Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 91-05; La Costa Fairway Villas; Tentative Map (CT) (21)City of Carlsbad Planninq Department June 3, 1991 Hossein Zomorrodi 5983 Cirrus Street San Diego, CA 92110 SUBJECT: CT 91-5/CP 91-3/HDP 91-10 - La Costa Fairway Villas Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your resubmittal of development applications as to their completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. Please contact your staff P^aimer>^HH|^HHHpt (619) 438-1161 extension 4448, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director c: Gary Wayne Robert Green Erin Letsch Bob Wojcik File Copy Data Entry Marjorie/Steve MJH:CW/rvo CT915.CW 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161 ISSUES OF CONCERN No. CT 91-5/CP 91-3/HDP 91-10 PLANNING: 1. The extent of development proposed in existing manufactured slopes will be reviewed. A modification to the grading plan may be required. 2. Recreational vehicle storage at a minimum of 20 square feet per unit must be provided for projects proposing ten or more units. The space should be reasonably accessible and be proportioned for realistic use. 3. A minimum five foot distance must be maintained between the edge of the private drive and structures. Open balconies are permitted to encroach a maximum of two feet into that setback area. 4. Building separation is at a.minimum between the "A" units. In some cases, it is exacerbated by a grade separation. Relief should be designed for these areas. 5. The project is being considered as a single development. Access from one phase to the other should be provided onsite to accommodate movement to each of the onsite project amenities. 6. There is a conflict with the proposed guest parking deck and a garage. There is not enough room to enter and exit the garage because of a parking overlap. 7. All exposed materials used onsite in building construction, including walls and fences, should be compatible in texture and color. ENGINEERING: 1. Refer to the attached Engineering check list. CITY OF CARLSBAD . ^GINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER (^rtsA^AJzf-TsvZn DATE /^^f 3o FROM: ^J/*y? A/2//?g6/ PROJECT ID VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness a)ni/OR(>n£rnefeFiniESJs&«.eiK' The Project application is now «» ~y totnd- complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The^ project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed prior to resubmittal of the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: /<> iQguJ &ow)l&s. zsu&s rsVi& is The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. CITY OF CARLSBAD _ Fro-ec -.VGINEERING DEPARTMENT " ' COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR Tentative tract maps and Tentative parcel naps. The following checked items were incomplete or missing from the site plan or application package and must be completed or submitted prior to further Engineering review of the projpct: I . G9"qral Infj -ration: A. > Name and address of owner whose property is proposed to be subdivided and the name and address of the subdivider; / 8. • Name and address of registered civil engineer, licensed surveyor, landscape architect or land planner who prepared the maps; '. C. • North point; '. 0. ' Scale; vicinity map; '_ E. • Date of preparation; ' F. . Classification of lots as to intended residential, commercial, industrial or other uses; '_ G. l Tentative Map number in upper right hand corner (City to provide number at time -of application,) ', H.A/a Lot width to depth ratio not to exceed 3:1. I. , Number of units to be constructed when a condominium or community apartment project is involved; J. i Name of sewer and water district providing service to the project. '_ K. • Average Daily Traffic generated by the project broken down by seperate uses . [ I . Site In format i on : A. General 1) « Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings and permanent structures; Location of all major vegetation, showing size and type; 3)*/a Location of railroads; 4) • Legal description of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision (approximate bearings, distances and curve data); 5) ' Lot lines and approximate dimensions aqd number of each lot; (jsir\3\** jot" "air £fSc€/d^odo pr^eo-h) Streets and Utilities 1) The location, width and proposed names of all streets r" within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision, show or\ proposed street grades and center! ine radii r^U\ — ' <2lieck- print" separate profile for all streets with grades in excess o f ' _7?T. Streets should be in conformance with City Standards and Engineering Department Policies. (Especially Policy Numbers 1 and 22) 2) • Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys. 3) • Typical street section for all adjacent streets and streets within the project. CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ - • Pro jec^Id ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR : Conditional use permits, condominium permits, master plans, planned development permits, planning commission determinations/ redevelopment permits, non-floodplain special use permits, specific plans and site development plans. The following checked items were incomplete or missing from the site plan or application package and must be completed or submitted prior to further Engineering review of the project: I. General Information l_J A. • Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, owner and Engineer or Architect who prepared the plan. North arrow and scale. Vicinity map showing major cross streets. Date of preparation/revisions. Project Name and Application Types submitted. Name of sewer, water and school districts providing service to the project. All facilities labeled as "existing" or "proposed". A summary table of the following: Street address and assessors parcel number. Site acreage. Existing zone and land use. Proposed land use. Total building coverage. Building square footage. Percent Landscaping. Number of parking spaces required/provided. Square Footage of open or recreational space (if applicable). Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable). Average Daily Traffic generated by the project broken down by separate uses. II. Site Information A. General / / 1. • Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings and permanent structures on site and within 100 feet of site. /_/ 2. A# Location of all major vegetation showing size and type. / / 3. ^ location of railroads. / / 4. / Bearings and distances of each exterior boundary line. / / 5.— Distance between buildings and/or structures. / / • 6.— Building set backs (front, side and rear). / / 7. • Location, height and materials of walls and fences. / / 8. — Location of free standing signs. 8. Street and Unities - L-_/. 1. ' The locacion, width and proposed name „, all streets within ' adjacent to the proposed project. Show street grades and .—-^ y center-line radii. ^•C^Gji. ' 2. ' Name, location and width of'existing adjacent streets and alleys, Include medians and adjacent driveway location^ !_J_ 3. • Typical street cross sections for all adjacent and streets within project. Width, location, and 4se7_of alj existing ,and//ori propose^ public or p r i v a t e e a seme n_t s .f 'r^-*^~ ^. <=>0J_ 5. ' Public and private strFets and utilites clearly identified. _/ 6. ' Show distance between all intersections and medium and high use driveways. J_ 7. , Clearly show parking stall and isle dimensions and truck _ turning radii for all parking areas. _/ 8. ^'/3-Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands. _/ 9. ' Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer, water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. l_J 10. • Show location of all fire hydrants within 300 feet of site. C. Grading and Drainage ~_ 1. • Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%, 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%, and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved; 2. ' Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export. 3. • Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. 4. . Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard . frontage. 5. . Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision show location approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. / / 6.<J/a Clearly show and label the 100 year flood line for the before and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent to _ a FEMA flood plain. l_i 14.M3 For projects with an average daily traffic (ACT) generation rate greater than 500 vehicles per day: Two (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. The analysis must be prepared by an appropriate registered Engineer. The analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments Identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management Plan. The following should be included with the study: a) 8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14" plats showing zone impacted roads, background and project AM and PM peak hour impacts and traffic distribution. b) Project traffic generation rates c) Necessary calculations and or analysis to determine intersection and road segment levels of service. d) Any proposed mitigation requirements to maintain the public facility standards.1 1 15. ' Two copies of preliminary soils/geologic report for all project with cut or fill depths exceeding 5 feet. r* - HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION SHEET GENERAL INFORMATION This sheet generally explains how your Hillside Development Permit (HDP) will be processed. If you have any questions after reading this, please call Development Processing counter at 433-1161 or review Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad's Municipal Code. When a Hillside Development Permit is needed: A Hillside Development Permit (HDP) is required when development is proposed on land with a slope gradient of 15% or greater and a slope height of greater than 15 feet. Development means building, grading, subdivision or other modification of a hillside area. It is highly recommended that you; as an applicant, 1) review Chapter 21.95 and Chapter 11.06 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (The Hillside Ordinance, Excavation and Grading) and 2) discuss the Hillside Development with^a City Planner before submitting an application for a Hillside Development Permit. The Hillside Development Permit should be submitted concurrently with any permit or application for development of a Hillside area. How your Hillside Development Permit will be Processed Generally the steps involved in reviewing your HDP application are as follows: 1. A Hillside Development Permit application is submitted to the Development Processing counter at 2075 Las Palmas Drive. The application must be submitted with and reference any other permit application such as a building or grading permit, tentative map, etc. All maps submitted shall be folded to 8-1/2" x 11". Information items required: (a) A.completed Hillside Development Permit Application Form (b) • Four copies of the slope analysis - Include north arrow and scale (see Section 21.95.020 of Carlsbad's Municipal Code) Acres % Identify slopes 1. 0 to less than 15% slope •—i r—i 2. 15% to less than 25% slope r-, •—, 3. 25% to less than 40% slope p. r—j 4. 40% or greater slopes ,—, •—i TOTAL 100% 10.89 % Slope = Vertical Distance x Countour Interval x 100 Horizontal Distance (Distance between contour intervals) (c) ' Four copies of the slope profile(s) - Include vertical and horizontal scale. (d) i Assurance of slope analysis and slope profile accuracy. Both the slope analysis and slope profiles shall be stamped and signed by either a redstercd landscape architect, civil engineer or land surveyor indicating the datum, source and scale of topographic data used in the slope analysis and slope profiles, and attesting to the fact that the slope analysis and slope profiles have been accurately calculated and identified. (e) Show with a site plan, grading plan and building plans and elevations how development fulfills the following Hillside Development and Design Standards (21.95.060) Submit four (4) sets of each plan. 1. Coastal Zone Requirements (if applicable) 2. Contour grading 3. Area or extent of grading 4. Screening graded slopes 5. View preservation and enhancement 6. Roadway design 7. Hillside architecture 8. Hilltop architecture 9. Hillside drainage 10. Man-made slope height and volume of grading cut orjjll. Volume of earth moved for cuts and fills shall be minimized. The larger volume of the total cut or total fill volumes divided by the total area in acres that is oat and filled (that is graded) shall equal the volume i p. of hillside grading For this chapter. The relative acceptability of ^ I/O I L/ywp Or hillside grading volume shall be determined by the following: S(<\& 3 C3<jl tft\ Cubic Yards of Cut or Fill Grading per Acre of Relative Sensitivity of Cut and Fill Area (in Acres) Hillside Grading Volume 0 - 7,999 Cubic yds./acre Acceptable 8,000 - 10,000 Cubic yds./acre Potentially acceptable > 10,000 cubic yds./acre Unacceptable