HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 90-36; Aviara PA 26; Tentative Map (CT)PA 26 South
D
CITY OF CARLSSAD
LANO USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 1 OF 2
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
(For Dept.
Use Only) (For Dept.
Use Only)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Master Plan
Specific Plan ,
Precise Development Plan..,
Tentative Tract Hap
Planned Development Permit
Non-Residential Planned
Development Permit
Condominium Permit ,
Special Use Permit......
Redevelopment Permit...,
Tentative Parcel Hap
^ Administrative Variance.
^ General Plan Amendment
•
•
•
Site Development Plan..
Zone Change
Conditional Use Permit.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Hillside Development Permit.
Environmental Impact
Assessment
Variance
Planned Industrial Permit...
Coastal Development Permit..
Planning Commission Deter...
2) LOCATION OF PROOECT: ON THE North SIDE OF Batiquitos Drive
BETWEEN Aviara Drive
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
AND
(NAME OF STREET)
1-5
(NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET)
3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Sections 27.28 and 34 Township 12
.Smith, Range 4 West, .San RernarHino MerifJian City nf rari shaxl. Cnnnty of
San Diego
4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).|,,^.-^,0.3,^ 2i5-n4n-7,. r 7i6-m-n«
5) LOCAL FACILITIES 19 6) EXISTING GENERAL
MANAGEMENT ZONE ' " PLAN DESIGNATION
fiLM,RM PC
N, OS 7} PROPOSEO GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION Same
8) EXISTING ZONING 9) PROPOSEO ZONING Same 10) GROSS SITE
ACREAGE 45.8
11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF
RESIDENTIAL UNITS 95 12) PROPOSED NUMBER
OF LOTS 98 13) TYPE OF
SUBDIVISION SF
14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS N/A
(RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTIRAL)
15) PROPOSEO INDUSTRIAL
OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE
N/A 16) PROPOSEO COMMERCIAL
SQUARE FOOTAGE
N/A
9
CITY OF CARLSBAD
LANO USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 OF 2
17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 46%
18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS
20) PROJECT NAME: I AVIARA
95
19) PROPOSED INCREASE
IN AVERAGE DAILY
TRAFFIC
950
21)BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Map for 95 single family
homes on 7500 square foot lots
22) OWNER 23) APPLICANT
MAMc /DDTMT rto TVDc\ Aviara Land Associs fRINT OR TYPE),^^„.^^j Partiership m (PRINT OR ^^Vl-^^^^
MAILING ADDRESS 2011 Palomar Airport Rd.
Suite 206 HAILING ADDRESS .. ^"i''®^*'^?.,^. 2011 Palomar Airport Road, #206
CITY AND STATE
Carlsbad, CA
ZIP TELEPHONE
92009 931-1190
CITY ANO STATE
Carlsbad, CA
ZIP TELEPHONE
92009 931-1109
I CERTIFY THAT I AH THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT
ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE /\ DATE
AviaraT^aii
ship; BY
otiates Limited Partnei
Vice Piesideut
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRE-
SENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF HY KN0WL5SfiE.
HGNATUFJ^L,,^^ / \ DATE , . . Aviara Lantr-As&ocrates Limited
Partnersfciy^fl^^ ^1 KK
Clcmenj/ ViWe jRregldcnt -Mr.
**************
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION:
APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED
Cf 70 - 3i>
110 . oo
P-f-h '^^^^ ^d. oo
Received
DEC 04 1990
CITY OF CARLSBAD
DEVELOR. PROa SERV. PiY.
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVhU
RECEIVEO BY:
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED
t PA 26 South
Citv of Carlsharl
Rl3rininc| Oepartment
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPUCANTS STATEMENT OF OlSCLOSUBE OF COTAIN OWNCFSHIP IMTW6STS ON AU. APPUCATJ0N8 WHICH WIU PEQUISg
OlSCSenONABY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE OTY COUNCU. 0« ANY APPOtNTEO 80A«0. COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE
(Please Print)
The following information nnust be disclosed:
1. Applicant
Ust the names and addresses of all persons having a finandal interest in ttie appiication.
Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership
ZOII Palomar Airport Rd., 1206
carlsbad, CA 92009
Owner
Ust the names and addresses of ali persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
Aviara [.and r.napany, a Delaware PApnMir- nAVi»if»p«oti» rn
rorporatinn a rai i fomi a rnrpnratinn
450 Ngwpqrt Center Drive. »*Suite 304 180 Ni RiverYieif Drivg
Newport Beach. CA 92660 Suite 130
Anaheim. CA 92808
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above ia a corporation or partnership, list the names anc
addresses of ail individuals owning more than 10% of ttie shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
Henry Hillaan Address: 450 Newport Center Drive
Suite 3o4
Newport Beach, CA 92660-7640
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above ia a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names anc
addresses of any person sen^ng as officer or director of tha non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
of the trust
N/a
0
Disclosure Statement
(Over)
Page 2
Have you had more than S2S0 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boar:
Commissions, Committees and Council wtthin the past twelve months?
Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s)^
P^rten ia d«fin«d ••: 'Any individual. Ann. eopartnarahip. j«<nt vantura, aaaociaiion.
racaivar. tyndieata, ttiia and any othar Munty, eity and county, eity muniaipaMy,
eombination acting aa a unit'
dub. fraiamai organisation, corporation, ••uta. trust,
or othar poiiticat aubdiviaton. or any einar grouo or
(NOTE: Anach additionai pages as necessary.)
U/?0/9O
Signature oh€Wner/date
Aviara Land Associates Limited
Partnership
Prim or type name of owner
By: D. L. Clemens
Vice President
• - ^ 11/30/90
Signatur*.jf^piicant/date
Aviara Land'Associates Limited
Partnership
Print or type name of applicant
By: 0. L. Clemens
Vice President
FRM00013 8/90
#
OTY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FAOLmES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: AVIARA PA 26(S^ - CT 90-36
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: _PC_
DEVELOPER'S NAME: AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES •
ADDRESS: 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.. CARLSBAD. CA 92009
PHONE NO.: (619^ 931-1190 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 214-170-51: 215-040-23: 216-111-08
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 47 AC/99 DU'S
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A. • (Jitv Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 3bt>.94
B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 195.82
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) N/A
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .733
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A
Identify Drainage Basin = N/A
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 990
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 & 4
H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - N/A
I. Schools: N/A
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 99
Identify Sub Basin - N/A
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand in GPD - 2178
L. The project is 11 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.
CDD:lh
CASE NO.: CT 90-36
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NAME: AVIARA PA 26fS')
APPUCANT: AVL\RA LAND ASSOCL\TES
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Tentative Tract Map to create 99 minimum 7500 SF
Single Familv Residential Lots and 3 Open Space Lots on a 47 acre site located
at the NW comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Section 27. 28 and 34 Tovynshio 12 South.
Range 4 West San Bemardino Meridian. Citv of Carlsbad. County of San Diego.
APN: 214-170-51 / 215-040-23 / 216-111-08
(Assessor's Parcel Number)
Acres _1Z Proposed No. of Lots/Units 102/99
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RLM
Density Allowed 2.35 Density Proposed 2.10
Existing Zone _PC Proposed Zone _PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site JPg VACANT/GRADED
North _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-26N)
South JP£ VACANT/GRADED fPA-27^
East _P£ AVIARA GOLF COURSE
West PC VACANT/GRADED fPA-30)
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District CARLSBAD Water District CARLSBAD Sewer District CARLSBAD
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 99
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated DECEMBER 3. 1990
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
JC Negative Declaration, issued June 20. 1991
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other,
CDO:lh
Notice of Detemiination 911009
To: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
Coimty Clerk
County of San Diego
Attn: Mail Drop C-11
220 West Broadway
San Diego, CA 92101
From: City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
2075 Las Palmas Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(6l9) 438-mi Q .
Ir^ Annette J. Evans, Clerk LLi
DEC 2 7 1991
ProjectNo.: CT 90-36
Filing of Notice of Determination in conq)Iiance with Section 21108 or 21152 ofthe Public Resources Code.
Aviara Planning Area 26 (S)
Project Title
91061061 Citv of Carlsbad/Chris DeCerbo 619-438-1161. Ext. 4445
State Clearinghouse Number
(If submitted to Clearinghouse)
Lead Agency
Contact Person
Area Code/Telephone/Extension
Northeast comer of the Batiquitos Drive/Kestrel Drive intersection. Carlsbad. CA San Diego Countv
Project Location (include county)
Project Description: Tentative Tract Map to include 99 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500
sf) and 3 open space lots over the 47 acre site.
This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on December 17, 1991
and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project.
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approvzd of the project.
4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project
5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
This is to certify that the final Negative Declarations with comments and responses and record of project
approval are available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
MICHAEL J. HOtZMILLfeR Date
PLANNING DIRECTOR
TITLE
Date received for filing at OPR:
CDC:km
PILED IST THB OPFIGB OF THB COUITTY CLERK, I
SAFD.isaaponHTYQ¥ Die 2 7 t99H j|
POSTED ^ ^ ^ BEHOVED JAN 2 7 1992 '
BBTTJEHJBDTOAQBlfOTON f/>g/9^ p^yj^^^ Ltober 1989
DlPTTTY
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Mail to: State Clearinghoose, 1400 Tenth
Project Title: Aviara PA 26(3)
it et, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 - 916/44^1Pri3 ^ "/ f /
Lead Agency: Citv of Carlsbaci
Street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive
City: Carlsbad Zip: 92009
See NOTE Belou:
SCH «
Contact Person: Chris DeCerbo
_ Phone: (619) 438-1161. ext. 4445
County: San Diego
PROJECT LOCATION:
County: San Diego City/Nearest Conniunity: Carlsbad
Cross Streets: Batiquitos Drive/Kestral Drive Total Acres:
Twp. ^
45.8
Assessor's Parcel No. 214-170-51 215-040-23 216-111-08 Section: ---
Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 Waterways: Batiquitos Lagoon
Airports: Palomar Railways:
Range: Base:
Schools: Carlsbad
DOCUMENT TYPE
CEQA: NOP
Early Cons
Neg Dec
Draft EIR
Supplement/Subsequent
EIR (Prior SCH No.) _
Other
HEPA: NOI
EA
Draft EIS
FONSI
OTHER: Joint Document
Final Document
Other
LOCAL ACTION TYPE
General Plan Update
General Plan Amendment
General Plan Element
Conmunity Plan
Specific Plan
Master Plan
Planned Unit Development
Site Plan
Rezone Annexation
Prezone Redevelopment
Use Permit Coastal Permit
J( Land Division (Subdivision, Other
Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.)
DEVELOPNENT TYPE
J< Residential:
Office:
Conmercial:
Industrial:
Educational
Recreational
Units
Sq. FtT
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
95 Acres
Acres
Acres
Acres
45.8
Employees
Employees
Employees
Water Facilities:
Transportation:
Mining:
Power:
Waste Treatment:
Hazardous Waste:
Other:
Type
Type
Mineral
Type
Type
Type
MGD
Watts
PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUNENT
_X Aesthetic/Visual
Agricultural Land
Air Quality
X Archaeological/Historical
_X Coastal Zone
Drainage/Absorption
Economic/Jobs
Fiscal
Flood Plain/Flooding
Forest Land/Fire Hazard
Geologic/Seismic
Minerals
Noise
Population/Housing Balance
Public Services/Facilities
Recreation/Parks
Schools/Universities
Septic Systems
Sewer Capacity
Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading X
Solid Waste X
Toxic/Hazardous
Traffic/Circulation X
Vegetation
Water Quality
Water Supply/
Ground Water
Wetland/Riparian
Wildlife
Growth Inducing
Landuse
Cumulative Effect
Other
Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use
Vacant and graded/P-C (Planned CoB«nunity)/RLM-RM
Project Description
Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots.
NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. If a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g.
from 8 Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill it in. Revised October 1989
CDC:rvo
Citv of Carlsbad
Planning Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast
comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral
Drive.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot
single family residential lots and three open space lots.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act
and the Enviroimiental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call^Chris DeCerbo in the
Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4445.
DATED:
CASE NO:
JUNE 20, 1991
CT 90-36
MfCHAELJ/H0LZMILLEF(
Plarming Director
APPLICANT: AVIARA PA 26(S)
PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 20, 1991
CDCrrvo
2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161
t •
Carlsbad Joumal
Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
ing dates, to-wit:
NOTICE OF
PUBUCHEARING
NOnCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Comntiuion of the
City OfCarlsbad wlUhold a pubUc hearing at the Council Chamben. 1200 Carllbad Village Drive (formerly Elm AvenueX Carlabad,
Califgmia, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednet-day, October It, IMI, to conilder approval of a rvtuelt for a Tenta-
tive Tract Map to include 9S linfle
fami^ residential lots (minimum TSOO square foot) and 3 open ipac« lots on a 47 acre site on properQr
generally located at the northeast comer of the inten^ction of Bati-quitos Drive and Kestral Drive, in Local FaciUttes^ilanuement Zone
10 and more particularly described as:
Portian of Sections 27,28, and 34
iqTo«BsUpi2touth,Range4West, in the Cily oir Arisbad.
Those persMis wishing to spfiA on this propotal are eoidlally invit-
ed i9 attend the ipublic hear}i£ Copi«s of the siaff report will & available en and after October 9. mi. If you ltav# any questioi)^,
piiase call Chris DeCerbo in pe Planning Department at 438-1II91. ext 444S.
If you challenge the Tentative
M-' - 'if .or samepne eUe raised at the ml
jTract Map in foiM you may be Ited to raitiiit only those issues
Uc Hei^ig described in this nc^ice
or in written correspondence mil-vsred to the City of Carlsbad a^ or prior U tke public hearing. '
Case tile: CTOOM " Applicant: Aviara Planning 26(S) CITY0FCABU3BAD PLANNING COIOaSSION .
October 03 19 91
19_
19_
19_
19
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California on_ the 3rd
day of October, 1991
Clerk of the Printer
CJ«S40:Octobw3,lWl
Carlsbad Journal
Decreed A Legal Nev\/spaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County
Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to
W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543
Proof of Publication
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid;
I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter.
I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal, a newspaper of general circulation,
published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper
is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which
newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying
subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the
said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next
preceding the date of publication of the
notice hereinafter referred to; and that the
notice of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in each regular
and entire issue of said newspaper and not
in any supplement thereof on the follow-
ing dates, to-wit:
NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCA-TION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast comer of
the intersection ofBatlquitoi Drive and Kestral Drive.
PROnCCT DESCRIPTION: Tenta-
tive Tract Hap te create (8 mini-mum 7,100 square foot single family residential lots and three open
space lots.
The City of Carlsbad has con-ducted an environmental review of the above described project pur-suant to the Ouidellnes (br Imple-
mentation of the California En-vironmental Quality Act and the Envinnmental Protection Ordi-
nance of the City ofCarlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative' Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a signiflcant
Impact on the environment) is hereby Issued tor the subject pro-ject Justifleation tor this action is on flie in the Planning Department
A copy of the Negative Declara-tion with supportive documents is on (Ue In the Planning Department
a07B Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92000. Comments tnm the public are Invited. Please sub-mit comments Is writing to the
Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. Ifyou have any questions, please call Chris De-
Cobo In the Planning Department at 438-1181, extension 444B. Dated: June 20, U01 Case No: CT 8048
AppUcant: Aviara PA 28(8) GARY S. WAYNE (br MICHAELJ. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director CJ 8084: June 20, UBI
June 20 19_
19_
19_
19_
19
91
I certify under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed at
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Cali-
fomia on the 20th
day of_ ilune, 1991
lerk of the Printer
STATE OF CAUFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME O O C O
ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE WBH RECEIPT ^ ^ O b O
DFG 753.5a (6-91) -
Lead Agency: QAJJI Ouf- (SAJ\jAi}--r-JL Date:
County/State Agency of Fmng: Document No.:
Project Title: tA^<AX(?J<-'^
Project Applicant Name: Phone Number:
Project Applicant Address:
Project Applicant (ctmck appropriate box): Local Public Agency Q School District Q Other Special District I I
State Agency CH Private Entity I I
CHECK APPLICABLE FEES:
Environmental Impact Report $850.(X) $
Negative Declaration $1,250.00 $
Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) $850.00 $
Projects Subject to (Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $
County Administrative Fee $25.00 $ _
Project that is exempt from fees
TOTALRECEIVED $ <3
Signature ancHhle of person receiving payment: ^
TO copyCipo A( fiST COPY-PROJECT APPUCANT SECOND COPY-DFG/FASB THIRD COPYJLEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY<X)UNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FlUNG
%
state of Califbmia
Project Notification and Review Sy^HH
Office of the Govemor
(916) iW5-06l3
SCH NLMEEE: 91061061
TTILE: AVIARA PA 26 (S)
SCH Contact: Ton Loftus
D^Hrtmant Date: 06/21/91
CLearEnoe Date: 07/22/91
(If (tocunait recieved after 10 AM review starts on nect d^.)
Please use the State CLearingixise NuniDer on fiiture correspcndenoe with
this office and with a^icies ^Dpraving or reviewing your project.
This card does not verifV caifiLianoe with envinxmaitaiL review
requirorrats. A letter containir^ the Staters cxniiBits or a letter
c3onfinmng no State carmants will be forwarded to yoa after the
review is coiplete.
Fron:
Cff ice of the Govemor
Cf f ice of Planning and Research
State ELearingiouse '
1400 Tenth Street, Roon 121
SacraTHito, CA 95814
To: CHRESDECERBA
. CUYCFCAR^BftD
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARJSBAD, CA 92009
Citv of Carlsbad
Planning Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast
comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral
Drive.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot
single family residential lots and three open space lots.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an envirormiental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Enviroiunental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments from the
public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call^Chris DeCerbo in the
Planmng Department at 438-1161, extension 4445.
DATED:
CASE NO:
JUNE 20, 1991
CT 90-36
iL J/HOLZMILLEF
Planning Director
APPLICANT: AVIARA PA 26(S)
PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 20, 1991
CDC:rvo
2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161
t
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART U
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 90-36
DATE: June 14. 1991
ACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Aviara PA 26(5)
2. APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 Palomar Airport Road. Suite 206
Carlsbad. CA 92009
(619) 931-1190
4. DATE EL\ FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 4. 1990
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Subdivision Map and grading for eventual constmction of
95 single familv. detached residential units.
NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
TATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
nvironmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment,
he Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
rovides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
mpact Report or Negative Declaration.
A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked
to indicate this determination.
An EIR must be prepared if the City detennines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig"
respectively.
; discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
)ISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
litigation for impacts which would otherwise be detennined significant.
PHYSICAL ENVIRO
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
(sig)
YES
(insig)
NO
10.
.1.
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils .
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, groimd water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or lustorical site,
structure or object?
X
-2-
t
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
UL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(sig) (insig)
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
\. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance? X
S. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects? _)(_
3. Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? X
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
ILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
Csig) (insig)
Alter the present or planned land use
of an area? X
Substantially a^ect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? X
t
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic?
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present pattems of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterbome, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
YES YES
(sig)
NO
(insig)
t
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIRCANCE
VILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(sig) (insig)
3. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of Califomia history or prehistory. X
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable fiiture projects.)
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
-5-
t
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed project involves the finish grading (28,200 cubic yards) of a previously mass-graded site,
construction of residential streets, drainage and other infrastructure, and tentative subdivision of Planning
Area 26(S) of Aviara Phase II. The tentative map includes 95 single family residential lots on minimum 7,500
sq. ft. lot areas. Three open space lots are also proposed over the 45.8 acre site.
The area proposed for finish grading has been previously graded per subdivision map CT 89-37. No
encroachment into previously designated open space areas are proposed by the project. It is located in an area
anticipated for residential development per the City's General Plan, and the Local Coastal Program for the
affected area.
For this environmental analysis, staff conducted several field trips to the subject property and reviewed the
Pacific Rim Coimtry Club and Resort Master Plan' Environmental Impact Report (EIR 83-2(A)) and the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map which akeady covered this property.
In that: (1) the proposed project site has already been reviewed imder the Master Plan EIR 83-2(A) and the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II (CT 89-37), (2) as designed, the project implements all
recommended mitigation measures of EIR 83-2 (A) and the Phase II Mitigated Negative Declaration, and (3)
the project will preserve in open space the previously deed restricted coastal habitat areas, no environmental
impacts are anticipated. There were no public comments received in response to the Notice for a Negative
Declaration.
Phvsical Environment
1. The project is a previously graded site containing no unstable earth conditions as discussed in the Soils
Report for CT R9-37.
2. Relatively minor topographic changes will result from the project. Only 28,200 cubic yards of balanced
earthwork are proposed. This equates to approximately 615 cu/yds of soil movement per gross acre.
Such minor topographic changes are not considered to be significant.
3. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be incorporated into the project to adequately reduce
potential soil erosion impacts. A downstream permanent desiltation basin has been constructed in
Planning Area 28.
4. Potential erosion impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon will be adequately mitigated as discussed in response
#3 above.
5. Constmction emission and minor fugitive dust generation impacts associated with project grading are
considered short term and insignificant. Dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering
operations. Air quality impacts associated with future development of housing upon this area is not
considered significant in itself. Long term full mitigation of regional air quality impacts will require that
dependence upon the automobile be reduced regionally and statewide.
6. In that no stmctural development is proposed at this time, impacts to air movement are not anticipated.
Air quality impacts fi-om dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering operations
during project grading.
-6-
J y W PA 26 South
CASE NO.
DATE:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I
(To be Completed by APPLICANT)
Applicant: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership
Address of Applicant: 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206
Carlsbad. CA 92009
Phone Number: (619 ) 951-1190
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant): D.L. Clemens (same as above)
GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please be specific)
Project Description: Tentative Map for 95 single-family homes on
maximum 7500 square foot lots and three open space lots.
Project Location/Address: North of Batiquitos Drive between Aviara
Drive and 1-5
Assessor Parcel Number: 214 - 170 . 51 215-040-23 216-111-08
General Plan/Zone of Subject Property: Combinatin Dist;:ict/PC Zone
Local Facilities Management Zone: 19
Is the site within Carlsbad's Coastal Zone?
Please describe the area surrounding the site to the
North: Open Space Phase II East: Open Space Phase II
South: Batiquitos Drive West: Open Space Phase II
List all other applicable permits & approvals related to this project;
MP 177 I f^-'^l
(Please be Specific. Attach Additional Pages or Exhibits, if necessarv)
Please describe the project site, including distinguishing natural and
manmade characteristics. Also provide precise slope analysis when a slope
of 15' or higher and 15% grade or greater is present on the site.
Planning Area 26 South is 45.8 acres, located in Phase II of the
approved Aviara (Pacific Rim) Master Plan. Planning area is
directly North of Batiquitos Drive and South of Planning Area
26 North.
Please describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
UBC energy requirements
PLEASE AHACH A PROJECT SUMMARY SHEET WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING:
a. If a residential project identify the number of units, type of units,
schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG
rates).
See attached sheet-
b. If a commercial project, indicate the exact type, activity(ies),
square footage of sales area, average daily traffic generation
(latest SANDAG rates), parking provided, and loading facilities.
N/A
:. If an industrial project, indicate the exact type or industry(les),
average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), estimated
employment per shift, time of shifts, and loading facilities.
N/A
d. If an institutional project. Indicate the major project/site
function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project.
N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Please Answer each of the following questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. Then, fully discuss and explain why each Item was
checked yes or no. Provide supporting data if applicable. Attach
additional sheets as necessary.
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly impact or change
present or future land uses in the vicinity of the
activi ty?
EXPLANATION: The Tentative Map is consistant with
the approved Master Plan for this planning area and
is an anticipated land use.for this site.
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of aesthetic value?
EXPLANATION: The overall project provides for
golf and sporting recreation. Aesthtics should
not be affected.
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
EXPLANATION: The project should have no net
affect on any surrounding neighborhoods. It
is not located in a highly urbanized area.
4) Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents?
EXPLANATION: No residents live in the area.
YES NO
5) Could the activity increase the number of low and ^
moderate cost housing units in the city?
EXPLANATION: Proposed housing is not anticipated to
be low or moderate cost.
6) Could the activity significantly affect existing
housing or create a demand for additional housing?
EXPLANATION: Additional 95 housing units is not
considered to be a significant effect.
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that Is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation?
EXPLANATION: No unique features exist on site.
Batiquitos Lagoon is approximately 500 feet to
the south. No impact on Batiquitos Lagoon is anticipated as
concluded xn hlR 83-2tAJ.
8) Could the activity significantly affect an ^
historical or archaeological site or its settings?
EXPLANATION: On-site archaelogical sites have
been mitigated as directed by EIR 85-2
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
EXPLANATION: proposed project will in no way
affect any identified scarce natural resource,
as concluded in EIR 85-2(A).
YES NO
10) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant resources?
EXPLANATION: Binlngiral resources have been
n^^r^j-ifi^H in FTR «5-2fA1. These identified areas
hgyp hPPTi Tftstriced and are preserved in their
natural state.
11) Are there any rare or endangered plant or animal
species in the activity area?
EXPLANATION: None on-site. Per EIR 83-2 (A).
AHjarent Batiquitos Lagoon contains both rare plants
and animals but no encroachment into these areas or
font buffer is proposed.
12) Could the activity change existing features of any
of the city's stream, lagoons, bays, tidelands
or beaches?
EXPLANATION: The proiect does not encroach into
or affprt any of the above water bodies.
13) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimin-
ation of agricultural lands?
EXPLANATION: Agricultural mitigation for the
entire Aviara project has been mititgated
per State law.
14) Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of already developed areas?
EXPLANATION: Development in this area has been
anticipated bv the City of Carlsbad General
Plan, and the Local Coastal Program and it's Implementing
Ordinances. No intensification ot the anticipated
development is proposed.
YES NO
15) Will the activity require a variance from estab-
lished environmental standards (air, water, noise,
etc.)?
EXPLANATION: No variance required.
16) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
EXPLANATION: The proposed proiect is a part
of the approved Pacific Rim (Aviara) Master
Plan.
17) Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state
or federal environmental control agency?
EXPLANATION: City of Carlsbad; City Council
and Planning Commission and the California Coastal
Commission approval.
18) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or
conditional use permit by the City?
EXPLANATION: No variance or conditional use
permit required.
19) Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
EXPLANATION: No hazardous materials
anticipated.
YES NO
20) Will the- activity involve construction of facilities
in a flood plain? X
EXPLANATION: No structures to be constructed
wii-Tiin finnd plain.
21) Will the activity Involve construction of facilities
in the area of an active fault?
EXPLANATION:
Nn active faults in the area as state in EIR 85-2(A).
22) Could the activity result In the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
EXPLANATION: Short term construction dust will
he created but this is not a significant
impact, as concluded in EIR 85-2(A).
23) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
EXPLANATION: No burning is proposed within
this proiect. ^^^^^
24) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
EXPLANATION: The proposed project should not
generate an increase in traffic from the
approved plan and therefore, will not change
the air quality.
YES NO
25) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
EXPLANATION: No increase in fuel consumption
over the approved project is expected.
26) Will the activity involve construction of facilities
on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
EXPLANATION: No grading to occur on slopes
25% and greater.
27) Will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
(a) Indicate estimated grading to be done In
cubic yards: 28,200 .
(b) Percentage of alteration to the present
land form: 56% .
(c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
50J .
EXPLANATION: The additional 95 homes anticipated
by the project would not be considered a substantial
increase in the use of the above facilities.
28) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
EXPLANATION: The 95 sewer EDU's have been anticipated
in the City's approved Local Facilities Management Plan
which was found to have no negative effect on the
environment.
YES NO
29) Will the project significantly Increase wind or
water erosion of soils? X_
EXPLANATION: The area will he 1anH.;raped
wh4>-h win afi-iially t^errea«;e the ern«;ivity
nf l-'hp. citP
30) Could the project significantly affect existing
fish or wildlife habitat? Y
EXPLANATION: The pmjert j.; He.;igned tn avoid
f i c;h nr wildlife area*;.
31) Will the project significantly produce new light
or glare?
EXPLANATION: The project proposes no additional
light or glare over that already approved and
determined to be non-significant impact by
EIR 85-2(A)
10
II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section I but think
the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your
reasons" below:
16. The proposed project is Planning Area 26 South
of the Avaira Master Plan.
17. The City of Carlsbad and the Coastal Commission
approve the project.
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE OUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
Signature
(Pers>Qa/lu0mplet1ng Report)
Paul J. Klukas
Date Signed 12/5/90
Instruct.eia
LBS:lh
11
# APPLJJPION COMPLETE DATE:
April 25. 1991
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(D
I.
CT 90-36 - AVIARA PLANNING 26(S) - Request for a Tentative Tract Map
to include 99 single family residential lots (minimum 7500 square foot) and
3 open space lots on a 47 acre site located at the northeast comer of the
intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive, in Local Facilities
Management Zone 19.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3304
APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and ADOPT Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3305 APPROVING CT 90-36, based on the findings and subject
to the conditions contained therein.
IL PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
This project is a Tentative Tract Map to create 99 single family residential lots (minimum
7500 SF) and 3 open space lots (21.82 acres) upon the southem half of Planning Area 26
of the Aviara Master Plan. Planning Area 26(S) is located at the northeast comer of the
intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive. The 47 acre subject property is zoned
PC and is under a combination General Plan designation of RLM/RM/OS/RC/N. The
project would have a density of 2.10 du/ac. This density is consistent with the Planning
Areas maximum permitted density of 2.35 du/ac. The property is also located within the
Coastal Zone (Mello I and East Batiquitos Lagoon) and will require a Coastal Permit issued
by the Califomia Coastal Commission.
As shown on Exhibit "B" the project would be accessed via Kestral Drive, which is located
along the northem perimeter of the property. Two 60 foot wide Local Streets (Black Swan
Lane and Kingbird Terrace) would be constmcted to intersect with Kestral Drive, to provide
access to the project's residential lots. The project has been designed to double load all
project residential lots along the intemal cul-de-sac street system.
Proposed project grading includes 28,200 cubic yards of cut and fill to be balanced onsite.
This minor amount of grading is regarded as finish grading for this site which is in the
process of being graded consistent with the previously approved Aviara Phase II tentative
map (CT 89-37).
0
CT 90-36 AVIARA P
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PAGE 2
'ARMING AREA 26
This project piroposes no encroachment into the previously Coastal Commission deed
restricted open space lots approved through the Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map.
These open space lots are vegetated with Coastal Sage Scmb vegetation.
The project site is surrounded by future single family residential to the north (PA 26N)
south (PA 27), and west (PA 29 and 30), and by the Aviara Golf Course to the east.
Since the project is not proposing stmctures at this time, a Site Development Plan will be
required to be processed subsequent to the development of the planning area.
ra. ANALYSIS
Planmng Issues
1. Does the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map satisfy all requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act?
2. Is the design of the proposed subdivision consistent with the intent of
Master Plan 177?
3. Does the proposed project grading substantially comply with the mass grading
approved through the Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map (CT 89-37)?
4. Is the proposed project in compliance with the Mello I and East Batiquitos Lagoon
Local Coastal Programs?
5. Is the proposed project consistent with the Zone 19 Local Facility Management
Plan?
DISCUSSION
The 47 acre, 102 Lot Tentative Map for Planning Area 26(S) satisfies all requirements of
the R-1-75(X) zone, Carlsbad's Subdivision Ordinance and the State Map Act. All proposed
residential lots will fix>nt on publicly dedicated streets and meet the minimum development
standards of the R-1-7500 zone. Specifically, all lots are:
1. A minimum of 7500 square feet in area;
2. A minimum of 60 feet in width;
3. A minimum of 90 feet in depth; and
4. Do not exceed a depth to width ratio of 3:1.
All lots have also been designed to drain adequately.
CT 90-36 AVIARA P
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PAGE 3
J
LWNI
ING AREA 26
Tentative Map CT 90-36 has also been designed to be consistent with the concept plan for
Planning Area 26, as identified in Master Plan 177. The southwest comer boundary of
Planning Area 26(S) has been relocated southward into Planning Area 27. This minor
amendment is a consequence of the redesign of the intemal street system (Black Swan
Lane) as a looped cul-de-sac. The original concept plan for Planning Area 26(S) identified
Black Swan Lane as a through connection to Planning Area 27 to the south. This street
redesign was implemented to mitigate potential traffic nuisance impacts to Planning Area
27.
The grading for the project (28,200 cu. yds. or 600 cu. yds./acre) substantially complies
with the grading approved through the Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map. This minor
amount of grading is necessary to create intemal streets and finished residential lots.
This project is in compliance with all policies of the Mello I and East Batiquitos Local
Coastal Programs as implemented through Master Plan 177. Specifically, all portions of
the property which were placed under open space deed restriction by the Califomia
Coastal Commission (Lot 48, 50, and 102) are being preserved in open space.
The project is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 19 in the southwest quadrant.
At the project dwelling unit count (99 units) the proposed project is 11 dwelling units
below that allowed per Local Facilities Management Zone 19. All public facilities and
services will be available to serve the project. The impact on public facilities created by
the proposed project, and compliance with adopted performance standards are summarized
below:
FAOLITY IMPACT COMPLIANCE WFTH STANDARD |
City Administration 366.94 SF YES 1
Library 195.82 SF YES 1
Waste Water 99 EDU YES 1
Parks .733 Acres YES
Drainage N/A YES
Circulation 990 ADT YES
Fire Station #2 8t #4 YES
Schools N/A YES
Sewer Collection System 99 EDU YES
Water Distribution System 2178 GPD YES
Open Space N/A YES
CT 90-36 AVIARA PL^IING AREA 26 1^
OCTOBER 16, 1991
PAGE 4
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact
on the environment and, therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on June 20, 1991.
The environmental analysis, along with the field checks by staff, identified that because:
(1) the project site has already been reviewed with the Aviara Master Plan EIR (83-2 (A)
and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Aviara Phase II Tentative Map (CT 89-37),
(2) as designed, the project implements all recommended mitigation measures of these two
environmental documents, and, (3) the project preserves in open space all previously deed
restricted coastal habitat areas, no environmental impacts are anticipated. There were no
public comments received in response to the Notice for a Negative Declaration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3304
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3305
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Disclosure Form
6. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
7. Exhibits "A" - "I", dated September 14, 1991.
CDD:lh:vd:lh
September 11, 1991
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 TentK^Feet, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 - 916/4.
Project Title: Aviara PA 26(S)
Lead Agency: Citv of Carlsbad
See NOTE BeloM:
SCH i
Street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive
City: Carlsbad
Contact Person: Chris DeCerbo
_ Phone: (619) 438-1161. ext. 4445
Zip: 92009 County: San Diego
PROJECT LOCATION:
County: San Diego City/Nearest Community: Carlsbad
Cross Streets: Batiquitos Drive/Kestral Drive Total Acres:
. Twp. _^
45.8
Assessor's Parcel No. 214-170-51 215-040-23 216-111-08 Section: --•
Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 Waterways: Batiquitos Lagoon
Airports: Palomar Railways:
Range: Base:
Schools: Carlsbad
DOCUMENT TYPE
CEQA: NOP
Earty Cons
Neg Dec
Draft EIR
Suppt ement/Subsequent
EIR (Prior SCH No.) _
Other
NEPA: NOI
EA
Draft EIS
FONSI
OTHER: Joint Docunent
Final Document
Other
LOCAL ACTION TYPE
General Plan Update
General Plan Amendment
General Plan Element
Community Plan
Specific Plan
Master Plan
Planned Unit Development
Site Plan
Rezone Annexation
Prezone Redevelopment
Use Permit Coastal Permit
_X Land Division (Subdivision, Other
Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.)
DEVELOPMENT TYPE
_)( Residential:
Office:
Conmercial:
Industrial:
Educational
Recreational
Units _
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
Sq. Ft.
95 Acres 45.8
Acres Employees
Acres Employees
Acres Employees
Water Facilities:
Transportation:
Mining:
Power:
Waste Treatment:
Hazardous Waste:
Other:
Type
Type
Mineral
Type
Type
Type
MGO
Watts
PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT
_K Aesthetic/Visual
Agricultural Land
Air Quality
_)< Archaeological/Historical
_X Coastal Zone
Drainage/Absorption
Economic/Jobs
Fiscal
Flood Plain/Flooding
Forest Land/Fire Hazard
Geologic/Seismic
Minerals
Noise
Population/Housing Balance
Public Services/Facilities
Recreat i on/Parks
Schools/Universities
Septic Systems
Sewer Capacity
Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading _X_
Solid Waste X
Toxic/Hazardous
Traffic/Circulation _X_
Vegetat i on
Water Ouality
Water Supply/
Ground Water
Wetland/Riparian
Wildlife
Growth Inducing
Landuse
Cunulative Effect
Other
Present Land Use/Zaning/General Plan Use
Vacant and graded/P-C (Planned CoiiMunity)/RLH-RM
Project Description
Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimun 7,500 square foot single family residential lots and three open space lots.
NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification nij*ers for all new projects. If a SCH nutber already exists for a project (e.g.
from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft docunent) please fill it in. Revised October 1989
CDC:rvo
%
Citv of Carlsbad
Planning Department
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: The 45.8 acre project site is located at the northeast
comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral
Drive.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map to create 95 minimum 7,500 square foot
single family residential lots and three open space lots.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant
impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this
action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments firom the
pubUc are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within
30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Chris DeCerbo in the
Planning Department at 438-1161, extension 4445.
DATED:
CASE NO:
JUNE 20, 1991
CT 90-36
IHAEyj. HOLZMILLE!
PlaimingDirector
APPLICANT: AVIARA PA 26(S)
PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 20, 1991
CDC:rvo
2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART O
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 90-36
DATE: June 14. 1991
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Aviara PA 26(S)
2. APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 Palomar Airport Road. Suite 206
Carisbad. CA 92009
(619) 931-1190
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 4. 1990
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Subdivision Map and grading for eventual constmction of
95 single familv. detached residential units.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist
8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked
to indicate this determination.
r
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings 'YES-sig" and 'YES-insig"
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
(sig)
YES NO
(insig)
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
2. Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
5. Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quahty?
6. Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
7. Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
9. Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
11. Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
stmcture or object?
-2-
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(sig) (insig)
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shmbs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance? X
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects? X
16. Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? X
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(sig) (insig)
17. Alter the present or plarmed land use
of an area? X
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services? X
-3-
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
(sig)
NO
(insig)
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
20. Increase existing noise levels?
21. Produce new light or glare?
22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
23. Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
25. Generate substantial additional traffic?
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
27. Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present pattems of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
28. Alter waterbome, rail or air traffic?
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
31. Obstmct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
32. Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
-4-
i
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO
(sig) (insig)
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of Califomia history or prehistory. X
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed project involves the finish grading (28,200 cubic yards) of a previously mass-graded site,
constmction of residential streets, drainage and other infrastmcture, and tentative subciivision of Planning
Area 26(S) of Aviara Phase II. The tentative map includes 95 single family residential lots on minimum 7,500
sq. ft. lot areas. Three open space lots are also proposed over the 45.8 acre site.
The area proposed for finish grading has been previously graded per subdivision map CT 89-37. No
encroachment into previously designated open space areas are proposed by the project. It is located in an area
anticipated for residential development per the City's General Plan, and the Local Coastal Program for the
affected area.
For this environmental analysis, staff conducted several field trips to the subject property and reviewed the
Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 83-2(A)) and the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map which already covered this property.
In that: (1) the proposed project site has already been reviewed under the Master Plan EIR 83-2(A) and the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for Aviara Phase II (CT 89-37), (2) as designed, the project implements all
recommended mitigation measures of EIR 83-2(A) and the Phase II Mitigated Negative Declaration, and (3)
the project will preserve in open space the previously deed restricted coastal habitat areas, no environmental
impacts are anticipated. There were no public comments received in response to the Notice for a Negative
Declaration.
Phvsical Environment
1. The project is a previously graded site containing no unstable earth conditions as discussed in the Soils
Report for CT 89-37.
2. Relatively minor topographic changes will result from the project. Only 28,200 cubic yards of balanced
earthwork are proposed. This equates to approximately 615 cu/yds of soil movement per gross acre.
Such minor topographic changes are not considered to be significant.
3. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be incorporated into the project to adequately reduce
potential soil erosion impacts. A downstream permanent desiltation basin has been constmcted in
Planning Area 28.
4. Potential erosion impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon will be adequately mitigated as discussed in response
#3 above.
5. Constmction emission and minor fugitive dust generation impa(:ts associated with project grading are
considered short term and insignificant. Dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering
operations. Air quality impacts associated with future development of housing upon this area is not
considered significant in itself. Long term full mitigation of regional air quality impacts will require that
dependence upon the automobile be reduced regionally and statewide.
6. In that no stmctural development is proposed at this time, impacts to air movement are not anticipated.
Air quality impacts from dust generation can be adequately controlled through watering operations
during project grading.
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION cont'd
7. This project will not change the course or flow of water as no streams are located in the immediate area
and all drainage waters will be handled by proposed drainage facilities.
8. Development of this project (tentative map grading and road constmction) will create impervious
surfaces which would reduce absorption rates and incrementally increase runoff velocities. However,
to accommodate this increased runoff, drainage facilities will be incorporated into this project and
future residential development upon the site, thereby mitigating this concem.
9. No inordinate depletion of any natural resources is anticipated by the subdivision, grading, and
constmction of infrastmcture proposed by this project.
10. No significant impact as discussed in #9 above.
11. A thorough archaeological testing of the area was conducted in 1987 as part of EIR 83-2(A). No
prehistoricaUy or historically significant sites were discovered within the project area. An archaeologist
and a paleontological expert will be present during grading to monitor operations in an effort to
preserve any uncovered objects.
12. Surface disturbance and grading for the project will not encroach into any native habitat area and will
not affect the onsite coastal deed restricted biological areas.
13. No impacts to the above mentioned coastal deed restricted areas are anticipated in that project
landscaping proposed adjacent to this habitat shall be required to be compatible and non-invasive.
14. As stipulated in the Master Plan, the conversion of agricultural lands shall be permitted upon payment
of agricultural conversion fees. In accordance, the project applicant has already paid to the State
Coastal Conservancy agricultural mitigation fees required for the development of the project site.
15. As discussed in #12 above, the previously deed restricted coastal sage habitat will be maintained in
open space. Accordingly, no significant impacts to habitat or species are anticipated.
16. No new animal species or migration barrier will occur as a result of the project, as further discussed
in #12 above.
Human Environment
17. Development of this project will be consistent with the Gener^tPlan, Master Plan 177 and the Mello
I LCP. The land uses proposed will be intemally compatible as well as being compatible with adjacent
uses.
18. As discussed in the Zone 19 Local Facihties Management Plan, with the payment of all fees and the
implementation of all improvement conditions (i.e. upgrading of the Batiquitos sewer pump station,
constmction of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive), all public facilities and services will be available to
meet the demands of the future development of 95 single family residences proposed on the project site.
No adverse impacts should result.
-7-
%
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION cont'd
19. Although this Tentative Map does not propose any actual residential development, any subsequent
dwelling unit constmction onsite shall not be permitted until the Batiquitos Sewer Pump Station is
upgraded.
20. Constmction of the project (grading and road development) may result in minor short term insignificant
constmction noise impacts upon surrounding existing and proposed residences. Otherwise, the future
residential uses on the subject property will be acoustically compatible with surrounding existing and
future residential uses. No traffic noise impacts from surrounding streets are anticipated.
21. Future lighting utilized onsite will be directed so as to not impact adjacent future views.
22. Because this is a residential project, it will not involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances.
23. The proposed density of the project results in 2.07 du/ac. This is in compliance with the Master Plan's
anticipated 2.35 du/ac.
24. The project will provide additional housing units to meet existing demand.
25. A total of 950 average daily vehicle trips will be generated by the project which will not significantly
impact the circulation system as discussed in EIR 83-2(A) and LFMP 19.
26. The demand for parking facilities created by this project will be satisfied onsite. Two garage spaces will
be provided for each unit and adequate on street guest parking will be provided throughout the project.
27. The additional 950 ADT generated by the project will be accommodated by the existing and planned
circulation network. This minor increase in traffic is not considered significant.
28. The project site is outside of the Airport Influence Area for Palomar Airport.
29. The project, as designed, will not cause conflicts at its intersections with Batiquitos Drive.
30. The project will not interfere with emergency response plans.
31. Manufactured slopes created through the already approved Phase II mass grading (which includes this
site) will be fully landscaped consistent with approved plans. Otherwise, the finish grading (28,200
cubic yards) of the subject property would not result in a visual impact.
32. The project will have no effect whatsoever on existing recreational opportunities.
-8-
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) altemate site designs,
c) altemate scale of development,
d) altemate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) altemate sites for the proposed, and
g) no project altemative.
a) The project scale, 95 residential lots, is not of a size where phased development would be
beneficial.
b) The project has been designed consistent with the Aviara Master Plan and all City ordinances. All
open space areas are avoided.
c) The project is designed at slightly less scale (density) than allowed by the Master Plan for the area.
d) The project is in conformance with the City's General Plan and the Master Plan. Altemate uses
would require amendment of these documents.
e) The proposed project involves subdivision and grading of the site only. Development of the site
will occur only if facilities are guaranteed.
f) The proposed project is the environmentally preferred project for the site.
g) The "no project" altemative is not in conformance with the General Plan/Master Plan designation
for the site, therefore, it is not environmentally preferable.
-9-
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
_X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the
environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with
previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required.
Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date
Date
CDC:rvo
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPUCABLE)
•10-
9
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WTTH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
-11-
ARPORT
V
ll-
ll I •••IIIII; Illlli'
•
SITE
IllllilllJ
•
RD
^1
•II
llllllliia \
1 \ lill^
BATKJUrrOS LAGOON
LA
<
UJ oc
Cil) If Ciriikid
AVIARA PLANNING AREA 26(S) CT 90-36
CASE NO.: CTT 90-36 #BACKGROUND DATA SHEET ^
CASE NAME: AVL\RA PA 26(S)
APPLICANT: AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Tentative Tract Map to create 99 minimum 7500 SF
Single Familv Residential Lots and 3 Open Space Lots on a 47 acre site located
at the NW comer of the intersection of Batiquitos Drive and Kestral Drive.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Section 27. 28 and 34 Township 12 South.
Range 4 West San Bemardino Meridian. Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego.
APN: 214-170-51 / 215-040-23 / 216-111-08
(Assessor's Parcel Number)
Acres _47 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 102/99
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation RLM
Density Allowed 2.35 Density Proposed 2.10
Existing Zone _PC Proposed Zone .PC
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site _PC VACANT/GRADED
North _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-26N)
South _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-27)
East _PC AVIARA GOLF COURSE
West _PC VACANT/GRADED (PA-30)
i'
PUBLIC FACILTTIES
School District CARLSBAD Water District CARLSBAD Sewer District CARLSBAD
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 99
PubUc FacUities Fee Agreement, dated DECEMBER 3. 1990
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
JC Negative Declaration, issued June 20. 1991
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other.
CDD:lh
PA 26 South
Citv of Carlsbad
Plannincj Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPUCANTS STATEMENT OF OlSCLOSURg OF CERTAIN 0WN6BSHIP INTERESTS ON AU APPUCATIONS WHICH WIU. REQUIRE
oiscflenoNARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE crrv COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED SOARO. COMMISSION OR ccMMnrEE.
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. Applicant
Ust the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership
ZUll Palomar Airport Rd., #206 Carlsbad, CA 92009"
Owner
Ust the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved.
a Del aware Aviara Land r.nmpany,
rnrpnratinn I
450 Newport Center Drive. Suita 304
Newport Beach. CA 92660
a Palifornifl rnrpnratinn
18Q Ni Rivervigw Priv?
Suite 150
Anaheim. CA 92808
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and
addresses of ali individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
Henry Hillman Address:
450 Newport
buite 3U4
Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660-7640
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) aiaove is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names anc
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as tnjstee or beneficiarv
of the trust
1UA
FRM00013 8/90
i
Disclosure Statement
(Over;
Page 2
5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boarc
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes No JL W yes, please indicate person(8)
P«faon ia d«fin«d M: 'Any individual, fimi. eopartnariAip, j«int vanOira. aiaociatian. lociai club, fratamal organization, corporation. Mtaia. trutt.
racaivar. tyndieata, ttiia and any othaf eeuniy. city and county, city munt«ip«lily. diatriet Of othar pelWoal aubdiviaMn, er any otnar group or
eombinatipn acting aa a unit'
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
11/50/90
Signature ohOWner/date
Aviara Land Associates Limited
Partnership
Print Of type name of owner
By: D. L. Clemens
Vice President
11/50/90
Signatur4.af^piicant/date
Aviara Land'Associates Limited
Partnership
Print or type name of applicant
By: 0. L. Clemens
Vice President
. I,
FRM00013 8/90
CTTY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FAOLmES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development AppUcation)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: AVIARA PA 26(S) - CT 90-36
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RLM ZONING: PC
DEVELOPER'S NAME: AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES
ADDRESS: 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT RD.. CARLSBAD. CA 92009
PHONE NO.: (619) 931-1190 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 214-170-51: 215-040-23: 216-111-08
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 47 AC/99 DU'S
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 366.94
B. Library: Demand m Square Footage = 195.82
C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) N/A
D. Park: Demand in Acreage = .733
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A
Identify Drainage Basm = N/A
(Identify master plan faciUties on site plan)
F. Circulation: Demand m ADTs = 990
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 2 & 4
H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - N/A
I. Schools: N/A
(Demands to be determined by staff)
J. Sewer: Demand m EDUs - 99
IdentUy Sub Basm - N/A
(Identify trunk line(s) Unpacted on site plan)
K. Water: Demand m GPD - 2178
L. The project is 11 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit aUowance.
CDD:lh