with the concept plan for Planning Area 26, as identified in Master Plan 177. The southwest comer boundary of Planning Area 26(S) has been relocated southward into Planning Area 27. This minor amendment is a consequence of the redesign of the intemal street system (Black Swan Lane) as a looped cul-de-sac. The original concept plan for Planning Area 26(S) identified Black Swan Lane as a through connection to Planning Area 27 to the south. This street redesign was implemented to mitigate potential traffic nuisance impacts to Planning Area 27. The grading for the project (28,200 cu. yds. or 600 cu. yds./acre) substantially complies with the grading approved through the Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map. This minor amount of grading is necessary to create intemal streets and finished residential lots. This project is in compliance with all policies of the Mello I and East Batiquitos Local Coastal Programs as implemented through Master Plan 177. Specifically, all portions of the property which were placed under open space deed restriction by the Califomia Coastal Commission (Lot 48, 50, and 102) are being preserved in open space. The project is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 19 in the southwest quadrant. At the project dwelling unit count (99 units) the proposed project is 11 dwelling units below that allowed per Local Facilities Management Zone 19. All public facilities and services will be available to serve the project. The impact on public facilities created by the proposed project, and compliance with adopted performance standards are summarized below: FAOLITY IMPACT COMPLIANCE WFTH STANDARD | City Administration 366.94 SF YES 1 Library 195.82 SF YES 1 Waste Water 99 EDU YES 1 Parks .733 Acres YES Drainage N/A YES Circulation 990 ADT YES Fire Station #2 8t #4 YES Schools N/A YES Sewer Collection System 99 EDU YES Water Distribution System 2178 GPD YES Open Space N/A YES CT 90-36 AVIARA PL^IING AREA 26 1^ OCTOBER 16, 1991 PAGE 4 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on June 20, 1991. The environmental analysis, along with the field checks by staff, identified that because: (1) the project site has already been reviewed with the Aviara Master Plan EIR (83-2 (A) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Aviara Phase II Tentative Map (CT 89-37), (2) as designed, the project implements all recommended mitigation measures of these two environmental documents, and, (3) the project preserves in open space all previously deed restricted coastal habitat areas, no environmental impacts are anticipated. There were no public comments received in response to the Notice for a Negative Declaration. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3304 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3305 3. Location Map 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Disclosure Form 6. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form 7. Exhibits "A" - "I", dated September 14, 1991. CDD:lh:vd:lh September 11, 1991 NOTICE OF COMPLETION Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 TentK^Feet, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 - 916/4. Project Title: Aviara PA 26(S) Lead Agency: Citv of Carlsbad See NOTE BeloM: SCH i Street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive City: Carlsbad Contact Person: Chris DeCerbo _ Phone: (619) 438-1161. ext. 4445 Zip: 92009 County: San Diego PROJECT LOCATION: County: San Diego City/Nearest Community: Carlsbad Cross Streets: Batiquitos Drive/Kestral Drive Total Acres: . Twp. _^ 45.8 Assessor's Parcel No. 214-170-51 215-040-23 216-111-08 Section: --• Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 Waterways: Batiquitos Lagoon Airports: Palomar Railways: Range: Base: Schools: Carlsbad DOCUMENT TYPE CEQA: NOP Earty Cons Neg Dec Draft EIR Suppt ement/Subsequent EIR (Prior SCH No.) _ Other NEPA: NOI EA Draft EIS FONSI OTHER: Joint Docunent Final Document Other LOCAL ACTION TYPE General Plan Update General Plan Amendment General Plan Element Community Plan Specific Plan Master Plan Planned Unit Development Site Plan Rezone Annexation Prezone Redevelopment Use Permit Coastal Permit _X Land Division (Subdivision, Other Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) DEVELOPMENT TYPE _)( Residential: Office: Conmercial: Industrial: Educational Recreational Units _ Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. 95 Acres 45.8 Acres Employees Acres Employees Acres Employees Water Facilities: Transportation: Mining: Power: Waste Treatment: Hazardous Waste: Other: Type Type Mineral Type Type Type MGO Watts PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT _K Aesthetic/Visual Agricultural Land Air Quality _)< Archaeological/Historical _X Coastal Zone Drainage/Absorption Economic/Jobs Fiscal Flood Plain/Flooding Forest Land/Fire Hazard Geologic/Seismic Minerals Noise Population/Housing Balance Public Services/Facilities Recreat i on/Parks Schools/Universities Septic Systems Sewer Capacity Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading _X_ Solid Waste X Toxic/Hazardous Traffic/Circulation _X_ Vegetat i on Water Ouality Water Supply/ Ground Water Wetland/Riparian Wildlife Growth Inducing Landuse Cunulative Effect Other Present Land Use/Zaning/General Plan Use Vacant and graded/P-C (Planned CoiiMunity)/RLH-RM Project Description Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimun 7,500 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots. NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification nij*ers for all new projects. If a SCH nutber already exists for a project (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft docunent) please fill it in. Revised October 1989 CDC:rvo % Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments firom the pubUc are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Chris DeCerbo in the Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4445. DATED: CASE NO: JUNE 20, 1991 CT 90-36 IHAEyj. HOLZMILLE! PlaimingDirector APPLICANT: AVIARA PA 26(S) PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 20, 1991 CDC:rvo 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART O (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 90-36 DATE: June 14. 1991 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Aviara PA 26(S) 2. APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 Palomar Airport Road. Suite 206 Carisbad. CA 92009 (619) 931-1190 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 4. 1990 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Subdivision Map and grading for eventual constmction of 95 single familv. detached residential units. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist 8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. r * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" and 'YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig) YES NO (insig) 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quahty? 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, stmcture or object? -2- BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shmbs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? X 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? X 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 17. Alter the present or plarmed land use of an area? X 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? X -3- HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES (sig) NO (insig) 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. Produce new light or glare? 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present pattems of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 28. Alter waterbome, rail or air traffic? 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? 31. Obstmct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? -4- i MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory. X 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed project involves the finish grading (28,200 cubic yards) of a previously mass-graded site, constmction of residential streets, drainage and other infrastmcture, and tentative subciivision of Planning Area 26(S) of Aviara Phase II. The tentative map includes 95 single family residential lots on minimum 7,500 sq. ft. lot areas. Three open space lots are also proposed over the 45.8 acre site. The area proposed for finish grading has been previously graded per subdivision map CT 89-37. No encroachment into previously designated open space areas are proposed by the project. It is located in an area anticipated for residential development per the City's General Plan, and the Local Coastal Program for the affected area. For this environmental analysis, staff conducted several field trips to the subject property and reviewed the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 83-2(A)) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map which already covered this property. In that: (1) the proposed project site has already been reviewed under the Master Plan EIR 83-2(A) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II (CT 89-37), (2) as designed, the project implements all recommended mitigation measures of EIR 83-2(A) and the Phase II Mitigated Negative Declaration, and (3) the project will preserve in open space the previously deed restricted coastal habitat areas, no environmental impacts are anticipated. There were no public comments received in response to the Notice for a Negative Declaration. Phvsical Environment 1. The project is a previously graded site containing no unstable earth conditions as discussed in the Soils Report for CT 89-37. 2. Relatively minor topographic changes will result from the project. Only 28,200 cubic yards of balanced earthwork are proposed. This equates to approximately 615 cu/yds of soil movement per gross acre. Such minor topographic changes are not considered to be significant. 3. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be incorporated into the project to adequately reduce potential soil erosion impacts. A downstream permanent desiltation basin has been constmcted in Planning Area 28. 4. Potential erosion impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon will be adequately mitigated as discussed in response #3 above. 5. Constmction emission and minor fugitive dust generation impa(:ts associated with project grading are considered short term and insignificant. Dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering operations. Air quality impacts associated with future development of housing upon this area is not considered significant in itself. Long term full mitigation of regional air quality impacts will require that dependence upon the automobile be reduced regionally and statewide. 6. In that no stmctural development is proposed at this time, impacts to air movement are not anticipated. Air quality impacts from dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering operations during project grading. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION cont'd 7. This project will not change the course or flow of water as no streams are located in the immediate area and all drainage waters will be handled by proposed drainage facilities. 8. Development of this project (tentative map grading and road constmction) will create impervious surfaces which would reduce absorption rates and incrementally increase runoff velocities. However, to accommodate this increased runoff, drainage facilities will be incorporated into this project and future residential development upon the site, thereby mitigating this concem. 9. No inordinate depletion of any natural resources is anticipated by the subdivision, grading, and constmction of infrastmcture proposed by this project. 10. No significant impact as discussed in #9 above. 11. A thorough archaeological testing of the area was conducted in 1987 as part of EIR 83-2(A). No prehistoricaUy or historically significant sites were discovered within the project area. An archaeologist and a paleontological expert will be present during grading to monitor operations in an effort to preserve any uncovered objects. 12. Surface disturbance and grading for the project will not encroach into any native habitat area and will not affect the onsite coastal deed restricted biological areas. 13. No impacts to the above mentioned coastal deed restricted areas are anticipated in that project landscaping proposed adjacent to this habitat shall be required to be compatible and non-invasive. 14. As stipulated in the Master Plan, the conversion of agricultural lands shall be permitted upon payment of agricultural conversion fees. In accordance, the project applicant has already paid to the State Coastal Conservancy agricultural mitigation fees required for the development of the project site. 15. As discussed in #12 above, the previously deed restricted coastal sage habitat will be maintained in open space. Accordingly, no significant impacts to habitat or species are anticipated. 16. No new animal species or migration barrier will occur as a result of the project, as further discussed in #12 above. Human Environment 17. Development of this project will be consistent with the Gener^tPlan, Master Plan 177 and the Mello I LCP. The land uses proposed will be intemally compatible as well as being compatible with adjacent uses. 18. As discussed in the Zone 19 Local Facihties Management Plan, with the payment of all fees and the implementation of all improvement conditions (i.e. upgrading of the Batiquitos sewer pump station, constmction of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive), all public facilities and services will be available to meet the demands of the future development of 95 single family residences proposed on the project site. No adverse impacts should result. -7- % DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION cont'd 19. Although this Tentative Map does not propose any actual residential development, any subsequent dwelling unit constmction onsite shall not be permitted until the Batiquitos Sewer Pump Station is upgraded. 20. Constmction of the project (grading and road development) may result in minor short term insignificant constmction noise impacts upon surrounding existing and proposed residences. Otherwise, the future residential uses on the subject property will be acoustically compatible with surrounding existing and future residential uses. No traffic noise impacts from surrounding streets are anticipated. 21. Future lighting utilized onsite will be directed so as to not impact adjacent future views. 22. Because this is a residential project, it will not involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances. 23. The proposed density of the project results in 2.07 du/ac. This is in compliance with the Master Plan's anticipated 2.35 du/ac. 24. The project will provide additional housing units to meet existing demand. 25. A total of 950 average daily vehicle trips will be generated by the project which will not significantly impact the circulation system as discussed in EIR 83-2(A) and LFMP 19. 26. The demand for parking facilities created by this project will be satisfied onsite. Two garage spaces will be provided for each unit and adequate on street guest parking will be provided throughout the project. 27. The additional 950 ADT generated by the project will be accommodated by the existing and planned circulation network. This minor increase in traffic is not considered significant. 28. The project site is outside of the Airport Influence Area for Palomar Airport. 29. The project, as designed, will not cause conflicts at its intersections with Batiquitos Drive. 30. The project will not interfere with emergency response plans. 31. Manufactured slopes created through the already approved Phase II mass grading (which includes this site) will be fully landscaped consistent with approved plans. Otherwise, the finish grading (28,200 cubic yards) of the subject property would not result in a visual impact. 32. The project will have no effect whatsoever on existing recreational opportunities. -8- ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) altemate site designs, c) altemate scale of development, d) altemate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) altemate sites for the proposed, and g) no project altemative. a) The project scale, 95 residential lots, is not of a size where phased development would be beneficial. b) The project has been designed consistent with the Aviara Master Plan and all City ordinances. All open space areas are avoided. c) The project is designed at slightly less scale (density) than allowed by the Master Plan for the area. d) The project is in conformance with the City's General Plan and the Master Plan. Altemate uses would require amendment of these documents. e) The proposed project involves subdivision and grading of the site only. Development of the site will occur only if facilities are guaranteed. f) The proposed project is the environmentally preferred project for the site. g) The "no project" altemative is not in conformance with the General Plan/Master Plan designation for the site, therefore, it is not environmentally preferable. -9- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: _X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Date CDC:rvo LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPUCABLE) •10- 9 APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WTTH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -11- ARPORT V ll- ll I •••IIIII; Illlli' • SITE IllllilllJ • RD ^1 •II llllllliia \ 1 \ lill^ BATKJUrrOS LAGOON LA < UJ oc Cil) If Ciriikid AVIARA PLANNING AREA 26(S) CT 90-36 CASE NO.: CTT 90-36 #BACKGROUND DATA SHEET ^ CASE NAME: AVL\RA PA 26(S) APPLICANT: AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES REQUEST AND LOCATION: Tentative Tract Map to create 99 minimum 7500 SF Single Familv Residential Lots and 3 Open Space Lots on a 47 acre site located at the NW comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Section 27. 28 and 34 Township 12 South. Range 4 West San Bemardino Meridian. Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego. APN: 214-170-51 / 215-040-23 / 216-111-08 (Assessor's Parcel Number) Acres _47 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 102/99 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RLM Density Allowed 2.35 Density Proposed 2.10 Existing Zone _PC Proposed Zone .PC Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site _PC VACANT/GRADED North _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-26N) South _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-27) East _PC AVIARA GOLF COURSE West _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-30) i' PUBLIC FACILTTIES School District CARLSBAD Water District CARLSBAD Sewer District CARLSBAD Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 99 PubUc FacUities Fee Agreement, dated DECEMBER 3. 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT JC Negative Declaration, issued June 20. 1991 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other. CDD:lh PA 26 South Citv of Carlsbad Plannincj Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPUCANTS STATEMENT OF OlSCLOSURg OF CERTAIN 0WN6BSHIP INTERESTS ON AU APPUCATIONS WHICH WIU. REQUIRE oiscflenoNARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE crrv COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED SOARO. COMMISSION OR ccMMnrEE. (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant Ust the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership ZUll Palomar Airport Rd., #206 Carlsbad, CA 92009" Owner Ust the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. a Del aware Aviara Land r.nmpany, rnrpnratinn I 450 Newport Center Drive. Suita 304 Newport Beach. CA 92660 a Palifornifl rnrpnratinn 18Q Ni Rivervigw Priv? Suite 150 Anaheim. CA 92808 If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of ali individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Henry Hillman Address: 450 Newport buite 3U4 Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660-7640 If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) aiaove is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names anc addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as tnjstee or beneficiarv of the trust 1UA FRM00013 8/90 i Disclosure Statement (Over; Page 2 5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boarc Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No JL W yes, please indicate person(8) P«faon ia d«fin«d M: 'Any individual, fimi. eopartnariAip, j«int vanOira. aiaociatian. lociai club, fratamal organization, corporation. Mtaia. trutt. racaivar. tyndieata, ttiia and any othaf eeuniy. city and county, city munt«ip«lily. diatriet Of othar pelWoal aubdiviaMn, er any otnar group or eombinatipn acting aa a unit' (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) 11/50/90 Signature ohOWner/date Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership Print Of type name of owner By: D. L. Clemens Vice President 11/50/90 Signatur4.af^piicant/date Aviara Land'Associates Limited Partnership Print or type name of applicant By: 0. L. Clemens Vice President . I, FRM00013 8/90 CTTY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FAOLmES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development AppUcation) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO.: AVIARA PA 26(S) - CT 90-36 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: PC DEVELOPER'S NAME: AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES ADDRESS: 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.. CARLSBAD. CA 92009 PHONE NO.: (619) 931-1190 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 214-170-51: 215-040-23: 216-111-08 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 47 AC/99 DU'S ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 366.94 B. Library: Demand m Square Footage = 195.82 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) N/A D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .733 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A Identify Drainage Basm = N/A (Identify master plan faciUties on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand m ADTs = 990 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 & 4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - N/A I. Schools: N/A (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demand m EDUs - 99 IdentUy Sub Basm - N/A (Identify trunk line(s) Unpacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand m GPD - 2178 L. The project is 11 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit aUowance. CDD:lh