Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 91-05; La Costa Fairway Villas; Tentative Map (CT) (5)I/ CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE^ENGINEERING DIVISION TO: PROJECT PTANNF.R /"/c%fc7%af? DATE: FROM: VIA: _ """' /4^?U^ TAL PROJECT ID. ASSIT. CITY ENGINEER PROJECT REPORT AND CONDITIONS The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project. The Engineering Department is recommending: That the project be approved subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. Also attached is a final Land Use Engineering project report for inclusion in the staff report for this project. That the Project be denied for the following reasons: PROJCOND.FRM/DAH ENGINEERING CONDITIONS FOR CT 91-5/CP 91-3 - LA COSTA FAIRWAY VILLAS 37. Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map. 38. The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project. 39. The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell Telephone, and Cable TV authorities. 40. This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) unit for recordation. 42. The applicant shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included with the CC&R's subject to the approval of the City Engineer prior to final map approval. 44. All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner's association (if on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R's. 46. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of Planning Commission approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the Planning Commission. In approving an extension, the Planning Commission may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code. 47. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act. 49. Prior to approval of the final map, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the Master Drainage Plan Update. 50. The owner of the subject property shall execute a Hold Harmless Agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map for this project. 58. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to final map approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with City Codes and standards. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, a grading permit shall be obtained and grading work be completed in substantial conformance with the approved grading plans. CT 91 -5/CP 91*3 La Costa . airway Villas Page: 2 61. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 62. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference Chapter 11.06. 65. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided or installed prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer. 57. Prior to final map approval the owner shall execute a hold harmless agreement for geologic failure. 66. The applicant shall place the following notes on a non-mapping data sheet of the final map: Geotechnical Caution: A. Slopes steeper than two parts horizontal to one part vertical exist within the boundaries of this subdivision. B. The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or land subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance. 75. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final map, issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. CUSTOM CONDITION: 1. The existing damaged, cracked and sinking sidewalk along the project frontage on Gibraltar Street shall be removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of any of the units. 2 The design of the on-sfte private driveways Including the structural pavement design shall be submitted together with required R-value"Boll test information and be approved by the City as part of the building Affiplan review. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TRANSMITTAL To Project Planner : From ; Date Via Assistant City Engineer ; Project Id: COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application completeness. The application and plans submittted for this project are: Complete and suitable for continued review. Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please see attached checklist for missing or incomplete items. In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues. (See attached initial review and assessment checklist.) Major Engineering issues whicH need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior tolxmditoning of the project are as follows: vl Also attached is a rediined check print pf the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the rediined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Project It-^*?/-** Field Check by: ^Zto/rf Date TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION - EXPLANATION _ Inadequate traffic projections provided ___ Street level of service problems Intersection level of service problems Driveway problems ~ • • i. > u,Corner sight distance problems Non standard street improvements proposed - Pedestrian circulation problems • •>-••- Offsite street improvements"heeded Street parking problems ? . Intersection distance problems ' — .- Cul-de-sac j length problems '-'•*'"" — -Parking'!'aisles lack turnarounds • - *'.\J ^'-^ ^,, ". ; . ^ - ', J . ; _ .•,"", " - ... ^ Parking lot dimensions inadequate v- "- - Truck access inadequate _ Parking lot lacks adequate circulation Private street widths not to code * > •\OS'&f\a O N/: End space needs 5' side backup Adjacent property access not considered Surrounding circulation conflicts exist Inadequate street/parking lot lighting Growth management circulation requirements not met ./TT ii /I i KL • / A fu • * iiJ _L JOther (list)— teed Topfandd- an eteWmonsl 2.TTriM WloTTi nb ed&\ - - ,'n ' SEWERAGE DISPOSAL Easement widths not to standard Gravity flow not maintained All weather access not provided Offsite sewer improvements required Non-standard facilities proposed Facilities not in compliance with sewer master plan Growth management requirements not met Other (list) // / WATER FACILITIES Fire hydrants not properly shown or located Water meter access problems Water line conflict with sewer line Water easements inadequate Offsite water facilities required , Other (list)- bX^ef fyek&($> CdflnoT te, loafed DRAINAGE Proposed desiltation controls inadequate Improper discharge of drainage into sewer system Erosion problems at proposed outlets Overland flow exceeds city standard Excessive or nuisance flow at cross gutters Improper diversion of drainage proposed Ribbon gutter proposed in parking lot Parking -lot drains across sidewalk Inadequate'''site* or•'.lot" drainage Inadequate' drainage behind 'retaining Proposed drainage too close to structure Lot drainage not to street or approved . ._i/".: i ."drainage; course •••-.• Excessive use of curb drains -L Narrow sideyard requires special design Pad sitest(not proposed to surface drain ; All weather access not provided to facilities Offsite drainage improvements required Facilities not in compliance with master drainage plan Easement widths not to standard Inadequate facilities proposed to handle upstream flows Encroachment into flood hazard area Failsafe over-flow not provided at sumps Growth management requirements not met Other (list) SOILS AND GEOLOGY Soils report inadequate for scope of work Site requires geologic review Geologic hazards not properly mitigated Excessive grading proposed for site Onsite spoil/borrow site problems Cut and/or fill height problems Proposed slopes exceed 2:1 standard Inadequate slope setbacks from site boundary \f Slope stability problems exist—. Retaining or cribwall heightRetaining or cribwall height problems -—- V Other (list) — 0 ^'^ fer exishiy sloped CONSTRUCTION Site lacks adequate construction staging area X" Project phasing problems \ Offsite haulage into neighborhood proposed Construction access problems Other (list) LAND TITLE Utility easement conflicts exist Notice of violation on property Unpaid liens or taxes exist Assessment district reapportionment required Access to public resources not provided Facilities reimbursement agreement exists Title Report boundary conflicts with site plan boundary Other (list) FIELD CONDITIONS Site plan conflicts with field conditions \S Existing public facilities damaged or — •5otfr£>' /Inadequate Will Existing overhead facilities to be addressed \( Utility conflicts with proposed improvements—I Major utility relocations required Other (list) \V }oCdT€,ZW GENERAL LOT REOUIRElvi£NTS Lot width not per Code requirements Lot area is less than required per zoning Lot not fronting on dedicated public street or easement Panhandle lot not to code Lot depth to width exceeds 3:1 Lot depth less than 90 feet 7 Project Project "*•• Location: LAND USE ENGINEERING PROJECT REPORT Brief Description: Discussion of Engineering Issues: Traffic: Projected ADT Adequacy of Existing System Prepared By_J_S____i Approved By access Writer *£r>™ Onslte Circulation and Access; Required Improvements Onslte -Me, Sewer: EDU's Required Adequacy of Existing System Required Upgrades/ Improvements // 6*eifftoJcT'fil&' ensile, Grading: "Quantity: Cut <2&4£ CY F111__________2_CY rtxport> Import Permit Required: CtjS-) No Off site Approval Required: Yes Hillside Grading Requirements Met: (&5> No Soils and Geologic on _ _ itte, adfretf* Special Grading Requirements/Ml t1 gat 1 on *hcs*» Dr»1n>Q» and ntr Adtqutcy of Downstream Improvements I Erosion Potential: Low Required Improvements: Oral naoe are Water; Water District: Adequacy of Existing System &K\g{ifx\ ^Required Improvements "Ttie proua^c raaatf&e/ 4e> Land Title; Conflicts with Existing Easements: Yes Site boundary coincides with Land Title Explanation of Conflicts or Problems No Special Easement Requirements/Mitigation .CITY OF CARLSBAD NEERING PEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER. FROM: ^J^9 /Wff&tJ VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER DATE PROJECT PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT •* .• •' The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness and/or engineering issues. The Project application as-now gr was previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed 'prior to resubmittai ot the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: MM a .tauJ J&gfo lAJi-W & a\n4 l& 3^» I • r I A - 2.houJ ir 1*4/lg, -j ed bwildi plan y/?u g- Vnti -m The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: ; Also attached is a redlined check prinOof the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. ^ crnr OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER FROM: ^^? /Wff&tJ VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL - •; -» DATE ^J&rt. £&. PROJECT ID PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness and/or engineering issues. The Project application jj.now or was previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed "prior to resubmittal of the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: *•;,'/ I . J-;i/Jllldrt^OUl. ir /gf uB/l and i The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: - Also attached is a redlined check prin^of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. City of Carlsbad Planning Department RECEIVED DEC 16 1991 CITY OP CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT December 12, 1991 Hossein Zomorrodi Zomorrodi Engineering 5983 Cirrus Street San Diego, CA 92110 RE: LA COSTA FAIRWAYS VILLAS - Dear Hossein: The following are comments received from the Engineering Department which must be addressed prior to scheduling the project for Planning Commission: Still need to provide verticle curve information on your "main circulation" private driveways when proposed grade breaks exceed 1.5%. Need to provide profiles for all driveways from your "main circulation" driveway into your garages which propose driveway grades exceeding 7%. You need to show that a car will not hang-up trying to enter or exit the garages. You are showing some of your proposed driveways with portions that "back-drain" towards the garages...before they warp and drain away from the garage. You need to make sure water does not drain into the garages. Heed -{v ^wte^^be^*{s&tk--» -\& ~{he*0&r&0&' 3X£>\o\ew.... ne, to> 11 JOgf" ia£cep'f"<a. li'p 3*°*^ ty&, c&Goe^ giek 33,35^1, You are showing an elevation difference between your proposed "main circulation" driveway and the proposed pad elevation of unit 16 ranging from 3.5 ft. to 6 ft.... (the pad and the building lower than the driveway). You need to show your proposed contours in this area and address drainage. Need to show any proposed slopes or walls and provide drainage away from the proposed structures. You are proposing grades on your "main circulation" driveway which are less than l%...City standards require a minimum grade of 1%. Need to show and call out your proposed sewer and water systems on your legend of your tentative map as being private. You are showing your proposed units 7, 8, 15 and 16 as being served sewer wise by one existing 4 inch sewer lateral. Prior to going forward for tentative map approval you will need to obtain a letter from Leucadia County Water District stating that they will allow 4 units to be served by a single 4 inch lateral. tin foo. 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 c Hossein Zomorrodi LA COSTA FAIRWAY VILLAS - CT 91-5/CP 91-3 DECEMBER 12, 1991 PAGE TWO You need to state on your tentative map that your 30 ft. wide "main circulation" driveways will be granted as "General access and public utility easements". Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. Please return the check print with the corrected site plan. If you should have any questions regarding the comments above, please contact Jim Murray of the Engineering Department at (619) 438-1161 ext. 4338. Sincerely, CHRISTER WESTMAN Associate Planner Attachment c: Jim Murray f CW:vd CTPlSJtr Project /""N CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHEC - Field Check by: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Inadequate traffic projections provided • Street level of service problems Intersection level of service problems •Driveway problems -€orner sight distance problems — Non standard street improvements proposed Pedestrian circulation problems Offsite street improvements needed Street parking problems - . Intersection distance problems Cul-de-sac length problems Parking aisles lack turnarounds : Parking lot dimensions inadequate Truck access inadequate Parking lot lacks adequate circulation Private street widths not to code space needs 5' side backup Adjacent property access not considered Surrounding circulation conflicts exist Inadequate street/parking lot lighting Growth management circulation requirements not'0*^ • • • ^ . i-1 . / Other (list)v ' L - J i i r i ^ ,-in met lA4r •^ SEWERAGE DISPOSAL Easement widths not to standard Gravity flow not maintained All weather access not provided Offsite sewer improvements required Non-standard facilities proposed Facilities not in compliance with sewer master plan Growth management requirements not met a ' n 4-" btes/ ID WATER FACILITIES 1 . _ Fire hydrants not properly shown or located _ Water meter access problems _ Water line conflict with sewer line _ Water easements inadequate _ Offsite water facilities required , (list)- ttdkf*yzAe& £3*nof foe, \O&kd DRAINAGE Proposed desiltation controls inadequate . Improper discharge of drainage into sewerfsystem Erosion problems at proposed outlets • ;"''•-,. Overland flow exceeds city standard ' ! Excessive or nuisance flow at cross gutters Improper diversion of drainage proposed Ribbon gutter proposed in parking lot \'-. .. Parking lot drains across sidewalk ; — >' •'. Inadequate site or lot drainage /JLj-^^tnadequate drainage behind retaining wall— ^0|/j^j»*^£foposed drainage too close to structure . {_ Lot drainage not to street or approved . drainage course Excessive use of curb drains Narrow sideyard requires special design Pad sites not proposed to surface drain All weather access not provided to facilities. Offsite drainage improvements required Facilities not in compliance with master drainage plan Easement widths not to standard : Inadequate facilities proposed to handle upstream flows Encroachment into flood hazard area Failsafe over-flow not provided at sumps Growth management requirements not met Other (list) 103 \ \^eho CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT FROM: VIA: PRINCIPAL CFVOL ENGINEER ' '" • " " ' : - ' ' '• . * * • •*"- • • • , . > PROJECT ISSUES. STATEMENT The Engineering Department has corripleted its review of the resubmitted project application for <saa3^^ega3Bs^jgE.engineering' issues. The Frnjrrt irvplfntinn TT nrnirnr was previously found complete tor the purpose of continued Engineering review. The_ project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to'p bresolved by the applicant. _ All Engineering issues should be fullv resolved or 'addressed prior to resubmittal of the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: Also attached is a redlined check prinf of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have t]?e applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. /. <3 CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ ENGINEERED DEPARTMEN . LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER FROM: ^//»? Aw/rr3t/ VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER DATE 4JU/ PROJECT ID • —/ PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for liXiMfolifkumiU aatVujj engineering issues. The Project application fr tmw 0**- was previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed prior to resubmittal of the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or ^concerns are as follows: ~ . \... vjsuallt^ And 4uMtfpow3»<( ~&e Jwe«»j£ feWfi'fie^ wwrf WOK^C-.. £A«* re- wit need -h> \oe~ The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project:. Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. Project CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST f-J> Field Check by: / TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Inadequate traffic projections provided Street level of service problems Intersection level of service problems Driveway problems €orner sight distance problems -— Non standard street improvements proposed Pedestrian circulation problems Offsite street improvements needed Street parking problems Intersection distance problems Cul-de-sac length problems Parking aisles lack turnarounds Parking lot dimensions inadequate Truck access inadequate Parking lot lacks adequate circulation Private street widths not to code End space needs 5' side backup are Adjacent property access not considered Surrounding circulation conflicts exist Inadequate street/parking lot lighting Growth management circulation requirements not met Other (list)^Kasd 4»flfaMA 3^ -fj^f -Wie prwxed'oo-rr. . wtti 4b SEWERAGE DISPOSAL _ Easement widths not to standard _ Gravity flow not maintained _ All weather access not provided _ Offsite sewer improvements required _ Non-standard facilities proposed _ Facilities not in compliance with sewer master plan _ Growth management requirements not met _ Other (list) WATER FACILITIES ^ Fire hydrants not properly shown or located Water meter access problems Water line conflict with sewer line Water easements inadequate Offsite water facilities required . \cc3tea we™ -Hiedni/(list)- \ ^J If DRAINAGE Proposed desiltation controls inadequate Improper discharge of drainage into sewer system Erosion problems at proposed outlets Overland flow exceeds city standard Excessive or nuisance flow at cross gutters' Improper diversion of drainage proposed Ribbon gutter proposed in parking lot Parking lot drains across sidewalk Inadequate site or lot drainage drainage behind retaining wall—«<*»<* "**> ™"^ aravw^^w W* Proposed drainage too close to structure Lot drainage not to street or approved . drainage course Excessive use of curb drains Narrow sideyard requires special design Pad sites not proposed to surface drain All weather access not provided to facilities Offsite drainage improvements required Facilities not in compliance with master drainage plan Easement widths not to standard . Inadequate facilities proposed to handle upstream flows Encroachment into flood hazard area Failsafe over-flow not provided at sumps Growth management requirements not met Other (list) •3 SOILS AND GEOLOGY ~_V\ Soils report inadequate for scope of work —f Site requires geologic review Geologic hazards not properly mitigated Excessive grading proposed for site Onsite spoil/borrow site problems Cut and/or fill height problems • Proposed slopes exceed 2:1 standard Inadequate slope setbacks from site boundary Slope stability problems exist—. Retaining or cribwall height -JV Other (list) — CONSTRUCTION Site lacks adequate construction''staging':are'a''^^ Project phasing problems — :M<2^f&$j^^ Offsite haulage into sensitive fl^&J^^^Offsite haulage into sensitive neighborhood proposed ; . ." Construction access problems ^Other (list)—-ftek\e^\Mpur <yan| LAND TITLE -'-;' ,' ' ' • r, :>'-' l^'-\''- . Utility easement conflicts exist' Notice of violation on property Unpaid liens or taxes exist • •'.'... •'•X^;.t.£:::'TfV:^:';;^ '<^:.Y;.'-*f;:&:::^H;U;ov;;v^;v/^r;;,^.;;7^ \ TpnnirfH •• >\-:'-'--'/:.5::-:^i?;y:A:Vtf^->s''':'.;.i-;r5-.,:.;;..^r^/:i.»-<:->*Assessment district reapportionment required .:.<''''^''S$^^?$^ Access to public resources not provided .v . - ;;,;;:';^ff^'•.•;,'-'.;••[;7'"'"-:-''"':••':-''"-^;,'.'''':•.. "V^-v"• ''' • '•-'•' '' • ;^''.''- -•.-•> '•' '-• '•.'• •-" .• -' • • : ,' •.' Facilities reimbursement agreement exists ; ; Title Report boundary conflicts with site plan boundaryV Other (list) ff. .••••• FIELD CONDITIONS Site plan conflicts with field conditions Existing public facilities damaged or — inadequate Existing overhead facilities to be addressed Utility conflicts with proposed improvements Major utility relocations required Other (list) uiil need *, GENERAL LOT REQUIREMENTS Lot width not per Code requirements Lot area is less than required per zoning Lot not fronting on dedicated public street or easement . Panhandle lot not to code Lot depth to width exceeds 3:1 Lot depth less than 90 feet CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER (^rtS-fes^M&7/v3r) DATE. FROM: vJ^?' X^y/flgy PROJECT ID VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness ah^/oikaagtasterirfgoslMjaoi The Project application is now < complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed prior to resubmittal of the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: 0 is The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. ---REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: June 26, 1991 TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT ^-^t^ PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - 311 S. Tremont St., Oceanside, CA 92054-3119 CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE * POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM: Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO; CT-91-5/HDP91-10/(|:P91-3 NOTE: PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. PROJECT TITLE: LA COSTA FAIRWAY VILLAS APPLICANT: HOSSEIM ZQMQRRODI PROPOSAL: 16 UNIT LUXURY TOWNHOMES, U-3 BR 2000 sf - 3 BA, 2-2 BR 1450 sf - 2 1/2 BA PROJECT PLANNER: CHRISTER WESTMAN Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to thelPlanning Department by JULY 17, 1991 . if not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED FRM0020 8/90 Wtttl -Hie/ dnVe*Bcf ipft .sa TO: Dale: Attention: Gentlemen: We are forwarding No. Copies Remarks: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Our Job # (X) By Mail Description ( ) By Messenger Sheet No. «• r EISV Received ARLSBAD 0 - Ftn This material is sent for your ( ) Checking f£Q Approval ) ( ) Files ( ) Other >d_ Please sign copies and return to our office. BY. 5983 CIRRUS STREET • SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110. 295-4442 DATE: \MUA6 A . .~\ TO: "y PLANNING riSwnMBJjfeff £JROM: FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU STANDARD CONDITIONS FO&RBOJECT # /VTjffi/-*5T /f-l&P 9/ -/ fl / ^*P9/-_S I. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. Additional on-site public hydrants are required. 3. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts location of required, proposed and existing hydrants. 4. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval of access, driveways and general traffic circulation. An all-weather access road shall serve the project during construction. AH required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site. -Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" key operated override switch, as specified by the Fire Department. All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "No Parking/Fire Lane" - pursuant to Section 17.04.020, Carlsbad Municipal Code. Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual. Applicant shall provide brush clearance plan to the Fire Department for approval. 10. Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. I1. Buildings having an aggregate floor area exceeding 10,000 square feet shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system. 12. Prior to submittal of water improvement plans, the applicant shall submit to the Fire Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the following criteria: * 400' scale * Photo reduction on mylar * At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be referenced on the map (not a separate vicinity map) * Maps shall include the following information: Street centerlines Street names Fire hydrant locations 13. Monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to driveway/private street indicating addresses of buildings on the site. Carlsbad Municipal Water District 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 9 Engineering: (619) 438-3367 /$ Administration: (619) 438-272$* Fax: (619) 431-1601 Date:3. City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 TO: FROM: SUBJECT:/=>*//<* twvvy CMWD NO. 9/-G. S73 C-T. *7/-5* cr. In response to your inquiry of the_ District has reviewed subject project and has the following comments : 1. The entire potable and non-potable water systems for subject project shall be evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity and pressure for domestic, non-potable and fire flow demands are met. 2. The Developer's Engineer shall schedule a meeting first with the City Fire Marshal and then with the District Engineer to review the preliminary water system layout prior to preparation of the water system improvement plans. 3 . The Developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the major facility charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The Developer shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge which will be collected at issuance of application for meter installation . "Serving Carlsbad for over 35 years" Page 2 City of Carlsbad Date Pursuant to our direction from the City Attorney's office, please make this a part of the condition of approval. 4. "This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the development determines that adequate water and service is available at the time of application for water service and will continue to be available until time of occupancy". SIGNED: