The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 91-05; La Costa Fairway Villas; Tentative Map (CT) (13)City of Carlsbad Planning Department February 4, 1992 Hossein Zomorrodi Zomorrodi Engineering 5983 Cirrus Street San Diego, CA 92110 SUBJECT: CT 91-5/CP 91-3 - LA COSTA FAIRWAY VILLAS Dear Hossein: Attached are comments received from the Engineering Department which must be resolved prior to scheduling the project for the Planning Commission. In addition to the drainage issue it would be appropriate to address the architectural design as we have discussed in earlier conversations on the project. As proposed, the project does not have adequate design features to warrant a recommendation for approval. If you should have any questions regarding the project or its status, please call me at (619) 438-1161, extension 4448. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN Associate Planner Attachments c: Jim Murray CW:lh CT915.3K 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 - CITY OF CARLSBAD L..GINEERIKG DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER FROM: ^>?? /"/tJ/r&tJ VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER. PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness and/or engineering issues. The Project application is now sr was previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed "prior to resubmittal ot the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: yaar#' 4-he, ribbon aoffer The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: and 'Also attached is a redlined check prinrof the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. City of Carlsbad Planning Department RECEIVED DEC 16 1991 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT d& December 12, 1991 Hossein Zomorrodi Zomorrodi Engineering 5983 Cirrus Street San Diego, CA 92110 RE: LA COSTA FAIRWAYS VILLAS ^ Dear Hossein: The following are comments received from the Engineering Department which must be addressed prior to scheduling the project for Planning Commission: Still need to provide verticle curve information on your "main circulation" private driveways when proposed grade breaks exceed 1.5%. Need to provide profiles for all driveways from your "main circulation" driveway into your garages which propose driveway grades exceeding 7%. You need to show that a car will not hang-up trying to enter or exit the garages. You are showing some of your proposed driveways with portions that "back-drain" towards the garages...before they warp and drain away from the garage. You need to make sure water does not drain into the garages. fe&A ~{v elwi'naffa-&<*,* ba* You are showing an elevation difference between your proposed "main circulation" driveway and the proposed pad elevation of unit 16 ranging from 3.5 ft. to 6 ft.... (the pad and the building lower than the driveway). You need to show your proposed contours in this area and address drainage. Need to show any proposed slopes or walls and provide drainage away from the proposed structures. You are proposing grades on your "main circulation" driveway which are less than l%...City standards require a minimum grade of 1%. Need to show and call out your proposed sewer and water systems on your legend of your tentative map as being private. You are showing your proposed units 7, 8, 15 and 16 as being served sewer wise by one existing 4 inch sewer lateral. Prior to going forward for tentative map approval you will need to obtain a letter from Leucadia County Water District stating that they will allow 4 units to be served by a single 4 inch lateral. 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 Hossein Zomorrodi LA COSTA FAIRWAY VILLAS - CT 91-5/CP 91-3 DECEMBER 12, 1991 PAGE TWO You need to state on your tentative map that your 30 ft. wide "main circulation" driveways will be granted as "General access and public utility easements". Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. Please return the check print with the corrected site plan. If you should have any questions regarding the comments above, please contact Jim Murray of the Engineering Department at (619) 438-1161 ext. 4338. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN Associate Planner Attachment c: Jim Murray •? CWtvd CT915.1tr Project CITY OF CARLSBAD i_ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHEC ^ Field Check bv: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Inadequate traffic projections provided Street level of service problems Intersection level of service problems// - •Driveway problems •• j ^ eorner sight distance problems — Non standard street improvements proposed Pedestrian circulation problems Offsite street improvements needed Street parking problems Intersection distance problems Cul-de-sac length problems Parking aisles lack turnarounds : Parking lot dimensions inadequate Truck access inadequate Parking lot lacks adequate circulation * , Private street widths not to code •\o^&f\us^~ space needs 5' side backup ^T ^fa '' . Adjacent property access not considered Surrounding circulation conflicts exist _^_ Inadequate street/parking lot lighting Growth management circulation requirements not met Other (list)®4b , i ^bll dof•~> SEWERAGE DISPOSAL Easement widths not to standard Gravity flow not maintained All weather access not provided Offsite sewer improvements required Non-standard facilities proposed Facilities not in compliance with sewer master plan management requirements not met year -fo /ATER FACILrfTRS ' i ' . • -T^J Fire hydrants not properly shown or located Water meter access problems Water line conflict with sewer line Water easements inadequate Offsite water facilities required , (list)- u#kr Meiers cannaf fee. \cG^&a wirh/n Hiedrit DRAINAGE _ Proposed desiltation controls inadequate . . . ''-•*'.•'_ Improper discharge of drainage into sewer system _ Erosion problems at proposed outlets .''•'.:, _ Overland flow exceeds city standard ' "•" • . _ Excessive or nuisance flow at cross gutters _ Improper diversion of drainage proposed _ Ribbon gutter proposed in parking lot ; •..-.•' _ Parking lot drains across sidewalk • -> .< , Inadequate site or lot drainage tnadequate drainage behind retaining T, JJ • " . Urt.- art- encne*Proposed dramage too close to structure^TV^. -L._r T • f , . / .. i- . wall-necJ 4» ^ess AtWOJoAwA UJd% beh* Lot drainage not to street or approved . drainage course _ Excessive use of curb drains _ Narrow sideyard requires special design _ Pad sites not proposed to surface drain _ _ All weather access not provided to facilities. _ Offsite drainage improvements required _ Facilities not in compliance with master drainage plan _ Easement widths not to standard _ : Inadequate facilities proposed to handle upstream flows _ Encroachment into flood hazard area _ Failsafe over-flow not provided at sumps _ Growth management requirements not met _ Other (list)