Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 91-06; Tienda De La Esquina; Tentative Map (CT) (6)CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECT PLANNER (drtSlfes' DATE:TO: FROM: VIA: ASSIT. CITY ENGINEER PROJECT PROJECT REPORT AND CONDITIONS TRANSMJTTAL The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project. The Engineering Department is recommending: That the project be approved subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. Also attached is a final Land Use Engineering project report for inclusion in the staff report for this project. PROJCOND.FRM/DAH ENGINEERING CONDITION FOR CT 89-33/SDP 89-15/CUP 89-15 TIENDA DE LA ESQUINA 52. Unless a standard variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map/site plan. 53. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project. 54. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Telephone, and Cable TV authorities. 55. This project is approved specifically as 1 (single) phase. 56. The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining all the private streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm drain facilities and sewer facilities within the subdivision and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the units within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included with the CC&R's subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 57. All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner's association (if on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individually owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsibility shall be placed in the CC&R's. 59. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of Planning Commission approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the Planning Commission. In approving an extension, the Planning Commission may impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code. 62. Prior to approval of the final map the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the forthcoming Master Drainage Plan Update. 63. The owner of the subject property shall execute a hold harmless agreement regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the final map for this project. Page: 2 65. The applicant shall agree to utilize reclaimed water, in Type I form, on the subject property in all common areas as approved by the City Engineer. Reclaimed water, as defined in Section 1305(n) of the California Water Code, means water which, as a result of treatment of wastewater, is suitable for a direct beneficial use or controlled use that would not otherwise occur. 67. Pretreatment of the sanitary sewer discharge from this project may be required. In addition to the requirements for a sewer connection permit the developer shall conform to the requirements of Chapter 13.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The developer shall apply for an industrial waste water discharge permit concurrently with the building permit for this project. No Certificates of Occupancy for the project will be issued before the industrial waste discharge permit application requirements have been met, all applicable fees paid and permit issued. 68. No grading permits shall be issued for this subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. 70. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on the tentative map/site plan, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in accordance with City codes and standards, be issued a grading permit and complete the grading work in substantial conformance with the approved grading plans. 71. The developer shall obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of any clearing or grading of the site. 73. No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, he must either amend the tentative map/site plan or change the slope so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map/site plan as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director. 75. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any proposed construction site within this project the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 76. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference Chap 11.06. Page: 3 79. Additional drainage easements and drainage structures shall be provided or installed prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer. 81. The developer shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map/site development plan. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. 85. Some improvements shown on the tentative map/site plan and/or required by these conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the subdivider has sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or interest. The Developer shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 86. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1. The form shall be provided by the City during the improvement plancheck process. 88. Runoff from this project is conveyed to environmentally sensitive areas. The subdivider shall provide adequate means of eliminating grease and oils from drainage prior to discharge. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit. 89. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the final map in accordance, with City Standards the Developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map/site plan and the following improvements: A. Construction of the "right-in only" entrance and deceleration lane along Rancho Santa Fe Road. B. Construction of the main entrance on Camino de los Coches. C. The design of a traffic signal at the main entrance at the intersection of Camino de los Coches and Calle Timiteo. The signal is to be installed as directed by the City Engineer. 90. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 12 months of final map approval. Page: 4 94. The Fire Marshall has determined that onsite fire hydrants are required to serve this project. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the site, the applicant must submit and receive City and water district approval for appropriate waterline improvement plans and easements. All improvements shall be designed in conformance with City and Water District Standards, plancheck and inspection fees paid and improvement security shall be posted with the Water District. 96. The structural section for the private driveway must be designed with a traffic index of 5.0 in accordance with City Standards due to a truck route through the parking lot and/or aisles with an ADT greater than 500. 98. Irrigation systems to accommodate future reclaimed water shall be designed consistent with Title 17 of the California Administrative Code. Off site future reclaimed water distribution systems should be anticipated by the installation of adequately sized sleeves at crossing points to minimize street excavation. * An additional 12 feet of public right of way shall be offered for dedicated along a portion of Rancho Santa Fe Road for a deceleration lane as shown on the tentative map/site plan. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. 4 Access rights along the project frontage on Rancho Santa Fe Road were relinquished per Parcel Map No. 13970 (MS 671). This project proposes access from Rancho Santa Fe Road for a "right-in only" driveway. Therefore, the developer shall pay for and submit an application for the quitclaiming back of a portion of the access rights to Rancho Santa Fe Road for this driveway. Prior to or concurrent with final map approval the issue of quitclaiming back of this portion of the access rights is to be heard and decided by the City Council. Should Council not approve the quitclaim, then the project cannot be developed unless the project is redesigned and the tentative map/site plan is amended back through the Planning Commission. 4 This project proposes the construction of cribwalls into the existing slopes adjacent to Rancho Santa Fe Road and Camino de las Coches. These slopes were constructed with buttress fills and the impact of the proposed cribwalls to be constructed into these slopes needs to be evaluated. Therefore, at the time of submittal of the grading plans for the project, the developer shall submit a report from a soils engineer evaluating the proposed cribwall construction into the slopes. If the soils report would find that cribwalls were not able to be constructed into these slopes then the project cannot be constructed unless the project is redesigned and the tentative map/site plan is amended back through the Planning Commission. Page: 5 77. The developer shall construct an urban pollutant basin of a type and size and at location as approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall enter into an urban pollutant basin maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to the approval of grading, building permit or final map which ever occurs first for this project. The urban pollutant basin shall be serviced by an all- weather access/maintenance road. Project Project Ma«a Location: Brief Description: LAND USE ENGINEERING PROJECT REPORT Prepared By^ Approved By Discussion of Engineering Issues: Traffic; Projected ADT £>, Adequacy of Existing System ~7/xi , tt Onsite Circulation and Access: Required Improvements Onsite n3 /oik aj Off Site 531.B»-t Required Adequacy of Existing System e,c7\ Required Upgrades/Improvements br? QT g>nsr&-rf Grading: 'Quantity: Cut 2%-SdO CY Fill ^SdO CY Export/Import. Permit Required: <(^j*) No Off site Approval Required: Yes (^D Hillside Grading Requirements Met: Yes No Soils and Geologic Conditions Special Grading Requirements/Mitigation ^ and Erosion Control: Adequacy of Downstream Improvements.i**i Erosion Potential: Required Improvements^ Drainage. Low High sur n<s* Erosion Control er^»^/'on QoKt4n&/ coi-fA ui // L.g_ Water; Water District: Adequacy of Existing System The. nana/le. rne fefeof Tt> Required Improvements IM(,TK) ^ PUPUC' $ . uJgfe.r Land Title: Conflicts with Existing Easements: Yes Site boundary coincides with Land Title Explanation of Conflicts or Problems No Special Easement Requirements/MitlQation A"ior\ err 3> JOKl ms riokh-<ro 'tll be needed o(& in J5 unable, -k troamfed o CITY OF CARLSBAD Interoffice Correspondence FROM: SUBJECT: OFFICE: DATE: l> -Tthr if8- IT ATTACHMENTS:REPLY REQUESTED;SIGNATURE. REPLY DATE:SIGNATURE PROPOSED CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 91 -6 TIENDA DE LA ESQUINA SCALE: 1' • 500' CALLE ACERVO RAHCHO SANTA FE ROAD- ROBERT G. SCHOETTftER. 1.5. 4324 DATE CAM I NO DE LOS COCHES LA COSTA AYE. SITE OLIVENHA1H ROAD VICINITY MAP HO SCALE PROPOSED CARLSBAD TRACT 91-6 TIENDA DE LA ESQUINA PROJECT NO. PR 3.4.132 /^ < s^^ " /7 v/^Ls-ar^r*,*^ ^l&si/ ' / DATE: TO: REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO RECEIVED CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SEP 21 1990 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT - 311 S. Tremont St., Oceanside, CA 92054-3119 MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: T Project Planner Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by /6~S-Qd . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU ^^^ COMMENTS: //P^^arag 7 PLANS ATTACHED Ks 73 CITY OF CARLSBAD . LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 1 OF 2 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (For Dept. Use Only)(For Dept. Use Only) ' — ' D D n n n n n Master Plan .............. Specific Plan ............ Precise Development Plan.., Tentative Tract Map ........ Planned Development Permit Non-Residential Planned Development Permit ........ Condominium Permit Special Use Permit Redevelopment Permit Tentative Parcel Map Administrative Variance.... D D D D D D D General PI an Amendment Site Development Plan Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Hillside Development Permit. Environmental Impact Assessment Variance Planned Industrial Permit.. Coastal Development Permit. Planning Commission Deter.. 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE East SIDE OF Rancho Santa Fe Road BETWEEN Mision Estancia (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) AND (NAME OF STREET) Camino Vera Cruz (NAME OF STREET) 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (NAME OF STREET) Parcel 1 of Map No. 13970, City of Carlsbad, Filed; Septmeber 25, 1985 as Doc. No. 85-355261. 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).255-031-20 5) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8) EXISTING ZONING 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 7) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION P-C 9) PROPOSED ZONING N/A 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS (RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTIRAL) 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ARFH0008.DH 4/89 CITY OF CARLSBAQ LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FORM PAGE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE *No open space ratio required for Zone 11. 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS 35"percent*19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY 'TRAFFIC 20) PROJECT NAME:Tienda de la Esquina 21)BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A neighborhood commercial center on 7.6 acres which includes a car wash/gas station, fast .food restaurant,, general retail and office uses. 22) • OWNER NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) ^ed%arSsMp MAILING ADDRESS _ .340 South Flower Street CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE Orange, CA 92668 (714)634-3839 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE/, / • r , . DATE / ii*. ^v- kW'cT , . i M^Au- A i**"0 w l \ '~ 23) • APPLICANT Marc Gerber— w-; NAME (PRINT OR TYPE)cunninqham-Ban^ir1 npvp. norp, HAILING ADDRESS 340 South Flower St. CITY AND STATE 7 IP. m£PHpUEOrange, CA 9Z668 (7T4) fr3£- Tfl^q I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S REPRE- SENTATIVE AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE ********************************************************************* FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED t — r~ <s~ 9- •?"?v — 1 O / SoP ^f-'^ cuf %•?->£• k^&rf P *~{~ ^p Tp r=^ ) ,OOO S",e>oo 2 ,000 2o O 7.00 3V SEP 81989 CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOP. PROC, SERV. DIV. DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: TOTAL-FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO. ARFM0008.DH 4/89 /• r (J <*, c. CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER FROM: ^J^i A "-•. VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL DATE PROJECT ID -xs~~ PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness and/or engineering issues. The Project application is now or was previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed prior to resubmittal of the project for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: £)?&**&. **S&TOiW ffr&f?jsrsaessg? *- &>T '/,>. or- <9T3£ <3T j/fetyj* AMVa&n_/L_ The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: Also attached is a redlined check jpnnt of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. Olivennain Municipal Watei District BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL COUNSEL Harold L. Gano, President 1966 OLIVENHAIN ROAD Smith and Peltzer Howard G. Golem, Vice President ENCINITAS, CALIFORNIA 92024-9761 ENGINEER Ann L. Peay, Secretary PHONE (619) 753-6466 Bo^le Engineering Corp. The/ma M. Miller, Treasurer FAX- (619) 753-1578 MANAGER Harley L. Denk, Director ' William H. Hollingsworth March 5, 1990 City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Carlsbad, California 92008-4859 Attention: Christer Westman Subject: Tienda De La Esquina/District Extension #169 Dear Mr. Westman: The subject project was analyzed in an hydraulic analysis by the District's consulting engineer in September, 1989. The project can be served within the parameters assumed. Attached herewith are excerpts from the hydraulic analysis which will indicate to you the following: 1.) Certain stipulated line sizes and connection points are required of this project; and 2.) only a certain degree of irrigation water was assumed in this study. A review of Exhibit "J" as submitted by the City for this project indicates a relatively extensive landscaping concept is planned. It is suggested the proponent review the landscape and irrigation demands in consideration of the irrigation demand assumed by the District's hydraulic analysis Given the assumption in the hydraulic analysis for irrigation in this case, a single one and a half (1-1/2) inch meter will suffice. The proponent should be made aware that this is the limit allowed for this project. If there are any questions, please contact the undersigned. OLIVENHAIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT F. D. Fontanesi General Services Director A Public Agency incorporated on March 24, 1959: formed under the Muncipal Water District Law of 1911 Section 71000 et sea. of the State of California Water Code 26 September 1989 SD-001-451-00 PROJECT Extension No. 169 (Tienda De La EsQuina1) 1. GROSS ACREAGE: 7.6 2. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: SIZE A. RESIDENTIAL No --- B. COMMERCIAL 6 Buildings 2.300-21.000 SF C. SCHOOLS No --- D. PARKS No E. GOLF COURSE No F. ORCHARD/CROPS No G. OPEN SPACE No H. OTHER No --- 3. FIRE REQUIREMENTS: A. AGENCY Citv of Carlsbad F.D. B. FLOW 2600 GPM Hvdrant/250 GPM Sprinkler 4. PRESSURE ZONE: 2 5. STATIC WATER MAIN PRES-SURE: A. 110 PSI MINIMUM B. 115 PSI MAXIMUM 6. WATER DEMANDS: A. DOMESTIC 55.000 GPD+ (12-Hour Dav) B. IRRIGATION 14.400 GPD+ (4 Hours/Day) 7. PRIVATE STREETS: Yes /PUBLIC STREETS: No /EASEMENTS: Yes La CostaEstancia 8. DEVELOPER: Limited Partnership /ENGINEER: Rick Ener. Co. 9. SPECIAL CONDITIONS/FEATURES: Small shopping center - southeast corner of Rancho Santa Fe Road and Mision Estancia. PROPOSED PARK SITE CONNECTION LEGEND . WATER MAIN . WATER MAIN . VALVE . CAP ASSY. FIRE HYDRANT PLATE IE PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC SEPT 1989 SD-O01-45 1-00 DATE: jf' r j jTO : -^ Planning Department ' " Engineering Department FROM: Fire Department /v /<? -?>CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT #~"' 7 /R'-ryU'V/o STANDARD CONDITIONS Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted • • --.-v to and approved by the Fire Department. 2.' Additional public and/or on site fire hydrants shall be provided •4^^ee»edKTftlf£fes'§aTy b.y, .the -Fire 'Marshal. 3. The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and on site roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for ,f"-\ approval. (4*x* An all weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction. /5./ All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior *""" to combustible building materials being located on the project site. 6. Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" key operated override switch, as specified by the Fire Department. 7. All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "No Parking/Fire Lane-Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, ^ \ Carlsbad Municipal Code. Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures. Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual. 10. / All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department .-•"' x for approval prior to construction. 11.- All roof-top appurtenances shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the building and shielding to prevent noise and visual impacts, subject to approval , '" '\ before issuance of permit. 12y Building exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. aggregate floor area shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq. ft. (or less) areas. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/COMMENTS ***' i.J j 0 REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE.- TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE Kll«CJi»I VfJJJ FEB 2 3 1990 CITY QF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FROM:PLANNING DEPARTMENT /£ £S0&» t7?*f t~ ar sq-ss REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. «&DP PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: L-A . 6?erbeT~J Project Planner:L Please review and ^submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by ^jnOorOr^ h-^lQ^HQ _ . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has hour endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS: c&n PLANS ATTACHED REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ars3-< REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. -&pp PROJECT TITLE: Tl-ePOB- 1Z>e APPLICANT: PROPOSAL:"I . u Project Planner:L Please review and ^submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by ^OnOraQ h-^lQAQ . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has hour endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS:__ PLANS ATTACHED REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. *&DP PROJECT TITLE: Tl-enOB^ Oe L-EV APPLICANT: M?y-G. 6erber~J Q.unr»n'fci hkry> - V^>anW PROPOSAL: u Project Planner: ^JhRV^VeT L Please review and ^submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by ^KV~VjirOJr^ i^^lQAO . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has hour endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS:7 tfc, s~*C I - PLANS ATTACHED 5- REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: TO: i FROM: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEB021990 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION PROJECT TITLE: "TifeTl^ O^ \7a APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: / C\ -X Project Planner:U Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by " - If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has hour endorsement as submitted. THANK YOJ COMME^ x! PLANS ATTACHED REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION PROJECT TITLE: Tl&m^ G£- 1 7S APPLICANT: rYYifr . Gi^rYy^r / PROPOSAL: npfrVDcriTOQA GamrnGrtLmA rer«ato--rTO <«7 j^rti i I ** Project Planner: Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by ^-^IDTUyt (r^-sLj (6fQQ . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has hour endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS: / PLANS ATTACHED £/>7 ? ° REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: MUNICIPA1. WATER DISTRICT CT -53-^3/^83-15 J / -9 Project Planner:P U Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has hour endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS: ^B&>. QJ II TH'tS is IKI ^S eg. vice. u PLANS ATTACHED J^GINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TRANSMTTTAL To Project Planner : From : WZTXtocJ Date Project Id: Via Assistant City Engineer :_ i WCOMPLET^ \M '7W AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT .//The Engine- ^ */tf? applicat* $K> \M^ffitw&x^W$S& Completed its review of the subject project for \* ~>n and plans submim*"* *- see attac. lor further ; ror missing or in» <In addition the Ei ^neering Department mad Engineering issues. (See attached initial re ^Engineering issues which need to be resolved or ^>f the project are as follows! ^au^fyato •to project are: iJidtfw 5tW* 'J.W*tne project for _.3cklist.)^ _v ^uuressed prior to conditoning 7.)y.) Also. <nor been Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. KjINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVffiW DIVISION TRANSMTiTAL To Project Planner ; ( ^f/S/^ W^'TTVdt? Date From ; -•-//>?'? Art/S/7?c/ Project Id: Via Assistant City Engineer : COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application completeness. The application and plans submittted for this project are: Complete and suitable for continued review. Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please see attached checklist for missing or incomplete items. In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues. (See attached initial review and assessment checklist.) Major_ .Engineering_jssues_wh[ch negd to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditoning of the project are as follows:•A .(jJ& sm( feweivia tor axkwv)5, nsaarJ^ vsur proposed onz'rte arq^driA a''; tttivdiy -to off^j-te. j.'<r£a\a.iidA...V6d toenL ctvfen (^THem5/'i5S"U<S5" -fyaft /wr -fia-ffjb r«pprf- ^fe&k -fo ^tftr&sr. • •''', \ / i Morf c4- -Hie- ^/jegf/oA^ raised ana I'TCWS- ca\\fJ GOJ- hat/&. nrrr hses) ir&ladetf id the recto^TJ. , ? (0<^ dann^f r^pmnoend BPPf2)\J& 1 o\r'<2 prz?f&=?f if- l/de<3r t/\ rv\— ^*> S" -. » . *4. i. J tfj^t ^*. i , .s~j* J /ii~f\ ^m . . _ ^s./ *-• J i . J^^.. ^*. >N x^ .X-, --^ ' • ^^rnaf/oi. inci area 4br buitti 7.) Also. <5eey Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be "7 ^ given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. CALC STATION^ AREA AREA REFERENCE .057 (50 scalel X .918 (200 scale) = .021 (30 scale) T--TE _SHT__ CHKD OF___ "DATE ACRES COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (consider probable development) Developed Areas (Urban) Land Use Residential: Single Family Multi-Units Mobile homes , Rural (lots greater that 1/2 acre) Commercial (2) 80% Impervious Industrial (2) 90% Imoervious Coefficient "C Soil A B .40 .45 .45 .50 .45 .50 .30 .35 .70 .75 .80 .85 Type (1) C .50 . 60 .55 .40 ., .80 .90 D .55 = .70= .65 = .45 = ;s5= -^r .95 = C = '°^ CA = \>\<\ TIME OF CONCENTRATION Tc T ,: Overland Flow (App. X-C)cl A^,-\ i @ \ % T man.T ,= <f( Gutter Flow (App. X-D) Length of street= ft. Approx ave. vel.= fps T _= min.c2 T =T T _c cl c2 mxn. RUNOFF: 0=1 x•CA Altitude Factor = 70 =x f factor 100 ="/hr (Chart C) 4-fe> cfs CA S-^> cfs b'SE Q 5" = USE Q100 = 4- •CFS CFS Reference: San Diego County Flood Control Design and Procedure Manual (1) Obtain soil type from Appendices IX-C1 throuth IX-C4 (2) Obtain overland flow TCI frora App. X-C (3) Obtain approx. average velocity from App. X-D (4) Obtain rainfall intensity frora App. XI 1C XIOKHddV ss/T .pssTAan Intensity ^incnes/ uuur, .% i- -• •*. ~ v v, ---«> r- . ~_ . j,- \v^ r -p „£,„!..s X. V s ^x, S. N •• — ;. • - ^ — - v . ^5S. iv V, X - .- '^ ~ - ^4_. n T riTiiTtnnii SZi£1 1 Equat ^ > ; > ; p ; • • : • i f 7 : s v ; S JX - ]p x{li \ |> ' x! ' "^XJ "ijTvt ^ " "iN" liXiTr'-jl'•• '•• <l' Ijjlrtl Vv^x x •.-.-.:...... .... - - - - • • - •- - -. . . . i •iTTTtTrn mTnrnrrniirmir= • — r~T~n~i7nrrcn.TITn i ! ion: I = 7.44 P, D ~-6/IS 6 I = Intensity (In./IIr.) . P, a 6 llr. Precipitation (I || , D - Duration (Min.)y 1 ' • 1^4 |[jjii! !H-- ^Hl '- > 1 hlSii ix ^ >'l r si - : i- _ . . ~* - — '. . . — ~ - - _ „ - ^ : ^x s, X X X ~ - - - - ~ X s^ * - s ^ N ~ - - r V V v X ; s - - - - V : ^ ^; N X - - - :. ^ ^ . 'f X, ^J - - ij. -:: fi1 -v >' 10 15 20 30 40 50 1 2 3 Minutes Hoursn.i.'.r/i.Hnn,. i • * - r ti 1 . : Xx- nr.i . n.) jT en1 i fii; ^ -In! ^ ' : 1 fDJii n ;<x |: pjiBio I' Mji'o - '^NMo'c nf|J<3 rr |3.0 R. -V x.,.'B 1' 1 4 5 6 Directions for Application: •' 1) From precipitation naps determine .6 hr. and , 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed 1n the County Hydrology Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps ^included in the Design and. Procedure Manual). 2). Adjust '6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of'.45X to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not^ applicable to Desert) . : t>'..;. " • •* ! ' Y 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on thejrlght side of the chart. . ;£••' '. 4) Drav; a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines.. ^\'-.': ' ***** * 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. ;">.••.. Application Form: .' ' i 0) Selected Frequency *?o yr. 1) P = .*.^1n., P. - 4- *P - -5^%* 2) Adjusted *Pr= ^^ , _ " • in.o — - " •• • 3) t = ^-^ min.L 4) I = ^'l In/hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region Revised l/SS^APPCHniX XI-A *W INTENSITY-DURATION DESIGN CHART ;ir,iiiimir= . ; i I I'l.iu.l Ll I !•( rniil'iTii -.645 irriTrrnimhTn Equation: I = 7.44 P, D I = Intensity (In./Hr.) 6 Hr. Precipitation (In.) ., D = Duration (Min.) 30 40 50 1 Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation naps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrology Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in the Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency 1 yr. in..24"P6"V 2) Adjusted *Pfi= 24 in. min. 4) I -4--1 in/hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region Revised 1/85 APPFNOTX XT-A CALC DATE CHKD STATION AREA AREA .057 X .918 .021 REFER EN (50 sea (200 sc (30 sea CE Ifel ale) = ^h le) ^ ACRF.S DATE J '•& COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (consider probable development) \00 Developed Areas (Urban) Land Use Residential: Single Family iMulti-Units Mobile homes Rural (lots greater that 1/2 acre) Commercial (2) 80% Impervious Industrial (2) 90% Imoervious .80 Coefficient "C A .40 .45 .45 .30 .70 Soil B .45 .50 .50 .35 .75 Type (1) C .50 .60 .55 .40 .. .80 D .55= .70= .65= .45 = (^ >v .85 90 95 = TIME OF CONCENTRATION T ,: Overland Flow (App. X- CI ' - C) T ,= 2..-2. min. T =T ,+T =c cl c2 -mm. RUNOFF: 0=1 X'CA Altitude Factor = 100 = factor x 6 (Chart C) "/h'r ISM cfs "/hr CA le? cfs C = CA = T : Gutter Flow (App. X-D) C Length of street= ft. Approx ave. vel.= fps T _= min.c2 USE Q USE Q 7 = 15".! CF S 100 = iB.o CFS Reference: San Diego County Flood Control Design and Procedure Manual (1) Obtain soil type from Appendices IX-C1 throuth IX-C4 (2) Obtain overland flow Tcl fron App. X-C (3) Obtain approx. average velocity from App. X-D (4) Obtain rainiall intensity from App. XI JO 9. -I.- I- S. • 2. ij i I; L jJ 6 • .5 - <» re* ' H- . •x, M X s^ a, V s» s — " — ,^_ ~~ _ 1 tr X s "S. — - - __ _.-. ^ .p |I(n(.[t( jStni"'. ". .' Equat <%$-: ' ' w^ W•|^4jNj,]] j v ' sj | ^ i ^N!! --------- ^ . . - r:z~.::. '-'''' __ ... _ — — - . . - - - >' 10 15 20 30 4 Minutes Lon; I = 7.44 P, D ~'64S b I = Intensity (In./Hr/ P, =• 6 Hr. Prccipitatioj j , D ~ Duration (Min.) <"> JJUlji :' HIlviiE K 'llrmsl 1 ' ' ""•-• •"'" lilx ll lh [1 -"• '•- "-'• ~ " , . . i — — — - X '-. » ^ X X X - - X X X X X, X X X - X- : x ,s X •^ 1 _ '- - : ^X ^ .. j X X X X - ' : illii . _l - - ' - x>1 <^tt-:: X w >, ^ - - 3 50 1 2 34 HoursDnrn Mpn ^ 1 1 » V M I nniilini ) » (In.) - TI T r* r*; ir 1 t ; : c f ! I ' i 1 1 pi 5 crt rnoc •o n>n •o—i, 'f).0 Srs.s -• 15.0 § T4.S -, i4.0 ^- l-i 5 n, J , Q 3- V2.5 •2.0 1.5 1.0 6 t,-t. •—-< • • t -( Directions for Application: : 1) From precipitation naps determine .6 hr. and , 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrology Manual (10, GO and 100 yr. maps' ^included in the Design and. Procedure Manual). 2). Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of'45j; to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) - : »£• .. 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the;.right side of the chart. ;*.;••' •>"'':'4) Draw a line through the point 'parallel to the plotted lines.. .:yV-'- ' • «; *V '* " 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for j the location being analyzed. .•']'.-., Appl ication Form: ' ' 1 0) Selected Frequency SO yr. 1) PC - ?>>2-S"j1n., Po^= 4" PC = 5^ %*0 • • •" • •• c"! .-i.-. [) 2) Adjusted *Pr~ /^-^/ _ • • in. 3) t = ^-5~ min.C ' ' ' . • 4) I = ^?- 1n/hr. ' ' ' *Not Applicable to Desert Region i-T * i ** * t ;' 'iJJj'i.. I- • .' RcvlscU 1/85 ,; APPENDIX XI-A ; — . — _ .„ , . „..,_„. TTmrmT7TT!imir= ;—i—n I = 7.44 P, Do JNTENSITY-DU/V\TION DESIGN CHART ijliTi 2. 1.1.1 u.l n-i:t\ -.645 I = Intensity (In./Hr.) P = 6 Hr. Precipitation (In.) en D = Duration (Min.) Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation naps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrology Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in the Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency | u-o yr. in.. 2) Adjusted *Pfi= 'L- / 3) tc = **•$ min. 4) I = *?.o jn/hr. '24 in. *Not Applicable to Desert Region Revised ]/8S APPHMniX XT-A Ti 2-^->Q.o— O^JL. ^-e^ - _. . -tj — /2L}«_S-t n 1i^ -? STATION AREA . OS K^x^__WOjjr -*• CALC I X AREA .057 .918 REFE ( ( 50 200 P.ENCE scale) scale )= o.* SHT DT^E CHIC ^ ACRES D OF DATE .021 (30 scale) COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (consider probable development) Develooed Areas (Urban) % Land Use ITU Residential: Single Family Multi-Units Mobile homes t Rural (lots greater that 1/2 acre) Commercial (2) 80% Impervious Industrial (2) 90% Imoervious Coefficient "C1 Soil A B .40 .45 .45 .50 .45 .50 .30 .35 .70 .75 .80 .85 Type (1) C .50 .60 .55 .40 ., .80 .90 D .55 = . 70= .65 = .45 = .85= * a £" .95 = C = ' ^^ CA = • ^ TIME OF CONCENTRATION T T: Overland Flow (App. X-C)cl WC, • Q I cc s 6? min. T =1c +T =L+1c2 -mm. RUNOFF: Q=I X'CA Altitude Factor =(Chart C) Gutter Flow (App. X-D) Length of street= ft. Approx ave. vel.= fps T _= min. I_So_=_J x_££3 »/h'r factor x 1100=_l x_^3 "/hr CA at-' cfs USE Q_i£_= USE CFS CFS Reference:San Diego County Flood Control Design and Procedure Manual (1) Obtain soil type from Appendices IX-C1 throuth IX-C4 (2) Obtain overland flow T ^ frora App. X-C (3) Obtain approx. average velocity from App. X-D (4) Obtain rainfall intensity from App. XI jn 9. I i. '3. - 2. ij i 3 i '.7u -i .5 - in »1 -reP. -x-Coin ,2 - 1 X s: 3s V s X X. S. — - — — J .b. X X N X, X, - ." •- — — - •.;;." ~T j T riTilTinniii ?Z| £!."/.." j EquatJ jf|||v |] , ^s^iMjjjJf J fljwilw " "^Svs" ' iNJ 1 ' '"• ^ lll> 1"V : iltr 7-::--:-- "x •;•::... . — *— — — ••* — - - - • • - - . _.._.-. ------_ "r.rrriTTntnmrt7ttTriiirnir= , — ; — i i i^rnrrrri'r Ion: I = 7.44 P, D ~'6/IS o I = Intensity (In./Hr." P, a 6 Hr. I'recipitatioj ., D s Duration (Min.) {>¥» --- ^^V. Yvil >'' ^NJ N. - - — 1 Ir^N. 1 1 1 1 ' T* 1 ' N!' ^v. • • -• vx v h n.i: v, 1 - • 1 £ -:N ~ r . . . . , _ — '- X•. ^' -s X X X : - :: "^X X X X X X X x X - - - X ; ^ N : - ; : ]•^- ^ V V - :-:J • - ' " ^tf:T px, ^s si. *X V - - . . •* .1 1 *-••—. >' 10 15 20 30 40 50 1 2 3 4 Minutes „ . . HoursOurnHnn, ' » (In.) r TJ T rr r"Si i r ii |" 1 1 ' i! jii 1 » f t "|v 5 enI o -iCDn ^.0 £ 75.5 ->' 15.0 ° ' ]4.5 ^ 1-j\ «1J' 3 rr'D3.0 ^. ]2.5 2.0 •1.5 1.0 6 Directions for Application: ; ' 1) From precipitation naps determine .6 hr. and , 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrology Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps' ^included in the Design and. Procedure Manual). 2). Adjust '6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it 1s within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. ({lot( applicable to Desert) . : ' t-V- ;•. 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on theYlght side of the chart, ;\'-;'. '. 4) Draw a line through the point "parallel to the plotted lines. .,«!.:/; ' 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. .-;;.'-.. • Application Form: ; • 0) Selected Frequency t?O yr. 1) PG = .2.2£ln., P0yJ= ^ *P6 = %& %* I 2) Adjusted *P^= ^--2"5 -..' jn_ 3) t - & mln. 4) I = ^-^ 1n/hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region '— * \ r- Revised 1/85^ APPENDIX XI-A INTENSITY-DURATION DESIGN CHART mrrrniilmi s. I = 7.44 P. Do I = Intensity (In./Mr.) 6 Hr. Precipitation (In.) D « Duration (Min.) 5 6 Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrology Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in the Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency | crO yr. In.. 2) Adjusted *Pfi= 3) t = C=>-tP min. / _ X5 4) 1.1 in. I =_Jf_£_in/hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region Mi nntoe Revised 1/8S /vpppNPTX XT- f CITY OF CARLSBAD -— Project Id : (27~0<2> ~_33 ENGINEERING DEPARTME. • ' ' COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR : Tentative tract maps and-~_ The following ^negxed items were incomplete or missing from the site plan or application package and must be completed or submitted prior to further Engineering review of the project: I. General Information: / / A. • Name and address of owner whose property is proposed to be subdivided and the name and address of the subdivider; LJ B. • Name and address of registered civil engineer, licensed surveyor, landscape architect or land planner who prepared the maps; / / C. • North point; / / D. • Scale; vicinity map; / / E. • Date of preparation; LJ f- ' Classification of lots as to intended residential, commercial, industrial or other uses; / / G. • Tentative Map number in upper right hand corner (City to provide number at time of application.) / / H. » Lot width to depth ratio not to exceed 3:1. / / I. M(a Number of units to be constructed when a condominium or community apartment project is involved; LJ J. ' Name of sewer and water district providing service to the s project. ~fi\—~" K. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project broken down by_^ seperate uses. II. Site, Information: A. General r / / . 1) • Approximate location of existing and proposed buildinjgs and permanent structures; \ / / 2) • Location of all major vegetation, showing size and type; / / 3) d|a Location of railroads; / / 4) • Legal description of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision (approximate bearings, distances and curve _ data); / / 5) • Lot lines and approximate dimensions and number of each lot; _ B. Streets and Utilities / / 1) , The location, width and proposed names of all streets within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision, show proposed street grades and centerline radii. Provide separate profile for all streets with grades in excess o f 7%. Streets should be in conformance with City Standards and Engineering Department Policies. (Especially Policy Numbers 1 and 22) LJ 2) « Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys. 3) Typical street section for all adjacent streets within the project.,' •zv tu u LL U LL LJ 4) 5) . 6) • 7) *djth and To.pat1on_ of all exir easements;or proposed publ 10) Public and private streets and utilities clearly identi fied. Show distance between a-11 intersections and medium and highuse driveways. Clearly show parking stall and isle dimensions and truck turning radii for all parking areas. Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands. Show all existing and proposed _sjreet 1ights^ind^ utilities (sewer, water, major ^Ts and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. Show all fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the site. c.Grading and Drainage 1) / Approximate 5%, LL LLLJ U U 9, contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%, and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved; 2) » Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import and export. 3) — Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. 4) — Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. 5) » Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision; show location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. 6) Clearly show and _1 abel the 100 year flood line fo_r_jhe jefoTe and 'after condition'; fnr any project which Ts" within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain exceeding one acre. ShowPreliminary Hydrology map and calculations for lots exceeding before and after discharges to each included drainag° basin. For projects with an average daily traffic 00 vehicles per day: (ADT) generation rate greater than Two (2) copies of a jMrcyjation Impact Analvsis_ for the project. The analysis must be prepared by an appropriate registered Engineer. The analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management following should be included with the study: %**£ The a) b) c) d) x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14"plats showing zone impacted AH and PM peak hour impacts 8 1/2" roads, background and project and traffic distribution. Project traffic generation rates Necessary calculations and or analysis to intersection and road segment levels of service determine _ / / Any proposed mitigation requirements facility standards. Two copies of preliminary soils/geologic re-P°'%for a with cut or fill depths exceeding 5 feet, f/ios?-^ ' l&Mfafor all condominium conversions, a signetf statement ' Section 66427.1 of the State Map Act will be complied maintain the public 17 by wi th. stating CITY OF CARLSBAD ( _ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT -&r*f>j&* 77*—- - / / -^*~'f <&>'—-/^ COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR : Conditional use permits, condominium permits, master plans, planned development permits, planning commission . determinations, redevelopment permits, non-floodplain special use permits, specific plans and sitg development plans. The following checked items were incomplete or missing from the site plan or application package and must be completed or submitted prior to further Engineering review of the project: I. General Information l_J A. ' Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, owner and Engineer or Architect who prepared the plan. / / B. • North arrow and scale. / / C. • Vicinity map showing major cross streets. / / D. • Date of preparation/revisions. / / £.— Project Name and Application Types submitted. /., / F. • Name of sewer, water and school districts providing service to the project. /,/ G. • All facilities labeled as "existing" or "proposed". / / H.-—"A summary table of the following: 1. Street address and assessors parcel number. / / 2. Site acreage. / / 3. Existing zone and land use. / / 4. Proposed land use. / / 5. Total building coverage. / / 6. Building square footage. / / 7. Percent Landscaping. / / 8. Number of parking spaces required/provided. / / 9. Square Footage of open or recreational space (if applicable). / / 10. Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable). l_J 11. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project broken down by separate uses. II. Site Information A. General / / 1. • Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings and permanent structures on site and within 100 feet of site. / / 2.'— Location of all major vegetation showing size and type. / / S.dja Location of railroads. / / 4. • Bearings and distances of each exterior boundary line. / / 5. — Distance between buildings and/or structures. / / • 6. —- Building set backs (front, side and rear). / / 7. • Location, height and materials of walls and fences. / / 8. • Location of free standing signs. £ rwi«, " B.Street a--ilities LL LL LLLL LL Li L-L U LL LL LL LL LL 1. • The location, width and proposed name of all streets within and adjacent to the proposed project. Show street grades and centerline radii. 2. « Name, location and width of'existing adjacent streets and alleys, Include medians and adjacent driveway locations. 3. Typical street cross sections for all adjacent and streets within project. (>U»-fop'**' -"*'« *w*^ a«fe5<e»r*n). 4. U1dth_^ location, and use of all existing and/or proposed publ jc or private easements,. 5. • Public and private streets and utilites clearly identified. 6. ' Show distance between all intersections and medium and high use driveways. 7. Clearly show parking stall and isle dimensions and truck turning radii for all parking areas. , / 8. A/d Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands-, A3*^ 9. • Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer. water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. 10. • Show location of all fire^hydrants wjJMn 300 feet of site. x^—C. Grading and Drainage 1. » Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%, 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%, and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing.and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved; 2. • Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export. 3.— Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. 4.— Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. 5. • Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision show location approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. 6. Clearly show and label the 100 ypar flnnd line for rhp hpfnre and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent__ta_ For projects 500 vehicles a FEMA f 1 ood p 1 a 1 n with an average daily traffic (ADT) generation rate greater than per day: Plan. Two (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. _The analysis must be prepared by an appropriate registered^Engineer.The analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments Identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management The following should be included with the study: a) 8 1/2" x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14" plats showing zone impacted roads, background and project AM and PM peak hour impacts and traffic distribution. b) Project traffic generation rates c) Necessary calculations and or analysis to determine intersection and road segment levels of service. d) Any proposed mitigation requirements to maintain the public facility standards. Two copies of j)rel iminary soiU/gpnlngic rg^orf fnr all roject with cut or fill depths exceeding 5 feet, CALC DATE CHKD STATION_ AREA -1REA REFERENCE J057 (50 scale} X .1918 (200 scale) = .021 (30 scale) ACRF.S DATE COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF: C (consider probable development) Developed Areas (Urban) Land Use Residential: Single Family Multi-Units Mobile homes t Rural (lots greater that 1/2 acre) Commercial (2) 80% Impervious Industrial (2) 90% Imoervious .80 Coefficient "C1 A .40 .45 .45 .30 .70 Soil B .45 .50 .50 .35 .75 Type ( 1 ) C .50 .60 .55 .40 , .80 D .55 = .70= .65 = .45 = /85^ • o\ ,85 .90 95 = TIME OF CONCENTRATION T , :ci Overland Flow (App. X-C) mm. c = CA = D : Gutter Flow (App. X-D) C Length of street= ft. Approx ave. vel.= fps T ,= min.c2 T =T ,-fT _ =mm. C CJ. C RUNOFF: 0=1 X • CA Altitude Factor = I g-o = x £•?> "/h'r factor x .' I 100= x ^-^ "/hr CA .2. • (Chart C) ^ cfs = ' I- 1 cfs USE Q USE Q CFS ioo =1. I CFS Reference: San Diego County Flood Control Design and Procedure Manual (1) Obtain soil type from Appendices IX-C1 throuth IX-C4 (2) Obtain overland flow T ^ frora App. X-C (3) Obtain approx. average velocity from App. X-D (4) Obtain rainfall intensity fro.-n App. XI INTENSITY-DURATION DESIGN CHART - i i i 'i i.i.iM.i ui-irrn<;hT!111. -.645I = 7.44 P D I = Intensity (In./Hr.) P = 6 Hr, Precipitation (In.) -f,.'• .. D = Duration (Min.) Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation naps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrology Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in the Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Not applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency yr. 2) Adjusted 3) t. = C 4) I = £ "24 in. mm. in/hr. *Not Applicable to Desert Region 4 5 6 BIT INTENSITY*-DUJVmON DESIGN CHART ID.iri I.UJ.ITI 1-f| rniilmi j. -.645 Intensity (In./Hr.) 6 Hr. Precipitation (In.) Duration (Min.) 5 6 Directions for Application: 1) From precipitation naps determine 6 hr. and 24 hr. amounts for the selected frequency. These maps are printed in the County Hydrology Manual (10, 50 and 100 yr. maps included in the Design and Procedure Manual). 2) Adjust 6 hr. precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr. precipitation. (Mot applicable to Desert) 3) Plot 6 hr. precipitation on the right side of the chart. 4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines. 5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location being analyzed. Application Form: 0) Selected Frequency \cr~o yr. P6 =X* 2) Adjusted *Pfi= 3) 4) 7..-7 24 in. t =c *Not Applicable to Desert Region D^te \ - . 7°(Page No. OF 0/vy .5 C - / 7 PD 300 ' <?/v?m. C s ^—&y -tOf P a 2,5 - ac ^ "59 \LUUJ fl^- O - LS: 7- /^ nrv. T) 3/8 = O.53' Q RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY I SSfiKVSffllSSiVffi ° , 365 SO. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD • SUITE 100 ° SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA 92069 • 619/744-4800 Date Job No.Page No.2 A. PA© -Z-S ^f-kl C 6 o its- PI -n o vj - 7, -- 7 P -: Z.S >£••. ^1"''. k* Z1 : 2- 5 S RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY I ^0'^^^ 365 SO. RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD • SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA 92069 • 619/744-4800 -€£ jn^4to.?L^LUVt^.LV T- / l*J T«»« <>£_,4L' . A «'^, ff -MA e v/ a*.nx> //E/OS . . ( '&«•* t \v,tJ[;^ ^4^*-^fc rr r »u ^"- ^AV •i , -i «or _J5>J ^ Nj ^_li LT ..&..... 4o f-!,«>». '.-10 ts r-eipfe^oV- vj'(( Ui ** • LAND To Project Planner : From : \ NGINEERING DEPARTMENT £ REVIEW DIVISION TRANSM :AL Date Project Id: Via Assistant City Engineer :_ -X5 COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application completeness. The application and plans submittted for this project are: Complete and suitable for continued review. Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please see attached checklist for missing or incomplete items. In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues. (See_attaghed initial review and assessment checklist.^ Major "Engineermglssues whic!Tneed~To be resolved or adequately addressed, prior to conditoning of the project are as follows: ~ o-rft'ce )ouMim.($\ and LJ O 'You t^i f I need 4o ;ed shrmdrain oajlzfS Soij-fh&Jy Iflfe foe. exiannaite ifxJf ."bteirtinq e«ase»ie«tE £mty •,&> l~fuc&}ia Csurivi&rt^ 3io«j^S ^(T~^*^se**ifiMNt~'-PrT)*vi T^ie 3cj (aci©*iT" Sou^vo n&&3 "fa £>>7>L/fe^g dll u&Q&jtiBr' &CC&SS TP -iHA-fe. ourl&fs. ie, Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be giyen1o"the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the Applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. \ Project Id CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST / > Field Check by: ^Jw /*% Date TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATTON V Inadequate traffic projections provided — Street level of service problems Intersection level of service problems \\ Driveway problems EXPLANATION _ \f Corner sight distance problems Non standard street improvements proposed*^ Pedestrian circulation problems Offsite street improvements needed •— Street parking problems Intersection distance problems Cul-de-sac length problems Parking aisles lack turnarounds Parking lot dimensions inadequate Truck access inadequate Parking lot lacks adequate circulation Private street widths not to code End space needs 5' side backup area Adjacent property access not considered Surrounding circulation conflicts exist Inadequate street/parking lot lighting VT Growth management circulation requirements not met /X Other (list)— J&adim area-s" required 7^ /40H E"£4-2L<5-r. ra SEWERAGE DISPOSAL Easement widths not to standard Gravity flow not maintained All weather access not provided Offsite sewer improvements required Non-standard facilities proposed Facilities not in compliance with sewer master plan Growth management requirements not met Other (list) £eceieF2TiC)n t-3n£- &$ion C ft. radtLg _ ined -£r q*s x also 'proposed efeajweHw WATER FACTLl'l'lHS Fire hydrants not properly shown or located Water meter access problems Water line conflict with sewer line Water easements inadequate Offsite water facilities required Other (list) — ipuf ™ ^^ rTre-fe DRAINAGE Proposed desiltation controls inadequate Improper discharge of drainage into sewer system Erosion problems at proposed outlets — oea^ TO <e.xfend W"fefc wre» Overland flow exceeds city standard Excessive or nuisance flow at cross gutters Improper diversion of drainage proposed Ribbon gutter proposed in parking lot Parking lot drains across sidewalk Inadequate site or lot drainage Inadequate drainage behind retaining wall Proposed drainage too close to structure Lot drainage not to street or approved drainage course Excessive use of curb drains Narrow sideyard requires special design Pad sites not proposed to surface drain All weather access not provided to facilities Offsite drainage improvements required —- Facilities not in compliance with master drainage plan Easement widths not to standard Inadequate facilities proposed to handle upstream flows Encroachment into flood hazard area— Failsafe over-flow not provided at sumps --tor 3 Growth management requirements not met — Other (list) (7) need -ft> Main I, j- • / -irrlefe &fd r&<MreJ erw /-Plood 5'eiJer' 'or-ft)-fe^ SOILS AND GEOLOGY report inadequate for scope of work *&& ~\O ocprr «»j • • • •— ~ - til r~> i i ' 1 4^11 ' <£•Site requires geologic review ${•{&..qraefrna , ~%£ct&neGA iesT \oca-rion piafioa-sj^ Geologic hazards not properly mitigated &Tfe£$\ed- Excessive grading proposed for site Onsite spoil/borrow site problems Cut and/or fill height problems Proposed slopes exceed 2:1 standard Inadequate slope setbacks from site boundary Slope stability problems exist Retaining or cribwall height problems ^ /HI J, "/efter (fPpernissvn -h>orad& -from a^^T^«/tfieHtf proper-hfOther (list) - > «» * , fJ" -utner tiisij ~°^^ prior -H> --'aoib/. — ' ^^ CONSTRUCTION _ Site lacks adequate construction staging area _ Project phasing problems _ Offsite haulage into sensitive neighborhood proposed _ Construction access problems _ Other (list) LAND TITLE Utility easement conflicts exist Notice of violation on property Unpaid liens or taxes exist Assessment district reapportionment required Access to public resources not provided Facilities reimbursement agreement exists Title Report boundary conflicts with site plan boundary y</ Other (list) £p AJaW -fa suSomfr sn uf?-dated 4fne r<s.forT. FIELD CONDITIONS Site plan conflicts with field conditions Existing public facilities damaged or inadequate Existing overhead facilities to be addressed Utility conflicts with proposed improvements Major utility relocations required Other (list) GENERAL LOT REOUT vtENTS Lot width not per Code requirements Lot area is less than required per zoning Lot not fronting on dedicated public street or easement Panhandle lot not to code Lot depth to width exceeds 3:1 Lot depth less than 90 feet CITY OF CARLSBAD - Project Id ENGINEERING DEPARTME. - COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR : Tentative tract maps and Tentative parcel maps.__ The following checked items were incomplete or missing from the site plan or application package and must be completed or submitted prior to further Engineering review of the project: I. General Information: / / A. • Name and address of owner whose property is proposed to be _ subdivided and the name and address of the subdivider; LJ B. • Name and address of registered civil engineer, licensed surveyor, landscape architect or land planner who prepared the_ maps; / / C. • North point; LJ. D. • Scale; vicinity map; / / E. • Date of preparation; LJ f. • Classification of lots as to intended residential, commercial, _ industrial or other uses; / / G. • Tentative Map number in upper right hand corner {City to provide _ number at time of application.) / / H. » Lot width to depth ratio not to exceed 3:1. /_/ I. ^ Number of units to be constructed when a condominium or _ community apartment project is involved; / / J. • Name of sewer and water district providing service to the / project. 2*^ K. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project broken down by_ seperate uses. 1 1 . Site Information : _ A. General / / 1) • Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings and _ permanent structures; / / 2) • Location of all major vegetation, showing size and type; / / 3) tJja Location of railroads; LJ 4) * Legal description of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision (approximate bearings, distances and curve _ data); LJ 5) • Lot lines and approximate dimensions and number of each lot; _ B. Streets and Utilities LJ 1) » The location, width and proposed names of all streets within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision, show proposed street grades and centerline radii. Provide separate profile for all streets with grades in excess o f 7%. Streets should be in conformance with City Standards and Engineering Department Policies. (Especially _ Policy Numbers 1 and 22) LJ 2) « Name, location and width of existing adjacent streets and alleys. 3) Typical street section for all adjacent streets and streets within the project. V LJ LJ LJ U. U LJ. LJ 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Width and location of all wate easements — 19 or proposed public; streets and utilities clearly a-11 intersections and medium and high dimensions and truck Pub! ic and private identified. Show distance between use driveways. Clearly show parking stall and isle turning radii for all parking areas. Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands. Show all existing and proposed street 1 ight utilities (sewer, water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. Show all fire hydrants located within 300 feet of the site. LJ.LL U U U |^» -*r+r I C. Grading and Drainage 1) • Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%, 2' intervals for slopes between 5% and 10%, and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved; 2) » Earthwork volumes: cut, fill, import and export. 3) •— Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. 4) — Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. 5) • Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision; show location and approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. 6) £lea_rly show and label the 100 year flood line for_the je"fore and after cnnrlTfinnT_fnr any prnjpct whichHT within or adjacent to a FEMA flood plain. 9. Preliminary Hydrology map and calculations for Tots exceeding one acre. Show before and after discharges to each included drainage basin. For projects with'an average daily traffic (ADT) generation rate greater than 500 vehicles per day: Two (2) copies of a fir^Hlation Impact Analysis for the project. The analysis must be prepared by an appropriate registered Engineer. The analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments Identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management following should be included with the study:n.The a) b) c) x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14 plats showing zone impacted AM and PM peak hour impacts8 1/2 roads, background and project and traffic distribution. Project traffic generation rates Necessary calculations and or analysis to intersection and road segment levels of service determine Any proposed mitigation requirements to maintain the public facility standards. Two copies of preliminary soils/geologic rejort for aU _ .with cut or fill depths exceeding 5 feet. (n^xf+o fa&f*- .^ LL IS.^For all condominium conversions, a signetf statement by the owner stating 'Section 66427.1 of the State Map Act will be complied with. 17 d) copies of pr CITY OF CARLSBAD Pr« ct Id ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT / • - //'&S7<3£3COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR : Conditional use permits., condominium permits, master plans, planned development permits, planning commission determinations, redevelopment permits, non-floodplain special use permits, specific plans and site development plans. The following checked items were incomplete or missing from the site plan or application package and must be completed or submitted prior to further Engineering review of the project: I. General Information i_J A. ' Name, address and telephone number of the applicant, owner and Engineer or Architect who prepared the plan. / / B. « North arrow and scale. / / C. • Vicinity map showing major cross streets. / / D. • Date of preparation/revisions. / / E. — Project Name and Application Types submitted. / / F. * Name of sewer, water and school districts providing service to the project. / / G. • All facilities labeled as "existing" or "proposed". / / H. A summary table of the following: 1. Street address and assessors parcel number. / / 2. Site acreage. / / 3. Existing zone and land use. / / 4. Proposed land use. / / 5. Total building coverage. / / 6. Building square footage. / / 7. Percent Landscaping. / / 8. Number of parking spaces required/provided. / / 9. Square Footage of open or recreational space (if applicable). / / 10. Cubic footage of storage space (if applicable). / / 11. Average Daily Traffic generated by the project broken down by separate uses. II. Site Information A. General / / 1. • Approximate location of existing and proposed buildings and permanent structures on site and within 100 feet of site. / / 2.'— Location of all major vegetation showing size and type. / / 3.^3 Location of railroads. / / 4. • Bearings and distances of each exterior boundary line. / / 5. — Distance between buildings and/or structures. / / • 6.-~ Building set backs (front, side and rear). / / 7. • Location, height and materials of walls and fences, / / 8. • Location of free standing signs. ( nen«. B.Street Utilities LJ. U. LJ. U. U. L2LJ. LJ LJ. LJ. LJ. LJ. LJ. 1. i 2. « 3. 4. 5. • 6. « 7. within and and 8. 9. « 10. The location, width and proposed name of all streets adjacent to the proposed project. Show street grades centerl ine radii. Name, location and width of'existing adjacent streets and alleys, Include medians and adjacent driveway locations. Typical street cross sections for all adjacent and streets within project. OU'-tyW -«*'« dwe^j aisle s*<**>n) . Width, location, and use of all existing and/or proposed public or private easements. Public and private streets and utilites clearly identified. Show distance between all intersections and medium and high use driveways. Clearly show parking stall and isle dimensions and truck turning radii for all parking areas. i L I Show access points to adjacent undeveloped lands^- -- •jab&l Show all existing and proposed street lights and utilities (sewer, water, major gas and fuel lines, major electric and telephone facilities) within and adjacent to the project. Show location of all fire^hydrants within 300 feet of site.~ C. Grading and Drainage 1 2 3 4 Approximate contours at 1' intervals for slopes less than 5%, 2' intervals for slopes between 57. and 10%, and 5' intervals for slopes over 10% (both existing and proposed). Existing and proposed topographic contours within a 100 foot perimeter of the boundaries of the site. Existing onsite trees; those to be removed and those to be saved; Earthwork volumes; cut, fill, import and export. Spot elevations at the corners of each pad. Method of draining each lot. Include a typical cross section taken parallel to the frontage for lots with less than standard frontage. Location, width and/or size of all watercourses and drainage facilities within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision show location approximate size of any proposed detention/retention basins. Clearly show and label the 1QQ yp*r flnnri line fnr thp hpfnrp and after conditions for any project which is within or adjacent_tg_ fEHA__flood__ For projects with an average daily traffic 500 vehicles per day: (ADT) generation rate greater than Two (2) copies of a Circulation Impact Analysis for the project. .The analysis must be prepared by an appropriate registered """Engineer. The analysis must show project impacts to all intersections and road segments identified as impacted within the included Local Facilities Management Plan. The following should be included with the study: a)x 11" or 8 1/2" x 14'plats showing zone impacted AM and PM peak hour impacts determine 8 1/2' roads, background and project and traffic distribution. . b) Project traffic generation rates c) Necessary calculations and or analysis to intersection and road segment levels of service. d) Any proposed mitigation requirements to maintain the public facility standards. Two copies of j>rel iminary soils/geologic report_ for all project with cut or fill depths exceeding 5 feet. /~/?ee*/ 7*0 REVIEW AND COMMENT DATE: TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT c/n-GROWTH MANAGEMENT (memo only) £% FIBE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT COSTA REAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5£>/° 7*7-/ REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO: Ct±P PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: Project Planner: Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by Sd - £>£> - £*'? . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU. COMMENTS: " PLANS ATTACHED CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 3 / — -^t J ., , ~ =^> <> I Conference Telephone Attendees: Date: Time:* Station: Project:/"(? Subject:- /. . £>lUt(0A. At^**1'^'1*' ?• O • //. DECISION 5/18/82 relative department comments prior to MARCH 1991 are located in file CT 89-33