HomeMy WebLinkAboutCT 93-08; Carrillo Ranch Village O; Tentative Map (CT) (4)City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
August 13, 1993
Mr. Chris Chambers
Continental Homes
12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92103
SUBJECT: CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - CARRILLO RANCH VILLAGE O
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department
has reviewed your Tentative Map and Planned Unit Development application no. CT 93-08/PUD
93-07, as to its completeness for processing.
The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information
which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly
to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy
of this list must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until
the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When
all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness.
If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be
initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was
initially filed, July 14,1993, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information.
Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your
application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application
is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted.
Please contact your staff planner, Terri Woods, at (619) 438-1161 extension 4447, if you have any
questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely^-imM
ZMIIJ<ER
Planning Director /
MJH:TW:km
c: Gary Wayne
Team Leader
Bobbie Hoder
Bob Wojcik
File Copy
Data Entry
Marjorie/Steve
Mike Howes, HPA
2O75 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 (619) 438-1161
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - CA&wtLO RANCH VILLAGE O
AUGUST 13, 1993
PAGE 2
LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED
TO COMPLETE APPLICATION:
PLANNING:
1. Affordable Housing Requirement. In accordance with City policy, combination projects
require concurrent processing of a site development plan for the affordable site (see the
Developer's Guide to the City of Carlsbad's Inclusionary Housing Program attached).
Pursuant to this policy, submit for preliminary review a site development plan, drawn to
scale, which includes: the number of affordable units, affordable unit breakdown, building
footprints, driveway and parking layout, building elevations, existing contours and proposed
grading. A letter identifying what specific incentives, (standard modifications, density bonus
or fee subsidies) are being requested along with justification for each incentive requested
should also be included. Propose and justify phasing of the affordable units. This project
may remain incomplete until the applicant submits a site development plan for the
affordable site.
2. Prior to Tentative Map approval, a detailed soils testing and analysis study shall be
submitted to the City for review. The soils testing and analysis study shall identify the
range of possible measures necessary to mitigate high concentrations of hazardous
chemicals.
ENGINEERING:
1. The site acreage is identified as 19.3 acres, as opposed to the Master Plan, which identifies
the site acreage as 18.3 acres.
2. The legal description includes several Assessors Parcel Numbers that do not appear to be
a part of Village O.
3. Please provide separate profiles for all streets in excess of 7-percent.
4. As there are several private streets planned within the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan area,
please label all streets as public or private streets.
5. Please show the name of "Q-C" Street as "Carrillo Way."
6. Please show and label all easements, including appropriate date and file number, as
indicated in the preliminary tide report. The plan set should include a chart identifying the
disposition of existing and proposed easements.
7. Please identify an easement for the water line as it runs from "O-B" Street to Melrose Drive,
in front of Lots 1 and 2.
8. Please identify slopes that are to be maintained by homeowner associations as easements
on the tentative map.
9. Please identify the connection of proposed utilities to existing utilities as "stand-alone,"
without assuming that the adjacent tract will be developed.
10. Please submit a hydrology study in accordance with the requirements of the Master Plan.
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - CARjtfLLO RANCH VILLAGE O *W
AUGUST 13, 1993
PAGE 3
11. Please identify all trails on the plans as either part of the Village trail system or as part of
the Citywide trail system.
ISSUES OF CONCERN
PLANNING:
1. The existing topography is shown on the tentative map. Provide an additional exhibit with
the Master Plan approved grading to illustrate that the proposed tentative map grading
complies with the master Plan grading.
2. Tentative Maps with Multiple family residential projects adjacent to Circulation Element
roadways must propose designs which achieve interior noise levels of 45 dBA CNEL or less
for second or higher stories. This map will be conditioned to submit acoustical studies
demonstrating compliance with City standards at the time of submittal of delayed
architectural review.
3. Fencing. The Planning Department strongly recommends upgrading the proposed chain-link
fencing to enhance the project and improve the quality of the development Proposed side
and rear yard fencing requirements should be included on the fencing exhibit for all lots.
Currently, lot 39 is fenced with chain-link; a screen wall may be needed to provide resident
with needed privacy.
4. Submit Tentative Map on 24" X 36" sheets for manageability.
5. Show the location and height of noise walls on the Tentative Map.
6. Show property boundaries on Tentative Map.
7. Show units per village/phase on Tentative Map.
8. Open space lots should be redrawn on the Tentative Map to correspond to phasing plan per
the agreed upon exhibit.
9. Maintenance responsibility of slopes shall be redrawn pursuant to our agreement.
10. Submit a letter regarding Solid Waste disposal pursuant to the Master Plan EIR.
11. Submit special design criteria for Carrillo Way pursuant to City direction.
12. The Master Plan EIR requires the preparation of a revegetation plan by a qualified biologist
for the riparian mitigation. The recommendations of this revegetation are to be
incorporated into the proposed landscape plan. To complete the landscape plan submittal
requirements, this revegetation plan must be submitted for review. The biologist should
recommend the necessary buffer between the riparian mitigation and natural area
containing coastal sage scrub if necessary. This will be a condition of approval of the
Tentative Map.
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - CAI&ttLLO RANCH VILLAGE O
AUGUST 13, 1993
PAGE 4
13. Prior to approval of the Tentative Map, the applicant must show evidence to the Planning
Department that a qualified consulting biologist has been retained to monitor all relevant
mitigation, assure compliance with mitigation requirements, supervise implementation of
mitigation, and file a report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Director upon
completion of biological mitigation requirements.
14. Provide clear designation of the 20' wide trail easement of the citywide trail segments. The
citywide trail segments should be identified separate from the community trail segments.
15. This Tentative Map will be conditioned to prepare a plan for the timing and phasing of the
RV storage facility prior to the approval of the final map. If the RV storage facility is not
proposed to be developed concurrent with or prior to phase I development, a temporary RV
storage facility must be approved.
16. The note on the tentative map that states "smaller walls not shown may be incorporated
into final design to enhance the project." This language should be replaced with language
consistent with that of the Master Plan (page 75).
17. Conservation easements over natural open space and riparian mitigation areas should be
added to the Tentative Map. The dedication of these conservation easements will be a
condition of approval of the Tentative Map.
18. The potential for discovery of fossils during the implementation of the Master Plan is high.
Therefore, monitoring of grading by a qualified paleontologist with recovery and curation
of any significant fossils discovered will be required as specified in the EIR. This will be a
condition of the Tentative Map.
19. Diegan Coastal Sage (gnatcatcher habitat) is present onsite. Compliance with the
Endangered Species Act will be necessary. Prior to final map approval, the developer shall
be required to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding
the impact of the project on the California gnatcatcher and to acquire any permits required
by the USFWS.
20. The PFF Agreement submitted has an incorrect signature on the notary. Please revise the
signature on the notary consistent with the developer-owner identified on the face sheet of
the agreement. The original PFF agreement was returned to Rick Engineering on August
13,1993.
21. Submit for the file a copy of the grading and Hillside Development permit exhibits approved
by City Council on July 27,1993.
22. The resubmittal of Village O as a separate application included new conceptual landscape
plans. These plans are being reviewed for consistency with comments provided in our
memo of June 1,1993 (attached), and comments of the Parks and Recreation Department
included in their memo of July 22,1993 (attached).
23. Clarify wall heights at the entry of Village O. The plans show both retaining walls (2'-4*
high) and screen walls, what is the proposed combined height of these walls?
CT 93-08/PUD 93-07 - CAT^atLO RANCH VILLAGE O
AUGUST 13, 1993
PAGES '
ENGINEERING:
1. Several sections of the trail system have grades steeper than the suggested maximum grade
of 7%. There is concern that these steep grades would gradually cause erosion of the
decomposed granite sections.
2. Sidewalk should continue from Lot 51 along the east side of "O-C" Street to front the top
lot on Lot 52. The Landscape Concept plan shows a sidewalk meandering through the top
lot, but it ends in the middle of the lot.
3. Improvements that are a part of another project should not be shown on this map, such as
the dam facilities on the west side of "Q-C" Street, and the proposed improvements to "Q-K"
Street.
Attached are redline check print sets of the project. Please forward these plan sets to the applicant
for corrections and changes as noted. The applicant must return these plan sets with the corrected
plans to assist us in our continued review.