HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 91-07; La Vercia Condominiums; Tentative Map (CT) (3)ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
LAND USE REVIEW DIVISIONAL TRANSMITTAL
To Project Planner : Elaine Blackburn June 3, 1991
From : Teresa C. Smith CT 91-07/CP 91-04
sty*/ <MVia Assistant City Engineer : David Hauser
COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject
project for application completeness. The application and plans
submitted for this project are:
Complete and suitable for continued review.
x Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please see
the attached checklist for missing or incomplete items.
In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of
the project for Engineering issues. (See attached initial review
and assessment checklist.) Major Engineering issues which need to
be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditioning of the
project are as follows:
1. The garage and visitor parking area adjacent to Unit 5 will
not accommodate the required 3 point turnaround.
2. Clarification of the intent of the proposed wall along the
easterly property line.
3. Guardrail should be placed along the easterly property line.
4. The drainage pattern along the westerly property line does not
have an overflow path (2nd outfall) . A statement from the
Soils Engineer specifically allowing this is required prior to
approval .
5. If off site grading is proposed, a Letter of permission
to Grade from the adjacent property owner is required.
6. A 20 foot queuing distance from the back of the future
sidewalk to the first parking space is required.
7. The garage at Unit 5 and the adjacent parking space do not
allow for a 3 point turnaround.
8. The easterly driveway apron must be a minimum of 3 feet from
the easterly property line.
9. Show the proposed sewer lateral or private sewer line.
10. Show the proposed water lateral or private water line.
11. Off site drainage improvements may be required. Show proposed
construction for the storm drain if Tamarack Avenue
improvements are not in place prior to construction of this
project.
Completeness and Review Issues Statement
CT 91-07/CP 91-04
June 3, 1991
Page 2 of 2
12. If drainage pattern at the southwest side of the project is
proposed as shown on the SDP, raingutters should be added to
prevent roof runoff from entering that area. The roof
drainage should drain to the driveway to connect directly into
the underground stormdrain system.
13. Grading along the westerly property line appears to show
slopes steeper than 2:1.
14. Address condition of existing retaining wall. Can the
existing wall support the load proposed by this project?
Also attached is a redlined checkprint of the site plan.
This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and
changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined
print with the correct site plan to assist us in our continued
review.