Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 90-37; Aviara PA 25; Tentative Map (CT)4 PA 25 CITY OF CARLSBAD LANO USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE I OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (For Dept. Use Onl^) • • • • • • • • • • (For Dept. Use Only) Master Plan , Specific Plan Precise Development Plan.., Tentative Tract Map Planned Development Permit Non-Residential Planned Development Permit Condominium Permit Special Use Permit...... Redevelopment Permit Tentative Parcel Map Administrative Variance. ^ General Plan Amendment • • • • • • • • • Site Development Plan Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Hillside Development Permit. Environmental Impact Assessment Variance Planned Industrial Permit.. Coastal Development Permit. Planning Commission Deter.. 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE South SIDE OF Alga Road BETWEEN proposed Kestral Drive (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAHE OF STREET) 1-5 (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (NAME OF STREET) Portions of Section 27. Township 12 South, Ran ie4 West, San Bernardion Meridian, City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S) 215-040-23 5) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 19 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION RLM,RM, PC N. QS 7) PROPOSEO GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Same 8) EXISTING ZONING PC 9) PROPOSED ZONING •Samfi 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 45.8 11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 34 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 36 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION SF 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS N/A (RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTIRAL) 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A-16) PROPOSEO COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A CITY OF CARLSSAO LANO USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSEO PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 20) PROJECT NAME: I . . I Aviara 40% 34 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 340 21)BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Map for 34 single family homes on minimum 7500 square foot lots. 22) OWNER 23) APPLICANT NAME (PRINT OR TYP£)Ayi?J^/-?t^^?°hiS' •mz (PRINT OR l^PEf^lllllJilT MAILING ADORESS 2011 Palomar Airport Rd Suite 206 MAILING ApORESf imited Partnership 2011 Palomar Airport Rd, Suite CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE Carlsbad, CA 92009 931-1190 CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE Carlsbad, CA 92009 931-1190 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWlfSDGE. 12/5/ SIGNATURE j^. DATE Aviara Lan3~-"A«.50ciates^ Limited Partner ship ; By: __^^-J-^_^i A I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRE- SENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE ^FORMATION IS TRUE^AND CORRECT TO THE Bi^iTOF MY KNOWLEDGE. I^MW^Sni-AWociatiJ^''"^ 12/5/90 ^.imited EuJ Iiiij3sliij>j| B^ ************************************************************************** FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED 5 >2?3^ - ^\ 0 . 0^ Pu^i:c P.c'Ar ^ H 0, od DEC06 i9S0 CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOP. PROC. SERV. DIV. " DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVEO BY: TOTAL FEE REQUIRED PA 25 Citv of Carlsbad Planninci Department DISCLOSURE STATCMENT APPUCANTS STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPUCATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CtVf COUNCIU OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD. COMMISSION OR COMMHTEE. (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. AppHcant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 2011 Palomar Airport Rd., #206 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Avi ara ^.nn^] Pninpgny a nplgw^r*^ RfipilM 1 r DfiVfil npmftnt Co , , rnrpnratinTi a ralifnrnia Cnrporation 450 Newport Center Drive, .Suite 304 IgQ N. Rivgyview Drive Newport Beach. CA 92660 Suite 150 Anaheim, CA 92808 If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or ownfng any partnership interest in the partnership. Henry Hillman Address: 450 Newport Center Drive Suite 304 Newport Beach, CA 92660-7640 If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. HUA Disclosure Statement (Over) Page 2 5. Have you had more than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No J|[_ If yes, please indicate person(s) Parson la dafinad «•: 'Any individual, firm, eepartnarship, joint varrtura, aaaociation, social club, (ratamai organization, corporation, astata, taist. racaivar, syndicata, thia and any othar county, city and county, city municipality, diatrict or othar political subdiviaion, or any othar group or combination acting aa a unit' (NOTE: Attacfcradditional pages as necessary.) 11/50/90 Signature of Own^r/daite Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership Print or type nama of owner By: D. L. Clemens Vice President 11/50/90 SignatuVe^ atfj'plicant/data Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership Print or type name of applicant By: D. L. Clemens Vice President FRM00013 8/90 Br amal ea Califof^^ia Inc X F'ark PI2 #110i Irvine CA 92714 Nob or Li li h velyn Tabata P 0 Box 943 Car' i :3bad CH 9201 a uavici b i/ Kar en ihompson I"' U bOK 14S7 wisrlibad CA 92018 Aviara Land Associates 2011 Paionar Airport Road #206 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Attn: Pamela Hainp<: f Evelyn M P 0 Bo;-; 33 '-"ar Q i f f CA Wei dner '\/ y2007 A notioe has been mailed to all property owners/occupantS listGCl herein. Date Signature^ y;iiini^TfTr«\^ .res ^ John R ?( Christina F'aj 1017 Ir13 C b Carlsbad CA 9200 Rodert Deborah Bas: 1019 lns Ct Car-1 =ioad CA :i:40oy Robert C S< Linda Alien 3174 Seabury .3t Car i sbad CA 1/ David W 2< •v'er i ee rreei 1023 Iris Ct Carlsbad CA 92009 Mario S< Molly Drent'^^a 1025 Iris Ct Carlsbad CA 92009 b Li s a n r' a y n e 1027 Iris Ct Carlsbad CA y:40oy To BOX ' ^ Don Brown :"i02 Daffodil L:ar Isbad CA ^2009 Qar^^P: .'v K.ry=tal Gannaw^iy lOCi^fcoxgl ove Vw Car ^R)ad CH laordon 3 4: Juliette Naylo 7104 Daffodil Pl Carlsbad CA 32009 Family Deinir.jian 1007 r o y; glove V w Carlsbad CA yi^UO'i Mary Vinson / 7106 Daffoail Pl\7 • arisbad CA 9200'; Elizabeth C Kehr 10 O 5 F o .V. g 1 o v e V w Carlsbad CA y^'ooy y2009 Michael t'. Judith Eiovit: 7IOS Daffodil Pl Car 1sbad CA Thom^is J 0; Marian Reichert 7110 Daffodil Pl LarIsbad CA 92009 Michael M S< Irene 1002 Foxglove Vw Carlsbad CA Stephen Oakley 1004 Fo.xgiove Vw Carlsbad CA Cur r; V :ix.OOy Fami 1 y Trust 02--28--90 Ridley H 7112 Daffodil Pl / Car 1sbad CA \^ 32009 Rose M De Lancey v^y^ 7204 Daffodil Pl Car1sbad CA 320OS # Dal.jit S ?< Elaine Sarkaria ^ P • Box 5986 •range CA 92613 • 76 Printed •»••*••* 3..;.ooy Norman R Sandra Schwendlsr- 1006 Foxglove V w Carlsbad CA George M S< Keiko Torigoe 1003 Foxglove Vw / Carlsbad CA ^ John A Nylander 1010 Foxglove Vw Carlsbad CA Paul W Simla 4812 Northerly St Oceanside CA James J Castner 52 Fox Chase Lane'' West Hartford Ct ykiooy yiiooy 92056 06107 # Raymond L ?< Filothea Mitchell 1016 Foxglove Vw Carlsb ad'CA 92009 Steven S< Whiting Bruning ioiS Foxglove Vw Carlsbad CA 92009 Robert K ?< Melinda Beec 1014 Daisy Ct Jjk Carlsbad CA 92009 o.t v/ - r ani-: 7214, carim^d OH 1 r-. 'j^ I IK. Her mine C ar r ffodil Pi ^ 3200'3 Jose 2< Bertha Kahuam 7204 Manzanita St Carlsbad CA 92009 Larry W Marta Jones 7212 Daffodil Pl Carlsbad CA v/ 9 2':; 09 Anthony fk Janice Imbrifiyione 1010 Tulip Way CarIsbad CA 920O9 Alan H S< Jo Bur son l/ 7210 Daffodil Pi Carlsbad CA 92009 Charles E S< Carolyn Myers \/ 1012 Tulip Way Carlsbad CA .92009 K a t h e r i n e B a u m 1014 Tul ip Way- Car Isbad CA 92009 H F Lavay 7208 Daffodil'Pl Carlsbad CA 3i003 Witt W S< Rosemary Row! ett I 7206 Daffodil Pl y Carlsbad CA \/ 92009 ^ Alwilda B Kirscher\/ 7111 Daffodil Pl Car 1sbad CA Melvin R Segal 3528 Prestwick Dr La Jolla CA K i yosh i .!< M i sao Mor i k a wa 1592 Bermuda Dunes Dr Boulder City Nv 89005 Alfred Jennie Zagroba 7104 Rose Dr - Carlsbad CA \/ 92009 Thomas F 7107 Daffodil Pl Carlsbad CA .?< Jill Snipes \/ 92009 Thomas E ?< Pamela Eberiy 1003 Foxglove Vw y Carlsbad'CA v/ 92009 Edwin C S< Connie Gates 7105 Daffodil Pl Carlsbad CA 920t:y3 Lloyd R ?< Shelley Hendrickson 1015 Foxglove Vw Carlsbad CA 92009 J Harry A ?< Orpha Wagner 1013 Foxglove Vw r Carlsbad CA 920Qy Robert C S< Elizabeth Keay 1006 Daisy Ave y Carlsbad CA \/ 92009 Ar1ene H Reed lOOS Daisy Ave Carlsbad CA Jeffrey R 8< Jane Regan 1010 Daisy Ct / Carlsbad CA 92009 92009 Richard T ?< Sherry Wheeler 1011 F o X g1o ve Vw Carlsbad CA 92009 David E ?< Judithr'Steen 1012 Daisy Ct Carlsbad CA 92009 Robert E S< Laur< 7205 Daffodil P( Carlsbad CA .ress V 920(:)9 .oren E ?< Sally Thomg>so.n •207 Daffodil Pl arisbad CA .enard 3 Debora Ellas '209 Daffodil Pl Carlsbad CA 92009 Edwin A DLisel 7211 Daffodil Pl Carlsbad CA 92009 Christopher J S< Barbara Ross 7215 Daffodil Pl / Car i sbiid CA ^ 92009 Family Trust 07-25-91 Wi11lams 7217 Daffodil Pl Car 1sbad CA yuooy Don Brown 7219 Daffodil Pl Car 1sbad CA y Family Trust 01--03~yl Brunner 7221 Daffodil Pl Car lsbad CA yk'O09 Jeffrey R Wenzel 7222 Daffodil Pl ;:ar Isbad CA J 32009 J •John C Sul ton 7220 Daffodil Pl Carisbad CA 92009 J Allan J .*?< Barbara Lahmann 72IS Daffodil Pl Carisbad CA / 92009 J 9200 Bruce M Carol Jordan 7216 Daffodil Pl C a r1sb ad CA 92009 # V Da1^^kechbrenner 102'^P-is Ct Carlsbad CA Kathleen E Moore 1032 Ins Ct Carlsbad CA Ram T Chi11ar 1030 Ins Ct C^ar'lsbazi L'A Jancy Stivers .028 Ins Ct l^arl'sbad CA Rosalind 1991 Family 1026 Iris Ct Carlsbad CA \y •i:i<:. irr ingto Anne M Kiegert 1024 Ir1s Ct Car 1sbad cA Maureen Wanzie 1022 Iris Ct Carisbad CA David W ?< Lisa Means 1020 Daisy Ave Carlsbad CA •:?i.Ouy y^ooy 92009 Stephen L S< Eugenie Garman 1011 Tulip Way /- Carlsbad CA \/ 92009 Kathryn F Rangus 1013 Tulip Way Carlsbad CA 92009 Michael B 8< Catherine Mc Mahon 1015 Tulip Way / Carlsbad CA v/ 92009 Family Trust 05-07-87 Woodruff 1017 Tulip Way ./ Carlsbad CA 92009 Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas. CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OFSAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal, a newspaper of general circulation, published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the follow- ing dates, to-wit: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commisaion of the City OfCarlsbad will hold a public hearing at the' CouncU Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad ViUage Drive (fonnerly Elm Avenue), Carlsbad, CaUfomia, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednes- day, Februaiy 5,1902, to consider approval of a request for a Tenta- tive Tract Hap for 34 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square feet) and 2 open space lots on a 27.2 acre site located on prop- erty generally located south of Alga Road, in Local Facilities Manage- ment Zone 19 and more particularly described as: Portions of Section 27, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bemar- dino Meridian, in the City ofCarls- bad, County of San Diego. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invit- ed to attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available on and after January 29, 1992. If you have any questions, please call Elaine Blackburn in the Planning Department at 438-1161, ext 4471. If you challenge the Tentative Tract Map in court, you may be lim- ited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the pub- lic hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence deli- vered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. Case File: CT 90^7 Applicant: Aviara Planning Area 25 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION till i CiM AVIARA PLANNING AREA 25 CT 90-37 January 23 19_ 19_ 19_ 19 19 92 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 23rd day of January 1992 e 0 r CL Clerk of the Printer CI 6677: January 23,1992 Carlsbad Journal Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. P.O. Box 230878, Encinitas, CA 92023-0878 (619) 753-6543 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, 199, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaidf; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the aBove entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Joumal, a newspaper of general circulation, published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the saidCity of Oceanside, County of San Diego, State of Calif ornia, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the follow- ing dates, to-wit: NEGATIVE DECIARATION PBOJtCY kO0RES8/LOCA-nOM: tMitti^AilPI Howl between XHtmlOiMuidT-9. raonecT D>SCIUPTION: A Ttntati'M TMel tfap t» ereat* 34 tinito tunlljr leti and 2 open space lOlB. The msj ot CarialMd has con-daelMni MnriroMitBtal iwview of tke riMva dMCrflMd project pur- •MSt l» fh* OHkkaiMs tor Imide-m*Bt||UM of the Calitomia Itn-vj^apMtel 9l*Utr Act and the AivIHBaiaiitai rrattetlon Ordi- «aiiM <rfthi of CarMiad. Aa a Mtnlt Mid Mvisw, a Hafatlve DaefattatlaB (daclaration that tbe project will nat iwTik a iifalfieant la^aet <>• tto (klivlr«aaiai>t) It hriraby ianwi^tw tba snbtaet pre-J««t JUMflcatton tor thlt action is aBffl^lBtlM nuuriBCDapaMmaiit A e«p# af tha.Nafattt* Oadara-tlon with luromlva doeuamit* is oa flla la tM Ftaanl wOapattmant, I PalaoM Drive, Carisbad, Ha IMllW. Comn^tt from Uc ara liivitad. Pleas* sub- Bti|T{eomlB«|ttti in writing to the PlaMtiii Dapartmant within 30 dayi of date otianiane*. If you bave any qaeitimia, plaasa call Elaine ' BlatUittn la tba Rawiliif D*i?art-, mairt atiae-lMl, extMuion 4471. nOBA^ X HOLZMILLER .RMUilaf Ditaetor CJ amlDfilcmbar IS, IWl December 12 19 91 19 19 19 19 I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 12th day of December, l^^l Clerk of the Printer STATE OF CALIFORNIA ^§ PETE WILSON, Go\/emor GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, GA 95814 Mar 13, 1992 ELAINE BLACKBURN CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Subject: AVIARA PLANNING AREA 25, CT 90-37 SCH # 92021054 Dear ELAINE BLACKBURN: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call Tom Loftus at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Sincerely, David C. Nunenkamp Deputy Director, Permit Assistance Notice of Det^mination From: City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 To: JC. Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 County Clerk County of San Diego Attn: Mail Drop C-11 220 West Broadway San Diego, CA 92101 ProjectNo.: CT 90-37 Filing of Notice of Detennination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Aviara Planning Area 25 - CT 90-37 Project Tide 92021054 Elaine Blackbum (619)438-1161/4471 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension South of Alga Road between Kestrel Drive and 1-5. in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego Project Location (include county) Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map to create 34 single family lots and 2 open space lots. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on February 5, 1992 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. This project was reviewed previously under an EIR and a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. Findings were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Negative Declaration with cormnents and responses and record of project approval are available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. ^7. PLANNING DIRECTOR MICHAEL J LZMIbLER Date TITLE Date received for filing at OPR: EB:km Revised October 1989 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Alga Road between Kestrel Drive and 1-5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Tentative Tract Map to create 34 single family lots and 2 open space lots. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation ofthe Califomia Envirormiental QuaUty Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Plarming Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Plaiming Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit coimnents in writing to the Planning Department within days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call in the Plaiming Department at 438-1161, extension . MICHAEL J. HOLZMKLER DATED: DECEMBER 12, 1991 Hy\Wt^>M^TJW^^^ MICHAEL J. H0L2 CASE NO: CT 90-37 Planning Director APPLICANT: AVLARA PA 25 PUBLISH DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1991 EB:km 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 CALIPANIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AJI^JAME PO BOX 944209 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2090 CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title/Location (include coimty): CT 90-37 - Aviara Planning Area 25. South of Alga Road between Kestrel Drive and 1-5. Name and Address of ^plicant: Aviara Land Associates, Ltd. Partnership 2011 Palomar Airport Road, #206 Carisbad, CA 92009 Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map to create 34 single family lots and 2 open space lots. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial Study for the above referenced propeity, including evaluation of the proposed project's potential for adverse environmental impacts on fish and wildlife resources. 2. Based on the completed Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning £)epartment finds there is no evidence before the City of Carlsbad that the proposal will have potential for an adverse efifect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that based on the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. EBrkm Section 711.4, Fish and Game Code DFG: 12/90 MICHAEL J. HOtZMILLER Title: Planning Director Lead Agency: Citv of Carlsbad Date: November 19. 1991 ' NOTICE OF COMPLETION Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Ten eet, Rm. 121, Sacrarnento, Ck 95814 - 916/J|^613 Project Title: Aviara Planning Area 25 - CT 90-37 Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive City: Carlsbad See NOTE Below: SCH « Contact Person: Elaine Blackburn Phone: (619)438-1161. x4471 Zip: 92009 County: San Diego PROJECT LOCATION: County: San Diego City/Nearest Conmunity: Carlsbad Cross streets: Alga Road and Kestral Drive Assessor's Parcel No. 215-040-23 Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 Total Acres: Section: 27 28.4 Twp. 12 South Range: 4 West Base: Waterways: Batiquitos Lagoon Airports: RaiIways: Schools: DOCtJMENT TYPE CEQA: NOP Early Cons Neg Dec Draft EIR Supplement/Subsequent EIR (Prior SCH No.) _ Other NEPA: NOI EA Draft EIS FONSI OTHER: Joint Document Final Document Other LOCAL ACTION TYPE General Plan Update General Plan Amendment General Plan Element Community Plan Specific Ptan Master Plan Planned Unit Development Site Plan Rezone Annexation Prezone Redevelopment Use Permit Coastal Permit X Land Division (Subdivision, Other Parcel Map, Tract Hap, etc.) DEVELOPHENT TYPE _X Residential: Office: Commercial: Industrial: Educational Recreational Units 34 Sq. Ft. _ Sq. Ft. _ Sq. Ft. _ Acres 28.4 . Acres . Acres Acres Employees Employees Employees Water Facilities: Transportation: Mining: Power: Waste Treatment: Hazardous Waste: Other: Type Type Mineral Type Type Type MGO Watts PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT Aesthetic/Visual Agricultural Land _)( Air Ouality Archaeological/Historical Coastal Zone Drainage/Absorption Economic/Jobs Fiscal Flood Plain/Flooding Forest Land/Fire Hazard Geologic/Seismic Minerals Noise Population/Housing Balance Public Services/Facilities Recreation/Parks SchooIs/Un i vers i t i es Septic Systems Sewer Capacity Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading Solid Waste Toxic/Hazardous Traffic/Circulation Vegetation Water Quality Water Supply/ Ground Water Wetland/Riparian WiIdlife Growth Inducing Landuse Cumulative Effect Other Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use LU Zoning General Plan Undeveloped PC RLM/RM/PC/N/OS Project Description A Tentative Tract Map to create 34 single family lots and 2 open space lots. NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. If a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft docunent) please fill it in. Revised October 1989 EB:km ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 90-37 DATE: JUNE 14. 1991 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Aviara Planning Area 25 2. APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 Palomar Aimort Road. Suite 206 Carisbad. CA 92009 (619)931-1190 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 10. 1990 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map for 34 single familv lots and 2 open st>ace lots. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist 8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City detennines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be detennined significant. # PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig) YES (insig) NO 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, stmcture or object? f lOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig) YES NO (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shmbs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? YES (sig) YES (insig) NO -3- HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systeins, solid waste or hazardous waste control systeins? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. Produce new light or glare? 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present pattems of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 28. Alter waterbome, rail or air traffic? 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or . emergency evacuation plans? 31. Obstmct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES YES (sig) NO (insig) X MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory. 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? YES (sig) YES (insig) NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Proiect Description The proposed project involves finish grading and infrastmcture constmction for Planning Area 25 of the Aviara Master Plan. This tentative tract map provides 34 single family lots and 2 open space lots on a 28.4 acre site. The project site has been mass graded as part of the Aviara Master Plan CT 89-37. The proposed project is consistent v^ath Master Tentative Tract Map (CT 89-37) for the Master Plan, and mitigation measures as required by the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 83-2(A)) have been implemented. 1. The proposed project will not result in unstable earth conditions or exposure to geologic hazards. The mass grading for the site has been done in compliance with CT 89-37 (the approved tentative map for the Master Plan). The proposed finish grading and infrastmcture constmction v^U involve 2,200 cubic yards of cut and 73,000 cubic yards of fill. Import totals 70,900 cubic yards. Pad elevations for some lots on the northem portion of the site are somewhat higher (10 feet) than originally approved, however the plan is substantially in corformance with the approved Master Tentative Map. 2. Any major topographic changes were evaluated in the EIR prepared for the Master Plan. Only minor changes will result from the finish grading and infrastmcture constmction of the current project. No development is proposed at this time. As indicated in #1 above some elevations have been changed, but the plan is substantially in conformance with original approvals. 3/4. The proposed project will not result in or be affected by erosion of soils, nor result in changes to beach sands or channels. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be required of the project in conformance vnth. City standards. A permanent desiltation basin has been constmcted in Planning Area 28 (to the south) to mitigate potential impacts from soil erosion. The drainage and erosion control mitigation required will adequately mitigate any potential impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon. 5. The proposed subdivision will not result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality. The ultimate development of the site (into single family residences) vydll contribute incrementally to an increase in local and regional air pollution. This project (when ultimately developed) will generate only a ininor amount of traffic (340 average daily trips). No development is proposed at this time. 6. The project will not result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature. Air quality impacts (dust) from grading activities v^dll be controlled by watering. No stmctures are proposed at this time. 7. The project will not change the course or flow of waters. No water bodies are located vithin or immediately adjacent to this planning area. 8. The project v^l not affect the quantity or quality of surface water, groimd water, or public water supply. The project is conditioned to provide adequate facilities to handle any increased runoff resulting from the development of the site. 9/10. The project will not substantially increase usage or depletion of any natural resource, nor will it use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. The project involves only finish grading and infrastmcture constmction at this time. -6- 11. All mitigation for archaeological, paleontological, and historic sites required by the Master Plan EIR has been done. 12. The EIR prepared for the Master Plan identified areas of Coastal Sage Scmb and required mitigation in the form of Coastal deed restricted open space areas. The proposed subdivision does not encroach into these deed restricted areas. 13 The proposed project v^dll not encroach into the coastal deed restricted areas, thus will not result in a barrier to replenishment. Any landscaping proposed vnth this project must be compatible with the deed restricted area vegetation. 14. The approved Master Plan for this project required mitigation for conversion of agricultural land in the form of agricultural conversion fees. The applicant has paid all such fees required for this project. 15/16. The site contains areas of Coastal Sage Scmb (gnatcatcher habitat). However, these areas are Coastal deed restricted open space areas. This project does not encroach into the deed restricted areas. Therefore, no significant impacts to species or habitat is expected. 17. The proposed ultimate development (single family residences) for the site is consistent wdth the General Plan and with the Master Plan (MP 177) goveming development of the site. 18. The proposed project will not substantially affect public utilities or public services. The project will be conditioned to comply with all requirements of the local facilities management plan, thus meeting the demands of the future development proposed for the site. 19. No development is proposed with this current project. However, the upgrading of the Batiquitos Pump Station will be required prior to constmction of the residential units, and any development proposal will be so conditioned. 20. The proposed project will not result in an increase to existing noise levels. Short-term intermittent increases to noise levels which may occur during grading and constmction will be ininor and insignificant. 21. Because the proposed project is for finish grading and public infrastmcture constmction, it will not result in an increase in light or glare. Any necessary street lights will be of the low sodium variety, minimizing glare. 22. The proposed project would not be expected to involve a significant risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances. 23. Because no development of units is proposed at this time, the project will have no effects on density. 24. The proposed project will ultimately contribute additional housing units to meet current demand. No development is proposed at this time. 25. The proposed project will ultimately generate 340 daily trips. This ininor increase in trips is not significant. The existing and proposed new portions of the circulation system will accommodate this traffic. Circulation and traffic for the project was evaluated in the EIR prepared for the Master Plan. No constmction of units is proposed currently. 26. Any demand for parking created by the ultimate development of this project will be satisfied on site. 27. The proposed project will not impact existing transportation systeins or alter present pattems of circulation. No new trips will be generated by this project, which is limited to finish grading and infrastmcture constmction. i28. The proposed project will not alter waterbome, rail, or air traffic. There are no water bodies or rail lines on or adjacent to the site. The project is not within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan Palomar Airport. 29. The project v\dll not increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. The project is designed to provide adequate separation between vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 30. The project is designed such that it will not interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans. 31. Revegetation of slopes after grading was required. This project, involving finish grading and infrastmcture constmction would not be expected to result in aesthetic impacts or offensive public views. 32. The proposed project will not affect the quality or quantity of existing recreation opportunities. The ultimate development of the site into single family homes will include the provision of private yards and a commumty trail. No development is proposed at this time. -8- ANALYSIS OF VL\BLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) altemate site designs, c) altemate scale of development, d) altemate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) altemate sites for the proposed, and g) no project altemative. a) The scale of the proposed project (subdivision into 34 single family and 2 open space lots) is appropriate as a single phase project. b) The site design is consistent with the approved Master Plan (MP 177). The design includes preservation of open space coastal deed restricted areas. No additional environmental benefits would be derived by an altemate site design. ' c) The proposed scale of development (34 dwelling units) is less than the density approved for the site in the Master Plan (37 dwelling units.) d) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and with the approved Master Plan. No additional environmental benefits would result from an altemate use. e) The actual development of the site will occur at a future time. The current project proposal is for lot subdivision and infrastmcture constmction only. f) The project site is appropriate for the proposed use. The project does not preclude similar uses on other sites. g) The no-project altemative would not prevent the ultimate development of the site. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the approved Master Plan and provides mitigation of environmental impacts as required by the EIR for the Master Plan. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore, a Notice of Detennination has been prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signatiire ' Date' Planning Director LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) -10- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature EB:km -12- ¥5 ARPORT 7JUII llllIM FD BATIQUITOS LAGOON •II liiid^ < UJ a / Cit) ef Cirisli< AVIARA PLANNING AREA 25 CT 90-37 ^ ^^^^^ ^ PA 2.5 CASE NO. DATE: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I (To be Completed by APPLICANT) Applicant: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership Address of Applicant: 2011 Palomar Airport Road. Suite 206 Carlsbad. CA 92009 Phone Number: (619 \ 951-1190 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): D.L. Clemens (Same as above) GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please be specific) Project Description: Tentative Map for 34 single family homes on minimum 7500 square foot lots and 2 open space lots. Project Location/Address; South of Alga Road between proposed Kestral Drive and 1-5. Assessor Parcel Number: 215 . 040 . 25 General Plan/Zone of Subject Property: Combination Disti'ict/PC Zone Local Facilities Management Zone: 19 Is the site within Carlsbad's Coastal Zone? Yes Please describe the area surrounding the site to the North: Alga Road East: Proposed Kestral Drive South: Phase II Planning A^eas West: .Offsite Greenhouses List all other applicable permits & approvals related to this project: MP 177/Ct 89-37 (Please be Specific. Attach Additional Pages or Exhibits, if necessarv) 1. Please describe the project site, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. Also provide precise slope analysis when a slope of 15' or higher and 15% grade or greater is present on the site. Planning Area 25 is 27.2 Acres, located in Phase II of the approved Aviara (Pacific Rim) Master Plan. Planning Area 25 is directly South of Alga Road and North of j&lanning Area 29. 2. Please describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. UBC energy requirements 3. PLEASE AHACH A PROJECT SUMMARY SHEH WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: a. If a residential project identify the number of units, type of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates). See attached sheet b. If a commercial project, indicate the exact type, activity(ies), square footage of sales area, average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), parking provided, and loading facilities. N/A c. If an industrial project, indicate the exact type or industry(ies), average daily traffic generation (latest SANDAG rates), estimated employment per shift, time of shifts, and loading facilities. N/A d. If an institutional project, indicate the major project/site function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Please Answer each of the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. Then, fully discuss and explain why each item was checked yes or no. Provide supporting data if applicable. Attach additional sheets as necessary. YES NO 1) Could the project significantly impact or change present or future land uses in the vicinity of the activity? EXPLANATION: The Tentative Map is consistant with the approved Master Plan for this planning area and is an anticipated land use,for this site. 2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of aesthetic value? EXPLANATION: The overall project provides for golf and sporting recreation. Aesthtics should not be affected. 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? EXPLANATION: The project should have no net affect on any surrounding neighborhoods. It is not located in a highly urbanized area. 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? EXPLANATION: No residents live in the area. YES NO 5) Could the activity increase the number of low and ^ moderate cost housing units in the city? EXPLANATION: Proposed housing is not anticipated to be low or moderate cost. 6) Could the activity significantly affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? EXPLANATION: Additional 54 housing units is not considered to be a significant effect. 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? EXPLANATION: No unique features exist on site. Batiquitos Lagoon is approximately ^00 feet to the south. No impact on Batiquitos Lagoon is anticipated as concluded m blR 83-Z(AJ. 8) Could the activity significantly affect an ^ historical or archaeological site or its settings? EXPLANATION: On-site archaelogical sites have been mitigated as directed by EIR 83-2 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? EXPLANATION: proposed project will in no way affect any identified scarce natural resource, as concluded in EIR 83-2(A). YES NO 10) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant resources? EXPLANATION: Riningiral resources have been i^^Tii-ififft^ iTI F.TR «5-2rAl. These identified areas havp hPip.Tt restricted and are preserved in their natural state. 11) Are there any rare or endangered plant or animal species in the activity area? EXPLANATION: None on-site. Per EIR 85-2(A). AHjarfint Ratiquitos Lagoon contains both rare plants and animals but no encroachment into these areas or mn font buffer is proposed. 12) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's stream, lagoons, bays, tidelands or beaches? EXPLANATION: The proiect does not encroach into OT afff^rt any of the above water bodies. 13) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimin- ation of agricultural lands? EXPLANATION: Agricultural mitigation for the entire Aviara project has been mititgated per State law. 14) Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? EXPLANATION: Development in this area has been anticipated bv the City of Carlsbad General Plan, and the Local Coastal Program and it's Implementing Ordinances. No intensification ot the anticipated development is proposed. YES NO 15) Will the activity require a variance from estab- lished environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc,)? EXPLANATION: No variance required. 16) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? EXPLANATION: The proposed proiect is a part of the approved Pacific Rim (Aviara) Master Plan. 17) Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? EXPLANATION: City of Carlsbad; City Council and Planning Commission and the California Coastal Commission approval. 18) Will the activity require Issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? EXPLANATION: No variance or conditional use permit required. 19) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? EXPLANATION: No hazardous materials anticipated. YES NO 20) Will the- activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? X EXPLANATION: No structures to be constructed yii-hin flood plain. 21) Will the activity Involve construction of facilities In the area of an active fault? EXPLANATION: Nn active faults in the area as state in EIR 85-2(A). 22) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? EXPLANATION: Short term construction dust will he created but this is not a significant impact, as concluded in EIR 85-2(A). 23) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? EXPLANATION: No burning is proposed within this project. 24) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) EXPLANATION: The proposed project should not generate an increase in traffic from the approved plan and therefore, will not change the air quality. YES NO 25) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? EXPLANATION: No increase in fuel consumption nver the approved project is expected. 26) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? EXPLANATION: No grading to occur on slopes 25% and greater. 27) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? X (a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: 4.100 . (b) Percentage of alteration to the present land form: 40% . (c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: • 6' . EXPLANATION: The additional 54, homes anticipated bv the proiect would not be considered a substantial increase in the use of the above facilities. 28) Win the activity result in substantial Increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? ^ EXPLANATION: The 54 sewer EDU's have been anticipated in the City's approved Local Facilities Management Plan which was found to have no negative effect on the enviroment. YES NO 29) Will the project significantly increase wind or water erosion of soils? ^ EXPLANATION: Th^ ar^a win HP 1aTiH..rapPrl ^lii/->i win artiially <^prrpa<;P! the ern«;ivity 30) Could the project significantly affect existing fish or wildlife habitat? EXPLANATION: THP pT-nj^rt i Hp.;igrnR<1 tn avoid fish nr wildlife area.s. 31) Will the project significantly produce new light or glare? EXPLANATION: The project proposes no additional light or glare over that already approved and determined to be non-significant impact by EIR 85-2(A) 10 II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to any of the questions in Section I but think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons'below: 16.) The proposed project is Planning Area 25 and part of the overall Aviara Master Plan 17.) The City of Carlsbad and the Coastal Commission approve the project. III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE OUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature (Perswl Completing Report) Paul J. Klukas Date Signed 12/5/90 Instruct.eia LBS:lh 11 September 19, 1991 AVIARA Mr. Jim Davis City of Carlsbad Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Carisbad, CA 92009 RE: CT 90-37; Planning Area 25 Dear Jim: Per your request, enclosed is correspondence from ICG Incorporated summarizing the conclusions of their analysis of the proposed grade change for PA 25. As this was the last engineering issue relayed to us, I would request that engineering conditions be delivered to the Planning Department at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Paul J. KlukM Director of Coinmunity Planning PJK/er cc: Elaine Blackburn pa25cond.akz 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD SUITE206 CARLSBAD. CALIFORNMA 92009 (619)931-1190 FAX:(6I9) 931-7950 ICG incorporated San Diego County Office: 9240 Trade Place, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92126 619/536-1102 fax: 619/536-1306 Inland Empire Office: 1906 Orange Tree Lane, Suite 240 Redlands, CA 92374 714/792-4222 fax: 714/798-1844 Orange County Offices: Construction Inspection and Testing: 2992 La Palma, Suite A Anaheim, CA 92806 714/632-2980 fax: 714/632-9209 Geotechnical: 15 Mason Irvine, CA 92718 714/951-8686 fax: 714/951-7969 Coachella Valley Office: 77-775 Jackal Drive, Suite C Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 619/772-3182 fax: 619/772-3184 Corporate Office: 15 Mason In/ine, CA 92718 714/951-8686 fax: 714/951-7969 SEP 8 1391 September 16, 1991 Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206 Carlsbad, California 92130 Job No. 04-3179-012-00-00 Log No. 1-2037 Attention: Mr. Curt Noland SUBJECT: GRADE CHANGE North End of P.A. 25 Aviara Phase 2 Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: Initial plans for the northern end of P.A. 25 showed a pad elevation of 220 to 225 feet above mean sea level. At this lower pad elevation a buttress was needed to adequately stabilize the resulting cut slope in to the landslide. This slope area was previously designated as Slope II on the remedial grading plans. In final design, other non- geotechnical considerations such as views were assessed. An alternative mitigation method ultimately decided upon was to raise the pad elevation by a minimum of 10 feet above the previous grade. This elevation change raised the factor of safety in this area to above 1.5 thereby eliminating the need for a buttress. Since the resulting cut slope is to be made into landslide debris we recommend that a stability fill be placed along the cut slope, with the same dimensions as Slope III. Discussions with P&D technologies indicate that a small retaining wall will be placed at the toe of the slope in this area. It is our opinion that this retaining wall should not have an adverse effect on the stability of the slope above it. This opportunity to be of service has been appreciated, we can be of further service please contact our office. Should any questions arise or if Very truly yours, ICG Incorporated Erik J. Nelson, P.E. C 44102 Registration Expires: 6-30-93, Project Engineer EJN/WLV/ejn C044102 X;''' OF ' id W. Lee Vanderhurst, C.E.G. 1125 Registration Expires: 6-30-92 Chief Geologist Geotechnical Services, Construction Inspection and Testing Mestre Greve Associates Consulting Engineers September 20,1991 P. L. Hames Hillman Properties West, Inc. 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 206 Carlsbad, CA 92009 SEP 2 3 1-^^ SUBJECT: CONFIRMATION OF THE NOISE ASSESSMENT FOR AVIARA PLANNING AREA 25 REPORT # 91-84 I iij Dear Pam, The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate compliance of Aviara Planning Area 25 with the noise related Gonditions of Approval placed on the project by the City of Carlsbad. This noise assessment is based on plans made available to Mestre Greve Associates on September 20,1991. A summary of the noise assessment for Area 25 is presented below and remains the same as the previous study. The project specifies the development of detached single-family residential units in the City of Carlsbad. The nearest significant arterial is Alga Road with an average daily traffic volume of 18,600 vehicles per day and a grade of about 3.5 percent. Alga Road is separated from the project by 420 feet. The space between Planning area 25 and Alga Road is occupied by trees that are to be preserved. The worst case home in Aviara Planning Area 25 is located on Lot 11. Alga Road is located 420 feet to the north. Lot 11 will experience a maximum worst case noise level of 54.3 CNEL due to traffic noise associated with Alga Road. This is below the 60 CNEL noise standard placed on the project by the City of Carlsbad and therefore mitigation measures will not be required for Aviara Planning Area 25. Ifyou have any questions or cormnents, please do not hesitate to call myself or Chris Bosley. Sincerely, MESTRE GREVE \lnce Mestre, P.E. 280 Newport Center Drive, Suite 230 • Newport Beach, California 92660 • (714) 760-0891 STATE OF CAUFORNIA—THE RESOURCES ^G&iCf PETE WILSON. Gomnor CAUFORNIA COASTAL COAAMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN OIEGO, CA 92108-1725 (619) S21.8036 Aviara Land Associates Paul Klukas 2011 Palomar Airport Road, Carlsbad, CA 92009 #206 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE Date October 29. 1993 Applicant: Aviara Land Associates Document or Plans: Gradino/Erosion Control Plan: Landscane/Fire Suppression Plan Submitted in compliance with Special Condition(s) No(s). 1 - 2 of Coastal Development Permit No. 6-92-41 Material submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your development permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to fulfill the requirements of said condition(s), Your submitted material and a copy of this letter have been made a part of the permanent file. Sincerely, Charles Damm District Director Bv: Bill Ponder (4Q2£N) r STATE OP CAUFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AG&4CY WILSON. Governor CAUFORNIA COASTAL COAAMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6-92-41 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 PaOe 1 Of 3 SAN DIEGO. CA 92108-172S (619) 521-8036 On April 10. 1992 , the California Coastal Commission granted to Aviara Land Associates this permit for the development described below, subject to the attached Standard and Special Conditions. Description: Subdivision of 27.2 acres into 34 single family residential lots (minimum lot size 7,500 sq.ft.) and 2 open space lots and site preparation including 2,200 cubic yards of balanced cut and fill, Lot Area 27.2 acres Zoning PC - Planned Community Plan Designation RLM/RM/OS/RC/N (4 dua/8 dua max.) Project Density 1.25 dua Site: South of Alga Road between Kestrel Drive and 1-5, Carlsbad, San Oiego County. APN 215-040-23. Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission by PETER DOUGLAS Executive Director and IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all term^ and conditions thereof. erraittee ( COASTAL DEVELOPMEN"nPERMIT NO. 6-92-41 Page 2 of 3 STANDARD CONDITIONS: 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgement. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the pennittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All development must occur In strict compliance with the proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 5. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24-hour advance notice. 6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permit Is subject to the following conditions: 1. Grading/Erosion Control. Prior to the issuance of the pennit, the applicant shall submit to the Executive Director for rev-iew and written approval, final site and grading plans approved by the City of Carlsbad which incorporate the following requirements: A. All grading activity shall be prohibited between October 1st and April 1st of any year. 8. All permanent runoff and erosion control devices shall be developed and installed prior to October 1. ( COASTAL DEVELOPMENfTERMIT NO. 6-92-41 Page 3 of 3 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, continued: C. All areas disturbed, but not completed, during the construction season, including graded pads, shall be stabilized prior to October 1. Any proposed temporary erosion control measures, such as Interceptor ditches, sandbagging, debris basins, temporary desilting basins and silt traps shall be used in conjunction with plantings to minimize soils loss from the construction site. D. Maintenance of temporary erosion control measures 1s the responsibility of the applicant, Including replacement of any devices altered or dislodged by storms. 2. Landscape/Fire Suppression Plan. Prior to the Issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit a revised detailed revegetation plan Indicating the type, size, extent and location of all plant materials, any proposed irrigation system and other landscape features to revegetate all manufactured slopes. Selective clearing and removal of vegetation in Zones 2 and 3 shall be Identified, and shall not exceed the limits of the fire suppression program contained in CDP #6-91-46-A. Drought tolerant native vegetation only shall be allowed in Fire Suppression Zone 2 and Zone 3 areas. No removal or replacement of landscape materials shall occur beyond the limits of Zone 3 areas. Drought tolerant native plants shall be utilized to the maximum extent feasible to re-establish the area consistent with its present character and that of the surrounding vegetation in all other areas. Said plan shall be submitted to, reviewed and approved in writing by the Executive Director. 3. Future Development. This permit is for subdivision and site improvements of Planning Area 25 only. All other development proposals for the site, including the construction of single family residences, shall require review and approval by the Coastal Commission, or its successor in Interest, under a separate coastal development permit or an amendment to this pennit. (2041P) APPLIOTION COMPLETE DATE: MAY 16. 1991 STAFF REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1992 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION (5) FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: CT 90-37 - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 25 - Request for a Tentative Tract Map for 34 single family residential lots (minimtun 7,500 square feet) and 2 open space lots on a 27.2 acre site located south of Alga Road, in Local Facilities Management Zone 19. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Cominission AIX)PT Plaiming Conunission Resolution No. 3338 APPROVING The Negative Declaration issued by the Plarming Director and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3339 APPROVING CT 90-37, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. PROJEGT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND This project is a Tentative Tract Map for 34 single family residential lots (minimum 7,500 square feet) and 2 open space lots in Plaiming Area 25 of the Aviara Master Plan. Planning Area 25 is located south of Alga Road between Kestrel Drive and 1-5 and contains 27.2 acres. The site has a combination General Plan Designation of RLM/RM/OS/RC/N and is zoned PC. The Aviara Master Plan allows a maximum of 37 dwelling units on this planning area (1.30 du/ac). The proposal includes 34 lots (1.25 du/ac). The property is located within the Coastal Zone (Mello I) and will require a Coastal Development Permit. The project also includes a portion of a community trail which will run along the meandering sidewalk on the south side of Alga Road. The project also incorporates deed restricted coastal resource open space as required by the Master Plan, including tree preservation and tree introduction areas. A drainage area will be located near the intersection of Alga Road and Kestrel Drive. The gate for access to this drainage area will be of wrought iron with stucco pilasters. The project includes two retaining walls. The first, along the rear of lots 16 through 19, will be a maximum of six feet in height. The second will be along a portion of Kestrel Drive behind Lots 2 through 5. This wall will incorporate popouts and recesses. The popout areas will have a maximum height of 4 feet. The recessed areas will have a maximum height of 6 1/2 feet. This wall will be landscaped. CT 90-37 - AVIARA PLANNING AREA 25 FEBRUARY 5, 1992 PAGE 2 III. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Does the proposed Tentative Tract Map comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance, and the Aviara Master Plan? 2. Is the proposed Tentative Tract Map consistent with the approved Master Tentative Map (CT 89-37) for the Aviara Master Plan Phase II? 3. Is the proposed Tentative Tract Map in compliance with the Mello I Local Coastal Program? 4. Is the proposed Tentative Tract Map consistent with the Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan? DISCUSSION The proposed Tentative Map does comply with all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance and the Aviara Master Plan. Each Lot contains a minimum of 7,500 square feet. Minimum lot width is 60 feet, except where reduction is allowed for cul-de-sac lots. Each lot also has a minimum depth of 90 feet, and a depth to width ratio no greater than 3:1. The project is consistent with the approved Aviara Phase II Master Tentative Map. The grading proposed for this project involves 2,200 CY of cut and 2,200 CY of fill. The proposed map is in compliance with all policies of the Mello I Local Coastal Programs through mitigation required by the Aviara Master Plan. A portion of the planning area was placed into deed restricted open space as mitigation. The proposed tract map does not encroach into that open space. The proposed map is consistent with the Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan. All facilities and services necessary will be available to serve the project. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and therefore, has issued a Negative Declaration on December 12, 1991. The environmental analysis concludes that, because: (1) the project site has already been reviewed with the Aviara Master Plan EIR (EIR 83-2(A)) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Aviara Phase 11 Tentative Map (CT 89-37); (2) as designed, the project implements all recommended mitigation measures of these two environmental documents; and (3) the project preserves in open space all previously deed restricted coastal resource areas, no environmental impacts are anticipated. CT 90-37 - AVIARA PLARWING AREA 25 FEBRUARY 5, 1992 PAGE 3 ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3338 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3339 3. Location Map 4. Background Data Sheet 5. Disclosure Statement 6. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form 7. Exhibits "A" - "P", dated February 5, 1992. EB:km January 3, 1992 Citv of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Alga Road between Kestrel Drive and 1-5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Tentative Tract Map to create 34 single family lots and 2 open space lots. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an enviroimiental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Califomia 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department v\dthin days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call in the Planning Department at 438-1161, extension . DATED: DECEMBER 12, 1991 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER CASE NO: CT 90-37 Planning Director APPLICANT: AVIARA PA 25 PUBLISH DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1991 EB:km 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 # ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 90-37 DATE: JUNE 14. 1991 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Aviara Planning Area 25 2. APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2011 Palomar Airport Road. Suite 206 Carisbad. CA 92009 (619)931-1190 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: December 10. 1990 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Tract Map for 34 single familv lots and 2 open space lots. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to detennine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Enviroimiental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist 8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this detemiination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist imder the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig) YES (insig) NO 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? X BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shmbs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? X 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? X 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES NO (sig) (insig) 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? X 18. Substantially affect pubhc utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. Produce new light or glare? 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? 27. Impact existing transportation systeins or alter present pattems of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 28. Alter waterbome, rail or air traffic? 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? 31. Obstmct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES YES (sig) NO (insig) X X MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal coinmunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory. 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? YES (sig) YES (insig) NO -5- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Proiect Description The proposed project involves finish grading and infrastmcture constmction for Planning Area 25 of the Aviara Master Plan. This tentative tract map provides 34 single family lots and 2 open space lots on a 28.4 acre site. The project site has been mass graded as part of the Aviara Master Plan CT 89-37. The proposed project is consistent with Master Tentative Tract Map (CT 89-37) for the Master Plan, and mitigation measures as required by the Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR 83-2(A)) have been implemented. 1. The proposed project will not result in unstable earth conditions or exposure to geologic hazards. The mass grading for the site has been done in compliance with CT 89-37 (the approved tentative map for the Master Plan). The proposed finish grading and infrastmcture constmction will involve 2,200 cubic yards of cut and 73,000 cubic yards of fill. Import totals 70,900 cubic yards. Pad elevations for some lots on the northem portion of the site are somewhat higher (10 feet) than originally approved, however the plan is substantially in corformance with the approved Master Tentative Map. 2. Any major topographic changes were evaluated in the EIR prepared for the Master Plan. Only minor changes will result from the finish grading and infrastmcture constmction of the current project. No development is proposed at this time. As indicated in #1 above some elevations have been changed, but the plan is substantially in conformance with original approvals. 3/4. The proposed project v^dll not result in or be affected by erosion of soils, nor result in changes to beach sands or channels. Drainage and erosion control facilities will be reqtiired of the project in conformance with City standards. A permanent desiltation basin has been constmcted in Planning Area 28 (to the south) to mitigate potential impacts from soil erosion. The drainage and erosion control mitigation required will adequately mitigate any potential impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon. 5. The proposed subdivision will not result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality. The ultimate development of the site (into single family residences) will contribute incrementally to an increase in local and regional air pollution. This project (when ultimately developed) will generate only a ininor amount of traffic (340 average daily trips). No development is proposed at this time. 6. The project will not result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature. Air quality impacts (dust) from grading activities will be controlled by watering. No stmctures are proposed at this time. 7. The project will not change the course or flow of waters. No water bodies are located within or immediately adjacent to this planning area. 8. The project will not affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water, or public water supply. The project is conditioned to provide adequate facilities to handle any increased runoff resulting from the development of the site. 9/10. The project will not substantially increase usage or depletion of any natural resource, nor will it use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. The project involves only finish grading and infrastmcture constmction at this time. 11. All mitigation for archaeological, paleontological, and historic sites required by the Master Plan EIR has been done. 12. The EIR prepared for the Master Plan identified areas of Coastal Sage Scmb and required mitigation in the form of Coastal deed restricted open space areas. The proposed subdivision does not encroach into these deed restricted areas. 13 The proposed project will not encroach into the coastal deed restricted areas, thus will not result in a barrier to replenishment. Any landscaping proposed with this project must be compatible with the deed restricted area vegetation. 14. The approved Master Plan for this project required mitigation for conversion of agricultural land in the form of agricultural conversion fees. The applicant has paid all such fees required for this project. 15/16. The site contains areas of Coastal Sage Scmb (gnatcatcher habitat). However, these areas are Coastal deed restricted open space areas. This project does not encroach into the deed restricted areas. Therefore, no significant impacts to species or habitat is expected. 17. The proposed ultimate development (single family residences) for the site is consistent with the General Plan and with the Master Plan (MP 177) goveming development of the site. 18. The proposed project will not substantially affect public utilities or public services. The project v^ll be conditioned to comply with all requirements of the local facilities management plan, thus meeting the demands of the future development proposed for the site. 19. No development is proposed with this current project. However, the upgrading of the Batiquitos Pump Station will be required prior to constmction of the residential units, and any development proposal will be so conditioned. 20. The proposed project v^U not result in an increase to existing noise levels. Short-term intermittent increases to noise levels which may occur during grading and constmction will be ininor and insignificant. 21. Because the proposed project is for finish grading and public infrastmcture constmction, it will not result in an increase in light or glare. Any necessary street lights will be of the low sodium variety, minimizing glare. 22. The proposed project would not be expected to involve a significant risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances. 23. Because no development of units is proposed at this time, the project will have no effects on density. 24. The proposed project will ultimately contribute additional housing tinits to meet current demand. No development is proposed at this time. 25. The proposed project will ultimately generate 340 daily trips. This minor increase in trips is not significant. The existing and proposed new portions of the circulation system will accommodate this traffic. Circulation and traffic for the project was evaluated in the EIR prepared for the Master Plan. No constmction of units is proposed currently. 26. Any demand for parking created by the ultimate development of this project will be satisfied on site. 27. The proposed project will not impact existing transportation systeins or alter present pattems of circulation. No new trips will be generated by this project, which is limited to finish grading and infrastmcture constmction. 28. The proposed project will not alter waterbome, rail, or air traffic. There are no water bodies or rail lines on or adjacent to the site. The project is not within the Airport Influence Area for McClellan Palomar Airport, 29. The project will not increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. The project is designed to provide adequate separation between vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 30. The project is designed such that it will not interfere vdth emergency response or evacuation plans. 31. Revegetation of slopes after grading was required. This project, involving finish grading and infrastmcture constmction would not be expected to result in aesthetic impacts or offensive public views. 32. The proposed project will not affect the quality or quantity of existing recreation opportunities. The ultimate development of the site into single family homes will include the provision of private yards and a community trail. No development is proposed at this time. -8- ANALYSIS OF VLABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) altemate site designs, c) altemate scale of development, d) altemate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) altemate sites for the proposed, and g) no project altemative. a) The scale of the proposed project (subdivision into 34 single family and 2 open space lots) is appropriate as a single phase project. b) The site design is consistent with the approved Master Plan (MP 177). The design includes preservation of open space coastal deed restricted areas. No additional environmental benefits would be derived by an altemate site design. c) The proposed scale of development (34 dwelling units) is less than the density approved for the site in the Master Plan (37 dwelling units.) d) The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and with the approved Master Plan. No additional environmental benefits would result from an altemate use. e) The actual development of the site will occur at a future time. The current project proposal is for lot subdivision and infrastmcture constmction only. f) The project site is appropriate for the proposed use. The project does not preclude similar uses on other sites. g) The no-project altemative would not prevent the ultimate development of the site. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the approved Master Plan and provides mitigation of environmental impacts as required by the EIR for the Master Plan. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjtmction with previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore, a Notice of Detennination has been prepared. I find that although the proposed project cotild have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signafure ' Datp' ' Plannin? Director ^J LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) -10- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature EB:km -12- ARPORT RD •fl ••••••••••a ^ < Ui ec "3X BATIQUrrOS LAGOON LA City of Cirisbad AVIARA PLANNING AREA 25 CT 90-37 ^ BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO.: CT 90-37 CASE NAME: Aviara Planning Area 25 APPLICANT: Aviara Land Associates REQUEST AND LOCATION: Tentative Tract Map for 34 single familv residential lots and 2 open space lots on a 27.2 acre site south of Alga Road. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Section 27. Township 12 South. Range 4 West. San Bemardino Meridian in the City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego. APN: 215-040-23 Acres: 27.2 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: 36 lots/34 units (Assessor's Parcel Number) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RLM/RM/OC/RC/N Density Allowed 1.30 Density Proposed 1.25 Existing Zone _PC Proposed Zone _PC Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site _PC Undeveloped North _PC Alga Road South ^C Undeveloped East .PC Proposed Kestrel Drive West PC Offsite Greenhouses PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 340 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated October 26. 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT JC Negative Declaration, issued December 12. 1991 Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, EB:vd Citv of Carlsbad Piannino Department DISaOSURE STATEMENT APPUCAKTS STATcMENT OP DISCLOSURE OF CHSTAIN OWNERSHIP IWTE3SSTS ON AU. APPUCATIONS WHICH WIU. SaaUIHE DISCRETIONASY ACTION ON THS PART Of THH OTf CCUNOL OH ANY APPOWTHD BOARD. CDMMISSION OR COMMrTTcE (Please Prim) The foilowing information must be disclosed: 1. APDlicant Ust the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 2011 Palomar Airport Rd. Suite 206 ' Carisbad, CA 92009 2, . Owner Ust the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Aviara T.aTit^ r.nTnpflny, a T)p1awarf> Rppuhl 1 r TIPVPI nprnPTlt C.Q . , corporation a California corporation 4 50 Newport Center Drive 180 N. Riverview Drive Suite 504 Suite 130 ~ Newport Beach, CA 92660 Anaheim, CA 9Z808 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the. names and addresses of aJl individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Henry Hillman 450 Newport Center Drive Suite 304 Newport Beach, CA 9Z6bO 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director ofthe non-profit organization or as trustee or benefidary of the trust UU - Disdosure Statemerrt Page 2 Have you had mora than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boarc Commissions, Committees and Coundl within the past twelve months? Yes No X If yes, please indicate person(s)^ P»r»en im dsfina^ M: 'Any indfvtduai. im. eap»rs\mnhip. )eintv«nsjr». BaaecUson. •ooal duh. fratemal eryanizabon. esrp«ratien. ••tai*. evst. r«e*fv*r, vyndical*. Vii* and any Gm*r EsuRiy. ciy and esurny, municipariiy, dicsSc: or uitmr peiiiical aubdfyiiicm. or any em*r group er esmfainaiion aesng MM • unit' (NOTE: Anach additional pages as necessary.) Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership BY: Aviara Lan^^ompany, a Delaware —-€oippration, (ieneral Partner Signature of^vner/uate lee President Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership BY: Aviara Land Company, a Delaware )oratioiL (ieneral Partner B Signature ce President leant/Date Signature of Owner/Date Secretary »nt/Di Signature of Applicant/Date taut Secretary BY: Republic Development Co., a Califomia qotporation, tner J^- jJieffiens'Zj/ice Fresiaent Signature orOwfierTDafe By: Signature of Owner/Date By: Republic Development Co., a Califomia cor|56l^tion, ll Partiler By: By: D.L. Clfe Signature of Signature of Applicant/Date president TRH Hoover/Assistant Secretarv Ted L. Hoovei/Assi stant Secretary Print or Type Name of Owner Print or Type Name of Applicant Disciosure Startement A (Over) Page 2 5. Have you had more than S2S0 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, ocarc Commissions. Committees and Coundl within the past twelve months? Yes No _X_ If yes, please indicate p€r5on{s) pyoen ia daftnsd aa: 'Any tr^dividuai. ftrTn. eepafSianhts. jointvanStf*. aaaeciaasn. •oeial duh. (ratvmal erpansassn. esrporaben. •atata. rust r*ca>w«r. tyndical*. nia and any eroat esuRty. eity and caurny, erty municiparity. diaaSc: or oew peMieal »ubdf»<»ion, er any owwr group or esmbinasen aetng aa « unit' (NOTE: Anac*! additionai pages as necessary.) Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership BY: Aviara LanoCompany, a Delaware —-^corporation, deneral Partner ^^.L. Clemeiiii/^lce Pres Signature of Owner/Date tdent Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership BY: Aviara Land\^ompany, a Delaware corporation, General Partner . L. ^ClemeHiyvIce President Signature oTAinncant/Date Signature of Owner/Date Secretary Signature oTA^Rcant/Date " /Dai Signature of Applicant/Date rtrant Secretai BY: Republic Development Co., a Califomia cotporation, Gfinejral Partner L. Lie Signature o ce fresident By: Republic Development Co., a Califomia corj^Sri^tion, General Partner Rer/Oaie By: Signature of Owner/Date TftH T.- Hoover/Assistant Secretary Prim or Type Name of Owner By; By: D.L. Liefflens/1 Signature ofAppupnit Signature of Applicant/Date president Ted L. Hoovei/Ass istant Secretary Print or Type Name of Applicant CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO.: CT 90-37 - Aviara Planning Area 25 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RLM/RM/OC/RC/N ZONING: PC DEVELOPER'S NAME: Aviara Land Associates ADDRESS: 2011 Palomar Airport Road. Suite 206. Carisbad. CA PHONE NO.: (619) 931-1190 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 215-040-23 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 27.2 ac ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: ~K. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 122.91 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 67.21 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) D. Park: Demand in Acreage = 0.25 E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A Identify Drainage Basin = N/A (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs = 340 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. = 28i:4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - N/A I. Schools: N/A (Demands to be detennined by staff) J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 34 Identify Sub Basin - N/A (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD - 7.480 L. The project is 3 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.