The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCT 91-07; La Vercia Condominiums; Tentative Map (CT)REVIEW AND COMMENT MEM"' DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 20. 1992 REVISED PLAN D TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) POLICE DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS £ RECREATION DEPARTMENT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT CARLSBAD WATER Dl STRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT CARLSBAD SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT FROM:Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 91-7/CP 91-4 NOTE: PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LA VERCIA CONDOS MICHAEL DOOLEY/A.R.C. GROUP 5 UNIT CONDOMINIUMS ON I LOT PROJECT PLANNER:ELAINE BLACKBURN Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by APRIL 10, 1992 . if not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED FRMOO&G 10/91 REVIEW AND COMMENT MEM'— DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 20. 1992 REVISED PLAN D TO:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEMO ONLY) POLICE DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT / CARLSBAD WATER Dl STRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT CARLSBAD SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT FROM:Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 91-7/CP 91-4 NOTE: PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LA VERCIA CONDOS MICHAEL DOOLEY/A.R.C. CROUP 5 UNIT CONDOMINIUMS ON I LOT PROJECT PLANNER:ELAINE BLACKBURN Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by APRIL 10, 1992 . if not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment, and the proposal has your, endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED FRMOOKC 10/91 REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO - DATE RECEIVED: MARCH 20, 1992 REVISED PLAN D TO: ONLY) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT (MEM POLICE DEPARTMENT 0-, FIRE DEPARTMENT / BUILDING DEPARTMENT PARKS S RECREATION DEPARTMENT UTILITIES/MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT CARLSBAD _ WATER Dl STRICT LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT CARLSBAD _ SCHOOL DISTRICT NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT FROM:Planning Department REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON APPLICATION NO. CT 91-7/CP 91-4 NOTE: PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS APPLICATION. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LA VERCIA CONDOS MICHAEL DOOLEY/A.R.C. GROUP 5 UNIT CONDOMINIUMS ON I LOT PROJECT PLANNER:ELAINE BLACKBURN Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Planning Department by APRIL 10, 1992 . [f not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your, endorsement as submitted. THANK YOU COMMENTS: PLANS ATTACHED FRM002G 10/91 City of Carlsbad Police Department Date: April 3, 1992 To: Planning Department From: Police Department/Crime Prevention Subject: Plan Review #CT 91-7/CP 91-4 The area of concern to the Police Department with this plan is: General building security. General security for residents. Plan review recommendations Keying- Upon occupancy by the owner each single unit shall have locks using combinations which are interchange-free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships or similar distinct occupancies. Lighting- Aisles, passageways, and recesses related to and within the building complex shall be illuminated with an intensity of at least twenty-five one hundredths (.25) footcandles at the ground level during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant covers. Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with a maintained minimum of one (1) footcandle of light on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism covers. Landscaping- The exterior landscaping should be kept at a minimal height and fullness giving police, security services the general public surveillance capabilities of the area. 256O Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92OO8-728O (61 9) 931 -21 OO Addressing- All residential dwellings shall display a street number in a prominent location on the street side of the residence in such a position that the number is easily visible to approaching emergency vehicles. The numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and shall be of a contrasting color to the background to which they are attached. There shall be positioned at each entrance of a multiple family dwelling complex an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the complex which shows the location of the viewer and the unit designations within the complex. In addition, each individual unit within the complex shall display a prominent identification number, not less than four (4) inches in height, which is easily visible to approaching vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic. It is recommended that house numbers be displayed in illuminated fixtures on the front of residences, clearly visible from the street. Residential Considerations- A Crime Prevention measure which should be used throughout the entire project would be the installation of high quality burglar resistant hardware on doors and windows. The doors and windows should also be of sufficient strength to resist break-ins. Doors-It is recommended that dead-bolt locks be installed on all access doors of any residential building and attached garages, including the door leading from the garage area into the dwelling. Dead-bolts shall have a minimum protection of one inch and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attacks. The dead-bolt shall have an embedment of at least three-fourths inch into the strike plate area. Strike Plate and dead-bolt are to be installed with wood screws that are three inches in length. All entry and exit doors to dwelling units should be arranged so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without opening the door. Except for doors requiring a fire protection rating which prohibits them, such view may be provided by a door viewer having a field of view of not less than 180 degrees. Mounting height shall not exceed fifty-four inches from the door. It is not recommended to place glass panels within in forty inches of a locking device.. The inactive leaf of a double door shall be equipped with metal flush bolts have a minimum embedment of five-eights inch into the head and threshold or the door frame. Horizontal sliding doors shall be equipped with a metal guide track at top and bottom. The bottom track shall be so designed that the floor cannot be lifted from the track when the floor is in the locked position. Hinges for out-swinging doors shall be equipped with non-removable hinge pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Garage Doors-Doors that exceed sixteen feet in width shall have two lock receiving points; or, if the door does not exceed nineteen feet, a single bolt may be used if placed in the center of the door with the locking point located either at the floor or door frame header; or, torsion spring counter balance type hardware may be used. Fences and Walls-Interior six foot stucco walls on unit fronts and between unit patios creates total privacy and reduces surveillance and territoriality between residents. For example, a shorter stucco wall for a symbolic barrier and rod iron fencing on top forces residents to see past their own walls and into the common areas creating surveillance and a feeling of community. 4.6 foot chain link fence on back wall breaks down the barrier and gives people a vehicle for climbing in an area with little surveillance. By, Jodeene R. Sasway Crime Prevention Specialist (619)931-2195 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENI LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TO: PROJECT PLANNER/^//^ FROM: d/Sun. J )a*t/sy VIA: PRINCIPAL CIVIL DATE 3 — ' J2 PROJECT ID PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the resubmitted project application for completeness and/or engineering issues. The Project application is now or was previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. The project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be resolved 4& the applicant-. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed pnor to resubmittal of the jproject for our review. The outstanding Engineering issues or concerns are as follows: / (/ The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting. The^abovexnpted issues are of^serioTiSv concern or of a sensitive nature. It is Ajaggested'thai a aieetflag be^held with the applicant and the following Engineering / /Staff members-io discusVour concerns with the project: V Alsa attached is a^tedlinpd check^rim of the-s1?e~plan. This pjan-should be given tc/tne ap^canl'iCH: corrections ania chjafges as iroted-^Ptealse have the applicant retuh/the fedSn^d zJnnVwh the/^prtected site^plarTto assist us in our continued '/revifew. ?/• i rt? 7. ft. at? City of Carlsbi J 92074 Fire Department Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Fire Conditions Date of Report: Wednesday, April 8.1992 Contact Name Elaine Blackburn Reviewed by Address 2075 Las Palmas City, State Carlsbad CA 92009 Bldg. Dept. No. Planning No. CT91-7 Job Name La Vercia Condos Job Address Tamarack Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1 st 2nd 3rd CFD Job# 92074 File* Other Agency ID 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, California 92008 (619) 931-2121 Requirements Category: e Conditions 92074 Deficiency Item: Satisfied 05 Access during construction An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shall be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations cease until the condition is corrected. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 07 Security gate systems All security gate systems controlling vehicular access shall be equipped with a "Knox", key-operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to installation. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 08 Fire lanes Private roads and driveways which serve as required access for emergency service vehicles shall be posted as fire lanes in accordance with the requirements of section 17.04.020 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Deficiency Item: Satisfied 13 Monument sign A monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to the driveway or private street indicating the addresses of the buildings on site. Page 2 04/08/92 Carlsbad Municipal Water District 595° El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Engineering: (619) 438-3367 .-.-..-: -~.:--^ Administration: (619) 438-2722 :,^V , '' Fax: (619) 431-1601 r oE Date: MAtzciH 2.G \ City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 TO: ElAlKtE. FROM: .TE)2g.y V-/H i TT-e V A«S£oC . EKlfcP^ . CMWD NO. SUBJECT : Q.T. H--I/C F* <=\\-4 (t=, unft Cbndo) In response to your inquiry of MAfgov-l 24, l^^g. _ , the District has reviewed subject project and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District conditions for potable water, reclaimed water and sewer systems are as follows: 1. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands are met. 2. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be collected at time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for meter installation. 3. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following: A. Meet with the City Fire Marshall and establish the fire protection requirements . B. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning Department for processing and approval. "Serving Carlsbad for over 35 years" Page 2 City of Carlsbad Date 3-G C. Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comment and approval of the preliminary system layout useage (G.P.M. - E.D.U.) plan for potable, reclaimed and sewer systems prior to the preparation of improvement plans. 4. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map. 5. 'p-ffc/Nfeiau-ATioMoP WAreg AMP 5>ewEg. Sae^cE^ SHOUUP ge DOME. VMITN TH& cny* TAMAK/iCK. /xve. <=.T. »Mppge>veM&KiTS ferry PaoJec/r -*3'Z03 , PW6»* 321-60W * / TUP'S ITEMS 3 A. g 4.0 MOST 0000^. PR\og To & OF THE If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. F. Jelirry Whitley Associate Engineer FJW:jm GUAf=y^,C-ny EKJlfo. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION TRANSMTTTAL To Project Planner : EJ\Qir\& Project Id: ^r-fA^ 7 Via Assistant City Engineer : _ ^ & ^' / COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application completeness. The application and plans submittted for this project are: _ Complete and suitable for continued review. V" Incomplete and unsuitable for further review. Please see attached checklist for missing or incomplete items. In addition the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for Engineering issues. (See attached initial review and assessment checklist.) Major Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to conditoning of the project are as follows: d tiW /''"] £> r\ 'Q4 i n'ke.sTij - . 15 c. -T->v^e^LS> r a i, VL, \Kv ^ ot^^' ^lA^zU I &U* / of "f^rnn/^f/o'/) r ^u^a-a^/ ~f-tU (^*G jj f' \jr^ / \cttL,CA Cd O&s Jrtfo ns-> ft(\\- I H)^0 rfu Qu>/yejs vinl D& \MKoV- V-YlTyDLg/)^ -Vt> ^>A^). IA- \.QD^flr<ar.-K 1^ HDr Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued review. CTTY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Project Id tfl^Ol Field Check by: _ Date TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION EXPLANATION _ Inadequate traffic projections provided _ Street level of service problems _ Intersection level of service problems V Driveway problems - -r? y-ovvcV-e-* 9--O O^^-r c \-iD|O DtfC— f' '•' L ****** ^ v— ^ &, ('!> ->HCorner sight distance problems ***** Non standard street improvements proposed Pedestrian circulation problems Offsite street improvements needed Street parking problems Intersection distance problems Cul-de-sac length problems , ^ , _ ,- ,-^~ f*'^ V- X Parking aisles lack turnarounds - * 'Cl •— - - *_ Parking lot dimensions inadequate \ !" V^ ' '" ^' v UL • _ Truck access inadequate _ Parking lot lacks adequate circulation _ Private street widths not to code _ End space needs 5' side backup area _ Adjacent property access not considered _ Surrounding circulation conflicts exist _ Inadequate street/parking lot lighting _ Growth management circulation requirements not met Other (list) T>v,-,^ »>..•' .<•,* 0'0vor% a\o> ( SEWERAGE DISPOSAL _ Easement widths not to standard _ Gravity flow not maintained _ All weather access not provided _ Offsite sewer improvements required _ Non-standard facilities proposed _ Facilities not in compliance with sewer master plan _ Growth management requirements not met Other(list) WATER FACILITIES S Fire hydrants not properly shown or located _ Water meter access problems _ Water line conflict with sewer line - «%• ' < ^ ^ ° <-° _ Water easements inadequate _ Offsite water facilities required ^. Other (list) &Jr> —"' ' "P'r<-'pc"> -"1 ~ - ..^v \ DRAINAGE _ Proposed desiltation controls inadequate _ Improper discharge of drainage into sewer system _ Erosion problems at proposed outlets _ Overland flow exceeds city standard _ Excessive or nuisance flow at cross gutters _ Improper diversion of drainage proposed _ Ribbon gutter proposed in parking lot _ Parking lot drains across sidewalk _ Inadequate site or lot drainage _ Inadequate drainage behind retaining wall * Proposed drainage too close to structure — r\ef*'K si p1' ' ;"V;<~- * ! "V " "* , Lot drainage not to street or approved ' ' * " ' ~ "" " drainage course *'""' _ Excessive use of curb drains _ Narrow sideyard requires special design _ Pad sites not proposed to surface drain _ All weather access not provided to facilities ^ Offsite drainage improvements required - ~\"Q>. r^. 0 << a £.. K A-»e?> :^><1^>, v'~ 'nTO _ Facilities not in compliance with master """•"-' ' V*5" ' i drainage plan _ Easement widths not to standard _ Inadequate facilities proposed to handle upstream flows Encroachment into flood hazard area Failsafe over-flow not provided at sumps Growth management requirements not met Other (list) - &$,#". <•: . C. -j-1" 1 * n 4 snn,S AND GEOLOGY _ Soils report inadequate for scope of work _ Site requires geologic review _ Geologic hazards not properly mitigated _ Excessive grading proposed for site _ Onsite spoil/borrow site problems _ Cut and/or fill height problems (\-&Proposed slopes exceed 2:1 standard -* $io/ -., Inadequate slope setbacks from site boundary "' ' \ ' * *' "' " •• Slope stability problems exist Retaining or cribwall height problems Other (list) o<?^A CONSTRUCTION . .,. ,..- _ Site lacks adequate construction staging area _ Project phasing problems _ Offsite haulage into sensitive neighborhood proposed _ Construction access problems _ Other (list) LAND TITLE Utility easement conflicts exist */ Notice of violation on property S Unpaid liens or taxes exist Assessment district reapportionment required Access to public resources not provided Facilities reimbursement agreement exists /_ Title Report boundary conflicts with site plan boundary Other (list) FIELD CONDITIONS Site plan conflicts with field conditions Existing public facilities damaged or inadequate Existing overhead facilities to be addressed Utility conflicts with proposed improvements Major utility relocations required Other (list) GENERAL LOT REQimt..*fFNTS Lot width not per Code requirements Lot area is less than required per zoning Lot not fronting on dedicated public street or easement Panhandle lot not to code Lot depth to width exceeds 3:1 Lot depth less than 90 feet