HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 93-08; Carrillo Ranch Village O; Tentative Map (CT) (3)August 16, 1993
TO: TERRI WOODS, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
FROM: Associate Engineer
VIA: Principal Land Use Engineer
COMPLETENESS REVIEW AND INITIAL ISSUES STATEMENT
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE O
CT 93-08, PUD 93-03
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the subject project for application
completeness. The application and plans submitted for this project are incomplete and unsuitable
for further review due to the following missing or incomplete items:
1. The site acreage is identified as 19.3 acres, as opposed to the Master Plan, which
identifies the site acreage as 18.3 acres.
2. The legal description includes several Assessors Parcel Numbers that do not appear to
be a part of Village O.
3. Please provide separate profiles for all streets in excess of 7%.
4. As there are several private streets planned within the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan area,
please label all streets as public or as private streets.
5. Please show the name of "Q-C" Street as "Carrillo Way."
6. Please show and label all easements, including appropriate date and file number, as
indicated in the preliminary title report. The plan set should include a chart identifying
the disposition of existing and proposed easements.
7. Please identify an easement for the water line as it runs from "O-B" Street to Melrose
Drive, in front of Lots 1 and 2.
8. Please identify slopes that are to be maintained by homeowner associations as easements
on the tentative map.
9. Please identify the connection of proposed utilities to existing utilities as "stand alone",
without assuming that the adjacent tract will be developed.
/*'
V
10. Please submit a hydrology study in accordance with the requirements of the Master Plan.
11. Please identify all trails on the plans as either part of the specific Village trail system or
as part of the Citywide trail system.
In addition, the Engineering Department made a preliminary review of the project for
Engineering issues. Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior
to conditioning of the project are as follows:
1. Several sections of the trail system have grades steeper than the suggested maximum
grade of 7%. There is concern that these steep grades would gradually cause erosion of
the decomposed granite sections.
2. Sidewalk should continue from Lot 51 along the east side of "O-C" Street to front the
tot lot on Lot 52. The Landscape Concept plan shows a sidewalk meandering through
the tot lot, but it ends in the middle of the lot.
3. Improvements that are a part of another project should not be shown on this map, such
as the dam facilities on the west side of "Q-C" Street, and the proposed improvements
to "Q-K" Street.
Attached are redlined check print sets of the project. Please forward these plan sets to the
applicant for corrections and changes as noted. The applicant must return these plan sets with
the corrected plans to assist us in our continued review.
If you have questions regarding any of the comments above, please contact me at extension
4380.
KENNETH W. QUON
Associate Engineer